skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yotels tend to be in pretty high-priced areas. I like how they optimize for space. There’s one I especially favor in Manhattan. It’s not cheap in absolute terms. But it’s well located for many purposes. Has a nice common area. Uses the room space well. And is clean and quiet. And a relative bargain for a Manhattan.

But sure it’s in $250 or so a night range.
> I’m guessing you don’t see your property or life as being worth sacrificing for this “noble” goal, right?

I said I personally think the risk/reward makes sense. So no, I wouldn't sacrifice my life or a non-trivial amount of property for this end. I meant at the statistical level-- I would enter a lottery with 1/n chance of the above for a working self-driving car in 5 years. I think the individual risk is low.

> If however you want to personally volunteer your person and property in the name of technological advancement.

To some extent I am depending on where I am in the country or on the road. That was my point. I personally think self-driving cars could be a great thing for humanity BUT I think states/cities need to individually vote on this stuff as indicated by the reference to a referendum in my post.

Not everyone is going to want to be on the highway next to a car that some company is field-testing some pre-beta code that lulls Bob into some false sense of security that the car actually drives itself.

I think we agree with eachother, I think a conversation needs to develop about this at the city & state level. I am not claiming I have an armchair fix but that there needs to be a way to allow this tech to develop without insane regulation while promoting a candid narrative of the risks to constituents to decide.
None of the links you provided are evidence. They're all signs that something, somewhere, is fishy, so why wouldn't this be fishy too. I can provide you higher-quality links about how we need to stop putting fluoride in the water.

At the very least, retract your claim about how people who don't want fluoride in the water are "loons," and then maybe we can have a good-faith conversation. But if you want to dismiss people with actual science backing their views as loons, I'll dismiss you as a loon, too.
Unfortunately this is incorrect. Extrema do not always exist (consider y=x^3) and they do not uniquely define a polynomial (y=x^2 and y=x^4 both have minima at x=0).
The sharing economy was always a scam
It's perfectly okay to buy an expensive car if you can afford it and it brings you joy.

People have trouble with the "can afford it" part, anything can look affordable if it's broken down into enough monthly payments. But one must look at the bigger picture and also work towards not having to borrow money for the rest of your life.

The problem I have with most personal finance advice is it usually comes down to simply moralizing. The whole point of personal finance is it should be personal.
That makes them less responsible (as opposed to liable) how, precisely?
> We have a list of drugs that work, it's the list of FDA-approved drugs.

Which doesn't take price into account.

And there's no reason for the patient or doctor to take price into account when insurance is paying for 95%+ of the cost.

This is the classic "someone else's money" problem.
They could be - if they spend a bit on improving the UI (look and feel) and a enable payment processing and they'd instantly be comparable to Airbnb. I use them 50%, 40% hotels and 10% Airbnb on my vacations.
Is that racist?
A slave and a poor free man working equally hard look exactly the same, and differ only by consent. The difference is hard to tell for rich people, but poor people are very clear on it.

I strongly disagree with your history telling!

Before industrialism, the whole world was poorer than the third world is today. Britain didn't get rich from plundering India or anywhere else, in part because there wasn't much to take. Every country was dirt poor by current standards.

In the last ~250 years industrialism and capitalism created wealth through inventions, industrialization and hard work. Now more than half the world is rich. China is already a medium income country, after having been desperately poor only 30 years ago. India isn't far behind.

Some pockets of real poverty remain, but the world will run out of poor people a few decades, unless trends take a serious turn for the worst. None of this depends on exploiting poor countries. Quite the opposite. The more advanced countries there are to trade with, the better off everyone is.
I would recommend going with the zen of finder. I basically just throw everything into Dropbox, unless I am specifically trying to put a collection together (eg: "documents for meeting 2019-01-01"), and then use Finder.

Surprised nobody has mentioned case sensitivity yet (as far as I can Ctrl-F for); I have a case-sensitive disk image called ~/dev/ where all code checkouts live.

