skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You (metaphorically) still didn't answer the underlying question, namely, wouldn't you do anything it took to save a loved one? The answer isn't grey, it's black and white. The answer is always YES to doing what it takes to save one's family. You have a moral imperative to do whatever it takes to keep your own safe, up to, and including, your own life. You fail your family morally if you fail to act when you could do so.
People like to throw in these trick questions like, "If you could save your own child, but nine others would die; or you could save the nine and your own would die. What would you choose?" Save my own child every time.
Looking inside the neural network black box
If anyone wants to learn about more advanced, bleeding edge uncertainty estimation methods unconcerned with neural nets, I can highly recommend Andrew Pownuk & Vladik Kreinovich's 2018 book "Combining Interval, Probabilistic, and Other Types of Uncertainty in Engineering Applications":

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-91026-0

Which basically represents a textbook summary of Pownuk's PhD thesis:

http://www.cs.utep.edu/vladik/pownukPhD.pdf
That result would go completely against the well-established behavior of the cell companies, at least in the US.
Fair enough. My concerns were more rooted in performance than the cost of the console itself. But the performance gains they reported by switching to an SSD would more than likely trump anything lost by supporting higher resolutions.
> very few change their life in significant ways to help it.

I did it, and it is really worth the effort.

What I changed:

- buy liquids in glass only -> healthier and reduced container garbage to 2/5

- use soda stream for mineral water

- buy fresh food -> healthier and reduces plastics packing

- buy used devices (where it makes sense) -> cars, phones, pc's etc. -> much cheaper, reduces waste -> don't be beta tester for newest products

- use rechargable batteries with smart recharger (to benefit the life cycle)

- avoid unfixable devices in general

- use grandma's household remedy, e.g. baking powder and vinegar instead of chemicals (packed in big one-way plastic bottles) to clean your house drains

There are many more tips in the Internet. For instance:

7 Ways to Support the Environment in 2018

https://www.care2.com/greenliving/7-ways-to-support-the-envi...

Further recommendations are appreciated.
Really? I get severe neck pain because of the desk height I have. I had to get a note from a doctor for them to let me elevate my monitor at no cost to them. Why don't they manufacture desks at a height comfortable for me?

The answer is simple: those of us who are more than one standard deviation from the mean will likely have to deal with the inconveniences that poses. Were there more women in said professional environment, things might change.

It's the same issue I have with representation-itis, where every body believes he needs his exact representation in media. "I am in a wheelchair; why aren't more movie characters in wheelchairs? People in wheelchairs can be cool too!". Fine, I'm not saying they can't, but if we did this with every possible person, there would be several billion characters.

Another analogy is how people are harmed by a disease and try to convince people to get tested. What they fail to realize is that were we all to be tested for all such things recommended by all such people, we would spend our entire lives in the doctors office.

How does this tie back to the issue at hand? Were we to try to accommodate every type of person, we would fail miserably and go broke in the process. Were we to only accommodate one, we would have a lot of unhappy people. So where do we draw the line? I think about one standard deviation (about 2/3 covered well enough) is about right.
What does the FW in GLFW stand for?
All of the changes are pretty much expected and even mandatory for justifying a new generation, especially with the spec boost we saw mid generation.

Nothing disappointing, but also nothing surprising/exciting.

There really isn't much revolutionary/big they could do, tough, apart from VR as part of the package.
In Germany the explanation was that under international law he could only apply for asylum if he was actually in the country. Meanwhile nobody wanted to contractually guarantee him asylum would be granted because it was seen as interfering in the division of powers (and might be overturned by the constitutional court).
Pretty bold predictions, I'd say. People still buy cable even with the rise of a half dozen streaming platforms and as long as you have to buy internet from a cable company, people will still be cowed into buying cable. Comcast (or anyone else, they all play the same exact game) can just make internet only packages egregiously expensive unless you also buy a cable subscription because many customers don't have another telecom option, and lawmakers are on the telecoms side.

5G is also going to need to have better coverage than anything ever made before if its to replace in home wifi. As it stands I drop calls when I walk into different rooms of my house on the data connection. 4G drops to 3G or even edge all the time going in and out or between buildings. That being said, I'm waiting to see what route telecoms pounce on to force us into 5G use. Will they degrade other data connections or go the planned obsolescence route? Either way, they are going to get their return, this isn't done out of technical altruism.
Thanks for the links! I really wish I read these when I was in my undergrad, they are really good!
OP should have posted the original source then.
the A220 is really meant to be an DC-9 Series 80/90/95 (MD-80, MD-90, MD-95/717) replacement, and doesnt match the 737max in either range or capacity.
Is it? I wasn't aware of this so I did some googling and found this study:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-011-0016-x

This doesn't seem like pseudoscience to me, but I don't really have context here. Is this considered to be a poor study or a disreputable journal?

