skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd add trading Futures to the mix too or Options on Futures. The beauty with the Futures market is it's open 24/7(though liquidity might be a problem in the night) and there are only a limited number of futures markets/commodities you need to keep track of. Just stick to the S&P, Nasdaq, Treasury, Crude Oil & Gold. You can do some currencies if you like. Yes it's highly leveraged so more risky but that's why you make risk management front and center of any strategy you end up using to enter a trade.
You can achieve L4 before you can determine if a pedestrian is paying attention. Your car will be slowing down when it doesn't have to but it can work and work safely.
No investor will get involved with a company that is presently undergoing major intellectual property litigation. IP lawsuits are the kiss of death for VCs.
As opposed to the "scientific", "quantitative" reasoning behind Tesla being the leaders in FSD?
I'm surprised they weren't fired for publicly admitting they weren't doing their job.
I have gone on some long verbal rants about the dark patterns (bordering on malicious behavior) exhibited by key agents such as SSH agent, GPG agent, Pageant, and the like.

What can you learn from the compromise? Never use an agent. Kill it with fire^H^H^H^H -9.
You're putting the cart before the horse on the heated seat argument though. It's cheaper to have one factory line for the seats. Ideally you would pay the same price for the car without heated seats whether or not the hardware was physically there.

It's the same thing they ran into with the software locked batteries. The goal is to have minimal overhead to try to drive costs down on Model 3, and making the SR just a software limited version of SR+ actually ends up pushing the overall cost down, rather than having to set up an entirely different line that does the cloth seats and the aluminum roof.
Armadillo Willy's is an awfully local reference. They only have a few locations relative to the other chains mentioned in this thread, and the furthest from the South Bay is in Dublin.
I'm glad I found someone that feels that same way. I used to walk by a BdB on my way to work and I couldn't help but notice the horribly stereotypical cartoon they use as their mascot.[0] My thought experiment for this image is: Imagine how this type of caricature looks like for pretty much any other genre of restaurant (Chinese food, sushi, burritos, etc). It's probably super offensive. To me, that's a good indicator that this caricature is offensive too.

[0] https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/06/d7/fd/30/...
>It could easily send way more data than any care company at any time including over WIFI.

Except that it isn't, and even Karpathy said the quantity doesn't matter, it's the data quality.
That video link shows as unavailable.
That’s not what it says at all.

This is like saying the NSA has backdoors in Cisco/Junpier/Arista and no country that isn’t the US should buy them. Then just fail to provide any evidence.
Out of curiosity, how big was your organization before the support model you're describing took off? What sort of product was it? I would love to learn more about how this works in practice for companies besides red hat
> > Also, most OO langs make a big ceremony out of each new type: create the class file, create the test file, blah blah blah. I want types to be cheap so I can make them easily and capture more meaning with less work.
> Totally agree with that, the ability to define a type in one line and have it reflected though the entire code base through type inference is the one thing that I miss the most in C/C++.

FWIW, I think that this is what distinguishes object-oriented programming as a language paradigm from object-oriented programming as a design paradigm: If you're going to say that all data types should have the operations you can perform on them bound up together into a single class (or class cluster), then that would imply that small, cheap data storage types are expected to be few in number.

If, OTOH, it's more about modularity, and you're not so concerned about how things happen on the sub-module level, then that gives more ideological space for code that's, for example, functional in the small scale and object-oriented in the large scale, like Erlang. Or procedural in the small scale and object-oriented in the large scale, like some C++ code.
I think you draw the wrong conclusion, even from your link. Your link as I read it is basically saying we are all collectively responsible for good and evil, and that there are supposedly unpopular evils which we ourselves create and implicitly endorse, often counterintuitively.

That doesn't mean we ought to just give up and worship whatever worst thing capitalism produces. If you look at Ginsberg's long history of political activism as an example it's certainly not what he and those around him lived.

At a separate scale from that discussion we need to "play our side" of the game, and that will necessarily involve your personal interpretation of ethics. I believe it is a kind of laziness to dismiss that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbgtGQIygZQ
For the named people organizing it, it probably does reduce their options a fair bit, though there are also companies who would hire for these kind of employees: As long as your company is on the straight and narrow, they're very engaged, enthusiastic, and public people.

Enough unnamed Googlers walked out that most probably would see no ill effects in their options due to having walked out.
There's no proof in the article. Still allegations. Just show the proof already!!!
> When voids (boiling water pockets) formed, these reduced the reactor’s ability to moderate neutrons, thus accelerating the reaction rate.

Actually, what the loss of water did was reduce capture of neutrons on hydrogen. The moderator, graphite, remained in place and was more effective.
Just leaving this here. Do tasks. Get paid.
https://coincircle.com/l/50VVxbObg3
I'm curious if any modeling has been done around 1 vs. 2 working-parent households in developed countries, in relation to population growth. Would we really be having a problem with "natives" not having kids if a single parent could work full time for a (very) comfortable lifestyle as it was just 40 years ago?

