skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm pretty sure linkerd 2 has switched to their own rust/tokio based solution
MCAS trimmed it so much that the pilots were unable to bring it back manually.

Not only that, MCAS controlled an electric motor which turned the trim wheel and which could apply more torque than a human turning it manually. The only way to disable MCAS was to cut power to that motor. MCAS pointed the aircraft at the ground, and it was impossible to trim the aircraft to achieve level flight again.

Mind, MCAS was supposed to be a crutch to fly at the edges of the flight envelope, something that a regular pilot would never encounter because under normal conditions pilots wouldn't find themselves in a regime where MCAS would be activated. That was the idea, instead we had two hull losses within 6 months!
> All of this can operate on device at the OS/IP stack layer.

I think, on Android, with root you could do a lot more and not have to use VPNs at all.

> That gives too much trust to the VPN operator.

Local VPN apps like NetGuard are open-source, btw. And server VPNs like ProtonVPN have no-logs policy. I'm curious, what other guarantees are you looking for?
That's interesting, it's effectively doing a radix sort but in a more scalable way.
Capitalism is based on exploiting the poor so yes, evil.
> How on earth do I compile a Form 8453 showing all of those thousands of trades?

By planning to do so from the beginning. "I forgot to keep records" isn't going to be something the IRS really cares to hear.
Not really - the system is just as unrepresentative for Tory voters in safe Labour seats. The net result is extreme lack of representation for just about everyone. It's the system that's broken - it's only functional for a two party system, yet still breaks for individual constituencies.

My real peeve is what the party system has become, even compared to when I first joined the voting electorate during Thatcher's first term.

The centralisation, and disenfranchisement and corrupt use of private capital in PPP was just as bad under New Labour.

Anti Tory sources? Thanks, that made me smile. For most of my life the Telegraph and weekend FT were the primary sources delivered to house, with Economist and New Scientist subs. I'd buy a Guardian periodically for balance, sometimes the FT full time. I no longer read the Telegraph since it became a rubbish tabloid Daily Mail 2.0 which leaves only Reuters, Guardian and to a lesser extent Independent as serious UK sources online.
You're off by 10-15 years as free software operating systems have been usable since at least the mid 90s. But there was a period before that which what you say was true which was one of the big reasons behind the GNU project.
I suppose worse is a matter of perspective, but I think the OP is right that at some scale, someone could be dragged into this good faith deal, like it or not.

Independently invent something. Turns out it's already patented, within this good faith consortium. Now the only way to use it is by participating. Normally, this kind of thing results in getting sued for royalties.
I guess it's not for everyone -- to me, Mad Men was a really interesting commentary on consumer culture and suburbia; along with giving a much more realistic view of a period of time that has been extremely influential yet usually reflected in a pretty one dimensional way. If someone asked me to read an essay about the values on 1950s/1960s america, I really don't think I'd care, but by giving me interesting characters and presenting their values in concrete situations, it made learning about that time a lot more interesting and relevant. I think with fiction, when it works, you learn a lot without even realizing it. That can make it seem like it's not valuable because sometimes you don't even realized it planted a seed in your mind. I mean, how much more effective was a novel like 1984 versus someone talking about the dangers of government surveillance? I'd argue 1984 had much more impact (unfortunately, probably not enough), even though it was entirely fiction.
>Philosophical problems aren't solved by legislation, it is important that people stop looking towards lawmakers to push their morals.

Murder, rape and theft are all philosophical questions, why are they easier to resolve through legislation?
Good point, but who will define "acceptable" and how? And what happens when it is "not acceptable"? Is a ration of 2 between the lowest income and the highest income acceptable? Or 10? Or 1.05? Where do you draw the line and why?
Airbus currently builds about 660 A320s per year. At roughly $100 million apiece, that’s about $66 billion per year of product. How many other manufacturing companies produce that much stuff? And this sort of low volume, high value manufacturing is a bad fit for the sort of automation that allows, say, Toyota to build 10 million cars per year.
Perhaps the problem you've experienced is with the 16:9 monitors that were forced on everyone a ~half decade back. Or rather 9:16 in this orientation. I still (barely) prefer them vertical, but it is true they are not optimal either.

I much preferred my portrait 4:3 1600x1200 (as 3:4) monitor a decade ago. Was close to perfect since there was room for two long windows side by side.

I've wondered if 16:10 might be good also. But as mentioned, those choices were eliminated in the "great widescreening" of the 2010s.
Does adding a sensor really significantly change the design?
I used this this year. Saved my ass
What are “poor people’s problems”? Do such problems go away simply by not having poor people? In that case, do you solve the first order problems, or try to solve not having the poor?

Would you try to differentiate the under-moneyed from the under-inspired? Are their problems the same?

If you want to use “markets”, how do you avoid Idiocracy?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
I'm sorry you decided to conduct algorithmic trading of digital assets on multiple exchanges without ever considering taxes. But services such as those linked by the OP (and others like bitcoin.tax) automatically import trades from all major exchanges and calculate the most advantageous method to minimize taxes.
I agree with this. Normal trading on exchanges might be relatively easy since you can just export transactions and dump them into a tool like this, but it can get a lot more complicated than that.

Some examples of things that are complicated:

- Trading ERC721 tokens (there are no tools to track down these transactions, track cost basis, etc - I ended up spending days hand crafting scripts to retrieve this data)

- Opening a cdp on something like Makerdao (which parts of this are taxable events / how do I file it?)

- What counts as a wash sale? [0]

- What are allowable methods of tracking cost basis?

- How do I handle hard forks?

Some of these are partially answered, but none of it is clear at all.

[0] https://help.cointracker.io/taxes/us-taxes/do-wash-sales-app...
Yes. I've used bitcoin.tax the past few years. This one looks nice although it's missing a couple exchanges that I would need to use it next year (maybe they'll have them by then).
Actually, that's on a standard cognition test. Other questions include identify pictures of animals, "what date is today", "Remember these five words (and get asked them at the end of the test), an "a is to b as c is to" question, etc. The assumption is that people over 50 in the USA can do simple arithmetic, because they all went to elementary school. Sadly, that assumption may have to change.