skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you want to take it to the water it is usually recommended that the watch has 10bar (100m) water resistance.

The Breitling Navitimer 01 would tick many of your boxes (Chronograph, (Logscale)Bezel, Date) and is an iconic watch. However you can't swim with it.

Another iconic chronograph is the Zenith El Primero with the tri color dial. It is also WR to 100m.

Then there is the Omega Speedmaster "Man on the Moon" Chronograph.

Tudor also has a few nice watches: Black Bay Chrono, Black Bay Heritage, Black Bay 58, Black Bay GMT, Pelagos.

If you want a fine Quartz watch have a look at Grand Seiko and Citizen Chronomaster. These are High Accuracy Quartz (HAQ) watches which means +/- 5-10 seconds a year depending on the model.

For more classic looking watches have a look at Jaeger LeCoultre. I especially like their Masters collection.
That argument means nothing to a radical anti-privacy person like me (e.g. prohibit any data to be concealed, except the means to authenticate oneself).

That particular problem is a great example, where I don't see any harm in revealing that information, as opposed to keeping it secret, which might cause actual harm in conjunction with the human factor.
killing user processes on logout

By "killing", do you mean some other signal than (or in addition to) SIGHUP? Does it send SIGKILL?
> All industries need to arrange cover for accidents (this should not be news in an argument about industrial insurance and liabilities).

Rarely in the amount of the theoretical maximum amount of damage they could possibly do. In practice when a company has more liability than insurance coverage, they end up in bankruptcy and it's the insurance policies of the victims that end up paying out, or some kind of government assistance. This is especially true for very rare and very large claims, because nobody really carries that much insurance.

For example, Boeing no doubt has insurance, but their worst case failure mode is something like the hypothesized worst-case scenarios for the Y2K or Y2038 bug where some integer rolls over and every plane they've ever made crashes into the ground at the same time. There is no way they have enough insurance to cover that -- it would be a trillion dollars. But neither do we expect them to, because it's very unlikely even though it could theoretically actually happen.

The same kind of thing could happen to a major auto company, or really any company that runs the same software on a million different pieces of industrial hardware. A company could sell a million pacemakers and have them all fail at once, or elevators, or emergency dispatch equipment. None of them are insured for that amount of liability.

The oil companies are rare in the sense of having extremely deep pockets, enough to cover a major claim like that on their own, but they're about the only instance of that. And even they would be completely bankrupt if the courts ever start allowing claims against them for the damage from climate change.
This also happens with open-source software too. It just takes a bit longer to figure out what's going on with closed-source software.
Yeah, I was wondering same.

It also talks about 8-bit support, but only lists AVR... I mean, AVR is compiler target optimized arch, more like a 16/32 bit system with register width chopped to 8 bits, not limited like other 8-bit MCUs. 8051 support wouldn't hurt.

Plus side there's support for 16-bit MSP430, important due to its low power consumption.

Anyways, it's good to see more OS competition in IoT space.

Signed: embedded & driver developer.
But the addition of 'dedicated GPU' is what drives sales, unfortunately. I don't think nVidia's x20/x30 GPUs for mobile improves anything. Anybody that actually needs power would opt for x50 or higher, and anything less would be served by integrated graphics.
OLED burn in happens because the organic stuff used to color the light into RGB degrades at different rates for the three colors. So for OLED, having an image on the screen for 30 minutes is the same as having it on the screen for 5 minutes, 6 times.

If the Windows taskbar is present 95% of the time that the computer is being used (with the other 5% being fullscreen applications), and a screensaver is active 40% of the time the screen is on, then the taskbar is still visible for 57% of the time the screen is on.

Maybe the tech has changed, but as of my first OLED phone 7 years ago, blue (the same color as the taskbar's Windows icon) was the fastest color to burn in.

Newer phones shift the navbar and status bar items a few pixels every minute. But the start menu icon is too big for that, so after a year or two, every time the user watched a movie in fullscreen, they would get a blue blob in the lower left corner.
that is true, i guess its more situational, than black/white.

when you say, "month long trips" are those holidays or work related?
Excuse me? I'm not being racist, the friend of mine in the story was also a Chinese guy. From what I understand, at my University there was a pretty strong culture among Chinese students to share code and homeworks. I even remember my old teacher telling me they caught a Chinese grad student who ran a business outsourcing undergrad CS homework to code-shops back in China. I don't see how this is racist, it's just observation.

I'm not sure how you're confused about relevance either.
This discussion is very much apropos of what the article is talking about:

> The whole systemd battle, Rice said, comes down to a lot of disruptive change; that is where the tragedy comes in. Nerds have a complicated relationship to change; it's awesome when we are the ones creating the change, but it's untrustworthy when it comes from outside. Systemd represents that sort of externally imposed change that people find threatening. That is true even when the change isn't coming from developers like Poettering, who has shown little sympathy toward the people who have to deal with this change that has been imposed on them.

