skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Right you don’t need to see someone’s face to guess what they’re thinking any more than you need to see their brain.

You can infer motivations and intentions based on how they’re driving. If you turn on your blinker and the guy in the lane next to you speeds up to close your available space, you have a pretty good idea of what they’re trying to do.

I’m not sure if there’s an algorithm that will figure out if other people on the road are complete fucking assholes that you want to avoid.
This sounds like reinventing the focused arty magazine/technical journal almost.
No, they aren't. The average private school tuition is about $10k a year [1]. Ones affiliated with religious institutions like Catholic schools often offer subsidized tuition for lower income people. It's within reach for a sizable portion of the middle class. In many states, private school tuition is tax deductible.

Granted, cheaper private schools are more common in the less affluent areas (namely, the South) where it's essentially taken for granted that the moderately well off and above send their kids to private schools. If you're from a wealthy coastal city with public schools good enough that the wealthy are comfortable sending their kids there, then it's understandable why some may associate private schools as being more exclusive to the upper class.

1. https://www.privateschoolreview.com/tuition-stats/private-sc...
I don't really understand the scenario. You're at the grocery store, and you would drive to New Jersey to get a plastic bag? If people can actually think of bringing plastic bags when going shopping, we wouldn't be in this situation in the first place.
Concur. The needed to use the phrase "Eat pollution" and "breathe electricity" to make it seem novel.
The Matrix – Joseph Campbell Monomyth [video]
Well, if you find it sufficiently fun. :)
Monads do exist in the programming for a reason.
Azure does, 35 days PITR andI beleive you only pay for the storage costs. Recovery is only on a database server level (not an individual database), and works by creating a new instance (the original instance is left as is) that is set to the state at the desired point in time.
List of companies offering free Web hosting to 501(c)3 nonprofits and charities
It's possible OP is in a Theranos type situation, and that's a good thing to look out for.

It's also conceivable the company is doing Wizard of Oz exercises (e.g., having humans simulate what they ultimately want software to do), to refine their model and build ML training data, which is an entirely valid approach, but they'd have to be upfront about that.

Upfront to users, and especially, investors. For example, if someone were telling an investor that they have a DNN servicing the customer requests, but it's actually humans, that would create a very difficult situation, and fixing it would probably include consulting a lawyer. In that scenario, there might be others in the company who are pissed at the person who ran off their mouth, but not want to take a hit of fixing it in a good way (and then things can get worse; "the coverup is worse than the crime" is a thing).

I suspect OP's situation is much more easily corrected, or might even just be a small misunderstanding.
I've never understood why ⊃, rather than ⊂, is used for implication. It has the disturbing consequence for set theory that "∀x, x ∈ A ⊃ x ∈ B" is the same statement as "A ⊆ B". I know this goes back at least to Russell and Whitehead, and probably before. Does anyone know the rationale?
https://youtu.be/tH0rASvVItk?t=176

if this is accurate, the current models give a hint of the issue. the car can't yet see very far and any minor obstruction confuses the hell out of it. there's too little pixel to make out the road at a distance and the car doesn't use any of the other clues human do to figure out what the road is doing next - i.e. we can guess a corner from vertical signs, guard rails, trees and even hill sides - see this example: in red the pixels that hints a tesla of an incoming corner, in blu those that also a human can use: https://i.imgur.com/CvntZuZ.png

the problem is that a camera, especially if it's not at a high vantage point, will have very few pixel to represent distant features.
Similar for self hosted shopping carts. Magento, PrestaShop, OpenCart, etc. There are very few complete shopping cart platforms that aren't PHP.
From a UK perspective seems strange that any investment company would it self owe CT tax individual US shares don't.

And the USA does have REIT's as a model.

And large chunks of the capital invested in the USA in the 19th century was by UK investment trusts which don't pay capital gains - the owner of the shares does.
Rester: API Scripting Tool
Can you justify that? The internet is full of people posting anonymously but there's no equivalent of cryptographic deniability (you cannot forge messages that look like they come from me, on this site).
Unlike what you seem to indicate, projects do imply a level of expected support and continual development by their projected image as given by their web pages, documentation, etc. If a developer/maintainer does not uphold this implied promise, users have a right to feel bamboozled.
Interesting also that for all providers except azure storage can only scale together with cpu/ram. Never understood why that is.
Judging by a lot of the discourse immediately following the most recent 737max incident, people were definitely blaming the pilots. Thankfully that's cleared up a bit now.
If I could edit my comment I would replace "common in parts" with "found in some areas". I used the phrase "common in parts" because it has been found in multiple cities[1] (in fairness, early 2010s), however I logically believed that it would be unlikely for this to be in every region of China, as it is a vast country with various cultures and levels of development. Some sources I've found claim it is a more common practice than others.

https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2012/04/03/chinese-gutte...
If balance of power is in landlorsd's favor, wouldn't they simply ask tenant to vacate instead of going in roundabout manner.
Maybe this is true, but by virtue of its popularity and ease of use, PHP has one of the largest selections of tutorials on everything, so that it’s possible to write code by just copy-pasting example snippets.
It's not that it has to be no-fail it's that the failures need to be a subset of the failures that humans make.

