skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Good luck.

https://qz.com/1258198/conspiracy-theorists-believe-wild-ide...

"It's possible to get through to these people if you're willing to argue in terms they understand"

No, because they would lose their feeling of superiority. On what kind of basis do you want to discuss with them? If you present a fact they will just say: "We don't believe this!"

If you present scientific evidence they will say: "We don't accept this! This is not proof! We want proof".

"Proof" is something that is not not inherent in the scientific method, requiring it shows a total lack of understanding of science.
A lifetime ban because they suspect an account was shared is not "reasonable". One person at most deserves a permanent ban, and it's not the OP. A state/national ID card should be enough to clear things up and solve the "can't just let people create new accounts" problem.
docker run will run a little base image (such as ubuntu), but the host kernel is indeed shared.

The Docker Client and the Docker Daemon (together called the Docker Engine) are running on the Host OS.

Each container shares the Host OS kernel.
As one who cannot get some vaccine shots. I am ever thankful to those that do.
Ha, I failed to notice that even the description is similar: A failed experiment to duplicate the first flame.

“The experiment failed and had terrible consequences, releasing pure chaos and creating a distorted being ... that consumed the witch and her followers. The being became the source of all demons: The Bed of Chaos”

Sounds downright prophetic.
There are two separate things, don't confuse them
Just wondering, which continent are you located in?

Does your company tell its' employees about their Orwellian policies upfront when hiring, or is it a public secret?

How do you deal with encrypted traffic, e.g. https?

Some companies simply filter web traffic via corporate white/blacklists, maybe you have some insights why an illusion of freedom has been chosen in your company?
Build a fully decentralized application with IPFS and Solidity
Somewhat related:

Create an email filter that moves any email with the word “unsubscribe” into its own folder out of the inbox.

It’s an amazing signal for separating direct and bulk mail.
If you want to know more, there are two related books you can read:

The Greatest Estate On Earth, Bill Gammage, on how Australian indigenous land management was much more extensive than commonly thought

Dark Emu, Bruce Pascoe - this one cites the above substantially and is much more polemic, but it looks at more aspects of Australian indigenous life, hunting, trade etc.
IIUC they mix known data in with unknown data.

If you get a lot of the known data wrong, they throw out your answer and make you answer the CAPTCHA again. If you get the known data right, they assume that your answers on the unknown data are correct and use that to label them, then start adding them in as the known data for other people. They might also show the same images to multiple people and see if they give the same answers - if so, it's probably correct and can be labeled, if not throw them out and make them answer the CAPTCHA again.
FWIW RFC 2616 was obsoleted by the newer HTTP/1.1 RFCs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-4.2
This video is just ... all over the place. It's too advanced for a basic audience and too simple for people who have been admins for years. I get what he's trying to say and it's a good production job, but it's trying to hit too wide an audience.
The relevant thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/46ED7555-9383-45D2-A5C...

There's literally one person saying that NFS is crapshot anyway, and several +1s for retries. And the former was accompanied with several questions about the concrete implementation.
One can buy an $700 machine every 5 years and play 3 games per year acquired at steam sales for $10 - $20 each. They can be aaa titles from 2-3 years back or less demanding items.

That is an average of $185 a year for 80 hours of fun or little more than $2 per hour.

One can also get or build a a micro atx machine that does not use much room and hook it up to a kvm switch and a keyboard.

At the touch of a button it goes from an extra monitor for your laptop to connected to your micro desktop.

If you like old games even better a $500 machine could provide hundreds of hours for years.

Say 100 per year and a few hundred hours per year = 50c an hour.

There are a ridiculous amount of classic games.
What makes it a "major" violation? It sounds quite minor to me.
Good question! The great news is that the maker movement has meant lots of the parts you'd use in robotics are now accessible and cheap! For example, you can buy Dynamixel AX-12 robot servos and build your own robot arm for ~$400-$1000. This gives you servos that have accurate positioning and feedback, unlike the super-budget arms that you can get for $100ish.

You can buy robot platforms and sensors from companies like DFRobot, Adafruit, Sparkfun, etc. Hobby 2-D lidar? $300-400. Plenty for personal projects & learning.

> should I buy industrial robot arms and build personal project of automating simple tasks with computer vision, machine control, and machine learning?

It sounds to me that you're interested in the software side of the space. My personal recommendation is if say you're interested in reinforcement learning to learn the algorithms in simulation like Mujoco and Unity. Sure, algorithms that work in sim don't move nicely to the real world, but you don't need your thing to work in real world to learn how it works. And if you _wanted_ to try it in the real world, you could go and learn the hardwarey things. Similarly, if you're interested in supervised learning or vision, you don't need to build robots.

