skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not a single scientific study blown out of proportions. It's the same at every level, including official reports by expert committees and scientific bodies:

Take eggs for example.

Here are the 1995 dietary guidelines:

https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga95/9DIETGUI.HTM

> Choose a diet low in cholesterol

> The body makes and requires cholesterol. In addition, cholesterol is obtained from food. Dietary cholesterol comes from animal sources such as egg yolks, meat (especially organ meats such as liver) poultry, fish, and higher fat dairy products. Many of these foods are also high in saturated fats. Choosing foods with less cholesterol and saturated fat will help lower your blood cholesterol levels. The Nutrition Facts Label lists the Daily Value for cholesterol as 300 mg. You can keep your cholesterol intake at this level or lower by emphasizing intakes of grains, vegetables, and fruits and by limiting intake of egg yolks, including those used in cooking.

Here is the scientific report of the 2015 guidelines:

https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/...

> Cholesterol: Previously, the Dietary Guidelines for
Americans recommended that cholesterol intake be
limited to no more than 300 milligrams per day. The
2015 DGAC will not bring forward this
recommendation because available evidence shows no
appreciable relationship between consumption of
dietary cholesterol and serum cholesterol, consistent
with the conclusions of the AHA/ACC report, Cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern for
overconsumption.

The sad part, is that there was never any good evidence to limit consumption of cholesterol and eggs.
I've been thinking about this piece all day and I can finally articulate what my problem is with it.

Science is the rejection of authority in the 'authorial' sense of the word. Pre-scientific thinking relied almost entirely on authorities to determine what was right or true. Science is thus the rejection of the notion that an authority of any kind is a substitute for evidence.

Scientific knowledge, when presented as an authority is thus
just as abhorrent as text from any other authority. We scientists trust it because we often have no other choice,
but also because over decades of training we have all done
the labs to actually see these principles operate first hand. Thus we accept the principles based on our own experience of them.

I hate to say it, but if someone hasn't had at least some
exposure to a laboratory setting of some kind, or experimentation of some kind, then the fact that scientific
knowledge is "right" is completely lost on them, and it is indistinguishable from any other knowledge from authority. Belief in the scientific process might be a substitute, but at that point it is no different that belief in revealed truth -- right for the wrong reasons means failure is just as likely.
People like to be right, and don't like to invest time in thought. Hence why the bandwagon effect works.
This is why I leave my phone on silent 24/7 (no vibrate either).
If someone from my Contacts calls me, then I see the missed call and know to call them back when I have time. However I live my life on my time, nothing is ever so important I have to drop whatever I am doing to pick up someone else's call right away. You might say, what if there was an emergency? Well how many times has someone called you about an emergency where you could actually do something about it?
Maybe some have, but I bet most haven't.
CIAAI
I feel 90% of the quality issues can be handled by being more proactive. Stay at a community with good trees, buy only organic, drink only mineral water, etc.
For anything but the smallest website, the first server a TLS connection hits is not going to be the end point of the connection. There will be caching, proxying, load balancing, etc, happening, and that will often result in connections that leave the datacenter. There will be decryption and rencryption (hopefully!) happening many times.

I don’t see why CF is any different than these other processes. I am also confused as to why you think CF is so much easier to infiltrate than say, a CA.
I can see that I sounded like I was one of those, but I have strong set of principles which lean toward some doctrines and yes, some ideologies in practice.

My point was more to be cautious of those who are very strict from the theoretical side of the said ideologies in their purest form.
I like the active placebo in cash idea.
We call it the opioid tax and it works pretty effectively at eliminating the unemployed.
Ukrainian presidential election have the same surname and initials
This is every CDN... how is a large, high traffic, website supposed to work without a CDN? There are literally NO large sites that don’t either contract a CDN or build their own (and the number who build their own is pretty small)
Land in a developed area is in very limited supply, it's necessary to make the economy function, and most of the owners are speculating on the price going up. Kitchenware doesn't work that way. Almost nothing else works that way.

Owning central land and not using it means that millions of people have to go further to get to their destinations. It also means that construction effort and money is going into a black hole and not turning into supply. Enough of this together makes a powerful negative externality.
Maybe nature should first take responsibility for their own role in discrediting science before asking others to do so, and stop publishing articles on discredited takes on complex problems such as the gender pay gap [1].

There is no excuse for a scientific magazine to publish articles with methodology that has been shown to misrepresent the problem at hand so many times. It certainly doesn’t help people’s trust in science when they do so.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-04309-8
¿How is an UBI going to help the feeling of "being useless / unnecessary / a burden" and seeing immigrants as the ones "taking away" their jobs as capital opts for outsourcing and automation?

The abhorrent coward assailant wasn't even lumpen to begin with.
So about 8 per day distributed across 5 media outlets.

