skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So g represents growth of the entire economy, not worker income or some such thing. Note that if Piketty’s hypothesis is true then the conclusion (return on capital will capture more and more of the economy) is more or less tautological.
> that would focus their attention on that system—which quite conceivably could have caused them to shut it off manually sooner.

But you can't shut off the AoA measurement "system", AFAIK. And the system causing the trouble (under wrong AoA information), the MCAS, can be shut off by setting the Stab Trim switch to Cut Out, but how should the crew know the connection between AoA and MCAS when they weren't even briefed about MCAS in the first place?
www.facebook.com/imelaos.tk

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100014512247253
Although if you’re implementing a hashmap from scratch, that is a very good hash function to use temporarily while building collision management.
The disturbing thing is that this "ordinary corporate crap" level of quality and decision making seems to have crepped into the production processes of a company that making aerospace products - ie planes that fly through the air. 'Cause there's a reason the standards for aerospace are different. Your plane crashing is a different matter than your insurance advertising campaign tanking.
Teen Patti Indian Poker Latest Version 7.43 – APK
Exactly. When spammers call me, they use the same prefix as work. Most of the times I answer just to hear a robocall.
As soon as I saw "verkkokauppa" in the list I assumed it was a Finnish developer.

It looks like a nice project, but I'd echo the other compaints - having a tree, or folders, would make it much more useable.

I tend to have a structure which looks like this (simplified):

Git/
github.com
gitlab.com
Servers/
ssh.example.com/
root.txt
ssh.example.org/
webmail.txt
Websites/
lwn.net

Having all the items in a flat list soon becomes very crowded. Checking my own password store I have over 300 entries.
But the air certainly moves fast enough at the moment of taking off, and if the sensors are sensibly sensitive, they should register AoA well before V_1.

EDIT to add:

Hm, Boeing states:

"During rotation, pitch angle is the critical parameter that ensures tail clearance. Once the airplane is airborne and at a sufficient altitude where ground effect and crosswinds do not affect the sensor reading, AOA will provide valid information."

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/aero_12/attac...
The only single line unlimited plan I see at T-Mobile is $70/month.
I'm interested in what anyone else finds. These are projects i'm aware of that are periphery to your request and valuable in their own right.

https://www.opensourceecology.org/gvcs/
http://digitarworld.uw.hu/ttlcpu.html
https://monster6502.com/
Uses This: Joe Armstrong
On both the Lion Air and Ethiopian Air crashes, the AoA sensor had failed before takeoff.

So the warning message could have potentially prevented both crashes and anything like it (assuming it activated during the takeoff roll, before V1 and the pilots were trained to abort take off when it happened)

Though you are right, if the AoA sensor had failed halfway though a flight, they still would have had problems.
> The fact is, over 60% of the 400 richest Americans were born wealthy.

Your propaganda piece does not state that. It quotes forbes stating that 70% of therichest 400 in the US made their entire fortunes from scratch, but then tries to put an ideological spin on the article by asserting that they were born "priviledged", without providing any definition.
That is interesting. I don't know if I'd ever feel 100% sure that the bullet actually bounced out until the bullet is actually found.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19832792
> Yeah, that is pretty much the entire objective of SVMs.

Which is hard to do by hand in many dimensions but almost trivial in 2. I haven't read the paper but maybe the OP is complaining about something like that?
Sometimes a neighbor you haven't met is the one ringing the doorbell.

I recently had to leave my car parked in front of a stranger's house, so I rang the doorbell to let them know, but they didn't answer even though they were clearly home. Capitalism might be great and all, but door-to-door marketing and phone spamming have killed reasonable methods of communication.

I refuse to let these things die, so I still open the door if I don't know the person (I have a hotel-like door latch now to help prevent someone from kicking in the door or shooting an arrow at me). You just have to learn to be aggressive and say "I'm not interested" if it's a salesman or Jehovah's Witness.
A few people also used to show up to say similar things about DuckDuckGo’s vaguely Fisher-Price branding, and now DDG is still a fringe of the market even in our increasingly privacy-conscious, big-tech-company-skeptical times. Sometimes branding matters.
Don't you think that it might be a win-win situation for both Google AND the users?
But it will not work if you do not know the password. (It can also be time locked with false data; they don't know whether or not it is the real data.)
> Again, you're interpreting my moral claim (billionaires are a policy failure)

Complaining about poverty is addressing a serious problem.

Complaining about some people having more money than you just screams envy and childishness.
The usefulness of this "trick" relies on not having the _data_.

They aren't going to hit me with a wrench for the decryption password to a cloud-stored blob that's not on the device (and ideally, one they don't know about. Remember the password and the location of the data. Remember to secure-delete it from your device though. There should be an easy "prep for border crossing" checklist that includes this.)
Except the stated goal of European Union is free movement of workers. You can literaly go and work in any EU country, no visa or work permission needed.

