skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Hm... Nope, ElasticSearch is a good entry point into Lucene. As your software needs grow, you may discover the benefits of going a level below. Start with ELK, then discover ElasticSearch, then use Lucene with your own way of distributing data over multiple machines if needed.

Personally, I never had to use more than 1 machine even for huge data sets (JFYI, Orbis and Wikipedia fit onto one bare metal server).
Bindable.scala: library of type classes for creating Binding.scala components
I actually tried to implement a SPA using just ES6 (in Typescript) some years back and ran into quite a few problems with data flow, which frameworks like Vue.js readily solve.

I think that (for example) Vue by itself is quite light (mu Vue apps were never slow, even on a computer that choked on most other webpages). The problem is that many web developers don't care about performance and will hapilly fire tens of HTTP requests while loading the page, which happens to be over 1M because of all the unnecrssary JS and CSS libraries (looking at you, Bootstrap!).
Google Cloud Bigtable Now Has Global Replication
I'm a hiring manager who shares this view. I see three distinct but overlapping skillsets with creating machine learning - as they mention in the article: data engineering, data science, ML engineering. I would never hire a person who only had one of those skillsets. I prefer all three, but can settle for two depending on the situation.

The trouble you might be having in getting an interview is probably partly to do with your background and likely also that those job postings get A LOT of submissions. Other hiring managers in my department as well as myself have found we get 10x more submissions for DS/ML positions than software dev positions. In general it's a really unrefined and new job skills that anyone and everyone who's taken a coursera course in regression or clustering will apply.
Gotta pay the bills somehow. I think that providing enterprise support is a very good way to do so. There is nothing compelling them to develop an official solution and a third-party one already exists. It looks like this is a good example of open source WAI.
I think AwesomeWM allows that
Fair point - updated my original comment to remove the expansion of the "bay area."
requests, the python package for HTTP/S
Well it makes sense for F5.

Their main buisness, hardware loadbalancing is rapidly diminishing, so buying in NGINX seems like a sensible move.

After all, its much easier to sell support to people who are actually _using_ your product.
> Also, it's much better for our Front desk staff, as they don't have to constantly check the email. There is only 1 fax number, and anyone can send out the fax and whoever is working at the front desk gets a printed copy without doing anything.

Seems like the answer here is to just have a "fax machine" but replace "phone number" with "email address" and automatically print any documents sent to it ("documents" being defined as the emails themselves and/or - if present - attachments in specific formats like PDF, DOC(X), ODF, etc.). Shouldn't be terribly difficult even for a DIY project, let alone as a full-blown commercial product.

A spam filter would of course be a given.
Why Did the Apple Cider Vinegar Diet Gain Popularity and Its Effectiveness
That picture is from where I live, Brixton in London - not exactly a low crime area.

Cable is locked at both ends. I've never tried it, but strikes me you'd have to be particularly stupid to put a cutting implement through a live electricity line.
Have you consider aiming higher? Like working for a company in which you believe in or qualifying in a new domain?
It's not about that. FPGAs behind engineering solution to digest packets at big PPS behind interface is what it does.

You know, Cisco's IOS XR is built on Linux, but all the real parts are behind their private kernel modules running on ASICs and FPGAs, traffic doesn't even touches the TCP/IP stack of the OS. Cisco ASAs have Celeron/Atom CPUs which obviously couldn't hold the specified loads.
So the bank shouldn't be able to send DMCA takedown notices, right? Because they granted npm the license to redistribute the package.
Interview with Max, an open-source deep learning engineer
I think the key difference here is the use of multiple virtual desktops in the tiling case. In my setup I typically have one vdesk for browsing, one for docs, one split between code/terminal. I may have others open for chat and music, and I can switch between any with one key combination, or resize with another. I love that when I open a new window it will maximize the screen real estate of wherever I put it.

