skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've asked the AMP team exactly this and they punted and demurred on the subject and said they have some vague plans to some day make it also contain sites that are as fast as AMP.

The AMP team will tell you that they are concerned with making the web faster, and it's the _search_ team that controls the carousel. Which is all well and good, but I can tell you that the _only_ reason any publisher is doing AMP is because they want the placement in the carousel and better search results.

As far as I can tell, google has no intention of ever allowing non-amp content they can't re-serve from their cache and add whatever analytics and tracking they want to from being ranked highly. AMP is a tactic to let them track the most lucrative mobile web users and take control away from publishers of original content.
Wow, the music business.
Network neutrality applies to last mile providers like Comcast and Verizon, and only to the extent that one of the endpoints is one of their last mile customers.

You're talking about transit providers like Cogent and Level 3, which it doesn't apply to any more than it does to Google.

It also applies to Google to the extent that they have Google Fiber last mile customers.

It's true that GCE and AWS have expensive bandwidth prices, but then buy from someone else. It's not as if they have no effective competition, unlike Comcast.
It's a photo of the absence of light (in the middle) and light/particles swirling around the black hole that haven't passed the event horizon (yet).
> but I never want to be in a place where I have to regex my code...ever).

I use regex search and replace fairly often; why are you so opposed to it?

If I need to change $t1 into t1 in a group of 6 lines (something I did today), its pretty easy to just make that replacement automatically. Doing it by hand would just take longer.

> ... with an occasional refactoring

That's exactly what I use the feature for.
It's not really speculation. The proof, as they say, is in the impact crater.

The only mystery left is, what is the nature of the paper trail that led to this catastrophe?

Was there malicious malfeasance? Overt and irresistible pressure to certify at all costs?

Was it all just a tragic mistake? We don't know. We only know the physical systems that contributed to the crashes, and some of the motivations that would have contributed. The technical implementation can be roughly inferred by any programmer, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out a ball was dropped somewhere for a plane development program to fall afoul of such a foreseeable failure state.
Climate Change Could Destroy His Home in Peru So He Sued a German Energy Company
I don't believe Alexa and others are malevolently spying, but if the data exists, you should expect nothing less than it to be public at some point, or at least be accessed by someone you'd not expect to share your life with.

You _should_ absolutely be allowed to buy a non-street legal vehicle to operate on private land. You _should_ be able to buy a recording device that has no privacy features. You should _not_ be able to sell a recording device that by default is streaming all audio all the time for common consumers without a big label saying "everything this device is within hearing distance of is now public data and you agree you are in violation of the law, where applicable, for using it".

We are no longer in the days where consumers can be expected to know what their devices are even capable of, let alone what rights are being trampled.
So, the people with the most money pay the same tax as those with a low income?

That...doesn't sound fair at all. It's equality but not equity.
Is there? Seems like a massive difference between recordings in the privacy of one’s home and, say, tweets intentionally published to the world.
I worked in Pivotal Labs for about two years. It is an amazing place to learn the craft.
There are other small and well established edge-case restrictions on free speech I am willing to accept, mind you, eg market manipulation or giving false statements to police. But I don’t see the classic fire-in-theatre one as being relevant to anything.

This contradicts the point you were making before, which I was responding to, where no agency is qualified to establish limits, so I guess this part of the thread is over.

HOWEVER

refuse to carve out the exception and accept the risk of the occasional unnecessary evacuation

You're still hung up on theaters, not to mention a whole whack of cherry-picked hyper-specific scenarios. Look into the Hillsborough Disaster some time. Or here's an on-point example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Hall_disaster ...would that be no fault of anybody in the free-speech society you are advocating? Maybe pulling a fire alarm would have to be established as a form of speech first, but I bet that could be done.
You're making it completely about monetary value. I'm talking about people taking time away from their own families, going to extreme lengths just to help another human being. That's crazy to me.
This is natural for corporations which grow to this size. It's not about good vs evil, they just weren't at a scale where they could do these projects which are all based in some combination of good intentions, serving customers, and profit.
Do you really need to read the news to know who to vote for given your views on those issues?
As long as it emits pure sine wave. There’s forum posts everywhere talking about this.
Practically, they probably weren't faster than their AMP page on mobile as a search result, because of preloading and google CDNage of the AMP cache of the page.
People point this out all the time. I think it’s used as a non-sequiteur argument to invalidate people’s opinions who have privilege.

Just because someone was born into privilege does not mean they can’t have opinions or that those opinions are incorrect.

I also think ignoring the news has nothing to do with privilege. So, you’re saying that if I did not have privilege then somehow reading the news is going to change anything?

