skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My point is that society has not said you can do what you like with alcohol, and should not do so for opioids, and that the restrictions for opioids are going to be stronger than the restrictions for alcohol even if opioids become freely and legally available to all who need them.
I wonder why nobody mentioned zoho.com (from India) and products they offer. They have docs as well as other apps that any business needs and no privacy issues.
I don't think you actually responded to anything that I said, so I'm not sure how to reply. Did you just sort all of the words in my comment and pick some at random to respond to?
justifying the destruction of privacy to find out child molesters who look for their victims online. there are many examples like that.
By coincidence we just published an article [1] comparing automated tools to human auditing in smart contracts. I am reviewing your article for expanding ours. At ethdev[2] someone suggested to check the Slither[3] tool also.

[1] https://blog.coinfabrik.com/smart-contract-auditing-human-vs...

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/ethdev/comments/a4492r/comment/ebbn...

[3] https://github.com/trailofbits/slither
Nice.

Many years ago, I had a male cat that could come and go as he liked. That was bad for birds etc, I know, but hey. Anyway, he eventually disappeared, so I put up posters around the neighborhood. And it turned out that several considered him to be their cat ;) He was "mine" to the extent that his mother was, but whatever. Never did see him again :(
I couldn't agree more !
I wonder though, is root kit even detectable? Perhaps most are.
Are you talking about free non-military funded thinking outside of Microsoft, Alphabet, Oracle, IBM and other corporations?
Try K9 Material [1], an unofficial fork using Material design. It works just like the regular version but looks a bit more in-line with the rest of modern Android.

[1] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.fsck.k9.material/
Their FAQ actually provides all the pointers I was otherwise able to come up with, so is probably worth a shot:

https://you.23andme.com/reports/ghr.alzheimers/faq/

In addition, you may find it helpful to talk to a genetic counselor about your results; your GP/PCP should be able to get that sorted, although 23andme provides additional resources.

https://you.23andme.com/tools/genetic-counseling/
> The fact that I'm traveling somewhere (on business or pleasure) during a given month basically doesn't affect anything. I travel maybe 100 days a year, in part outside the US.

It can affect your taxes dramatically. Bump that up to 335 days / year outside the US, and you're entitled to the foreign earned income deduction, which last I checked was about $120,000.

That's not evading, though; it's a formal deduction.
This makes so much sense, in its own way. Is there anywhere I can read more about this perspective?
Live in a Seattle community of inspiring tech entrepreneurs
Jesus what a hero
> Except the resulting code will look nothing like “the humans say it”,

Actually, I find it maps rather directly to how a lot of people explain things. For example, "Examine each number, and as long as it's greater than 10 and odd, then pass it to the the work function."

for my $number ( @numbers ) {
next unless $number > 10;
next unless $number % 2;
work($number);
}

Perl generally allows you to structure your code as you would explain how to accomplish something to another person. This can be beneficial or detrimental depending on how deep you go with this concept. A lot of becoming a good Perl programmer is learning where a sane line is for this, but each language usually has a similar feature which the user needs to decide where the sane point to stop is before taking it to an extreme that is detrimental.

There are definitely aspects of Perl that I think are better left untouched, and thankfully the community has pretty much come to consensus about the most problematic missteps the language allows.
Python to Perl 6 in a nutshell
Well, he did marry Wendy Deng. Some have said it was to help break into the Chinese market. If it wasn't for Tony Blair, they'd probably still be married.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendi_Deng_Murdoch
> It's pretty damning

Understatement of the year! That's an 8 point list of incredibly shady practises by someone with an utterly broken moral compass.
How did Japan came to the discussion in the first place? You wanted to add a random fact you read on the internet?

And to add my own opinion, for the people that know you, you are considered one and the same. Yes people who don't know you will assume you are a foreigner due to your looks, but why do you think this is a Japanese and Chinese thing only?
Do you really think an asian man is seen as local in the first glance in Sweden or Ethiopia?

