skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What does correct mean? Engineering is about solving problems.

Ultimately it was the right solution for a very specific scope and time. The knowledge gained helped avoid nuclear conflict — an extreme benefit worth a lot of cost.

Once satellites matured, it’s utility was reduced. Once drones were a thing, it’s utility went to zero. Top-secret state of the art stuff in 1990 is on the deck of a mueseum today.
That one is super hard when looking only at the face.

Look at the clothes and necklace. The clothes are different on left and right sides of her face - the moment you see it you can't unsee it and it's obviously wrong.
“Warrior vs. Worrier” Gene: Genetics Explained
Thanks for sharing. As you mentioned it works well for Google based books but you cant download the books your upload.

Would be interesting to hear your feedback if you decide to try BookFusion
>I haven't found anything that I can self-host and allows me to have multiple "vaults".

I'm not familiar with 1Password. How do you access these various "vaults" - you type a password, correct?

I guess I'm not following why multiple Keypass DBs with multiple passphrases is not acceptable for you, but several passwords in one app is?

(To be clear, I'm not saying your opinion is wrong I just want to understand - usable security is an interest of mine :) )
Tangentially, it's interesting to see how Samsung's reveal video (at the top of the article) [1] is so uncannily similar to what Microsoft came up with a few years ago for the Surface Studio [2], right down to the music selection. Something about technology killing creativity, perhaps? /s

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7r_UgNcJtzQ

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifZXp2geVKI (apologies that this isn't a link to an official source; Microsoft doesn't seem to have it online anymore)
Maybe it's shorthand for "arbitrary code execution in the kernel mode context".
Seem's it couldn't decide between hair or beanie, so it just went with both
"Everyone does it" does not mean "it's harmless".

If you want to see other examples of ubiquitous practices that were treated as harmless and necessary to be competitive and ultimately shown to be incredibly harmful, I would just refer you to {the entire history of competitive and professional sports}.
Coldboot attacks do not necessarily require breaking Windows/Mac password. I agree it is unlikely for most individuals, though.
Yes! This is the exact article I was talking about. I spent quite a bit of time yesterday trying to find it but had no luck.
Thank you so much
:)
Your local sleep doctor can evaluate your sleep apnea risk factors and prescribe a take-home test. Should be covered under insurance.

I think you can DIY with a cheap pulse oximeter, but I'm certainly not qualified to say how to interpret the results.
Is this patched or is everything vulnerable?
Wikipedia says he was represented by the Institute for Justice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbs_v._Indiana

Otherwise, yes, Timbs would have to pay. You can file a petition to ask the court to waive your court costs (there's a Latin legal term for it that I believe means "with pockets turned out" or "with pockets empty" but I can't remember it), but your lawyer's time isn't covered by that.
I'm not tring to convince you, i'm sharing my pov. Systemd is here because of pov like this, and people not liking it end up with it anyway because they fail to aknowledge others pov.
I don't even know how to gauge whether something is obvious or not. What qualities does an "obvious idea" have?
I feel uneasy with your reaction.

Maybe reducing the max number of recipients to the hundreds would help reduce the chance for abuse while still keeping your core customer base happy? It might also reduce the risk of getting booted off the Chrome Store.
I noticed a lot of folks in here are putting the emphasis on the 'this is how I spotted the fake' which is extremely valuable on its own, however, have you thought about the potential practical outcomes and unintended consequences.

Its amazing to think about the implications of being able to create faces that look real. It can have an impact on police questionnaires, future holograms, may be used to adulterate security camera's data and so many others. I wonder if we will be able to keep up with the changes in technology to protect what society holds dear.
Everything is vulnerable apparently: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2019-8912
I remember a brain freeze episode as well! I can't really recall the plot anymore, but that one definitely stuck with me for some reason.
Hehe who knows. I was just sitting at 5 point comment and in like 30 seconds im at -1.
I wonder who was the designer responsible for this monstrosity, and i honestly hope that person never gets to work again.

