skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Honestly, I don't like scratchpad. If you use it on multiple windows, doing `scratchpad show` multiple times causes one window to appear, then disappear, then next window appear, then disappear... and it does this across workspaces. I don't understand when I'd need something like that. It's a weird feature.

Instead, something I really wanted was to be able to toggle the hiding and showing of all floating windows per workspace. It sometimes happens that I just want to work with floating windows for a while, and the number of windows explodes, and I end up with all these floating windows on top of my tiled windows. Using i3 with the default configuration, I had to manually move all floating windows out of the way to get to the tiling windows below, and then move them back when I wanted to work with them again. That was cumbersome, so I did this:

bindsym $mod+Tab exec "current_workspace=\\"$(i3-msg -t get_tree | jq -r 'recurse(.nodes[]) | select(.type == \\"workspace\\" and ([recurse((.nodes, .floating_nodes)[])] | any(.focused))) | .name')\\"; floating_workspace=\\"F${current_workspace%:*}\\"; if i3-msg -t get_tree | jq -e \\"recurse(.nodes[]) | select(.type == \\\\"workspace\\\\" and .name == \\\\"$current_workspace\\\\") | .floating_nodes | length > 0\\"; then i3 \\"[workspace=$current_workspace floating] move to workspace $floating_workspace\\"; else i3 \\"[workspace=$floating_workspace floating] move to workspace $current_workspace\\"; fi"

Now, I just press Super+Tab and all floating windows on workspace e.g. 6:some-topic get moved to new workspace F6, and when I press it again they're moved back to 6:some-topic, right where they were. This is workspace independent; the windows belong to a workspace. I can hide the floating windows of however many workspace I want and call them back and they won't get mixed.

I think it's pretty cool that i3's configuration and tooling allow for this kind of advanced configuration. It's like I added a whole new feature.
I used to have Gentoo, specially when I was a student. It was definitely an interesting experience, and the skills I learnt are useful in many other contexts.

But when I started working, I switched to Debian, maintaining a Gentoo was a bit costly, and when I wanted to try out something, compiling everything was really slow (you frequently have to wait a few hours).

I still use a minimal setup (dwm with some customization and helper scripts: https://github.com/kakwa/dwm-desktop), and frankly, once it's done, you barely have to touch it, I've not touched my setup in years.
Will it though?

The frequencies are so easily blocked by anything that you need transmitters everywhere and receivers everywhere - literally 5G phones will have to have 3+ separate 5G antennaes in different locations to avoid the signal being outright blocked by your hand.

5G devices will practically need line of sight to a transmitter.
I do not actually see a concise course out there that puts it all together. I am a big fan of Rachel Andrews, Jen Simmons and Lea Verou, however, at the moment it really requires some DIY effort to get everything learned. You also need a project such as your own portfolio site to have a go with.

Given there is no guide out there I think I had better write one.
Just in case you thought it might be a good idea to order that aliexpress thing, it's terrible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3frnBoqqI_Q
> leave your personal drama out of the interview, no matter what, because ain't nobody going to want to hire a depressed mopey anybody

I would like to second this. I do this by never showing weakness. Always try to provide solutions and when in self doubt, keep mouth shut.
The questions she raised in the letter were so clear and good.
Unfortunately, I think this is true.

If in a game I can steal 10 points and at most get a 1 point penalty for getting caught, I'm much more likely to give it a shot than if I get a 10 or 20 point penalty for getting caught. Plus, if everyone else in the game is cheating and getting away with it, I'm much more likely to try it too.