Not everywhere is America.
Indeed, privacy-wise it is equivalent to having cameras recording. But convenience wise it is brilliant, when I want to do sports.. I do not want to bring keys or gym cards, just sports clothes
Not really. Adult goat meat stinks. (Literally, due to the male hormones.)
To be fair, he has a newer main page:

http://www.quadibloc.com/main.htm

and there are really some nice articles. And he has an even older site:

http://friedo.szm.com/krypto/JS/home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/frho...
Paris braces for new riots as 'Yellow Jacket' protests sweep France
I believe (I haven't read the study in detail) that their results show that different people get different results when not logged in. They didn't actually correlate this with anything like purchase history or individual user info. Others ha e hypothesized that the differences are due to location.

In other words, the study proves that different people get different results. It doesn't prove, as they claim in some press, that this is because Google tracks you while you aren't logged in. It's misleading on DDGs part to claim such of that's the case.

(I work at Google, but have nothing to do with ads).

As a broader point, just because you have a null hypithesis does not mean the study is biased. That's completely not how academia works.

Bias as the gp used it doesn't mean statistical bias which also isn't what you mean, but more like "even if these results are technically accurate, they may be misleading", a common example would be p-hacked results. This, contrary to what you say, often involves inventing a hypothesis after the fact, such that it is easily disproven with your data.
Dragon Resupply Mission (CRS-16) Docking (live)
The counter to this is AWS. My credit card was not enough to access the account after I lost the password. No way to close the account either. Just cancel the credit card and hope they didn’t send debt collectors after me.

Please be smarter than me and keep your AWS account tied to a current email address.
Their balance sheet still reflects liabilities in terms of showrooms, salaried salespeople for those showrooms, automobile service centers and salaried mechanics at those service centers.

Until those expenses become immaterial in the grand scheme of things, they’re a car company.
Humans are social animals. Technology (i.e. work, phones, netflix, computer games, browsing the internet) can distract us enough to neglect social relationships but it is no substitute. Clearly you are coming to that realisation after 10 years.

Start small, if you have any hobbies go to a meetup or group for that hobby. Go do a fitness class in a gym.

Try asking a few people each day "how are you". It doesn't matter if the conversation doesn't go any further than "I'm good thanks" but just do it. It sounds like you don't like small talk but consider where that has gotten you, maybe you need to reevaluate your thoughts on human interaction, maybe you have been wrong?
First real world project as freelancer Benefits and Obstacles
99% of people would support destruction of privacy for this cause.
Whenever this topic comes up I think about Judas Priests "Electric eye" song
> When electronics fail, it's generally a handful of causes, or one or two well-known design flaws in some particular model of device.

Once upon a time in the age before I dedicated my life to all things software repairing color tvs was one my sources of income. I respectfully disagree with your assertion, electronics can fail in very many different ways. All the way from 'rodent electrocuted in HV power supply' to passive component that never fails somehow in fact did fail.

Even something as mundane as a coil-over-a-resistor can fail if the conditions are right. And don't get me started on bad soldering connections, corroded connectors and a million other little details that can affect the functioning of a device to the point where the repairguy gets called.

This was before the days when oscilloscopes were portable, and unfortunately also before the days when I had a driving license. A typical house call would end up with a working TV or VCR and me learning yet another way in which things could fail.

Main tools: a couple of folders of schematics of the most commonly encountered models of TV/VCR (pick the right one before you leave, hope the user read the type plate correctly), a stack of matchboxes with passive components, some of the more common active components with enough spread that you could cover most cases, a soldering iron and a very large collection of parts scavenged from old TVs waiting for the opportunity to recycle them.
A Blockchain developer
Agen Poker Online Indonesia Deposit Termurah
That's exactly what I have been pointing out at every innovation conference or meeting where I speak. Where is the innovation? Where is the technology? We think that what we use today is advanced and works better, but it's just not true.
What's the moral justification here? Most people love biotmetrics.
Individual snowflakes are not capable of abstract reasoning.

