skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This sums up well Trump's ascension: there are a lot of people who have real needs and real opinions, and whose votes count as much as someone's in California or New York. An environment where we insist on leaving those voices unheard is what enables someone to have extreme influence.
He could have put "Show HN" in the title. But you seem unaware that this is one of the functions of this website. In fact, there's an entire section for it with a link in the header: https://news.ycombinator.com/show

Show HN is suppose to be helpful criticism and feedback. Calling it a "shittier product" is entirely uncalled for. Not just for the language, but because it's entirely unconstructive. It helps no one.
Very well said. I grew up in a below-average income family and this is exactly the viewpoint much of my extended family has. Yet they're just considered dumb for voting against their own interests and told they don't know what's good for them. Leftists have an odd way of convincing the very people they're trying to help by making fun of them; it hasn't worked out too well in the last 20 years and I don't expect it will going forward, either.
we built https://projectilo.com partly as a way to encourage collaborations between makers.
How do you know that it’s not the majority of your sources that has been mitm’ed?
I have to say I don't really care about cyclists obeying the speed limit or not, but I have had way too many near misses with bicyclists just speeding through stop signs and red lights than any other traffic hazard. Then there are the ones who kick your car if they perceive you it's a rude driver, but I do grass let's stay on subject.

I think it should be a case closed Darwin award if I hit them and kill them if I have the right of way, but it's awfully inconvenient, and their family will probably sue for whatever reason they pull out of their keister about my irresponsible behavior obeying traffic laws or something like that.

I used to know a paramedic who would make sure that the ride to the hospital for such a cyclist was super bumpy and unpleasant so as to make that experience memorable in the hopes of encouraging them not to repeat it.
What "focuses" jobs in one area though? Is it a conscious choice to place a job in a location, or is it the density of the people and the skills that allows the jobs to exist at all?

The idea that jobs can be placed anywhere flies in the face of pretty much every single city's economic development efforts over the past few decades. It's not realistic, or reasonable.

What can be placed anywhere is housing. The only reason that we don't have higher density is a small number of landowners lobbying to keep everything identical to the way that it was when they moved in, and when they moved in they had just massively changed the landscape from fruit groves to suburban sprawl. They said: change to allow me, but no more. And now they benefit massively by restricting density around them.
> And sadly, I had to break it to the girls that these two facts mean that no piano is in tune. In other words, you can tuna fish, but you can't tune a piano.

I heard a sound as if two dozen girl scouts cried out.
It may still be too expensive for devs in (very) developing countries or whatever, but I'm pretty sure there are (paid) remote desktop solutions for this. Also you can snag an old mac mini for well under $600, where I am. Like $200-300. It won't be good but that's probably better for testing anyway.
how to make friends and influence people. Funny old book, take from it what you will, but it espouses what you said.

Improv skills help, if (like me) you aren't brilliant at conversations, treat them more like a game, "yes and" to keep things flowing.
What I don't get is why r/politics is not banned yet. To call it "toxic" would be severe understatement.
We don't?
Maybe because Scala is also the name of a programming language as well as the linked software tool? Don't know, I'm just a bystander guessing.
The world is less racist now than it was in the past. What mechanism do you posit for this?
Even if it is mostly fossil fuels right now, the big win is decoupling fuel from vehicle so that the source of power can be changed without the vehicles having to change.
Kids are funny creatures.

Having two I hVe the moral right to call my two creatures.

I wonder if instead of comparing parenting to our profession, perhaps we should perhaps compare it to Game of Thrones.

Instead of “Mother of Dragons”, call all Mums/Dads by the title “Parents of Children” when they arrive at a public venue with appropriate pomp and circumstance.

Because raising kids is like a combination of herding cats and raising dragons without a user manual.

At times, especially between the age of 2-4, my kids responded as if every word out of my mouth was “Drakarys”.

Looking back at my now teenagers, I’ve been able to teach them heaps.

And they’ve been able to teach me chaos, complexity, embarrassment, exhaustion, humility, and unpredictability.

The only legit piece of advice I can offer that actually relates to the subject article is:

It’s easy to lose your cool on your kids and partner, especially after being overly diplomatic to the rest of the outside world all day/week.

Don’t.
Do you have any sort of academic citation that Jevon's paradox applies in any way to housing, or is this just an intuition?
Gossip, by definition is qualatatively different than libel or slander -- else we wouldn't be having this discussion.

The information I shared in the OP is neither libel or slander, but seems like it would be covered by gossip laws.

