skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Generous Tit-for-Tat was the winning algorithm in a very particular scenario: repeated prisoner's dilemma. Each player knew the full history of its opponent's participation in the game and knew therefore that there would be consequences for its behavior in the current game. In this scenario your identity and reputation are perfectly known. This is a very different game.
It feels like this development will eventually force us to "help evolution" in this regard and heavily invest in engineering plastic eating organisms that can sustainably live in the environment.
I was wondering the same. What is the logic behind this setup? That basically means that it is no better than having one sensor. Because if any one of them breaks, you have broken sensor active on next or following flight.
Also I recall there was something said about Lion Air crash that the crew on the day before experienced some flight control problems which was not communicated to the crew involved in crash? Did they use other sensor on the day before and that was faulty too, or isn't that is how it actually worked?
I'm suggesting everyone on the planet automatically tunes out ads, what is shown is irrelevant no matter how relevant it is. There is no ad industry on the internet, there is only a tracking industry, the ads are just an excuse. There's no good reason Apple should even provide the id.
Yes, but you also described it as the strictures of "the religion", as if there is a single monolithic Judaism that universally follows that rule.

She disagrees with the way they operate; she doesn't need to justify herself either. They were able to come to a satisfactory business agreement regardless.

I think what I'm responding to is that your circumcision comparison made it sound like you're suggesting she's somehow "less Jewish" or an outsider to Judaism, when in fact the specific thing she's disagreeing with isn't a universal part of the religion.
Look at the resources it takes, to lift even a small number of children out of failure. Instead of building a wall, we should be building more bridges to success..
This is a pretty standard approach, not just an "Indian outsourcing company thing".

eg I used to do contract work with Fujitsu some years ago, as one of the implementation people in their projects team. We'd get things set up and working well, document the heck out of it for the ops team, and then hard it over to said ops team for daily running.

It's done this way so the more experienced / creative solution finding types ;) (eg expensive) can be engaged to solve the initial problem + implement the solution. Once that's working it just needs people to run the daily playbook and look after minor issues that crop up.
I think the answer is yes, and it’s called the Shapiro time delay effect, but I don’t trust my comprehension of anything about GR: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_time_delay
Good observation.

There is a nice analogy to programming here. The same that one of the main tasks of the programmer is to handle errors, one of the main tasks of the engineer is to know the limitations of the tools he is using.
iOS won’t let apps do that. But apps can record their own screen.
In the automotive sector India has its own successful manufacturers.

Tata now owns a whole slew of British auto companies in Jaguar/Land Rover. So, despite these horror stories of corruption, someone in the Indian auto sector is doing something right.

I don't see why, given the market size, that India can't have its own full stack of mobile phone tech, operating systems, apps and everything else. Why settle for crumbs from the Apple table? Why settle for a few jobs for the profits to go back to Cupertino? The Tata Steel example is proof that dreams don't have to be downsized and that countries have to be beholden to American corporations.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19101020 Previous discussion on apps secretly recording the screen and sending data in the clear, including credit card details.
They are higher risk, but sometimes come with great rewards too. I'd say Martin Luther King was pretty fundamental, as was Gandhi and a bunch of other people I have to credit with doing a lot of good.
Doesn't Pocket require a sign in too?
If the purchasing base (or potential buyers) believe the reviews to be mostly fake, they may lose trust in the service...

This seems like a problem worth fixing, from Amazon's perspective.
With no back checking?
Testing will happen. The choice you make is who does the testing and when it happens. Internal people testing earlier is generally preferable to external customers testing 'live', but either way, the testing will happen.
I see exactly the same routine in our game.

"Yes we can do that in three weeks. We need the API documentation for _those_ two systems, network access to _those_ resources, and credentials to log in to _those_ services first."

