skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Trump's twitter statements have actually been used in court to strike down several of his executive actions...
If you dislike JS in the first place, you're probably not going to be doing much with React to begin with.
So he should stop tweeting about company related matters unless someone has cleared him to do so.

Seriously why? Do you go around teeeting about potentially sensitive company info? Employees don’t do it, why is Elon doing it?
judith curry has an argument. She can speak for me.
All science is 'advocacy science' when you deny the conclusions.
I think the answer should be designating official channels like the company's website or an SEC-managed site that you can post to. Everything else gets designated non-official and carries a warning notice saying it's not official so if you wanna trade on it or whatever you do so at your own risk.
This is probably wrong, but I always think of tensor's as n-dimensional generalizations of matrices with units attached.

Edit: After some wikipediaing, "bases" might be a better word than "units."
That's cool. We interact with as many communities as possible but sometimes it's hard to know if people find our documentation useful
GCP is the only service that I know of that supports this.

That being said, AWS does allow you to put your name servers somewhere else, say GCP, and then do DNSSEC there.

Really the main security concern with AWS is no browser in the terminal. This feature, which both GCP and Azure have, really eliminates the ssh-key litter.
In one of their SEC filings. You need to search EDGAR.
Relevant discussion on this topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18425923
Los Alamos was replete with brilliant people doing dangerously stupid things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_core
Evangelism is needed if adoption is a goal, which is far from a given even for proprietary products.
Trial Judge Declares Male-Only Selective Service System Unconstitutional
Judea Pearl should have written "The Book of Why" about the millions of preventable deaths attributed to global warming.

Instead, he wrote about, what appears to be the same phenomena, the "cigarettes are bad deniers" of the 1900s.
He is a revolutionary guy, but somebody needs to take his cellphone away from him so he cannot tweet - - sorry Elon.

Tweeting is the same as "running off at the mouth"
Tensors are in effect a generalization of matrices in higher dimensions. A tensor of dimension 3 is a similar step up to the step from a linear array to a matrix. They arise in all sorts of places though fluids is where I met them first. Operations on tensors are also a bit more challenging than operations on matrices.
The rules never apply equally to everyone. Tesla needs elon and elon needs twitter to hype up millions of people so he can achieve his goals. I m not a fan of the guy, but he's got the resolve to make things happen. if you take away his twitter, it will be bad for the future of tesla.
> I felt like I was in a movie about a dystopian future.

Actually, you're in the dystopian future itself, it's just that "it's unevenly distributed." https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Future+unevenly+distributed&t=fpas...

The movie will come later.
Yes, but I get some satisfaction in making them go out of their way to do it.

And no way in hell am I giving the information to Intuit first, so that they can mine and sell it (and probably leak it unintentionally as well)
Nord is the best, no logs, clean, enough nodes, speed is okay
That says 500k annualized, not 500k for the year
as stupid as tweeting incorrectly and without legal review when tweeting correctly and with review is essentially your simple, easy to observe, 'terms of parole'?
Like you're that interesting.
One near me has a 7 second VHS clip (you can see the tracking lines) on repeat, which is just a "stretch exercise" with muzak playing.

And I wish I was exaggerating. Seven seconds.
In the future you should quote it in the parent comment. that way people will at least understand what you're talking about.

To make a nice look quote use the ">" and wrap the quote in asterisks to italicize.
from elsewhere in the thread: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000119312513...
Elon effectively has controlling interest due to his supervotes. Sure, 89.5% of the outside votes can out vote him, but that’s an absurdly high bar. [0]

Also, the SEC is a regulator for a reason. Saying the company is cool with it (even when it’s really unclear if that’s actually true give the voting setup) is completely irrelevant to if the behavior is acceptable to society. After all, grifters are totally fine with gritting when they’re the ones doing it, but that doesn’t mean grifting a societal benefit.

[0] https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/how-elon-musk-con...
so, the intent was not to mislead investors, but to insult the fcc. snowflake committees much
I definitely don't! I also don't attribute that to fiat currency. I attribute that at least within the United States to "trickle-down economics," reduction of the top federal income tax rate in the US from 92% in the 1940s (and 72% in the 1970s) to 37% this year [1], and the estate tax from the high 70% range [2] in the 1970s to 0% moving forward. The reduction in the social safety net and the government services afforded to the poor over time helped prevent social mobility. Along with a simultaneous drop in union participation rates meant that labor didn't have as meaningful a way to push back against capital.

