skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm glad someone mentioned this, or had a question about this, since it's the one thing I would really want on a fully convertible device.

Currently the s9 and s9+ have open betas for Linux on dex, and it works on note 9 and tab s4. I am pretty optimistic that the fold will support it.

But seriously, think about how great this would be: phone that could turn into a tablet when you want (say, to read or consume media, or edit photos, or take notes). That device would also be able to run in a desktop mode for you to carry out work when you need to. The device as it currently stands does the first two, with Linux on dex you get closer to the third.
> “[...] paper money is going away, and crypto is a far better way to transfer value than pieces of paper, that's for sure."

I don't know why he's comparing cryptocurrencies to paper money. Government-issued money is mostly transferred and stored electronically, not with banknotes and coins, and I'm sure he knows this. Is he also including checks?
Ironically the first time I’ve seen this point made is in an Onion video - 6-Year-Old Explains How Messed Up It Is That Her Entire Life Has Been Put On Facebook https://www.theonion.com/6-year-old-explains-how-messed-up-i...
Gender is also not about genitalia, fwiw.

I see that the author of the edited comment got defensive about it and went on an irrelevant rant about singular they. Wish people like that would grow up a bit.
This isn't quite right -- The 4% loss could just represent the delta between what was already priced in and the actual loss. This case has been a long time coming so the expectation of the penalty should have been priced in long ago.

Secondly, and it depends on the jurisdiction, but penalties and fees associated with wrongdoing generally aren't tax deductible.

The US clarified this during the TCJA but most countries agree: https://www.clearyenforcementwatch.com/2018/02/1962/
Good Job Bro... Keep sharing
It's only a matter of time before thisporndoesnotexist.com happens.
Along with the innumerable other bugs like it, yes.
Me too - it's a really insightful statement. I'd never thought about it before, but in social settings, the actual film watched is frequently an afterthought; it is secondary to the plan of 'going to the cinema'. Plans changing because someone is late is another factor. I really enjoy when this website makes me think of something obvious I'd never considered!
Static analysis tooling is outside the scope of these MISRA conventions.

And yes, the language features you list are recommended against for extremely good reasons.

If you know better, you can try to convince the examiners during your certification process that your coding style is superior. Good luck!
As disturbing as I find this situation, I think that it is a bad idea to force companies to block photos and videos of children to be uploaded.
go into your profile and mark the ability to see [dead] comments. a lot of them are useful.
>You are blocked from following @paulg and viewing @paulg's Tweets. Learn more

rofl
That router looks interesting
Fhat's everybody's question but given the material spec, they probably made it so no internal pressure buildup is done when folded. You can roll paper forever if you stay in the constraints
I have almost a conditioned reflex for upvoting grey posts at this point. The people who downvote are a weird crew that don't seem to judge by Reddit's "contributes to the discussion" standard.
Thanks Bro.... keep spamming
By the time I go through all my passwords at least once, browsers and OS will release multiple rounds of patches and potentially fix the exploit in question. This is still preferable to uploading whole database...
It was interesting. It was challenging and it was fun at the same time.
they notify you when you get banned. i’m currently one of them. I didn’t notice for a few days though because the site doesn’t have an obvious way of notifying you when you get a reply.
I call birthday paradox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem

Number of all possible topics is N, number of news on FP is 30. For example if N is 365, you would expect 70% chance that two separate items on FP mention the same topic.

Although, HN recurrence probably a bigger contributor. When a person gets reminded of some previous highly upvoted link and re-submits it. The highly upvoted link gets upvoted again and now you have two items on FP with similar keywords.
Yet another reason not to gamble.
I 'Finished' My First Personal Project That Is Useful Feels Good To
It is not unrelated, because it means that the lawmakers have to be more careful and take their jobs as legislators and writers of policy seriously, instead of merely yelling for a living.

In civil law jurisdictions, the law is what the legislator says it is, no more, no less. What you write is what the law is, period. Judges can take each others advice and try to apply it consistently, but they can't go beyond or against what's written.

In common law jurisdictions, the law is ancient and practically unknowable. Your laws can be struck down for being out of whack with some older precedent, or it can be re-interpreted to be something better or worse than it is. It is common in common law jurisdictions for legislators to poop out something vague and inconsistent and then rely on the courts and the regulators to turn it into actual policy.
Non-rhetorical question: how would you build this feature? What if the user lies about their age to avoid COPPA? What if the user uploaded 100 videos in the past, but didn't want to make this video public? Should we bug them every single time to verify if they wanted to make the video public? How many times should we bug them about it?
What kinds of domains do you use when you run this on dex files?
Now if you look up tangible...

