skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's what happens when unrestrained capitalism moves production of goods outside of the local economy and into distant foreign economies which are more difficult to access. Capital aggregates in the few international trade hubs and starting a new business becomes more difficult as various gates are put in front of the newly foreign production. As capital becomes more centralized, fewer people are in charge of the decisions to invest and innovation becomes more difficult because rather than being distributed across the range of economies and lifestyles in the US (or any country) it is invested in the few who have access to the gatekeepers. Usually that requires physical access over time, which means living in an increasingly expensive city and successfully competing with an increasing amount of individuals vying for a limited amount of investor attention. Innovation comes from people responding to a wide variety of different problems and situations - how is that going to happen if everyone lives in the same place and is competing to solve the same problems that the relatively few available investors want to put money in? Markets that retain capital are much easier to find money in than markets which leak it.

If an American with wealth wants to help the US economy, they should focus on rebuilding the production capacity of underfunded economies across the US by redistributing wealth from the main international hubs into smaller domestic markets. It probably won't produce optimal returns, which scares off most investors. I have seen a couple funds starting to do this, for what it's worth.

P.S. Banks used to be small and local! Look at how far we've fallen:

- https://ilsr.org/number-banks-u-s-1966-2014/
- https://ilsr.org/vanishing-community-banks-national-crisis/
Yeah, I've always found vague calculations of radiation exposure like this to be highly inaccurate, mostly because people can't into inverse square law and fuck up the units. I'll wait until the OSHA investigation to reveal more accurate information; my opinion is that it's the lifelong employees who hung around the area who should actually be worried, instead of some kid who went on a field trip there six years ago.
NSFW Detection on the Client-Side via Tensorflow JavaScript
Do you know how many pops CF has compared to Akamai?
"I am only leaving so that I can experience the joy of joining your perfect company again."
Kudos StavrosK I would suggest reaching out to code shelter's community to figure out where the most need is.
Password Managers Have a Security Flaw. But You Should Still Use One
Seems to be the same for women here. It was their choice to have children thus leaving their field.

Why do we care that not everyone is offered the same opportunities? Life isn't fair.

Until I see women fighting to take on all the roles men have taken in life, Alaskan commercial fishermen, roughneck oil rig workers, loggers etc... and just not 1 or 2, equal representation throughout I am not concerned with unequal representation in STEM, tech or any of the fashionable areas to be concerned with.
Google for Clear Air Turbulence.
But, for that reason, they will probably get very good at playing off failures (since drivers aren't in the picture to blame) as maintenance failures rather manufacturing defects.

Manufacturers already do that now...Ford was doing that back in the Pinto days.

The change to self-driving cars will make maintenance (and maintenance records) more important for drivers for liability purposes, but will also make it more difficult for the manufacturers to avoid liability.
Sorry, neglected to include important details.

Approximately one week a month on-site at client(s) location. So, flights, food, accommodation.

I expected company payment card. If everything turns to shit one month the employee, in this sort of situation, could be left holding a fairly hefty bag.
My mom once told me that the only thing she knew of that was worse than having cancer, was being the long-term caregiver for someone who had cancer. She was taking care of her sister at the time, who had stomach cancer.

Then my mom passed away a few years later, due to lung cancer -- caused in part by her sister who was allowed to smoke like a chimney, even in the hospital, because she was at stage 4. My dad was the primary care giver for my mom.

My dad recently passed away in ICU, when I had to make the hard choice to remove the ventilator instead of doing a tracheotomy, because everyone in the family knew that the last thing he wanted in life was to die in a nursing home. And if we had them do a tracheotomy, he would never be able to go home again. He never woke up, and passed within an hour of removing the ventilator. He was 74.

I've had thyroid cancer, which was surgically removed and then I had radioactive iodine therapy afterward. I'll be on synthetic thyroid replacement medication for the rest of my life.

I don't think I have much illusion about what is around the corner for me. I'm just trying to put it off for as long as I can, try to get some good work done in the time I have left, and enjoy spending as much time as I can with my wife and what is left of the family.
> Is this standard in the software world?

This is standard in every world. Corporate credit cards are usually reserved for senior executives or people who travel/entertain a lot (e.g. sales reps). Cash advances aren't a thing outside of small companies.
I've asked for some reasons for why BRI is an overextension. I was given a few indicators. I respond that those indicators are present, some of them three-fold in the current political situation of the United States.

