skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Go look for Russian collusion, “it’ll be hard to find some, because historically it just doesn't happen”

Still satisfied with your argument?
Yes, they are. I don't care whether a ride service is available in one, a dozen or three hundred locations. I care about the best option in my city, and I would bet dollars to donuts that this aligns with the market majority.

A thousand local or regional competitors are just as much an existential threat to Uber as one or two big ones.
We have a small sample size of humans who have been exposed to space. I wonder what human mutations will be more preferable for space travel. Physical fitness is part of the equation but so is genetic-space compatibility.
No, he's being prosecuted for allegedly agreeing to extract a password from a hash. Not for actually doing so, massive difference.
Our Closest Neighboring Exoplanets Could Be Habitable After All
Because that's market collusion, and that is illegal.
I think it's the beginning of a relevant discussion thread on any Google service. At this point it's such a significant problem with anything Google runs that we should be talking about it every time they launch something.
In this case it was cracking a password to blow the lid on US war crimes in Iraq.
Holy wow, that's pretty amazing! You should consider making it into a opensource library for others to use, it's truly beautiful! Thank you for making this project.
Is it really the same thing? The method you cite is a type of style transfer. Input sharp focused image and you get a blurrier version out with the required style. You’re removing information with a particular type of convolution.

The nvidia version seems to inpaint new details into the user segmented areas, like a collage of sorts.
>To paint that as US law "reaching the globe" is a bit facetious

'Everybody does it' argument does not invalidate the claim. I'm not making judgement on what should happen here but...

An Austrailian man was just arrested in the United Kingdom and is to be extridited to the United States for allegations of attempting to aide the circumvention of encryption on a laptop (while located in Sweeden) that was owned by the US government and stolen by (while located in the Afghanistan) a US citizen containing information about the United States government's invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.
> The court of public opinion should be subordinate to the judicial system.

I don't think I agree with this. The legal system decides whether or not an action was legal, not whether or not an action was acceptable in society. The court of public opinion decides whether or not an action was acceptable in society, not whether or not it was legal.

They address two different things, and I think that's proper. You don't really want the legal system deciding social mores, and you also don't really want legality to be determined based on the public's emotional reaction to things.
> He convinced a lot of people that he was an expert at all things science despite using an incredibly immature writing style

I skimmed the article, but couldn't find examples or mention of his writing style.
Uber is a non-profit version of Uber. They made a 10% loss last year. So a non-profit (assuming they intend to at least break even) would actually need to pay the drivers less.
Was curious about using pdfs as source but the docs have no info on it: https://docs.rockset.com/
No, it's usually negotiated as part of an options package.
"We will lend you the money to exercise your options".
Then they can pay it back once they sell the shares they received.
Julian Assange’s Charges Are on Hacking, Not Publishing Classified Information
Yeah, but thrust to weight really matters too. I'd be floored if two Russian engines had anywhere near the power to weight ratio of the F-35 engine.

But the Russian engineers are very good, they've done a great job of designing competitive planes with those constraints. I wouldn't cast stones at the prototype Sukhois or MiGs.
It's unfortunate but some C++ standard library implementations do require allocation in some moves (notably, IIRC, Microsoft's std::list). So we're stuck with it.
LHCb Results Add Clues to Pentaquark Mystery
Android 7.0 Phones Can Now Double as Google Security Keys
I'm not at all well-versed in statistics, but it seems that without enough extra cash to consistently one-up the competition in terms of incentive structures, a ride share company could not make the driver's choice of which app to use a non-random event. So yes, a driver wouldn't necessarily choose all four at once, but they also wouldn't consistently pick one.
Let’s say Waymo get to legit, truly market ready SDC taxi tech 3 years before Uber, and they start expanding into Uber’s markets at lower prices. This is bad for Uber, but hardly the end of their business. People won’t immediately trust SDCs, so Uber will lose market share only gradually even if their prices are higher. Plus Waymo have to scale up massively to significantly compete with Uber - that’ll take time.

If Waymo don’t make much of a dent in Uber’s market share in 3 years, Uber gets their SDC tech to market and problem solved. If they DO start making a big dent, Uber can likely raise enough money to simply drop prices to Waymo levels (with human drivers), and just bleed cash until they get the tech out to be profitable. Uber (and their investors) are well versed in this strategy.
Okay, it seems like Manning was uploading the leak to WL when this happened. Did Manning provide any new data after this conversation?
I'm not saying anything about whether it was morally here or there, but that it's not at all an unreasonable application of the CFAA.

