skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd still hold that the name stuck because it was at least a funny play of words and probably way older than the earl.
I stopped doing front-end dev for this reason. I told my manager I no longer wanted to do anything on the front-end, and they were fine with that. Since I've gone 100% back-end only, my work life has been far more sane.
Does it fall under GDPR violation?
The Pleasures and Pains of Coffee — Honoré de Balzac (1830) http://blissbat.net/balzac.html

Posted on HN last year: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13647098
When I learnt I could already ski, was terrible at skateboarding, never got good enough to even ollie.

Did one day of 2x2 hour lesson, then could board well enough to do intermediate runs and manage on t-bar and chair lifts.

Most abiding memory, very cold arse. We broke for lunch after the first 2 hours and I had difficulty using the loo because I couldn't feel my arse at all.

Great fun, but for the last couple of days of the trip I went back to skis. There's something about the rhythmb that matched mountain-biking for me.

Day after the snowboarding lessons I couldn't sit up in bed, had to roll over, my tummy was so sore. I'd recommend lots of sit-ups and squats to get your abs ready!

I think it's easier to learn to board.
The GIL is mostly managed by CPython and the host application doesn't touch it directly. Host extension modules may use PyEval_SaveThread et al. just like regular extension modules to release the GIL during blocking operations when called by CPython. There is a separate API for fondling the GIL when you're in a host-created thread (not created by CPython) and want to call CPython. Those are orthogonal (called by CPython vs. calling CPython).
What difference does it makes whether it is "live" or not? Ultimately, the question is about recognition and self-awareness. Whether you can do that through a reflection or a photo or a video or scent, it doesn't matter.

Also, I think don't you understood my point. My point is that different species recognize themselves differently. Cats recognize themselves and others through smell. So a mirror test is not applicable. It would be like giving a blind man the mirror test and expecting an actionable result.
GhostWritting Venture
Can you give an objective example of the magnitude of difference in performance?
Hey Jay. Just want to say good job on the execution on this. It's clearly articulated and goes along way to show the industry how and why this needs to happen.
This is a silly argument. Do you expect to get a free X-Ray because they're just showing you your own bones?
Growth team = MBAs is that right?
It's not super complicated, just apparently controversial.

In your $complex_app you probably have JS generating most (if not all) of the HTML seen on the page. CIJ just says that the JS should generate the styles as well so that each component in your page is self-contained.
I feel pretty good giving money away as well!
I'm not sure what else they could do about this.

I'm as sad as you are about licensing complications, but I can totally see why they're doing it. And I'd say it's miles better than these parts being closed.
> Open source is not synonymous with free software.

This is literally the point of Open Source. It is "Free Software" repackaged for business people who hate ideals and morals as part of the story for the development of software.
The coding of perception in language is not universal
Why would they use Git at all, then?
Master Rent a Car
https://outline.com/nsaNJ4
This is the inverse of two wrongs don't make a right.
By your reasoning you're not expecting people to use the same software for more than ~4 years.

I bought Adobe Master Collection CS4 (student edition, for $1000) way back in 2008 and have been using it for the past ten years. It runs even better than it did back then because of the better hardware available now! The subscription model would have been much more expensive for a user like me.
Yanis Varoufakis: My plan for Europe can succeed where Macron and Piketty failed
Yeah, but they seem to be coalescing into the same thing.
I've been trying to tell this to people for years:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14804175

Our product, Elevate Web Builder, has been using component-based visual controls with no CSS since 2014. It's modeled on the traditional way of doing components/controls in Delphi's VCL and .NET's WinForms, with a splash of WPF in terms of how control interfaces work.
I think the real issue is people ignore CSS while building applications. You see the same issue when people try and the database or other critical component. That always results in a hacky mess that gets worse over time.

Know your tools.
A modern electric car is electronically regulated, which means there is controller software involved somewhere. Even if someone else cannot direct where your car can go, they can certainly insert code that prevents it from moving or charging if certain conditionals are met.