Granted, I've been using i3 for more than half a decade, but I do agree with sibling posters on how 'freeing' the experience is once you get used to it. There is no doubt a learning curve; but in my experience it's on the order of days.
> to a goal that he views as essential to the survival of humanity

Can we have a take that doesn't start with "Elon is the messiah"?
Do you know of any blog posts that would discuss a setup like this? Sounds pretty interesting.
I'm glad someone finally explained this! It makes some sense, but I'm curious, was the combining of the bits of the plane to get the index to look-up done in hardware? Because it sounds like storing 3 5-bit pixels in the expected way in 2 bytes (with a bit left over) wouldn't be any harder in software than combining 5 bits from different planes. But if the hardware handled assembling the various bits, then I guess it would probably be faster. Am I understanding that correctly?
If you're comfortable sharing, what did you do to get out of that state?
What happened is the realisation that FOSS developers also have to pay their bills and idealism only takes so far.

So anyone that refuses to pay for their tools will eventually either loose them, or contend to be happy to use lesser ones.
You don't need hooks to do any of this, but hooks have everything to do with closures. Hooks are created every single render, unconditionally, guaranteeing that each hook is one-to-one with the render environment that created it. The point of using hooks is that you are always referencing the props and state at the time of creating the hook and not at the time of running the hook. In this way, hooks become part of your rendered output.
I always thought most of their ‘stores’ were actually showrooms and didn’t sell cars, they only helped you pick options and let you test drive.

Do they have any ‘traditional’ dealerships that keep inventory on lot?
No it is not rewriting the world...
It's a hosted service with multiple categories rather than FOSS you can self-host (with public examples).

I don't think it doesn't deserve to exist just because something else is already doing something similar.
https://archive.is/https://resecurity.com/wp-content/uploads...
> I will trust market signals over journalists and experts any day.

i think it’s a balance, market signals alone aren’t enough imo. it’s multitude of sources that are important, and then to correlate with data that indicates a trend in one direction or another... “market signals” don’t necessarily take into account morals or “human dignity” etc... if we just relied on “market signals” we would arguably still have child labor and (even more) lax labor laws because desperate people will fill any role they can get to “fit the market”

that being said “journalism” now a days is more and more clickbait and sensationalism (profit motive at work?) so i can totally understand the sentiment....
How times change. Back in the day OpenGL had a paletted texture extension (EXT_paletted_textures), but nothing supports it anymore. I guess the extra indirection doesn't work well with GPU hw architectures?
No one would use such a thing. Very few open source code is in the public domain. The only one I can think of off the top of my head is SQLite.
I can't understate how bad changing "you'll be a Man, my son" to "you'll be an Adult, my child" would be.

It would be like, in the pursuit of lowering your sodium intake, making bread without salt. Is it healthier? Maybe. What does it taste like now? Cardboard.
I'm not sure this counts as "bare metal" since it runs in a VM. Though doing it this way is probably cheaper then using an FPGA.
Laravel is incredibly well crafted and documented, one of the highest quality OSS projects ever, IMHO.
It was an SQL dump of their entire database: https://archive.is/https://resecurity.com/wp-content/uploads...
For the tweet in TFA

>That single @linode VPS takes 50,000,000+ requests per month for http://nomadlist.com , http://remoteok.io

So it's not that early stage. I think remoteok.io is currently the worlds #1 remote working site. ("Remote OK is the #1 remote jobs board in the world trusted by millions of remote workers" it says)
Thanks for the response. I tried a previous version of Sway and am interested to try it again now that it has reached 1.0. I understand the nature of it, but I still think at one screenshot would be helpful for people to get the general idea. I would use one that includes a number of bells-and-whistles enabled, as it's easier to visualize something removed then to guess what might be added.
HaProxy does load balancing better, it never was a primary feature of nginx. Varnish can do the caching. Apache/Lighttpd can serve files and CGI, but maybe not as efficiently.

Apache is really struggling on resource consumption. It's still living in the world of one process or one thread per connection.

