skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly, which is why I think a literal flipping of the bird to authority is beyond pointless from FB's perspective. They can continue to work contrary to the interests of the state with a wink and a nod.
I will use this to get letsEncrypt Certs for intranet pages. Self sign certs just seem so dangerous. And I want to renew every 30 days and not 100.
I'm really digging this site design.
A good example of how the result will look like is any US drug commercial: thirty seconds of smiling people holding a box of "Shititol" pills, then five minutes of a boring voice reading over a list of possible complications in legally precise, but humanly incomprehensible language.

The truth is all here. Will it help though?
I was in the thick of it and frankly I found it to be pretty cringeworthy to see so many armchair "investment experts" coming out of the woodwork.
There’s no Russian version of The Lancet, nor Russian translation. Nothing to distinguish crank stuff from.

People can distinguish if they speak other languages and search global Internet. Maybe I’m underestimating AI but I don’t think AI can do that currently, nor will be able in foreseeable future.
What happens to a generation raised in a world where misinformation is criminalized? Does critical thinking lapse? Do people just assume all published works are authoritative by definition? Not an experiment i’d care to see played out.

The current fake news tug-o-war might actually make citizens more scrutinizing of their news, not less.
The scalability problem is fortunately amenable to piecemeal solutions. Some research teams will focus on validation (i.e. novel proof of ____ approaches), others will focus on block propagation, some on bootstrapping (like the OP), novel hash structures for transaction aggregation, etc.

It would be difficult to come out with a new approach that simultaneously advanced the state of the art in every possible scalability dimension. Each individual approach might give a 2-10X improvement on that particular aspect, but it also means that the "bottleneck" keeps shifting, and trending towards scalability.

Source: I'm an academic blockchain researcher.
If reasonable people are disagreeing, then they have reasons to disagree. If reasons can drive a discussion, they can decide issues like this. So your question is misleading. It's not "who decides", but "what decides", and how to we ensure the "what" remains reasons that reasonable people would support.

Otherwise, you're just asking how people make decisions. "Who decided murder should be illegal" is just a poor (rather conspiratorial) way to ask what reasons are used to argue that it should be illegal and how we determined that those reasons were sufficient.

Presumably, in a democracy, the answer to "who determines what the government does" is "the people."
This breakage reminds me of similar constrained-search problems with the Google Groups/ Dejanews USENET archive. Once upon a time it was nice to research with.
Cryptocurrency hasn’t done this yet but it certainly has the potential to do exactly this.
I understand your preference for frameworks, but I actually appreciate that it's not out of the box.

I'd rather have libraries focus on one thing and do it well - the Unix philosophy. This lets me compose the appropriate libraries for the problem at hand.
If you apply this same logic to humans, don’t you wind up with a xenophobic perspective? This seems like an alt-right manifesto but applied to animals not humans.
Japanese government will access home devices in security survey
Common doesn't need to mean every day, everywhere. Just that it is regularly performed in a number of places. It's all relative.
Here's the Wikipedia page for Moringa:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moringa_oleifera

The pods are used in sambar in South Indian cuisine, and are pretty tasty. You have to eat only the inner pulp and seeds, not fibrous outer cover.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambar_(dish)

I've read the green leaves of Moringa are very nutritious too, though never had a chance to try them.
It was very much in keeping of the Microsoft of the era. Not out of maliciousness. Just a general lack of interest or knowledge of any non-Windows platform, but a recognition that if Frontpage was going to be as dominant as they wanted, they at least needed to vaguely support it.

Think the worst case of "Well it works on my machine"
I have a literal stack of yubikeys after getting many of them shoved into my hand at trade shows. I'd love to actually use them for anything but OTP. Can you document this process? Care to share your setup?

How do you handle, if at all, ssh/gpg on a mobile device?

Is it possible to have both yubikey based cert authentication for SSH/GPG in addition to normal password based cert auth on the same server/user?

Does this work on MacOS as well as Linux?
Show HN: I built a chrome extension that tracks your habits using heat maps
Crypto currencies have all seemed like an obscurantist version of hot potato. Either the hash gets too long to calculate effectively or the amount of money at stake means very very smart people will start finding ways to hack the coin (and they will).

