skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As an ex-Christian, I can still offer a more charitable view: just read the Golden Rule, love your neighbor as yourself, practice virtues of Galatians 5:22-23, and read Proverbs. That's the best parts of it that even a non-religious, utilitarian society might want to keep. The Christians I know that practice what they can of those values with less focus on judging people are among the best people I've ever met. They do more good and less harm than average person.

So, there's good takeaways even if there's lots of bad stuff in there. I'll throw in Buddhism and Confucianism given they have some good advice. As always, keep the good tossing out the bad or questionable stuff.
Looks like it is time for you to switch bank :-)

Here in the UK, it seems that most reputable organisations are GDPR conscious. I've deliberately got my birthday slightly wrong to see what they do - 100% of the time they refuse to proceed.

Perhaps I'm just lucky.
Yeah that's why I hate headlines like this. It's so easy for modern writers to find that validating tweet or comment to present the narrative that supports their article. Was 'foolish' a consensus? I'm willing to bet that an equally factual headline would be "Researcher called 'genius' then won Nobel Prize"
This is all true. I would also add to this as a cause the trend of media outlets publishing a larger proportion of populist and outrage -driven content than they used to, which I suspect is a reaction to the new attention-driven business models that news outlets rely on these days.
Reddit is now suspect, after the major investment from PRC. I no longer visit there...

I wonder if the 50 cent party https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party is going to be involved in hacker news anytime soon...
If you poke at economists you get the exact same arrogant rage that you get when you poke at fundamentalist religions.

Go ahead poke at Milton Friedman and watch them get really hot under the collar.

Compare with poking at Einstein (never accepted quantum mechanics) or Linus Pauling (alternative medicine nutter), Shockley (racist). Poke all you want the physics community doesn't care.
Sorry to hear about your experience. That's one of the main things that puts me off about the current startup/VC relationship.

I am not a Silicon Valley kid though, don't want to be, and this isn't going to be a unicorn.
Don’t know why you were down-voted. It’s quite true that humans have the same kind of vulnerability. Drawing misleading things on the road could kill human drivers, too. It’s not a new threat, it’s just that most people aren’t murderers so it’s not a serious problem.
> making a dynamic language perform well

Perhaps the advantage here is that PHP really all that dynamic. PHP is much closer in design to taking Java and compiling it on every request than it is like Python or Ruby.
How is syncing your PHP code with the server serverless?
The 32 core ARM is 30% faster than a 8 core Ryzen on Geekbench [0]. It's not exactly slow but it also has 4 times as many cores which is pretty depressing.

[0] https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/compare/12621419?baseli...
Can we get age and weight verification too?
The FBI definitely considers them a domestic terrorism movement, for some time.
https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2010/april/so...
https://www.blackhat.com/asia-19/briefings/schedule/index.ht...

Excerpt: "The complexity of x86-based systems has become so great that not even specialists can know everything."

We need a new CPU manufacturer. One that is built from the ground up on transparency, auditability, accountability, and Einstein's "as simple as possible but no simpler" maxim.

Such an entity cannot, CANNOT be a corporation.

The reason why such an entity cannot be a corporation is because a corporation is legally bound to the legal structure in the country in which it operates, and that legal structure may create, one way or another, a door for secret agreements / secret hardware modifications between that company and the host government.

In other words, transparent, ethical engineers with NO conflicts of interest -- are no longer running the show... Corporate lawyers and Government lawyers are.

That has to change in the future...
There does appear to be an internal AST in php7: https://github.com/nikic/php-ast
A decentralized marketplace for digital content
This has been my experience as well, but even with only 2 accounts it takes several clicks and quite a few seconds of waiting to check all of my email because it's also fragmented with the 'social', advertisement' and 'main' tags.
The article says that this will help PHP in areas outside of the web. But what others areas actually want PHP? Even in its niche, the web, it has fallen out of grace for new projects.
I don't think anybody misunderstands your intention. The disagreement is the effectiveness of your proposition.

