skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
What I am saying is, that a corporation does not have a mouth. Only people have mouths.

Therefore any time you a preventing an entity with a mouth from speaking, you are by definition preventing a person from speaking.
Three Hundred Programming Interviews in Thirty Days (2015)
I don't see how openjdk is related to the openmp pragma. GCC has no problem using FMA if you just let it, avoiding the pragma which simply says "simd".
this is one of the very best articles i've ever found on HN.

it addresses the most important aspects of the toxic employee syndrome which i personally have encountered in multiple working environments. every manager should read this article.
You're assuming that these people don't want their videos public. Even if it's true for some, clearly some of these uploaders do want their videos public, so your solution doesn't generally solve the problem.
I don't agree with most of the views by the poster in question, but I can't see the comments that are being disputed because it says [Flagged]
What do you do know? Just curious [=

That's a really cool idea.
I think it's actually more similar to magic-wormhole, https://github.com/warner/magic-wormhole
I'm not interested in engaging you with formal logic. I'm making a hard assertion. This content is pornographic in nature and anybody who enjoys watching children do it is a creep who should be segregated from the rest of society.
> .. is to use an encrypted messaging app like Signal Desktop, Wire, Keybase, or iMessage.

Solid selection by authors, not familiar with Keybase though
I don't believe this is an actual feature, but I've noticed a trend that I've been calling "twos", where, at any given moment, a particular subject (present as a word or phrase in the article's title) will show up twice on the front page.

Funnily enough, currently the "twos" subject is "Hacker News", with this article and "What I've Learned from Hacker News" both being present in the front page at the same time.
Okay, but let's say you convince all the MEPs in your small country. Now what? Are you going to start sending letters to MEPs from foreign countries? Why would they care about what you have to say?
All of the means to attack Youtube have been centred on questionable video content being supported with ads from mainstream companies.

Youtube should have wisened up and become a lot more selective of which videos were supplied with ads.

And if running slightly fewer ads is too commecially difficult, then save costs by limiting new uploads to 720p.
Yes, but two wrongs don't make a right.

It is not your job to deliberately stay in someone's way to prevent them from speeding. Leave the speed enforcement to the police.
Mystery solved. Thanks.
Looks nearly exactly the same as the newsletter I run, https://techatscale.com
How do I turn off echo chamber mode where well-written posts that go against the mob thinking turn grey?
> Why do you need to post publicly rather than marking it as unlisted and sharing the link with people you know and trust?

Not always realistic. If you record some boyscouts event, you probably don't know the name of everyone there, let alone account information. People often email a link, and then people share it by forwarding it.

Alternatively, of course, you could upload it to some website for your organization, but again it'd generally need to be public, or you have the usual IT horror of getting everyone an account and dealing with people who say they can't log in. There is a reason people just toss it on YouTube.
> This distinction isn't merely semantic, though the end result in the present case is the same: under the majority view, the prohibition against excessive fines is a limitation on state government in all cases; in Thomas's view, it would not be a limit if the target of the state action were not a US citizen, since noncitizens necessarily do not enjoy the privileges and immunities of citizens.

That's the outcome, but I don't think that's the intent. The reason why Thomas wanted to go via the Privileges Clause rather than the Due Process Clause is because he represents a faction in jurisprudence that believes that the latter was historically inappropriately used in lieu of the Privileges or Immunities Clause in general.

If you dig into the history of that argument, it does kinda make sense - we have plain language in 14A speaking about states not allowed to deny rights to citizens, and we have historical record of the intent behind it. The reason why it's not used as intended is because in the infamous Slaughter-House Cases, SCOTUS essentially ruled it to be a nullity. Later, when the pendulum swung towards instead of reverting that decision and giving teeth to the Privileges or Immunities Clause, they made an elaborate construct of substantive due process from the Due Process Clause to allow for incorporation without a reversal.

The mainstream argument is that it's good enough, and that trying to revive the Privileges or Immunities Clause is simply not worth it - which is why it hasn't been referenced by SCOTUS in decisions for a long time. Nevertheless, there have always been judges that believe it to be wrong, and those judges would supply minority opinions referencing it. This generally correlates with textualism (and hence opposition to substantive due process, which is an inherently anti-textualist notion) - which is the case for Thomas as well - but is not limited to that crowd.
That's 2 different topics though.

Cutting ads does not also cut analytics frameworks.

I wonder at which point apps will just start to bury analytics in their API calls and serve ads with their main payloads
Many of these videos are uploaded by the kid themselves, no? Above 13, you're allowed to have your own account and upload videos. Even if the parent uploaded videos are removed, it still doesn't fully solve the problem.
Another post I stumbled accross when looking for part one
http://www.goodmath.org/blog/category/bad-math/cantor-cranke...

