skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This!

So back in the day (fault of bad meds) I was sometimes a crazy driver. Poor impulse control. Drive it like you stole it. Whatever. But hey. I'm still alive, and I never got anyone else seriously injured or killed.

But anyway, one afternoon I was doing slalom at ~90 mph through ~70 mph traffic. And then, out of nowhere, this dude on a racing bike blew through at 140 mph or more. And we were all damn lucky that I saw him just before using the same gap that he was heading through. It would have been a serious mess.
It's a seagull not a duck. Don't confuse the dumb AI even more by not knowing what a duck doesn't look like in the first place. Jeez.
Exactly. You have only one life to enjoy everything except buying that fancy car that will cost you a ton of time, money and worry. Is that how you want to spend your one lifetime? Centered on Vehicles? Really?
> Even if it was broad daylight, it still would be unlikely that the driver would have been charged.

I'm not arguing that the driver should have been charged at any point. I didn't do so even back when the event happened.
Finally, something thought-provoking! Everybody, ready your Internets, this gentleman deserves an answer!
Yes again, for two sets:

a = {1,2,3}
b = {1,2,3,6,7,8}
len(a) - len(b) == 0
len(a) != len(b)

Subtraction on sets does not work like you're suggesting it should.
I don't understand why you're using that to defend broken notation.
The only reason why we have a|b as union is because a∪b is too hard to type
on most keyboards, and we still are trying to catch up to APL when it comes
to math source code.
What Is Vectorization?
Anyone that has used a third-party API or written a parser understands all they need to about declarative languages...
Algo.Rules: Rules for the Design of Algorithmic Systems
Building a Static Blog Using Gatsby and Strapi
True cars and trains are loud. However, we're on the verge of both Caltrain and car electrification, which will significantly reduce ambient noise.

I can't believe we haven't cut & covered the Caltrain line yet. I imagine that's a project even the plentiful peninsula NIMBYs could get behind.

As sibling points out, airplanes at moffett are rather far away, whereas these flying bikes are meant to be point-to-point in dense environments. Also note that there's lots of regs & techs that help reduce noise for larger planes, and I'm not sure the same is going to be true for these smaller vehicles, similar to how all those two-stroke lawnmower and leaf blower engines are horrible both environmentally and noise-wise because they're optimized for size.
Well, maybe Marlinspike should consider just not moving so fast. There’s something to be said for stability. (Cue Debian.)

On the other hand, I do strongly agree that the extensibility of XMPP basically killed off Jabber. I’m back to just IRC except for a (non-federated) work-internal server, and occasionally (say twice a month) firing up a Jabber client to get a message through (though I mostly eMail those people instead).
nginx is not shipped by RHEL so you are probably pulling from epel. you can also pull the latest stable version directly from nginx's repo http://nginx.org/en/linux_packages.html#RHEL-CentOS which has supported http2 since RHEL 7.4 when they released alpn support in openssl.

https://ma.ttias.be/centos-7-4-ship-tls-1-2-alpn/

you can also install the latest version of apache from red hats software collections repo that supports http2 but it throws everything into /opt/rh/rh-httpd24/ which is a bit weird.
The answer is that you’re right. I did the money first, and since then working on moonshot stuff has been a lot more enjoyable that what I typically see here.

The challenge and stress of the moonshot never goes away, but the stress is more “intense trek through the mountains” and less “my family is going to starve and my friends hate me. “
> you can use emails as one-use affairs [..] what's the point? It only saves you from journalists, not from a motivated attacker

Can you explain this claim?

If you generate your single-use email addresses wisely, then you should know that the one you gave to - say - Marriott should only ever receive emails from Marriott.

If - say - Marriott gets hacked and that particular one of your many different email addresses leaks, then:

a) you'll find out that address is burned just as soon as anyone other than Marriott uses it (you immediately generate a new one, give it to Marriott, and stop accepting any mail at all on the old one)

and

b) if anyone other than Marriott uses it, you know immediately that that message can't be legit.
First Dive into Go
Thanks for keeping us inspired and trying to bring the future to now. Few thoughts & questions after reading the article & comments here...

