skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Men and women have the potential to be equally unhappy when you force a partner on them.

His point wasn't about happiness for either party, it was that men simply had more societal control and rights than woman at the time arranged marriages were common - so it wasnt so much a partnership as it was one party having a huge amount of control over the other party's autonomy. That may not be the case with arranged marriages today, but I think the historical trend points in that direction.

>Also, giving women free reign is causing great inequality between men and women in their chances of having a partner and forming a family, which I believe will be problematic in the future. Very well explained by this other user:

This is just sexist drivel, to me you're a.) making frankly unwarranted generalizations about how both genders date, b.) reiterating the shirt 80/20 meme spouted by right wing incels, and c) proposing
a system that takes away both party's freedom of choice with relationships because it's "unfair" to men.
> Fossil fuels burn cleaner and if we run out of those we'll be dead.

So, you're saying civilization is going to irretrievably collapse when the fossil fuels run out? That's dark.

Fortunately, you are quite wrong. There is nothing magical about fossil fuels that makes them irreplaceable.
Careful there - that's some of the same lines that the redpillers use.

And really, arranged marriage as a "solution"? Really?
No data, no citations, implying other people are lying, and mostly just a vaguely misogynistic incel rant. HackerNews deserves better quality comments.
From the conceptual modeling point of view it is important to understand that:

(1) There can be several levels of entity identifiers, that is the same entity exists at several levels where it has different identifiers. Example: a computer has DNS name and IP address (and MAC address); a person may have several identifiers. These (initially independent) spaces can be structured differently:

(1.1) Layered structure like DNS and IP
(1.2) Independent, e.g., a person has two passports from different countries

(2) Links (representing relationships) are attributes. Like all attributes they are functions which map input entity identifiers into output (address) space identifiers.

Taking this into account, the problem is that URLs frequently play two roles, that is, one address convention is used at two layers simultaneously which can lead to numerous problems and controversies:

o URLs are used at access (protocol) level where the goal is to identify computers and access paths within some service (and not entity). For example, this layer has no idea what this means: http://service.com/passports/1234 - it is used for HTTP access only.

o URLs are used to identify real entities and here we re-use the previous name convention for higher level purposes by identifying people like http://service.com/passports/1234 although we do not care about protocols or computer names.

In order to avoid serious problems we need to follow these steps:

* Recognize and document that there are two independent address spaces

* Define a mapping between these two spaces. Initially, it can be identity relationship, that is, every entity name (URL) is mapped to the same URL used for access.

* If necessary (and frequently highly desirable) use relative names by assuming that the higher level segments of the name can be restored from the context or configured separately.

These rules are especially important for extensibility and for complex evolving systems where the standards and conventions change in time.
Are you sure ? There are multiple dimensions for competition between men. Money, power, intelligence, artistic talent can transcend looks to some degree for example.
I am surprised the article didn't mention RDF. In every data facet of RDF the data is uniquely identified by URI. In the case of RDF the URI is merely a unique identifier that can resolve to a HTTP resource, but doesn't have to.
It's important to raise awareness for issues like this. I'm glad NYT wrote it.
They're suggesting that women, on average, just aren't as good as men at some things (and vice versa):

> perhaps men and women don't have the same performance envelope in every walk of life
The "incel" population also manage to be a self fulfilling prophecy.

It's a little dramatic, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fD2briZ6fB0 explains it well.
He Built a $7B Business and Raised $300M for His Next Startup Valued Now at $1B
I would be generally in favor of reusable packaging for comsumables (not just food, but also soap, detergents, ...). Also, I often stare into supermarket shelves in dismay because some perishable items are sold in fixed container sizes far bigger than what I can comsume before it spoils.

But I don't get why you would have to reduce the variety of product brands to get there. Care to elaborate?

Edit: I have seen repeated news of tub stores opening up in Germany. They are very few and far inbetween, but the the that exist seem to do reasonably well.
It should be there among the flight itinerary data, often hidden behind an accordion or tooltip.
FROM AUTHOR EDIT 1:

Thank you very much guys for awesome guidance. I also have one more doubt. How should I talk to my manager about it? My manager put some serious efforts(time and company's money) to get me there. I am feeling bad about my manager. I don't want to disturb my relations with my manager.
"Red pillers say X, hence X is false" doesn't sound like an argument. There are also statistics that support this point of view, namely https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19601600 which was discussed a month ago.

