skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Fascinating! Thank you for sharing. The issues around the assignment of credit is as old as science and the concept of discovery; reading "The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution" by David Wootton really opened my eyes into how this is actually a fundamental feature of our modern conception of scientific discovery (sounds counter-intuitive.. I know!). It's like a societal "bug".
How much would it cost to hunt [insert group of people here]?

Even if someone commented that as "sarcasm" it would look pretty bully to me.
Reportedly Boeing only used data from one of each plane's TWO angle-of-attack sensors to drive MCAS.

Does that strike anyone else as almost criminally incompetent?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the JVM and CLR assume they're working with GC'd languages and a number of other things? Making them poor targets for many languages, and AFAIK a WASM runtime is a lot more lightweight than both of them

The JVM and CLR seem like they're language platforms first and VMs second
This looks like some valid and interesting info on these commercials.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2018/01/04/how-atts-you-w...
Is your argument that they don’t deal with finances or that they don’t use technology?
Party A had done X and Y when it elected to do Z. I kind of read that as X and Y occurring before Z.

As for the subject matter if saleforce knew in 2016 what the FBI acted on in 2018, I don't know. It leaves me with several large questions, the biggest being about why the site lasted for as long as it did. The FBI received continuously information about child sex trafficking and prostitution, and had several court cases dating back to at least 2010.

From a moral perspective its an valid discussion to ask if saleforce should consider their ethical consideration of how their customers utilize their goods and products, but from a legal perspective I kind of look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backpage#Legal_decisions and see a complete failure from the legal system to tell the world if the behavior of backpage was illegal. It would not surprise me if saleforced did ask their lawyers and got a OK back.
Sarcasm and bullying aren't mutually exclusive.
There is an infinite number of definitions for “like their country”.

Nazis in Greece like their country or what they perceive as “their country”.
Yeah, I agree. I am starting with one delivery per day because that's simple and easy to communicate. But really I'd like to gather feedback and add delivery options. A delivery style I would enjoy, for example, is actually linking the time to sunrise/midday/sunset based on user location. Also, I think it would be nice to let users choose one or more of the delivery times, instead of just one. And once an hour, like you said, might work well for people.
"People who consume more pornography and more violent pornography tend to be more violent people."

I feel like this is probably correlation than causation. It seems obvious to me that people who want to be violent are more likely to both fantasise about it and commit it. Further consuming any sort of vice to degrees well past the norm (pornography, alcohol, drugs, food, sex, video games, etc.) seems likely to be a sign of poor impulse control, which obviously means they are more likely to just be violent when they feel like it.

When taken with the fact that overall pornography exposure within a culture seems to either not impact or reduce the amount of sex crime I'd argue that desire to do thing causes both fantasies and increased likelihood of doing that thing.
Perhaps the other way around. The media was Hillary’s tool. She asked for increased coverage on Donald Trump because she thought she could beat him easier than anyone else (if you don’t like Trump, thank Hillary) asking to the pied piper strategy from the Podesta emails. She was funding the DNC so she could deliver or withhold media access.

Small point and while I agree overall I’m not sure the media ‘selected’ Hillary. I think Obama Admin did, and after all, it was her turn.
There was a thread I made about ProtonMail v FastMail and this one point came up at the top. However ProtonMail’s inability to support standard clients without an awkward bridge app seems to take edge off it.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19372882
>What does your average 'white person' celebrate?

Holidays they imported from their European past. Saint Patrick's Day isn't originally a drinking holiday, it's a Christian religious holiday. My friend with Serbian ancestry celebrates 'Serbian Christmas' or Julian Orthodox Christmas.

Lots and lots of Christianity.
Grindr is specifically targeted at the male homosexual and MSM audience. The information that users share about themselves on Grindr is much more likely to be sensitive than a traditional dating site.
If only Facebook focused its products on encrypted, private conversations, they wouldn't have to worry about / could claim to be incapable of policing content...
I think it will serve better to think about it as a difference of emphasis, rather than a difference of category. Maybe the term has been introduced to make the subject seem more tangible to newcomers? I notice that University of Missouri doesn't also have a "linear algebra" course.

As you say, "Matrix Theory is about matrices as a data structure" ends up being a pretty hollow concept anyway, because the important part is always related to matrix multiplication. The example of Markov chain models only underlines that point, since the main results of that theory depend entirely on the transition function being linear, and not at all on whether we represent it by a matrix. To put it another way: matrix multiplication is composition of linear operators. You can't extricate the matrix-as-data concept from the other.
> No, it means that while you can cheer this decision today, how do you know it won’t be used against you in the future?

