skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The pages for the search results are dynamic, based on external data.

Is the idea here that, for each point in time, a static concrete, crawlable permalink is generated, with a version of the page at that point in time for a particular query?

Seems like it’d be this huge spool of link rot. The common standard for dynamic content is to flag a URI path in robots.txt as non-static content, based on live data. This is near-universal behavior for anything generated on the fly, without the intent of external linking.

Since search results are sometimes related to availability of external content, like whether the server providing the content at the search result is down or not, the quality of snapshots for concrete results would become a curiousity over time.

It would be interesting to see such an experiment, but the resources needed to host such a curiosity, catering to spell check searches, spammy requests, bot requests and so on would be suicidally prohibitive.

I think you’d need a dyson sphere to power a server attempting to host a combinatorial explosion like that. All anyone needs to do is start querying the digits of pi, to produce a spacefilling spider trap.
The Curious Foreign Accent Syndrome
Buying green products is also a type of consumerism. Certain personalities gravitate toward "green" products and buy a bunch of that instead of reducing consumption (well, I guess consumption is reduced because "green" products are more expensive) for similar reasons as someone who buys other luxury goods. "Organic" and "gluten free" have become memes at this point, and people buy them without understanding what they really mean.

People do things because it makes them feel good. Talking about global warming doesn't make people feel good. And it's not a political issue, it's a social one, yet we've dumped it into the realm of politics because we don't want to be responsible for it. At least now we can say "party X is at fault because they didn't support legislation Y".

To truly fix a problem like global warming, we need to fix the social aspect of it. Find a way to play off people's self interest instead of making it a partisan issue. Only suggest policy changes as it relates to molding social perspective. We need to find a way for people to selfishly protect the environment, not force people to give up things they like to help someone else...

There are simple living communities, but I doubt they'll reach mainstream success. Nonetheless, I think those communities success because there's a way to communicate with others in the community. If you want to help, find a way to make it "cool" to save the environment, and make a way to display that publicly as a status symbol.

People are self interested, and to make significant progress generally, you need to play off that.
What makes you sure it is a coincidence?
Is it a coincidence? Or, is it the same problem again? It appears (by the map in the link) that this one also crashed not long after take-off.
They don't say what you say they do. Saying something happened doesn't mean they said who did it. They did not. Most likely it is false flag.
It used to be easy. You wore a suit to a professional job interview. End of story. End of discussion. Today, I assume that there are more than a few people in tech making hiring decisions who would flag that as "not a cultural fit."
I simply didn't want to jump to a conclusion, of course I can not be sure.
Chelsea vs. Wolves live stream free
https://qiita.com/GamE1419/items/33a77e30dda789a50a83

https://qiita.com/1419/items/f14bac144dca40e6086c
Beware of Computation in Static Initializer
Is the assumption then that "you" means only the conscious part of your brain?
This argument is not much different than what the grandparent is referring to. weev was convicted of conspiracy to access a computer without authorization because he advised a guy who discovered a publicly available HTTP API hosted by AT&T that returned email addresses based on guessable ids. The conviction was overturned, but on procedural grounds, not legal ones.
Well, it's better than a trial by your accuser.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years%27_War#Casualti...

The war ranks with the worst famines and plagues as the greatest medical catastrophe in modern European history.[78][79] Lacking good census information, historians have extrapolated the experience of well-studied regions.[80] John Theibault agrees with the conclusions in Günther Franz's Der Dreissigjährige Krieg und das Deutsche Volk (1940), that population losses were great but varied regionally (ranging as high as 50%) and says his estimates are the best available.[81] The war killed soldiers and civilians directly, caused famines, destroyed livelihoods, disrupted commerce, postponed marriages and childbirth, and forced large numbers of people to relocate. The overall reduction of population in the German states was typically 25% to 40%.[82] Some regions were affected much more than others.[83] For example, Württemberg lost three-quarters of its population during the war.[84] In the region of Brandenburg, the losses had amounted to half, while in some areas, an estimated two-thirds of the population died.[85] Overall, the male population of the German states was reduced by almost half.[86]

All told that DA map seems to be grounded in the best research available. It’s also a great example of how a primary shock opens the way for massive secondary casualties due to diseases and social disruption. The war itself in terms of direct casualties was dwarfed by resultant famine and epidemic diseases as a result of the primary casualties and destruction.

