skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I didn’t kill any mall. If these stores provided a better experience and actually tried to be competitive the slightest, it would be worth my while.

Just face it, you did kill the mall with this consumer attitude.

Now if you don't care about malls and you're fine with them going extinct, keep it up. Don't act like you're not responsible. What you buy and how you buy it shapes the world around you.

I don't personally care much for visiting malls, but then again in many pointless cities across the severely underpopulated United States, malls are the only "public space" there is.
All you need is one or two of those generations to have more than one kid and the same dynamic that makes it unaffordable for everyone will make it unaffordable for at least one branch of that generational family.
Some of the older RealSense depth cameras are already integrated in laptops and tablets
The 7+ is from early 2018. The iPhone 7 likely outperforms the 7+, and it will probably have software support for longer.
If you like this, I can highly recommend Jeff Quitney’s collection https://vimeo.com/jeffquitney Days of fun and educating content from a bygone era.
The only Evelyn that comes to my mind is “Waugh”...
> To begin with, "causing harm" is still essentialyl subjective. An anti-vaxxer wouldn't think they're "causing harm" at all. You're still basing yourself on whether or not you agree with someone or not.

It's not about whether you think you're causing harm... It's about whether you objectively are.

Anti-vaxxers have led to the resurgence of diseases once thought to be extinct.

White supremacists carry out acts of terrorism/violence against people of color, and lobby against laws that would improve the quality of life for minority groups (sometimes, they are actually the elected officials voting on these laws). And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

People who defend sex offenders let alleged rapists get elected to the highest legal office in the land just because of party affiliation.

That is in no way comparable to using Apache over nginx.
My understanding is that the big problems are 1. existing credentialing bodies and 2. the AMA, which wants to restrict entry into the profession and chiefly does so through the residency system. The physician shortage is a bug to the larger society but a feature to existing doctors, who wish to charge patients more and raise their own salaries. But see also https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/08/upshot/a-doctor-shortage-....
Dude, if I just want to put a page online, the last thing I want to have to deal with is SSH...

Have browser, will content.
But the attitude of "can you compare it with X?" is fine, and is what most of those comments are actually doing.
My co-workers thought it hilarious to line up clips of people being run over by trains or having their throat cut, then tell unsuspecting people that they had something very important to show them. Management didn't like being bothered by people complaining about what they viewed as guys being guys. Until they got an eyeful of guys doing guys, that is.
"Sunlight is the best disinfectant"

Unless, of, course, the disease is cancer.
June 1985 was already several months after the end of the military government.
Yes, as routers generally only speak Ethernet and WiFi while IoT devices speak Zigbee, BT/LE, Powerline, 433 MHz custom protocols, a bunch of low power WAN protocols and for the more professional/industry settings CANbus, Profibus and more.
we all remember and respect 15-213 :)
Wrike has an emoji picker, but we don't use it much in our group because it's so small that it's hard to make out what the characters are supposed to be.
Some people have money in their PayPal stored-balance component, and it's easier to spend it out than to have them credit it back to a bank account.

I suspect some people use it as an "off the books" account in family/spousal relationships. They'd have a fit if the credit card had a $300 charge, but they don't even know you had $300 in PayPal balance from selling stuff on eBay and can go to town.
> because of cheap labor, no medalions, and less empty rides they could offer their drivers.

You forget that dispatcher already take a pretty big cut already and I don't know where you live, but here in Montreal, we have a bunch of them that are all profitable. Sure dispatcher started to makes apps, but they only cover a tiny market (thus the apps is more expensive to develop per ride than Uber) and plenty of their clients prefer calling, thus an human operator (which Uber doesn't has to pay for).

Our government also decided a few years ago to force them to accept credit/debit card. One of my friend worked for one of the operator that rented terminal to taxis. They were profitable too.

If Uber can't make money by being much more efficient in MULTIPLE already profitable business and that's WORLDWIDE, there's something pretty wrong.
> Millenials stopped going to malls, ergo millenials killed the mall. That's just a neutral statement of fact.

It's not neutral at all. I could just as easily say "Boomer-age owners of retail failed to adapt to changing tastes, ergo boomer-age owners of retail killed the mall." Totally different implications based on wording.
in my experience `LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8` is sufficient for python. not sure if that slows down grep or not.
Gérons book is both entertaining and educational, I really enjoy it so far.
And I think I had read that Whatsapp used Erlang because Facebook Chat was using Erlang and they thought Facebook knew what they were doing and decided to use the same tech. What a twist
>>A working family living in a city for generations shouldn’t be displaced by taxes on unrealized gains.

Why? What entitles someone to being in a certain location?
> The downside of this is that some part of the project might fall apart if someone leaves, because no one else can take over.

