skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Instead of the article I get:

"A MESSAGE FROM USA TODAY NETWORK
It appears that you’re visiting us from a location in the European Union.
We are directing you to our EU Experience.

This site does not collect personally identifiable information or persistent identifiers from, deliver a personalized experience to, or otherwise track or monitor persons reasonably identified as visiting our Site from the European Union. We do identify EU internet protocol (IP) addresses for the purpose of determining whether to direct you to USA TODAY NETWORK’s EU Experience.

This site provides news and information of USA TODAY NETWORK. We hope you enjoy the site.
"

I am not in the EU and I am not using an EU ip address.

So I guess you can't find out about police misconduct unless you are trackable...
> You're doing that thing I warned you not to do...

> The key is to build the business to the point where it replaces your income before you quit your dev job.

So your counter argument is for people to build a successful business on their own that will last for the remainder of their careers while working a full time job (and most likely while supporting a family and raising children)? Yes...it's just that simple.
Just proxy
Since you keep breaking the guidelines after we've asked you to stop we've banned the account.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
That's still high for a "healthy" level of vacancy, and it's also assuming those vacancies are in areas where people want to live. In reality, most of this housing stock is in smaller towns people are leaving while available housing in Tokyo is not exactly plentiful.
Largest corporation in the US, builds the best jet engines in the world, is very innovative. Constantly developing new technology and learning from failure. Amazing culture, laid back, supportive, management is well trained and very smart and they don't force engineers into full-on management.
The hamburger is actually a simplification of the original icon, which actually looked like a pop-up menu, and I think is why it was acceptable for most people during the transition period.

Nowadays it probably really is just as you say.
Exams were pen and paper only.
People frequently enter a forum/sub/thread/etc with a not-yet-completely formed opinion on an issue.

Sometimes to learn more, sometimes to further convince themselves, very rarely to change their mind.

When the right group of people are waiting to reply to everything with zealotry, it's easy to go from •leaning• toward a viewpoint to full on embracing it and becoming a zealot.

And let's face it, hate is the most effective weapon for this.
This is exactly wrong.

Services used are inversely proportional to bodies inhabiting.

In far-flung suburbia, you still need all those miles of roads and sewer pipes serving a relatively small number of people.

One of the papers did an excellent heat map of the Bay Area and pinpointed where all the traffic congestion originates. The eastern periphery of San Jose was the worst.
"Initial encounter" means the first time seeing the medical professional and not the first time the accident happened.
No discussion of strange ICD-10 codes can omit this amazing book: https://www.icd10illustrated.com/
I did find that but described as a fork, it is 11 commits ahead, 5210 commits behind rust-lang:master. The only activity in the last month is https://github.com/avr-rust/rust/pull/137 ... which seems to be you talking to the void. Honestly, and I don't mean this to sound rude, I assumed it was a dead project. Well done for persisting!
It probably isn't obvious from my posts, so I'll put it here explicitly: I'm not pro-censorship. I think ideas should be out there. My ideal world is one where there are the "big" sites with millions of DAU generally keep racist content (or at least the really nasty stuff) off their platform, but there are plenty of little sites that "keep the dream alive" so to speak.

A lot of people aren't going to be willing or able to actually engage with the real logic of an anti-racist argument. Instead, people use heuristics for this sort of work. In my ideal world, the question of "was this on a big site? or some little blog and/or known racist publication?" would serve as a useful heuristic re: what arguments to bother with. This is how newspapers generally settled out. Is it in the paper? If yes, then there are at least some standards. If no, e.g. if it's some vanity publication, then squint a little harder.

These sorts of things have happened every time we've had a big shift in information distribution technology. There's an explosion of ideas with no real markers to differentiate them, and mass chaos for a while as people sort it out. Then eventually people identify the signs of trustworthy info distributors, and it settles back down. If a platform allows racists to flourish, they're not going to remain a place that people can trust. I would like to see Reddit remain a place that has some amount of trust, so I'm happy they banned the really nasty racists.
Slack is bridging email to chat, improving calendar integration and search
Scary exploit!
Would it also work using Element.scrollIntoView()?
In such case it wouldn't even need user interaction.
Yes - 100%. Javascript is different because the language has quirks, but that's more superficial than you would think. The runtime environment is where all the gotchas are.

Everything is single threaded, but events happen constantly and at times you don't control. However there's no good atomics support. The environment uses async for pretty much everything non-trivial but has some of the worst async primitives ever (until very recently, at least).

That make things very different to develop for, and won't be solved by writing your code in Java. It will just run into the same fundamental browser limitations.
I think your two examples are actually the opposite.
And to your point, it's a question where the data, such as it may be, is going to be complicated, and hard to harness. And you can phrase a question about that lack of data in such a manner that it puts the burden of proof on whoever you want it to be on.
"Is a swimming injury in a prison pool medically different than a swimming injury in a YMCA pool?"

