skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did not accept the premise. Please don’t mistake my attempt to improve the discussion as agreement with anyone. I just want this discussion to be better. I don’t think demanding burden of proof is a comment worth making; could you at least explain why you think there can’t be such people?

I do agree it is interesting that the GOP campaigned that way, incidentally. Regardless of what degree of support for complicated taxes there may or may not have been, support for simplified taxes in the large, populist wing of the Republican Party plus presumably broad support in the Democratic Party should mean more changes to tax collection soon.
So are you advocating these be taken down? Or you think that if the rule isn't applied equally everywhere then it shouldn't be applied at all? Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. I think its pretty fucked up to think that shoving this guys murder vid into peoples faces is somehow for the greater good.
A recruiter will take whatever you've posted publicly, and draw conclusions based on what you've presented. Whether you agree with it or not, that's precisely what will happen, even if they try not to.

It's on you to communicate your intent for things you release publicly. That means a README.md which explains what the reader is looking at. If it's just some half baked idea you've been kicking around, say so. Tell your reader what to expect, because if you don't, they WILL expect the wrong thing.

Effective communication is the foundation of any relationship, including work relationships. Show that you can communicate your thoughts. Guide your reader. Make it dead simple for them to see the best of you.

Beyond that, it's helpful to have a showcase "portfolio" project that is written as if you were presenting a finished product to a customer, including documentation, unit tests, ci, good design, the works. Showing that you can see a product through from initial design to release will impress people. Do you need it? No, but it will set you apart from the crowd.
I'm an ex-manager who went back to being a developer. Here are some things I think you'll need to be comfortable with if you want to be a manager:

- Spending time in meetings. Everything from one-on-one meetings with your staff to meetings with higher management. The higher you get promoted, the more meetings you'll be expected to attend.

- Dealing with other company bureaucracy. One of your jobs as a manager is to shield your staff from bureaucracy so that they can get their work done.

- Not being an individual contributor anymore. Once you get promoted beyond being a lead developer, you'll be spending much less time on designing and writing code. You'll be judged based on the contribution of your entire team, not your own contribution. You'll need to start spending time mentoring your staff to make them more effective.

- Dealing with HR issues. You will be your staff's first point of contact when they want to ask for a raise or promotion, report problematic interactions with other staff, or ask for accommodations due to personal or health problems. You may need to fire some of your employees because their performance doesn't meet expectations. Even worse, you may need to lay off high-performing employees because the company wants to cut costs or cancel a project that they're working on. You may need to choose which of your staff get laid off. You'll need to be aware that certain actions you take could expose the company to legal liability.

- Because of the above, it will not be a good idea to be personal friends or drinking buddies with the people you now manage. For example, if the employee who socializes with you happens to be promoted while the one who doesn't gets laid off (even if the decisions were made completely fairly), it will be demoralizing to the rest of your staff and may result in your being accused of discrimination.
If recruiting software didn't penalize for keywords I think it would be less of an issue. Its a struggle trying to figure out what to put in the "list of technologies" type section. I have to put them somewhere to get past crappy HR screening software since explaining every tech in a job description would create paragraphs but just listing it doesn't represent the level of aptitude.

For example, I might use Chef daily. If I put it in a list of other tools I use it can mean I know how to use it for my very specific use case, but usually it is taken as "this guy thinks he contributes to the Chef source code and knows every bizarre scenario involving it" by some tech screener trying to get his rocks off.

I 100% blame every tech recruiter for furthering this mess.
I don't know about Ireland, but I did recently look up the same statistics for the UK: https://www.gwern.net/Questions#physical-beauty You can source it to the UK national dental surveys (which wouldn't be surprising if they covered Ireland as well), for example, https://archive.org/details/np70033823/page/n1
Just some small warnings:

the P71 is very bulky (somehow more than how it looks in the pictures) and its case feels a bit cheap (the case is "real" plastic and if you tap on it below the keyboard it really makes the sound of an empty plastic case) => personally I expected a bit more as it's not cheap (the components I chose are basically the cheapest ones with the exception of the 4k panel and the backlit keyboard).

Additionally some weeks ago, while I was typing, the backspace and "t" keys stopped working out of the blue => I switched the laptop off but 1 day later the keys were still not working => I then opened the laptop and extracted the keyboard (veeery easy - compliments Lenovo) to read the model number to order later a spare part, touched a bit the connector cable of the keyboard and after putting all back together they keys magically started working again.