But let's be honest, this is android, so it was probably designed by 12~75 product managers responsible for a single small feature each, which they personally never used.

they had the opportunity to work with the most cool and anticipated new tech... and they just slap two phones back to back like it's not their job to do anything. How can someone screw things so badly?

the meetings probably went

PM for some small samsung video chat app: "but if i open it, i can't have video chat! we must have front facing camera on this side too!"

PM for some Advertising as Notification OEM deal: "but we get paid more for non-flip phones! we have to show notifications without opening!"

PM for s-gear: "what do you mean an innovative wrap around the wrist phone?! this will kill sales of smart watches! let's keep this idea for the 3rd version ...maybe"
Also agree it shouldn't exist, but if there were a general fund, it shouldn't go towards funding any government agencies even in a distributed fashion. Maybe credit it out to all tax payers?
Oh, definitely. It was a minimal ruling, but it's still a landmark.

Honestly, though, this case is so perfect that I almost wonder if the Supreme Court of Indiana didn't rule the way they did just to force the issue.
"Probably" applied to catastrophic outcomes isn't particularly reassuring.

It also requires a certain wilful denial of the mounting evidence that catastrophic outcomes - including starvation, oppression, and worse - have already happened for many people, and are likely to happen for many more people in the near/medium future.

Having said, it's true that this is the Number One problem that humanity has to fix now - how to deal with bad actors?

Clearly, elevating them to positions of immense power and influence through political, corporate, and economic systems that attempt to deny their toxicity isn't the correct answer.

Meanwhile there's a certain unaware irony in applying the "toxic" label to employees, but not to employers.

Most of the FAANGs (with the possible exception of Netflix) and many prominent unicorns could be considered toxic actors in exactly the sense described in the paper the OP is based on - self-regarding, high-performers generating high productivity gains for insiders, but a net social and cultural loss overall.
Great points, I think I agree on all of them. Cynically speaking, I think the answer is just that it's a round psychological number -- the three comma club. It's a rough binary signal that indicates growth and clout to a layman, and works reasonably well as a proxy therein, even if it's pretty noisy. I've personally noticed that working at unicorn companies has done a lot more for my career and network than non-unicorn companies, and it's done the same for lots of folks I worked with there, even those who weren't on as high profile projects as me and who felt like they didn't grow as much.
> We should be sharing more...

The Spanish Inquisition would certainly agree.
I find it hard to believe that this ~7“ device with a strange aspect ratio and without a foldable keyboard can replace a $1100 tablet like a Surface Pro or a 12.9“ iPad Pro.
Not necessarily. You could, for instance, elevate the privileges of a process you can't completely control, which might allow you to read sensitive files or disrupt a system, but not perform arbitrary actions with those privileges.
A basic linter will hopefully flag two unrelated statements on the same source line...
you could essentially have both for the same price and fit them in your pocket

Will you be able to fit this in a pocket? My pockets can't fit anything bigger than a Pixel.
This does apply to non prod environments. Development/test environments that have low utilization and only run during business hours are better candidates
may be it was supposed to be http://thesecatsdonotexistANYMORE.com/
Wouldn't it be very diluted, to the point it is no more harmful than whatever else may be in that river water?
I mean, I would just translate to the secular equivalent, "perfection is not a real thing". More concerning is the "image of the Creator" language, which is a short step from exactly the kind of hyper-idealism that he's critiquing in the first place. He does at least acknowledge that trying to achieve perfection in the real (or "the present") world is folly, but still, it's from a very different perspective than the secular one.
Are you saying you've never received any benefit from an email you received that was part of a campaign? Like a discount to your favorite store? Not all uses are commercial, either. We have teachers who use it to communicate with all the parents of their students. A tennis club that emails out the week's upcoming schedule to all players. An HOA communicating with its residents.
> A basic linter does not resolve the semantic question.

That's not the job of the linter, that's the job of the engineer.

> The linter could be satisfied by changing the code syntax [...]

What you're suggesting is the equivalent of turning your car stereo up so that you don't hear the strange noise your car is making.

