skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Twice as long! Have you found an existing bug report? Did you remove every difference in your testing except for the OS?
> We all have to do our part to extend safety nets to those in our spheres of influence

...or we can collect taxes and provide goods and services to those that need it the most, even when they are not lucky enough to be in the "sphere of influence" of somebody that is (a) well-off and (b) willing to share their wealth with them.
Polarisation is how Google, Facebook and Twitter manage to be popular platforms. It's nothing more than returning the results that you want are searching.

What these platforms need is transparency and a web of trust pretty much the same as distributed version control systems. Look at Linux and how the source is managed, it would be a good model for social media in combination with blockchain for engagement.
Some languages also use rhythm to distinguish words, such as Finnish or Japanese.

It could arguably be a factor in English as well, and the cause of such effects as the "sesame street F-bomb" where the odd rhythm led many people to hear something else that what was said.
I heard that it was renamed to KillerFS
Your comment is begging the question. The reason that Lisp “+” can accept a list of arbitrary length, rather than a pair, is that the underlying addition operator is associative.
All this leads to is less people going in for annual checkups and preventative health care which leads to people becoming catastrophically sick ($40k medical bills) vs. preventing that situation from happening at all if it can be prevented; or catching it early on so it can be mitigated.

It's been a long time since I've worked in retail where I had no employee provided healthcare but back then I'd only go to the doctor if my arm was falling off. Everything else was "this feels weird, I'll wait it out, hopefully it goes away because I don't have $150-200 for a checkup if it turns out to be nothing."

A simple example is dental care. Yearly checkups, cleanings, etc and actively working to prevent major issues leads to far less diseases (blood, etc). But when you don't have decent insurance knowing that you might go in and get told you've got a $400 cavity or need a $1500 root canal out of pocket dissuades a lot of people from even going in. Thankfully I have generally healthy teeth but I hadn't gone to a dentist since my teens (parents insurance) until a few years ago. And once you tell someone that you might be shocked by the number of people who come out of the woodwork to tell you they haven't gone either.

I generally thought I was incredibly healthy and invincible until 28 when out of the blue I got appendicitis, which was $35k. I still had my "only go if my arms falling off" mentality back then but eventually the pain was so unbearable that I drove myself to the ER as I knew something serious was going on. Thankfully I had insurance. That really taught me that there's a lot of things in my body that I have no control over regardless of how healthy and active I am and having a fall back plan to help when catastrophe happens is critical.
Ironically, I support single payer healthcare (or at least a dramatic restructuring that decouples pricing from employment) specifically because of individualism.

Right now, you need to work at a corporation to get collective bargaining for healthcare prices. This presents a huge disadvantage to people wanting to be contractors, self-employed artists, people wanting to start small businesses, people who only want to work every other year for whatever reason, etc.

Your options are limited because you need to be part of a corporate collective to get reasonable healthcare options.
No none of that overhead was needed. He was giving them free money. That's what this system is more akin too.
Why on earth wouldn't Dart count? It is AOT-compiled and meant to be run untrusted inside a Dart VM inside a web browser. That was the intention of the project even if it was cancelled and the VM deprecated. For more examples, see ActionScript on iOS, TFA itself or any of the myriad of projects trying ti AOT-compile JavaScript. For example https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S036176881701008X
Set Up HA PostgreSQL on Kubernetes
Well for a minor cut you went to a facility that has staff and equipment available 24x7 to deal with multiple concurrent heart attacks, strokes, major injury and trauma.

Next time wash it out, bandage it up and wait for cheaper treatment if you still need it.
3 hour of wait time is bearable but i'm really sorry that you had to spend $2 on that shitty Timmies coffee.
It’s what we collectively create, not bargain. There is nobody on the other side of society to “bargain” with.
Those prices are likely low because their "competition" is single payer.
"Doesn't everyone complain about how technical interviews only measure how well the candidate is prepared for technical interviews?"

Many do. I used to believe that was because they had never sat on the other side of the table and seen how many people were just trying to bluff their way through without the ability to do anything.

Now, I am much more bitterly cynical.
> For whatever reason, I rarely see the idea of anonymous cash cards discussed in these types of conversations.

Because it's really really hard to prevent forgery. Maybe impossible.
A doctor can charge you $300 for your yearly visit. If you’re healthy he comes in the room for about 5 minutes, asks you a question or two and looks in your ears and says “see you next year”.

They still charge you if you don’t show up and will even asses a fee if you don’t cancel with enough notice.
Perhaps this

> you need people, mostly to talk to, but also to depend on and to help in turn

was his point? I think it's a valuable thing to say.

