skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In my Constitutional Law class in law school the professor said something like "only in a room full of lawyers could you end up with this interpretation of the Commerce Clause," which I appreciate more and more as time goes by.
Don't play games where other people have the aptitudes and you don’t
Pretty much any mens group where some form of behavioural issue facing men is discussed loops back to the effect of school and other childhood factors extensively.
Lessons learned growing my career as a software engineer
I didn't get the pop-up, but your right, its a hard with all those ads. The info is good, but without adblockage...

There are some clasics on the archive.
Browser tips:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071227104629/http://sheldonbrow...

how to make a website:
http://web.archive.org/web/20071227104613/http://sheldonbrow...

Sheldon Brown's wife was my CS prof at northeastern[2] and someone named John Allen[1] seems to be keeping the site up to date. Oddly John's bike blog page is pretty good and ad free. Lots of words on the old web.

http://john-s-allen.com/blog/

http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/fell/#Courses
Sure, if you’re using pre-1990’s memory management. Best practices have evolved far beyond the explicit use of malloc & free and unsafe string handling.

Most popular dynamic languages don’t use garbage collection under the hood anyway. In Python and many other runtimes, it’s primarily reference counted.
Not really though you may want to. The main CPU could compact memory if it felt fragmentation was high enough to warrant it. By its nature the traffic is asynchronous so the CPU won't do a perfect compaction (it won't have processed all the inbound messages to mark garbage as free) but it would probably be close enough.

The big win here is making it all async. No need to stop the world, issue write barriers to application activity, or otherwise synchronize for GC. You'd have a bigger highwater mark for used memory but otherwise the main CPU can pickup the "the memory from x to y is now free" messages on any thread and whenever it is convenient.
Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
In Canada is an apartment what the us would call a condo or something similar?
No longer since TLS 1.3
Great quite.

I had thought the same about his background, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bezos looks like he was technical at college and the first couple of years (or less) of his career.

> He graduated from Princeton University in 1986 with degrees in electrical engineering and computer science.

and

> After Bezos graduated from Princeton in 1986,... He first worked at Fitel, a fintech telecommunications start-up, where he was tasked with building a network for international trade.[28] Bezos was promoted to head of development and director of customer service thereafter.[29] He transitioned into the banking industry when he became a product manager at Bankers Trust; he worked there from 1988 ...
How much does it need to interface with main memory? If the external chip has its own memory then it can maintain its own view of the object graph. The software can update it when references are made/deleted and query it when an allocation needs to be made.

There is still the overhead of communicating when references are made/deleted, but you need that anyway, as something that only looks at memory doesn't know what is a pointer, or the size of objects.

The communication overhead is then linear in with respect to the amount of updates to the object graph, not the size of the object graph.

You could even go so far as to not put the chip on the memory bus at all.
So if a tourist carries RTL-SDR device to listen to local music on FM radio, he/she/other is going to rot in jail or worse?

Tunisia being a tourist hot spot I expected their customs to be knowledgeable enough to differentiate a malicious device.

I think they had already made their mind to arrest this person and RTL device is just a scape goat (or) they were super paranoid for some reason & this person was just unlucky to have a USB device with a antennae which for the uninformed has spy gadget written all over it.
Also 7zip, Calibre, some torrent clients.
Yes, federal law applies for immigrants.
He got degrees in computer science and electrical engineering from Princeton. I have no idea how competent he is, but I think you can assume at least equal to the average college grad SDE.
So you see a peaceful protester with a sign saying "No fascism" and a bunch of people saying "Jews will not replace us!" and -- let me get this correct -- to you, they are the same because of the level of zealotry?

Sometimes the people on this site amaze me with how much they're willing to use pedantry and sophistry and their "intelligence" to just throw away the lessons that our society learned 70 years ago, such as "ethno-nationalists are BAD."
So, does this chap just take the word of his kid for truth?
I feel like Amazon is going to bring back custom hardware like this. Imagine if this was an instance type.
We wrote latency-sensitive and high-performance code in GCed languages back in 1980s - avoiding pauses or having predictable latencies (in fact, more predictable than usual manual memory management!) are more of "we don't teach people how to program" rather than issue with GC.

As for energy savings, many garbage collectors have amortized energy use lower than malloc/free. Even pretty simple ones (some of the simplest I've seen beat it so hard it's not competition, but they are specific to their application)
Ok, so we agree that at 100x the current supply the price would drop. What is stopping builders from creating 100x supply?

There's only two things I see that make sense as answers here.

