skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The runtime package allows you to grab the current trace, you can just pop the last frame off and print that.
Do you use any sort of visual comparison tools or snapshotting in CI to catch regressions caused by changes to Base? Seems like this would remove any (technical) objections to having overrides.
If I was America I think I’d want my rivals to be relying on technology provided by people I can bully into turning it off when needed
Google doesn't want to index the web, it wants to index what it can monetize. It is a business after all, and storage space costs money.
Palm devices were great little machines, with some interesting technical tradeoffs for developers to push the very modest limits of the early hardware

I had a US Robotics Palm Pilot III. I did two exceptional things with it:

1. Wrote the content for my second web site (sold for six figures) on the roof of my apartment building after work using a Palm Pilot with the foldable keyboard.

2. Used the sync cradle to connect to the RS-232 port of an early GPS (around 1999-2000, I think) ripped out of a friend's Honda minivan. There was a program for the Palm that could take B&W bitmap images of maps, then scroll the map in sync with the incoming NMEA data. The hard part was that you had to tell the program the coordinates of the northwest and southeast edges of the bitmap so that it could scroll the correct amount.

- The maps couldn't be too big because of the memory limitation of the Palm.

- This was before Google maps. I think the only online map service was Terraserver, and you couldn't download images, so I took screenshots of the city overview, converted them to B&W and used those.

- You could only have one map. No stitching.

- No zooming.

Also, it took forever to lock into the GPS signal, though I think this was a problem with early GPS receivers and not a Palm issue.
In fact, the investigation did not establish that there was a “quid pro quo” relationship with Russia.

> “Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump
presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

It would be more accurate to say that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

This is not quid pro quo, it’s not collusion, and it’s not cooperation. It is benefiting from blood in the water.

Trump also benefited significantly from Bernie Sanders’ attacks on Clinton and the fact that many of his voters wouldn’t vote for her. Trump did not collude or cooperate with Sanders either.
What you're proposing would simply have the self censoring effect that is common on other platforms and in person.

So instead of potential two sided discussions, you get phenomena like closet Trump supporters.
What are dockerhub's alternatives? No 2FA. That is bad.
Googling phrases of the soft 404 page and some of the authors 2003 blogs did show the pages.

I did notice that all of the authors content is duplicated in index pages, so maybe Google just doesn't consider the article page the canonical link.
If you want to extract just the values of a single tag or similarly trivial things or the XML is a very restricted set, regexes are just fine for parsing.
Which vulnerability was this?
The Microsoft Approach... 'people totally didn't access your email body... except we eventually owned up to it after it got leaked'
Yea sorry about that I was more focused on figuring out what needed to be done today and who needed waking up so I just dumped the email.

I hope this doesn't hurt docker too badly. I really like the hub / auto build service.
It’s not the if staments: for an assertion the panic branch should be ice-cold and likely proven by invariants up the stack frame — other assertions or plain old conditionals — so in theory should be optimized away every time. It’s the expression in the condition that’s often expensive. The assert macro eliminates these trivially with the preprocessor , but go cannot as easily because the condition expression may have side effects.
C3-PO: "Sir the probability of successfully navigating an asteroid field is approximately 3,720 to 1!"

Han Solo: "Never tell me the odds!"

--------

C3-Po has the habit Munger recommends. Han is probably an incorrigible optimist.
Matt Taibbi wrote an interesting article that agrees with you on the Iraq 2.0 front: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-mill...

I haven't read this one, but it seems to be in the same vein:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/russ...
Ratings are imperfect censorship tools that evolve over time.
PG-13 was created specifically for Indiana Jones Temple of Doom because there was no rating between PG and R.
Content that fits in these boxes is not the same from year to year. Not just with regards to violence or language, but casual topless women that were commonplace in the 70s is no longer PG/PG-13 acceptable.
There's making money, and there's making enough money to justify an $84B valuation.
This experiment was run 10 years ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=844979
Did Docker become any less useful for you due to this, or provides less value? Unlikely.
If you ever want to put VMS on that VAXstation 3100 m42, it's pretty neat to play around with. DEC people were sharp, like the Bell Labs and Berkeley people, and did a lot of things differently than Unix did. VMS was perhaps less agile, but more consistent. If you can get hold of VAX C for it, you might be amused to find that some of the documentation for system libraries has examples in BLISS instead.

BTW, don't underestimate an old workstation with only 12MB of RAM: they were often used for technical software that today people might write to require machines with 100x that much RAM.

