skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I suspected that this had been the case for years now. A few years back, when I heard Myspace had "relaunched" with a focus on music artists, I checked it out, as in the 2000s MySpace was basically what Bandcamp is now for independent artists; streaming music with options to buy tracks.

The artists' pages were completely blank, barring a few pictures and a description extracted via the Wikipedia API. No music available at all. This is was in stark contrast from the original MySpace days when the profile pages would be chock full of streaming songs, tour announcements and interactions with fans.
I had iPads 1 trough 3, and they were awesome comic-reading devices. Then amazon bought Comixology and buying comics became too much of a hassle and I stop using my iPad altogether.
If I could only get one of these installed in the claw crane, I might finally be able to grab one of those elusive prizes.
has o reilly really sunk this low? this is sad. i owe my career to o reilly , in significant measure.
i.e. the unprofitable and future-less Apple
Let me guess, you can't possibly be in shape !
Episteme is always political once it gets societal acceptance and there is little difference between it and doxa. Techné is what actually does all the work and though you can find how to do it through episteme or doxa, it does not actually depend on them -- it does not matter what you believe as long as you know how to do something.

At the end of the day humans really only have techné, everything else is political... and it's also obvious that the political is generally dysfunctional scientifically -- i.e. inability to manage stability of the environment through science... and also scientifically managing the political is fascist or totalitarian. We get stuck with a set of choices that don't lead to good outcomes... maybe can never lead to good outcomes.
Wikipedia game: name the person from their table of contents
I can tell you that there is a not inconsiderable amount of effort going into the computational protein folding problem. I do not know where this funding comes from though. It's just a fundamentally hard problem, and it isn't clear (to me, at least) that it can really be solved. Quantum computing, maybe, but I'm not knowledgeable in that. Short of that, though, it might always turn out to be computationally more efficient to just "build" an analog body. There's no guarantee that we can simulate every physical process at faster than realtime speeds with CPUs.

I don't think you're going to find a single line of accounting that says "improve biochemical knowledge of the body for modeling purposes". Essentially, all fundamental research in medicine falls into this bucket.
> Easy enough: call the restaurant yourself then.

Except many now use a service provider to manager their reservations. Once they have your phone number (to confirm) it's no longer a one time transaction.
FTA AMD confirms nothing. It just states that the company believes it's not vulnerable to the SPOILER vulnerability due to AMD's processor architecture.

Mods, could you please fix the title? Not only does the article confirm nothing but it's also specific to a single vulnerabilty.
The importance of libraries turns largely on how powerful the language is. For a weak language like Java or C, it takes a lot of library to be much help.

A more powerful language like C++, Rust, or Haskell can capture much more semantics in a library. This builds on itself, so that spending time optimizing a library is worthwhile if the library starts out more useful. Putting more work into a library benefits every user if the library can absorb the extra work.

Obligate-GC cuts library authors off at the knees, so otherwise powerful GC languages tend not to collect libraries.
Ask HN: Learning How to Live?
I keep discovering that I'm living wrong:

- I drink coffee in the afternoon

- I eat unhealthy food

- I drink soda

- I drink bottled water

- I don't recycle

- I drink while eating

- I brush my teeth right after eating

- I rinse my mouth right after brushing my teeth

- I don't floss properly (or at all)

- I look at blue lights before going to sleep

- I sleep on my stomach

- I breath through my mouth

- I don't sleep with white noise

- I wake up with a loud alarm

- I don't sleep 8 hours a day (and don't track sleep cycles)

- I snooze multiple times

- I don't take cold showers

- I shampoo every day

- I don't use conditioner

- I use aluminium-based antiperspirant

- I don't exercise

- I don't protect my skin from the sun

- I wear clothes that don't fit

- I leave the AC/heater on during the day

- I leave the lights on

- I buy a $5 Starbucks coffee every morning

- I drink coffee

- I drive for 1 hour to work every day

- I sit on my thick back-pocket wallet

- I sit at my desk all day

- I multitask

- I have 100 browser tabs open

- I have 100 files on my desktop

- I type in QWERTY

- I don't touch type

- I use my mouse instead of keyboard shortcuts

- I use a monitor that's too low

- I procrastinate on important things

- I never empty my inbox

- I don't use a calendar

- I don't take advantage of 401k matching

- I try to time the stock market

- I don't have emergency savings

- I don't save for retirement

- I have credit card debts

- I buy lottery tickets

- I smoke cigarettes

- I drink alcohol

- I watch porn

- I masturbate

- I swear

- I lie

Where can I find an exhaustive guide that explains how to live properly?

