skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You don't have to pay 100$ to run a marathon. If you have a pair of running shoes and a normal running belt (for water and a gel) that will do. You just have to put them on and there you go. I've done a couple of "Sunday marathons" (aka "long aerobic run") with two friends. They have costed me ~2$ for a gel.

Equipment wise, you don't need to pay 100$ for shoes. There are many <300$ shoes from the last season (last year model) on discount pretty much all year round for 60$-80$. I burn 3 pairs of shoes a year, and even though I could afford expensive shoes, I pretty much always end up finding the ones I want for 70$ somewhere online.

Running belts price varies (from $10 to "as much as you want to pay"), but they are a one time investment. I bought a nice neopren one once, and it will probably outlive my children. If you are running enough to be able to "just go and run a marathon", chances are that you already have a running belt to carry a mobile phone, keys, id, money, gels, water, etc. They are just insanely useful.

I run around 8 hours / week, and my expenses are around 300$ per year. Some years I've paid a bit more, e.g. got a heart rate monitor for 30$, running ear phones for 80$, headlight ~20$, I don't have a running watch yet.., nice running shorts and shirts (couple of 100$s), etc. I've also gone to some races, but I've never paid more than 15-20$ for them. You can do half-marathons and marathons for that money, and some of them are non-profit, so you could deduce that from your taxes if it was worth your time. Also, most races typically give you running tshirts, gloves, and what not as a "finisher" gift.

Honestly, factoring the time I've spent running during my lifetime, and the money I've spent over the last 10 years, it's by far the cheapest hobby I have.

EDIT: That might be a lie. My absolute cheapest hobby is actually swimming. Swim shorts for 20-30$, swim googles for 5-10$, and an annual membership on a masters team (120$/year for 6h of swimming / week, where I only actually end up using 2-4 h). Swim short and googles need replacing only every couple of years, so swimming costs me around 150$/year for about half or a quarter of the hours I spend running / week.

Swimming and running, compared with my other hobbies, are negligibly cheap. I go snowboarding for 2 weeks a year, and that cost me ~2000$ + maintaining my equipment (I basically end up spending ~300-600$ on snowboarding equipment / year). I go cycling with my gf every now and then but not enough to make a 2000$ road bike + equipment cheap. And well I have a motorbike because I want to and that also costs multiple 1000$s dollars per year, I don't even want to know how much.

So yeah, swimming, running, calisthenics, etc. are damn cheap sports. You don't need to spend 1000$s/year on these. If you are tight on money you can probably manage 20h of fun per week by spending ~300$ per year without issues. Obviously, if you want 1-on-1 crossfit training wearing fashionable clothes wearing a go pro and drinking avocado toast kale smoothies you are going to end up paying a lot, but that's not necessary at all.
“Secret” in NYT
Gasket material is probably one of those components where you should have tight tolerances.
I've had an LG OLED for 2 years now, and have had no problems with burn-in so far. Before that i owned a Panasonic plasma screen and while it's still pretty nice for the bedroom, it does have Netflix pretty badly burned into it in certain color spaces.
> That is not to say that everything is pre-determined, or that we're hopeless to change our behavior. Our self-talk or conscious narrative help to create a feedback loop that can influence the way future decisions are arrived upon by reinforcing certain neural pathways over others, making some decisions more likely than others.

Yet the self-talk or conscious narrative themselves are a result of a combination of deterministic and stochastic factors. We are not hopeless to change because we are systems that react and adapt to our environment all the time. We are a ship afloat a partly stochastic sea.
What country is that ? As a French person, this is shocking - I can't imagine living in such place.
What is the benefit of using riot os on Arduino instead pure Arduino? I mean what is the reason to add an extra layer since I have to write the same code with and without riot.
So just an irrelevant factoid. Sigh. For a moment I thought someone had found enough data to compute effective marginal rates. That would have been interesting.

