skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You can do all of this in best buy with just pointing with your index finger at a rep, then the laptop, not needing to utter a word during the entire transaction, and be back in time before OPs reps find him again in the apple store. Only at Apple and a car dealership does it not take five minutes to buy a product off a shelf.
Superblocks rather than Hyperblocks. Except for cmov which is partial predication, x86 doesn’t have predication. But SBs are probably what your optimizer wants anyways.
>If the average REM sleep cycle is 1.5 hrs, then your only "perfect" window is 7.5 hrs of sleep - 9 would be detrimental?

First of all, the hours of sleep measured is not necessarily sleep end to end. It's also getting away to go to the bathroom, lying down a little before getting asleep, etc which can easily eat the extra 30 mins.

And even actual interrupted end to end sleep is not just end to end full REM cycles -- such that it has to divide perfectly to 1.5. Nor are REM cycles all exactly the same, and all exactly 1.5 hours.
Can A.I. Help Stop Bee Extinction?
Blink and WebKit are basically the same though. I'm not sure if they should be counted separately. How much WebKit existing helps prevent Google from taking control of the web?
Even with 6 to 8 hours for the change, it's far too short. This is not a code change. This is a business process change. The ramafication is far greater than one line change.
Script-wasm – Require WebAssembly modules using script tag
That's exactly what the parent says.

"Add it altogether and an "eight hour night" may actually only constitute 6.5 hours of actual physiological sleep. ".
In the US, just drawing from congressional leadership: Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer, Kevin McCarthy, Steve Scalise, Ben Ray Luján, and arguably Gary Palmer are all professional politicians.
The trick is to book it right after the new day opens up. Truly a terrible design. Even by calling support they won’t be able to make an exception.
Windows-3.11 reminiscent design

Strictly speaking, it's an MS DOS design - a descendant of Norton Commander.
lsd:

run1:
0.03user 0.04system 0:00.16elapsed 50%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4884maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps

run2:
0.02user 0.05system 0:00.10elapsed 77%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4920maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps

run3:
0.03user 0.04system 0:00.14elapsed 58%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4936maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+4635minor)pagefaults 0swaps
It depends on what basis algo trading was sold to the customer. Regardless of whether it's a human or computer, anyone willing to give such an amount a go, should be asking how risk is beimg hedged?What happens when shit hits the fan? How fast can you exitvthe position?If it's Forex, what stops are being used to minimise the losses and etc. I'm sceptical that either sides signed the deal without firstly going through some details on how it works, the risks and rtc.Also,the legal department probably did their homework to cover as much as possible in such cases. The responsibility, ultimately,falls upon the institution utilising the software and not the software itself.
It's missing the below 5 cents microcontrollers:

https://lcsc.com/product-detail/PADAUK_PADAUK-Tech-PMS150C_C...
I would say that just because it's online, doesn't make it any different than someone you only talk to at the "water cooler" or friends of friends you only see at parties.

"We don't use the expression IRL. We say AFK. [...]
We don't like that expression. We say AFK - Away From Keyboard. We think that the internet is for real." - Peter Sunde
Random access times aren't great -- to say the least! However, raw bandwidth isn't bad, LTO-7 gets 750MB/sec (faster than SATA3) and LTO-8 looks to improve on that.
I don't understand why researchers are so interested in 'Turing completeness'. The concept of a Turing machine which operates on a strip of tape is outdated and no longer intuitive. It would be good if the abstraction of a 'Turing machine' could be refined into something more modern.
Can you give me more detail than "unintentional back door"? I'm obviously interested, but it's difficult to know what to do without more of a pointer on what the issue is.

Edit: Found this - https://github.com/ellatrix/rename-wp-login/issues/27 - and can reproduce that behaviour, so I'm going to start looking for something new, or potentially taking over that plugin.

