skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah I'm in the same boat. Easily over 100 orders and everything has been great, other than the occasional item damaged from shipping (which isn't exactly their fault). I am in Canada, though.
Uber is clearly losing share to Lyft:
"In 2017, our ridesharing category position in the United States and Canada was significantly impacted by adverse publicity events. Although the rate of decline in our ridesharing category position has since moderated, our ridesharing category position generally declined in 2018 in the substantial majority of the regions in which we operate, impacted in part by heavy subsidies and discounts by our competitors in various markets that we felt compelled to match or exceed in order to remain competitive."
To be fair it is only a small, incremental improvement to the first FH launch which came within a whisker of doing exactly the same thing, if only for a small lack of fuel on the way down.
So that you can see oncoming traffic when passing on a single/two-lane road
This article does a great job of explaining.

https://www.edmunds.com/car-leasing/should-you-make-a-down-p...

In summary, when leasing, put as little down as possible.

When buying(loan) it depends.

Obviously every person has a different financial situation, ( which also determines at which interest rate you are allowed to borrow money), but in general or ceteris paribus , that advice holds in general.
> It's actually particularly heavy

Huh? It's a very small API built _into_ the web browser. What's heavy about it? It's kinda similar to how JSX works just with less bells and whistles, more standard web stuff.

> It disagrees with many of the (much more popular) frontend frameworks far too much.

Ember, React and others plan to eventually support them. So, I am unconvinced that it disagrees with them at all. In fact I think it enables them to have wider access to developers.
I know that it intends to meddle with the election. Like I said, that isn't inherently a bad thing. I also fully intend on "election meddling" by sharing my opinions on the internet. As should you. It's on you to prove why this is bad for the american people.

Here are quotes from the two conspiracy theories you were talking about. Did you even read the articles you linked? he specifically warned in both instances that he did not have damning evidence of either of these things.

> WARNING: This investigation is a Speculative investigation which lacks clear and provable evidence, yet could be interesting should additional evidence be presented.

> We're not saying that Seth Rich's death necessarily is connected to our publications – that's something that needs to be established

Assange is not responsible for the conspiracy theories that other people generate from his information.
Gangnam Style overflows INT_MAX, forces YouTube to go 64-bit (2014)
Out of all of the people I know who own tesla, I have yet to meet anyone who bought one without autopilot. I don't understand why would you decide to purchase tesla over other electric cars if it was not for autopilot. If you want electric without autopilot - there are better options than tesla, so maybe the reason why they removed it was because a vast majority of people were purchasing the autopilot model, and offering the lower priced version was slowing down their prodution somehow (adding options is always time consuming).
> Do Japanese users actually expect names to be sorted phonetically?

Yes - or that's how a human would sort them, at any rate.
> [S]patial orientation and motor praxis accuracy increased...cognitive speed decreased.

It's too bad they didn't measure if TW's become empathic vs. HR. I guess we'll never know how well he's at piloting giant robots.
It's so fucked that the law is written this way.
> If the purpose of this article is to convince people that disagree with your statements

You missed the point. It isn't about disagreement. Its about not throwing away evidence to retain a challenged opinion. The first two thirds of the article was very explicit about this.

> when I haven't been able to find anything indicating this elsewhere on the web.

Then you didn't search very hard. The article specifically mentioned this is in relation to the web assembly host bindings proposal. The first search on any search engine brings me to the spec on github. As far as DOM work you would have to dive into the DOM string portion of JS API integration section: https://github.com/WebAssembly/webidl-bindings/blob/master/p...

If you are confused as to what the article says then submit a pull request with a superior recommendation. It is on github after all.
> The stroke-based methods aren't so arbitrary - they are based on the way you write.

Indeed, they are not arbitrary.

The very invention of them is meant to create something much more meaningful to the users as alternative to the telegraph code and alike, which is nothing more than a bunch of numbers. But I say "arbitrary", in the sense that the classification and organization of strokes in the system is selected artificially by the designers, not something inherently exists in the language and understood by the speakers, difficulties are overcame once you are familiar to the system. But extensive effort is needed for a new user to master the system.
I was talking from personal experience as a LGBT person.
Excuse me?

I admitted that I was incorrect in my impression. I could have deleted the original comment but posted an admission that I was too quick to jump to conclusions.

You should be aware of what the media is trying to say, and how it's presented. This comment section is showing how different countries are presenting the same situation.