Can we make it a requirement for ourselves to limit our power to our ability to keep that power safe?

I think that’s a superset of the problem of incentive alignment in AI safety, so probably not... but we also shouldn’t let the perfect to be the enemy of the improved.
I think this Haskell version (pugs) came at a time when perl6-development was somewhat stuck, and it enabled the Perl 6 developers to test new language constructs on an improved runtime (I believe); so Haskell was actually key to Perl 6 development. (https://gist.github.com/masak/479846/4908b28645b8815d1afe2b4...)
Technology has gone through the nerves
Comments are a terrible idea. You can respond on your own blof, of course.
An extra point - senior means FU money. Often people have degree of authority and sway with others in authority - often by right of tenure, organisational position and friendships.

But coming fresh and new into a company, it's hard to just have your opinion or taste taken seriously - especially where that opinion will be unpopular (ie your code base needs rewriting from scratch)

So FU money is needed to avoid the tendency "just to go along with it for a bit"

Hire rich people is hardly a great line, but it will have benefits.

Hiring desperate people with no other options does not sound like you are winning of course
Location: Italy
Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: well, it depends

Technologies: Java, C, Python, Javascript, NodeJS, AngularJS, Angular2, jQuery, D3JS, Bootstrap, APIs, React, SQL, XML, XSL, GIT, MySQL, MongoDB

Resumè/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/simone-della-marca-25b55b26

English level: Excellent

Email: s.dellamarca@gmail.com
I don't remember any longer, did PC-DOS, DR-DOS and all other DOS compatible variants also ship GW-BASIC?
I would say it is quite ingenious.
I started doing web dev before 2000. Only Windows worked as a dev machine then and OS X came around but obviously lack of third party tools made it a no go. Now I can't think of going back to Windows because third party tools that I take as granted aren't even avaialable with same level of quality on Windows.

3 or so years ago, I tried to set up a dev environment on Windows just see how good it can be then but gave up in 1 hour knowing it'll just slow me down bad.

I have no idea why most of people I know around still use Windows (and funnily 1 guy uses Linux)
According to https://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49#49 it also checks the CPUID.

There was also a guy who benchmarked a Blizzard game in a VM where he changed the CPUID of his AMD CPU to an Intel one and received better performance than on the host (with GPU pass-through btw).
Are you refering to the two email leaks from the University of East Anglia (Climategate), the one in 2009 and the 2011 one to Russian servers?

There was no scientific misconduct there, only climate denialists taking messages out of context. Even then you have to be a conspiracy theorist to see anything into it.

I don't think anyone ever stashed (or could stash) a whole century of research into a single Github repository, but around 95% of what you seek is out there.

For the data source I would start with the Global Historical Climatology Network (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ghcnd-data-access).
And what objective measures do you have for nations like China, Russia, Iran, and plenty of despotic dictatorships in Africa? There isn’t some magic measure that goes filters through all the lies perpetuated by those countries. There is definitely some degree of corruption in the US but there isn’t really evidence for the strength of your assertions. I suspect China is probably a lot worse because of the opacity/concentration of power of the communist party. I’d also be interested to hear what felonies perpetuated 2008. The government incentivized individuals to buy homes, and the banks looked the other way as long as people signed their mortgage agreements. A lot of the laws that would’ve prevented this were repealed in the 90’s.
Why Neutralinojs Is Better? Comparing with Electron and Node Webkit
Let's find a bug and get out this thing!
Technology is really give happines wherever
We are using in in production. One of our bigger uses is a DB metrics aggregator. We use it to to pull stats from DB servers for remote clients and dump them into graphite. Sort of an agent-less monitoring platform. We've had this Perl 6 tool running 24/7 since last summer. It's now pulling from ~80 DB servers.

