skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm not sure about other cultures, but in Japan they're pretty explicit about washing before entering an onsen. They even discourage putting your towel in the water, wearing a bathing suit, or submerging your head (as well as going when you have open cuts or sores). But, they also prefer mineral water to chlorine and it's generally fed from a spring or the water is changed every day.

I'm not a fan of overly cleanliness, but not doing these things means you have to add more chlorine. In addition to the aesthetic unpleasantness of chlorine and other chemicals, it's harder on the pool equipment and like another commenter said, it should require better ventilation that most pools currently have.
I'm confused. In another comment you said "GMass doesn't actually send any emails through its own servers."

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19211369
Launch and iterate!
Severe Vulnerabilities Uncovered in Popular Password Managers
So can capacitors - a common factor to avoid in amplifier design - and at the limit, so can just about any semiconductor.
It’s certainly about hating the game it also accepting that if you want to make some money you probably have to play it.
No. I see what you mean, but in practice that's not what happens.

Numeric value is determined at time of sale. Without a sale, the object has no "value". It might be useful to you in some way, but it's value is 0 unless you can sell it. There is no such thing as "underlying value"

example: I have a normal orange that I bought for $5 at the supermarket. The orange's underlying value is $5. If I sell it to my friend for $10, the value of the orange is now $10. If no one is willing to buy it, its value is $0.

The same thing happens when you raise a new round. When you raise a new round, you've made a "sale": someone paid money for it. That exchange of money/shares is what determines value.
If that were my service, I'd be pretty embarrassed by the number of unhappy users who have commented on the blog posts about cancellation[1] and refunds[2]. Doesn't seem like a good look.

And if my business was turning over $115k/Month I'm not sure I would let that keep me awake at night.
If we can find a better system we'll use it, but this chicken system isn't it. It relies on an all-powerful farmer with the power to arbitrarily reshape chicken society. It isn't based on getting best welfare for the chickens, and from the chicken's perspective isn't optimised for their welfare.

It would be very easy to outperform capitalism if you could find leaders who care more about the output of the system than their personal power. There is no evidence that it is possible to find such leaders, and lots of evidence that capitalism resists bad leaders for extended periods of time.
Right...but that doesn't mean it's correct to refer to a privesc exploit as arbitrary code execution. For a privesc exploit to be valuable, you typically need to already have code execution.

EDIT: I concede in another comment that privesc without code execution can still be useful, but my original claim that privesc does not imply arbitrary code execution still stands.
The only good vegetable source of DHA is some types of algae. The foods you listed contain alpha-linolenic acid, which the human body can convert to EPA and then to DHA, but this is an inefficient process and might not always meet the full requirements for those longer chain omega-3 fatty acids. See:

https://rnd.edpsciences.org/articles/rnd/pdf/2005/05/r5505.p...
> Pool diapers only hold poo, and even then only some of it.

Quite a lot, actually, but not all.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/15216564/

“Swim diapers of all three brands exhibited an approximately equal fine-solids retention capability of about 98 to 99 percent over 30 minutes of water immersion activity. Conventional disposable diapers invariably fell down or came apart during the experiments, resulting in very limited solids retention. This study indicates that commercially available swim diapers represent a vast improvement in reducing the potential for fecal material release in public pool facilities, but that some release will still generally occur with these products.”
From your documentation:

>We recommend that an unsubscribe link be added to all mass emails containing promotional or marketing content, but the decision is up to you.

An unsubscribe link is a requirement of the CAN-SPAM Act and the GDPR. Your own docs effectively say "We advise you not to use our product to break federal and EU law, but the decision is up to you". I can't speak for anyone else, but that doesn't really accord with my sense of ethics.

https://www.gmass.co/blog/unsubscribe-link/
More like a foldable tablet that can make phone calls.

What I like is it eliminates one device you may be carrying around. If you previously had a $900 phone and a $1100 tablet, you could essentially have both for the same price and fit them in your pocket.
Increase Your Team's AWS Certifications by 50%
Glad you like it. I really think we're on the right track with it - I was surprised the linked article didn't come up with the same idea.

I don't see much point in an even distribution in radial distance from the centre. If you want to model something like the distance from the bullseye to an archer's arrows, you're presumably going to want a normal distribution on radial distance from centre, which is of course very different (though at a glance they might look similar).
That wasn't my claim though, since I was assuming finiteness of the system.
It's not the executive's role to determine whether something is constitutional or not.
But I can already do that with WiFi? I'm really not seeing the advantage unless somehow there's going to be a lot of 5G gear in unlicensed bands that's somehow mystically better than WiFi.
I don't see anything wrong with posting your own content as long as it's not all you post. Way better and more honest than using a sock puppet.
I agree with all the key points you have listed, I just wanted to add that a unicorn became a status symbol that can impact a variety of things:

* A supplier to the unicorn may perceive the company as a future star, which makes them decide to provide goods & services at a discounted price with the intention of having their business for multiple years with potential for new business areas

* A future employee can perceive the company as "the next big thing" and decide to work there in part, because of their status symbol

* The medium-large investors may mentally perceive the company as a 'sure bet'.