Edit 2: This seems to be a maintained fork that is in active development and covers the issues on the original abandoned GitHub repo - https://wordpress.org/plugins/wps-hide-login/
WTF are they saying you can't use Dropbox, you should use Google Drive?
Met Gala looks took more than a thousand hours of 3D printing
Why would the agency rate it as low-risk though? Because they are assuming that individual defaults are uncorrelated? The variance of the distribution of returns of a portfolio like that must be huge, not to mention the risk of an economic downturn putting the entire portfolio into default.

I'm just an armchair analyst, but I'd love to know what the people buying these loan packages know. Because it doesn't seem low risk to me.
Calories should not be considered as just "a nutrient to limit" in such a way that the number is only a maximum. I sometimes used to look at the energy value to choose a ready meal that had at least enough energy so that I would not remain hungry after eating; providing significantly less energy would leave me hungry.
> No weightlifters.

I've suspected that you'll write this.

https://www.riseofthevegan.com/blog/only-male-us-weightlifte...

Why do you think that 1kg of free range chicken is more ecofriendly [0] than the factory farmed one? I'd agree free range chicken is better from the ethical stand-point, but from pure efficiency of producing 1kg of chicken from available resources, I'd speculate that free range is not more ecological.

We are talking about the fact that people are not fitting on this globe anymore and some sacrifices need to be made. Why are we destroying forests to make land to grow crops to produce meat with 10% efficiency versus if we'd use that land to feed ourselves directly? Growing animals just to slaughter them sounds extremely inefficient, land and resource consuming. 10% efficiency is pretty shitty efficiency when we are low on resources.

[0] in terms of CO2 required, in terms of land required to grow same amount of animal meat, in terms of clean water required, etc.
On the contrary, there are plenty of devs who won't take on any work until it's been designed, scoped, run through management, prioritised and scheduled, when the actual fix is a one line change that would have taken less effort than the meeting where it was prioritised.

There's a happy middle ground between the two, and assuming developers who will deliver quick fixes are all hacks who don't care is counterproductive.
From my limited exploration and talk with Justin over at http://www.kinematicsoup.com, the requirement for low latency combined with a lot of large binary data requires different approaches.
Street lights aren't just for cars they light the area around for pedestrians too. The only place that's true is highways and even there street lights increase visibility drastically compared to headlights.
> "what are you going to do with that information?"

> Restricting chemicals proved to lower IQ springs immediately to mind.

Iodized salt is an example of a successful global health program that effectively did just this, but in reverse (promoted a IQ protective chemical).
WSL performance problems were mostly due to slow I/O.

How does virtualization fix that?
I don't get the whole issue with the who to blame conundrum when it comes to robots or AI. They're just glorified buttons, pressed by a human.
I wanted to give this link to a coworker. We're not coders at all but over time she got stuck doing "glue" work that's somewhat like management (she basically can tell us all what to do -- I trust her to say "we need to jump out the window") but not really a management role. But there's too much coding context for her to get it.

I wish I knew what X to tell her in "you need to reinvent your story to be X".
That's an interesting one, because you can say that IQ is a flawed metric or misguided concept, but also agree that (random example) childhood lead exposure lowers IQ therefore let's reduce it. If the metric has any validity at all you can get good outcomes with this even if some details are wrong or imprecise.
I don't think YC is opposed to their startups signing partnerships.
He seems to have experience that suggests it has been tried but doesn't work.
I'm not selling a product. I'm selling a service. And cost of that is determined by the service level.

At the "I change it you test it" level, it can be pretty cheap and fast.
Do you have examples of this? My sense is why this had been the case, it's been several years since I've encountered a site that doesn't work with some combination of the HTML5 web stack and flash.
The formal name is an orthodox file manager.
> Basically there's Intel Optane DIMM

These chips are extraordinary, when the prices finally go down to a reasonable level it will be another revolution in both persistent (speed) and volatile (size) memory.
it seemed to be part of some larger 'communication and marketing' package he was subscribed to. I was getting monthly email updates, etc - ghostwritten by someone else. It wasn't bad, but video responses to everything was annoying. It felt like he was intentionally trying to hide something.
FreeNAS for media and VM storage on the R320+SA120.

