skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I call it a public offering because it is a public offering ...according to the Packers and according to the SEC.

You’re really acting like an authority on “public offerings”, do you think you know more than the SEC about public offerings and they don’t know what one is? I understand your definition, it’s just not the legal definition is all.

What’s at odds is Packers “Stock” which isn’t “stock” in the common definition and understanding, but it’s still called stock, it’s just not a security or investment.

Have you even seen the Packers Public Offering Document(s) or subscription agreements? Because I’ve never seen a donation/charity issue “public offering documents” or require subscription agreements.

Edit:

>public offering is selling parts of your company for cash, aka a stock, ownership has it's privileges, without those privileges, you aren't selling anything to the public,

You should also really take a look at SEC enforcement actions against ICOs because almost none of them are “stock” nor carry privileges yet are considered public offerings.
One thing Forth is great at is signal processing. This was kind of a revelation to me when I tried Paul Batchlor's Sporth, a Forth-style language specialized in audio processing.

Nowadays audio synths and effects are most commonly represented as interactive spaghetti diagrams connecting basic DSP blocks together into directed graphs determining the signal flow. To make a good audio programming language, the question then becomes: is there a nice textual representation for this kind of graph? And Forth is a great answer to that question.

I had so much fun with Sporth that I ported it to the browser and made an online playground for it: https://audiomasher.org/ with some examples: https://audiomasher.org/browse and a tutorial: https://audiomasher.org/learn
I mean, crypto is a payment system that won't kick you off for fraud.
Hmm.."don't drive while blindfolded..'

I imagine this will not be the last stupid thing this person does.
This post is not surprising to me. Google product support team lacks empathy at a very fundamental level. Last year in middle somehow google's system decided to get me locked out of the old gmail account. I have all the phones which have ever been connected to it, and all emails I have had ever connected to it. But no! The only message I have got is, our security team will take 3-5 days to get back to you.
Almond milk is my bugbear.

Comparing the land and water use of cows versus almonds is ridiculous for many many reasons.

If you've been to a cattle ranch (not a CAFO) and to an almond farm, you'll know exactly what I mean. Almond land use is land use: it's barren of all life besides almond trees. Ranch land in comparison is typically semi-arable, has living things other than cows on it, and while cows sequester water (like all other living animals), the notion that they use more water because rainfall catchment on ranch land isn't absolute is a collossal error in thinking.

Also note that calories per 200ml aren't shown, which is really where the math breaks down. Whole milk has 160 calories per 8oz glass.

Unsweetened almond milk has 40 per 8oz glass.

Soy milk, the most calorie dense of out all of them, which is totally reliant upon monoculture, pesticides, and artificial fertilizers only has 80.

So, you know, multiply the vegan options, or divide the cow milk appropriately.

There are fantastic naturally vegan foods (including whole almonds and whole soybeans). Investigate those before indulging in ersatz environmental sleights-of-hand.

There are also tenable reasons to be vegan (or at the very least to reduce animal product consumption). Arguing that lifestyle identity products are sustainable isn't one of them.

Final positive note: oats and oatmilk are fantastic. You can make it yourself, then cook the sludge for porridge. Oats grow on marginal semi-arable soil and their husks are useful. Eat more oats.
It puzzles me that the linked data future is still discussed, as if we didn't already try it, and didn't already discover that developers dislike arcane RDF standards and the academic-rooted designers of the specifications have a terrible track record of solving real-world problems. And that now they're presenting linked data as some critical component of the decentralized web while skipping out on the debates that everyone else in the space is having - like whether decentralization can be fast, or how to ensure data authenticity, or whether a 'local server / pod' can be built that doesn't get hosed by hole-punching through a home Comcast connection.

Instead, it's just 'what about old-fashioned websites, plus lots of xml schema and long spec documents'? It just tastes like a rehash of Berners-Lee's existing '5-star open data' schpiel ( https://5stardata.info/en/ ) but now with the billing that it'll fix the internet. 5-star open data has been around for years now, and, well, the linked data future isn't here. When's the last time you consumed RDF in an application?
PHP 7 is a very different (better) language compared to 4. You can write very good quality code with it now.
There is a ton of incredible nature within SF itself. Like Presidio and Crissy Field and whole Golden Gate recreational area and Ocean beach
Yes, it is illegal for you to consider it abandoned. In the US, at least, "abandoned" has a specific legal meaning which involves intent: "Abandoned property refers to any personal property left by an owner who has intentionally relinquished all rights to its control. When property is intentionally abandoned, it belongs to no one until it is found and when it is found, the title (ownership) transfers to whoever finds it and possesses it with the intent to take ownership."

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/abandoned-per...