They are medically but they will be covered differently by insurance. A private insurance company would probably not cover a swimming injury in a prison pool as they would pass that off to the government
And just a Note, TSMC Node Number is like one step smaller than Intel's equivalent. So TSMC 7nm DUV is roughly Intel 10nm.

And to the point the OP was asking, I don't think there is a technical problem to 3nm, or even 2nm process size. Expect this year's iPhone A Series SoC to be on 7nm EUV, 5nm in 2020, 3nm in 2022, likely 2nm in 2024 / 2025.
There may be a 5nm+ and 3nm+ in between those. Or as TSMC's CEO Joked, expect to see 5.5nm in the future.

We don't have a technical barrier, we do have an economical / cost barrier. With every node progression near to doubling of design cost, not everyone can afford to be on leading node. [1] The extremetech article is an easy to read version of Semi Engineering [2], if we assume the number are correct ( I do think the number are little exaggerated ) $500M for 5nm. Apple will need to find a $2.5 BOM reduction per iPhone to off set that cost. Qualcomm will have to sell their chip $5 to $10 more expensive. Now if you imagine $1B for 3nm, and $2B+ for 2nm.

Unless you are Apple, who can easily hike the price by another $100. For others like Qualcomm, this is going to create lots of problems unless they could spread the design cost over many more units.

[1] https://www.extremetech.com/computing/272096-3nm-process-nod...

[2] https://semiengineering.com/big-trouble-at-3nm/
https://voat.co/v/Voat/3178819

> Gas the kikes Race War Now is not an illegal threat. The supreme court has ruled that a threat needs a place and a time to be considered actionable or illegal. example: We're gassing the kikes at the Freemont Synagogue on 5th avenue, Tuesday.

This is the most upvoted comment. We can say things like "it's a matter of perspective", but sometimes things are simply objectively shit.

edit, to those of you who think I'm exaggerating, here is one comment in that thread out of many:

"Fucking faggots...meanwhile Antifa gets run of every liberal city in the country while the nigs murder us daily...and we aren't even allowed to talk about clownworld."

Pretty much any place on the internet that promotes itself solely on being a "free speech zone/place" is trash. Theoretically they should be fine but in practice they just always attract assholes and people who want to say very edgy things. Someone should coin it, "the law of internet free speech zones" or something.

It has nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. Proper places of discussion don't have comments like "gas the kikes isn't technically hate speech so we should be allowed to say it here". You can always go ahead and host such a place if you want, but I'll stick to HN, Tildes, and Reddit instead so I can have reasonable discussion.
I might have misunderstood it when I read it (and it has been a while), but I thought the general idea was about shitty Nash equilibria.

So far capitalism has driven moral progress and increased standards of living, but maybe we'd be wrong to trust it forever. If the logical end result of following progress is us innovating ourselves out of existence (AI, nuclear weapons, whatever) then we might need to take drastic measures to avoid the default outcome, get off the path we're on and onto a different one.
You don't actually need to do asynchronous background compaction at all. You can do compaction whenever in small incremental steps not causing any spikes in read or write latencies. Just spreading it across all writes gets you slightly slower, but latency capped writes. It's unfortunate that LevelDB popularized this compaction in a thread idea. It's pretty bad one.
I highly recommend Syntorial (https://www.syntorial.com/), it took me from nothing to being somewhat ok in almost no time at all.
Very nice article! Also of interest, 1 not being prime can be viewed as a particular example of a more general phenomenon that occurs throughout mathematics, known as the 'Too simple to be simple' principle:

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple
I get all that, but in one case the type of the value bound to the declared identifier is T, and in the other case it is T?. To me, that violates The Law of Least Astonishment, but that is admittedly subjective.
There isn't much agricultural land, if any, in cities and suburbs. In the US, land is taxed at the local level (municipality and county), not at the state or federal level.
The project slightly predates a standardized German orthography and the original manuscript used its own capitalization conventions: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/Grimm_W%...
Ahh, thanks...that makes sense. Still holds though. No coding an initial encounter if your first stop is a coroner.
> [Using Optional] mean that wrong code look wrong

...as long as you don’t use any implicitly unwrapped optionals (which virtually all Mac/iOS code does), or use any frameworks that predate Swift (like AppLit/UIKit/Foundation), or wrap any C libraries (most third-party libraries in the world).

So basically that’s true for the 5-line samples showing how cool Optional is, and no real program I’ve ever written. It was a nice experiment but in practice I have more issues stemming from Optional than I ever did with nil.