I always feel like this is swept under the carpet because 1) victims are male, and who cares about males, and 2) there is no easy solution to it.
Irish Government Will Press Ahead with €3bn National Broadband Plan
The points that were mentioned on the CLIPS history page were 'compatibility' and 'syntax'.

I would guess to be compatible one would need to know both syntax and semantics (what the constructs are doing and how a rule system executes the rules) of the constructs of ART. Having access to documentation and actual implementations helps with that.

I never did say anything about source code or performance. I would also not think that people were stupid - especially since they were smart enough to develop expert systems.
Everyone is familiar with bro culture, but it seems odd and unrealistic to assume there's no female equivalent.

It's also odd that talk about the value of different perspectives and diversity can disappear as soon as some women create women-only workspaces for themselves.

It's examples like this that make me unfriendly to feminism. Equality of opportunity is a worthy goal, but either you support genuine diversity or you don't.
The real problem with Hudson Yards is that it’s walled up so it’s separate entity from the rest of the city. It completely breaks congruity with the rest of the island. This was likely a purposeful design choice similar to how Lincoln center was walled off before it’s redesign. The walls make you feel that what’s in side the walls is protected from the rest of the city as if the city and it’s people are hostile. At least that’s how it makes me feel as it dominates the only view of the city I have from my apartment window 10 blocks from it.

We aren’t a hostile people but are upset about how this was funded:

“As I reported back in 2017, records obtained by CityLab under the Freedom of Information Act reveal the gerrymandered map that Empire State used to qualify Hudson Yards for EB-5 financing. This particular TEA snakes up from the West Side and includes Central Park. (Think about that: a map of Manhattan that claims Central Park as an economically troubled area.) Beyond the park, the qualifying zone for Hudson Yards captures several census tracts in Harlem, where public housing projects boost the overall unemployment figure.”
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2019/04/hudson-yards-financin...
This doesn't work and can never work. But it's a nice toy.
Decision tree research papers from the last 30 years
A curated list of decision, classification and regression tree research papers with implementations from the following conferences:

Machine learning:

1. NeurIPS

2. ICML

3. ICLR

Computer vision:

1. CVPR

2. ICCV

3. ECCV

Natural language processing:

1. ACL

2. NAACL

3. EMNLP

Data Mining:

1. KDD

2. ICDM

3. CIKM

4. WWW

Artificial intelligence:

1. AAAI

2. IJCAI

3. UAI

4. AISTATS
This is actually something I've been thinking about for a long, long time. A platform only allowing for Markdown and some HTML could do the trick, since the CSS configuration would be user-defined. And it would work on low-end devices, as well, even e-ink tablets. I even came up with a mock-up a month ago for a blogging platform following that premise: https://imgur.com/a/57pArEk.
Hospitals negotiate for the rate with the insurance companies, including Medicare. They don’t have to accept Medicare payments at all. It is the right price because that is what the group with the most bargaining power says it is. That doesn’t mean Humana should pay less, but should work harder to add people. Maybe there is a way for one entity to have all the people?
How about this:

$ ping google.com.au
PING google.com.au (216.58.196.131) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=3239 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=4524 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=4434 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=3622 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=1022 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=849 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=1030 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=8 ttl=51 time=974 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=897 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=1022 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=1008 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=949 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=871 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=1103 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=16 ttl=51 time=1005 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=17 ttl=51 time=830 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=18 ttl=51 time=752 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=19 ttl=51 time=703 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=20 ttl=51 time=899 ms

64 bytes from syd15s04-in-f3.1e100.net (216.58.196.131): icmp_seq=21 ttl=51 time=821 ms

Does this answer the question? =)
Did not say anything about the post being false, just that the claims need to be investigated further as /r/incel is not a healthy place.
Arranged marriage != forced marrige.

Majority of marriages in south east Asia and India are arranged marriages. There's nothing unethical about it.
> Not sure if that's the case in historic Germanic regions

It wasn't (aside from food and other common needs).

> it's a crutch to take the principle "women are universally oppressed by men"

I did not say that. The OP spoke of centuries where arranged marriages were common in Germany, and there's no doubt that women did not have equal rights during that time. The crutch here is to define "success of marriages" through fertility rates and number of divorces.
> I don’t think there is a widespread consesus within Feminism for the idea that women and men aren’t different — and honestly, everybody who says so didn’t bother to inform themselves.

