skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think so? I honestly don't know, I never really worked with the CL codebase, I just used it for reference sometimes. But even if it did, I'm not sure how much velocity is gained by using CL vs. Python, especially when making a web app, where there are so many examples, libraries, and frameworks out there to help in Python.
It seems to be the nicest iteration of a foldable phone so far.

I'm still doubtful about the usefulness, though. Does it support the S-pen?

I suppose they made it fold to the inside because their display technology limits them to it (even though intuitively I'd expect the opposite to be true), I would find it folding to the outside much more useful, since this thing you'll have to unfold to (properly, the outside screen is quite small) to use, but then it becomes a tablet ...

So far I see it mostly as a technology demo. I'm glad that manufacturers are actually selling them, though, it gives a good feeling of the practicability and readiness of the technology (and something for rich hipsters to buy).
I must admit that I have not (yet) played with Elixir. It looks very exciting though!

I don't do much "web stuff" with Erlang. The closest I go is probably HTTP-based control interfaces for other services (routing, validate input, do something in the system and return a response).

I usually turn to Python and Django when I want to create web stuff. Generic views, the forms API, DRF, admin, and an ORM that integrates well with all of the aforementioned are godsent if you just want to get something online quickly.

I still have old Django project that I wrote for a customer back in 2007. Besides upgrading Django two times a year and updating the ui a little it has been running w/o problems ever since. And I still find my way around the code instantly.

I have yet to try something that comes close to being as convenient to work with.
The author put two years of work into reporting it. A lot more detail and strong evidence that contrary to what was claimed 12 years ago, Tim Donaghy was throwing games.
Youtube wants to cater to everyone but to me it is clear Youtube is a risky place for a child. I let my kids use the site but I have no expectations of anything less then we are seeing here and try to keep an eye from behind. But I myself have found these types of wormholes he talked about in the video. Searching for massage techniques and saw a pretty girl so clicked it then next thing I know I am down a worm hole of naked women being massaged on Youtube. Another worm hole is the one pointed out by another youtuber about breastfeeding videos. You search for breastfeeding and you will see these creepy videos pretending to be educational but clearly are just a video of a woman showing her breasts and a child feeding. Then came across videos that seem to be educational but really it was just a large breasted woman standing naked and the video described all her lady parts with close up shots. So to me clearly youtube has all sorts of crazy things from how to have sex to how to build weapons. I am not kidding myself that it is a kid hostile environment. I do find that they have do many good videos for kids so allow my kids on the platform. I just do my best to keep an eye what is going on.
how that would work for static websites? let’s say I generate website from markdown files, and server (let’s say hosted on Amazon S3) does not support any backend languages. so how your suggestion would work?
Or their voice is just echoed down a chain of managers that don't understand why it was brought up in the first place.

Not a good look for Nest...
I.. don't get it. I imagine it's embarrassingly straightforward once I do, but until then I'm lost. Could someone help me out?
They only send SSIDs of ‘hidden’ networks. There is no reason to send SSIDs of normal visible networks because they are visible if you need to connect.
Instead of stealing, I'd say forking. Thanks for the idea! ;)
Looks like someone has a lot of free time on his hands. I've received 4 emails I didn't sign up for in the last couple minutes. https://www.dropbox.com/s/j8e0qpvnzn23opg/Screenshot%202019-...
Not “considering” in any serious way. Proposed by one wealthy GOP State Senator from an area full of wealthy anti-tax hard liners who like to speed around unsafely in their sports cars, and don’t like the concept of a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Here’s the district: https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/37th-Dist...

This bill is never going anywhere. The GOP is now 10/40 seats in the CA State Senate (2 seats vacant), and 19/80 in the CA State Assembly.
Does "lanes" mean whole roads, or just that, single lanes on a highway composed of many? The first option seems acceptable, but the second seems like a nightmare.
Useful for either the survival of the species or the individual. Still, hell for those suffering them. That's the broken part.
No, I meant what I said. If the original commenter swims as much as they claim, they surely would have encountered at least one non-pisser, rendering their statement untrue. The claim that every swimmer pisses in the pool is them just trying to normalise their own selfish disgusting behaviour.
YouTube should just disable comments on all videos
> corporations are 'people'

A corporation, is, by definition, a group of people, yes. And those people who make up the group have rights that are protected by the constitution.

Or in other words, a corporation is the plural form of the word 'person', in many situations.
Why Media Monetisation Won't Work
I wonder if CV systems will be similarly catastrophically perplexed?

Imagine laying out the zebra rug for an Amazon drone delivery
The missing piece for your brain algorithm must be: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
My area of expertise is mathematics. A number of times I’ve explained to someone that the concept of infinite sets is a well defined one. There is a definition and it allows us to work with such sets. I provided the (from my perspective) simple definition and an explanation but to no avail. My point is that often times people outside of the area just don’t understand it. Personally I don’t care if someone doesn’t understand something but I do care if their misunderstanding becomes normative and endangers others.

