skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, and I strongly suspect most people would vote against that. Hence why it exists.
If you're in California you could probably drive to a desert, mountain, forest or urban area in less than a day.
Two minutes of searching tells me differently. Grocery stores have used loss leaders for decades to get people in the store. Why do you say the opposite?
Nest, designed to keep intruders out of people’s homes, allowed hackers in
This is cool, but would be significantly cooler if they did some kind of biological follow up. Perhaps getting their model to output an "ideal" sequence for a desired enzymatic function and then swapping that domain into an existing protein lacking the new function.
I would argue that Julia's strong point is generating specialized code, and facilitating generic programming. Throughput is definitely the driver, but I think several aspects of Julia's design could benefit real-time programming as well.

Currently, there are many blockers to using Julia in real-time application, such as dynamic memory allocation and lack of thread safety. But I find it promising that a subset of Julia could be used for real-time programming.
I'll take "things people without kids do in their spare time" for 200, Alex.
Reminds me if improving process performance, getting from 60% to 80% is easy, 80 to 90ish already hard, 90-95% really hard and everything above 98% is either luck or killing single deviations or both. Not counting for all the new causes that pop up.
Anyway, it is an interesting angle, also economic wise. As causes are getting narrower all the time the increasing development costs can be shared by a lot less patients. I can see the incentive of not going after these treatments.
Our users participate to win cash prizes, to learn, and compete with others. Everyone loves seeing their name on a leaderboard, especially when they can improve their skills and win cash prizes at the same time!

Today we’re building out our annotation tools. We have bounding boxes, localization, and more depending on the task.

Today we use publicly available datasets and depend on our clients to only provide deidentified images. We’re also working to verify certain users to enable them to see cases with PII.
Why The "Cutesification" of Mental Illness Needs to Stop:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfy4KWtsiiA
> a lot of "cause" related groups don't sell so much as try to preach to the choir

At many non-profits, the audiences for messaging are existing donors and fellow executives. There are no measurable objectives from the broader audience. Accountability is thus impossible.
Doesn't sourcegraph already have an LSP server for go?
Microsoft Build Accelerator – open-source build engine for large systems
Now imagine being an angsty teenager looking for harry potter erotic fanfic and stumbling onto the NSA's director tumblr.

They 're onto us, you 'll think in a flash of paranoia. As if a swat team is in your house.
All I can say, is that when I was 19, I was falsely accused of rape. It was terrifying as a prospect even before fully knowing all the following results that would happen.

First, you're in prison for a crime you didn't commit. Second, you're unable to get most jobs after prison because of the sentence. Third, you have to register for the rest of your life and deal with harassment or worse from vigilantist neighbors. Fourth, you aren't allowed to even live in a lot of places as a former felon and sex offender.

If a false accuser goes far enough to actually see a trial and they're found to be lying, they absolutely should at the very least have to register on the sex offender registry as a potential risk to ANY future partners even if they don't see jail time when convicted.

Edit: I've also been on the victim side of this... being falsely accused was far, far, far worse.

Edit 2: The accuser doesn't have to turn over their phone... beyond that, I'd be fine to see an immunity from all but a specific list of felonies against any evidence found on the phone. I understand the risks against personal liberty and would prefer some protections... but it's too easy to get a false conviction. How many people every year are convicted under false accusations, and only accusation without evidence?
Just reading the article I am extremely interested in the Advanced Query search. Bravo on allowing the user to decide how they search(unlike some products). It's something I have been waiting for years. What I would like to see next is the ability to mark items that should be excluded from the search. Usually when I am doing a long complicated and unpredictable search for information, I will go down rabbit holes and from my experience exclude all the information results that I know for sure I do not want. Unfortunately I have to keep track of the items mentally which limits the capacity of relevant info I can find.
That's OpenMedia in a nutshell. They definitely aren't alone in this category, but I find them very frustrating. They mean well and I largely agree with them, but by agreeing with them I also seem to be agreeing with their nuance-free tabloid version of activism. I've somehow found myself on their mailing list a few times in the past and felt a strong sense of relief each time I have unsubscribed.
Government Economists Turn to Big Data in Estimating Inflation
Considering the vast gap between the male and female population, that is, many more males. It should not be hard to find a partner but it is. Women will not talk to you unless you own a house and houses are about 50-70 times the average salary.
> Golden’s mission is to collect, organize and express 10+ billion topics in an accessible way, presented in neutrally-written and comprehensive topic pages.

