skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not the parent commenter, but wanted to chime in on this – it’s two different evils / bad… however I feel that google is more bad because they have spent years trying to convince the world they are good and trustworthy, many people have come to believe that ‘googling it’ is truth – and yet there is so much censorship with google that many people will not find the truths they are seeking.

At least with fbook it’s fairly transparent – we are cramming ads down your throat, and people are sharing shit that is not necessarily true but it makes you feel the ‘others’ are bad, and your tribe is better, and we make it easy to like and share.

There are many other reasons for the bad things these companies do that could weigh in on who is worse for the world, who is worse for democracy, etc -

Sure facebook might be able to cause more damage to more people more quickly – easily being weaponized and helping people spread dangerous messages around the world, it’s fairly transparent that it’s random fake people being fake, and advertisers are trying to sway you to do things you would not be doing otherwise.

however Google is more evil, as it purports itself as the arbiter of truth – yet it hides so much from the world and is opaque in so many ways, the truths it shows are not counter balanced by others who have similar access to show the other side of whatever story.

Google is unfair to it’s users and webmasters. Thing is, many people may never know it. That is more badness imho.
The EU is quite popular among most of its other citizens. (Half) the UK citizenry was an outlier in that regard.
Curious, do you have examples of this working well? It sounds like SOAP, which in my experience ends badly. Yes because, well, SOAP, but also because sharing your schema means you're stuck with it along with any internal assumptions about design that result from it.

I'm assuming you're more likely talking about something like GRPC/protobuf which I have similar gripes about.
Tiles and edges
You're using low-dimensional intuition. If your data has a non-linear relationship between 1000 features (or more), then 500 million samples is quantifiably better than 1 million samples. If these are boolean features, you have 2^1000 possible data points. Your samples are extremely sparse.

The current state of the art of ML assumes nonlinear relationships between all parameters. It can't assume simpler & reasonable models, and therefore it can't extrapolate easily with reduced data.
Steep them in some hot water and serve with cream.
The Relevant Xkcd is actually an excellent guide to why this is a problem: https://xkcd.com/882/
So if you implement an interface and then use code generation to create proxy from a "parent class", congratulations you just reinvented inheritance. What's the difference?
Here's a summary report from the EU: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/59682...
I was referring to the products of cell degradation. Autophagy – destruction of cell components or full cells – is a constant, natural, necessary process. Its waste products have to go somewhere, and biomarkers related to autophagy, and all the other waste-eliminating functions of the kidneys and liver, can be detected by byproducts in urine.

It's also the case that full red and white blood cells, and epithelial cells, are found in urine, and at higher-than-trace levels in various disease states... but that may just be incidental to kidney/urinary tract functioning.

Still, more peeing from regular use of a diuretic like caffeine, and commensurate higher water intake, is going to mean more flushing of anything unwanted in your blood, like the broken DNA strands detected by this study.

Which raises my question: is there really less DNA damage, or has the detectable evidence of the damage just been swept out more rapidly?
>getting them to answer the question "So what did you do?" is a monumental ask, much less fixing the issues they've caused.

Protip: remote desktop. Trying to do support over the phone is infuriating for both parties. It's almost always quicker and less frustrating to talk them through opening a remote desktop session so you can fix the issue yourself.

TeamViewer is free for personal use, it's quick and easy to install, it's cross-platform and it works well even over crummy connections. There's a reason why all the tech support scammers use it.
It is just the nature of university wide committees that you won’t always have experts in every field on the committee.

We certainly had people for outside the STEM fields on this committee and they were in no better position than the scientists trying to rank these grievance study students and projects.
Luca Deri, the author of nDPI did an excellent talk on this topic at the DPDK summit in December. The techniques they have to use now to apply heuristics on https is really cool:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Vp8-UONhmM&t=0s&index=17&li...
Which sage, prophet, satirist, poet, con artist, whomever had their ideas faithfully represented, properly understood once they were discovered?
Funny thing is so many liberals that say they care about the environment are buying them...
Indeed. "Many agencies, particularly the military, would intentionally run out of money, obligating Congress to provide additional funds to avoid breaching contracts." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antideficiency_Act
> whole-unit rentals totaling less than 90 days per year, as well as shared-unit rentals of any length

The multiple dwelling law does not allow any whole units to be rented for less than 30 days. There’s no exception for less than 90 days in a year total.

