skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I built apps for clients on the side. I saw that it's almost impossible to live off apps in the App Store. The chances are very slim of your app hitting enough sales. So I quit my day job and started doing contracting work fulltime. But that's not really what you mean, I'm guessing.
This article gives a good overview of the options and potential threats: https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Full_Disk_Encryption_and_Encrypt...

Use whonix itself and read the privacy guides in its wiki if you are concerned with privacy beyond FDE.
I was not being sarcastic - the question was purely rhetorical. From the company's perspective - there is no difference because they all result in the same thing - transfer of money from the company to the government.
Thanks! In those cases (honeybees), do you tend to say drones?
That looks amazing. Do you use Qml or standard QWidgets?
That would still give a huge benefit to the greedy boss who can "accurately determine productivity" and hires all women for cheaper, which means it would inevitably be copied in the end.
I hope this will end up with a hefty penalty. At this point, I believe a strict regulation is the only way to tame the Facebook beast - the more so because I heavily really on FB to be in touch with my family and friends.
If you just use the latter part "au4a83", which is "password", it's been seen more than thousand times on HIBP. And the best part is, If you tried "ji394su3", it's 20000 times! Want to guess what is it? It's "I love you" lol
I agree that CI is a brilliant investment. Also it can initially be as simple as a git hook. However, I agree with the author’s point that you do not need a Kubernetes distributed NoSQL megagalaxy when you have a number of customers which you can count on one hand. I’ve seen so much time wasted on this sort of thing.

One obvious benefit of the whole single/simple server idea is that you can make changes to the system so quickly and easily, which is very important at the beginning.
And here my answer was going to be that discredited one which triggered the anti-vaxxer movement.
He will be a Hero of China in 21 century to save Chinese from communist party.
>Equal wages is supposed to result in improved production... isn't it?

No, why would they?
EU and GDPR.
Add an authenticator app and delete the phone number.
It depends on who your customer is.
If your customer is the investor, then there is no limit to the amount of hardware, infrastructure, and experts sitting behind a desk and multiple monitors in every concevable separation of concern you can think of in every major city across the globe. Your product is amazing, and its going to change the world and how people percieve things. You need everything you can throw at it. Investors want to be the best. And thats if you customer is the investor.
These look really cool, I had no idea the PINE project was so diverse in its hardware projects.

Especially the $20 "naked" digital camera core ("The Cube") looks like it might trigger loads of cool projects. I guess it runs Linux, since it's pretty high-specced and has rich I/O. Power over Ethernet support suggests fixed installations is a niche (like security cameras, smart homes, automation and so on), but it might also be useful for visual effects. Cool stuff.

I think this:

Over the last year or two we’ve seen the Raspberry Pi form factor starting to become a defacto standard for single-board computers, much like Adafruit’s Feather has for micro-controllers

was a bit surprising, Feather is cool but surely it's an attempt to establish another standard, since Arduino already is the standard for microcontrollers? It was a bit weird that Arduino wasn't mentioned, there.

Looking forward to seeing when these become possible to order.
Yeah, if you are going for a microservices architecture, you need at least one person or dedicated team in an oversight / architecture role that keeps the design and growth in check. Primarily that means saying "no" when someone wants to create a new service or open up a new line of communication. It's an exercise in limiting dependencies.

And the easiest way to do that is to not build a microservices architecture; instead (and I hope I'm preaching to the choir here) build a monolith (or "a regular application") and only if you have good numbers and actual problems with scaling and the like do you start considering splitting off a section of your application. If you iterate on that long enough, MAYBE you'll end up with a microservices architecture.
That's why I don't put it in there.
This has been my experience too. On a project I'm working on now, I went majority integration tests. I have about 200 of them and they now take 2 minutes per run. VirtualBox and Jest doesn't help. To stay sane, I've had to run only relevant tests. They're great for a final sweep but they do slow down the feedback loop quite a lot.

For future tests and projects, unit tests do have a place and I'll make better use of them.

