skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with this, but what I was trying to say is that full GCs happen (even when generational lets you delay them), thrash your caches to trace all live pointers in your heap, and still run faster on multiple cores. That seems to be in tension with the blog post's suggestion that you need locality for parallelism.

Many recent GCs don't actually try to use all your cores because they run concurrent with your app and want to leave a lot of capacity for it, but Go 1.4's GC (the last non-concurrent version) used all the cores it could, and V8's Orinico does in some phases too.
My understanding is that E-Ink holds all of the patents and is preventing any further competition or innovation.
They’re spoofing the numbers so that would likely cause apple to blacklist numbers belonging to innocent people.
Works great for me and I will continue to support him. The bookmarklet continues to be great as well as the API. Paying customer and will remain until I roll my own solution someday.
Where are they claiming to have invented the three-wheel mechanism?

What they're claiming to have invented is a specific folding dolly that uses the 3-wheel mechanism.
Rudy's was hands down the number one thing I missed in moving from SA to SF. Eventually I found solace at Everett and Jones in Berkeley, but even that'll never come close to Texas BBQ.
I like this idea, but I think there are probably two things that are an issue with this:

1 - You remove control of the company from being able to plausibly deny that something happened; you become a second subpeonable party that would disclose something if forced to.
2 - You're not pricing it high enough for a big reseller (like CDW, etc) to want to try to sell it.

Not sure how to fix #1 besides selling/licensing the tech (if the patent issues) to a larger company that can roll this into a larger offering (and out to their exiting customers).

Background; I've worked in Enterprise Software Sales and as part of a SaaS Operations Team.
You assume that how you use a computer is how everyone uses one. Your molehill might be someone else’s mountain.
Brigade Cornerstone Utopia
http://www.brigadeutopia.org.in/ - Brigade Cornerstone Utopia is a new prestigious residential apartment developed by Brigade Group. http://www.brigadecornerstoneutopia.net.in/
Adwalled.
Hurtling down the interstate at 70+ mph and I also tend to mash the big red button when I get a call and need my direction.
The weather will always help prop up SoCal real estate (relatively).
This is my favorite solution. Time is money, if a caller is willing to pay me for it, I'd be ok with it. Make spam directly uneconomical, and spin the customer/vendor/3rd-party dynamic back to where it's supposed to be.
Wasn't this site a lot more professional back in the day? All I see is a rampant amount of ads and three paragraphs of content.
Westy – Responsive Multi-Purpose Html Template
> Nobody could have envisioned how deeply ingrained cellular technology would become in our society

Am I the only one often peeved by this kind of slop in thought and expression?
Of course somebody could. Some visionaries even did, and not than just Arthur C. Clarke.

So rightly: 'Few envisioned how deeply ...'
I'm not sure I am reading the article correctly, but it looks to me that this new display tech uses less energy than EInk for the initial image creation, but then requires quite a bit more (0.25mJ/cm2 is greater than 0mJ/cm2, though still a minuscule amount) for continued display.

I would guess that they probably are able to get a crisper image or perhaps full color with this new display tech while still being optimized for low-energy pull.

Edit: Someone else posted this link which shows the Rdot displays do in fact have color capability - https://rdotdisplays.com/technology.
*deflationary
From the article, "Outside the plane, one of the plane’s angle of attack sensors falsely indicated that the plane’s nose was pointed too high, and the aircraft could stall."

I'm not in any way eligible to comment on aviation systems, but why that equipment needs to measure the angle of airplane be outside? Couldn't something like gyroscope mounted inside do the job?
You're describing Powershell's object-passing.
That's way too harsh to describe a man's personal quest for adventure. It's not just vanity. You have no idea how many young minds have been influenced by this adventure. How many potential new startups will come about because someone somewhere out there thinks 'well this guy just gave up his life trying to cross the Antartic, what stops me from doing something perhaps tiny in comparison, but monumental in value, or something that I can undertake'. This is true of all adventurers who seek to accomplish something beyond perceived abilities - free diving, climbing k2 or summitting Mt.Meru on the shark fin route.

