skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Calcium is most certainly an issue. A lot of vegan dairy substitutes are already fortified with calcium for this specific reason.

I'm still learning this stuff myself. But from the things I've read so far, vegans (especially the WFPB variety) can have difficulty getting: Vitamin B12, calcium[0], iron, and possibly a balanced amino acid profile if they have elevated protein requirements. A diet too high in carbs and too low in fat and protein can also cause long term problems like candida overgrowth and hormonal imbalances.

[0]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967195/
> The FaceID-generated name is just speculation from Apple.

No, it's not. As I've said multiple times, the name came from the stolen ID the thief had. The only use of facial recognition in this case was to link his presence at the time he gave the ID, to his presence at the other stores where thefts took place.

Facial recognition played no role in actually identifying the thief (either the actual one or the poor sap whose ID was stolen).
Highly disagree. Strategic firings can help with culture issues.
Can't wait until someone automates it.
20% of 100,000 is much more significant than 20% of 100 billion dollars.
Another sane decision from MA courts, now we just need some of that logic to trickle up to the national level.
The rewrite leaves out a lot of words. The bits you've quoted don't actually say much, which is rather the point. If you take the quoted bits literally, the first is absurd (all Gothic buildings, really?) and both are begging the question because they already assume the premise is correct. There's precisely nothing that demonstrates that Gothic buildings are reflecting the serenity of society, nor that monuments are accurately portraying an idealistic or faithful society. It's a whole lot of not content.
Well that seems perfectly reasonable to me. Read the terms of service or ask important questions when you before you start paying them once a month like "what happens if I don't use all my minutes?" (They rollover) "Do I have to keep paying if I have minutes already?" (No) "are the minutes refundable?" (No). You can't just walk into a store and say "talky talky please" and walk out with a phone. Allowing her to use the minutes toward internet and TV is generous of them.
Additive meter is actually a well-known concept even in Western music. It's clearly needed even to make sense of, e.g. "5/4" or "7/4" meter, which yes, are sometimes found in the repertoire - because these are already ambiguous in practice: does the 5 in "5/4" mean "3+2" or "2+3"? You need to know that in order to understand the music and figure out how it goes - to make it "meaningful" as someone else said.
My preferred place to buy sager is from xoticpc, default option for them is to ship without an os installed
Ask HN: Techniques for managing medium-term goals?
By medium term I mean something between a to-do list item that can simply be 'done' and checked off, and a longer-term ambition like, for silly example, 'run for president', unless you happen already to be a senior politician in a country with a president.

How do you organise thoughts around what will help you achieve a more medium term goal, and stay sufficiently motivated to progress towards it?

My question's intentionally vague, because I'm thinking of a few different things, and specificity won't be helpful to (m)anyone else.
former user of their product. originally presented to me as a chrome alternative with the ad-block built right into the browser itself and not as a javascript extension. But as the product has evolved, they've changed in ways to monetize it themselves. While they still block ads, they're deciding which ads they want to block now based on how sponsors compensate them. As a bonus, they're throwing you back a bone to put up with their new business model. Brave has inserted itself as a new middleman between the advertisers and web users.
> This all slowly degraded and eventually disappeared with the fall of the empire.

BULLSHIT. How on earth you can present blatantly false presumptions as information?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Romanesque_art_and_archite...

"In most of western Europe, the Roman architectural tradition survived the collapse of the empire. The Merovingians (Franks) continued to build large stone buildings like monastery churches and palaces."

BTW we still have Roman aqueducts, roads and bridges all over Europe.
This particular position has been filled. Thanks to everyone who showed interest!

For any general career inquiries, please do not hesitate to reach out: hr@shipchain.io Our careers department is always keen to meet new people!
Really cool, I'm eagerly awaiting for the signed HTTP exchanges.
From the article:

Many writers rely more heavily on pronouns than I’d suggest is useful. For me this sort of thing comes under the heading Remember that Writing Is Not Speaking. When we talk, we can usually make ourselves understood even amid a flood of vague “he”s and “she”s. On the page, too many pronouns are apt to be confounding. I’d strongly suggest to the point of insistence that you avoid referring to two people by the same pronoun over the course of a single sentence; to be frank, I’d suggest that you avoid it over the course of a single paragraph. (I know a few authors of same-sex romance novels who are regularly driven to tears by this sort of thing.)

Tightened up:

Pronouns can be overused. Writing is not speaking. When we talk, we can understand who's who amid a flood of "he"s and "she"s. On the page, that's confusing. Best to avoid referring to two people by the same pronoun in the same sentence. (Same-sex romance novelists struggle with this.)