But that's not really the situation here: it's a business providing services for customers in another country. You send a driver abroad for a few days, that should not make him subject for local tax and labor laws. If you can prove that said worker spent significant period of time there (most tax treaties use 183 days as a rule of thumb) then that's a different matter.
This is true. Which means per FAA certification standards MCAS should have been a "hazardous failure" system. Which means it should have had at least two levels of redundancy. Which means it should have never been certified with no redundancy at all for a failed sensor.
Good categorization. However, the example of sound -> text uses a set of expected invariants for the problem. Invariants abound in sensory data related problems as they are inherently high dimensional as measured but our interest lies in a vastly reduced space. You could squint and look at these examples as PBT as well. Such powerful invariants have been hard (caveat: for me, personally, not done research) in general systems dev areas.

Other examples more illustrative would be useful.

Also, this is commonly done as "data augmentation" in ML ... which isn't surprising given the ML related examples linked in the post. When talking to software engineers without an ML exposure I often ask them to think of ML as "extreme TDD" and gave a basic level talk with that perspective [1].

[1]: http://sriku.org/blog/2019/03/07/talk-machine-learning-as-ex...

edit: by "ML as extreme TDD", I don't quite mean the algorithms themselves as they're not central. I refer more to the data work involved.
Not sure why you got downvoted so much, you make a valid point, like maybe this guy shouldn't have bought a thousand dollar phone:

Google, because of your ADMITTED MISTAKE, my rent check on Monday is now going to bounce. I very well could get evicted from my house over this. What is your plan to make sure I do not get evicted, or is Google going to pay for a new place for me to rent if this happens?
This is a failing of Apple (and Google? not sure what their motivations are here). Smartphone apps need to be ephemeral, up and running in <5 seconds and deleted as quickly. The heavyweight install/delete process means they're going to be fighting against the web's tide.
The wet plate collodion process is only sensitive to blue/UV light. Those tattoos must fall elsewhere in the spectrum.

As an aside, I've just started doing them myself and it's clear why there's been a resurgence. Scans don't really do them justice, and the aforementioned sensitivity makes freckles/other features really stand out. It's also really hard, and takes a good 5-10 minutes per shot.
Case in point, see https://blog.revolutionanalytics.com/2014/08/statistics-losi...
Good move, congrats on surviving the second armag-add-on finally BUT I won't be moving from chromium until Firefox (or Mozilla) explains:

- why am I opted-in to a Studies program in Firefox's default state? (With no explicit information about what it is)

- what does app.normandy.enabled switch do and why is its default value is True and doesn't change to false when I explicitly state I don't want to be in the Studies program?

- why can't we see any xpi's installed by studies program unless we explicitly go to about:studies?

I don't say chromium is better, but I think we deserve an explanation regarding these points.
You ignore the destruction of capital war causes. Germany in 1945 had maybe three bricks still stacked on top of each other, but had lost less than 20% of its prewar population.
posix_spawn is fine for that point in particular: it's encouraging the use of exec to regenerate state in servers that fork child processes as workers, so that accidentally leaking information from the child doesn't also leak it for the original parent process as well.

posix_spawn-style interfaces aren't particularly friendly to spawning processes with reduced privileges though, because you don't want to drop privileges in the parent.
These are two sides of the same coin. Our economy is structured so that wealth is concentrated at the top. This isn't just something that happens, it's a result of specific policy decisions. It went hand in hand with the dismantling of unions and the social safety net in this country in the 80s and onwards.

Regardless, if you're not a billionaire capitalist, why are you on their side? The rich are cognizant that capitalism is class struggle and openly state so, so why do you ally with them when they fight against you and your interests?
I've switched to Vivaldi on my desktop and Brave on my smartphone. For now. It's been three days and I'm still waiting for an official release with the add-on fix, can't wait forever.
What a Midwife Wishes People Knew About Her Job
Every country that has had a GDP ppp of over $8k equivalent 2010 dollars does not have replenishment birth rates.
Prismo, an open source decentralized alternative to Reddit, has reached 0.5.0
Help give EVERY child the chance to code
Show HN: Hacker News like community for book lovers
Get a Chromebook, factory reset before going through security, go through the security, then login. Same for the phone for android. Nowadays both Chromebook and Android recover almost all states back fairly quickly and smoothly that you can do this with minimal hassle.

i.e. There's no password to share if the devices are fresh.
Show HN: Mr2, Expose local server to external network
Steve Cheney's unreadably low-contrast font problem.

Also: this is not what "information asymmetry" means. Steve is discussing simple contradiction and/or hypocrisy.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/asymmetricinformation.a...
Skunk Radio Live Auditions – Athens, Greece
> "Opt-out telemetry" creates precisely the scenario I describe, where ... no one knows ... why they're opting out.