I think you're caviling, at this point.
Could have designed a middle ground use case where you use the thing half unfolded with interface at the bottom and content on top
but in this example would you blame wordpress or whatever is hosting your blog?
Hysteria like this is why it's almost impossible to have rational conversations about things like radiation or nuclear power.

> ...something that resulted in the miscarriage, or birth defects of the child of any pregnant woman who stood near that closet for just a few minutes.

If we really are talking about a couple of buckets of uranium ore, then no, standing near them for a few minutes will not cause miscarriages or birth defects. Even the AZ Central article, in the midst of its fear mongering, says, "Just 5 feet from the buckets, there was a zero reading." The rest of the article is no more helpful, giving not nearly enough context to the cited measurement for readers to draw any conclusions.

> It is a radioactive substance that gives off dangerous levels of alpha, beta, and gamma radiation, as well as nuclear byproducts like radon and other gaseous nuclear isotopes.

Radon yes, and as I learned from another HN thread regarding this same story, radon can be generated at much higher rates than I ever realized. However this is highly unlikely to affect anyone who didn't spend extended periods of time in an enclosed (or sub-grade) space with the ore.

Gamma radiation here wouldn't be significant. Alpha radiation is stopped by mere inches of air. As with alpha, beta radiation is only hazardous if the material is inhaled or ingested. And aside from radon, there are no gaseous elements in uranium's decay chain.

I suppose, if the rocks were chalky and they were taken out the bucket and played with frequently, there could be some kind of inhalation risk. On the other hand, mineral dust is heavy, and typically settles out of the air too quickly to be a significant inhalation hazard. We see something similar with lead, where leaded dust from paint and vinyl mini-blinds is mainly a hazard to babies and little kids who can get their faces right in it, or eat things off floors and window sills.

Otherwise, it's hard for me to imagine how this material could have posed a health hazard to visitors.
> “My thing is I wanted to be able to have free time. To me, having time is the most precious thing.”

Interestingly it's a backward model when compared to people that use time as a resource towards money/success/<your_goal>...

I guess actual freedom indeed requires both free time and available resources (money/skills/knowledge/etc.).

I see many people always filling up their schedules months in advance while I always feel better without the constraint to follow past decisions. Maybe linked to control seeking & risk aversion vs. interest for unexpected opportunities...
Most of corn and other staple crops large yields have more to do with the excessive usage of fossil fuel derived fertilizer. There have been some gains in GMO to get slightly more efficient yields, but we already spent a few thousand years doing that by hand selection so any extra gains are pretty difficult. What we have largely been focusing on is making the plants resistant to pesticides so that the inevitable infection doesn't occur while you are dumping on crazy amounts of freely available energy as fertilizer. Basically we are turning natural gas into food, 60% of the worlds total crop yield in fact exists because of natural gas derived fertilizer, and when nature tries to take it's share of that free energy, we dump anything we can on it to prevent it from infecting our crops. Pump and dump the soil like that for 20 years until it is garbage, sell it off, buy out some poor struggling farmer that is doing sustainable practices, start over again with fresh 50-100 year maintained topsoil.
Thank you for this - I'd often assumed Canvas Defender was no good but I couldn't quite put my finger on why. I would encourage anyone with even a passing interest to read this truly illuminating post because there is some fascinating stuff that even as a web developer I did not know:

https://multilogin.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-can...
Enhanced Tracking Protection Testing: Protecting Users’ Privacy by Default
>It takes a lifetime of respect to earn a seat on the Supreme Court bench.

If that were true, more justices would ascend to the court quite close to their deaths. In reality, it's maybe half a life, less if you subtract youth.
They're excuses because none of them involve explaining when, where and how they are useful to a user.

They all basically say "framework needs it" or "we heard you like functions, so now we're getting rid of classes and making everything functions, but you still actually need classes and state and all that stuff so we're shoving state into globally accessible static functions that you have to call in the same order every time or things just won't work."

Like this whole thing is just absurd.

> They give you the ability to reuse stateful logic between components.

Stateful logic a code smell, we do not want this.

Redux actually gets this stuff correct - binding logic and effects to props and state should be done outside of the presentation layer.

I would have just fixed the redux API so people stop shooting themselves in the foot with it.

---
In any case, thanks for your comments, this has given me a lot to think about, I'm now wondering about how to replace useState with a prop named state. I'm also wondering if bi-directional prop mutation would solve all this cleanly - i.e. bind props instead of passing them, I think KnockoutJS did something like this.
"Why do humans have teeth? To chew food"

Doesn't look bad to me, and it's the same exact point.
Be: From One Ice Floe to the Next
Supposedly it is already in production, or at least that’s how I read https://twitter.com/sergeygalich/status/1091060842047492096
I wonder, does this support threaded transfer? It really bugs me that so many tools don't, and therefore just leave users waiting around with unused internet bandwidth.