( is gossip a sufficiently vague term that this whole debate falls under the modern trope of creating new laws for the purposes of optics, which actually address issues that are already covered by existing legislation? )
I have never seen a SAK-before-login notice on any linux machine. Only one institutional setting, I suppose.
That sounds like a secondary management problem to have other projects lined up. Although that isn't new - one or two years is already an effectively encouraged time to look for new jobs because raises don't keep up and changing jobs is the current defacto way to raise salaries. Seems like a needless expense and hassle to all involved and yet it seems strongly preferred oddly.
Likes/Dislikes, unlike facebook clicks, are very personal and they vary with interactions, communications and level of trust in between you and your colleagues.

I would like to recommend this small exercise based on the game theory called "Evolution of Trust", https://ncase.me/trust/

At the end of this exercise there were three findings:
1. Repeat Interactions
2. Look for a possible win-win situation
3. Low Miscommunication

Definitely, as I said in the start, there is a lot more than a few factors that affect a colleague likeness/dislikeness towards you. The biggest lesson from above exercise in response to your questions would be:

"In the short term, your environment defines how people like you, but in the long term, it is you who defines the environment. So, do what you can do to improve conditions necessary to evolve trust, build relationships, communicate clearly."

If it is important that you want people to like you, then communicate clearly.

Ask them, "Have you ever thought, Why do you think any colleague should like you?". Tell them, what are the reasons you like them professionally and personally, and ask the favor back.

I do it every time whenever I have a question of like/dislike related to a colleague.
What differentiates this with the other successful JS file upload libraries?
For my situation at least (and likely for many who move to large cities), more people means more freedom in several ways. Better choice of jobs, often the ability to walk straight out of one job into another, more variety in social circles, more things to do, bigger dating pool, and improved likelihood that people have better things to concern themselves with than each other’s personal lives. It doesn’t come without downsides, but the negatives are comparatively trivial for many.
idgaf :) I try to be polite, be a good team member, and keep personal distance. My coworkers shouldn't have much information to (dis)like me or have much personal idea about me. I don't want to be a full person with them - we're professionals. Works well.
Some examples: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8844083

If I had to guess, I'd say that for every hacker news user that ships and markets an mvp, probably somewhere around 1-10% hit 150k/year from it. It's hard to find good data on this though.
I've spent a lot of time thinking about the philosophical nature of love. My abstraction is that 'love' is a sufficient level of interest at the expense of our own interest. Indeed, it is rationally irrational, and 'sufficient' is dependent on each individual.

One of the best ways I can explain the mechanism is to use a percentage analogy. For a given relationship, say you have 100% interest in yourself, than you have 0% interest in that other person. Things get interesting above the 50% mark because you are willing to take risks for the other person.

Say you are single and meet an attractive and interesting person... are you at a point where the risk of being rejected is less than the reward of a future relationship? If you have an 'interest level' of >50% I'd say yes, you would take that chance. Likewise in dating, heterosexual males tend to have interest levels that start out much higher than heterosexual females. A successful dating strategy for a heterosexual male would be to accurately gauge a heterosexual female's interest level and act as if his interest was no higher than hers, but to continually work at increasing her interest level in him.

I think the magic threshold for what is considered love is a band between 90% to 100% interest level in another person because this leaves you with between 10% to 0% interest in yourself... i.e. you are overwhelmingly putting that other person's interest before your own, up to the point where you would sacrifice your life for theirs (0% interest in yourself).

Where things can go wrong is where this level of interest is not reciprocal or at the very least balanced. 'True love' could be a perfect balance whereby you both have 100% interest level in each other and therefore your needs are met by your partner and you meet their needs.

There are exceptions, say the love of a dedicated parent may be at the 100% threshold and they would willingly sacrifice themselves when it isn't clear if their child can conceptualize that level of love, or be able to return it.

Anyhow, I have a lot more to say on the topic but I'll digress too much.

My point is, to give a framework to think through the mechanics of 'love'... and to back up some of the posters here who have made assertions such as:

* Simulated love is equivalent if you cannot tell the difference (à la Blade Runner)

* Love is a contextual perspective

* You can feel love with no reciprocation (this would cover love towards inanimate objects, and situations where your love interest is not interested)
Rad quote. BUT! Why is land going to be valuable? Robots will not use much land. People will lose salary over time as their skills are automated - which will lead to lower land prices.
They are tracked but aren’t a “first class” statistic like GDP is as far as measuring the “health” of a nation is concerned.
I disagree. An oligopoly does not need to be a cartel, but a cartel is a special case of an oligopoly, and here I'm talking of oligopoly, not the narrower case. A structural deficit in a market can lead to oligopolistic markets and exploitation without collusion, sometimes with regulation and sometimes wihtout. For more details, see (for example) here: https://www.diffen.com/difference/Cartel_vs_Oligopoly
We do.