Operationally it always ends up in a clusterfuck of rewrite rules and there are many gotchas with undocumented and misbehaving directives.
The sad part about this truth is that because it is PHP, the vast majority of people will dismiss it out of hand.
Unless you assume some magic/soul/etc, then a human brain is a proof that there exists a non-impossible algorithm that learn to be a General Intelligence, and it can run on non-impossible hardware.
Another idea that I find fun to think about, especially for fiction: What if those ancient humans weren't primitive creatures newly learning things, but remnants of a civilization making do with whatever they had left?

e.g. If everyone in the future uses always-connected AR glasses and personal AI assistants, would anyone bother to write much, "in the wild"?

Someone discovering a cool sightseeing/hiding spot may Instagram a few photos, saying "follow the arrows.", and we kind of already do that with geocaching etc. [0]

In the farther future, someone may only find the crudely-etched arrows, with no reason to assume that anything like the internet existed back now. :)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocaching
Thanks for the thoughtful reply, it's much appreciated.

> you also want the mission statement for people that aren't motivated by money

I wouldn't agree with this — we want people who are motivated by AGI going well, and don't want to capture all of its unprecedentedly large value for themselves. We think it's a strong point that OpenAI LP aligns individuals' success with success of the mission (and if the two conflict, the mission wins).

We also think it's very important not to release technology we think might be harmful, as we wrote in the Charter: https://openai.com/charter/#cooperativeorientation. There was a polarized response, but I'd rather err on the side of caution.

Would love people who think like that to apply: https://openai.com/jobs
Tesla Goes on Truck and Trailer Shopping Spree with $14M Worth of Common Stock
One object lesson in how this can go wrong: REI

This "cooperative" ostensibly elects its board. In reality, nomination by existing members of the REI board is the only way to stand for election by the REI membership, and when you vote you only by marking "For" the nominated candidates (there's no information on how to vote against, though at another time they indicated that the alternative was "Withold vote"). While the board members don't earn much, there is a nice path from board member to REI executive ... which can pay as much as $2M/year for the CEO position.
This arrangement is highly questionable, but it does have one advantage, touched on in the last paragraph: you can write a 1bpp drawing routine that does whatever you need, and it can deal with any number of planes. Like, if you've got 4 planes, and you need to draw a line in colour 7, you just use your 1bpp line drawing routine to draw a 1 in planes 0, 1 and 2, and a 0 in plane 3.
> If their code is proprietary, no one can use it. Even if they accidentally uploaded it to a public site.

Surely this depends on the terms under which they uploaded it. I would expect npm to have a legal structure in place under which code you upload for public use is also licensed for public use.
Just put the package in a git repo like Github and point to it w/ package.json

EDIT - I see what you are saying - your own registry with browser and all.
It was linked from https://resecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/, which is a common and public URL, and anything uploaded there is intended to be public. Of course, whoever uploaded it either wasn't aware or didn't think it through--maybe they thought nobody would ever visit that page.

As you can see, the link is gone now.
Yes, significantly more for comparable performance. And then PaaS is not a silver bullet, either: every service has SLOs and downtime.
One of the most dumbfounding things I've encountered throughout my career is the python community's dogged persistence at avoiding using libcurl.
I've opened it for editing so you can change it now.
Or perhaps a more us-vs-them fork, maybe something like 'ngin-us' (pronounced 'ingenious')
The I-Pace competitor would be the model X.

It also starts at double the listed price of the Model 3.

I'd rather have an I-pace.
It's visible, but only really in terms of libraries and frameworks, not as user-facing tools.

OpenEXR, Alembic, USD, OpenImageIO, OCIO, Open Shader Language, OpenSubDiv, etc, etc.
Indeed. I run Linux and FreeBSD on all of my computers but the vast majority of the time I spend on HN I am browsing using my iPhone. On the couch, when I am walking between places, during breaks etc.
> With how prolific Amazon is, most of the consumer market relies on reviews to discern which products to buy, and is better off for it.