Planning and control you can probably do a lot in sim too but those things have a lot of theory behind them that might be nice to learn in the classroom setting. If I were trying to be a planning & control engineer I'd probably look into a coursera course or something. Thing to remember about RL for control & planning right now is that it doesn't quite work yet.
The whole point of an ombudsman is they operate outside the system and have a higher level of authority, vested in them by management.

They have authority, more or less, to "get shit done".
Ask HN: Best way to manage API secrets and other secrets in teams
Searched a bit around but didn't find a clear answer to this:

API and other secrets/credentials shouldn't be on source control and .gitignored. Still they need to be backed up, shared to team members, updated, etc.

What's the best way to do this (just for server-side apps) without using any paid 3rd party product?
I started a meme newsletter for my friends. I publish it occasionally - not on any schedule, and with whatever content and style I feel like. It's like publishing a small, private website from time to time. And it's completely decentralized, and responses come back straight to me, so there's no fighting in the comments. I almost never post on social media anymore.
There is a very simple solution to this mess which both Apple and Google have created through they duopoly.

Any business that is profitable and employing many people but has single point of failure with Play Store can solve this problem by giving Google some money for a more detailed review with an option to submit additional evidence. Say company X gives Google $10K to do this extended review. If the party wins, Google returns the money and reinstates the account else Google keeps the money.

Secondly, a private arbitrage company which may be setup by all big players in the game that can further review the whole process and provide a neutral view of the whether the ban was warranted or not.

I have advocated with most of these large companies to come together and form an open Privacy Working Group which will advice all companies to adopt privacy standards and also help evolve those standards by a widespread industry participation. If we could do it for HTML, Javascript and Web Standards we can do it for Privacy as well. This will also pre-empt government's heavy handed approach to force these giants to adopt standards that might be completely arbitrary like GDPR.
so if my base image is say ubuntu, `docker run` runs the entire ubuntu os, then also runs the process on top of that os?
Elaborate on some of your ideas or do a blog post?
Its sampled together with other people. If all of them provided the wrong information, you could label something else as a traffic light or whatever.
One the messages told me to go lobby NFS vendors.

Many others were as you note bikeshedding the commit.

Only one, if I recall, questioned why it was a controversial patch at all.

If you check the patch that was committed eventually, IIRC it’s identical to what I proposed.

As I said, I don’t look back particularly favourably on my interactions with the community.
One of the cornerstones of TypeScript is that types do not not alter the semantics of the underlying JavaScript. You can compile TypeScript by just ignoring all the types and dealing with only the minimal syntax which it adds to ES6/7.
In some ways, I feel that this is a systemic problem with mobile app developers. Most these guys have barely any interest in technogy or innovation. As long as they can code something up and make a quick bug they are happy. They should have seen this coming when all their apps had to go through the playstore if they were serious about it.

If they are half as serious about this as usual opensource community they would have built a reasonable alternative to it. It's a disgrace that Android, something paraded as opensource, has taken away the very things it promises to give the community: choice and liberty.
That’s actually good advice, bur doesn’t appear to be applied to mist kids apps. All apps that I’ve come across have been litterd with ads placed in such a way to increase the possibility of the kid accidentally clicking on them. A dark grey UX pattern.
Android does offer those things. Google play store does not. They are two separate things.
Bakkt to Launch Later This Year, ICE CEO Says
Yeah I just saw your producthunt post and I guess you get that a lot, I'll give it a try on a future project.
depends what you mean by running an entire ubuntu os.

It's not running systemd, its just running that one process you asked for. It be as if you booted ubuntu kernel and instead of running systemd to run all sorts of services, you run the single process you wanted. You're running on "ubuntu", but not really, i.e. the file system is provided by ubuntu, but you're not using the normal ubuntu environment with all the services that would start at boot.

You can also have docker containers run systemd if you want, but that's a much more advanced use case.
> I am in utter shock at the lack of customer support from Google.

It's very common now and I think these experiences are kind of a 'coming of age' for newer users.
No, it probably only starts a bash shell in the container. In most cases docker containers only run a single application, not the entire os. It is possible to run everything, but that kind of eliminates on of the big advantages of docker.
Or they didn't think that simply repeating the self-contradicting joke already made added anything to the conversation?
Assuming the developer has been in business for a significant amount of time, there are a lot of signals that help tell you whether an app is legit or not. As a random example, if I look for information aout Overcast (a fairly successful app from an independent developer), I get:

* A bunch of reviews from users, very few of which sound fake: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/overcast/id888422857

* Articles about the app from well-known websites: https://9to5mac.com/2018/04/29/overcast-versus-apple-podcast...

* A wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overcast_(app)

* Information about the developer: https://marco.org/about

You could fake all of this, but it would be really difficult and expensive, and probably wouldn't work in the long-term.

