skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Acid-base disorders:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5260542/

> There are four simple acid base disorders: (1) Metabolic acidosis, (2) respiratory acidosis, (3) metabolic alkalosis, and (4) respiratory alkalosis.

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2648667

Respiratory alkalosis:

- https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/301680-overview

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482456/

- https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/endocrine-and-meta...

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963184/

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11262557

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28478843

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12071494

Respiratory acidosis:

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561264/

- https://www.biologicalpsychiatrycnni.org/article/S2451-9022(...

- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4444067/

- https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/301574-clinical

- ...
Thank you for the actually useful reply to my flip comment.
I can't wait for blockchain ride-sharing.

Never mind
https://www.iride.io/
> C++ without deterministic destructors to manage lifetime would be a (fundamentally) different language.

The problem is that it's not usefully deterministic once you add in exceptions, shared pointers, move semantics, lambda captures, etc. Not to mention every perverse combination of those things. Yes, it's deterministic in the tautological sense that almost everything is deterministic given enough information, but I'm not sure that's enough even for the people who write the compilers. Even they have bugs related to misunderstanding this "deterministic" system. I certainly wouldn't want to make it less deterministic, and defer certainly doesn't make it so.

> resource lifetime is complex, but it’s inherently so

A certain amount of complexity is natural, a certain amount is spurious and self-inflicted. See above for some of the causes of that spurious complexity.

> C++ just makes the complexity explicit

Being explicit about memory management isn't a goal. C is even more explicit about these things. Does that make it a better language? Even in C++, new/delete is more explicit than most of the current idioms, and every book on modern C++ recommends against them. Explicit memory management should be a last resort, for the cases not handled cleanly by the language's other constructs, and those should be kept to a minimum. C++ has notably failed at that. Literally every other popular language except for C does better.

> Handling resource lifetime in languages with nondeterministic GCs can be such a pain

Do you really see no alternatives between dumping all memory-management complexity on the programmer and a full tracing GC? The authors of Objective C's automatic reference counting or Rust's borrow checker might take issue with that, as would the people who developed the memory-lifetime rules and infrastructure for all of the bigger older C codebases I mentioned in another comment. It is in fact possible for object lifetimes to be far more deterministic than in C++ as it exists today, and I for one think that would be a good thing.
I'm well aware of the advances. However, I can tell you that 6mm or .30 trumps 5.56 every single time w/o exception and the military is actually looking to replace the 5.56 with a 6mm cartridge. 5.56 is a weak performer. There are myriad reports of troops having to double/triple tap enemy combatants to get them down. This is a waste of ammo and saps faith in their own gear. 6mm or.30 doesn't tend to have this issue. The energy dump is much, much more. A .243 or 6.5 has more energy at 500 than a 5.56 does at 100 and with a barely-noticeable recoil difference, especially in a gas-operated platform.

The M-14 is on the way out as a DM rifle anyway in favor of newer platforms like the HK417 or FN MK20.
We can disagree all day long, but ballistics don't lie. The 5.56 is barely an intermediate round. It's still a .22 caliber round with all the inherent faults. The Corps referred to it as a "poodle shooter" when I served. It wasn't well liked. Ditto the myriads of soldiers I know who share a disdain for it.

I find it interesting that of all the people I know who are civilian shooters who were in the military in combat MOSs and who use an MSR of some type, none are in 5.56. They are either in .243, 6.5. or 7.62. You can guess why. They don't trust the 5.56 round other than for nuisance animals like coyotes. I've seen coyotes take 5.56 rounds center mass behind either leg and limp off to die in the bush. Never seen or had this happen to me or guys I hunt with using a .243, 6.5, or 7.62. They are DRT. And we don't hunt with FMJ.

If a superior (than issue) round being used on coyotes is suspect on occasion, you can imagine the troops who actually need decent rounds are hungry for something that actually performs as it should. 5.56 has been shown to be weak and ineffective except in a crew-served hail of rounds scenario or extremely close in. 6mm/.30 allows troops to keep the enemy further out there while still taking them down.

Military is working to get off the 5.56...
https://www.military.com/kitup/2018/04/11/marines-working-ar...

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/10/05/the-army...
> (afaik) no one is marketing a self-driving car that doesn't also require a driver be attentive at all times.

Tesla's marketing videos for Autopilot have a caption along the lines of "driver is only present for legal reasons".
A case study in rural telecom network expansion
I got a pixel 3 last year, iPhone user since the 3gs. I dont miss my iPhone. The first month was tough, now when I have to use an iPhone or touch one, I feel lost and like I am holding a clunky toy.