The posix violation is by design. If you think that posix dictates the wrong thing, then you will do something different and this is what Poettering has done. The fact that systemd has more or less been embraced by linux is an endorsement of his design philosophy, even if distributions reject specific features.
I've only seen supervisord as the root process in multi-purpose containers. Is there any significant gain to using systemd instead?
Bluetooth 5.1 has new direction finding feature
Well, I think

> At the same time, the Flow team is also taking a closer look at our roadmap, and we will have more to share about this topic soon.

implies that they will be sharing more about, among others, that, soon.
So it is not user-hostile when you don’t respect the user’s attempt to delete data? It seems condescending at the very least.
Pretty useful.
I'd always viewed password tools like this as less secure than 1Password etc.

With 1Password an attacker needs my encrypted vault and my master password to get my email password.

With this, they just need the master password (since they can guess the domain and revision number presumably?)
SMMsmartmarket.com: Buy YouTube Subscribers
I'm with you. The potential for websites to add themselves is far too dangerous; the web being open, wild, and dangerous, adding a website to the home screen should only ever be a browser-based task.

And no, asking the user for confirmation is never sufficient to stop unsuspecting people from accidentally causing their own compromise. It's a trust thing. Once they trust one dialogue from a legit website, they'll trust it over and over.

Let web sites leave the home screen on my phone the same way web sites have always left my bookmarks/favourites: alone
ifixit.com :-)
Tone can be hard to convey over the internet - try and imagine this conversation is happening in a cafe over a coffee. I'm calm, and not trying to disagree with you for internet points or anything of the like. Just trying to have a conversation. I just lack the skill to write things in a sensitive enough manner.

---

Whilst I agree with you in part, I also believe that over-emphasising personality traits or behaviours of a person also engages in revisionism.

One should be able to view an event entirely separate from the person, if the person's generalised behaviour isn't relevant.

We don't need to think about the man at all, in my own opinion, in this particular case. Redact his name if you have concerns that the man is unworthy of attention.

Adding complaints of a person to any mention of them is calling for jury and judgement. It's a distraction from what's important. It takes an event that should be discussed and explored, and twists it so you are forced to take sides about the person.

You can use these tactics to derail any conversation. It's a debating tactic commonly used in politics to avoid answering questions.

It might be better in future just to say something along the lines of "Aside: Can we not use his name? The guy is actually a racist, and has a pretty deplorable past."

We don't want to get lost in the debate of a man's merits, when his actions may themselves be meritorious.
That's an argument for publicising every issue that might damage others if drunk, negligent or careless.

Hepatitis, short temper, gun ownership, knife ownership, herpes, syphilis etc. In fact why not everyone's medical records, just in case?

If not, why do those infected with this virus deserve special public demonisation?

For the avoidance of doubt, I think this would be a terrible idea.
So, fstab says to mount a filesystem, and systemd mounts the filesystem. The reporter explicitly says they want the filesystem mounted at boot time. The response is correct: there's no such thing as "mounted at boot time but not 'after system boot process completed'", because there's no magic "after system boot process completed" point at which that behavior could change. When the device becomes available it gets mounted.

sysvinit and typical distribution init scripts couldn't implement the behavior seemingly desired by the user, either.
That is interesting to learn that it is the wallet team handling the payments, not someone in the Cloud team. But the issue here is not payment, it is how they handle the free tier users. And they mess up in the case when several owners together in the same projects.
Another possible explanation is that there's something about some people's personality that drives them to do both. Neither one is easy. Both require dedication and hard work. The willingness to tough it out and do what it takes can apply to both.

Along the same lines, it might be a personality trait where the person is prone to excess in certain ways. The article says the aim of a high-income is to live comfortably, but I think you can live much more comfortably putting in less work and getting a moderate income. Higher-income is something that happens when you want to go beyond comfortable. Similarly, you can stay in shape without running a marathon. A marathon (or other endurance activity) appeals to people who are looking for more than just the practical benefits.
> That particular problem is a great example, where I don't see any harm in revealing that information

Surely you're aware of at least one genocide that was greatly aided by detailed demographic data?
Not if they did not know each other beforehand. But if they did, that is very much possible. I am surprised you asked that question. The answer seems obvious??
And Service Workers, though admittedly that implementation took long and is apparently still brittle.
> How do you explain the cost of education in the modern world where the logistics of information are as cheap as never before? Any kid on the world could access material from the best teachers on the planet. So why keep this legacy system for education that is more and more based solely on prestige?