Amazon doesn't sell a lot of products that people are getting financing for at $30K+ prices and trading in other expensive products as part of the purchase transactions.

Things like cars and homes are not the same, for people of normal financial means, as phone chargers and boxed cereal, or even big-screen TVs.

(Also not convinced that online reviews are much of a benefit beyond partially compensating for problems unique to online retail, like the lack of gatekeeping.)
Maybe. At least our company won't touch GPL code; as one colleague described to me, if you violate a proprietary license, a company will come after you for money, while violating a GPL license gets the EFF involved who will come after you for your source code.

I'm still wary, though. I could imagine if the resultant fines or source code releases from violating a GPL license weren't a strong enough deterrent, you could win by using a GPL-licensed product enough, then parry off attacks from EFF/FSF until you do a complete rewrite of the product underneath, then pay the fine/contribution to EFF/FSF while toppling the original company. If the company is big enough, and can afford enough good lawyers, there may be legal ways to get around laws.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7572332
Please, it's arbitrary to run a private PyPi repository, all you need is a web server and a certain folder structure. If you want, you can even host everything on a private S3 and use a tiny Nginx configuration to authenticate the requests on behalf of pip [1].

Private npm repositories are an entirely different beast, and like GP mentions, there is no great option here.

[1] https://www.guido.nyc/pypi-s3/
Those are cheap and easy shots to take, with no burden of proof. But you actually don't know how hard we work for those things not to be true. Nor does it change the rules or the request that you abide by them.
I agree and disagree with this post. I do think data scientists need to be better at data processing and do more of it. But I still think you do need a separation of labor between people setting up pipelines and people building models from the data. The real issue is that there are a lot of data science departments where they wittle away at their models in some notebook and then they're "done" once the notebook is showing the right metrics. Data scientists should be writing their models from the beginning so that they can productionize them once they are finished. There shouldn't be frequent hand off events requiring lots of communication between DS, pipelines, and data engineering teams, there should be an integration process set up so the flow of work continues to function without intervention.
I used awesome for a few years and while I think you're correct to say it does try to do both, in reality it ends up doing neither very well, IMO.
I think I read in another study they are just moving to Instagram.
Yup, but that's exactly why IB isn't too relevant anymore. Ethernet had plenty of time to catch up because of PCIe-SIG and Intel dragging their feet.
Prior discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18037613
Honestly, they competed on price & marketing at first. The handwriting was already on the wall for these companies long before IB had any real advantage on speed. We were all limited by PCIe bandwidth, after all. So no matter what the link speed is, you're not going to get more bandwidth than what PCIe can provide.

I worked for Myricom when Mellanox was starting out with IB. I recall stories from that time of customers that would try IB for something like 1/2 to 1/3 of what we charged. But they could never get it to work, and ripped it out and installed Myrinet. Sadly, this made our management smug. Mellanox eventually ate their lunch because we never responded to their marketing and pricing war.
I wonder how much of that is related to Model 3 availability. To me, a high-end 3 seems like a better buy than a lower-end S.

If you expand your date selection farther back, it looks like the S price decline really started around July 2018.
Not unusually bad depreciation for a luxury car. Better than many.
Well, let's look at numbers, shall we? XLNX P/E is 37, INTC P/E is 12, MRVL P/E is 22.8, AVGO is 23.19, the current S&P 500 PE is 21.34. Of course P/E is just one number but it's certainly one important number. Do you have a better comparison that makes XLNX at this price an alluring stock?

My original comment reacted to nVidia acquiring Xilinx and I am trying to explain why that won't happen: it's too expensive.
Automation is just leverage. Sometimes you need the leverage of a trowel, other times you need a six-ton digger. And if you use the trowel, you can employ fewer people and skip approvals and certifications.