> But, the question is the empty bracket correct or should the contents of the subsequent scope be cut into the scope of the if bracket?

That's the job of the engineer to figure out. The linter is only supposed to raise the flag, not come up with the answer.
Also, shame on Indie Hackers for choosing to promote this.
Background on the Slaughterhouse Cases: https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landma...
It also won't save you from

if(something);
{
do_something();
}
Who is your threat model when sharing a password with your mom?

If it's not the government, isn't a phone call sufficient? Harder to tap, and presumably she knows your voice.
TOT = Tip of Tree.
Galaxy Fold
A combination of text files that I edit with Emacs or Eclipse depending on what I'm doing, and a self-hosted Mediawiki instance.

For TODO list / task management stuff, I'm actually in the middle of building my own command line task manager tool that maps specifically to the way I like to do things. Once it's a little bit further along, I'll release it as Open Source in case anybody else might find it useful.
You can use your own mind. Assess the actual point of view, rather than engaging your bias the minute you detect a whiff of religion.
> But what you're missing from my comment is that companies all think to themselves "Well cmon - $X/month isnt that much money"

> But also forget about subscription fatigue, as well as the fact that a company/individual might want/need >a dozen "subscription" services to accomplish what they want. So if you're paying ~$10 to $20 per month for every thing you need....

I would imagine these companies run the numbers on how many people think "$x/month isn't that much money", how long people stick around on average and then optimize for maximum average revenue per user (ARPU).

Though your perspective is entirely valid – and I am not disputing any of your arguments – from the company's perspective, there are probably enough people that don't feel like you on the margin so they can optimize for them instead at the expense of potentially alienating you.

I don't disagree that a centralized hub for handling subscriptions should exist. I'll go even further and wager that your bank will ultimately provide some variation of this service so that you can easily tell apart recurring subscriptions from one-off purchases. At least that's what I would do if I were appointed CEO of Wells Fargo tomorrow
AFAICS, this was exposed by the addition of sockfs_setattr() in v4.10. So it's incorrect to claim that kernels older than that are vulnerable, even though the code being fixed was older.

Also, note that there may not actually be a proof-of-concept exploit yet, beyond a reproducer causing a KASAN splat. When people request a CVE for a use-after-free bug they usually just assume that code execution may be possible. (Exploits can be very creative.)
My undergrad is in Materials Science and I am very uninformed on the NN/AI stuff, but I completely agree that the term AI seems to be applied to all sorts of techniques with zero relation to true intelligence, seems more to be just working with patterns that have been fed into them.
I’m not religious myself, but I think you’re letting some weird biases get in the way here. The point is that the world and the work of human beings is flawed, fallible, and imperfect. Whether or not heaven exists in heaven, it certainly doesn’t exist on earth and essentially never can.
if the curly brackets of an if statement are unnecessary then that should also be an error.
Totally agree about third party representation. It's still hard to believe that Ross Perot (like him or not) got around 20% of the vote in the 90s and 0% representation came out of this. Congress would do well if there were some swing voters who aren't beholden to the two big parties. This way the big parties would have to collaborate more because they couldn't just go straight party line.
> I don't think going to university after 15 years of industry experience will reap any benefits. Something like this could just plug the gaps in your knowledge for less than a hundred dollars and a fraction of the time.

I think OP knows this and just considers it for the piece of paper at the end, probably to help ensure future employability.
>That only helps if you assume the laptop is fully powered off when it is stolen. If it's on or merely in "sleep" mode, disk encryption doesn't help.

Is this true for Filevault? I know a lot of Mac owners who assume otherwise.
Using 'optimization' here makes it an odd construction where I don't think I've quite understood what you are trying to say.

Is it synonymous with social change? Most social changes aren't optimisations, they are complicated changes to how resources are distributed; leading to unpredictable outcomes.