(I did a little work on the VAXstation, for technical software. I also kludged up a gateway to one, from a TCP/IP LAN, through an Ultrix box that was also on DECnet, since no one had paid for a TCP/IP stack. A lot of important software was optional, little was free, and the printed manuals you could find were precious.)
You’d be a fool to spend your bitcoins. It’s a deflationary currency. That means it’s worth more later than now in the long run. As opposed to dollars, which is inflationary and worth less as time goes on.
It's not really a discussion when everyone on HN thinks the same way politically. There's no point to have political discussions here. If you're not on the liberal train, you get downvoted to oblivion, or flagged. It's just not worth it, noone replying or reading actually wants your perspective, they just want their turn to say their talking point based on some keywords in your comment. That's why I deleted my comments and that's why this is my last political discussion on here.
Bigger question for me is why does everyone take his tweet so seriously? Have you seen twitter? It's 99% meme's, over top joke's/comments, and people tweeting for lulz. Elon is using it exactly like how most people are.

I get it. He's super smart. CEO of huge companies. That doesn't mean he can't have fun, be goofy, and tweet for lulz.
BEM 101
Story time.

This took place around 2009. Back then I was working for Rapid7, on their network vulnerability scanner Nexpose. The codebase was mostly Java and was relatively large at 1M+ lines of code. We had many unit tests. Running the entire test suite took up to 40 minutes on Windows, and 20 minutes on Linux (Windows was always about twice slower on everything: building, product's startup time, etc.) The company had grown quickly to at least 30-50 software engineers. The problem was that every time one of them ran a build on his or her local machine (which happened multiple times a day) it would have to run the test suite and waste up to 40 minutes of this person's time. 40 minutes × dozens of engineers = lots of inefficiencies in the company.

I loved solving performance issues so one day I remember arriving at the office and making it my mission to investigate if there was an easy way to speed up the test suite. Our build system was based on Ant, and our tests used the JUnit framework. After a little time profiling Ant with basic tools (top, strace, ltrace), and taking a few Java stack traces, I realized that most of the wasted time was not actually running the individual tests, but many instances of the JVM kept being started and destroyed between each test. Our Ant build file was running the JUnit test with fork=yes, which was required for a reason I don't recall at the moment. This forks the JVM for running the tests. Then a little googling lead me to this:

https://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/junit.html

While reading this documentation, I stumbled upon an unknown parameter to me: forkmode. What does it do?

"forkmode: Controls how many JVMs get created if you want to fork some tests. Possible values are perTest (the default), perBatch and once. once creates only a single JVM for all tests while perTest creates a new JVM for each TestCase class. perBatch creates a JVM for each nested <batchtest> and one collecting all nested <test>s."

Our Ant build file did not set forkmode, so it meant we were forking a new JVM for every test!

I immediately tried forkmode=perBatch and... the test suite ran 10× faster! 40 minutes down to 4 minutes on Windows. And Linux ran it in 2 minutes instead of 20 minutes. I told my boss right away but he was unbelieving. He asked that I check with our most-experienced Java developer. I showed him my 1-line patch speeding the test suite 10× and he said "I guess you are right, we can commit that." By lunch time the fix was committed and everyone loved me :)
I have the same perspective but I don’t consider it pessimistic. My photography is for me, and my friends if they see it.
The folks behind Storybook created a product for that: https://hichroma.com/
That's a "healthy" market in the sense of a liquid market with high levels of information communication. That's not necessarily the same thing as a "healthy" market in the sense of good public policy. For instance, very few people would say that a "healthy" labor market has no minimum wage or discrimination protections, trusting supply and demand to solve those adequately. Similarly, letting the market price trips to "bad" neighborhoods higher is probably undesirable, even if that's what a free market would do.

It also may not be the same thing as a market customers understand and feel comfortable participating in. It's true that there's more demand for unblemished produce priced the same as misshapen ones, but I'd be very unlikely to patronize a grocery store that ran an auction for each individual vegetable. So it might be in Uber's interest to not expose a variable-pricing mechanism. (Indeed, customers already seem not thrilled with surge pricing, even though it arguably gets them the service they want more efficiently.)
The OP is not claiming US labor laws are the best. The OP is saying that the US has decided that these are the laws it wants for itself and so if you want the output of your work to be sold in America, then these are the standards that should be maintained.

It’s similar to a Kosher or halal restaurant demanding that any meat that they purchase must adhere to the standards they have.

The foreign workers are free to provide their services to non-American companies, just like a non kosher butcher is free to sell their meat to a different restaurant. It’s just not the rules that the US meets.

And in fact, this is true if nearly everything you purchase. Ivory cannot be sold in the US. Blood diamonds cannot be so,d there. A whole host of products need to meet certain standards to be sold in the US. The OP is suggesting the same sort of laws apply to services that apply to goods.
Your own repo, AWS ECR, whatever GCP's version is called, and many others.
The USA executes people.

