skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
While soy oil is quite common, soy allergies seem to be to the protein, not the oil (or lecithin for the chocolate lovers out there). According to wikipedia,

> Some food contains soy-based ingredients that are not considered allergens under national regulations, and thus not labeled, for example, foods cooked in highly refined soy oil, which is considered safe due to absence of soy protein.
Firefox already uses irregexp, though it's unlikely they'd use the whole of V8 since SpiderMonkey is so tightly integrated into the runtime.
My point is that he claims C can't do closures or pass them either. Follow the thread.

As far as being turing complete, CSS is supposedly that, also, so good luck with that.
Having kids is not essential to society.

Could you please explain what happens in, say, 80 years (or so) if we collectively stopped having kids? The answer is this: human beings cease to exist. Now, that may be something you view as a goal to achieve, and in the absolutely trivial (and meaningless) sense that everything (including our existence as a species) is optional you'd have a point. Beyond that trivial and meaningless sense, however, you're simply arguing about how many children we should have.
So, you are implying these are my responses even though I never actually wrote them? How is that different from telling me I did not supply citations?
I've heard that theory, but I can't say I understand it. Let's say USDT goes to 0 instantly. All traders lose their parked money. I can see a crash from panic and from people recouping their lost safe money, but what else does it have to do with with cryptocurrencies?
كلمات اغنية انا اتعودت – هايدي موسى
Americas True Debt 72T Dollars in Debt
Yes. The fine needs to take into account how much Facebook would stand to lose if the case went to trial and they were found guilty, setting a precedent for future actions against them. That seems like it could result in near-unlimited liability for Facebook. The fine for avoiding an admission of wrongdoing should be set equal to the expected value of all that liability, based on an estimate of the probability of winning the case.
Not being a fan of SaaS, I applaud your intentions, but want to add a note of warning.

As a case study, Atlassian do 'source available' with self-hosted or cloud-hosted options. This is a result of history, and I suspect Atlassian wishes they were cloud-only. The self-hosted option is de-emphasised on the website, costs more than SaaS per-user at most usage points. The Cloud product codebases has been totally redesigned over the last 10 years for horizontal scalability. Cloud-only features are rapidly being added, while development on the self-hosted codebase languishes (Atlassian's public bugtracker is full of trivial feature requests ignored for years, my favourite being https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFSERVER-27618).

As for source code for self-hosters, while the bulk of it is still available, it isn't buildable because Atlassian routinely neglect to publish build dependencies, and they don't publish source for new libraries like Confluence's real-time editor.

In Atlassian's defense: consider the costs of offering self-hosted. SaaS products these days are built on top of other IaaS and SaaS: you can't do that without adding abstractions (docker/containers) or finding self-hosted equivalents. You need to maintain installation and administration documentation, and offer support for weird customer-environment-specific problems. Your build infrastructure needs to spit out both SaaS-deployable and self-hosted versions. Your billing systems need to handle both cases. Even your license agreements need to address two possibilities.

OTOH, while software companies love SaaS, many of their customers (particularly large, conservative ones) do not. Having a self-hosted option can thus become a competitive moat, since 99% of your competitors won't offer it.

So good luck with your strategy, if you feel you can pay the costs of offering that flexibility.
Cox Introduces 'Elite Gamer' Internet Fast Lane
beware the spam that comes with this... you'll want to block sales@example.com, etc...
> I don’t like honors.

It's not about honors, but about things like:

"Probably their most famous study was about trying to stop the infiltration from North Vietnam into the South," ... "The problem was that North Vietnamese troops and supplies were hard to find beneath the dense jungle canopy. The Jasons' solution was to develop a system of remote sensors that could be airdropped into the jungle and provide intelligence on the enemy. The program, like much to do with Vietnam, was controversial and didn't work perfectly. But it laid the groundwork for modern electronic warfare"

Compare with, for example:

https://www.ted.com/talks/malcolm_gladwell/transcript?langua...

Also, I wouldn't be surprised that there is a connection between "They were offering the opposite of cheerleading" and "JASON also produced early work on the science of global warming and acid rain." (second quote from Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JASON_(advisory_group) )
Be hilarious if it relied on an algorithm that needs mining.
Ask HN: What's the most valuable skill to pair with programming?
I'm a full stack dev (mostly Python/React)/software consultant. When I think about skills growth, usually that means new technical skills.

I was reading a blog post by patio11 in which he talks about his work assisting with A/B testing and email campaigns. It made me wonder, purely as a intellectual exercise, if my goal was to maximize my weekly pay as a consultant, what skills would I be wise to pair with fullstack programming (other than sales)? Design? Copywriting? Marketing? More programming?
Crimes committed when he was ages 17-20, according to the article. He was only a minor for the first year.
> Have you never committed a bug before?