99% of “news” is absolute garbage and a distraction from actual issues.
That's a good point. I might have to try some experiments with side-scrolling columns, see how it works out for longform reading.
Sure, but one of those conventions and limitations is that the page is hosted by google. It's not something you can deploy on your own server. It's not as if it's just some list of recommendations that make sites faster - you're signing up to a Google service, and you're at their mercy from then on.
I don't disagree, it probably should be made more explicit to customers that someone could listen to certain things said to the device. I just wanted to point out that there is a big difference between reviewing everything a customer says and having the possibility of certain phrases reviewed.
Einstein Couldn't Believe His Own Black Hole Theory
I have been reading news (news on real paper) since I could barely understand what I was reading about. I read news often just for reading.

But I have also stopped reading/watching/hearing news. When election time comes, I will read the laws being proposed, do some google search and pick a candidate or yay/nay a proposition (I live in California).

Just step back and reconsider what 'news' is trying to tell you from a 3rd person view. Ultimately you are being manipulated, imho. To vote for a candidate and/or clicks so that ads can be sold.

Just check this book out. Or at least read reviews of the book.

> How the News Makes Us Dumb: The Death of Wisdom in an Information Society Paperback – March 17, 1999 by C. John Sommerville (Author)
> Interesting side fact: unlike in english, there are two completely distinct words for illegal and legal drugs in russian language.

German is the same: "Drogen" = illegal drugs like cannabis, "Medizin" = medicine. For Germans learning English, "drug store" may sound confusing until one learns about the various distinct meanings of the word "drug" in English.
Essentially, this is the DMCA for terrorist content. With a somewhat short time requirement driven by some recent events (New Zealand being the most prominent, but not first).

Here's a link to the current EU draft: https://www.laquadrature.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019...

(It's a document highlighting the latest changes from committee, making it somewhat hard to read but not less interesting)

I'm not sure if it's fair to compare notices from the current program, which sends out notices without any legal force, to what this envisages. The directive sets out a process and requirements for notices, including detailed reasoning for each. It also specifically mentions avenues to protest (and sue) in cases of disagreements.

I'm no particular fan of this for both practical and philosophical reasons. If youtube had invested in some sort of oversight that prevented this kiwi neckbeard from live-streaming his massacre of innocents, the vote this week would probably have ended differently.
In many countries authors aren't allowed to put the code under the public domain. To avoid these issues it is instead preferred to provide an explicit copyright license.

https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1371/
It's often one guy with a spreadsheet, and 1-2 people to review the spreadsheet and a few business people to validate assumptions. The modeling is easy, getting the assumptions right is hard.
To be honest, if you're skilled very simple models that you can do in your head or in a few minutes usually give you a perfectly good answer. The more complex exhaustive models are usually there to make sure you didn't overlook something or 20 small inputs all cross multiplied to throw your answer off.
Getting the answer exactly right also doesn't matter, if you make $90m in profit off a deal or $100m your going to do it. What you are most concerned about is making sure that you don't lose money and what factors would push you to do that.
How long? It's always quicker than you think once you're sliding down the slope.
What stops ordinary companies from doing this to ordinary shareholders?
I think people can accept change in language as it pertains to new contexts, but I really don't like it when people just don't bother (especially with misuse by native speakers). This is especially true for those of us who don't correctly parse poorly-written language. I normally read very quickly, but when something isn't right, it's jarring and I have to go back, scan it several times, and figure out what it means.

I've always found it odd that in a place like HN, most are pedantic in their use of every language but English.
It's still a problem for us in the U.S, because there are always politicians in the U.S. that look at dumb things being done in Europe and say, "We should be doing that, too.", and voters who will vote for them.
Anyone else getting sick of the media calling this the first "PHOTOGRAPH" of a black hole? It's a spectrograph at best and more realistically a rendering. Don't get me wrong it's really cool but it's not a photo.
How do you know whether someone works at Google?

Don’t worry, they’ll tell you.
That’s the sales pitch but I usually notice AMP pages because they take so long to render at all, waiting for a ton of JavaScript to load before anything displays. Mobile caches are small and unless you hit Google a lot in the same browser you see those delays frequently compared to sites which follow other Google teams’ recommendations for performance.
There's many different kinds of sex work, but the movie Indecent Proposal taught me that everyone has a price. My first question, if someone solicited me for prostitution, would be to clarify not how much but what would you like me to do? If you want me to sleep with your hot wife, my price is within reach. If you want me to be gangbanged in a public park, you probably can't afford it. All semantics aside, while I don't know anything about you, my gut tells me that most people would turn to prostitution with far less trauma both faster and more consistently than you might expect. In fact, it's really only the culture in the west that gets really uptight about pretending many romantic relationships aren't highly transactional.

