skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sv3rige aka Gatis is notorious for being bashful about his consumption of fruit and vegetable juice but maybe supplementing with human blood lowers one's vitamin C requirement?

He doesn't say much about the blood's nutritional content in the clip here but he does express what might be a feeling of sexual arousal at around 2:50: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RX9T4xJqxFo
There's been a whole bunch of unexpected benefits.

Physical junk mail has noticeably gone down. So much so the Royal Mail issued a profit warning because GDPR had decreased total volume 10% or some such. Well that was unexpected, but grounds for flags and parties by itself.

> Just a few years ago that would never have been a topic

Really? I remember discussions at UK startups and larger places I worked about whether such and such was a part of the Data Protection 1998, whether some data should exist, or whether we were covered by the regs at all.

Far as I can see the big positives of GDPR are the tidying up and extending what constitutes personal data and plugging some of the loopholes. That and the max penalty has been increased enough to hope multinationals start caring too.
HN is like 50% ads, 50% programmers.

Enjoy the good, ignore the bad.
South Africa. Just a laptop & cellphone.
But log in is also a phrasal verb...
> Most password managers don’t do jack inside a native app (for good security reasons - thank you Apple)

This isn't true on iOS 12; there's a pretty good OS-wide password manager API. (And older versions of iOS don't get security updates so your device is pretty easy to compromise if you're not upgrading.) It securely pops up the password manager similar to popping up a share screen, so no copying and pasting is involved.

> A number of services force you to change passwords every couple of months. They save (may be hash) the old passwords so you can’t use them. How many goddamn passwords is one supposed to remember?

One. You put the changed passwords in your password manager, too.
>Is is being CsTreated since eight years, why we do have radioactive Caesium still accumulating in the coast?

As far as I know, this is because about 10 PBq of Cs-137 was released during the accident and the released material is transferred by ocean currents. CsTreat is being used for purification of the water, which is pumped into and out the containment to keep core remnants cool. Nowadays the releases are very limited if any.

>This is very reasonable, but storing sand for 50 years somewhere is technically feasible...

You're right. Also CsTreat is solid, rock/sand-like material. It can be stored as mixed into concrete and disposed as low/intermediate-level radioactive waste.

Now you probably want to ask: Why there is huge amounts of radioactive water stored at the plant site? Because of tritium, which is chemically equal to hydrogen and is very expensive to separate from water. Under normal operating licenses of NPPs, you could release such water into environment, but at Fukushima standards are nowadays peculiar.
RIOT-2019.01 – Release Notes
Outline:

https://outline.com/VMWqxS
Thanks everyone for the corrections, obviously my understanding was flawed there!
Haha. Not quite but we did wait.

The logistical stuff is difficult as a postdoc. A traditional wedding is fairly expensive and time-consuming to plan, and many postdocs are cash and time poor. People often like to have the ceremony near family—-isn’t the bride’s hometown traditional?—-but people move, often very far, to find good positions. Traveling back and forth is also tricky if you have experimental time points or lab animals to take care of, as we did.

More psychologically, being a postdoc is a weird transitional state. I felt odd promising life-long commitment and support to one person, while not knowing if my own job was still going to support me next year. (I was on one-year renewable contracts).

Finally, we were a little concerned that being married could make things more difficult for my wife. Although they shouldn’t, a surprising number of profs are reluctant to take on a postdoc who might be ‘distracted’ with a spouse or kids. Furthermore, if you have a kid as a professor, you often get an extension in the tenure clock, help with daycare, etc. As a postdoc, you can maybe get a little more time on these time-limited fellowships, but that’s about it.

We eventually did get married though (and it’s been great) but waiting was not totally irrational.
The police should deal with illegal content. Anything else that offends someone should be easy to ignore with personal filters.
> All benchmarks were ran on an X1 Carbon 2016 (i7 U6600 + 16 GB) in Node.js 11.9.0.