Telemetry doesn't tell you why users do anything. They would have to ask, which doesn't require telemetry. There used to be a form for submitting feedback.

> How could Mozilla respect the needs of users who opt-out of Mozilla knowing they, and their needs, exist at all?

Because of the values and principles that Mozilla used to share with its users, the principles that underpinned the first implemenation of Firefox Sync and were completely abandoned in the current implementation.

I trusted Mozilla because they didn't require our trust. They understood this principle and designed their systems in accordance with it.
## What is Mr.2

Mr.2 can help you expose local server to external network. Support both TCP/UDP, of course support HTTP.<br/>
Keep it simple, stupid.

### Server

```
$ mr2 server -l :9999 -p password
```

### Client

```
# Local server is 127.0.0.1:1234, expect to expose: server_address:5678
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 -c 127.0.0.1:1234
```

```
# Local web root is /path/to/www, expect to expose: server_address:5678
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 --clientDiretory /path/to/www
```

### Example

#### Access local HTTP server

```
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 -c 127.0.0.1:8080

# then
Your HTTP server in external network is: server_address:5678
```

#### SSH into local computer

```
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 -c 127.0.0.1:22

# then
$ ssh -oPort=5678 user@server_address
```

#### Access local DNS server

```
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 -c 127.0.0.1:53

# then
Your DNS server in external network is: server_address:5678

$ dig github.com @server_address -p 5678
```

#### Access your local directory via HTTP

```
$ mr2 client -s server_address:port -p password -P 5678 --clientDirectory /path/to/www

# then
A HTTP server in external network is: server_address:5678
```

#### Any TCP-based/UDP-based ideas you think of

...

## License

Licensed under The GPLv3 License
Not directly as a developer, but I've wrangled with this a few different times. The most impactful:

I was standing up an analytics function at a growing company. There were several internal systems that had been organically created to handle different parts of the companies internal processes, with little structural support in the form of project or program management. Each system was developed by a single, but different, developer. The developers knew their systems really well, but there was little formal documentation on anything.

As part of creating an analytics/BI function, I had to start digging into the data models of the different systems and ETL'ing the data into a data warehouse, and was the first one outside of the initial developer to really dig into the databases for their systems. Each developer used company terminology for their entities that made it relatively easy to intuit the data model. But each one had been left to interpret business needs and definitions themselves, and had done so differently. And neither one of them matched up to how the actual business users defined such things/processes, or presumed the software was defining them. Yet because they were using the same terms, each developer was presuming/projecting their implementation logic for a given process or entity onto the other system, without actually confirming.

I spent well over a year finding and having inconsistencies corrected, and getting system processes aligned with what the business actually expected to be happening. By the end of it, we improved our production efficiency[1] by about 30-40%, which had previously been getting silently lost in the void as the two systems would have subtly incompatible definitions of what was valid and what wasn't. Funny enough, the primary value that came out of the analytics and BI team I stood up wasn't the actual analytics work, but rather the operational discipline and system refactoring that was necessary as a prerequisite to support the analytics.

[1] What was being produced was digital products, not physical. And there wasn't previously any end-to-end analytics in place, so it was non-obvious that stuff was getting lost in the mix.
You'll always have a phone number, but on an SMS- or Data-only plan it will never ring (MVNOs in my country offer these types of plans at a discount because reserving a voice phone number here is subject to ID verification and higher fees)
Boeing is in fact in the certification pipeline for crewed spaceflight at NASA, and has received more NASA funding for this than every other applicant together, including SpaceX.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CST-100_Starliner
Just to remind you, that the battery technology is still Panasonic. That is why Panasonic does make the batteries in the Gigafactory and Elon calls up on Panasonic that they may not produce as much as they should (or agreed on or whatever).
One small point: 'their money is money that is taken from your pocket'. I wonder how you work that out. We buy from Amazon (if we do) because after consideration we reckon on getting more value, in its broader sense, from that supplier than from elsewhere. We have a choice. Amazon would go bust in short order if that value was not perceived to exist. And of course the same (with exceptions mostly due to government interference) happens with all other businesses. Wealth creation is not a zero sum game.
Maybe you've opted out of studies or otherwise disabled Pocket? That's how they're bundling much of this new stuff in.

See: https://help.getpocket.com/article/1142-firefox-new-tab-reco... especially the part that says "From time to time, the occasional sponsored story may appear as a recommendation from Pocket. These stories will always be clearly marked, and you have control over whether they’re shown on your new tab page."

All so-called recommendations I've seen have been spammy, the sort of stuff you see linked as "other articles you may enjoy" when you disable your ad blocker on bad sites. Regardless, this directly contradicts your claim that there haven't been incidents of sponsored content on the new tab page: this is explicitly what is happening according to Pocket's own website. Mozilla themselves explicitly said they are introducing sponsored stories to the new tab page: https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2018/01/24/update-on...