The problem is if you make the penalties so severe and the application of the rules unequal, then you end up with chopping people's hands off for stealing.
Shamrock transacts billions of dollars with Serverless
I love Wikipedia for those articles. However, as many fundamental science articles, it is hard at the boundary of original work (which is against the rules: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research ). Interestingly, for the front picture of this article, the originality is "avoided" as it originates from
https://networkscience.wordpress.com/2012/05/04/taxonomy-of-... -- a blog, not a well-citable scientific source.
How about lower premiums as a reward for having good credit or a crime free history?
I worry that if you don't take away his Twitter, it will also be bad for the future of Tesla.
Funny how word 'Enterprise' picks up more and more negative connotation in modern software world. These days, 'enterprise' means outdated, inflexible and intentionally flawed monster of technology.
The author addresses this in the conclusion, and is also suspicious, but presents some possibilities that explain it.

"This surprises me, because the dramatic shift in 1973 made me expect to see a single cause (and multifactorial trends should be rare in general, maybe, I think). It looks like there are two reasons why 1973 seems more important than it is...."
> Now I'll have to make an argument based on capacity and price-point when I find them.

You mean you're reporting them without buying them and testing them, based on what you think the capacity and price-point should be?
It's because a huge number of people just discovered the net and they don't surf as we are used to, like they don't search as we do etc. I don't want to sound elitist, many of them don't have the experience of it. They are going to repeat all behaviors and fall in all traps since we were new on the net. I see this in the way my kids use their phones.
>"It is hard to imagine a realistic threat scenario where MRI's are altered by an adversary, _before_ they are fed into a CNN."

what about when people in the hospital who have a patient that they suspect has cancer use the best machine to create that patients scans and tend to push patients that they think are ok to the older less good instrument? Or if they choose to utilise time on the best instrument for children?

What about when the MRI's done at night are done by one technician who uses a slightly different process from the technicians who created the MRI data set?

At the very least there is a significant risk of systematic error being introduced by these kind of bias, and as you say, it's really hard to guard against this, but if a classifier that I produce is used where this happens and people die... Well, whatever I feel I would be responsible.
Returns on investment always exceed wage growth. And as wealth concentrates, the effect is cumulative even over generations. It happens to be tech. It could just as easily be empire.

There was a moment after the world wars when this was intentionally compensated for and now it isn't. There is no William Beveridge, no Roosevelt brain trust and, Keynesian is apparently a bad word now.
Web technologies are based on standards otherwise there is no conformance. If you want something different advocate for a change to the standard.

> The Pandora box is already open, haven't you noticed it?

WASM has been widely available for a while now in all major browsers and yet the fantasy of replacing JavaScript still has not come to pass. I guess I haven't noticed it.
https://filecatalyst.com/how-to-move-large-video-files/

553GB for an hour of 8k
88GB for an hour of 4k
How to Evaluate Functions as a Service (FaaS) Providers
How a payday lending industry insider tilted academic research in its favor
Building Windows for the ARM processor architecture (2012)
> Yes, prisons are unpleasant

I think that's a bit of an understatement. For a vast number of inmates, prisons seem to be hell on earth.
So does this algorithm generate a report that predicts the future? Like a minority report?
Is it really the worst possible option? It’s often a pretty good guess, and accept-language is similarly unreliably set and can be fiddled with by intermediaries. Navigator.language doesn’t help you until you’ve already served and run JavaScript.

The right solution I think is to make a reasonable guess and then allow the user to control it. None of these guesses are going to work for everybody on their own.
Why not buy a 2.5" SSD in the first place? It will be cheaper, faster, and more reliable.
Most of it is acide orange fruity sugar concentrate diluted in water though.

The vast majority is 100% orange juice, either not from concentrate, or re-hydrated (sometimes claimed to be "artificial" because they also add orange juice zest or oils).

To go back to my original, I can find traditional balsamic in multiple major grocery stores in my city. It's very expensive for a usually tiny bottle, but if you want it it isn't terribly hard to find. You can buy it on Amazon any hour of the day. And if your standards aren't quite so high, balsamic vinegar of modena, usually with just two ingredients (grape must and white vinegar) can be found everywhere for little, tasting marginally different. Italy considers and regulates either of those as "real".