Here’s a simple thought experiment: What happens in densely populated cities when everything from sanitation to firefighting breaks down due to primary casualties? We’re not rural 17th century Germans, so a fire is going to spread catastrophically if the people who are meant to fight it are sick or afraid to leave their families. Just like the 30 Years War, but on a far greater scale, the secondary effects would dominate.
If it's such an affordable and great idea, why don't CA & NY implement it independently of the rest of the states and let their residents utilize the system?

Why does it have to be an every-state solution?
I tried to follow several non fiction but end up not finishing. Always take time to digest the idea
Datalog is awesome as is Logic Programming generally. It's not only useful in static program analysis but also in areas as diverse as synthetic biology and data integration.

There's lots of datalog and similar technology in most Knowledge Graph platforms, too. For example, http://stardog.com/.
> in sub-Saharan Africa while excavating the site of Akrokrowa in Ghana.

Article never says if this is modern Ghana or the Ghana Empire. Elsewhere it uses "Nigeria", and then goes back to talking about Akrokrowa being near the Mali Empire.

I wish it will be a bit more specific. There seems to be a dearth of historical/archeological information about the site that is modern day Ghana (save legendary accounts from various tribes) before the Portuguese arrived at Elmina.
SAT/SMT by Example
Example to Set Border Radius of an Image in React Native
It doesn't tell us anything about free will other than the fact that the process of decision making happens prior to our conscious awareness, which we already knew.
Gotta plug shodan, the search engine for refrigerators (and any other connected device/service)

https://www.shodan.io
As I wrote earlier, I am not flying with 737 Max until this issue is going to be addressed.
I always thought WSL was only meant to be a dev-tool. Do you have any links where there is a mention of a plan for them to be prod? (I know that's not what you're mentioning but wondering if that's how you guessed...)
This is essentially what single-payer is, except people are free to determine who the actually want to cover. A bunch of normal folks setting aside money.

Unless people just expect 'the rich' to pay for everything.
The commenter did not list it as a positive example, just as an example.
> I can’t understand the doctors that didn’t say fuck it I don’t care what these morons think and didn’t just vaccinated the kid.

Probably because they didn’t want to lose their medical license, and make their degree (that they’re still paying back their debt on) suddenly worthless?
As have I, it's a fairly common racket. However, rights to a trophy / rights to use the logo etc are also sold by perfectly legitimate awards too.
Ye, it's is kinda obvious that the decision is made before you "know it". How would it otherwise work.
Looks like it crashed at a very steep angle.

Previous crash was involving a stall prevention software overwhelming the pilot input.

It was said to be added to new 737 due to it getting slightly tail heavier, and as a safeguard to pilot overreacting to it feeling unusual.
Nix[0] does this, sort of. It doesn't merge everything into one tree at runtime, but instead builds every package to a unique path, which gets embedded into downstream dependees. It assembles the dependency tree into a DAG, and uses this to automatically parallelize builds (where safe). Builds automatically run in ephemeral containers, to ensure that all dependencies are accounted for. There are also importers for many languages, and an exporter for Docker images (where each Nix package becomes one Docker layer, up until a limit that you specify).

[0]: https://nixos.org/nix/
Difficult to tell. I'd probably stay within a plain dev environment as long as possible. Just keep in mind you can't rely on host auth within Docker if you ever wanted to use it. Besides, it's never wrong to learn something new, and Docker isn't difficult to pickup.
Yup, and besides, Go has the unsafe (https://golang.org/pkg/unsafe/) package, which allows for basically the same sort of unsafety as Rust's unsafe.