How do you plan to uphold the neutrally-written part? Wikipedia does not really do this; many editors try, but it is very difficult. This is especially true seeing as every one carries personal biases. How will you make sure opinions that do not agree with the majority of your users, editors, etc. are allowed?
I've been consumed with this idea since going back to France for a few days after living there for five months almost 10 years earlier. I had the experience of trying to learn Danish mostly by immersion and a little by terrible classes (no one seems to have an idea how to make Danish phonetics decently teachable, and that's the number 1 challenge in Danish). I theorized that foreign language learning has evolved to develop a pyramidal approach towards literary translation. That's definitely an important skill, but my guess is 99% of people interested in in a foreign language don't care about that level of language mastery, even in their native tongue, and would much prefer to learn enough grammar to start to acquire more and more conversational fluidity. People shouldn't read poetry in foreign language learning, but magazines. People should watch TV, partly because there's so much TV/video available in every language now via the web, and it's a great venue to hear diversified fluent speakers speak, rather than just actors or newscasters who are trained in speaking as clearly as possible.

My plan for Danish was to try and establish a transcript feed for viewing DR programs online, so you could watch the most audibly diverse shows on your device and quickly refer to the complete transcript (not the CC for hearing impaired because it scrubs the verbal grammar a bit and omits the vocal punctuation that are extremely important for holding your own in a foreign language), and change the playback, jump back and forth a few seconds, etc., the way one reads and rereads a passage in a text that catches their attention or evades comprehension at first.
EPSG 4326 vs. 3857 (on map projections, coordinate systems, and more) (2017)
It's a non-sequiter.

> We don't want you to be concerned

> Now here's this new TOS which is what you're concerned about, but it is new, and shiny.
Love the modern take and long tail focus!

Do you think the paid features for enterprise use is enough to support a VC model? (How do you avoid this becoming Quora (which also had an enterprise proposed use case)?)

What was the decision process around taking this a VC route vs not?
Lol, this is getting a bit hypothetical... but running a "gifted" programme for a selection of kids that score 0% in the test sounds like a waste of time. I think you'd reasonably be better off just not doing it.
Jude from Golden here. We won't do the reg wall - hold me to it :>. We want the information to be open and EASY to access, thus no reg screen. CC4.0
Which is exactly what I said. Genetics determine how much willpower you have, then you control what you do with it.
How will you handle people that want to add knowledge that isn't accurate such as flat-Earthers, anti-vaxxers, etc? Seems like only a matter of time until you're overrun with contentious and vocal minorities that have nothing better to do than undermine our species longterm survival.
why not join efforts with wikipedia?

or at least borrow heavily from?
And predicting protein function is not that hard either. The ground truth labels are often determined by sequence alignment similarity, not by experiment. So the results are far from profound
It better, they only have 3 decades left...

> Jakarta faces massive challenges. As the BBC has reported, it's the fastest-sinking city in the world, with almost half of its area below sea level.

> "If we look at our models, by 2050 about 95% of North Jakarta will be submerged," Heri Andreas, an expert in Jakarta's land subsidence at the Bandung Institute of Technology, told the broadcaster.
> And it gets blurry when the private parties are ISPs or phone companies.

Not really. That's pretty much exactly what the changes to the verbiage in Title II of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the FCC's 2015 classification of ISPs as Common Carriers were for.
You say that you'll be doing more media and learning oriented content than Wikipedia: how are you planning to support this - given how many contributors Wikipedia has? (And if you don't mind then maybe you could go deeper into how would you compare to Wikipedia. :)

Good luck!
>That’s terrible coming from an institution that is supposed to protect people under its jurisdiction.

Nah, they are there to protect those in power. Been that way for a while in case you didn't notice.
An Unguided Survey of Anonymous Functions
Because the pain is bearable if you've survived this long. Emotional pain can be controlled in ways physical pain can't. I wouldn't dare delegitimize your feelings, so understand that isn't what is intended when I say that it is all in your head.

>when I do feel very suicidal, I can tell you I don't care what anyone thinks.

That right there, thats antisocial. You aren't considering those around you. Do you have no family? No friends? No coworkers? Nobody? Even people who "truly have nobody" usually have people around them that they aren't appreciating. People who would be devastated, and feel guilty for the rest of their life.

It also is murder of your future self potential. You have absolutely no clue what the future holds, what your interaction with it might be, and in a sense you have no right to take that from your future self. Personally I see this as equivalent to murder. I've been in dark places before, and I am very very very happy that my past self didn't kill present me.