Property owners don't have any legal responsibility not to leave an item in public unlocked. That might be careless, but it's not illegal.
Thanks!! It so happens I'm signing on a house on a few acres Monday and want to set up remote soil sensors - this seems like just the thing for coordination.
Indeed, the fake cert thing was foundational to their business model.
Somebody mentioned it's a pulsing one.
I think it’s still one of the pragmatic language around.

The ‘quick and very dirty’ parts are still there, the ‘clean and efficients’ bits have been added, and there’s a ton of still runnable doc and code lying around.

All of that is a blessing and a curse of course, but I think that makes it a unique proposition.
If its not yours, you can't take possession of it. Just because it is currently resting on a sidewalk doesn't mean that it is any less the property of someone. Besides, most cities have a formal process to determine if a vehicle really is abandoned.

My neighbor has a sign on the dash of his van explaining that it is in working condition, is able to be moved, and is definitely not abandoned. Obviously he got complaints from other neighbors in the past about it.
4 Ways to Debug Your Deep Neural Network
Built-in SEO gaming would be a weird feature
Generally speaking theft requires an intent to deprive an owner of property. It's a crime to take my bike intending to deprive me of it, but it's not a crime to take my bike while attempting to return it to me.

Property owners do not have any obligation to lock up their items.

There are sometimes very specific laws regarding found property when the owner cannot be located, generally these involve turning the property over to the state first.
I bought a soda stream (the KitchenAid one) and use flavored stevia drops myself. Changing sweeteners takes getting used to though.

If you want to reduce ongoing costs, could piece together a feeder system for a larger co2 tank, or a refill tank with kits to refill their bottles or adapt other bottles for the soda stream.
Are boundary markers really completely deprecated in much of the world? Here in Finland, private properties still commonly feature them, and it's illegal to move them.
I'm not a lawyer yada yada but it says on my dollar bill that it's legal tender for all debts, public and private.
Snigl [0] leans more towards multiple dispatch and Lisp than OO and Ruby, but I figured it might me interesting anyway if you've been thinking along those lines.

[0] https://gitlab.com/sifoo/snigl
It depends on the jurisdiction, but a lot of places have laws around found property... often a finder would have rights to truly abandoned property, but there are usually laws in place that establish a procedure for determining if something is truly abandoned or just lost/misplaced/stolen.

Usually that process involves turning the property in to the government, and waiting some period of time for the original owner to claim it. If it is not claimed, it would become yours.

I don't know of any law that requires property on public space to be locked. There may be laws saying you can't leave property in public for more than a certain amount of time, but I am pretty sure none of those would allow anyone to just take the property.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lost_property

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/abandoned_property
I don't think engineering is the problem here. As an example, Toyota, a very engineering-driven company, is also famous for customer focus.

I think the problem is that Google is mostly about selling users' eyeballs to their real customers, advertisers. That's not a business of making individual users happy; it's essentially statistical in nature. With a search engine, if something works for 80 or 90% of people, that's great. If it's bad for the rest, well, tough luck for them. It's very hard to go from that to seeing each individual as valuable and important.
Why Jim Yong Kim's move has shaked up the world bank
So the ThinkPad is the NASA laptop of choice?
Email is a federated system.

If you don't like how Google handles it, run your own mail server.
Ever notice how Google Photos always bugs you to clean up your phone of your personal photos and move everything to the Google cloud?
Not sure why this is being downvoted, since it appears to be accurate (searching for "remote sensing agriculture" only yields results about aerial/satellite imagery), and the linked paper contrasts "remote" (aka aerial) with "ground-based".

That usage is quite problematic though, because, by using such a broad term for such a specific application, you lose the ability to use it to describe other valid "remote sensing " instances such as those implemented by the OP.
Recently I was going through my father's papers and found a stock certificate for IBM, I think from the 60s or 70s. I think I'm going to frame it.
I've actually had decent luck getting Stripe to un-blacklist subscribers that they incorrectly identified as fraudsters.

But it takes a ton of back-and-forth with support reps who generally don't even know or believe you that blacklisting exists (sometimes just an email address, not a specific card, was blocked) – and in one case we didn't get a resolution until the customer got the CA Attorney General to write Stripe's general counsel.
My son will be traveling to Europe this summer for a school trip. He'll be spending time in 6 or 7 different countries (UK, France, Germany, Switzerland and a couple more I can't remember right now)

Is there a better option than Fi for this type of trip?
PayPal has sales representatives and technical support people and you can actually deal with them, so I am not sure the premise is right...

