skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is today as described in wikipedia

Truffle oil can be produced using any oil. Common versions use olive oil, or a more neutral flavorless oil such as canola or grapeseed oil.[6]

Some truffle oils are made with truffle residues incurred during collection or preparation for sale. Many truffle oils sold in retail markets are not made from truffles[1] but instead use manufactured aromatic compounds including 2,4-dithiapentane (one of many aroma active compounds that can be found in some truffle varietals) with an oil base. There are no regulations regarding the labeling of 2,4-dithiapentane and it can legally be called truffle aroma, truffle flavor, truffle concentrate or other similar terms, even though it is not extracted from truffles. In the United States, the ingredient may use the modifiers "organic" or "natural" as long as the components meet the federal requirements for those terms. Truffle oils range from clear to cloudy, and yellow to green, depending on the base oil used. Some include a piece of truffle in the bottle.[2] These pieces can be from any of over 200 different truffle species and may be listed as "black truffle" or "white truffle" even if not one of prized culinary varietals such as the black Périgord or white Alba truffle.

This is historic and no longer the case:

Truffle oil is frequently used as a bait for truffle-hunting dogs and pigs. Modern Italians often use a strufion, a ball of rags scented with truffle oil.[7](p87) Truffle oil has been used for this purpose since at least 1756, made by boiling truffles in olive oil and given to hunting dogs.[9]
Well, the English name for it is custard, but that tended to be mixed up with Bird's in people's minds, so a real custard in a sauce consistency gets the French name for prestige value.
This idea is absolutely going to backfire and drive up rents because they are about to massively constrain the supply of rentable houses.
YouTube self-defence
The "electoral roll" is hardly secret.
You wouldn't be skeptical if you spent an extended period of time in a city mostly occupied by these "young and dynamic people". Hong Kong is a good example.
He is being downvoted because his comment was factually incorrect. That's not why the EU was started.
Office365 only offers "use your own domain" for business type accounts. $8.25/month. https://products.office.com/en-us/compare-all-microsoft-offi...

Fastmail is a relatively cheap option. Yandex mail will do it for free.
I guess I can see both sides of the argument. I own multiple semi automatic rifles and enjoy them very much. At the same time no one "needs" to own one of these. I think anyone attempting to buy any type of firearm should have to: 1) Attend a safety training course; 2) Present some type of proof that they have met with a trained counselor, psychologist, whatever, that says they are not a danger to themselves or society (tricky! I know, very, very tricky); 3) Limited to how many they can purchase in a given time frame; 4) Waiting period of 2 weeks or some definitive cooling off period.

That's all going to be very, very controversial. Personally, I don't want it, any of it, but as a responsible owner of high capacity, semi automatic rifles, I'm willing to at least meet the other side halfway. I love going out to the range and blasting away at old cars and crap, but I don't think an outright ban is the answer. We have to find a middle ground.
Our First Experience with Story Mapping at Appear Here
I feel like this is one area where clickbait media has pushed things backwards. Everyone wants the clicks so facts from studies get skewed into binary results when its most always shades of gray. If I see a study and it shows that you may be slightly less likely to get alzheimers if you drink green tea every day, but only on the order of half a percent or so, I dont have a magic cure all to alzheimers. But you will see news headlines "Green Tea cures alzheimers! and may even be effective for ED!" Maybe we shouldnt rise against statistical significance and push back on incorrect dissemination of the results?
Sugestion for vim autocompletion plugin for PHP development?
Ouch. You and I may well disagree about the meaning of soul!
Why such an important decision wasn't required to be 60/40 to pass completely baffles me. Almost as much as how the referendum is treated as some iron-clad decision while passing at 51/49.
So more investors will leave houses empty. Brilliant.
People like to talk about "17.4 million".