Saying all this just because I have the feeling that overall it could be that in the case of the P71 the quality might be a bit lower than what's otherwise the case for other models. Cheers.
That's great. After moving that function, rename the file in Vim to reflect the change. Just kidding. Made you sweat though, huh?

Not knowing how to use a more productive IDE doesn't mean that Vim is more productive.
Just because it is poorly produced doesn't make it documentation or rule out it being propaganda.

I've no interest in seeing the video, but I understand they marked the ammunition clips with messages seen on camera. Several have been quoted in reporting. That sounds very like a deliberate attempt to make a propaganda piece of the footage. I would hope that Liveleak would rule out carrying it on the same justification.

Phone cam footage from a victim or innocent bystander is far easier to consider documentation, and make a case it should be seen.
There is something of a "No true Scotsman" that comes up with both of those.
Yes, the video player is legal. What you’re doing with it is not legal.
> people have the right to see and face evil if they so wish to and have a strong heart.

Not on a site someone else owns and operates they don’t.
Superdry is perhaps the most obvious example (in the opposite direction). In the same way that Japanese products often include gratuitous English, they include gratuitous Japanese on their clothes:

> The company's products include meaningless excerpts of Japanese text generated by machine translation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdry
I never lock my bike. I know bike theft happens a few times per month because it is the only crime ever mentioned in our kairanban (a kind of neighborhood newsletter). My impression is that only high-end road/mountain bikes or very nice mamachari would be targeted. The easy solution is to ride a $200 Chinese bike and experience the tremendous freedom of taking on the extremely low risk. My local grocery store/mall has literally a thousand bikes parked at any time, and I would say about half don’t even bother with the built-in rear wheel lock.
What are you saying the other option is? There’re countless other options.
I'd be curious to learn how much of that $80k/mo was returned by Apple to consumers (and not actually paid out to the developer). It's hard to imagine such a scheme would last long on the top grossing page without intervention...
Linking to that plugin means you haven't used it. Use an IDE that supports this well, not an incredibly buggy hack to get basic editing features.
What could be classified as hate speech more than a self videoed murderous rampage? Why the fuck should that be given a platform? Go search the dank corners of the internet for that shit if your "strong heart" desires it. What sick mind desires to give this piece of shit a bigger soap box?
I used to be a suckless person, not official, but I had branded them _my tribe_. I still appreciate them for their simplicity target, but the means and methods for me have changed.

When I first came across the UHH, my systems exposure was AmigaDOS, DOS, Windows 95, Windows NT 4, Ultrix, FreeBSD and Linux. I had never used VMS in any meaningful way (David Cutler is a well known Unix Hater) and the idea of "Hating Unix" was off putting because it seemed so useful, and the pain inflicted I internalized as my failing for not properly understanding it. I had no idea how much of a patched together mess it was. Hell, I think if we had continued using DOS that it would have eventually gotten a scheduler, memory protection, pipes and signals and then ended up in largely the same place.

At the part of the stack that most programmers are operating now, the operating system doesn't matter much. We can take the pain points from UHH and apply them to our own lack of system design.
What about any of this is closed source?

https://github.com/RPCS3/rpcs3

>> The world's first free and open-source PlayStation 3 emulator/debugger, written in C++ for Windows and Linux.
My mistake, I thought you were referring to the X201/X210.
> nobody will ever judge your code if it's public, unless you work very very hard for it.

But this whole thread is about people reporting that they do just that for recruiting purposes.
The fact that browsers, websites, and apps autoplay video, often with sound, doesn't help.

I've posted a ... friendly notice to Google about this.
Modern slavery of disabled people in South Korea (video)
So adding an extra space between every sentence all the time, just for vim's "deleting sentence" to work? (not even by default, and that's a very specific command). And the command breaks because there is a . in the sentence.

So changing a pretty much worldwide convention for a pretty specific edge-case on a rarely used command in vim.

Why not just update the command to detect the special cases like Mr. Mrs., seems like a much simpler solution.
Well, not several times.

uTorrent for Windows: 2.84 MB https://www.utorrent.com/downloads/win

picotorrent.exe: 3.98 MB https://github.com/picotorrent/picotorrent/releases

picotorrent also seems to come with a language pack while you download uTorrent's separately at 1.3 MB. Not that I think it matters.

