skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, because these fake transactions occur of-chain, in a database managed by the exchange.
AWS have services to back up your data. Anything that a human or automation can touch can be obliterated instantly. This includes your live, staging and disaster recovery sites.

Important data must be backed up where humans and automation can't remove it. A vaulting policy / data retention policy is also useful.
Wasn't part of it that before 9/11 a hijacker using the plane as a weapon or wanting to kill everyone wasn't the expected, and thus the assumed "best" route was to comply (as not to provoke the hijacker to start killing hostages to increase the pressure), go wherever they want and hope law enforcement will sort it out?

E.g. the cited Cuba hijackers didn't very often kill people. Some of them might have given up when unable to get to flight crew, but others might have used more force to get what they wanted.
There are so many women I know that are cognitively over-qualified for the jobs they are in, and kind of stuck because of finances. I am sending this to all of them.
>But he did actually do the boots on the ground research, not just copy other stories:

He tried to. And when that didn't turn up anything, he decided to go on ahead anyway with no evidence of his own.
Not bitcoin but forcing a proof-of-work scheme has been proposed as an anti-DoS measure before: http://www.csc.kth.se/utbildning/kth/kurser/DD143X/dkand12/G...
So this is a Karen:

"44. mother of three. blonde. owns a volvo. annoying as hell. wears acrylics 24/7. currently at your workplace speaking to your manager."

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=karen

I used "enterprise Karen" as a corporate personification of "Karen".
The gender equality paradox is the observation that offering men and women more freedom increases the degree to which they self-select. In other words, offering people more freedom of choice increases the under-representation.

The alternative - shaming women who do not go into tech - is unpalatable to most.
Over 35% of my company's tech hires we're women in Q1, as compared to an industry representation of 20%. 39% of new grad hires we're women when tech grads were about 20% women. When women join the company they received additional mentorship and leadership opportunities that are exclusive to women. They are also promoted at higher rates than men (albeit slightly). This is in addition to the explicitly discriminatory hiring policies I detailed elsewhere in this thread.

What about this situation makes you think that white and Asian men are privileged as compared to women?

The assumption that women are underprivileged in tech often does not hold up to scrutiny. Many studies have found significant bias in favor of women. When Google studies it's wages recently it found proportionally more men were underpaid.

Again in case you missed it, my company does explicitly deny employment opportunities to white and Asian men where they would have been hired were they women: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19464944

Barriers are going up. Perhaps at the moment this is limited to certain places like San Francisco and silicon valley. But to say barriers aren't going up for white and Asian men is counterfactual.

And besides, I'm Cuban myself so I ostensibly belong to an "underprivileged" group (though I would be among the first to tell you that this is a BS generalization. I am not by any means underprivileged).
Source? Hah. My life.

I lived most of it in the high-rises, and not slums at all. "Respectable neighbourhoods".

I'm not talking about slums.

I pity the people who choose to live in those anthills.

I hate people who advocate to force other people to live in those.

I'm talking about overcrowding. Not enough private space, not enough public space, not enough transport. And it's a death trap if something goes just slightly wrong with the infrastructure. Have you witnessed shit fountains out of you r toilet? I did. Have you seen what a gas explosion does to those? A section or three just collapses, top to bottom, and everyone there is dead. What if water mains gets cut off because the electricity cut off and so there are no lifts? What if it's 15F outsite and the heaters die?

This is no way to live.
I recently did lots of traveling as well, and this attitude just boggles my mind. I got lucky on my day at the Louvre because they cleared out the whole place because a fire alarm got pulled. So I started as far from the Mona Lisa as possible, and slowly worked my way toward it. Far away from it was still amazing art, but the closer I got to the Mona Lisa, the more people I saw with their phones out snapping pictures of things that hundreds of other people were snapping pictures of. I amused myself for at least an hour taking pictures of people taking pictures of pictures. To me, the point is to stand in front of things (art, nature, architecture, etc.) and allow yourself to be awe-struck. If you want to look at it on your phone, there's no reason to use your camera to do it.
Everything has "visibility: hidden !important;" set on it, for some reason, and it's only unhidden when Javascript runs.
We'll Be in Orlando for Learning Solutions 2019
Spark column methods-part-02
Oracle is huge, and the different parts feel like completely different companies in some ways, with different cultures, paces, levels of cooperation, etc. The parts that used be Sun (where I worked) still felt very Sun-y for a decade afterward. I loved my job, never had a bad working relationship in all my experience with 0.1% of the company.
“KEFT Join” Works the Same as “Left Join” in MySQL 5.7.19
Just found out "KEFT JOIN" works the same as "LEFT JOIN" in MySQL 5.7.19 and I just noticed it saved me a 3AM call out last night

Anyone else have incidents where bugs actually helped?
> A universal truth in the social network space.