One is regulation/zoning. Let's assume we could fix that.

The second would be if the sale price dropped below the nominal cost of constructing new units, with some wiggle room in there for opportunity cost to builders who might make more money by choosing to build elsewhere. Do you believe that's the case currently in NYC, Chicago, etc? Is the price so low that it's not even worth it for builders to bother creating new units, because they couldn't recoup their costs?
> I signed up with a Gmail account years before any of this existed, and I never would have guessed they would do what the original poster is concerned about.

Whether or not you realized how the information could be used, you did consent for Google to have that information by choosing them as your email provider. Anyone with a modicum of understanding of how email works would realize that the content of any unencrypted email is readily available to the entity which receives and stores the email, along with the sender's email provider and the operators of any services it might pass through prior to final delivery. If anything this is even more obvious with webmail services. The only reason people are upset at Google here is that Google is more up-front than the average free email provider about the extent of the information they have and how it can be used. They didn't have to reveal what they know or provide controls over it or use it to offer services for their users' benefit. Sure, they also use it for advertising—but that was always part of the deal, since long before any of these other features existed. Yet it's these aspects that benefit the user that people seem to complain about the most, because it highlights aspects of the relationship they wouldn't otherwise have bothered to consider.
High quality manuals for professional power tools
Air leakage standards in which direction?
One time me and some girl were grouped together for a few minutes for a French exercise in high school. I was known for constantly being tardy to class. After we finished the exercise, that girl said that I wouldn't be tardy if I was hit more as a child.

That was upsetting. I don't remember being angry or yelling (but I could be wrong?). But I was sad and probably non-communicative with her for the rest of the class time.

The teacher took me out of the classroom and scolded me for behaving the way that I was and that I have to talk to her and that I was bad. I kinda just took it with a blank face. I didn't tell the teacher what the girl said, probably because I didn't really understand why I was upset.
> Many Linux and FOSS geeks today use Linux only professionally

As a long time FOSS and Linux user I can tell you that usability of FOSS GUI systems has repaidely degraded in comparison to professional systems (Mac OS or Windows). If half of my hardware is defunct under Linux I will not use the FOSS. It's like buying anew car and being unable to switch to fourth and fifth gear or use the built-in entertainment system.

The Wayland fork hasn't contributed to this situation.
This also puts a huge burden on small businesses and individuals.
it should have check boxes so that one can combine them.
"giant barrel" is clickbait. It's a (unpowered) boat that externally looks a bit like a barrel.

"measures about 10 feet long and seven feet wide and includes a small kitchen and bed, and space for storage."
How was the original plan “reasonable”? S3’s FAQ talks about durability in terms of tens of thousands of years https://aws.amazon.com/s3/faqs/. To honor that claim, AWS has the burden to support v1 URLs until the end of the internet.
"Fascist person"?
Deep convolutional networks, by design, are unable to integrate contextual and ambient information present in an image (or in preceding images) to inform how to interpret local features they use. So it's no surprise they struggle with unconstrained images. Images where ambient context varies.

It's intriguing how much focus there is on adversarial examples. You don't need adversarial examples to make a deep network fail - in a sense that's overkill. Just point the poor deep network at a sequence of images from the real world -- images from a self driving car, security camera, or webcam. You'll see it make spontaneous errors. No matter how much training data you gave it.

The field will advance when/if practitioners recognize that classifying pixel patterns in isolation isn't sufficient for robust visual perception, and adopt alternative neural network designs that can interpret what they perceive in light of (no pun intended) context and physical expectations.

It worked for our prototype.[0]

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06854
It’s not zero — those -retain and -release calls still exist when necessary and have a small penalty — but it does minimize them well, and is lower overhead and vastly more predictable than GC.
>This is true so long as the new supply isn’t itself causing new demand

Which is where your argument falls apart. Cities aren't closed systems. The price reductions won't trickle down to the bottom of the market because at some point there is always going to be people who are willing to move in from neighboring neighborhoods, cities, or regions. It isn't like the only people who live in San Francisco are the only people who can afford it. There are plenty of people who could afford the worst possible home in San Francisco but decide not to move their because they can't afford a home they want. Once those middle of the market prices come down, people will move in to fill that new supply.
Unfortunately, templates aren't sorted that way.
Sore LA LADO
黃體酮
Is SSH fine..?

mosh dev and users think no.
I'm not interested in seeing war crimes on facebook. If you want to disseminate that stuff, use a public forum where that stuff is welcome. There are countless places. Facebook and the spin users give is not welcome by me and no doubt by others.
When my brother and I were in high school, he got into a discussion with the English teacher. At one point of disagreement, he asked her heatedly, “what are you on about?” We’d been watching a lot of Monty Python. She misinterpreted it as, “are you on the rag?” and proceeded to flip out.

