skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I use re-frame/reagent with ClojureScript

I personally feel like what's really missing here is something like a generic spec (not a generator, but a descriptive standard) for the structure and organization of CRUD-style JS/JS-derivative SPAs, something like what re-ducks (https://github.com/alexnm/re-ducks) did for the Redux world.
> "One is a 1920s Singer. It’s super basic, doesn’t even have a reverse, but it’s bullet proof."

That goes for much earlier models too. Recently, during a factory clean-up, I came across a Singer that predates yours by some 50 years—it was made in the early 1870s—1874 to be precise—and it too was built out of cast iron and made to last seemingly for ever (it was still quite functional).

Incidentally, you can tell the date of your Singer easily by by checking the many Singer serial number databases on the Web. Here's a couple to start with:

http://www.sewingshop.com/dateyourmachine.aspx

https://sewalot.com/dating_singer_sewing_machine_by_serial_n...
It could. Adobe has a model to generate speech from arbitrary text. All it needs is typical samples from a speaker and transcripts for training. You could easily make it sound like Obama, for example. It will match intonation, timing, etc. and maybe insert the occasional "uhm" or "uh" when appropriate.
But cheaper cost for everyone else also, provided they own the tech. That seems an argument for wide distribution. (Do you want to be the lone human voice against the bots or do you want to have your own bots to amplify your voice?)
I understand the concern wrt E. Coli (I assume you were referring to O157:H7 -- the number after the O refers to the antigen produced by the lipopolysaccharide layer, and H refers to the flaggelar antigen, so H157 is likely an error). Also, the USDA has categorized other E. Coli stains as adulterants: O26, O131, O145, O45, O111, O121.

Also, Salmonella has a tendency to grow in ground production areas and is a concern as well. The fact of the matter is, ammonia disinfection is a tool to combat these threats, and is useful even in instances where proper food handling practices are observed. After all, if ground beef is prepared correctly by the consumer (i.e. cooked to 160F, not cross-contaminated), then it's a moot point anyway. But we still do all of this as a precaution to protect people. And because it's the law.
Europe doesn’t allow pink slime. Any meat product requiring it to be disinfected because of potential fecal contamination will not fly in EU.
The use of the words 'sleep' and 'dream' make me instantly skeptical.
Face swap software is only one form of video editing software, and video editing software has been used to deceive people from the moment it was first created. You can easily use adobe aftereffects or blender to deceive people.

Check out the "CaptainDisillusion" channel on youtube, it's full of examples of people deceiving others using video editing software. To my knowledge none of the examples he's talked about have used face swapping.
The point: "It's long and heavy" isn't any sort of good reason to believe it can't be messed with. That incident also demonstrates China's willingness to play chicken with US assets.

Throw a steel cable into its prop, get too close using another sub or two, etc.
USA NACHA system is old. It's fixed width files transmitted via SFTP or web portals and manually uploaded to other banks.
Indeed, it's a common confusion for French-speakers. Nevertheless for AIL, we came with the acronym first...
You're worth more as a person with more stars. They're like upvotes, basically.
Mastercard has a service like this also, but I seem to recall that last time I tried it, it required to have Flash installed, so I didn't use it.
> I would also wholeheartedly recommend separating the development into two teams (frontend / backend) . It makes both pieces of the application even more robust due to both teams guarding the interface with the other part even better.

In theory, we should strive for that. In practice, back-end team tend to strive on "technical purity" and would ask the front-end team to take any hacks/workarounds necessary to deliver "compelling" user-experience. One example would be the disagreement over "Data Model" of front-end vs back-end.
While a pure YC ETF doesn't exist, there are several YC demo day funds that approximate it. Both FundersClub and AngelList run funds you can invest in every batch that invest in many of the YC companies.
I grew up learning programming at early age.
Things got more reliable, and more automatic too. Setting up a web page is easy, dynamic db apps are trivial now. In the pas you would have to do all that yourself

However, if you somehow get into new areas, it feels similar. Like smart home tools of today are very badic and requires a lot of troubleshooting.
> Model wise this is just openAI's GPT with some very slight modification (laid out in the paper).

> The secrecy and controversy makes no sense if the model is open, even the methodology of data collection is laid out.

This is exactly why I found the results so compelling: It suggests that this technology is already accessible to some big players: The odds that a Big Corp. or govt agency has already begun using the technology are high, which is precisely why the public needs to start thinking about it.

I cannot know exactly why OpenAI chose to withhold the model, especially given how easy it would be to recreate, but even if we assume that OpenAI withheld the full model purely to drum up controversy, the controversy is justified, as it's very likely that this technology is already in the hands of a few big players.
To address your concern, here is a guide to vegan Omega 3 supplements -- from PETA (including, for example, walnuts):
https://www.peta.org/living/food/vegan-recipes-packed-with-o...