I understand that everyone is different and that "properly" can be highly subjective or controversial (don't get too caught up on the above, mostly fictional, examples), yet I think we could do a much better job at making it easy for people to be aware of their bad habits, inefficiencies, and missed opportunities.
Every hospital and clinic has them available at the entrance where I am in the US.

I'd be curious how effective any of this is, but that would be hard to test.
There are a few web clients that use redis to allow you to see history. I will be the first to admit, those clients don't scale as well as IRC itself does. [1] [2] And of course, someone would have to manage that infrastructure. It isn't for everyone.

Another option would be to rent a really cheap VM and run a tmux or screen session with weechat [3] or epic [4], but command line isn't for everyone either.

[1] - https://github.com/thelounge/thelounge

[2] - https://github.com/Nordaaker/convos

[3] - https://weechat.org/

[4] - http://www.epicsol.org/#getting_epic
I buy 3rd party replacement batteries on Amazon. The original batteries have degraded by now, and replacing the cells is a tricky operation: https://hackaday.io/page/247-replacing-lenovo-laptop-lithium...
It's a bit more difficult in Oakland if the places you are trying to get to aren't by a BART stop. The AC transit buses are slow, dirty, sometimes dangerous, and don't have 100% coverage.
I hereby title this post "Ingesting supplemental levels of glutamate — the single most important endogenous neurochemical — invariably does various stuff to the nervous system, the single most complicated system we study. Spending decades debating between black/white positions of 'it's always bad for everyone' and 'it's always fine for everyone' is ridiculous."

I've never met anyone in real life, or had a proper 1-on-1 online with anyone (with basic biology/neuroscience knowledge) who denied MSG's health/biological effects.

It's frickin glutamate. That's it. GABA is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter. Glutamate is the main excitatory neurotransmitter. Ingest various/increasing doses of the former, and you will be relaxed verging on sedating. Ingest increasing doses of the latter and you (and your whole nervous system) will be stimulated verging on seizure-y (for various reasons it wouldn't be possible to orally ingest enough glutamate to actually seize).

It's all a matter of doses. But seriously, grab some size 0 capsules, put 500mg of GABA or Glutamate (sodium glutamate aka MSG being the most readily available) in each, mix 'em up and have a party. You'll easily be able to tell which one you've taken after 15-30 mins. This is basic stuff.

Individual traits (species, morphology, and brain chemistry/epigenetics) all play a part, the same way they do for sensitivity/tolerance to any other ingested food constituent, herb, supplement, or drug. But for Glutamate at least, these factors mostly equate to differences in tolerated doses, because in the end there isn't anybody (or any species that I know of) for which Glutamate doesn't play the vital nervous system role we know it to play.

So, that's basic biology. Supplementing Glutamate/MSG generally isn't needed/wanted/pleasant. But is it so much of a problem in the amounts found in food? That's what the whole debate is about after all.

The answer is there is no answer. It's a nearly meaningless question. It's the kind of meaningless question/debate that comes out of the relationship between regulatory agencies and business/industry, because the former is tasked with the impossible task of making conservative black/white/one-sized-fit-all health decisions for the public, and the latter is tasked with making addictively-tasty things regardless of health impact as long as it's legal. They NEED the answer, and the answer they've come up with is SAFE.

The real answer, like any real answer to any biological/health question, is it's complicated. Or at least variable. It's a matter of how much you ingest until you experience/feel something you don't like. Maybe it's 500mg, maybe it's a gram or two. It doesn't really matter. "Consumers" should simply be able to know in advance the same way they do for salt and sugar content.

Please no one jump on this post for lack of sources. I'm not going to copy/paste 5 decades worth of research on Glutamate in humans/mammals for the sake of winning what is basically a nonsensical political/conspiracy-hunting-mob debate.
wow. And as a result the kludges just keep piling up, one on another.

>>Obviously, if you need to turn down the volume in the car past the minimum level, you should turn off the stereo instead.

Yep, you guessed it -- that's exactly what happened. I'd just switch it off entirely. I didn't realize until the next car that I had developed an aversion to using a stereo at all as a result of this experience. It was a few years before I learned not to flinch when turning down the radio.

Sure, in the larger scale of things, it was only a minor irritation, but once it gets under your skin it's impossible to ignore. I think the fact that I'm still thinking about it more than 15 years later, is testimony.
What worries me is if we're going to see some kind of relevant similarity with the 777X which afaik is 'type rated as the same as the existing 777', despite having new mechanical processes to fail (wing fold) and entirely new undercarriage.

Still, the 777X is still some way from hitting customers, so maybe Boeing will spend some time contemplating the way they gamed type rating with the MAX before hitting customers.
iOS doesn't have mouse support because Apple doesn't want it to, not because it's "not good enough".
Myspace lost all the music uploaded from its first 12 years in server migration
Partners (in both law and private practice medicine) can earn much more.
People may confuse believing in the scientific method for believing in the current scientific consensus, which as you point out is fluid.

