skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Unfortunately doctors have to do this because the common legal interpretation of HIPAA and HITECH Act is that they have to.

Dates of service for a patient are protected health information. Most covered entities and business associates won't risk sending any PHI using methods that are not covered under the safe harbor provisions of the HITECH act. So... endless proliferation of "secure email" systems instead of using email. (And I don't see S/MIME taking off anytime soon as an alternative, even though that would be sufficient to qualify for safe harbor.)
Flourescent lights need much higher frequency. They're typically >= 22 kHz.
Title is very misleading as it implies he was competing against adults. "8 year old refugee better than any other 8 year old" is a far less interesting story than the implied chess prodigy.
I think a big part of this is consent. My kids know I post their photo on Facebook/Instagram. They pick which one, and even tell me to "like" it after it's posted.

It brings up the question of how old they need to be (my kid was about 3-4 when she started telling us to put up her photos). But I guess we can always remove it later, and just don't put anything embarrassing up there.
> Baby carrots are not, in fact, small carrots

The ones I've gotten that still have the tops on them, and the outer skin, absolutely are; IME, what you are referring to are generally sold as “baby-cut” or “petit” carrots, rather than “baby" carrots.
I thought everyone knew this. Alton Brown talked about it on Good Eats years ago.
And yet, what we are doing is still the best thing; as opposed to broadcasting his name, reinforcing the legitimacy of martyrdom by committing heinous acts just to be remembered, and thus having the public swallow some sob story about Howe he wasn't breastfed as a baby, my country focuses on unity, peace, understanding, fraternity, and doing each other a good turn whilst minimising the potential for a bloody massacre, our first in decades, from happening again.

Yeah, bloody terrible response.
naw. just a giant nationstate trying to control its own resources. theres nothing good about it. at best you could argue its neutral. Personally i see this as nothing more than the occasional revenue dipping. Big companies have to take it because of the market and the eu knows this. anytime theyre short on funds theyll fine facebook or google.
That's rendered on an AMD Vega card, RTX is Nvidia's Raytracing tech.

https://www.cryengine.com/news/crytek-releases-neon-noir-a-r...
Ways to Unlock the Web
My hesitation about the MBA was I believe it's limited on how many monitors you can run but tbh I haven't looked at them in a few years. I deal with a lot of container work so I need 32gb ram so it's not really an option. Also I think throwing a dock in the mix gets around that problem anyway since the expensive ($200+) docks I'm talking about typically handle video on their own somehow.

So, basically I'm spitballing and have no real answers to your questions, sorry. Just wanted to reply and tell you I'm probably wrong about there being MBA + dock issues.
The fact that there's so much of it and the sources are indirect and imprecise. All motion capture with actors is from the surface of their body and then you have to reverse-engineering all that data into skeletal and facial muscle positions.[1] The techniques are very cool but not perfect and there is error at every step of the process.[2] So then you still need tools and people go back through the data to clean it up / smooth it out... and even then, it's still not going to be perfect.

[1] For some strange reason surgical procedures to implant hundreds of hyper-accurate mo-cap sensors in the actors or otherwise hack into their nervous system hasn't become a thing. ;-)

[2] Camera lenses aren't perfect, dot placement (for marker based systems) isn't exact, tracking software slips since the markers aren't infinitely small and can move around a bit etc.
No, it does not. While I agree that testing patches on users with no testing beforehand is horrible, 1) I doubt Tesla does this, and 2) the person died before they fixed it, which GP seemed to be confused about.
You're definitely not expected to eat the ginger along with the nigiri (sometimes menus will point this out) but, I mean, if you like the way it tastes, go for it. :)

The only thing I think we have to agree on is that people who mix wasabi in with their soy sauce are evil.
Well, to be frank, what I really meant was "do you think the lack of HTTPS was intentional so nefarious actors could be passively identified."

