skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>OK I'll just buy an LLC

When I bought code signing certificate for my LLC, in their infinite wisdom CA put "Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością" as CN, because that's what they saw on proof of ownership. "Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością" literally means "Limited liability company" in Polish.
That is exactly why we need safety rails.
How would let's encrypt verify the identity of the author?
"the good old days", as in, "the days when the average person had no freaking clue if something was safe, but installed it anyway because it's completely unreasonable to expect them to do otherwise"?

If your security model is "do your research" then you're going to fail.
I quit it cold turkey, got the headaches for a couple days, and at the longest time, didn't do it for a whole week. I felt okay and did work fine, but when I had a cup after being off it for that week, it worked. It was an actual drug with an actual buzz, and I was insanely productive with it. However, it seemed to stay in my system a lot longer, so I'd have to drink it real early in the morning, or else a cup I drank at 8am would have me up until midnight. I've eventually switched back to having just 1 cup in the morning (as opposed to 3-4/day when I originally quit).
We got a Moccamaster 3-ish years ago, and honestly I haven't been that happy with the coffee it makes. But we also don't have a grinder, so we are using preground beans. But those same beans when run through a Chemex pourover taste dramatically different. Even though the Moccamaster is meant to mimic the pour over brew.

I have switched to the Chemex, partly because as this article says I am liking the process. Partly because it tends to taste better. The Moccamaster does seem more consistent, it's just, to my taste, more consistently bad. Sometimes my Chemex is as bad, sometimes it is great... At home I have an Oxo BaristaBrain, and that is more consistently good, for some reason. But I also grind beans there with a pretty high end grinder (Virtuoso by ...?).

In the end, I have come to enjoy the break in the day that the brew gives me. I don't tend to take breaks otherwise, and I should, but that is a good opportunity.
Lockheed Martin | Onsite or REMOTE | Full Time | https://www.lockheedmartinjobs.com/job/lakeland/systems-arch...

Systems Architect Sr Stf - Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Architect

(Note: every other Friday is an off day!)

Are you ready to invent the future? The Future Enterprise Program (FEP) is developing and implementing a transformational operations strategy to position Lockheed Martin as the Aerospace and Defense leader in leveraging emerging, digitally-enabled capabilities to lower cost, speed-up development time, and create disruptive solutions to best serve our customers and stakeholders. We’re bringing the 4th Industrial Revolution to every role in the company.

Our Build team needs an Architect to support program tasks, activities, and stakeholders. For 2019 and beyond, the Build Team is tasked with setting up a corporate infrastructure that allows individual pieces of shop floor machinery to send and receive data securely from higher level data lakes.

Primary responsibility will include:
• Optimize the design and development of the IIoT architecture for FEP Build Team
• Ensure architecture integration between the FEP Build Value Streams and help set priorities
• Coach and drive IIoT architecture standards to support the evolution of the FEP vision and strategy

More jobs: https://www.lockheedmartinjobs.com/
OLTP vs. OLAP: what's the difference between them?
It's a strange test, giving credit for being able to show a distracting background image under the test or letting the desktop bleed through, but failing to check that both copy-and-paste systems are correctly functioning.

Performance tests somehow involve both Java and Python. I don't think that is how you do it. :-)
ThunderX2 isn't made by Apple.
And compile your compiler, and ...

(In reference to the classic paper: https://www.archive.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p7...)
Then go and buy another BMW 3-series, byotch, lol.

Go figure.
Honest question: A couple of years ago I worked for a startup. They used Agile, which mandates code reviews. "Brilliant", I thought, "that can only be good." I'd never really had code reviews before even though I've got decades in industry. I like the idea.

However there was no written (or often, even oral) statement of what it was supposed to do so all I could do was spot syntactic cruft and offer cleaner code, and... that was about it.

To me, without clear statement of code's intent it must be impossible to review that code meaningfully, but I've never come across this most basic requirement in Agile that the code must have a spec of some sort to review against.

What am I missing, or was their Agile practice simply wrong, or what?
Genuine question.
Some problems are irreducibly complex. There is no way to make the code smaller or simpler without losing essential functionality or performance.
you can. 1000 mile refund policy.
I can see how you gain energy but you’re also putting yourself deeper into a gravitational well that you’d have to expend energy to get out of.

Wouldn’t it be a wash?
> without even being able to try the product?

People can still try it, just not for free and from Tesla. I test drove a Model S P90 in 2012 from the store in Toronto and it changed my life. I can't afford the car, but it was an incredible experience for me. The test drive storeperson told me at the end of the (safe) trip that I could not drive back into the car basement parking lot. The last person they let test drive it into the parking lot totalled the car. So now for test drives they limit it to street-level. Anecdote and maybe irrelevant.

