skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Be sure to take into account the retrieval costs https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/pricing/

$10 per 1,000 requests for expedited retrieval could result in a shocking bill if you're not careful.
...it sounds like you're complaining about the people who are trying to make money from a relationship being the ones to put the work in. If you're renting or selling, it's up to you to put in the legwork.
Storage is cheap but GC is not.

Source: I worked for Microsoft on C# projects where GC was constantly the bottleneck. Reducing number of exceptions (especially those used for control flow) helped.
I don't think Fox News really cares about Facebook
The IoTaWatt does measure voltage. You plug in a calibrated AC wall wort as well as the DC USB power supply.
I'm not saying the problem is to great to handle, I've explained ways to handle it.
One person taking multiple IQ tests will see markedly different scores.
”Well,this is basically lack of trust between you and your devs”

It’s pretty amusing how many definitive responses I’m getting from devs who are diagnosing my problem without any knowledge. It’s also telling how different they are.

Like I said, there are reasons, and I’m aware of them. I’m also fully aware of the technical barriers.

The devs are padding their schedule, and think they’re being clever about it. They are not. Some of it does boil down to trust (i.e. bad history with previous managers), but a lot of it is just that they don’t want to do the thing because it’s less fun than other things, and nobody has ever held them to account in the past. A sufficiently lazy developer
will find endless Legitimate Technical Justifications for not doing something he doesn’t want to do.

I’m not trying to generalize to all developers here, but I do know the people and problem I’m working with.
I'm a former Oracle DBA and I love the Django ORM. After you learn it, it does almost anything I want, and when I want custom SQL I just write custom SQL.

Learning it well is important though, and inspecting the SQL that was generated for your test cases after you've implemented a feature is also important.

It can do multiple joins with same table when needed, it can do filtered prefetch, it can do subqueries, it can do exists(), it can do group by, it lets you use SQL functions Django doesn't know about out of the box, etc.

But I think the documentation is not intuitive, and in the complex cases the ORM code looks complicated and I think I prefer writing SQL in that case because there is greater chance that the next developer will know SQL than that of them knowing advanced Django ORM features. Also, more chance of getting stack-overflow help for SQL.
Disney announces dates for new Star Wars movies, MCU Phase 4, and more
I imagine the primary cost is labor. These are street lights that can't just be swapped out in 30 seconds.
If you search for "ESP8266" (especially on a website like hackaday.com) you will see a lot of projects using these boards or very similar ones. You can also look up the ESP32, which is the big brother of the ESP-8266 with Bluetooth LE, more CPUs, and some other cool features.
We're proposing treating cookies as `SameSite=Lax` by default (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-03...). Developers would be able to opt-into the status quo by explicitly asserting `SameSite=None`, but to do so, they'll also need to ensure that their cookies won't be delivered over non-secure transport by asserting the `Secure` attribute as well.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-incrementalism spells out the proposal in a bit more detail.
`nnn` is a console file manager.
The on-device Machine Learning sounds pretty amazing.
Does anyone know if this will be a part of AOSP or be a closed-source extension (like digital wellbeing)?
>How anyone can be against that is beyond me unless they working in the tech industry

Most economists?
Let me reveal some of my personal health for this discussion.

I was diagnosed with minor sleep apnea, and my doctor prescribed an anti-snoring mouthguard (a $1000 device that is basically a mouthguard with a screw in it... ugghhh). Costs aside, the device works, and I've been getting LESS sleep recently.

Why? Because 7ish hours of sleep is all I need now... because I'm not getting minor "self-wakeup events" during night. Before this mouthguard, I needed 9ish hours of sleep to feel rested.

The mouthguard definitely works (for my case anyway. I did some research and its apparently because I've got a large tongue or something, which means my snoring / sleep apnea could be cured by a mouth-guard forcing my jaw into a different position). Apparently, other cases of sleep apnea can only be solved with a CPAP, while still other cases of sleep apnea can be solved with a simple "sleeping backpack" (to prevent sleeping on your back).