The problem is that your 80/20 deal causes an adverse selection that attracts the lower-quality non-coders that you don't want.

If non-technical non-programmers like Evan Spiegel (Snapchat), Brian Chesky (AirBNB), and Steve Jobs (Apple) can hustle to find that 1st angel investor, or 1st VC funding, or 1st paying customer, that means they also have the street smarts to find an alternative solution to your very expensive 80/20 deal.

Even after the biz-idea guys hustle to get that 1st customer, they have to continue hustling to get the 2nd, 3rd, and so on customers to grow a viable business -- unless your thesis is that a new startup with 1 customer is enough to "flip" it to an acquirer like Google/Facebook/Microsoft.
Yes, I've reported everything, and they were extremely helpful (to the point where they debugged things with me), but nothing changed.

> Why does it take several days to pin something?

The daemon doesn't act like a torrent client, where you can add a pin and then come back later to check progress. You need to do an HTTP POST (or whatever verb) and then wait until it's done, which due to availability issues and size might take days to complete.
I’m driving, but don’t want to forget this later... do you think you could help me with a 30 second run down on Intel JTAG?

I assume not all chips have the same JTAG password. I assume JTAG can be accessed via software running on the processor itself and not require explicit physical access. I assume there is a hack that allows someone to obtain their processor JTAG password, how that works is what I’m most interested in I suppose.
As Ha Joon Chang points out in his book Economics: The User's Guide, economics is about political arguments yet pretends as if it's a science. Hence most economists don't like the politics of Pinkety's economics. Which is what the op was alluding to though he did not mention explicitly... because they depend on money from people who don't like forwarding that political agenda. Secondly, it seems that the math that he used to make some of those arguments is not up to par so that makes it easy to dismiss his political arguments, and that's the issue when you go up against the status quo you better have inscrutable math because they are going to find any reason to dismiss you.
Trickle down economics is disproven. Trickle down corruption is real.
Very useful, thank you! So your team is the CherryPi team from Facebook AI Research if I understand well?
Every sovereign country has a right to block companies based on their security risk assessment. In this case however, the given reasons sound a bit flaky. Would have almost been better if they gave no reason at all.
Because the fact that it was patched twice means they didn't fix it the first time, which means they didn't test it properly and might not have fixed it the second time.

It's entirely logical.
Seems like in the U.S. the pilots are properly trained and are capable of handling the difference in the new vs old aircraft.

Other countries aren't fairing so well. Is this a failing of the U.S. Government's FAA? No.

I have a good friend who was a Naval aviator and did crash investigations for the Navy, his ordered list for causes of aviation crashes. The top 3 causes he believes are responsible for 99.9% of all crashes.

1. Pilot error due to fatigue (Which the U.S. has made strides to drastically reduce)
2. Pilot error not due to fatigue
3. Pilot lack of training
4. Plane failure (hardware, software, mechanical, etc)
I think 1 year is reasonable. AWS upgrades often enough that it makes sense to not lock yourself out of those performance increases.
> For the same reason you pay income tax every year not just when you die.

You pay income tax every year because you consume about that amount of resources every year and the things you want to buy aren't tax deductible. If you didn't, and you have enough money to be worth doing it, there are already a zillion tax shelters that cause taxes to be deferred until you actually want to spend the money on something.

It would reduce inequality to make that available to ordinary people rather than only the super rich, as well as encourage people to have more savings so they have more stability and aren't as impacted by a large sudden expense.

> Taxes are designed to fund the government and also address inequality. You need to be taxed more frequently to address the inequality issue.

