skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Here's an anecdotal story.

My team was interviewing engineers last year. We had a Chinese engineer come interview with us. She was in the States on a work visa, and her first job here was for a state government project. She was on a team building a web application that had public-facing and internal-facing UIs, and she was apparently working on both of these.

Anyways, she comes in for the interview, and shortly after our conversation begins she pulls out her work laptop, opens up her work project, and start going through the code with us! I asked "is this open source?" and she said no. I could even see slack messages coming up from her team mates.

I honestly couldn't believe it. We asked her to stop. As you can imagine, she didn't get an offer from us.
Incidentally, Boeing has received billions of dollars in illegal tax subsidies from the US (as in, anti-competitive with non-US manufacturers like Airbus): https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38131611 So it's hard to imagine fines or market penalties actually conveying any productive sense of punishment.
Read Showstopper it is about the making of Windows NT. It talks about the people that moved for Microsoft from DEC.

https://www.amazon.com/Showstopper-Breakneck-Windows-Generat...
You should brush up on the history of Japanese-US trade relations during the Reagan era if you are seriously convinced that is a remotely faithful retelling of history.
Wow, what is happening to funding of academic research? Why do we need a "Kickstarter" for scientific experiments?

https://experiment.com/projects/are-we-catching-photons-trav...
IG’s report says Amtrak wasted $23M on unneeded office space
The UI is a bit funky and makes it hard to know when you can press the 'next' button when you are trying to do it as early as you should
Open-Sourcing Habana Back End for Glow
I'm inclined to agree.

The worst sort of thing to track down is working ... but not. God knows when it started or what it has impacted.

Worse if it impacts real data or data goes where it shouldn't.
Thanks for the responses, looks like I have some digging to do. My point remains though that I don't know of a way to write user extensible syntax in SQL. I can get by fine in most languages without user extensible syntax (especially python), but the lacking feature really hurts in SQL.
Master the Skills of Buy Facebook Reviews and Be Successful
> But when you ask what they will do with the test results there often is silence.

With chronic and serious conditions, like in oncology, some tests are pretty much the only way to see if there's any progress with the treatment and how the general health levels of the patient are (bloodtests).
Extract from who? It was theirs, and now some is his, and some is hers.
I personally advocate for Django with the Django REST framework library, between the two you have authorization & authentication (including tokens and sessions), pagination, serialization, rate limiting, and basically everything else taken care of for you. As a bonus Django works great with PostgreSQL and even provides things like special model fields to take advantage of its capabilities.
Can only speak for myself, but I didn't understand enough context to get much out of the site. I'm used git for small, personal collaborations, so I don't know why it sends email or when you would want it to do that. I don't know what a "patch" means here and why you use email with them.

If I'm not your target audience, then that's fine, but it might be helpful to have some background on this.

Otherwise, the site and layout look great to me. It is a little tricky to have step 1 be installation, because someone who just wants to find out more without installing might stop there (I was a little deterred, then I just picked a random OS and clicked through the instructions).
Do you honestly believe people who take public transportation don't go to coffee shops? This is Manhattan we are talking about. You walk out of the subway...there's a coffee shop. You actually see it because it's on the walk from the subway to your office. You're not parking in an underground garage and getting directly into an elevator. You get your coffee before or after you get on the transportation. Obviously you don't stop in the middle for it. That is a ridiculous strawman.

> you don't have your car at work to go anywhere on your lunch break either.

Dude. Again. We are talking about downtown Manhattan, not some suburban office park. Nobody needs to drive anywhere for lunch. There are hundreds of places to get lunch within walking distance.

> Options that are worse, by definition, or they would already have chosen them.

They are worse because you are currently able to offload the negative externalities of your driving onto everyone else. Now that you have to pay for those, you can weigh the true cost of driving vs. the cost of other options.

> And one of those options is to not go to work -- you take a job closer to where you live at the cost of lower pay, because you've been priced out of the one you had before. That is not a social benefit.

That's fine. How is that not a social benefit? If it encourages people to find work closer to home, that means less transportation, less pollution. Everyone wins. On the other hand, maybe it encourages employers in the city to pay more to offset the costs. That's good too.

>Compare this to improving the alternatives. Build more housing in the city,

This is not mutually exclusive. We can have congestion pricing and build more housing in the city. With fewer cars running around thanks to congestion pricing, that means we don't need as much parking, so there's more space to build housing. There you go.
Agile Is Dead (Long Live Agility) (2014)
"Forcibly extract?" They were married for over 25 years, since long before he was a gazillionaire, so it hardly seems like gold-digging. Also, Jeff still has more or less infinite money.
The point was more that Tesla has already scaled beyond the level where "these companies know how to build cars" is reasonable spin. Tesla's building plenty of cars, making money doing so, scaling rapidly, and can only be expected to be doing better still by the time those competitors arrive in the market. That's not to say that they won't be highly competetive cars, they might (I for one certainly hope they are). But you don't get to handwave away Tesla's existing success on the basis of production numbers.