It's no surprise that wealth inequality started going up and to the right as soon as these things changed, in the years immediately following when Reagan took office (1981) [3] -- over a decade of decline after the switch from the gold standard in 1971. It's all in the graphs attached. Broadly, it's "Reaganomics" related.

By all means have at those windmills though.

tl:dr; if you let rich people keep more of their money, they have more of the money. If you simultaneously take from poor people, they stay poor. We could be on the banana standard for all it matters with this type economic policy.

[1] https://nickgogerty.typepad.com/designing_better_futures/200...

[2] https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2017/11...

[3] https://inequality.org/facts/income-inequality/
Because the clients/server quality varied (very fragmented standard compared to it's relative use amount) and for what it did plain HTTP or some pre-existing "proper" file exchange protocol likely met the need better anyways.
Are you really saying the billionares who pledged more than 90% of their wealth to charity, and will "only" leave their kids 10 million dollars isn't backing up what he says?
No I didn't say "single threaded concurrently reasoned applications are more performant than multithreaded applications" because I was highlighting this style of concurrency from the programmer's perspective. But yes, for certain types of applications it can be more performant.

Naturally, if your application is computationally intensive, a single thread can't compete with a multithreaded application. But for applications that use a lot of slow, blocking I/O, converting them to a single-threaded application that uses non-blocking I/O is a significant reduction in overhead. Compare a traditional web server that uses one thread per request and blocking I/O, versus one that uses an event loop, non-blocking I/O. You will see why the latter is more efficiently on system resources. Again this isn't a panacea, and for some applications you do have to use threads. I'm just pointing out an omission of the article.
Ask HN: Hearing the same audio being recorded on Memojis like the recent FT bug?
I’m noticing about a half a second of audio being recorded before I even press the record button for Memojis on an iPhone X. Am I crazy?
Public? Every company in existence makes you sign a contract that you won't disclose sensitive company information, public or not.
It has been demonstrated countless times that "just don't make mistakes" does not work, has never worked, and will never work. The whole reason bureaucracy exists is because people can't even be expected to consistently follow their own rules, let alone rules that are imposed on them. Every publicly-traded company has a process for shareholder communication but Elon Musk is just out there tweeting whatever comes to his mind.
I mentioned that Jung mentioned it I'm not a fanboy of his, as it happens. But nobody's wrong all the time.

Please educate me about what wasn't okay about my reply - it's all blandly factual. "Principle of Charity" is a thing, not a phrase of mine.
Awesome thanks for the input, I think it would be an interesting problem “how to engage async workers in VR”
Can a corporation demand an employee waive their right to speech as a private citizen?

Said citizen and his company avoided prison time and massive fines respectively by agreeing to said restrictions as the result of earlier fraudulent misrepresentations on a private account he demanded the corporation register as an official public account for regulatory purposes.

So...yes. Definitely they can enforce an agreement he voluntarily entered into for a medium he deliberately turned into a regulated source.
Thnx. Now that Nekochan is dead I’m really lost in the Irix world.

Btw, do you know if there’s a way to make the boot drive a network drive (not the install drive)? I thought I remembered the post-doc in the lab keeping a half dozen O2s alive w/out replacement drives. But I might be wrong
I deride it based on bad journalism AND bad science.

Not all climate science is bad, of course.

The kind that takes an RCP of 8.5 with zero chance of happening and uses it as an input to policy recommendations is bad science.

Attributing current weather extremes (hint, occurrences are non Gaussian) is bad science.

Releasing doom and gloom predictions to the media before peer review that are then ripped apart (but not covered by media) is bad science.
I'll admit that I couldn't resist replying; such comments are usually discouraged. However, I felt that you deserved to know the reason why Hacker News downvotes comments for the off chance that you didn't know already.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/412423/what-are-the...
A trivial example is BERT_large; won't fit into 12/16GB and takes ~year to train from the scratch on a single 15TFlops machine. It's now a base model for transfer learning for NLP.
The legality is above my pay grade and will have to be deferred to the experts.

Just from an economic line of thought, even a cursory look at Tesla and Elon's history of public statements would make a reasonable investor think "Gee, the CEO talks a lot. Maybe don't read too much into it."
Will do Shafyy I appreciate the comment!!!
This, if anything, is a good lesson on why politicians and PR firms tend to speak the way they do.

Unfortunately, the baseline for your understanding requires a reasonable amount of intelligence, a reasonable amount of empathy, and a reasonable amount of ability to frame situations in context.

The reality is that, surprisingly enough to people like yourself, the majority of the population does not actually have all three of those abilities. It was something that was unbelievable to me until I was close to something that dealt with public opinion.