Engineers who make mistakes that harm people are still responsible for the mistakes they made. You cannot just claim "it was a bug" and get off scot free if your code harms someone or otherwise breaks the law. Also there's no need for this sarcastic tone, "have you never..?"

> I doubt it was an engineer who deliberately removed the text but kept the contact import functionality.

Why would you doubt that? I personally think that situation sounds quite likely. But either way we're just speculating.

Also, don't ignore the part of the parent comment that discusses the manager's (and implied other decision markers) that result in the decision being made to make an illegal change to the code.

Engineer, or manager, or QA assistant - someone or some group of people will have made the change. And "oops that was a bug" doesn't count. Corporations and their employees must be held to the same laws and standards to which the rest of us are held. "Ooops I didn't mean to do that" doesn't fly as an excuse to break the law.
>or the fact that when the crimes were commited he was a minor

One of the charges he plead guilty to had him updating and still selling the banking malware in 2015, when he was 20, and was already acting publicly as a whitehat.
Yet they’ve been there forever. People don’t simultaneously decide that they’ve hit their peak. They do get pissed off in clusters though.

The more straightforward guess is that perhaps there are problems with some aspect of working on this team.
What's the easiest way to get access to the basic HTML view? I used to be able to switch to basic HTML following the link in the footer, but it's gone now.
Having a job is not relevant. It's about _requiring_ a salary. If every single person _had_ to work but you removed the financial incentive almost nobody would do their exact current duties or work their exact current hours. They would switch things to be happier. The more of a financial incentive there is the harder it is to make that switch. And the entire point is that you can lessen the financial incentive by lowering your ongoing costs and you can completely eliminate it sooner by saving and investing. Imagining a straw-man that slaves away and saves too much is not helpful to anybody except as a 'gotcha, your rule-of-thumb life advice is wrong in one case' pedantry. It seems ridiculous in a context where seemingly nobody saves money or plans for retirement. Nobody over-saves. This is made-up smug-bait peddled to those who are far from saving too much and want to feel good about it. "Can you believe this guy cuts his own hair? Scoff!"

Your last sentence is also a straw-man. You are attempting to debunk what constitutes a click-bait headline. Nobody will defend that ridiculous, oversimplified, universally-extended argument. What is even your point? The full statement requires so many variables to fully qualify, what truth are you attempting to convey?
The amount of space that messages take up can be configured in Settings > Display density. The screenshots look like they're using "Comfortable". I use "Compact".
I posted this, and definitely wasn't thinking of it as clickbait, or even as controversial. As Dan says, I think this history is both intellectually interesting and relevant to my work as an engineer, today.

Over time, as the technology of photography was invented and iteratively improved, film formulations came to work better for taking photographs of light-skinned people than of dark-skinned people. Inventors and engineers didn't set out to disadvantage dark-skinned people specifically. But it happened anyway.

In the relatively short history of commercial "AI", we've already seen examples of machine learning systems that followed a similar development path. Non-representative data sets[0], replicating existing bias[1], over-fitting data sets to the point where the outcomes violate non-discrimination laws[2], etc.

One way to help avoid making these mistakes is to think about how they were made in the past, in other engineering contexts.

[0]-https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/the-u...
[1]-https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/10/17958784/ai-recruiting-t...
[2]-https://www.vox.com/2019/3/21/18275746/facebook-settles-ad-d...
What technology in what language are you comparing them against?
your first two sentences are spot-on. The third was really iffy (and not true). The last line is completely false.
Same, but this can definitely get long, ala

& > div, & a, & a { &:hover } etc.
Volkswagen quite publicly use that very solution from IBM, and there’s numerous other examples of it being used in supply chain management, which absolutely isn’t the only useful application of blockchains.

It’s not even clear if you know what a blockchain is, and your comments on its usefulness are just as extreme and misinformed as the evangelists who say it can be used to solve any problem under the sun.
Web developers have a long history of doing it just because they can, not necessarily because they should.
I'm actually kind of surprised to see the only reference to lavabit, in all of the comments, is that it was shutdown. It seems to be back and their server is open source: https://github.com/lavabit/magma although you can pay for their hosted version also: https://lavabit.com
> To the best of my knowledge, the only accepted laws of physics relate to the 3 laws of thermodynamics.

How about conservation of momentum?
Following parts are still under a question mark:

- sufficiency of compute;
- software architecture;
- complexity budget;
- sensor suite;
- datacenter.