The indirect benefits of such expeditions have not been measured. If someone did, I'm quite certain, a ton of benefits will crop up.
My org is using namespaces for tenant isolation. Works quite well.
I guess this is supposed to be the part where the masses decide whether the added safety is worth the inconvenience of not having cellphones? Or have we already.
No. Ada might be too complicated, but it's far more coherent. C++ is like a novel with each sentence written by a different author. Even worse, each author keeps trying to pull the plot and the characters in a very different direction. Any C++ codebase that spans more than one version of the C++ standard ends up combining the two into its own special dialect, defeating the whole purpose of having standards in the first place.
I had success with Udoo.
I think if you figured out a way to compare Cleveland to SF while factoring in cost of living, or just real estate, Cleveland would do pretty well in a showdown.

SF is picked on because people pay such a premium to live there (including employers via the necessary high wages), and it is becoming less and less worth that premium as tech extends out of the bay area.
I agree. I don't believe each and every social network should be obliged to host every damn extremist group in the nation. On the other hand, ISPs, CAs, and registrars should be obligated to do so, being analogous to public utilities. I'd support a law codifying this requirement.

Social media companies, in the other hand, are more like the modern version of newspapers and magazines. And you don't have the right to be published been the most popular magazine simply because there's where the most readers are.

However, I would put cloud companies like AWS in the bucket of utilities and not media. Gab shouldn't have to worry about being cut off for lack of a hosting company. We can't say, "go find another social media home" to people we disagree with, only to watch in glee as the social media companies that will have them are shut down for lack of a hosting company or data center.
Really what you're saying is "start your own credit card."

Hatreon launched as an alternative to Patreon. Know why Hatreon closed down? Visa shut it down. [1]

If Visa bans you, no payment processor will work with you. Not PayPal. Not Stripe. Not Braintree. Not Authorize.net. You are cut off.

So yes, of course Conte says he "welcomes competition" in the article. Any legitimate competition, that caters to the voices booted by Patreon, gets squashed by Visa. There cannot be any competition.

So all anyone actually has to do if he wants to share views the American elites find distasteful is go start his own bank (takes $12 to $20 million and jumping through a load of regulatory hurdles, according to Wikihow [2]), roll out his own credit card, get mass market adoption of that card, create his own payment processor to process the card, found registrars and hosting companies that use that processor, and start a platform.

We need a digital Bill of Rights set up before there's nothing left online but the most sanitized, P.C.-friendly content. A place where everyone has to act fake-nice and pay lip service to beliefs he doesn't really hold so no one will think he's guilty of bad-think. That might sound like a utopia to some, but to many of us it sounds like the opposite.

> To be honest, I'd be OK with going beyond that and just rewriting the laws to European-style "no Nazism allowed anymore", so sadly sighing and talking about how disgusting I am for wanting a world without Nazis isn't exactly going to shame me into changing my mind, y'know?

A simpler way to put this is just "anyone who does not agree with me should go to a reeducation camp, or to jail, or maybe die."

People with views like these were behind the French Reign of Terror, the Russian Bolshevik Revolution, and the Nazi concentration camps. In the end, in all cases, the instigators ended up on the receiving end of the same kinds of punishments they put in place for those who disagreed with them.

History is filled with examples of policies boomerang'ing back on those responsible for them. Just another way of saying, be careful what you wish for, because few wishes come without a catch.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatreon
[2] https://www.wikihow.com/Open-a-Bank
If your kids are the right age, can you have them try reading this on their iPad?…

[1] https://bubblin.io/cover/stroke-of-genius-by-david-revoy

or…

[2] https://bubblin.io/cover/pride-and-prejudice-by-jane-austen

if slightly senior. I'm looking for some outside-in feedback, though kids in my neighborhood have so far liked the experience.
> 1) You omitted threaded

To Edinburgh we go, then.
You should sell it to consultants. The problem with honeypots in enterprise is that the enterprise leadership wants to avoid knowing things.
> Especially the bit about 'negative space' got my intention, that's one tool I'm going to put in my toolbox to re-use.