A highlight I'd like HN to read, because it comes up every so often.

> There’s a common belief among crackpots of various sorts that scientists and mathematicians use symbols and formalisms just because we like them, or because we want to obscure things and make simple things seem complicated, so that we’ll look smart.

> That’s just not the case. We use formalisms and notation because they are absolutely essential. We can’t do math without the formalisms; we could do it without the notation, but the notation makes things clearer than natural language prose.
It’s interesting you use unit tests as an example.

That’s something on which I have never actually settled my opinion. One month I conclude “nope, unit testing takes too long and offers no net benefit”. The next, I switch - “unit testing is glorious and helps push errors down significantly”.

Part of the reason why my answer to most questions is “I don’t know” or “It depends”.
The only specialized support it really needs has less to do with folding and more to do with toggling between two different screens without problems and while maintaining context, which they already seem to have nailed. Everything beyond that is just building on things that are already relevant for normal tablets, like multitasking.
Nah. I think it's just aversion to culture war. I know I get more than enough of my fill on Twitter.
That's an odd analogy knowing USA went into a bloody civil war to fix that.

You're comparing a broken system with an older and even more broken system that we already fixed and trying to find merit in current broken system by that comparison. Of course it's better to be alive than being squashed by a dinosaur. But how's that relevant?
Unfortunately fake. Also, convincing just one Judge isn't really great success.

"Update: It turns out that the judges and test were as artificial as Eugene. The event was organized by a well-known prankster. We regret having been duped. On the other hand, chatbots on Twitter are fooling humans into thinking they are real all the time. "
After reading all of your comments hear, the only image I can form of you is a a guy with his hands over his ears yelling "I CAN'T HEAR YOU!" You need to wise up. Before you read this article, you were naïve like many parents, but now you're just being wilfully ignorant by continuing to defend these videos being public.
> If the comment desaturation makes Hacker News difficult to read, you can click on the comment's timestamp to go to its page where the comment will no longer be faded, or you can install the CSS extension discussed here.

Or, you can select its text to see it in (typically) black on blue.
I think it's related to the old "in a gold rush, sell the shovels" adage. And these are often phantom shovels.
> The only thing that is slightly annoying is that the iPhone seems to drop the VPN from time to time. If only there was a way to work that out....

I recall NordVPN on iOS used to do that and I took it as a norm. Perhaps a year ago after few iOS and apps, I noticed that not only the time takes for connecting dropped, the drop rate also decreased a lot.

Not directly answer the question, but this made me think that there is a way...
Hardware Virtualization: The Nuts and Bolts (2008)
A visual guide to the Go memory allocator from scratch
I thought it also required some sort of twisted wire pin that interfaces with the sear and hinges off something built into the upper.

The majority of my firearm knowledge comes from that world of guns puzzle game so I'm probably very off on something, but I do remember there was a lot of going on in that area of the gun
Any static constraint is likely to rule out good and bad programs. The tradeoff is how irreplacable those good programs are vs. how dangerous those bad programs are. "endofunction over either integers or endofunctions over integers (or over endo…)" is cute but I wouldn't lose a lot of sleep from underconstraining that domain.
Outside of the obvious increase in value, it tends to be lost that VCs are money managers.

Mark-ups serve as marketing for the next fund which they get a % of an annual basis. The time horizon to see any company turn to cash is so long that their major day-to-day level is to market a strong rising portfolio to new LPs for more money to manage.
The real top Stack Overflow Questions
> You have a beautiful daughter - congrats.

Creep!!! Just kidding.... Thanks, she's the best. :)

Point taken. I get a bit defensive here and there, and I guess what I'm more defensive about is reflected more here in the comments, where people are so quick to shame parents for not being so worried about things that I think are non-issues. (note that I am a bit of an outlier at Hacker News, in that I am in general not particularly concerned about privacy...in the sense that I don't worry about, say, Amazon following me around the web because they have figured out that I am in the market for digital pianos and skateboard parts)
I get white on blue, but yeah, I also do this and it's very readable.
Glad you agree. I suspect QuillBot is not ideal for fake reviews anyways since you would likely want a diversity of positive opinions rather than the same ones regurgitated. What I'm really excited to see is, where this technology goes in regards to education and writing enhancement. (For clarity, I'm the CEO of Quillbot)
I can't think of a single element to add that would make it more similar to pornography without it being actual pornography. I believe that it is as similar as is possible, and getting so close cannot be accidental. I assert that if you can think of something that would make it more similar your premise that the similarity is loose may hold water, if not however it would seem that I'm correct and the similarly is uncanny.
I should add a section on dupes to the list, as the policy is a bit inconsistent (for example, a post on a subject that gets a lot of upvotes but is not the original source, might have the original source submission duped to that later submission.)
"The amount of urine a swimmer can introduce into the water is small compared to the amount of urea coming off their unwashed body" - really? how much urea does a normal human have on their body, assumed they wash at all e.g. if they showered this morning, and go to pool after work ? Assuming they don't spend the day pissing on themselves, do we just secrete urea?
The Shopify User's Comprehensive Guide to Instagram Marketing
Bad Statistics Are Costing British Taxpayers $1.3B a Year
Is there any kind of standard that 'defines' what a plausibly deniable format is?
'To fight against confirmation bias, is to fight the hardest battle and never stop fighting'