---------

Undiagnosed Sleep Apnea is associated with longer sleep, less-restful sleep, and a variety of ailments like obesity and high-blood pressure. I don't think cause-and-effect has been figured out yet (maybe obesity causes sleep apnea, or maybe vice versa).

It is quite possible that excessive sleep is correlated with a variety of sleep-issues, like Sleep Apnea. People who fix their sleeping issues may live longer, higher quality lives.
Haha, let the algo decide the stop-loss, genius. This guy was sold on a fancy robo investor that couldn't beat VTSAX if had twice as much money to start with.

If you don't know who the idiot is, it's you.

The dudes who put this thing together were using a theory from, get this, 2015, to do sentiment analysis. Cool 4 character domain, but they couldn't even be assed to get a let's encrypt cert for it -- why would you trust them to manage billions?

http://42.cx/ The number of buzzwords is both overwhelming and inherently fishy.
This is an important distinction, as I've found that the optimal strategies in Magic are very rarely the most intricate ones or the ones involving recursive constructs. Occasionally a trivial infinite loop becomes part of a top deck, but you definitely aren't going to see someone doing the equivalent of calculating pi to win.

I think the Turing completeness is definitely still part of the appeal of Magic, because the bizarre edge cases and complexity occasionally do creep in to even serious play and add a lot of interest, but the complexity is of the iceberg variety, where most of it rarely makes itself visible most of the time.
It isn't accurate to describe HN as pro- or anti-Microsoft (or any $bigco or $bigtopic). It has a wide range of users who feel different things. The comment above isn't representative. Its indignation-to-information ratio was too high to be a good HN comment, though.

Calling names like "herd" and "groupthink" doesn't contain information either; it's just bragging. I wrote about this the other day: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19791293
Criminals are citizens.
It depends a bit on where I'm sitting. If I'm in first class (most of the time I am these days) I don't really mind, but if I'm in steerage with my knees pressed up against the seat in front of me I want to spend the absolute minimum amount of time possible physically onboard the plane.

Likewise I don't mind wasting time in an airport when I have a company per diem to pay for my drinks, but if it's on my own dime I'd rather not spend any longer than necessary sitting around in uncomfortable airport seats.
Our VP of Sales has an interesting reaction to every large deal won: "We could have asked for more"

Winning (i.e. meeting the stated goal) every time means that the boundaries of what is possible haven't been explored.
Why is solar position so important compared to ability to coordinate simultaneous events across wide geographies? It would be much simpler to have a globally consistent definition of time/simultaneity and treat other things (like solar position, working hours, etc) as scheduling constraints.

We put up with crazy things in an attempt to match solar position. The meaning of time we all use is flawed when I can hop on a plane and go back to yesterday. That's quite inconsistent with the accepted definition of time as unidirectional.
> huge hacks like Nix are born in this quest.

Would you mind elaborating on this? Maybe I'm using Linux wrong, but Nix seems like a huge step forward fixing a lot of my frustrations. Admittedly, I haven't used it in production.

One huge benefit of language-specific package managers is having multiple versions of packages on the same system and you can choose which you'd like for the project (without changing the OS). I feel like 10 years ago I heard a lot of grumbling about languages like Ruby or Python should just use apt/rpm, but I haven't see any OS package manager put much effort into this use-case (this is ignoring mac/win support). The closest I've seen is something like Red Hat's Software Collections.

Personally, I feel strongly that any software that's critical to your company should be decoupled from the OS. This is borne through painful and much delayed OS updates and following it makes things much easier long term.

My personal use-case is that different projects (working on multiple in tandem) need different stacks of versions. Also giving the ability to swap versions on the fly. Here's one package manager specifically designed for it https://github.com/nerdvegas/rez

Swapping versions in Linux is pretty heavy out of the box (with rpm/apt); download, remove old versions files, write new versions files. Only one installed at a time. a/b comparing libraries is a pain. For the things I need, I build things into folders like libjpeg-turbo/2.0.2 and nasm/2.14.02 and set the ./configure flags to point to these...basically a more ad hoc approach to what Nix does.