Seems a lot more impressive than "around half of voters".
I've employed or worked with many ex-cons in my years. It was always the good guys who screwed up.
Exactly, one can always rely on the general population to illegally stockpile guns and ammunition, just in case. That tyrant won't stand a chance!
Women's Shirt
How can the potential breakup of the UK, increased economic uncertainty, increased political uncertainty, and a complete lack of plan yield any good outcomes for the Tories in the mid-to-long term? I mean, it may be popular, short term, but you have to remember that the people screaming their lungs out in favour of Brexit are probably the least informed about its potential consequences. And they are probably also the most affected by the potential consequences - they will turn as soon as the going gets tough.
Then you'd be a terrible professor, because that attitude is not pro-learning. Students take their own notes because writing is an aid to memory. Students take electronic notes because those notes are easier to organise, edit, and search through. Many "decent" professors will not hand out notes, and the writings they put on the projector might be scanned and put online, but those writings have none of the benefits of actually typeset notes. Moreover, since you would ban electronics, students couldn't access those scans in a later lecture anyways.
Very well. We've been using it for 1.5yr at work, keeping up-to-date with latest React and Redux.
Wait, that's not how it works. How do you know that the people who voted aren't signing this as well? Everyone gets exactly one vote.
I think the correct solution to fighting housing speculation is increase property valuation to real world prices, eliminate extra taxes on vacant apartments, and drastically increase (to about 5% - 7% of valuation every year) the property taxes on everyone.

At 7.2%, the doubling period is about ten years.

This should cool down the market.
It's not the 90's anymore, getting a virus is pretty hard. Hell, it wasn't really all that easy in the first place, unless you pirated or installed shady software from shady ads on shady websites.
Normally the result would be overturned. See Lutfur Rahman: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-45452342

Apparently the Brexit referendum was "advisory" so this doesn't count.

> sounds like a failure of the government structure and charter

Everything is a failure of the government structure and charter at the moment, pal. We've had half a dozen constitutional crises this year and the Speaker is digging up precendent from 1604.
Agreed, I always equate the soul of a city/neighborhood to having multi generational culture. Cleaning up Brooklyn and putting a bunch of hipsters there didnt give it soul...
That's why I mentioned smart parking meters. They would set prices so that there's always spots available for those willing to pay more. The end result being less congestion and shorter commuting times for everyone, by avoiding the need to circle the block.
I would argue that there is a design to evolution. At least in the case of sexual reproduction. True, its not one big, upfront design but rather an iterative design built up from the collective decisions of the partners.
This guy put in an insane amount of research and work to do this. I don't think there is a "secret moral superiority", but this takes a lot of dedication and focus which few people on this planet could achieve. I find this to be a very interesting project. Anyone can build lego bosts from kits and it only takes about an hour, so no one cares when you do it.
Evidence to support this? I have never found this to be true - heavily owner-occupied towns tend to be sleepy suburbs whereas the economic powerhouses of city centers are almost always very renter-heavy.
One possible consequence of limiting the market is that it could lower the price of buying real estate. Hopefully, that should make it accessible to younger buyers.
the objective of the tax would not be to eliminate the unemployed, but rather to put them to work
> The key problem is the rich buying property for literal rent-seeking to become even richer.

This key problem is in no way solved by the political proposal, as "the rich" can move to buy older real estate instead.

> This drives prices up for homes in the city to a point that only if you are in a relationship and over 30 you might be able to buy your first 'home'.

The reason that prices are going up is because a lot of people want to spend a lot of money for the real estate, so in the end you must take a moral stand regarding who owns the right to live and/or own real estate in the city, and what this right is based on. Long term consistency is key here, because short lived stabs at the market like this one will not make any difference apart from creating volatility.

As soon as you create economical impediments to achieve your "moral", or "political" goals, you must ask yourself questions almost like a penetration tester: how would I exploit this law if I wanted to stand to gain from it economically? There's almost always a way, and unless you take this into account before creating the law, you're just making the problem worse, and more complicated (normally the same thing).

