skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As I understand it, very small.

Most allergens are denatured by acid and enzymes in the stomach. Many food allergies, which typically are not the same kind of immunological reaction as seasonal allergies/allergic rhinitis, are caused more by the failure of epidermal barriers or acid attack than by mere exposure. don't become sensitized because you ate something so much as because your body allowed bits to get somewhere they are not allowed to be under any circumstances, which is why the outsized anaphylactic reaction food allergies often cause.

(...typically. In some cases it is cross reaction, where an antigen in food is too similar to some other antigen the body has previously identified as an invader. See for example the temporary meat allergy that can be caused by some Lone Star tick bites. And there are yet other causes of course...)

Seasonal allergies are usually mild because they are generally localized, peripheral, and provoked in tissues that are designed to give this response as a normal protective action.

(That is, your nose is correct to run or stuff in response to histamine release caused by pollen. Frankly, I feel some foreboding about what sequelae we will eventually discover to be caused by chronic H2 antagonist administration over decades, drugs like Claritin/Zyrtec that people are taking every day of their lives.)

So! While it is possible and some rare cross reactions have been observed (particularly in fruiting trees/eating fruits), as a general rule your seasonal allergies do not increase your food allergy risk.

Now, some people are at higher risk for both due to environmental or genetic circumstances. But there it is a prior immune dysfunction that caused both rather than one causing the other-- though it's an understandable intuition to connect them as your question does. Having one or the other makes it more likely you have both, but it one doesn't cause the other.
...or use another product with a better UI.
Thank you for using Gitlab. I'm not affiliated with them but I love seeing open source projects that use open source platforms.
The system is not symmetric and it's not supposed to be. For example, the prosecution is required to disclose all of their evidence to the defense, but the defense has almost no requirements to disclose evidence to the prosecution.

A defense attorney who has proof that their client is 100% guilty must still defend their client to the best of their ability. A prosecutor who believes that the accused is innocent is ethically required to dismiss the case. (Obviously, this doesn't always happen, but it's supposed to.)
What do you think our society's Gini Coefficient should be?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient
If there is a common mechanism for triggering dual boot, they would know about it and try it out too. So, not unless you use a unique, inconspicuous mechanism.
It's really the unintended deceleration you need to worry about.
Before MCAS started malfunctioning.

Autopilot was enabled for a short period after take-off, then disabled at 05:39:55 due to turbulence and never re-enabled.

If you look at the graph in Appendix 1/page 26 -- FDR Data you'll see that the first MCAS command occurred at 05:39:30. Once autopilot was disabled it remained disabled until impact.

The information you're quoting above is just included for informational reasons, it likely won't play a part in what caused this accident.
The media seems to be on a mission to kill commercial aviation similar to what happened to recreational aircraft. I wonder how long before we see an article about how Boeing knowingly omitted flare and chaff systems despite the risk of surface-to-air missiles. They'll talk about how the AN/ALE-47 system could avoid 22 deaths/year for only $30k.
It does have a decent browser integration, OTP support, history support (last 5 passwords) support for arbitrary additional data and icons.

Having not read the source code, or investigated the details, my understanding is the sync is entry based over file based. On multiple occasions I lost data to Keepass's insane lack of sync functionality, I've never once done the same with Bitwarden. Google drive sync is kind of moot as the sync happens on a server (which you can run yourself).
If you look at the CFS forums they are trying all kinds of crazy experimental therapies, many of which have side-effects and few of which have any effects

Another interesting correlary is the pelvic floor dysfunction world. It is mostly a stress based illness which is best addressed by mental health treatment and relaxation but some people have gotten tons of invasive surgeries with reason to think they would even be helpful
Many people broke the law but weren't prosecuted because they didn't go far enough to justify it. This person broke the law and was prosecuted because he went further. Sounds to me like he was, in fact, prosecuted because people didn't like him.
The reason you need the resistor is that the LEDs pull too little current, not that the voltage drop across them is too low.
I have been using koa in production for a few years, about to launch a second product soon.

Also using TypeScript. They go great together.
This story is really starting to annoy me. Now there's a new person named "Boeing" who somehow lacks self awareness to know what they're doing or selling even though this Boeing character designed, built, and sold two variations on their product. I feel like Boeing will soon become the main character, and try to plead insanity.
The resource they consume is wealth. It's disingenuous to claim that a wealthy person does not consume more resources. Houses are a particularly poor example.

A wealthy person may have a 2. 5 million mansion and a quarter million dollar vacation home and own 3 rental homes.

They may trivially capture some of the resources available for others housing by buying up the housing supply and renting for more than the cost of the mortgage while fighting to maximize the value of investment by limiting the supply of new housing.

