skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You absolutely can run GPL software embedeeded however you feel. You can't distribute it without meeting the conditions, however (and some database software providers think distribution within a company counts as distribution, so there's that)

AGPL is a totally different beast.
This is a terrible standard, unfortunately. This makes branded or "clever" SSID's difficult and awkward. (And Microsoft has a different standard too ...)

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2015/07/windows-10-shares-your-w...
Already posted here several times, sorry mate.
> You are assuming he bought the building with company resources. If he spent his own money/took on the liability personally, that is his business.

It would be his business if he rented out his property to an organization that he can't sign contracts for. But as it stands, he is transferring money from an account he only partially owns (but fully controls, with legal obligations to his co-owners which he seems to be breaking) to an account that he owns fully. It's a sneaky way to give himself a raise that is easier to get past the board. The article even cites WeWork with "approved by the board or an independent committee", which implies that not all of those arrangements happened worth explicit board approval. How he got into the possession of the means by which the transfer from controlled-but-only-partially-owned to owned was facilitated is an unrelated topic.
No one cares about your product video
Really brave to take a gamble on negative income. I really hope it pays off. This could be a very good example of how to make free software.
NYT advertising is still targeted to their demographic though. NYT would know their demographic pretty intimately at this point.

I would be surprised if there is no difference, but advertising worked for decades without hyper-targeted ads, I'm sure it will keep working.
Part of Antarctica Was Not Supposed to Be Shrinking
Conservatives didn't elect Trump. They tried to elect everybody else but Trump, he was maybe their sixth choice out of the original group.

Independents and particularly white women elected Trump. They were the most important swing vote that determined the critical states that gave Trump the electoral college edge over Hillary's massive $2 billion political campaign. Hillary's failure to resonate with independent white women and minorities, particularly black voters, sank her campaign.
I wish America had universal health care. If i do this, I can afford to pay for rent and food in a low cost of living area but not health insurance.

Anyone know of a nonprofit that pays for health insurance for ppl working on OSS?
"Capitalism produces corruption" is not the same as "there's something inherently capitalist about corruption".
I suggest you Google "phones broadcast ssids". And then go get a stiff drink.
I get that most spelling corrections on internet discussion boards are like that, but I don't think that's the case here.

It was a substantive error in the use of a whole word/phrase, and the commenter was trying to do you a favour by relieving you from that misconception for the future.
Anyone working on Alpine and Musl wins my more or less automatic upvote.
And then full-time, with no immediate reimbursement and no long-term guarantee. Refreshing. Thank you, sir.
Well, if you ever deal with sensitive analog signals, what you're doing would reduce delays and inductive pick up from other lines. Of course, you'd only clear the area for those, not the whole board.
I guess you don't have a lot of experience with the police here.

This is actually very common. Whether you have dark hair or not, the former just makes it more likely. What I learned is that by law they're supposed to do that job. However, the general recommendation is not to go to the police, but rather to write the complaint to the DAs office[1]. Not only is a complaint to the DA office generally more fruitful they also immediately give you a reference number, which is more valuable than what most police officers will give you when you file a complaint there.

I'm going to contact the DPO yes, but I don't have any expectations. I'm not a big fan of Casper actually, his last legal publication is about animal rights. The SH DPO is way better efficient and faster at decisions. The line up is two ladies leading it, one of them with a technical background(computer scientist) and the other one a lawyer[2]. I work in German government, and we even tried to pay SH to get feedback(something they won't do).

That's why I was surprised when the Hamburg DPO received praise at the 35C3, since that's not inline with what I've seen from them at all.

[1] https://www.unternehmer.de/recht-gesetze/122808-so-erstatten...
[2] https://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/ueber-uns/
> Instead I would argue that the nature of the corruption has everything to do with the ideological foundations of said system.

How so? Is corruption different somehow depending on the ideological foundations of the system? Corruption is corruption. Every system has rules. When you subvert those rules for personal gain, that's corruption.
It's all about the brand, ad tech firms are even willing to take losses to acquire big publishers so that they are more attractive to advertisers.
You can do that, or you can let priority of business requirements drive your testing efforts. For each project, I have a certain set of hard requirements that will never be used in the field. We deliver these half-assed and fix bugs if 2 years later someone uses the feature by accident.
Because you not always want to put everything in the box (and if you do, there's a shortcut to do it), and "git commit file1 folder/folder/ * .cpp folder/folder/ * .h ..." for a complex set would be annoying and require you to mentally keep track of it from the beginning.