The marginal rate on its own, without the rules that are used to compute the taxable income, is IMO about as meaningful as the wordcount of the rules.
Competing costs money in any sport, and yeah commercial races can be expensive but there are many many cheap races to be had too. I am based in the UK, and here's how you can get involved in running cheaply:

* Join Parkrun[1], free weekly timed 5k runs almost anywhere in the UK and in many other countries. Open to all abilities, and there are tail-walkers for all runs so you literally cannot finish last!

* More serious? Join a running club. Subscriptions will be ~£50 per year, include (lots!) of training, track access, free entry to many races throughout the year and reduced price entry to all others (via your included UK Athletics membership).

* Find cheap runs (non-commercial), e.g. those run by the Sri Chinmoy Marathon team, which only cost ~£5 to enter[2]. Many other such races around the country can be found via Run Britain[3].

Of course, all you need to run is a pair of trainers, weather-appropriate clothing (doesn't have to be running gear) and motivation to get out the door. The great thing about running is you can do it anywhere.

1: http://www.parkrun.com/

2: https://uk.srichinmoyraces.org/races/london

3: https://www.runbritain.com/races
Sounds like the Facebook MLB Game of the week telecast, where the usual team broadcasts are superceded and the result is unwatchable. You can shut off the emoji screen by clicking the right secret option, but it resumes after every commercial break.

It's like something a teenaged Instagram influencer would design.
Yes CSS is too damn hard.

Too hard to learn? No.
Too hard to use? No.
Too hard to do elegantly? No.

It's too hard because it doesn't need to be nearly as hard as it is. Advanced layout can be done using techniques like pivot, relative anchoring and alignment, and lots of other approaches that CSS lacks.

It's too hard because what is there is broken. Even the new stuff (try to select a row in an auto-adjusting grid. You can't yet, and the powers that be will eventually fix that... which is ridiculous for a modern release)

It's too hard because it's neither how designers think, nor how programmers think, nor how users think. So you need to write it in some weird hodgepodge that accounts for none of those and all of those.

It's also too hard because due to the difficulty it takes a lot of time to get good at, and so we as non-CSS gurus don't invest the time we need to digest it... because why would we when it shouldn't require that sort of investment?

At the end of the day it's almost like going to your neighbor's house but some committee forces you to walk in zigzags and on your hands. It'll get you there, and you will become so good in the process you could work in a circus, but it's an unnecessary pain when you just want to drop off a cup of milk.
But Chrome doesn’t use WebKit, it uses blink.
Is it just me or did UIs just start getting worse at some point? I just take it for granted that every redesign will somehow reduce features while increasing clutter.
If you print it maybe (as it is clearly a layout meant for print reading). In the browser it is clearly not an optimal reading experience. The 2 column layout forces you to scroll up and down to carry on reading, and it has hijacked left mouse click to reveal a sing in side bar.

Really genuinely interested din understanding why you found the reading experience wonderful! (no snark intended =)
I'm aware of that but it's a moot point because you'd be popping the storage device back in anyway. Which is why I didn't address that in my previous comment.

In any case, half the examples you've provided there are server specific and you really shouldn't be allowing untrusted physical access to your servers (nor running Xorg to be honest).
Differences in climates can play a part in this as well it would be difficult to call but possible that cooler locations fair better than the tropics. I have no data to support this but would be very interested if there is data on the lifespan of electronics like this in different climates.
That's really interesting. I'm also firmly in the space of finding CSS layout inscrutable (CSS styling is fine). I'd concluded that the issue is precisely the lack of peer-to-peer relationship constructs. Everything seemed based on 2 constructs:

1. Flowing 1D content (text) into a 2D space

2. Hierarchical relationships, i.e. positioning children with respect to parents.

I haven't looked deeply into flexbox or grid. My initial skim suggests they're both still fundamentally hierarchical. I'll take another look now given your comments.

I'll freely admit I haven't invested a lot of time trying to get to grips with the more recent constructs (flex/grid). I would say my initial forays were difficult and frustrating. CSS layout seems (seemed?) the antithesis of the maxim "make the simple things easy and the hard things possible".