The guy driving the getaway car from the FBI field-office break-in* (or whoever) is going to be on the hook for burglary, even if the burglary was done for laudable reasons. I think Obama 100% did the right thing commuting Manning's sentence, and was pleased to see her go free. I'm not at all sure prosecuting Assange for essentially the same crime is in the interest of the nation or justice or whatever.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens%27_Commission_to_Inve...
The whole point of this article is to make elections more secure not be complacent with the status quo. Not having an ID and needing an ID to vote are 2 different issues that democrats insist on making the same. Just give every citizen a free ID. It would cost less than 1 days interest on the national debt. The real reason is because democrats want to turn texas blue like they did to new mexico and dominate elections with just 3 states
The behavior is predictable to anyone versed in the language. C++ is a complex language to learn so that is inherently harder than most alternatives, but the concepts here are not.

I am first in line to acknowledge the flaws of C++ as well as sheering on more modern approaches. But I do find your criticisms shallow and a quite oddly chosen.
I won't fix it for that reason...
>Assange didn’t succesfully crack the hash, it’s questionable if he even did anything with it.

So if someone tried to break into your home and failed, that means they never committed a crime?

>At best his crime is agreeing to help hack into the DoD network, not actually doing anything in furtherance of that.

That's why the maximum sentence is only 5 years.
Is there a valid comparison between Uber and a company like Amazon? Amazon's loss leader strategy paid off and they're doing well now, so can Uber "become profitable whenever they want to" and be fine?
I wouldn't call a rural portion huge, but, sadly this still happens. About 5 known cases in last year
He was charged and convicted of skipping on his bail in 2012.
Who Needs Casinos?? Decentralized Gambling with Augur
Because you have to be physically present in order to do that, and nobody wants to risk getting thrown in jail if they pick a name that’s already voted, or that the poll worker happens to know.
> never do anything unexpected

> I'll actually stop and let any cars behind me go ahead. As soon as I put my foot on the ground, cars know they have nothing to fear from me.

Contradiction!

Whatever's wrong with signalling, pausing to see if the driver's going to obey the highway code, or accelerate to overtake, and then moving into the road?
>reviews the old footage

Reviews all the footage or only the footage featuring his enemies?

> Are you saying the second guy committed a biased issuance of a ticket?

Depends entirely on if that person was auditing random (or all) footage or specifically looked up plates of people he doesn't like.
I think you are misinterpreting the question. The US Constitution obviously has no legal impact on the laws of Saudi Arabia. The question is whether the US government needs to follow the US Constitution when dealing with a non-US citizen on non-US soil.

There seems to be a precedent that US citizens have different legal protections from the US government while abroad when compared with non-citizens. That is why US citizens involved with Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or similar hostile organizations will occasionally receive a domestic trial in the criminal justice system while non-citizens generally only face military trials if anything.
Yes! I have been looking for a name for this type of error for a long, long time.

|{i, i+1, i+2, ..., n}| = (n - i) + 1
is a little clunkier to say
Worse than that, Uber are taking money from investors and directly giving it to the drivers to subsidise the trip price for the consumer all in an effort to build market share. It's folly to think that customers are going to remain loyal to such a service once the money runs out.
I'm unconvinced that a software routine (MCAS) that can be (indirectly) disabled, and pilots are instructed to disable in the case of MCAS upset, is an acceptable work around for any portion of FAR 25 certification.

I think it's more likely that MCAS was intended to avoid a new type certificate for the MAX, thereby triggering FAR 61.31(a) requiring that the pilot be type rated.

Either way we have a problem here, as I see it. The aircraft flight manual and emergency AD 2018-23-51 specifically recommend a procedure that instantly makes the airplane not airworthy, or renders the pilot flying an airplane with behavior he's not really type rated for. This seems highly problematic, and I'm not able to account for it.
Rust moves don't allocate, and yet can still support recoverable allocation failure.

The reason C++'s model is so much more complicated is because of backwards compatibility and nondestructive moves, not as a mechanism to support recoverable allocation failure.
Would Emacs' paredit be considered SDE? If so, that would be a huge counterpoint. Everyone I've talked to that's gotten up to speed with it has loved it.
Where was I speaking for a group?
Yeah, which is why her sentence was commuted (albeit later than would be ideal for her).
I do this as a rider, but I suspect it's different when you're a driver and your livelihood depends on it.
I don't see the point in ignoring race, or any other physical traits. It's almost as if when it comes to survival some people would rather be dead than being seen as a bigot or racist.

When the details of the situation you are in start to fit the common parameters of stories you hear that's when you need to be on high alert.

For instance, I doubt most people will think twice if they pass a woman in an alley, no matter how she's dressed. Females mugging and killing people just isn't a thing you hear about all that often. So you take your chances.

Likewise a man of any race wearing a suit is probably not going to be perceived as any kind of threat either.