But, I didn't want to pose an allegation like that with so few facts.
Basically every generation of phones' regressions are based on looking at what Apple manages to get away with, and copying it. Even if I would never buy their junk myself (or encourage anyone else to), it's basically impossible to get away from their aftershocks.

Unremovable batteries? Apple got away with it from the start. Hell, they even managed to get people to pay ridiculous markups to replace them after it was discovered that they tampered with device performance.

Unremovable storage? Just look at what Apple manages to charge for storage upgrades!

Dropping the headphone jack? iPhone 7 got away with it, and drove the sale of plenty of adapters.

USB-C? Well, if Apple could get people to buy new Lightning devices and chargers...

These are standard "features" now. Every phone has this now. There are no other options for me to "vote for" with my wallet anymore, even though I always did when the I had the option to. There is no way for me, as a single consumer, to get away from this bullshit.

Fashion doesn't spring up from thin air. It's crafted by people. With agendas. And accessories to sell.

Hell, nobody seemed happy about any of these changes when they were introduced. But the manufacturers had the pockets to outlast the outrage. And eventually, fashion changed.

And, just maybe, ask why on earth a whole industry exists around fake pockets, and what accessories they exist to sell.
Yes, but that's just some humans being uneducated about how the human brain works. It doesn't really say anything about the existence of free will. In fact, the reason untrained humans are bad random number generators has little to do with the abilities of the human brain and more to do with how random distributions work.

Untrained people just don't know, for example, that long streaks of heads and tails are actually quite likely in a sequence of random coin tosses. If they did know the likelihood, and they were tasked with writing down a sequence of random coin tosses, they would probably do a much better job.

If you take this to the limit, a human could learn to compute a pseudorandom generator in their head (at least in theory, although it may be very slow going) or perhaps figure out an effective way to gather entropy from the environment and turn it into a truly random sequence.
Tesla skirts morality.

The feature is called 'Full self driving'. Their sales reps regularly told customers to take their hands off the steering wheel of their "Autopilot". Sure, the fine print says "always pay attention", but there's an entire marketing scheme going on here which is borderline dishonest.
More Than One Reality Exists (In Quantum Physics)
Hillsong United – Whole Heart (Hold Me Now)
That's pretty much my line of thought. If I decide to bicycle somewhere, I'm certainly not consciously thinking through most of the act of actually cycling, but I have no doubt that the "uuugh, this is going to suck but I need the exercise" decision happened on a conscious level.
'Facebook Isn’t Going After Bitcoin. It’s Going After the Dollar'
It also doesnt help if papers are submitted to journals and reviewed by peers who also have an inadequate understanding of statistics.

Change needs to start at the top, otherwise the reviewers will not understand what they are reviewing, as silly as that sounds.
If anything, getting rid of some term because we currently find it insufficient to convey what we mean by it will, in all likelyhood, open the race for far more confusing, rosy and well-meaning, yet more meaningless nomenclature.

By that measure, I find this entire idea rather idiotic.
It's funny how the language you primarily work with changes your perspective.

JavaScript supports "object spreading", which lets you do this:

let foo = { x: 1, y: 2 };
...
let { x, y } = foo;
console.log(x + y); // 3

A common pattern is to use this as a stand-in for named/unordered function arguments:

function bar({ x, y }) {
return x + y;
}

bar({ x: 3, y: 4 });

// or...
let foo = { x: 1, y: 2 };
bar(foo);

Which is pretty much exactly the "epiphany" at the bottom (the interchangeability of these two). I don't mean to diminish the author's thought process; I just think it's fascinating how different programming languages (even ones so similar in syntax) dramatically shape the way one thinks about a given problem.
F# - Jet.com
Same here. I've been reading about this since the early 90s, at least

Also, if it's a mildly expensive steak in your local Japanese restaurant, it's neither Kobe nor Wagyu, as people have been pointing out since the 80s.