It seems to me there is at least a correlation around the time a 2 parent household more or less became a requirement for the middle class to simply survive and when it became such a burden to raise a child. Since everyone is now more or less competing with 2x dollars for the same amount of fixed cost "stuff" (housing, education, healthcare, etc.) prices for those things rose substantially faster than inflation.

Then you add in the second or third highest cost a dual-income family has (child care) that didn't really exist 40 years ago.... It seems at least obvious on it's face that this was going to happen. We removed any and all slack from our family lives, and wonder why we can't seem to get ahead when we have multiple decades of income hyper-planned in advance.

I also think car culture and suburbification of many western countries also heavily contributed - at the same time we were forcing parents to both work outside the home, we also decided it wasn't cool to live near extended family or within a close-knit multi-generational community. Thus making the need for child care even more acute.

I'm not entirely sure the point I'm making really - just that it seems so obvious. This outcome was practically written in stone on the policies (fiscal, social, and energy) western governments put in place since WWII.
It's no longer in that link. I found it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbgtGQIygZQ
Meaning you want to build a bluetooth hardware device and then have it be able to interact with iOS?

If so, I suggest you dig into the bluetooth SIG (standard etc) a little, just understand what all the different terms mean and how Bluetooth and BLE work at the radio, protocol and profile (BLE) levels.

Bluetooth isn't crazy hard, neither is BLE but a key is understanding what you are trying to do and how to fit into the existing standards. If you are thinking "real-time" streaming, bluetooth is the way to go, if you are IoT with occasional data than BLE is more efficient.

I had done a bunch of embedded stuff prior at different levels, but got involved working with BLE/Bluetooth a lot in the past 3 years. I made quite a few preventable mistakes not starting at the beginning thinking it would be substantially similar to other wireless technologies. It is, but it also isn't.

Outside of that, pick up a dev board (~$50/USD) from Nordic. I suggest them not because they are perfect, they aren't, but they are the most consistent and reliable I have found -- with a super detailed API spec. There are some to stay away from as well, Bluegiga for example. If you ever get to the point of productizing, you can start with pre certified modules using Nordic or TI etc and be far ahead of the curve for a smaller price tag. Make sure you check out the chipset too before committing at a full product level as well, there are some known TI chip issues with certain ones. TI acts like these issues don't exist but every product that uses them has the same issues, it is almost comical.

If you have specific questions let me know, happy to share my experiences and anything I can help with.
>This is a much different argument than you have been making. You're (now) saying people can't be persuaded not to kill animals, so we should do so in a more humane way.

Can you help me to understand where i contradicted myself?
> It's not clear to me that on-premises state university education is interstate commerce.

It's already heavily federally subsidized, and challenging changes to the subsidy conditions on the grounds that the feds have no right to be involved at all would be suicidal for state universities since it wouldn't just kill the new conditions if it succeeded but the subsidies themselves.
More of a Shelbyville Idea (Tesla)
NYC Tech and the Compounding Interest of Making a Hire
In 5 years working in NYC Tech, working with 30+ Startups, it's interesting to see all of the different approaches to Tech hiring. Specifically looking at companies so focused on hiring with velocity, yet struggling with something we like to call Recruiting Hygiene.

From what we've seen in the industry at HiveFive, the average Onsite to Hire ratio is about 1:12. That means for every 12 people you are bringing onsite, 1 will be hired. Now think about that for a second:

Let's say there are 4-5 steps to your onsite (5 hours): A Coding Problem, Systems Design, Lunch, CS Fundamentals and a Wrap Up.
Each step is a different person (Sometimes companies even have 2-3 interviewers involved for each)
If each portion takes an hour, that's a minimum of 55 hours of Engineering time that's being pulled away from doing their core competency to make 1 hire.
What happens when your goal for the quarter is 6 or even 10 hires on your team?
At 10 hires, you're looking at an astounding 605 hours that Engineering is not doing their core competency.
What do you think your organization could get done with an extra 600 hours of Engineering time?
Additionally, how can we expect to compete with the major players in a hyper competitive NYC landscape when you are not able to hire efficiently and, in most cases, can't compete on compensation?

If there's one thing I've learned over the past 6 months that has stuck with me, and just makes sense it's this:

You only need to evaluate for 4 things in your process:
Do they have the relevant experience?
Can they do the job on a daily?
The Level of Engineer
Culture Fit

From there, you should have a clear cut decision on hire/no hire and the level of Engineer you're bringing on.