The rest seem to be done right.
> I also have always had a problem with the dismissal of FTL travel. “It cannot be therefore it must not be” is not at all sound logic given our history with technology.

There is an important difference here. In the history of technology, "high-level disciplines" may sometimes be "overthrown" and completely be rewritten frequently, making something impossible to be possible. But it rarely occurs in foundation of mechanics. Even it has been revisited multiple times in the past 200 years, things that were impossible in the past is still impossible now, and possibly in the future, at least from a macroscopic scale.

The mere existence of a nuclear submarine navigating the ocean in 1800s England, as an object, is compatible with the Newton's Laws of Motion. Although nuclear reaction itself violates other known physics at the time, But if compared to Newton's Laws of Motion, they are not as important. And nowadays, Einstenian mechanics have replaced Newtonian mechanics, and it has the same status as Newtonian mechanics had before.

That is, among all rational conclusions, those that is directly based on the foundation of mechanics have the most "weight" than anything else, so comparing to "640 KiB is enough for everyone", "humans have no means to survive in the vacuum of outer space", "atomic weapons are impossible", "supersonic flights are impossible", "cooling to absolute zero is impossible", "accelerating to c is impossible", the last statement is more likely than other statements.

This is why I believe "no-FTL" argument has a strong point.

But well, I lied... It's well-known that general relativity does not directly forbid one to wrap the spacetime to create worm-holes. So I agree with you, the "no-FTL" has a strong point, but it's a non-issue anyway.
Makeup gone right with a little wrong
Hey Guys go follow
@_anarasconxo
@_anaxoxo13
or check out her Youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/acardenasrascon
When I got my first job, I did similar. 9 am to 2 am straight for 2 weeks with 6-days week. Reaching home back around 3.30 am. Then waking up at 7.30 am and reaching office again at 9 am.

I was replacement for senior dev, who was leaving on very short notice. Noticeably, I used to eat very little than usual. Caffeine and nicotine helped me go thr' it.
But now I feel like stupid for being so naive that time.
It's also not all about 0-60 (at least for the motorsport market).
Tesla's seem to still have issues under sustained high performance driving[1]. There's many cars with significantly slower 0-60 times that smash the Model S around Nürburgring due to batteries overheating and being put into limp mode.
As the technology improves no doubt this problem will go away, but it doesn't look like we're there just yet.

For perspective the Model S made it around the track in about 10 minutes, an old diesel Jaguar S Type with a 0-60 time of 8.5~ seconds did it in about 9 [2 & 3].

[1] https://insideevs.com/news/323053/tesla-model-s-fails-to-lap...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_N%C3%BCrburgring_Nords...

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_S-Type
A question: How many people are there out there that understand what these devices are whom are in need of a(nother) symbol reference?
Good piece. I would take argument over his asserted correlation between the improved accuracy of drone strikes and the 10x increase in attacks on U.S. Forces.
This thing sounds awesome! After hearing it, I am truly amazed at the level to which AI has evolved! It's good music... Heck, it's not just good music, it's potentially borderline (with some tweaks by human professionals) great music!

But, despite this potential greatness, if there's a problem, it's that this AI only produces music...

What this AI composer really needs is an AI lyricist to write lyrics for the songs it composes!

Sort of like an AI Lerner to it's AI Loewe...

An AI Hammerstein to it's AI Rodgers...

An AI Gilbert to it's AI Sullivan...

An AI Tim Rice to it's AI Andrew Lloyd Weber...

An AI Robert Plant to it's AI Jimmy Page...

An AI Keith Richards to it's AI Mick Jagger...

An AI Paul McCartney to it's AI John Lennon...

An AI Bernie Taupin to it's AI Bernie Taupin...

An AI James Hetfield to it's AI Lars Ulrich...

An AI Wierd Al Yankovic... to it's... AI Wierd Al Yankovic... <g>

You know, an AI Assistant for this... AI Assistant... <g>

Well, an AI Assistant to write lyrics that is... An AI "Lyrcistant"... <g>

Come on, I know there's someone in the AI world who can do this! But it might be a bit challenging... the AI would not only have to write poetry, but it would have to match that poetry to all of the various characteristics of the music...

Not an easy task, to say the least!

But, for the right AI researcher... an interesting, challenging, worthy one!

(I think I hear 2001's "Daisy Bell" playing in the background...)

By the way... disclaimer: I am an AI. That is, An AI wrote this message on HN.