Oh yeah, I got the pixel because there is no way I'm paying $1000 for a phone.
You can't blame a business for doing what they're meant to, making money, as long as something is legal and profitable they will do it, the problem is the lack of regulations and the failure of government to keep pace with technology.
> we're basically solving the most difficult situation up front

I disagree. It's not up-front, there's been decades of work on autonomous systems such as drones, UAVs, trains, robots, etc.

It's just that it's a hard, if not impossible problem. Some companies thought they could successfully navigate this problem with enough data. I don't think it's a data problem, I think it's impossible to give real situational awareness to a machine, and that's the problem.
Are people obliged to abide by an obviously racially discriminatory contract under EU law?
Visual History of the Pencil
If at first, you fail, try and try again. This was sobering. I watched expecting the normal rush I get when watching live events of this nature but it was not to be.
This is just anecdotal, but the individuals I've talked to seem to mirror this. I'm imprinting my own perceptions of this, but it's often an elitism that populism (following the will of the majority) is self destructive and there's this privileged class that knows better--whether that's a certain class of voters (people responsible enough to hold an ID) or a political class.

When I try and dig in, their opinions seem very shallow and self serving. I don't think their idea, in concept, is entirely without merit. Senators used to be elected by the state legislature because the intention was they represent the state's interest, not necessarily the voter's. Things like capping the House has really skewed representation and the Electoral College...which has undermined any "genius" that might have been intended by the EC. These otherwise well-read people don't seem interested in these problems, they're just supportive of the approaches you describe.
You don't seem to be refuting the central claim, but rather accusing the person of being non-genuine, can you point out any flaws with their assertion?
It’s not really feasible. Maybe in an extreme case, but this just isn’t one. We have done this for fixing language soundness holes, but it is extremely rare. The spirit of the law matters as much, if not more, than the letter.
AFAIK all funding was private, and though IAI provided expertise, they were paid for it (likely at-cost and not for-profit, but still)
Saying that the thoughts of people affected by policies you claim to support isn't "worth your time" really undermines the idea that you have their best interests in mind.
Hey, I meant landing page. I think maybe elaborating a bit might be helpful for you.

Please understand, that I am not a designer, I only design for my sideprojects.

- navbar and very rounded buttons make the site look cartoonish for me. But not in a good way. https://chatterbug.com/en/ <- this site achieves playful design with rounded buttons and cartoons, but this is the style they are aiming for. Not sure if you want to go that way or want more serious look (for B2B, chatterbug is B2C mostly).

- Your buttons colors are pretty bootstrap like. Not sure if the green + blue combo works well. Both can be used as "action colors" in websites, and maybe it get's a bit confusing what action is in the navbar - login or signup.

- For the "hero" image (background) in my opinion it doesn't look to good. I think it's too grey. One example I have in my bookmarks, that kind of have similar idea (img in the background) https://designcode.io/courses (I think you actually want less color - it's sometimes hard to read white text on this site)

- On the longer look, I don't see the pricing page. Is it a free service?

- Icons in the third section are not coherent with each other. Third one especially doesn't fit in.

- I am not an expert, but 2 buttons (signup/download app) are confusing. I think you should prfioritize one of these action buttons, but probably someone with UX experience could tell you if I am right.

Other pages I have in my bookmarks under "good design" (Great artists steal)

https://blend.com/

https://reedsy.com/

https://www.matadorapp.com/
We could solve the biggest problem in maths in the next decade
And now I'm thinking enhancing the intelligence of wolves, already smart, would be exactly what we don't need.
Major Uptick in Exploit Activity: Here's What We Know So Far
Does Atom still eat any resources your computer has to offer?
What issues? Lawsuits != research. Most clinical research suggests ECT has high efficacy with fewer side effects than many pharmacological interventions. Your baseless claim is mental illness shaming and treatment shaming.
really? that's interesting, because I'm literally running an experiment right now since this whole 'Facebook shows you who's targeting you' thing started.

Facebook explicitly has my name, my "second" birthday (I love all my birthdays equally, especially the ones I give to marketing sites) and a special email address I have literally created only to give to Facebook for my account. The rest of my account info is deliberately empty and I've deliberately locked down as much privacy settings as I can, don't use the site from my phone (Honestly I barely use the site at all) and have opted out of everything I can.

Advertisers are still showing up (one of them is a liquor store even though I'm a teetotaler and I have selected not to be shown alcohol ads, but what can you do?)

either way, something rather fishy is going on.
There are certain branches of communism that do believe in forced work for bad elements (criminals for example) of society. I don't believe any mainstream US or Europe politician approximates communism, even less that branches.

My take with GP is the question of where would the various left wing anarchists fit in his explanation. Also, I would argue that the classical critique against private property that right libertarians reivindicate is that the state is actually equivalent to the warlord on the example and is inevitable of the concept of private property.
Gotta be a terrible "oh man we're back up---- nope" moment :(
I'm actually confused here. Stonogo is using enough detail that they sound like someone who understands the domain, but what they're saying is, in many cases, simply factually incorrect.