If those points are the reason China's about to topple over, why hasn't the United States already done so?
I mentioned further up thread, there's a book about this topic written by an HR person called "Corporate Confidential" which basically reinforces all this. It's a fascinating read.
Typically yes. Right now there is a general avoidance of Ukrainian (Crimean and nearby) and Syrian airspace so the flight plans will take that into account, the winds aloft, and the airways available.
Every 5 years or so, there is a rally to make millimeter-wave communications a thing. Every time it fails. Maybe there's enough money and effort his time around to make it happen, but I wouldn't bet on it myself.
Air France 447.
It's basic product liability law. The liability is actually on both the owner and the manufacturer (and the dealer, and anyone else involved in that chain of transactions...). And as the deeper pocket, realistically the liability is all on the manufacturer.
That is a made up justification to force a person into living in a broken system when in unbearable pain. While ignoring the person who wishes to end her life and exerting one's will forcibly upon another who is not privileged.
Well the nectar of the gods made you immortal if you ate/drank it, right? So it seems appropriate considering what they purported to be selling.
Proof that at least one number exists: Take for our logic first order logic with equality[1]. Take for our definition of the word "number" the Peano axioms[2]. The first Peano axiom is "0 is a natural number." Define "N" to be the unary relation "is a natural number." In our formal language, we write the first Peano axiom as "N0". By the principle of existential generalization[3], we have "∃x Nx", which we read as "there exists x such that x is a natural number." Q.E.D.

I assume you find the above deeply unsatisfying. Most people do. Yet I find it clarifies the matter entirely! If a person's conception of "number" is consistent with the Peano axioms, and if that person's use of the word "exists" includes the existential logical quantifier, then for that person "numbers exist" is a theorem. If a person uses other definitions, the matter may be otherwise.

[1]: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_generalization
Show HN: ByteScout Data Playground – Filter, Sort Raw Data with Natural Language
They're mentioned. They're not addressed.
Unstated assumption in this claim: this instinctual genetic imperative has a dimension that causes people to leave their jobs, and this dimension disproportionately affects women more than men.
No guide can guarantee a successful startup. There are so many factors that you can and cannot control, even you have built a successful startup, the chance of building another one is not much greater.

I strongly recommend two books:
- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future
- Lost and Founder: A Painfully Honest Field Guide to the Startup World
The article ends with "Almost certainly not, but if so why would we care?" which I find (along with its inverse "Almost certainly, but if not why would we care") to be my answer to many philosophical questions.
Kirin is giraffe and upset Confucius as it should not appear in his chaotic time.
Because of federal preemption. Thankfully NIMBYs dont have the power to block communications improvements.
> but it's also very possible that competing products or service providers will overtake them or become dominant in the market they are trying to establish for themselves.

It's not really possible, they are just playing the startup game. Honest non Patreon sounding justifications are pretty hard to come up with at this point.
When I first heard about global warming, the physicist in me said, hmm, the major effect of this will be energetic weather systems will become more energetic.

Now put that together with my personal experience of extreme weather events both in NZ and ZA, the jet streams has _always_ been involved.http://squall.sfsu.edu/scripts/shemjetstream_model.html

ie. If I see a major stream coming near me... Big Stuff happens with the weather. If something extreme is happening with the weather, I check and a big stream is going very near by.

ie. I expect we will see more interesting stuff happening with the jet stream as the climate cooks.
You can move to african or other 3rd world countries still. If you have cash to start over,you can get about without using your old ID past the port of entry. It may not be the western life you're used to but you can buy a house,have a source of income (business or a job if you forge paperwork) and even a family.
Yes, if it goes against corporate policy...

Security is like 90% policy.
The Never-Ending Now
How is two straight lines crossing in one and only one place not an example of a single occurrence without reference to real world objects (which the OP dismissed as “not really being a number”).

As for reading “too much into this”, as Instated: Irma a mathematician, of course I’m going to take this seriously and make an effort to disprove naive misconceptions.
I'd like to add one other important (free!) way you can help: Sign up to be a marrow donor.

In the US, here: https://bethematch.org

Alex mentioned graft-vs-host disease. When you get a marrow transplant, the better the match, the more likely you are to survive. The bigger the database, the better chance of a good match.

Seven years ago I lost a good friend to non-hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer sucks.
And the greatest trick Keyser Söze ever pulled was convincing women, men have the better deal working full time and not spending time with the children and we should literally campaign telling them they are wrong not to want to work full time and the small benefits you get from that over the lifelong reward of bringing up healthy caring children.

But it is best for society... and other suckers not you if they work. Shug, so what's to complain about?
The cost of autonomous cars, especially in terms of maintenance, is likely to be higher. And autonomous taxis will be cheaper to operate because drivers are a very expensive part of them. The number of people for whom owning a car makes sense will definitely go down when prices on cars rise and prices on taxis and public transportation drop.