Fish get their Omega 3s from algae; people can get Omega 3s directly from algae as well; see:
http://www.berkeleywellness.com/supplements/other-supplement...
"Derived from various types of micro-algae, algal oil is gaining popularity among vegans and other people who want a source of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (EPA and DHA) but don’t want to get them from fish or fish-oil supplements. But it’s also gaining buzz because it’s a more sustainable alternative to deriving oil from fish (due to declines in certain fish populations) and doesn’t pose the risk of contamination with pollutants, such as PCBs, that are found to some degree in many fatty fish."
> Anyways, it was worth it, Andrej is doing an amazing job, and OpenAI is still alive :)

Tesla does not even offer their full self driving package anymore. No coast to coast drive yet. Hard to say that's an amazing job.

OpenAI abandons their open source GitHub repos after a year, is now not releasing code, and is always in DeepMind's shadow. Alive, yes. Successful, no.
But an outbreak implies other children caught measles (the article suggests other children at their school) so they also weren't vaccinated presumably.
This works. Now you only need double the engineers to create the same app as you would using a server side framework. Hardly a more powerful argument against SPAs than this.
Check out buildah, it's a tool that builds container images using real shell commands, with no big fat Docker daemon necessary. So instead of a COPY command, you can just use cp.
This particular recruiter was a partner at a small company where he owned it with another recruiter.

I worked with another guy in both sides, from getting a job and hired people through him. He was definitely under corporate pressure. He would routinely send job descriptions with salaries and they were well targeted.
That's not unexpected, with the popularity more companies apply - even some who would have never done it in past. So, I'd assume applications will continue to grow and acceptance rate should be going down. If the acceptance rate stays the same, I guess YC is lowering the bar. This likely happened already given the top ranking post from a YC member saying that acceptance is same still even though many more apply.
These articles with headlines relating artificial neural networks with brain functioning via some superficial analogy are obnoxious. This kind of reporting based on fresh individual papers is getting out of hand. This work might lead to Nobel prize winning insights, or end up as a completely irrelevant footnote in scientific history. Writing profound-sounding headlines about unknown value with regards to long-term progress is awful sensationalism that leads to loss of credibility of publishing org ("the boy who cried wolf") and encourages the worst kind of flag planting culture among researchers.

I don't know why I'm so riled up by this article; it's just the last straw on the camel's back. Putting up with this is exhausting.
I wonder to what extent the Lena image has stayed around longer than technically warranted because of a desire to avoid PC pushback.
I used Dvorak for about 5 years. Switch to it was hard. Stopped in 2008 when I got a nice Dell XPS laptop at work without approval to mod the keyboard. Soon after that switched back to QWERTY with all the other computers as well.

Main issues during this brief encounter:

- there was not a really big difference in speed, even after the training period;

- nobody was able to use my computer, having half of the keys blank also helped;

- it was very hard to use normal QWERTY that happened to be... everywhere; every coworker had it; or laptop you had for taking random notes.
You simply trade back-end frameworks complexities for the front-end framework complexities. With the right architecture there is no huge difference IMO, just of course you also need to upgrade your teams so that they can handle a lot more tasks on the front-end than with SSRs (and you'll probably need less back-end devs)
I said, and I quote: "can it defend itself? Should it?"

Armed, unmanned robots change the calculus on both sides of an engagement.
There's no reason that the company couldn't pay interest on the money you lent it.
There's also the personal enjoyment factor. People that run long distances rarely need that skill level. People that sing for fun don't need to do it. It's great to push your abilities just for its own sake. Lots of us just enjoy it.
500 Startups and AngelPad also seem fairly well-known. I'd love to hear from someone more involved in the VC community about how those two accelerators are generally regarded.
Constructive murder is also known as felony murder in the US: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_rule. It can lead to some seemingly strange outcomes:

“For example, 20-year-old Florida resident Ryan Holle was convicted of first-degree murder for lending his car to a friend, who used the car in a burglary during which a murder was committed.”
If every recruiter has responded "thanks for responding and thanks for being up front.", it just means a wasted opportunity. Some of them could probably give you the $Y, but might think that the only thing you consider is money - and you know how HR is.

I know the game sucks either way, but I'd rephrase your answer a little and use it as a second e-mail, not first.
You’ll face kickback from ad agencies over that: the third party requests are also used by the agency to track that the impression/click/etc did actually occur and the publishers aren’t just lying about it to boost their numbers.
I don't think they're stonewalling the issue. They need to figure out what happened, they need to figure out who got affected, they need to figure out how to refund their money, with ACH it's slow. Friday is the worst day, banks are closed Sat, Sun and Mon (Banking holiday, President's day), their customer service lines, emails are probably flooded. Their legal team might have already taken a few calls, their PR department is working as hard as possible, their retention team is also trying hard to keep business. The dev team needs to also find a solution. They need to do all this, and their postmortem report probably needs to be reviewed by legal to reduce any future exposure.

