skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I pretty exclusively rely on prints and intuition. Honestly I've implemented logging frameworks in different production situations and never gotten use out of them. Like you say - they don't answer the questions you need answered.
Consumer Reports: Tesla Must Prove Safety Before Claiming “Self-Driving” Ability
Aside from the lack of load shedding and decent access to cheap technology and loads of bandwidth...

I feel everything else is the same for anyone outside SV. Can't meet deadlines (but that's because everything takes longer than you think it will, even when you account for hoffstadter's (sp?) law) and trying to bootstrap stuff in your spare time is next to impossible. Not impossible, but It's right up there with the most difficult things you could try and do.
> Can you imagine if it was the other way? "Well I have no idea what it means, but they said these few sheets of math would be interesting to you and I thought you'd like to have them."

I can easily imagine that there exist lots of math nerds with a love for alien conspiracies in the internet who are keen on decoding these formulas.
Rust isn't "a comparatively bad starting position." Those obstacles I listed are not just cases of "d'oh, if only we had thought of this earlier." They're conscious, intentional design choices to trade off a general monadic interface (and other similar designs) for real benefits in Rust's domain.

The people who made these choices, and the people who "exalt" them, thus cannot fairly be described as "just don't see the big picture," "don't care," or "not realizing it's contradictory." And until someone has figured out a way to combine a general monadic interface (or more likely, some other method for orchestrating continuations) with Rust-like zero-cost abstractions, these features continue to be "cool" "in their own right." :)
Screw Google and every other tech company on this list

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee_Antitrust...
Can you please find a reference? That sounds interesting.
Those things aren't bad ideas. However:

Teachers, nurses, janitors, waiters and so on can't work remotely.

Splitting things up that naturally group together likely has some costs. VC's might not want to invest in a startup in, say, Tulsa, OK. I've read that some are changing their minds, and it'll happen some, but clusters do happen for a reason, and fighting that may create some problems.
Replace 'luxury' by 'standards', among which size, but also fire hazard standards, noise standards, pollution, accessibility, height etc, and you can see why it's silly to take this libertarian idea to the extreme.

You have to find a balance. That balance will differ from city to city. But to mandate some minimum living standard makes a lot of sense. Breaking the law is not free of consequences, illegality is not the norm, it's a strong disincentive for anyone to engage in a housing practice which we as a society deem unacceptable. A line has to be drawn somewhere. From there you can, as a government, implement programs to help people meet those standards, and provide sufficient resources to do so.

Whether you think the line should be at 3m2, or 15m2, or 50m2, you can argue. What society deems acceptable is up for debate. I fully agree there. But the notion no mandated 'luxury', or minimum standard, should be set, and for government to just allow anything, without standards, because hey, otherwise you might create a situation where almost everyone lives according to an acceptable standard, except for a few edge cases temporarily breaking the standard illegally... I think that's silly.
Thank you, that works
Not a tornado, a hurricane (or typhoon as it's called in the Eastern hemisphere)
I wonder if Tesla is getting subpoenaed for video clips.

Other than for accidents, the SEC investigation, etc.
A small group of the most outspoken people always dominates discourse in any group of reasonable scale. It's how group dynamics work. The question that matters is if those attitudes reflect wider attitudes at the company. And I think the answer is yes.

The dominant speakers spoke popular opinions.
>Giving a corporation personhood does not give the corporation rights as much as does take away rights from those who interact with that corporation.

Maybe, but the purpose of legal personhood for abstract entities is also to hold them accountable under the same proven body of law that applies to individuals. Corporate personhood is not a new invention, but came from Roman law as it became practically necessary to extend the body of law governing individuals to families, clans, tribes, and eventually to such entities as guilds, universities and even city states. Today, the word 'corporation' has become virtually synonymous with a commercial enterprise, but the concept of legal incorporation is much wider than that.
The servitude model: after all, anything and everyhting is provided by the state, so the state owns you!

What if you don't live in the country?
It's a radar + cameras vs lidar + cameras debate. It sounds like radar + cameras > lidar + cameras
I really like his blog and it’s in my RSS feed.

I wish his writing style was a bit more serious. I personally like it, but when I share articles with friends and family - nobody can take him seriously.
I won't say it destroys startups but, it does change the focus significantly.
I am happy to be proven wrong but I feel that they’d never change defined behavior to undefined. Unspecified to undefined sounds more likely.

There’s this article [1] about compilers exploiting undefined behavior but ... it’s already undefined behavior.

[1] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=63...
Glossary of Web Analytics Terms You Should Know
Buffer's Equity Formula and Full Individual Breakdown (2014)
What do you need saving from - Ada has existed for nearly 30 years now ; )
The purpose is to allow anyone to run their own web server, for purposes of web decentralization.