2 months later we're still waiting on critical pieces of those prerequisites, while someone's screaming that the deadline they'd committed to with the customer was 5 weeks ago.
I hear you. Still a very subtle take on things.
What is the best way to pas Cisco 300-135 exam in first attempt?
anyone who know the trick to pass the exam od 300-135 cisco in first attempt..
How to accept payments through PayPal Checkout
> Yes, but you also described it as the strictures of "the religion", as if there is a single monolithic Judaism that universally follows that rule.

I don't see why this has to degrade to an argument of semantics, but here we go.

Just as if we were talking about Hokkien, we could talk about "the language" Hokkien, despite the fact that you could say "the language" and mean Chinese (which may include Hokkien) in some other context. Right now we're talking about this specific publication's circle of association. They clearly have different religious rules than Deborah, but she is still Jewish.

> I think what I'm responding to is that your circumcision comparison made it sound like you're suggesting she's somehow "less Jewish" or an outsider to Judaism

She is, in relative terms, more of an outsider to this specific publication's Judaism than somebody who would agree with their first offer (assuming they still hold the view that their first offer was preferable).
Why our world needs more empathetic leaders?
I don't like the lottery because it inhibits life planning. I'm not going to move near a charter school based on a 1/2 chance that my kid will get into the school. But I can shop around different zip codes, move to a house near the school in the one I choose, and know just what I'm getting.

Obviously, this might price me out of the very best zip codes, but at least in my case it still leaves many good options on the table.

The story may be quite different for someone in the bottom 50% of income. Maybe they should prefer a lottery. Maybe they do?
My experience with a guitar suggests that it is a wrong mood to learning new tricks. When I was told that my right hand thumb position is not right, and I should try to change it, I didn't challenged the idea at first, I knew that if I try to change it, I would face problems, it would be harder for me to make it right, even if "right" is a way to a mastery. A few hours a day in a month or two, and I learned how to do it right. Now I can do both ways, because each has its upsides and downsides. I'm playing classical pieces with "right" position of my thumb, it is really good, but when I use guitar as a rhythm-driver I prefer to use thumb to silence some strings.

There are no point to compare a new way and the old one before you mastered new. And there are no point in thoughts like "my natural ways are different and should be preserved for the sake of keeping my personality". If your physiology is near enough to averages, than all the differences are neurological or mental. These differences can be overcome. But because they are mental, the mood of yours when you are learning is the very important to a learning.
curious about this person's reaction to things not being implemented in 2 days. did he/she think that people were just dragging their feet? or not as smart? or sabotaging things to make him/her look bad?
No, there's more to it than that.

Firstly, from 1903-1968 aerospace was in a period of exponentially improving performance (range, speed, altitude) comparable to Moore's Law. But from the mid-60s onwards the rapid improvements stopped, as developments hit hard limits imposed by material science and thermodynamics: it's hard to get a material much stronger than carbon fibre or titanium alloy, it's ridiculously hard to go faster in air (drag increases faster than the square of speed: if you throw more energy at the problem via your engines it comes out in the form of friction-induced heating).

Secondly, there have been huge incremental improvements since 1968. Consider the 737 series. The 737-100 had a maximum range of 1540 nautical miles on 17.86 metric tonnes of fuel; today's 737MAX-10 can do 3850nm on 25.94 tonnes of fuel: it's 72% more fuel-efficient. It's also gone from 118 to 204 seats, so about the same upgrade is passenger capacity. The cargo capacity has almost doubled, too.

This being HN, the point of comparison should be an Intel-cpu laptop circa 2009 with an equivalent laptop today. The headline clock speed is probably similar (stuck around 2.4GHz), as is the number of hardware cores. The modern laptop probably has more RAM and more storage, but only by a factor of 2x or 4x. But it has double or triple the battery life, 4x or 8x the pixels on screen, a screamingly fast SSD instead of a rotating-platter drive, and a GPU that the OS can offload a chunk of work onto other than simply accelerated graphics. It looks disappointingly similar, but if you could give your 2009-self your 2019 laptop they wouldn't be in a hurry to give it back again.