In all of advertising. Non-US users remain extremely hard to monetize across the board.
Could you elaborate on some? Things that come to mind include generics, annotations, best in class IDEs, high performance concurrency structures, selectable GCs, heap analyzers, profilers, hot swapping, more expressive language, and a large library ecosystem.
HN community, obviously, skews young, urban, and often "progressive". Quite the demographic that may not (right now!) be interested in car ownership. When I lived in Chicago, it was quite possible to live w/o a car (I still had one, because, hell, it's convenient). If you're an overpaid hipster in the SF bubble, you can absolutely do without a car, riding over little old ladies and baby strollers in a Bird or Lime scooter, and having some poor gig economy Joe Schmoe lug groceries and packages for you. And that it does not actually work for the rest of the world... well, they try not to set foot there, so why would they care.

As for people who point at China, or some European country with lower car ownership, sure, you CAN do without. And 200 years ago people did without electricity and (gasp!) computers, too. But not many people want to go back there.
Pluralsight Is Hiring an Architect
>If they give Purdue grant money to do the research and this process results, then they make it both free to implement and required, then the result is a "reward" where there is less polluted water out there, everywhere.

This is pure fantasy. Grant money is scarce and drying up everywhere. Not two weeks ago, this administration put a $1 billion dollar cut to the National Science Foundation[1] on the table.

Because they are pursuing a patent on this process, revenue generated by the licensure of this product will flow to the institutions supporting that research. Companies can then be incentivized to pursue licensure.

The scientist that discovered insulin, Sir Frederick Banting, forfeited his right to profit from the patenting of his discovery[2], and yet we have companies to this day restricting supply to wring hundreds of dollars per dose out of patients that depend on the drug. The patent isn't the problem.

> As a thought exercise, compare how much you have benefited from the gcc tools suite being "free and unpatented" versus having it cost you every time you used it.

You present a false dichotomy: that GCC tools be free/unpatented vs having them cost every person on every usage. Just yesterday we saw posts on HN describing the struggle of open source community sustainability and undue burdens on maintainers of free software.

When multi-billion dollar corporations depend on free and open source software, they should be made to contribute in some way.

1. https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/433507-trump-pro...

2. http://www.cdnmedhall.org/inductees/sir-frederick-banting
As a passenger, if these were the trade-offs Boeing made, my stomach just dropped. I don’t consider myself naive as to which trade offs corporations might consider fair game to increase profits, but if,,, changing engine placement in spite of impact to stability and such.... can anyone else talk to this. I’m actually bothered by this. This sounds like dangerous engineering.
Hmm...do you have evidence for that?

Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_medicine#History seems to say quite the opposite.
A320.
I’m going to put a big fat Citation Needed on that one. I don’t see how it would have helped in the 1970s. The hijackers take over the rest of the plane and say they’re going to execute one passenger every hour unless the pilots take them to Cuba. Are we expecting the pilots to say, nope, we’re safe, execute whoever you want?

9/11 was a game changer becasue it was a completely new kind of hijacking where the hijackers have no demands and everybody dies quickly if the hijacking goes according to plan. Reinforced doors are useful there, becasue threats to the passengers don’t hold weight when you know they’ll all die anyway if you open the door. That was very much not the case in the 70s.
Shouting "gender equality paradox!" doesn't warrant a mic drop. Aside from particular policies in Scandinavian countries that might actually limit women's options[1], the underlying issue is we don't know what a "natural" allocation by gender in STEM might look like. It's not like we can eliminate all societal/cultural barriers in a given population and run an experiment over time to observe how many women self select into STEM in some context free state of nature.

And so, while we might hypothesize that a "natural/biologically driven" allocation be uneven (and I'm willing to grant), we have no idea by how much. Perhaps it's really 95/5, or who knows, perhaps it's 60/40.

The argument that where we're at now is where we should be (and thus why we shouldn't try to eliminate various obstacles to entry) is really just a form of status quo bias. It's the same argument that's been used over the years to justify why women couldn't go to college, be lawyers, etc... etc...

[1] https://capx.co/what-jordan-peterson-gets-wrong-about-the-no...
Where are you getting this 50% from? Also, you're ignoring that there is more price risk in long bonds even if you can sell them, so there should anyway be a term premium (upward-sloping curve) even if the expected interest rate over five years is constant.
Duh... Any exchange can pretend it's a large reputable player by showing fake volume, it has nothing to do with blockchains.

Further, any with a substantial amount of bitcoin, e.g. $1m, who might gain from their assets having a reputation as a means to transfer money, can create $1b in daily volume at the cost of $1 per year on the blockchain, fully automated.