This is the reason, i think, corporate world HATES with passion such devs. Even tho they need them to meet deadlines.

It also gives a bit too much power in negotiating to the employee which is also seen as "bad" in corpo.
> The main thing that makes an apartment luxury is location and being new; new construction in the Bay Area (except maybe an isolated single unit or small development in a particularly blighted area) is luxury inherently.

Ok, so a 1 bedroom 2nd story apartment in San Francisco in a new building without air conditioning and without a dedicated doorman that costs $4000 a month is luxury but a $1200 a month apartment on the 25th floor of a highrise in Atlanta with a view of the entire city, a dedicated doorman that will bring groceries and packages to your door and air conditioning isn't?

Or are they both?

The San Francisco option is to be clear not a luxury apartment. It's just overpriced.

So what I'm saying is

> The main thing that makes an apartment luxury is location and being new; new construction in the Bay Area (except maybe an isolated single unit or small development in a particularly blighted area) is luxury inherently

this statement is flat out wrong.

>So, yes, that's literally the most cost effective way to increase the supply of affordable housing for anybody but the rich.

Just so we stop using terms that were invented for the sake of propaganda such as "affordable housing" and "luxury apartments" why don't we call a thing what it really is?

Affordable housing - a limited supply of apartments taken off the market and given off in a lottery to a lucky few who get to pay less than market rate for rent. The rent is subsidized by the rest of the people living in the city.

Luxury apartment - a normal apartment that is overpriced due to artificial scarcity. This artificial scarcity exists because of people using direct democracy to vote for laws that they believe to be in their interest without any understand of the second or third order effects of the law.
I can certainly see why you might think that!

As for the way it normally goes, both real flesh people and non-people people generally pay taxes on the value of their real property. Which strikes me as, on the whole, reasonably fair and equitable. California has decided that nobody should have to, provided they've had that real property long enough. The change going to voters would leave real flesh people exempt(-ish).

On the one hand, having corporations pay actual taxes will help state and local governments uncouple their budgets from the stock market some. On the other hand, there's already a problem where cities are incentivized to permit offices over housing, and this seems likely to make that worse...
Big companies always innovate but take little risk.

That new smell for dove soap. The thicker papertowl bounce came out with are all examples of innovations.

Changing the world.. that's a dangerous idea companies want no part of.
I work for a good platform. It's name is Textbroker. The positive part is in the name: it's a broker. It provides a marketplace for writers to find work. It mediates the relationship between writers and clients.

I don't chase my pay. It takes me seconds to request my pay once a week.

I don't fight with difficult, unreasonable clients trying to screw me over. I let Textbroker handle them.

I have tried to promote their model as a good model. I have tried to suggest people should create businesses like it for other types of work.

So far, it seems like no one is listening to me.
I like emoji, and I enjoyed using them for a while. But since it's become politicized by the manufactured outrage industry, I just stick to my old-school 1980's emoticons.

Nobody ever got fake offended by :)
Boeing didn't tell Southwest or FAA re: disabled critical 737 MAX safety alerts
You can (should) also give leadership to juniors on appropriately sized projects. That's how you make better programmers.
This article is one paragraph with an additional three paragraphs of fluff padding. Why on earth did we collectively upvote it?
Things to Do When Medium Doesn't Curate Your Articles – Imposter Syndrome
Why would the opposite necessarily be "on the fence"? This is both a false dichotomy and false analogy. The vast majority of users aren't "on the fence", meaning the more likely person on the other end of the argument is avidly anti-racist.

What if said "on-the-fence" individual visits stormfront? Who's to argue against it there? No one.

> nothing is stopping you from searching them out to do so.

Except there is. Racist forums are walled gardens. They're safe-spaces for white supremacists. They don't invite dissent.

> Daryl Davis went I to people's homes and met them in person to befriend and sometimes "convert" them. It wasn't accidental cross pollination. He explicitly reached out.

In person, correct. If this is to be analogous to the real world, other users on a popular social media platform like reddit are your neighbors. And obscure radical forums are like impenetrable cult compounds. You can reach them out online, when in plain view, but this isn't as easily accomplished in every medium.

More importantly, you're framing racism as an infectious view that could plague just about any innocent bystander. It's more fragile than that, in terms of logical merit (there is none). I think the exposure makes it more vulnerable.
There is only a catch-22 if we need _that time source_ to verify its time.

That's not how things work, though: we have hundreds available, so there is no catch-22 whatsoever: we check multiple sources and go with the majority vote, then flag an error for any outlier(s).
I'll take unit testing and static and dynamic analysis tools for $800.
I understand that there are training/certification processes for medical coders and I expect that to certainly help. But is there a basis to the claim that errors are occasional and that coding is done correctly? Or is that just an anecdotal assertion? My observations are just anecdotal, but do come from a fair amount of on the ground experiences.