Many beginners will start by always doing "git commit -a" and that's fine, as long as they know there's an alternative once they need it.
But do people generally think that targeted ads are especially accurate? If anything, I’d think people are bothered by all that privacy invasion and still getting completely irrelevant ads!
"failure to resonate" being "Fake facebook memes knocking Hillary posted from a partisan meme factory" made her demographic stay home from the polls (they didn't vote for T either)
Perhaps that's what google want you to believe, much like how Target scared people off with their targeted (heh) marketing that outed, among things, that a teenager was pregnant due to the things she started buying. After those events, they started inserting random ads to give a plausible chance that the very-targeted ads were random.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-targ...
Virtual Laboratories in Probability and Statistics
That is entirely not true, both iOS and Android send out requests for known APs when not connected to Wi-Fi. iOS does it VERY often in fact (depending on your list of known APs, could be upwards of 50x/min while device is in use). If you have a wifi chipset you can put in monitor mode, it’s easy to see how noisy mobile devices are.
Seems Linux version also depends on forking to the shell:

https://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/posix/wordexp.c.html
I just assume that there will be camera constantly recording when I stay in airbnb, or anywhere really. They way I never have to worry about whether it exist or not. As recording technology becoming more and more advance, it's less and less reasonable to expect privacy. I rather adapt my life to fit this new culture.
>efficiently connecting people with a message inherently involves targeting

The point of this thread is that maybe it doesn't.
Not everyone stays a beginner forever, and it's nice to have a tool that doesn't play to the
lowest common denominator. It's really not that hard to just do a "git commit -a" if you
want to avoid staging.
I know a guy in Sacramento with a lawn mowing business. He hirs high school guys and pays them minimum wage. He has 4-6 teams going 4 days a week, and he clears $300K a year. His expenses are 6 trucks, 40 riding mowers, and gas. His employees tend to be high school burn outs.
That’s what they did on the “European constitution”. On Maastricht, on schengen.
>Not sure this makes sense to me? There's corruption in every system, regardless of the ideology behind it

I'm saying that some types of corruption are endemic to certain systems. And if we see these types of corruption time and again on a system, then the system enables that type of corruption.

>It seems like corruption is simply endemic to the human condition. It has nothing to do with capitalism/communism/etc. Whatever the system happens to be, we will find a way to corrupt it.

My argument wasn't about corruption in general (which we will always have under every system), but about a certain type of enterprise-related corruption, that can't be brushed away by "no true Scotsman/capitalism", as if 'truly adhering' to the ways of capitalism would eliminate it.
Elon Musk's Bad Writing Habits Hurt Tesla
The point is that exploitation (of the people, the system, etc) for personal gain has nothing to do with capitalism, or socialism, or any other system.

Some people will do that in any system, it's human nature.

Now, in a system that has the rule of law you cannot be prevented to do something that isn't illegal. This is actually the best (or least bad) system we've come up with.

It's childish to blame capitalism.
You and I might, a prior, believe that they would be much more valuable, but after 10 years and with some of the sharpest minds in the world working on the problem, facebook has never once shown me an ad for something I wanted. I have as far as a recall only twice clicked on ad on google with intent to acquire the item (as opposed to just clicking on the ad rather than go to the homepage of a company).

If you could actually create ads for things that I would want, personalized ads are probably worth more. I just don't think it is possible with current technology.
Who could possibly not be a vested interest? It's hard to think of more than a few cases where I've personally wanted to learn about something and didn't, at some level, hope for one answer or outcome over another. "Ban vested interests" is an impractical policy. stevenhuang's suggestion to be aware of them is much more practical and has the benefit that "vested interests" who truly do wish to fund an objective study aren't stopped from doing so.
>do you have any source for your first statement that "It's absolutely working so well because they are NYT" other than your gut feeling?

6 year experience working in ad-tech on different projects.

>Just because other sites are smaller doesn't mean they can't do it or work together.

Well, try to get a slice of Procter&Gamble or Volkswagen ad budget being a small guy and not having any targeting.

> they just hire Google or any other ad network for that. They could do the same with non-targeted ads.

This is not how it works.

If you are a small site, you set a google or any other ad network tag on your site -- right.

After that, when someone visits your site, you initiate a call to these ad networks with user cookie.

If this user is identified as known (say, male, 25-35 y.o., NY, was interested in Hi-Fi equipment) some advertiser may pay a lot to show an ad to this guy. 5$ CPM is not uncommon, and you may even get $10-20 from time to time.

If this user is totally anonymous and there are no advertisers interested in him, good luck getting even $0.5 CPM. Most probably impression will go unmonetized.

>About your edit: Yes, this is literally how advertising has always worked; you 'target' an entire audience, not an individual.

nope. in case of retargeting or even modern prospecting you do target individual, just as in example above.

If good portion of your audience is known to DMP's (Data Management Platform, basically tracking silos, google "Salesforce DMP" for example) and other ad-tech players, you will easily get x5 return on showing ads to them, as compared to anonymous users, all other things equal.

