skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Size generally; you can aggressive inline it, but you'll likely be pulling in some chunky stuff for the throw. Push the throw out of line and your inline will be more trim.
> It's much less probable to be right about both price and timing

But that's priced into any analysis of the puts. If you're just arguing that speculation in general isn't prudent, then I'm with you, but you can't really say that a particular bet would be a "terrible strategy" (if you mean that in a negative EV sense?) when we don't know what the prices will be.
Can you give an example of a search that works in Google, but not in DDG? It must be a couple of months since I last searched with Google.
More importantly the government cannot deliver both "Brexit" and "business continuity", potentially including such things as "food and medical supplies". This is gradually dawning on even the dimmest Cabinet ministers.
Source? iMessage is E2E encrypted so no, Apple did not share that part (or other encrypted data like keychain). They’ve actually gone pretty far in protecting their E2E encryption from adversarial clouds.
But I'm not sure what it has to do with Brexit.
Here are two lesser-know tricks that can be quite handy:

Using () instead of {} for the functions body allows to isolate it:

foo=5
bar() (
cd /
foo=7
)
bar
echo $PWD # not / but the current directory
echo $foo # still 5

Bash 4.0 can splat array of arguments back into a valid bash string with @Q. This is super useful when you need to stop using arrays, like with `bash -c`

ary=("arg1" "arg 2")
echo "${ary[*]@Q}"
# outputs: 'arg1' 'arg 2'
It's not clear to me that the control group drank 500ml of boiled water.

If they're drinking cold tap water, it could be that the act of boiling the water yields the desired effect. If they're drinking bottled water (and if the instructions said "drink 500ml of water", this would be my first inclination) then maybe the DNA damage is being caused by plastic that's leaching into the water as opposed to any preventative effect in coffee.
Right, though technically the EU insists on a border, not the UK.
I Use AI to Keep a Better Journal
How to reduce the file size of large background images by over 93%
I’m Only 9, and I’m Already in College. Here’s What Life Is Like for Me
Does he remember things still? Personally I'd prefer a note saying: check with X before buying anything online. Can you try to get him to send you links to the Items he wants to buy and you start buying them now? Place it under a guise of "I don't want you buying the same thing twice".
> Brexit is history in the making. The EU is a phenomenally novel way of integrating sovereign nation-states into a singular political entity, that happened without war. It's aim is to make something as singularly powerful as the United States, without force.

The thing is, the people of the UK don't want to be part of that "United States of Europe". It is being forced upon them. The failure of pro-EU people to recognize that they are breeding unrest will lead to civil war, unless they allow the Brits to exit as they've voted to do.
Tips to Develop a Quick Pitch for Potential Investors
Nothing prevents another company from doing that, but all of the hosts & guests are already on Airbnb. Two-sided marketplaces are very difficult to start, but once they have some momentum, it's even more difficult to unseat them.

Look at Craigslist - terrible UI, hundreds of startups have tried to challenge it in the past 15+ years, and yet it's still my go-to when I need to sell some old furniture.
That's the problem we're talking about. It is very feasible but only if performance and energy use is something you want to focus on, while accepting the economic penalty of not prioritizing time-to-market. This is just yet another case of unchecked capitalism and free market destroying the planet. Focusing on energy and resource conservation may be more important as well as feasible, but it's not quite as economically competitive. Unless the industry as a whole decide to do what's morally right, or it is regulated and mandated by the government.
"Anyone who tries to remove a pre-installed Google app from an Android phone, for instance, will likely be confronted by a vague but menacing warning: “If you disable this app, other apps may no longer function as intended.” This is a coy, high-tech form of blackmail: “Give us your data, or the phone dies.”