In turn, I'd ask you to please try to be more charitable when reading other people's posts.
All of this is a side-effect of the uniquely American philosophy that says that if someone is making money they must be making a net positive contribution to society, because otherwise why would anyone buy their product? This approach overlooks externalities and rent-seeking. The net result is that we have a lot of people making money selling things to people that they want but makes them sick (soda, cigarettes, corn chips) and a lot of other people making money professing to make them less sick, and yet another group of people making money by professing to control the costs of the second group, and lot of other people making money lobbying politicians to keep the laws in place that maintains the status quo. So everyone's making money (except for the slackers who dare to get sick), so everything must be hunky dory. The American health care system is the broken-window theory writ large.
This is super awesome, and this is the kind of thing that makes me long for an early retirement where I can tweak how I live.
One of the seminal books that people read about object modeling “Domain Driven Design” by Eric Evans writes about “transaction scripts”. Not everything needs to be modeled.
30 may be out of range again, but your point is exactly right.

None of these color palette sites & service ever work for actual interface or brand design work. They encourage picking harmonic sets of 4-5 colors, which is only a secondary parameter when actually designing - you need contrast & workable combinations first and foremost, while you seldomly really want more than two different hues (unless you know what you're doing with them).

I consider offers like this a nice starting point, get an impression of different ranges. But even if I end up picking a set from there, I'll seldom be using all of the suggested colors in a set to build my palette.
This really isn't a good argument it just looks like one on the surface. In fact while computer science is a branch of math its pretty clear that most applied software development has substantial differences from theoretical math.

Further there is no reason to suppose that any group of humans act optimally in this area when they clearly act on the whole so illogically and sub optimally in every other area of human endeavor.

It asks respondents to prove the much more complex question of why different groups may prefer a particular notation instead of taking the much more simple and direct route of explaining why the poster prefers a particular notation.

In short its not a missile its chaff.
So what happens when in the next decade the best poets, illustrators, and architects are all AI (assuming there's double-blind competitions)? What happens when humans are finally able to take their inner 'Daemon' and puts it into the heart of the machine? In the near term, it means media producers will start harnessing this machine creativity in generating news articles, generating marketing plans and designs, and other product development. I once thought that the last remaining jobs for people in the robot revolution would be in creative fields... however, I'm quickly changing my mind about the pure power of ML to automate all of humanity's work and even creative outlets. Perhaps human art will no longer be a commodity (because markets will be saturated by AI gen art), but rather as a pure zen/tao act of self-expression for only oneself.
Does using Kafka help mitigate this? Or should it be producer-driven vector clock? I imagine the latter is the event-driven equivalent of a optimistic locking.
You are paying much more than anyone else[0]. I really doubt that's because of you being the 17th fattest country by BMI[1].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_hea...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_body_mass...
With healthcare you either have a true free market, as in no licenses, no patents, etc or you need the State to regulate it and provide it for everybody.
The US has the worst possible combination.
>Apple doesn’t charge developers for providing worldwide distribution across hundreds of app stores.

You have to pay every year to be in the appstore.
And 100% of iOS ones are. Why are they even allowed in the App Store?
I never asked for a book. This guy is making rhetorical questions equating donation to bribe. Sounds sophist to me and definitely deserving a challenge.
In my experience, the thing that's wrong about object-oriented programming is not the object-orientation itself, but the over-application of it.

Or the misapplication of it. If an app is really about dataflow, but programmers have tried to shoehorn in a pedantic OO model, one can often end up with lots of nouns with names that talk about How (exposing too much detail) and lots of code that serves to stick data in this cubby, with other code taking that data out, then sticking it into another cubby, ad nauseum. In that case, the relationships between the cubbyholes, the data, and the dataflow are only maintained through naming conventions, which can in turn be misapplied or neglected.

This makes following the dataflow into detective work to circumvent missed naming conventions, where it should really just be following implementers/senders/references in the standard way provided for by the language.

since a model is often looked at as a representation of real-world objects, a programmer thinking in OO is likely to stick every conceivable property and behavior around the imaginary object into the model code

This is where YAGNI comes into play. (You Ain't Gonna Need It) Never implement something unless you have empirical data to back up the need. If you implement according to imagination... well, the imagination of creative tech people is often practically unbounded. So just imagine how badly scaled the result could be.
Exploitation is neither natural or virtuous. It's like arguing that a rapist has no earthly reason to consider what's probably the best interests of the drunken student. It doesn't matter how misguided or caught off guard users may be, no company is entitled to use and/or abuse them, ToS or not. We cannot rationalize away ethics or morals, especially not for the sake of a goddamn profit margin.
Meaning? Privacy is a right, and rights are non-negotiable?
Science is as much predicated in faith as any religion. (Faith that people correctly report the "truth", etc.). The congregations of, let's say, Newtonian physics may be pretty skeptical, as they can examine claims by throwing a ball around, but most modern "hard" science takes place on scales too small or large for any person to observe. That takes a lot of faith in instrumentation and models.
No. That's the absolutely worse way of solving the problem.

