skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know, maybe pretend e.g. the Nazis were convinced of the errors of their ways -- rather than defeated first militarily, and then shamed socially.

I'd say, "what you should do" is to organize with others and enforce boundaries on those who are in the "bubble" of not giving a (meaningful) fuck of continued organized existence of the human race. Deal with the mote in your own eye, just to shut Jesus up, and then get to work on the speck of dust in the eye of your neighbour. Turns out size doesn't matter, but what it blocks the view of, and that's one hell of a speck of dust.

The mote probably never meant shit in comparison but do it anyway, get rid of attack surface for people who are looking for excuses to not confront anyone in earnest. As if just knowing about Auschwitz was possible in a vacuum, without making oneself an enemy of the Nazis. They are obedient now, they will fall in line when you achieve critical mass with people who are worth their salt. So completely forget them until they do better, if they ever do. Don't put more stock in them than they themselves did. Focus on those who are not just a drain of resources, but that pollinate and challenge you in a way that leaves you and them better.

And notice the irony of you being downvoted without reply, instead of that downvoter instead criticizing something about themselves. You're supposed to not "think you're better than others", or consider your concerns more important than theirs -- but people will absolutely consider themselves better than you for allegedly not considering themselves better as others. But that's not for them to realize, I guess.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough in my comment. I didn't mean it wasn't scummy and dishonest, just that having a legal entity in charge of the term "5G" isn't necessarily enough to stop them.
If what you got from reading this was "this is a perfect description of other people", then you missed the point.
That's ridiculous. The popular CAs are not part of the TLS standard and neither is CT. Plenty of intranet TLS with intetnal CAs. CTs are good if the end client only uses root CAs that participate.

Let's say CT solves the server authentication issues,how does does the server authenticate the client? End to end means both parties authenticate,TLS supports client authnetication but a) DNS over HTTPs isn't doing that b) even if it did there isn't CT for client certs...
Not an implementation bug, a thinko. Adam Langley's strike register is supposed to prevent replays. In practice this, and other attempts in the same direction, all work fine for toy systems (e.g. one Apache no load balancer no failover) where you don't care but don't work for a real system. So the outcome was don't build any of them into TLS or QUIC and just warn implementors that Replay is a thing in 0RTT modes.

Unlike QUIC Crypto, TLS 1.3 is a product of a modern approach where you start by getting the mathematicians to prove the idea works, then you implement the idea. That article might give you almost the opposite impression, but not so.
Class-A automotive surfacing (using Alias, ICEM, Catia, NX) is all done with higher degree Béziers. I use them all the time in SolidWorks for consumer and medical product design engineering.

It’s certainly tricky to figure out how to manage Béziers, but with the right tools and some knowledge of the math, you can do amazing things. Using the sketcher constraint tools in the SolidWorks it’s possible to join higher degree Béziers with G3 tangency (or even higher). I also build approximate offset curves of the same degree using a modified version of Tiller and Hansen’s method (I keep the control polygon legs parallel, but I add constraints to control the offset distance of the curve at n-2 places along the curve).

If I was doing font design, I’d love to have higher degree Béziers. Being able to make a sans-serif ‘S’ with single span curves would be great. Or lining up 3 control points on either end of the top of a lower case ‘n’ with vertical straight lines to have it be G3 would be nice.
When I was in undergrad I pretty much just read the textbooks directly and used Wikipedia for supplementary reading. I donate (nearly) every year to Wikipedia because I would not have graduated without it.

This is the exact Molecular Cell Biology text we were assigned a decade ago (though I’d imagine it’s significantly updated now):

https://www.amazon.com/Molecular-Cell-Biology-Lodish/dp/0716...

The first principles of a an education in biochemistry are roughly, (1) the central dogma: DNA (transcribed) -> RNA (translated) -> Protein. (2) basic principles of diffusion and chemical equilibria.

Most biochemical systems do work by leveraging potential energy gradients across membranes. For example: there’s a lot of K+ on one side of a membrane, and very little on the other. If you selectively open a channel between the two compartments, we know that statistically the ion (K+) flow will be directionally towards where there’s less K+ (diffusion). Biochemical systems use natural properties of stochastic systems to do work: if we know K+ is traveling in one direction, you can imagine a flywheel of sorts positioned to turn that ion movement into useful energy (ion channels).

The processes by which energy is transferred and utilized is pretty much the field of biochemistry in a nutshell.
How Flutter uses Widgets, Elements, RenderObjects to create eye-candy at 120fps
One of my favourites was James Governor’s Sympathy for the DevRel. A call for people in tech to take better care of themselves.

https://devrel.net/dev-rel/sympathy-for-the-devrel
From what I gather, bazel is used to build Angular itself but users of Angular mostly use angular-cli which is a webpack wrapper that does not use Bazel.