I expect their to be limits on the effectiveness of that sort of thing. My original comment dealt with the complexity issue, but there's how well that training/certification ages over time... such that common codes are handled well due to daily reinforcement, but less common codes will tend to fare worse. Unless there are required maintenance trainings and re-certification requirements (I'm not aware of that either way), I expect on average for there to be issues in practice.

While there has been medical procedure coding of some sort for a very long time, this rather more complex coding that we're generally discussing with this story is still in rather early days. Nonetheless, I would be interested to see an actual study on how the complexity of coding systems like ICD fare at actually capturing the information they try to; I just tried searching the ACM Digital Library, but didn't find anything... though that could just be weakness of my search terms.
Can you run e.g. PHP scripts on Neocities? I know this is why I quickly outgrew Angelfire and kin as a kid....
I initially read: "Why you can't trust New York Times." Might've been an interesting article too.
As a total layman, I think this is my favorite definition so far.
Looks like LeetCode is for technical/coding questions. Whereas, Interview School is for non-technical questions like behavioral questions. So, instead of solving coding questions, we are presenting you with a questions like "Where do you see yourself in 5 years?", in which you would then answer while being recorded. We then run it through some Watson APIs so that we could give you some grading based on your tone, confidence, and the number of filler words you used. So you can practice on that aspect of your interview. We also take questions that have already been reported from that specific question and company.
In our team we have two enthusiasts who propagate ReasonML for front-end development. Personally I like many its features (for instance, pattern-matching) that JS/TS is missing. There are a lot of talks about it in React community. We even tried it in some small projects and seems like we could start to use it wider. But situations like this described in the article make us concerned. We are following developments in ReasonML community, but for the moment we don't dare to start adopting it.
You're assuming that the basis for their hate is rationality. If they were rational people, they wouldn't be racists/fascists/hate groups/etc. Assuming you're correct that having "some success" removed people from such a path, it's still just drops in a bucket. Recycling the contents of a dumpster won't stop climate change.
> People who are laid off don't just quit the union; unions often offer additional support for members who are laid off including aid for job seekers.

What kind of job seeking assistance are you imagining in a car service union? The services themselves already tell you when work is available automatically and the problem is that there are more workers than there are jobs at the higher wage.

Moreover, if you're going to offer things like that then you have to gatekeep union membership and then your problem isn't that people quit the union, it's that they can't even get into it if they wanted to, and would then happily take any non-union work they can get.

> A great example of how unions exist in a competitive market is SAG-AFTRA which by your own argument simply shouldn't exist.

It shouldn't exist if Hollywood is a competitive market. But it isn't. There are a handful of major studios that make substantially all of the major motion pictures and control the major channels of distribution and promotion.

Before the internet it was effectively impossible to strike out on your own as a high grossing studio. It's still extremely difficult using traditional channels. What we're seeing now is individuals doing it using platforms like YouTube -- but they're hardly making anything like what Hollywood does and the various YouTube celebrities are generally not SAG members either.
You should give leadership/ownership/responsibility of smaller components of the larger vision to juniors or people new to the team.
Inspect your own feelings of why you feel your approach/solution is better. If you haven’t done it before, this can be a lot of work.

Get to the point where you can convey the underlying reasons for them: why is it important to you? What’s going to be worse or slower with their solution? What future problems is your solution avoiding? How can they identify similar situations and apply the same concept next time?

It is good that you see these things instinctually as you say but if others don’t (including the coder in question) then you can make improvements by conveying this to them. And that is frequently more than half the battle in getting improvements operationalized: getting others to adopt and push and spread your good ideas as their own.

In a healthy org, these developers should be open and eager to listen, learn from new ideas, and adopt improved methods or outlooks, especially from a tech lead (or equivalent), who in turn should be able to update his/her own methods/outlooks when similarly presented with improvements.
I used to think exercise sucks at the start. But if you start with moving weight, instead of aerobic activity, it doesn't suck -- at least not longer than a few seconds at a time. You are then able to sidle into running a lot more easily.
I written in quick basic clone of novell network login screen and dumped passwords to a file.
Got dozens of students passwords and did nothing with it...
I was 13 years old...
"Around 95 percent of them visited a physical shopping center in a three-month period in 2018, as opposed to just 75 percent of millennials and 58 percent of Gen X, according to an International Council of Shopping Centers study."

I don't see what's specific to Millenials here. In 2018, most millennials finally have jobs, after completing their ten-year-degrees in bozonomics. Same for the X'ers, except a larger part of them has given up on leaving their homes at this point. Only the Generation Z still has time to waste at the mall. That doesn't mean they're buying much, they're mostly teenagers. Hence, the mall remains doomed.
They show no remorse mostly because you didn't end up hurt.