It's true that for a brand-new app from an unknown developer, it's difficult to say what their intentions are, but Google and Apple don't really have any more information to go off of than you do regarding that - at best, they likely have the developer's contact information, but you can probably find that yourself as well. Additionally, the nice thing about sandboxing and permissions is that you don't really have to trust the developer in order to run an app. For example, the other day I was looking for a protractor app that would give me measurements in tenths of a degree, and I found this app [1]. Aside from a few reviews (which, as you said, could easily be fake), I know absolutely nothing about this developer - for all I know, they could be trying to steal all my data. But because iOS sandboxes everthing, they won't actually be able to access any of my data or do anything bad unless I approve it, and if I don't like the app, I can press one button and get rid of it. As a result, I can feel comfortable installing the app anyway, even if I don't trust the developer.

[1] https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/angle-pro/id750327028
'There Is No Such Thing as Emancipatory Technology': David Harvey
Then I'm sure these guys wouldnt have to write this up. The reality of Android is you need Google's approval if you want to develop for it in a commercial capacity. The rest is just theory.
<filename wc
But unless you use server push, it still is an additional roundtrip.
You can't reason a person out of a position they didn't reason themselves into.

You have to have a genuine and open dialogue with them in the form of a socratic discussion. See examples of street epistemology to get them to lessen their confidence. The first step to lessening their confidence is to get them to recognize and understand that the methods they are using to recognize true things is unreliable. Often you can't get them to flip positions on it over one discussion, so you have to have multiple discussions taking their ideas seriously and being respectful with them before they can come around.

By presenting evidence, they'll be unconvinced and it will probably trigger the backfire effect and drive them deeper into their dogma. So I agree with what you're saying, street epistemology is like a form of motivational interviewing.
Amazon does not deserve any breaks.

US Steel employs Unionized blue collar workers with a pretty decent entry level training program. The other steel companies are not unionized at all (looking at you AK Steel). While they don’t deserve these breaks either, this is night and day from Amazon.
https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
Ruby is fast in some cases and python in some other cases.
You've completely missed the point of my comments. Go back and read them more carefully.
That's a frequently asked question!

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
Container ~= process which has been isolated from the host system using linux specific kernel features. If you launch systemd and all ubuntu services, yes, it will effectively run the whole os, otherwise, it's just a process like any other with no overhead. Why the image? Well it contains the filesystem of your container - all the libraries your process needs to convert its' logic to kernel syscalls, all in their own filesystem bubble, so there are no clashes, wrong versions, etc.
> "Company-specific tax breaks allows companies to pit cities against each other ... Would we not be better off as a society if ..?"

The real pressure does not come from cities and regions within the same country, but from abroad. Corporations have other options pretty much globally.
> The problem facing other European economies is not that large amounts of actual economic activity is moving to Ireland, it's that Ireland's tax rules let it suck out the tax revenue from work, production and sales that occur across Europe.

They wouldn't if they would actually tax work, production and sales that occur in their jurisdiction. This whole game works by assigning a jurisdiction to "profit" independent of those things, when profit is an accounting fiction. Unlike customers or employees, it has no physical existence, so it's easy for companies to arrange for it to be wherever it's most advantageous.

If you want to tax companies for employing or selling to your people, you can perfectly well have a payroll tax or sales tax.
Yup and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13989215, from 2017.
> You have it exactly backwards here. There is no need to justify stopping the flow of money but for the flow of money to exist in the first place. There is no right to a business model for such a thing can only end in abject insanity of demanding that it rain so you can sell your umbrellas.

No, you’re demanding the government give umbrellas away for free because people have a right to be protected from the rain. The government isn’t stopping you from distributing documents you got on PACER. It’s charging you for access to PACER itself.

> Issues like "There are two postings one for a Allan Smith in New York Court ABC Room A at 3pm on January 2nd, 1993 and one for Alan Smith in New York Court ABC Room A at 3pm on January 2nd, 1993 - which is correct?"

PACER just stores free-form PDF files. There is some metadata, but the substance of your example above would be in the PDF.

> Then they have their own valid business model to sell their derivative works to supplement the public data that anyone else can get for free.

That’s what they do. The original court opinions are free on PACER.
> Power, water, etc. involves one set of infrastructure that runs across public and private land.

Yes, that's the reason that they naturally tend to monopoly that is resistant to correction, but it is the fact that they tend that way, and not the reason for that tendency, that justified treatment as a utility.

> Land is in no way the same; it's literally everywhere and many people own it.

Are you arguing that residential rentals do not, in fact, either in general or in specific locales, tend to difficult to correct monopoly? If so, you aren't arguing against my point, which I'll remind you is merely that it doesn't matter if this is true in terms of UBI; if it is true, it is a problem of exactly the same dimension without UBI as with UBI, and thus irrelevant to the debate over UBI, and if it is false, then it's clearly irrelevant to anything.