There have also been huge improvements in overall safety, the 737MAX MCAS problem aside; compare accident rates today with accident rates in the 1980s, let alone the 1950s if you want an eye-opener. (Of 1010 Boeing 707s delivered, there have been 173 hull losses in accidents.)
I don't have Advertising option. Is this only available in certain jurisdictions?
Its funny. It was always said here in the USA that the far-right christians were the 'idiot anti-vaxxers', but it seems the orthodox jews are having their 'hold my beer' moment.

It brings up a good discussion of where personal rights and group rights intersect. It is going to be a weird future.
Not if there is a massive loss of jobs an rioting in the streets.
Z-Machines aren't compilers, they're virtual machines that can execute the compiled output.

There's no (known) compiler that still exists that can compile ZIL into Z-code.

edit: except for zilf, as mentioned, but it's not functional for even zork 1.
I stopped doing that after I bumped into the guy ahead, who didn't notice the light had gone green.
This is unequivocally false. Ad spend is so high specifically because advertisements work. Advertisers especially love digital because its so easy to attribute revenue back to their ad spend. Google didn't take in $118B for showing ads because "everyone on the planet automatically tunes [them] out."
That's ridiculous. If everyone tuned them out, it wouldn't be a multi billion dollar industry. People pay attention to ads, and they click ads and companies get very rich pushing their products through ads.

What exactly do you think all these companies want with all this tracking data if not to sell you products with ads?
So, are these playable online over gh-pages? It would be so cool if the gh-pages contained an interpreter that loaded the source from github.
I do, irrelevant ads aren't going to alter my behaviour, relevant ads might well do so.
Can your MITM proxy modify HTTPS traffic? If so, how did you configure your machines to trust the cert you're using?

Yes, of course. It wouldn't be very useful otherwise. The proxy has its own CA, and I install the cert into the trusted roots of all the machines I use.
Depending on your layout and whether you're signed in, there's no such link. On my view, I see a "show parent comments" button above the comment.
The gender fight behind Sicily’s most iconic snack
Thanks, I should have tried harder, any old email will do.

After looking at the paper I think the issue is that they are counting CWEs assigned to CVEs, but CWE assignment to CVEs is not very granular / accurate.

For a contrasting point of view here’s an alternative reference:

“FreeSentry: Protecting Against Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities Due to Dangling Pointers” - https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3829/df26d4ce686251b9b50308... - “In 2011 and 2012, the most exploited memory errors for Microsoft products were use-after-free vulnerabilities. It was also the most exploited vulnerability for both Windows Vista and Windows 7 and is the most common type of memory error that occurs in Internet Explorer.”. Ok, that’s a bit old. Also why doesn’t it show up in the data?

In an unscientific sanity check (bit slow to do because on mobile) I am not sure UAF is getting all the credit it deserves in CVE classification.

For example https://www.cvedetails.com/cve-details.php?t=1&cve_id=CVE-20... is a UAF (https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46184) but is listed as CWE category 264 (permissions, privileges and access controls).

CVE-2017-8540 https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/cve-2017-8540 is also a UAF but is listed as CWE category 119 (memory corruption / code exec), ref: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42088

I think I could find a lot more. CWE assignment to CVEs is not really an exact science. I suspect UAFs are getting under-counted because the bugs just went into “privesc” or “memory corruption / buffer overflow” buckets.
For examples:

"Look Ma, No Hands! Automated Bus Steers Itself" - https://www.wired.com/2008/09/look-ma-no-hand/

"Volvo Thinks Magnetic Roads Will Guide Tomorrow's Autonomous Cars" - https://www.wired.com/2014/03/volvo-magnets-autonomous/

Guided vehicles on factory floors have been around for a while, see https://patents.google.com/?q=guided&q=vehicle&oq=guided+veh... .