Confirmation bias in academics:

It's very common to escalate the work from undergrad->grad->postdoc->professors. (Doing the most work to the least in that order). It's pretty terrible.. but that's how it operates. Does the advisor do much? Do they get their name on the paper, yes. (In many times at the top)

Women- Her gender doesn't matter on this. The work she did for her research is awesome, it's clearly her work. (It's similar to super-resolution) This wasn't a single I just applied my algorithm and everything happened. Lots of people were involved in collecting, cleaning, managing, and adapting her improvement to existing CV algorithms to reproduce what a blackhole looks like.
Sure, and that's why intent is important. I fully understand encryption being fully legal, but I don't seen any benefit to legally being able to crack/decrypt other's information without their permission and knowledge, against their will.

This has zero implications on crypto-research because it's always legal to try your cracking on your own encrypted data, or on others' data with their permission, like public challenges. What good will it do to extend it to everyone encrypted data?

There are also privacy and property rights issues at hand. Should you be able to crack someone's private key and impersonate them without legal issues?

Reducing something to its basics and then claiming it should be legal by ignoring the real world consequences like the GP was doing is disingenuous.
I had a string of instances where what I bought just never showed up, and I got tired of that. I don't enjoy transacting with them, it's sort of terrible actually.
Attorney here! (Not offering legal advice, though - consult a licensed attorney in your state.)

They key phrase here is "prior restraint." That's not the issue here; the information has been published already. So the holding in the Pentagon Papers case (aka _New York Times_) doesn't apply to this set of circumstances.

Moreover, the Pentagon Papers case made no law. The opinion itself only reversed an appellate court decision and affirmed the judgment of a district court.

Read it yourself: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/713/#tab-opi...

First Amendment law respecting the dissemination of classified information -- by "journalists" (whatever they may be), or otherwise -- is not as settled as people think, and it's my personal view that unless the Supreme Court concludes otherwise, Mr. Assange could find himself in very hot water, as Chelsea Manning did.
That doesn't make any sense. There is no right to be a juror; rather, the defendant has a right to a jury of his peers. So the affected defendants deserve compensation, not those excluded from the jury pool.
Study shows being a cop now is safer then 50 years ago
Sorry, yes, I was sloppy in my phrasing and in use of "prison" vs. "jail." She did indeed leave her military imprisonment a while ago when Obama commuted her sentence and was out and in public and trying to put her life back together, but as of about a month ago she's been jailed again. I didn't mean to imply she'd been in prison continuously.
Leasing and renting are synonyms; I've always seen them used interchangeably.
> I don't understand why would you decide to purchase tesla over other electric cars if it was not for autopilot.

Supercharger network? Safety? Performance? Cargo Space?
Japan college adopts facial recognition-based attendance system
In addition to the SV companies there is WeWork, which is headquartered in New York. Also a bit surprising when I first heard about it.
Julian Assange would not need the first amendment rights if - with according to international laws - he would not be extradited to a country where he could face torture or the death penalty.
Thanks. In AZ, when you are issued an ID, it's good until you are 65. We also have provisional ballots.

So I looked up AL: https://www.dmv.org/al-alabama/id-cards.php (and got SEO'd)

4 years. And it's expensive. Bad. Seems like it's a reason for federal innovation at least on the fee and access side. ID's are difficult to copy, I haven't heard an arg to make them expire in such a short window.

That said, I would rather fix that problem than not have voter ID, some courts appear to agree it's a problem as you mentioned and have rightly intervened.
But isn't that par for the course when it comes to methane on Mars?

It's been detected before at astronomical (heh) levels with subsequent readings the very next day indicating only trace amounts.

https://earthsky.org/space/methane-spike-june-2013-both-curi...
Coinbase Debit Card
Everything you said could be used to describe longs as well, with incentives just aligned in the opposite direction.
They don't have to buy the cars they use today, what makes you think they'll have to buy them when they're self driving?
I thought so too, but I’ve had (non-tech, non-Bay Area) friends start ordering household items from Target instead of Amazon because of experiences like knockoff nail clippers and purple shampoo.

It could just be my circle of friends, but from my vantage point it feels like Amazon is starting to do serious damage to their brand.
> What GP appears to be advocating is that while considering this possible crime, we should "simultaneously" be thinking of what a general twit Assange is, lest we forget that the real goal is to punish him somehow.

Is that the real goal? That's the point I'm making, because both directions of reasoning matter. It could be that the charges against Assange are absurd and he should be freed. It could be that the charges are accurate but he should be granted clemency. It could be that he's guilty but not worth it. It could be that he's innocent of these crimes but guilty of things that, for various reasons, sit outside statutes. All of these positions imply stances one should take on the various particulars of the situation and so we should think about them.

> That is directly contrary to the rule of law.

This is exactly how the rule of law is practiced. It's one of the reasons why there are such dramatic racial disparities in the american legal system. It's why people regularly commit felonies without knowing it[1].

