skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
he said 1/2M or 500k, not 1-2M.

I have a friend that is senior dev at FB with 550k total comp (pre-recent crashes). He is just really good at interviewing.
Taking loan on a reit isa different issue, however.
It’s more that software is way riskier and unknown, so you’re forced to go with tougher demands from VCs instead of more traditional investors/debt
People will do "evil"(as harming allies) if:

1) they are unsustainable (like harming allies) - not sure can be fixed

2) Don't have enough knowledge(broken perception) to do differently.

3) ROI of doing evil is too high.

etc.

Could you point to scenarios where aknowledging non-existence of free will could help us? IMO it doesn't matter.

EDIT: Actually I think that existence of concept of free will is positive because it makes people compute choices better (even assuming free will does't exists and computation is deterministic)
Now that's a depressing perspective.
We end up with oxygenated gas that supposedly produces 10% lower emissions per unit volume.

But it has 11-13% less energy per gallon, so one burns 11-13% more gallons to travel the same distance.
Igor's Blog 2018 roundup and and sign-off for the holiday season
Charybdis and ratbox are both installable in that fashion and easy to configure, not to mention they are also more stable, better-programmed, and better optimised for large networks than ngircd. With ngircd it's trivial to cause a netsplit by flooding; also, the dev Alex Barton admitted a while ago to neglecting proper input validation from server-to-server links, claiming servers are "trusted" ... I think after a while he finally agreed that it wasn't best practice and that all incoming data should be considered untrusted and hostile, but the fact that he didn't care at one point speaks volumes for the rest of his code which is probably still unsafe and unidiomatic to a degree. Meanwhile, ratbox and its charybdis successor both practise proactive defensive coding for untrusted input and I have witnessed no crashes with either, and I have been able to modify both their sources with relatively little trouble.

IP spoofing is possible on ratbox and charybdis; host cloaking is possible on charybdis but I would not depend on it. Personally I believe IP addresses are public information, but for those who don't agree with me, it's super easy to spoof hosts. Not to mention, both ratbox and charybdis support alternate I:lines (connection classes) for bouncers and the like.
[NSFW] Maximizing Your Slut Impact: An Overly Analytical Guide to Camgirling
Yep. This is what I'm leaning towards as well. They can't lock us all up!!
The hard thing about (some) interest groups is that sometimes they have people "way out there" in political opinions, "different" view of the world (think the views that include the usage of aluminium headwear) or just maladjusted to normal living.
Agree, this article reads, whilst historically interesting from perspective of the breakthroughs in psychopharmacology, much like a grand conspiracy theory about the industry itself.
SSRI (and its descendants, ie SNRI) is an incredibly effective class of drugs that has helped a lot of people function well. Without it, many of them would likely have resorted to drugs or alcohol. Doctors don’t prescribe it because they are evil; they do it because it is proven to work and helps the majority of people that take it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12923431

Example that some of parents are trying to tell the world that Autism is a gut related issue.
Yes!! I loved Jasc Paint Shop Pro too. Until this day I have a PSP7 copy from like 2002 with me. Corel completly ruined it.
> Can I ask because I'm genuinely interested - what on earth do you do for third-party applications (for eg. closed source) that have to be integrated into your environment that don't come pre-packaged in a convenient container?

Depends what it is. I've taken a number of apps and wrapped them into docker containers and then written a helm chart. Some orgs get a bit skittish over "vendor support" but this usually only matters when they think it's a key product.

The point is, once you have a fleet, you should manage everything the same. If you're off building other pet services, you're going to have capacity problems.

> None of which matters one jot, if one cannot properly manage ingress/egress filtering on one's API endpoints, or a reasonable level of password/credential security. One will be used for cryptomining or worse, as per the fine article.

I mean sure, but I did say use a managed service, which will come with auth. Similarly I wouldn't recommend you host services on any cloud or network facing the public, without a professional involved.

For example AWS is easy to get wrong all the same. One of my current client is busy hiring developers with no experience to put services on AWS, and they came up with no encryption, no auth, no monitoring, misconfigured IAM. What's really the difference between that and kube?
Easy for some to say. Billions of people rely on the current web, because it’s functions have replaced the previous traditions and infrastructures. Highly mobile folks will pack up and go elsewhere, leaving the masses to suffer under the list of features you mention. I think what we should be saving is the functionality society as a whole depends on. This is not so easily done.
I enjoyed the episode very much, and his opencogs project its interesting.
I think the best approach to the issue of IRC not being federated is to create a separate protocol that can not only do that, but also learn from the mistakes of IRC. By design IRC is not very extensible, and because of the initial limitations of the protocol and the divided opinions on what IRC should be, we have each software vendor proposing different standards and clients that have to support all of these differences. While IRCv3 is making efforts to standardise everything, there are still very large networks that will never switch from the old-style IRC and we still have that backwards-compatibility kludge in our way when we try to build modern clients. Creating a new, modern protocol from scratch hopefully allows us not to repeat these issues and have some foresight about extensibility, elegance, and standardisation.