In fact, I would say Rust is typically more safe than Go, because in Rust you can mark any code as unsafe, it doesn't necessarily have to involve unsafe pointers. For example in Rust FFI functions are typically marked unsafe even if they don't involve pointers. There's no way to do that in Go.

Another example is strings: Rust ensures that strings are always valid UTF-8 by marking any function that could break that as unsafe. OTOH in Go you strings can contain invalid UTF-8 if I recall correctly.
Most incidents are going to happen at the two parts of the flight with least margin for error, take-off and landing. Even if something bad does go wrong in cruise, you are very far from the ground and glide well, you have lots of chances to fix it and not die.

So, sure, it might not be a coincidence, but "it happened near take off" is not surprising.
Forecasting from a Regression with a Square Root Dependent Variable
Giving the infrequency of airplane crashes, it probably isn't coincidence.

Very unlikely for a brand new plane to suffer issues with altitude shortly after take off.

Even less likely for it to happen twice in a span of a few months.

However, aviation history has more than a handful of samples where a new design suffered multiple crashes shortly after introduction and the cause was ultimately a design flaw.
Just to add a bit to this:

>> Using data from drafts carried out by humans, I trained a neural network to predict what card the humans would take out of each pack. It reached 60% accuracy at this task. And in the 40% when the human and the model differ, the model’s predicted choice is often better than what the human picked.

How the model's pick is "better than what the humn picked" is never made clear, but since accuracy is measured by the model's ability to match its training set, I assume that's also what is meant by "better": the model was better than a human in memorising and reproducing the decks it saw during training.

Well, you'd never evaluate a human's deckbuilding skills by how well they can reproduce a deck they've seen before. Given the same deck archetype, 10 humans will probably make 10 different card choices, for reasons of their own. It's like trying to evaluate how people style their hair by measuring how similar their hair looks to some examples of particular hair styles. It's a concrete measure, but it's also entirely meaningless.

This effort really suffers in terms of evaluation, and so we have learned nothing about how good the model is, which is a shame.
The frighting thing is, I was just looking at tickets for that exact flight leg (but the opposite direction), for an upcoming trip this summer.

I am not flying any leg on the 737 Max now.
I've got a customer that uses docker to make binary distribution easier. All runs on a single machine and a docker-compose file is all they need. I don't think they'll ever need kubernetes unless they change the way they sell their products.

Docker is useful for developers because we pull containers and run on Ubuntu and OSX them without having to install anything. Much easier than Vagrant.
Sure, and seeing some elecrical patterns in DRAM circuitry will predict changes before they show up on your monitor too. That's just how computers work.

Similarly, unconscious activity is just how consciousness and choice work. That doesn't mean that free will doesn't exist. It's a complete misunderstanding of the concept.
And most crucially, this system can't be overridden using stick inputs whereas previous systems on the 737 were. And this change amongst others was kept relatively hidden by Boeing as a cost-savings measure, so that a 737 pilot can fly a new MAX without needing a new certification.
Google can sorta already do #2 and what you are asking for is very hard in it's entirety. Wolfram Alpha is a great prototype but it also shows how hard it is to do in the general case. When Wolfram works it is amazing, but it often doesn't work. The problem is that there is too much ambiguity for the current state of the art of NLP and ML. However I do think it is possible to do what you are asking if you are able to constrain the context to one or a few major topics.
A CMYK jigsaw puzzle
Urgh. I had not thought about some ill effects:

1. It used no ad-blocking. Hence the bot is happy to download all trackers and advertisements! Also trackers know my pocket bookmarks now...

2. Websites are ugly. In a 1440x2000 screenshot of a national geographic article, the top 1440x1500 pixels consist of black with just a grey round progress in the middle and the word "ADVERTISEMENT" at the top.

3. Websites are wasteful. Many warc archives clock in at 30 to 50 MB. Without downloading media, a single (article) webpage is 30MB!