And this is how you make money being a small publisher on the internet these days.
Arq Cloud Backup Backs up all your files automatically. Installs in 1 minute
We don't know. I'm going to tell you a short story, though.

Rumor has it that KMS[1] was developed entirely because a deep-pocketed RH customer was annoyed that their workstations showed a fraction of a second of the boot/init log, and wanted a more seamlessly-graphical boot.

This feature was not universally welcomed by the kernel community. It excluded BSD cousins and frustrated nVidia and AMD/ATI. I remember standing next to the DRM/KMS maintainer while Linus yelled at us.

RH absolutely will interact with upstream on behalf of their customers. They don't just "open a GH issue"; they present designs, code, rationale, and evidence to upstream. I wonder whether this is something that Oracle does, but it doesn't sound like it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Manager#Kerne...
> and everybody says 'its not me!' and it doesn't get fixed.

Test automation is not a remedy to prop up broken leadership. I would appoint an arbitrary owner of the defect and that person would visit with other people as necessary to remove or dismiss various functionality from blame one by one. Once the appropriate collision of changes is discovered it will become more clear how to address resolution.
That is fantastic.

"There are only two hard problems in Computer Science: cache invalidation, and naming things." -- Phil Karlton
I wouldn't say it monitors the directory, because there is no git daemon running. Git just looks at the changes whenever you run a git command
Future of Decentralised Web (Part 1)
Google has probably put in you in the category interested in "sports", without giving it a second thought.
I understand storage, but could you elaborate on why there would be higher network stability with Openstack?
Racist behaviour by German police is a thing. No need to call "bullshit" on something that you haven't experienced yourself yet.

> German police will file your case in any case.

Yeah, that's what you'd expect. Doesn't always happen.
huh. this was easier than expected
They are screwing (the other) shareholders.
I completely agree. I've seen a lot of these, and this one is simple, to the point and easy to understand.
Space Merchants: a SF novel about hyper-developed consumerism (1953)
I tried it. If you had a super serious algorithm where you were will to spend any money to test it (a central security algorithm for example), it might be worth it.

The problem I had is that there were many many mutations which led to code which was functionally identical, just a bit slower, or took a different route. You have to manually verify every mutation to check if this.

For one mutation it took me 30 minutes to convince myself the algorithm was still doing the same thing, just in a different way.
Just to be clear, "brine" isn't "salty water."

It mostly is, and the additional chemicals they mention are already in the sea water, not that were added somehow in the process. It's just concentrated.

That it's concentrated is a problem, obviously -- very high-saline water (e.g. brine) and concentrated toxins are a problem, and would cause environmental problems if just dumped. The most common way to deal with brine is simply diluting it before discharge, ensuring that the salt content isn't high enough that it sinks and forms a brine pool.
Set a wifi chip in monitor mode, fire up wireshark, then see for yourself. Rather easy to do and once you do, you’ll learn to keep wifi off when you aren’t intentionally wanting it.
There's no clear motive. I guess he's keeping the company alive long enough to sell off more of it's assets, but it seems like a relatively low yield operation to me.

Perhaps he's operating on a level we can't comprehend
This is such a terrible article and provides no value.

How is it news that I would be able to recall an emoji that I probably see multiple times a week compared to a symbol that I might be lucky to see once a year, if that?
> said the same criminals also stole advance press releases sent to three newswire services

Yeah I remember the charges against those people too

Basically newswire services get hacked and people get the earnings reports beforehand

SEC gets hacked and people get the earnings reports beforehand

I think public resources shouldnt be spent on that. Prosecute the hacking but just drop the “trading on material non public information but only in the equities capital markets and only when there is a duty from the source to keep things nondisclosed” sanctions. It is so narrow but extremely expensive to prosecute, has with little efficacy in stopping the behavior, and incorrectly effects the collective conscious on what can be traded and when. People at this point think its actually illegal to have a trading advantage in any context
I refuse to work with AMP simply because it seems like the only reason for its existence is to retain more users permanently in the google "ecosphere". Making performant, fast loading websites has always been a priority for me and my employers, AMP isn't being integrated everywhere because companies want to make their pages load faster, they simply don't want to be penalized by google for not doing AMP.

So TL;DR AMP is rarely implemented for the right reasons, and the implementations reflect this.
I don't know if moving is an option for you. But there are plenty of countries that offer free healthcare.

Sweden, UK, Norway... the list goes on.
Same. On a recent trip a close friend advised me to look at hotels as well as airbnb.
Turns out that a 5* hotel was renting a room at half price (I was looking for a room at the last minute), making it competitive with a mid range airbnb.