Of course, I suppose the design of TCP is part of this. It seems that there ought to be some more control of how aggressive it is about dropping connection rate. I keep hearing about multiplexed connections in newer protocols (QUIC etc.); would that translate into saturation of network connections?
Just because there are dirt poor people who are successful and well-off people who aren't doesn't mean they're equally likely. To your broader point, no one person exists in a vacuum- one person's "self-made" is another person's "took advantage of the right tax incentives and business climate and, most importantly, had the luck of timing that they were successful instead of plunging themselves deep into debt". My experience with people who talk warmly of "self-made" people is that they tend to leave out the role of luck.
I don’t think I was totally clear. I agree if one takes a cell and cuts it in half then the overhead of managing the two cells isn’t hugely significant but I think what happened here is volume which could’ve been cell became hinge and that loss of capacity could prove to be an architectural disadvantage.
Check out The White Plague by Frank Herbert. And Jerry Pournelle wrote a lot of novels about the CoDominium, an alliance between the US & USSR to suppress scientific research due to the instability it could cause.
This only works if your sample space is small, whereas I'd argue the range of topics that can show up on Hacker News is nothing but ;)
Believing Everyone Else Is Wrong Is a Danger Sign
I wonder if scrambled distributed chunks over torrent would be useful.

Btw who works on tor replacement or improvement ?
You're right, but I also think about how the Zetas had (have?) a habit of kidnapping engineers to build and maintain their radio network.

https://www.wired.com/2012/11/zeta-radio/
This cracks me up. Violence solves things all the time. Speaking of aphorisms!
I'd be very interested on reading more about this if you have anything you could point me towards
I've found https://www.hnreplies.com to be pretty useful.
No, I'm right. If you want to pick some super-specialist job that requires top 1% verbal skills then sure you want a woman doing it, but most jobs only require slightly above-average skills which will fall into a roughly 50-50 split.

And even then you can't reasonably claim that most jobs are better performed by spatial or verbal thinking. Both tend to have their moments.
I upvoted your remark and it immediately dropped down the page. Evidently I am typhoid mary for unfavourable comment ranking...

Joking aside, dang specifically denies there is a comment ranking adjustment due to account karma, but not other factors (such as account age, an unseen reputation field, your IP address/choice of web browser/#{1/user.name.size}).

We are the blind to Hacker News's elephant in this.
This is already a case for quite a few years in Queensland...

https://www.caradvice.com.au/539545/automatic-number-plate-r...

https://www.caradvice.com.au/539545/automatic-number-plate-r...
I've created orca and this message resonated with me, and how I feel about computers today. Thank you for saying so.
> I think you could apply for exceptions like you would for child actors (e.g. whatever law allows them to get around child labor laws)

There is an application in CA for an entertainment work permit, but that's mostly validating age and satisfactory education status (for school age children) and medical clearance (for infants under 1). So, I think the analogy doesn't work and you should work out what kind of application you mean here.
I have a different definition of miracle than yours.
There's a thing called "forcing a circuit split," which is a precondition for SCOTUS cert, but AFAIK it's usually a strategy by parties to a case (see: forced-birth organizations), not judges.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_split
I would like to see a more objective scoring. Lopsided foul ratios are not solid evidence of bias by themselves. Teams play different styles and sometimes have bad defensive nights.

Nor is a single bad call evidence of bias, such as the nosebleed incident.

An example of a good evaluation would be several professional referees, not employed by the NBA, observe the videos of that game from different angles, and score the accuracy and fairness of each call and potential non-call, including which referee made the call and/or was closest.

I don't wish to accuse people of conspiracies without strong and detailed evidence. And, too many teams habitually blame the refs for bad results to deflect their own shortcomings as a team. I've heard "wolf" far too many times.

There is human error and thus randomness in referee calls. But as they say, luck favors the prepared. If you don't want bad calls deciding the game, then get good enough to have the margin of error in your favor.
> with older comments and subthreads being deleted over time

No, don't delete comments! Hide them if you must, but I always like being able to enjoy and send people link to comments from years ago.
"Additionally an impetus product for the misconduct treatise hard-working"...
Apple and Microsoft?

How could this guy miss out on RED HAT?
That makes sense in cases where you know what's best for others.
The SCotUS has extremely broad leeway in it's decision making. Any court case can rise to the SCotUS, but the SCotUS also has the power to deny hearing any case it wants.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction (that is, the first court the case must be heard in) in a very narrow set of circumstances defined by the US Constitution (in Article III): "In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction."