4. While consulting the archive, my adblocker allows everything since the initial page is on file protocol. It seems archivebox does not rewrite the URLs in its html output (as wget's convert-links option would do). So trackers and ads galore when opening output.html and even archive/<timestamp>/index.html which automaticaly load the other files.
Makes one wonder why complete eradication of the health "system" wouldn't fix its problems.

If you like your startup, you can use your startup. Free market always works better.
While my incredibly rational side tends to agree with your point, my closer-to-the-reality side tends to think that the real world doesn't exactly operate in a state where "consumerism, environment, politics and income inequality" are not mixed up already.

The picture isn't clear, there isn't a single issue that makes the world as it is today purely by itself. So I would blame consumerism, together with everything else you listed - and I would strongly believe that you need to put the blame on every single one of these things at the same time.
Interesting that you’re actually advocating for this type of “lord of the flies” culture. It actually indicates your org doesn’t have clear direction or technical competence (imo). I’d personally be wary of joining such a company. I’ve been a part of too many directionless zombies myself.
All of them. It would be part of your migration process.

Let's say you want users to have multiple emails, your scripts would be as follows:

multiple_emails.up.sql:

CREATE TABLE user_emails (
user_id INT NOT NULL REFERENCES (users.id),
email VARCHAR NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO user_emails SELECT id, email FROM users;
ALTER TABLE users DROP COLUMN email;

multiple_emails.down.sql:

ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN email VARCHAR;
INSERT INTO users SELECT id, email FROM users;
DROP TABLE user_emails;
What happens 11 seconds before the conscious decision can be part of free will, I guess.
I basically agree with the technological argument made in the post. Orchestration plays the role of OS, where resources are defined, managed and protected. Containers are something analagous to device drivers, presenting the underlying resource as narrowly and efficiently as possible.

But that's the life I expect, not the one I live today. In the present day I'm much more reliant on docker than on kubernetes, and I cannot live without being able to freely mix and match go, python, or Java , really old and really new, in any host configuration I want.
I don't see why tho - either way you have an implementation file to add, so what's the difference?
It seems pretty obvious that when confronted with a choice you generally take an immediate biased opinion and then spend some time reviewing the alternatives just in case. It wasn't 11 seconds until they made the decision, it was 11 seconds until the decision was confirmed and vocalized. It sounds like 'basic' image focus detection.
Great article on the technical challenges of meeting their tough list of requirements.

But the headline made me think this was going to be about a glaring gap in the Go ecosystem but I can’t tell if that’s true from what they wrote. Only one library was mentioned as a theoretical solution. Are there others?
Someone is probably pulling all of the flight logs for the 737 MAX right now and is going to see how many other non-fatal cases of altitude issues after take have been reported.
> The author gives a visual example, for example, of why basic vectors 1,0 -1,0 are bad. The article shows they cannot span the whole space.

I'm assuming you didn't mean the word "basic" this way, but on the off chance you did: {(1,0), (-1,0)} doesn't just not span R^2; it's not a basis of R^2. Partly because it doesn't span R^2 like you've said. But it's also linearly dependent, which is really the more important thing (since every linearly independent subset of a vector space whose cardinality matches the dimension of the space is a basis).

Just wanted to make the terminology of "basis" clear, since you used the term "basic" which could somewhat collide with it.

> On a separate note, I am wondering if such good step by step + counter examples, knowledge presentation -- is a result of author studying at MIT, or a natural trait (or both)?

MIT has very high quality instruction, and the author could be naturally talented at exposition. But I doubt it's because of either of these things. Realistically you could attend any math department in the top 100 and be equally capable of succinctly writing about this topic at the same detail for a general audience the way the author has. Schools like MIT shine on the upper level material and research capital.

