skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm by no means an expert, but I wonder if it isn't actually the 'uninterested' EU parties who are turning this into a 'bad' deal for the UK.

After all, with little to lose personally from a poor UK-EU trading deal, those uninterested parties have a much stronger incentive to push for other things they find important (such as freedom of movement).
What final "assumption" are you referring to, a definition or an axiom?
If you're not aware of 6k charges on your credit card (or even 6 dollars) then you're a very, very irresponsible person, let alone irresponsible parent.
At what cost to your social life and relationships?
Trying to be cute, get press and promoted? ICE and everyone knows damn well where "illegals" are working. No need to spend money on such elaborate ruses to find them.
> I don’t want web packages, nor AMP, how do I get the ranking bonus and lightning bolt icon with my website (which has Google Pagespeed of 100 and Chrome Lighthouse Pagespeed of over 95)?

First, those metrics say how well optimized your site is, not how long it takes to load. For example, a tiny site that's text and a single poorly compressed image might load in 500ms but get a low score, while a large site that loads in 5s can still get a perfect score if everything is delivered in a completely optimized way. These are metrics designed for a person who is in a position to optimize a site, but not necessarily in a position to change the way the site looks. When speed is used as a ranking signal [1][2] Google isn't using metrics about optimization level, it's using actual speed.

But ok, metrics etc aside, Google could switch to using loading speed instead of AMP to determine whether a page is eligible for the carousel at the top, and whether to show the bolt icon. But AMP means a page can be preloaded without letting publishers know that they appeared in your results page. You can't just turn on preloading without solving this somehow. AMP is kind of a hacky way to do this, and I'm really looking forward to WebPackages allowing preloading for any site in a clean standard way.

> With web packages or AMP, if I navigate from Google Search to Page A, and then from Page A to Page B, Google can see that I went to page B.

No, web packages don't allow this, what makes you think they do?

(Disclosure: I work at Google on making ads AMP so they don't get to run custom JS. Previously I worked on mod_pagespeed which automatically optimizes pages to load faster and use less bandwidth. Speaking for myself and not the company.)

[1] https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-i...

[2] https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2018/01/using-page-speed-i...
Super interesting article -- it broke down the steps of the simulation algorithm very clearly and the code samples supplemented the theoretical explanation well. I've been learning D3.js recently (working with force-directed graph simulations) and this reinforces a lot of the concepts I've encountered in learning graph simulations with D3.
It's not morally wrong to categorize them. It's morally wrong to use them to take their family's money, though. (And maybe that's what being gotten at: a notion of these as regular and eager customers of free will, which is wrong.)
that very much depends on your definition of "important"

personally I would call employment, business, immigration, social security, criminal law, and half a dozen things listed there as important, but there you go
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy
Oh great. What a moral. 'oh that's fine. cool. agreed. just double checking'. Thanks god he's not a judge. These guys side Facebook versus a 13 year old kid, nice morality.
The executive's ability to be flexible with the law is supposed to be used expeditiously when it's urgent. For example, it would be appropriate to suspend ICE operations temporarily during a national emergency. The executive isn't supposed to just unilaterally decide that some law is "too mean" and then stop enforcing that law indefinitely. It's shocking that people so hostile to the executive body seem to wish for the executive body to gain implicit legislative power!
It's illegal in many countries to market unhealthy food to kids, so while they can buy the candy, or ask to be bought it, kids TV channels for example won't have ads for them which limits the negative impact.

You can market toys to kids, but most toys aren't harmful to their health, mental wellbeing, or financial state. Arguably many kids toys promote good health, wellbeing, educational material, etc.
I’m not sure about an Android internal app, all employees are given brand new iPhone x’s.

When I worked there we all had to use the internal fb and IG apps and do all communication through them.

Switching to android would mean a huge IT change and mean replacing every employees phone.
Thanks for the explanation. It is just very sad that things turned out this way.
I think you have that backwards. It was another Islamic regime until the west interfered with it. Then it became more progressive due in large part to our interference. Then the Islamists revolted, wanting to regress back to a less progressive state, fearing secularism - which gave us the Islamic state we have today.
Enrolling in the school ostensibly isn't illegal per se.
If you enjoy chris' videos, and you enjoy the zen of watching someone make things, check out this channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7FkqjV8SU5I8FCHXQSQe9Q
Girona vs. Real Madrid en vivo: Copa del Rey 2019, vuelta cuartos de
https://simplyevents.io/como-ver-assister-el-girona-vs-real-madrid-de-la-copa-online

https://simplyevents.io/Real-Madrid-v-Girona-En-VIVO-ONLINE

https://simplyevents.io/.como-ver-el-girona-vs-real-madrid-de-la-copa-online

https://simplyevents.io/real-madrid-vs-girona-vivo-online-directo-via-directv-online

https://simplyevents.io/como-ver-el-girona-vs-real-madrid-de-la-copa-onlines

https://simplyevents.io/Real-Madrid-vs-Girona-En-VIVO-ONLINE-Gratis
This makes perfect sense if the recruiters knew they were running a fake university.