Also, don't forget to include any ads or malware that might download with your next version of uTorrent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9CTorrent#Ads_and_malware
All those high-paid FAANG jobs come with that term. Most others do, too, but if you're senior enough and they want you badly enough, you can strike it out.
Using vim is not at all about the number of milliseconds saved, it's about lack of interruptions. An expert vim user can get into a flow state and be moving and jumping around the file, adding and deleting text, without stopping to think about how to do a command in their editor or worse, having to reach for the mouse and figure out where the cursor was left last time.

For some people, having your flow state disrupted can cause a very long delay as you have to figure out what you were doing all over again.
It's not as clear to me that this development is fortunate. The customs of social dance have evolved over centuries, and I'm leery of doing away with things simply because we no longer understand them.

I learned to contra dance in a groovy, gender-free group, and I found it frustrating for several reasons.

Contra dance is designed for bodies that fit together, statistically, as men's and women's bodies do, and it was far more often the case that a figure designed for a man and a woman would become physically awkward when attempted with two men.

Many of the figures involved four or eight partners, and it's honestly confusing for beginners when you lack a visual reference point for whom you're supposed to dance with next.

Dance is a pretty mystical thing, and I don't find the question "why should the sex of your dance partner matter?" to be that compelling. It matters because I want to dance with women who want to dance with men. I don't begrudge anyone for setting whatever ground rules suit them, but I wish the STRICTLY GENDERFUL, PROBLEMATIC AND PATRIARCHAL dance groups would advertise themselves a little more loudly.
You're avoiding the point. As he mentioned, 4chan and co are the epitome of no-censorship and entirely free debate. Under the assumptions made in this thread, the free market of ideas should squash ideologues and people who choose to believe in things such as white supremacy or conspiracy theories.

Yet this is not the case. Why?
It's a fuzzy one I'm not sure I understand either.

One thing though "tru OO" guys often complain of false message passing based on function call. Others here are hinting at asynchronous vs synchronous. Very likely to be what Kay meant.

Another thing to me, is that message interactions mean standalone data exchange. As if to design your interfaces to accept very small but complete objects as communication protocol. Rather than passing structures to be modified. I'm not sure it is even true at all but that's a feeling I got from Kay's talks and his biology metaphor. In a way it's a stateless bus connecting stateful objects (probably trying to minimize their internal state space as much as possible too).
I hadn't realised about the (lack of) HDMI over DisplayPort - now I don't feel so bad that I can't afford one - this would render it much less useful to me.
Which is why dental veneers [1] are so popular with the easily influenced reality-show-wannabees. If you can afford veneers you have apparently made it...

So much that some of the reality stars make it a show or as part of their contracts. [2][3]

Except they look ridiculous and many can't chew properly especially some meat afterwards...

Not sure I'd want my teeth ground down to little sticks. Nature works best as it intended, I like my teeth.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veneer_(dentistry)

[2] http://www.39harleystreet.co.uk/jodiemarsh_veneers.htm

[3] https://twitter.com/jodiemarsh/status/598229937133375489
Access to EU funds when the EU was still young and everything was cool. They also have private motorways.
What is so fortunate in "smash the patriarchy"? assuming there is a patriarchy at all and assuming than even if there is it is a good idea to smash it.

Certainly in dancing there is a sexual tension between the partners, it is part of dancing appeal in the first place, even in the animal kingdom. To sterilize it completely makes it into a sport, not a dance. It is important that people will actually keep the sexual role differences in dancing.
You guys thinking ATX is a standard has me laughing my head off. On those motherboards we had 6 bus 'standards', 6 video card 'standards' (AGP, AGP 2X, AGP 4X, ...), 6+ disk 'standards' (IDE, EIDE, PATA, SATA-1,2,3, M.2, PCI, and the list goes on). the biggest joke is that CPUs are not even 50% faster in the last 10 years and yet we are still fooled into buying entirely new systems every two or three years by the Intel-Microsoft-Dell-Motherboard Cabal.
Even better you don't have to be with the cursor on the number you want to increment or decrement with Ctrl-A and Ctrl-X. It will work with the next number to the right of the cursor.

The same goes for ci' or ci".

a = 'foo' // imagine the cursor on the letter a

Executing ci'bar will change foo to bar.
Difference is presumably in the intention, not the video quality.
Consider that before WW2, pilots had direct connection between the control and moving the surface. After WW2, planes got too big and heavy for that, and hydraulic boost was added. Starting with the 747, where it is not credible a pilot could control it with muscle, the switch was made to fully powered surfaces.