A few corrections:

1. MTA-STS does not specify ports. I don't even know where that comes from. Mail continues to be sent on port 25.

2. The claim that "nothing is gained over security the MX record to start with" is, again, simply untrue. DNSSEC alone does not solve anything, unless you also somehow validate the presented identity of the recipient MX--which is what DANE and MTA-STS attempt to provide. DANE arguably does this better (neglecting for now the debates about roots of trust and DNSSEC), but, to be perfectly clear, DNSSEC alone (or anything else that merely secures the MX record) does nothing to validate the recipient MX's identity (meaning you're vulnerable to e.g. BGP routing interception or other active MITM).

3. MITM attackers cannot merely RST connections to STS-specified ports. Among other reasons, because STS doesn't specify ports (meaning this criticism is nonsensical) but, assuming "ports" was supposed to read "hosts", because STS requires senders to validate the host's presented certificate. That's sort of the point of that.

I think the criticism here was written by someone who knows a lot of the context but seems not to understand the threat model. If you don't understand the threat model, yes, STS is going to look crazy.

I don't love MTA-STS. It's an imperfect compromise, which is sort of the nature of compromises. Stonogo does fairly contrast it with two alternative approaches: DANE (not just DNSSEC) and simply announcing a planned deprecation of unauthenticated SMTP (which, as an aside, would also require some currently-nonexistent principles on MX presented identities, like that the identity must match the @hostname of the destination mailbox--a constraint currently commonly violated).

But it's trying to solve an actual problem. And, as I said, the heart of the criticism here is simply factually incorrect, whatever warts STS does indeed have.
Using AI to Solve Collaborative Challenges by Playing StarCraft
Detroit comes to mind
"Despite early speculation which consisted largely of unique and fantastical possibilities... by affording unprecedented visibility due to it's mamouth size, proximity to dense population centers and rotational properties of the celestial body, Lamar advertising was able to secure exclusive rights to the entire lunar surface by 2036."
The flip side of that is: "Many were increasingly of the opinion that they'd all made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place. And some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the oceans." - The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Not all of the mass transit in Boston is weather protected. Snow routinely causes train stoppages. The lines are also really old, being dug by hand when street cars and horse and buggy still existed. There's also the face of massive cost increases forcing people to take transit and park, not to mention the increase in commuting time by not getting directly to your location. I've been on some really great transit systems in places like Bucharest and Tokyo. Boston is an unfortunately poor comparison on some lines.
If a murderer kills someone and then says murder is bad, we know they're full of crap

Only if we already know they've murdered someone before they advocate against murder. Until we do find out, the murderer appears the same as anybody else, despite being a hypocrite.
I would suggest doing some research into the clinical efficacy of ECT, for many it has been a lifesaving intervention, and it is nothing like the treatment depicted in one flew over the cuckoos nest.
> or take out the 'threat to national interests'?

Isn't that what we did in Iraq, blindly listen to the IC? Ha, that was an A++ operation. All those lives lost - for absolutely nothing. I mean sure there was "Iraqi democracy" but where did the WMD's go? The solution being proposed is to literally kill the messenger. It's a two-party induced cognitive dissonance where you would rather be lied to than have your political affiliation be embarrassed.
Still a great achievement! An inspiration for all kids looking to do science.
I'm Finnish. Almost everyone I know has lost all confidence in the political system years ago.
It’s a policy question, not a technical question. We can absolutely do it technically.
Don’t think an auction makes sense when there is essentially only one buyer. Better would be to just offer a pool of money to buy up shares at each fundraising round at whatever price is set.
> They were blatantly obvious obstacles

Each accident you cite happened under supervision of a human driver. Without knowledge about accidents prevented by supervisors it’s difficult to tell how much worse ai is than the average human.
> The real answer is not being in that position to begin with.

That to me is the crux of the issue. Self-driving cars are a poor solution to an entirely self-inflicted problem. The only viable long term solution is to reduce commuting.
When is it not a terrible time to have an engine failure?
This spacecraft was the main thing my three year old and five year old were talking about all week, so at least partial success here :) Next time!
You didn't even read the article?
One of my Singaporean friends mentioned that the population is quite content with their government, they are enjoying the countries prosperity and the country is peaceful. He said, "Why change a working system?"
If you brought a drill to your government office to break into a safe that you didn't have keys or authorization to open, that would read as "brought and used special hardware, a drill, to open the safe". Even if said drill is available at the local hardware store.
> In flight, the lift is nearly always equal to the weightlab times load factor. (From your link)

This is not true at or near stall conditions.
Boston/Cambridge were built for horses not cars. A car centric layout would actually create way more space to accommodate the bicycles.
So: first attempt to get to the moon (by them, who are not quite USA or China) and they just fail at the very end.