It does make sense to automate - after you have the design. But the type of automation also changes with scale. Ideally, at a small scale, your automation can be something like: A script to pull the database for its regular backup. A script to automate uploading new PHP scripts and site assets. A script to reinstall the dependencies on a fresh image. Some version control and another backup layer over all of this. And then a huge test suite running the gamut: user workflows, failure conditions, site attacks, data integrity, backups.

It's the followthrough into automating the QA processes that makes the product great, not the underlying stack(which in most cases is going to have to be treated like a placeholder in the event of real scale). And it mostly isn't substantial engineering challenges at any level: they're "tick off the boxes" exercises, they just punch above their weight in terms of delivered value.

It's the tendency to add more things to configure and more systemic non-linearity("in this mode it does X, in that mode it does Y, but when Z is enabled both modes do Q") that creates a serious IT headache, and that in turn kills your progress as an independent. Oftentimes you have to give up on using the new stuff, the theoretically good stuff, because the additional layers of automation mean that you end up doing original R&D for an apparently ordinary problem, and you can't actually get a build off the ground. Or you fight through numerous issues and get it working but with no established "best practice" to follow, you only half-understand how to configure it properly, leading to technical debt and future unknowns in the risk profile.
How to stop your iPhone from storing the locations of where you live, work visit
Sure. But to justify the three switches you must tell me more about this malware that would succeed with the baseband disabled in hardware while you continue to have wifi enabled in hardware.

I can only think of the special case where a carrier wants send a specially crafted message to exploit a flaw in FLOSS in order to implant malware that tricks the user about the status of the baseband. Still, if the carrier wanted to take that risk the only users who are protected are the ones who never switch on the baseband OS.

I don't think it makes sense to decrease usability for the off chance that some user has an idiosyncratic threat high enough to never use the baseband os, yet low enough to toggle wifi on and off.
We use their VPN client at where I work...it's a mess. Disconnects all the time, IF you can even get it to connect in the first place, it like's to sit there for up to 20 minutes sometimes before it finally connects. Almost never works with captive portals, and all sorts of syncing issues with our network drives.

To be fair, it might just have to do with our company's implementation, our IT department pretty hit or miss when it comes to implementing new stuff, it only rolled our 6 months ago and we do have 30,000+ employees/contractors so I'd imagine it's headache getting everything just right, but still.
Exactly this, it's slightly annoying to see the claim scenes are "slow" or "not what they used to be". They use the technology that it makes the most sense to use, weighing up encoding speeds, tooling, quality at the resolutions they care about, and output size. They will actually move when some of these technologies actually start providing major benefits that outstrip the existing technologies in these categories.
I think Hashicorp[0] has nailed down the open source enterprise model perfectly.

Where they make open source software for enterprise and provide services to support.

[0]: https://www.hashicorp.com
Watch Movies and channel your favorite Monologues.
Avast and Emsisoft release free decrypters for BigBobRoss ransomware
You are correct. CRF 23-27 is a sane range for good quality and compression. Once you hit 30 there are too many artifacts and it looks bad. Not sure why the author chose to recommend that for x264.
For acceleration.

That's 1 part of driving, it's just the part Tesla chosen to highlight because it's where electric cars have an advantage.

They are also heavier and tend to overheat if pushed.

Even in a 1/4 mile the Tesla is somewhere in the 10-11 second range. That's insanely fast, but it's not reaching the levels of purpose built drag racers or even some production cars.
This was wonderfully simple and concise. Thank you.
> The answer? Simple … a single Linode VPS.

Fully second that. I started some of my best projects on the small Intel Atom Linux server at my residence. And we all know the garage story of Facebook (and similar)
Seconded. It's not obvious from TFA if they are treating whatsapp or instagram as distinct or included. Color me skeptical. Maybe someone with access can chime in more on their methodology.
What stuff are you putting on your Pi through docker? Just getting started and interested to hear how others leverage it.
Software is copyrighted "by default". You don't need to apply for copyright like you would need to do with a patent.