Edit: Apparently it's been cited 61 times since publication: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=270710047801738518

Edit 2: Okay, there's definitely skepticism: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cell-phones-kill-bees-study_n...

I'm not sure if I'd call this "pseudoscience" as much as "speculative and controversial."
Everyone "owns" the code. Then there's the guy you go to when it fails.

Helps to document things, so you at least have something to throw at people when they come asking.
The first piece is from 2002. A lot of things have changed since, including MEP salaries and the expense system (which has become more transparent).

Laura Pignataro's story is a sad one indeed, and the Selmayr affair as a whole was probably instrumental in getting impetus behind this directive. Selmayr himself will probably be removed once Juncker goes at the end of this year.
the team owns the code. the whole team. whoever is oncall gets to wake up at 3am if there is an issue.
If AMD can afford to announce this now rather than 1st of May, which is their 50th anniversary, it suggests they have seriously impressive announcements to make in the anniversary event.
Huh? I see this happen all the time. If people decide the backup is "shorter" over there (i.e. the last stopped car is a few car-lengths ahead) they will absolutely merge into another lane approaching a backup. Same behavior you see at the grocery store.
> I've never seen someone try and do this with a home contractor.

I'm surprised that you haven't. I've certainly seen the same kind of thing happen, though admittedly it is usually based on cost rather than time. Ultimately, though, the discussion was the client disbelieving a high effort estimate.
To clarify, 1/2"x28 is the standard thread pitch used on most .22 and 9mm caliber firearms for muzzle attachments. In most cases it's a flash hider or a recoil compensator, but suppressors can attach in the same way.

Also, this one is an example of an "ambiguously legal" listing. The thing is, after all, an actual oil filter, albeit a poorly made one. Owning it alongside with a firearm it can attach to would likely constitute constructive possession of an unregistered NFA item, but that's buyer's problem. Although I would imagine the seller can still be sued if it can be proven that they knew how most of their customers are using them (which is evident from reviews), and intentionally designed them for that purpose. But, well, good luck suing a noname Chinese merchant.
I wouldn't necessarily tie net neutrality and this together, since NN supports them as much as us.
Considering it most likely would be them footing the bill (or loosing traffic) without NN
Yes, you make an excellent point and I agree.
Wire has a much better experience than Signal but then it's yet another switch... :/
sure.. but does that mean it's ok if they stuff them with their own orders in a way nobody else can and that gives them guaranteed profit at the expense of others?
Also, don't get photographed by anyone else! It's not just our own phones we have to worry about; everyone is more eyes and ears for the man :/
The far-left routinely castigates "white people", blames unrelated individuals alive today collectively as the sole villain of history, and does not allow people to participate in discussions and debates based on the color of their skin. They say that race needs to be the main factor when restructuring the country with mass property redistribution. Isn't that inflammatory ethno-nationalist rhetoric?
My use of the phrase "Jewish Practice" was taken from the article. I didn't mean anything additional by it.
"SWAG" sets the expectations much better than "educated guess"- you're saying "I got very little idea, but you really want a number, so here's a number". "Educated guess" sounds much more like you've got a good idea, which using the term "SWAG" is trying to avoid.
Users of HN also have a major problem understanding this distinction.
> This whole you-can't-estimate-software accuracy position is entirely a position of inexperience.

There are other sources of uncertainty. NASA is probably the only organization that fully specifies product requirements before building stuff - often, even the customer doesn't know. Some problem domains preclude you from knowing in advance! When building the thing, complete understanding of the existing code, frameworks, libraries, and infrastructure is not possible. All of these abstractions eventually leak and break down at scale. Every one of these parts is also continually changing! Even if you could solve all of those problems, you'd still have to deal with people problems - incentives never align, budgets change, and alliances shift.

I don't have a formal proof, but I'm strongly suspicious that the only actual way to know how long something takes to build is to actually build it, which of course, may be impossible.
I've seen EQUAL? in some of the code snippets. I can believe that inspired Scheme predicates.
What is the latency like? Could I play CS:GO or another game where latency and jitter matters?
Yes it is smaller, so airlines can run more frequent flights. The range is not so good, but there an awful lot of flights the 737 flies that don't go to the full range.
I didn't miss it. I was just responding to the HTTP/1 part.
https://msmagazine.com/2013/09/06/a-guy-is-a-man-is-a-guy/

> Thought Experiment #1: Imagine a room full of men and women. Someone stands at the front and says, “I want all the guys to stand up.” What happens next?

I don't know where I personally land on this debate, but the points are cogent.
Well, if the cost is that low, I would think that would be an argument for just making it a flat rate.

Historically, I think the fear among people like those here was more or less two-fold.