The advantage over a raspberry pi is it comes preconfigured so you don't have to be a computer geek to set it up

https://www.freedomboxfoundation.org/
Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of.
> Insulting half of the political structure isn't going to help anything

Bear in mind that having 'half of the political structure' maintaining prescientific views re our planet's climate systems has become quite eccentric in 2019 - the US and Australia being the worst offenders. Most of the rest of the world has moved on from outright primitivism to mere obfuscation. Which is some kind of progress, but not enough. Anyway, at this stage the US far right Republican party is now enough of a worldwide laughing stock for insults to potentially be worthwhile. At some point there's a chance that half the US citizenry may come to see themselves reflected back as obscurantist and backward.

> Climate change isn't a new phenomenon. The earth wasn't this magical garden of eden with perfect climate just for us

No, but agricultural civilisation emerged from a background of a relatively stable climate. The range of possible near-term consequences of our current GHG gas emissions include (at scary probabilities, rising as new research comes in) ones that all but eliminate large scale agriculture. This has not been faced in the last 10k years, not with a 7-12 billion population, and not with the additional insults of soil and fresh water loss, habitat destruction, insect population collapses etc. Most ecological scientists are pretty terrified of what's coming at us at this point.
Scientific citations seem like a very poor metric for a country that is plagued by scientific fraud.
you're describing second wave feminism. It was about equal opportunities for women, regardless of any (supposed) intrinsic differences between the sexes.

What we're looking at here is a bit more complicated; the modern situation (not just feminism but a number of different position groups) wants to downplay the existence of actual differences between the sexes. This seems partly motivated by existing, bad/biased science, and partly by the worry that if women and men are physically different, that people will use that as a basis for discrimination. I do see a bit of what appears to be science denialism amongst the "there is no male brain or female brain" crowd, which I find worrisome. Ultimately, I am with the second-wave feminists: people deserve equal opportunities regardless of their differences.
SF over South Bay weather any day, especially summer.
While noble in its intentions, if flipping the roles is seen as discrimination (no all female boards), it’s discrimination.
> Giving a corporation personhood does not give the corporation rights as much as does take away rights from those who interact with that corporation.

I think you are (aside from any debate about your basic position) conflating juridical personhood, which is the issue here, with Constitutional (under, e.g., the 5th and 14th Amendments, and thus applying to rights within the scope of liberty addressed by those Amendments) personhood, as at issue in Citizens United, which are different concepts.

Juridical personhood is a defining feature of corporations, making them subjects of law that can, for instance, be sued.
My FOIA requests say no, but lots of blind spots. I'm not operating "at scale" due to the cost involved with non-electronic FOIA requests.
FYI you can do

import pdb; pdb.set_trace()

It pulls up console debugger and is a standard python package.
GUI stands for Graphical User Interface, emphasis on Graphical.

If it's in a text buffer it's a TUI, text user interface.

I mean you could get pedantic about these things, but basically if it's rendered with a graphic framework, it's a GUI, whether it's CPU, deferred or immediate, or GPU rendered.
The first people to get displaced by upzones are the ones who can't afford to continue to live there after a place gets redeveloped. I think this is really the key - you can "save" the castro, the painted ladies, and the billionaire estates in cow hollow, but you need to give people living in upzoned areas a 1-1 swap. The housing that gets built needs to be AFFORDABLE, and the people that would be displaced if they turned Excelsior into towers can't wait 10 years for rents to come down.

So here's an equitable solution that requires too much money/effort/organization/faith:

* Raise land taxes on the millionaires and billionaires in the mansions and areas that don't get upzoned - you can't have your cake and eat it too

* Everyone in the area of an upzone gets their rent frozen, and gets to move into a new "equivalent" apartment as new ones are built - in the same neighborhood. Rent is unfrozen when the median rent price lowers back to where their rent is now, or equal difference between median and theirs at freeze time.

* Govt pays market rate for the housing out of land taxes - city-wide rent control for up-zoned communities, in order to move into new places.

* Create a special economic zone in some of the upzoned communities - prioritize building and reducing regulations like sight-lines, and people in that community get first dibs at new housing (with their rent subsidies, or if buying a new place).

* Flurry of building occurs, eventually excess is made and maybe prices go down, but the buildings are less of a soulless shell for rich people, formed off the remains of the community that was once there, but filled with people who've lived there.
Nope, you're confusing the syntactic definition of discrimination with the semantic definition of discrimination.
No-one studying coral reefs now thinks they have much chance of surviving beyond mid-century given already baked-in ocean heating.
I was referring specifically to ecommerce players, in the context of the recent protectionist laws enacted by India in that area. And it is more than just protecting small business out of work since the laws specifically target foreign investment.
Often reverse is true. Trying to optimize system with million lines of code may require serious change in architecture and much harder because of backward compatibility and all the legacy baggage. As many people would describe it, it much harder to fix an airplane that must also continue to stay in the air.
Is this separate from US investment abroad - historically, when the US was at it's peak, there were governments in central and south america that were overthrown to make sure fruit corporations received favorable government treatment. In the modern world we're seeing the influence of the US waning, but lots of countries have "voluntarily signed on" to buying the boondoggle that is the F-35 even after all of the negative press and the US (or US organizations) still have significant political sway in eastern africa, though their losing it.