Where am I going wrong?
The DOE is responsible for the USA's nuclear arsenal so I expect a few simulations of that nature.
Then its probably fool hardy to have any sort of ranking for self driving efficacy due to lack of publicly accessible data.
Congratulations on not reading the article.

They bought from multiple vendors, following procurement rules, from a company in San Jose, CA (and a division of Lite-On), from a company supplying lights across the country, and the design was flawed, not the parts. Don't blame them when you know nothing of the situation.
I'm kind of hoping that someone at Google will notice this and get it back up and running.

Google has made it near impossible for members of the public to contact them.
> I don't really use my phone for gaming or anything intensive

Let me be the first to tell you that for many, many people, smartphones are their primary computing platforms, and they do everything on them. I've had to help people file taxes on smart phones, sign documents, and more. Processor speed isn't important now so much as it is later. A good portion of the budget market is going to grab a phone because of the price and hold on to it for years. Will a 20% slower processor stand up as well as its bigger cousin in the future? Probably less so.
That's exactly what this is all about. Many states want to have "permanent Daylight Saving", which is the same thing as just jumping to the next timezone to the east, and no longer observing DST.
The kernel version was finalized some time before this release when 4.18 was current. Red Hat expends a ton of effort on long term maintenance and huge backports of new features to the kernel, so while I don't want to speak for the kernel team, I don't think the upstream stable kernels bring very much to the table.

Plus (my personal view) what goes into the upstream stable kernel is fairly random based on just mailing list NACKs, whereas what goes into the RH kernel has to pass a massive range of automated tests on a wide variety of real hardware.
I wrote an opinion on ORMs here in 2017: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14661391

Most of the stuff I said still sticks for me (after reading article, and after using ORM this time).

I haven't programmed much golang. But with Python + Django I can use `./manage.py shell_plus` and can drop immediately into a shell with history, readline support, syntax highlighting, and tab completion, with all model objects in local scope.

I can then do lookups and annotations (Yes, they're expensive, not for production, but save lots of time during the day in a pinch):

Lookup:

Library.objects.filter(books__author__name='Book author')

Annotation:

Author.objects.annotate(total_books=Count('books')).filter(total_books__gt=5)

When the data model of a project gets bigger, writing queries by hand gets harder to think about. Perhaps its due to my own overreliance on ORM's: but I can't fathom how I'd manage without them. Because in practice the data models are far more complex than above, and it'd take a lot of time (not to mention mental energy that could be put to use elsewhere)

Also, there are ways around performance problems: For one, it may entail rejecting features offered by the ORM. Such as django's content types, multi-table inheritance to instead use abstract inheritance (basically just reusing common fields) and even plain one-to-one relations. They're just too complicated and slow at scale.

Same goes for extending the ORM with stuff like django-polymorphic (and django-model-utils). I've gotten nice performance out of django-polymorphic (and cleaner code), but it's hiding a ton of metaprogramming, there's still a penalty "upcasting" naive models, and they're very burdensome to maintain if APIs fall out of date.

Next is trimming down queries with prefetching, only(), and doing direct ID lookups. This prevents multiple queries from piling up by doing the join ahead of time, only getting fields asked for, and doing the fastest lookup for objects after a more expensive "filtering" query has ran.

Here's an example of the query earlier, with .only():

Author.objects.annotate(total_books=Count('books')).filter(total_books__gt=5).only('id')

And to print the SQL query out:

print(Author.objects.annotate(total_books=Count('books')).filter(total_books__gt=5).only('id').query)

That would then be used in something like:

BookSet.objects.filter(book__in=Author.objects.annotate(total_books=Count('books')).filter(total_books__gt=5).values_list('id', flat=True))

And finally, for debugging certain types of query performance, django-debug-toolbar is nice. If its API calls django-silk can "look back" on background requests.