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/suicide/resources.htm...
Motorists run red lights differently to cyclists, because you are at the front of the lights you just don't see it. However, watch any lights in the UK and you will be shocked at how many motorists waltz through after the lights have gone red, waaay after the amber light has gone out.

As a cyclist you filter to the front so you just don't see this as often as it happens. Statistically there are more cars on the roads than bicycles so the majority or red light jumping is almost certainly by cars. On a bike it is just a bit more blatant with turns on left (UK) made that motorists would never do if there was a red light stopping them.

Jumping pedestrian crossings - 'pelican crossings' - is another thing. Cyclists get this wrong but there is also a lot of common sense, if people have crossed already, why stop? Plus if the traffic was cyclists and buses then these crossings would not be needed.

Funny the flack you have got here.
As an industrial specialist term, sure. I'm not sure if you've noticed but the term "off-gassing" now has a more general meaning & life of its own outside of that domain. I've heard people use it for situations up to and including stinky clothes and flatulence over the last few years.
Why would we ever want to Tor into a non-DNSSEC like 1.1.1.1?

https://egberts.github.io/egberts/articles/public-nameserver...
Several random unrelated answers:

It can be pretty hard to know whether work friendships are genuine. It’s worth assessing what you want, and whether it actually matters to you. It’s much easier to get what you want when you know what it is.

Also turn the question around and ask yourself whether you care about others at work, and whether you like them and enjoy them. Are you letting them know in verbal or non-verbal ways? How often are you putting yourself in a place to be judged? For example, do you invite coworkers to your place for drinks/dinner/games? Some indicator might be whether people will do things with you outside of work, if you want that.

Work relationships, like school, usually are happenstance. You’re all employees making a living and the company controls making a living. It should be expected that some work friendships are a matter of employment or situational convenience and not deep lasting bonds.

Personally, I do feel somewhat liked at work, but it’s starting to matter less to me. I do usually try to be likable and also contribute, and those things do help. They way I actually know whether people liked me usually comes much later, often after I’ve left the company. The way I know is by finding who’s interested in catching up with me on social media, or getting together to hang out or reminisce, or even start a new side project.

Seeking out some people with shared interests outside of work can help. At one company, I started a mountain biking club, and made some friends by welcoming newcomers and helping people learn how to ride.

It has in the past felt like more people liked me when I’ve been a manager. That also fades faster and becomes apparent that it’s more often ‘purely by interest’ as you put it.
What they never mention in these breathless articles is that your multi-billion-dollar tokamak power-generation system will be bathing itself in high-energy neutron flux, essentially destroying itself over only a few years, leaving a multi-hundred-ton radioactive husk to be somehow disposed of, or at least kept the rain from eroding and leaching radioactive slag into the water table.

Probably they would need to be built underground to begin with, so they would already be buried when they have been used up.

The pB reactor designs that emit mostly charged particles do not suffer from this problem, much, but get overwhelmingly less investment. There is a reason: the main purpose of the tokamak is a jobs creation program for high-neutron-flux physicists, to maintain a population to draw upon for weapons work. There was, and is, no intention ever to actually use tokamaks as an electrical-energy source.

Many involved will not agree with this. It is easy to get caught up in the technical challenge and leave worrying about practicalities and true motivations to others.
What is the opposite of hero project? I didn't see one project in my life that doesn't have a BDFL style person in charge for my 10 years programming experience...
> We can never get perfect octaves from a stack of fifths because no power of 3/2 will ever give us a power of 2.

Yep, none of them will ever be in the same ring. This is actually quite similar to the reason you can't trisect an angle, square a circle, or double a cube.
I always raise an eyebrow at statements like ‘most early greeks’, because who knows how many of them actually read Euclid or had any exposure to math at all.
No, people at work don't like me, and they don't enjoy my presence, but that's okay. I act professionally, I do my best to make good technical decisions, and I assist others when asked for help. I'm generous with my time. I receive positive peer & manager reviews, but when all is said and done only one thing matters: no one keeps in touch with me after work ceases to be the shared medium within which communications usually take place.

It's difficult to estimate how many people I've worked with. I've built good rapport with dozens of individuals throughout the years, but I'm still in touch with only one person.