The R520 runs Proxmox and hosts whatever stuff I’m playing with at any given time along with Kubernetes, FreeIPA, Graylog2, probably my mailserver again soon, etc.

One R210 II runs Sophos XG to handle router+security duties, the other runs Windows Server Essentials 2016 for AD and NPS.

The CRS317 switch provides 10Gb networking for storage on a couple of servers, and everything else is connected to the EX2200.
used it for an Hadoop cluster after I've read an interview with the author that it's ready for production and Suse talking that it's the premier filesystem for their enterprise distribution. At that time ZFS was at 0.6.x and the new ARC stuff was not there and no dkms for Ubuntu and I was afraid that nobody could handle that... A few month later I'm obsessed with reading any commit in master and the mailing list, because things like undeletable files, hard lockups of the whole cluster and manual reboots in rescue-image and running btrfsck and stuff like that started to took too much time. That beeing said no problems after 4.8 or so, besides out of space on 20gb used with lots of files in a 16tb raid-10 btrfs array but that was minor in comparision to the other problems...

Might be unfair, but I've learned my lesson there. I decided to follow the spectactle from a large distance.
My favorite is the ATTINY 85. It's so cheap and yet, it can do almost most of the things you can do an Arduino. And yes, you can program it using the Arduino IDE as well.

Last year, I started out to digitalize my entire house with these tiny ATTINY 85 chips and with some nrF wireless chips. It has worked really well for me and I'm able to control and monitor any power port in my house as well as my mains.

The overall setup still costed less than a Nest, yet, vastly more powerful. Of course, the downside is you need to write code, have a running server to control it on the cloud. But, no problem for me as I'm a (Google Cloud) consultant and this is what I do for a living.

I use Google Cloud's IAP with AppEngine (I may switch to cloud run now, since it's cheaper tho) and I have a private REST server running that I can access from my own Android app.

The whole thing took me a year to finish, but that's because I worked on it maybe once or twice a week in the weekends and didn't focus on it much.

But, my effort has paid off and it's amazing to me that what is possible with just a dollar investment.
Yes. A framework is a detail, the business logic shouldn't care. Even if the framework is tied in I'd keep using it while moving newer stuff to something else. I've been in big rewrites to change the framework and everything else, on hindsight I believe I could have done an in-place refactor of everything to the new framework and been working the whole time, at less cost.

That isn't hypothetical, in the above rewrite we took one part that was considered too essential to wait brought it in, wrapped it, and used the new framework. It was working much sooner than the other code. It still isn't completely re-written - but it doesn't need to be as the core business logic is known to work.
LS_COLORS mustn't be set for colors to be used. If you unset it the default color schema will be used.

There was an article about this posted to HN a week ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19761159
But can he run iMessage on Windows?

Sure, he might be able to export his data but what use is that??
Translating syscalls to the NT kernel is slower than running Linux with a virtual filesystem.
Do you mean that you have an alias like this:

alias d='ls'

Or is there a program called `d` that is a faster version of `ls` that you're aliasing `ls` to?
Microchip PIC32MM – Entry-Level 32-Bit MIPS-Based Pic
I think the key to answering your question is to try to explain space which is very hard with our human evolved intuition.

We acquired so strong intuition about space, edges and boundaries. I tend to think that space we have available in the universe is again result of current state and degrees of freedom in which inherent randomness can be channeled.

It also has memory in quantum fields, that's why we don't collapse into singularity all the time.

Also I think that inherent randomness is unbounded meaning that it can produce space as long as it is possible due to quantum field structure and properties we happen to have.

Other quantum field configurations might have different smaller or bigger universes, but I think they all feed on the same source of inherent randomness.