The article was fair IMO, but I'd wager ORM's payoff depends on the ecosystem. Software being about tradeoffs: the convenience outweighs the downsides everytime for me. Maybe I'm to be humbled and find I'm not getting the big picture, and it could be just plain learnt-dependence, but it'd be a step back in productivity for me not to have an ORM.
Also, it loses the Pixel Visual Core that the Pixel 3(XL) has.
I'm half-convinced my gains all come from afternoon naps after large protein-rich meals the day after training.

Might be an age thing but I'm seldom able to stay in bed for more than seven, eight hours at most. Fortunate to have a lifestyle that supports taking naps a few times a week.
128-bits of random data is sufficient to securely generate a stream of 100s of terabytes of random data. It's not /that/ hard to find 128-bits of true entropy, even during boot phase. Here's one example:

1. Seed with any fixed hardware IDs

2. Mix-in the wall clock time

3. Spin up a kernel thread and flip a bit on/off in a tight loop. Interrupt it every 100 nanoseconds and take the value of the bit at that time. Do this 256 times. Mix that in too.

4. Mix-in 256-bits from RDRAND

5. Mix-in timings from other interrupts as and when they happen.

6. Repeat steps 4. and 5. ad infinitum.

By step 4 we have taken 26 microseconds and we have the kind of entropy I would be comfortable generating an RSA private key with.

Note that step 3 is effectively a measure of how precise the system clock and CPU are. Attacks have been demonstrated against step 3, but they require co-resident processes and don't apply during the boot-phase, if you've got a dedicated core at least. In theory if system clocks and CPU got super precise it could become too deterministic, but the point is the likelihood of /both/ that happening /and/ RDRAND being broken.
Gopher had the right idea. Menus only. What executable code?
Welcome to software development, enjoy your stay.
This does mean that MTG is not algorithmically solvable, which is very interesting. However, in most cases I think it is heuristically trivial to determine the best move.
Is there a site that has benchmarks of mobile SoCs? I've been using notebookcheck.net, but it doesn't seem like it has benchmarks for the SD 670.
Because politicians attack things perceived as bad by the public. If there's a time to implement such a tax it's after a year of sensationalist (and largely fake) news about FB and Google, from exaggerated data breaches to helping terrorists.
For me, the best feature of the Django ORM is that it integrates with everything all the way to the frontend forms.

In fact, missing the database integration wouldn't even be that large loss. Sometimes I wonder if it isn't even holding the framework back.
The purpose of those statements are to uphold contracts and compensation clauses when things go wrong and end up in court due to refuse of payment for delivering broken software (which might be debatable if that was indeed the case).
This is weird thought where your solution to the problem is just "have the people on the team be better."

The entire phenomena exists because people that see how important these things are end up on teams led by and staffed by people who either don't see how important they are, or aren't competent enough to do the glue work.
This is CW, not pulsed. The only reason short-pulse people get away with calling it "Petawatt" is because the pulse duration and focus are both incredibly small. The total energy content on the other hand is often not that much compared to say the energy content in missile. Also, the Petawatt scale is state of the art, in a lab that is finicky to being hit on the side of the laser table with ball driver. It's not fair to use the state of the art as a figure of merit for a weapon to be deployed in combat situations.
Dart could very well end up being the secret weapon behind Flutter. Not only does Dart compile to JavaScript -- it's done this from day 1 -- but it also compiles to ARM binary via LLVM for iOS applications... meaning that compiling to WASM should be a trivial option to enable bringing near-native computational speeds to any targeted platform.
I think you'd really enjoy this podcast episode on libraries! https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/palaces-for-the-peopl...
Your project looks very promising. I'm not sure if this feature doesn't exist or I cannot find it anywhere on demo account, but: what's missing for me is fine grained ACL/permissions management.