They're bluffing. Turning off Google Drive, Google Duo, Google Gmail, Google Play Movies and TV, Google Play Movies, Google Play Music, Google Play Store, Google Keep, Google Maps, Google Photos, and Google YouTube doesn't do anything other than turn off those user-facing apps. Google Play Services is the only one that affects other apps. Then install F-Droid and install open source replacements.
I grew up there and my dad owns a real estate brokerage. I can confirm that this is pretty common, and it's a great example of Airbnb making a market that has existed longer than I've been alive (vacation rentals in a resort city) orders of magnitude more accessible to the average person. I've seriously considered (to the point of starting to model it) buying something that can credibly be called "walking distance" to the Coachella venue and seeing how much of the of the mortgage in that month (two Coachellas + Stagecoach) + the tennis tournament in March.
The reviews are worth the price of admission
It's not a corruption of capitalism, it's just capitalism. They found a market, they sell on that market. They dominate that market.

That's capitalism, no need to make up a new term.
You are forgetting 1 aspect. Advertisement. I gladly pay extra to not watch commercials.

I agree with most of your statement. Netflix a few years ago was the only service I needed. They had tons of content from multiple providers. Today it's very few shows outside of their own content. I'm about to cancel honestly, I don't want Netflix's 90% crap content. Amazon Prime is probably the worst of the services from a content perspective even though they are the richest company. Please do yourself a favor and swap to Hulu from Amazon, at least with it you can get some of the latest TV Shows and cartoons.

Per your pirate commentary: The problem I am having is finding a service that has the show or shows I want. Some of the content owners make it impossible to stream the content anywhere, even if you want to pay money! Thus, forcing us to have to go out of our way to find the products, probably illegally.
A lot of people over the years have gotten the message that "use /dev/urandom and forget about it" is the final, end-all, be-all for secure random number generation.

In fact, this ideology (and that's what it is - an ideology) has been trumpeted right here on HN, in some cases by people who repeatedly seem to comment on topics that they don't fully understand. Security is hard, but there's also a high reputational value on being perceived as an authority on the topic. As a result, there are some nuggets of "wisdom" that require asterisks next to them, including this one.

Even though "just use /dev/urandom" is almost always true, it isn't always true. In fact, the universe of cases where some form of blocking entropy is needed (and again, this is a very tiny set) is growing, not shrinking.

https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/186086/is-alway...
Here is nice meta study of coffee and cancer risk (dna damage and cancer are probably linked).

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep33711

> coffee intake was associated with reduced risk of oral, pharynx, liver, colon, prostate, endometrial cancer and melanoma and increased lung cancer risk.

(Heh. Smokers drink nearly twice as much coffee as non-smokers. Smoking increases caffeine metabolism. I think this explains the lung cancer risk)
SSH saves the host identification in .known_hosts file. So after the first connection (that asks you if you know this key, and sure, nobody verifies it) you known for sure that this is the server that you want to connect.

If after all that you receive a message an error from SSH that the host key identification changed, you didn't change this key yourself (or your team) and you still blindly ignore this issue (since it is not easy to bypass either, there is no flag, for example), this is not an UI issue and you're responsible for your actions.
17m people might be in a rage, but the other 16m are equally in a rage, but I've not seen any civil war here yet. With respect, I think you are grossly over-reacting by mentioning civil war.

If it goes to a second referendum and remain win, then that is the "will of the people", not politicians/Westminster elite/EU telling people how to live their lives, it's the fellow man and woman on the street making the decisions just like it was the first time.

Resorting to violence is extremely unlikely. There are always nutbags around but I can't see this turning into anything more.

...and if it did I would remind those considering violence that the vast majority of the remain vote were young and healthy adults, while the leave vote was predominantly from those aged over 54 (1). Every year more and more leavers die, yet the remain ranks just get stronger and stronger as more kids turn 16. No amount of rose-tinted blitz spirit is going to help with those gammy-knees, dicky-tickers, and bad-backs if it comes to the rough stuff.

1 - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36616028
Odd days: research shows coffee is good for you

Even days: research shows coffee is bad for you
> The UK imports a lot of food from EU neighbors. In case of a hard Brexit, this will just ... stop.