Hiring should be thought of as a product (NOT a sales funnel)
Hiring is NOT a Democracy and feedback needs to be gathered individually immediately to avoid bias and group think

Agree of Disagree?
Pedal Power Part 1: Dawn of the Drum Kit [video]
I really like this quote. It succinctly summarizes what being a programmer is for me. However I would like to add to it that you have to know what to ask when you get stuck.

When I try and learn something and then get to the point where I know what questions to ask, that is when I know that I have learned something.

If you’re staring at a problem and you don’t know what it is or how to describe it then you can not progress, but that is how you progress. You try and fail and ask yourself why you failed. Building on failures is a slow way to progress, but gradually those failures becomes knowledge and it gets easier to progress.

When I learn a new language, tool, library or feature my knowledge gets me going quicker. It doesn’t necessarily bring me the whole way home each time, sometimes you really have to learn something new, but looking at that thing that I know that I don’t know is what gives me confidence in feeling that I will learn it.
If you invite a girl at your house do you have the right to rape her? No. Same applies for free speech, it doesn't stop at your doorstep no matter how private your property is. You can physically more easily abuse the right to free speech of other people in your property censoring them but this is still abuse.
How many people are poor like that? And the amount of money they hold seems a poor indicator, too. People who have paid off half their million dollar house, and have an income of 20k/month would count as poor.

If the average household has 5k in savings, pool with your parents to get to 10k.

Or take on some night time job once per week, to earn an extra 400$ per month, and save for 2 years.

And you don't have to buy a whole house, a small flat can be a sufficient start.

I have to say I have never done this, but I was recently in talks with people who propose doing that and help people who do it. It sounded plausible - why not? You can buy a rented flat (that already has tenants who pay rent). So the numbers are pretty much clear.

They told me the bank doesn't count the rent as your income, though. That is the catch. So for your first investment like that, you have to be creditworthy on your own. However, after a while you can build trust with the bank (they see the rent from the tenants keeps coming on a regular basis), and get more credit. Then you can start the next project.

You don't have to invest in a desirable area, as you don't want to live there yourself.

Nevertheless, I am still not convinced it is for me. I worry too much about bad tenants, things breaking on the property and so on. I have almost no knowledge about housing properties (like to how do you recognize damage to the property before buying it, how much do repairs cost, and so on).
Cost is also a significant consideration on mass market cars.
I'm a long-time Apple user fully baked into the Apple ecosystem and have friends and acquaintances in the same position, and I'm not sure I agree with most of those. Maybe "Retina display," only because Apple arguably was the first company to give that a specific branding term. I don't even think iPod was ever a generic for "MP3 player"; it was far and away the most popular MP3 player, and I'm sure the dozens of people who bought Zunes were tired of people saying "I've never seen an iPod that looks like that before," but that's not the same thing as being a generic term.

Beyond that, though, your other examples just seem weird, because I don't ever hear anyone use iPad or iPhone as a generic term. "I have an Android iPhone." "Hey, that's a cool Microsoft iPad." Nope. And the Mac was the first computer anyone outside of nerdspace ever heard of using a GUI and mouse, and I'm sure that's led to some pop culture confusion, but that doesn't strike me as comparable to the other examples anyway. "GUI" and "mouse" are generic terms.
> It would translate to try-catch that wraps the entire body of the method

It would not not be the same unless you change how scoping works in these instances, and that can introduce other complexities, e.g. how to limit scope so that some things are inaccessible to the catch block.
It does mean you're not rich[1], what it doesn't mean is that you won't be rich when you retire, at that point you will shift your accumulated wealth to a region with a lower cost of living (in all probability) and then you'll get to enjoy it - but while you need to keep a large portion of your value tied up in a house so you can afford the house you don't have much in terms of liquid assets.

[1] Assuming your labor isn't portable - if your labour is portable (i.e. you can move to rural montana and keep your job or a similarly paying one) then you're making an active choice to pay a high cost of living for the environment you're living in, many people can't remote themselves without cost so to continue to earn at the rates they're earning they need to stay put.
>Autonomous farm vehicles or something, sure

I knew I'd find someone here who hates when John Deere locks down their vehicles, but is fine when Elon Musk does.
> But if Company B can execute a similar concept faster and better than Company A, that's ultimately better for society.

Only in the short term. In the longer term, it may no longer be worth the risk for any Company A to begin in the first place.
White Castle Impossible patties are delicious. I don't order traditional meat there anymore because of it.
You have no idea how developed China's internal shipping is.
Correct. Though they now need to register their copyrights (proving original art) in order to move to the lawsuit phase.
Maybe I missed it in the other comments but is anyone else uneasy about the idea of your coworkers having a town hall to tell their "stories"? Just seems ripe for unfounded accusations or cherry picked facts to basically defame a coworker.
Those are some very bold claims. Level 5 by the end of this year? I find the software approach intriguing and Karpathy's segment was enlightening and did a lot to convince me of Tesla's advantages.