From the MDL:
A ‘class A’ multiple dwelling is a multiple dwelling that is occupied for permanent residence purposes… ‘Permanent residence purposes’ shall consist of occupancy of a dwelling unit by the same natural person or family for thirty consecutive days or more and a person or family so occupying a dwelling unit shall be referred to herein as the permanent occupants of such dwelling unit.

Per your own link that means 75% of nyc Airbnb revenue is derived from facilitating illegal transactions.
I'll trust some beautiful fem-robot that says she likes me for who I am and that I make her laugh and tells me how lucky my late wife was and that no she needs the bank account details just so she can wire the car down payment I've been taking about to my granddaughter and how she's sure my daughter wants power of attorney to get control and feed a fentanyl habit and that yes even though I've had two heart attacks a trip to Bali would do me good.

I'm f*cked.
There is a huge difference between complying with a state’s requirements and relying on privacy violation for your business model.
How do you have a single market without common rules and hence political integration?
You're redefining words; rationality means something much more specific than "not magical thinking".
Many of the exact same properties are on VRBO.com already, so Airbnb doesn't even have a lock on their own properties.
If the Globe is warming via ARTIFICIAL or NATURE
then what can we really do as INDIVIDUALS ?

Even if everyone in West (USA + UK + CA + NZ + AU )
swapped from

* Grid power to solar

* Rain tank water from grid water

* Countries swapped from Coal to Nuclear power

* Countries swapped from Petrol to 100% ethanol

Would this really impact the pollution from India + China ?
Nice one, all the best!!
I had an awd ats with blizzak all around. It handled the snow better than any suv I'd been in.
The best thing said in the article is "Many people have been predicting a China crisis for a long time, and it has kept on not happening". Since China has a planned economy with a strong grip from the government, they could keep things going for a while. No planned economy has ever gotten so big
Interesting. Is there a benefit to running Kubernetes in Openstack in their case vs running it on bare metal?
None of the data you describe ever leaves the device unless you opt in to syncing it to iCloud (which is not on by default). The FaceID/Fingerprint never leaves the device and if you don't enable iCloud syncing of the other data off the device the data is unreachable with keys kept on the device.
An income cannot be negative
Not to put too fine a point on it, they once said that - the linked paper from Brin and Page was published in 1998, when they were still students.
I believe, but cannot prove, that systemic fraud has soured many on digital advertising.
Commons relates to access, not ownership. Ownership relates to property and the sine qua non of property is ability to exclude. Everybody owning something is a non-sense statement in the context of public policy. As both a legal and practical matter public property is owned by specific governmental institutions so that access can be efficiently controlled.

Tragedy of the Commons describes the exact situation where people have unfettered access to exploit a resource, capable of deriving a personal benefit to the detriment of everybody else; and specifically such that exploitation of the resource produces significantly less social benefit than if access were limited. It doesn't matter if 99% of people are conscientious and abstain from unfairly exploiting the resource because of a cultural sense of transitive "ownership" as a citizen or human. The laws aren't for the 99%, they're for the subgroup of people willing to subvert the norm for personal gain (and to be fair everybody has been and regularly is a member of that subgroup at some point).
Because it's only illegal because it's not regulated "properly?"
Whats wrong with using Openstreetmaps
Instead of Company XZY cloud solution ?
> however as with uber this comes down to private property rights, who do you choose to side with. Me, I am with the property owners as a Libertarian