A hard Brexit doesn't mean the EU will impose an embargo on the UK. The EU now happily exports food to WTO members outside the EU, and doesn't impose export tolls or restrictions on those that I'm aware of.

Of course the UK might impose its own tolls, quotas and other import restrictions after crashing out of the EU, but that'll be its own doing.

Edit (since OP updated): It seems implausible that the government would make that self-imposed process onerous enough to result in a literal famine. Which goes to the heart of what you've misunderstood here.

This "chaos at the border" refers to chaos for UK companies trying to export things due to customs requirements the EU has, whereas the UK's hypothetical inability to import something would be due to a purely self-imposed post-EU customs process.
You would have to ask a lawyer! I presume the adequately-funded academic research projects have, and are comfortable their contract-trading won't be prosecuted as "bets or wagers" under the Wire Act.
More info: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixed-term_Parliaments_Act_2...
I'm surprised (horrified?) that a control group's DNA deteriorates significantly enough in such a short trial to use as a comparison. #entropy
Not a sine wave. The vocal tract is subtractive; the larynx has to generate a waveform with lots of harmonics some of which the vocal tract can then remove.
Do you see Google and Facebook as equals in terms of badness?

Honestly, I’ve always perceived Google as less insidious than Facebook. To me FB is more in your face, channeling your behavior. Google seems more passive and delivers more utility.

What am I missing?
Wikipedia suggests that

1. The French didn't hold a referendum on Lisbon

2. The treaty was ratified in 2008

Presumably you are either confusing the referendum on the EU constitution with the Lisbon treaty, or trying to suggest that they are one and the same? They are not of course, the Lisbon treaty was drafted specifically to address the concerns with the EU constitution. "The electorate rejected version 1, so we redrafted until it was acceptable" sounds like a pretty good policy to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratification_of_the_Treaty_of_...
how do i use this to answer the phone?
The problem with drawing lines in the sand is that you trip up all the players that make an effort to act responsibly as well, thus reducing the incentive to act responsibly.

You're basically reducing market effectiveness by ignoring the details of available information and grouping unalike things together. The market will likely respond by reducing access to or the clarity of that information *e.g. they'll track you, but hide it even if it's innocuous and the vast majority would have no problem in what info is given up because apparently the people can't be bothered to make a decision on anything but the coarsest of details).
> Nothing in life comes free: everything, including all abstractions, comes at some cost.

Yes. As a slogan, it is imprecise. But it's always been talking about a very specific kind of cost: runtime costs. You're 100% right about there always being some kind of cost, but the slogan doesn't disagree with you.

(Some prefer "zero-overhead principle" instead to make this a bit more clear.)
if dependents are the issue, why not only make it illegal for people who claim dependents on their tax return? or better yet, just make it illegal to neglect your dependents.

I don't have any dependents myself. why do you care if I spend all my money?
> they ignore regulations and simply extract wealth out of our communities

Can you elaborate on this?
What's that supposed to mean? Do you think this person was the literal, direct victim of such practices, and as such "has a [personal] axe to grind?" If so, although it exhibits bias, it also exhibits the phenomenon.

That being said, there are _many_ communities upset by AirBnB's influence on their area. Example: https://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/article_ad1c91a...

Of course, Googling for that article turns up, primarily, AirBnB listings in New Orleans.
I do not know specifically as I have not read Apple Maps policy but to choose Apple Maps over Google Maps says a lot. I use google maps personally. Apple maps is getting better, but it's not google maps. So one can assume, the choice to choose apple over google means, IMHO, is that with Apple Maps they do not track as much as google would/does. Apple stance on privacy, publicly, has been pretty good. Tracking is everywhere and DDG still is sticking to their privacy first method.

