skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> We've already tried this, it doesn't work. Housing is valued exclusively by the value of the housing around it. Building more housing raises the value (and therefore the cost) of all nearby housing, and does so continuously until the economy resets.

Really? Maybe I'm being overly simplistic, but surely building enough dwellings to exceed the immediate demand would lead to prices dropping?

Could you point towards some links to learn more about this?
Probably EICAR
You could make a convention where the file has to end with a document separator, i.e.

---

But depending on the exact setup and used YAML parser, this may be hard to enforce.
> For large-scale solar you need batteries

No you don't. You need storage, but it can be pumped hydro, hydrogen, ammonia, molten salts, and many other things.
Yeah, this is definitely a thing. I'm a bit conflicted over it.

One one hand, staying within the world of React components gives you a lot of functionality for free. And with Suspense and Hooks, the amount you can do within a component has become even greater.

On the other hand, there are still things that you can't do within a component. For example, you can't easily run an async function once when the component mounts - which in my opinion, would be the perfect way to fetch data.

I've been building Navi to try and create a more natural way to map routes to views and a stream of data. The thing is, the more edge cases you cover, the closer it becomes to just building React from scratch.

At this point I still think that routing and data fetching is better handled externally from React, but it's less clear cut than it used to be.
Many people are fine with taking the train in the US when it's remotely competitive in terms of time and price. However, in practice, that mostly means a subset of the Northeast Corridor (the whole thing is about an 8-hour trip vs. a short flight) or a handful of various city pairs that are only a few hundred miles apart. But it's simply not practical for me to take the train from Boston to Chicago, much less San Francisco. People can get out pitchforks if they like but I'm essentially always going to fly.
Brexit: The will of the people, in real time
Fair enough. Back to the actual issue here:

"When it was rolled out, MCAS took readings from only one sensor on any given flight, leaving the system vulnerable to a single point of failure. One theory in the Lion Air crash is that MCAS was receiving faulty data from one of the sensors, prompting an unrecoverable nose dive.

In the software update that Boeing says is coming soon, MCAS will be modified to take readings from both sensors. If there is a meaningful disagreement between the readings, MCAS will be disabled."

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/21/business/boeing-safety-fe...
Astronomers discover a companion of the nearby star HD 118475
I would heavily disagree that smoking only affects them individually. Also, someone with a gambling addiction or other addiction will need support from society.

That said, I also disagree with the "adult, but not quite" restrictions. Though the US also has its share of weirdness, where you can join the army, get married and have children before being allowed to buy alcohol or visit adult establishments.
As who says? And what reason do they have to believe it?
That was written by someone that clearly does not know what they are talking about or was simply lying. Many off grid systems operate by having excess solar and minimal storage.

“storage for what could be many days — or even a month or more — of power.“

The only way you get that kind of assumption is to set production at exactly as much energy as you need over the year. If you produce extra power every day then you never need even 1 day of full storage. It’s true wind and solar does not always produce the same amount of power every day, they never produce zero. Thus, it’s a question of what you scale the system around minimum or average production over some time frame.

Run the numbers vs. assuming minimum production and some storage is a net gain. But, as Nuclear costs at a minimum twice as much and also needs redundancy, actual storage requirements are fairly low. Those numbers get worse if you need run Nuclear as less than full capacity.
It also protects against STDs.
South Australia is a small state with green minded politicians.
India Rivalry as Firms of Famous Split Pick Competing AI Providers
I'm a bit dubious about the connection between heart disease and depression explicitly. Inflammation seems to be the general "something is wrong" check engine light of the body, and so drawing cause/effect from it, or even co-morbidity based upon it's presence makes me wonder. I wonder what lines could be drawn between another pair of conditions that are caused by/cause inflammation, like anxiety and diabetes.
Indeed, but much less frequently.
In fact, some of the recent google queries returned results that have nothing to do with the query! I had to go to - sorry - bing to find what I was looking for.
One of these days, I want to come up with a non Turing complete s-expression based config format (basically something like a Lispy JSON) and post it here just to watch Lispers rage at not being able to write DSLs in it.
Given that women with lower digit ratios[1] aren't socialized any differently than women with higher digit ratios I'm very unsurprised at this result.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digit_ratio
I've done both. I'd prefer train over car if it's possible. Being able to stretch your legs, change positions, and not focus on the road constantly is nice. Its much more relaxing than flying, however I'd rather fly and be uncomfortable for only a few hours.
The problem is that they have too much special syntax for booleans.
Is the only option to add cities one-by-one via "edit company>cities>add city"? The list is a bit long, ~260 cities in total.
Then why does anyone who owns property in SF rent it out rather than selling it?
Sure, safety features aren't free, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be included. If that raises your cost, you increase the cost of the plane, not offer it as an optional add-on.
You should try working at an abuse desk for an business providing email services at some point. :)

You are, of course, absolutely right re. spam and rightfully so. On the other hand, I regularly get spam reports re. 100% legitimate mails, often in the middle of longer email conversations and so on, and where one side of the conversation marks entire email threads as spam.