You are absolutely correct on your take of the situation. The reality, unfortunately, is that the majority of the population is not capable (not their fault) of understanding the situation at that level.

This is why messaging out of corporations and politicians tends to be so odd. The majority of people are simply not capable of understanding things at your level.

Edit: I would strongly encourage people here to look up the median reading level in the United States. Then find an example text above that reading level(it's around 9th grade) and realize that half of the United States is below that level
That's because our constitution has no non-political mechanism for holding the president to the law. Unfortunately for Musk, the SEC has no such limitation.
Mass scanning activity targeting NUUO devices detected (CVE-2018-14933)
I have the same question. What is the purpose of this post?
Sure, but the people in the billing department have never met me? So unless they're doing a credit check or doctors are taking notes on suspected financial situations... I doubt they're doing this.
I actually agree with you somewhat; I'm a bit dismayed that any information at all on Twitter is being taken as worth a damn to any significant degree. It just means the day when I need a Twitter account to get anything done, creeps ever closer. But I feel like nobody else is concerned about that.
Nuts & bolts haha.
i believe elon’s argument is that the offending tweet didn’t need approval because he believed that he was just restating a projection made on the previous earnings call
Rates of retirement savings participation vs doomsday hoarding, controlled for age cohort, should get you a rough cut at it.
> Scientific fraud is not a thing of the past. It's not even rare.

Sure, but even accusations of scientific fraud require evidence to back them up. Can you provide some credible evidence to show that the majority of the scientific community is engaging in fraud?
I don’t think the ballpark estimate 0-500k could possibly be interpreted as accurate/reliable (and by extension, bad) information.

Except by some particularly whiny people looking for an excuse.
Can you record a demo of this happening? I just tried to do this and it worked normally for me.
We agree, then.
Are you serious? Literally no other major CEO has ever needed something like this because they can exercise the barest minimum of self-discipline. Most actually have a built in "STFU button" when it comes to making financial projections on Twitter.

I thought Musk spent 120 hrs/wk working and sleeping in the factory, why would he need to be tweeting about production numbers that have yet to be hit?
The hard part is (probably) the transition from Prokaryotes to Eukaryotes. The transition from unicelular Eukaryotes to multicelular Eukaryotes is (probably) easy [1] .

Edit: [1] From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicellular_organism#Occurre...

> Multicellularity has evolved independently at least 46 times in eukaryotes, and also in some prokaryotes, [...] . However, complex multicellular organisms evolved only in six eukaryotic groups [...]
Has anybody else also problems with a buggy input field?

I tried writing "Palahniuk". Here I stopped typing after the h:

PPALPPALAHPPALPPALAHAN
This looks like very, very early work.
This is great. As a University of Minnesota graduate I'll always have a soft spot in my heart for gopher. Even in 2010 I remember we had some old gopher documentation floating around the IT department. Here's a summary[1] of its history.

[1] https://www.minnpost.com/business/2016/08/rise-and-fall-goph...
It evolved from a stripped down Debian originally to Core Linux today. It's just a firewall, so it hardly needs any software.
In the time between Elon's two tweets, enough trades could have occurred based on the misrepresentation that investors were financially harmed.

The point of the SEC is to prevent harms like that. The point of the SEC's 2018 settlement with Elon was to prevent him from investor-harming tweets like the one he made by requiring tweets about Tesla to be reviewed for accuracy and correctness before posting.
Thank you indeed for your comments. My intention was to get feedback on the editor itself. Your comment on the tutorials (demos) is actually a bonus to us. We will rename the menu item to demo and write separate tutorials and documentation in narrative form as you suggested. The purpose of some sections is to demonstrate site wide section, and may not be in logical order in the demo.

The demos are talking points when we provide training to the end users. They can edit the sections and remember a thing or two while they practice. The meaningful words and phrases are better than ipsum lorem.

The comments on toolbar are good points too. We have recently changed the workflow for users to edit their content on their own website, on an editable page (index.goandmake.html) next to the published page (index.html). They can navigate to a page and edit. This makes oauth2 integration much harder, but is more intuitive than loading and editing data of a separate domain. so the toolbar can be visible by default, and hidden after user clicks a button. we are going to act on this. It is good you noticed it and brought it up.

Highly appreciate your inputs.
> Because remembering to not do things is a restraint that is extremely mentally burdensome and thus difficult to get correct 100% of the time.

I have ADHD. I legitimately struggle with impulses.