Plus, my hope is that good citizens would make money selling sex long before they sell the trust of their electorate. It's only a morally bankrupt crime that could in some cases be treasonous if you get caught, right?
>A free society is one, where people and ideas can show up, be given a chance, and stand or fall on their character and merits.

How do you square this with the recent surge in flat Earth and anti-vaccination beliefs? The merits of truth aren't guaranteed to win this battle.
I believe you should be able to write off a loss as cap gains or OID depending on how long after excise you liquidate. Will at least be able to get some back.
> Only AMP can be guaranteed safe to preload through static analysis

No, AMP pages can't be proven safe, because with AMP you can include ads which are a very common vector of malware.(if I understand your comment)
I can see why the UK would not be excited to remain.
First, I also had trouble with XCode.
About the regex in vi: there is a technique of writing/maintaining code based on substitutions instead of inserting/deleting. It can be very powerful but you have to "write" your code thinking about the patterns and maintaining some kind of structure. I am not saying that it is good or recommended. It's interesting. I coded for like 5 years like that. I was maintaining a codebase completely solo. When working with a not very synchronized team or having tools like resharp or omnisharp etc avaliable, I don't think it would pay off.
At any rate, it's a good thing that literally every single IDE can do search and replace with regexes.
You are correct. The rather humorous aspect is that they really can't stick to the "no retraining" claim or really the claim the plane is airworthy because the plane is only certifiably airworthy when MCAS is operating.

So in short, yes. Their fix is introducing problems elsewhere. This characteristic is what has many thinking their was a series of grievous process, business, and regulatory errors layered on top of the known poor engineering decisions that came together to set the stage for these catastrophes.
well, high enough levels of RF (ie, well above routine public exposure) can burn.
Yes, and no. IT development is one of the best paying professional jobs in China, commanding 3x to 8x a typical office worker's salary.

If you have skills, experience, or for a fresh graduate an interest, in what in the US would be considered a mainstream enterprisy (Java, Angular, .NET) and passable English or Japanese language skills, you can get a position in development with a Fortune 500 or as a contractor to a F500 without too much difficulty. Normal 9-6, 5 day work week, public holidays plus 10-15 days discretionary holiday per year, stability over fast-pace, middle class income (8,000 Yuan per month for 0-2 years experience, 20,000 per month in a Tier-2 city for 5 years experience; for reference rent for a newish 2 bedroom apartment within 20 minutes walk to the office would be about 3000 Yuan per month).

The BATs (Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent) pay more, 2x or 3x, and are the glamorous places for fresh grads to work. Good luck getting in though.

Want-to-be BATs are probably the worst employers. They lack the pay and prestige of BATs, lack the stability and sane working culture of F500s, and tend to have terrible management that lack conviction and realistic goals. Without a BAT or F500 early in one's career, it's hard to break away from want-to-be-BATs.

I know nothing about Games development, so no comment there.

There is a big age ceiling. 15 years experience doesn't pay much better than 5 years experience and will often be met with questions about why not able to move into product ownership of management, but that's another topic. Working in a Tier-1 city will mean rents are way higher, purchase of property probably unattainable, and wages probably less than double those mentioned above.

I hope that answers part of your questions.
Where government is concerned, you’re completely correct. However, voting with your dollars does work well for markets, e.g. grocery stores and the like.
The harm these companies might cause is primarily in the future. This is still the sunny phase where they have not been incorporated into some Orwellian system (pardon me, google tried really hard in China but got stopped for now)
Getting modern browsers to accept your CA is a huge pain, different per browser and OS, and barely anyone will do it.

The moment anyone starts a community CA for this they'll just blacklist it.
This comment is a lowbrow dismissal of important work. In the MTA-STS status quo ante, an attacker could break TLS and MITM SMTP transactions by forcing a protocol downgrade. That's an untenable situation, as would be a decree from the major mail providers that all mail must now be sent over TLS. The third alternative, widespread deployment of DANE, would be even more onerous for site operators, in addition to its unfortunate side effect of instituting a global PKI rooted in world governments.

There has been an SMTP-over-TLS port for ages. Obviously, that doesn't fix the problem, because a MITM attacker can simply RST connections to that port.

MTA-STS does not in fact require EVERY message to do an "HTTPS lookup and a reconnection".
I feel that journalists haven't shown enough self criticism on serious issues with how they operate like click-bait-ism, hyperbole-laden head line writing and the Gell-Mann amnesia. On the face of such and other issues I see them mostly on an defensive stance than that of any serious self introspection. It is rare to see even acceptance of these and other problems from them, let alone thought of any solutions.