Maybe we should have a Hacker Olds for stuff like this and the random Wikipedia articles.
Freedom of speech applies to not being oppressed for saying something in contradiction with the values of the current government. In no way does New Zealand's concept of freedom of speech, nor any other country's, give carte blanche to any message, there are always parameters. These parameters are defined by each country to assure the well-being and peace assured to its citizens and residents, so naturally hate speech isn't tolerated.
I hope that if theres a process problem it is quickly found and solved. The FAA has done a fantastic job with air safety. We can only hope that no such accidents occur in the future.
Never thought I'd get "the feels" watching a video about wasabi. But I really salute the initiative of making such a nicely done video to showcase a dying(?) local artisanal practice. I think young people would find a lot more interest in such professions if it was showcased like that!
> properly

What does this mean, really? This always strikes me as snobbery signaling. Perhaps it's traditional, but does that make it "proper?" Why do only some cuisines have such constraints on what is "proper" or "authentic?"
Neat but tapping a search result doesn't do anything on mobile
> That was also the first place where I had 'not possible to be any fresher' sushi - orders were placed at the fish tanks on the first floor, restaurant was upstairs.

While I won't question your description of the freshness, I would point out that that set up would also work as a hack to suggest freshness regardless of where the ingredients that actually go into your food are sourced.
There is only one system that doesn't abide by this law. That is the cosmos including the quantum cosmos. All at once all the complexity in the universe came into being. Basically its safe to say that "everything" disobeys this law.
Google's delivery, authentication, compromise-detection, PEP management, and content encryption policies and capabilities directly contributed to the success of this attack.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politically_exposed_person

https://old.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/7qya12/informa...
>You could say the same thing about vanilla, for which Cooks Illustrated was infamously not able to triangle-test a meaningful preference between artificial and real in a baked goods panel (IIRC, the Milk Bar cookbook went a step further and specified recipes that only worked with artificial vanilla). Sometimes, the artificial ("beer-grade") version is a legit advance.

True. (And TBH I prefer a decent beer to an equivalent tier of champagne) People get wrapped up in the status element of the luxury good and lose sight of the actual use/enjoyment function of the good itself. If we were more comfortable letting the cheap stuff sing in its own right instead of trying to imitate the expensive things we might open a lot of doors for new innovations.

Your point about truffle oil makes me think of all those 50s cookbooks doing all kinds of weird stuff with gelatin since gelatinizing stuff wasn’t some absurdly laborious and expensive process anymore. It seems like it took a while for people to realize that entombing all foods in gelatin just because you can is actually. . . Not very good. Haha
yeah I thought I might drop in and make a well reasoned point in good faith. the shower of down-votes shows me I shouldn't have bothered (:

HN is a bit of an echo chamber, unfortunately.
It's cool that they are making a more packaged product. For a more hackable setup the original Donkey Car setup is pretty good and available now:

http://www.donkeycar.com
Are there differences in speculative execution?
And how both Windows and Mac looted the corpse of the Alto, and MacOS X + iOS looted the corpse of NextSTEP, and Linux looted the corpse of Gnu, and Android and the iPhone looted the corpse of General Magic, and the WWW looted the corpse of Xanadu, and most modern programming languages are continuing to loot the corpse of Lisp.

Actually, it seems like a lot of very successful companies get started by taking a failed project that was too complex, throwing out everything that was difficult, re-doing the core of it in a short period of time, and then slowly bolting back on the features that were discarded in hacky, inelegant ways that nonetheless work. Makes me reconsider my own possibly-too-complex-for-its-own-good startup idea to see if there's a kernel of usefulness that can be more easily achieved.
Go gets the latest tag (if there are tags in the repo). You can force `go get` to check out a commit by branch or concrete hash with respectively @branchname or @commithash123. That's sometimes necessary when maintainers are lazy taggers.
I can understand the idea of starting from a simple spot, and iterating/evolving a system to more complexity.

But where does - or can - security fit into this?

That is, I've consistently found over my years developing, is that when making a "secure system" - ie, implementing some kind of permissions-based system on top of a login/password or other authorization scheme, for access controls and such...