They should test on average hardware and not on the top one. Take a 2013 year Celeron or Atom with 2 Gb of RAM and HDD and test on it.

Regarding privacy, I think the code that blocks network requests could run in an isolated environment so that it cannot send the information about requests outside.
The limits of browser checks
Actually Visa's Credit Assessment rate is .14%. They raised their prices by 1bpt in January 2019 and wrote themselves a $500 Million check by doing so. This is one of the reasons why Visa's stock performs so well over time.
> The blocking engine operated by either Safari or Chrome is a black-box and independent devs will have a harder time understanding it, tweaking it, improving it, debugging it.

I mean, both engines are open-source, but yeah, I do agree that it would be nice it have this enshrined in a web standard rather than a de-facto one driven by the shins of two large corporations.

> You also don't get feedback regarding the rules which matched on a page and this makes it harder to debug or give nice insights to users.

This seems like an easy tooling problem to fix.
The text usually is from Wikipedia and the tabulated data seems to come from Wikidata.
The title is super clickbaity and quite simply myopic.

I suspect that creativity means many different things to many people but narrowing it down to software is simplistic imho.
You're right, from the point of view of a sufficiently strong logic and a sufficiently strong prover for that logic!

But:

> N is either ...

In a type system like Prolog's, N can also be any of:

f(Y)
apple_pie
N (a free variable)

You assume a type and mode system in which X and N must be bound, and they must be bound to ground natural number terms. You also assume that the logic programming system can deduce positive information from the failing unification on an infinite domain (that X must be s(0) if it is not 0 and not of the form s(s(N)))).

It's possible that the article's author also had all these implicit assumptions, but it's not clear to me that they did.
> The current web request APIs can delay approval/rejection of any request for an indefinite amount of time to perform arbitrary computation (including IO or talking to other extensions) to decide.

I believe this is the reason Safari introduced content blockers. It fits in very well with the traditional computing model on iOS of preventing unbounded, arbitrary computing where possible.
>There's a modern movement of people adopting an all-carnivore diet [1][2], who report it to be effective at overcoming conditions like autoimmune illness, depression and other chronic illnesses that defied other forms of treatment.

Famously, Jordan Peterson:

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/08/the-peter...
thanks, worked for me.
There are also people reporting that they have cured cancer with crystals. I mean, always consider the source.
It's always from slightly worse to no absorption at all though, if you take them as supplements. Getting them from food is optimal.
> Navigate to the site, open the password manager, copy and paste the username and password into their respective fields.

This leaves you vulnerable to (at least) two attacks:

1) Phishing. The password manager extension will refuse to send the password to the wrong site; it can't be fooled when tired the same way you can be fooled when tired.

2) The password stays around in your clipboard. There's a general risk of accidentally pasting it (e.g. to the next site you log into). There's a specific risk of sites that capture activity on unsubmitted form fields, which is becoming way too common.

You should decide for yourself how you weigh these risks, but I'm a pretty paranoid person (e.g., I have a Chromebook in a corner of my room which I use as an SSH / web client for certain high-security sites like my domain registration and maintaining certain servers) and my conclusion is that the risk of phishing and mispastes is high and the risk of my particular password manager extension having serious bugs is much lower.

> Yes, it's less convenient, but as we know convenience is the bane of security.

I'll be honest, I don't know that. Security keys are more convenient than SMS-based 2FA, and significantly more secure. Signal is more convenient than PGP, and (depending on threat model) more secure in real-world use. Doing string processing in Python is way more convenient than doing it in C, and way more secure.