Suicide is a bug in the human program, it must be allowed in order for us to be able to think freely, but it is absolutely never the correct option for anyone that isn't terminally ill and on their deathbed already. (assisted suicide for physical issues with no potential good future makes sense. Suicide for anything else is almost certainly a mistake, an incorrect action)

Please get help, talk to people around you. Look at what causes the pain you feel and think about if you maybe are holding onto assumptions about how the world works that are keeping you from exploring what's good in life. One perspective I've seen is that nobody should be truly suicidal ever, because once you are, you may as well just do anything and everything you can imagine, you're already going to die, so why not during something exciting. Theres an irony in it, since someone suicidal often may not feel they even have doing anything they could imagine as an option, and if they were to actually do such things, they'd likely no longer be suicidal. If you at all can, try to do the things. I don't know what else to say, I've been in a place where I'd say similar things as you do, and looking back it was absolutely wrong. Not that you are bad at all, but you are wrong in the way you are looking at things, and that, at least in part, is causing your pain. The real cause of the pain is something only you know, best of luck dealing with it.
Requisite sad Orwell comment.
9. Github style issues feels much more modern, as a semi-regular wiki editor talk pages are one of my least favorite (and hardest to audit) parts of Wikipedia
Reminds me of the quote (of Benjamin Franklin):

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> The driver is already responsible for not running people down, including deaf people and people listening to music

I know! If only the driver wasn’t responsible, society would be so much better!
How will you be handling "soft" topics like history?

What about the handling/records of/provenance of artifacts?

Who is the arbiter of Truth? Will this wind up like Snopes or Wikipedia with an entrenched viewpoint that is dogma and defended at all costs? How will you avoid this?

Will alternative views/paths of inquiry be considered seriously? For example; vaccination efficacy research? I understand this is a hot-button issue, but that's exactly why I picked it. How you handle it will be a litmus test of how other issues will be handled.

How will you avoid the apathy and dogmatic approaches of many scientific journals?

What about scientific verification (or lack-there-of)?
> The arbitrary threshold of what is notable and what is not doesn't cut it in the Knowledge Age. There are currently 5.8 million English language articles in Wikipedia, and Google had 1 billion objects (200x Wikipedia's size) in its Knowledge Graph when it launched in 2015. We estimate internally that there are 1000x the entities to cover than what Wikipedia has today. It’s an exciting challenge!

This is a very weird comparison. Why not helping Wikipedia and contributing to this huge open knowledge base? The rules set by the WP community for acceptability clearly do not imply that “actual technologies, projects, products, theoretical electrical components and academic ideas” might be removed if written there, as the author suggests.

That articles, or even drafts, for specific American VC-funded projects did not reach WP's acceptability threshold does not mean that there is something fundamentally wrong in Wikimedia's approach. I'd love to see a better comparison.
Provably an affected person.
Thanks, I think a lack of vulnerability is a useful perspective to understand some of what I've experienced. Typically the people who seem concerned that I'm not drinking don't know me well.
Silent cars are more dangerous to blind or otherwise impaired people and just general makes it easier for people to notice cars it's a complement to driver awareness.
> removing gatekeepers means you don’t need to run your idea through a dozen filters before showing it to its final consumer. People get the uncut stuff directly — in all its glorious weirdness.

Isn't the goal to be build systems where users are able to modify and optimize the gatekeeper in the fairest way to their collective needs? The assumption that all gatekeepers are bad just feels so undergraduate at this point.

To be honest, this whole post reads like an updated version of a 'the web is going to be so neat guys' / cyber-utopian rant from 1993. If the last 5 years are teaching us anything, it's that being able to 'run your idea through a dozen filters' may not be such a bad thing.
Yes, we'll certainly be writing it up. Similarly i'd be interested in reading about your experiences attempting the same if that's available.
Scanning your app at the scanners is pretty quick and painless, like any other rewards card, and for me at least seems to be worth it more often than not.

(disclaimer: I work for amazon, although not WF/retail)
Google workers are holding a sit-in May 1 to protest alleged retaliation
Because you have value. Unless you're literally hitler, you have value, and probably a lot of it actually.

We're all pretty much the same, and in that, we all have pretty much the same potential to be better than whatever we are in this moment.
> Yes, but the mud sticks a lot better if it is made of fresh shit.

Unfortunately, mud sticks well enough even if it isn't real, so I really don't think that's much of a concern.

>> All I am pointing out is that the US government would carry greater moral weight when lecturing others if it didn't keep invading places and propping up dictators.

Do you think anyone affected or with influence would give greater credence to US "lectures" if it had never invaded anyplace?
> In the UK, perhaps something to do with social change in Britain post-war, but what about similar personal codes in America?

They only work so long as they are widely understood. Take the humility common to a Midwesterner and put them somewhere like California or NYC, and they'll be very confused by why everyone appears to be constantly bragging.
Dumb question -- but what exactly is an audio programming language? Google seems to be failing me.

I can make some guesses by looking at the example in OPs link. But what is the primary goal of an audio programming language? Who's using it? How? Alternatives?

Genuinely curious.
Valid points that many may disdainfully overlook. But nonetheless, still valid.

But sex crimes do have a stigma in society and there is for many a reason, though mostly though historical injustices and injustices that still transpire today have produced. This the tendency to lean towards guilty until proven innocent, over innocent until proven guilty, can and do play out socially and in a majority of people's mindsets.