If a drug dealer hires henchmen to sell their drugs, and under threat of dismissal tells them to move a certain amount of product, the henchmen are still guilty of a crime.

If the kingpin is actually the FBI, everyone working for them is still going to jail.
Just my 2 cents - but I would be ok with light, non-invasive advertising, like that by which DuckDuckGo operates:

https://fourweekmba.com/duckduckgo-business-model/
We mostly use replicated MergeTree, SummingMergeTree, AggregatedMergeTree etc. And yes, we do use Kafka engine to consume directly from Kafka, in additions to standard Clickhouse inserters.
Seeing an informed rebuttle like this always reminds me of the "Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect as illustrated by Michael Crichton:

"You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. . . In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know."
To be fair most relationships that put an important emphasis on Facebook to be maintained are probably not very important.
The US position with Iran has LITERALLY NOTHING to do with gener lines, or causalities or export of terrorism.

The allies that the US works with to contain Iran are worse in every single category you mention. Claiming the moral high ground over Iran is embracing and only works for people who don't have a clue about the middle east.

Iran has complied with an international process according to international law after being bullied by the US when the US claims were never true. Iran never had nuclear weapons, they never had a program to build nuclear weapons and pretty much everybody including US spy agencies agree with that.

After this international process, the US fucked all its allies, went against everything they had worked towards. Just to hit Iran with more sanctions that were originally about nuclear issues but now they have dropped that pretense.

Iran is not a good country, but the US and allies does worse quite often and consistently and Iran has very real and legitimate complaints about how they were treated since 1979.
I like the flutter widget test approach (it't not unique, but it's well executed there):
https://flutter.io/docs/testing#widget-testing

In flutter parlance, a whole view (page/screen) is a widget, and that's the granularity I was testing it - it's good for testing the high level patterns that the screen is meant to adhere to, e.g. Send button appears when there is some text to send.

You can also have golden images for rendering of each screen. They change a lot, but that at least forces developers to look at the changes each time and decide if they're on purpose.
This whole discussion reeks of California.
That's not how our system works for better or worse. The executive branch has co-opted much of congress's authority over the years, so we now have a system where the executive branch is also a legislative branch.

You can complain about the long term problem, and the short term problem at the same time.
Server-side rendering: how to serve authenticated content
The return of Andrea Dworkin’s radical vision
Software Engineer Amazon Seattle
Looking for several mid to senior level (5-15years) for Amazon Prime and Amazon CoreAI teams in Seattle. If interested please message me at tnywil@amazon.com
Then you're probably using the wrong language.
I think it's wrong to market anything that is intentionally created to be addictive.
Do you work for twitch?
I think the magazine is a Sunday insert from the same company.
> You need your phone

This is debatable. What can you really do on your phone that you can't do on a PC?
I unplugged from Facebook a few months ago. I haven't deleted my account because I have some contacts that I have no other way of getting in touch with, but I probably login to see if any important messages have been sent every 3 weeks and sometimes longer.

Nothing of any value was lost. When I login and see all the garbage spammed at me I ask myself "Why should I care about any of this?"
Would this setup be easier to achieve with Reddit? This is pretty much what I use Reddit for (and then WhatsApp for 1-1, BBC for news, and my calendar for events).
Binary Options Arbitrage
Well, between smartphones, desk jobs, lack of proper physical activity there is definitely more people with rounded shoulders and "smartphone necks". And to be honest I don't think anyone read the newspaper for 3+ hours a day [0]

It's especially damaging for kids (still growing + somewhat more malleable bones / joints).

[0] https://www.emarketer.com/content/mobile-time-spent-2018
http://research.cs.wisc.edu/multifacet/papers/micro15_border...

I think this paper presents an interesting overview of how to mitigate a subset of hw-related attack vectors. Seems really relevant.
I love op 9 no 2, yeah it's not too hard although the ending is a little tricky! That sounds like an amazing experience, do you have a video or something?

edit: not too hard but I should say I don't feel I'm at the point I can really do it justice emotionally, as you say, haha.
> itt'l be too good for them to pass up. Itt'l be the only thing going that the UK can accept

Do you mean "it'll"?
There are certainly things I don't agree with with the options available.

This idea that candidates need to perfectly represent everyone's opinions is just absurd. I don't agree with everything that Hillary did or that Trump is doing. That doesn't mean everything they did was bad or good.