...but the core problem is this argument is in reverse anyway: if I get banned from Bank of America somehow I don't lose access to the concept of a card that lets me pay for my Verizon account, and in the worst case scenario I can send them a check. I have had serious issues with Verizon paying for my account before (they both claimed I was behind on payments but would not accept money without a PIN number, which I could only get by verifying my address using a post card that would take forever), but it wasn't a catch-22 scenario where I lose my phone number as there is somehow literally no way to pay for their service again.
Sorry, I forgot the /s!
Still, you used to actually get real paper stock when you exercised.
I can understand that, and I guess it's relative to the US, is where I'm coming from. Reporting on US issues is at least generally more balanced than what I see from CNN or Fox domestically.
I'm not sure how other people use so much data (besides video). I use whatever I want, and rarely go above 500MB ($5). I made sure to do the offline Google Maps (which I want anyways), and avoid streaming video on phone.
Or the first generation of responsibility laundering.
All About Todd S Burnham
I, too, prefer a company whose hardware is their core product, not an offshoot developed to supplement other revenue. Learned my lesson the hard way with Apple Airport line.

Even though I probably overpaid, I have a set of Eero routers vs Google WiFi or Netgear competitor, a Roku Stick vs Chromecast or Amazon FireStick, and a Ring security setup vs Dashcam/Nestcam (although my last example is kinda diluted after Ring got acquired).
> Can I take a (working) scooter on the street and use the 30 USD kit? After all, it's an item on the street.

No, just like you can't take someone's bicycle or a stroller if the owner isn't nearby.
>They used to have decent support.

In 2001 it was apparently on par with the "Psychic Friends Hotline" - https://slashdot.org/story/01/04/27/1715203/microsoft-tech-s...
Yeah but you used to need a credit card. The barrier to entry is lower. HTTPS is a tire fire.
Car LIDARs do/would operate at a different frequency and power level than the LIDAR at issue here, so no.
It always seemed like a rip-off to me, given that there existed a $120 per 4 lines T-Mobile plan with _global data_ for free and unlimited domestic data (well, speed is capped after 4GB per line, but still pretty decent). When abroad, data speeds aren't going to impress, but it's enough for email and maps and it works nearly everywhere. I'm not associated with T-Mobile and don't hold any of their stock. Just a satisfied customer.
In either case, the game isn't much use without assets... and those can be copyrighted separately from the executable.
Google is really developing a reputation for starting and canning projects. I’d recommend not getting too invested in their products when possible.
What kind of answer do you expect?

You can get no causality from data alone. You always need additional assumptions.

If you can do an intervention and manipulate a variable as you wish, the assumption of its independence is warranted. A correlation with the outcome indicates a causal path (or you're being [un]lucky). Even in that case a more complex causal model is useful to get better estimates, distinguish direct and mediated effects, etc.

If you have observational data only there is not much that can be done without a causal model. Given a model, the causal effect of one variable on another may be estimated in some cases. But if your model is wrong you may conclude that there is an effect when none exists or deny the existence of a real effect.
If they really put the real password in a public repository, then it's not a minor mistake. It's a huge error.

Perhaps the author could have contacted them to give them a few days before the announcement, so can they delete[1] the data from the repository, but it's nevertheless a huge error.

[1] You can't really delete anything from the internet, it's only a hide button. They can try to change the password in the server anyway.
I can't understand sites without a fallback so many are turning javascript off.
Since T-Mobile holds the primary numbers for Google Fi accounts, going from T-Mobile to Fi legally isn't a port, just a change in T-Mobiles billing system.
BitPatron – A Bitcoin Censorship-Free Patreon Alternative
It remains a technological product, though, and one doesn't like to buy into tech ecosystems without a full assurance of ongoing support. Chromecast Audio being discontinued today is one thing, and Google does promise continued support for the product … but Google's track record may not bear that out.

In the case of some sort of critical security update or a theoretical future update to pick up a hitherto undetected, show-stopping bug, there's little assurance Google would look after its customers — they've too much of a tendency to introduce something then rescind the product not long later, something that doesn't inspire much confidence in whether or not there will be ongoing, high-quality software updates to support the products.
Yes this is a problem for some things, but at least when I was working in systems you'd be surprised how frequently GC doesn't matter, especially with all the huge GC improvements in recent versions (and future versions) and the trend toward breaking apart monolithic code bases.
I imagine it is doing something to the fluid in the eye with that kind of energy it absorbs. Maybe cataracts for example.
Campfire – Put in an artist, get genres
Yeah phone autocorrect.
You're describing theft. Bird didn't abandon their scooter, they know where it is and intended for it to be there.

As noted in another thread here, something being left on the street doesn't mean it's legally abandoned, whether it's a car, a wallet, or an electric scooter.

Most jurisdictions require the (former) owner to intentionally relinquish ownership in order for something to be considered abandoned.
How. They are the ones who have the lawyers to protect themselves. It's the small platforms that will suffer, and creating startups in the user-generated content will be too risky.
Please, please, please don't suggest people use the k&r book to learn C. It is one bad practice after another and many of the suggestions in that book have given C much of its reputation for buffer overflows, stack smashing, etc.
Right, but I think the point of the article is to admonish Bird for sending bogus DMCA take down notices. The EFF might be overkill, but it makes for a good story and generates more interest in the real story, which is that Bird is sending bogus takedown notices.
On a recent trip to Europe, I found this prepaid SIM a much better value than Fi:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01FI1JW72/ref=cm_cr_arp_mb_b...
I'm equally astonished how people can use so much data :)

Like one of the other posters said, I don't stream on phone, and use the wifi at home and at work. I'd love to see the breakdown of data usage (reported by the phones) for heavy users. I wonder if it's like 4GB netflix, 200MB chrome, 100MB Tinder, 20MB Uber, 5MB email.
It's too bad. The government shutdown did not cause this.