Honestly... your argument is a year stale. The window on "Tesla can't scale" closed. They did.
The reading from the pitot tubes (pressure sensors) for a particular airspeed varies with the sensors angle to the airstream so the airspeed value is adjusted based on the angle of attack (AoA). If the AoA sensor is on the fritz on one side the airspeed reading for that side changes.

For redundancy, each pilot receives separate instrument readings from independent sensors. When the airspeed readings disagree a warning is activated and the pilots are expected to follow a prescribed and memorized procedure. The warning that the AoA sensors disagree was a paid option before this crash and the Lion Air crash.
The major difference here being that congestion pricing is only going into effect in Manhattan south of the park, where public transport is absolutely a suitable option.
That's awesome! Thank you very much for sharing your experience and explaining the processes involved in detail.

From my light research, it seems that obtaining such scan would be costly ($1k-$5k price range for full body scan without a health insurance).

I will reach out to local universities to check if they can aid me in this or if I can do this over time, piece by piece.
Still too early to tell, this report is just the first step and inevitably will invoke conversation around who's to blame.

Boeing's bottom line would like this is be crew or operating procedure.
No need to apologize for asking questions!

I'm using commercially available fuel that is available from fuel vendors. UO2 with zircaloy cladding.

As far as I'm aware, the NRC has no stated mandate for removing reactor-based methods. Or, if you have a source for that, I'd love to see it because that's a big deal. What you may be thinking of is the DOE/NNSA grants that are being given out for encouraging a domestic Mo-99 supply, which have strings attached which mandate it be for developing an "alternative" technology. I've found that the correlation is very strong between nuclear startups which have failed and which ones rely on government money.

I'd be curious why you think those projects have failed. I've had many discussions with other nuclear startups and friends at INL on this topic, and it's pretty nuanced.

Having been a DOE contractor, I have some... strong opinions about how nearly everyone in the industry operates or their approach to regulation. To refrain from ranting, I'll just say that it is my strong opinion that pretty much everyone does things "they way we've always have done them" and that everything is over-engineered and costs way more than it needs to. Most people I've spoken to seem to think it costs $100M to build hot cells. I know it doesn't cost that much to build a glorified box of concrete, even if that's what cost-plus entities have historically paid for them.

We could take this discussion offline as well, if you'd prefer. Then we can both be more specific and protect anonymity. Feel free to shoot me an email at info@atomicalchemy.us if you wish.
See previous post. If you can't produce links and quotes, then that's just, like, your opinion, man.
You should read through some of the fact checks, especially the first one for Net Neutrality. They address literally this "presentation" aspect.
Glad to hear this. I recently test-drove the new RAV4 Hybrid, which just came out. I was unimpressed by their "lane tracing" system, which seemed noticeably worse than the CRV's equivalent.

I would be much more likely to pull the trigger on the Toyota (which gets much better gas mileage, due to the hybrid powertrain) if there was a hope of software updates.

I am hesitant to spend $30,000 on a vehicle whose driver assist features are currently subpar, and will only fall further behind over the lifetime of the vehicle. Makes me just want to lease, despite being generally opposed to leasing.
Yeah, I have the same feeling about the baseline CT service and I'm sorry I wasn't more forthright about it above.
Also known as a Boltzmann Brain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain
The concept of royalty in 2019 is so repugnant. Fuck the crown and their hundreds of years of theft from the people.
I don't know. Followed Carmack since I was a kid. Guy's an inspiration.
Why exactly? if Boeing did not updated the manuals and checklists how would pilots know that? from internet forums? Should a pilots ignore the checklists and try steps he read on the internet ?

I could not find if Boeing updated their manuals/checklists after the first crash.
A decent and cheap 3d printer with a large build volume would be the Creality CR-10s. You could print it using PETG filament.
Snap Games
> The crew performed runaway stabilizer checklist and put the stab trim cutout switch to cutout position and confirmed that the manual trim operation was not working.

Are they talking about manual electric trim, or physically moving the trim wheel with its handle?

I would expect manual electric trim to stop working after you STAB TRIM CUTOUT, since that kills the trim motor. Did the pilots try physically moving the trim wheel?
Disabilities should get a waiver. There is already a special license plate and a placard.

But now, low-income? There are problems:

. You can be low-income and still own a car, and still be near public transport. Why would you be incentivized to own a car, first off, and drive it into a congested area?

. It's not the "low-income" exception that's the last exception. There are tens of thousands of City-provided placards for teachers, firefighters and civil servants with an unspoken rule by the police to never ticket them, even if parked illegally. This, plus the idea of exceptions just smell like another foray into a De Blasio handing something out for please one union or group or another.