But to suggest Jill Stein as a viable alternative when she has some dubious backing doesn't really empower choosing the 3rd party, does it?
Wasnt the last time this actually happened "occupy" and didn't that get dismantled and side-tracked pretty quickly?

IMHO not even a US specific issue, people in a whole lot of "western countries" seem to have forgotten how to meaningfully protest.

Sure, there is the occasional "against climate change" or "for this societal issue" marches, but they all have the problem of being incredibly obscure in their goals and demands.

Long gone are the days of large scale peace protests against very specific "interventions", like the invasion of Iraq triggered.
you should always be skeptical, even of nice experts. But in this case, he backed up his arguments with fairly good data (some of this stuff is still in open disagreement when he claims it's fact) so anybody in competent in the field (like a fact checker) could verify his claims. But make no mistake: this was a carefully written rebuttal by a master of the scientific arts, designed to maximize impact and make the Times look like they were unfair to him.
Terms like Whale are derogatory and dehumanizing words used to remove empathy from a conversation. When you refer to a "whale" you're not bringing humanity into the discussion and thus precluding it form influencing your decisions.
Curated and Niche. Google is still great for general searches in my opinion but when I need a drill down level of search that can only happen with curation, we have a gap there.
Completely different context. You're not wrong, but the usages are not connected.
Yeah, that helps a lot. Still, while the students who enrolled knew it was a fraud, the article didn't mention how many wasted time and money (and aspiration) applying.

Also, prosecutors said that this is proof that the student visa program could be abused. That's not clear at all from this case. We know at least one of the fake school's neighbors knew something was wrong. We don't know how likely this was to have been discovered by authorities routinely, or how many applicants reported the fraud. This is going to put extra pressure on the student visa program for no good reason.
Because most of the Internet is controlled by four or five big companies now.
Anything medium can be encoded and decoded. You transpile your code into pixels, CSS, whatever medium is considered "ok." Images just happen to be large and so can be used to hold a lot of information. You can't just inherently know what is and isn't encoded information and strip out "the bad stuff."

Those pixels do not execute themselves (or cookies, or headers, or whatever we are still allowing). They still need an interpreter. Interpreters are indeed security flaws. Pushing people away from scannable code and towards hiding their code in other filetypes will cause a proliferation of interpreters, and a proliferation of security flaws.
Should consumers be hunted and exploited for profit? Would high-spenders appreciate the label "whales" if this reasoning were explained to them?

The moral issue here is that people generally do not want to be hunted and exploited for profit. They imply that people are prey by labeling them "whale".
Even Photosynthesis can be improved: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/genetically-engin... by 40% apparently.
Doing customer support for one of the big app stores, you will encounter adults spending hundreds or thousands of dollars on play-to-win in-app purchases and subsequently blaming it on their child to get a refund on a daily basis.
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2018/07/11/new-u...

USCIS is not ICE. When USCIS refers people to ICE (the topic of this article), ICE has their own procedures which have more to do with carrying out immigration and customs law than "cruelty".
Of those three? Python. Why? Lots of stuff built in or well-known.

But it's almost entirely irrelevant: reasonable companies will either (a) expect you to code in the language they're hiring for or something at least used within the company, or (b) not care (within reasonable bounds, e.g., don't do your interview in Piet).
Does anyone use vagrant for angular app development?
Legally there is none. Both are considered minors, not capable of giving informed consent for (in many US states) marriage, employment, military service, voting, driving, or opening a bank account independently. And it's not like Facebook deserves rebuke for exploiting 5-year-olds and a Nobel Prize for exploiting 15-year-olds. But it's also true that the content of the article doesn't support the headline.

Edit: Even the math is wrong. If they're asserting that everyone's eligible to be called a "whale" who plays Angry Birds, and that the average age of an Angry Birds player is 5, then the minimum age ("as young as") of a whale isn't 5, it's less than 5.
I think completely different publications is a bit exaggerated. According to wiki:

"The New York Times Magazine is a Sunday magazine supplement included with the Sunday edition of The New York Times. It is host to feature articles longer than those typically in the newspaper and has attracted many notable contributors."

I also was curious as to how supplement was defined within the context of publishing and again according to wiki:

"A supplement is a publication that has a role secondary to that of another preceding or concurrent publication. A follow-on publication complements its predecessor, either by bringing it up to date (e.g. the Index Catalogue), or by otherwise enhancing the predecessor's coverage of a particular topic or subject matter, as in the Tosefta."

In my opinion the difference is insignificant.
I originally wrote "female selection didn't happen much in human society" but changed it since those societies were rather fringe and aren't the dominant human society.

I know there were pockets of it. I remember watching a documentary on a small chinese ethnic group that practiced matriarchy and polygamy. But that's not the dominant nor the successful human society.