Who, besides the guy himself, says this guy is the "Internet's copy editor in chief"?
Foundational Partners

Oath works with select partners that process your data to provide significant functionality for our products and services. For more information about these partners, and to understand and manage their use of your data, see:

Google (Privacy Policy)
Amazon (Privacy Policy)
Facebook (Privacy Policy)
Teads (Privacy Policy)
Nielsen (Privacy Policy)

You cannot turn off Facebook tracking for example.

This is in violation of GDPR because it is not possible to access essential functionality without tracking.

This illegal implementation is even worse than before because it now forces me to explicitly agree with the tracking.

It essentially means that I could not access Tumblr anymore.
Haiku AppServer is home grown, using AntiGrainGeometry libs for rendering to Framebuffer.
> The fact that, in today's world, a single misstep generates an immediate and irrevocable loss of trust, even when that misstep is quickly corrected and apologies are issued, is incredibly weird to me. It pushes people to hide their mistakes instead of being open about them...

This happened in the past too. What people did in the past was "move to another town", but in the age of the Internet you can't really run away from your public gaffes.

In this particular case, it's commendable that Caddy reversed course on the ads. However, many people's first exposure to Caddy was this ad story and it is extremely hard to change first impressions.
You have no problem with the create_user function? Obviously it's pseudocode my point is there are a finite number of log locations and checking for an instance of a known string among them isn't difficult.
"Today, there’s no way for users who receive BAT for viewing ads to swap their digital currency for dollars, but Eich says Brave will partner with cryptocurrency exchanges to make that possible."

So people can pay to buy tokens but can't sell them, seems legit.
Vocal Tract Simulator Translates a Person's Brain Activity into Clear Sentences
Smart (in the usual understanding of smart), or good programmers (in the "can invert a binary tree on a whiteboard" sense)? These are two measures that are basically orthogonal.
“I studied factory farms for years. Visiting one was far worse than I imagined”
I'd love to see if it works when people are dreaming. Or people who have Locked-in Syndrome. Or even people who are in a coma.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locked-in_syndrome
On many of my favorite Youtube videos, that "excrutiating" warm-up is part of the appeal. It feels more like a mysterious build-up towards an exciting payoff, when done right. That can be generalized towards writing or any other media.
> I'm curious where you're coming from here.

the GP is probably coming from some workplace that doesn't do exactly that same thing all day, every day, and doesn't know a framework for this from the inside out.

How to do a custom HTTP request on any language will probably take some good 15 minutes reading the documentation (if one is perfectly comfortable with its networking documentation), how to parse JSON will take at a minimum some good 30 minutes reading the docs even on Javascript (unless you are ok with eval). Discovering how to serve that endpoint is a multi-hour learning task by itself.
Awesome that it worked so well for you while it did. Tip for others who may try this: don't forget to lower your macros (and, in turn, calories) an appropriate amount as your weight drops. The same diet that maintains keto at 250 lbs won't keep you in keto at 190. For much, much more: https://peterattiamd.com/
> whose entire premise rests on safeguarding sensitive information

Is this a joke? You are not Equifax's customer and they do not need your trust. Their entire premise is selling information about you, to people who do not trust you. Securing your data is something they have to do for compliance, not a core part of their business.
That isn't evil. You wouldn't call a hurricane or a fire evil. You wouldn't call a person who kills someone in a no fault car accident evil. Evil isn't about results. It is about intent and motive.

You can call Facebook a number of things from amoral to negligent or even criminal, but once you start talking about evilness you have to start judging their intentions and motives.
Are You a Highly Sensitive Person?
It's an interesting dilemma for the consumer when subsequent failure happens so soon after repair. If the product is under warranty, original or extended, I think the equivalent of automobile Lemon Law should apply: consumer is entitled to a permanent fix, manufacturer is entitled to three attempts to do so within 90 days; if it's still not working or subsequently fails, the consumer is entitled to a 100% refund.

I'm not aware of that being the case in any U.S. state. How does a consumer protect whatever rights they have? 50% off an external keyboard isn't good enough but people have work to do. Why bother getting yet another "fix" when it too likely fails in a few months? I'd want to make sure that if my warranty is about to expire that I've got documentation that Apple agrees the defect exists and that I'm entitled to a better permanent fix.

Consumer protection laws are important. This finders keepers nonsense makes people angry and they aren't just going to reduce their trust in Apple, their trust in the industry and society is diminished as well.
That was the first thing that came to mind for me too. Usually the recipes come after two pages of exposition and 5 ads. It gets especially bad on my phone because then all I see are ads.