1) I either want them to be overridden or not. The current .update can do both, you just put the dict you don't want to override as its argument

2) finding common keys is a different problem, which can be solved in a different way

So no, throwing an exception is just completely useless and won't make any of the common cases easier
Haha no worries. Enjoy your day.
Seems like it's more an argument and prefix notation vs infix.

z = Add(x,y) is just a form of prefix notation in my opinion. I would say that z = x + y feels better because that's how we are taught in school. But in English at least, it's reasonable to say the following:

Z is X plus Y.

To get Z, Add X and Y.

---

It's also an argument about inconsistent syntax. For example there is not a big gap in lisp for (+ a b) and (add a b). It's a bigger difference in python.

---

I find infix for math easier to read because it's how I learned it. But I also use lisp, and appreciate being able to say (+ x y) and (+ x y z a b c) where plus might be more accurately read as sum.

That and in college I used an RPN calculator, and going from postfix to prefix isn't as odd as infix to prefix.
I think the key point here that was left unmentioned is that the writer seems to be working from home. If I had to get ready to leave the home and commute every day, I think a lot of my morning time would be spent just getting ready and commuting. This is one of the chief reasons I prefer to work from home: the productivity gains one gets from having free time in the morning to work.

EDIT: I just noticed that the author does commute. Still, I'm not sure I'd be productive if I had to commute an hour each way every day.
Radio and tv are worthless for information on demand. The phone is still talking to other people.

I can now travel into a city I’ve never been to, find directions to and make reservations at a popular restaurant, follow it up with directions to a nice scenic spot, and finally find a last minute nice hotel to stay in all without ever interacting with another person.

None of that was possible with radio/tv.
Oh oops, there already exist bug trackers for a few decades :)

Take your favorite bug tracker and put its offline storage into a git submodule?? I imagine they are all better than GitHub issues which are literally just a forum of threads
OpenBSD doesn't support sendfile(2), which might account for performance issues in some cases, but certainly not twice as long.

Do you have a link to the bug report you undoubtedly filed when observing this?
Many people have.

Most of them were vendor specific and so sucked.

Others were too low-level and so were meaningless, or never had any buy-in from anyone. They sucked.

Finally, can you image the same crowd that complains about technical interviews responding to a bar exam? "I haven't ever had to write a binary tree in my 30-years of real-world experience! Why would I have to do it for your test?!" That would suck.
There are two major concerns in software, performance and legibility. These concerns are somewhat orthogonal but neither can be abandoned, and the challenge is balancing them. By contrast in bridge-building (etc.) the two main concerns (performance and aesthetics) have been largely separated by discipline, into engineering and architecture, the former a purely mechanical discipline, the latter almost entirely artistic.

The main result of Modernism has been the subservience of the latter to the former, and in general the almost wholescale abandonment of aesthetic concerns. This is starting to come apart a little bit as people realize that this separation is unhealthy, and maybe we shouldn't build brutal, ugly flyovers through our cities because they have measurable effects on happiness, and thus property values, etc. (i.e., aesthetic concerns have functional consequences).

Similarly I think many software "engineers" take a long time to realize that one of their main functions is writing code that others can read; this is an aesthetic, artistic discipline that I think many developers reject as outside their domain. This, too, is starting to come apart as we slowly figure out that code's maintainability is a key determinant of its long-term success - that is, aesthetic concerns have functional consequences.
I think it requires some mental gymnastics to say that you shouldn't be surprised that a term that etymologically means 'according to the direct and actual meaning of the words themselves' could be reappropriated to mean, in effect, the opposite - literally almost nothing, a blank hyperbole - taking more purpose in its effect on the rhythm of a sentence, than from any of its dictionary definitions.
in the specific case of strings, my preferred way to spell that in python is

f”{'foo'}{'bar'}”
Indeed, served unbearably hot so you don't notice the taste. Give me dunks any day over that.
I live in Newcastle, and this isn't the case anywhere around the North East.
Reminds me of how Winston Churchill, who liked a drink, worked around Prohibition-era rules while in the US: http://www.openculture.com/2016/05/winston-churchill-gets-a-...
I’m an American and I sure as hell don’t refer to my parents as my “extended family” even though I’m married with children.
People believe that paying higher costs for something mean it is of higher value than that which is free. "You get what you pay for." But if you disagree with the content of a site, why would you pay for it in the first place?
It'd come down to context for me. If it's 2 or maybe 3 items then I'd prefer x + y, but if it's any more than that I'd definitely use Add().
I don't think that "individualistic" is a strong enough word. European society, for instance, is also very individualistic, yet doesn't have anywhere near the levels of indoctrination against "socialism".