"It's annoying, therefore it must be secure" is a fallacy. Sure, there's some correlation, but it's not a perfect correlation.
Fighting one dirty tactic (manifest v3) with another, though. I'm more alarmed about the former.
Today 70% of the adult US population is classified as overweight. Globally the rate is 30% and rising, at some 2.3 billion people now. The top three global causes of death are "lifestyle-related" illnesses. Perhaps dwelling a little on what we eat is reasonable.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and...
Yup, I’m not saying that the old API should be killed; it’s just that it’s convenient to have the new one and be able to “trust” the extension to not be able to slow down my browsing, steal information from the page, etc. but also be able to fall back to something I do trust for what gets through if necessary.
> The sad reality of modern "decentralized" software is that organizations, people behind it don't even have any intentions to make it decentralized, to give up control

All the examples of decentralized software mentioned in the article are fully open source. They don't need to "give up control", because they are not necessarily in control.

It is of course true that they run the most used implementation of the software, and that the project is centralized around that. That's mostly a result of these projects being run as meritocracies; any person or group who wishes could aid in removing that initial organizational centralization. The original authors also simply know the most about running their own software in production.
LIVE STREAMING Iran vs. China RRC, FREE Live Stream AFC Asian
https://qiita.com/zomDut02/items/26c79390361ad6e166d7

https://qiita.com/Wanted/items/71ca543924a8243641e5

https://qiita.com/gundaRj/items/ab93af829b24892c8477

https://qiita.com/SmKnoBolod/items/fe398c8fa69a3de388d5

https://qiita.com/Lalu_Mama/items/80dc7883d5be6225b86e

https://qiita.com/BacchuVai/items/ac863c905e7e772dbc25

https://qiita.com/HaydarKaku/items/022ea686e68d2de655ff
But if you encrypted them, there is no reason to also sign them. Either you have the key to decrypt, thus you did it, or you don't, so you didn't.

Signing is for verification of identity over potentially compromisable channels. Not securing controlled items.
I guess it can be configured to send a "retraction" e-mail to the recipient? I've received some of those at least.
Browsing and discovery within a blockbuster store was far superior to what any of the steaming apps have given us. I absolutely loathe the process of trying to find something to watch these days
Is this the only reason the current house of cards stays up and functions? I think so.

Almost no one realises what companies predict and infer from their data, or the extent of its collection. Once they see some of the surface effects they start calling it creepy or scary.

If people ever start realising the true extent, expect a backlash, surely?
>Nobody would call a python-like language "a python"

Unlike Python, Lisp is not "batteries included". The original and standard definition of Lisp is the handful of special forms in McCarthy's paper.

Dev didn't say they made a Common Lisp -- just a Lisp.
Isn't the design motivated in part because one (or more) of the key contributors actually are/were sailors?

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/05/meet-...
My smartphone is not right next to me unless I'm outside the house. It remains in one place in my home (on my desk). Diff'rent strokes.
Thanks, I might! The "time to completion" metric is important for my continued enjoyment, mostly, as I get frustrated otherwise.
I understand their mindset and circumstances, I live here. It's the same mindset that you see everywhere in the world and I have lived a lot of different places. People don't' like things to change and sometimes they have the political power to ensure that doesn't happen and it turns into this or NIBYISM or neighborhood battles.

It's really that simple. You don't need to turn them into victims or anything like that to explain it.

There is nothing new about the rate of change with regards to Amazon. Had it been another company you wouldn't even have heard about it and it would have been installed. It's purely political opportunism.

All that is left is that these politicians cost new york 25K jobs. That's it.
Here's the whole essay where he made the "lesser author" comment:

https://medium.com/@Powells/how-i-wrote-life-of-pi-6ffe1c017...

He made that comment as a hypothetical in the context of a really bad book review. He even said in the very next sentence that the book may possibly have been very well written. I don't think he's trying to make any personal attack.