Bazel seems to be too resource intensive and complicated for use outside of Google - at least for JS projects.
I think that was awkwardly worded, but seemed to be expressing the stance of the US in 1945.

I don't think it's entirely accurate, though. Yes, the US had to align with USSR, yes the public face was he was our ally, but the US was already aware he was a "bad dude." In fact, the US would have no reservations kicking off a public campaign to that end immediately following the war.
the original test specification was literally “plug the device into the USB port of [your] laptop, and type in this AVRDUDE command to load code

At the outfit I work for this is pretty much what they were doing for one of the products when I started. It wasn't that they didn't know better (they had other items in mass production); it was that the product used to be such a low volume that typing in CLI commands to program and test it was (almost) good enough.

I spent months automating that to the point of "plug cable into device and watch for Pass/Fail" indication on screen. Now that we're shipping thousands per month it make a huge difference :-)

Testing is a weird thing. The points you test are a function of what you expect may fail in manufacturing. No point in testing something that's extremely unlikely to fail, unless it's required by regulation.

e.g., FDA (Food & Drug Administration) Good Manufacturing Practices state that if you don't build something using a documented and repeatable process then you must test 100% of product coming off the line. If you have a tight manufacturing process, then you can decide what level of testing meets a good balance of safety and cost.

People spend their entire career as Test & Manufacturing engineers and it is quite a complex and interesting field.
pure bull
No headlines on revolution in Russia in 1917?
> Because it's the FLOSS devs who need to learn to empathize with the ordinary user.

If you were talking about using these protocols over a telnet session, then I would be more inclined to agree with that statement, but just installing an application, entering a server name and account credentials (the latter of which aren't needed for IRC), and connecting isn't any more difficult than creating an account on slack and connecting by entering the address in the browser.
haha, I also think to clean a desk is to waste my time energy :D however, it's no wonder, 'cause I try optimizing everything in my life. even my college homework. if you need any assistance with a term paper, just check https://essayshark.com/buy-cheap-essays.html
To be fair, we're not coding huge projects in it, just little toy programs.

No one seems to struggle too much though. And the things they struggle with, they would struggle regardless of the language chosen.
Odd I would have thought Khashoggi and Saudi Arabia would have taken October-December. At least that's all I think about the world outside of the usual US stuff.
Citation needed. Most governments that admitted to having a program, only admitted it after it had already been shut down.

Very few countries if any, admit to having a bioweapon program, let alone one based on gene-edited bioweapons.
Epic is a steaming pile of shit. I hate the medical software industry so bad. I don’t understand why the current EMRs are so bad. I’m in medical school now but I hope to make a better EMR some day.

I’m upvoting this in hopes that someone with more knowledge than me can explain why the EMRs are all terrible.
Yeah, I agree that it's good to point that out. But I felt that some people might've been losing sight that more evidence would likely be presented in court.
Ah, thanks for clarifying. I was totally under the impression it would be the norm. Here is an example of a map: http://www.freeworldmaps.net/world/america-centric/physical-...

I think it was on west coast or Hawaii I saw those.

But what really made me think it's the norm was that the a Universal Pictures logo also has the Americas in middle and their intro ends with the Americas centered also:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KpNkgRv_8XE

Quite interesting.
The US has a huge German immigrant population, and during WWI many people sympathized with the Germans and felt they were basically forced into a preemptive strike because Britain and France would have declared war on them soon anyway. A lot of Americans wanted to join the war on the side of the Germans.

Then the Germans sank the Lusitania and became the chief bad guy.

In WW2, as others have mentioned, the US was more concerned with the plight of the British (would they hold out?), and then especially focused on Japan. Japan attacked Hawaii and subsequently the Philippines, which was owned by the US at the time and home to a lot of Americans.

Certainly the US played a role in every theater in WW2, but there were almost two different wars going on —- in Europe, primarily Britain and Russia versus Germany; and in the Pacific, primarily the US against Japan.
From another great writer of the human condition ...

Musée des Beaux Arts
W.H.Auden

About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters; how well, they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully
along; ....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mus%C3%A9e_des_Beaux_Arts_(poe...
Given that it apparently buzzed past the tower that does seem strange. Conspiracy theorists are already out in full force lol
>Ah yes, a nation pouring an immense amount of resources into propaganda targeting a specific subsection of american society and having close contact with the currently elected administration definitely wasn't the reason they got elected.

Here are a few questions for you: Why did Russian ad-buys during the 2016 campaign fund both extremist sides of the political spectrum? For an example, why did they try to simultaneously organize pro- and anti-gay rallies in Kansas?^1 And just who is Vladislav Surkov?^2

>The U.S. had a useful law for dealing with the problems of "today." And it's sad to say we've basically created problems where there never needed to be. Time to re implement the Fairness Doctrine -- across the board.