As a counterpoint: back in the midst of time, there was a cross-platform UI toolkit called Galaxy. It only had 2 layout constructs: springs and struts. Springs defined a proportional layout between components (so would stretch/compress), struts defined a static relationship. It was remarkably simple to define layouts using just those two concepts.

The web is clearly a more complicated space than conventional, thick client apps that only ran on the desktop. Responsiveness is a much bigger challenge now. Nevetheless, it seems to me that the key construct lacking in CSS is the ability to specify peer to peer relationships among elements - without needing to create a whole cruft of container components.

You've incentivised me to give flex/grid another look. I remain healthily sceptical, but thanks for the prompt.
I'd hardly call this a "Golden Age", precisely because of the shortcomings mentioned in the article. Regardless of how you may re-architect a processor you will still end up hitting CMOS limitations in time.

To contrast my fantasy for "Golden Age" would be multiple viable replacements for CMOS that were actively being used in a variety of processors.
I am using browserless for a niche project.. Seems this space is taking off slightly
كلمات اغنية وضحى ماجد المهندس
Sadly growl seems to be mostly obsoleted but it's cool to see my code show up in a project like this
You may not even have to do that. It looks like Apple disabled Group FaceTime server side[1].

[1] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19025329
Wasn't that the whole point of this: not to discriminate based on age?
It wasn't always this way / this may be culturally dependent. In the UK at least there used to be a big working class connection to outdoor walking (Kinder Scout trespass!) and camping, as it was the cheapest form of holiday. I think this may have gone away with the advent of cheap flights to cheaper drinking locations.
No Bitcoin (SV implemention) support

I'm out

https://bitsocket.org Message Bus for Bitcoin (SV)
Good to see Bluetooth in the new hardware. Lack of real mobile support for hardware wallets has been by far the biggest pain point for me. (With regard to the best possible physical security, I would have preferred NFC over Bluetooth, but the latter is alright for everyday use.)
Apparently for many folks on HN it's okay they can get away with this, just because it's NYT.
You are right that getting a remote job is probably more difficult than finding a local one. OTH the existence of remote jobs market definitely works in your favour in some situations because you simply have more choices.

Fo example, I am a machine learning scientist / engineer currently based in Prague. The ability that I would be able to easily find a remote job definitely increases my negotiation power which would other way be quite limited in Prague because there are not as many great local options in my field here.
My first thought on reading the title, and not dispelled by reading the article, was "poverty is an endurance sport you're not allowed to quit".

There are extreme examples like https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/07/need-to-sign... , but of course we've all heard of the conditions in Amazon warehouses.

Less extreme examples which are "just working class / not rich" are all the retail jobs which involve standing most of the day, shelf-stacking, anything in hospitality, anything in construction, and so on.
It’s extremely obscure as a verb in North America too, fwiw.

Buffalo the city was probably better known 150 years ago, when it was an economic powerhouse as one of the end points of what’s still the second most famous canal in the Western Hemisphere. Afterward it continued to be a significant industrial center until the decline of manufacturing turned the Great Lakes region into part of the “Rust Belt” in the past 50 years. Most Americans probably know of it these days because it still hosts an American football team.

Anyway, the point isn’t that that’s a common sentence. It’s that it’s a grammatical one.
> agilely developed chips

I feel there's a long way to go there. The economic structure of the industry is against agility because "deployment" remains stubbornly expensive, and the product culture is also much more conservative.

> manufacturing also gets open sourced.

It's one of the most capital-intensive industries in the world, so I don't quite see how this would work? Libresilicon are offering a 1000nm (not a typo) process.
Why would you criticize a remark for being unfounded, by making another unfounded remark?

But here is some recent proof that the actual current rental market in the US is an example of what I was saying: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-07/boom-to-b...