In China the government appears to clearly control the corporations (while there are some highly influential corporations that, through their economic power, have essentially become moves and shakers in the government) in America corporations control the government (while there are a lot of former politicians who end up sneaking off into highly paid do-nothing positions for their help during their tenure in elected office). These things are different, and America is absolutely a more free place, but it isn't an absolutely free place.
The entire peninsula is built on 1970s garden apartments without an update in 30 years. We need a solution to NIMBYism in the bay so badly - just making it more exclusive can't be the answer.
> And not only do you get more, but they deliberately add an excruciatingly slow delay to each image. It can take 10-15 seconds to solve a single image set, and then you still need to do 5 more.

There's a GreaseMonkey script that eliminates this delay.

https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/382039-speed-up-google-cap...
> For vertical integration to work you need to have funds to support it long term.

Elaborate.
How to overcome your TFS/TFVC hangover and get started with Git
I wasn't talking about sales tax, only yearly tax filings. Anything that is on an itemized tax return should be moved elsewhere into programs specifically for giving money for that instead of being given a coupon off of what you owe.

If there is some reason you report produce on your tax documents then no, it should not be there.
Many countries with strong social support systems have a baby bonus program where people are literally paid to have kids.

In Canada, it's based on household income. In 2016, the max was $6,496 per child under age 6 and $5,481 per child age 6 through 17.

If you have two kids (2 years old and 10 years old) with a household income of $50k, that works out to roughly $10k per year. When you consider that you don't need to pay for childcare (which could be more than $20k per year for a 2-year old in Toronto) and the constant care and support those children will receive, that's actually pretty good. And once the kids get a bit older and can be trusted to care for themselves once they get home from school, the stay-at-home parent can easily start working full-time again.
I get what you’re trying to say, but I’m not sure there’s such a thing as the “syntactic definition” of a word.
A mystery agent is doxing Iran' hackers and dumping their code: Ars Technica
Anyone have any insight into what makes Chinese companies list on US vs Shanghai/hk exchanges?
Maybe for MTV and NYC...but go out to Google's DCs and you'll find 80%+ conservatives who don't agree with all the anti-military and demonization of the right that goes on internally.
I hope they'll not mind someone identifying as trans to get on a board. You get what you measure, and you can hack around all sorts of discrimination.

Edit: To be clear, I do not support, encourage, or condone discrimination of any protected class. You should be able to discriminate by skill level, of course.
I think VDOM made sense at the time because DOM elements come with so much overhead that dirty checking thousands of elements (in Angular 1's case) does not scale well.

I think the issue became that the VDOM creates some overhead that making very simple DOM changes can avoid altogether. From what I understand, Svelte sidesteps the VDOM and outputs the smallest amount of code to achieve the desired level of reactivity which might be the better abstraction.
That German VC company contacted us to talk about partnering, learnt as much as they could from us and then (not to my surprise) launched their clone of our company with $42m backing.
> What you are talking about is a US experience...

Correct.

Because that's what this comment thread is about.

Grandparent:
>I'm curious is this because jd.com is far ahead of American Amazon or because Chinese Amazon is far behind American Amazon?

Parent:
> I would say jd and taobao is far ahead of American Amazon

The question was whether or not JD and Taobao in China are better than Amazon is in America. Not whether or not Amazon in China is as good as JD and Taobao are in China.
This has been discussed extensively in the C++ community. I think if you need a very safe code, you shouldn't use the string_view or span without thinking about the potential consequences. These are added to the language to prevent memory allocation and data copy for performance critical software.

Herb Sutter has concrete proposals to address this issue and Clang already supports them:
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3307522/revised-proposal-c...
You're correct, IANAL, but is merely quoting an official EEOC page tantamount to giving legal advice? GGP said "Nothing these Google employees did is even close to being on that list", and I pointed out items on the list that were. I didn't intend for it to come across as legal advice.
This sounds wrong. You're probably thinking of undefined behavior that happened to behave the same across all available C++ compilers, so people began to rely on it. But since it was technically undefined behavior, optimizers were free to take advantage of it, and when they started to it smashed any code that relied on that undefined behavior behaving in a consistent way.
Exploding Animal
Right, but this post refers to the Republic of Ireland, a sovereign state in the British Isles, a part of the world where there is, on average, zero shortage of water in general. It literally falls out of the sky.
The technical angle seems like a very smart one for this talk. You can just smell the cowering insecurity of the analysts and their deference to Musk when the technical descriptions whoosh past them. They may be (rightly) skeptical, but they don't want to look stupid while being so.
with plutonium, at the time? I think indefinite.
>"We've gone over this multiple times. Are we sure we have the right sensor suite? Are we sure we have everything we need?.... No."