But if I want to test drive one today, I'd just go to Turo and rent one for like $50 and then not have to worry about someone over my shoulder telling me I'm gonna be a bad driver.

I'm not suggesting Turo or whatever is a replacement for a test drive! But it's also not the case that interested buyers have to buy without trying first.
Scheduling in React
Having watched people in the Tesla retail store at Westfield here in the UK, it was basically a playground for kids and adults alike. I reckon they sold very few cars if any through that outlet.

I'd buy one off the Internet. I bought my current car, a Citroen, off the Internet unseen. It's pretty low risk if you pay deposit with credit card here in the UK.
I use my own 10€/month 2TB server with OVH but also have it synced to Google Drive.
Not just any old postmodernism, though. This is blockchain postmodernism.
That's what I took from it. Forbes is aimed at the people buying solutions so from the perspective of a CIO or CTO (or even the people they're supporting with their analysis systems), the article is telling them that they may not be getting what they think they paid for.

This is about industry trends, and you CAN get a representative sample in reasonable time, for some definition of reasonable. The takeaway from this article is that what someone in the data space may think is reasonable isn't what someone who just paid for an army of data scientists and a data lake solution because those things are sexy thinks is reasonable.
The days of custom software are over in general. Every major niche has at least one major player that offers its services for free, selling your data (or ads, etc) in exchange. I'm not sure Sublime Text gets any money anymore now that VS Code does all the same things and more. Custom music players have been dead since Winamp 3. The 1990s and 2000s were like the Wild West for software, now it's like California, fully settled and complete with monopolies.
Buying a car and returning it is not the same as going on a test drive. Pretending it is the same thing is just ridiculous and super out-of-touch with the target audience of the lower-cost cars.
So the basis for tracking journalists and treating them with suspicion is that they were present during a newsworthy event (i.e. doing their jobs)?
You are not the only user who feels that way. Apply very explicitly said they do not think their users want iOS and macOS convergence. This needs to be taken in the context of apple recently providing tools for devs to port iOS apps to macOS. Here is the full quote from Tim Cook:

"We don't believe in sort of watering down one for the other. Both [The Mac and iPad] are incredible. One of the reasons that both of them are incredible is because we pushed them to do what they do well. And if you begin to merge the two ... you begin to make trade offs and compromises.

"So maybe the company would be more efficient at the end of the day. But that's not what it's about. You know it's about giving people things that they can then use to help them change the world or express their passion or express their creativity. So this merger thing that some folks are fixated on, I don't think that's what users want."

https://www.smh.com.au/technology/users-don-t-want-ios-to-me...
In 2019, Investment in the Blockchain Industry Will Grow by 88.7%
> insurance software suggests cheaper generics to the pharmacist

I have never heard of pharmacists using "insurance software". The pharmacy system requests coverage from the patient's insurance, and it is either accepted or rejected.

Additionally, if there is a generic they just fill it, assuming the patient consents. In fact, pharmacists in many states are required to point out generic alternatives if they exist.

> requires the pharmacist to do the leg work of asking the doctor to change the Rx based on what the insurance company wants (ie the cheaper medication)

If a prescription requires modification, the patient is required to go back to their doctor. Pharmacists cannot just ask doctors for prescription modifications.

Where are you getting these ideas from?
Ah, that's too bad.

We have one managed by yarn where I work, and it's only broken on me once. I occasionally get asked for help (maybe 1/3years/person) when somebody gets a cryptic error (well, not that cryptic, but they ask me because it's git related) from it, and rerunning the hook installation task has always fixed it.
Why would anyone buy a book online and wait for 3-5 days? -- Almost everyone in 1995.
If you like the functional aspects of Java, check out kotlin. It's quickly become my favorite programming languages because you get all the benefits of java's strongly typed OOP system with a lot of elegant functional features, and type inference!!
Goodness me, this was a chore to try and read. I guess points for postmodernism? Not sure what else to take from it.
Nobody here is accused of breaking the law. Are you lying about this or do you have other sources?
You don't need a show room for a test drive. The "schedule a test drive" page is still up on their web page,
Regulations Are Choking Out California's Legal Weed Industry
Revealed: Populist leaders linked to reduced inequality
>"If you are interested in projects like this ... consider applying" is even mentioned in the README.

* As long as you have citizenship... which is the minority.
> Can you name a country where the latest technology is developed by the gov't? Even in the highly socialist systems of Europe they rely on private companies to develop products.

And if you look at the actual financial statements, those private companies in Europe rely disproportionately on sales in the US market to fund their operations.
> absurd advice that security experts put out about "only download something you trust"

This is mostly a meme from the overzealous FOSS and privacy crowd, not the security crowd. Professional security engineers do not, as a rule, encourage software engineers (or end users more generally) to only use open source software because "you can inspect the code for vulnerabilities."