* Small investors may perceive the company as "one of the ones that the big investment guns have approved off"

* Future & current customers may perceive them as a successful company

* The 'unicorn' name is catchy, increasing the brand value

All in all, 'unicorns' is just a measurement stick. In theory a $990M can be just as successful as the $1B in the medium-long run, however, the perceived view from humans (yes, all of us), can have a material impact on the business
But privilege escalation does not imply "being root", it only means "ability to perform operation as root" (or whatever the role is can can be compromised). If your distribution accidentally packaged a suid root /bin/cat, that would allow a normal user to perform (read) operations on all files on the system, so it would be a privilege escalation, but it would not necessarily lead to arbitrary code execution as root (unless that allowed you to read a file with the root password, say).
Show HN: Visual GraphQL Programming
You need not question their statistics to say the study is of little value. They define a toxic worker as someone who is harmful to an organization, and conclude with the tautology that organizations are better off without these harmful people.

In other news, red apples emit more red light than green apples.
Does it have an effective breakdown of number and destination of requests per app?

I prefer to generally leave telemetry enabled, and simply not use apps from publishers whom I don't trust to use it responsibly.
Legal responsibility, or moral? The answer is of course "it depends," in this case on who you ask. Maybe they don't even think it's their responsibility, but they think it will make life better for their customers. I personally do a lot of things that aren't my responsibility, but which I think are good to do for various other reasons.
Have you tried KeepassXC?

It can do this, and I don't see anything remotely resembling "hot garbage" in its UX.

https://keepassxc.org
I don't think those things are obvious to a lot of people.

> a critical mass of developers

How do you reach a critical mass of developers without something that looks like "marketing"?
This is likely not a widespread policy (or if it is, I doubt it's followed), but I'm pretty sure at a pool I worked at if there was feces they would evacuate the pool for 20m. 20m was chosen because that's how long the pump system would circulate all of the water 1x or 3x.
Also, a lot of the existing bike infrastructure is just awful. They put bike lanes next to parked cars, paint sharrows instead of building real bike lanes, and pedestrian islands on roads with no bike lane, that make passing cyclists safely impossible.
"I’m a big fan of Slack Technologies Inc.’s approach to corporate finance. Near the peak of the unicorn boom, in 2015, Slack Chief Executive Officer Stewart Butterfield correctly noted that “it might be the best time for any kind of business, in any industry, to raise money for all of history, like since the time of the ancient Egyptians.” The relevance of that point to Slack was not obvious, though, because it happened to have all the money it needed. A less financially savvy tech unicorn might have taken that as a reason not to raise more money, but Slack decided that cheap money was cheap money.
...Is 2019 the best time in history for tech unicorns to raise money from the public markets? Ehh, not particularly. The S&P 500 is down more than 10 percent from its peak last year. Volatility is up. There is an overhang of several very large rumored unicorn initial public offerings, most notably one from Uber Technologies Inc., which might distract investors from other
unicorns. Fortunately for Slack, it still doesn’t seem to need any money, perhaps because it did so very much top-ticking in the private markets. This gives it a certain amount of flexibility with respect to corporate finance. So:

Slack Technologies Inc. is planning to go public through a direct listing, "

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-11/direct...
> I've been frustrated at the absence of any integration with my eng teams build/CI systems or really any automated way to catch problems at the PR or code review stage. Is this something on your radar?

CI / GitHub integrations are definitely on our radar. We have already integrated `avo status` in our own CI pipeline (see https://www.avo.app/docs/reference/regression) and we are excited to do more. I would love to understand your desired use case. If you want to share feel free to continue here or email us at friends@avo.sh.

> I feel strongly that the data organization needs to own this outright, and the only thing holding them back was the right tooling. This seems like the perfect tool to enable it. Very excited to give it a spin.

Glad to hear. We can't wait to hear what you think.
Biggest Crypto Exchanges Combined Comprise Less Than 1% of JPMorgan
vscode with https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=pajoma.v... and https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Gruntfug...

It stuck because it's just markdown, vscode is always open and it syncs to plaintext in dropbox so is greppable, accessible from basically everything.
Smart TVs are a good example of this. And most Android phones. And some US ISPs. And Windows 10. And the Sidewalk Labs projects. I'm sure there are many other examples. You cannot expect what are effectively hostile entities to treat you well, just because you give them money.
That just seems gimmicky at best IMO. No ecosystem. I expect it will sell for 2-3 years and then die off and have them lose money on it. What type of niche market actually needs a phone that can display 3 apps at once and fold down to a brick sized phone?