I do agree that there are inefficiencies in the market that mean high building prices don’t always lead to more buildings being built. But the cause is certainly not because there is too much indiscriminate foreign capital available. That’s like telling me candy bar makers stopped making candy bars because they were selling for too high of a price. Local building restrictions, permitting, high labor and material prices have huge impacts on whether a growing city will be able to build enough housing to keep rents low. All it takes for rents to keep growing is one more family moving to the city than new units have been built. In cities with increasing rents, has the population recently been growing or shrinking?
Yeah of course, but we are talking about international transfer here (that's where transferwise is useful)
CSS itself isn't a bad idea but less, scss etc. showed that it was lacking some features you desperately want and in the meantime just styling the web with "a little CSS" is not enough anymore.

You have a shitload of display sizes to support on the other hand and strange behaving browsers which aren't truly standardized on the other. That makes adjusting your CSS to all of these a pain in the ass even if you like fiddling around with styling (as I basically do).

I don't want to adjust my margins, paddings and fonts and then restart from scratch because f Apple decided they will do everything in Safari completely different from the rest of the browsers just to show how special they are.

I'm also sick of building selenium grids with a mac mini in them just to also test this piece of ... "ingenuity" ;-)

So nowadays I just go with a framework with sane defaults and no-hassle usability and when I need something special I ask people who don't do anything but CSS the whole day.

Without more standardization it's not a domain you'll be great at when you don't specialize in it - which means you got to invest a lot of time to master it.
Yes, I also have the old 2015 model (3200x1800). Definitely, good enough in my opinion too.
> This is the exact reason why slacking evolved.

Speculation! Slacking individuals probably got turned into food more often than not, until we discovered agriculture.

> those who were and faced an emergency at the wrong moment when they were already exhausted were either unable to deal with the problem or collapsed and died.

Those who weren't prepared probably died. Preparation could mean stocking up in supplies, training, building weapons.
The safety aspect is... well, in my experience, the rich like dangerous sports.
Think skiing, horse riding/polo, sailing/yachting. The rules of boxing are named after an aristocrat. They're all expensive, they're all fun, and they can all kill you without too much trouble.
For more fun like this, see the Dangerous Sports Club: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2004/02/oxford-university-d...
Can you show a few press articles in which that term is glorified as "stealing from the west" as GP mentions? As far as I can tell using translators, the usage is almost exclusively in articles talking about their own research, technical and scientific advancements, etc. Nothing that implies stealing.

So is that "translation" actually a translation or just the personal interpretation of GP based on their preferences and understanding?

P.S. I'm genuinely curious for those articles, just in case you're interested in supporting the idea that the word actually has a more "creative" translation. Shouldn't be hard to find given that there are "lots of Chinese nationalist stories in Chinese news reports and textbooks".
> even in a standard laptop you get at most a 1:1 ratio of RISC:CISC

If you manage to find all the processors I bet it's more like 10:1. To a first approximation everything on the PCI and USB buses will have its own processor, even if it doesn't accept external firmware.
The title should be "Why are the people who love endurance sports rich?"

There's no evidence presented that a majority or even a significant percentage of people who are rich love endurance sports, only that most of the people who love endurance sports are rich. Is there a name for this sort of statistical error? Because it's everywhere.

Let's pretend there's 10,000,000 "rich people" and 100,000 "people who love endurance sports". Easily 100% of the people who love endurance sports could be rich while it's still an insignificant percentage of rich people as a whole.

I'm going to guess that the majority of people who are competitive at any hobby are pretty well off, simply because people who are poor do not have the time or resources to practice enough to become competitive at leisure activities.
Strongly disagree with #4. If you stay in middle management you are basically the easiest target for company "re-structuring" and your position will be made obsolete in a moment - as you are expensive, visible and easily replaceable with a more enthusiastic/younger/cheaper/less vocal individuals. I have seen it many times, such people are unemployable after years of management on this level.
Running does generally have a low cost of entry, but how low depends a lot on conditions. I typically go through three pairs of regular shoes a year, plus a separate pair of winter shoes which are even more expensive (because Gore Tex). Since I run in snow and sub-freezing temperatures, I need a whole bunch of other gear - cap, gloves, tights, long-sleeved shirts, a jacket for the really cold days, etc. Multiple pairs of all-synthetic socks and underwear aren't free. Throw in a headlamp, various kinds of ankle/knee support, anti-friction stuff, belt/pouch to carry ID and money securely, probably other stuff I can't remember.