However, for the average person, a dogmatic belief in the scientific method would be a huge step up over religion.
This is a little off topic w.r.t. the article, but to some extent I like privacy as a currency. Despite the fact that you might make minimum wage and can’t realistically afford to pay for most services, Google gives you access to the majority of human knowledge, for free. Nobody forces you to use Google - if you can afford it, you can pay for it with time (i.e. worse results from places like DDG).

Redistributing wealth to ensure fairness is hard, but at least when we use privacy as the currency we all start with some, almost equal, amounts. The downside is that realistically this approach only works when everyone participates - I don’t think hybrid “pay or we track you” would work out to be efficient at large scales.
Some type of regulatory-skirting financial account device that pools everyone’s money while the backing organization can gamble with it and extract huge overall fees regardless of whether they succeed at gambling...

Sounds a lot like defined contribution retirement plans, asset managers, mutual funds and hedge funds...
With all the hype about the efficiency of ARM processors and Apple thinking of putting their custom designed processors in their laptops, I wonder if we'll ever get better battery life on our laptops.

I know nothing will be very significant, but I wish at least my laptop can stay for the whole day on battery.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/arm-takes-wing/
I know what the parent meant. Your explanation now directly contradicts what the code does because even with the Job method you are directly setting salary except now it's a more circuitous way for the sake of abstraction. The person class has no notion of a Job.
Sorry, I didn't intend to be flippant about "fly-over" states.

But, yeah, the farmland-developer-mcmansion-exburban-dystopia transition is something I've seen too many times in too many places.
TLDR: Jio upset the status quo, for now.
I actually stumbled across this a couple weeks ago, while thinking about the design for a project. I'm working with threat intelligence/security data and I need a nice way for users to save/share that data with the team, as well as query it in a simple fashion. People are pushing for a graph database. So I did some research and learned about RDF, OWL, Jena, etc.

I'm still not sure if this is the right road to go down. Just from reading papers it's hard to tell how much of this is hype and over-engineering and how much is solid. Anyone have some RDF/OWL/Jens/SPARQL stories they want to share?
I don't know what OP is referring to. Broadcast TV in the US is more or less the same as it always was, just with a lot of extra content on the sub-channels that is mostly reruns of old shows. Nothing subversive in any of it. You don't see the partisan crap that occupies subscription TV in the US. The only notable difference is that certain advertisers don't bother with broadcast so you never see their promotions.
There is now a general crisis of authority. Just recently I have learned one peculiar theory (from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mmlmxamw_k&fbclid=IwAR3A42D...). Some moon landing photos (and maybe films) are really fake. There are people who believe that this is a proof that the whole moon landing was just staged - it is kind of natural to think like that, but a more probable theory is that it just proofs that a press officer did not have good material and just used what was available. Traditional media are kind of not very strict with this - I even have some personal experience about that, but people have much more romantic view on it and treat each photo or other material as fact and true. With the internet we have more to reconcile. I don't think this is bad - maybe media just needs to change. With some time we'll adapt.

It is similar case with science, maybe it is not that perfect as we used to view it. It is very good at where the incentives are well aligned - but they are not always 'adequate': https://equilibriabook.com/inadequacy-and-modesty/
> but that doesn't mean it's the only thing they test.

That was exactly my point. In checking values, they also check types, without any extra effort.

> creates a whole category of errors

It doesn't create them. It just doesn't prevent them (type errors) at the language/compiler level. But since you have to test the values anyway, that doesn't really matter.

> delay the moment

Not really. Dynamic languages make possible environments that compile+run before the static compiler is done compiling.
Were the tests blinded? Did you do an additional test with just salt?
None of your points 1,2,3 highlight a loss of authority so much as its transfer between different institutions: religion, state, teacher, parent.

Ok, maybe transferring authority to individuals as in (1) could be counted as a loss, but in a topic so personal that it would be ridiculous for somebody to claim authority over others in it anyway.
That's pretty much what we settled on, and for similar reasons. In time, just see forest, sometimes with flat local stone or wood plaques, without bleak rows of cemetery headstones. Far more uplifting and not even more expensive, surprisingly. Not as surprising was burial in managed woodland is a fairly common option when we looked into it, some planting a native tree in place of headstone.

Needless to say once we dug into how it's usually done, we found yet another industry that's become horribly eco unfriendly.
> If you are young without kids, it may not make much difference for you to ride a car, or take a bus, or a train, subway, etc.

We have a toddler and a large dog. We own two electric cargo bikes and get around perfectly well without owning a car. There's car/truck sharing and rental if I really need to transport something large and heavy (> 100kg).