Biases are built in, it takes effort to be rational.
Yeah that was happening to me. I was being woken up a little less than half that (average of 27 times an hour). I was constantly seeing and hearing things, but they were too indistinct for it to be called something like "hearing voices".

It was more that I really often saw a flicker of motion in the corner of my vision or thought I heard someone mumble or say something that I didn't quite catch. These hallucinations were easy enough to rationalize away - maybe the people near me just took a breath weirdly and I thought it was a word, or a bird flew nearby or something.

I didn't realise any of the above were symptoms until I I noticed they weren't happening to me any more a few years after I had started treatment and hadn't happened in quite some time.

I can easily see myself ending up like your grandfather after a few more years of living with severe sleep deprivation. Ironically I got treatment when seeking help for insomnia (because it took me a ridiculous time to fall asleep and could basically only do it when I was completely exhausted)
This is essentially it. The names are a fiction. You let somebody say that you or your dependant is "disordered" or what have you, even if functionally they're doing better than most people, and in exchange you get benefits. Insurance coverage, social assistance, access to specialized programs, certain social privledges.

I do wonder if we're absolutely fucking up the minds of a generation of people by giving more and more people the made up labels. They come hand in hand with stigma and insecurity. We've been loosening diagnostic criteria continually on the dubious grounds that we "better understand" mental illness in the past. When it gets down to brass tacks we just decided as society labelling more people as "different" and treating them differently was for the best. Beyond the concern I have for individuals more and more people are qualifying for disability assistance every year and its unsustainable financially.

I do wish we had a model of mental health that was more focused on addressing more granular individual strengths/weaknesses and one less prone to just saying a broad swathe of people who are nothing alike are part of the same "spectrum".
> Interacting online isn't any different

Except a school is a (mostly) sealed environment. The Internet is not. Anyone can join the conversation online. Not just anyone can walk into a school classroom and pretend to be a teenager to social engineer a young girl.

> Cutting them off from the network is like giving them a lobotomy.

I didn't say cut them off.
This a thousand times over. See my other posts in this thread for more on this perspective.
It's... An amazing list, thanks for sharing.

Can I ask two things:

- Where do you get your movies?

- Do you watch a new one daily to have seen so many?
> "there are no good or bad movies, only boring or interesting movies"

I appreciate the sentiment but in this case, wouldn't that make boring movies bad and interesting movies good? (Assuming, of course, you don't want to be bored...)
This sounds super nice. Checking it out!
You're comparing a subdivision to an urban block, and you're not including time and cost to clear LOS obstacles. It's also very unlikely that 4 small poles will have direct line of site to 150 households outside of high density apartment buildings where running fiber directly to the building is already easy.
If the consequences are potentially life destroying, then it's the height of dishonesty to handwave away due process, saying, "It's not a criminal prosecution." It might as well be. Such an accusation outside of the Title IX process would be seen as "per se defamation." In plain English, some accusations are so damaging, there's no need for the purposes of defamation to prove they are damaging.

By eliminating most of due process, reducing the burden of proof, and denying the ability of the accused to face and cross examine their accuser, Title IX is basically declaring "open season" on life damaging accusations. Granted, it's often a bad situation to be in, to be an accuser. No due process worth its name is going to be easy for either party. If it were easy for one side or another, that's a signal the system is broken. Example: Falsely accused black men in the South suffered injustice because the role of accuser was made too easy by racial bias.

(EDIT: Note that there are even local DAs and prosecutors in the US who are seeking to erode presumption of innocence in sexual misconduct cases in the actual judicial system, for similar reasons as cited for Title IX.)
Thank you for surfacing the need for a better demo and examples.

> I'm currently managing a team using Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel and Hotjar.

Avo is optimized for event based analytics, such as when people send events with metadata into Amplitude, Mixpanel, Segment or into custom pipelines. Are you sending custom events into the platforms you mentioned, and sending metadata along with the events?

> From what I understand, I can use Avo to setup flows that I want to watch (like a sales conversion funnel) and make sure that the analytics tags are properly implemented across all pages of the funnel.