I am definitely going to do comparison shopping again, it was an awesome experience.
There is an app called Fing on iPhones and maybe Android. It will scan the WiFi you are on and give you a bunch of information. There’s also a few more network functions you can do. It recognizes phones, my plex server, and a brother printer at my house to name a few.

No router login required just the WiFi password.
What’s the difference? On cable there’s 100 channels with nothing good on. In Netflix there’s an entire catalogue with nothing good on demand.
And since you had asked for the difference and not the ratio, the candidate immediately failed, right?
Is there a reason why all SEC filing shouldn't be immediately publicly available?
>How so? Is corruption different somehow depending on the ideological foundations of the system?

Of course.

Different systems enable, empower, and encourage, different types of corruption.

(Corruption being an abstract word, in programming terms there's no corruption "class", just corruption instances. So the nature of those corruption instances depend on the classes defined in the program -e.g. capitalism.c- you're running...).

(And of course share some basic corruption types, present in all societies/systems, e.g. theft -- the POSIX of corruption).
For example in typescript this is valid:

type A = {name: string}
type B = {name: string}
function print(obj: A) { alert(obj.name);}
let a: A = {name: “hello”};
let b: B = {name: “world”}
print(a);
print(b);

This is because of typescript structural equality and I think that the same applies to flow given your link.
Obviously if I want a function to accept an email I don’t want the same function to accept an address, but in typescript you can’t guarantee it because you have no way to get rid of structural equality as far as I understood.
Well, yes, you're very much right on that regard, and as others mentioned, the 'official installation instructions' were always using Mongo's official repo, so it's a different case.

But I still feel that Red Hat has pull with the Linux industry, and others might make their decisions based on "what's RHEL up to".
>> All I see in this post is complaints and no real solutions. The solution that's given is what? Have less data?

The solution is to direct research effort towards learning algorithms that generalise well from few examples.

Don't expect the industry to lead this effort, though. The industry sees the reliance on large datasets as something to be exploited for a competitive advantage.

>> You can reduce it via PCA one of the many techniques in multivariate statistic.

PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique. It reduces the number of featuers required to learn. It doesn't do anything about the number of examples that are needed to guarantee good performance. The article is addressing the need for more examples, not more features.
I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect this may cause you to lose the liability protection of the corporation. From [1]:

"The veil of liability protection provided by an entity may be pierced based on the following theories:

Alter Ego Theory. If you run your company as little more than your “alter ego,” as a mere extension of yourself (this will generally be the case where there is a lack of separateness between you individually and the company itself, due to commingling of funds, lack of proper governance, and other factors)."

1 https://businessattorneyinaustin.com/llc-corporation-liabili...
Or, how about one rule: No cameras in living spaces. If you want to make money using AirBnB, you understand that you can't use cameras inside living spaces. I don't think we need to invent a new bureaucracy to deal with this.
Is any OSS project working on MongoDB API layer for FoundationDB ?
It was a strategy of the tory government to be as ambiguous as possible about what brexit would actually mean, how it would be implemented, what the details are. Their aim was to cause uncertainty and dissuade people from voting leave.
I guess so. I wrote some tutorials back in 2010
https://web.archive.org/web/20100604100310/http://www.dealta...

https://web.archive.org/web/20100725142105/http://www.dealta...
Yes - so they're not released while the markets are open.
Some of the biggest web hosting sites were vulnerable to simple account takeover
> It's funny to me, because AirBnB runs in to all the same problems we had with hotels a hundred years ago. We have dozens of taxes, rules, regulations, building codes etc now for hotels. I imagine at some point it will be the same for AirBnBs. What's old is new.

An industry can only be disruptive for so long. Eventually, it will either fail, or be successful and become the new status quo.
Here's my best argument for why UBI can't work in the USA. Let me know where i went wrong:

My TV told me a "living wage" is at least $15 (but probably higher in liberal controlled areas like NYC / most CA cities / etc due to high cost of living & taxation), but we'll start with $15 to make it easy.

$15/hr at 40hr/week = $31,200 per year.

$31,200 * 328,300,000 population of USA = $10,242,960,000,000

Written out (for emphasis) that's TEN TRILLION TWO HUNDERD FOURTY THREE MILLION DOLLARS. That's just the handouts, not counting in any overhead / administrative costs to give out the handouts. It'll likely be more than that if you adjust it higher than $15 for people living in NYC, etc.

Meanwhile, the entire GDP of the USA is less than 20 Trillion. That's the current GDP where people are incentivized to work, so it would likely go down (perhaps drastically) when people are paid to do nothing under UBI.

Let me know how that adds up.
Countries with proper (ie almost everyone has it so it is reasonably affordable) paid-for healthcare exist as well, though I'm not aware of one that would be as cheap as the US could be in terms of cost of living.
There's been a couple of studies that confirm people will sell out their employers for as little as an extra $500.