That's why I love King Arthur Flour's recipes (among others). Short intro, and then it gets right into how to get more consistency and quality out of the recipe or how to do variations on the recipe. It's not another long winded essay that boils down to "I cook this for my family."
So their incompetence lies in lacking configuration management in production as opposed to a lack of testing? Why are they manually configuring production servers anyway at that scale?
Specmanship doesn't matter. What matters is how fast it's able to execute on the task at hand and for what cost in terms of purchase price and energy.

Nvidia's offering can be really good, and so can Tesla's.
This is unfortunately the same boat everyone is in.

If any 2nd or even 3rd degree relative has their DNA information banked with any of these services then you are effectively identifiable. Police or anybody who can get a sample of your DNA left behind anywhere will be able to immediately identify your family, then rapidly rule out most of the other family members through orthogonal information and in most cases you will be the only candidate remaining.

So the real question is, if you already lost your anonymity, is there anything left to lose by buying in? You might as well get the benefits if you are having your privacy destroyed anyway.
Blue airplane lighting has taken over Delta, JetBlue, and United
I am sorry but how does that even pretend to be news?
Jeopardy’s Prize Budget vs. James Holzhauer
Maybe, I also just drive it hard. I should get a secondary filter regardless.
We could have that same intelligibility for less-expert users if we didn't have all the legacy gunk. Of course, the expert users have a vested interest in having a more-exclusive club. Nearly all of them would reject anything new.

A simple improvement is to give each of the 12 common pitches within the octave a distinct position on the staff. This eliminates accidentals from typical music, leaving them only needed for quarter-tone compositions. Sight-transposition becomes trivial, possibly within reach of beginners.
Lisp and OpenGL Coding Videos Show REPL in Action
A $10 billion fine for the Cambridge Analytica "scandal" would be so far beyond reasonable as to merit criminal charges against Joseph Simons. $3 billion is already insanely ridiculously high.
Just today I was browsing for new wine glasses. I finally found the product that I wanted and checked out a couple of options on Amazon. The first two reviews for the pair[1] I liked were complaining that they received counterfeit items.

The reviews are verified reviews, but there's no way for me to know which third party they bought it from so I could avoid them.

I ended up buying them on the manufacturers website. The shipping might not be as fast, but I got a great discount by signing up on their newsletter and it ended being significantly cheaper than Amazon.

This isn't my first experience like this. The biggest pain point of shopping outside of Amazon is the checkout experience of a lot of smaller sites and slower shipping, but I would much rather get my items a couple of days later than have to deal with returning counterfeit items.

I'm surprised about how Amazon is dealing with this issue. It's the growth at all costs approach, taking care of this would hurt their sales numbers -- but that's a pretty myopic view of things. It's the kind of attitude that flooded Twitter with bots, since taking care of that issue would hurt their growth numbers that investors love.

I really hope Amazon fixes this since I like the idea of a one stop shopping experience, but maybe people buying from the manufacturers directly might be better for everyone involved. A universal checkout experience (one login, saves CCs and contact information) would make Amazon obsolete in my opinion.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Riedel-Burgundy-Cabernet-Merlot-Glass...
Short answer: no

Longer answer:
This article mentions how to leak the key, but it assumes that you can generate many signatures successfully.
But to successfully use the key (thus sign with the key), you need to provide the password to the TEE, else it will refuse any operation on the key.
If the TEE is properly written (I'd say Qualcomm's is), the key in keymaster (which encrypts the key for the storage) itself is encrypted based on the password, so it can't leak anything since it's not decrypted even for the TEE itself.

Also, unless you unlocked your bootloader, the attacker would need to be able to launch its own software while the device is on the boot lockscreen. That requires to find an additional security flaw in the bootloader and/or early Android boot.
At the end of the day they need to increase revenue by adding customers or by increasing revenue per customer. Once the market is saturated they either buy competitors or they raise prices or try and sell you additional services...
i bought a second hand thinkpad T410 about 5 years ago for $280 . it is a fine development machine and i have not had any issues with linux compatibility.
At the VERY least, extract them to Environment Variables... ensure .env is on your .gitignore, and have your localized/dev configs in your local .env ... production environments should have them set. For more complex environments you can set via a secure key service, or build from there.

Again,. the LEAST you should do is use environment variables and keep the actual keys out of your code. .env files are a developer convenience measure, and easy enough to use side channels. I go a step further and ensure a fallback that might be the dev environment, but that is not the same as any higher environment
Other way around. By installing the shoplifter-detecting cameras, the shopkeepers will lower their guard because they have just spent a lot of money and are happy to abdicate the surveillance responsibility to the computer.
Not only that but it looks more like government is asking for its cut of the profit FB has made.
I am following this with interest.