These are parking placards, and I used that example to demonstrate what happens when we pick and choose winners and losers - what criteria do we go by, in a city of 8.5M? Which group suffers the most?

. There are low-income allowanced for things such as HPD buildings and other subsidies. I know people who make (as a couple) half a million dollars a year who still own real estate with income restrictions, because the income was only verified Year 1 and it became de facto voluntary in the years after that.

. A huge percentage of people are low-income in this City. And hold on just a second - you're low income but you're spending how many hundreds of dollars a month on a lease, gas, maintenance, and so forth for a far, and insurance in one of the most expensive insurance markets? Have people lost their senses to not question that?
Was his intent to intimidate? Why do you say that? How is that a "fact"? Where did you even hear that story?

Geez, y'all don't understand fact checking at all.
>Swaged copper bullets exist, but at ~$1 a pop they’re appropriate for hunters and not for an army that goes through billions of bullets.

Most bullets are fired in training, an copper is recyclable, so cleaning up bullets is feasible. It might even be an opportunity for boots to relieve their boredom and learn about weapon systems
The article focuses on approval versus IRV, and the advantages it gives for approval are valid.

As you know, there are various other methods (Condorcet, STAR, 3-2-1, etc.) that keep most of approval's advantages, but sacrifice simplicity for better expressiveness. It would be as unreasonable for the advocates of such methods to try to undermine real-world campaigns for approval, as it would be for approval advocates to undermine those other methods.
I dont think this is settled -- I've seen world class swimmers do it both ways. Personally I find taking a long stroke after each breath more effective.
Would love to see a comparison with bike exercise.
This is an absurd comment. The rule of law works in the USA as much as it does in other developed countries. There is no such thing as "too large to take on". I note though that there is not yet any evidence of a crime having been committed.
My take on that is that any standup attended by project manager is not a Scrum standup anymore, it's a status update. What I've seen in few companies is that after such morning meeting with PM, the development team, would hold their own, smaller scale meeting, the real stand-up :)

One pathological case I've seen is the Scrum meeting that would run for an hour, because it was attended by 25 people, every day.
The NFL player's association negotiates such agreements [1, 2] unilaterally across all teams. Perhaps e-sports athletes should have a union that negotiates likewise.

[1] https://www.nflpa.com/active-players/off-season-rules

[2] https://www.ajc.com/sports/football/look-nfl-new-practice-ru...
> It's possible that aerodynamic load (of the stabilizer opposing the elevator) made it physically impossible to manually trim given any mistrim at the time the cutout happened, given the airspeed they had.

Its been noted in previous discussions that while it would be difficult, the load can be overcome if both pilots were to operate the manual trim wheel at the same time.

Not that its a good situation to be in.
Really? Five downvotes for an innocently tongue-in-cheek comment?
>I'm used git for small, personal collaborations

This is a great reason to use email! You don't need a platform at all, you can use the tools presented in this tutorial to email your work directly to your collaborators.

Outside of that, email is used for collaboration with many large and important projects, such as Linux, PostgreSQL, and git itself. I have some writings about why I think this workflow is nice:

https://drewdevault.com/2018/07/23/Git-is-already-distribute...

https://drewdevault.com/2018/07/02/Email-driven-git.html

(forgive the formatting on the latter, fix is being deployed now)
> Where did I say I didn't want Muslim immigration?

It's the natural conclusion of not wanting to introduce intolerance into a tolerant milieu. But you've now qualified this claim with the concept of treating people as individuals.

So will you extend the same courtesy to white supremacists? No doubt there are white supremacists who also don't take it too seriously, and similarly pick and choose which parts they want to believe based on their "basic human instincts [that] always beat their religion in the end".

Somehow I doubt it. For some reason, the intolerant white supremacist beliefs don't get the same benefit of the doubt as other intolerant religions. You can't have it both ways. You can't suggest we should treat people as individuals and not judge them on their adherence to some professed beliefs, and then turn around and do the same to another group of people.

> Your post heavily implies that you equate ISIS with all Muslims though.

Really? Which part exactly? Be precise.

> How else would you end a group of people and their views? A sternly worded letter?

By convincing everyone that you're right and they're wrong of course. If you convince every white supremacist that they're wrong (or enough of them), then white supremacy ends.
I think they couldn't turn the trim wheel because STAB TRIM CUTOUT unpowers it.
It lessens the amount of cars storage and increases the amount of cars on the road.

You can't transport by car and reduce both at the same time!
My understanding was that the helical shape described the orbital of the electron at the molecular level and not its track down an actual wire. I think the hope is to exploit this helical shape using external electromagnetic sources of energy to manipulate (move/rotate) individual molecules due to this.

Disclaimer: I am a layman in this realm. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
That's an opinion, not an example.