Since these have been around for decades (I think I saw a video from the 1960s about a future world of self-driving cars with such sort of system), it's likely not so easy to do.
It's worse than having one sensor, the chance that one of two breaks is larger than that just a single one breaks. And by alternating you ensure that the broken sensor will be used.
$15,000 spent how?
Learn the material sufficiently well enough to be able to answer the exam questions?
The Cost of Saving Notre-Dame
People buy magazines for the content, the ads are an unfortunate side effect of the low cost.
Incorrect historical revisionism. Google was always allowed to use the utility poles. It lobbied Louisville to get a special law passed that would allow it to not only use the utility poles, but relocate other peoples’ wires to make space on the poles while putting up their own. (Ordinarily, the owner of the lines does the relocation.) AT&T challenged that law in court.[1] The city defended the law at its own expense, and won fairly early in the process (on a motion to dismiss). AT&T did not appeal. That was two years ago. According to the article, Google didn’t even start nano-trenching and signing up people for “fiber hoods” until October 2017, after the lawsuit was already over.[2]

[1] AT&T did not challenge Google’s right to use the utility poles, only the law allowing Google contractors to relocate AT&T’s equipment and wires in the process. These laws are probably a good idea on the whole, but given the shoddy work Google’s contractors evidently did with the city’s streets, maybe AT&T’s complaint wasn’t so dumb after all.

[2] The whole concept of “fiberhoods” is another concession to Google that other providers do not get. Almost everywhere, franchise agreements require universal coverage of the city, not just build-out in places with demonstrated demand. Moreover, Google wasn’t required to pay for various additional concessions that Charter had to pay in Louisville, like wiring up government buildings and providing public access channels and a studio for government use. Those provisions are routine for cable franchises, but Google Fiber categorically refuses any deal that has them.
ag is slower than ripgrep in all of my benchmarks (https://github.com/hungptit/fastgrep). And ag might be slower than GNU grep if files are stored in fast storage devices i.e SSD drives even though GNU grep is a single thread command.
I think the point of the ID is (partially) to reduce the chance that ad agencies will use scummy workarounds. If the ID isn't guaranteed to be there, I can see them using the scummy ways instead.
Same thing for rock climbing, and complacency born from routine is exactly the problem: you tie knots that your life will depend on every day, thousands of times, and then stuff like this happens to some of the most skilled and experienced people:

- get distracted while tying the rope to your harness and leave the knot unfinished, fall 20 meters from the top of the climb (Lynn Hill, by sheer luck only broke her foot and elbow)

- use a slightly unusual rope setup and when preparing to be lowered, tie in on the wrong side of the anchor, fall 14 meters onto rock (Rannveig Aamodt, broke her spine, pelvis and ankles)

- have your partner point out damage on your harness, shrug it off because there's plenty of safety margin, continue climbing for 3 days in a manner that puts repetitive abrasion on exactly that part of the harness, have it snap while rapelling and fall 150 meters to your death (Tood Skinner)
The title does not match the article:

> The law will create an independent infrastructure for the Russian internet, or "Runet," which will essentially allow Russia to pull up its virtual drawbridges in case of attack.
you mean interpreters, but this is about compilers of which there are only two: Zilch en ZILF.
To me, software projects take longer than i think because customers don't know what they actually need until there's a runnable version of what they want.
As long as software is a cost center to your company, it will be treated this way. Trying getting a job at a company where software is a core concern. Ideally with a CEO that is not from a marketing/business background.
Rational companies wouldn't be paying for ads and minting multi-billionaires in the process if the results did not surpass the costs. The dominance of online advertising over print/television/physical is largely due to metrics and ROI visibility provided by tracking.
That doesn't seem to make sense. If the ad agencies have better methods for tracking than Apple's Ad-ID then they would be still using those, surely?