Anyone with legitimate security expertise will understand the benefits of specialization and core competencies. Namely that despite the ideological perspective of many in the FOSS community, it is actually better to trust someone else with the security of your software. Because you most likely can't trust yourself with that task anyway.

The idea that most people can reliably identify security vulnerabilities in the software they use just because it's open source is laughable. They might find trivial low hanging fruit or obvious malicious activity, but they won't have a better picture of the overall security posture just because they can read the code.

As an obvious case in point, consider how few people identify vulnerabilities in Firefox versus how many people use Firefox. The people who write complex open source software don't even reliably find the issues in their own code.
That much easier than typing "geli init", and "zpool create"? :)
Mostly how I see it too.
I roast my own and I like it quite dark. I stop roasting when the first bit of oil appears and sprinkle water on to slow things down. The oil keeps coming out until the heat leaves, so getting the heat out of it is my objective. Stir and a little water, and wait until it cools about to touch.
The oil doesn’t seem to keep coming out after the heat has left.
Also code signing doesn't automatically lead to the "blue-trusted UAC popup" anymore anyway.
Add a good static analysis tool such as SonarQube to your continuous integration pipeline. It isn't really a substitute for human code reviews but it can quickly catch a lot of common problems.
They could sign an email address instead of a name.
I think if I remember correctly, they were opposed going the store route because it took too much effort building on top of the store sandbox and new installer packaging.
Does saving $2,100 help? Oh and you can return it. And you can rent one on Turo if you don't want that hassle.

I don't know that it will work, but driving price down is often a very good move.
Crypto exchange Kraken CEO interview on QuadrigaCX $190M loss
Id depends on your own skills. what can you offer to managers of top companies
I keep a Melitta cone and Bodum kettle at my desk in my office at work. I can work and make coffee at the same time. I grind my coffee at home before I leave in the morning. Beats having to buy coffee somewhere or depend on whatever shite is in the hallway.
Thanks for this summary. I have to say, the most annoying co-workers for me are those without attention to detail. Absolutely hate those guys. I'm your reviewer, not your editor.
The insurance companies are not recommending generics because it’s cheaper for the patient...they do it because it’s cheaper for them.

There are many reasons generics, especially in the case of Medicare patients with chronic conditions, are worse for a patient.

Generally if you have a Medicare patientwith chronic conditions such as diabeties and/or high blood pressure, and their physician has successfully been managing their conditions using a name brand therapy, it’s not good practice to switch their therapy to a generic because it helps the insurance company. More importantly, it’s only the active ingredients in name brand drugs and generics that are the same. coloring agents, binders, etc... are different and those can have significant negative side effects. There is no shortage of examples of generics having worse outcomes in the case of chronic conditions.

Also it’s not just the therapy the insurance is changing, they also change the quantity. So again say you are a Medicare patient with type 2 diabetes and your doc prescribed 30 day Rx so you come back for the doc to check your blood work between fills, insurance is demanding the doctor change the Rx from 30 days to 90 days, because they don’t want to pay for the additional doctor appointment/blood work. They are watering down care and interfering with doctor/patient treatments.
Windows signing is a ripoff, $500/year you're getting nothing.
Your certificate is not trusted. You have to "get reputation for it" before Windows Defender would stop giving users warnings.
Also, renewing certificate is not a thing. Every time you have to get a new one, with same story of "reputation" again.

[1] https://www.digicert.com/order/order-1.php
Possibly. But not necessarily.

In any business, management needs to "inspect and adapt." Agile businesses do so more frequently. But change is not necessarily inspection and adaptation. It can sometimes be throwing things at the wall and hoping they will stick, without properly evaluating each of the things thrown at the wall.

Inspection and adaptation also works best when done with discipline. Experiments should are conducted with explicit falsifiable conjectures to test.

It may very well be that this course correction is the result of an experiment, and the results have been inspected, and Musk is adapting. or it could be a knee-jerk reaction to cash-flow problems.

I am not disagreeing that this may be a founder courageous enough to try experiments and abandon those that invalidate his conjectures. But I want to point out that drastic changes in and of themselves do not necessarily indicate the presence of "inspect and adapt" management.
> only a small percent of those will actually do so.

Even then, it won't save them the money. Like anything else, if you want to save the money - you have to move it out of your regularly accessed account, and put it somewhere else, ideally an account you can't withdraw as easily from.

So - when you cook for your family to save the money - you need to then (immediately) move the money you would normally spend for dinner (perhaps minus the amount for ingredients, time, and power - if you feel it necessary) over to that other account.

But most people never do that, I'd wager.

Instead, that extra money stays in their primary account, which they then likely spend on something else. So their savings continue to be zero (or likely less), and they continue to wonder where their money goes...
Another good analogy, I think, is to electricity. Should your electric usage be differentiated between your alarm clock and your toaster?

https://github.com/ryanpcmcquen/ryanpcmcquen.github.io/blob/...
This reminds me of the notion of "samizdat" during the cold war times, but still happening now in various countries, particularly China, Vietnam, North Korea, et al.