> the fun part of government is that you can learn, change and adapt

Government shouldn't be having fun with laws. They should be enacting laws that are thoroughly studied, where the possible outcomes are weighed against eachother to minimize risk and maximize the odds of success. Of course you always need to evaluate and adapt, but this proposal is sloppy to say the least, perhaps even malicious.
Thank you for setting the record straight!
There's no unlimited supply of land. And there's a limited distance that citizens can travel before that impacts their lifestyle or behavior.

Also, if you wanted to build higher buildings to accommodate more people in the same space, good luck doing that in a city center, because there's no space for such thing.
€302.000 is the average home price here? Hah! You can buy huge homes for that price just outside the Amsterdam Area (like I did).
Alas, history tells us that the people with "rational" opinions are no better to rule than the ones with "irrational" ones. At least not in the long run.

As a fellow EU-citizen I am absolutely horrified by the chaos currently unfolding in the UK, but dismissing the entire voting process while referring to "democracy yada yada" is far scarier than the outcome of a democratic election will ever be.
Yes, nasty renters don’t deserve access to new houses.
Yes, it’s all your fault
I think it can work fine so long as there are sufficient protections for renters. Rent control, long term contracts etc. I understand that this is the case in Germany.

Unfortunately this works by making property less attractive to investors, who are the people with a large amount of capital, who typically are those people who have influence over the political classes...
Used v3 a few years ago at Linode and it was ok, if overly complex. The API changes resulting in v4 were so great that it basically became an entirely new project -- and the v4 docs are _still_ incomplete/not very helpful. Faced with learning a new project anyway I went with router5 at Capsule8.

Not only is router5's API simple, well-documented and easily programmable, the router5 folks have been receptive to feedback and pull requests. They also keep fairly well up-to-date compared to react-router (router5 supports React hooks, react-router doesn't yet).

I'm content with the direction and design of router5 and encourage others to check it out.
By that logic if every individual in the 16,141,241 signed the petition it would suddenly make it 32,282,482 vs 17,410,742?

I'm not trying to downplay the significance of the petition or its size, but I don't believe math works that way.
Cord cutters now experiencing video subscription fatigue
Petition to Leave the EU without a deal in March 2019.[1] Currently has 371,000 votes. Seems like its overwhelming Brexit opinion, rather than overwhelming brexit rejection

[1] https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/229963
https://www.zimpler.com/ is pure clojure, with some haskell I think
Tipping is an anachronism from slavery and should be banned.

I think tipping is a sham that businesses use to keep labor costs down at the expense of the worker. Banning it is the only way we're going to get rid of it, and force restaurants and other businesses to pay a fair wage.

As for what that fair wage is, I don't know, because that depends really on the area; i.e. $10/hr is great for Elizabethtown Kentucky but would be poverty for San Diego.

Tipping is the issue here, not minimum wage, and that's what we should really be targeting.
These shenanigans provide a real economic benefit to companies at the risk of long-term damage to an established market. High yield and distressed CDS is more or less a joke right now because of this stuff and the only thing restricting this from higher quality names is no one is big enough to play games at that scale. Without a credible market, the "financing opportunities" for companies will disappear.

In an already inefficient market, it's also very hard to price the possibility/structure of these games as it's not like the company can publicly shop around deals for this. In the case of the HOV deal, issuing new bonds to game CDS deliverables was unprecedented and IMO just total nonsense.
There's a reason why the second amendment comes right after freedom of speech. If the government doesn't uphold your rights as citizens, the citizens have the authority to hold their ground. Imagine Venezuela, but the citizens having guns. The government couldn't do what they're doing over there if the citizens had guns.
Does GHIDRA actually do something that radare2 doesn't?

I'm asking seriously. To me, it seems like it deals with a subset of radare2 features only, and is slow + uses a shitload of ram, when it doesn't outright crash/100%cpu on a problem binary.

As for reusing code as r2 plugins components, I've heard about some efforts around r2's irc channel.
Are there any occurrences of such a price control doing anything but worse unintended consequences?
But that's my question, what's a "realistic consensus"?