We see the same gatekeeping claims with parmigiano-reggiano: Someone avails themselves on the Kraft green "parmesan" and then tells everyone else about how they've never tasted the real thing, it's so exclusive, etc (but, of course, they have that one time). Never aware that the cheese aisle has big blocks of 100% real, certified, regulated, straight from the source Parmigiano-Reggiano. This same discussion is occurring regarding tomatoes, as if having eaten a ripe garden tomato is some exclusive experience (rather than completely banal and experienced by virtually everyone).
Let's say that you pay that hypothetical employee twice as much, so that his wage increases with the output. In effect, you've negated the technology's effect on productivity. In this case, wages would trend with productivity, but only because productivity would not increase.
The person pays for the good in US dollars. Where do those dollars go? The Chinese people who now have USD either spend or invest them back in the US.
Re: If the median worker isn't responsible for the increased productivity, are they entitled to a share of the work of other people?

Other people? The rich? Or even machines? There are several questions raised here.

Even if we go with the presumption that the rich are simply more productive/useful and "deserve their income", that still doesn't answer the question of why inequality is increasing.

Did the rich simply start to get significantly better than the rest around 1980? Instant evolution? Or perhap the economy is becoming "winner take all". The more you control the more you CAN control. For example, the big tech co's have huge patent portfolios in which to sue any upstarts from entering their turf. Their big competitors have their own giant portfolios to defend against each other's patent claims via counter-suits. Thus, smallbies are essentially locked out, forced into niches.

Even if we assume they deserve their big incomes, it could still pose a risk to democracy as the rich buy influence. The Supreme Court more or less has concluded money is free speech, meaning the rich (and corporations) can speak louder than the rest. Their point of view gets splattered everywhere and counter arguments from regular folks get drowned out. And there is campaign donations, which is legalized bribery, which the Court also upheld. The rich can use their influence to get even more politicians and judges in play which favor the rich, creating a runaway train of influence. "Slippery Slope" is often considered a debate fallacy, but we are sliding into inequality in practice. Sliding does sometimes actually happen. Unions are being gradually stripped of power by politicians and the courts, for example.

Therefore, even if one accepts that the rich deserve most their money, their spending power may have the practical side-effect of undermining democracy and equal representation.

And, how many mansions, Maseratis and swimming pools does one "need" to be sufficiently rewarded? 7?, 20?, 82? I thought it really telling that John McCain lost track of how many mansions he owned.

If we assume it's machines that have generated the increased total wealth, then obviously machines don't want nor need money (although I'm working on a Greed-A-Tron). So who gets it? The owners of the machines typically do, but are we just rewarding them for simply owning more machines than you and I? Owner take all?
_Every_ CEO of _every_ publicly traded company has _every_ company-related tweet vetted by a company lawyer. What the SEC is asking of Musk here is simply that he follow the industry-standard.

Let's not forget Musk owes a fiduciary duty to Tesla shareholders and his tweets have repeatedly lost shareholders money and induced people to purchase shares on false/misleading information. That's securities fraud.

Source: Corporate & Securities Attorney. I was once the approver of many such tweets. Though thankfully the people I worked with were exceedingly reasonable in comparison to Musk.

Edit: Missed a word.
I am admin on a few high profile js projects. Github has enabled sending alerts for vulnerabilities, I haven’t yet seen one that was actually a real one. Lots of times there’s a deep dependency that we’re not even using that can accept a regex that may cause a DoS.
But I do!! I sometimes get bored and there isn't anything particularly interesting on hn so I open Wikipedia, think of a random thing, and read its article from start to end.
I use a VPN for all traffic, using an exit server in Finland. I don't speak a word of finnish.