If the failures are in places that humans can easily and reliably handle (which is the case now) then people won't trust these systems. If the failures are created by the software not being able to handle basic driving tasks and wouldn't normally happen with a person driving then this is a huge problem with the system. A system that repeatedly drives at a lane divider repeatedly is not something people should trust.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/03/dashcam-video-shows-tes...
Superthin plastic bags are better? I walk home with groceries all the time, I've had many plastic bags break on me, but never a paper or cloth one.
My feelings about PHP are stuck in what I remember from 2004. If I’m starting a new backend web project in 2019, should I be considering PHP over Ruby, Python, or TypeScript? Why or why not? I’m curious to hear from anyone who’s used it professionally in the last couple years.
This Canadian judge's ruling includes pretty much a full reference book on this kind of weird stuff and its attempted application to court systems (Canadian and U.S.), which he calls "Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument": https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012a...
The iPhone is really a platform
Got it! Here's the demo link: https://ben-tossells-spectacular-proje-f568c3.webflow.io/loc...

Two things to note: page needs to be refreshed manually after submitting a booking. And that I'd have to manually confirm your booking (with email + invoice) for it to mark as confirmed :)
Deploying the attack presented in this thesis requires not only having access to a TEE but also compromising one of the parties to a communication

Essentially everyone with a PC has access to TEEs: beyond Intel SGX there's also the traditional static root of trust mechanism, which suffices for this, and also voids the paper's proposed solution; indeed the paper recognises that given a certain kind of TEE there appear to be no solutions.

As for 'compromising one the parties', the point of deniability implemented cryptographically is that your counterparty in the conversation could encrypt messages such that you can't tell who encrypted them, i.e. an encrypted chat log could have been forged. So the adversary is the person you're talking to: they're already 'compromised'.
I think the GP's argument is that retailers (not consumers) would cross state lines to buy plastic bags for their stores.

There are pretty simple ways around this, though. For instance, tax based on number of plastics handed out, not the number purchased.
The existential threat Y Combinator must confront
The chip's supposed to be shipping soon. I think the design was done a while back.
Show HN: Dead simple user account system so easy a cow could do it
When you apply "hacking" to the law, if you don't already know what you're doing very well, it usually ends up called "fraud".

https://xkcd.com/1494/
Counterpoint: increasing access to public restrooms results in unuseable public restrooms. As someone who (a) likes to 'hike' in-city but (b) has a small bladder, I rely on public restrooms on city trails, and in my admittedly small experience (Fort Worth and San José) they don't just become disgusting, but actively get vandalised within a very short time, after which repairs understandably take a very long time.

Somehow the ones in Ann Arbor and Chicago don't seem to get such harsh treatment. I'm not sure why; maybe those cities just budget a lot more for maintenance.
Wow, I didn’t realize that was an option.

Are people really asking themselves “what am I supposed to shit in now?”
> Not really, you don’t really gauge traffic by looking at the drivers firstly you can’t see most of them secondly it’s dangerous to assume their intention which is why we have things like right of way and road signs.

Have you ever driven in a city? People don’t follow right of way rules and road signs. Pedestrians jump into traffic randomly. You absolutely have to be looking around trying to gauge peoples’ intentions in order to drive safely.
Now that is interesting, thank you!
Moved all values to maximum and got exactly my current Hetzner configuration: 8 cores, 32 Gb RAM and 500 Gb storage. I have around 500 Gb of data, but real storage is about 3Tb.

Difference is that minimum price on DO is $480 per month. I pay 30 euros, and some more for backup storage.
The Great Firewall is known to do packet inspection, so if you ever had a long-running SSH session with your server, they might have classified it as a homegrown VPN tunnel and banned it for you specifically. Or they're letting requests from greatfire.org through to make censorship harder to detect.
>That sentence right there describes one of the main problems with reddit: Power-seeking moderators who are more interested in flexing on users than making good communities.

Agreed. Reddit went from being an active discussion board (if I can call it that) to having controlled dialogues. Echo chambers now exist, everywhere. Essentially, each sub is - veritably - it's own version of r/TumblerInAction on 'x' given topic, whether it be politics, social discourse, or what-have-you.

Even the ban against "hate subs" doesn't seem to take into the fact that a lot of hate subs still exist[0], espousing hate and dehumanisation of people. (Far more have sprung-up since this list was made but do note that the list referenced has a political leaning to it, as well. Perhaps, though, this has more to do with the radicalisation of politics.)