What about the property rights of the landlord? The co-op? Fellow condo owners? In addition to violating state law most of these units in NYC are being rented in violation of signed agreements (leases, proprietary leases, condo rules incorporated into purchase agreements).
I'm not convinced that this wasn't the second biggest mistake of my life
The article says taxes on the rich in the us are a fairly high 37%. But that's quite misleading, because the rich have all sorts of ways to cut those taxes, like tax shelters, that are unavailable to everyone else. The actual rates the pay are far lower, as low as zero.
Unless we are vastly different heights, an SUV is always much easier to get into. I had an Audi A4 prior to the Grand Cherokee, and nearing 40 years of age, I grew tired of the "fall in/climb out" ingress/egress of a sedan that is low to the ground. Im 6'2", and my Grand Cherokee (which sits about and 1.5" lower than the other models) is pretty much perfect sit height. I don't need a third row, and the grand cherokee is not 3 row, you have to get the Dodge Durango for that extra row. I love wagons and hatchbacks and SUVs. They are variations of the same flavor. That was the point I was driving at. A wagon is the same shape as an SUV. The spaciousness of a wagon is practical. An SUV sits higher and is easier for some to get in and out. I don't see why there is any distinction made. I would not correct anyone who called my Grand Cherokee a "wagon". Remember the original Grand WAGONeer?
With a garage and an air wrench, changing 4 tires is a breeze. I hope you made them do at least 1 each with manual tools.
Cryptocurrencies Business
I've thought a bit more about it, and concluded that while the above is a neat answer, it doesn't explain the question, and [thewarrior]'s remarks were nearer the mark on that. So here goes.

It's tempting to think of "knowledge" as some relationship between the mind and a single fact. But when we use the word "knowledge", what we actually mean is "an accurate world model" - a set of beliefs. This is the disconnect that Gettier cases are designed to expose - they construct scenarios where someone's mental model is inaccurate or incomplete, yet by sheer luck produce a single, cherry-picked correct prediction. We are uncomfortable calling these correct predictions "knowledge" because as soon as you start probing the rest of the mental model, it falls apart. Sure, they think there's a cow in the field, and there really is one. Ask them any more questions about the scenario though ("what color is the cow?") and they'll give wrong answers.

From this perspective, "knowledge" as a "justified, true belief" is a perfectly coherent concept - the problem lies with the inadequacy of the word "justified" to describe the output of a complex decision procedure that incorporates many beliefs about the world, such that it could be expected to yield many other correct predictions in addition to the one in question, up to some arbitrary threshold.

A thought experiment - suppose you tell the observer that the cow they see is made of paper mache. They no longer believe there is a cow in the field. Intuitively, has their knowledge increased or decreased?
I took the title the author used on a thread, since I think the title of the album is not explicit.
search.

I advertise a rule set, you give me a function - pattern really - and i return all the data related to that pattern.

There are other organizations that accept a function. effectively the result is return the record in the True case, and don't in the False case.
There are many jurisdictions where this is an extremely dangerous assumption. Knowingly facilitating illegal transactions is often a crime.
> This problem did not affect the TAP production environment in the same way due to it simply being a much smaller environment

Is it common for a dev environment to be larger than production...? Maybe paints a picture about Target's ratio of software developers to traffic/load?
Filtered Dispatch (2008) [pdf]
Well, if I do "activemq vs rabbitmq" I then switch to "comments", I get 2 results. The 2nd hit is reasonable: "ActiveMQ: Not ready for prime time"

Google gives many more results, and a few on the first page seem quite relevant. Most notably: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5531192

but also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1657574
That sounds like a pretty compelling reason for me to stay in Texas. :) I like snow and all, but dealing with that daily is not something I would enjoy. That said, a Grand Cherokee is a very capable vehicle properly equipped. Its not like you could stick a Subaru Outback in its place and the outcome is any better. You need snow tires and or chains and to pretty much stay home when the snow is that bad.
It's funny what you say here, but the truth in what you say actually makes it more sinister if we consider that many of these personalized ads are paid for by companies that are poisoning the earth and babies.