Equally there have in the UK, there have been cases of false rape claims, for various reasons and access to all information pertinent in establishing a crime is what the law and justice demand.

Whilst many may feel such actions as a blanket are bad taste, there have been instances in which justice would of been perverted had it not been forthcoming and justice for all is what is needed.

Will this or any of the examples you outline hinder justice - nope. But if those examples are hindered, then justice suffers.

Also worth noting that with this law, it will in instances help support the case and expedite it, think about domestic abuse here. So whilst it may leave a bad taste and for some victims, feel like an intrusion into their life, it is an intrusion that is in there best interest to help bring about swifter justice. If anything it just formalises full-disclosure and supeaner avenues and bureaucracy in courts - hence speeds up justice. Which is in everybody's interest.
Sourcegraph agreed to join the effort around gopls, to have one really robust implementation supported by the whole Go community.
Scientists find “biodegradable” bags perfectly usable after three years in dirt
An example of delay line memory using a wire that vibrates: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BIx2x-Q2fE
It seems like you're putting the text out under CC-4.0-BY-SA [1] (Attribution, Share-Alike), which is great (the updated version of the same copyright for Wikipedia content). However, you're also collecting a TON of structured and relational data, which seems to be the value generated by your editor. Are you planning on keeping that locked up?

[1]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
How about API access and textual dumps for the other kinds of analysis?
Jude from Golden here. Yes, I believe we can have the top 50k companies of the world as paying clients and help power open knowledge for the world. We have paying customers today on that front.

The decision for VC includes the following reasons:

1. Making this happen at scale / quicker.

2. Having people like Marc from a16z, FF and Gigafund adding valuable insight in order to pull this off.

3. Derisking the mission with $$$
Whitecastle has impossible sliders now
> It's my content

A (lay) reading of their TOS makes it less than clear this is the case. Sure, it’s yours, but they have the right to do as they please as far as I can tell.
https://m.facebook.com/about/privacy/update?refid=42
Uber's enormous, vague IPO prospectus is an outrage
Call me crazy but the fact people can't record spots in their body and how they change over time might be step one.

For humans and AI.

Why don't I have a record of my spots from being a baby?

Privacy left to implementing, but there's a few ways you could go.
Gomft and goimports have been great for as long as I’ve been using Go. GoLand had a rocky start but has been excellent for ~2 years. Pprof is awesome.

The only weak tooling I saw was dependency management; Dep is great and modules are part of the toolchain now.

I can’t agree that Go lacks tooling. Maybe it’s just a disparity in what my company configures out of the box, but I feel better supported by tools in Go than in Python or Java.
Single biggest thing I really like about MS software is o365 and their email platform. Nothing does calendar + email + contacts in a business setting better. There are competitors that do come close, and some do email or calendars or maybe contacts better... but none do all three as well on concert.

I'm not sure I like azure as much... I'd be more inclined to explore kubernetes and/or cassandra and similar solutions on digital ocean if it was my dime.
>any clear way to reproduce the results.

Given that it's evolved I'd imagine this is a given? Or more accurately you could probably duplicate some kind of emergent behaviour but it would be different given different randomized parameters
What tools? I think the biggest thing is a reflow oven, but, honestly, I've soldered using a cheap, used toaster oven from Goodwill + an oven thermometer. Worked wonders!

The 3D printer might have been the biggest offender, to be fair, but many libraries have some (as do many maker spaces that are hourly). Additionally, you can order a number of 3D printed parts online as well, for relatively low cost.
Will you have an API, or will the information only be available through the heavy Web interface?

How will you handle inherently contentious topics, like vaccine safety, the existence of Morgellons as a disease distinct from delusional parasitosis, and the existence and current territorial extent of Israel and Palestine?
I don't think any of the advertising I'm seeing is localized. The four ads I see now are:

1. www.consumersadvocate.org
2. www.bankrate.com
3. mortgage-loans.thetop10sites.com
4. www.lendingtree.com

Then there's a map. Of Seattle, because that's where Google thinks I am (it's off by a couple hundred miles), with mortgage-related businesses shown. Below that, we get to "People also ask" and finally, links that are not marked as advertisements.

On the right side of the screen I have links for Annaly Capital Management, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AGNC Investment Corp, and Wells Fargo.

Writing this out made me think more seriously about DuckDuckGo. Going there and searching for "mortgage" is ... refreshing.
Transhumanism Is a Dead End (2017)
Facebook sort-of-recently introduced measures to defeat ad blockers, which I think has greatly increased the number of clicks.
GoEdison Accredited by the BBB
Concr3de wants to 3D print Notre-Dame's new gargoyles from rubble
conspiracy hat: I wouldn't have heard or noticed that the amazing, silent Audi e-tron is in the new Avengers movie if they hadn't incorrectly added noise.