Here's why I am not on Twitter: I have ADHD. I legitimately struggle with impulses.
I deny creation science. I am a denier.
Try finding any public space in the USA where there is not blaring background music. Good luck. I always felt the reason Starbucks plays deafening music is to discourage people from lingering. It certainly has the effect on me, and I pity the poor employees.
Check out chapters on my YouTube channel to my audio book, “Black Butterfly”
No, you expect that a top representative of a publicly traded company obeys the law on official company channels. E.g. if your job is to trade on Tesla based on newly announced information, ignoring facts from such a message might very well get you in financial trouble if it turns out you shouldn't have ignored it and your clients loose money because of that.
it's not about shareholders, it's about ensuring 'healthy markets'.. manipulating markets in either direction damages this.

also: the terms of the agreement required him to have statements audited by counsel, this was apparently not - even if it was 100% spot-on with no ambiguity it would still be a violation
So all he has to do is find a fall guy to say he approved it, and it will be thrown out?
> Maybe it's the display, since I still only have the old 1600x panel.

It is most likely due to poor quality batteries. The "cells" in a 9-cell battery are 18650 batteries, which vary in capacity from 3400mAh at the high end, to counterfeit ones that are labelled to have 1200mAh capacity, but in reality have only a fraction of that. Lithium-ion batteries also have a limited shelf life, so even good quality aftermarket batteries will have a fraction of the rated capacity if they have been sitting in a warehouse for years.
I had read these explanations, but found them insufficient. You don't mention the G5/optic cable angle, which I think is a better argument on your side: https://www.wired.com/story/china-will-likely-corner-5g-mark...
No, the intent is that he doesn't take the secs censure seriously. It helps to address the question of if this was an honest mistake or not, and the judgement will likely take that into account.
1. Judges at this level are pretty smart.

2. They tend to take contempt seriously.

3. Especially if you double down on it.
That list hasn’t been updated since 2016, but they continue to ship vulnerable firmware. Including in all bios updates since 2016.

You would have to dump an image of your bios firmware using chipsec to confirm for yourself. https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec
Readers who come after, this user is not trying to argue in good faith, they are using the front page of this board to spread their fringe ideas. I recommend not engaging, logic will not convince them.

If you're interested in learning more about this why this style of argument gets used online, I recommend The Alt-Right Playbook series on YouTube.
What he believes doesn't matter, it's what he agreed to that matters, and he violated that agreement.
distorting share prices doesn't cause harm?

i'm sure all of the poor Enron shareholders are mad at the SEC for the same reason, etc etc etc
If he didn't want to be bound by the requirement to have all his tweets go through a legal review, then he shouldn't have agreed to a settlement with the SEC that required him to do so. It's really that simple. Doesn't matter if it's stupid or not; he signed a legally-binding court document agreeing he'd do it.
> Attributing current weather extremes (hint, occurrences are non Gaussian) is bad science.

I'm pretty sure the general conclusion is that, on average, the climate is warming, which makes weather extremes worse.

> Releasing doom and gloom predictions to the media before peer review that are then ripped apart (but not covered by media)

What are these predictions, and where are they being ripped apart?
Show HN: smart reminders built for sms – iprompted
How is ground chuck not ground beef? Chuck is a cut. You can also get it cubed - it makes great stew meat.
But the answers are all less interesting than the headline, making me not want to take the time for the article.
Sounds like there’s more to the story.
Funny, I haven't heard any Skinny Puppy[1] at Starbuck$ recently. (Ironically, I'd find that a reason to go there...)

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/feb/07/skinny-puppy-p...
He said "around 500k", not "0-500k". And the SEC isn't filing this because he tweeted "bad" information, but because he violated the settlement where he agreed to have Tesla legal review all such tweets, which he didn't do. That he had to correct the numbers just made it obvious that he might have failed to do so.
My point is that we don't know whether the poster was speculating. I would be happy with a citations for all comments rule, but it's not in place now. The comment had details, wasn't general speculation.
You don’t see these in Canada but I am always flabberghasted by them while in the US. I noticed that holding my finger over the tiny speaker hole greatly reduced the volume, and I resolved to carry a roll of duct tape with me so I could do some public service next time I had to deal with them.
In Portugal we have "singing the kings" in the first days of January, and traditionally people shared the Christmas food and drinks with them.

https://youtu.be/JlBnLlKPPGA?t=11
Private equity firms, hedge funds, any firm that does investment at a large scale will use every kind of advantage they can to understand if a company or competitor is testing new things