Likewise it's probably less about natural talent and more about practice and good editing. On the other hand, what would be very helpful is getting exposure to many textbooks with different pedagogical styles. Someone who learns linear algebra in the hardcore abstract style might have difficulty presenting the material in an accessible, geometric way even if they fully understand it. Similarly if you've only learned about vectors in the Euclidean sense of direction and magnitude, it can be difficult to teach in the more abstract, non-geometric style.
Unless these orgs can replace it with something as feature complete and stable as Docker I suspect their customers will ultimately have the last word.
You can use macvlan (or ipvlan) with Docker, it's built in.

But yes I agree (as a former Docker Inc employee and current maintainer of moby which is what Docker is built from), the default networking in Docker is often problematic... firewall handling is annoying, at least from a sysadmin perspective.
The people that such a policy would actually apply to are not who you think of as typical pro-plague people. Vaccination rates among low income households and minority households is lower than white households. It would mostly target those people instead of the pro-plague movement.
> What’s wrong with Docker? Why would I want to switch to something else?

Security, performance, reliability and following best engineering practices. Everything else is fine.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.05039.pdf

https://hackernoon.com/another-reason-why-your-docker-contai...

https://www.scylladb.com/2018/08/09/cost-containerization-sc...

https://thehftguy.com/2017/02/23/docker-in-production-an-upd...

http://catern.com/posts/docker.html
I wonder if capsules are better at recognizing shapes
We need to make companies criminally liable for this information if it gets stolen. If they can’t secure it, don’t collect it.
My wife, a civil engineer, loves all kinds of new things, especially new car models.

Me, the software engineer, am extremely paranoid with newly released models of any kind. I'd rather wait a few years for it to be tested, never being an early adopter for it.
I'm allowed to look at property from the street. There's nothing stopping me from walking around the neighborhood looking into everyone's property. I can even walk up to the house in most cases, and peering into windows is usually legal as well. I would even argue that trying the doors is also legal, though entering is probably illegal in most areas.

Accessing a URL is like walking around the neighborhood looking from the street. Trying different URLs is like peering into windows. Trying the door is like testing default credentials.

To make something a crime, you need to prove some kind of loss as well as intent. If there's no intent, it's likely a civil case to get restitution (e.g. you won't arrested for breaking something in a store accidentally). Likewise, you could get arrested for intent without loss (e.g. tried to break something in a store, but failed).

IMO, it should only be illegal if there's intent to harm. Likewise, if you accidentally harm something without intent (e.g. accidentally DOS a server), you should be expected to make restitution. Both need to be proven in a court of law, criminal if there's intent, civil if there isn't, and if there's no harm or intent, there's no crime.
The amazing part to me is that it still sucks: it’s 2019 and random hangs requiring a full session restart are still a daily occurrence, and I recently measured keystroke latency at 130+ms over a LAN. That’s much worse than using X11 over SSH ever was.
Yes, athletic gear x1000.

A long time ago I realized that dressing without showing brand logos was much, much classier. E.g. shop at J. Crew or Uniqlo (no logos on any shirts) and not Ralph Lauren or Tommy Hilfiger (damn polo player/flag on every single shirt). There are plenty of brands/pieces without logos.

It baffles me, though, why athletic gear isn't the same. Everyone winds up sporting their allegience to Nike or Adidas or Puma or Under Armour or Reebok or Lululemon or whatever it is. I'm unaware of any major athletic brand, where I can buy a full range of workout gear (tees, shorts, sneakers) that doesn't advertise itself.

I don't get it. Why isn't there a J. Crew or Uniqlo of workout gear?

(Even brands that sell mostly unbranded clothing seem to compulsively slap some kind of "signature" on their workout gear specifically, e.g. Gap attaches it's own special Gap-athletic logo, and Old Navy has a kind of signature stripe on everything.)
It’s a shitty UI isn’t it? In fact you don’t, you just need to enter a string in the username box.
"It's not the fall that kills you, it's the ground" is an adage for a reason
Exactly, we have POCed Docker and realised we have a solution for every aspect that it is trying to address. I found one and exactly one use case for Docker, running CI/CD workload.