Okay, now where is the threshhold to qualify for consideration in the Fairness Doctrine, particular in a society with manifold subcultures? Is it party members? Is it adherents? Is it hashtags? Who gets to be on the Fairness Board? How are violations handled? Who gets to determine what speech is acceptable (because clearly revolutionary parties exist)? When is a platform accountable? Are foreign platforms accountable? Are personal servers broadcasting or narrowcasting?

>It's not so much as a new wave, but a new class of citizens who desperately need to become actively engaged in the political process. And understanding that the systems they're creating has lead to new power structures and information conduits, and with power comes responsibility. A responsibility to ensure the consumers of their platform are not unduly influenced by incorrect, false, and misleading information (Facebook tried doing this but was lambasted by the right, can't imagine why). A responsibility to support good governance and to support policies that provide a continued foundation for a functioning, healthy, productive, peaceful society.

In so many words, you're advocating for fixed fortifications in an age of Blitzkrieg.^3 Or to paraphrase Toffler, instead of automobiles, we need to just make stronger and faster horses.

>The situation we're in isn't a technological problem. It's a social one.

The notion that it's a monocausal issue of social policy has been addressed thoroughly for decades by luminaries such as Marhsall McLuhan and Jacques Ellul. The Medium is the Message. For a more up to date take, I strongly recommend that you read Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves To Death.

---

[1] https://www.advocate.com/media/2017/11/03/why-did-russia-pro...

[2] https://youtu.be/Y5ubluwNkqg?t=126

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blitzkrieg#Definition
There’s a silent war between two giants of 3D printing: DWS and Formlabs
Well, I wouldn't be surprised if the software internally always computed l/100km and the converted to mpg for display.
How to install GO language on Ubuntu 18.04?
>Or, widespread Internet use decreased the ability of the traditional gatekeepers of information to manipulate voters.

I think the opposite is true. In the 2016 election, we saw people get trapped in information-bubbles. The internet allowed far-right/alt-right information sources such as Breitbart/Infowars to manipulate people and gain a wide audience.

Similarly, there has already been substantial evidence that the Russian government used a variety of techniques to spread false information through the internet.

To say that the internet decreased the amount of false information in the 2016 election is misleading and false.
Those are both examples of signals we can't interpret interfering with the signal we're trying to interpret.

However, it's not like the electrical noise came to be by magic -- it's the result of many interactions that have a structure, and hence impart that structure on the "noise", we just lack key facts to be able to interpret that signal.
I don't think I've ever wanted SQL embedded in my Java source over loading it as a resource. Loading it as a resource allows me to edit the SQL in a sql-aware text editor.
Yeah,but now you're talking about browsers. You and others keep telling me how secure TLS and CA pki is,I never said otherwise. It's just not end to end. The subject here is dns over https and there certainly is no client auth here. TLS provides good transport security for the client. Not end to end,as in the CA infra for client auth isn't on par and even if it was CT is not TLS protocol feature and it's up to applications to verify CT,have only good root CAs and do client certs right
Is free speech dead?
I have a TOC that covers the right third of the page. Do other folks have that? Does the document author not see it?
Yep, it’s only around 2x as many.
Your example of lack of structure, rather than merely something we can't interpret, is algorithmically generated?

I think we may be speaking past each other.
> I don't believe monetary incentives are a good way to raise birth rates. In the end a child is massively expensive, and no government can afford to compensate parents completely.

Transfer payments don't consume resources, they only reallocate them. If you enact a larger child tax deduction, people with children will pay lower taxes and people without children will pay correspondingly more. The result will be more consumption of childcare and childhood education and less consumption of tourism and luxury cars, but that doesn't harm the local economy -- if anything it helps it, because the things children need tend to be locally produced, rather than your citizens spending money they earned locally to vacation in the Caribbean.

The argument you would have to make is on the other side, that the economy can't afford people to spend time rearing children that they could have spent working. But at a world average level that can't possibly have been true or humans would already be extinct, and economies have much more surplus now than they had in the past. And the cost is inherently short-term, because the net work done by the average human is more than the cost of raising them, so in the long term you get much more from having a working adult than it costs to raise the child.

You also don't have to provide enough in tax incentives to cover the entire cost of the child, only enough to push enough potential parents at the margin over the threshold to raise the fertility rate to the population replacement rate. This may still be a significant amount, but nowhere near the entire cost -- and you only have to offer it during the years when the child is in the care of the parents, not for the parents' entire working life, much less the child's, by which point you're already making dividends -- the now-adult child is working and paying taxes that more than pay for the next generation.
This. My international friends often express surprise at how things are in the US. I’ve told them they should try thinking of the US as the EU and the States as the EU member nations. Then our federal dysfunction suddenly makes a lot more sense to them.
This is just an inter departmental circular circular blown out of proportion by click bait media coverage, the law has not changed. Legally you still need a magistrate sign off, which is not a private court like FISA is.