This is ignoring the fact that having an unproductive self driving car sitting in your garage becomes a significant opportunity cost itself.
This is really annoying now. I was fine with having to do 2 clicks but making it inconvenient for me to open songs in my streaming service of choice is a pretty good way to never have me try the apple music service.
Oh. Like every single codebase ever then?
I'd pay a small premium if it's built into the a single ongoing cost of a car. I know I'm not alone - Insurance industry is one of the least trusted.

This may be bi-modal - many many folks would agree with you, but enough might agree with me for someone enter the market - potentially disrupting it.
How am I liable for an accident caused by my self driving car, though?
An ad blocker that solely uses the declarative API won't be a good one.

The good ones will still want onBeforeRequest() for heuristics and dom access for click-to-block.

The whole privacy excuse from Google is intentional hand waving. Decent ad blockers will still need permissions for scary sounding things.
> Paying for blood significantly increases the risk of blood borne pathogens.

Because the money incentivizes those who shouldn't donate to donate (and attempt to bypass any controls that prevent them from donating)?
Password Manager Report Gets Researcher Booted from Bugcrowd
Does the Supermoon affect the Jet Stream?
Albany, NY.

The FCC is choosing to let the telecoms do whatever. It’s wasteful as they do things like block crosswalks with additional poles (to avoid renting from the electric utility) and place the poles in less attractive spots to reduce cost.
It’s OK to Chase the Money, Programmers
I’m all for reification. It’s not even limited to mathematics: ‘democracy’ is just another example of a reification from another realm of human endeavor: it gets implemented in different countries with slightly different axioms and varying degrees of success but in aggregate those nations that abide by some form of it are accepted as functional equals by other whom have likewise implemented their own instantiation of the overarching ideal.
Are you being facetious? Obviously labor intensive work does not reap the same benefits from diversity of perspectives as scientific or creative fields.
Can you expand? I think the author chose counting because of its intuitiveness, but they then go on to show that a very simple definition of counting can lead to some non-intuitive concepts, and that even restricting yourself to that simple definition of counting can lead to classifying something controversial (i.e. infinity) as a number.
27th, blank-or-control characters don't make good labels, plus their phonetic version may confuse investors, e.g. "Series Escape" (033) just sounds bad
But other kinds of numbers can be made from that:

- Differences of counting numbers (integers)

- Ratios of numbers (rationals)

- Limits to sequences of numbers (reals)

- Solutions to polynomials made from numbers (complex)

You can think of each of these as adding a layer of behavior to the basic “each number is nothing or one more than another number”.
> O(10ms)? […] so says the marketing

https://i.imgur.com/Dg4Jit5.png

That's my RTT ping to 8.8.8.8 as I travelled south on CalTrain from SF last week, on T~mobile's network.

Now, this is on an old phone that is only capable of HSPA+. However, the actual performance on the whole is still nowhere near any theoretical limits, or even limits of HSPA+.
It's by design, as a test that the maintainers have read the instructions and told us a bit about themselves and what they like, as well as just getting to know them. It generally works well, I think, except in this specific case where the meeting was done out-of-band.
The leadership principles in and of themselves strike me as something that is likely to lead to a toxic culture.

For reference:
https://www.amazon.jobs/en/principles
This is a battle they lost decades ago. Product liability laws have been on our books for more than a century, and the general gist is that everyone from the owner to the manufacturer is jointly and severally liable to various degrees depending on the circumstances of the failure.

A failure to do poor maintenance shifts the liability almost entirely to the owner, but a defect puts liability almost entirely on the manufacturer. (But note: "jointly and severally liable" means that they're all on the hook with respect to the plaintiff's award. The assignment of liability is how the plaintiffs ultimately settle the bill amongst themselves.)
Because it's hard to tell who is going to make the next big leap. Losing 25% of the top brain power because we cannot be bothered to organise crèches seems shortsighted

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Swan_Leavitt
Device Stitches You Up Without the Need for Stitches
I think what will change is... take a South Floridian car insurance car payment. You can pay $200/$300mo for 60 months and never need it, because based on statistics, everybody else in your area is getting into accidents with uninsured motorists.

Less accidents happening around you, insurance claims write fewer checks for claims, your payment (which is basically a savings account contributing to "when you might need it" in my eyes) should be lower.
Number of PoPs would be a pretty weak metric for a CDN, even if that's all they were.
Or it could be a feedback loop with multiple possible starting points.
I'm more excited about the low power aspects than the high speeds.
Your first two paragraphs make a very important point. Outliers from every cohort exist, and often it is due to a kind of inner drive, and we should not ignore that truth. Your final paragraph is cruel. From every cohort the vast majority of people in that cohort will end up with around the mean outcome for that cohort. This is a statistical fact. Only a few can be outliers, and expecting everyone to be one is mathematically guaranteed to cause suffering in the world.
> How am I liable for an accident caused by my self driving car, though?