But basically the deal crypto developers are trying to make with me is to trade US backed dollars for "fun bux". These developers are usually very smart people - often much smarter than I. But I don't like smart. Take US dollars. Little pieces of green paper are very uncomplicated and if anyone starts copying them armed thugs show up at their house to have a very serious discussion. And my corner chemist takes dead presidents on delivery no questions asked.
What would be gained from converting money into cryptocurrency to buy something you could just buy with money?
So would it be possible using this approach of cell transforming to target cancer cells?
Acid attacks are not common, but a lot of young immigrant women live under quite repressive family conditions, and can not see a doctor for their sexual health with their family knowing about it.
I think I also saw :Cuecat at their last show in LA.
As someone coming from a traditional strict separation-of-content-and-style background and now convert to Styled Components, CSS-in-JS felt unnatural to me when I first encountered it. The problems with styles in large applications are well known and I had a solid handle on them with BEM and other bits of tooling, namespacing styles to a particular React component to avoid collisions etc.

It took me helping my brother learn how to do web development to shake me out of that mindset. He's not from a traditional webdev background and he got quite far quite fast with React. When he showed me his code, I noticed he was inlining all of his styles in his relatively small React components. I was going to explain why its bad practice to do that, but when you're building small almost atomic components, that approach actually makes a lot of sense, its what the BEM methodology tries to do albeit in a poorer way. CSS-in-JS tools like Styled Components preserve the spirit of this approach and minimise the downsides.

I think CSS-in-JS lends itself quite nicely to atomic design. At my current company, one of the first things we did was build a component library of atoms & molecules that are shared across many applications, keeping our design language very consistent.

We also make heavy use of Styled Components' theming capabilities, so we wrap our React apps with a ThemeProvider and give it an object with theme variables that drive the look and feel of our components. This is super useful when you have to support whitelabeling like we do, but even if you don't, its nice to keep your mystery-meat colors and spacings all in one place similar to how you might with SASS.

One of the gripes a lot of people have with CSS-in-JS is portability, and while that is a drawback, I feel it's an anti-pattern to rely on shared CSS styles to enforce design consistency across many deployables. It's kind of a classic case of developers trying to solve a process issue with technology, which is admirable, but from experience styles go out-of-sync with eachother quite easily and its rare that you can drop a CSS file into another project and have styles just work without having to do rework, so the benefits of sharing CSS rather than writing new styles off a styleguide are marginal at best. Again, this is all my subjective experience, your mileage may vary.

We still have a couple of issues with Styled Components, no technology is perfect and SC is still relatively young, but so far the pros have far outweighed the cons to the point where none of us really feel the itch to go back to SASS or plain CSS. I'm definitively not a magpie developer by any stretch, I'm usually resistant to change for the sake of change, but CSS-in-JS makes a lot of sense when you use it how its intended
Space? ... no. Another planet maybe?
You make it sound like any kind of information a child absorbs or is taught could be interpreted as brainwashing.
> What guarantees that they will always be on the side of governments?

Most people who join militaries are not career military types and most also care greatly which side they're on. True mercenaries are extremely rare.
Yes, especially since my e-mails are also signed through GPG.
How does the speed and scalability of Algorand compare to something like nano?
I do have an nvidia card, but since MacOS 10.14 the nvidia driver manager reports that my driver (387.10.10.10.40.105) is not compatible with my OS, and it also reports that there are no newer drivers available when using the update function. So I'm currently back at the default Apple driver.

I have ran the nvidia driver before MacOS 10.14, and it did feel slightly faster than the driver supplied by Apple. I doubt if it will improve opening an 8K*8K image in a browser though...
I imagine more the reams and reams of data that Google (and the rest of FAANG) has stored on each and every citizen, including those elected to power. They could utterly destroy virtually anyone sitting in office politically with a few keystrokes.
And partially incorrect. This is indeed the case for the first few weeks of strength training. In the beginning your body learns to recruit and better utilize the existing muscles you have. But after that the long and slow process of building new muscle mass starts. The CNS adaptation( i.e. the first part) never goes away. That's the reason why if you have trained in the past for at least a couple months and now you restart your training your new starting weights will be higher than your old ones.
>Which brings us back full circle to the point I was originally trying to convey: if a coding standard forces you to write more convoluted and harder-to-read code just to work around some of its rules, that is a clear failure of said standard.

Only if the "more convoluted and harder-to-read code" is worse than what the standard tries to avoid.

A standard that calls for not allocating memory dynamically for example might result in less elegant code than one that does, for example, but that's not a "clear failure" since that away it avoids the uncertainty and variable runtime performance that malloc brings.

I'm addressing the general claim here, that "if a coding standard forces you to write more convoluted and harder-to-read code just to work around some of its rules, that is a clear failure of said standard" -- not specifically where the particular no-goto rule was justified.

A standard can be perfectly valid and good in restricting things even if that forces programmers to write "less elegant code" -- as long as this is necessary to fulfil some other objective of the standard (e.g. easy formal verification or real-time behavior).
Or maybe the academics and type theorists are philistines about the software that runs the world and their arguments have mostly been about hand-picked toy examples?