The expectation that nobody on the planet will do this is obviously zero. So you naturally get fake volume. I'd be surprised if it wasn't >90%.
For most small deployments you are far better off using Ansible playbooks or similar solutions. Declarative orchestration management seems, for most relatively small and medium-sized deployments, a black box with an obscenely high learning curve which isn't justified if your deployment and scaling needs fall within the vast majority of use cases.
If airlines could fill up the seats I’m sure they’d fly more wide bodies. Unfortunately people want direct flights between all kinds of small metro areas. As such even routes like SF to DC only get widebodies at peak travel times like Thanksgiving and July 4th (at least those are the only times I’m able to book the United 777s for demostic flights).
:clap: This looks great! I'm very excited that ethical ads are becoming more and more common. It looks like this recently launched.

I am the founder of https://CodeFund.app. We are an ethical ad platform that is focused on funding open bloggers, builders and maintainers. We also do not do any tracking of users nor allow 3rd party scripts.

I'd love to connect sometime and see if there's anything we can do to help. We also have a small group that meets each month to discuss ethical ads.
>If the industry is systematically unfavorable to women

It's not. The CS graduation ratio is just as bad.
Keynotes Announced for CurryOn 2019
Curry On 2019 Keynote speakers now available: Lars Bak (Google, Dart), Cynthia Solomon (Logo),
Ashley Williams (Cloudflare, Rust/WebAssembly), and Simon Marlow (Facebook, Haskell).

CFP open: http://curry-on.org/2019.

Curry On is a conference focused on the intersection of emerging languages and emerging challenges in industry (e.g. big data or security), as well as new ideas and paradigms in software development.

Curry On also seeks to act as a conduit for ferrying understanding and ideas back and forth between industry and academic programming languages, software engineering, and systems research communities (amongst others). Curry On is a rare event where academic minds responsible for concepts and tools now invaluable to everyday software development – like functional programming, or generics in Java – collide with the movers and shakers in industry that are building next-generation systems and developing software engineering practices central to our entire industry.

Curry On will be held in a different European city year-to-year, and it will always be co-located with one of the top academic conferences in programming languages. This year, it's co-located with ECOOP.
>Statistically that should be the case 50% of the time.

Only if the risk premium is the same.

>Treasure bonds are liquid, so buying a 5 year one does not mean that you have to hold it to maturity.

Here you claim that the risk premium is the same because it's liquid. However the term is not the same so you'll be hit with a bigger effect when short term interest rates change on a longer time horizon instrument.
Conceivably this could be leveraged to allow docker for mac to only push deltas to the build virtual machine when running docker build, correct?

Currently docker build compressed everything in the working directory on every build. This is fine for building images for deploy/upload but is annoying for a local dev situation where you're frequently rebuilding.

Seems like it wouldn't be too hard to write an alternate docker build that checks a previously built "Stargz" and just sends the additional files? (There would be some complexity here reassembling a valid tar within hyperkit).

I might be missing something here, it might be misplacing the bottleneck during build, but every time I'm annoying by this problem it seems part of the issue is the single fat tar that needs to be created every time.

edit: this strategy could also work with docker-machine building on remote machines
Following your reasoning, we should just create and feed oligopolies to avoid, god help us, becoming "victims" of oligopolies from other countries... In other words, lets kill the competitiveness of the local economy, so that other countries won't be able to do just that. This is similar to the soldier who decides to commit suicide so that the foreign army won't have the chance to do so!
I don't want to argue over the word choice, I said you implied it. Regardless, what I was trying to imply in response was that it would be unfortunate if despairing over deregulation's current state led to the belief that "tough on crime" approaches are a better alternative.
A company is and should have reflections of certain cultureal standards, such as not doing this kind of business with the chineese, when you are Google. It's bad management and a lacks morale.

I see companies as people, for sure. Without people and types of people, companies wouldn't act a certain way.
> This person also had a similarly aged daughter and he was doing none of this for her.

Anecdotal, but me and my dad tried so, so hard to get my sister into computers back in the 80s and 90s. Even just to use them, let alone program them. She had no interest. Absolutely zero.

She also had no interest in Legos, or Dungeons & Dragons, or video games, even though I tried to get her into them just so I could have another person to do these things with.

Ironically, she's now a successful project manager in her employer's IT department, managing software development projects.
Oh I was thinking home network or some small business. I'm not yet used to this cloud thing, still hosting my email and website at home. For a network that is not yours, like at a VPS provider, I would totally not try this. They would not be amused.
I've actually done this! It worked out mostly well, though it's a perk reserved for us people at or over 25 years old :)
You can always tie it to the organization who is running it, by the simple fact of looking at the IP address that is "acting slow".