It's good that companies take these leaps of fate but they sort of seem reaching.

Why not wait and keep pushing the tech until it's worth releasing a beautiful product that can capture actual market share?
Its not one post. Indians favour other Indians, to the exclusion of Americans and Europeans in general. I've seen it in IT, in retail, in trucking, in America and in other mass-immigration previously European societies (Australia). Even the largest companies (Infosys) engage in Visa fraud and discrimination:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/08/india...

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/infosys-says-settles-whist...

Indian CEOs and managers are popular with boards because they will often ruthlessly pursue a corporate agenda without a brotherly spirit for (American) coworkers or citizens.

Americans and those descended from Europeans have been living in open, civil societies for thousands of years. Most of the world is not like that - in-group preference and close kinship rules. Outsiders will exploit our societal structure for their benefit, and we need to be at least aware of it, and penalise it as necessary. China's current corporate espionage effort (and the resultant trade war) is another example.
Movies used to be better without having to go for the art school/criterion outlets. Cf the entire pre-Star Wars 1970s oeuvre which mostly managed to be relatively highbrow and entertaining in a way that they haven't since then.
So sounds like you should be okay with the minimum amount of politics that unions have!

At any rate, it's definitely arguable that office politics in tech have gotten worse and worse in the last few decades, as more money and money-men have poured into the industry. Compare Silicon Valley now to how it was prior to the Netscape IPO, and the toxicity has definitely grown.

Politics may be inherent, but the type of politics can vary in quality and livability. Ditto for the politics in a union.
So, a thriving insect ecosystem? Isn't that... the point?
I don't strongly disagree on any particular point, per se, but the fact that the author's thoughts are rooted in a religious worldview felt like it was snuck in there at the end:

"Moreover, this world is fallen, so it is by nature flawed...The utopian visions that animate real places...seek to remake humanity and society in someone’s image—and that is not the image of the Creator."

For further context, the website it's on is "The Russel Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal"; from its Wikipedia page: "The Center is known for promoting traditionalist conservatism and regularly publishing Studies in Burke and His Time and The University Bookman, the oldest conservative book review in the United States."

Not that these things invalidate it necessarily, but they're important context to place it in.

Overall I'd say the article is more an argument about semantic nuance than a grand social commentary. Probably a valid semantic critique, but nonetheless.
The reason we "ended up with this turning right at a red light rule" is simply that it is more efficient, and transportation is by definition architected for efficiency. It's the same reason we have more flashing yellow turn lights these days, because you shouldn't be stuck sitting at a red light in a turn lane when it's extremely visually obvious that there are no obstructions preventing you from proceeding.

In the world of marine navigation, baked into many rules and courtesies, is the idea that larger vessels are to be offered right of way over small vessels. Because small vessels are both more able to perceive the current situation, and more able to avoid mishaps.

Paradoxically, pedestrians often have the right of way always, despite the car being far less maneuverable, less perceptive of it's surroundings, and far more dangerous to collide with.

This negation of the common-sense logic found in marine navigation is why our streets are always reported as "becoming more dangerous".
Does that comment means you would you be ok with the "spam canon" one too?
I'd say no, because to be able to make a privilege escalation attack useful, you'd have to already have arbitrary code execution.
I'm not sure I agree, now I have no clue where he's from, but assuming he would save 7k a month that'd be 84k a year.

Obviously there's other overhead/costs involved, but surely he could find somebody for 60k+ a year (I make less then that at my current development job but I'm from Michigan)?
> Keep them in a separate pool or mandate pool diapers

Pool diapers have roughly zero effect on urine (the whole reason for pool diapers is to retain feces in an environment where liquid absorbent diapers inherently will fail completely.) So, the pool diapers plan for dealing with urination is unworkable.
This sounds like a dangerous mindset to get into. If someone believes "I'm the smartest person here and nobody understands me" then I agree leaving right away is the best solution for everyone.
Working at Project Zero
Actually, if you are just using the bathroom to pee, you should probably wash your hands before you go, as your hands are usually "dirtier" than your genitals are.
I use pass with multiple vaults. Not the same 2 vaults as you want, but I run one "everything" vault, and another one for just "mobile".

The "mobile-passwords" git repo doesn't have any password I don't use on my phone.
It depends on manipulating/knowing what gets allocated in the same region. If you know what gets written to the freed space or you can try to force the right allocations to happen, you get almost-arbitrary write.