This doesn't bother me, as my personality has nothing to do with work. My opinions, to which I'm entitled, are equally upsetting to both sides of the political divide. I don't take part in office parties, and I'll never join my colleagues on a company-sponsored beach retreat. My personality is my own, and liking me isn't a prerequisite to working productively together towards shared goals.

All this is to say: work isn't life, and life isn't work.
Time Lords
Outwardly, strive to be a professional. Inwardly, strive to not give a damn about what others like or dislike.
I think the issue you are pointing at is that you want people to care more about these kinds of statistics, and less about GDP. That's a very different and much harder problem to solve than the one implied by you first post (that we don't measure them in the first place).
Cringeworthy Words to Cut from Online Copy (Product Landing Pages)
I don't know what to say... There is no way I am clever enough to make something like this up.
Maybe when I embellished the hero and genius part.
I would think that would be quite a good error rate. Especially when considering people in the hospital are often not in good health, possibly making their veins more difficult to find.

That is assuming by error you mean missing the vein. If error is defined as a fatal complication, then 1/1000 is terrifying.
Yes, but that brings into question how large a project needs to be for the hero model not to be feasible anymore. They surveyed over 1 100 projects and I would guess a significant portion of them would be counted as "large". I found their raw data on github here, https://github.com/ai-se/Git_miner, although it is in some weird .xlsx format so I can't verify if my guess is true.
> I am not sure why 0 is not considered a prime number in this context.

The greatest common divisor of any two primes is one. To say that two numbers are coprime, is to say their greatest common divisor is 1. If we considered 0 a prime, it would be a bit weird (and messy) that two prime (0 and any other prime number) numbers aren't coprime.
It looks like we just disagree on definitions -- my definition of love entails commitment and obligation, yours doesn't.

But there are so many existing ways to communicate your definition of love: you're so rad! hanging out with you makes me feel great! I'm having such a good time! or any of the things you wrote responding to my comment above. Why take love and make it synonymous (ignoring issues of correctness, I think the current popular meaning of love, expressed between two romantically involved persons, is closest to the "serious" one I have in mind)?

I think we should generally be careful using words that may have charged meanings for people -- not for the sake of anonymous third parties not present, but because one of the two parties may be such a person.
> I think it should be a case closed Darwin award if I hit them and kill them if I have the right of way

I'll be sure to stay away from you.

> I used to know a paramedic who would make sure that the ride to the hospital for such a cyclist was super bumpy and unpleasant so as to make that experience memorable in the hopes of encouraging them not to repeat it.

That's sadistic. Most of the time it's not the cyclist's fault.
If we can't get precise time securely and do not have real-time clock, it does not mean, there are no options left.

For instance, device may be booted for the first time in secure controlled environment and synchronize time fro trusted source.

Then, every N seconds (like 60 to 3600), device will write current time to local file. Most devices have some kind of writable local storage.

Any next synchronization will not be able to return time before already experienced moment. Certificate expiration will actually work, with a bit higher tolerance of a few hours.
I used to keep my bike outside and it went a couple of years with no maintenance to speak of. Maybe some tyre pumping. As long as the bikes are not vandalised / stolen / chucked in canals etc I think the economics could work.
Who hires someone with the expectation of failure?
On the Future of Tesla and Full Self Driving Cars
What’s gender have to do with this?
Some criticism on the evangelism of the Farmer suicide problem in the US is mentioned in Farm to Taber 2.1 part 1 - 21m39 - https://www.farmtotaber.com/episodes/2019/1/29/fitness-cultu... -

"[The 2016 cdc study] counted a lot of farmworker suicides as farmer suicides...so what's really happening is there is a suicide epidemic in migrant farmworkers. Through the magic of data-fudging it became a rash of farmer suicides, and then through the magic of the farm lobby farmworker suicides became a federal opportunity for funding farmers. Who when they're in legitimate financial trouble already have a thing we all have called bankruptcy law..."

Googling for the 2016 cdc farm suicide study reveals they have retracted the study back in June 2018: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cdc-retracts-study-that-found-f... https://newfoodeconomy.org/farmer-suicide-crisis-cdc-study/

Sarah Taber had a recent twitter thread also questioning the therapy efforts as possibly ineffective if those with power in a farming community exert toxic traits: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102961401507782658
Not all of these sources come through the Internet. Think GPS, GSM, radio time signals (DCF-77 or the likes).
Everyone is one bad quarter or Jack Welch style manager from being kicked to the street. When you think about it, none of this really matters.