With 40% of their neighbors paying rent to people like them and some living on the street it's hard not to qualify the situation as unequal.
Most likely the similar method can be applied to the transfemoral setup as well, after some improvements and miniaturization.
I'm not saying any of this is likely. But, as the topic was raised, if they break you and you start talking, you will volunteer the information. They don't need to know before hand.

That said, the most practical scenario here is to keep your important files secured somewhere else, cloud or elsewhere, and when they ask you to unlock your phone or laptop you say "Sure!" Because there's nothing to find and you're compliant and helpful so they quickly let you go after a proforma search.
Scammers are getting more and more sophisticated now a days. It seems like most of these scam calls are a result of the ability to spoof phone numbers.

Spoofing phone numbers does have legitimate purposes (for example a phone number from a customer service company is able to use their company phone number as the caller ID) but these scammers seem to abuse this. It's quite similar to how SMTP for emails allows the "From" field to be set to something other than your actual email. Email scammers abuse this same thing too but the difference is that in SMTP emails, you can still tap the detailed headers of the email and see what the actual "from" email is. But for phone numbers, this isn't the case.

I think, the best way to solve this phone scam issue would be by modifying the phone protocol (I am not sure of the details) to allow users to be able to see the "Real" underlying phone number.
Why would anyone want to upgrade from XP? New versions of Windows have no improvements (the only improvement is search in Start Menu), but they cost money, they work slower and require new expensive hardware. They have spyware and updates that cannot be disabled. You pay for the product and then you are used as a free tester of new versions of Windows. Microsoft wants everyone to upgrade to earn more money and to upsell to users new "cloud" features they don't really need. But for me it would be better if MS would drop newer Windows versions and returned to improving XP without increasing resources comsumption, without HTML apps, telemetry and "cloud" features.

This is an example when the interests of users and the manufacturer are opposite. If the user uses an OS for many years and everything works, why upgrade? Looks like a waste of time and money.

Imagine if you bought a car and several years later you are told that you need to upgrade it, because, you know, car factory workers need higher salaries and if you don't buy the new one, then there is no way to pay them.

This explains why MS and independent developers (that drop XP support to help MS) forces users to upgrade. Because it is MS who wants an upgrade, not the user.
Better than 500 years ago but worse than 50 years ago seems like a bad standard to strive for.
> And that doesn't mean that MCAS was designed to mitigate the problems related to an AoA disagreement.

You literally said it was designed to do just that:

> The autopilot systems cannot cope with AoA disagree, that's why MCAS came into play.

I still have no idea what you were trying to say there.
Gold and silver are commodities that don't produce value outside the price you pay for and then sell for. Also, you don't really need to cover it when you can easily find graphs for their prices going back hundreds years.
Don't be fooled, this is 99% the work of big corporations, and not individual farmers or loggers (if such a thing still exists). Most of the workers will have moved to the area because of the jobs.
Police generally have access to full-automatic machine guns. They’re not limited to the semi-automatic models sometimes available to civilians (e.g. in the US).
Sure, in a sense they prosecuted him because they didn’t like him, but it’s because he went too far. It’s like prosecuting someone doing 30 over the speed limit but looking the other way when someone does 5 over. Yeah, we don’t like reckless drivers so we prosecute the first guy. But it’s not arbitrary, and it’s not improper.
At current trajectory I won't be able to afford medication to keep breathing in 5 years with all due respect FUCK YouTube, coursera, and Spotify.
I was just pretending to misunderstand as a joke.

You did make me curious, though. The numbers are fairly small. I implemented the dumbest possible brute force search for all combinations of numbers 1-255. On my laptop, it found 133^5 + 110^5 + 84^5 + 27^5 = 144^5 in about 50 minutes.

I'd guess that this laptop is something like 100,000 times faster than the CDC 6600, so that dumb search would have taken about a decade. However, you can get at least a couple orders of magnitude improvement with some simple improvements.
>My gut feeling is that equity should have the best return as it involves the most risk.

'Should' is an interesting word isn't it :). However the higher the risk, the higher the chances that you may not get the return you are looking for.
Location: San Jose, CA
Remote: OK
Willing to relocate: yes
Technologies: Django/Flask, Python, Vue, C/C++, Linux, NGINX, Apache
Resume/CV: https://quinoutland.com
Email: qoutland@gmail.com
Interestingly it is relatively popular in Japan (to the point where someone non-technical asked me if I used it the other day!) It's really only an issue for English speakers (though in the context of HN that seems like the whole world ;-) ).

I think it would be pretty darn easy to maintain a rebranded fork, though.
I don’t know your situation, but all I’d say is being okay keeping a flexible schedule that fits your life and family needs is the most important thing. The 9-5 in the office normal job is actually worse for situations like these than what you could have in a startup.