Because I'm not a white nationalist? Facebook already bans child pornography, pro-ISIS content, and doxxing. Does anyone seriously believe that Facebook is slippery sloping to banning all speech?

But let's say that Trump and Pence do indeed take over Facebook and make it so they ban all users that don't loudly praise Trump. If they do, honestly, so what? Facebook can't imprison you or legally remove your property. The worst they can do is ban you from their platform. Which, well, that sucks, but there's lots of sites on the Internet. In fact, you could go ahead and legally make a non-censorship Facebook.

...of course, sites like that already exist, in this world, not in the Trump/Pence Facebook world. And they're dominated by child pornography, white nationalism, and doxxing. No one at large uses them because they're horribly toxic and disgusting. Almost like some rules about content are actually helpful for sites on the Internet.
"Technology companies often choose to gender technology believing it will make people more comfortable adopting it.

Unfortunately this reinforces a binary perception of gender, and perpetuates stereotypes that many have fought hard to progress.

As society continues to break down the gender binary, recognising those who neither identify as male nor female, the technology we create should follow.

Q is an example of what we hope the future holds; a future of ideas, inclusion, positions and diverse representation in technology."
> What makes Grindr special in this regard ? I’m sure there are other dating or social apps out there that also could be foreign owned and used for espionage....???

select opm.name, opm.address

from opm_security_clearance_files opm

join grindr_users grinder

where grinder.phone_number = opm.phone_number

and opm.clearance in ('SECRET', 'TOP SECRET', 'SCI');

If any of those people are in the closet, they could be susceptible to blackmail.
If this goes through, then condom manufacturers are in big trouble.
Trump says Sundar Pichai told him he is 'committed to the U.S. military'
> The tablet that they show sending a fax from the beach is essentially a smartphone.

Except for the fact it's sending a fax.

Smartphones don't send faxes, but they could. They don't because they exist in a world where faxing someone something is a niche application, and approximately nobody would buy a smartphone based on how well it faxes. The technological culture is different. The world has changed in more ways than just "We can stick a good computer in your pocket and power it all day long" and AT&T didn't predict that.

I realize I'm partially repeating some elements of your comment, but I do have my own point to make here: In looking at history, avoid Presentism. Try to see the past on its own terms, not through the lens of the modern day. That is a learned skill, and not having it is shown by crediting people in the past with predicting things they never thought of.
I don't believe these slippery slope argument are sound. You can apply these kind of arguments to almost every alleged free speech issue. Just make it an argument against banning <insert whatever content you find absolutely reprehensible and clearly worth banning>.
You should consider, that you just have a bias against "web people".

But this technologie comes not from javascript webprogrammers, but from browsermakers.

People who specialize in sandboxing, performance and portability since years. And they had to do this with javascript... and now they want a better foundation, BECAUSE of the flaws of javascript.

So I don't know if they will succeed making a better jvm either, but they certainly have the expertise that they might succeed.
You're not the only one annoyed by this.
Zeppelins.
I've seen Rust mentioned, but not for the reasons I'm thinking of. My biggest complaint and simultaneously source of praise for the language is that it changes how you view other languages.

Implicit copying, unsafe access in multithreaded scenarios, deficiencies in type systems, and more - all become obvious and inescapable observations when using many other languages.

I'd imagine this effect is lessened if you came from C/C++ and watched the birth of Java, JavaScript, C#, etc., however as someone who started programming more recently, Rust has been the lightbulb moment for me for how languages work under the hood.
I don't see what's so complicated about it. Facebook will set some standards and they will meter out moderation action as they feel is necessary. Will it be selectively applied in some cases? Yes. Will they get it wrong sometimes? Yes. So what? People who don't like Facebook's approach to moderation can quit, protest or otherwise boycott Facebook. This is the same problem of moderation that has always existed in online communities, the only difference between today and the past is that today the masses feel like they are entitled to use these platforms.
Here's another "way" that's ignored: Nearly all services give users little to no control over the content they see. They can't self-moderate or filter the content coming their way. Instead, users have to "Appeal To Authority" (whether Facebook or the Feds) in order to make changes. It's incredibly disempowering in both cases, and doesn't need to be this way. "Mods" on Reddit help. Page Owners on FB pages help. However these are still "Authorities" that must be appealed to. Even resorting to contacting advertisers to pressure them to not sponsor "bad" content is still an Appeal To Authority.

Essentially, you have no control so the only solution is to not participate or appeal to a higher authority. Both are terrible.