Been using autojump for a while to make terminal navigation easier
Apps YOU use. I wouldn't be complaining if I felt the same way with the stuff I use.
I saw a different company’s car today: they’re being responsible and have two people in the car.
Let say that in the future every car it is a Self-Driving Car. Which are more reliable and accidents are reduced by 99%. How to deal with that 1%? Whose fault is it? The manufacturer? The developer?
people who can afford a nice place in NYC probably dont want to rent out their place to strangers.
>50 cockerels
You recreated the chicken version of an American prison, no where in nature would you find a gathering of 50 male chickens in tight living quarters.

Is it only American prisons that hold males in tight quarters?
You could have installed them on a VM for the sole purpose of writing the book. You didn't really wish to see the book published.
HTTP2 has multiple optimisations e.g. I only just realised it compresses XMLHTTPRequest requests, not just responses.

We use CloudFlare, so most of our users get HTTP2 even though our own infrastructure is still HTTP1.1 (however some corporate customers have proxies, which usually downgrade the browser connection to HTTP1.1).

We log whether HTTP2 or HTTP1.1 is used by the browser by JavaScript reading `window.performance.getEntries()[0].nextHopProtocol` which is supported by most modern browsers.
> issues mostly happen on the client end with XMPP.

from what I have seen in comments over the years is that it's been spotty to make it so you could depend on things working / being delivered to the other (federated) clients - as most do not accept the same feature set as each other.

I had suggested that a chart is made of all the clients along with which features are not yet implemented there, along with the programming language they are written in. This way it should be possible to estimate the amount of hours to add all features to all clients, then estimate the cost - and maybe we could crowdsource the amount of money or volunteer hours to get most clients to reciprocate most feature interoperability.

When I mentioned this here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19216077#19223912

someone pointed out this chart here:
https://compliance.conversations.im/

Which I found interesting and was not aware existed.

I'd love to see xmpp, the clients, and matrix and it's clients all get more streamlined and user friendly. (signal too)
Evidence of the NSAKEY being a backdoor includes some description of how the backdoor might work, backed up by a reference to the relevant Windows source code or its disassembly, both of which are easily available to researchers. What sort of backdoor is it? Does it provide remote access to Windows? Does it enable certain cryptographic modes that are disabled? Does it disable certain cryptograph modes that are enabled? Does it trigger key recovery, and if so, how?

Evidence of X does not include "X would have been done by Y, and Y did Z, and X and Z are both bad, so why wouldn't Y do X too." That is basically the definition of an ad hominem argument. Whatever else the NSA may have done, and however much it's reason to believe the NSA might have wanted to do this specific thing, it's not evidence of them doing this specific thing (and again I'm not sure what this specific thing is even supposed to be). And if anything, the lack of mention of NSAKEY in the leaks is a reason to believe that there wasn't anything there.

Evidence of X also does not include "Y refused to talk about X." That might be evidence that Y is suspicious and untrustworthy (or evidence that the person asking was a conspiracy theorist who wouldn't be satisfied by any explanation), but it's not evidence that Y actually did X.

So, that's my definition of evidence. I'll turn this around: what would evidence that NSAKEY was not a backdoor look like to you? Would anything convince you, or is your claim unfalsifiable?
The truth is somewhere in the middle. Like most sciences: a theory is put forward, and then you test it with empirical data.

The issue, and I think this is something that most economists would definitely dispute, is that there are few real hard and fast "laws" of economic behaviour. And this leaves scope to construct theories and even test theories in a way that is not objective. This occurs in other sciences too ofc but there is far more scope for this in economics.

If we go into the meta: I think all disciplines go through this at some point. History went through it in the late 19th century, and eventually got over it by simply acknowledging that historians are human too. Economics is very far from this point but it will get there. And once it becomes more clear what actual knowledge looks like then I think economics will be on more solid footing (I don't think economists understand that no-one believes their bullshit about objectivity, I really don't and it reflects badly on them).