Could these people be threats? Of course, but statistically it is unlikely.

Likewise, if you are somewhere where a member of a race has never killed anybody, you probably would feel at ease around those people. Or maybe it's an area where crime is low in general all around, then perhaps you walk in peace and freely ignore everyone as a threat.

It has nothing to do with being a bigot or a racist, it's all about being aware of past patterns that have led to people's deaths and avoiding them.
The saddest thing is that the moon men are still bereft of queso: https://www.kvue.com/article/news/weird/austin-queso-launche...
Totally off-topic but if someone from keybase can answer ... since keybase finally added chat history search it's only missing two features for me - responsive design(if you make the main window small then the left menu and especially contacts list don't scale and you end up with small chat and these two huge panels on the side) and dark theme.

=> Any plans to focus a bit more on GUI?
The article you posted highlights exactly what's happening here, he's being charged with hacking, not publishing.

> One former law enforcement official said the U.S. government could bring charges against Assange if it discovered a crime, such as evidence that he directly hacked into a U.S. government computer. But the Justice officials said he would almost certainly not be prosecuted for receiving classified material from Manning.
Body building forums were really weird places, back around 2002, up until maybe 2004 when MySpace started to explode, and then, eventually Facebook.

I remember encountering at least one, and the passages I read tended to brush up against a sort of dimwitted infantile fan fiction, mixing bizarre fantasies with near-zero understanding of human anatomy and physiology.

One particular discussion that sticks out in my mind was something akin to a 12 year-old's musings (and it might, very well, have been some little kid), about how protein travels from a dinner plate all the way into the muscles, and it was tempting to believe one person was sock puppeting the whole thread, pretending to carry multiple sides of the conversation, as a sort of blend of creative writing and performance art, but just based on the voice and tone of the various replies, it really did seem like some sort of group fantasy role playing session.

This was before I knew the true depth and breadth of furry subculture, and eventually, once I became more familiarized with such facts of life, and developed an understanding of the intersection of interests between fan fiction and fur suit fetishists, I surmized that on some level, what had been going on with all those body building forums was that a subset of the fur suit/fan fiction subculture had begun to fantasize collectively about bulging human muscles and oiled up skin, as if it were a form of fur suit, and then took to authoring concept pieces, to role play within that context.

In the same way that ASMR is something akin to an alt-kink version of phone sex, this sort of thing seemed to be likened to alt-cybering in an obscure sub-genre of fur kink.

Anyway, that was the weird shit I remember bumping into back then. Now I suspect it's all rolled into the general morasse of Facebook flotsam, diluted and washed out. Maybe it's better that way... Maybe.
Only if those 11 people were randomly selected. Was that the case?

I’ll go ahead and answer that one for you: no, it was not the case. The odds of selecting 11 black Americans at random and ending up with all 11 living in Harlem are infinitesimally small.
So you're saying he... conspired to do something illegal?
They're actually more likely not to extradite to countries with the death penalty, which the US has and the UK doesn't. That's one of the main reasons for the state not to agree to extradition -- the punishment is what the state views as cruel or unusual, which many countries view the death penalty as. Extradition agreements are generally much simpler among countries without it, but that is indeed a generality.
I am not sure, nor I'm sure I care very much about efficiency (in resolving problems) in the first place.

But I learn, take notes, and rarely make the same mistake/ask the same question twice.
Vec::new doesn't allocate.

Vec::try_reserve, on the other hand, simply uses a common `CollectionAllocError`, which is not really (a) or (b).
Unfuckinbelievable!
Aren't they also the world's largest foreign aid recipient?
I saw Tufte CSS and loved it too. I'm glad to see someone putting it into action. I loved it so much I wanted others to be able to use it. So I created this nearly complete project to allow anyone to write Tufte essays, blogs, or articles.

https://writetufte.com
Agreed. Genentic engineering will probably be helpful, but first we do as you say, have to know what to engineer for. Then of course we’ll have a kind of speciation event and we’ll risk having a kind of genetic apartheid based on people who work in space vs. planetside. It could get sci-fi dystopia levels of ugly if we don’t work to prevent those outcomes.
...and a billion years of meteorite rubble
>It should be assumed everything can and will fail.

And anything still seemingly working to spec over a fairly conservative cycle count has already failed. Just in ingenious ways that it hasn't yet informed you of and nobody has yet discovered. You should probably swap it out for a spare and take it apart and hit it with things till you are sure. You should probably do that now while there is still time.
I think a lot of the verification problems for electronic voting could be solved by simplification and using old 'outdated' technology. You don't need a full fledged PC to tally votes, you need the computing power of a 30 year old calculator that could be built on a 2-foot wide board with large and simple traces. Something somebody at home with a multi-meter could probe around and test.