In a weird tangental side-thought: The Internet is to Western Capitalism what Glasnost/Perestroika was to the Soviet Union. The opening of information, while allowing many great things through, also removed the filters that kept harmful content on the margins. In the Soviet state, it was the authority of the State that dictated content. In the Western world, it's mostly those who own/control large media platforms. Since liberalization, each situation found The Authority under acerbic attack from these new wellsprings of content, both legitimate and illegitimate.
That headline is backward. The laser destroys drones. They didn't show a drone destroying the laser.
Google doesn't have a monopoly on email. Check your (personal) inbox - I'd bet the majority of emails on the first page are not from Gmail users but rather from various companies and organizations. Even among individuals, while many people get their email from Google, the most popular client (which is what's relevant in this case) is the mail app on the iPhone. Microsoft and Yahoo still have decent market share as well, though much less than I thought before I started writing this with 12-18% between them according to my not-super-rigorous Google search.
This. I don't have a clear enough mental model for either docker or wasm+wasi, but I immediately thought of docker. What is docker except a bunch of purpose build operating system instances? And why do we need Linux installations (as much as I am a fan of Linux) when we could just run on WASI? And Electron, where each instance runs on an individual instance of a browser?
Very true!

I think the closest English analogue is 'think about', which taken extremely literally does also place the thinker _about_ (in the vicinity of, around) the idea.
There’s a huge new interest in hypersonic gliders.
Leaving the EU can be equally messy, our own Remainer-in-charge-of-Brexit PM nearly voted against the government last month. If nothing else, Brexit is proving that the EU is better than the alternative.

https://inews.co.uk/news/brexit/brexit-vote-results-parliame...
I have nothing but positive things to say about coworking spaces after having worked at them for the last 3 years. I've met great friends, business partners and clients. I think they'll continue to be important as the freelance and remote working economies grow.
I ask what's the biggest problem the company has around the position and what's being tried to solve it.

How this question is answered gives information about what to focus on, also about how they react to problems.
That's not Pat?

https://www.google.com/search?q=pat+snl
And not surprisingly that makes it less readable. It is a lot harder to have one-character names when you need to scroll across many pages to look up what they mean. So the more code you have, the longer code you need. As Eric Evans points out, naming things in computer code is difficult and important; wrong names can be misleading. This style avoids the problem by avoiding names.
We don’t have a bill of rights, but we’re hardly a totalitarian state. Nanny state, maybe.
Low-quality sleep can lead to procrastination
And when you're in my house around my children you absolutely do not have it.
A solution to this would be selective enforcement. Let the user decide if they want "light" (auto accept new keys), "strong" (skull and crossbones), or "paranoid" (auto-block any new keys) security.

The same should be applicable to browsers, I think. When logged into your bank, you should be able to click a button that says "Make this website use paranoid security" or similar, which would apply very strict policies that prevent most HTTPS attacks, and maybe even enable protection against phishing and similar domains, or something.

I don't know why apps keep painting users into a corner with one generic option rather then giving them more choices.
You believe it's literally impossible for someone to advocate for separatism, pan-Europeanism, or protection of white culture without being a violent hate group?
It seems you and I go to different websites; and I’m quite happy about that.

But I beleive my comment said legal things. Having a different opinion is still legal, for now. You jumped to all sorts of illegal things.

And my context was what if “the bad people” are suddenly running these services or in positions of power and relative to them, you are the one with hate speech? Perhaps it shouldn’t be up to them, or you, or anyone to police what someone else MIGHT find offensive.
Why would I not be able to make inferences about the software the servers are running if the chances on lying on the letter is low? I haven't read Signal's source code, and yet I believe with just as much confidence that they aren't logging extra information as if keybase had sent the same NSA letter. To me, Signal's source code is effectively closed, and reading it wouldn't increase my belief. (Have you read all of their server's source code? If not, why do you justify your belief?)

The article on attested contact discovery states "Of course, what if that’s not the source code that’s actually running? After all, we could surreptitiously modify the service to log users’ contact discovery requests. Even if we have no motive to do that, someone who hacks the Signal service could potentially modify the code so that it logs user contact discovery requests, or (although unlikely given present law) some government agency could show up and require us to change the service so that it logs contact discovery requests.", which is exactly the point I'm making. They choose to solve it by signing code and ensuring that exactly that code is running (seems like they just move the trust to Intel. Hopefully SGX never has any bugs like https://github.com/lsds/spectre-attack-sgx or issues with the firmware, as noted by the Intel SGX security model document), which is fine, but an equally valid way to do this is to make it so that the secure operation of the system does not depend on what code the server is running.