Some of the reasons Tesla has succeeded that may be relevant for Speeder:
-Safety: Tesla's construction has allowed their vehicles to have the highest crash ratings. Removing an engine & simplifying the frame have helped.
-Driverless: Tesla has popularized & legitimized much of the technology that is trending towards driverless cars.
-Performance: The Tesla Roadster was the moonshot (no pun intended) since it kicked off the brand while being sexy both design wise and by its performance. When electric car was associated with the nerdy, economical Prius, Tesla flipped that stereotype on its head.
-Infrastructure: Tesla created the ecosystem to maximize the customer experience. From purchase/service/charging, Tesla independently set up the touch points to minimize friction.

My advice would be to go the SpaceX route instead of the Tesla route. You can go both and I'm sure you already are. Just remember that the regulatory environment will stall major headway for consumers. For military/government applications, this can be fast tracked and see applications right away. Those learnings can satisfy regulatory concerns and be the beta test needed.
>>One of the excellent things about YC is how they are completely unphased by moonshots.

On the other hand, it's not like they're betting the farm on a moonshot. They've funded over 1400 companies so they can afford to take chances, $150K for 7%. Who knows...after all they make their money of very few companies.
Anybody can build a bridge that doesn't collapse, it takes an engineer to build bridges that barely don't collapse. This is hard work, don't downplay it.
Yeah. Not to mention the really nice dinners Uber lawyers took the prosecutor to to discuss the case.
Jsonnet, not Jsonata. Damn, I was excited for a moment there. Well, it was an interesting article anyways.
I don't have time to grind games anymore, so I simply don't play games that have microtransactions, if a game has good and complete DLCs, that's still okay, but I remember fondly the times where games came complete when you bought them.

Also, they are predatory, so that's other reason for not support them, companies that try to sustain themselves using addicted "whales" deserve to fail as soon as possible.

By the way, the most downvoted comment[0] on reddit history so far is exactly one when a big company (EA) tried to stuff a lot of microtransactions in a big brand name (star wars), fearing the backlash, disney intervened and told EA to remove them.

https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsBattlefront/comments/7cff0b...
Creator of the animation here. Most of the relevant information/context behind the animation (including a link to the repo) is in this Reddit comment: https://reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/aydqig/_/ehzyo...
I simply cannot explain why they wouldn't do it if it made a difference. A machine that sorts the beans by size is cheaper than the machine that package the coffee, so if it would make a better product, I'm sure the big roasters would do it. It's not like they cannot make great coffee. They can make coffee that's world class, but the market will not pay that much.

But regardless, I have tried coffee that isn't burned. I primarily use lighter roasted beans, and there is zero burned taste.
About 40,000 people died last year in the US. That's over 100 people dead every single day. Millions are injured on a scale from minor bruising to permanent disability every year. It's the number one cause of accidental death if you ignore overdoses. This is not a low rate.
By punishing the company, not the users.
I haven't, but it sounds like something I'd enjoy. Thanks for the pointers.
Interesting read but it doesn't really answer the question.
Rowhammer is different, it doesn't use a timing side channel. It uses an electrical(!) flaw to turn reads at address X into writes at address Y. It can work on a single core machine running a single process.
Cool, I'd love to see the specifics. I imagine it'd be impressive and worthy of showing off.
> This [1] has video from the dashcam as well as commercial video from news crews immediately on the scene. Keep in mind the news video is heavily lit from all the flashing lights. It's not as dark as the Uber video makes it look, but it's also nowhere near what you'd call "very well lit"

1. It absolutely is. The specific spot (00:33 in the Kaufman video) is clear as day on a cellphone.

2. Visibility doesn't even have any relevance in the first-place, self-driving systems don't rely on visible-light cameras, there is no obstacle in the middle of the road, there is no fog, there is no rain, the self-driving system had full and perfect visibility all along.

