skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Interesting - this isn't a big issue for me, but I guess does limit the size of the community that might be interested in developing for it. Do you happen to know of any KaiOS phones that work well in the US?
Ecuador legalized gangs, murder rates plummeted
It's easier to get a job interview at Google.
They're not embarrassed, that's the problem, or embarrassment is just not enough. Usually money talks but "take your money elsewhere" also doesn't work when it's free.
Writing bindings for C libraries is ridiculously easy. You can run a script that generates the corrects .ads for a header file and then... wait, there is no step 2. That's it!
cool i'm vegan :)
Not well-disposed toward humans, elves, hobbitses and others who cut down trees means evil?

That's a bit too Manichaean for me.
LinkedIn is ... Go to for recruiting.... (Anything and anyone)?
I'm sorry but I am saying this all over the place on this thread. https://hyperstack.org is a logical successor to meteor but it uses Ruby (instead of JS) and Rails on the backend. However its a complete integrated isomorphic stack.
How is that different than, you know... actual driving?

Anyway, isn't this just a purely empirical concern? How many accidents happen to people who use autopilot, how many to those who don't.

If the second number is bigger, autopilot is a safety feature. If it's smaller, it's a safety liability. End of discussion.

No?
The Marshland Conjecture
Not the GP, but I'd say humans are not meant to be cooped up in these piles of boxes we call "cities".

I've lived in both rural and urban areas, and strongly prefer the former; the latter may be more "efficient" mathematically, but at the cost of a substantially-worse quality of life in my opinion.
but google often violates copyright by showing so much of your data on the search engine's page that users might not even need to visit your page to get what they need... I'm surprised nobody is suing Google for that yet (or maybe they did and I missed it)
> there should be nearly no technical advantage

In practice there is. Specifically in regard to parallelism and performance, which is important for any non-trivial application.

You can spin up multiple Python processes or just re-implement in a different language, some nuanced part of the stack that you've crafted to bottleneck(s), or you can just choose not to use it from the start. It's not like you're going to design around the deficiency at all levels.

You'll run into Ruby performance problems very early on without specific knowledge, so people just stopped using it for anything load bearing. My bias against Ruby is limited to PoC programs having memory problems and poor performance compared to virtually identical implementations in other languages, being a cultprit. YMMV.

Perl is hard for people to understand, since every feature of the language is a landmine of obfuscation...php is getting there on it's own, to be fair.

The idea that there should be no technical advantage is ignorant. There are choices that have been made and there's reasons for each. You don't run Python on stream processing with Flink because it's not suited for parallelism. Catching errors like a kafka broker disappearing, in PHP, is almost trivial like in many languages, while Java requires a custom retry method that requires intimate knowledge of how any connector works.

Knowing the languages, PHP has some very compelling strengths, as does Java (performance and safety) and Python (generally consistency of implementation and speed of development)...I still don't understand why I keep running into rats' nests of javascript and other esoterics.
Yes and it seems that's what Archive Team has been trying to archive.
Insatiable Shipyards: The Impact of the Royal Navy on the World’s Forests [pdf]
I was in the same boat (and checked periodically just in case), but I recommend that you re-check. In this past year, something must have changed substantially, because there are a lot more false positives. I just went and looked, and about 1/3 of what was there wasn't spam, but stuff like e.g. Kickstarter campaign notifications, and even a car manufacturer defect notice.
Amazon stores could be threatened by cashless trend
Stack Overflow Gets 90s Theme for April Fools Day
Honestly, if my company would tell me this it’d become a game to interview and get higher and higher salaries.
Aiven has been pretty cool for me to quickly set up clusters of things like Kafka or Postgres among others to do various tests with. I have really enjoyed them.
Its only 30k until your project gets large enough that the jquery terseness makes up the difference.
The same thing happens when you've been with a mobile/telecom/etc company for a long time. They milk you for every penny they can get and give all the promo pricing to new customers. The pay sales higher commissions for new sign-ups and treat existing loyal clients like garbage.

It really bugs me to have to waste the time to change providers for everything every ~2 years, but I'd feel like an idiot if I left thousands of dollars per year on the table. It's a stupid game, and companies are not immune.
You might be interested in the work of Erik Verlinde and so called "emergent gravity". While there are still significant problems that the theory needs to explain, it is certainly an interesting perspective to consider.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2017/02/28/is-d...

http://www.astronomy.com/news/2018/05/the-case-against-dark-...
Life isn’t fair. People don’t want to catch grief for it. They don’t want to be “gone after.” Part of the draw of hiring from these pools is you’re less likely to get folks who have the hang ups you’ve displayed in your post.
Cynically, it could be even worse. A nicer gym gives students a bigger tuition bill.
In parts of the US I have lived in at least, not letting the landlord in under certain conditions allows the landlord to evict you or go after you for damages. There is no way to never let them in
Codepen experiencing multiday DDoS attack
Not temperature, but I once had a tiny speck of solder bridge two address lines together on an EEPROM. Drove me nuts figuring out why my attempts to program it kept failing after installing a JTAG when everything else I read worked fine.
WSL is not technically a VM...