It's really the prime minister's job to build this based on working cross-party, but an obvious example might be a relatively close Norway-style relationship, which would be much more likely to receive opposition support.

I don't think anything better than the current deal is even possible

This is again just absolutely false.
It depends if current tenant/investors are impacted or not. If they aren't, the supply of rentable houses won't change, or at least not decrease.
A Robot Leg Learned to Walk by Itself Without Programming in Scarily Short Time
> Isn't that exactly what the shooter wanted?

The shooter left a long manifesto. It contained quite a bit about white nationalism, but you’re the first person to suggest that it was secretly about gun control.
This is pretty cool. Wonder what his techniques are: How does he get the paper fitted and molded the way he wants?
We have something similar here in Singapore. You cannot rent or sell a new HDB for 5 years. And you cannot rent to non-citizen / non-pr till it’s 10 years old. I would say it works but that’s only because the market is entirely different here.
1. Outlaw guns in New Zealand

2. Outlaw guns in the US

3. Race War 2020

4. ????

5. Profit

Pretty much the TLDR of this guy's manifesto.
Have you tried that? If so you can make a fortune suing these callers under the current law
I eat wagyu fairly often (I live in Japan and like to buy local). Of course it's Shizuoka wagyu since that's where I live, but as others have said the difference between various regions are not that great (I go to Takayama fairly frequently and eat Hida gyu, which is rated as highly as Kobe gyu these days and it's not that much better than Shizuoka yume wagyu).

IMHO eating wagyu as a steak is a waste for essentially the reason you state. The fat softens at that temperature and because there is so much of it, the texture suffers. I'll take a long aged, lower fat, dry cured cut over that any day of the week. Where wagyu really shines is yakiniku. When it is cut thin, the fat has somewhere to go and the flavour and texture are amazing. This is one of the reasons why if you buy wagyu steak at a teppen yaki place, they will typically cut it fairly thinly.

Wagyu is not actually that expensive in Japan. I mean it's expensive, but not the ludicrous prices that people pay overseas. IIRC 100g of Shizuoka bara (stomach -- think the same cut as bacon) is about $6. Sirloin is up around $16. That's still nearly $70 a pound, but if you aren't making a steak or a roast (for which it is really completely inappropriate) it's fine. When I do yakiniku at home with my wife, between the two of us we eat 300 grams of meat and that includes the pork (Shizuoka black pork is amazing).

I really like wagyu, but there are other traditions for preparing beef that are just as good (in a different way) and not as expensive.

Edit: I forgot to mention that I typically make a roast here using thigh meat (momo) and bard it with stomach. That is a fantastic combination and I can make a 1 lb roast for less than $20.
Andrew White at the GDS[0] wrote about "Scaling the Petitions service following the EU Referendum"[1] back in August 2016. I wonder if we'll have another write up after this petition?

[0] https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/government-digit...

[1] https://technology.blog.gov.uk/2016/08/16/scaling-the-petiti...
His plan can loosely be described as "shoot people in NZ --> NZ gun control --> US gun control --> 1776 Pt2 Electric Boogaloo --> White supremacist victory --> Europe follows suit."

Boogaloo in the US seems iffy because any gun control measures strong enough to touch it off would probably be a non-starter because if there's a civil war brewing (let alone a racially charged one) the people that make up the base of the party that usually pushes gun control would very much want to be armed. Boogaloo resulting in some sort of white supremacist victory is laughable. Europe copying either is just fantasy.

The fact that the NZ politicians are doing exactly what a terrorist asked for is what annoys me most here.
You don’t need to run multiple processes - Python already has shared memory threads (that’s what the article is about) - and these work just fine concurrently even with the global lock. The big lock stops you doing some things but not many.
>and 23 didn't get to vote because they were too young or aren't British citizens

Those are also not meant to vote, and rightly so. If you aren't a citizen (or aren't yet), you shouldn't decide of the country's matters. And if you're not an adult, you are considered not mature enough to have an opinion. That's part for the course in every democracy.