Lastly, I love that I can dump random searches from my weird brain into DDG without the feeling that I'm giving some random machine, data that at some point can tell someone what I may want or do or have searched. Everyone knows what you're doing on the toilet, everybody poops, but we still close the door for privacy.
It doesn't only hurt themselves. They are tax paying citizens and the government has an interest in their welfare. They may have dependents. Now Timmy can't go to college because Dad blew their savings. They get a divorce, now mom and dad are depressed and Timmy enters a life of crime (or, less hyperbolic; doesn't make as much taxable revenue as he could have otherwise.)

There are all sorts of laws which protect people from themselves, this is nothing new. See; seatbelt laws for an obvious and simple example.
Can take 15 minutes+ in Oregon since we can't pump our own gas. But yeah, last road trip I got ~600 miles out of a full tank. This company has a loooong way to go if they want to compete with that.
Why? That's the differentiator they chose to go for. You can argue that's it's dishonest, but i don't see the problem with the marketing.
Oh, I have absolutely no doubt. I mean more that the implication that in the US, profoundly capitalist, at times to a fault, has airports as a bastion of socialized community benefit.
Here, I think you dropped your copy of "Das Kapital"
Well, that is the EUs problem, not the UKs.

Neither the UK or Ireland will ever ever be the ones the enforce the hard border.

It would have to be the EU enforcing it, if that is what their trade deals demanded. And I sincerely doubt that the EU would be happy with the consequences of them stationing troops on that border.

Both the UK and Ireland have stated that they will not be enforcing a hard border.
Search would be nice -- I just wish parent would elaborate because I'm not aware of this existing in any other BT device. I'm not sure how it would work, but I don't know the BT spec/featureset.
Are you saying there is currently a coup going on, and the armed forces are taking over the government?
If it's the plastic, then we need follow up studies comparing people drinking coffee in plastic cup vs paper cups vs other non plastic non paper glassware!
Tesla superchargers also peak out at 120KW.
C++ has a garbage collection interface API since ISO C++11, it is up to the respective implementation to provide an optional implementation.
For US viewers, it's kind of like if the Republican party held a national referendum that said "repeal and replace Obamacare in two years", and the vote passed.

Then then they're on the hook to do the actual replacement part and realize that there never was a replacement but they have this hard deadline to get it done.

The fact that the vote was held at all is total madness. They were trying to call a bluff and it blew up in their face. The whole "post fact era" thing only works up until you the point where you need to actually implement policy.
Think of it this way: if your apartment burns down and you don't have insurance, you lose your apartment and everything in it. If your apartment burns down and you do have insurance, you still lose your apartment, but that loss is completely (at least in an ideal world) offset by money provided by the insurance company. Which scenario is the bigger gamble?
With Bing ads even (well actually Bing via Yahoo :))
I agree. Outside of energy, we'll still need oil for asphalt, plastics and other synthetic materials. It doesn't seem like those needs are going away anytime soon.
Added sources. Apple moved the keys for accessing the data at rest to Chinese servers, which were nationalized by the Chinese government. The Chinese government has access to the users' data at rest and the keys to decrypt it.
> I think Airbnb's technology is at least 10x better than Booking's

Perhaps a cynical or unpopular point of view but until the technology becomes a hindrance, does that really matter? Its not as though people are going to these sites because they have great technology. They go to them because the prices are good and they have good UX I assume?
I think this is a ridiculous claim. Are you saying the UK is going to stop food coming across its border when it is to the clear benefit of it's citizens? That is ridiculous. The UK will suspend ALL customs operations before it does that. The bureaucratic state is kind of broken but not that broken.
I think that's a sweeping generalisation. I suspect, admittedly without numbers to back it up, that a significant minority of people in the UK - myself included - are happy to be part of a greater European state. I also suspect that there is a generational factor, and that this significant minority will grow over time to become a majority.
While FB and Google may have birthed "surveillance capitalism", capitalism has always been corrupted, see slavery.

Somewhat recently you had the whole Banana Republic thing too. Capitalism has to constantly expand and create new markets, and when goverments let them, or actively aid them in this process, rights are trampled.