Except that you aren't, you just keep the holdings you have already instead, and then everything is worse for everybody. The government ends up with less in the long run, so does the taxpayer, so does the new business looking for investment capital to challenge the incumbents. About the only beneficiaries are the incumbents who retain capital that wouldn't continue to be allocated to them in a more efficient market.
I’m not sure I follow. Care to expand how one can serve someone they aren’t beholden to in some way?
Ride-hailing, bike and scooter companies raised less money than you thought
I suspect many of the AI companies floating around nowadays are really just faking it till they make it on the assumption that they will figure it out once they get big enough.
No idea about the OP, but in my case every contract I signed contained some clauses that prevented me from speaking or acting in any way against the companies interests, at least while I was working there; just like a sort of non-compete agreement but applied more broadly.
Luckily I never had to test those clauses, but I'm sure had I done anything against them they would have destroyed me in court in no time.

If I was in the OP shoes I'd leave ASAP. One day someone will let the cat out of the bag anyway (coworkers, researchers, competitors doing reverse engineering, etc) and he could lose his job anyway if the company tanks. Not to mention being related to a technical fraud.
>Just now, 2 months later, the same issue happened with a security login email from Stripe.

It just happened for the same user, but it seems to be a long standing issue. In the old thread another user was complaining about Stripe emails getting the same treatment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19100629
PHP has had an AST for years now.
Possibly dumb question: Do we know the dark matter proportion of our own galaxy? (in other words, how hard is it to take a selfie, at galactic scales?)
Applications that benefit from huge pages should have/add support for them. Transparent huge pages are a hack.
Why stop at 500GB storage?
Hungarian Notation
There is no way scarcely was being serious. It has to be a joke, no?
Perfect forward secrecy.
This proposition's assumption is that there's something special about ideas. Reminds me of the kind of person that might make you sign an NDA before telling you a "cool idea I had last night." It's no secret that YC -- like basically all incubators -- invests in people, not ideas. Teams will sometimes fumble for years before they find product-market fit.

There are no shortcuts.
What do you expect from me?
Thanks for making this! I've got a PostGIS app that is starting to groan a bit with a Heroku Standard-0 database and I've been trying to weigh my options for next step.
This is a downright bizarre list of "no risk" businesses. The first two of your examples are both restaurants. Enough said on that. The last one is a franchise that sells a highly regulated commodity product from a brick and mortar storefront. I mean geez... what do you consider to be hard business?
Since we're talking about Japan, the 2003 anime Texhnolyze had Behavioral Sinks at its conceptual core.

https://www.crunchyroll.com/anime-feature/2017/07/03-1/the-g...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK47Azd6OO8
Especially somewhere as central and busy as KX. Scottish Stores is an ok pub but fuck off would I let my bag leave my sight in there.
Only pictures of people when drunk - we'll call it FacedLook.
The work around for this (unfortunately) is to use another device to dish out DHCP. I have setup my Pi Hole to serve this and my DNS
Yeah, now that I think about it, almost everyone does this in some form or another. I would even argue that making your business look nice (like a well furnished bar, etc) has the same type of effect. You go in, it looks nice, and you feel good about being in nice surroundings. So you get that initial reward before the business engagement even begins. Just reflecting on my own experience, I feel like I have been colder to businesses that don't look nice. I didn't think it was related to reciprocity[1] until now.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocity_(social_psychology...
Wow, the 59 cent part looks like the Chinese version of Operation Earnest Voice,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Voice
Wow I never knew Bill Gates had a multi million dollar trust fund. Kinda puts the drop out of Harvard and start a software company with your friend in perspective. https://philip.greenspun.com/bg/
>Such an entity cannot, CANNOT be a corporation.

How would that work? You want a government designed secure processor... why wouldn’t you figure that the reasons they are insecure now is because of gov involvement?

If you want an open source processor... that’s cool, and corporations can/are already do that.