It's also important to highlight the article's last two paragraphs as it constrasts significantly with the tone of the headline:

> Articles were regarded as “negative articles written about Islam”, if they “referred to Islam or Muslims alongside words like violence, extremism, terrorism or radical”. It should be noted – this is a pretty expansive definition. A story that accurately reported a noteworthy incident of Muslim violence, without being inflammatory or misrepresenting material facts, and which had the respectful cooperation of Muslims, would still be caught up under this definition.

> Indeed, the definition could go further. A report that noted Muslim women in a non-government organisation helping victims of domestic violence might also be caught up under this definition. It should also be noted – there is an implicit slippage, in the sense that a negative story about Muslims isn’t necessarily a story about Islam. Thus, I would argue that the definition may be overbroad.

Edit: Originally, I erroneously wrote that this was 8 per day across all Murdoch owned outlets. That is not the case, it is among 5 specific ones.
For some reason, this affects me a lot more than I want to admit.
Let's be honest Vue is a temporary blimp in web frameworks like all the others. I've been doing mobile dev the last 2 years and React was the hot thing. Then a year before that it was Angular. These things change and Vue is temporary like the others
You know how some people say that if you're going for investors for your start up, it's better to sell them on user engagement & growth rather than revenue, because revenue brackets what you're potentially worth? I bet it's something like that. If you rent at a certain price, that brackets the property (and depending on the lease, maybe even locks it in).
The ability to apply the same argument to another situation has no probative value. Any policy has its pros and cons. One can support vacancy taxes/fines without supporting other taxes on unused possessions.
According to the article, is mostly speculators betting that the property values will rise faster than the market consensus (these speculators don't want to be locked into leases that will soon undervalue the property). Also, it is arbitrageurs who think they can profit by repurposing the units (e.g., hotel/airbnb conversion).
What strikes me with robocalls that leave messages - they cut off by "talking" too early so I cannot identify who they are, yet if I answer, I get nothing but silence if I answer with "Hello? Hello?" Calm and slowly paced. That's my personal rule. I say hello slowly twice, and if theres silence, I hang up. Dont care if I start to hear a connection as I'm going to hang up. You called me, have someone on the line. My time is worth money to me. I am not amswering the phone to be put on hold for the next representative. Fuck off and call me when you have someone ready to talk to me.
The service desk feature is nice, but maybe having a form for people to fill out to file a support request would be even better. That way, people can file requests without directly opening their email client.

Just a small thought :)
Here's my secret: Don't buy ANYTHING advertised to you.
If the value rises considerably in a few years for you to make a decent profit, then its mostly a headache (and operating costs, wear and tear etc) to have tenants .
Google should shame the carriers by putting a red padlock next to unverified numbers.
What places? I am going to a clinic out in NW burbs called Chicago Pain and Wellness. (If I do it that is)
As much as I'd love for this to be true (I've wanted a 7" low bezel phone since I got a Note 2) 4 phones in the last year match the criteria you define as a "trend" https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?fDisplayInchesMin=6.9&...

6.4" remains the popular choice for new high end phones but these phones remain the same physical size as the 5.4" screen phones of older generations due to decreases in bezel size.
About 8 per day too many, no?
> the other aspect is the majority of people aren't seeing the material gains that science offers the world

I'm afraid this last bit is a big problem. I suspect there is a certain lag from discovery to perception. And then starting in the 1800 we had wave after wave of discovery, from electricity, magnetism, cars, airplanes, wireless, nuclear bombs, computers... stopping around the 1980s. At this point we can keep talking up science all we want but I fear something like fusion reactors or true AI would be needed to boost the faith.
It can change depending on the season and weather, but it is seriously bad and hit #1 for a day in 2017. [1]

The geography does trap the pollution, but having refineries and mining operations just north of the city doesn't help. There are also loads of 18 wheel trucks coming through, since SLC is a bit of a hub area in terms of highways.

Despite the city being pretty walk-able with decent (by US standards) transit, lots of people have at least one large 4x4 vehicle to get up into the canyons. It hurts to see since I understand the appeal of outdoors activities, but this way of approaching them will degrade and ruin the outdoors long term.

[1] https://kutv.com/news/local/salt-lake-city-has-the-worst-air...
This has already happened with supermarkets.

Use your tracking token (safeway club card = phone number) or your groceries will cost significantly more.
Any thoughts re: the comments here [0] about usability for smaller workloads?

0. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14165785
Because renting doesn't make you that much money and you have to work for it. Just leaving it sitting there and selling it later is no effort profit
I think it's reasonable to assume Airbnb reduces supply. I don't see how you can conclude the 30% rent increase you experienced was largely driven by Airbnb.