> In contrast: bad.shit.happends

Do you not read any Swift forums? There are newbies posting every single day asking why "a.b.c" crashed in Swift.
Learning computer programming you mean? If you think creating something musical would motivate you, JavaScript using the WebAudio API isn’t a bad starting place, as it provides high level components such as oscillators and filters that you can plug together without needing to know the internals - for example, check out https://teropa.info/blog/2016/07/28/javascript-systems-music..., which is aimed more or less at newcomers to programming. Another good starting point if you are using Mac (and iOS, if you like) is AudioKit, which has some great interactive “playgrounds” and similar high level “blocks” of code as WebAudio, which you can wire together to get quick results.

If you want to write your own plugins or audio software you’ll need to learn C++ at some point, which I think is a fairly complex language to start with and likely to be frustrating in terms of getting quick results, but your mileage may vary!

A colleague of mine learned C++ as his first “real” language (which is now his job) because he started out playing around in SuperCollider (a DSL for computer music stuff) and wanted to turn his ideas into real plugins, but it can get pretty complex pretty quickly so I’d say you’d have to be pretty motivated to do this!

If you do want to go down this route I would probably start with the aforementioned SuperCollider or something similar (maybe Max/MSP) to get an idea of how the musical side of things works without having to master C++ at the same time, then when you feel confident you can start learning C++ - personally I’d recommend the JUCE framework as it is designed for audio apps, hides some of the complexity/gotchas of C++, and has some good tutorials for beginners: http://juce.com.

DSP stuff can get pretty maths heavy and I’ve not come across anything equivalent to the building blocks supplied by WebAudio/AudioKit for C++, although JUCE does now have some DSP modules such as filters which you can easily use, and there is sample code online... but you’ll probably have to get your hands dirty at some point :) Will Pirkle’s book on audio plugins provides quite a good intro to DSP but the code in the book is, to be honest, pretty outdated/bad style - he is apparently working on an updated version, but if you are able to take the code with a pinch of salt (e.g. write the examples yourself in JUCE rather than using his RackAFX framework) you might find it useful.

Feel free to reach out to me for more advice, my background is in web development but I’ve been working on audio stuff professionally for the last couple of years so have been through the learning process of C++ etc and would be happy to help if I can!
Islam is a race now?
> If you ever wondered why you have to press ctrl-alt-del to log in, that is why (nobody ever fixed this for Linux).

Seems you're not familiar with Linux. It had SAK since forever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LzA1K3Q_5k
Thanks. This is a great reference indeed!

The challenge is preserving ability for content to control all pixels; without it, the content ecosystem ends up developing single-purpose, generally crappy apps, which isn't necessarily a better thing either...

I'm not sure it is the only solution either - what about "secure attention key" type ways to get the system's attention (in this case the browser's), bypassing any content interception? For example, what if there was a key combo guaranteed to always bring in the browser UI, and typing that key combo was necessary before inputting any password field?

Alternatively, the reliance on browser password management could provide some security if it can be trusted to always work...
I assume he means U.K. (IR35 ruling) although there may be equivalents elsewhere in the world
Can you provide some screenshots?
Yeah I did the first few parts of Syntorial and thought it was pretty great, maybe I’ll pick it up again one day!
Angular: Recurring Problems I Face as a Front-End Consultant
When it was being described the checklist a pilot has to go through before taking off, it resembled, though quite crudely and without life or death implications, the lengthy checklist the developers at our company had to follow back when we deployed everything manually. We had synchronization steps to pull modifications, couple compilation steps, we had to check if configuration files were added in order to accommodate extra services, there was cache mechanisms that had to be cleared, after that we needed to check for database migrations, then restart the systems, run the little tests we had and manually check if nothing broke. It happened often to see code conflicts, 40 to 50 with varying difficulty every release. It was insane and never quite worked, we always got weary of release days and never wanted to go through them as we didn't trust the system (with good reason).

Automation and good practices brought back confidence, so I was wondering two things.

First most obvious, how come do pilots trust a system that has these layers of manual security checks with their lives. And second, can't it all be automated? I understand aircrafts must have independent modules and every level of integration implies extra risk, but at least in security critical tests, automation would come a great way in ensuring crew safety, wouldn't it? Is it too hard? Systems are not flexible to implement automatic security checklists or is it just a culture in the field to check it all manually?
You are correct. I should have read more carefully and verified instead of assuming.
Sounds also like the Google X branch.
Unit Testing: Our Tests Are Too Big and Some Ways to Fix Them
In general, once the Science is settled, it should never be questioned. It is often the work of hundreds of peer-reviewed papers and bias-free institutions devoting time and resources into confirming hypotheses. Researchers from outside fields, in particular, should never be given a platform to question the experts in a given field.
I mean in the constructor... Can one do *this ={}?
> If not, you’ll stagnate at a pretty high level, but stagnate none the less.