My personal opinion on plagiarism is that everything is fair game as long as it's clearly acknowledged upfront.
Slightly off topic, but while we're on the subject of graph databases: could anyone point me at some useful introductions to the subject? Thank you.
From Vimperator to Tridactyl (2018)
Afaik, you "sign up" for something, like a newsletter, or health insurance. You sign into a hotel, ie leave your signature at the check-in (or sign-in) desk. Btw, also not a native speaker.
Wikipedia's text content is licensed under CC-BY-SA, which means that if Google isn't giving attribution somewhere then they would be in violation of the license.
I was just saying that instead of all the hassle of going into production with self-supported, on-prem Kubernetes on top of some new-ish distro, the sane way seems to go with Red Hat's Kubernetes on top of a battle-tested distro with extra security features that is all supported.

If you want to run your prod workloads on self-supported Kubernetes with SELinux and similar features yourself, sure you could do that. Is that sane? I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader. What do I know, maybe it is.
Minisign's counterpart for encryption is encpipe (https://github.com/jedisct1/encpipe).
WCF for the Real World, Not Hello World
Cool, don't hezitate to shoot me a message to give your feedback or if you meet any difficulty in the process
The Most Positive Changes Through Positive Doubts
For securely sharing data online, you may also want to consider Piknik https://github.com/jedisct1/piknik
All humans are unique in their own way- thus what might be working on some humans it might have a different effect in some others. As an example: My wife has horrible migraines almost every other week. She has followed so many different diets that worked for some others but didn’t even improve her migraines at all. Simply put, be mindful about what you read and what you put in your body.
I have often felt that programming is an art form,

whose real value can only be appreciated

by another versed in the same arcane art;

there are lovely gems and brilliant coups

hidden from human view and admiration, sometimes forever,

by the very nature of the process.

You can learn a lot about an individual

just by reading through his code,
even in hexadecimal.

Mel was, I think, an unsung genius.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/story-of-mel.html
There's nothing wrong with an infeasible thought experiment. Frictionless surfaces and spherical cows are a staple of learning physics. The problem is when the author describes them as "greased surfaces" or "watermellon shaped cows" and asks you to treat them as perfectly frictionless or spherical.

Describing the rope as being "steel" instead of "rigid" is just needlessly confusing.
I think it's definitely worth exploring this angle because modern JIT compilers have become very advanced, and there's still a lot of juice left to squeeze there. Look at some of the things Graal is doing and it looks a lot like what OOO speculation is doing - it'll recompile branches on the fly based on profiling information and things like that.
As someone old enough to have used search engines extensively myself and watching over others using it during the AV - Google transition, I can definitely say that defaulting to AND was one of the most important reasons Google appeared to give better results than AV for both advanced and basic folk.
Another problem with lean meat is protein poisoning. If your body has no other sources of energy than protein, you’ll eventually produce too much waste for your kidneys and liver to handle.
Two Sigma and Jane Street are known to pay their dev interns $10.4k monthly ($125k annualized). You can find this in #talkpay on Twitter and on Quora, and I can corroborate one of them. I don't think those are the highest, either.
How to calculate the price for acquisition of a mobile game
Other things to remember:

- Personal health and nutrition is one of several criteria by which diets can be compared
- A carnivore diet is harmful to the environment
- A carnivore diet causes more suffering to sentient animals
The power users are the goto point for alot of not power users. So you spend hours and hours of 5 Minutes restoring windows to its original state, and reinstalling that over and over again, when the updates come.
My sources are all sorts of things however as you said yourself if you are not a scientist you don't really have the ability to know what is true and what is false here and so it's much better to see these debates as they flush out the actual disagreements.

No new models have emerged that changes things in any fundamental way again. You are more than welcome to point to it if you think it exist but you won't find it because it's mostly speculation not science.

Epstein is not saying we shouldn't get of fossil fuels he is saying we shouldn't do it before we have a better alternative solar and wind is not that. They won't be delivering more than 2-3% even with heavy heavy investments and they are unreliable they are not clean. They are not solutions to getting of fossil fuel and that exactly the problem. So why on earht would any sany person support something that isn't going to solve the problem just because it's green if its not going to be able to deliver enough energy? That's a waste of taxpayer money which could be used for R&D into proper solutions. That's the problem. Even if we do everything that's in the paris agreement it's estimated that we will only be able to adjust the temperature with less than 1 degree. In what world is that a sane investment?