A good learning experience, none the less.
Direct link to announcement this post seems to take most info from: https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=7093&pid=43850#p...
Look, I was merely trying to give the author more information by verifying your observation. Your remark to me seems reasonable only if the author can see how many upvotes/downvotes a certain comment has. I don't know if he can.
You know, I’ve spent my life loving Pac-Man in the arcade but merely liking the myriad home versions I’ve purchased over the decades. Thank you so much for finally explaining why.
I don't think there's a single government that sets taxes based on fairness. Rather, I'd wager that most governments set taxes as high as they can without suffering consequences such as economic slowdowns or capital flight.
I think puppeteer is an interesting project, but right now it's Chrome-only and therefore pretty much useless for cross-browser testing.
Even with support for Firefox, it would still lack support for Safari Desktop, Safari Mobile, Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge.
It also won't allow you to run the same tests against real devices.

I think Puppeteer is likely the superior choice for any browser-automation task apart from cross-browser testing.
But if you want to make sure that your website is working for your users, using a Framework that uses the standardized W3C Webdriver API is the far better choice, unless you only want to support Chrome.
> partly offsetting its crime reduction benefits

No, potentially outweighing them. There is no reason to think surveillance cannot enable more crime than it solves, and the more surveillance you have the more likely that gets.
https://wiki.debian.org/MaliGraphics

RM produce designs for a GPU called 'Mali'. This is incorporated in many SoCs and thus devices. It is used in a number of devices that can run Debian.

There are three major revisions of Mali GPUs: Utgard, Midgard, and Bifrost. See wikipedia page for reference.

Partial free drivers were developed for Utgard but were abandoned (lima). Work on Utgard has continued by a new set of developers (lima). Free drivers for Midgard and Bifrost are under active development but are not yet ready for Debian users (panfrost).

Proprietary drivers are also available from the vendor for each Mali version. Since 2016, the binary drivers put out by ARM have been redistributable and thus can be packaged for non-free. GPLed kernel shim drivers are also released by ARM, which is eligible for Debian contrib. As of March 2017, these have been packaged in Debian for Midgard devices; see MaliMidgard. Upstream proprietary drivers are available from The ARM developer site
As government oppression continued to increase over time, they had to keep increasing the dosage ;p
Even that wasn't enough though, so that's why they started doing Chemtrails.
So now they implement a comprehensive three-factor approach; water supply, food supply and air supply.
They can combine different ratios of the chemicals in order to customize treatment to the geographical region; that's necessary to achieve a more homogenous (and therefore, predictable) population.
Predictable, homogenous populations are also better to encourage corporate consumerism because it allows corporations to use the same marketing approach globally.

It all adds up. Everything is connected.

> goes crazy and starts talking to self
"every service can just subscribe to the data it needs."

Doesn't that imply that each service then has to store any data it receives in these events - potentially leading to a lot of duplication and all of the problems that can come with that (e.g. data stores getting out of sync).
Services having a single responsibility sounds like good advice, but how do you turn a number of services with a single responsibility into a working application? Any process that touches multiple systems will become a lot more complicated. Single-responsibility services is good advice but it's too easy for short-sighted developers to obsess over that - instead of the bigger picture. Yes it makes it easier to carve out your segment of an application, and yes that codebase will be easier to maintain, reason about, and maintain, but someone has to keep bigger picture in mind. That's often lacking.
I wonder why you're being downvoted, maybe people don't want to face the consequences of their actions. Though I think we don't need to be so absolute in terms of "stops eating meat," that's hard for people to handle. It would be easier to convince people and still extremely effective to reducing meat consumption to once a week and on holidays, like in the old days.
It was C#, NServiceBus framework. Nowadays I'm doing similar work in Typescript. The approach is somewhat technology agnostic
We need 8-16G options for smoother experience once you start up desktop applications.
1. Python. I was amazed at how awkward it was to scale a Python program and coming from C type strictness, how much time I would spend running a program again and again to get over silly typos and stuff. I absolutely refuse to use Python for anything beyond one page long program.
It's still awesome for transforming data, but nothing beyond. It really felt to me like "the king is naked" because everyone around me was/is heavily using Python and I just couldn't stand it (and I've been using Python here and there for over 15 years now). I felt like I was doing something wrong - no, guys, you were doing something wrong. Not even talking about the pathetic performance and the abysmal concurrency; just the quality of tooling and static checks.
(much of the critcism obviously applies to other dynamic, scripted languages like JS, but at least everyone admits JS is shit up front, not so with heavy Python users).