One of the most profoundly useful things I've ever realized in my life is that the most important choices are often about deciding what not to do. Creativity is deeply wedded to the idea of constraints and pragmatically, there are only so many hours in the day. Deliberately deciding to not investing in one thing is the clearest way I know to free up mental capacity for the things I do want to put care into.
Mimic MS Word 2016 Behavior for Fixed-Page Formats and WMF Fonts Scaling in .NET
Without more info, it's a little tough to tell. A few parameters which would influence an answer:
- How big is the startup? 10 employees? 50? 100?
- Do you have an outside offer?
- What makes you think you deserve a raise?

But otherwise, usual rules of negotiation:
- establish the relationship with the decision maker,
- What is a win win for you and the company? How is them giving you more equity going to put the company in a better position?
- Early stage startups look for believers and an outside offer can be interpreted as a negative signal from that point of view. Step carefully.
This article is a great read as it scratches my science and comedic itches simultaneously.

My favorite quote: “This is probably not unique to pigs.”
Ok, caffeine is not the culprit.

Red 40 has a very easy to see in real life cause and effect. It's possible it doesn't affect all kids, but I've seen it way too many times to deny it.

If you've not actually taken the time to observe it yourself you really are clueless as to cause and effect, and I don't care what the "studies" say.

If you read even the title of this article you'd know why.
You have a point, but evolution is regarded, on both sides of the divide, as being the antithesis of intelligent design.
I dont think that by looking only to features we can understand this very well. Go was very lucky to be launched when cloud computing fever was catching up, and people were being burned for using techs like Java for this end.

C++ were very performant, and unlike Java not a memory hog, but for this sort of tasks it was deemed to complex. Besides the ammount of people that were able to program in it was limited (and you can even see this reasoning being used as a reason why they created Go).

Then Go showed up with simplicity and a good story in performance and memory, deploying simple binaries in a world of complex server infrastructure paved out by Java was a very handy and right on time approach.

The problem with Rust now, is that it is target the system programming, in a era of system programming renaissance given the whole mobile app scenery.

The problem is; there is already a lot of C++, C, Java, Objective C and Swift code there, so it will be hard to have a good reason to rewrite complex stuff with a lot of man hours in it in Rust.

Every language needs a platform. C is here because of Unix, C++ because of Unix, games and early 2000 and 90's era startups. Java and C# because of bussiness software, Go because of the cloud, Ruby and PHP; because of webservers, Rails an blogs, Python for educational purposes, Data Science, ML and now AI.

Now what about Rust? Its trying to eat some lunch from C and C++. But a lot of code and value is already there in C and C++, where rewriting it in Rust just for some ocasional added value here and there is not reasonable.

Its really tough, and if Rust dont find a platform to grow it will be very hard to advance any further. But, there's always new tech waves and tools that will marry perfectly with them.

Lets see which languages are able to be a perfect fit for them in years to come. But right now Rust will depend a lot of the community it already formed to keep sharp and maybe be lucky to surf one of those waves.
All traffic between peers is encrypted. You can read more about the encryption below[1]. You can also create encrypted (at rest) folders[2] for replicating via public clouds while still maintaining 100% privacy.

[1] https://help.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/205451025-Can-oth...

[2] https://help.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/207370466-Encrypt...
Are you telling me the baseband on an iPhone doesn't have access to the system RAM?
That's my understanding too - if someone can create a screen that competes on energy use, then they occupy the same market and will hopefully force E-Ink to innovate/bring down prices.
Yes, but please examine how the case becomes muddied with literally any level of nuance. Sargon of Akkad was deplatformed for using the n-word in a conversation criticizing a group of white-supremacists for behaving exactly like the people that they constantly classify as "n-words." He was literally using the term ironically, against white-supremacists, to show them how their own behaviors were exactly the sorts of behaviors they were attempting to classify as inferior and "black."