If you aren’t able to keep consistent hours then putting in a Saturday morning or Sunday night to make up for it is totally fine in my book, assuming you are a truly irreplaceable asset to the company.

It’s hard work to get to a place where you’re confident in your flexible schedule and still get great work done when measured in terms of results not consistent time spent in the office. That feeling won’t go away either when the startup matures. If anything it will get worse, especially when you start delegating!
Maybe just "a randomized search". Sounds very inefficient.

I think they are just looking for crimes like drug mules, people coming to work with tourist visa etc. Everyone here talks about nuclear plans but I doubt.. probably bully too but against simple minded criminals it can work. Texts of arranging work or when is the package going to arrive etc.
Generally speaking, there isn't a difference between traveling for the purpose of work and working while traveling for other reasons. If you are physically in one country while performing work it is considered working in that country and requires appropriate permission. Many countries do have a business visitor category that allows for some form of work (attending meetings, and the like, things that wouldn't be stealing the job of a resident).

I actually learned this the hard way, I was in your shoes, 100% remote job, for a US company, US clients, and went to Europe and thought I might work while traveling. I was detained at the border, interviewed, and very nearly denied entry. I was let after a couple fairly lengthy interviews (I was detained for about 16hours) and proving I had funds to support myself without working. I was given a "visitor record" and a firm exit by date, not sure what all the record entails but I get questioned every time I enter now.

Anyway, point being, legally speaking what generally matters is where you are located when performing the work, and that's really the only way that makes sense to judge where the work takes place.

With all that said, in reality being caught is extremely unlikely and plenty of people get away with it and I don't think there are many countries actively trying to crack down on that sort of short term work while being a tourist. If you want to be above the board though, unless your work counts as what a business visitor can do, you would need a visa to perform any work. There is generally no distinction between traveling for the purpose of working, and working while traveling for other reasons.

I'm not a lawyer though but I've spent a fair bit of time actually looking at the restrictions on the tourism and business visitor visas to stay legal while traveling long-term and working remotely.
I haven't heard of Linux getting people detained at border crossings, but it definitely gets you more scrutiny from other government organizations like the NSA[1].

[1] https://www.eweek.com/security/linux-lands-on-nsa-watch-list
https://twitter.com/geographyjim/status/1121809404049776641?...

GIF of housing supply in London, New York, Paris and Tokyo, 1970-2013, showing growth of maybe 1/3 in the first three and doubling in Tokyo. Amazingly real estate prices in Tokyo are basically flat throughout this period, those of the other three, not. Real estate prices will go up in desirable locations if supply is not allowed to grow with demand.
Even if I agreed with customs officers rifling through my devices, I would only ever want them to have read-only access.
Like, you'd hope they're not malicious, but can you really trust some in-a-hurry agent with little to no training in this area to not accidently wipe half your hard drive?
They could also refuse entry or detain you if your not a citizen for obstruction of justice.

These laws that give border security unfettered search and seizure authority along with issuing punishment for non-compliance is the problem.
Not that this is particularly important to your point, but 30 over vs 5 over is usually a different law.

I'd argue that there's a qualitative difference between selective enforcement that involves informal standards that evolve over time (e.g. police ignoring anyone who breaks the speed limit by less than 10MPH) and selective enforcement that involves a law that hasn't been enforced for centuries being pulled out of retirement and aimed at a single individual.
Web devs might want to use older versions to test their site in them.
We'd all be impressed and terrified if your telemetry "messed up" a burrito, whether it was in the microwave oven or out.
Before the eternal September, the structure and form of usenet encouraged discussions that were just qualitatively different than what I enjoy on reddit these days.

My cringe wasn't due to a bad analogy. I was cringing because I remember what usenet was like once, and the last time I spent much time there, it had lost so much of what made it good that, yes, comparing newsgroups to subreddits is essentially on point, now.

I cringed because the analogy is on target and I don't like that as much as I liked usenet before. Comparing it to reddit gives a pretty good picture of late stage usenet for people who didn't experience it. At one time (I think including the time period this article is covering) there was more to it than that, though.
The local parks I where I lived in Germany had apple and plum trees. In spite of the fact that all the fruit came in a short time in autumn, I never saw a fully ripe fruit on the trees, let alone a rotten one fall.

Between people and birds, there was nothing left for the rats.
In what way does the income on an investment on precious metals or commodities differ from the income on a paper asset?

An interesting difference that I do know with respect to gold is that selling physical gold is not subject to any taxation
Just like with email, that ship sailed a long time ago. In many cases, there is no "real" underlying phone number (example: VOIP... VOIP numbers may as well be disposable.)
I don't know much about cryptography or low-level software, but could you hide the second profile inside the encrypted data?