Unless you write your own firmware, your electric car is vulnerable to control by non-owners.

But this condition already exists on internal combustion cars, so there isn't really any reason to prefer them over electric cars, except that you can buy and own ones that are so old there are no complex control systems.
I agree that the proliferation of new licenses is annoying. But I think the reason you see changes in licensing from Elastic, MongoDB, etc is that the world has changed pretty dramatically since most of the original licenses were created. This proliferation existed early on in the days of open source and eventually died down to a set of standard things that solved the problems most people had. But the reality is the public cloud has dramatically changed the dynamic and many of the people who want to make code available with a permissive license don't have an option that is common and well understood and that protects them. I believe such a thing will likely emerge and will allow us all to standardize.
You can open an Ameritrade or any other brokerage account and deposit money into the account with no intention of purchasing securities. There is no dispute that the SIPC would cover your account in that instance.

The only thing that has changed here is Robinhood is explicitly marketing their brokerage account as being able to be used as a savings account without any need to invest in securities.

It’s not black and white on either side. If there ever was a default event, it would surely go to court and it’s not 100% clear who would win. For that reason, I wouldn’t make use of the account.
I think people fear change in software because updates have a habit of making the user experience worse. Think of the troubling trend in web design where they take away customization options and add more padding to everything to be "mobile friendly".
Yes. See, for instance,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8326382_Influence_o...

and for some wider background and reassurance see:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/38114212_Commentary...
Show HN: Togetheo – meet likeminded people nearby
Yes, I think it wrapped the Microsoft IE control. (For convenience and compatibility?)

Trident layout engine: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL_Explorer
Pure the use of JS vs. CSS is not what makes CSS-in-js more maintainable. It's "scoping styles locally to a component" that makes it more maintainable. As well as having easier interaction between them, like theming or dynamic behavior.
Adobe lost about a year in feature development on XD when it ported it to Windows. They've picked it up since they've reached feature parity.

Also, XD is the spiritual successor to Fireworks. Its internal codename was "Sparkler" in reference to Fireworks.

To call XD a Photoshop they slapped UI features on does it a disservice. It's a completely new app built from the ground up specifically for UX/UI design.
> You can hack capitalism just like you can hack software.

Any tips on this topic?
Maybe the funds are still used for securities but done on the behalf of the account holder who makes no investments directly?
I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under the covers.
It doesn’t matter what it looks like, if it wasn’t paid for, but was in fact produced by a news organization as journalism, then it’s not an advertisement.

The word advertising has a meaning.
You think people want advertising? I’d say companies want advertisting, and people cannot do anything to stop it. There are some exceptions though, like cities banning outdoor advertising in historic city centres, the reason being that they’re intrusive and ugly, thus making the location less attractive for tourists. It’s a shame that a mere ugliness is not enough, it has to be linked with a financial loss - but it’s a step in the right direction IMO.
Do you have experience photographing such events?
Lol oops. Thanks.
36 Hours in Chamonix
Real Due Diligence (DD) Guidelines for Crypto Companies in 2019
Just last month we had our designers give a short demo of their new tools, and they compared Sketch with XD, and they went with XD. I know this is anecdotal (like everyone's comment is here), but considering the feedback they got from people they worked with when trialing in Sketch and XD, I'd have to say that XD impressed across the board, from designers to developers, more than Sketch did. And these are all people I respect.