Pre-internet nutjobs existed in all communities. Cranks and whatnot. This is nothing new. What is new is the scale at which such people can propagate their nonsense. The cost of convincing others your are right has drastically declined. The speed at which such stupidity can spread has greatly increased.

We have entered an era in which regulation of stupid, crackpot ideas may need to happen. If and when we do decide to crackdown on this it’s best to rely on expert opinion. This is of course just an opinion of mine.

I submit to you that the vast majority of what you believe is due to knowledge you gained form others and not from first principles as you put it.
White privilege. Brown guys can't even report racism.
What makes you say that the ability to vote is the most important privilege? For example, I'd happily give up my right to vote before my right to legal due process. I'd rather live in undemocratic Singapore than in somewhere with free elections but widespread corruption and poor rule of law like India, Turkey, or Mexico.
Youtube is not facebook, and judging by the continued neglect of youtube's comment system I doubt their ability to add fine grained privacy control, especially since they abandoned Google+ integration.

This isn't a new problem as their comment subsystem has been a usability nightmare in years. When a comment thread geta to a certain length, following the conversation and pinging specific replies become increasingly difficult. The late John "Totalbiscuit" Bain had to turn off comment on all his videos and direct all discussions to Reddit, because once the comments start to get rowdy it's impossible to moderate.
Again if we were riding horses and buggies we would not need to even go to driving school and get a driver's license. Only when something is a necessary condition it happens, to have the same level driver-education here as in Germany first you need higher speed limits.
> facilitating spam is some distance further down on the benefits to harms scale than facilitating Facebook or Google

So... Facilitating spam is worse than facilitating censorship in China?
DOS: The Final Frontier
Cool! can't wait to be crushed by a 5000 pound tesla going 100MPH faster than me.
Accidents seem to happen at all speeds.
Help Me with Code Review of My Pet Project
Not sure that analogy makes sense. YouTube makes it pretty clear you are publishing your video to the public when you upload the file. You actually have to confirm the video is going to be public. It's not like YouTube is raiding the family archives for the content
Respect is not quite the word I'd use. Yes you have to put in your time, but politics play just as much a role in SCOTUS appointments as any other branch. The major difference is that the appointees do not pander to the public for votes, rather they pander to those we have voted into office.
Anyone could enter your email into that subscribe box. You totally want double opt-in.
Also, the term jaywalking itself was invented by car companies to absolve drivers of the deaths they cause.
The early bird gets the worm and the early comment gets the karma.

Maybe a dynamic system that randomly shows an order weighted on upvotes in the past X minutes. That’d give fresh comments a chance to compete.
You can rifle a barrel in your garage. Search youtube, there are DIY videos.

Btw, you need a rifled barrel to make accurate shots at long-ish distances. For close quarter combat a submachine gun with a smooth bore would do quite well. Something similar to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borz. Any machine shop can crank those out in numbers.
Search Adoptable
>So what if it turns out that industrial monoculture techniques are vastly oversold (they almost certainly are)

Maybe some of the more recent techniques of industrial monoculture are oversold, but the steady rise of yields since the 1940s [1] make me feel like you're talking up a much bigger game than is actually the case. Perhaps the cost of some of Monsantos latest GMOs and pesticides isn't worth it. But throwing out the entire industrial monoculture paradigm is absolutely not cost effective. If it was more farmers would have figured it out by now. They aren't that dumb.

[1] https://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/timeless/images/Co...
>I only saw harmless videos of kids having fun when I looked at his own examples.

Have you seen this -- https://youtu.be/M78rlxEMBxk?t=364 ?
Yep. I live in said district and this could not be any more true. I don't have just one or two anecdotes, but hundreds and I've only lived here for a relatively short amount of time. I drive a red Model S and people attempt to race all the time (once out of every few times I go out, or more often), and even then they drive super aggressively and fast. On YouTube, many of the high speed driving videos are filmed here, too.

I'm not going to say this should have any bearing on the merits bill at hand, but your characterization is absolutely correct.
https://github.com/NVlabs/stylegan
Big in Bolivia: Zebras in the Streets (2017)
The only argument seems to be some religious BS. What we live today(in the developed world) could be perceived as Utopia for the poor caveman for sure.
It means "outcome with low prior probability". Just that and nothing more. Seriously.
Do big advertisers have a way to pick what creators / channels they advertise with? It seems like they don't give the number of times they've completed pulled out.
The obvious place to start are commuter lanes, especially those with specific entry-exit points that are otherwise shouldered off. Remove the maximum and introduce a 100 mph minimum.
Person comes to conclusion that objective tool doesn't work because it doesn't give him the results he wants.
I'm glad he didn't get to just subjectively call people bipolar or not based on what he wants, it would just bias his research and make it all scientifically useless.
Whether you like skid or not, at least "According to skid patient is in box X" has a definite meaning, and can be scientifically trusted to mean something. Opposite to that "This one specific doctor based on this one single interaction decided that the person fits in box Y" is just completely useless.
Faster, Better, Cheaper: The Rise of Crispr in Disease Detection
Someone will build a lego technic testing device for sure.
> Maybe I'm cynical

Confirmed.
To the first point, I believe it's a spectrum.