2. C# and its tooling. I consider it the apex language. If there's a useful feature or convention somewhere else, Microsoft will make sure it makes its way into the C# standard in the next version. Super elegant, readable, straightforward and powerful. Superb tooling all around, from the blink fast compilation to catching most issues with static analysis before you even get to build. Linq and fantastic abstractions. Now that .NET Core is open source, there's very little reason left not to use it as the go-to language for backend programming.
It got me excited about programming again, because my ideas would translate nearly instantly into high quality, high performance code that I could almost always rely on to run right the first time.

3. The Linux kernel. I've been doing kernel development in many opportunities for the last two decades and it's always a great example of an elegant, no bullshit codebase. It's a window into the working of many great minds. Early on, it got me educated on proper error handling in low level code (goto stacks).

4. Actors for concurrency. I started using the actor pattern in a commercial embedded RTOS I designed, and it was the answer for all my concurrency needs lots of time later. If you're extensively calling lock/unlock in your user code, you're doing it wrong and it won't scale.

5. Functional programming principles, most notably immutability and avoiding stateful objects. It makes complicated logic so much more scalable and avoids ripple effects when doing modifications to the program flow.
The code is also compiled to native code, but it's written declaratively. It's not for everyone, but it's not the same as Electron. Even still you have the option to use the traditional imperative API.
I don't think it's called air if you can't breath it.
Of course, it’s not something I would normally watch. It is however very popular with my parents generation. They get very invested in the whole idea of the world falling apart when the data shows that crime is falling.
I quite like the dreary stuff, it provides a useful foil to the demanding parts of my work.
A micro service should not depend on another micro service! I see the same mistake in plugin and module design patterns.
When you make one service depended on another services you add complexity. Some complexity is necessary, but everything (scaling, redundancy, resilience, replacing, rewriting, removing, etc) will be more easy without it.
Really, whenever someone blames "discipline" be suspicious

Not even the army has perfect discipline, even with hard training. They have cross-checks, piles of processes and move slowly for the most part

(Software development shouldn't aim to be like the army though)
In any organisation it's only the owners who are ultimately concerned with overall cost - managers can have all sorts of incentives for larger or less efficient staff.
But your species sends humans to ISS all the time. Or do you think Russians are cats? :)
What's Wrong with MMT?
You mention importance and usefulness, but TBH it's not about those, it's about economic value - that is, can miners earn money from crunching the numbers. I think once a cryptocurrency has dropped below feasibility, miners will abandon it for more profitable ones and open it up to a 51% attack.
Python is strongly typed.

See here: https://wiki.python.org/moin/Why%20is%20Python%20a%20dynamic...

"objects can change their shape anytime" is a function of dynamic typing and is orthogonal to strong or weak typing.
There are so many fuckups in security systems these days, so it's not strange.
Pilots!
I use it, but I'm part of Status, the biggest Nim sponsor ;).
Good wear levelling :)
It wont work with password managers or devices without keyboards. Unless a comma (or other char) separated string form is accepted by the implementation.
I could also think of solutions for screen keyboards, but my goal is not to replace normal passwords but rather to offer an alternative where high security is needed and compatibility granted.
I'm using LUKS, with disks being mounted with crypttab.

The keys for the drives are stored on an encrypted USB key, and the key for the encrypted USB key is stored on the root SSD.

I wanted something where i could boot unattended, and at the same time i wanted the possibility to destroy the keys and render the disks useless.

I have an encrypted backup of the keys, stored outside of the encrypted disk arrays.
Paper Generator was also a nice experiment, in this context:

https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/
Keep in mind that companies are not just large multinationals but also small mom and pop stores, freelancers and everything in between. I hope you understand how deeply hypocritical it is to tout paying taxes as a moral obligation while at the same time refusing to be held accountable for how that money is being spent or denying companies a voice.
Don't worry, your friends will help Facebook fill in the blanks with their smartphone address books. There is bound to be some Facebook-connected app (WhatsApp perhaps?) they use that does link your Facebook identifier with your phone number.
Well, in principle you still pay it now in the form of lots of unit tests that you wouldn't need with a statically typed language.
TBH Java used to be a lot worse than it is now :)
Discrete robot motion planning in a continuous domain
That's the top answer (https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-of-the-worst-academic-pa...) - and deservedly so!
Okay so we finally killed off the telephone book and now Facebook reintroduces it? And you can't even opt out?

My policy of never giving out my phone number to an American company proves wise once more.