And before anyone proposes Matrix to fill in that blank, I do not believe that it is at all suitable for the goals it is trying to accomplish.
I use PCF at work. I’ve noticed most of these but they didn’t really bother me...

We have low timeouts on most logins anyway, so having it on PCF isn’t a big deal.

We have a CI/CD workflow, so I don’t really have to login to the CLI that much.

Locked down environments are always a pain - but it would be no different if your org locked down AWS or Heroku, which they could.
There's no need to teach racial profiling to Israeli, since after their mandatory military service they already know what kind of people has no right to live freely or at all. Spending years in an environment where Arabs are seen as subhuman practice targets will change a person, and in this case it means each Israeli adult has gone through military brainwash.
Random fact about that puzzle in Monkey Island: it's the only way I know in which you can actually lose the game.

M.I. prided itself in having no dead ends, but if you throw the leaflet into a fire then you cannot leave the island. I thought I was being smart throwing items in the fire (the game stops you from throwing other useful items, and I wanted a smaller inventory), but in the end finishing the game took a couple years and the internet.
Physics cannot be explained so easily
Don't underestimate the danger of falsehoods going unopposed in forums.
Bonds also mature.

The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet primarily contains bonds. They just get the principle back and the balance sheet is reduced. They dont have to sell on the open market.
I would call it weird! OP surely received similar advertise that led to this post. Why would someone advertise such an old tech now?
Try both, and see which one you prefer.

Vue first though, as it's easier to get started with it and it will get a sense of what minimal setup you should expect. Then try to match that with react.

If you start by following most react tutorials, they will make you begin with something way more complicated that it needs to be and you will get discouragedd.

Both have a "cli" tool. Everybody tell you to start with it. I strongly advise against it, as it's the best way to not understand a thing about what you are doing and make bad decisions.

Find a tutorial that starts with the bare lib (no webpack, no transpilation, nothing but a script tag), for both vue and react. Then when you know how this work, find a minimal webpack based tutorial.

Then when you know those basics, use the cli tool, but immediatly use the eject feature. Read the result to understand the whole shebang.

Once you have done that, you can start any project using the cli without eject, and be confident you know what's going on. It will make you not only very productive, but also will let you take decision based on what you know, and not what other people wants you to know.

Now, I personnaly prefer Vue as I find the lib easier to work with, the community saner and the documentation is one of the best I've read, even including non JS projects. But again, make an educated choice.
That's... extremely indirect. When you buy a public stock, there is no flow of money from you to the company. That's stock they already sold to someone else, a long time ago.
In not so distant past many of weak-minded but talkative, ambitious and narcissistic people could have find their niche in any organized religion. Almost every fancy bullshit, as long as it fits the canon, could be accepted, praised and even rewarded. There were never a shortage of fancy bullshit.

In the current age religions has been obsoleted, but weak-minded "creative" people are still here. So, science became a new religion, especially when it hit the wall of empiricism, a limitation, which has been realized by ancient eastern philosophers (Brahman is unattainable to conditioned intellect which could see nothing, but its conditioning). Modern day's notion of impossibility to break an abstraction barrier (see the wiring of a processor from the level of code) is the very same notion reformulated.

Every bizarre bullshit could be framed as a hypothesis and published, giving a high social status of "theoretical researches" to its authors (instead of much more appropriate status of talkative idiots). It is due to social status, similar to those of a monk in medieval ages, which one's parents could buy for their children by paying them through a costly elite religious school. Nothing new under the moon.

I personally prefer to see those disconnected from reality academics, who gave advice to Macron (based on disconnected from reality abstract notions) to tax the population to combat climate change, to be held accountable for all the damages caused by resulting riots and being forced to pay for their ignorant arrogance, but this will never happen, because academics are allowed to produce bullshit labeled as working hypothesis. The rest of us aren't.
Claiming you shouldn't use the greater than sign in conditionals because sometimes it's confusing is going too far.

Also in python you can just do `if 5 < x < 10` :)
My cat lives more than 50% of its time outside the house. It also can sit for hours on a window sill.
For most Founders who go the VC route,the reality is your boss is the investor. Crowdfunding 2.0 aka Security Tokens will change this dynamic. Then your boss is the market, which is more healthy.
Here's what I would do: send it back to them and tell them to send it to my employer's legal department.
Both kinda.

Yes, it is still a thing.