Another internal use is an AWS infrastructure management tool that we built. A cli util that handles the initial bootstrapping for new AWS projects and a few helper features to simplify some of our common management tasks.

Perl 6 has been pretty easy to work with. Even in situations where a module isn't available or the requirements are too complex to build it with Perl 6 within our project time constraints, its facilities as a glue language really make it simple to work with external tools, modules, libs.

If you like the Perl 6 syntax then I'd recommend just spending some time with it. It's stable and fast enough for regular use now.
Have you tried https://wandbox.org?

It’s consistent and Github login saves your code in one page.
It feels the settings are in dozen different places on Windows to begin with when it could go down 5 levels or deeper to get to the option you're looking for.

The "good old" control panel doesn't even look categorized well.
Estonia is brilliant, the whole country has a buzz to it, like everyone is excited for the future. Totally the opposite of Finland just across the Baltic.
> As far as I know, it's actually an effect of a particular choice of coordinates inside the horizon, so it's debatable whether it actually has physical meaning.

What's the point of science with no "physical meaning"?
I suppose this list was created using automated testing? I'm in general a bit skeptical of the results of these tools, often they will have a very high false-positive rate and be more distracting than useful. For example regarding cookie security it's often the case that web apps use a mix between secure+HTTP-only cookies (e.g. for access tokens) and JS-accessible cookies (e.g. just for storing the login status so a web app can know if there's a secure access token cookie as well). Doing this usually poses no security risk but often gets flagged by automated tools anyway. Are you able to differentiate between the two cases? Similar arguments could be made about many other points on your list (e.g. mixed HTTP/HTTPs content, CSP headers etc.). Also, some of the things you mention like public key pinning and HSTS can carry operative risks themselves and should only be implemented with great care, slapping them onto a bullet list might give the suggestion that it's always a good idea to implement them (it's not) and is therefore not very helpful (IMHO).

I see that you do port scanning as well, which IP addresses do you scan against? In my experience many SaaS providers sit behind proxies like Cloudflare these days, so of course you won't find any open ports when scanning against their HTTP services, that doesn't mean that their real servers don't have any though.

I'm not complaining because we're not on your list (we're not), I just think if you really want to help companies to be more secure you should strive to explain the trade-offs and benefits of each point you mentioned instead of grossly oversimplifying an extremely complex topic. I understand the marketing value of this page but honestly I think it might be harmful to your reputation as a serious security firm. Just my 2c.
RISC-V ASM Tutorial Collection – Western Digital
> No company is a what it actually does company.

Or perhaps that companies, like individuals, have facets.

Someone calling Google a search engine company is no more correct than you saying they are an advertising company, technology company etc, or in a negative sense, a monopoly.

Each of these epithets refer to the same entity, it's just that each emphasizes a particular trait over other traits for the point being made. A regulator is more much more likely to use "search engine" in conjugation with "monopoly" to characterize Google than with the term "technology company" since their goal is to highlight a potential case of abuse that is known to stem from such market power.
As long as we don't know P!=NP we're not sure if we actually need to introduce a systemic weakness to break crypto, no?
It's simply the plural of "universe". If there actually is more than one universe, it would imply that "universe" was a misnomer, much like "atom" turned out to be.

People might keep using the word with a new definition. The new definition could be something like, "a region of the multiverse that is causally disconnected from other regions of the multiverse under such-and-such conditions." If those conditions change, two universes could become causally connected and merge into one universe. I imagine inhabitants of those universes would (if they look in the right place) witness events with no recognizable cause until the merger was complete.

Or what we currently call the universe might be renamed a sub-universe within the actual "one" universe, which was much bigger than we thought. Then the question is what would happen when sub-universes merge. Same question, different glyphs.
To me this sounds like a bizarre example - I and everyone else who lives in European cities do carry all of these things on our persons. I don't see this as an inconvenience. It all fits neatly in a briefcase or a backpack of your choice.