Apprently there is, otherwise why claim that any gender imbalance in the workplace must be the result of discrimination? I agree with you that diverse points of view can be useful; but diverse points of view imply (average) psychological and cultural differences, diverse attitudes and interests, and these might well be the reason of the gender imbalance. To use a steereotype (don't kill me for this) if female software developers can bring value to a team because on average they have a better eye for UX or design, then it is also probable that more females will be in UX or design than males, creating a gender imbalance in the number of candidates for software development positions.
Economics 101: Price controls create shortages.

Note that I’m not defending the broken U.S. system, but attempting to fix it with price controls will exacerbate its problems.
Medicare processes and payments have very little basis in reality. The payments are so low that doctors and hospitals often factor in the lost money into non-medicare bills to make up the difference.

So, the real story is that these doctors and hospitals are so committed to providing care, that they're willing to figure out ways to provide it despite medicare.
/E/ Announces 'Un-Googled' Android Smartphones
Should put defaults in the choices, instead of defaulting to 0
I see the "women go after 20% of men" line repeated over and over again as if it's some sort of self-evident truth. Aside from the fact that people who spew this line generally go on to justify why women's agency should be reduced ("enforced monogamy" or whatever that means), I have never seen any evidence for this stat. And no, how people behave on dating sites is not an accurate representation of social dynamics at large. It takes a certain kind of personality to go on dating sites and American men and women on Okcupid don't represent all men and women in the world. Dating apps also highly bias the way you engage people with undisclosed algorithms and shady practices aiming at maximizing your time on their apps. They don't have people's best interests at heart and influence them as part of their business model.

But seriously, think about the implications of these numbers: do 8 women just patiently wait in line for 2 men, doing literally nothing in the meantime while the remaining 8 men just stare at their feet or something? Is it something that people think actually happens in real life?
Why Europeans Don’t Get Huge Medical Bills
He’s just rejecting the null hypothesis, asking for a working theory in its place is a bit of a rhetorical fallacy
So, I live in the US, and our county went through a FEMA-backed 911 ‘address improvement plan’, where all physical addresses were changed to make it easier for first-responders to find a location.

This made response times worse, made data aggregation more difficult, caused issues with billing and package deliveries, and made me realize a physical address is arbitrary, and can be changed at the whim of the government, much like ‘time’.

So, address changes while physical location remains the same...code for that.
Amazing how you are being downvoted. Capitalists being inhuman scum like normal.
A good def for the R. integral is: the one number which is both a lower bound of the set of all upper sums (area with superscribed rectangles), and an upper bound of all lower sums (inscribed rects).

That has a lot of nice properties which are useful in proofs, whereas the limit of sums definition suffers from there being too many ways for "delta x goes to 0" which need to be shown to be equivalent at some point to be useful (nasty!).
I'm not a smuggler, but I know one. Let's call him George. He's not currently available to tell his story so let me give you the abridged version.

George ran a (very) successful business here in NL and in Belgium, made a lot of money and was doing just fine. Then in a short period of time his wife died and his business took a hit both from competition, regulation and because he wasn't paying as much attention to it as he did in the past.

One thing leading to another the business failed. George panicked a bit being left behind with a child to take care of and a huge drop in income so he figured what's the harm in taking a boat filled with pills into Australia. That didn't work out too well and George is now on an extended visit to Australia, I don't think we'll meet again in this lifetime, that's how long his sentence was.

Now, before you judge: George was in every sense of the word a start-up type, serial entrepreneur with a lot of hustle and in general doing just fine. All it took was a couple of cards dealt from the bottom of the pack to turn him into a criminal.

So no big balls, no small brains, just plain old desperation and momentary lapse of judgement. If not for that you'd all be proud to swap places with him. The really sad person in that story is the kid, first to lose mom and then dad effectively too.
OP is probably thinking of Euler, who according to a contemporary often worked: "with a child on his knees, a cat on his back "
It's almost like HTML should be used to encode semantic content and leave presentation up to the browser...
> Over the last decade or so, I've evolved my expression style to a much more discussion oriented tone (de-escalating the situation) rather than a debate oriented one (trying to prove yourself right, often escalating tensions).

I've been heading this way over time, and as you clearly have experience that it works I'll make an effort to try harder. Nothing like learning from other people's wisdom - thanks!
>His point wasn't about happiness for either party, it was that men simply had more societal control and rights than woman at the time arranged marriages were common - so it wasnt so much a partnership as it was one party having a huge amount of control over the other party's autonomy.

Meh, in my experience (Indians I know) females in both families have the same amount of power when choosing a mate, even more power than males I'd say.

>This is just sexist

Reality is sexist. Both genders are different. That's just the way it is.