We need the equivalent of a moped to do what we need done, but are being sold on F1 racecars which end up being built by equivalent of rednecks in a scrapyard to line the pockets of the scrapyard owners.
>Space efficient? Yes and no. It is more space efficient for people whose options are bike vs car to ride a bike, but there's tons of people that doesn't apply to

And those people can continue using roads. Nobody is asking for a nationwide ban of all cars. We just want to make bicycles a safe option. That means less cars on the road, which is better for everybody.
Many people attribute the tech industry in Israel to the failure of the Lavie fighter jet project, many of the engineers moved forward and created startups utilising the knowledge they accumulated.
> Surely if a previous DOJ refused to prosecute the case it is 'weak' in some sense.

No, prosecutorial decisions are not, even in theory, made based solely on the strength of cases; while that is a factor, evaluation of importance (including cost/benefit considerationa), which are ultimately policy decisions which different decision-makers (and even the same decision-maker at a different time, particularly if facts pertinent to the prioritization but not the strength the of the case change) are likely to see differently even with the same view of strength of the case, are also a factor.

Plus, available evidence and relevant case law can change over time; even if the case was weak during the previous Administration the same case might not be weak now.

> Surely if a previous DOJ refused to prosecute the case it is 'weak' in some sense

That's not a matter of the case being weak, that's a matter of policy on which actors with different policy preferences will differ even with perfect information and judgement regarding application of those preferences.

> Or perhaps because there is prima facie evidence of a crime but First Amendment arguments could potentially prevent the government from securing a conviction.

That would be weakness, but no one has made a coherent First Amendment argument that would bar prosecution for conspiracy to break into a government computer system manifest in an offer to help break a password and actual attempts at that. A lot of emotional appeals lacking a specific argument have been made in that direction, but that's not the same thing.
https://rockset.com/blog/how-to-run-sql-on-pdf-files/
That’s an amusing proposition but a true non-profit could have more advantages like tax breaks and volunteer staff.
How to Make Startup Stock Options a Better Deal for Employees
Samsung Announces Its Launch Date in the US for Galaxy Fold and Galaxy S10 5G
Yes, but where I'm from you need to actually do something in furtherance of the conspiracy to face prosecution.

I'm not trying to make a legal argument, this just feels fundamentally wrong to me.
You're right that we "don't see anyone scrutinizing public commit counts when it's a man in a similar context". Well of course! The media never promotes an inflated story of a man's accomplishments due to him being a man, so it would be silly to suspect it.

Nobody is doubting that it is possible for a woman to do impressive science.

It's just the ordinary problem of trying to promote/advance/assist a particular group of people. Any time that happens, it casts suspicion on the whole group. Both the deserving and the undeserving are suspected of having what isn't earned. Everybody in the group is thus hurt.
When I took journalism in college, they taught us to things that is not protected by the first amendment. One of them is anything that effects national security which I assume his case falls under.

Edit: As I get down voted, I should clarify that I mean for a civilian. I believe my professor was talking about this case since it was relatively new at that time [1].

[1]https://www.rcfp.org/national-security-trumps-first-amendmen...
And who lives in the city not far from the public transit.
Sounds like Google, Sidewalk Labs and Sidewalk Toronto

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-g...
Outline link: https://outline.com/spbLvB
It's not aupposed.

The court's job is not to enforce ryanlol's idea about what the law should be. The court's job is to enforce the actual existing text of the actual existing laws.

The actual existing laws say that attempting to break into a computer to which you do not have access is a crime, even if your effort alone is not the lynchpin. And that conspiring to help someone else attempt is also a crime.
> The publication of The Pentagon Papers set a precedent

The Times was allowed to publish the Pentagon Papers, but they didn't facilitate their theft. Ellsberg was charged for the theft, but of course the Nixon admin's misconduct resulted in the charges being dismissed.
So is the cost of entry for an airline. Yet, it is a very competitive business.
>The court's job is not to enforce ryanlol's idea about what the law should be.

Ah great. Did I ever suggest that?

>The actual existing laws say that attempting to break into a computer to which you do not have access is a crime, even if you do not succeed. And that conspiring to help someone else attempt is also a crime.

This is correct, but doesn't mean that it's right.
They exited some markets and sold their business. "Other" refers to that, I think. So it's a one-time revenue.
> When I took journalism in college, they taught us to things that is not protected by the first amendment. One of them is anything that effects national security

You should get a refund on your tuition; a number of First Amendment protections have been articulated in national security related cases, notably the rule against prior restraint in the Pentagon Papers case which is what allowed their publication.