Also, the OP mentions finance...there is a big difference between finance and economics. First, things that get published in academic finance have an effect on the data. If you publish a strategy that works, returns will that strategy will drop off. Second, there is a lot of self-promotion. Finance is a fast-moving, aggressive field which is great because it leads to high output but a lot of the results can't be reproduced.
/Or/ we take the way less insane course of action and regulate AV safety, like we do elevators and airplanes?
I have the opposite opinion. I just use priceline to get get a good deal on a hotel. Its always cheaper than airbnb. Plus its a pain to browse through hundreds of listing to try and figure out the catch in an Airbnb listing because of the non standard places.
>There's a consistency to the hotel product that you can't get with Airbnb that I place a premium on, especially for short or last minute stays.

Every time I try to use Airbnb I have to 'request' from the host and I swear 4 out of 5 times they cancel the requested rental because they're staying in the place or some other BS. I know when I get a hotel room its instantly reserved and there is no question about its availability.
Top talent is still going at 1/3.
But it is. Duality requires commutativity of composition.

It sounds like the ideas that you’ve put forward confounds duality with something else, perhaps transformations. You may be digging a hole here.
I really don't get the appeal of valet parking. It's expensive and I don't like other people driving my car. It's nice when a hotel offers a garage (super nice when it's snowing)
Not really. The point of origin is the private key, which does need to be protected. Lack of identity verification might make key revocation/rotation more difficult, but identity is not really permanently coupled to the keypair. If that were true then why is the only thing stopping me from circulating self-signed certificates with bogus info the lack of a CA signature?
Note that this the Nios II/f is an in-order CPU, while this is a superscalar CPU. A more relevant benchmark would be the superscalar dual-issue ARM Cortex-A9, illustrated in figure 13.4. It's about the same performance as that one if you average all the benchmarks.

In theory, RISC-V should be at about the same performance as ARMv8 (note that Cortex-A9 is ARMv7): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15343287
How am I supposed to know that the classes will get better? Why should I spend my very valuable time in classes that don't challenge me in the way I want?
The huge number of fraudulent and malware-ish apps for android vs iOS does suggest that costs reduce the number of low quality attackers. I guess that is good for protecting the naive user. But I'm more concerned about protecting against the threat that will take your whole digital identity.
Why So Many Americans Are Turning to Buddhism
I have been able to stumble into it by tracing down jargon and reading textbooks.
I've seen no evidence Chrome is doing keep-alive on Linux or Mac OS

That sounds like a bug with your server implementation. The web would melt down if Chrome's keep-alive support didn't work.
The tradeoff is that you write some more code and parser performance is less optimized.

Performance improved when GCC switched from a generated to a handwritten parser. Additional techniques like using an operator precedence table/"precedence climbing" as described in the article can reduce the amount of code, make extending it easier, and you still don't have to learn the specific language of a parser generator nor attempt to debug what it's generated.

IMHO parser generators and parsing algorithms in general seem to have gotten a bit to heavy on the academic theory side of things while ignoring practical considerations, which is why recursive descent + precedence climbing became so popular. Big production-quality compilers use it, little toy ones use it, I don't see any drawbacks other than maybe a misguided attempt at academic purity or dogmatism.
Yes, I to remembered this. The article has eschewed the blockchain references this time.

Also, this time in my opinion, the comments seem more intelligent and engaging.
Those are not the things I said. I specifically said that this statistic approach is an impossible debate because fundamentally it assumes everything down the chain (elementary school, parenting, society) is not prone to similar gender bias. In reality, all of those things are prone to gender bias. There is no debate here. If there is a genetic difference between genders that demonstrates aptitude/proclivity towards STEM, then statistics can be leveraged as pointers towards the result of actions taken to equalize gender opportunity. If or until such a time as that genetic evidence is discovered, I see no reason to believe that women, by nature, are inherently less capable or interested in STEM - therefore, the only useful statistic in a debate on hiring results (i.e. 38% are women) is that 50% of humans are women.