> especially given that the pedestrian was wearing all dark.

Given how well-lit the road is, that would have made them more visible against the background, not less. Again not that it has any relevance.

> Something that stands out to me on ars clips is that the street lights look like fireballs, even from a distance. I'd guess they have their brightness or some other setting pumped way up.

Yeah, sure, who'd think a camera with a finite and middling dynamic range (such as a cellphone's camera) would try to actually capture information at night and thus saturate on bright direct light sources.

> Also looks like the drivers are cruising with brights and/or halogens.

Yes of course, a rando would equip their car with an omnidirectional halogen which somehow magically brightly lights up the roadside but doesn't move with their car. You've certainly cracked the code here.
I've seen that too. This API for example [0] called "email enrichment" where I got my full name back, based on email address.

Edit: Added main company link providing this API [1]

[0] https://app.livestorm.co/api/v1/utils/email-enrichment/?emai...

[1] https://docs.enrich.email/
I'm not sure I'd call that a moonshot. Difficult and maybe crazy, but modern agriculture clearly already exists and works, unlike driverless cars for example.
Totally, I can't imagine having started this business and moving to Nairobi with a couple kids and a mortgage. I think moonshot businesses are in many ways the privilege of the young and at least modestly financially stable.
The parent was quite clearly in favour of punishing the driver even when they were operating everything correctly, for the purpose of disincentivising unsafe code at the point of purchase. I'm saying that this is a bad proposal.
We're going through the program right now. Definitely a great learning experience in many ways. Happy to answer any questions. Learn more about our work at https://menten.ai
There were a few variations.

For the nes you could get an adaptor that took a nes game (for the lockout chip) and a famicom game, allowing you to play famicom games, that didn't have lock out chips. A few pirate/ unlicensed games went this route also.

I've seen a similar thing for the snes. I believe the super famicom had a lock out, so cant remember if this was required for those.
You are not entitled to live in a particular city at a particular price.

If a property owner can make 17% more, why should they make 17% less so YOU are more convenieced?
Here, I'm using "driver" as a proxy for Uber as the entity controlling the car, not the person sitting in the driver's seat, who was apparently reading. Sorry for the ambiguity.

E.g. if a human was driving the car and the car did the exact same thing, as the Uber car did, but it was broad daylight, then they still most likely would not be charged. If you jaywalk and get killed, it's basically your fault, and the only exception would be if the driver was drunk, or speeding, or not obeying traffic signs, etc. Jaywalkers don't have the right of way, and cars are not obligated to yield to pedestrians who don't have the right of way.
The i9-9960X is over 40% and is a 16/32 vs a 4/8
Government's worries over backdoors in Huawei’s 5G tech castle
Somewhat ironic, considering that I just saw their own 3DS Badge Arcade, which costs $1.00 for 5 plays of a highly luck-dependent claw machine game, to win icons that you can decorate the home screen with (and sometimes custom themes.)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_Badge_Arcade
This denialism is not compatible with the facts. While part of the gender pay gap can be explained by the factors you describe, not all of it can. This unexplained part is often assumed to be (largely) due to discrimination. This unexplained part has also been shrinking over time, indicating that discrimination has decreased. (See
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13524-014-0320-... )

Here are journal articles on the topics, showing that economic researchers are covering the topic:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/209845

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0077995020954435...

https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMP.2007.24286161

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/073088848601300...

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001979390606000...

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/344125

You can find more publications here: https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=di...

For a start, the Wikipedia article unifies many sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_pay_gap_in_the_United_S...
I'm not sure how facetious you're being so I'll just play it straight. Modern buildings are not supposed to barely not collapse, they're supposed to be safe even under scenarios quite a bit more extreme than what they're expected (or even legally allowed) to handle.
I had a look at the i3 and it's just so off from the rest of their models. I'd loved if they had just taken their series 2 station wagon model and put batteries in that. Just like Mercedes did (still do? thought it was discontinued) with their B class.
I use ProtonMail with a custom domain.
the fool and his money are soon parted.