I asked for examples. I'm getting opinions.
Q: How do you use a barometer to accurately measure altitude?
A: Drop it, and count the seconds until it hits the ground.
Tesla just buys panasonic batteries (https://electrek.co/2018/07/31/tesla-gigafactory-panasonic-b...). The technology is kinda shit - why distract the driver with a touch screen instead of physical buttons and knobs (those are considered technology too)?.

The only thing Tesla has is some form of self driving, and that won't be enough.
"Good enough" is, I think, the operative phrase. Most people don't get their cars near to 100,000 miles before buying/leasing a new one. (people average a car per 6 years [0], about 13,000 miles/year[1])

If the cars keep most of their capacity that long, it won't matter all that much to the average consumer that Tesla keeps theirs better. I'm not saying Tesla wouldn't have a place in the market, only that other manufacturers are showing the potential to eat up most of the lower end market before Tesla ever gets there.

[0]https://www.autotrader.com/car-shopping/buying-car-how-long-...

[1]https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/bar8.htm
Adoption of Lung-Rads is essentially required to be designated as an ACR screening center. To be reimbursed for Lung Cancer Screening, you must provide registry data to CMS (the registry is run by the ACR).

It's not codified into Federal Law, but if reimbursement requires a Lung-Rads code, then it's more or less mandated.

I'd argue out of all the fields of medicine, Radiology is pretty quick to adopt new technology or reporting schemes "on the ground". See the proliferation of Lung-Rads, TI-Rads, Cad-Rads, LI-Rads, PI-Rads, etc.
House Democrats refuse to weaken net neutrality bill, defeat GOP amendments
Plug-in hybrid is best of both here, assuming you have a charger either at home or work, you will increase time between fueling, and you can go on a road trip without worrying about range.
Does there need to be an objective measurement? Even in sports there is wide disagreement about which athletes are better than others, score and stats only gets you so far. The point is that if you are doing very well -- at anything -- your perspective on what is acceptable changes. See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill
> Basic marksmanship is better taught with iron sights, scopes are awesome for real use.

Do we care about achieving some kind of platonic ideal of proper marksmanship instruction, or do we care about familiarizing Marines with the weapons system configuration they are going to actually use if they one day have the privilege of launching rounds down a two-way range?

To be clear these are not mutually exclusive -- you still learn marksmanship when you qual with an ACOG, despite the protestations of Old Corps internet hardos -- but the latter should still be the priority.

The whole KD range routine is outdated anyway, no matter how much nostalgia we may have for the RSOs' funny hats and the "youmayfirewhenyourTAAAAAAAAARGETappears" spiel delivered over the inevitably shitty loudspeaker.
Most Americans didn't own cars until a few years after the Second World War. So that's maybe 70 years ago, but let's give the car companies some credit because they already scaled up to produce war materiel about a decade previous. Volkswagen, though, started from 12,000 cars per year in 1946, which is remarkable in itself.

Between 1949 and 1969, Toyota scaled from tens of thousands to millions of cars produced per year. That's 50 years ago.

Kia manufactured 26 cars in 1986 and millions of cars per year today. That's 33 years ago.

Tesla isn't doing something that hasn't been done in over a century, unless you're willing to pretend that the rest of the world doesn't exist and you're willing to round up "less than 80 years" to "more than 100 years".
What is the point of the token then? It’s simply a presale tool?
Ya know, I suppose in an ideal world you drive down the cost of on site manufacturing so you could spit out any model you wanted in the classroom. Want a healthy kidney? Boom, done. Want an organ that has a specific issue for a particular ailment being studied? Out it comes.
The Google implementation of application specific passwords is horrible. There's nothing application specific about it -- it's valid for at least mail, calendar, and contacts, with no way to limit the scope. It ends up being a password that effectively bypasses all MFA on your Google account. Where do you store such a password? That's a powerful credential to be regularly unlocking.

I should be able to create a credential that's valid for just SMTP, with no IMAP or cal/card access at all.
The problem is that few people can leave a clean slate. If one's parents or other relatives remain in the country, not being able to visit them there is very vexing.
No, but it paved the way, in many respects, to those newer approaches – and Ecmascript itself evolving.
There has been quite a bit written about this subject lately, there are mounting evidence that training hard have a negative impact on your heart.

https://www.amazon.com/Haywire-Heart-exercise-protect-heart/...
Is appealing to distributed individual interest worse than appealing to corporate interest?
> The traditional way to manage this impossibility is that engineering lies about it (they have to lie, because they can't know either)

Honest estimates with uncertainty are not lies, and not having certainty doesn't prevent estimation.

But, yes, people seem to often decide that being uncertain justifies self-serving lies instead of honesty (and sometimes the environment encourages that by punishing honest estimates.)
I tried the word "embattled" in Google News. One of the articles that came up was about an embattled tree. Which I'm sure is every bit as guilty as the media suggests.