For example, I believe Truecrypt has a dual container system with two passwords in addition to their regular encrypted containers. You enter one password to get to the "fake" container and another password to get to the "hidden" container. Plausible deniability exists where it is impossible to prove whether you are providing the hidden password and whether there is a second hidden container.

Could a similar system be employed for a mobile device? The core OS components could be shared by both containers and it's clear that you could potentially have a second hidden profile, but it's not possible to prove that it exists.

Of course just the presence of countermeasures on your devices would raise suspicion.
Did you just like the taste?
I am reminded of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sheep_(2006_New_Zealand_...
Ask HN: What's the best privacy-minded virtual mailbox?
I'm moving to another country for 2 years. I don't want to forward my mail to a friend or family member and expect them to sort through all my mail all the time.

I'd feel better if the service was open source and used encryption. I prefer open source because I just think it's better, not because I want a self-hosting option.
Your days of centralized decentralization are over!
> The A320neo and A320 have a common type rating too.

> Googling seems to suggest the differences are fairly minor however.

> I guess Airbus benefits in the A320 being a newer airframe than the 737 (which is ~50 years old now)?

The 737 is uniquely low to the ground among modern aircraft. (This was an advantage at airports without jetways high off the ground a long time ago.) Which means for every other model there’s plenty of space for new larger style engines under almost all of the existing planes. This makes airbus’s neo programs comparatively simple and reasonable for keeping the same type rating. The 737 doesn’t have the space, so they moved the engine location and came up with the MCAS as a workaround. It was clever, but unfortunately, too clever.
It's relatively new, but I've been using Coda.io to build a lot of interesting ideas out. I've built some fantasy leagues, a very powerful task tracker/organizer, and do all of my trip planning using it.

Definitely check out their templates, https://coda.io/templates
We're killing off the only life we know of anywhere in the universe
No. And neither do you.

Edit: How dare I have an opinion on opinions.
I don't work in Banking but I do work in healthcare and testing is required.

No code makes it to Master if it doesn't have any tests.
We do unit tests, integration and EtoE testing with a few full-on regression tests being thrown in here and there when we do a major upgrade.

At first, I thought that maybe we were kind of overdoing it but as the codebase is expanding, I find it actually quite easier to refactor old code when I know there is a test covering that piece of code that I have just replaced.

As for the excuse: there is no time to write tests, you simply need to change the estimate of your story during the sprint planning.

Even for my own personnal projects, I write tests.
It's good practice and it makes me more confident when I add a new functionnality.
Women Did Everything Right. Then Work Got Greedy
Ask HN: Have a lot of stock but want to leave the company. Looking for advice
Hi,

I am an early employee of a startup in San Francisco and I own about 1% of the company's stock (I already exercised my stock options). I am pretty optimistic about the company's future and I think I could eventually make a lot of money.

I've been in the company for about 5 years now and I don't think an exit is happening any time soon, and I want to leave the company and go do something else.

The problem is, I'm pretty clueless about how startup acquisitions typically work and I'm worried that if I leave right now I could be leaving some money on the table.

Do existing employees ever get preferential treatment over past employees? Is there any other things I might be missing that would be a reason to stay in this situation?

I would love to hear from people who've been in a similar situation before, or maybe someone could point me at some blog posts or books even that I could read.

Thanks!
That's kind of a distinction without a difference. A standard function was non-functional.
If anybody has a link or video to this, I would be extremely interested in it.
They also seem to miss a fairly obvious reason for the fearsome but humorous rabbits and snails:

Farmers, as most monks were, do not get on horseback and fight dragons but instead get on their knees and wage war with small rodents and snails that eat the fruits of their garden.

It's self deprecation. In annals recounting heroic deeds and legends, we have monks illustrating their own epic battles (and defeats) at the hands of the dastardly hares. Those fruit stealing @#$%s.

It double as a counterpoint to the notion of saintly innocent white bunnies, too.

"Christ bunnies me arse, little buggers will find themselves on their own cross if I catch them in me cloves again."
I switched to the Dev build[1] with 'xpinstall.signatures.required = false', and now that it's fixed I don't know if I'll go back. There seems to be a bunch of new features in Dev that I assume will arrive in Firefox eventually, but everything else being equal, I think I'll stick with it.

I'll probably turn 'xpinstall.signatures.required' back to true though.

[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/
I was cringing because I think the comparison between reddit and late usenet is accurate, and I don't like that. Usenet was different at one point, that went away, and the cringe is because newsgroups looked a lot like subreddits by the end. You couldn't have had early 90s NANAE on reddit, and I don't think there is any public forum that is in the ballpark now.

I should probably add that I'm saying this as a fan of and avid user of reddit. I'm unhappy about what we lost as Usenet wound down, not complaining about reddit.