It may be semantics, but I think "stagnating at a pretty high level" may be a pretty good endgame for a smart engineer who does not want to go to either people or technology management.

If this means significant autonomy, mentoring role and decent compensation what is wrong with stagnating at this level? This is not for everyone, bit may be OK for some. An honest question.
would you know why LevelDB choose compaction in thread vs the method you are describing.
Um, what? Standardization of UI is what makes this type of thing feasible large-scale, not the collapse of standardization.

Even just in this case - making it look like Chrome mobile results in a different bar than Firefox mobile. If they converge more though it'd take less effort to hit more people.
“They wake up at 4 o’clock in the morning to go to the toilet and come back to bed ruminating about how to deal with work issues.”

Especially a problem for men dealing with prostate issues.
But they did it wrong. The correct number is 180M degrees Fahrenheit. Sigh.
>Then FPH was banned, and you know what, we didn't see it metastasize elsewhere, we just saw many fewer FPH-style posts, which I'd say is a good thing.

But what we DID see, for a while at least, was a lot of people sympathetic to that subreddit arguing in any way they could think of that the ban was either inconsistent, not needed, unfair or wouldn't work. But what do you know, by and large that content kind of just went away.
I would say this is the engineering incarnation of the Broken window theory of the early eighties, if you want a term which is much more known: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory
Any though on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NILFS ?
you’re posting in a heavily moderated forum. HN too works, because a heavy hand forces good behavior.
Well, you can get as philosophical as you want. In the real world, for American companies and services, it comes down to basically doing what they want.

There is no real argument that a company like Reddit must adhere to free speech. No one forces you to use facebook, reddit, or any other website.
> But some of Ms Wong's scoops are so big that they threaten to impact the stock market, leading some to accuse her of insider trading.

Can anyone with a good understanding tell me if that really qualifies as insider trading or market manipulation? As I understand it, she reverse engineers a publicly available app, something that anyone with the technical know-how could do. So even if she bought stocks before releasing this information, anyone could have done the same and learned the information the same way.

I would be really surprised if big investment firms aren’t already doing that (but just don’t release this information publicly). I don’t see how this is any different from collecting other public information and placing bets based on that information. (e.g. reading import lists from container ships and estimate the production volume from a company before they announce it).

Otherwise, Jane’s efforts seem to be pretty cool and I am honestly surprised that more people aren’t doing it. I can’t wait to get read her blog later!
I imagine they get a pretty low amount of EU traffic, and so went for the least effort path to deal with GDPR. And, yeah, IP location databases are often wrong. Or maybe they just treat "non US IP" as "redirect to sparse GDPR site".

It is an odd publication. They have some sort of deal with many US hotels where guests get a paper copy for free. I suspect that represents the overwhelming share of anyone that reads it. It's commonly thought of as low quality here.

Archived copy: https://outline.com/FdzvqY

Their database as a csv: https://gofile.io/?c=bEbPGv
Although I've heard urban legends questioning the efficacy of keeping them long term, dot.tk and another registrars are simply free for at least four TLD's.
Fission emits lots of gasses and other sorts of hot air from the Green Lobby.
I didn't know about Japanese property tax, a quick google shows there are a lot of taxes, 1.7% annually. 2% on registration. + some extras

https://resources.realestate.co.jp/buy/guide-to-japanese-rea...
I´m really sorry, this is what copyright should be for, but I´m sure it´s whack-a-mole and a load of money :(

FWIW I love your content.
16 Things You Can Do to Make Tech More Ethical
Seems like a not bad idea. Especially if the antiparticles accelerated away before they could interact. But the two types of particles should be mutually attracted. They’d also have to appear in an organized way to avoid collisions with other particles.

Maybe there wasn’t a Big Bang, but instead a “large shearing”. Ie two “sheets” (like higher dimensional objects) started in contact with one another and moved apart/were pulled apart from one another. Before the shearing, lots of energy existed with little or no opportunity for massive objects to form. During the shearing the particles adhered to one sheet (for whatever reason) and the antiparticles the other.

(End of my out there positing)
Show HN: A dead-simple Trello-like TODO manager
> Japans as a whole is losing population but Tokyo is increasing.

And even smaller cities are losing population much slower than their rural surroundings e.g. Wakayama mentioned in the article shrank by 10% (population wise) between the 2000 and 2015 census, but Wakayama-chi "only" shrank by 6% while rural Kushimoto-cho shrank by 23%, Susami-cho by 30%.
Close. It doesn't need to live forever though. Just long enough for you to build something to replace it.

You appear sceptical, but it really isn't hard to do. There are lots of examples here that come up every time anybody asks.
Haven't heard of, but the storage system is heavily inspired by ZFS and by putting some of the ideas (plus adding our own obviously ;)) to the sub-file level:
https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/2769...