Which makes Apple's Ad-ID redundant in addition to useless.
if it was assault (sexual or otherwise) then someone should have contacted law enforcement as they are uniquely suited to initiate a process that results in consequences
One of my funny-not-funny jokes is "Double it then change up to the next unit of measure" So "I can do that in 3 minutes!" becomes 6 hours. 2 hours become 4 days. 3 days becomes 6 weeks. 2 weeks becomes 4 months...
But they weren’t recording the screen — they were eventing user interactions within their own app, including button presses and keypresses. That was described as “effectively screenshotting” by the article, which it is not. It might still be lousy behavior depending on the sensitivity of what users do in the app, but it’s not screen recording (which implies notifications and other apps might be recorded too).
Low Power Demand – Ujala Which Has Cut Down Peak Power Demand by 9 GW
I was never big into the traditional superheroes of Marvel and DC but I had a real soft spot for this game. They got into animation as they matured but the original walls of text from missions were pretty good reads. Heroes and villains had a lot of polish. I had to stop for a while and by the time I was ready to get back in they were shutting down. Champions Online came afterwards but the IP it was based on seemed stereotypically awful. Dr. Destroyer as the main villain? Come on. There's a project called Ship of Heroes that might be a good substitute if they make it to release.

https://www.shipofheroes.com
There are designs like platooning [1] which, in theory, would allow self-driving cars to drive bumper-to-bumper at high speeds, accelerating and braking together like the carriages of a train.

Of course, for that to work every car has to trust the data it gets from every other car, so there's no place for bugs or user-modifiable software in such a system. And the stopping distance is the worst of any car in the platoon.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platoon_(automobile)
Advertising Company Design
It looks like they might have added some things since you made your archive. The zip you posted is missing the following repos:

stationfall
suspect
suspended
trinity
wishbringer
witness
zork-german
zork
zork1
zork2
zork3
If these asshats ruin the sky, even for a moment, with advertsing, I will never buy another pepsi product again. What a terrible precident. Advertisers and marketers really are the lowest rung in modern life.
They can range expensive to around $200 [1] that is like Universal Robotics clone to really cheap using hobby servo that cost less than $30 [2]

[1]https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3327968

[2] https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:360108
I like relevant ads, click them, and usually get really happy when I find cool stuff with them. I've bought at least a handful of things off of instagram ads that were relevant to my interests. I also discovered a dog carrier backpack I now use to cycle with my dog to the beach every weekend from a Facebook ad that I got while browsing a dog owner Facebook group.

I'm just leaving enough data to support my assertion because I'm tired of this meme that "nobody looks at ads" or "all ads are bad".

I also deliberately do not use any ad blocking even though I know they exist and would save me bandwidth because I do get value from personalized ads.
The compiler for these source files has been lost. You can play the zip files that were released commercially with Parchment, but because the copyright on those has not expired you wont be able to do so legally on the public internet I believe.
Al does it again! Where does he find the time?
My that looks like LISP!
The BBC and 5G
Except that he didn't, which would imply that the journalism was a witch hunt.
Well my day job deteriorated to a state where the stress of staying on far exceeded the anxiety of leaving it, so the only rational thing to do is to cut it off.

As for customer development, there are already multiple healthily-growing startups doing what I'm doing; there is a market, no doubt. It's a matter of reaching them now. It's an MVP, not a full-fledged product.

Worst comes to worse, I'll do a major pivot or shelve it.
In trade wars of 200 years ago, the pirates were Americans
Im going to inject you against your will.
Design Principles from Biology: Effect of Knee Direction on Bipedal Running
Nope, racism is saying that such group is better or worse in some way.

Now, are you saying that white people in 21st century America are enjoying something they don't have a right to have?
Everything you list was formulated in response to measurements that didn't fit with existing theory, with the possible exception of quantum computing. I'm not diminishing the value of theory, merely correcting what I think was an overstatement of its importance on your part.
Apparently not even that. Tfa says they just analyzed remains from what they estimate is a similar time period as what they estimate stonehenge to be. Not even local to the site. While some inferences can be drawn, this is mostly puff.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I got to ramen profitability within 6 months in my previous SaaS startup. I'm not saying it wasn't hard, but it isn't this super-impossible thing everyone makes it out to be.