Why I think there are other universes, well simply because evolution as a process has proven to be very efficient in finding solutions in a large search space, not only in biology. Thus quantum field structures might be a result of many evolutionary iterations even before time we know began. Majority of which probably doesn't allow for a Universe like ours, some Universes might got even luckier who knows :)
> updating the roadmap, talking to the users, noticing the things that got dropped, asking questions on design documents, and making sure that everyone's going roughly in the same direction… have you thought about who is filling this role on your team?

I thought that's what various kinds of "managers" were for.

Granted, only once, for one year before she left, have I actually experienced a manager doing that. I was like, geez, a manager actually doing their job really amazingly improves our stress levels, job satisfaction, and the quality of our product.

It does not seem to be what managers are actually trained, selected, or rewarded/recognized for at many places, it is true.
You'll find the original discussed on Hacker News at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19761159 .
I worked in software development within companies for 20+ years. The "why does it take so long" conversation has come up a lot.

So on one hand, I see the argument. Simply opening unknown code, and making a change no matter how small, is a risky game. You need to research the impacts, test, and walk slowly through a deployment you haven'y done in ages. I totally get that.

But I also see the other side. Why DOES it take 8 hours to do a simple one-line code change? That's ridiculous. Somehow, we've developed these fragile systems. We've trapped ourselves in processes that add 7 hours to any change we make, no matter how small.

The status quo does not need to remain. It should be easier to make small changes. It should be cheaper to respond to simple requests. The client is actually right to question us when they just want an email to appear a day earlier and it costs them $1500.
It's correlational, not causal. People with health issues are a disproportionally represented among people who sleep a lot.
Short term tourists too. Not everyone has EU style or T-Mobile ONE style roaming.
(TimescaleDB engineer here) There are major feature and capabilities available in TimescaleDB that are not available in pg_partman.

On the query side we implement a whole bunch of planner and execution time optimizations that don't come with plain PostgreSQL (and pg_partman does not implement any query optimizations AFAIK). These include optimizations that have to do with ordering based on time_bucket/date_trunc, execution-time chunk exclusion, etc. These result in query speedups of more than 1000x on many common time-series queries.

TimescaleDB is much more automated than pg_partman and thus easier to maintain and administer. There are a lot less knobs to tune and a lot less things to go wrong in TimescaleDB.

We implement analytical features necessary for time-series analyis: gap-filling, common time-series functions liked time_bucket, first, last, etc.

We also implement a lot of data management functionality geared towards time-series data: scheduled data reordering, schedule data dropping/expiration, etc.

This past Monday we released major feature called continuous aggregates. That automatically maintain a materialized view of aggregates over your time-series data, updating it as new data comes in and correctly handling backfilled data as well.

The two projects are really not comparable in breadth or scope IMHO.
>a significant portion of Republican base now considers Silicon Valley tech companies as foes

Which is hilarious, as Facebook at least is happy to take Russian money to aid Republicans. Silicon Valley is party-less, stateless. They serve only money, nothing else.
Google and OnePlus are embracing the junior flagship trend
Tips from fat people who have
Another viewpoint:
https://john-millikin.com/sre-school/no-haunted-forests
Perhaps the state of LA has the power to stop this pollution, but the residents lobbying for help from regulators， as depicted in the article, seem to be focusing their attention on the federal EPA. Unless I accidentally skipped a paragraph that talked about lobbying at a regional level.

If the state doesn't lack the teeth to fix this, why would they choose to compete for federal attention with an order of magnitude more people?
The losses made by software training may be the least problem for the institution.If case goes to court,they may be required to reveal the reasoning behind software's decision and that means going through the code,as all that marketing bs called AI is just a trading algorithm trained on some datasets. No company would want to reveal the code.
That's awesome! Let us know how it goes.
Wow this is really cool - thanks for sharing. Apparently you can add a clickable button to repos like this now for deploying to cloud run. Might be something you would be interested in. Would be cool to be able to click a button and then have GPT-2 on demand (not that it isn't easy already with the provided instructions)

https://github.com/jamesward/cloud-run-button
Then don’t do that (tm). I wouldn’t go near any Windows manufacturers consumer line of computers. They are full of crap ware and have horrible support.