> Better solution? According to a professor of economics I talked to, it's to create tech hubs in other cities (at least for San Francisco; finance for NY, etc.).

Well, not any kind of solution if you are an academic economist with no concern for pragmatics. Virtually every metro area of notsble size that isn't NY or SF had been trying to do that for a long time. Just choosing a policy result like that isn't a real-world solution, a real-world solution involved a policy action that can reasonably be expected to produce the desired result.

Also, either (1) local housing markets don't tend to monopoly, and this isn't needed, or (2) they do, and this just extends the time slightly before a successful firm in one market diversified into and also monopolizes other markets until you have the same problem nationally that you had in the local markets you tried to provide alternatives to. So, even if you had a mechanism to acheive what is sought as the solution, it wouldn't be a solution.
No no, it's customary on HN to link to previous discussions because they're interesting to look at! Linking to a previous submission with no comments is frowned upon, but a big past discussion is a generous offer.

People sometimes think we (moderators) are being jerks when we post such links as well. I'm a bit puzzled about what to do about that. It's tedious to post "because it might be interesting" every time.

(p.s. I get that your positive intention was to support the submitter of the article. But on HN, please express your positive intentions more directly. That user wasn't a dick, and it sucks to come to the internet and see oneself described that way.)
Are you using tools like mailchimp or plain old e-mail ? Templates ? Fancy graphics ?
yes, GDPR. furthermore, regulatory capture is indisputably proven.
Lufthansa sues customer for skipping flight
There are about 8500 users registered in total. Activity fluctuates a bit, but lately it's pretty normal to have about 30 new topics posted every day, and a few hundred comments between them.
>"His decision was based largely on a guess, he said, but he did have doubts about the accuracy of the computer warnings. First, why just five missiles? A country seeking to start a nuclear war would’ve fired more, he told The Post. Second, the ground-based radar installations, which detected missiles, showed no evidence of an attack."

It's wonderful that someone like him was in that position, who could look at what was in front of him so that he could make make that ultimate gut decision. Thank God.

But this also brings up a fear in me, the next man or woman in his position may not be as rational and calm-headed. Instead of second guessing it, they may respond appropriately to what they believe is the enemy's nuclear launch, fully trusting the technologies in front of them. Or maybe they have too little trust in the technology, and then they don't act at all, and they'll be screwed if there really was an attack.

Really makes you think about what kind of person is qualified to be in that position and the training it takes. How does someone get a job in that position? How do they make sure that they aren't going to be someone with a loose screw somewhere? Imagine being the guy who has to choose someone for this position. Imagine being the one who gets chosen. I would shit bricks either way.
Keep telling yourself that as more and more hardware and low level networking functionality is directly exposed due to the demands for 'apps' that can equal the abilities of native applications.
In my experience, people that have profoundly anti-scientific beliefs have always been such; whether their purported trigger is Jenny McCarthy or an odd alignment of Jupiter, it's hard to know if it's even relevant- the problem is that they don't have the skillset to make rational choices. And I just don't see a Sokal-style hoax making a whit of difference in their minds, as there are a million other things that could do the same.

In other words, their feelings of anti-science came first. Whatever reason provided is ex post facto confabulation.

Meanwhile, the sciences themselves need this kind of scrutiny to stay scientific.

I'm open to being wrong. But I think it is a mistake to put too much weight to the 'we should be careful what the people who never use science anyway' consider.
> I publish ... it's completely decentralized

What do you mean by decentralized in this context?
Without analytics, I don't justify my project soooo
> To put into perspective the situation we are in, imagine one of your neighbours commits a crime and is arrested by the police. You don’t know which neighbour has committed the crime but you are linked to each other by the street you live on and therefore you are ‘associated’ to that neighbour.

More like you handed over keys to your car to a neighbor and the next morning there's blood on the bumper and the cops are knocking on your door. You do bear some responsibility but since it's Google's store it's their rules and the analogy kinda breaks down because Google cuts off access in order to mitigate the impact of a Sybil attack.
Thank you for this, I just unsubscribed from like 10 mailing lists within the last 5 minutes.
If you like to hyper optimize your site like me, and since it doesn't do any good on mobile (Edit: apparently it works on mobile, ignore this), you can have it selectively grab the script on desktop and save a few bytes like this:

<script type="text/javascript">
if (screen.width > 768) {
let script = document.createElement('script');
script.src = '//instant.page/1.0.0';
script.type = 'module';
script.integrity = 'sha384-6w2SekMzCkuMQ9sEbq0cLviD/yR2HfA/+ekmKiBnFlsoSvb/VmQFSi/umVShadQI';
document.write(script.outerHTML);
}
</script>