Besides lunch of course, because we're not savages. We enjoy our lunch sitting down at a restaurant. ;)
Kids come up with their own outside activities. Computer games are often built to appeal and take advantage of our brain circuits (sometimes purposefully, other times accidentally), to which kids are especially suspectible.

Not that outside activities can't be harmful. Not sure how I managed to not get seriously hurt as a kid, considering some of my accidents and my stupidity in general.
Here (Lille, France and Antwerp, Belgium) it is quite easy to find restaurants, takeaways, food trucks, etc, that offer food made from either locally sourced, organic or ethical ingredients, or all of those at the same time.
[XFCE] Flashback to Mac OS 9
I knew that one, but it was 5000 pieces limited production and its no longer available.

https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/thinkpad/thinkpad-t-ser...

... and besides that one no other modern laptop has 'real' keyboard.
How China is moving up the value chain in exports
The rocket scienceThe rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
The rocket science
$@"?,!,',@$+"$"""""""#####
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<i>ahdhdjdid</i>
React Native Floating Action Button
Do most Lyft and Uber employees even have large enough stock grants to buy houses?
Facebook Used People’s Data to Favor Certain Partners and Punish Rivals
Mozilla and AWS being the top listed that aren't news/info sites, while Mozilla somtimes also posts general tech stuf.
dupe, e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18621513
the 'cold war' ended up being a bunch of proxy actual-wars in my area, and I don't think the thousands that died liked it very much.
(And it was ridiculed by some back then as an "interactive slide show".)

If I remember correctly, Myst was a pioneer (if not revolutionary) in a number of areas:

1. It was one of the first computer games that were distributed with CD-ROM.

2. It was THE first computer game that was distributed ENTIRELY with CD-ROM.

3. It was probably the first computer game outside the racing/flight simulator/FPS genres that emphasised a first-person perspective.

4. It was probably the first computer game that used pre-rendered 2D backgrounds.

5. It was the first adventure game that isn't dialogue-based or inventory-based (it has a small inventory, but mainly for storing documents rather than tools; if I remember correctly, the first Myst game has only one "tool" that can be "used" at the end of the game). Myst was exploratory. The player wasn't told to achieve any goal.

It also remained as the top best-selling computer game for a half-decade. Its sales record (six million copies) was surpassed only by Half-Life and StarCraft in 1998, five years after Myst was released.
Thank you for your honest advice! It's great to learn about the thought processes going on at the "other side of the table."

Some more context which clarifies my decision to "pave my own road":

-Before Fullstack Academy, I founded/co-founded two startups (we succeeded in building the products, but failed at marketing). I've also taken some actual CS courses. Bootcamp filled gaps in my knowledge and taught me how to collaborate better, but it wasn't my first time coding or interacting with fellow coders.

-Most of the jobs I applied to are entry-level. If a company is looking for senior talent, they should state that clearly and not waste junior developers' time.

-When I get excited about a company, I put a lot of time and energy into my cover letter/introductory email. In return, most companies didn't even bother with a template rejection.
Don’t pay yourself and it’s easier to say you are not employed.
Invacio to offer third-party access via API to AI-driven data analysing systems
Are you constantly switching languages and environments? Maybe try to focus on the ones you're best at.
There's an interesting side effect to adblocking, which is that sometimes even the clickwrap agreements get blocked and the user never gets a chance to see them in the first place.

I wonder how many sites I've visited where blocking 3rd-party scripts broke their Javascript and prevented them from ever giving me a TOS popup. I have no way of knowing for certain, but given that I regularly find websites where the box does pop up but doesn't work properly, it's probably not zero.

IANAL, but if I was a site operator and I really needed absolutely every visitor to my website to be legally bound by a TOS, a Javascript-powered clickwrap agreement would not personally help me sleep any better at night.
I'm surprised this is understood so positively. The article is revealing how much discrimination is happening. It is obviously being economically rooted, also if you look at the history.

That being said, farming is the least economically interesting thing to do.