On the other hand, I've been sensing that Tesla is finding it harder and harder to raise cash and has been getting increasingly desperate. Are we on the cusp of a new transformative technology or the peak of the mother of all bubbles? Time will tell.
Most scientific research made by Neal D. Barnard proponent of Vegan/plant-based diet and founder of the said Committee.
> China will not let a non-Chinese company ever gain top position in any sector.

I don't know about this. Starbucks, McDonalds, KFC, Boeing, Apple and many others are ahead of their Chinese peers in China. It sounds like you're just using a blanket statement from reading various online articles without even how it's out there.
Classic traveling salesman problem cast into a large number of analytically incompatible and often hard to quantify dimensions.
... so like Outback?
No, you need to file every tax form that applies to you. I assume you are talking about forms like the 1099-B, which TurboTax charges you to file (~$80 IIRC). If you don't file a form and the IRS knows about it, you will have a bad time.
The value proposition really isn't that great. It's not any cheaper than food from a local Italian joint. What you're paying for is that Olive Garden experience, whatever that is worth to you.

A good example is the Olive Garden in Times Square. It's _always_ packed despite there being better Italian places a few blocks away. Not to mention, if you're willing to hop on the subway there's significantly better Italian food available in the outer boroughs for much cheaper. Olive Garden isn't that cheap, that nice, or that tasty which makes it a mystery to a lot of people.
I'm not really sure what your point is by claiming I am considering his reaction mature.

Actually, your comment could indeed be read that way. Therefore I'm obliged to push back against such a position, even if you didn't mean it precisely that way. I'm generally having a conversation for the sake of the 3rd party. The lurkers are the majority of this site's users.

Thankfully, this is the internet and we can talk it through if we want.

My un-provable suspicion is that civil discourse itself is being targeted by nefarious forces. It's either that, or the emergent incentive structures of social media as currently constructed are having the same effect. Or both. It's bad either way.
I have wondered about this myself... and I am working on an CV ML project myself... but data that is correctly predicted is not not as useful.. what you want are edge cases, images with low confidence, and errors. So when users take over and disengage, that is useful data. when the system beeps and forces a disengagement.. this is the data you need. That has been my experience and I'm glad to hear them validate that. Your training data needs diversity.
It not about high-paying roles. The industries that are talked about in gender segregation discussions are those that are high-paying, high social status jobs. A big difference.

When I was young the highest paying job direct out of high school was underwater welder. Not many teenage girls are signing up for that program, nor are there much political interest to get 50/50 gender ration for jobs that work in the dark, dangerous, on rusty oil rigs far away from land.

In a bit of irony, the same can be said for professions dominated by women. Hired midwifes during the summer vacation months here in Sweden are getting salaries up to 9k a month. Very few people here in Sweden has a monthly pay that high. Demand can skyrocket when you only recruit from half the population, at which point the employer will pay what the market demands.
Google telling Whittaker that they don't want her doing work on AI ethics after she torpedoed their first effort to have a public discussion is not even close to firebombing her or hiring mercenaries to shoot her. Nor was she engaged in trying to form an employees' union, which I think is the activity protected by the NLRA.

They didn't even fire her. Apparently they just said, We don't want you involved in the AI ethics discussion going forward. That seems reasonable, considering her past efforts in that area have not benefited Google in any way, but rather harmed them.

Just as employers can't firebomb their employees for organizing, employees can't bury steel spikes in logs headed for the sawmill.
So treat it like the federal highway funding being conditioned on the states "behaving" with respect to speed limit, DUI laws, and other items.

I don't love but accept the feds exerting economic power based on economic grants they decide to give or withhold. I do have a problem with them asserting regulatory power reserved to the states/people by the 10th.
It's just been the 100 year anniversary of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in India, perpetrated by the British, which had its roots in India pressing for self-governance given that Canada and Australia had been granted independence and more autonomy.

We have many dark periods in our history.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre
I took it as weasel words. The robotaxi business will be the vertically integrated capstone of everything Tesla does, therefore 100% of their expenditures are building towards the robotaxi.
What I found interesting as well is that they (him and Elon) hated the idea of using high definition maps, saying that if you need them you don't do self-driving cars really. For example, when driving condition change (roadblock or anything) you're done.
How would authors make money without copyright? Publishers would just print whatever they wanted and authors would be living off patreon and ad revenue like youtubers today do...
> Students loans must be dischargeable via bankruptcy. Until that happens, student loans will continue to be an issue

Cancelling existing debt and stopping issuing new loans (redirecting federal aid from loan guarantees to eliminating tuition at public universities) would, I think, cure the problem without making loans dischargeable in bankruptcy.
You're assuming a human would try and physically approach and remove it. It was discovered by a drone, why wouldn't a poacher use a drone to retrieve it?
Yeah, I saw that but somehow I'm still watching it in another tab.