The USA executes juveniles, as SA has done. (https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/execution-juveniles-us-and-othe...)

Let's not throw stones.

The terrorist cell had killed people, he did more than send a WhatsApp message, but it's very murky how much more.

If they didn't have the death penalty or didn't kill juveniles then this might have been fixable, so perhaps we should put our own house in order first.
dude. you have apparently been here long enough to know that that kind of response is unacceptable here.

you are choosing to interpret that series of events differently than i did. i see it like this:

1) kubrick reads the american version of the book.

2) he writes most of the screenplay.

3) somebody tells him about chapter 21. he reads it.

4) kubrick decides that, even if he had originally read the 21-chapter book, he would ignore the final chapter as being unrealistic.

in that version of events, it doesn’t matter if he didn’t know about it beforehand or not, it would not have affected his final screenplay.
it's really not
Presumably the Google+ exfiltration issue.

> The bigger problem for Google isn’t the crime, but the cover-up. The vulnerability was fixed in March, but Google didn’t come clean until seven months later when The Wall Street Journal got hold of some of the memos discussing the bug. The company seems to know it messed up — why else nuke an entire social network off the map? — but there’s real confusion about exactly what went wrong and when, a confusion that plays into deeper issues in how tech deals with this kind of privacy slip.

(https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/9/17957312/google-plus-vuln...)
like GNU?
That doesn't work.

India relied on GPS and Clinton turned off (regrettably IMHO) India's access to high precision data in the 2000 Indo-Pak war.

India went on to build their own.

EDIT: Year was probably 1999, not sure.
Listen at 2x. Bam, 3 hours instead of 6. That’s a few commutes, work outs, or some other daily task that can be filled with audio. And it’s very easy listening.
That's pretty neat, for something that originally not much more than a calendar PDA. :)

If you want a more powerful handheld from that era, see the iPaq that came a little later. I'd kill for a good Linux handheld like that today (hopefully more people will pitch in on making PostmarketOS that handheld).
From Trump’s perspective it was a “witch-hunt” investigation which hamstrung his Presidency from the start.

And in fact by the end there was not compelling evidence that Trump or his Campaign coordinated with Russia at all.

There were many dirty tricks and bad actors which served to perpetuate the investigation, which by the way cost many many millions for innocent people to defend themselves against. And they are innocent until proven guilty.

Trump knows he did not collude or conspire or cooperate with Russia to defeat Clinton, and yet the investigation grinds on for hundreds of days while he is trying to enact policy to improve the lives for millions of Americans. That’s his mindset.

Flynn, Papadopoulos, and Cohen lied to Congress or investigators, which impeded the investigation, and were charged for it. No such charges were brought against Trump.
Me too. 2 "spam" emails in Gmail's trash folder, none of which were spam (one was a newsletter from Mastodon (software)).

Edit: Gah. Now I checked my work Gmail spam folder. There was an email from one of my users there. (and nothing else)

Now I'm considering migrating away from Gmail, at least for work related things.
Google got where it was by being the best at finding what you wanted. I remember those days.

Google has a hard time getting me what I want these days, and sites I do find do things to get found that make me like content a lot less (that's you, inane story on top of every recipe required to get ranked)
Reading the comments, it amuses me that those who support Linux fail to realize that IRC is the microkernel (i.e. Minix) approach in messaging. Want authentication/security/archiving/etc.? Layer things of variable quality on top, and hope there aren't any holes on them!
I don’t see the problem? Override the option component with a new one that adds a checkbox or radio if a specific combination of parameters is passed:
I would take anything Dr Hipp says very seriously. While he may be wrong, I wouldn't discard his thoughts without some facts to back it up. SQLite, both its functionality and amazing test suite, as well as his other achievements, certainly make him worthy of my respect.
They apparently want anyone to be able to easily connect and talk to developers, except for trolls, scammers, spammers etc. I'm not really sure what kind of authentication provides that, but they seem to have something in mind.
He made rockets that can land again. I'm pretty sure he knows the word "responsibility".

This is my assumption, but I believe at some point he realized life is too short to be all uptight all the time. That as long as you focus on stuff that's really important. You can still have fun and make jokes.
Speeding up a random-access function?
It sounds more like a developer environment got exposed with prod data on it.

This going by the way it's worded "single hub database with a subset of non financial data"
We don't care about "advertising" as an end in itself, only as one means among two (the other is anonymous user payments) to the end of keeping creators funded and the Web alive as a viable economy. What's more, there's no way for us to make money with Brave Ads unless users opt in -- in which case they make >= what we make. Last thing: don't let someone use "free speech" as a confidence trick. Read the privacy policy.
This.