Nothing will make the users happy till their money is refunded and that will not happen till Wednesday. Earliest day they can submit refunds will be Tuesday, it will show up on Wed. Same day ACH is not going into effect till Sep 2020.
Coding to an API spec is one of the most freeing things I have done as a backend engineer. We use JSONAPI at work, and while it still leaves things open to interpretation and places to fill in gaps, having a standard just frames everything for the better. Tooling can be created on either side with explicit expectations, and we can give new employees a link to the spec to know how things are supposed to work. It's great.
If you look at it as a PR stunt, it is almost certainly a good idea. If a bad actor can auto-generate text that is not really distinguishable from something written by a human, how does a community with open membership (eg, HN) protect itself? I imagine this technology will enable interesting new attacks against online communities; we havn't seen that for a while.

OpenAI are extremely sensible to draw attention to the fact that AI is approaching a boundary that has practical implications. It is good that everyone is being alerted that that boundary might be crossed at any time in the foreseeable future.
I think abstractly in these terms too, probably too much so. Whenever my wife or I purchase something or throw it away, I ask myself how much we just debited from the earth. I wonder how one would actually go about defining this measure?
Should have retitled this "Not Remember the Story You Previously Submitted"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14541465
SeaBubbles shows off its ‘flying’ all-electric boat in Miami
It seems possible to make AIS receiver using RTL-SDR + RPI. I am about to make it, there's a couple of guides online.
Show HN: ByteScout Data Playground – filter, sort CSV using natural language
I’ve used this strategy before, but I find recruiters do not respond politely and I end up getting increasing amounts of spam over time; I suspect from recruiters sharing email addresses and especially addresses that are linked with any kind of recent response.

When recruiters do respond to these types of messages, my usual experience is that it’s an even more aggressive hard-sell on positions based on some poorly copy / pasted sections of a job description, incoherent lists of buzzwords or technologies that make no sense as skills belonging to one single person (e.g. years of machine learning experience as well as expert in rails), and various all caps or bolded promises that they are paying a lot of money.

This comes from every type of recruiter too, from giant big box headhunting looking for contractors to the latest and greatest stuff like cybercoders to boutiques like phaidon / huxley / other finance crap, on down to lone individual recruiters who have been doing it for 20 years and only got my email because a friend highly recommended them as a legit recruiter.

Truly, in over a decade of working with all types of recruiters, I have never seen a recruiter add value for any party at any time. It’s pure loss to engage with recruiters.
I really wish I could upvote this twice. Tacking on features to a traditional MVC app causes orders of magnitude more technical debt and buggy, tightly-coupled, unmaintainable or extensible spaghetti code. React et al. didn't pass through a membrane from another reality for the sole purpose of annoying devs with more stuff to learn -- they're elegant, powerful solutions to the rapid growing pains and requirements of our modern web. The SPA pattern of completely separating front-end & back-end concerns is seemingly taking over the world for very good reason.
54-propeller superdrone lifts off with a person inside(2015)
I think it's still a great starting point, especially, for someone who has no place to start when looking for specific libraries.
It would be good to annotate with perhaps a Pros/Cons for each item in that list (pull requests, maybe?). So that you can choose whatever fits your needs.
Having people trust you is a concrete gain for being honest. Hiding the truth to avoid liability demonstrates that you're not trustworthy. To me, it's fundamentally unethical, though I know it's often promoted as "practical" in our culture.

They should be bending over backwards to try and restore their users' trust. It's insulting that they expect us to go by faith alone.
It's a useful term that I like to use when politicians propose something stupid or harmful that is related to digital technology. It's fitting because it sometimes seems that they want to push their visions of how the internet should work on others. A good example is the current copyright reform of the EU.
i’ve found that too much in lining, especially with a lot of inline closures can throw testability out the window, but the examples here are pretty good as each example is showing how to recompose each function for clarity and usefulness, not turning them into huge inline monstrosities, of which i am all too familiar ^_^;

[edit: fix grammar]
So having read the article, why does limiting work-in-progress work? Because it allows you to finish more work that you start? I struggled a little bit initially with the generic concepts used for modeling. But I suppose the real insight is that, focusing only on these 3 basic parameters (work started, work finished, and number of developers), you can get wildly different results. Is that a fair reading?

This is a topic to which I've given a fair deal of attention in leading software development teams using scrum. Especially after reading Donald Reinertsen's Principles of Product Development Flow, where he approaches this topic in more depth:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22586058-the-principles-...