We always follow up on spam complaints and the one thing we do get often in cases like that is that the other party only wanted to delete the emails and didn't realise there were other consequences.

Yes, there's a lot of people that knows how to use the "Mark as spam button". I still, however, maintain the position that a lot of other people don't know how to use such features.
why brave over opera (also based on chromium)?

it seems that brave is setting the table for its own advertising once it has enough market share. the roadmap includes "opt-in" ads which will "respect your privacy". so clearly an advertising model is their source of revenue - exactly what people are switching from chrome to get away from. i personally don't buy into the idea that ads (which in the modern world are targeted) and privacy are compatible.
American trains are so sloooooow. I routinely take long range bullet trains in China, and am greatly grateful for the generosity of Chinese taxpayers making it real =D

Shanghai - Beijing sleeper trains are great value, and during 8 hour Guangzhou/Shenzhen - Shanghai day trips, you can work comfortably.
Even for the most basic of logic positions this is now considered outright false. Here are all the possible answers for Boolean predicate:

1) true
2) false
3) independent

and, sort of,

4) unknown

In a parallel dimension (using the true mathematical meaning of the word dimension here) there is also, about every predicate:

1) it is theoretically possible to know
2) it is theoretically impossible to know
3) it is impossible to know if it is theoretically possible to know (thanks a LOT, Godel)

Note that in the case where it is impossible to know, there still exists an answer. There is just some reason we won't ever know the answer. If this is relevant, then of course the practical answer to your Boolean predicate is "unknown". In some cases it may be useful to pretend we know the answer, and expand math as if we know the answer.

So yes, we even have claims that we consider "true, yet impossible to know". What that means is that we add a fact we can't prove or even prove as non-problematic as an axiom (e.g. the existence of large cardinal numbers. And of course, an honest mathematician would say that since the first 3 large cardinal number axioms were proven to be disasters, odds seem pretty good the current one is a catastrophe in some currently unknown way as well. But maybe we got lucky this time)

And in yet ANOTHER dimension you have the rather important fact:

1) it is practically possible to know
2) it is not practically possible to know

Here answer 2 is pretty nice, because that provides an argument, a useful dimension where we could research into expanding our practical options to practice science. Or perhaps I should say, it gives us a very practical reason to try to make one particular expansion of our knowledge. A LOT of claims in quantum physics fall into the 2) category and there's lots of research into finding the answers anyway. And sometimes a kindergarten teacher in Italy thinks of a way to ...

So this means there are 12 possible answers to every predicate in maths. 3 basic ones. And there are many fun things that can be said about every independent claim, because then of course that predicate becomes an argument to change maths to change the answer..

So where does a claim about God fall ?
You could always ship that Dev Kit 2 over to me. I'll put it to good use! ;]
Apple March event: what to expect from the TV and news service announcements
I think it’s the opposite. Your confidence intervals are only true if your distribution is true. But how can it be that perfect? At least Bayesians adjust their knowledge like scientists.
From what I've experienced, it's mostly tools that target either sysadmins or sysadmins-turned-pseudo-devops, and those tools pretend that anything can be done with 'just configuration' as a marketing point. Programming is for programmers, you see.

It's easy for someone who never {wanted to, learned to} program to accept yet another configuration format (with all options specified up front) and then accidentally learn (bastardized) programming concepts. It'd take much more effort to turn them into a 'real' programmer, learning a language from scratch, practicing that, and only then introducing some tool in the form of a library.
> "why should I care for someone else's child"

Because those children will grow and join society. When you are old, some will be your doctors and some will be the attendants pushing your wheelchair. They will vote and drive, form opinions and act on them. They will work, or not, and will require more or less in public services. They are not going to disappear, regardless of how you view their parents.

Today's children will be the society around you. Make it a strong one.
On the Hot Seat in the Hyperscale Datacenter
I also find that extremely strange, but maybe I'm in the minority. I think Toyota has safety features standard in all trims.

Regardless, the safety requirements in planes are much more stringent than in road vehicles.
There are some startups that try to store energy by lifting or spinning concrete (see www.energiestro.fr).

Also please note that in case France and Germany electrical grids frie because of a solar storm, cooling down the reactors will be impossibe once the emergency power generators run out of fuel.
The system was designed to correct an issue inherent to all aircraft with podded engines under the wings: nose up tendencies at high power settings. This was inherent in all versions of the 737, it was a bit apparent in the NG, since the new engines make the problem a bit more prominent, MCAS was introduced to correct it.