That's probably because reading/watching materials isn't everything what education is or what brings its value. Just the fact that the system manages to get 8-18 year olds to read those materials and learn them makes a start difference, not to mention allows access to mentors and peers doing the same thing.
Probably an hour or so daily.
It is the only website that I visit daily as well.
Mostly commuting to and from work, as well as during my lunchbreak.

In the weekend usually when I have some time that I wait for something. Like waiting in line at the shops - so probably less than an hour during the weekend.
Looks interesting, but I'm too ignorant to understand it...

What is the practical significance of this? Is this the design for the processor that was used in the actual Lisp Machines, or a design for a hypothetical processor?
What does unplanned pregnancy have to do with HIV status?
That's fairly irrelevant to my comment. The cost of achieving a 4 year education doesn't have to be high, either.

Let's assume we're talking about Georgia, a place with a low cost of living and access to a high quality engineering school.

Year 1: Work in the state, securing in-state tuition costs
Year 2+3: Go to Georgia Perimeter College (2 year tuition cost: $4600)
Year 4+5: Attend Georgia Institute of Technology on the transfer program (2 year tuition + fee cost: $12,400)

Total cost of tuition is now $17,000 over 4 years.

To get at your point about information logistics: nothing has ever been more useful in my life than being surrounded by intelligent people going through the same grueling process that you are, supporting each other and working together for the single point of trying to learn material and complete assignments under unreasonable deadlines.

There's also difference between access to the best instruction on the planet and having direct communication to some of the best instructors doing some of the most interesting work on the planet.
Stock manipulation perhaps? Happens a lot with Tesla apparently, short sellers will pump up any negative story and try to get it into press. This person was making several attempts to get in contact with press after all, and a story about a teenager finding a big privacy bug in a company that publicly touts its privacy chops has ‘news at 11’ written all over it.

Personally I think a bug report story is not a particularly plausible strategy for such a thing - this person’s concern seems entirely genuine - but crazier things have been done for money. I’m relatively skeptical of complaints from companies about short sellers and bad press, but also recognize that stock manipulation happens a lot more than most ppl are aware of.
> The bug you've linked to was closed by the reporter

Are we reading the same bug report? The one I'm looking at was closed by the creator of Systemd.
Basically said, systemd follows quite the opposite of the KISS principle which made Unix and Linux so great.
GRSec is vital to Linux security
OLED screens suffer from burn-in due to pixels wearing out unevenly on the screen. The effect is cumulative and can't be fixed by using screensavers. I wouldn't call it "image retention".

I have an OLED TV for watching shows and movies and try to be careful to not display static elements for too long. I would never use an OLED as a PC screen for fear of burn-in.
Also make sure to check out Reina Sofia museum. It's a walking distance from the Prado and it has master pieces from Picasso and Dali
On the 1st of November a friend shared with me a screenshot from the Instagram of a concerned parent explaining a situation in which her child was being cyber bullied, and it was clear from the content of the messages that the bully could her their private conversations.

I guess this bug has been know and abused for at least three months?
It's just about showing a banner to add to home screen, and the person is not wrong — there is no technical necessity for it. There is already, and always has been, an "Add to home screen" button in Safari. Since the very start.

Having said that, if PWA support in iOS moves forward I wouldn't be surprised if that API is added to iOS, since then it'd be part of a bigger-picture thing.
I think you're seeing some cultural difference here. That is, assuming this is actually the sort of thing you do in real life.
Thanks for the feedback!

I chose recursive page tables because the underlying mapping is very simple as it only requires to map a single level 4 page table entry. Thus, the bootloader does not need to force any address space layout on the kernel. If the kernel wants to use a different mapping scheme, it can use the recursive page table to perform that mapping and then unmap a single entry to undo the recursive mapping.

That being said, I like your proposal to map the complete physical address space to some higher-half location. It would allow to introduce a simple `phys_to_virt` function, which completely avoids the bitwise operations required for recursive page tables. It would also make this blog post much easier, which is always a good thing.

The question is how we can support that approach in the `bootloader` and `x86_64` crates without breaking users who wish to continue using recursive paging. I opened an issue in the blog repository with some ideas: https://github.com/phil-opp/blog_os/issues/545
They are derivative works which are eligible for their own copyright protection.

For example, the NIV, NIrV, and Amplified Bible translations are covered under copyright. Here's what you need to do if you want to use more than what their 'gratis use guidelines' allow - https://www.harpercollinschristian.com/permissions/#2 .
I am a radical anti-privacy person, so I am all for a variant of that, where the 3rd party is everyone.