Now... with any solution proposed, verify to me that the silicon as designed is really the silicon made, esp when talking about 7nm.
I wonder how this Tesla issue relates to the admonition "stay in your lane".
They have been pretty good for domestic violence issues and assault when I've needed them, though.
Maybe not hurt if it was not dilutable, the initial 20% holder could be issued more shares to keep their percentage at 20%. By the time 3 or 4 rounds are raised the initial 80% owner might only retain 20% after dilution. So in the end you have to look at the cap table after future rounds, the fact that during a period of history (probably before there is any real cash to distribute) the split was 80/20 won't matter.
1. I like the alternative to the status quo for "starting a company". Even more so b/c you're addressing the unmet implicit desire to finish side projects.

2. Premise 1 is agreeable. P2 doesn't hold past the initial VC demo, let alone MVP stage. P3: probably approximately correct. P4: I would agree.

3. Skimming the comments here and seeing mixed/confused feedback, I assume those taking this more seriously are keeping silent.
Economics as used in policy seems to be mostly about using outrageously nonsensical arguments to justify tax cuts and increase corporate power by cutting regulations that enforce corporate responsibility.

The results are predictably grim for everyone who isn't a 0.1%er - sometimes fatally so.

There's a side-field of purely academic economics which includes heterodox ideas like MMT, but they - currently - have almost zero chance of having an influence on government policy.

I'm always bemused that psychics are regularly attacked by sceptics for being dangerous and fraudulent scammers who act in bad faith.

On the evidence, policy economists are vastly more dangerous.

A bad faith psychic might bankrupt a handful of people. Bad faith economists can bankrupt entire countries and/or force entire generations into debt - but sceptics seem to swallow what they have to sell with no rational oversight, and sometimes with support and approval.
and now you see why "serverless" is misleading.

"serverless" now means you don't run your own web server, you use someone else's.
Allergic reactions play role in sexual behavior development
I think we need to separate cases with actual evidence like what you are describing from default behavior. With a little evidence you can defend spending a little more resources studying the same thing. Over time that feedback loop works to both efficiently spend money and change orthodoxy.

That’s different from saying X seems likely based on gut feeling or whatever. In the case with zero evidence the goal is to find the cheapest way to gather any support and this initial effort is generally cheap enough to self fund. If not, looking for funding outside of normal channels is a viable option.

That proof of concept stage is something of a road block, but less so than generally portrayed.
I agree. I suspect it's also supported as an economic stimulus (which I find slightly morally repugnant, though it's undoubtedly utterly practical for government to do it).
> Taiwan blocking Chinese websites? Good.

> China blocking Western websites? Bad.

That analysis is so oversimplified that all the important factors have been left out of it.
That’s why films and TV shows are so powerful. Hollywood is the greatest weapon of American soft power.
Not sure about lighter. Mod-perl at least was quite RAM-hungry if I remember.
Thanks for checking it out and for your comment. Trying to get feedback on how to improve it and which direction it should take.

No, the name is not inspired Naval Ravikant. I didn't know who that was until now. It's derived from my parents' names.
But more importantly, if I build the product and get the first customer what do I need you for? 2k is chicken shit. Unless the idea is a throwaway, something I'm not passionate about, I'd just build it myself.
Members of Saudi Rapid Intervention Group Received Training in the United States
Arsenic and Lead in Fruit Juices
Multiple ideas - maybe, totally depends on what comes up. Though it would change the intention of the deal, flipping around the deal wouldn't be something I'd say no to right away. It's a proposition after all, not a ridged set of rules we have to follow :)

Got anything in mind?
Donate at least 100$ to Greenpeace.
Lane markings is always about vision system. The brand does not matter for this.
Inflation would also be a tidy way to pay for Universal Basic Income. Just print money and give it out.
I never got to read your reply. Look I'm sorry for any negativity. I think there is a place for you and what you are doing. But I'd like to make my own software my own way.

I don't agree with your paradigm for how people should use computers, but that's ok. I know I can very vocally disagree with the direction software is going, but I'd very much like for us to coexist peacefully.
Depends on why they patched it twice.