I have chatted with people who work on internationalization about IP based detection. The explanation I've always heard is that `Accept-Language` is all but useless. For a significant number of users the value is, incorrectly, `en-US`. Because of how unreliable `Accept-Language` is, IP based detection is unfortuantely has a much lower false positive rate.
This is probably a better explanation for how wages have grown. The biggest problem is healthcare costs have grown too.

https://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications/the-region/where...
People glance over and talk around it, but part of prison or punishment in general is to appease victims. I don't think there is anything wrong with that. Sending someone to a 4-star hotel after they've damaged a victim in some way will not appear as justice to the victim. Some people say that isn't the purpose of punishment, but it serves as a reason to "believe" in the justice system and processes itself, which is important.
WASM is getting DOM access, but there is nothing indicating that DOM access is to the page containing the WASM instance.
Lot's of people still go to the library, and many of them still check out books a century or more old.

A 1TB dump is not about expecting people to read all of it, it would be about getting a broad enough section of knowledge that the chances of a decent subset of it being of interest to a decent number of people.

And if the purpose is to "spark the next Einstein" as the comment suggested, it doesn't matter if 99% of them ends up being used for games, or sold, or used for all kinds of other things, if a tiny portion triggers an interest in learning and provides a good starting point.
In approaching 100% of cases the operating system pesters you to set a language+locale during setup, and the browser propagates that via Accept-Language. The advanced use case is the user who wishes a set of > 1 weighted language ranges; e.g. de-DE most preferred, then English in any culture, then Latin American Spanish.
> the burden of proof is probably on those who want to refute this claim.

I agree that the claim is fairly self-evident, but the burden of proof should be on the person making the claim.

It's not my job to do your research!
How does this compare to vagrant?
Risk-First Software Development: The Menagerie
Spinning Up in Deep RL – Workshop Review
does the SEC have jurisdiction and legal evidence to go after POTUS even if they wanted to?

No, because Trump isn't tweeting (or claiming to tweet) insider information about publicly traded companies, nor is he in a position to economically benefit from any of these trades (as per the few disclosures he has made, he does not own any publicly traded stocks).
I was not making a comparison.
What do you mean by being cautious? Wouldn't being cautious mean not including un-used libraries with vulnerabilities in them?
No, not really. Catholic social doctrine is dictated by all the popes now and in the past. When this pope and a previous pope contradict, one of them is being interpreted incorrectly. The Church also is guided by its own traditions, ultimately meaning the collective decisions of bishops in the past.

In other words, the pope trying to dictate social doctrine would result in massive unpopularity or schism. That is why this pope is unpopular in some circles. Whether that's deserved or not is not an argument I'm having today.
That made me chuckle. I will be elaborating on this mentally over the next few weeks. At least a trip to the airport does take you to the heavens above. I am now imagining the staff in Catholic style robes.
Except that Bill Gates was one of the precursors of modern computing.
Einstein? Modern physics. Picasso? Cubism.
That's why these three will be remembered for a long time.

History books will probably talk just a bit about his wealth, maybe about his humanitarian actions, but he'll definitely be remembered as the person who made personal computing a thing.
Well, compared to the rest of the internet today (including mashable that you provide a link to), they are wayyyyyy less flashy and graphical. I wish the rest of the internet was a clean as google's homepage.
"unfaithfulness is more common than being a good person"

Source?
>Isn't catholic social doctrine dictated by the pope?

Yes, but it's more akin to how US Foreign Policy is dictated by the President.

Ignoring the religious aspect for a bit. The Pope has the power to dictate Catholic social doctrine, but he primarily interprets existing doctrine, which has been established over 2000 years. I don't believe that the current Pope has taken any steps to explicitly change doctrine, merely to explain it.

For example, the church considers abortions to be a sin (murder). This has often resulted in penalties and bias against women who have had an abortion within the church. Pope Francis has called for more love and respect towards these women. This was not presented as a change in doctrine, however the language is imprecise so it can be interpreted as "abortion is not a grave sin" or as "love the sinner, hate the sin." Obviously people will use the imprecision to support their agenda.
If your stance is:

No opaque data leaves my network

Then this is the only way you can have outbound HTTPS connections. And for e.g. a bank, certain legal firms, or any company that has a lot of sensitive data they either don't want to be leaked, or at least want the option of detecting when it is leaked, that is a somewhat reasonable stance.
In the case of banks, this is needed for regulatory compliance regarding insider trading. For legal companies, I imagine this is about ensuring certain confidentiality. I could see the same thing for companies dealing with trade-secrets.