It seems Americans (generalizing here) have been let to believe that someones gain can only happen at someone else's loss, thinking there can't be a win-win situation.
I used to believe that
with all my heart until I started reading 4chan, now between that, deepfakes, and the imminent arrival of GPT-2 bots, I’m really fearful of the future of online publishing.

We’re going to end up with defacto censorship because most if not all platforms will be threatened into it.

Fundamentally it seems online discussion for human beings has serious bugs. Self policing used to work in the early internet but it seems the volume has overwhelmed most self policing systems.
paywalls probably a huge part of it. I dont click paywalled sites
Plus they're likely doing something they enjoy.
You still end up with the contract with the right to exercise the contract for the stock from the vesting date until the expiry. You can sell a contract at any time before the expiry date or you may exercise at anytime after the vesting date up until the expiry.
Here is a good link for you that might be a good place to start: https://www.thebalance.com/understanding-your-employee-stock...
It’s like any tool, it can be very helpful or not so much. For me, in almost all cases I have found live chat widgets to be super helpful and a way to get answers and save time.

I don’t really get why you would need an extension for this.

Now, if you want to make an extension that is really helpful, make one that auto accepts cookies on all those annoying GDPR slide ups that warn you about cookies!
This missed the fact that there’s a massive body of evidence showing people have different genetic predispositions to being morning people versus night owls
Yes. I'm just wondering if anyone has actually compared side by side and can either corroberate or contradict my findings.
Its no surprise at all - I agree completely. Its extremely ominous all the same.
Some states make it more difficult to enroll in Medicaid, and have reimbursement rates that exclude many from getting care.
I'm asuming he was sarcastic, but...

"Software engineering" doesn't have much to do with either software (it's mostly generic project management) or engineering (ask an engineer: vector calculus! statics, dynamics and thermodynamics!)
That would make sense if it was a fixed charge regardless of treatment. But if you did need those extra facilities they would charge you even more!
I wonder how much is the reverse: we now tend to say mathematical expressions as they are written, but before this was standardised, you would just explain the steps.

Probably not "one plus two" -- I think + is essentially a variant of & which is a ligature for "et", and I guess most languages put "and" between the things being combined. But I'd be surprised if (x/y)^2 was said "x over y all squared" by many people before this notation. But the notation is clearly more designed for thinking on paper than for explaining down a phone line.
Maybe put a prominent mark on the transcript that the enrollment was fraudulent? Similar to how withdrawn sports and music industry records are noted on the books. And there would need to be a public list that employers could check to verify whether or not a degree from one of these schools was fraudulently obtained. These people should not get a free pass or be able to claim that their degrees were not tainted by fraud.
A lot of people just don't like doctors. I have good insurance, but I haven't been to a doctor (MD) in probably close to 20 years.

I do get regular dental cleaning and checks though.
Aah that is a shame. They're clearly not equipped to handle anything that requires human support.
Aren't lie detectors junk science?
I use OpenBSD on both my remote (VPS) and home (a tiny pcengine box with 3 NICs) servers. Naturally, they do some IPv6/IPsec/tunneling and other shenanigans with each other, and the home server is the router and firewall for probably overly complex home network.

It is an absolute joy, and often I just mess around with the system for the fun of it. One of the compelling factors is that, unlike with a modern Linux distribution, I practically always have the impression of having full reach and understanding of the whole system, mainly because of OpenBSD's impressive consistency and documentation through man-pages.
As a kid, I remember playing a racing game where you could just wait for the AI to cover one complete lap (on the three to go). Since you were so much behing, the AI would become very slow. After being overtaken, you could start racing and it was easier to win this way than really racing from the start.

After discovering this trick, the game was ruined for me.
what about the UI patterns? any word in defense...

counselor...

I have noticed the annoying(to say the least) habit of everytime I click on a video on youtube on Android...the fucking youtube native app pop-up a fuck window to ask If I dont fucking prefer to watch the video on the native app...

so...´do no evil` , righ,

wery well...

Lol!

want more? they ask your phone number right now, and they write in size 0.2 font hidden down there , your freewill option to Fucking ´skip` giving them your personal phone number...

the acropole is yours, Counselor

in my opinion...

Your Honor

thanks...
> Is there some sort of feedback when you're really close?

If you watch the practice for the race coming up shortly in Australia, you'll see one corner in particular where pretty much everyone including the fastest guys slid off the track. So a lot of it's a feel thing, but you've also got engineering data telling you all the measurable stuff about how the car is performing, which you can then feed into a computer simulator which knows the exact (one hopes) layout of the race track.

One of the younger guys who qualified surprisingly well supposedly spent hundreds of hours on a PC simulator before this latest race.