The man has hundreds, if not thousands, of hours of footage of his opinions online. He is not racist...at all. And yet here you are confidently and smugly declaring your comfort with his livelihood being taken away on the basis of his racism because the issue could not be simpler in your mind.
Ex-employee of Indian outsourcer HCL fired after reporting harassment of Muslim
Regular `ls` lists files in a variable number of columns depending on the terminal width. Many utils enable or disable color output depending on the destination of that output, and on terminal's capabilities.

CLI utils are full of special behaviors for convenience of use by people. To enable strict consistence that is mostly necessary for usage by other programs, there are flags.
Audio and camera don't inherently need to be hooked through the baseband. And without a serious redesign of the cell protocols, any use of the cell network spills your location.

With the baseband and application processors being logically separate, strengthening the isolation between them is straightforward.

For starters, you can use a phone with a discrete baseband chipset, like the Samsung Exynos lines.

Or use a Wifi-only application computing device with a separate not-always-on Mifi for a data connection.

If you want to be more paranoid, use an application processor with an Atheros chip and MMU, or a third device as a protocol converter to translates Wifi to RS-232.

But the real point is that with IP-based protocols and Free software, you can unilaterally do any of the above without requiring your friends to also do so in lock step.
> I'm not sure why people expect platforms that have ToS to be robotic about them.

Being fair, being open, being honest isn't being "robotic". Treating people like more than something to exploit and throw away is what I would consider "robotic". The constant "it's a private company, brain off", that's what is robotic.

> Companies are run by people. People get uncomfortable when you become known for spraying around racial epithets, and some are not going to want to work with you.

Yeah, people. Not necessarily adult people. Take this man, for example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORp3q1Oaezw

Do you honestly think you know or have anything he doesn't? Wouldn't you rather think it's the other way around?

If you stand aside as mobs try to kill free speech on the internet, you're banking on them winning, on there never being a time where, if you can't show clear proof that you resisted, nobody wanting to work with you. I doubt you would just say "fair enough". I don't think you'd consider that a humane society just because the majority might claim it is.

> If I'm using some vendor and find out that I really don't like what their public persona is doing, I'm going to reevaluate that relationship.

This isn't just a vendor. We're talking about companies that provide services that really, realistically, should be utilities. You shouldn't get your water turned off for calling obese people names, or your electricity turned off for saying Hitler was right. That's a stone age level regression that not just shows a level of moral bankruptcy on par or worse of the views that are "fought" by these mobs, it also says that these views cannot be fought other than by fighting the people that hold them, virtually or even physically.

It's undoing progress and re-introduces "might is right" as a valid ideal. That is all. If you use Patreon in 2019, you have a.) no alternatives, b.) no clue, and/or c.) double standards, and I for one will not be working with you. A bad standard is a bad standard, a person with double standards is quicksand.
Angle of Attack is based on the angle between the plane and the surrounding airflow, not based on gravity/landscape/etc.
There is a reason why POTUS can't have an iPhone.
The definition of stalling is exceeding the critical angle of attack... regardless of airspeed. You can stall an airplane at any airspeed, though typically you stall at slower speeds because you are operating closer to that critical AoA.
The United States literally kicked off the transformation to the new world. We started as slaves to the crown, overthrew that tyrannical presence, and then created the most liberating government framework to date. Then we slipped back into high taxes and oppressive regulations. (Not saying all taxes and regulations are bad)
It's measuring the angle of the plane relative to the air moving past it (i.e. the angle the plane is "attacking" the air). Knowing the angle of the plane in an absolute sense isn't as useful when it comes to detecting stalls, etc.
And MasterCard and Visa operate their cartel in cooperation with banks and federal regulators. To what degree does the first amendment apply to entities that are regulated and protected by the federal government?
This has always dumbfounded me about animal experimentation - it's perfectly OK to decapitate a pig to make bacon but it's somehow horribly inhuman to do so to potentially save millions of lives?
A lot of this discussion is recapitulating the discussion around https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson%27s_law , no?
>Stop Blaming Yourself

I'm not sure if such advice is good. Of course, the industry should start reducing/removing added sugar from products. You can keep eating what you're eating, keep blaming the evil corporations and wait for ages until the industry starts changing.