The news is not the it is slower, it is how much slower it is. I found the number surprising given the prevailing wisdom out there was ... sure its slower, about 5-10% slower.

The other news is that mac is slower and it does not do any virtualising.
Spanish (in Spain) is El ordenador - I'm guessing mimicking the French?

Lovely comment on some of the different words for computer in a variety of languages:

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:computer
The answer to this question really depends on whether your vehicle is FWD or RWD. It sounds like you have a RWD car and the people not answering it "correctly" don't.
Or they're so 1337 they're DDOSing the CnC server during the fight.
I’m a big recent fan of AWS. I know I am late to the party. I’ve only used it for a year. But the biggest impediment and obstacle from me to go from idea to implementation was always dealing with the infrastructure and Neto folks. Being able to have access to any infrastructure I needed via an API call was a revelation.
I believe that this is not possible in America. I'm a founder and we just started offering health benefits earlier this year. I tried really hard to figure out a way to let employees effectively pay 100% of their premium (either by paying them more if they opt out or just having the company share be 0%). I talked to a number of people, looked into different types of plans (HRAs, etc) and at the end of the day, I couldn't figure out legal way to do what you're suggesting.

I think the closest possible thing to this is for the company to offer to pay 50% of the cheapest plan possible and then let employees opt-in to better plans, add dependents, etc. at their own expense. That way the majority of the expense is "optional" to the employee, but whatever the company pays still isn't.

Note: this only applies to health benefits. We do compensate employees who decline other benefits e.g. a parking pass
haha that cool veggies on box
It's not even clear that Google is specifically doing that at this point, but ultimately a service like G+ is quite expensive to run. It's a bit weird to suggest it's public property because Google has an unrelated product it does make available without direct monetary cost to most of the world.
It's hard to know, because in the majority of these cases, people don't even actually bother trying to contact Google and go straight for the outrage post.

It's Sunday afternoon, the much more likely explanation is that it's an automated system, or something broke.
I was driving the other day and stopped behind a stop sign at a 4-way intersection. A police car was already stopped at the same intersection, to my left. Since he had the right of way I waited for him to proceed. But after a few seconds without moving he flashed his high beams, which I understood to mean that he was waiting for something and was yielding to me. Now that's not a standard signal for yielding in the California Vehicle Code but most humans can figure it out.

These are the type of odd little situations that come up all the time in real world driving. I can't understand how anyone would expect level 4+ autonomous driving to work on a widespread basis without some tremendous breakthroughs in AGI.
Google has all sorts of awesome things, but fault proof hardware is not achievable in the real world.
Catering to their child's need to be INFAMOUS for needing sunglasses because they can't be bothered to bring their own?

I think his infamy problem would go away quite fast if he/she was able to bring their own sunglasses. :)
Having worked on the Windows kernel team, I can say this impressive stuff. It seems early enough to pick a specialty for this OS that it could do well that others may not.
Chick-Fil-A Makes More per Restaurant Than McDonalds,Starbucks&Subway Combined
Well, the good news is that the graduate students and postdocs who actually do the research are sourced in a much more meritocratic way. Academia definitely has its politics and inefficiencies, but almost everyone wants to be there and do good work, and top universities have solid systems for attracting and identifying real talent.

Of course, the quality of undergraduates has some effect on morale among the researchers - one imagines that the professor and graduate students teaching a course colloquially called "Stars for Stoners" must be wholehearted evangelists and/or be dying inside a bit every year. But this is largely isolated from the research itself, and you'll always find diamonds in the rough - undergraduates who are truly passionate and capable at a graduate level. They do great work.

If anything, the parent post may be referring to students who come from "feeder schools" which provide tremendous amounts of preparation and everything-on-the-legal-side-of-this-entire-controversy. And though those students are slightly more likely to be immature when they first matriculate, they too end up finding their passions and work ethics, and making great contributions of their own. Sure, the very same resources that let them enter those feeder schools tend to help them when they graduate. But if anything, it's good that the university can now count them as alumni, and that they can help their fellow graduates with networking and continuity of the collegiate experience. Research universities are a well-balanced system, and though there are many reforms that can be done, the systems as a whole work well.
Not if it also catches fatal mistakes that you would have missed.