So, its more like an Volvo 18 wheeler which drives just like your Volvo hatchback except when you try to take really sharp turns under power.
In the US, voice time is rarely metered for domestic calls. Even discount providers offer unlimited domestic calling. The only case where you see metered calls is for pre-paid SIMs, which aren't very popular here, because you can get unlimited talk & text for $25/month.
The person who will be occupying the vehicle gets to make those decisions. Unless you're buying your own 737, you don't get to make that choice.
Who pressured WHO to put gaming on a par with drug addiction
For more than a year, I was paying for them to live there for free. That doesn't sound to me like I'm a parasite in this story.

Can you elaborate? Help us to understand your point of view.
well if you don't trust chromium, as a consequence you cannot trust any apps built on electron (slack, github desktop, etc) and you can't trust a single thing on android. that's pretty steep.
Tesla sues self-driving startup Zoox, former employees for trade secret theft
> redirecting to ads on an unknown domain

I can cleary see that, in states like iran or china, getting redirected to somewhere you did not chose to go is really problematic, but getting redirected to ads by your own provider, does this happen in your country?

In germany, i guess, this would be quite illegal for a provider to do and be considered as attacking the ingetrity of the dns system for personal gain.

>If you connect to something fronted by CloudFlare your ISP can see you connecting to CF, if they provide your DNS then they can see what you're connecting to that's fronted by CF. A subtle yet important distinction.

Well, most of the time, you would connect to ips that are not fronted by CF servers, so theres nothing to gain there.
Why not avoid artificially grouping those age restrictions out of an artificial sense of "fairness"? I was one of the previously rabid "if you can be sent to war you should be able to have a drink" back in my teens. The two topics aren't related. I insisted that they were to the ends of the earth before, but they aren't. Alcohol is a dangerous trap. Having the age be 21, even with some sneaking it early, is smart. 18 year olds don't need to try to deal with alcohol when 50 year olds can have a hard time with it. Your time will come.

When I was in my teens and 20s, I felt like older people were just rigging the rules for their benefit. As I approach 40, let me tell you younger folks something (even if it's useless), we are all on the same team and we're trying to make things the best we can (for you too). And when you get to this age, you'll do the same and younger people will rail at you the same way.
It's not about the decision and responsibility. The reason is for the health. Alcohol and Tabaco affect the health of young people more than the old people. So the ban.
It's often slightly cheaper to own than to rent in the Netherlands.
We already know that men graduate form high school and college at a lower rate than women so I'd assume the effect is the same.
Intro to Web Development with Rust for Node.js Developers
If you restrict people under the age of <magical unexplainable constant x> from doing something, they usually will find the means and do it anyway, but out of govt control, so it migt be even worse than if you didn't try. That is true about porn, alcochol, tobacco, working (I could never get that one) and lots of other things.
Windows Defender Antivirus Is Jumping to Mac
fake news, your votes don't tally with the actual website votes

Try harder next time :/
Petition to Cancel Brexit Crashes Government Web Site
You can say that everything spreads like a virus(i.e the internet, facebook, Google etc). Bitcoin (like any viral technology) is no exception
Haven't newspapers always been like that? If you want to see someone else's source of information, you would have to go and buy that days copy of the paper.

Newspapers seem to be the original subscription model--you only have one source of news.
Wait for the Librem5 instead?
Dealing with Density in the Datacenter and Beyond
It doesn't though, because the question wasn't about why they thought of right wing terrorism, the question is why they would limit it to right wing terrorism. Just say "terrorism".
> So you block them, and they create another user who is unblocked and continue to harass you. Blocking doesn't stop harassment.

Keep blocking, never respond. At some point they will stop.

> who used Google to generate new numbers

What ? How is that even possible...

> Thus the harasser wins

Wins ? What exactly ? From my experience they lose a victim and move on to an other one. Unless ofc they have access to you IRL...
Personally I think the legal drinking age should be 18. I started drinking when I was 18, but didn't learn to do so responsibly until I was doing it in public. A bartender can refuse to serve, or call you a cab. Not that they always will, but I think it is advantageous to have at least one adult around keeping an eye on things. Sure there are plenty of irresponsible bartenders, but my experience says it's better than nothing.
Kicad uses non-turing-complete S-expressions as a file format: https://github.com/KiCad/Connectors.pretty/blob/master/bnc-c...
The problem in this case is that europe has spent 40 years welcoming people from elsewhere in europe. Doesn't matter where you're born, you have the right to live there and build a life.

Imagine if Texas had a vote for independence, but only people born in Texas, and not those that moved from say Chicago, were allowed to vote.

> In the sense that all of the above wouldn't be considered a problem if the majority had voted to remain.