To a practitioner, "better" can be defined along well-known dimensions. Suppose you know your data lies more or less on a straight line -- you could fit a NN model or a run a linear regression. In this scenario, linear regression would be the "better" choice for some widely-accepted measures of "better" (interpretability, computational efficiency, parsimony, regularizability, etc.).

One almost never chooses NN just for the sake of choosing NN... there are well-understood trade-offs.
For instance, it is widely known that NN's generally require a larger amount of data than classical/statistical algorithms for weights to converge -- mostly because it's fitting a more general function than most classical ML algorithms. (The reason NNs have begun to show the results they have (vs in the 1990s) isn't just because we have more compute than before or that the theory has advanced significantly; it's also because we have more a lot more data to fit the more general function with.)

To the second point, I can see the point, but I wonder if the semantic meaning of the term is eroded by being overly encompassing. We could say a calculator implements AI.
*For very limited workloads
> VBMI on CNL is an indicator that 64-way is pretty good

And now I'm distracted looking for 6-bit lookup tables that will enjoy that instruction. DES had 6-bit SBoxes for example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DES_supplementary_material#Sub...

Hmmmmm... 6-bit lookup tables. Yum. I wonder what else is out there that would benefit?
Despite some others' replies, I never meant to dismiss Christianity, much less religion in general. "It's a handy abstraction" is something I wholly agree with, which I think gets lost on a lot of self-identified "rationalists".

I actually think there's a lot of value to be found in religion; the problem comes when it gets infused with a political or national identity and becomes a rallying call instead of a subject of contemplation. The red flags I saw in the article were 1) the hosting organization has a political agenda, and 2) it felt like the author tried to hide the roots of his ideas. It's possible he was just trying to avoid being judged based on his faith, which, yeah. But I've also seen people with an agenda try to propagate their religious or political ideas in a spoonful-of-sugar fashion; obscuring them within content that doesn't advertise itself as such, in hopes that it travels further. I've developed a heightened sense for that sort of thing over the years.
Electric cars are, on average, much faster than typical ICEs.

Edit: Added the usual caveats. And yes, they are.
The more I follow SCOTUS rulings the more I think this happens quite often.
I’m surprised mocking works, wouldn’t the shaming zebroids get attacked?
Next year Samsung will announce a new phone with FOUR apps that can be open at once! Or Apple will do it for them.
University of Washington Medicine: Data Error Exposes Patient Information
> YouTube makes it pretty clear you are publishing your video to the public when you upload the file

After working in tech for long enough, you realize that no one reads anything, even if its absolutely clear in the UI. And they will blame you for it.
Couldn't the valuation be based around both most recent private valuation, and comparatively <usefulAdjective> public companies? The bankers basically just make it up, anyway. Their goal is to just pick a number as close to what they think the market will settle on as possible. The "market" includes previous investors in the company, and also public investors of similar companies. So it makes sense the bankers would consider both markets when pricing the stock.

If you sell a car, you set the price by considering how much you paid for it and how much people are paying for similar cars. End of bad analogy.
Google Wants Cloud Services to Borg Your Datacenter
Side note, I always found it funny that one of the symbols for the Royal New Zealand Air Force is the British symbol (composed of concentric circles) with a Kiwi in the middle. The symbol for their air force literally has a flightless bird on it!
How is anyone being exploited here exactly?

> The children are unable to agree to the terms and conditions set forth by YouTube

Which means that children should not be able to upload any kind of video to youtube, but it should be fine if they upload it to say an ftp server for public domain videos that does not impose any terms and conditions, right?
A Man Threw Away a Napkin Last Month. It Was Used to Charge Him in a 1993 Murder
on most ICE cars, the most fuel efficient speed is the minimum speed where you can get into the highest gear without lugging the engine. frictional losses from spinning the engine at a higher rpm tend to be larger than losses from air resistance. on most modern cars, this is around 50mph, which is very slow to drive on the interstate. my car can get well over 40mpg at this speed, which drops down to the mid 30s when I travel at 80mph.

on most EVs, there are no gears, so efficiency increases asymptotically as speed approaches zero.

what I'm getting at is that fuel efficiency for an individual car should not be the only optimization target for traffic laws. we are willing to make at least some tradeoffs in efficiency to get where we are going faster. most speed limits in the US have not been increased since the 60s, and since then cars have become much more efficient, capable, and survivable in the case of a crash. I'd say at least a modest increase in speed limits is warranted.

plus, a bunch of ICEs crawling in stop-and-go traffic is pretty much the worst case scenario for fuel efficiency. if this new policy can actually reduce gridlock, it is likely to have net gains in emission reduction.
Can Rust prevent such bugs?
Which logically would mean it’s the universe that’s flawed not humans.