Maybe Mr. Pike actually has some well-deserved reputation when it comes to real-world software and engineering projects that are about handling large scale data in real time?
> The parent should have said, "Go is regularly used to ship..."

So does C, C++, Java, etc. That statement is meaningless. It just means that with enough contortion, you can write some code in golang that works. But that doesn't mean mean there aren't better, safer ways to write code. As others said, you can write large systems in C, but we still see the fallouts of using a very limited and unsafe language.

And the funny things is, how do some of these larger projects get around golang's limititions? They write code generators to emulate mocking and generics, ending up with a weird mix of code that is difficult to manage. I saw this at my current employer, where they use golang for most of their backend. It's funny that I always think that even writing in Java would make the code base a lot more maintainable and even shorter and less verbose.
Based on a book I read on the subject, there's a way to make a phase-array microwave transmitter, which achieves the required focus by tuning into a reference signal from the receiving station on Earth. Using this system, if you try to transmit to an arbitrary spot you'll have a much more diffuse beam, and even the tight beam is only concentrated enough to raise the temperature several degrees. The receiving station is about the size of a ground-based solar array, but cheaper because it's just microwave antenna.

Another approach is to use a laser, at a frequency that gets absorbed by the atmosphere. Beam it to a high-altitude receiver station, which beams microwaves to a receiver directly below. But that way is a lot more expensive.

https://www.amazon.com/Case-Space-Solar-Power-ebook/dp/B00HN...
Do the new neurons inherit quorum sensing abilities? That might even be an interesting feature of ANN's.
I wish them the best of luck. Their stories of starting out with very little and ending up a success are inspirational through tough times, at least for me.

To really end it, look at who profits off of people always being unhappy and fighting one another.

Best bet, walk away. Don't get personal over anything, even if it's your life's work. Settle and start something new.
My point is that the only “price” that matters in the end is the total amount you pay, with shipping. If shipping is separate then they’re not really showing you “the price,” they’re just showing you a somewhat arbitrary number that sets a floor on the actual price you’ll pay.
If it fits the rules, you could post a Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/show
> Go biggest advantage isn't the language, its the decent documentation and standard library design

Which, ironically, Java is just superior in every way when it comes to documentation of the standard library. Large open source Java projects are well designed and very well documented, unlike golang projects.
We're a bit past that right now.
This is the internet, just posting that something is true because your grandfather said it is does not make it true, literally anyone could use that as 'proof' for anything. You and OP are both going to need to produce more data/sources to support your differing claims.
It's worth pointing out that nobody has 'colonized' the sea yet. Not once in the history of the world. Sure there are ships and large platforms but nothing as self-supporting as a colony.

As has been said before by others: I'll believe we're ready to colonize Mars or space after we've colonized the Sahara Desert, Antarctica, and the bottom of the ocean - all of which are vastly easier.
That might apply to Facebook. But governments are loath to show a force like this which might destabilize markets. It’s not blockbuster action sequences it’s a slow transition of power.
That viewpoint is quite close to Stoicism.

While the dictionary definition is a little stuffy ("an ancient Greek school of philosophy founded at Athens by Zeno of Citium. The school taught that virtue, the highest good, is based on knowledge; the wise live in harmony with the divine Reason (also identified with Fate and Providence) that governs nature, and are indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.") a more approachable view is to simply be grateful for the good things one has and appreciate them, understanding that things could always be worse. A form of optimism, if you will, but one that should be moderate.

The extreme of this was parodied by Dr. Pangloss in Candide, by the French philosopher Voltaire. No matter the horrors the good Doctor observed or the fates which befell him (war, murder, disease, pestilence, etc.) he always absurdely celebrated what he found and proclaimed the majesty and greatness of this, "the Best Of All Possible Worlds!" Voltaire's mockery of contemporary philosophers via this character was as entertaining as it was thorough.

Finding a balance is key.
I thought it was the nucleus on the muscle cells, not the mitochondria but I might be wrong.
How is it better to have only one of something and give it a class that nothing else uses than to use IDs how they're intended?
> Cambridge Analytica and the data they stole through Facebook was pivotal for the UK's "Leave" campaign.

Source?

update, pls see my comment before downvoting: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19192463
To me this seems really implicit and magical and strange.

Where is template getting assigned to the code inside the script tag?

Does OtherComponent somehow mysteriously map to other-component? How does one pass arguments to it? Is a .vue file actually HTML or is it parsed somehow to be HTML?

The thing I like about React is the explicitness of it. This is a source code file that exports component X. Component X uses style Y as defined above because it's explicitly passed in as a prop, etc etc.
> But in practice, anything other than "Hillary Clinton is completely healthy" and "Trump is a Russian puppet" is categorized as fake news.