Then you have to subtract A from B to find out if it is "a system which kills you".
I agree 100%... The network boundry is in fact arbitrary. There are all sorts of similar hardware boundries in any computer system which we trust the OS, framework, language, etc to abstract away for us. For example how often do we think about where an Array is stored? It could anywhere from Highspeed cache to swapped out on disk. Likewise the client-server boundry for most of coding should be invisible.
I wonder how big a role Windows Defender, or other antivirus software, plays in the notorious inefficiency of reading and (especially) writing many small files on Windows. Sam, did you disable Windows Defender real-time protection, or add exceptions for it?
The situation in English is a bit more complicated though. We have words of Norman French or Latin origin that contain gender information, like actor vs actress, and then we have the ending -er that is of Germanic origin, and we can use that to make new words. I don't believe the French/Latin endings are "productive" in English: you can't really make up new words that have those endings, but you can readily make new words from verb + er (and I suppose in old English and its ancestors there must have been a feminine version of -er, like Dutch -ster and German -erinn, but we lost that along with all kinds of case endings and so forth a very long time ago). That's because we imported the "foreign" words as whole atoms when we bolted Norman lexicon on top of our Germanic grammatical base, and perhaps we've mashed them around a bit, but they're not really composed of phonemes that we can work with individually in quite the same way as we can with Germanic words. Those are the ones that some people are trying to kick out of the English language, with the idea that "actress" is somehow inferior or has connotations other than just gender, or that marking gender is unnecessary, and it's natural to get rid of them by analogy to our more Germanic words. But those types of endings are entirely productive in French -- they're in the toolbox of living phonemes you can make new words with, bolting on -eur, -rice/-euse/-resse etc (though I'm never sure to choose among those...) So it makes sense that French speakers are trying to "fill out" the missing logical combinations of gender-marking endings, and the English speakers are trying to "remove" the unnecessary variations that we see with just a few of our words. Perhaps someone who objects to "actress" should argue for "acter" instead of using the masculine ending "actor"! (Not a serious suggestion, just a shower thought really, as someone who's spent a bit of time in English and French speaking countries...)
i like smiles
Fathers’ age linked to schizophrenia at early age in kids
Workers as a whole don't get more from having employers forced to offer above-market wages to their workers.

Employers as a whole have a certain amount that they can afford to spend on labor expenses. Forcing them to spend more on that, or divide that spending between a fewer number of workers to pay each a higher wage, does not raise aggregate wages in the long run.

The former does in the short run, but it comes at the expense of lower capital investment, which results in less company/productivity growth, and smaller future wage gains. The split between labor expenditure, or profit from selling services, and company profits, or profit from delaying compensation and personal consumption to found and invest in companies, has some optimal ratio that maximizes growth in productivity. The aggregate of all interactions of a free market will approach that optimal ratio as a result of the pursuit of profit aligning with the outcome of raising total productivity, while mandates to reduce company profits to raise wages won't. And growth in productivity is the source of almost all wage growth, and is the only sustainable source of wage growth. Sacrificing it is a huge strategic mistake for public welfare.

As for the latter - hiring fewer workers and paying each more - it provides no short term net boost to wages, because the higher per worker compensation is neutralized by fewer workers being hired, and it reduces company performance, and with it, growth in GDP output and future labor expenditures.

As for fairness, the only fair outcome is that both parties are free to accept or reject what the other offers. A fair wage is what the worker's service is actually worth based on supply and demand. Anything else is just some ideological judgment.

It is unfair to use the threat of imprisonment to restrict someone from making an offer in the market. Force should always be used as a last resort, to punish and deter others from violating people's rights, and not as a policy tool to shape consensual human interaction and engineer some ideologically desired social outcome. The use of force means the imprisonment of those who do not comply. This is not a power that should be used against behaviour that is not unambigiously a violation of another party's rights.

>>for most people working for someone else is no longer voluntary

We must work to live. That is the nature of the world. It doesn't mean making an offer in the market, that others are free to accept if it is better than the next best offer they can find, is an act of coercion. Therefore there is no moral justification for prohibiting people from making offers that don't meet some arbitrary minimum standard. It's only ideology, that is designed to rationalize exerting totalitarian control over others, that says otherwise.
Where do you "contact Google" such that you don't get to play with a bot for free over the course of several weeks?
I think he means partial classes in C#. Great for code generators.
Solar-Powered Slugs Hide Wild Secrets–But They’re Vanishing
This is an authoritarian project. It attempts to impose authority in an area that operates fine or better without it, by people with no particular claim to authority in the matter beyond membership in their own club. How is France improved by having an official government dictionary? For the authoritarian it seems that the proper role of the state to reduce any form of uncertainty in life, and positive uncertainty is oxymoronic.
I understand that we might now feel obliged to intervene. I think the weirdness for me comes from the fact that we are watching them, and the paradoxes it introduces.

If we weren't watching them, they would potentially go to war, some of them would likely die, and there is a chance that more would die of disease. But we would be none the wiser.