> Just design a better one.

I'd very much prefer if all that parking space and all that space used by 4-lane roads would be used to make the city more dense and walkable. If I can walk to the kindergarden or school, there's no need to even take a bike, if close enough a kid can even walk on their own. The only things that makes such a thing infeasible are cars.
>I have no idea what the appeal is, there's none at all for me, but there must be a decent sized market out there. It's interesting to read the other comments and see what the appeal is for them

Here's what the appeal is for me:

1) A device I can use at the bed/crapper comfortably -- to read, check email, browse, etc.

2) I'm a hobby artist (from the Amiga days) and I love the digital painting apps and Apple pencil.

3) It's my main reading device. I have tons of physical books (several thousands), but its now cheaper and more convenient to read PDFs, ePub, etc books. I use Apple's Books and the iOS Kindle app.

4) Photography. It's great for sharing with friends nearby, casual edits on the road, having your portfolio in an easy to show, glorious screen.

5) Music apps. If somebody does guitar, piano, or electronic music, there are tons of apps, from amp modellers to complete DAWs, and tons of "VSTs" (AUs in our case).

6) Great for note-taking, drawing diagrams and so on.

7) Handy to watch a video in something less to carry around than a laptop and bigger screen than a phone.

8) Not bad for games too if you're not an AAA gamer.

9) For writing articles, book, etc, it's also good -- non distracting, lots of great editors (even Scrivener), and so on.
The Irish Backstop: Nothing Has Changed? It Has Actually [pdf]
In addition to convenience, habit, and layout of cities and living areas, I'd say that a big push for cars is personal security.
It's not real, is it?
There is a huge difference between swatting someone to get their attention and hitting someone with enough force to cause injury.
I heard this too ("Adam ruins everything"). But there is a hugeg bird population in Istanbul (more than US cities I lived in). Mostly seagulls (thousands of them), pigeons, sparrow and crows which are all around the city. It's possible these are "city birds" resistant to cat attacks somehow and cats damaged other bird populations, though. I'm not educated enough to give a better answer.
Using Data Science to Understand the Film Industry’s Gender Gap
Here's the Kaggle competition for this year, with many more potential starting points and ressources: https://www.kaggle.com/c/womens-machine-learning-competition...
The one design tool you can’t afford to live without
The fundamental issue with all surveillance mechanisms is that it's the exact opposite of foundational legal principles like presumption of innocence. [1] If anyone or everyone could be guilty of something if only they were caught in the act, and if judges accept such evidence as prime and override any suspicions that these are beyond reasonable doubt and ignore the fact that these could have error rates or be completely falsified, [2] then law enforcement and prosecution wouldn't have to work hard. It's questionable if law enforcement really works hard in any country and does what it's expected to by the common people; it seems to be a continuous power game (and power grab) in many places where law enforcement is becoming more and more militarized.

Biometric and behavioral recognition, profiling and tracking will turn all democracies into namesakes and into dictatorships where people will always self-censor because they don't want to get into any trouble. There is a bigger chance that more (not all) activists will be marginalized and silenced through different means. That would be a tragedy for everyone. "Nothing to hide" would seem like a cruel joke that thoughtless people of the past played on the future.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence

[2]: Even routine evidence collected and processed today could have error rates or be falsified, but there seem to be trends where technology is perceived as being infallible, and is trusted completely on first sight.
Converting a cheap musical keyboard into a custom built keytar
>>Actually, you don't — tap the "button" and just start sliding your finger.

That works (sort of) but in a way it's even worse. Now you're sliding your finger a couple of inches to the right of the actual control image, further damaging the illusion of a physical control.
I think that's the detail underlying my question. Does the interaction collapse the frames of reference into one? I guess it doesn't have to.
Interviewing Product Managers
What you are referring to our container classes which exist solely to hold members. This is not that case. The setting of salary is one of many behaviors offered by the class.
Talk to a designer of any kind. They’re hooked on iPad.

All the designers at our company have personal iPads that they use for various things including illustration, taking notes, sketching concepts, wire framing, etc.

I’m not a designer but I’m a hobbyist photographer and I love using my iPad for editing photos in Lightroom, reading, consuming media, etc. I can’t wait until Adobe fills out their creative suite on iPad. They announced that a fully featured Photoshop will come to iPad in 2019 - we’ll see.

I wrote this comment on an iPad, in fact. I do use the keyboard cover though so don’t get the impression that I wrote this on the on-screen software keyboard. That’d be tough.
https://blog.jabberhead.tk/2019/03/10/a-look-at-matrix-orgs-... is quite a good comparison.
So, 40% of this figure is Disney alone?