I think there's a world of difference between making a search engine that sells ads the default, and selling ads yourself and inserting them into the browser's chrome. Among other issues, if I help someone install an ad blocker, that ad blocker will block ads on Google, but will not block ads in the browser chrome.

So, given this and other recent behavior by Mozilla, I have to say I don't think seeing "related stories" inserted into the browser chrome for certain web pages is at all far fetched. That should worry us.
Kubernetes Deconstructed: Understanding Kubernetes by Breaking It Down
Right now, the Firefox for Android version is still not available in the Google Play Store.
Don't lie about your experience living in China. There is already too much China-related misinformation on HN.

For 99% of the time, you go straight to click-n-buy which should get your order delivered on time, and for the 1% you prefer to talk to the seller the option is a blessing, not a curse.

I used to work for Alibaba.
I too use only two extensions, uBlock Origin and HTTPS Everywhere and the hotfix pushed by Mozilla re-enabled them within half an hour of disabling. I do sympathise with those who apparently lost the settings of certain addons, notably Container based ones. Fortunately I always found the UX of Containers so clunky that I never bothered.

Sticking with Firefox as an open competition to the browser monopoly is critical now more than ever before.
Well stopping bots from buying tickets and vpns so they can resell them at insane prices is exactly why events need AXS type stuff, and then they abuse that for their own anti-consumer actions
The sour science driving James Harden's vexing genius
The MMIO restrictions make sense. Thanks for the explanation!
That's messed up. Deporting somebody who has been in the country since they were a kid to a place they might not know anything about seems pretty cruel, regardless of your criminal history. After 20 years, you should be dealt with like any other citizen (however shitty that might be in the US).

On the other hand, I could see temporary deportation (with means to get back after some weeks / months) as an interesting punishment -> maybe realizing that not breaking the laws and working a shit job in the US beats scavenging for water in Africa..

Anyways, I have no advice for you, no idea what I would do in your position but I wish you luck.. hope you can get into UK or somewhere and start fresh.
Okay. Now malware addons are signed, and nothing has been accomplished.
I get maybe 3 or 4 spam calls a year. I've had the same number for over 20 years and I've given it to thousands of people. Like you, I only give it to real actual people who I want to call me, though many of them were strangers. I never placed any restrictions on how they store it or made any other effort to keep it private. Since 2009 or so I have had a google voice number in a different area code that I use to fill out forms and give to strangers, but since blocking calls to it from that same area code I let it ring through to my main number now and it also gets virtually no spam (it's possible the 3 or 4 I get are actually from this number).

My main actual trick has been to be discerning in the things I sign up for and never filling in information that's not required.
The bullet would have to be made of something really exotic in order to hide from a head-to-toe CT.
Not less safe. Perhaps not as safe at others. Such as of those where the front doesn't fell off.
See also "50 years of Data Science" by David Donoho (2015), which discusses the question of whether there's any difference between "statistics" and "data science".

http://courses.csail.mit.edu/18.337/2015/docs/50YearsDataSci...
How to fix Nature and avoid human misery: UN report
Well, isn’t that the point? The intended association is supposed to be with paleontology, a type of outdoors excursion. It’s aspirational marketing—maybe if you wear an Arc’teryx jacket you’ll be equipped to go out in the wilderness and discover ancient fossils or something.
It’s less funny because of the implied association with flatulence.
The paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07603

The disagreement existed for years already, the news is one more value from those measurements using the "distance ladder" which disagrees with the values obtained from "CMB and BAO" method. Both groups believe they haven't made any error in their measurements and can still claim so:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2019/05/03/cosm...
Linux 5.1 has been released
I get the distinction you're making, but I still feel like the actions taken by Boeing resulted in charging for a safety feature. I also never bought into Hanlon's razor; I don't accept anything Boeing claims as being true just because they claim it. I don't accept that upper management didn't know, I don't accept that they intended to add this feature in the next software update before they were forced to talk to the FAA about the first crash, and I don't accept that they didn't know about this "bug" until after the plane shipped. Like, really, they didn't test all of the indicators on an airplane before shipping it? Really? If that isn't malice, it's an unbelievable amount of incompetence. I find it more likely that the airlines conspired with Boeing to act like this was a bug rather than admit that the didn't pay for a safety feature, so Boeing gets to act like they intended to ship the software-only safety feature all along. Maybe I'm crazy, the crazy rarely know it.

> This situation is still bad. Boeing should have done something back when they discovered this bug: released a software update, given everyone the optional feature for free, or at the very least notified the pilots.

Do you feel like the failure to do this qualifies as malicious behavior?

Edit: tense.
Do random rows get pushed from the bottom on purpose? It looks like a bug.

It's still fun though. :)

Edit: It's definitely on purpose.