I am aware of the idea of law that you're invoking - that a crime is a crime is a crime and that we should speak to the issue at hand and not address the context around the issue. The problem, to me, is that the context around the crime is exactly the thing that produced the crime! The charge was doubtless chosen based on what the government thinks it can prove. If it couldn't prove this, it would have selected another charge.

To refuse to consider the context is to play the governments' game. If the charge is the charge, then go ahead and read the statute - I have no doubt Assange is technically guilty in some way. We are all guilty of felonies in some abstract technical sense.

But - if we do the sensible thing and consider the context, we have to consider both sides of the context - how did we arrive at this charge and what behavior (if any) does this charge ignore? This is what I mean by needing to do the two things simultaneously - you can't pretend Assange isn't arrested while you talk about his actions and you can't pretend his past actions don't exist while you talk about his arrest.

[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704471504574438...
> reflectors on the lane markers

I'm from the snow belt, and these are invisible until the plows come through.

We'll eventually embed sensors in the road, but that's not really general purpose self-driving imo.
The fact that you are making it about her appearance instead of her scientific achievement is you, my dude, not the article and not the media. She is first author, she came up with the algorithm, she did this thing, and all your attempts to belittle that just prove Joanna Russ’ absolute correctness.
They did not get "out competed" in china, a country where competition has nothing to do with success. Likewise in Russia. Grab is the only company to out compete Uber so far.
SNAP is up 105% YTD.

I wouldn't discount that company yet. Their market cap is actually fairly well priced right now, and I'd wager they are under-valued (assuming they execute well over next 6 months).
And/or lithobraking.
You just use a (somewhat cleaned up) UTF-8 representation as a slug. UTF-8 URL components are universally supported (transparently encoded and decoded) in all modern browsers, and Google shows the real characters instead of the urlencoded version. You still end up with the urlencoded version when you hit Ctrl+C, but I expect that to be fixed in the near future as Unicode becomes even more widely used.

For example, the following link should work perfectly well in all modern browsers:

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/メインページ
where? i''ve used several times over several years in Medellin, BsAs, without issue. also CDMX, Panama City in CentAm were fine.
Good point.

Some forms of Cantonese romanization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Government_Cantonese...) does exist, but their use is limited to mainly language study and transliteration. And apparently, there are multiple projects to create phonetic input systems for Cantonese (see the reference section of this Cantonese Wikipedia article, https://zh-yue.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%B2%B5%E8%AA%9E%E6%8B%B...), but all with very limited standardization and official supports.
You've been heavily downvoted because you made a category error. GlibC, musl, and uclibc are implementations of the c standard library[1]. Glib[2], this, and NSPR[3] (among others), on the other hand, abstract away platform-specific things. So whereas strcpy is a standard function that you can count on being there, the process for opening a window is different on windows, mac (quartz), mac (cocoa), unix (x11), unix (wayland), and others; the cross-platform libraries handle this and provide you with a single api for (for example) opening a window.

Now, as a language developer, you actually don't have to worry about any of these. The c standard library will be provided by the os and you don't have to think about it. Some programming languages that want to replace c don't rely on the c standard library, but you shouldn't have to worry about that. As for abstracting out different platform apis, I would say that doesn't really belong in your language itself.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_standard_library

2: https://developer.gnome.org/glib/

3: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NS...
Somewhat ironically, one of the few cases where increased competition will not coincide with better prices for the consumer.
Dragonblood – Analysing WPA3's Dragonfly Handshake
The concept of having a displayed value and a value to actually sort by isn't limited to Japanese words/names. It also comes up when there's a desired display function but for sorting intents different parts should be added or removed from the name of an entity. One such example is book and movie titles in a library.
The analysis you linked to seems to be vastly misrepresenting Andrew Chael's contribution. Quote from the link:

> Andrew Chael wrote 850k out of the 900k lines of code. He was also the leader of the project. Michael D. Johnson wrote 12k lines of code. Chanchikwan wrote 5k lines of code. The woman? Only wrote 2.4k lines of code.

It's a little bit unbelievable that the author of this comment (/u/dragonballcell) nailed all of these fine-grained details (red herrings, perhaps?) and yet glossed over an incredibly important and superficial/trivial detail: that Andrew Chael did not "write 850k LOC", he generated hundreds of thousands of lines of data and committed them to the repo. Needless to say, I think this whole drama is incredibly pointless.
Pretty rich, coming from the co-founder of a company that willfully handed over encryption keys of user data to authoritarian and brutal governments[1].

[1]https://www.reuters.com/article/us-blackberry-saudi/rim-to-s...
So they can pressure you in to spending more.
Ugh, did the author expect Go to make his code magically real-time? That's pretty difficult, GC or not.