Better safe than sorry is not a useful argument. The majority of scientists are not saying what you think they are thats the point. They are saying all sorts of things which then get packaged into a catastrophist viewpoint through the media.

You are taking what the media says as truth not the scientists as they science do not make any such predictions what so ever it can't.

Even the person who is arguing against lindzen agrees that the idea of consensus is stupid it's not science.

Science is falsifiable the other thing is a mix of speculation and politics.

The real question you should be asking yourself is exactly what you are prepared to do to reduce carbon footprint. There is no solution out there that will get us off it or even reduce is drastically besides R&D no one is arguing against that.

So again what exactly are you worried about and how far are you prepared to go? You gonna go to war with china over coal plants? If not then it's purely gestures and you go into any government in the world and you will quickly realize that they don't really prioritize it as high as they say they do because they don't either know what exactly they should worry about and what to do about it.
> If people ever start realising the true extent, expect a backlash, surely?

No. Since it has been going on for so long, people, when they realize it now, will rationalize:

• To not have realized it for this long, I must have been stupid.

• I am not stupid.

• Therefore, I must be OK with what is happening.

And they will come up with numerous ridiculous rationalizations – fake reasons to be OK with the current situation, all to avoid admitting to themselves that they did not realize it.
> For example, data about a mobile phone’s past location and movement patterns can be used to predict where a person lives, who their employer is, where they attend religious services and the age range of their children based on where they drop them off for school.

Is it me? I don't consider any of these to be particularly sensitive information.

Where you live: We used to have these things called "phone books" where they listed the name, address, and phone number of everyone in town. The world didn't collapse.

Who their employer is: My name and picture are listed on my employer's public website. Not exactly hard to find.

where they attend religious services: I don't, but of the people I know who do, nobody has ever considered it something they need to hide. Many would want to tell you and ask you to join them.

age range of their children: So? If somebody knows you have a kid aged 5-10, then they can...what?

I mean, I still try to limit how much information I expose online, but if anything this makes me less worried rather than more.
The spying fears look like an excuse to put the Chinese company at a disadvantage.
and yet ensemble methods seem to win an overwhelming proportion of the kaggle competitions and the netflix prize.
I adressed these points already in other places through this thread: Why would it be any different if they just hardcoded the IP to YouTube? Would that also be "not respecting the DNS server from the DHCP client"? What if they used a proprietary protocol (not DNS) to look up the IP to YouTube?

Just because your network provides a DNS server does not mean that it makes sense to use that DNS server for every single IP address lookup in every piece of software. It's there for general internet browsing purposes, not specialized proprietary purposes like this.
Interesting choice for comparison given that Walmart is banned from NYC limits.
Different rover. Spirit and opportunity aren’t RTG powered; curiosity is.
Google gives attribution when text content is used.

For simple bibliographical information like who someone’s spouses is, it is not copyrightable, and no attribution is needed.
which is close enough to "login", which is widely understood (I do have the same issue with "sign in" VS "sign up", I know the difference, but as a non-native speaker it also takes me a second, or sometimes one is more prominent than the other and I mistakenly click on it, etc).

But whatever, ("Sign in" or "Log in") alongside "Register" is clear enough. "Sign in" alongside "Sign up" is confusing. Thanks Al-Khwarizmi for bringing that up... or is it bring in ? ;)
Can anyone explain to me the rationale for the recent trend to split the input of username and password into two steps? I noticed more and more services (including Outlook, iCloud, Evernote, etc.) have adopted such an annoying design, which makes no sense to me. I guess the purpose for doing so is to preempt user from typing a wrong/non-exist username so that server resources for checking unmatched credentials are saved and brutal force attacks are prevented? But do they justify all the hassle caused to daily users?