Like getting a silver medal at the Olympics. Yes, sad. But man!
Discussion prior to the outcome: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19634570.
Phil Greenspun thinks it’s solvable in 10 bytes of object code! Why would you waste $35?
It's accountability in the age before we had AIs that could spot strange patterns of behavior across millions of government employees. Presumably now there might be more efficient ways to do this, but it's a combination of inertia and fear of what the consequences would be if such a program didn't work out. The upside of the current system is that it leaves huge paper trails and everything is auditable; the downside is that actually auditing all this stuff is so painful.

It also doesn't really help that a majority of the politicians and a majority of voters foam at the mouth about government waste, no matter how minuscule and how much it would actually cost to eliminate. If we implemented more efficient algorithms and saved 90% of administration but some waste slipped through they'd say the government was getting sloppy. You see this a lot when people rail against, say, fare evasion on public transit; people would rather have 10x of a bunch of highly paid employees to manually check every ticket, instead of having proof-of-payment and random inspections with fines, because it feels like the right thing to do.
Root cause analysis: excessive pressure to keep type rating caused lax engineering to be considered acceptable.

Fix:let the FAA do it's job independently
I've heard this argument before. It is among the weakest against vehicular cycling in my view. It's a misrepresentation of vehicular cycling, which doesn't require cyclists to keep up with drivers. It also strikes me as an ad hominem attack, attacking vehicular cyclists rather than their arguments. A point I like to make is that perceptions of safety are not the same thing as safety, and I think vehicular cycling is all about that.

The strongest argument against vehicular cycling would be the evidence of where cycling infrastructure works well, which many people who accept the basic tenets of vehicular cycling (like myself) admit. I'd call myself about 1/2 vehicular, 1/2 infrastructural.
> jurisdictions like Washington intentionally make it difficult to track whether non-citizens are voting by issuing them IDs and offering to register them to vote sans additional proof of citizenship. This is why WA has to have enhanced ID — they don’t meet the federal standards of ensuring people they issue ID to are here legally.

You are not automatically registered to vote just because you have a WA driver license. I moved here from Australia, got my DL, doesn't mean in any way shape or form that I can vote as a permanent resident, nor can I register.
You just killed a startup.
Things like "charges" and "due process" are a luxury for the thousands who were kidnapped, imprisoned and tortured by past US administrations.

People like Assange are fortunate to have visibility and nationality that they do. He at least is getting charged for a crime he hasn't really even denied. Thousands of others have lost their freedom and their lives because they were at the wrong place at the wrong time.
Yeah, if the free media is told something is classified, they will do the responsible thing and not pursue the matter any further. They know the government has everybody's best interest at heart, and that if something is classified, it's probably classified for your own good.
This was a dickish thing to do on his part (although far form rape). I think that the seven years he spent at the embassy are enough of a punishment. The only thing that I believe would be fair to have is monetary compensation to the victims.
Best Books by Indian Authors You Must Read
Ordos is kind of the 'original' ghost city, the one that sparked Western curiosity.

There's a lot of reporting about it subsequently.

It looks like folks are indeed moving in, but maybe not at the rate that would make sense.
Trump said today that "he knows nothing about wikileaks".

In 2010 he said Assange should be given the death penalty for leaking Bush admin's diplomatic cable.

In 2016, during the campaign he praised wikileaks more than 100 times.

Now he knows nothing about it.
When you're floating along on a stable orbit not about to impact the surface.

Or with more time to recover from the outage before landing. If it happens within the last minute (wild estimation) then you have little time to recover the lost velocity.
If OP was interested, I'd provide a twitter/reddit/signal/messenger or whatever for DMing. Or just an email address. I meant it as more of a euphemism for private communication.
And apparently they selected the immoral option.
Exactly. Here's an example of the type of law you are talking about.

I live in a all party consent state, so if you want to record a conversation with me, legally, you need to have my consent.

Some states are one party consent states. You can record any conversation you want.

Across state lines, federal law requires only consent of one of the parties. But that doesn't resolve anything. Courts in different states handle cross-border complaints differently, some enforce their local all party standard, others demure to the other jurisdiction's one party laws.
They're obviously better at ethnic cleansing.
Cheezborger, Cheezborger, Cheezborger
It's well documented in numerous reports that:

1. The position and size of the upgraded engines for the 737 MAX caused the plane to tend to pitch upwards, which could cause a stall.
2. Boeing was concerned designed MCAS to automatically push the plane's nose down to prevent stalls

Every single piece of reporting I've seen on the matter refers to MCAS as an anti-stall device.

Pilots of 737 who have talked to reporters refer to it as an anti-stall device.

I have a hard time believing that this information hasn't been fact checked to hell and back yet.