No, I'm kidding about that! But... how would you know? (insert ominous sounding music here) <g>
Saying that the app asks is not accurate. It's not presented as a choice and it's not clear what will happen when you continue.
And why wasn't that disclosed to customers prior to today?
> "Def[ies] the known laws of physics", is a good sign your imagination is too narrow, or your understanding of physics too small.

I don't know but I would assume they are usually referring to conservation of momentum being violated, rather than something like the 2nd law of thermodynamics or the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Which is pretty easy to see unless you have reason to believe there is something rather crazy happening that you cannot see (like I imagine a neutron being emitted at >99% of the speed of light to cancel some change in momentum that you otherwise can't explain).
Whenever I get a bug in the production system and I have all the required information in log - that time I thought I became better at programming.
If you've issued long-term bonds and rates go up, you can buy back your own bonds below par and earn a profit (depending on rate movements etc). And when it matures, you can likely issue more stock if the cash flow situation of your company hasn't changed. The only route for insolvency is if you've used debt issuance to pull more cash out of the company than the actual equity slice should have been worth.
I didn't like it (which is why they didn't get my damned password), but they were pretty open about what they planned to do with your credentials.

The problem isn't how open they are, it's that most people don't understand what the harvesting means. Facebook could have asked for the sacrifice of the firstborn and people would have snapped it up on the prospect of a few likes on their fake online alterego. It's human nature and the HN echo chamber exists far outside that normalcy. Most people don't "get it" (through no fault of their own) and that's why it's dangerous [edit] and effective.
> "other than sales"
...You can maximize your weekly pay most by improving your Sales.

Otherwise you would want to carve out a niche, become incredibly good at that one thing and after you have mastered something that few people can do really well... learn how to sell that better too.
don't worry, dang is not adding anything to the conversation. He just enjoys virtue signaling. Hard!
Sometimes interviewing a candidate as a team can have small benefits such as strengthening / making explicit what values are important to the team among the participants. This assumes that the team is operating in a full transparency, which is often seen in a small startup. I had the experience that after being eng. interviewer a few times I felt more glued and aligned with the team.
None of these things equate to "collected and sold on third-party exchanges".
There's something about work.. I always felt better at low level producing jobs (bakery, burgery) because I knew that my work was quantifiable (and predictable). It felt like a robot to many but to me it felt like the difference between superstition and arithmetic. There I couldn't say I worked N but in reality only worked M because there was no way to be confused; it was obvious and there were traces of my work that were function of time.
It is unclear to me why there is "inherited bias" in film/photography technology. Inherited bias implies that the biased film practices of the past have spilled over into the present, causing further racial bias in photography.

While it's true that photography in the past was racially biased, it is unclear why modern photography is still racially biased. It may just be genuinely harder to photograph dark skin, after all, the article even says that attempts have been made to fix racial bias in photography.

All of this being said, even if photography is not racially biased and the issue is more technological rather than social, the problem should still be fixed.

I could also be wrong about all of this, and in reality dark skin is just as easy to photograph as light skin, but the article did not give a modern example of the racially biased "Shirley card"--except for facial recognition technology, but I didn't really consider that photography in the traditional sense.

Edit:

While modern photography may not be racially biased, Kwindla does make an excellent point that machine learning is replicating the past mistakes of photography.
Are there screenshots or something of this "asking for email password" thing the article talks about? I feel like anyone who sees a facebook page asking for their email password should already feel a bit warned and skeptical. I had personally never seen such a thing until 3 years ago when I deactivated my account. Is this a new thing?
Amazon's worker tracking system can fire people without human interaction
For the incremental development the author describes, you can do that atop any GNU/Linux host platform on which your CL implementation runs.

To play with a bootable user experience, before you've replaced the host kernel and device support, you can strip down something like Debian Live. I previously did this for a Racket-based living room appliance project. A simpler example, without Racketisms, that uses only 2 shell scripts (you only need 1; the other is to play partition table tricks), is my earlier Debian Live variant: https://www.neilvandyke.org/lildeb/

I'm also a fan of a variation on the author's approach: have your better/different language get a foothold on a working GNU/Linux system, alongside traditional apps, in a system the user could use as their daily driver, and incrementally replace all of userland. This was my plan for PostmarketOS (though I've suspended my open source work on "non-employable" things): https://www.neilvandyke.org/postmarketos/

The author's approach also seems valid, and worth playing with.
No, not any more than eyes are. At least, with a neutral projection surface.

But once you add technology for recording photographs on film, or creating and displaying digital images, there's potential for racism. I know next to nothing about photography. But it seems pretty clear that building stuff that works well for everyone is a hard problem.
https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/QuestionsAndAnswers#Does_...