The people in control want zero accountability despite what they may say. Power corrupts people and once they experience it, they want more.

I know people from China, and they, to a person, say where they came from is a hideous form of life. They could say nothing. The father of this family will not return, ever. If he does, he stands to be arrested for what basically amounts to "thought crimes".

This man has explained to me so many things about the facets of life in China. From filial piety, to how Confucianiam/Legalism is the thought process of everyone in power. He was saying that the current Chinese leader is in love with the writings and legalist thought of Han Fei Zi and Shang Yang, and these two ancient philosphers inform his current thinking strategies. Even the new social credit system stems from this thinking of rewarding people for being "good" and even being a prefect for the state for additional "rewards". China is now offering bounties to people who turn in their neighbors for looking at porn. I believe the going rate for a turn in and subsequent conviction is $86k. I pray nothing like this comes to the west.
In my experience, credit unions have stricter lending rules.
Mine does offer an overdraft protection, which is essentially the same as a payday loan, for $30; no matter the amount. I could go $2 over and bam, $30. This also applies to each transaction.

They do allow me to keep cash in my savings and still pull from this "credit", so for example I can transfer everything to savings and let my rent hit this "credit line", but if I'm not careful this is way more expensive then a payday loan.
I buy pre-ground beans from the store (usually what's on sale), chuck them in Mr. Coffee, and have a wonderfully enjoyable carafe of coffee everyday.
Build a Pro Deep Learning Workstation for Half the Price
Smoke a whole dang pastrami, because you’re worth it
Thank you, this is the first time I've seen anyone explain this including the last part, other things I've seen leave that out and without it there's no benefit.
I think some news articles mentioned that test drives are over? Maybe that was a mistake? I think that Tesla will remove the Schedule a Test Drive link soon? Maybe I'm wrong.
It looks like it took Gitlab only a day to verify and release a fix for this issue. That's quick!
Ah the good old days when nobody except the experts cared to buy, never mind install, third party software.
Apple building retail stores seemed absolutely crazy at the time, but was clearly an interesting experiment (regardless of whether it succeeded, which it happens to have done). Shutting the stores down 2 years after the pilot stores debuted would have felt like Jobs was "winging" it when he came up with the idea.

Tesla's time between debut and shutdown feels less like an experiment than a bold cost-cutting move. At least with Apple, they knew they had strong product sales before doing dedicated retail. Obviously, Tesla will sell plenty online, but how certain are they of the impact of online-only?
Show HN: Database Janitor – Customizable Database Dumps
https://pthree.org/2012/12/14/zfs-administration-part-ix-cop... Here is a good one I've used.
People who don't even believe in karma are pretty dense.
If you don't provide value, you won't have anything.
He took value from people, all was taken from him.
You can't escape it. It's the law of sewing and reaping.
To me, the end of the article seemed to suggest that Salem might be a contrived identity used by a larper larping as a larp organizer:

>Suddenly I’m curious about this strange person. From the balcony, I ask her where she’s from.

>“The U.K.,” she says.

>“Where exactly?,” I follow up, wondering if it’s London, Scotland, or wherever.

>She squints back up at me, surprised by the question, and repeats, “The U.K.”

>I watch her walk quickly down the block, hail a taxi, and drive away forever.
My understanding from recent news is that they are discontinuing all test drives in favor of a liberal quick return policy:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-takes-new-road-in-pushing...
Blueshifted light has more energy (and momentum) than it did before the blueshift. If it returns to your spacecraft blueshifted, you can get more energy and momentum out of it than you used in sending it. The change in momentum can be used for propulsion.
Yeah, I'm not paying 30€ to read three or four stories like these, and I have no intention of reading the WSJ outside of the few HN links I click on. I already pay monthly fees for other publications.
If you're working in a language like Java or C++ which has good static analysis tools available then the developer should be required to resolve all static analysis issues first before submitting code for review. That way the human reviewers don't have to waste time manually marking simple issues.
I don't know, getting rid of the huge "YOU MAY BE INSTALLING DANGEROUS SOFTWARE" warning in Windows 10 seems like a practical purpose.
Well......Actually....
Facebook knows Facebook isn’t the future
We have been using ZFS for a couple of years now with ubuntu on 4 machines managing a total of ~160 TB of raw storage and have had 0 problems. We chose it mainly because we wanted something very reliable with checksumming and because we consider it to be much more mature and stable than btrfs.

Prior to that we used proprietary RAID hardware that, while fast, did not have checksumming and was frankly a nightmare to manage.

If I had it to do over, I'd choose ZFS again.