So while I wouldn't bet on them having this in the bag just because they're Adobe, I would bet on it based upon the feedback I heard and the fact that Adobe does have the ability to throw more resources at it.
$ perl -MO=Concise -e 'my $v = 1234; $v *= 9876'
a <@> leave[1 ref] vKP/REFC ->(end)
1 <0> enter ->2
2 <;> nextstate(main 1 -e:1) v:{ ->3
5 <2> sassign vKS/2 ->6
3 <$> const[IV 1234] s ->4
4 <0> padsv[$v:1,2] sRM*/LVINTRO ->5
6 <;> nextstate(main 2 -e:1) v:{ ->7
9 <2> multiply[t2] vKS/2 ->a
7 <0> padsv[$v:1,2] sRM ->8
8 <$> const[IV 9876] s ->9
-e syntax OK
My family had it! It was not half-bad, except for poor reliability and high fuel consumpton. From what I’ve heard, it also drove terribly (top gear made entire episode about it, just to make fun of how badly the car handles).
Got it, thanks for that!
It's the manufacturers fault they (might) not have invested in their drivers.

Intel is strongest in power savings, drivers, and generally not having to give a shit. Depends what you care about, Mr. Idiot.
It's an interesting discussion and one that has bothered philosophers for millennia. I'm afraid you won't have a true answer to your doubts and it's a matter of what makes sense to each of you.

As usual, Wikipedia does a decent job of surveying the landscape so you can deep dive into any of the philosophies as you wish: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will
Horrible position to take. He was bullied and bullies deserve to be punished.

Recent suicide of 9 year old because bullying had sparked debate in our office. And most agreed her bullies and parents of bullies should be charged criminally.
Build and Validate Forms in React Native with Formik and Yup
None of the replaced logos had “handwritten” typefaces (I’m thinking Coca-Cola, which by the way, it’d be brutal, if thry changed it like Pepsi-Cola did). And I don’t think this ‘neu bauhaus’ look works for any but one.
Part of a broader effort - I committed to learning to code about 3 years ago. At that point in time, I didn't really know why I was doing it... really out of curiosity. I kept going because it was addicting, and really an antithesis to my day job at the time (investment banking) - which I felt was corporate / bureaucratic and unintellectual.

That said, eventually, I want to start a startup. I'm building out small side projects now. I'm generally comfy with web + mobile dev, and I wanted to upskill in a "newer" technology that was more "mathy".
Open source is not synonymous with free software.

Nobody is saying that it is.

The community license is additional features free for use but not for you to provide as a managed service.

IOW, "not Open Source". And that's fine... a company has a right to create software using any licensing terms they want. But making something that's "almost OSS, but not quite" and trying to steal the sheen of respectability that comes from being OSS, while not actually being OSS, is disingenuous and misleading.

Additionally, license proliferation in general is a Bad Thing because it muddles the issue around what's really Open Source and what isn't, especially for new-comers.

The world is evolving and so open source should also evolve with it.

Not all evolutionary steps are good things, in real life, or in metaphor-space.

until the cloud providers start to philosophically realign themselves back with what open source stood for and stop being bad actors.

There have always been people who used OSS without contributing back. There's nothing novel about this w/r/t cloud providers. And it's very questionable how you can consider somebody a "bad actor" for using a project under the terms that it was explicitly licensed under.
For perl5 there have been several attempts at AOT native code compilers. For example: http://rperl.org
> Looks like Yahoo sold brightroll in 2017

What makes you think that? Oath is Yahoo.
> "We're sorry this happened."

That about sums it up for all these privacy breaches these days. It's getting to the same level of "thoughts and prayers" for tragedies. No actual change or consequences for the problems happening, just empty "sorries" and "promises" that it won't happen again/they'll get it fixed. I don't know if this is a GDPR violation or not (as someone else asked), but if it is, I hope we start actually seeing action of these sorts of things.
I've been snowboarding for over 20 years and skied for 10 years before that. I live near Whistler, did a season there and average over 20 days riding a season. I still take lessons when I get a chance and always get value out of them.
Yep; this future is a direct rentier society. It's a decent projection from where we are now, where the entire society is built on a mountain of debt. It's also horrifying the vision of serfs paying a hamster wheel subscription model for the basics of life. Whether funded by debt or subscription models; we're just simulating prosperity while living as serfs.