I have no sympathy for people who cannot use sixth grade maths.
That image is a visual illusion. I find it hard myself to detect that it's a rabbit when it's ears are horizontal like a mouth.

Not sure what is the purpose of it, is it to show that even computers vision algorithms can get confused by visual illusions?
When the output switches to rabbit the picture actually resembles a rabbit. I am unsure if this experiment was supposed to be a “haha look how stupid AI is” type thing or not, but it seems like the cloud vision api is performing as intended.
A Deep Dive into Serverless Attacks, SLS-4: XML External Entity (XXE) Attacks
$100k/year if you can solve this reverse engineering test
I’m a proverbial dad as well.

No didn’t test drive it. Petrol.
If you can make successful macroeconomic predictions you can get very rich so there are many, many people working on doing so. But you don’t just need to be right, you need to be right first because people with a good model acquire more and more resources from their own growth and from acquiring more outside investment until they reach the limits of the strategy they are using.

Astronomy is not the study of things that resist being predicted and self-modify to be unpredictable upon being successfully predicted.

All that said here are some things we know in macroeconomics;
In the long run inflation is caused by an increase in the money supply;
If you unexpectedly increase inflation you will have an economic boom as people are fooled by the short run disequilibrium between their expectations of the real value of money and what their nominal money now buys, likewise an unexpected fall in inflation will lead to a recession;
You can have at most two of control of inflation, control of the interest rate and a floating exchange rate. If interest rates go up you will attract investment and your currency will appreciate unless you have capital controls. If you want to maintain the value of your currency you have to keep your domestic real interest rate very close to the global real interest rate, unless you have capital controls. If you choose to forego capital controls and have a floating currency you can control interest rates and inflation but you may have large inflows and outflows of capital; If you contract the money supply like the Federal Reserve did after the 1929 stock market crash (30% decline in monetary base, 30%!) you will have a recession.
Sure, but why assume that Uber and Lyft drivers all fall into that category? That's what seems patronizing to me. They'd have to be dumb to take that gig for very long if it wasn't economic for them, and many of the ones I've talked to have stuck with it for a long time now. To me it seems disrespectful to assume that they don't know their own interests, and it fits with a meme of poorer people being dumber, which I dislike.
It is acceptable because the woman chose to be a mother of three. She chose to do it without financial stability.

If you jump into a river, other people should not be liable to bail you out if the water is faster than you thought (or never thought).
Does Google Cloud like Duck or Rabbit? That’s where the answer lies.

In addition, if Cloud could taste one, it would really help itself with the answer.
You can choose to not participate in Uber's system.

You can not choose to not pay tax. Well, you can choose that but you will go to jail and be potentially sodomised.
Which is why their security team is now pushing for C#, Rust and constrained C++ for new developments.

https://github.com/Microsoft/MSRC-Security-Research/tree/mas...
Maybe not, but please don't post unsubstantive comments here.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
So if I don't scam people, do MLMs whip me or something? How do they 'make' me?
Why do I feel things are getting as ridiculous as 'The Reds Under The Beds' stupidity?

We've learned that the 'little white chips' story was bullshit. Now we target power cords. If we're really afraid as all that, we should not be importing ANY of our stuff from abroad.

The dumbed-down West is in terminal decline. We don't have long to go.
AZ has very liberal regulation on self-driving vehicles (and cars in general), but IIRC the main factor is they have almost no oversight while California has some auditing and reporting requirements, including disengagement rates, and the CA DMV releases annual reports.
I don't see what so special about apple. A lot of entities manage to keep secrets very well. They use a mix of paying their employees well, having a company culture around innovation, a good security system, and contract promissing to sue you to death if you rat.