Take social welfare. This can probably be considered a social optimisation and most reasonable people would agree that some level of welfare is appropriate. But there doesn't seem to be any particular agreement on the economic or social front about whether the optimum amount is more or less. Or what we are optimising for.
> ignoring the fact that a password manager makes this as convenient as microformats (which we never got, ironically) for stealing secrets.
That was his point. Public swimming pools crank up the chlorine to counteract the number of people using them.
No, since privilege escalation can also mean that you are able to take specific actions that you wouldn't otherwise be able to take. It does not always mean code execution.
I doubt Phelps was fucking with the interviewer. I was also a competitive swimmer and my experience matches what Phelps said.
They aren't. In order to overcome the omega-6 metabolic preference, you need to consume, at a minimum twice as much omega-3 oils as omega-6, but actually closer to 4x.

Twice as much omega-3 means eliminating olive oil, soy, most nuts, and many other foods. Or, alternatively, downing a pint or so of flax seed every day.
The Future of Retail in the Palm of Your Hand
Demand for Data Professionals in New York Is Growing
> Additionally, a lot of the constitution is actually phrased as limits on the government rather than rights as citizens.

This is because the Constitution is supposed to be an enumeration of what the government is allowed to do. The limitations are there to narrow the scope of those enumerated powers. In this context, enumerating most rights of citizens would have been redundant. The enumerated citizen rights were those that could be affected by the powers the government was granted.

Unfortunately, Commerce Clause abuse and the effective neutralization of the 10th Amendment has created the opposite situation where the government can do anything it wants as long as it isn't specifically prohibited, and citizens are only guaranteed rights if they are specified.
Kindles are cheap and light, if digital reading is your goal.
They are notorious for copying Apple in many ways too
"At least in the United States, where I live, this doesn't happen because the "progressives" are radicalizing towards utopianism while the "conservative" faction is themselves split between utopianism and reaction."

Sometimes It feels like the "conservatives" are more utopian than the progressives. They just live in the utopia of a past that never existed.
The only argument I have heard is that it was useful for prosecuting property where no owner will claim it, or the owner is unavailable for prosecution because they are not in the country. Imagine a drug cartel shipped a large pile of cash to the US and it was seized. I could imagine it might make sense to have US vs. Big Pile of Cash because the cartel isn't going to claim it and you could prove it was likely part of the drug trade. IMHO it went sideways as soon as it was used when an owner was available.
Death is a very personal thing. Would you tell the author of TFA that they are "giving up?"
Live Streaming Iran vs. China RRC, Free Live Stream AFC Asian
https://qiita.com/Shopno24/items/e270589212cea53c2adb

https://qiita.com/Heart_Attack/items/70b5a5f0949b45772965

https://qiita.com/Cheleta_Beyadob/items/f0ee8523decac16cdd89

https://qiita.com/Buddhir_Raja/items/7f5a0733484c3ac55e63

https://qiita.com/Love24/items/ab465245436cb07ae8d1

https://qiita.com/Faguneagun/items/927be76b74e6ad079898

https://qiita.com/Faguneagun/items/927be76b74e6ad079898

https://qiita.com/TakluChacchu/items/d83d52f2d2701b710046

https://qiita.com/Guruji24/items/4a3a1b6b399ddc5a4d4c
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19205457
They can.

> This finding suggests that when animal foods are wholly excluded from the diet, the endogenous production of EPA and DHA results in low but stable plasma concentrations of these fatty acids.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16087975
Yes, if you have a good plan on using the money. Keep in mind that these are investments, not loans. So they don't have to be paid back. The investor is taking the risk that they believe you can do something with the money.

When I say that "money is cheap" I mean in dilution cost, not interest. Although to be fair a lot of corporate debt can be written off without destroying to company so it's not a bad option for bigger companies to issue debt either.
It means Austin (below) would now apply for state/local cases.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/509/602

1. Forfeiture under §§ 881(a)(4) and (a)(7) is a monetary punishment and, as such, is subject to the limitations of the Excessive Fines Clause. Pp. 2804-12.