You should know how bad people are at estimating risk. Combine that with some short-lasting road rage and you can easily find someone that will do dangerous things all the time but be distraught if that ends in death.
That’s a good way to think about this, it has a unique problem on that level.
> The firm devotes about a third of its time and resources to finding jobs for its graduates, an unusually high share. Another third goes to recruiting students and the rest to teaching.

So, 2/3 of what they're paid (presumably after Austen Allred's and the VCs' take), is marketing, leaving the leftovers to pay for actual instructors. If I end up in the hospital, I want a nurse with an actual education, not "nursing boot camp."
I'm surprised to see that they pay workers to count ballots. In France ballots are counted by benevolent citizens at voting places, and I always assumed it was a necessary condition for free democratic elections.

What about your country fellow HNer, how do elections work there ?
"if everything will be automated by then and pilots will have gone the way of lighthouse keepers"

I would expect so. The areas where humans do better will get smaller and smaller.
Thankfully iOS added an "emergency" screen you can set up to show your relatives and their phone numbers without unlocking the phone.
All I did was present evidence that your claim was false.

You said the article didn’t make any claims as to what features weren’t available so I provided them.

I’m not going to engage in a tangential analysis of those features, but you are welcome to it.
Seeing a conversation go south into that territory is a far cry from stumbling upon a full-fledged white supremacist sub.

I've seen plenty racists on reddit, they're still around post-censorship.
Yes please I would like to read it :)
This is ironic. My girlfriend, a nurse of 10+ years, got accepted to the Lambda School web dev track and is starting at the end of May, to get out of nursing.
Articles that go around in circles while avoiding reflection or synthesis are infuriating. Of course relying on the PKI isn't going to magically solve every problem. But the article wasn't titled "Why you can't trust the PKI", because we're all bored of reading about that.

At a certain point, you must choose some immutable trust root. If your kink is to use public CAs (fuck me harder, (go)daddy), it implies attacks. If you chose to setup your own private signing key, it implies attacks. If you choose longest sha256 chain ("blockchain"), it implies attacks. If you simply stop trying to retain absolute control over devices after they're owned by someone else, it implies attacks.

You can hardcode further constraints as mitigations, but the fundamental drawbacks remain. If you want direct synthesis from the immediate complaint, keep a bit of a state to ensure that the date only ever moves monotonically forward. However you'll still be open to an attack if the device is off while a certificate is compromised.
Worth noting that Eastern microtonal music evolved just fine without equal temperament. This was largely a Western phenomenon.
Have yet to find a single defense for free speech that wasn't a 'slippery slope' fallacy at it's core.
they're accepting submissions now -- get writing, then!
That implies the most politically passionate people are going to be counting votes? Isn’t that a bad idea?
Recently bought a .com for $0.99 on GoDaddy! Not an issue at all imho.
>Can someone explain how/why California has failed government policy?

The proposition system. People in California voted for laws that were in their interest without taking into account (or not caring about) the 2nd or 3rd order effects of the policy.

The result is that existing property owners are reaping massive sums of money while the rest are struggling to make ends meet.
But the job of T1 is not to capture long term patterns, it’s to extract useful short scale features for T2 so that T2 could extract longer term patterns. T3 would hopefully extract even longer scale patterns from T2 output, and so on. That’s the point of having the lstm hierarchy, right?

Why would you try to manually duplicate this process by creating F1, F2, etc?

The idea of skip connections would be like feeding T1 output to T3, in addition to T2. Again, I’m not sure what useful info F sequences would supply in this scenario.
Infoq is pretty good
I've also used them many times, for smaller amounts, and know several people that work there. While their environment seems somewhat cultish, I find it hard to reconcile your 'scumbag' comment with the people that I know - one of whom used to work in the anti-fraud department.

Are you really claiming that fraud is part of Transferwise's standard mode of operation? I really find this hard to believe.
In that instance the content is being deliberately sought out. What's to prevent them from searching online for more reclusive forums like stormfront? Absolutely nothing.

EDIT: since I can't reply to you, yes, by definition, it's seeking it out.
It essentially means that I could not access Tumblr anymore.

But that's actually okay, no? I mean, you can make a decision what's more important to you...
There's a whole book of these: https://www.icd10illustrated.com/products/book
It’s called 1MB because free members get 1 megabyte of storage. You build your site from scratch or use a template. That’s just how I chose to make my site look
Except that you're usually building knowledge specific to the organization in which you're working. IMO, you should avoid monopolizing vision and knowledge. I see this as different to the surgical team, where each patient is a different "project".
>It may require physics that we won’t learn for another 100 years

It may require physics that we won’t learn without another 50 billion
Both in Denmark and in the UK workers are compesented for working at the polls/counting votes