1.) The original top 1% downloaders were mostly those downloading lots of "Linux distributions" (and of course many other types of media) over torrents. I'm sure quite a few of those 1% ers were on sites like this and preferred to effectively be subsidized by the 99%.

2.) Whether or not it was just a rationalization for #1, many made the argument that bandwidth caps would constrain innovative services because if you turn a meter on, people are going to use bandwidth-intensive services a lot less and the Internet will be less generally useful as a result.

The dynamics today are probably a lot different. I imagine the profile of a big home bandwidth consumer now is a family that watches a lot of Netflix and YouTube.
I've been typing since I was six or seven and I guess I just sorta picked up touch-typing. I was never taught how to type but I don't have to look at the keyboard. (Usually, that is. I switch between English and Icelandic layouts, and it takes me a moment to find punctuation/special characters after switching. And Icelandic keyboards are awful for programming.) I think starting at such a young age got it wired in deep.

I find that I rest my fingers on the officially designated home row, but aside from that I couldn't even begin to tell you if I'm touch-typing "correctly." According to keybr.com I have trouble with Q and W (top left/pinky keys, which seem to require repositioning my hand) and B and Y (which I discovered I use the "wrong" hand for when I tried a split keyboard).

Whatever I'm doing, it works: I average 100 wpm, and max out at 150 if I'm in a hurry. My partner says my typing sounds like "evil bugs." :)
Restoration is itself an art as well as a scientific and engineering effort.

Paintings are treated to remove as much detritus and patina as possible without damaging the underlying pigments or lacquers that might have been part of the original artwork (some might argue this is itself destructive and might accidentally go too far.)

To make this process easier to future treatments, restores take great care to make their contribution visibly obvious to a careful (and close) observer rather than blend it with the original.

I think something along these lines will be the best solution for all; perhaps we can avoid reinstalling that pike which - however beautiful in its own - was more suited to an Alpine parish church.
There is a miscommunication here, arising from the fact that bunderbunder thinks that 'Citigroup' is an entity, and is clearly both a market maker and has clients, whereas you (and other professionals in the field) think 'Citigroup's equity option market making desk' and 'Citigroup's prime brokerage division' are entities, and are clearly only one of those things each.

People at a distance from organisations see them as monolithic. People closer to them see them as coalitions of distinct entities.
My somewhat more nunanced retort to such kind is that it depends how much of this work is linear and how much non-linear and how are they naturally occurring. non-linear work may mean things like understanding a complex codebase or developing an algorithm. these dont speedup by adding more people ( what I dont say is these may speedup by adding more quality/unfragmented hours to the individuals doing it). However stuff like refactoring codebase or minor bugfixes may benefit by adding more engineers.

Unfortunately, the problem then becomes defending whatever timeline you have in mind for non-linear work. also doing too much of this can give bully managers an opportunity to nitpick and micromanage the whole thing.
Another appropriate response:

“That’s odd, you build major products that sell for hundreds of millions of dollars, that tens of thousands of peoples’ lives literally depend on, and that are completely controlled by software, fly-by-wire, etc. And yet you have no need for programmers?”
> ... it's difficult politically.

The thing to understand about politics is you can do everything right and still lose.

Here, the damage was already done by their unrealistic expectations. You were either going to accept the job, fail and make them angry, or reject it and make them angry.

Sometimes your least worst option is to cut your losses.
I don't have to pay close attention to the map. I've been there. It is absolutely close enough to the river to have hoses running directly from it. The fact that they didn't use it suggests it probably wasn't such a good idea, we are only dudes writing on the internet, they are firefighters with experience doing their job.
I've got the Ergodox as well and like it in general but I think the thumb keys are a bit too far away from the rest of the keys.
A very interesting project is Mitosis[1] which uses PCBs both for keeping the switches in place as well as connecting the swithces.

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards/comments/66588f...
In our case, teams don't own projects/code-bases, they own "features" and "releases".

About 67% of our code is some form of Ruby - some of it Rails, some of it custom Ruby code running in Kubernetes+Docker processing data.

The other 33% of our code is Rust - and not just service side code but Rust that has to run on multiple platforms with varying deep operating systems knowledge.

My team generally owns Features and Releases related to the Rust code because two of the three members are OS programmers by experience. That said, we don't exclusively work on the Rust code and sometimes wander into the Ruby code base.

Similarly, other teams occasionally need to update the Rust code to generate some new data - a lot of that is pretty basic stuff and doesn't require deep OS knowledge. So they'll make changes there.

Since our stack is so heterogenous, it's hard to have everyone work on everything. However, from what I know of most companies outside Apple/MSFT/Google/etc, they're gonna fall in the "we own web services" where the only real bifurcation will be "frontend code" and then "middle-to-backend code". Maybe throw in some apps as well.