This isn't to say that the Indian intelligence agencies do not try and monitor outside the judicial purview ( who really noes ? Without Snowden we wouldn't know about NSA either). Even if they want, the Indian security apparatus simply does not have kind of resources (both money and tech) to implement a dragnet like NSA has, today. Of-course this may change in future as tech may become cheaper, expertise easier.

The security threat for India is also considerably different than first world countries, two neighbors(Pakistan and China)with border disputes, both nuclear armed and not friendly, Pakistan is not exactly stable and also funds/controls proxy agents who use terror tactics and has significant active support and arms from the U.S. GPS. was disabled during last "war" in late 90's so an Indian system with local coverage was developed. If there is serious thought in the intelligence community that because monitoring is not good enough then it is tough not attempt any means necessary.
Only 1000? At a range of say 100m... you might raise the temperature a degree or two. If the bird stood very still.
Deviant Ollam - The Hotel Room Gourmet
https://youtu.be/qtFV73wpEAw

Also not 2018 but his elevator with Howard Payne talk:
https://youtu.be/oHf1vD5_b5I (1h version)
https://youtu.be/ZUvGfuLlZus (2h version)

And the search for the perfect door:
https://youtu.be/4YYvBLAF4T8
I've been able to get gigabit everywhere I've lived so far in Seattle (through either Wave-G or CenturyLink), but I only have a sample size of '3 addresses in 2 neighborhoods'.

Cost was around $80-100/month.

Symmetric

Dynamic ip address, but CenturyLink link did not support IPv6.

have had no issues hosting web services.
>"Why do you say that GS has a rotten reputation?"

Do you not know about the subprime mortgage product they sold ? It was notable in that it was designed to fail i.e they defrauded investors

see:

http://fortune.com/2016/04/11/goldman-sachs-doj-settlement/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07...

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1983886...

>"They are probably the most respected bank on Wall St"

Respected by who exactly? Other investment banks constantly mired in their own scandals and white collar crime.

Here's some other Goldman highlights:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs_controversies
As sentient animals emerging from nature I think the ability to look away from atrocity understandable. It permeates nature to its core. Predation, disease, decay, and death are everywhere outside of our human distraction bubble.

What's more interesting to me than the ability to look away is that we've developed a sense of urgency to change that. Not just for ourselves, but for other humans and animals around us. In general, as a species, we've moved significantly in the right direction towards reducing the atrocity.
That sounds like a good lesson was learned.
"Yes, the US had to align with USSR" to take 50% of the cake while paying 5%.
now this is an idea i like.
If you are rich and not having a baby then I don't think bit more money will encourage you to have one.

If you want to pay people to have babies then you should pay poor people because they might be the ones not having babies because they lack money.

If you don't want poor babies then when the baby is born in poor family buy for them the best education, healthcate, toys, food and other activities and you have a good chance that you turn poor baby into rich baby and then rich adult.

If you just want to have rich folks to have more kids you should give them what they lack. Most likely time. So limit work week to 30 hours top. Make overtime paid 200% and unpaid overtime highly illegal and heavily fined. Pay people to not work for a year or more after they have a child.

I think the solution with poor parents is actually cheaper.
A Shepherd's Journey in Himalayas [video]
There’s always a reason...
> I doubt your average joe even knows what GS does beyond being a “vampire squid.”

..which is a prime example of bad reputation. Reputation, does not care about justification, it just exists once it started existing.

It must be tempting for GS to just not care about their reputation on main street since they don't engage in that kind of business, but the business they do engage in does not get easier when everyone they might want to interact with is carefully weighing the benefits against the risk of getting tainted by association.
i hope you are joking
Agreed.

My esperience is teaching me that anyone with "the" answer/solution/cause is selling something either unwittingly or not.

I've yet to encounter any event above molecular physics that can be described accurately with this much simplicity.
What bodies think about - by Michael Levin at NeurIPS 2018.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjD1aLm4Thg

I dont really know anything about biology, but this piqued my interest.One of the most interesting talks of 2018.
I agree it makes sense to install safety devices to protect against carelessness and inattention. But cruise ships already have that, with waist-high railings around all outdoor public areas.

Going further, with horizontal netting or 6 foot fencing, would be trying to protect passengers against injury even in the case of outright thrill-seeking or tomfoolery. I'm guessing the cruise lines resist that partly out of cost considerations and partly because they don't want the ships to start looking like prisons. Passengers aren't going to like it if they bought a luxurious getaway and they find themselves in a cage.
As someone said, in practice what happens is that people like at the bars, not actual performance. Heck, I hear people who think the phone is messed up when their are full bars but no data working (because the bars are showing analog signal or other things). They rarely blame the carrier. So why should the carrier care?