But since we are watching, we perceive a risk that they don't, and we now feel an obligation to mitigate that risk through intervention. We want them to be independent but they are our dependents. We want them to be free but we must restrict their movements. We want them to be untouched by disease but must expose them to it in order to minimise exposure. We take pride in the fact they are untouched yet we must touch them in order to maximise their untouchedness. It is weird.
A someone who was heavily consuming cartoons over the relevant period, I find it remarkable that there was no mention of either WB/Looney Toons or the growth of Japanese animation. Makes me suspicious of his conclusions.
This assumes that’s what medical companies want. If we get closer to full value based care, then yes.
Were you (or your brother) paying for his Gmail service?
> Why is what Latin did relevant for French in the 21st century?

Scholars have always gone back to Latin to influence modern language. Most technological, scientific, and plenty of engineering terms, for instance, derive either from Latin or Greek.

Modern French didn't 'branch' from Latin so much as the Latin dialects in the areas that have since become modern France evolved from Latin into what it has since become. Therefore, going back to classical and vulgar Latin tells us a lot about how the language has evolved, what features still provide valuable meaning, allowing people to guess what a word means based on their existing base knowledge of the language.

Doubly so considering the French curriculum remains relatively old-fashioned compared to the Anglophone world, such that explicitly teaching grammatical concepts at a very young age has not yet gone out of fashion in France and other Francophone regions and nations), so that the general population has a firmer understanding of the derivation of terms, the meanings of prefixes, suffixes, and so on.

Not only that, it allows the modern French language to maintain a sense of consistency by going back to the roots and origins of words in order to determine how best to coin new words without causing needless difficulty, having to create exceptions where unnecessary. Hello, English language, especially in the past hundred or so years with 'electrocution' where the most important part of one of its components, 'execution', is entirely missing (such that it's not clear just from looking at 'electrocution' that being killed, 'executed', is a key part of the word).
Probably referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstetrical_dilemma
:) Some people are meant to be employees and lack the ability to think for themselves. Stay in school.

[BB] The PLAN is to enter the Jun 21 $10.00 Calls if BB crosses above 10.50 if you like

[HD] The PLAN is to enter the Apr 18 $190.00 Calls if HD crosses above 193.00 if you like

[AAPL] The PLAN is to enter the Apr 18 $192.50 Calls if AAPL crosses above 193.00 if you like
Faster Fiber Links for Data Centers
VM will always be shit at compilation tasks. All of the existing solutions out there (including Docker) will lead to slower builds, especially if you need to build an embedded Linux distribution. Native is better, for those tasks.

The haters he’s replying to are literally splitting hairs.

Wow, they shave off 3 mins to run an interpreted language test suite. This is the ABSOLUTE state of the industry right now.
Draft.js doesn't use the native browser content editable behaviour. It ensures that only valid markup can be generated: all text exists in a single block level element (p, h1, h2, li, blockquote) and then inline text can have an number of a developer-defined formatting options applied (emphasis, bold, links).

It doesn't have the compatibility problems and ambiguity that markdown suffers from.
Somebody is scared of democracy.
In many states you lose your right to vote, you lose your right to firearms, you lose your right to privacy since you're now a known felon, you have almost no chance of getting a white collar job or a high paying job unless you were already connected before the felony and very wealthy. Poor people who get felonies often get tougher sentences because they can't afford the lawyers of the wealthy. Pretty sure for most people a felony severely limits any chances of a life that isn't just scraping by or in the best case middle class.

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130647...
> It is an urban myth to imagine one can easily move to the interior and then, by means of instantaneous willpower, cope with the most ruthless solitude

Urban myth, sure, but to me that sounds like heaven.
2-5% raises are all I've seen pretty much (which is just cost of living).
Unless you are looking to contribute to a project and kick off a project I would recommend sticking with the bigger players our there like nodebb/vanilla and so on.

Getting stuff right is not easy, very few forum software platforms out there for example have a bug bounty like (https://hackerone.com/discourse ), last thing you want to do is deploy an XSS hive out there to the public.

As far as I know there is no small-medium well supported Discourse alternative written in Go. There is a Slack alternative though written in Go called mattermost which I can recommend.
Nguyên nhân phổ biến khiến trẻ thức đêm
Nguyên nhân gây ra tình trạng thức đêm rất nhiều ở trẻ, mẹ cần đảm bảo những yếu tố cần thiết trong phòng ngủ, chế độ ăn uống ngủ nghỉ hợp lý cho con
Xem thêm: https://sokitium.com/be-thuc-dem-5-nguyen-nhan/
Not really - it was talking about proprietary extensions to the instruction set, but the real problem is on implementation level. You can implement most everything strictly to the spec, and still have vulnerable side channels.
You can do the same (but better IMHO) in Ruby and Rails using the https://hyperstack.org gem.