You can use Avo to define the structure of the events that you want to send at each step in that flow. From those definitions, developers can generate code that validates that the event structures are correct.

What I mean by event structures is for example event names, which properties should be required on those events, what those properties should be named, and which type their values should be.

An example event could be:

event name: "Checkout Completed"

properties and their values: {"Number of Items": 2, "Amount": 100.00, "Currency": "USD"}

> In the case that the sales funnel changes and a new page is added, do I need to remember to update Avo with the change?

If your data should change along with the sales funnel change, then you should update Avo and then your code.
This is part of the project Calling Bullshit, a course on calling bullshit.

https://callingbullshit.org/syllabus.html
The main difference between Quillbot and spinners, is that a majority of people we've surveyed say they use QuillBot for suggestions on their writing. I'd give it a good chance on providing a better sentence structure if you are a non native speaker.
>If a user has 251 Karma, they can set the color of the top bar in their profile settings

Why on earth is there a karma requirement for this, let alone such a high one?
If there are no people left on earth, who are we preventing the catastrophe for?
Potential resolution could be to limit use of the lanes to just zero emissions vehicles.
It's less about privilege being challenged, more about "inclusion" being used to justify just about anything and often going too far.

Here's a comment in an official nodejs repository that got edited by a contributor to correct a pronoun on somebody else's post: https://github.com/nodejs/package-maintenance/issues/77#issu... (click the "edited" dropdown)

That you yourself come right out the gate guns blazing about "privilege" shows exactly why people prefer to just not have the discussion at all anymore on this forum. It seems more like flamebait and it never ends well.
You just won that bet.
Well, sure... if you're looking for an "invisible idiot" solution. This short passage from Terry Pratchett:

"The expression on the face of Lord Havelock Vetenari was, for a moment, a picture. And it was a picture painted by a very modern artist, one who had been smoking something generally considered to turn the brain to cheese."

was rendered as

"Lord Havelock Vetenari's expression on the face was a picture for a moment. And it was a picture painted by a very modern artist who generally thought to turn the brain into cheese, smoking something."

Language is hard.
I wonder if you can use an emoji that looks like a number or letter (in a similar font to the rest of the number plate).
I think whether to incorporate early or not depends more not on revenue but on risks of being financially liable. In other words, if it's a straightforward service or product you are going to deliver with your collaborator and you cannot imagine a massive debt or litigation, or explicit contract that deems you liable for a potential financial loss of your customer due to using your product or service — then incorporating can be an extra burden.
You're speaking as if HSM encrypted memory and strong hardware security are standard on all laptops these days. They aren't. Lockscreens can often be bypassed, especially if you have physical access. [1][2]

All it takes is for the _exploit_ to be automated (not the actual act of stealing laptops) such that any random person off the street can do it. Then a targeted attack is no longer necessary; crimes of opportunity become the larger threat.

[1]: https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/microsoft-fixes-cort...

[2]: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/29/macos-hig...
It's still a philosophical debate if such an phenomenon can be seen as cause and effect. It's a similar problem as with teleological views in eg biology and medicine: "what's the task/purpose of the lungs?" - there is no predefined task.
The system is by no means perfect. If I had to compare it to self driving cars, I'd say its a level 2 on automation safety. You should have your hands on the wheel when you use it, but it still makes driving easier.
http://www.whichfaceisreal.com/methods.html

"On this website, we present pairs of images: a real one from the FFHQ collection, and a synthetic one, as generated by the StyleGAN system and posted to thispersondoesnotexist.com, an web-based demonstration of the StyleGan system that posts a new artificial image every 2 seconds."
Keybase is basically a communication platform that's secure, but allows the users to verify that they are who they say they are. It's basically like "I am foo, and I identify myself like this, and you are bar, and you identify yourself like that, we now know that we are who we say we are, and now we're having an e2e encrypted conversation.

It's supposedly a way to put a stop to imitation, but unless adoption gets huge I'm not sure it'll work that way.

It generates a string, you store it on, for example, your twitter, facebook, github, HN account, almost anything with an editable profile. That way when 2 users are talking, one can be assured that the other is who they claim to be (either that or they have access to all of said person's accounts). It's kind of cool but it's impractical in a way that usage is pretty low (at least among people I know. Maybe it's got a big underground following I don't know about).

I have a keybase account and literally no one else I know does, so I've never used it.
>How much a candidate raises has been correlated to ability to win.

Key word being correlated. Winners raise more money in large part because people donate to candidates they think will win. So your third statement is technically true, but in a very uninteresting way that you probably didn't intend.
Yes, both ends the tower and endpoint can be mounted higher than a bus, but because most building are single story, they can't be mounted that much higher.

So a small increases in elevation in an area between the 2 points means that the LOS can still be crossed by a bus.