Please re-read what I have posted.
In harm’s way: Attacks on critical systems alarm the security world
Adults living in the state where they were born
The problem I have with this advice is that its all based on the last 50 years which have been absolutely incredible returns for investors. You should also read more history of what happened to Japanese property investors in the 90s, Argentinian investors in the 70s and Russian/Chinese/Cambodian capitalists before their communist takeovers.
Not much of a meta-"game", when humans are OP.

Scat marks the fence. They needn't remember.
I thought maybe he meant Lisps whose compiler isn't another Lisp, or maybe macros at a stretch ..
Eat your . . . heart out Marcel! #AMERICA

https://qz.com/quartzy/1190158/the-guggenheim-offered-trump-...
Thank you. Fantastic TLDR -

that smart people will invent, nasty people will ruin, smart people will be ruined and the state will intervene and grow in remit.
>The article you cite says that's exactly what happened:

Nowhere in that article does it claim that black people wanted white people off campus because they hate white people.
Although the keep alive periods may vary:

https://fastmail.blog/2011/06/28/http-keep-alive-connection-...
And are code-signing certs really so different? The reporting and regulatory requirements behind them make me think that they are an intentional barrier-to-entry for newcomers, amateurs, and startups, and the business student in me admires their moat-like quality. Code-signing certs lock a lot of people out of certain channels of software distribution
Even in that case you're still spending 20 hours a week on classes. I dont know about you, but I couldn't sustain 40 working hours + 20 working hours for 4 ywars.

Also, there's a qualitative difference between a job and a part time gig. my part time jobs in early college were trivial and required no mental, no emotional effort, and no outside of work skills development. My part time jobs in late college were mostly tutoring, which was doubly good becayse I reviewed material and also I could do less of it because it paid well.

In any case, at the very least the combo of part time and no mental/emotional/professional devlopment effort makes a huge difference. At least IME.
While it's clearly re-purposing of their core IP, I think the A10 assumption was a mistake on the part of iFixIt, who then corrected their mistake realizing the core size was not the same (and it definitely isn't just binning). The HEVC performance is still surprising though because they get much better performance out of the T2 (whatever its lineage) than they get out of a 6-core Intel processor, the Intel integrated GPU, or even the AMD dedicated GPU. That's the power of optimized silicon.
I do what others have said - I have domains and use pre-defined (DreamHost, no catch all) addresses different for most sites. I also define a bunch of generic ones I cam reach for on the go. I have about 150 now.

Is it worth it?

I don't know. It's part of the patchwork of steps I take, better than many people but by no means failsafe.
And that value is 25 Gauss (0.0025 Tesla), which isn't all that high. Run a neodymium magnet across it and it's going to affect it. 25 Gauss is only half of what a standard fridge magnet would even give you.
That's assuming that every word used in every definition is also listed in the dictionary. While that's probably the case, it doesn't necessarily have to be true.
Not really anything that scales, although that may just be a lack of imagination. College could be cheaper, though. It is in most countries. Not just at point of purchase but also in the absolute number of dollars spent sense as well
The supreme court says corporations are people and have the rights of people (e.g. free speech). If they're people then they are subject to the criminal codes that people are subject to. I don't know how you carry out such punishments, ask the 5 guys who decided to make that the case.
The public doesn't trust scientific research because the local news airs studies with controversial claims to outrage and confuse the public.

It's similar to how the YouTube algorithm selects content that will make a person angry.

In both cases the goal is engagement.
Actual title: 3 New Chips to Help Robots Find Their Way Around
Simple Blockchain Demo
Too many sites disallow the + thing. It's not a great solution.
The FAQ makes it worse:

"GNU Parallel is indirectly funded through citations. It is therefore important for the long term survival of GNU Parallel that it is cited. The citation notice makes users aware of this."