(a) The determinative question is not, as the Government would have it, whether forfeiture under §§ 881(a)(4) and (a)(7) is civil or criminal. The Eighth Amendment's text is not expressly limited to criminal cases, and its history does not require such a limitation. Rather, the crucial question is whether the forfeiture is monetary punishment, with which the Excessive Fines Clause is particularly concerned. Because sanctions frequently serve more than one purpose, the fact that a forfeiture serves remedial goals will not exclude it from the Clause's purview, so long as it can only be explained as serving in part to punish. See United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 448, 109 S.Ct. 1892, 1901, 104 L.Ed.2d 487. Thus, consideration must be given to whether, at the time the Eighth Amendment was ratified, forfeiture was understood at least in part as punishment and whether forfeiture under § 881(a)(4) and (a)(7) should be so understood today. Pp. 2804-06.

(b) A review of English and American law before, at the time of, and following the ratification of the Eighth Amendment demonstrates that forfeiture generally and statutory in rem forfeiture in particular historically have been understood, at least in part, as punishment. See, e.g., Peisch v. Ware, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 347, 364, 2 L.Ed. 643. The same understanding runs through this Court's cases rejecting the "innocence" of the owner as a common-law defense to forfeiture. See, e.g., Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co., 416 U.S. 663, 683, 686, 687, 94 S.Ct. 2080, 2091, 2093, 2094, 40 L.Ed.2d 452. Pp. 2806-10.

(c) Forfeitures under §§ 881(a)(4) and (a)(7) are properly consideed punishment today, since nothing in these provisions contradicts the historical understanding, since both sections clearly focus on the owner's culpability by expressly providing "innocent owner" defenses and by tying forfeiture directly to the commission of drug offenses, and since the legislative history confirms that Congress understood the provisions as serving to deter and to punish. Thus, even assuming that the sections serve some remedial purpose, it cannot be concluded that forfeiture under the sections serves only that purpose. Pp. 2810-12.

2. The Court declines to establish a test for determining whether a forfeiture is constitutionally "excessive," since prudence dictates that the lower courts be allowed to consider that question in the first instance. P. 2812.
During my attempts to push the performance envelope, I've determined that even pushing into the top 0.1 - 1.0% segment of the performance population is primarily just consistency in avoiding brain-dead stupid obvious mistakes.
I would love to get more people's opinions on if this is still happening in the NBA and to what extent.

Naturally, I would assume that this rarely happens still if ever. Modern methods of oversight and statistical methods ought to be enough to ensure such things don’t happen. The NBA has a vested interest in maintaining the legitimacy of the league and thus are naturally inclined to root out any kind of cheating or illicit betting. Could you imagine if it got out that this was still happening and a more intense, modern investigation happened? It could destroy the NBA, which is something I’m sure the NBA is working hard to make sure doesn’t happen.

However, at least on reddit’s r/nba it seems a common opinion (at least according to upvoted responses) that much of this is still going on. Obviously that’s not saying much, but it makes me wonder… Do I have it wrong? If so why? And likewise, if so what’s the point in watching these sports?
You are perfectly correct, I was wrong. Upon closer reflection it appears impossible to have a nontrivial set (meaning other than {0}) that forms a group both under addition and under multiplication because the identity element of the former does not have an inverse in the latter. However, take this with a grain of salt, because I haven't had time to prove this to my own satisfaction yet (and I am loathe to go googling for answers in my own field of expertise).

My abstract algebra professor would be horrified by my misstatement, and I shall go to bring flowers as a sign of atonement and rememberance to his grave at the earliest available opportunity.
Radfem. You wouldn’t go around calling pro-choice and pro-life people “anti-life” and “anti-choice” would you?
Oh gotcha, misunderstood your comment.
The Shield of Achilles [0] hits a lot harder than September 1, 1939, in my opinion, though I still like "We must love one another, or die" as a flat assertion of fact.

Out of the air a voice without a face
Proved by statistics that some cause was just
In tones as dry and level as the place:
No one was cheered and nothing was discussed;
Column by column in a cloud of dust
They marched away enduring a belief
Whose logic brought them, somewhere else, to grief.

[0] https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/shield-achilles