For a made up example, imagine something allocates a structure with a pointer to a function struct->foo, then frees it, but still holds a reference. Now you call a function which allocates a buffer in the same place and copies your arguments into it. When you make the original code try to call struct->foo again, you can any function you want.
>TERF is most definitely a slur

Really? What else should we call self-professed radical feminists whose definition of a woman excludes trans women?
So stacking up debt is how you stay on top of a downturn in the economy when it comes?
I think what most people want to know is whether they could re-write a multi-threaded program that is currently using synchronization primitives (locks, semaphores, mutexes, etc) with actors.

Like, show me the producer-consumer pattern using actors.
Unrelated question, but who is paying for all these lawyers? Timbs himself out of his pocket?
The concerns they have don't sound completely unreasonable.
That's more than he spends on EC2 servers entirely. So your math is off by at least an order of magnitude.
What is ToT? I’ve found that term mentioned several times on the Chromium bug tracker but no definition.
It is unfortunately the only point that we can clearly explain to beginners, designers, and other people who aren’t deeply familiar with programming principles. We still care about them and want to emphasize we’re not ignoring them with some new paradigm. When you have such a vast audience as React does, someone will get upset anyway.
You are correct that they didn't rule on it. But they did write an opinion that was highly suggestive of what the particular finding in this case should have been. It doesn't carry the weight of law, but it isn't nothing, either.
With a good interface you do not have to know the implementation. But the implementations here are leaking hard since everybody can and does implement the directive differently, so you can't deal with the interface but you rather have to deal with each implementation separately!

So sadly no interface at all.
I wonder how well they work in the real world? I had trouble finding a properly fitting swim diaper for my son. They seemed to require a fairly tight fit around the abdomen and legs (which vary greatly across children and as the grow). Because it's only a handful of times during the summer and most places only carried 1 or 2 styles, I can see the few people who got them might not have the right size or wear it properly.
I'm pretty sure they can also remove you; what they can't do is remove you based on the content of your speech, but then again I doubt they can have a policy of only removing iPods playing political speeches with certain viewpoints.
The Lego Story (2012)
>> ML can detect kids in videos
> It can't detect context, however.

You don't actually need to, at least initially. You only need to detect kids, and when you have some threshold of reports on comments on a video where the computer vision algorithm detected kids in the frame that rise to the level a human should take a look, the human can flag the video as containing elements of CP, which would kick in the following:
- Deeper ML analysis of the dependency graph of commentors, related videos.
- Blacklisting or law enforcement notification for commentors that are violating the law.
- Training data that can be used to train more advanced algorithms.

Because there is no profit motive to do so, like there is with music licensing, they won't do it.

> It's technically easier to do so.

I'm not talking about determining context with ML. That is a hard problem, of course. But identifying "child human" with a computer vision algorithm is very simple, then relying on human moderators to initiate the dependency graph traversal.

> Please go read about how ML works before making such comments in the future, they make you look really stupid.

No need for the ad hominem. I'm not an ML expert, but I understand enough of the basics to know what is possible.
pro bono. I think IJR is involved in this:
https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/
I agree this first-gen product is worth skipping, but given that many people spend probably 20% of their waking hours looking at their phone screen, it seems short sighted to me to argue that a 2x boost in screen size is merely a gimmick.
I meant youtube themselves shouldn't monetize unless they're certain that the content is advertiser friendly. They have no problems cutting legit youtubers off from ads, so why can't they also kill ads for uploads from children? It's just been creating problems for them.
> There will still be bike-bike collisions

These are both more rare than car-bicycle collisions and less likely to be injurious.

> also exclusive roads for bicycles are usually of low quality not up to engineering standards for roads, they will be full of dirt, unmaintained, with potholes

Citation needed? The main problem I've experienced on bike paths is tree roots. Roads for bikes don't wear out particularly quickly, because bikes don't make anything like the kind of wear and tear on roads that cars or especially larger vehicles (buses and trucks) do. Road wear is proportional to weight squared.

> Most bicycle accidents are not even collisions with cars

What are they collisions with? Do you think bike-bike, bike-ped, and bike-fixed object collisions combined are more frequent than bike-car collisions? I don't have numbers on this one way or another. To provide some color, motor vehicle-fixed object collisions are about a third of all motor vehicle crashes[0].

Additionally, 95% of cyclist collision deaths are definitely car-bike collisions[1]. So even if they are not the majority of collisions, they must be disproportionately deadly and worth consideration anyway.

[0]: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/... p. 18 (table 5(b)).

[1]: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/... p. 5-6.
If I saw that, I'd ask why someone put the code block on the same line as the conditional.
Prediction: In order to be performance-competitive with other ISAs for software written for SIMD, RISC-V will get a SIMD extension. However, because it wasn't there from thw start, Linux distros will not compile their packages with SIMD enabled and the result will be sad like NEON on 32-bit ARM.
Where is crypto/af_alg.c actually used? In what use cases does this vulnerability come in to play?