" With usura hath no man a house of good stone
each block cut smooth and well fitting"
There are databases with much higher accuracy. I once had a pizza delivery website I had never before used pre-populate the complete address for my location (on a desktop PC with no GPS). They don't do that anymore though, so I can't take a screenshot.

Retailers buy and sell customer data as part of "data cleanup" efforts, that data can be correlated with geo-IP and third-party cookies, etc.
Strange, I remember one person who spoke up at Google with what he believed was a legitimate problem and was subsequently tarred, feathered, and fired. Sets a good precedent for this culture they're promoting.
This is a great question. Many people think the AGPL solves this problem but it absolutely does not. This is why MongoDB, which was AGPL licensed, just changed to a custom license.

The other reason we don't want to use AGPL is that it can be quite aggressive in making you open source your own code if you want to embed our code in a proprietary application. We actually think building proprietary applications is a fine use of our software, and is one of the major use cases for this kind of infrastructure. This is addressed in more depth along with many other questions in this FAQ:
https://www.confluent.io/confluent-community-license-faq
You are right, I'm actually underselling it. 1 second is the typical performance for doing a 2d histogram (or other binned statistics) since it involves writing to memory as well.

I just ran a quick benchmark:
In [7]: %timeit -r3 -n3 df.mean(df.ra)
330 ms +- 5.46 ms per loop (mean +- std. dev. of 3 runs, 3 loops each)
In [11]: f'{len(df):,}'
Out[11]: '1,692,919,135'
In [12]: 330/len(df)1e9
Out[12]: 194.92957057278463

so it is 0.2second for 1.7 billion rows, which is:

In [15]: (len(df)8/10243)/0.2
Out[15]: 63.066152296960354

63 GB/s. (this is a high end machine, on my laptop I get ~12GB/s)

We do not use float32 much in science since you really should know how not to screw up. It does give some extra performance boost (not much though), and also saves you on memory cache.
> The bug also impacted photos that people uploaded to Facebook but chose not to post.

What about, for example, pictures sent in a private message?

I'm so very glad I deleted my account months ago.
Oh, I wasn't dismissing experience in general, nor was I questioning your experiences. I would love to see your numbers on the different dispatch methods you tried.

I was only questioning that one blog post you linked that lazily said (paraphrasing) "computed-goto dispatch will be undone by the compiler, so don't bother". Others have posted numbers in this thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18679477) showing that this information is at best outdated.
Go to this one [1], change the GEAR_NUM to like 30 and enjoy the rendering

1: https://turtletoy.net/turtle/9ddc6d4dc5
AirBnB and Uber are both examples of companies that were huge wins for customers/consumers. Just because they flout regulations which are often times outdated and unnecessary (re: protecting inefficient incumbents) doesn't mean they aren't doing what's good for the consumer.

I agree though that Robinhood is a different story with potentially harmful consequences for unsophisticated investors looking for a safe/easy investment.
> The correct response to this used to be "wow, that's pretty cool that they can make this work in a browser".

Yes, but that would way too non-cynical for the HN psyche.
There's plenty of valid criticisms you can make of Photoshop but it's still an astonishing bit of software in many regards.

So - no.
This doesn't even make sense; a filter that filters on From: wouldn't detect the sender having used a bcc:. To: is more the issue here.
Which is interesting because Adobe XD also heavily uses MacOS specific API's and had to do a complete rewrite to support Windows. But Adobe has the manpower to do that.
AFAIK they haven't yet launched, it's not going to be until "early 2019". Not a defense of Robinhood, but their lack of (apparent) SIPC protections today do not necessarily imply they will be missing when they formally launch with actual customer deposits.
As I said, there is a reason they are all switching to EVs.

The Tesla Model S, in its main US market, is the leader in the luxury car market. Model 3 is the #1 selling car by revenue.

Production is limited to 2 US factories. Worldwide numbers go up fast when they have a Euro factory, Chinese factory, etc.