[0] - https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/68da...
> I think it’s a poor choice for a door lock, but I’m not sure I a priori think it’s unacceptable for a product to not work for some (~10%) portion of the population — especially when it reflects an engineering reality

If my employer specifies a uniform, it's their obligation to provide one to 100% of their employees, not the 90% covered by the cheap "one size fits all" company they prefer to use.

If my landlord specifies a locking system, it's their obligation to provide one that unlocks 100% of the time for everyone who rents there.

There's also an issue of scale: an apartment is a fairly major decision with a lot of other factors, that affects a huge chunk of your life. Being locked out by a small, easily changed decision on the landlord's part is unreasonable. Conversely, if you can't wear a "one size fits all" product, there's plenty of other options out there, and you're not potentially creating segregated neighborhoods, locking black people out of living near good jobs, etc..
> This is a fallacy.

Please do point out where the statement is incorrect.

I wasn't talking about perception, people have all kinds of ideas about machines (mostly unfounded), but typically safety records drive policy, not whether drivers think they are better than the machine.

I believe machine assisted driving is safer than unassisted already and will continue to improve such that in 10 or 20 years human drivers will be the exception, not the norm. That will happen because computers are already safer in most conditions - the switch will happen when they are demonstrably far safer in all conditions.

Remember they don't have to beat the best human driver, just the average.
> It’s so crazy wasteful for the 100 feet of walking, why should it even be offered?

It's often a lot more than 100 feet if you're in a big city and don't have a car.
The mystery of my desktop that locks up when it gets too cold
> It's pretty typical to see people bring their own bags to the store which hardly anyone did in Pennsylvania where I grew up.

I moved from CA to Pittsburgh, and people look at me like an alien when I take out reusable bags at the local grocery store. It’s pretty bizzare.
The USA pays quite a lot of taxes.
Sovereign citizen arguments generally reach well past any actual constitutional or legal principles and end up with stuff and nonsense like "that fringe on the flag means this is an admiralty court, so this ruling doesn't apply to me" or "by writing my name in all caps on the court document, you're actually talking about the legal corporation the government created in my name at birth".
> You'll be criticized irregardless.

You are implying that criticism is bad. But criticism is not bad. Negative feedback is, usually, eve more useful than positive feedback.
NP - I can submit a PR to your work tomorrow? Seems like a useful tool for surveying the growing PG-aaS space!
Having lived in Germany as an 11th grade exchange student, the rather minimal homework and the schooldays that ended in the early afternoon (early enough to eat lunch with guest family) were great.

It's important to consider that 30min to 1hr is a typical homework load for a single subject in many places in America, that American students get out of school at around 3pm, and that American students have extracurricular activities (sports, theater, etc) which run another 1-2hrs after that. Those rather insane circumstances create the hatred of homework.

It's also important to ask, "verify for whom?"

If the answer is verify for yourself, I don't think even the homework I did in Germany was much other than busywork. Trying to apply your own knowledge to some real world situation or problem is a much better self-verification. If the answer is verify for the central administration, that's just a strong statement about your culture/society's values with respect to the individual and the administrators/managers of large groups. Note that I'll freely admit: American homework mostly serves the central administration, and that's a statement about our societal and cultural values at present. (It did seem to be even more oriented toward administrative convenience in Germany, albeit with a lower volume of homework overall, even in a Gymnasium.)
There's no way in hell that foreign countries waited until 2016 to test out online propaganda campaigns. Anyone in Congress with half a brain would think to check previous elections for similar evidence of 'meddling'. It's far more likely that online election meddling dates back to MySpace and AOL or earlier.
China Is Burning Books Again
If that was actually the case, i.e. it had a lower accident rate than humans buts its accidents were silly bugs, it wouldn't be a "huge difference" -- it would be a slight improvement that would become a major improvement when the bug gets fixed.

If the average person thinks they're better than the computer when the computer is better than the average person, the average person is incorrect.

> They want to be safe when they haven't done anything dangerous -- they want to be in reasonable control of their destiny.

If you don't trust the computer, does that mean you won't trust another driver, if the computer is better than the average driver? Then how do you drive at all, when the roads are full of average drivers who could hit you at any time?
Lucky for you, you can get your plastic trash bags you so adore for exactly the price you suggested: 10¢ per bag

https://www.amazon.com/Bathroom-Trash-Bags-Garbage-Products/...

And in the meantime, the rest of us don't have to deal with the millions of bags that are bought every week just to be thrown away the same day.
As someone who has enough regular xrays (to keep an eye on my bone tumor) I always opt for the pat down and avoid the machines. Extra bonus when security staff member feels the massive bone tumor on my femur and thinks I've got something strapped to my inner thigh.
OK, you're implying at this point misleading editing, false claims and more.