Years ago when I was playing network admin for a company, I set up a tarpit system which ran for a few years. In that time we never encountered one pissed off person in person (or on the Internet).
Direct flights and flights more often. There’s more than enough DC-SF traffic to fill a couple of 777s a day, but people would rather have six 737s or A320s with a wider variety of departure times to choose from.
ELI5 - are there any prevailing theories as to why this is?
I can recommend setting up a server and do extensive logging. Then watch hackers as they attempt to break in. I had a server hacked last week and today i read the logs to figure out how they did. From first discovery, trying to figure out what system they're on, to gaining a shell, and figure out how to execute stuff, gaining network access. It was better then watching an actual movie. And a humbling experience. But also entertaining, watching the struggle against my hardening and even stumbled on a bug, feeling his/her frustration. And the wow feeling when they finally got a shell.
When people talk past each other what we get is two sides with genuine concerns feeling that the other side ignores it, thus painting the other in the worst possible interpretation possible.

You want "the other side" to acknowledge the barriers existed in our industry, and yet do not want to acknowledge that reverse discrimination directly hurt people. Being rejected for the identity you are born with hurt on a very personal and primal way.

Then we have cases like my own perspective. I have seen this kind of gender initiative for about 30 years now here in Sweden. Gender segregation in this industry has in the 30 last year gotten worse. I know for example a woman who took a "women only programming course" in the 90s, and she is now the single person left still in the programming profession out of every single person that graduated (she got a job before she graduated but that might be beyond the point). Study after study report the same where if a person belong to the minority gender in the work place, the risk that they will switch work place to one where they are majority is significant every single year. If I recall right it actually increase for each year, in particular after they graduate. Regardless if Men or women are the minority in the study, the result is similar.

The only effective measure I have seen to prevent this pattern is mentorship programs. I have not ready any in-depth explanation why they tend to work, through I strongly suspect it addresses some of the core issues behind gender segregation. An observation I made is that you can offer mentorship to both majority and minority segments of a group and the minority will more likely join and participate, which still focus the effort on the minority but does not exclude if any individuals in the majority have a similar need for the service. Obviously not everyone of that identify as belonging to the majority is identical and individuals have different needs.
I don't understand why you say this and where the claim about "upholding an idealised social hierarchy" comes from.

Is doctors' work beneficial to the community? Is teachers'? Firefighters'? Nurses'? If it is, what is the purpose of assuming some other reason that this work is appreciated?
Unfortunately, what you want is completely incompatible with the price you're willing to pay for an airline ticket... and likely the amount of time you wish to spend traveling (hub-and-spoke model takes a lot longer than direct flights, due to layovers, boarding and deplaning, etc, and offers fewer departure/arrival times).

Also, a modern 737 can be very comfortable - it depends on the interior layout and choices the Airline (not Boeing) made when leasing the aircraft. Airlines are responsible for the interiors...
As stated, "you should adopt another strategy to win the hearts of C++ devs".

Repeating ad infinitum in every HN thread about C++ improvements regarding safety, that the only path to enlightenment is rewriting the world from scratch, without any regard for the loss of productivity, tooling and libraries in doing so, always hand waving them as minor inconveniences, is trying to catch flies with vinegar, but I guess I am wasting my Latin as we say back home.
Did you mean RediSQL.com? Or is that someone else?
I find it very easy to imagine. So if women on-average would be more successful with "Learning Method X in Context Y" what's stopping someone from simply creating a school or company which facilitates people learning from that method? We wouldn't have to resort to "we're giving women $9000 to help them learn to code".
Why hold onto addresses you're not using? This is against the allocation requirements and lead to the IPv4 exhaustion we have now.
That's always been my understanding of it. Hijackings were common in Europe for example and that's how it almost always went down. (Not too familiar with the history of hijackings in USA, but sounds the same.) Then we saw the change right on 9/11 when passengers on UA93 learned their hijackers intended fate and fought back.
TOTP solves this issue. Even with a new number or loss of control with your service's password, if you have the TOTP app on your phone or watch you can effectively control access.
Got a source on that? Keen to read up on it.
Neat. What's the deal with the Blue Dot? Seems to indicate that somebody authored that palette. Why are some authored and others algorithmic?
They haven't spent all of that $146: "Much of the primary capital that we have raised in recent years remains on our balance sheet" in fact it looks like they actually have more cash on hand than they raised (due to pre-pays for contracts, even if they can't recognize it).

Profitable + Net dollar expansion of 140% + Growing 118% YoY at over 100MM in revenue + 4%-ish penetration in the F500 so there's room to grow, this is an amazing set of numbers.
because printing out some recovery keys is so much hassle, or god forbid you have multiple 2fa methods like two keys and a TOTP authenticator app.
The curse of being profitable. Everyone always laments how "little profit" is made, whereas wildly unprofitable companies are seen as big opportunities (e.g. Lyft).
If you already know how the declarative management system works (and if there are other people out in the world that also know it, as is the case for Kubernetes), it seems like that is just creating yourself a less-reliable tarpit for no real reason, especially if you have to learn Ansible to do it.