I have some variant of Marfan's syndrome but have not shown the associated heart problems. After consultation with a geneticist we concluded that I could spend a bunch of money to get the exact variant that I have of the relevant genes sequenced. But almost certainly I would learn that I have some variant of Marfan's syndrome that is not understood. Relatives who also have the same phenotype can get sequenced to verify that it is genetic. But since none of us are showing the most troublesome problems, and the literature almost certainly doesn't have our exact variation, I would learn nothing more than I know already.

So just get an MRI every 5 years, and wait for costs to come down and research to improve. In 10-15 years look again and maybe the genetic test will be useful then.

For a genetic condition as specific as mine, the sequencing done by these commercial providers is useless.
<3

I don't have a good set of resources for you, sadly. Practice, practice, practice. That's sort of the best I've got right now :/
Well git can most certainly have multiple separate history trees within one repository that are all technically unreleated.

One could even use the existing submodule feature to reference unrelated history in the same repository, but the submodule tooling would want create a seperate .git folder, and duplicate everything, and would want a url to identify the repo, rather than knowing to use the parent repo.

It ought to be possible to modify git submodule to be able to specify that the submodule is actually just all the refs in namespace "blah" of the physically containing repo. Basically you would only need an expanded version of the .git "symlink file" feature that lets you specifify both "gitdir" and a ref namespace to use for all operations. Then poof, you would have self-contained submodules.

You would still have the problem that namespaced refs do not get cloned by default.

You also have some risk of pushing some refs of the parent that have module entries that reference objects only in unpushed refs in a ref namespace, meaning that if somebody cloned the repo, and tried to expand the self-contained submodules, it would discover that the commits are not present. I'd not be surprised if regular submodules also had that limitation. (I've never really used them in a manner where i might modify and commit in the submodule.)
>> Why doesn't Zuck just quit? He's so rich. I would have fucked off and retired so long ago.

> I would guess because he truly cares about making the world more open and connected and issn't in it for the money.

It's more likely that he just likes being powerful and in charge of something big. If he just "fucked off and retired" the power he'd wield would be much less.
Unfortunately, MLMs are legal, and since a service is being done for pay (ads count as a 'service') then this is probably legit.

But I thought the point of Brave was to pay content authors. Wouldn't a simpler and more consistent solution be to make it so that if a viewer received a payment for viewing ads (man that is hard to type) that the money is held in escrow until they pay it out to a site the user has visited?]
The federal government doesn't have the capability to do that, and it never will. If it were to try to do this, it would do what it is told to do by some lobbyists or special interests.
There's no best diet, there's just a diet that works for oneself. For me it's a ton of fruits (tomatoes, clementines,
.. depending on the season), vegetables (onions with leaves, spinach leaves, herbs, peppers, aubergines, carrots...) vapor-cooked or boiled in water, occasionally with some white fish, and some rice to 'cement' a bit that, some honey. No sauce and no waste or almost, no drugs (this diet is like a natural drug for me). Doing some exercise the weekend on a bike. My BMI is always around 18 (60/1.83^2)
Some people may not enjoy the "making the world an objectively worse place" part. Not everyone is moved only by a fat paycheck and working on interesting problems. Otherwise we might as well assume it is perfectly fine to work on a poison gas that only works on ethnicity X -- after all the pay might be pretty good, and it's a cutting-edge, advanced biochemical problem.

Obviously not saying FAANGs are quite that bad, but still, this is a pretty shallow reason to work somewhere.
I am more pessimistic. When discussions of securing user data come up, how often do people vote - limit lifetime of collected data and delete it after x days? I don’t think businesses ever choose that because they don’t want to commit to the lost opportunity to mine that data later. So what we are stuck with is security through some ad hoc set of encryption and distribution practices- ie only let the transcribers have random access to a small set of data. But then years later we discover the whole dataset is hacked, leaked or accidentally publically accessible and the only thing that would have guaranteed to protect us was - systematically deleting data, the thing they will never do.
Zero-Base Budget Is Magic If You Used to Be Poor
This seems like one of those ideas that's great in theory but not in practice. I don't care about paying or even being paid when browsing the web...I just want to be left alone.

Also this particular implementation is rather shady.

See podcast:

https://www.whatbitcoindid.com/podcast/francis-pouliot-on-th...
Of course you can ask individuals directly working on such stuff to make that decision. Implementers (who are aware what they're implementing) are just as much responsible for it as the people who gave them directions. In fact, this is just a rehash of the "just following orders" defense, except in this case it's not even orders, since you can walk out on them.

Not only that, I seriously doubt that Google would punish anybody who would simply request to not work on that particular project, instead of accommodating them by reassigning to a different team. So this is a very low bar to clear.

Does it mean that somebody else will do it? Probably, but responsibility matters. If you're the one who assists in illegal or unethical activities, then you're personally responsible for them.