In a democracy, "X of the the country wants Y" = "X of people qualified to vote && who voted, want Y".

Even in the suffrage and civil rights era, nobody seriously complained that this doesn't include 10 year olds or non-citizens of a country.

>The problem is that only the views of the 24% that voted to leave, and arguably the 41% that voted leave or didn't vote, seem to matter.

That's not a problem, that's how democracy works. Want your opinion to matter? 1) Become an adult (e.g. just wait), 2) Become a citizen (if you're a foreigner) 3) DO vote (don't stay at home). Else the others who are will determine the result.

The real problem is the hypocrisy. In the sense that all of the above wouldn't be considered a problem if the majority had voted to remain.
If there's one thing that has brought remainers and leavers together, it's how badly May is handling the negotiations.
Are you arguing relatively while others argue absolutely?
It's perfectly revocable, until 11pm 29th March.

Opinion is divided as to whether it requires Parliament or if the Government can do it without further ado.
It's a petition for debate, only.

If the issue has already been debated recently, the Petitions Committee may decide not to put a petition forward –– and one might argue that this petition has already been debated in parliament.

This particular [petition] case is already active in the UK court, which means the petition does not meet the required standard to be considered.
And cronies in government making insulin cost $750 a year, or the Red Cross stealing half a billion in charitable donations to victims, are even more directly in conflict with life. So where is the outrage? And I barely hear a peep from the media about this. Do you wonder why that is?
The situation is more convoluted. You are partially correct. The key sentence is this:

" In the second place, the revocation of the notification of the intention to withdraw must, first, be submitted in writing to the European Council and, secondly, be unequivocal and unconditional, that is to say that the purpose of that revocation is to confirm the EU membership of the Member State concerned under terms that are unchanged as regards its status as a Member State, and that revocation brings the withdrawal procedure to an end."

This means that any withdrawal from Atricle 50 can only be proper if this is the true end of the procedure. Otherwise, it would not be "unconditional".
I've got a similar timeline as the OP, however in my case it wasn't fear that held my startup back initially, it was a reliance on 'old school' methodologies.

In my case, I built an app about 15 years ago that was purely Windows based, and it sold like hotcakes into the small/medium business market. I then thought I could do the same 3 years ago by writing it as a cloud based system that worked on the web, and sales were way off what the previous system sold for.

Reason? Because I was trying to sell it the 'old' way, and customers had moved on and were more informed now and had far more choices. It took me a while to re-learn how to do it the new way, and now sales are picking up at a steady clip.
I guess it depends on how you define "huge"
100 sq m isn't huge, yes?
> Sadly, that's not practically possible.

Why? With cpython there are plenty of cases where parallelism is possible with threads because the GIL is released (for instance most IO operations and many C based number crunching operations), making threads and locks useful.
> worst anti-democratic statements

Direct democracy isn't the only form of democracy.

We're all irrational and biased, that's inherent to being human. Some people are more informed than other and there are processes to mitigate biases (direct democracy isn't one of them).

The problem comes from people who have no business in the vote, no knowledge of the issues, are not even aware of what biases are, and drink the propaganda kool aid.

Brexit was mostly about:

- "we spend to much money on EU"

- "too many migrants"

Well first off London only strives because of international financial businesses, closing the borders and making it harder for people to migrate is a death sentence [0]. Since the vote Brexit cost the UK much more than what they contribute to the EU [1], they export/import ~50% of their good to/from Europe [2]

Time will tell, what I'm convinced of is that Brexit was sold on lies. It might turns out good for them, but if it does it won't be because of good planning and well thought decisions, it'll be a combination of luck and really good damage control.

[0] https://www.ft.com/content/371c63ba-4b08-11e9-8b7f-d49067e0f...

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46338585

[2] https://fullfact.org/europe/uk-eu-trade/
What happens if you need to sell it for some reason? Job relocation perhaps?