Also, time.Sleep in a test wouldn't pass code review. A better approach is to timestamp incoming lines and merge them based on that alone. That is testable, although the overall concept is still a bit unsound.
In the future we are Sims running on Google's computers.
(For security purposes, in vanilla js we should all be using textContent, not innerHTML, and creating dom nodes directly.)
Eh, I think blackberry's destruction was of their own making. They had a huge head start but failed to embrace apps. The onboarding process for developers was painful and their devices were chronically underpowered.

They failed to read the winds of change that saw Bring Your Own Device come to the workplace and thought they were safe with enterprise and government users.
Any of these big tech companies is not your friend.
"declarative way of updating the DOM"

Updating is not declarative.
Abominations everywhere... The bloated JS site is the replacement for Flash.
All appropriate-age male residents of the US have to register for the Select Service system, which org would implement a draft if required.
This article is a long winded view of the sophisticated behavior modeling ad-targeting networks that google and others employ - long on hand wringing and short on solutions.

Stratchery published a beautiful, irreverent proposal earlier this week to address this very challenge through a regulatory framework that actually feels like it could work and I encourage all HN users to absorb:

https://stratechery.com/2019/a-regulatory-framework-for-the-...
Couple of things which I find interesting are:

- The whole calculation around "Other Income" are nothing short of financial engineering to show bottom line profitability.

- 24% of Uber's gross bookings come from 5 cities - Los Angeles, New York City, and the San Francisco Bay Area in the United States; London in the United Kingdom; and São Paulo in Brazil

- 15% rides started or were completed at an airport.
So to summarize:

- Tesla launches 35k Standard model along with 37,5k Standard Plus Model

- Tesla raises price of Standard Plus Model to 39,5k

- Tesla discontinues Standard Model

So Tesla just increased the base price of the Model 3 from 35k to 39.5k, but tried to do some marketing tricks to make you feel like it's a great deal.
Whataboutism. Regardless, his point is that comprehensive surveillance of the Sidewalk project is bad.

> Sidewalk’s proposal is peppered with phrases like “comprehensive data collection,” “an enormous amount of data,” and “fine-grained data.” The data it desires runs from environmental (localized weather conditions, noise levels, and pollution) to social ( everyday actions that paint a detailed picture of what residents are doing and when ).

It looks like Google's vision for the modern city is to turn it into the Sims where Google can peer into everything. If you want to live in that world be my guest, but he's absolutely right. This is not something which is good in many ways. Where Google is monitoring everyone all the time. I mean even in Star Trek the computer isn't monitoring everyone all the time.... if it were then many plots could be resolved with the surveillance log on everyone's actions.
> Uh, wait. They're taking the Model 3 Standard off the menu....so.....that means the $35k version just got stopped?

You can't stop what never began to move in the first place. There has never been a single reported delivery of the $35k model. There have been a LOT of complaints about delayed deliveries however.

EDIT: Seems I'm getting downvoted. Lemme put up some sources then. https://electrek.co/2019/04/04/tesla-model-3-base-doesnt-exi...
Because they look better and carry a better brand image. If I were to buy one I will buy one without auto-pilot.
As other comments have pointed out, devices (mobile and desktop app) do require
2FA and there's no way around that. So I'm assuming you meant the keybase.io
website where you can log in with username and password.

Note that the functionality of the website is very limited. You can't access
any chat messages or non-public KBFS data, for example. The most power thing
you can do is resetting your account, and after that is probably using your PGP
key if you uploaded an encrypted version of your private key to Keybase. If
this worries you, you should turn on lockdown mode [0] to require a device to
access those features.

[0] https://keybase.io/docs/lockdown/index
What technologies did they have in the 60s? I computer used to cost thousands of dollars and its the size of your room in the 60s also.
"I don't think we need new complicated technologies to solve the kinds of problems React solves."

Isn't web components the standard, and react is the complicated technology?
>The onboarding process for developers was painful and their devices were chronically underpowered.

I can resonate with this. I worked for a major bank developing their blackberry app. It was amazingly painful to develop on their platform, its a literal mess.
Not whataboutism at all; with historical context you might be able to see that this isn't a principal stand but possibly has some, yet unknown, commercial reason.
Hailing cabs by phone (and later on, using the non-Uber hailing services that interact directly with cabs) never worked as well for me as Uber. Takes too long for them to get there, and the incentive for them to abandon your request and pick up a fare they find on the way is too strong.

Taxis only make sense in the very small perecent of the US where you can walk outside and hail one coming down the street.
Really insightful, explains the current situation.