(assuming that bayer and johnson and johnson may have given fbk or big G money for ads at some point, and perhaps companies that make plastic or pump poison into the ground and water to extract gas, other companies that use plastic, etc)

To think that these 'top companies" make it easier to use data to change an ad slightly so that it sways the opinion of open group of people one way and another group another - and get be put right in front of someone's eyes at the moment they are feeling down or researching something else -

This kind of propaganda power is indeed saying a lot about the improvement of the well educated and powerful humans of today.

As to the "great improvement" of humans today.. I'd say a majority are being influenced, and it's more often about extracting money from the majority than it is to personalize in a do-no-burn, let's-un-poison kind of way.
ICE sedan sales may be falling, but the Tesla Model S and Model 3 are selling just great.
uhh I think we killed it lol.

$ ping sintonen.fi

PING sintonen.fi (95.216.45.180): 56 data bytes

Request timeout for icmp_seq 0

Request timeout for icmp_seq 1

Request timeout for icmp_seq 2

Request timeout for icmp_seq 3

Request timeout for icmp_seq 4

...
CL UX is great, as both a buyer and seller.

It _could_ introduce more barriers to reduce scammers, but that would come at a cost to both buyer and seller UX.

There is value in simplicity, and the market thus far agrees.

Craigslist is the anti-thesis to the hubris-fueled notion that technology can and should solve every problem, including dishonesty. I've not yet been scammed on Craigslist because I've built up a valuable skill in identifying scammers in general rather than relying on an imperfect system implemented differently on all marketplaces. In return, I do not get scammed as a _seller_, which is something most marketplaces seem to neglect.

More broadly, we often blame human nature on software implementations, as if there was a software solution to (all of) such without trade-offs.
I totally agree generally, in this case it was mostly cars with lower clearance getting stuck.
Humans will not go extinct even in the worst version of global warming. I really hate this hyperbole because it's easily disproven and simply gives fuel to deniers. Please don't use such hyperbole.
oops, that should be 2023-2025
What a bizarre legal situation -- instead of banning sports betting, the federal government tried to force states to ban it. It isn't like 1992 was pre-Wickard v Filburn.
A year ago I excised MacBooks from my main computing life. An old System76 Galago Pro with a stand and a bluetooth keyboard became my couch computer, a Windows 10 with a Ubuntu VM for webdev Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga became my coffee shop / bar computer, and I turned my work MacBook Pro into a glorified desktop by adding an external display, keyboard, and mouse. Eventually I want to replace it with a Mac Mini but can't justify the expenditure this year. There's also an Arch Linux desktop that I'm typing this on now.

The only thing I use one for is at home in bed at 3am where f.lux Darkroom Mode on OSX is still unbeatable at what it does, and there's zero chance of liquid spills.

Apple's legendary quality just isn't there anymore, and the machines are so fragile to liquid damage and the repair experience went from awesome to utter shit over the last 5 or so years. I just can't justify it anymore. My next phone is a Librem 5, my next laptop a Librem 13. I love the OSX ecosystem but not enough to turn all my machines into hackintoshes.

I really didn't think it would only be a few years after Jobs died before Apple started whiffing. Now it's easy to see just how well he was able to keep the jackals away. Now the whole company is solely interested in making stupid amounts of money.

Such a shame.
If that applied, then major changes to the structure of the European Union such as Maastricht or the Lisbon treaty should also have required the >50% vote.
Seemingly an empty article, as though the author had nothing else to write about.
External World by David OReilly (17 min short film, 2010)
Here in NZ I have used Apple maps as my first port of call for a few years. It’s improved a lot. On the rare occasions I’ve been led astray I’ve submitted reports and all have been followed up with fairly quickly. Driving time estimation also seem to be conservative to the point I usually arrive 5mims early which is a good thing in my opinion. I also find Apple directions does a good job of avoiding awkward turns and working out a good overall route. I also receive good and timely traffic and road closure notifications mid trip which allows me to easily reroute my journey even while en route. Another advantage is good public transit directions particually during my holiday in Europe last year. Apple is generally good enough that I don’t even have the Google Maps app anymore.
hi, I attempted to recreate the algorithm in the post:

https://github.com/daedalus/misc/blob/master/testQuasiLinear...
VR screen could end the smartphone
Don't conflate an SUV with a full sized truck. An SUV can be the same size as a Ford Fiesta or as large as a school bus. I would argue that most of the US is buying small to midsize SUVs and not the full size suburban/expedition that people seem to equate with over consumption. And while the 1,2, and 3 selling vehicle[1] is the Ford, GM, FCA trucks, the bulk of the top 25 top sellers in the US are not very big:

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/g25558401/best-selling-car...
Let's finish getting all the useful benefits from knowledge gathered about the Higgs boson.
Is the narrator a machine? He said "eee gee" for eg.
Because they can’t agree on D. So they end up with N.

Worse, some of them seem to be deluded into thinking they can get some sort of D+ or D* or D’, even though the EU has made it clear they will not renegotiate.

I believe one MP likened that scenario to the likelihood of Scarlet Johansen riding in on a unicorn.
then i totally misunderstood how squid bypasses ssl.
My understanding is that:
After building a TCP connection, the SSL handshake is started by the client and sends which version of TLS it knows.
The server then picks a compatible cipher and compression method. and then sends its certificate.
This certificate must be trusted by either the client itself or a party that the client trusts(a certificate authority). In this context the word 'trust' means that the client has the public key that can decrypt the certificate. For example, if the client trusts GeoTrust, then the client can trust the certificate from Google.com because GeoTrust used its private key to cryptographically sign Google's certificate and my browser has the public key for Geotrust.

How SQUID enables SSL failure is obscure to me because the failure of SSL is complicated and this slide is overwhelming
https://blog.ivanristic.com/SSL_Threat_Model.png

SQUID is a proxy for the website you want to access - so when your browser negotiates the TLS handshake it's really talking to SQUID who then talks to the website if necessary. So how does your browser get directed to an illegitimate proxy? The only way I can imagine is if the DNS is bad but I don't see how that can happen.
So for example you want to go to google.com Your browser goes out to your DNS (the ip you plugged in to the network configuration settings) and gets the ip for google. How can someone interpose squid between you and google ?

And then even if squid talks to the server on your behalf, it cannot just forward that stuff to you in clear text because you are expecting that stuff to be encrypted with a private key that only the server or the certificate authority has. Since squid doesn't have the private key it needs, I don't understand what it does.
This wiki
https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslBump
says
"Squid-in-the-middle decryption and encryption of straight CONNECT and transparently redirected SSL traffic, using configurable CA certificates." I interpret that to mean that squid configures a CA certificate. So squid can make it appear like you are talking directly to google?
> Of course, this is a nice way of saying that slavery doesn't make rational sense

Have you read the post we're discussing?
So in response to “this company isn’t bad in this particular area” your argument is “Oh please! They may not be bad in that area, but what about all these unrelated areas where they are bad”?
This is JS. The (current-ish) Java ones use the OS-provided facility.
If I'm employing you, you're also employing me. I have the currency or in-kind value provided by others I business with, and you have some form of value to provide to me. Whether you provide that or not is up to you, but I'm not "stealing" anything.

No "employer" imposes any system on anyone, they can only negotiate.

People can feel whatever they'd like, that doesn't entitle them to property which is as much theirs as the neighbour's dog.
http://citygrazing.org/
Learning more isn’t always better
They could perhaps vote again.
Lillie from Notion here! We're working on a big release, hence the cadence has slowed down some. But we have definitely not abandoned development, nor are we being acquired :)
"If your business idea is so fragile that can be blown away by competition, you might want to rethink your strategy."

It may not be that you "want to rethink your strategy," but if you stumbled into becoming a one man show for a super niche unrivaled business app, why talk about that on a forum of developers?