=========

Now all of that said - the reason we went to teams owning "features" and "releases" was to push folks to not be possessive of code. Stuff changes and it changes quickly, so there's not much use trying to isolate folks. Document gratuitously, test heavily, and refactor often.
I think "guys" is gendered and using a non-gendered word is better when referring to a group of people.
We struggle with this question where I work and there is some toxicity.

I've been wondering if you could add a comment to the top of files to indicate ownership (//owners:someTeam, someGuy). Then your CI could parse the modified files and require a review from a team and/or send a notification to said user.
Ah, that's too bad! I've been hunting for ways to get better integration tests on CI for Revery.

Would like to have image-based verification for certain classes of tests, and we use Azure CI pipelines - seems their VMs don't have hardware support at all for OpenGL (on any platform).
>if no appropriate action is taken or in cases where reporting to the authorities would not work, whistleblowers are permitted to make a public disclosure – including by speaking to the media.

Shouldnt public disclosure be the first thing which is protected?
Here is Katie Bouman, one of the EHT team members, explaining it in excruciating detail:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGL_OL3OrCE

And an interesting side note:

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2019/4/16/18311194/bl...
That's true. However, it allows to integrate your Wasm program to your favorite framework more easily. It's likely to be a small surface of code to review carefully. It's always a balance :-).
> What good it would be if you get it 100% right, and your competitor has their app already out, and captured all your potential customers?

A constant stream of bugs have driven customers away before too, so if you're waiting in the wings with a bug-free/verified version of your competitor's program, you have a real shot at stealing their customers. First mover advantage is important, but so is quality if marketed properly.
I imagine it has practical value for historians who have to read cursive documents, and as an art form it's just as valid as any other sort of calligraphy. But yeah, outside of a few narrow areas it doesn't have much modern use.
8k support is so Sony can sell more TVs.
I'm not obsessed with checks. Writing checks is technically simpler and has fewer dependencies and distractions. This question exemplifies the cost of other approaches: the OP is spending time researching alternatives to a simple and proven solution. For what? Mostly appearing sophisticated at the cost of increased financial attack surface, secret management, and uncertainty regarding future availability of the business handling the transactions.

Solve the problem at hand by writing a check and moving on. In a year things may or may not be different enough to warrant change.
I think the winning move would be to establish English as the second official language. Hell, the EU should adopt English as the main language. I believe one of the growth factors of many Eastern and Central European countries is the widespread proficiency in it. I was impressed to find many interviews of Estonian politicians speaking it fluently.

(I'm not a native speaker and I've never nor do I currently live in an English speaking country, I just think this is the best and most practical way to start decreasing fragmentation in the EU market).
I'm now writing a blog post about my journey - 13kg less in less than 12 months.

The only 'diet hack' I used was replacing regular Coca Cola with Cola Zero (yeah, I know what it contains but 'this one little hack' made me stop gaining weight).

The other hack was to start jogging - for first couple weeks 3km, then 5km, now my regular route is ~7km (I've also ran 10km one time and made it under 1hour! :D ).

I tend to run at least 1 time per week, or as many as possible (due to family responsibilities 3 times is max).

While switching cola stopped me gaining weight, running made me loose it.

I've also started eating less fast-foods/sweets and more proteins (nothing fancy! e.g. homemade fried-egg burgers FTW! :) )

But the key I think to not be so strict about it - reminding yourself that you're "on diet" is the biggest pain I think.
"Claim" is my favorite of these words.

Main example: "Elected official claims nothing bad was done"

It has a gentle enough negative connotation to allow you to massage the emotions of your reader, while still being a technically accurate statement.

Only people with something to hide will "claim" or "deny" something. It's the same idea where you're talking about something and your audience can feel a "big old but" coming. Even if you never produce the but, they still have the feeling what was just stated is about to be refuted.
Practically speaking, most people who want this tech probably should just get an AMD laptop (Ryzen 2500U), or build a AM4 MicroATX PC build.

Your typical Ryzen 5 2400G is quad-core, 3.5 GHz (3.9 Boost) with 8x Vega EUs. Typical builds would be around 20W to 70W (https://www.anandtech.com/show/12425/marrying-vega-and-zen-t...). Its hard to beat a standard PC build in cost, flexibility, and performance.

Ryzen 5 3500U laptops are under $600. Quite bad specs (as any other $600 laptop would be: 720p, Hard Drive, etc. etc), but yes they are available. https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA6ZP8Z20... . The 3500U also is quad-core with 8x Vega EUs.

For those with power and size restrictions, as well as the need for a long-term embedded solution... this R1000 SoC will fit their bill. Digital signage, Casino slot machines, etc. etc.

--------

For those with supercomputing needs, Vega 64 and Radeon VII have 64x Vega execution units. Even a RX 580 GPU has 36x EUs (just ~$200).