>making frankly unwarranted generalizations about how both genders date

You have statistics here, which paint a broader picture: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19601600

>reiterating the shirt 80/20 meme spouted by right wing incels

Why is my argument bad? "People I don't like say the same thing" is not an argument.

>proposing a system that takes away both party's freedom of choice with relationships because it's "unfair" to men

I didn't propose that we go back to arranged marriages, and I agree that there's no easy solution. In fact I've got nothing to propose. The fact that there's no solution doesn't mean we should just pretend there's no problem.
There’s no evidence that non-profit hospitals perform better (or worse) than for-profit hospitals.
Tell that to every other country that has socialized medicine that has cheaper services with better outcomes.
The casualness with which you declare its Economics 101 shows how ignorant and brainwashed Americans are.
Ask HN: Would a cooperative ride hailing model offer a better future?
It sits uneasy with me that the future of humanity is to have large swathes of the population functioning as stimmed up zombies barely making ends meet, while Silicon Valley floats what is essentially an on-demand marketplace at meaningless paper valuations.

What is the reason ride hailing apps could not adopt a cooperative driver-owned model? Allegedly, Uber subsidises each trip to the tune of 40%. I imagine this added cost is broadly Uber Operations and tech infrastructure. Without any evidence or analysis, I would guess this was largely necessary to prove the model, fight regulatory barriers, incentivise riders, customer service, reference checking, etc. In fact, I would be interested in a postcard estimate on costs involved for simply keeping the lights on.

With the legwork largely complete, and assuming such a service is relatively straightforward to replicate technically, what efficiency does Uber as an entity provde in the marketplace? Could we not evolve to a driver-owned model which employs the necessary technical infrastructure (perhaps opensource or state-owned even) to stay operational, rather than some unicorn chasing self driving fantasy?
You're exactly right, the exact level of qualification is impossible to quantify. Therefore, we can really only go with rough approximations; this person has experience in the field before, or has relevant education, or has done a lot of similar work before in hobby projects, or whatever.

From what I understand, the suggestion is that if one person is obviously more qualified than another, you pick the most qualified person regardless of other factors, but if there are multiple people where it's unclear who is better, you pick the person who's from a marginalized group.

If we had some kind of ultra-precise scientific way to measure a person's level of qualification, the point would be moot; it would be highly unlikely that two people would measure exactly the same, so we would never be in a situation where we choose based on other factors than qualifications. It's precisely because it's impossible to determine exactly how qualified someone is (probably by the very nature of what we mean by "qualified") that the idea has any merit at all.
Well they're not suddenly going to gain in mercury content or anything so I'd expect they'll always have an edge in health.

Also, 11/10 with the fishy idioms. :)
Where are these guys who have five women?

Certainly not in the environments that I frequent and not in my circle of friends either. Lots of normal couples, though.
Was it the transition that made things worse, or was it something intrinsic to the new addressing scheme? If the latter, can you elaborate on why it was worse?
That question occurred to me too. They say they last 10 years? Fantastic, that's very reasonable. What happens then? They dredge them all back out of the water and replace them? Because that sounds like a hell of a logistical problem compared to dumping them in.

Your link, however, appears to persist in the misconception that their purpose is to prevent evaporation. Why is it such a common meme?
One of the reasons I switched back to iOS is to leave to notification hell of android.
This unhackable USB drive has a camera and it check the iris pattern as well as a password before unlocking the storage.

USB drive doesn't have enough processing power so the software running at host implement the iris pattern recognition and authentication.

The problem is, the USB drive store the password and iris pattern value by plaintext and it's readable without unlocking.

Totally useless.
The answers given are the obvious one; that pre made content can be buffered heavily.

But the internet can, at its core manage packet delivery within the delays required for real time communication.

More precisely the issue is probably one of supply and demand; that our internet is tuned for content to radiate out from large scale producers of content, flowing down to its consumers. There's far less capacity and focus "laterally" in the network -- between consumers and other consumers -- as is required by VoIP sessions.
You will see the new traffic that previously would not have been on the road, b/c there wasn’t enough road for them to consider driving at that moment.
Medicare rate and the reality of using Medicare are separate issues though

For me the issue is that if you had something like a hernia it would essentially cost less to fly to Europe, have the surgery, and stay a couple of weeks than to pay out of pocket in the US. And many European healthcare systems tend to rank better than the US.

So it seems that the procedure can be done for less, maybe even for less than Medicare costs; the "dollar store quality" doesn't seem to come from the inexpensiveness.