It is amazing software yet also amazingly expensive [1] for those trying to get into the field, or not from a first world country.

[1] https://www.hex-rays.com/cgi-bin/quote.cgi
That's because he only started it recently. His first post was November 30 this year, and he already has 5 high-quality articles!
Yes, good points. To nitpick (sorry):

> AVX2 is used widely in perf sensitive libc routines like memcpy

Depends on the libc. I believe FreeBSD's libc avoids AVX to avoid the additional context switching cost for libc-using programs that don't already use AVX.
You mean a interroperable, international standard based information plateform sharing the vast humanity has access to "has no inherent value of its own" ? I call BS on this one.

Anything that's worth something is imperfect. Not the other way around.
Sources people, sources
They've "launched" a "commercial" service, and claimed that their some of their early riders moved to the new service with no NDA.

Where are those social media posts?

Waymo's PR is getting more and more divorced from reality with every announcement.
I'm not sure if this is actually the case. HSMs exist and it should be well within the governments capabilities to implement sufficient physical controls to defend against attacks.

I mean, they seem to manage pretty well with nuclear weapons.
As an atheist, I've been on two Catholic pilgrimages and countless church services.

My first pilgrimage was to Lourdes in the South of France - as a member of the German army. During an introduction course in the first weeks after joining the army we were told we were entitled to certain programs, and getting time off from the army. After basic training and entering regular service I went to the base's priest, told I'm I'm an atheist and that I'm interested in going to Lourdes. No problem. Best party of my life I must say, in a landscape straight from a movie (but I think I was the only one of ~35,000 soldier pilgrims to walk into the hills, even if they started right at the edge of town).

Second pilgrimage was with a Catholic girlfriend, walking from dawn to dusk to a Catholic pilgrimage destination for several days. Very strenuous. I even "spread god's word" in a sense, when towards the end somebody thought I still looked fresh and strong so I got to carry one of the loudspeaker backpacks used to spread the prayers spoken by a priest at the end of the procession along the long line of pilgrims :)

Nobody cares what you are. Just go if you want. There even are priests that are atheists: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/lutherans-in-a-quandary-over...

> Alarm bells started ringing in earnest last June, when the priest in question, Thorkild Grosboel, pastor of Taarbaek, a town near Copenhagen, went on to elaborate his views in an interview. "There is no heavenly God, there is no eternal life, there is no resurrection," he said, with typical Scandinavian matter of factness.

> Grosboel has since refused to step aside and insists that his lack of belief in some of the theological foundations on which the Christian church is built, does not stop him fulfilling the duties for which he is paid.
I don’t think “following dreams” actually describes what I mean. I just mean doing anything except the safest thing to do, or making any sudden moves that requires a new start. Watching friends try to change careers has been cringeworthy. You have to be willing to lose everything. I think that takes all the fun out of life. It makes you feel absolutely trapped. Maybe i do love my life just how it is, but it’s hard to say when I cannot even visualize working toward anything else. I am just so much more fulfilled when working toward something. I don’t really get much out of just trying to save money so that’s I can risk it all at some point down the road. That feels like a trap. My happiest times have always been when I can be relatively confident I will not lose everything and I am in a place to contribute to something with other people. That is what I mean by “dream” and I currently have one of them, but it’s not a dream. It was once, or, it was at least a goal. I think “goal” is what’s I really mean. I want the ability to have goals in life that are not mere consumption, but that do not require overwhelming risk. The goals can be lame or common everyday things, but more real than a hobby and less deadly than risking homelessness.
Also think of the mothers who can’t breastfeed through no fault of their own. We could potentially improve baby formula to counter the risks of not breastfeeding.
As a non native speaker, a "housing boom" sounds like a boom in number of houses, not a boom in the price of existing houses :)
China Warns Canada of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Huawei Arrest
They've already made it — they care about stability more than growth.
Taxi, Uber, Lyft.

The only advantage of a self-driving cars is that it might be somewhat cheaper.
This is nonsense. If you have a solo bootstrapped company that has any chance of making revenue or providing you income in the nearish future (which is what boostrapped means) then you should use the company structure that offers the most favorable tax consequences and worry about all these hypotheticals if and when they happen.
This suggests that I want more money or consumption, and that’s wrong. Nor do I want popularity. Quite the opposite. Popularity and attention are really the main problem, if anything. Who we are is defined by what we have done more than any time in history. Every day that passes is further locking ourselves into our cages of individuality. How can popularity and followers, like you mention, be our only hope for change when they are also the ties that are trapping us to our current trajectories?