But in this thread we've presented three sources of MEPs saying this is a real problem, that back each other up. The onus is now on you to find rebuttals that undermine that testimony, which again, is convincing because it comes from the people who are actually working in this chamber.

Now I haven't actually dismissed any evidence because you haven't presented any: it's totally unclear what reports you mean, or what they might say that voids the problems shown in the video. Please do cite specific reports that explain how this video evidence is wrong or falsified.

For the avoidance of doubt, NO institution calling itself a Parliament should find itself in the situation where votes are being counted wrong, EVER. This should be obvious but the sole purpose of a Parliament is to vote: votes are their only output. Creating a situation where it's possible to vote wrong by accident, in any way at all, is a gross breach of basic competence and massively undermines their entire institution.
Keller finished designing HW3 before departing Tesla. In a recent tweet Musk claimed HW3 is nearing production, then, a while after after media outlets rushed to report on the first tweet Elon threw out the caveat, which is that HW3 won't be going into cars until the software is ready, which could mean anything, and likely means they are nowhere near having their current software validated for HW3, let alone FSD.
I don't see these other people as fellow developers, but as golf-playing executives or their children.
I'm aware that not everyone here is a dev, but we mostly have similar careers.
Connecting Professionals in Real Time
Have you ever hesitated to share your whatsapp number?
I am sure many a times, because whatsapp is personal.
Linkedin exist even after facebook because there is a separate need for professional space. We realised this and so we are building an app to connect professionals in real time because whatsapp is personal and email is slow, isn't it?
Please show some love and to be the first to get the app link, please subscribe to us at-
http://cerqul.com
> The real question is what is driving these people to behave in such an irrational way?

From what I understand, a substantial part of it is scam artists taking advantage of people who fundamentally lack understanding about the legal system. See this judge's ruling that contains a substantial guide on the subject, and look at the section "The OPCA Guru": https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012a...
Just so long as old Joe weren't colludin' with no foreigners!
Similar things are done by JS engines and others nowadays. They optimize and keep the original stuff in case assumptions stop holding.
When I was poor I carried groceries on public transport using a large rolling suitcase on wheels. Worked pretty well and would not have been a problem with paper bags.
Any time I read or hear "AI" these days I automatically translate it in my head to the word "software". After all, all software is a kind of artificial intelligence, so it's not exactly dishonest to use the term AI -- it's just a bit lame.

The benefit of doing this mental translation is that I'm no longer annoyed all the time ;-)
PHP was not really designed, though. It grew accidentally from a templating system. When other systems are said to be more secure, I think it's meant in the sense of not being horrifically broken and routinely injecting untrusted input into namespaces, markup and SQL queries.
Or maybe we should accept that no system is perfect and that cars that kill people at a lower rate than human-driven cars are a good idea, even if they keep killing people.
1. Buy smaller garbage bags. They definitely exist here in Europe; I can't imagine they don't in the US?

2. Why can't you use one of the paper bags provided by the retailers to support your whimsical impromptu shopping trips? Or are you really a very regular whimsical shopper?
Is this a Gmail issue or a G Suite issue? You'd think they're similar but they haven't been in my experience. G Suite spam filtering has always sucked for me and others I know. I've gotten completely legitimate replies classified as spam from completely normal and legitimate people in the same domain as far back as 2013, if not earlier. In the case of someone else I know this happened to, it was an extremely critical email that got classified as spam.

P.S. If any Gmail folks are here: There's a bug in Gmail/G Suite that might as well be equivalent to marking an email as spam, since it prevents you from seeing emails: last time I checked, the "Important" section of Priority Inbox seemed to sort based on the timestamp of the most recent important email in the conversation, not the most recent email in the conversation. So if a subsequent email comes that isn't Important, the conversation doesn't pop up to the top -- so if it's not on your screen already, you don't see it as unread.
Googles draconian algorithms aside, there are legitimate security concerns with "security alert" messages.

Here are some of them:

1. The likelihood of you clicking and opening such an email is higher than regular emails

2. Phishers and scammers know this (point 1 above)

3. Malicious content is embedded in such emails

4. It is very effective, even against tech-savvy individuals
Is there any such thing for European calligraphy?
I would agree if Twitter had a usable interface.
This seems to me to be a good article on the subject. It covers the bases soberly.

> The legitimacy of the judicial system is based on its status as a well-tested, publicly examinable, and heavily scrutinized tradition of practice. A shift to an unaccountable, opaque software system throws that basis away.

To me this is the fundamental problem with ML poisoning judicial systems: For better or for worse, we are abdicating our responsibility. Justice ain't easy. Automation should free up our time for more important (less automatable) tasks like justice and politics.
I care enough to click the link. But I don't care enough to know anything about PHP 8. Why is the author insulting me with the intro?