By whom? No serious fact checking effort I've seen suffers from that problem.
> Couldn't get started on what?

On owning them.

> Anyone can buy in at market value and start using coins for their stored value

Not everybody can, that's the point.

Almost nobody can, expanding the first point.

It's not really a democratic and open process.

It involves a lot of prerequisites that are usually not met by the general population.

> Look at Venezela's attitude towards Bitcoin.

You mean Maduro's?

AFAIK Maduro made bitcoin mining illegal in Venezuela and arrested more than a few miners.

Or do you mean the Petro Coin (a total scam currency) that Maduro tried to force down Venezuelan's throats?
I am involved with research that takes blood cells from a patient population and coaxes them into neurons. Seems like magic, but it is happening.
Timely! We just added a super-efficient implementation of Online Non-negative Matrix Factorization to Gensim.

Jupyter notebook tutorial:

https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/gensim/blob/nmf_speedup...

What's unique about this implementation is that it's streamed, i.e. can process arbitrary amounts of data in constant RAM. It's also heavily optimized for sparse inputs (~text corpora, not just dense images), just like the optimized sparse SVD, LDA, FastText etc in Gensim.
Most people on here tend to be anti-censorship, based on my impression of past discussion re: EG recent Tumblr content changes, but seem to be largely in favour of it when it comes to "fake news".
Best Innovations Witnessed in CES 2019 – Part 2
Kodak's Discovery of A-Bomb Testing (2016)
The original proposition was that Prime wasn't geting you free shipping -- that pre-dates Prime -- it was getting you upgraded to two-day service rather than the standard wait-a-week ground shipping.
So you can just use styled-components as in the OP
Far fewer to almost none, BUT by the same token interchange rates on bank/debit cards are way lower than they are on credit cards.
I bet the 16.5" is from maximizing the screen size while keeping the same form factor
You are complaining about react's philosophy itself, which is they don't want to make any choices for you.
Fingers crossed but don't bet on it
I took a fun cooking class in college that was targeted at home cooking.

We did double blind taste tests on nearly every type of food we could think of. It's still amazing to me how infrequently the brand name won in terms of flavor.

Take that as you will, sample size was only about 25 students and my memory might be flawed. But I'll never buy brand name chocolate chips again in my life, I remember that much.
I love your site! All the areas for improvement you mention are things that can be fixed. The unique style and creative presentation are awesome!
Would be a really niche monitor
Keep in mind that many golang programmers just parrot what the golang authors say, without fully understanding it or even realizing the golang authors are wrong (not saying that's the case in this specific instance).

They hear the golang authors complain about Java, that it's the only way to do things, so they think that the only other solution is to go the extreme opposite way, not even looking at real modern languages (which golang isn't) like Kotlin or even C# for instance.

It's very evident that the golang authors have no experience designing language, and didn't look in depth at what other languages did.
Lessons Learned from Not Using Webpack
This can definitely be true and I personally find that the writing style of Clark's tutorials could use some polish -- his random switches between scientific and colloquial styles within a single tutorial can annoy both engineers and artists. I also heard that he does not like debate that he deems repetitive and is not be the friendliest opponent to his critics.

That said, the criticism above is very scarce on details. What exactly is the nonsense about mathematical concepts that he is objecting to? Roger's data describe his metrics, methodology, data and conclusions (not to the level required to publish in Nature, but better than most websites on the topic). One can argue with either or all of those, but such arguments should include the rigor at least to the level used on Clark's site.

That way we can understand what are some reasonable simplifications that are OK even if not strictly correct (e.g., when we tell middle school kids that equation x^2 = -1 has no solutions without into complex numbers or axioms of R) and which are genuine, major errors.

But the strongest argument going for Clark, IMO, is his stunning pictures. If his methods describe how he produced them, I am interested in reading more. My 2c, corrections welcome.
I don't have too great a desktop (i5 from more than 4 years ago (launch date was apparently 2011) and 16 gigs with more than half already used, no graphics card) and I could open the 291M file just fine in viewnior.
I would be fine with that, but I am not hugely into crypto. I have a bit of BTC somewhere. I considered the money gone as soon as I got it. Had gotten a chunk of money and wanted some of it to go somewhere where it could theoretically make me money. I did increase it at one point by going from BTC to Tether after prices went up, then back again on a dip. I don't even check its worth anymore, it's $100 or less I think. Just a little fun thing. Crypto as a concept still seems interesting to me even if it's not a major interest of mine. Similarly I think ipfs and freenet and such are cool, but have yet to get involved with them.