...doing so after the fact (ie - bandaid-ing) - when the system has already become complex enough to "suddenly" need it - usually ends up being a very poor implementation with tons of holes. It also tends to be very grueling to implement, and lots of refactoring tends to be needed to accommodate the changes.

A similar kind of issue can also be found in the hardware world, specifically automated/robotic systems where you need to implement and think about certain safety measures, cutoffs, big-red-button-full-stop measures. Doing so after the fact can lead to missed edge cases or other issues that can make the system less robust and/or less safe - but only in retrospect after something fails to work from a safety perspective (and it is compounded by the fact that such a system will have both physical hardware and electronics coupled with software).

From that standpoint and personal experiences, I've always tried to stress for new projects that such parts of the system, if needed or thought to be possibly necessary in the future (which is pretty much almost guaranteed for all but the most simple examples) - that it should be designed and implemented "up front" - as the first part of the project. Get it in place and get it solidly built, to the best of your knowledge, then move on to the rest of the project built around that security/safety system(s).

However, such systems can tend to be or become extremely complex in their own right.

Am I wrong in this assessment? Should I not be advocating for such things for new designs? How do you balance this "law" with such needs? Stub all the things?
The Federal Courts Are Running an Online Scam
Coming from mostly Python/JS, I also found Go quite tedious. I don't have much experience with C, though.

I actually spent quite a bit of time trying out Go for a new project recently. While it's performance and deployment characteristics are highly attractive, I don't actually need that performance, yet, and it's more important that I am able to actually get things done quickly than spend 2-4x the time learning how to do it in a new language.

So, I'm sticking with Python, for now. I needed to be able to do things like test my application easily with mocks/stubbed data, and although I found plenty of information on how to do this in Go, it was obviously going to be a quite a bit of effort.

Another issue I found pretty frustrating was error-handling. So many functions return (result, error) pairs, and I found myself needing to check for error every-time I called a function. I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is - or even the "hack" to just do the minimal checking, if I'm in a rush to get something working. In Python, at least I can wrap the inside of an HTTP handler in "try/except", for example, and that will take care of any unhandled exceptions without breaking the entire server. In Go, I was not sure if unhandled errors would propagate and crash the server process, or what might happen. Obviously, I'm very new to Go, but this is just an example to demonstrate that adopting a new language comes with a lot of overhead.
I checked this out. FLW actually said (in the 30s) "a 10k house for 5K", which translates to a 200k house for 100k today.

source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4633622
yea but its fucking chicago. inner cities suck in the us.
Epic Games has 250M 'Fortnite' players and a lot of plans
Do you have anything to back this up? That seems like a pretty big claim to make unsubstantiated. If autopilot literally ignores staionary objects, you would see them crash much more often than they do.
Devonthink

For bookmarks, web archiving, RSS reader.

Everything that I need to collect and organize
So you set it to $1000. Now the parents are still late and also argue about the insane fine, so you get no money and end up staying later than you would have anyway arguing with the parents.

How about instead of a fine you give the kids to CPS. You go home on time, the late parents never come back, or if they do they're never late again, and you win.

I guess the point is that monetary punishments don't seem to work when companies can consider it as 'cost of doing business.' If we start taking away the company's hypothetical metaphorical children when they're late to pick them up then they have a reason to listen.
You may want to try my markdown based CLI definition tool:

https://github.com/mkdoc/mkcli

Generates help files, man pages, shell autocomplete for bash etc
I hear the real wasabi is not as strong as the fake one. I've never tasted it, nor the American type, but it's quite possible that it was even more fake. That doesn't mean the sushi is lower quality though; a lot of really good sushi spots use the horseradish wasabi.
There's no uninitialized memory. File-scoped variables are initialized to 0 in C.
Quantum Computing Academy
Then presumably those same people will look with discust at Moroccans still raising goats/cows/sheep/chickens and killing them for mundane mealtimes and for Sacrifice Day[1]. What will we as a global society do about such a divide in culture as far-reaching as this? Gay marriage requires basically no life-changes from the average person. Why would this not be far more divisive?