The statement 'Just log it on the end-points' presumes complete access to those end-points and all software running on them.

This method is considered better than terminating TLS early at a proxy and setting up a separate tunnel to the clients because breaking PFS is passive, rather than active. Thus it is a lot less resource intensive, a lot less vulnerable (no internet facing box that, if broken, has all communication in plaintext), and introduces no extra latency.

It is essentially a 'better' way to do an authorized MitM on everything on your network, and some companies want this authorized MitM. Like any authorized MitM, it introduces a third party who can compromise security, which is not generally desirable, but some companies don't mind being that third party to their own employees.
Have you any idea how much work that is and how many things can go wrong I might have a dozen or more locales / languages and if you then want to see any locale in any language that's a huge amount of different urls

Ok so you want German content in the UK
do I show you the German locale and products legally available in Germany?
the UK locale and products legally available in the UK translated into German?

And do I age gate you based on German law or English
what happens if I show you a BOGOF offer do I obey German law or English
What happens if google messes up.
What happens if your in Quebec and I accidently show you an illegal competition
What T&C's do I show you
This one feels a bit witch-hunty, the "500k" number he tweeted wasn't meant to be some new accurate prediction, but a reiteration of their public position, to make a general point about how quickly they've grown over the years.
Sure. Look, despite the impression I may have given, I'm not arguing for separating things badly. The cleaner the separation, the better. It really makes a difference.
I don't disagree that this doesn't seem necessarily secure and the auto dependency resolution is a bad idea for other reasons in my opinion, but I don't see the security aspect of it.

The moment I can upload files to the application folder that are executed, I can just `require('child_process').spawn("my_evil_stuff", [])`. In particular "my_evil_stuff" could be some npm install command. I don't see how automatically installing the dependencies makes this worse than it already is.

EDIT: While this is a different attack vector than I was envisioning here, jexco has provided a scenario in which there are additional vulnerabilities: Vulnerable dependencies that cannot be managed.
I don't work for a bank so I can't speak definitively to their applications. A few sample applications I see listed as certificate pinned in Netskope (a CASB) though include:

Adobe Creative Cloud
Amazon Work Spaces
Docusign
GitHub
Google Drive
GoToMeeting
iCloud
Microsoft Office 365 Outlook.com
Microsoft Skype for Business
Salesforce.com

Note this typically refers to native applications and plugins which also connect over TLS and not web applications.
That's the real danger of AI, not the "raise of machines". It gives theoretical foundation for saying "humans who are not X are not Y".
What the Church says refers to the 2000 years of writings and teaching that the Church and her bishops have collected. Those writings are at odds with what the author is saying. You do not need to take my word for it. Read the church fathers, the encyclicals of the previous popes (and this one as well), and read the writings of the great theologians, and you will get a good idea of Church social teaching.

You will also get a taste for how possible and how surprisingly often individual bishops misrepresent it, both today, and in the past.
So will it die after 6 months of writes as they tend to do?
Yes you can, but that's not the majority.

And even pressed juice, something I actually buy regularly, usually tastes so-so. It's ok.

It doesn't have to be.

If I walk 15 minutes, I can get to the houses of somes friens. Once a year, for a few weaks, they get oranges in their garden.

From it you get juice that children will choose over coke, grenadine, etc.

Of course, the oranges are ugly, small, annoying to press, and appear only a short period of times in the year.

It's not something you want for industrial purpose.

When we reach industrial scale, a good deal of quality goes away. Now for a chair, I don't mind. I think society is not worst because of it.

But for food, it's a double edge sword. On one hand, we can feed more people. On the other, we have an obesity epidemic because people crave sugary junk food. And I don't think it's their fault.