In our company we are using https://www.bookstackapp.com/ as knowledge base solution for multiple clients/projects (separate installation for each). Main requirement is to be able to control which user or group can access particular document or group of documents. Is it possible to achieve something like this using your project?
It's mostly a result of our voting system. Score voting or approval voting would change everything.

https://www.electionscience.org/library/approval-voting
That's been true for every Apple mouse I've used and it's embarrassing that it's still the case. Between that and having to put the mouse on its back to charge, Apple is being brazenly ignorant. Sometimes I wonder if they even use their own products.
Google Nest
But any would be copy-cat could simply push out the new model a day later.

I'm also struggling with whether such a model should fall under copyright. Models would naturally converge.
Note that this is for bipolar sufferers rather than unipolar depression sufferers.
Intermediary platforms such as Airbnb and Uber exacerbate cities’ housing problems and weaken worker protections.

Its interesting that this line has no support and just treated as fact for this article. Is there a source to explain the reasoning?
That sounds good in theory, but it doesn't work in practice. The last time the Federal government mandated something related to time zones, it was when George W Bush changed the days of DST, expanding it. It was a giant mess, and studies showed that instead of saving energy as was the claimed rationale, it instead ended up costing a lot of money and wasting more energy; a "fucking mess" as you put it.

If we had a Federal government that actually knew WTF it was doing, your idea would make sense. You really think the Trump Administration could make sensible timezone policy decisions?
yes, also guns, identity theft data, etc, but mostly drugs
Considering GP was still using the Nexus 5 two years after Google dropped support for it, I doubt that matters too much to him.
As an Minority I check for:

1. Negative if has a "diversity" panel or ombudsman (will explain more below).

2. If all VPs and "big shots" came from the same university

3. Power Ranger Factor (negative factor)

If #1 is present and there are several examples the Company is more cautious about the virtue signalling and to avoid fire the bad "minority" will allocate them on a "non work" club.
Mostly "push paper" tasks or trivial tasks that will not have direct impact on revenues. No good position to be it as I want to make an impact.

#3 If in all communications there should be All "races" all the time like Power Rangers again feels fake.

I never set my hiring forms as minority and try to best to blend in. I just hate when people get too touchy about something from my culture or country and don't want to touch the subject.
So I have to came forward and say:
"Heyyyy I escaped from there I know how it works and how to deal with that... So please lets be frank XX will not work maybe we should do Y" and that is it.

There are bad actors in All races. There are bad actors in Asian companies, in Indian companies in European companies. The question is how much they hide or fire them.

Great companies don't look your name, age or school. They look at your CV, portfolio and ask questions about your work and your skills. They test you and bang you are hired.
They don't care about my political affiliations or if I got to the church.
German cake? Care to link?
The perfect language to expand your brain?
Ask HN: Is Open Source useful for hardware projects?
Hey HN,

Recently, I've been learning a lot about chip design, and I was wondering if there are any open source projects around accelerators or even neuromorphic chips.

When it comes to hardware, is open source useful?

Also, are there any big projects in the chip design space?
> it would be difficult for me to switch back to Android since I have an Apple Watch that I love

Vendor ecosystem lock-in triumphs again.
This is a very good point and it's probably far more common than it is given credit for.

Sometimes you manage to catch some of these early on, but often they aren't caught until later in the process -- at which point the cost for the change (and the impact on budget/timeline, and potentially even the very architecture you set out to fix!) is drastically higher.

I've seen it happen a number of times where the 'spec' seemed simple enough at commencement & throughout most of the project; then you'd have each department test & the reports would start coming in... and the result would inevitably be a multiplier on the project scope.

Not from missing features mind you, but via the omission of 'complexity handling' / business logic which was documented -- but the code itself was the documentation, which isn't overly unusual (and IMO isn't even a particularly bad thing in many cases, though not all).
I agree with you here. I am also negative on loss of the headphone jack, but switching to primarily wireless audio has had quite a bit of network-effect positive benefits.
Install and Configure FreeRADIUS on CentOS 7 with MySQL / MariaDB
You could always read the discussion that was already here on this very page. (-:

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19850938
Nah. We buy apple products because we got work to do and don't have time to fiddle with rooting our devices :)