However, the Constitution goes on: "In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make." (More here [0].)

So, for state courts (which try violations of state or municipal law, which are the vast majority of cases), you would have your original jurisdiction court (civil court, criminal court, etc.). If the case is appealed, it goes to the state appellate court. If that decision is appealed, it goes to the state supreme court. If that decision is appealed, it goes to the SCotUS. Not all states have both a supreme court and a designated appellate court. Some cities also have their own courts for municipal laws (New York and Chicago both do) but they work the same basic way and I believe they appeal to state appellate courts.

For federal courts (which try violations of federal law or that occur on federal land or that cross state lines, but also any trial in Washington, D.C., because the federal government regulates that), you start at the district court[1]. Appeals to that cast go to the circuit court[2], and appeals to that go to the SCotUS.

There is no appealing a decision by the SCotUS. It would require an act of Congress, Constitutional Amendment, or a completely different trial where the SCotUS reversed it's prior decision. This has happened, most famously in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) (legalized racial segregation) was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954) [3].

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_jurisdiction_of_the_S...
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_district_court
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_circuit_court
[3]: https://money.howstuffworks.com/10-overturned-supreme-court-...
Let me know if you manage to make a self replicating pattern in Orca, I've been working at this for the past few days myself.
The actual mechanics are complicated, a mess, and (in the case of the current President of the European Commission) made up out of whole cloth with no legal basis and used exactly once so far, but a rough summary is: through shady backroom deals we have no visibility into.
That's also possible. Don't think I have vouched for something that shouldn't, but I would say that, wouldn't I? :)

So have others noticed a change, or did I accidentally flag my own account somehow?
It's only theoretically possible that the author's specific worldview is incidental to their stance because there are people who have the same wordview but the opposite stance? That makes no sense.

> I also know plenty of Christians who do not try and impose their values on society.

Yeah, like the article for example, which raises the question why all this is floating at the top.
Google's Acquisition of Alooma and Talend's Acquisition of Stitch
Nice! Consider this your rare opportunity to talk about your karma without repercussion. Don't make it a habit, though; I'm sure you have better things to talk about anyways ;)
Even if 'alleged', this should have been enough to stop the confirmation until it was properly investigated. Or frankly, it should have stopped it outright.

Few positions are more important, and fewer still require a higher standard of morality than a supreme court position. Why settle for less than a spotless record? The person should be beyond reproach, so much so that an invalid allegation could be easily dismissed(during the confirmation, or any time afterwards).

You are placing someone in a position where they are able to influence lives of countless people, with repercussions that can span generations.
“My goal is to buy and almost never sell"

Therein lies one of the great secrets to wealth.

Buffett, Bogle, etc. all espouse it. For those who are looking for ways to level the economic field (at least personally), take note.
Why do you think Apple is bringing iOS apps to Mac? ARM MacBook is inevitable (unless they switch to AMD).
So law should dictate what we're able to say? There was a time when that was counter to the entire point.
Yes, unfortunately. It would make me laugh if it didn't make me cringe.
How to Market Effectively on Instagram in 2019
It's not so much that it is fallen - you can have a meaningful discussion about whether there was ever a point in history where life was better, or a theological discussion about the nature of any fall from grace.

It's the religious implication in the article that invalidates it. Christian belief is that humanity's fall from grace can only be redeemed through the intercession of christ, and the author links the impossibility of any utopian state with that fall from grace, so obviously the only way to resolve it is theological.

The author's implied statement that any attempt to create a utopia must either come from god, or be religious in nature, is the problem. If, like me, you don't believe in god, and believe organised religions are inherently bad, then at that point the author's credibility is destroyed and the article is just another religious rant.
Emailing the mods seems like a great way to know the answer to your question :)
Right... but assumed by whom? The author of course. But anyone else? Maybe I'm the only one here with uncommon sense.
Good point! And that doesn't make them any less great, does it.
Another slap on the wrist. No one goes to jail because of Deferred Prosecution Agreements

HSBC got fined about half that when they caught laundering money for the Mexican cartels a few years back. True story: HSBC had to design special teller windows because the standard ones were too small to fit the sacks of money that were being brought in and laundered. If you want to know why these guys don't go to jail, pull up a bottle of lithium and sit down with The Chickenshit Club.
To Brie or Not to Brie: Can Vegan 'Cheese' Taste as Good as Dairy?
It’s unlikely that it reduces aging. It’s probably worse but it is possible to have no impact depending on how they did it.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877531...
Why GameAnalytics Migrated to Apache Druid