I probably have several hundred US dollars worth of running stuff on hand at any time. Sure, I could just throw on an old pair of shoes, but I'd freeze or injure myself right quick and that would end up being even more expensive. Running once in good conditions is cheap. Running continuously in all kinds of conditions is less so.
Hi everyone! Do you seek a real ethical hacker to do your dirty jobs? Do you want to clear up your criminal record? Do you want to upgrade your result or increase your attendance in school? Do you want to get a database from a website? Dou you wish to get your Email account, Facebook, Snapchat, twitter, Instagram accounts back?? Hit me up at >>

hacktech@hackermail.com
What specifically is "wrong" with CMOS? Not small enough for you yet? :)
I think the mindset is different. I’m not sleeping in my bed about 35-40% of nights but I’m usually not crashing with friends or just working remotely from a location. And I actually own a house so I do have a base.
This is definitely true. You do not want to be poor and male and running at night when the police come by, or poor and female and running in a truly bad neighborhood. I've spent time in the back of a police cruiser because they thought I was breaking into cars when they saw me jogging at night.
Bear in mind many US companies that are looking to hire remotely only want employees to be based in US... So your experience will be different based on where you want to live.

The most important job boards seem to be https://weworkremotely.com and https://remoteok.io. Many jobs posted on the monthly "Who is hiring?" Hacker News post are for remote positions. A few years ago I built an index of "Who is hiring?" posts with a search by location and technology: https://hnhiring.com/search?locations=remote

Edit: given you're FAANG you might find facet useful: https://www.facetdev.com/
I've found many "weird" repos in github with full codebases that should be secret (like SDKs, linux device drivers, etc) that were posted by Chinese people. I never understood the reason. I wonder if it's related to this?
Apparently one of its slang names locally is "Gotham City".

(My dad lived and worked in Singapore for a few years and told me this when I pointed it out on a visit)
But your comment it missing the point. Parent commenter said it needs to start recording audio and video earlier, and a combination of other circumstances cause the device to send the data. Nobody argues this is acceptable.
I suppose it depends on what version of camping you’re looking at. Backpacking in the wilderness seems to draw a crowd of either students or middle class people. However, pull into a state park in Michigan and you’ll see the whole range of socio-economic groups. Additionally, in this style of ‘camping’ the wealthier people actually show up with a whole house on wheels so I don’t even know how you call it camping.
You could have stayed on an older systemd version? Preferably one used by a major distro, such that someone else might backport security fixes etc for you.

Anyway the root cause here is bad vendor BSPs being stuck on old Linux versions.
well Kite's server side is presumably linux (most people's are). Pretty sure that they had to re-engineer specifically for Windows and OSX on their native APIs.

Instead, only engineer for Linux and make it available through Docker on all platforms. Since VSCode exposes hooks to interact with Docker anyway, this might make more long term sense.
Show HN: How I automated deployments for my static hugo blog
Thanks for the constructive comment and plug of your product.
That's such a "US only" statement... along most of Europe from Russia to Spain and from Ireland to southern Greece you can run safely almost anywhere as long as you wear mostly cheap-looking clothes (eg. no $100+ shoes, no iphone on arm-band, no apple watch or rolex, no over-colorful clothes that could be mistaken for pro training gear etc.)... As a woman there would be areas to avoid, but by picking to run through more crowded places and at more daily times it can also be safe enough.

I'd bet the same would apply to most US too if you wouldn't purpusefully dress like a "rich runner"... (or go the other extreme and end up looking like a home robber on the run form the police :P).