She went to the principal, and they began some Title IX paperwork along with extreme disciplinary action.

This was a small rural school. My class had less than 70 students. My parents didn’t have a lot of resources, but they showed up the next day with a lawyer in a suit carrying a briefcase. The school was completely unprepared for that type of response and immediately backed off. They were able to clear up the misunderstanding.

It means so much for parents to listen to their kids with respect, and stick up for them. I’ve never forgotten it.
> In true OOP...

That word "true" is doing a lot of work for you here. There are other definitions of what true OOP is, at least one of which (SOLID) appears in the comments on this article. By calling yours "true", you avoid having to do anything to defend your choice of definition. But if someone does not already buy your definition, calling yours the "true" one is completely unpersuasive.

> There is this basic implementation of something B, and then these derivations D1 and D2 are like branches: they use the B code, but they replace some of it with their own versions of functions. Those functions initially correctly mimic what their counterparts in B are doing. But if B is subsequently maintained, that can fall apart. B functions can be altered, while their counterparts in D1 and D2 remain the same, not incorporating the new logic.

True. But there is no software technique that is proof against bad maintenance. So your argument here is that this technique faces the same problem as every other technique. That's not much of an argument.
[Citation needed] mate.

Meanwhile take a moment and review Apple's stance on privacy and security before you continue [1] [2] [3].

[1] https://www.apple.com/privacy/manage-your-privacy/

[2] https://www.apple.com/privacy/approach-to-privacy/

[3] https://www.apple.com/business/site/docs/iOS_Security_Guide....
Slack is a really interesting company IMO. They were very late to the space - I was using Flowdock when they became a thing, and felt like Slack's lack of threads was a deal breaker. But Slack raised a boat load more money than their competitors, offered a free product and spent a huge amount of money on marketing and now they are the top dog.

They're still losing money, and both Microsoft and Google have competitors rolled into their productivity suites, but I think they've largely crushed the smaller competition.

I'm still not very bullish on Slack since I don't see how they build a defensible moat against competitors for what is a fairly simple product, particularly when Google/Microsoft have basically free versions for their enterprise customers, but all I know is that I have no idea how to evaluate anything even remotely like a consumer company!
chewing tobacco.
One article that helped me to understand the OO inheritance problems understand much better is this one:

https://www.sicpers.info/2018/03/why-inheritance-never-made-...

It argues that there are three different kinds of inheritance and in OO you often mix them up into one hierachy - which may work in some situations, but in some it just can't. Personally, I've experienced this kind of conflict often enough.
The point is that increasing the regulatory compliance burden actually gives landlords more power, as it will consolidate property ownership amongst those who have the ability to employ lawyers to argue for the reasonableness of their terms.
This article seems mostly concerned about Facebook and YouTube's opaque filtering systems, but the authors are looking in the wrong place. These platforms aren't and shouldn't be responsible for hosting violent and disturbing content - regardless of its purpose or utility. The authors themselves discuss the can of worms that open when you start accommodating the interests of some groups and not others; it isn't sustainable and it isn't possible.

Instead, this article should have focused less on the decisions of AI systems and neural networks, which can be difficult to decipher and interpret, and more on the decisions of the humans behind these tech companies. The latter is much easier to scrutinize and dissect.

I think the truly concerning initiatives are projects like Google's Dragonfly. There's absolutely nothing opaque about a search engine that will actively assist the Chinese government with whitewashing history for a billion individuals. These are the decisions that should be examined.
You Might Want to Turn Passive Candidates into Applicants
Towards an Understanding of Technical Debt
Here's a benchmark that includes an energy comparison: https://thenewstack.io/which-programming-languages-use-the-l... . It's interesting that speed does not directly correlate with energy consumption and the the energy consumption of functional languages was much higher than imperative.
What It Sounds Like Hiding in a Dark Classroom During a School Shooting
I was gonna bring one in to take some super cool Roman ruin aerial shots but was thankfully dissuaded by a friend.
I understand where you are coming from, but a lot of what you just presented isn't actually relevant to the topic of ambiguity from lack of context in language. Some of it just doesn't apply. Allow me to explain...

> the first context is English language

Let's ignore this context. If you don't understand English then you shouldn't be expected to understand an English statement regardless of context.

> How long is a mile?