Specialist vs. generalist gets more at the problem I think we were talking about, but even the fact that it is such a debated concept seems off. Something seems wrong on a bigger level. Sometimes you need a specialist and sometimes a generalist, and we are highly adaptable creatures. It is strange this thing leads to so much anxiety. I think people are just worrying tremendously over which one are they to an unhealthy degree, and because they are scared to death of failure. Who can blame them?

I’m sure some love popularity and never want to do anything else with their life, but that is an unrealistic bar we have created for everybody in our society. So I guess that seems like a thing to look at.
>Just like they protected the NSA's hacking toolkit that leaked.

There's simply no comparison to be made between keys stored and generated offline in a high-end HSM and warez.rar being passed around by a bunch of analysts.
> Keeping interest rates lower was how they bailed out underwater individuals. Lower interest rates stimulate demand for housing, shoring up housing prices for the people who were underwater. Of course, that reinflated the housing bubble, so here we are again.

No. I meant using TARP money to wipe out a portion of that debt or create jobs instead of QE. The banks did not need bailing out. Certainly the execs shouldve been arrested.

Because of decisions last time around, the execs take risks with impunity now.
Or, for that matter, the TSA's quite literal master keys.
"In another incident, a Waymo car was part of a line of cars approaching an intersection where a car crash was blocking the right lane. The human drivers saw the issue far ahead and began shifting to the left lane. The Waymo car continued straight and only began trying to merge left when it was a few car lengths away from the traffic cones"

So the car actually behaved correctly then? It's called a zipper merge.
If you are gonna work as an individual dev, then you can evaluate both. But if you're in a team, then choose whats best for the team.

Both are good options that nothing serious will come against your way when working on most CRUD apps. If it involves serious computations then you should really evaluate both and select what best fits your usecase.
Given so much info in it, The list of your blogs are very helpful for those who want to learn more interesting facts. Keeps the users interest in the website, and keep on sharing more
Please free to call us @ +91 9884412301 / 9600112302
More Details: https://www.credosystemz.com/courses/openstack-training-chen...
Small mammals is kind of the point. There are mice in the garden that try to get into the house; the cat's job is to kill as many as possible.

Regarding birds, I'm not sure. It can't catch magpies and other crows. We don't see or hear other birds (we live outside Paris and don't have that many birds). I don't think it would make a lot of difference to keep our cat indoors since all other cats in the neighborhood also live outside -- except upsetting and depressing ours.
It would be similar if they allowed people to use their ownership of stocks and index funds to use as leverage to borrow funds to buy more stocks. They could borrow based on the risk ratings of stocks, and everyone knows it's a fact that index funds are the safest investment out there so the risk on that should be close to 0 and allow the biggest leverage. I'm going to stop right there, I'm starting to frighten myself.
The question becomes: why are you embedding an entire font into your mobile app? So you can create one off UI widgets? For corporate branding?

While every dev seems to fancy themselves a great designer, the reality is that apps end up looking like they were rejected from MySpace and Geocities for being too ugly. Custom widgets using non-system fonts (much like in the desktop and web sphere) often lose out on important accessibility baubles as well. I can certainly understand a desire for completely custom widgets on something like a full screen game. But to eschew the system fonts? Meh.

Meanwhile if your main use is branding you don't need to embed or subset the whole font. Include your logo or whatever as a sprite (vector or bitmap) and get a license for that sort of usage, it's cheaper.

If $50/seat is too much, the correct answer isn't "hey let's pirate it for my commercial app".
I’m not sure what your point is. React components can use Shadow DOM if they want, but they don’t have to. Neither do Web Components. React components can be rendered to DOM nodes, but they can also be rendered to lots of other things.
Filtering research grant application based on personal/organizational beliefs is serious thing that can alter understanding of science. Highlighting these problems in application review process is important for public to understand to not to trust research blindly without accessing for any hidden bias.
The Internet has changed the world and just ignoring it won't change it back. We won't be able to completely evade the tiresome phenomena you mention, either on the web or irl. I still have a faint hope we might be able to carve out a niche where we can use the web without falling prey to these things more than absolutely unavoidable. However, the masses have spoken and it seems glaringly obvious that they don't give a rodent's backside.
Consider Signal, which is open source and not based in Australia. If AU wants to intercept a signal message, then presumably they would need to either force Google and/or Apple to push a custom app to a specific user, or take over the entire phone (again, via Google or Apple). In the first case, is the app that comes from the app store somehow verifiable, or do you need to build from source to be sure? Is there anything that can be done about the second case (which I suspect is the general intent of this law)
I like to point out that the English language has a beautiful way to describe it by having two distinct words ("anyone", "everyone") instead of just one, unlike my native German ("jeder"):

If something somebody proposes in response to a population-wide problem works for anyone it should also be tested if it works for everyone. A lot of "how to get ahead and gain wealth" suggestions come to mind too that fail the second test.