The truth is that overspending is the cause for the inability to maintain services. Those same people who are politicizing this mess are directly responsible for it.
Keep in mind I'm not recommending that you don't use React. I'm using it for a hobby project right now. I just mean that you should understand all the concepts behind it so that if you need to move to another tool for a particular job or if it's superceded by something in the future, you can make the jump across much easier.

My usual measuring stick is "if this thing disappeared tomorrow, would I be able to recreate it from scratch myself with no documentation?" (obviously not up to the same performance standards).
I'm using a Chromecast audio on a 1960s record cabinet. Sounds and looks great. I'm sure many people have built similar things.
I personally found DDA much less overwhelming to start than EvE or DF. Then again I started contributing to the project at the same time I was playing.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I want to point out a charitable interpretation of the opposing viewpoint, which is that tax redistribution protects people from the consequences of their own decisions and incentivizes bad behavior.

Under this viewpoint, parents who manage to afford to live in a wealthy neighborhood and send their kids to good schools have sacrificed a lot - in continued education, in long work hours, and in taking careers that are in-demand rather than ones that might be prestigious or enjoyable - for that privilege. It's unjust to take their sacrifice away from them and give it to folks who dropped out of college and spent their 20s playing video games, just because the latter group is now reaping the consequences of their decisions. Moreover, it means that now there is no reason to study & work hard and go into professions that people will pay a lot for, because your money is just going to go to people who don't.

Whether you hold this viewpoint or your "taxes = justice" viewpoint hinges a lot on the factual question of whether you believe that one's station in life is primarily due to outside factors or whether it's due to your own actions. I suspect you'd find very strong correlations between the former worldview & Democratic political preferences and the latter with Republican political preferences, though obviously it won't be 100%. Personally I think it's a little of both, so I tend to identify as a moderate. But I'll point out that this worldview, on a societal level, is itself self-fulfilling: if most of the society believes it, they create a redistributive welfare state, which means that your success is dependent upon outside factors, which then justifies the original belief in the first place. While if most of the society disbelieves it, they create a cutthroat individualist economy, which highly incentivizes individuals to make decisions that will put them on top, which means your success is dependent upon your own actions, which then justifies the original belief in the first place.

To muddy the waters further, when a society with a cutthroat individualist economy encounters a redistributive welfare state, the former has a tendency to conquer the latter. After all, it's their own damn fault that they've coddled their weak and have no strong leaders that can lead the fight. So the latter type of society tends to fall into irrelevance or disappear even if the majority of people involved would actually prefer it.
There are a lot of diagrams and a bit of math, which don't naturally translate to a purely auditory experience very well. Having read The Book of Why I can't imagine how it would translate to a reasonable audio-book. Frankly I'm surprised they even released an audio-book version at all.
For the purpose of analogy, the comment aligns "moving through the room with my knife extended" with sharing a small piece of data; "murder" with whatever the deliberate import was of sharing that small piece of data. In no case is it saying any pair of things are the same thing or equally bad (except the two patterns of reasoning).
Show up at Google HQ security gate with cash in hand and journalist in tow?
No, my point is that this change only affects non-Retina displays. In my experience (worldwide, many companies, etc) anyone who uses a Mac with an external monitor generally doesn't settle for some POS. It's a high-end screen that matches the MacBook, hence why it's not that big of a deal.
Even if it's deserved ;)
Windscribe: https://windscribe.com/signup
I got a vastly discounted "lifetime" signup for them (seems to be good until 2028 on the expiry page but whatever).
Eve is not a spaceship game. It is a game of deception and pain. Space ships is what the medium is.
That's a great approach. I should add that having only one measure is discouraging: in fitness or anything else.

So your approach broadens beyond weight and gives a win, even in the event weight temporarily increased.

Also per my previous comment, I suspect that if you got stronger, then you probably lowered your weight circumference too. At least if your weight was stable. Muscle mass and bone density take the place of fat as strength increases, at equal weights. Hard to go wrong with functional measures.

The types of fat may change in a good way too as function increases. I looked into the health of sumo wrestlers. Turns out that at an equivalent fat percentage of a non-athlete, they will have much less visceral fat. This is fat around the organs, and is the type of fat most linked to bad health effects.
SAMSUNG Smart TV 40 – Smart Tv 40 – 4K TV