Limiting work-in-progress was a major principle in Reinertsen's book. Another related one which I've applied successfully in practice: limit batch size. In my case using scrum, this meant keeping user stories within a certain size range (2-5 points).

This has an important benefit: it controls scope creep. It does this a couple ways: 1. It's helps during planning avoid overlooking complications or other costly delays before works gets started. 2. When a story starts to creep during development, you tend to catch it sooner and control it more effectively.

Which helps get stuff done, which helps limit WIP, which as the article suggests helps get stuff done.
> I do.

Good for you. However not all kids are the same so what activities worked well for you might not work well for other families - despite their best efforts.

Like I said - we have tried doing needlework with my son with a kit that was specifically designed for kids. So my comments are not without precedence.

> ...and that is the 'secret' to raising self-reliant children: involve them in common tasks when those tasks are performed anyway. This does not take any "high-roading" as you imply, it just takes a little bit of forethought and might make things go a bit slower than they normally would.

Geez, I wish I thought of that. So all those years I've spent playing number and word games with them; teaching them to cook, handle scissors, knives, gas cookers and even open fires responsibly; how to do a great many DIY projects with power tools safely and engage in their curiosity for the natural world was all just a waste of time because I didn't happen to do that one thing you do. /s
So an article about recycling generated by OpenAI model (best out of 25) already makes more sense than presidential speeches or most of ramblings of average politicians. Can we automate them away as well?
It doesn't look like anyone has yet addressed my biggest PRO for switching to Dvorak. It has pretty much healed my RSI. QWERTY had caused a huge drain on my ability to type. I was at risk for being unable to continue my work if the pain progressed.

I made the admittedly-difficult switch to Dvorak and that went away almost immediately. My typing speed is on-par with what it was with QWERTY. I can type out conversational English in real time, and that's about my functional limit. I don't consider that a selling point, but for those of you with wrist pain I can wholeheartedly recommond Dvorak.
This is just their billing system, not the way sellers are paid?

I was very active in the Etsy community back when they start planning to implement their own payment system. At the time, I perceived them to have a record of continual incompetence paired with insensitive or hostile customer service. I was very wary, along with friends of mine in the community, of something such as this occurring to me. I certainly have never trusted them with my money.

The response is typical of the vague, downplaying way I remember them handling problems way back in 2008.

“We're aware of a bill payment error affecting a small group of sellers which resulted in some cards being incorrectly charged. We don't expect this error to impact additional sellers going forward.”
Technically correct ;-)
If you want to learn how to touch type without changing your layout I can recommend getting blank keycaps, that very quickly got rid of my bad habit of looking at the keyboard to "make sure" the keys were actually where I thought they were when typing.

Also I think it's worth mentioning that the QWERTY layout was likely designed for transcribing Morse code which explains some parts of its layout.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/fact-of-fiction-...
Yes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVNvEGe2UOA&list=PLPXsMt57rL...
Will you? Why would you avoid a person that is doing all the paper work, has some knowledge of the position already, and will have much more selling time with the employer than you could get? Just to save your future employer some money?

I can imagine people going through the extra work of avoiding the recruiter if they think it will increase the odds of they getting the job (what means they think the recruiter is incompetent or dishonest), or if working with the recruiter is even more work than going without (what again means the recruiter is incompetent). But I can't imagine people doing that without a problem by the recruiter part.

I can also imagine many developers sending the emails directly to the trash, and latter finding out about the position and applying by themselves. That could give one the wrong impression.
Journalists love making clickbait headlines like this, but if you read the article it’s just separating the NN’s processing into two phases: one for consolidation of learned material, and one for learning. Calling the former “sleeping and dreaming” is a stretch.
You could move closer to where you work, so you have a 15 minute bike ride to and from there every day, saving you two and a half hours. Use that time to mend things so that you save money, which you can use to pay for the more expensive house! Problem solved, you can thank me later...
>"Women don't learn how to sew and men don't learn how to woodwork, and no one knows how to budget."

Gender issues not withstanding, you're absolutely correct, the tragedy is that very few people of either gender know to do these skills today and it's resulted in some very negative consequences.

As I've pointed out in a rather long post below, we desperately need to regain many of them and there's multiple good reasons why we should do so ASAP.
Hi,

Made this Data Playground to help non-technical people to work with CSV files by filtering, sorting, viewing data from them using natural language questions like: "Show 5 recent orders", "Get customers with email like Berry", "Get orders with size like XL".

For technical people it also can work with SQL queries (just use the special switch).

The app works online, any suggestions and comments would be appreciated!
Finally, I was waiting for this.

I was sending money from UK to Romania and it was so expensive. About time to challenge those fees.