Lets say anyone renting out their unit for less than half a year wouldn't have put the unit on the rental market anyways. If you download and dive into the data, you'll see that there are ~9550 "Entire home/apt" listings, of which 5992 are available for less than half the year, leaving only 3558 units. In a city the size of Toronto, that seems negligible.

Data: http://data.insideairbnb.com/canada/on/toronto/2019-03-07/vi...

Even if we took Fairbnb's number at face value, it still seems small relative to Toronto's total number of rental units.

Here is a report published by McGill's School of Urban Planning, commissioned by the Hotel Trades Council, that found Airbnb responsible for a 1.3% rent increase over a 3 year period in New York: https://mcgill.ca/newsroom/files/newsroom/channels/attach/ai...
I wish I had read the texbook or something similar sooner to gain knowledge like this. Used latex for years without knowing the basics and I regret that a lot.

Also, (v)phantom and smash are something I really should have learned before all those fancy packages, nowadays I'm mostly using context anyways.
This exactly.

The cold war was ended by the Strategic Defense Initiative - not because it worked but because we forced the USSR to pour resources into matching us and it bankrupted the country.
Possibly, I think the noted downsides of the methodology prevent drawing any conclusions at all let alone decisively counted ones.
Confirmation bias. Many cities that are larger than Barcelona don't have that problem.
Google Is 'Helping' China's PLA Says U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
Nuclear submarines?
> Distributed across all these entities

No. Five newspapers.

"The report investigates how five newspapers covered Islam in 2017... The newspapers were all Murdoch’s: the Australian, Herald Sun, Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, and Adelaide Advertiser."

There are presumably many thousands more in the other Murdoch properties around the world.
The argument that science is a social construct is easily disproven by the device you are typing this on, which is build upon science. However, the claim that some science is more believable than other science is obviously correct.

Science is a network of knowledge [1] where central nodes can be assumed to be more likely an accurate representation of something predictive. The literature critical theory claim that it is arbitrary does not acknowledge those relationships, effectively missing the forest for the trees which also explains the shoddy science done in critical theory’s name.

Science is progressed by building new leaf nodes and supporting them through other nodes as evidence, or by showing that core nodes are not as predictive as you thought they were.

[1] https://youtu.be/bxdBRKmPhe4
No. Islam, and its followers, are not perfect. Why should they be totally free from criticism?

Edit: Would you say it's 8 too many per day if they were trashing Trump? (or Israel, or Hillary Clinton, or anything/anybody else with faults)
Why should one make the blanket assumption that criticism of Islam bad? If a cleric says women should not have the right to vote, why is it a bad thing for me to criticize this Islamic cleric, and the broader trends such statements reflect?

Let's be clear: there absolutely are valid reasons to be critical of Islam. It is entirely appropriate, for example, to "trash" the fact that in some regions of the word the majority of Muslims support executing those that leave the religion: http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religi...

The undertone of the article seems to be implying that negative media coverage of Islam is reponsible for Islamaphobia. While I'm sure many people erroneous apply negative comments about trends in Islam asa whole with individual Muslims, the blanket assumption that criticism of Islam equates to Islamaphobia is also reductive and non-productive.

(Deleted bit about the number of companies Murdoch owns, as it is not relevant to the study in question).
It’d be interesting to see the numbers from another media conglomerate for comparison.
What happens when one of your friends behaves in exactly the same way? Do the two of you ever manage to actually talk to each other?
Only you can decide what tools are best for your projects. Jquery is javascript. It's a clever tool that often results in better, clearer, readable syntax.

Creative devs or "mid level" front-enders like myself enjoy its clean syntax and reliable operation. I am VERY thankful for Jquery in how it helped me understand and execute more difficult concepts, and complex interfaces, and gave me opportunity to make better things beyond my vanilla abilities.
I think this depends on the type of the product. It's important that the team allows and finds the right spot to restart with more focus on architecture and code quality to not loose motivation of later employees
How strictly and often are those laws enforced? I don't think anyone is suggesting that they gather together in a back-alley kitchen to talk shop with the Joker. Rather, it's not unreasonable to think that many of the people involved in an area's real estate market are connected, socially, and share their independent strategies in the course of socializing.
> Are you currently selling your unused possessions on Craigslist? That camping gear or extra set of kitchenware?

Can you create new land?

No. They are completely different things.
Thanks for catching this inaccuracy, I'll update the original post.
The credibility of the Imam of Peace being called into question is a new thing for me. I follow him on social media and find his overall message to be uplifting and positive.

This post questions his title and Wikipedia states he's a self proclaimed Imam. His website seems to reference some authorities claiming hes legit: https://imamtawhidi.com/licenses/

He's far from perfect in all of his messaging but overall his messages are positive.
No, this did not pass. All that has passed is that you need to "register" your vacant storefront or be fined for _not registering_.

https://hoodline.com/2019/03/board-of-supervisors-passes-leg...
Demo
Really handsome
If you park in a car park for too long but no one notices you can drive off and be totally fine. If you don't pay taxes someone could work it out and look in to history to catch you out.
Learning a human language is not "hard" in the way that rocket science is "hard". Almost anyone can learn a language and many of the least smart people in the world are adept in at least one human language. That might be obvious. We all speak at least one language because we learned it in childhood.