That depends on what time and space you are in. But that's ok. All such measurements are relative and defined by non-natural constructs. But we can be realistic and assume a mile is whatever our government has decided.

When I tell you "I ran a mile", I'm not telling someone in Australia I ran a mile. I"m telling you that. If we are speaking over the internet it might complicate things, but we only have to resolve the meaning of mile once for our relationship, and all proceeding discussions will use this meaning.

I would argue that this makes the word mile unambiguous in the sense that you are saying. If we had to assert each time what I meant by a mile, then that would be ambiguous.

> that sentence might not make any sense to someone reading it in 20 years

Evolution of language is a separate phenomenon. We don't need to consider that. Only what the language means today right now as I use it. That's the utility of language. For older English texts, we have literature which matches our common vernacular to the vernacular of the time. Foreign translations are out of scope for the same reason listed above. Since we have mappings between today's English and yesterday's English, I would again argue that this is not a source of ambiguity.

> And then when is today? May 7, 2019

That doesn't have anything to do with language. That is a chronospacial coordinate. It represents a certain degree of completion of our orbit around the sun. It isn't a measurement of time at all. It's only relative in the sense that all time and space measurements are relative to the spacetime coordinate of the Big Bang.

Time is inherently a relative concept. We don't have time unless we are comparing (relating) two different frames. We define one in terms relative to the other (motion, state, etc). In a single, non-relative frame of reference time just doesn't exist.

> And then finally, what if you were lying?

Again, this has nothing to do with language. You aren't trying to guess what I'm thinking, you're trying to understand what I'm saying. That's what language parsing is about. Discussion of motivations, misdirection, etc. is irrelevant.
I'd say the momentum from having no competition in the space for nearly a decade is far more impactful.
Totalitarianism is a scorpion that cannot but sting.

So no, in my books that's just suicidal playing for time I have no patience for and will take no part in.
I knew I should have wiki’d it! I suppose a Princeton compsci grad would know a bit about compsci ...
Beginner’s Guide to Web Scraping with Python Lxml
> And yeah, having someone in your corner who knows how to navigate the school system and get the best for you is super important.

This is very typical of the bureaucracies that run socialism. It becomes a system of bartering favors, connections, and influence. (Instead of money.)
Rhode Island students who owe lunch money get jelly sandwiches until debt paid
ITT: People saying they like VSCode
If you are interested to study the basics of web scraping using Python, do read.
Last time I encountered these sorts of claims on HN I did the above research and the results surprised me. I'd like to find time to further narrow this research as you suggest above, and I suspect I'd find evidence of discrimination, as I suspected the last time. Though I will keep an open mind. In the meantime I would remind you to remember the burden of proof is traditionally on what is being claimed--not on disproving a claim.
I'm more interested in optimizing the client side, at least where the web is concerned. I keep wondering when Google is going to start generating energy ratings for the top few thousand sites on the web. It would shame the low performers into producing front ends that are no longer glacial. I was loading wunderground.com's 10 day forecast for the umpteenth time lately and reflecting on how horribly slow and inefficient it is... Surely website energy ratings must be in the works somewhere, right?
What, no SCSI flatbed scanner?
The Twitter conspiracy that sabotaged a small-town California festival
I have been noticing food prices in general going up.

Just tonight, I bought a 5 gallon water refill and it was $1 more
I took math classes at the local community college while in high school. All it took was signing up for them. No juice required.
Of course, I agree. My point was just that it's not like my grandparent's suggestion that there could be consequences for the rescuer is unheard of.
Dart had an initial hiccup, but I think things started changing with flutter - https://github.com/flutter/flutter
> In Tunisia a charge of espionage could be punishable by death.

> Tunisia is a member of the UN

Umm... what? Logic tells me these two statements should be incompatible.
>The second would be if the sale price dropped below the nominal price of construction new units, with some wiggle room in there for opportunity cost to builders who might make more money by choosing to build elsewhere.

You also have to factor in the opportunity cost of the land/unit too which is where the argument starts to fall apart. Why build a unit that rents for $X when you can increase your build costs by Y% and charge a rent higher than $X + Y%. That is why new construction generally comes in at or near the top of the market. Construction costs generally don't make up most of the costs of new homes in places like San Francisco, Chicago, or Los Angeles.

But sure, if you want to create a world with no zoning laws and with 10000% increase in housing supply, I am sure it will solve all the problems with pure brute force.
None of this is communicated by having me implement binary search

I'm curious how you're so sure of this as a not-yet-junior Dev.