Though, that gets into some very odd arguments. History would be rather boring in a static or cycling universe.
but what else do you do here?

Not attempt to monetize your family videos. Disable ads on your own videos.[1]

[1] http://orgspring.com/turn-off-ads-youtube-videos/
What Is the Dark Spot Visible Below the Cockpit on A-10s? False Cockpit
My issue is that whenever the topic of "child exploitation" comes up, there's always a lack of specifics. Both the specifics of what we're actually referring to and the specifics of an actual solution.

Instead, everyone (like every media outlet and internet comment) casts a vote against "child exploitation". Who wouldn't? And the discussion stops there. "Whatever they're doing, it needs to stop!"

For example, I bet most people aren't thinking "whispering girl" or "family video of daughters playing in the pool" when they hear the phrase "child exploitation". And maybe most people think Youtube is no place for those videos, fair enough. But the taboo subject and the lack of specifics creates an incredibly charged and blind environment that makes it hard to have a real discussion.

So let's be specific here: what kind of action should be taken against this whispering girl's video and what kind of policy does Youtube need to have at scale?
While I take your point, the very act of uploading the video is akin to "going down to the library with a copy of the tape for anyone to rent" in this analogy, which does mitigate the degree of upset to an extent.
I'm sure lots of women would not agree with your last statement.
What prevents someone from stealing my content, modifying one byte and then uploading back to the network as their own?
Some states have laws that say as such, often passed within the last decade.

Then the local law enforcement agencies "partner" with the feds and the forfeiture goes through the federal govt, and the local law enforcement gets a kickback.

This practice of kickbacks to circumvent state law was limited by the previous US President, but was now being un-limited and expanded under the current one.
If we were riding horses and buggies we would not need to even go to driving school and get a driver's license. Only when something is a necessary condition it happens, to have the same level driver-education here as in Germany first you need higher speed limits.
Cool! This is exactly what I was looking for.
I'd love to see one, and benchmarks for the Rust compiler running atop it. Impressive work!
Saying "the world is fallen" implies that the world fell from something. It didn't. The same rules of physics, as far as we can tell, have been plugging away since the very beginning.

If you mean "The world sucks" then say that instead of saying "the world is fallen". Fallen has a very specific meaning, and using it as a poetic slush word is enough to make me not take the OP seriously.
I think the real problem here is that the courts are failing to provide the "independent judiciary" role. The whole point is for an independent expert to look at the law and situation and make a determination. The problem is that the local/state judiciaries very infrequently find a police organizations behaviors unlawful. Time and time again, the local law enforcement stretches the definition of unreasonable/excessive/etc and the courts go along with it. The statistics are completely out of whack (to lazy to dig up the reference I saw a few years ago) on the side of the police. Which is why there are so many of these crazy cases making themselves to the supreme court. Its the airport search situation, at no point has a court actually stepped in and said this is unreasonable, which is why we find ourselves in a situation of being naked body scanned, felt up, poked and prodded like animals without a drop of probable cause.
Every studio that has focus on children is smart marketing.

Children > parents.

If you are a parent, don't you go to a child friendly restaurant that is reasonable good instead of one that is very good but not child-friendly.
This isn't really a non-standard vocabulary, it's a more-or-less standard vocabulary in the domain of discussing utopias. I think it's reasonable to expect someone writing about a topic to have an understanding of society's ongoing discussion about it. If I read an essay on consciousness, I expect the writer to be familiar with how the term has been defined by philosophers past; if a friend tells me they've regained consciousness, I have no such expectation. That being said, I don't think the author of this piece is using a complete layman's definition of the word either:

>Likewise, dystopias are inevitably totalitarian: to achieve a perfect society, nothing can be beyond the reach of the state.

This discounts anarchist utopias entirely, and any argument against the attainability of an anarchist utopia makes it all the moore utopian. The author seems to be using a shoddy, half-baked definition created for the purpose of this article.
One thing my partner and I disagree about is taking pictures of our kids in the bath or paddling pool, on the basis they might end up in the public domain somewhere.

My personal opinion is that it's the other guys problem, if they want to sexualise images of my kids, if I have to self sensor, we've already lost. But as my partner points out principles don't count for much if you've got pedos trading pictures of your kids, so.....?
That's why sometimes you just need to go around your manager's head and talk to people up the chain.

If they're all doofuses, it's time to leave!

But, if they're reasonable people, things will change for the better.
Convince with a Video Pitch (Side by Side with Your Slides) – Youpitch.me