They need to get off their ivory towers, and be transparent about their own vulnerabilities.
> This has always struck me as a weird sort of edge case,

Actually, it's not if you look at it a different way. We have Free Speech in the U.S.A., but there are many instances where it's illegal (and rightly so) to lie. You can't lie about your finances to the IRS. You can't lie in court when under oath. You can't ruin someone's reputation by lying about him (i.e., slander or libel).

And you can't lie about there being a fire in a theater.
Well, I'll just say this article (and a lot of them from the author) about the independent journalism business are worth reading: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/nuts-and-bolts-of-prime...
Why don't you just spend that money on marketing/ads ? Setup campaigns on Google Search/FB, etc.
Amazon warehouse employees had to pee in bottles because they were worked so hard, and there is that business about selling large scale facial recognition services to governments (possibly in emulation of what China is doing)
You are wrong, this is definitely a photo, shot by multiple telescopes global-wise.
Does this site run on AMP?
Do any web sites based in the USA have to honor these takedown notices from countries based in the EU?
Vim is like Dvorak. The cognitive burden for remembering which key maps to what is high unless you use it 24/7.
Absurd for three reasons:

- You've produced no evidence these pilots are at any training limit, you just made that up, so I call bullshit.

- I'm a pilot and a former flight instructor so I have some credibility in refusing a binary choice like you've proposed. It's not that much training. I had to do difference training for checkouts on a regular basis (giving it and receiving it) and it's not high quantity training, it is high quality training.

- The strongest argument there's plenty of opportunity for training is the fact the MAX had the same type certification as the previous NG model series. So what's the worst case scenario for difference training? It'd require an aircraft type certificate, which will require pilots undergo training and checkout for an additional type rating.

Quite a lot of pilots have multiple type ratings, it's not unusual, in fact the pilot of Ethiopian Airlines 302 had type ratings for B737-7/800, B757/767, B777, and B787. What, was he only training and never flying?
The National Inquirer Is Up for Sale
100% agree. Fewer auth providers (ideally, one) greatly reduces the work involved with mitigating this attack (and maintaining permissions, auditing, passthrough... everything gets easier, really).

Happy Okta client here.
Because Christchurch.

(Which postdates the first draft of this directive. But there were similar cases before)
I'd like to reach people organically, and it means something more when you get to talk to the people who are using it. I'm not looking for downloads or upvotes.
- Yeah, hate that Google walled garden. Much better to go with Apple.

- Yeah, that gmail specific stuff is evil, except it isn't gmail specific at all.

- Yeah, killing browsers with Chrome. Just like IE6 except it's open source, cross-platform, evergreen, and pushes standards forward rather then trying to subvert them. The biggest problem now is others like MS using their browser engine is reducing diversity, but I guess that's their fault for making it open source. evil!

- And yeah, they have now officially destroyed VSCode (which includes lots of closed source MS stuff) by releasing a closed source extension.
In addition to the fact that, had Google declared plaintext SMTP EOL'd, someone else would be here to tell us how that too was an instance of Google ignoring the operator and standards community, and the fact that there's no real effort in the IETF to formally end plaintext SMTP, there's the fact that simply refusing to interop with plaintext SMTP wouldn't actually fix the problem; it would just break SMTP into a bunch of incompatible islands, which is run by a myriad of different users who are not, for a myriad of reasons, in a position to upgrade their software stack to TLS.
> Germans in particular are acutely aware of the disastrous consequences of allowing incitement to go unchallenged.

I’m not sure that current hate speech laws would have been effective at countering Nazi propaganda.

The Nazis were not openly advocating their most extreme policies before the war. Even during the war, the worst atrocities were mostly kept quiet.
Right so those least able to pay, the ones who spend all they get — which is what keeps the economy moving btw, pay the same amount as people who are most able to pay and least likely to spend, slowing down the economy. How can I lose?!
Producing commercially useful training sets on a sustainable basis.
How has your TC changed since you’ve joined Google?
The big tech companies most affected by this law actually don't care too much about it, because it disproportionally hurts startups that are competing with them or will compete with them in the future.

Netflix, Google/YouTube, Amazon/Twitch etc. will be able to afford to pay ISPs extra for the fast lanes.

Startups and companies that could never take off because of appearing slow to their potential users cannot afford lobbyists and political donations.
I try to post in-depth and reasoned comments to this exact point whenever someone in my social circle posts ranty "news" articles, but they just get completely flat-out ignored.

I've never seen anyone argue that this elite vs the rest pickpocketing isn't actually happening and (what we call) the culture war is the real battle.

It would be helpful if there was, because then I could try to understand the mindset behind the dismissal of our view— it's driving me crazy.
Completely off topic, but I hate Accuweather. The guy that runs it has lobbied left and right to keep the NWS and NOAA from being able to just deliver weather products because they'd cut into his revenue stream he's developed by charging people for access to public data.

Anyway... End rant.