"I have the honor to report that the legal advisor of the United Fruit Company here in Bogotá stated yesterday that the total number of strikers killed by the Colombian military authorities during the recent disturbance reached between five and six hundred; while the number of soldiers killed was one

"John Foster Dulles, who represented United Fruit while he was a law partner at Sullivan & Cromwell – he negotiated that crucial United Fruit deal with Guatemalan officials in the 1930s – was Secretary of State under Eisenhower; his brother Allen, who did legal work for the company and sat on its board of directors, was head of the CIA under Eisenhower"
I think it's a big mistake to blame Google and Facebook. They are just the latest symptoms of a long term trend. I think the real corruption started sometime in 70s or 80s when it became acceptable to declare that a company has no other obligations than to their shareholders.
My understanding from Brussels is that there is no second phase of negotiations. They just voted for a hard Brexit.
Don't bother. Movie is pretty bland by itself, only novelty of
interactivity saves it. But if you ever player Detroit Become Human before,
even interactivity is pretty weak here.
>The amount of meta-work required to consolidate and annotate data we collect, in order to prepare it for public consumption, seems likely to hurt government efficiency.

As a data analyst working for a state government, not consolidating or creating metadata really hurts my efficiency. I've gotten too comfortable with munging tables in PDFs.

>it appears to ignore the fact that non-sensitive information, in sufficient quantity and correlation, becomes sensitive information

This is something we're trying to figure out. The problem is, I doubt many agencies are actually maintaining privacy with their publications. The Census is adopting differential privacy strategies [0], but my own agency relies on practices from the days of printed reports. I know for a fact some of them don't work, but government is slow to adapt.

[0]: https://privacytools.seas.harvard.edu/why-census-bureau-adop...
It's as if some collectors wanted art just because they enjoy it, not just for the resale value or risk involved!

Shocking, I now!!
The alternative is a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, which the UK specifically agreed not to do in the Good Friday Agreement.

A hard border, combined with the overwhelming preference of North Irish to remain in the EU, increases the chance of a successful North Irish referendum for unification with Ireland. If the UK allows such a referendum and Ireland unifies, then the UK is ceding territory anyway. So there's really a no-win scenario assuming that the UK leaves the EU customs union.

If the UK wanted to commit a further violation of the Good Friday Agreement and act to prevent an Irish reunification referendum, or ignore the results of one, the Troubles would very likely start all over again, and the UK would be in no position to negotiate any kind of cease-fire because they would have demonstrated twice over that they can't be trusted in such things.
I disagree. The Single Market is what is very hard to get out of without a hard border on the Irish border. Customs documentation can be addressed away from the border and is potentially fixed with technology, but the necessity of physical checks for standards conformance that cannot be fudged is the real problem.
A Windows crash simulator
At this point a no deal Brexit looks substantially different from the possible-Brexit that was voted upon. Shouldn't there be a new referendum of basically a new question of a no deal Brexit vs Remain? I know very little of British politics, is there some other dynamic at work that pushes to what seems like a strongly economically destructive no deal Brexit?
Reallocating wealth to free up resources to focus on the challenges would be pretty straight forward. The IPCC report had a few figures on various techniques we could explore which to me looks “trivial” given the resources we have at our disposal.

My point: it’s mostly a political issue.
Association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use
I have an axe to grind against mini-hotels that operate without regulation that raise rents for everyone while providing massive money to a small number of interests.

So yeah.
We have anti-drunkenness laws in the US to deal with people who drink to much.

AFAIK, no such laws exist with respect to gambling.
I would debate the phrasing of that answer. The value unit ($) is implicitly pluralized. Fully written out, that phrase would be "four point four billion dollars". The value unit is pluralized, but the numbers are not pluralized.
To your parenthetical comment: May be unrelated, but totally anecdotal, smokers tend to drink a very light roast that is easily drinkable like a folgers or maxwell house, maybe a coffee shop light roast, like a Dunkin. I don't think smokers are downing cups of Starbucks dark blend and if they are god help their stomachs.