Where did he say this? He repeatedly said they have everything they need to drive.

>but before you can deploy, you need to integrate Lidar,

Why?

>not all the conventional things you need to build a complete autonomous vehicle.

No one knows how to make a completely autonomous vehicle because they don't exist. I'll take the billionaire tech genius' approach, whose gotten farther than anyone in this field, over your armchair opinion, thanks.
The funny thing is that Huawei isn't even a very compelling brand. Like, even before the big freak out, no one was waiting in line around the block for the latest Huawei doodad.

If kids got a Huawei thingamajig for Christmas, they'd probably be a little pissed off, and toss it in the corner to be forgotten. Here and there, you'd see a random person with something they picked up as a stop gap device because they smashed the screen on their good phone. Maybe.

So now, every other week, noise, noise, noise? Huawei is the devil? Who gives a fuck?
Anyone have seen the list?

https://github.com/pe3zx/huawei-block-list/blob/master/maste...

Looks like a troll.
Thank you.
It should also be noted that WASD controls are very bad on an azerty keyboard. There are better choices than these keys. (Arrows being obviously even better than letter keys)
Editorializing is prone to abuse, but sometimes it is necessary on various grounds, such as the original title of an article being obtuse, misleading or even offensive. A good title should convey the nature of the subject matter and why it is worth reading. Nothing else.
Oh I have seen it, and I'm not suggesting they haven't copied that. I'm saying that most client SDK documentation looks alike at least for authentication etc. and when you look at the examples given for Otonomo, most of it is boilerplate information.
I assume your application is using a dedicated thread for each request?

Even then you would be handling more requests in parallel than the number of cores you have, but your concurrency would be limited by the cost of context switching and your memory capacity (having to allocate a sizable stack for each thread in most threading implementations).

Queueing is usually required for a stable multi-threaded server, but if you were doing async I/O you wouldn't need it. The extra memory overhead for each extra concurrent request (by means of lightweight coroutine stacks, callbacks or state machines) is not much different from the size it would take on the queue, and there is no preemptive context switching.

In most cases, you'll get the same behavior as having a queue here. Cooperative task-switching happens only on async I/O boundaries, so if you're processing a request that requires some CPU-heavy work, your application would just hog a core until it completes the request and then move to the next one.
it was a point in time. I have no problem with casks on secured trains. I've even watched the crash-test videos for amusement like everyone else.

I'm talking about ancient history where they put two guys on a train with a box.

This 'its the company don't ask questions' airline is much more what I would have expected, back in the day. I would have expected they detailed off a truck and some troops to do the drive. But no: they gave a suitcase to somebody and sent it on the red-eye.
Sure, but that is only a convenience the concept is that the river has it's own identity comes from local tradition.

The law was recommended by the Waitangi tribunal which is a body that redresses historical grievances by Iwi.

Not only is the river now it's own entity which is not owned by anyone local Iwi received $80 million from the government and a $30 million dollar fund to improve the health of the river.
Meat consumption is expected to increase as less developed nations like china, india, ASEAN countries, africa get wealthier.

https://ourworldindata.org/meat-and-seafood-production-consu...

People forget that for much of the 3rd world, meat was an unaffordable luxury. It won't be for much longer as they develop.

Also, meat is a natural part of a healthy human diet. It's unrealistic to think that meat consumption is going to be viewed as tobacco. It's even more unrealistic to think a natural food source like meat is going to be replaced by lab produced processed food.
Today's C++ will be considered a cobbled together relic in a few C++ standards time periods!
How many technologies do you see people working on where they say, "well we have one approach we think is gonna work, but we're also going to spend a ton of resources and time developing this other solution that would be useless if the first approach does work. Oh and it would make our cars 5k more expensive atleast."
I didn't down-vote you, but I imagine it's because you just repeated "out of" without explicitly clarifying which definition was meant (though it's more obvious in your version, at least to a native speaker).

For what it's worth, the usage here means "from within."
This is still unsolved research problem

Luckily, Karpathy is pretty good at solving research problems.

Karpathy could have easily spent entire day talking about current state of the art and how they have improved on it

Why would he do that? To help Uber?

Collecting data is actually more trivial part of this problem.

For Tesla, yes. For all others that’s the hardest part.