On the ”we should be worried” end of the scale, we have

”we fixed a bug but didn’t add a test, then accidentally reverted the bug fix, had to fix it again, and still didn’t improve our process to prevent this from happening again”

In the exaggerated version, they don’t use source control, so they had to figure out how to fix the bug twice, and they don’t even did a test, but, in both cases, only believed they fixed it.

Going back to your example, it depends on how they detected that they missed cases, and on how sure they are they know them all now. If (100% hypothetically) they only detected it after ten people died, denied existence of the problem, and were sued in court, we should be worried.

In the real world, just like all other companies working on autonomous driving, I think they will never be able to say they truly fixed the problem. The problem is, and always will be, underspecified, and even if we knew the problem well, we don’t really know for what kinds of problems the software we use to do this is a reliable solution.

I would be a bit more worried about Tesla than, say, about German car manufacturers because Tesla has shown to be willing to sail close to cliffs. Worried enough to be really worried? No.
Isn't it to do with the rotational velocity? If it isn't what you'd expect from the matter that you see, you need DM for it to add up.
Situation is worse with Outlook. They'll mark mails from Microsoft itself as spam.
He still has the opportunity to turn down all but the greatest ones (or all of them) so I think that this is a pretty decent way of approaching it.
Rails was popular among those that never saw such approaches before, like on AOLServer and Zope.

I just kept using Java, .NET and C++, while enjoying their performance, IDE tooling, and whatever ideas they could bring into their web stacks.

Nowadays most cool companies that were pushing Ruby, are on JVM languages.
They are not idiots, just highly motivated political operators using papers full of mistakes to make a point. That's the part that should have gotten them fired but since you agree with their goals then you don't take issue with that.
I would say $180-$200.
Why not? If you're good enough to get the job you’ll have no trouble at all getting a new one. You’re probably already fending off recruiters with a stick.

And again, it’s clearly not for everyone, but that’s ok, as long as it appeals to some people. Investment banking is also a terrible job for most sane people, but for a small percentage of the population it’s perfect.
Not sure how where I live factors into this argument at all.

> The ones who work there love it.

Again, this clearly isn't true based on what's posted on Glassdoor. Many people have written about being blindsided and fired without any warning or indication. That kind of environment gets toxic, clearly not everyone who works there is happy. There's a reason the word "cult" gets dropped constantly. Are you saying those people who claimed to be fired despite good performance are just trolls who've never actually worked there?

If anything, Glassdoor review bias tends to skew towards companies because HR departments send out internal emails asking employees to fill out positive reviews to counter the negative reviews. I've been asked to fill out positive employment reviews by my employer on multiple occasions throughout my career, but perhaps my experience is unusual.

> My friend said he saw 20 people let go in 2 years. But he’s genuinely happy being there and makes over $600,000/yr.

How he doesn't wonder when they're going to axe him is beyond me, but I'm not privy to his situation. In most companies, turnover like that dramatically destabilizes the culture and retention of truly outstanding employees.
Things aren't worse now, the author even acknowledges things are the same as they always have been:

it was in the arts section and it was about a group of black artists who were suddenly being recognized in their 70s and 80s. It was a frustrating read, a sort of too-little-too-late scenario because, sure, it’s always nice to get half a million dollars for your work, but where was the money when you were actually producing the work, while supporting a family and paying a mortgage, with many decades of life ahead of you? When you could run to speaking engagements instead of rolling to them? “The kind of elation I may have had back 30 years, I’m past that point,” 75-year-old artist Howardena Pindell said. Where was all of this back in 1989? Oh, right, Robert Mapplethorpe, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Jeff Koons — guess they took up the allotted spots.
I think a good policy to have would be to tell everyone: "if you have a feature request or if you find a bug, make a pull request implementing it (or fixing the bug)".

For feature requests, perhaps it'll be good to encourage people to discuss it first, before they start implementing it.

But make it very clear that you're not doing free work for anyone simply because they ask. (And that this is open-source project, and everyone is expected to contribute.)