99% of human beings live in a patriarchical society. China, Europe, Americas, most of africa, Middle East, etc.

Edit: Here is the PBS documentary if anyone is interested.

https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/rough/2005/07/introductio...

And the chinese ethnic group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosuo
>It's shocking that people so hostile to the executive body seem to wish for the executive body to gain implicit legislative power!

The executive body already has implicit legislative power. There are 2 arguments. How they use that power, and whether they should have it in the first place.

You can have both of those arguments simultaneously.
Something tells me that you are not a parent yourself.
I was recently searching for a metal box that I could put my iPhone in when it's time for me to focus on family. After seeing a few vintage cigarette boxes pop up in the search results, I realized that sticking my phone into a box built for cigarettes would be a helpful reminder of how addictive my phone can be. I even considered getting a Camel-brand tin, but decided to get something classier/more subtle.
A regex is a state machine. You can code the state machine by hand, but that does not invalidate the previous statement.
Sorry, seems there is not much left under UK control

Bentley -> Volkswagen
Rolls Royce, Mini -> BMW
Aston Martin -> Seems to be independent again
McLaren -> Half the company is owned by Bahrain
Lotus -> Geely (China)
Jaguar/Land Rover -> Tata (India)
I had similar issue with iOS.
I didn't disable in-app purchase and right after installing the game, my 6 year old spent $55 and when I got the receipt email a day later it was too late to reverse the transaction.
Lesson learned and in-app option turned off.
> people are not proper Turing machines. They have limited storage and limited running time.

In this sense, people aren't even proper regex machines. They have limited running time. But do you really believe the brain has less computational capacity than a regex machine?

> I think the conventional view is that free will is the requirement for both good and bad actions, not that free actions are by definition good.

What free will means is basically the core problem of moral philosophy, and different positions take different formulations of it. Consequentialists usually try to say that both bad and good actions are free (critics say consequentialists have absolutely zero freedom). Kantians say a free action following the categorical imperative is a good action. What I'm doing in this essay, though that's not the point of this particular essay, is showing a bijection between the categorical imperative and the halting problem.
> why this is not entrapment

because they are charging the recruiters too! Hahaha this is hysterically bad, so because government agents werent the ones getting people to do what they wouldnt have otherwise done

And because deportation isnt a criminal charge

All necessary elements for an entrapment defense

But The recruiters might have a defense and do face criminal charges
uhhhhh.... it's an insert in the sunday times. served up alongside the times on the website. created by the publisher of the times. I suppose you could get technical and say it's an independent publication that is housed within another publication... but that would be pedantic to the point of meaninglessness.
Can there be civil suits against the government for time and money wasted in enrolling into fake universities that are fraudulently certified as legit?

I am struggling to find a good analogy here. Like a fake cop that is certified as legit by the police department? Wouldn't that make him a real cop as far as the law is concerned? How is this a fake univ if it's certified as legit by ICE?
Presumably they're not being charged with attending a phony university. They weren't "entraped" to be here without a visa.
That warning at the end, to always read and follow the directions of your tools, will be burned in my mind now. I bet this video will prevent some bad injuries.
The law makes a clear distinction between entrapment and opportunity.

Setting up a "honeypot" is not entrapment.

That's not to say that this was anything other than a waste of time and resources, and a textbook example of what happens when a law enforcement agency is unleashed from regulation.
> Being born in one place doesn't make you special or entitles you to a job.

Um, in some continues it is. But then I have to ask why have countries at all if being born in a country gains you nothing?

While I see your point I can't help to have a hard time with it. Mostly because you fail to see how detrimental to the country it is when its citizens can't get jobs because they are competing with the res of the world, who don't follow the same rules.

We have countries for a reason. And if the vast majority of people in a country feel they should not have to compete on a world platform for a local job then that seems fair to me.

Lets also talk about numbers. Given there is ~400 million in the US, And ~7 billion people in the rest of the world. It is almost statistically given that we could replace every American citizen worker with a better skilled worker with a non-citizen worker. So I ask again, is that what we want to do? What will that mean for the notion of the US as a country? Why have a country at all?

Why have a country at all? Well right now because other countries will continue to be countries and want to be countries, and they don't all play by the same rules. It might be different if we all played by the same rules but right now it seems like the US is being gamed by everybody else.

But anyways, it matters what country you are born in, and that does grant you some rights that others in other countries were born in don't have. Otherwise we would not even be having this discussion.
Notice they didn't charge the 600 students who enrolled. They charged only 8 of those students who recruited lots of other students. That's kinda shady but it's probably a step removed from entrapment. The article doesn't have anything from the defense's side though.
so the consensus is that fb shouldnt be collecting data but its ok when theres something that portrays fb in an ethically (not morally) bankrupt act through circumstance. smh