What's less obvious is that learning a second language is not "harder" than learning a first language -- at least in the way that learning rocket science is "harder" than learning a card game. Language is not difficult. It's has evolved in the way that it has precisely because that's the way we think already.

However, learning a human language is "hard" in that human languages are huge. Normal adult proficiency for a college graduate is over 20,000 word families. There are about 1500 common grammatical structures. The combination of idiomatic phrases for a fluent speaker is mind boggling.

Learning a language is not complicated -- it's a grind. People fail to learn human languages not because they lack the ability to learn a language, but rather because they are unable or unwilling to simply put in the time and effort. It takes the average human child 12-18 years of full time study and practice to get to adult level proficiency and fluency in their first language. You can do it considerably faster for subsequent languages if you know how, but this is really the benchmark you should compare against.

Computer languages, in comparison, are "harder" to understand, but are orders of magnitude smaller. We're not talking 30% as big here, we're talking 0.01% as big. I don't think the task is in any way comparable.
They fired anybody who had any doubts like the CFO at the beginning of the book. Someone who honestly wants to solve a problem doesn't do that. They also never had any real idea how their stuff should actually work other a "vision".
Netflix Confirms That It Won't Be Part of Apple's New Service
Meanwhile in Australia you get tax rebates for the very same thing.
> Let's try something else

N=8 or 9 (low power), 150 mg/kg(!) doses.

That's like ingesting 11 g of the stuff for a 75 kg adult.
My own "one year later" post about Vue for those interested: https://stribny.name/blog/2019/01/one-year-with-vue-js.
Never tried to eliminate one. But I’ve had them reviewed by lawyer friends who suggested edits (that were accepted) to make the agreement much more employee friendly while still protecting the company’s right to IP created for the company.
Then you get issues with the rich from other places using your city as a wealth storage zone and suddenly you have millions of homes empty but no one has anywhere to live so the city dies.
Ooh, that's good. "Everyone has one, and they all sound incomprehensible to someone else".
Sure, but one can learn a great deal about Jquery in a short time. It's more accessible than the frameworks mentioned in OP.
Higher rents and cheaper houses because they are being sold to the people who want to live in them rather than to someone who already has 5 houses.
I wonder if Holmes was able to charm and dupe this director like she did so many other people. I read that sociopaths could be exceptionally manipulative and conniving.

The only goal of Holmes was to make money. Just like everyone else. The "noble goal" is just BS PR she concocted for herself to more easily influence and trick investors. Like her Steve Jobs' turtleneck and her fake "manly" voice.

Almost everything about her was fake and her only goal was cold hard cash. But I guess it makes for a better story if we turn her into a fallen saint who failed to achieve her "noble goal".
The subheadline says "And before you Fairfax readers say ‘I told you so’, they didn’t fare all that much better."
You're talking about cultural norms while the examples we're using here are in the context of economic transactions. Even still, yes, there were differences in who was considered responsible for problems. 100 years ago and more, the government was seen as less responsible, i.e, less regulation. This is why I chose it: Closer to an unregulated free market. That makes it more apt for examples where the free market had an opportunity to arrive at solutions for common problems, yet failed to do so.
I'm not angry. Are you angry? Let's sing kumbaya till no one is angry.
How about chastising the major world leader (of a New Zealand ally) who the shooter spent a lot of time quoting, and whose supporters and ideology were clearly a strong influence to the shoooter?
Absence of duties, schedules and deliverables can be quite a stress factor as well. I would not be surprised if that control group would end up suffering even more from being locked up in a free-falling can.
If there was some financial incentive to buy food and leave it to rot and this was causing a food shortage then yes, that is a sound idea.
One potentially useful context would be how this compares to other religions.

A quick internet search tells me there are about 1.5 billion Muslims in the world and about 2.19 billion Christians.

If we consider the amount of media attention the various catholic churches have been receiving it isn't difficult to believe the number of "negative" stories could be much higher than ~3000 per year.

Does anyone know if this comparison has been done?
> explicit semantic outline structure… superior

That! …but one with strong layout and referential accessibility of page numbers would be even better! I think we need page-wise referencing on novels and prose fiction too. It opens us up to the possibility of having real conversations and annotations deep inside the content of a book.

Reflow otherwise has always been a bane of _all_ digital books because it wasn't possible to scale content without leaving room for it. That's also the raison d'etre for other "non-web" formats, digital stores and even hardware to exist.