In the previously mentioned podcast the host, a former doctor, tells a pretty scary story about being a sleep deprived doctor.
We are in the same boat. Skype for Business was extremely unreliable. Especially if you wanted to use a mobile device (I also had a weird issue where my Skype for Business would occasionally start thinking it was Lync, and refuse to work).

Switching to Teams has made life a whole lot better.
Why does Google deeply index those useless telephone directory sites? Try searching for the impossible U.S. phone number "307-139-2345" and you'll see a bunch of "who called me?" or "reverse phone number lookup" sites. Virtually all of those sites are complete garbage. They make no attempt to collect numbers from telephone directories or from the web. They won't identify a number as being the main phone number for Disneyland for example.

It's odd that so many of those sites exist, that Google indexes them so deeply, and that they show up in searches so prominently. It's obvious that they are spam, scams, or worthless, but those same sites have been appearing prominently for years.

I agree with the author. My experience has also been that Google heavily prioritizes very large and frequently-updated sites over small static information-rich personal sites. I think it's a big flaw that needs to be fixed or for someone else to do better.
That says you must permit google to send email on your behalf in your SPF record. How is that relevant at all for sending email to Google?
> I'm sure you've always quit every company in such a situation?

I have absolutely quit jobs because I had serious issues with the way my employer did business. I would again. It makes sleeping at night a lot easier.
I'm curious why you didn't choose to emulate the Palm hardware itself, much like e.g. a Gameboy emulator would, and thus not need to worry about the internal structure of the software.
RBC first bank in Canada to launch a personalized, AI-powered budget solution
Hi, just for the record, Netscape management as well as Sun insisted that JS look like Java. Java was supposed to be the big language on the client side. That didn't pan out, but JS got big and begat WebAssembly thanks in part to the asmjs.org latent static type system (another part: WebGL typed arrays).
If the paper was really really really stretchy you can do it 13 times. I'm sure such a paper exists.
You’re not parsing XML at that point. You’re parsing a text based data format that looks superficially like XML. This can work if you strictly control the encoder but it’s not generally interoperable.
Lack of evidence is not a conclusion. It's what you'd expect if there were successful obstruction of justice. Even Barr's summary quoted that the report "does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
I feel like it depends on the city. In Phoenix I typically get a relatively nice car with a fairly normal guy or girl that drives a relatively newer car as a side gig, or to keep busy during retirement.

Conversely in Columbus Ohio all the drivers I’ve had recently are clearly former taxi drivers that migrated to Uber. The cars are old and beat up, the insides are dirty, and the drivers disregard the app’s directions usually taking us to the wrong spot.
The overall stirring is that technology, interfaces to leveraging processes with less energy than otherwise, depend on existing cultural and linguistic artifacts—which are themselves technologies (they facilitate social agreement, cooperation by providing norms, signaling, and metrics e.g. rituals, mathematics, and behavioral disambiguation through communication). That is technology serves to further the abstractions provided by existing linguistic, cultural, and technological means. However, once those abstractions become integrated, if they are a "game-changing" technology they will begin to alter the very cultural and linguistic abstractions in which they depend on. In this way, they mutually manifest a feedback loop to accelerate the utility of each other.

This viewpoint was actually the implicit argument of Operationalists like Bridgman, Fourier.

It was the explicit argument of Bohr, who believed "we are all suspended in language". Bohr took this further and believed that perceptual experience itself was a linguistic model to communicate the stimuli, the outside world, to the perceiver. In the same way, everything is a language, a game (set of rules) for communication.

The utility of this viewpoint is to create technology which conforms and supports existing cultural/linguistic/behavior norms rather than one which obstructs them.
Also because I just beamed it around to people at CodeCon, but couldn't ever manage to land that distribution deal with Sony to ship it on every Clié, alas.

My Pet Rock Remote Control for the PocketPC never got off the ground, either. ;(

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG0FAKkaisg
Pedestrian Deaths Are Rising on America's Roads
That's a nice summary. One thing I'm curious about is:

> Data includes usernames and hashed passwords

How are they hashed? And specifically, can we expect them to be already cracked?
The report on the Department of Justice website is already searchable. No one's been relying on the Archive to search it.
it’s hilarious reading the hacker news genius squad try to grasp at a dead, buried, and rotted conspiracy theory because their politics demand it. never change, hacker news. never change
Very nice and Thank you. The pullup/pulldown resistors and decoupling capacitors were some of the first i learnt to identify. But still much more "patterns" to add to the mental database!