Or, you know, you can take a bit of responsibility for own eating habits and get noticeably healthier in a matter of weeks. Adapt to the reality where most packaged products are full of sugary stuff and therefore should be avoided as if they are spoiled. Maybe buy less packaged products, and buy more fresh food. Maybe cook sometimes instead of watching TV. Maybe start paying more attention to ingredients and don't buy products which contents is more appropriate for a chemical lab rather than a kitchen. It doesn't take much and it definitely is not "an incredible burden" as the article states. Yes, it's a burden, but far from "incredible".

And no, you don't necessarily have to start going to the gym to become healthier. It would be a nice addition to your new lifestyle, but it's not strictly required.
> non-ionizing radiation

This is a tired response that everyone memorizes but fails to back with facts.

1. There are studies showing some effects besides DNA mutation, such as heating, due to non-ionizing radiation, which could cause a number of health effects.

2. The World Health Organization classified cell phone radiation as a potential carcinogen. The CDC has stated that there is no conclusive evidence one way or the other on whether cell phones cause cancer.

3. I said "potentially" above.
The economics agree, Zerodium pays as much for VM escape as for LPE. It does seem to be a bit of a low price though, $50,000.
For those who still live somewhat paycheck-to-paycheck (or who manage their money that way as I do), Mint can be a bit challenging to use because it only allows budgeting at a monthly resolution and things like pending charges, etc., can be tricky to manage.

For me it's easier to see "I have A amount coming on B date with C expenses due and D left over for saving or spending" than it is to try and budget monthly and deal with all of the expense carry-over, etc., that Mint tends to do. Maybe I'm doing it wrong but it's a system that, so far, has worked for me for a little over a decade.
There is also a sunk cost fallacy which keeps people trapped.
I am using this now! Clean!
>point to some solution for building apps outside of the web ecosystem that doesn't have this impedance mismatch you're talking about

>all of the UI frameworks on any platform that I personally know of use some combination of an XML-based templating system

I also know of no other approaches with significant traction. That's the problem I'm referencing: they all take the approach of starting with technology that was designed for serving static documents then, essentially, layering on some cruft that attempts to adapt it for dynamic environments. This is obviously because the delivery platform (browsers) still rely on the underlying tech. But, there's no reason this can't be completely abstracted away by our tooling/frameworks.

I understand your references to React's abstraction but, in the end, it still comes down to CSS-in-JS, HTML-ish templating, etc. So, React's is not really an abstraction "where it counts". Think about it: why are we writing CSS at all when what we want is an application? In other words, if there were no Web and you wanted to build out a platform and/or development ecosystem for constructing applications from scratch, would CSS or XML-based templates, etc. be a design-choice you'd make? Of course not. They are wonky and inefficient for these purposes. Meanwhile, we're at the point where pre-compiling on these frameworks. So, why isn't there a framework that looks more like what we'd build from scratch that then compiles down to the Web-ish stuff we're working in (i.e. JSX or similar); thus completely abstracting away everything Web?

Because if you step back and look at, say, JSX through this lens, it's slightly insane. Not picking on React here--just following up on your example. This problem is endemic to virtually all frameworks that have gained significant traction.

There's a better way and it's frankly probably more akin to Swing or Visual Basic than it is to anything we've seen thus far.
One of the issues with Openstack is managing the services required to run it. I imagine that helm
could be used to make it easier to run these services in kubernetes.