Take the CNES (National Centre for Space Studies in europe): they have individual scanner gates at each entrances. You can't get in without your whole body being trapped in a tube, alone. You can move anywhere without the proper clearance, and often somebody going with you. Each room is locked out with a card system. All the corridors look the same, so an attacker would have a hard time going somewhere specifically. The IT system is seriously locked down. Yet in all rooms you'll find prototypes, scale models and pictures, so that everybody is proud to work here and feel a sense of responsibility.

Protecting industrial secrets is not an apple thing.
Maybe some people actually like a graphical UI that does not require learning arcane syntax or keyboard shortcuts, provides a passing simile to actual paper and allows them to be productive (if not proficient)?

As for "anything significant", even OP shows one file per chapter. That's very likely what most users of word processors do, I'd imagine, even though Word (for example) had master/child documents support in the late nineties.
> but he won't be able to obtain that until he has some kind of business or organization registered in his jurisdiction with that name.

Even in good old bureaucratic Germany this will take you less than an hour and cost you about 30€. Can't believe it can be much worse anywhere else.
Ex-Trump campaign boss Manafort gets 47-month sentence
Elizabeth Holmes and the Great Patent Scam
I'm all but positive there are more. That turned up just looking through older "sharing economy" posts in HN. And a single instance suffices to disprove the claim made.

Though it's somewhat heartening to see that the skepticism was dialed way up from the start, for the most part, among commenters.
For me the moonshot problem I'd like to see solved would be trash. Literally! I've been to New York the first class world city where they pile plastic bags full of trash outside the houses and been to leafy suburbs in Europe where they put these bags in boxes and leave them outside too. Meanwhile in developing countries trash causes real pollution and health issues. But in all places it's people create waste and the waste accrues and then the waste then may be moved about. One possible solution for non recyclables would be some kind of composting / incineration-generation device to convert the trash into organics and/or electricity.
2. Visibility doesn't even have any relevance in the first-place

It has relevance in showing that the pedestrian was failing to exercise their duty of care and was thus at fault. Jaywalking at night wearing a black shirt is pretty negligent. Jaywalking even in the day is negligent in AZ, but at night, across a major artery, it's crazy.

Unless you are going to argue that they knew it was a self-driving car, and so thought that the car would see them in the dark. But they apparently didn't even know a car was there, so that's a tough sell. They didn't even look if a car was coming.

A lot of people here are having a hard time coming to grips with the fact that a pedestrian has responsibilities and can be at fault in a collision with a car -- e.g. that the pedestrian doesn't automatically have the right of way or a right to be avoided every time they step into a street. I get that this is a tough concept for a lot of people to internalize, but if you're going to be arguing that someone should be charged, then at least the broad outlines of the law in AZ need to be understood.
It does hold, in some form or other, in other professions. The EPA formally defines how much cash they're willing to burn to save a human life, which seen from one perspective is an "environment gonna kill people" cop out. Nuclear missile silos have two operators because "people gonna launch nukes". Cars have airbags because "vehicles gonna crash". Every field has risks and risk management, every field has certain steps that they could take for the purpose of safety that are judged too expensive to justify the risk, and part of managing risks in software is that you should plan for bugs and plan to mitigate their impact.

Nobody calls the emergency services out because they assume cars are going to crash and plan accordingly, so why does the software engineering industry get called out for assuming software will go wrong and planning accordingly?
Semiconductor Innovation: Is the party over or just getting started? (2018)
Madrid, like Barcelona, has rising rent prices but blaiming them on AirBnB like some politicians have is very disingenuous.

AirBnB and similar players have a small percentage of the rent stock. They can only shift prices on the margin.

If you want the real culprits, Spain has a broken rental law that increases risks both for renters and lenders, and both cities have strict construction limiting codes (i.e. almost fixed supply).
meanwhile the guy who's perfectly fine driving for uber is eating cheetos at time and you will never meet him.

it's like being a doctor and complaining that everybody is sick.