I have had no problem with Dell’s business laptops. Barring buying from the business line, I buy computers from the Microsoft Store.
The importance of Turing Completeness is the capabilities it offers, not the model of the machine that offers them. The machine doesn't matter at all, which is precisely why the "strip of tape" is still used.
I put a ton of work into an ORM that statically typed SQL a couple years ago. I always thought this would be a cool way to go.

https://github.com/rspeele/Rezoom.SQL/

But I never got to use it at work, and thus lost interest. The biggest thing missing with it was that you lost type safety if you had to dynamically build a query. These days its main problem is lack of compatibility with .NET Core, which somebody else was working on for a while.

I think the flat row model for querying data from related tables is just not very good. I'd MUCH rather work with an object model like LINQ, where I get a list of Foos and each one has foo.Bars nested within it. As opposed to the output of a join where I get one row for each Bar, and parent Foo's columns are duplicated across each row.

Entity Framework does an excellent job of mapping the LINQ model to the SQL one, but since they really are different under the covers, it's easy to produce hefty queries. For example a LINQ "group by" frequently cannot be translated to a SQL "group by".

I tried to keep it simple and not deviate too far from straight SQL. But I still didn't want to force processing those damn row-based outputs onto the programmer, so I at least had to add notation for breaking out the columns of a top-level result set into an object hierarchy:

https://rspeele.gitbooks.io/rezoom-sql/doc/Language/Navigati...
This.

Investing is not a guaranteed return system. You might win, or you might lose all your money. At the end of the day, the only person who is responsible for it is you.

Don't want to lose your money? Don't invest.
My favorite idea here is how it's a developer's job to articulate the issues with a client's code base to the clients themselves. Some clients just want the problem to go away, but smart ones recognize the importance of a high-level understanding of the state of their code base.

If you work for a cheapskate who's just nickel and diming about billable hours, the "Why does this take so long" question is nothing more than the rhetorical whining of a bad client. But in a healthy client-developer relationship, the question is important. It's a less-articulated, unfamiliar version of the following, which any good developer would find amiable:

"I, as someone invested in the success of my company, am seeking insight into a part of that success that only you have. I trust that you're not playing Minesweeper on our dime, and yet our current process isn't delivering the returns we expect. As someone who knows better than I do, are my expectations unreasonable and in need of adjustment, or are there investments that can be made to get us there?
I know that most forms of clinical depression and the treatment associated with it has the side effect of a desire to sleep longer. 10 hours is a normal amount of time sleeping for people on anti-depressants. I'm not entirely certain whether sleeping closer to 8 would be any better for their mental or physical well being.
It can rap :) silly though

(Stan, fan, pan, man!) I'm an idiot, man!

So, now this is my own place.

And I didn't come here for all this.

This is one of my own…

I'm no different.

For now, the next generation's.

I'll be here for as long as there's anyone here.

Don't worry about it, I know.

[Hook, Solo]

Solo: So!

Bran: Why the…

So the rest is up to you guys. It's going to be a fun ride.

[Outro]

The entire world is watching me now (bark)

This is gonna be a fun ride.

[MUSIC]

Hey you guys

It's me, the one and only Jon Hamm!!!

You've got no idea who I'm, right?

But you know me, Jon!

I'm good! Now do you wanna bet? You don't wanna bet $50 that I'm really Jon Hamm!!!

Jon Hamm: What a great name!

If he were to say "Barry" (laugh)

I'd get a laugh! (laugh) That's Jon Hamm to ya!

Oh and that's not even the joke

It's not the funniest thing ever!

I know how to play, I know everything.

Here's a little secret

There
Isn't there also an argument that excessive sleep may be caused by health issues that end up affecting longevity as well?
But in the end, the virtual filesystem is backed up by done Windows storage?