The trouble with that is the pilot's controls simply crack open a valve, and hydraulics do the rest, meaning the pilot gets no feedback via forces on the control column. He'll "overcontrol" the aircraft leading to a crash. The solution is the addition of a "feel computer" which pushes back on the stick making the airplane feel like direct control. Safe flying relies on the feel computer working properly.

Also, the travel of the control surfaces is automatically reduced as speed goes up, because full travel at high speeds will literally tear the airplane apart.

So right there are two flight critical computer systems on jets, and modern air travel would not be possible without them. Each produces an illusion to the pilot.
pascal, cpp and java were very very bad typing acrobatics.

smalltalk goes by by having a sensible topology of classes that can encode a lot of natural information about processes (errors, restarts etc)
Insightful, this makes me think of the importance of the ecosystem in contemporary art, especially when you write: ""supported" by collectors and/or institutions", "someone with a degree of clout", and "convinced some people that they are the real thing." Thanks.
We have the bot running and a telegram room for experience reports if anyone wants to participate there:

https://t.me/joinchat/LKAIcRIoXO6S8Dzp8uc0Wg
I stocked up thin silicon membrane keyboard covers, put one over the keyboard, and replace it every 6 months. It prevent spills and scratch. Keyboard can get really dirty. Replacing it once a while is like getting a new keyboard.
For those of us that don't know (myself included), what is "mewing"?
Isn't YC the perfect example of that network and that it comes down to connections? That's why there is high demand for people applying as it opens the gates to that network.
People Want to Know About Algorithms–But Not Too Much
There is a lot of nuance to unpack in these discussions. You'll pardon me if I express skepticism at it being worth the effort to have that conversation with someone whose own contributions to that conversation so far include calling an analysis of existing studies and patterns of behavior a "study" that can (and should) be "replicated", and the gems: "intersectionality ideology dogma" — emphasis added, and "secular theology for the intersectional faith".

You display a dismissive, even disdainful attitude about the matter, and I really don't feel like fighting uphill like that today. But if you really want to have a good-faith discussion about this then you can start by explaining how you read their position as "redefin[ing] meritocracy into... equal outcome", when the only occurrence of the string "equal outcome" in The Fine Article was:

> Just having the idea of skill in mind makes people more tolerant of unequal outcomes.

The context was a "fake game of skill", where players were told they had won. This is about self-belief, not outcome.

EDIT: Phrasing

EDIT 2: And my new favorite: "People that share the intersectional beliefs does not believe in scientific reasoning."

People who make statements like that don't appear to believe in logical reasoning.
> this argument basically requires one to assume that (a) society was progressing towards the denying of these religious beliefs

No. I've never said that and I don't believe in that.

My thesis it: there were the thinkers around 2500 years ago, on some very distant places, that came to the basis that is the actual basis of the modern science, fruits of which we all enjoy.

The actual basis of the science is simple: to investigate the world, one must simply posit that the scientific explanation for any observation is not any other-worldy miracle. As soon as one bases his explanation on that, anything is possible, and automatically is out of the science.

Moreover, the sciences which have to posit that aren't only physics or biology. Even history has to posit that: the basic premise of historic examination of any historic even is that there were no deities doing miracles, but the stories claiming miracles invented by humans.

So one can either do history scientifically, or simply be religious, but he can't get the points in science from doing later. His work will then, correctly, be dismissed.

Note, we started the discussion here by talking about Herodotus, the father of history. Not the father of religion.

For a historian doing history, every religious story involving miracles is just a myth, no matter which religion tells it. Every (non theological) university book can't be made otherwise.

And the same approach was of course true for the physicists doing physics: Newton could believe in deities as much a he wanted, he didn't explain the movements of planets with angels flipping wings but by demonstrating the calculations based on the rules of gravitation.
Muscle recovery (protein synthesis) rate is increased at sleep.

Doing exercise before bed is not a good idea if you have difficulties sleeping though.
They get the votes anyway. The worst ones. People who vote for them don't care much about highways, they care about their pensions and public sector salaries not being cut. Otherwise you're right. I tend to view the one metre of highway as unintended contemporary art.
there are not so many videos about this topic

this GDC talk is kinda hard to understand (at least for me)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHinxAhv1ZE