Attempting to impose control over where people get their food is the sort of thing that starts wars.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eid_al-Adha is the holiday
Not really a fan of this approach. I don't like the duality between the help text and the struct it gets bound to - much prefer the approach of generating the help text from a struct.

https://github.com/jessevdk/go-flags is my favourite option; it's lightweight but amazingly featureful, and I much prefer the declarative approach to a programmatic one like the standard library flags package
San Francisco officials propose ban on e-cigarette sales
Putting "US", "president", "$80M", and "scheme" in the title was definitely done on purpose. The title could have easily been phrased differently to make it clear that the president in question was the Haitian president but that wouldn't get as many clicks.
Vulnerability in golang.org/x/crypto/salsa20
>Budget-brand soy sauce might actually be "soy sauce powder" mixed with water, as opposed to something straightforwardly brewed.

Is this because brewed soy sauce isn't Halal?

ED: why the downvotes? That's a legitimate reason for why vinegar in most chip shops is actually "non-brewed condiment".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=642x2Y3Zla0
Flutter/Md2_tab_indicator
Great idea for an application. Very useful and love the design on this!
I mean N = 12 is incredibly small to make such a sweeping statement about all of humanity but further it implicitly accepts that 1. free will is demonstrable via the experiment, 2. the reaction wasn’t preempted by free thought leading to the decision, and otherwise, 3. you’re a bad philosophy teacher if you’re trying to prove philosophy with statistics, imo.
It's describable at the quantum level but appears at the macro level as well. Relativity is based on exactly this. reality is based on the position of the observer RELATIVE to the thing being measured. If a you measure a photon it says you are standing still. Yet when you measure a photon it is moving at the speed of light. Both realities are true relative to the observer.
Almost all the safety issues with actual meat are around the fact that, well, animals are involved. Contamination on slaughter, which is the big one, wouldn’t be an issue. It should be far easier to make this sort of process safer.

I doubt livestock farming will be banned, but if this works out well it may be economically unviable.
> But it's something I'd prefer to believe regardless and be wrong about.

This is fine so long as you are judicious about what actions follow from such beliefs. If it motivates you to seek opportunity and encouragement for all, that is wonderful. If it motivates others to run witch-hunts in against fairly meritocratic organisations whose makeup stubbornly refuses to conform to their beliefs, that is less than wonderful.
Hurricane Committee Retires Names Florence and Michael
> Your citation supports my argument

Part of, but part of it is refuted. Cats and other animals are genetically closer. Rats are preferred not for their genetic similarity, but for similar physiological responses and generic homogeneity.
I think that the authors of most papers in the biological sciences will at least consult with a statistician. My experience has been that many of these issues are simply hard to reason through and our conventional common statistical language doesn't work very well.

Couple this with the scientist going to the statistican basically saying "what can I claim with some kind of plausibility", rather than being indifferent to whether the result is interesting or groundbreaking or would make a good clickbait headline, and it's hard to figure out what's true.
AirPods have a lot of criticism? I would understand that if you made the same claim about iMac, Mac mini, iPad mini, i9 MacBook Pro or the stupid butterfly keyboards.

AirPods sold 36 million units and everyone and their grandma got it on Christmas. They have been sold at most holidays.

I personally think this is one of the best device Apple has created in a long time. It’s not for everyone but once you get used to it, you won’t go anywhere without them.
Broccoli.js – A modular JavaScript build tool for assembling your app assets
I thought it was the other way, all being effectively restrict, with the hazard removed by the borrow checker.

In any case, I want to be able to have both behaviors.
It's how basically the entire language is, they keep reinventing the wheel, only in a subpar way and market it as if it's some breakthrough, and people who don't know better drink the Koolaid. golang wouldn't have gone anywhere if it didn't have the Google name behind it. Did you even notice how verbose the testing code was in that post?