Doing that has some tradeoffs: there's usually overhead with cryptography, or an algorithm you need may not even be possible (Signal disliked those tradeoffs for this specific algorithm), but for some algorithms, it's entirely possible to do. For example, one can audit OpenSSL's code base, and determine, regardless of what the middle boxes or routers do, that the entire system is secure. Just replace OpenSSL with keybase's client, and middle boxes with keybase's servers, and do the auditing. Hence, open sourcing the server is not necessary for security. Would it be great if more systems could be audited? Absolutely. Is it always necessary for security? Absolutely not.

edit: Another quote from the article: "Since the enclave attests to the software that’s running remotely, and since the remote server and OS have no visibility into the enclave, the service learns nothing about the contents of the client request. It’s almost as if the client is executing the query locally on the client device." Indeed, open sourcing the code running in the secure enclave is effectively open sourcing more code in the client.
I love the way your dad's mind worked. Sounds like a great guy to be raised by.
The problem isn’t having the train, it’s having permission to use the rails.

Having worked at a railroad, I will say it’s comically easy to steal a train, for instance. They all have the same key, which is basically just a plastic rod.

The argument of the railroads is... okay, you have our train. Now what? You either go forward or you go backward, and we know where both those directions go.
I'm imaging the cockpit's screen showing a "Your computer needs to restart to install an update" right when the pilot is preparing for landing now... Is that why they grounded the fleet?
Everything Apple isn’t telling you about its new credit card
You can commute (either to or from) Vancouver, or find a remote job in Vancouver. (check with your lawyer regarding doing remote work while living in the US) There are tons of startups in Vancouver, some of which can afford to pay you a Seattle-level salary.
I wouldn't go so far as to say the timestamp types are broken, just confusingly named. `timestamp with time zone` signifies an absolute point in time; `timestamp without time zone` signifies a timestamp relative to some unspecified time zone (which you must store separately, as you point out). The builtin functions universally adhere to these semantics.

E.g., when you do store the timezone separately, use `timestamp without time zone`: `time AT TIME ZONE timezone` [1] only does the right thing (i.e., interpreting `time` as relative to `timezone`, and producing an absolute time corresponding to it) if `time` is `without time zone`. (If `time` is `with time zone`, it produces the local time corresponding to the absolute time `time`, which is mathematically exactly the opposite of what you want.)

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-datetime.h...
Yeah the security of matrix + riot seems like the best of its kind. The issues come from the extra security causing some things to be a bit of a bad user experience but its getting better.
Decepticons, attack!

* Soundwave G1 voice compilation part I - YouTube || https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOu3hYXE_tM
The way calculus is usually taught is a mess. A mix of epsilon-delta formalism, without adequate motivation, differentials and excessive focus on computations.

For young students, a great introductory textbook is Calculus Made Easy. It is around 100 years old, and develops all the material using infinitesimals. Which is essentially modern non-standard analysis, minus rigor. It is also the way Newton and Leibniz thought about calculus, and the way most physicists intuitively think about problems.

For a more mature audience, I like Infinitesimal Calculus by Henle & Kleinberg.
Best attempt at a judgement-free guess: some people don't like the bimodal manifestation of gender and would like to not be reminded of it.
Handheld deathmatch!

> A Game Boy version was developed by the original developers, Xanth Software F/X, and published in 1991 by Bulletproof Software, under the title Faceball 2000. [snip] It is notable for being the only Game Boy game to support 16 simultaneous players. It was thought it did so by connecting multiple copies of the Four Player Adapter to one another so that each additional adapter added another two players up to the maximum - thus seven such adapters would have been needed for a 16 player experience.

And three months ago I had a nice discussion with one of the people responsible for the Game Gear version:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18652227
You can make your own website, though.
I'm referring to the modern Basque independence movement, not the historical Basque ethnicity or ethno-nationalization movement of the early 1900s that has been subsumed by the geopolitical independence campaign of the 21st century.
Anatomy of a Logging API
If you have enough knowledge, confidence in said knowledge, and the discipline to consistently apply it, you will know how much money is required to make it a near certainty that won't happen.
Travel like the Queen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Royal_Train
+1

Simple explanation that likely explains the security panel's reasoning behind their statements.

Also explains why a phone number as an identity token is a horrible idea.
I dont think anything will convince you if you dont see the comparison to antifa being more apt than isis.
Because you haven't done that, can't point to any groups which have done that, and haven't bothered to file any complaints about these nonexistent groups with Facebook moderation.
> ProtonMail’s inability to support standard clients without an awkward bridge app

Isn't that one of the pros of Protonmail? All the data is encrypted and decrypted on the client. There is no way to have mail apps access the data without a piece of software that handles the encryption.
That sounds more like you just need to have the place that you put your keys immediately by the door.
I remember watching this in grade school. Ah, memories
Disclaimer: I am an employee at Google, but I have never touched the code for flogger.

I found this and thought it would be interesting for others to read.