> GM turned a loss selling nine million vehicles or so, opening a whole line to enter a market which is moving just one million units or so competing with players like Tesla that operate at almost a loss make zero sense.

And yet they are doing it.
They almost have the UI changes to the phone app done, which is the hard part. What's a little paperwork?
Yeah, I admit, it's hard to figure these things anecdotally. Our next door neighbor near Kazimierz plows with a horse and I do see that occasionally elsewhere. Things like hand tools, wooden wagons with rubber tires, organic fertilizer, scarecrows, free range animals and small family farms are also things I see frequently. Tractor ownership seems definitely less than 100%. From what I understand, there are some areas of the Lublin Voivodeship that are especially poor and this poverty might be highly localized.

I'm contrasting this with the USA where farming practices make use of a lot of highly specialized machines and huge scale. Actually many of the farmers I know in the USA are quite well off due to a combination of subsidies and very large operations.
We have built our own jsxstyle-like library and we got about 10-100x improvement.

It is really super fast since all your layout is compiled to a simple divs with a classNames whenever possible (almost always) and it became zero-runtime styling and this is awesome, this is the only way to build fast app - do nothing in your app if you can.
What narrative do you think the photos are trying to build? To make Poland in the 80's appear more quaint? Your paranoia seems. . . unwarranted.
8mb JavaScript bundles to display their static homepage to a mobile browser that has maybe a couple hundred MB allocated to caching things

Thanks for that. It explains why even on very high-end new phones, switching between complicated web sites in different tabs causes a reload.
At least in the states near me that have tried (unsuccessfully ) to pass at will laws, no part of the law that I saw would have taken away employees rights to resign at anytime they wanted for any reason. Is this actually part of at will laws else where?
This was an incentives issue. They were paid by the companies they rate. So in order to not lose market share they had to certify junk.
The French Protests Do Not Fit a Tidy Narrative
Agree. I'm trying to right now. I think it has more artsy types, which means more drama.
It turns out that making someone's job easier is in fact the foundation of good security.

One way this is true is that people won't use security if it isn't usable or easy to use. For almost two decades we had CA workflows that sucked. Certificate use has spiked in the last couple of years. Why? Witness the outstanding work by LetsEncrypt which is now allowing Chrome to flag insecure login forms.

Other examples; DDoS defense as a service, facial recognition that unlocks your phone every time you pick it up, cars that lock when driving, and fobs that make passwords almost irrelevant.

Good security and making someone's job easier are one and the same.
You must always understand the starting point of something. The rest of the world didn't start with tippping, hence why they adapted without. When restaurants in the United States have tried removing tipping, they lose their best waiters to rivals whom still do offer tipping, which causes them to quickly switch back to tipping.

It's like credit cards and mobile payments. Why has India and China embraced mobile payments so much more than the west? Because they never had credit cards! The delta between paying in currency and paying with a mobile phone is vastly greater than the delta of paying with a credit card vs a mobile phone. So the places which had credit cards in the past, mobile payments are not as ubiquitous as in China or India.

The starting point is extremely important.
FR is one biometric. One biometric can be spoofed, as this article shows. For authentication of anything desiring security, such as financial transactions, it is recommended to have at minimum 3 biometrics. Considering a phone can perform financial transactions and is often a storage place for passwords, 3 biometrics should be required to unlock a phone. The iPhone's 3D FR is closer to 1.5 biometrics, and with added software analyzing successive video and 3D sensor "frames" it could become a full 2 biometrics - but one should still have a 3rd, such as fingerprint or passcode for financial authentications. But at that level, why have FR at all?

In time, within a year, publicly available FR systems will have "spoof detection" suites. The FR software I work on does, but this is just the beginning. Non-living 3D objects, such as that 3D printed head, fail under motion analysis because it lacks the momentary flush of a human pulse, and likewise that can be used to detect prosthetics on a face. Additionally, it is too rigid, faces undergo constant subtle deformation - the lack of that is also a spoof detection method.