Except it would have been Farage was already calling for a second referendum before the results from the first came in. Rees Mogg and Owen Patterson were also big fans of two referendums, one to start the process, and one to confirm it 3 years later.
My government has made complex weaponry to instantly kill half of the world's population with one push of a button. For me, that's a huge part of the equation.
Two people arrested for spycam videos of 1,600 people
The Good in Standardized Testing
at least Google seems to be better at that than DDG
> Youtube filter being a prime example.

Youtube filter is there not only to follow the law, but also to please their advertisers/copyright holders.

Their latest change in the filter made Youtuber life so much worst and Youtube definitively know how they depends on theses Youtubers (and are lucky to have them). Thing is the cash come from advertisers/copyright holders and that's a much bigger issue for them right now.

To me that filter is beyond the requirements of the law, not for the law itself, but for the advertisers/copyright holders.
>If companies were allowed to sell cars without safety features for a lower price people would buy them.

On the other hand it costs money to develop these systems. The people developing them deserve to get paid. The government needs to decide at what points it becomes mandatory to have these systems.

If companies can't charge for new safety features, the result will be every company getting out of the safety feature (non-)business.

If the newest safety features make cars unaffordable for most, people will complain also.
does it create a native executable?
Artistic Style Transfer with React Native
This is why I really like what Beaker Browser is doing. It feels like when I first discovered the Internet in the 90's. I highly recommend you check it out, if you're into decentralized and easy to use web: https://beakerbrowser.com/
Very, very few companies do well after a large firing round. What I would look at is how they handled the firing. Did they do it respectfully? Did they apologize or did they blame the people who they fired? Is morale still high after the process? Did the founders handle the firing themselves or did they outsource it to someone?

Generally the companies that have done turnarounds after a firing round have done it respectfully. Often morale floors after a bad round, smart people leave, remaining people are unproductive. Combined with whatever reasons triggered the firing, most companies don't recover.
> I had never considered it by train - seems harder to just stop off and meet people

Could you take the train, but instead of a non-stop journey just jump off when you pass through an interesting town, and then resume your journey the next day?
The point stands no matter how you write it - those two things are not equivalent.

Case in point, an agnostic fits one of those, but not the other. An agnostic does not believe in a god, but they also don't believe in "not god".

If those two things are equivalent, then "not Belief(god)" and "not Belief(not god)" couldn't both be true (as they are for agnostics).

The issue is not that you need to find a way to frame it as boolean logic, the issue is that we don't believe in boolean logic. Belief has more than two states.

Of course, this is all a side track because the central point remains: believing there is no god does not require disregarding the possibility of being wrong any more than believing in anything does. It simply means you think it is the most reasonable belief given what you know at that time, as with any belief.
> Private landlords are parasites.

I take it you don't acknowledge the need for short or long-term rentals, either by migrant workers or low-income households who have no access or interest in taking home loans.
With smaller data sets I find the summary to be less valuable than the actual paper. In this case we are talking about 4,533 twin pairs where one is a male and the other female. The female twin had a 2.8-percentage point higher probability of dropping out of high school compared to other female students, and a similar 1.9-percentage point lower probability of graduating from college.

Those two numbers seems connected, ie that individuals that have higher risk of high school drop out have also a higher risk of not graduating. The study do not cross compare this with male students which also have higher drop out rate and lower graduation rate compared to female students, but some relation seems implied.

The study also notes a lower probability of ever having been married by age 32, and lower probability of employment. The article does not explore if the effect could be exclusively a result of lower education.

As a final thought, the sample size is relatively small and the effect relatively minor in absolute numbers. The paper does not give out any P values or confidence intervals for their primary findings. The relative effect is large, but I interpret that more like a warning flag. In absolute terms we are talking about 136 additional students born between 1967 and 1978 that dropped out compared to a null hypothesis. The same number for college drop out was 49 students that did not graduate. With so few individuals having that large effect on the conclusion I personally will wait a bit for replication studies.
> Not according to the press release.

Questionable conclusion, the press release doesn't go into details either way.

To quote this NYT article:

> Boeing is updating the software to require data from both sensors for the system to kick in, according to pilots at several major airlines and two lawmakers briefed on the matter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/15/business/boeing-ethiopian...

> Interconnects like that are quite unusual.

Not in aviation, for example the Airbus A330 has triple redundant Pitot tubes, the B737CL (Boeing 737 "classic") has four, the B737NG has three (737 Next Gen), etc.

So this "quite unusual" system appears on the very airplane we're discussing for the Pitot-Static System, a safety critical sensor.
The Standard Model explained it in the early 1970s
Why is “marriage rate” a factor in determining “life success”?
Taxes on VC and electric buses harming oil prices
Have you read about how the algorithm works?