Because you failed to maintain the vehicle in a safely operable condition. Now, if s manufacturers defect contributed to that failure, the manufacturer may also be liable, but that doesn't mean you aren't liable, and the manufacturer is going to claim and try to prove that that isn't the case.
Only in the most general terms, and from first principles: Composite structures will have a higher stiffness per unit mass, which will cause the fundamental frequencies to be higher both for the pure structural modes and the control surface interaction modes. It's therefore likely that you'd only begin to encounter these aeroelastic modes at higher speeds. In other words, if you take the driving frequency as something like the inverse of the time it takes for air to pass over the wing, that may match the metal wing more closely than the composite wing. Modeling that stuff in a wind tunnel is very tricky, and you used to end up with these not-at-all-realistic-looking models that, nonetheless, captured some aspect of the full-scale aircraft being modeled.

Don't die. Stay in the envelope. Flutter is only the quickest way to ruin your airframe and day, not the only one.
Well you can reduce the +/- notation further by allowing yourself to (after removing all +/- pairs) to remove pairs of sequential + tokens, and if it reduces to an empty string then it's an even number, otherwise it's an odd number.
My personal advice is that while learning CS is helpful but University degrees are expensive and may not give you a ROI.

The right course taught by the right person and learnt the right way will. And often, I found that some MOOCs have a way better structure and content than the ones I was taught in my University back in the day.

I'd suggest going through them and strengthening your concepts yourself - and if you feel all you need is a degree (or) a course that offers you far better discipline, then go for it.
I wish HackerNews had a way to save comments so I could flag this and come back to it in a few days when answers are more fleshed out so I can learn. Any ideas?
From a Washington Post article on this study: "LastPass had me speak with its top technical executive -- but it also got [lead researcher] Bednarek banned on Bugcrowd, the site for researchers to report flaws, because he disclosed the bug to me."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/19/passwor...

More from CyberScoop:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/bugcrowd-adrian-bednarek-lastpass...
> So it seems appropriate considering what they purported to be selling.

Or inappropriate false advertising...
I mean, I guess I am? I'm technically doing a PhD in it at the moment, but my opinions on philosophy of mathematics don't have much to do with the finer details of test-case reduction.

My actual degree, which is where most of my philosophy of mathematics opinions were developed, is in very pure mathematics. I've done quite a lot of software development since and that's definitely shaped the framing, but the core philosophy is one that I've had since long before I knew much about computer science at all.
I've experienced that plenty of times in Team Fortress 2. There are not many women playing it and using voice chat, but when they are, in my experience, it is vanishingly rare for it to be a big deal. FWIW, i'm in the UK, and so mostly playing on European servers. I suspect that relative to other FPSs, non-competitive TF2 players skew older and less tryhard, which may explain it.
I am going to go with, not until they get all non self driving cars off the road. Until then during the transition it will become a lawsuit paradise until the regulations are settled as any crash involving a self driving car with a person driven car will be challenged with boasts of class action suits and more.

a large portion of my current insurance is for uninsured motorist and under insured though my agent says the former is by far the biggest issue. considering law enforcement isn't making much head way there and true self driving isn't going to happen soon except under theme park ride conditions I don't think insurance is going anywhere.
Years ago, I was working in a biochem lab, and helping a state senator's staff draft legislation. The state capitol building was classic granite and marble. So one day, I brought in a Geiger counter. Everyone freaked ;)
https://zocoi.com/

Personal blog built with Jekyll, code on Github and hosted on Netlify (all are free)
This man is living my worst fear. Also 34, watching my 6 year-old play a video game.

Good luck, Alex. All I can say is, I don't know how you stand, but I know a man who can.
I'm OK with sending a patch or pull request back to the author in any circumstance and using the author's work as a base for said patch/PR makes complete sense to me. The problem I've seen is when the reviewer takes it upon himself to make these changes directly in the current PR without giving the original author a chance to change or defend his code. This is exacerbated when said changes take an entire day or two of the reviewer's time and are so extensive that the original work submitted becomes irrelevant. This wastes the reviewer's time which could be spent on other things instead of rewriting something that already works and has been done and it wastes the author's time because it essentially discards his work. You're right, it is definitely about the relationship between programmers, but I think some ground rules would help in cases where the relationship is unclear or the programmers work async remotely.