It's a bit like saying:

"Webkit is indirectly funded by iPhones. It is therefore important for the long term survival of Webkit that people purchase iPhones. The iPhone notice make users aware of this."
Perhaps not, but I was referring only to the assertion that wide SIMD is not in the "hard part" of designing a CPU.

I happen to agree with the GP that comparing SIMD accelerated to not can give a misleading picture, and so deserves to be noted - especially when one party has relevant SIMD instructions but they weren't used for some reason.
See the Onion Futures Act, which banned trading of onion futures in 1958.

A brief summary is: experts have been divided on the effect that onion futures trading has on the volatility of onion prices.

To me it sounds like the effect of trading on volatility is relatively small.

Beware though that this stance tends to piss off people with both left and right political views.
Generics are not guaranteed to be identical, especially in the inactive ingredients. It is rare but not unheard of for someone to have a reaction only to one form of a drug.

Edit: I have a friend who has such an allergy, which was confirmed with double blind testing.
A lot of gamedev networking is like this too. Half making sure your game model works in a latent environment/can be extrapolated. The other half is clever tricks(particle systems! sound effects!) to make the player think something is happening when you're just waiting to reconverge the state with an authorative response from the server.
I wonder if it might be a minor performance issue in the worst case.

Without keepalive, you create a new connection and pay the latency costs of doing so. With keepalive, there's a chance you try to reuse an old connection, and it fails, which requires round trips to learn about, and you still have the latency of creating a new connection. So more total latency in that case.

It seems it would improve the average case but make the worst case slightly worse. If your keepalive timeout is short, maybe it would come up often enough to matter.
You're interpreting what I'm saying (and what I believe the author is saying) as "amount you won't mind losing, so just go for it bro, you might hit it big!"

Maybe I'm reading too much into the original text, but when I said, "amount you can afford to lose," I intended an implicit "because you will lose it and then you will learn" that I think the author is also implying.

If you do a 9 week fake money stock pick'em exercise (say in a FINA class), people will follow it for exactly 9 weeks, some will lose, some will win, and everybody who doesn't win will take away "gee I should have picked better, that was obvious in retrospect" which obviously isn't the point.

With real money, I feel like you're more likely to learn the intended lesson. If it works out for nine weeks, you'll keep at it because it's actual money. You'll learn eventually.
So does it even matter whether they are or aren't?

Internet schminternet.

https://youtu.be/GltlJO56S1g
Yes because that's the same as requiring two passwords. It's even more secure to get three or five. But using the email address serves a different purpose, people rarely forget them.
Absolutely not an issue. The last thing you want when developing a prototype piece of software for a 1 ton chunk of metal is another bit of software plugged in that you dont control or understand.
I have used awk several times in different ways. I still don't find it easy to remember a command with as many punctuation characters as letters, like your first one.

And I'm not even sure what the second one is trying to do. Print the user name, followed by the number of fields separated by colons? What good is that? Perhaps you've forgotten that not everyone can read awk syntax right off the page.
Economists like to argue that Economics is the "science of choice." [1]

The first decision you must conceptualize with a utility curve? Which dogma to choose.

[1] http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/economics-2/economics-is-...
Of course they know my meatspace identity.

And maybe someone knows that Mirimir is meatspace me.

But Mirimir is only a semi-anonymous persona. And I don't count on being anonymous as Mirimir.

However, I've had thousands of other personas, over the years. Mostly all using some mix of nested VPN chains and Tor. Some using Mixmaster remailers as well. Many I only used for a few days, or maybe for a month.

I doubt that anyone knows all of the connections. Or even enough to trouble me substantially.
Anecdotally - I've always gotten excellent deals in the Bay Area and I've used HT there a lot. It usually gets me prices about 15-20% less than what I'd get via the traditional booking sites. What makes you say it failed at its one job?