"That logic" assumes there's little harm in having that data public. Unlike police tracking, which has proven to be a terrible idea.
Lumi is hiring a VP of Engineering to build AWS for manufacturing
sounds like a switch most people will leave in the on-position 100% of the time and then when it accidentally gets flicked they’ll bring their phone to the Apple store because “it’s broken”.

laptops with hardware wifi and bluetooth switches. Took plenty of support calls about those.
I'm so sick of it. It just makes me want to stop using these portions of the internet completely. It is naive to think that companies aren't putting as much into social media manipulation campaigns as they do into advertising.
But the Windows 95 login was just for logging into the network, not the computer

I think that if you hit Cancel there it would work just as well. You wouldn't get it logged into the domain though
My 6 year old oled phone that I used daily until last year (I would say 'used heavily' but then compared to some people, it might have been moderately) did not have any such issues.
Sounds like HuffPost.
That quite a lot of people are negligent about having sex.

UPD. Despite knowing the consequences.
wasn't GP specifically mentioning user processes and not system daemons? e.g. for daemons it's perfectly expected behavior to not shut down on SIGHUP. Apache, and other system daemons would re-read configuration files when receiving SIGHUP (as a way to reduce downtime during config updates).
I think his real issue is market fit. He only talks about his vision, what he wants to do. Not a word about his customers. The ability to run that fast is amazing, but the boots themselves are ungainly and the stride looks awkward as hell. I wonder what kind of speed boost he could get in a boot that looks more like a boot than a pair of stilts. I'd bet there's a bigger market for a "normal" boot that gives you, say, a 10% boost in speed, than these things.
Skype used to be "P2P" where one party would act as the host in a group call.
Remember OpenSSL / Heartbleed etc?
Demystifying JOIN Algorithms
I am not upset that there was divergence from POSIX.

Design choices are fine - I can understand why systemd takes a different approach.

What I don't like, and completely disagree with, is systemd not working with the community they directly effect to reduce disruption.

Like it or not, the product is an industry standard, and so will be held to industry expectations.

Rather than turning around and requiring everyone to change, they could have said, "Sorry, we're making changes, here are some preliminary patches that could help."

Or a timeline for a breaking change, wherein they can negotiate with others.

I don't have significant issues with systemd's software, though some reservations about quality. My main concern, and it has been since the beginning, is that systemd acts without thought or conscience to the effects that they might cause.

They lack the ability to be a team player, despite creating an environment where people depend on them.

systemd's adoption rates is an absolute credit to it. They have some very good design thoughts, and those working on it have done some excellent work.

However, it would be better if they communicated with the people they effect, rather than letting the community be an accidental Q&A team when things go wrong.

They do get this right sometimes, but that seems to be the exception, rather than the rule.

They approached the init.d situation calmly, and slowly. They worked with Debian, and Fedora and others to make sure it would work without interruption or loss of quality.

They approached the sigkill situation like they were a kid who just learned how to light a fire and wanted to burn the library down.
i agree tech illiteracy is the red herring, the fact this vulnerability affected so many people, points to the issue being with the manufacturer, designing and coding this, without consideration to the security.

i think the "attack" they did is pretty perfectly grey hat, expose a weakness to the user with a "how-to-fix" guide.

(i should note, i'm talking about the chrome hack.)
You’re curious how a complex piece of software can have a bug? Come on now. You’re either naive or being hyperbolic.
Don't be ridiculous.

Brand everyone with QR codes that can be scanned to show a quick list of things like HIV, mental health issues, wrong political beliefs.

I'm pretty sure there's ways to design QR codes, so we could come up with a way to embed a brand of a few of the "worst" traits so you can see before you scan.
> Snap in general seems much more concerned with user privacy than instagram and Facebook at large

Wait, is this the same Snap that convinced people to share intimate pictures by making them inaccessible after a short while, but retains the right to store those pictures indefinitely and to use them for other purposes?

(Mostly-but-not-entirely rhetorical question, since I never used it and haven't looked closely into their privacy policies - so I might actually be wrong.)
Mimimi Ethereum Token
The first in the world 100% honest and very sweet Ethereum ICO

Soon!
Not the parent nor Systemd developers, but apparently they think it's the only way to make sure the user's session is cleaned up.

But frankly, 100% people would be fine with it if the default was left at no instead of changing it to yes. It's all about giving users a choice when a new feature is introduced, something Systemd developers understand only partially.
Organization of Complexity: A Five Step Implementation
You can have a look here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TLJSlNxCbwRNxy14Toe1.... Found my last comapny in that list, 10/10 would do again.
The Python Challenge
There's no reason to assume, that in the absence of that data there would be no genocide on some other arbitrary basis.
Show HN: My Story from Junior Developer to Technical Lead
Of course you don't need an Apple ID.