skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I would suggest to either get an annuity (is that the correct term in English? Dutch "lijfrente" is what I'm talking about), or put it in safe investment and let it pay interest every month. That way you're certain to have a decent income for the rest of your life.

Now you can either retire early and spend more time with your family, or, if you need something else to do, just get another job. Do volunteer work, become an activist for a cause you care about.

Free yourself from the worry and stress that comes with having to work for a living. You can still work, but do it because you want to, or because it's something you care about.

Paying off your mortgage is always a good idea too.

And you don't have to use any of this money. Feel free to be generous with it to others. Give to important causes, or to the homeless near where you live. Or sit on it. You wouldn't be the first person to turn out to have an unused fortune when you die.

Whatever the case, don't freak out about the money. Use it to free yourself from stress; don't make it a new source of stress.
I would really, really like to know what they are doing. Was it an in-house solution, something from a startup, or something from an established enterprise tech company?

One of the things I’ve been saying repeatedly is that companies are going to implement machine learning incorrectly, and there will be obvious failures and blow ups, but the most dangerous and catastrophic failures will be a cascade of things that look like they work correctly. In this case, Tumblr implemented something that was blatantly obviously broken. That’s just pathetically poor management.

In the next 10 years, I would give high odds of least 1 company in the s&p 500 will fail due to bad machine learning implementation(s.)
1. --

2. Also, is ProtonVPN such a stronger contender than the rest of the field that Mozilla would endorse them?

3. And what is Mozilla's final relationship between you and ProtonVPN? Why are they relevant as a middleman?
and i'm currently imagining getting work done rather than being on HN :)
I wonder in this day and age if a mind like John Nash would have thrived. Nash had only a handful of publications, but all of them were masterpieces. Same with Riemann.
I've always wondered if the problem might be in the handoff procedures. Those studies about mortality in the event of a handoff always make it sound like obviously handoffs are an inherently dangerous thing, but perhaps the modern way of doing them is just poorly implemented? It feels extremely unlikely to me that absurdly long hours are the only solution.
very basic and available in Firefox too. heck, except the drag and drop (really...) all that is available since IE dev tools addon I guess (which started all that)
Good explanation of Robinhood's business model by Matt Levine: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-10-16/carl-i...
And avoid spoiling them [the kids]?

Most of the comments about not losing wealth amount to either poor investment or "spoiling" oneself - ie spending excessively on luxuries. But, I imagine it's harder to avoid spending excessively on other people; what does "my parents can just buy me a new one" do to a kids perception of value, how do they develop a sound work ethic, would retired parents in their youth have a negative hold over their ability to perceive themselves as workers (for themselves or others).
Keep in mind Reddit users also predicted the death of Reddit during the pao/banning fiasco. It's only grown since then.
Lol buying your kids $3 million worth of condos seems more than "nothing".
New York adopts pay floor for rise share drivers
You forgot radar. Most startups are using a combination of all the perception approaches, especially vehicle manufacturers.
Remarkable for so many to have invested that amount of money, only to abandon the project so quickly.
This has been a very interesting read. I've been wanting to build a single page personal website as a means of learning. I'm not a star in webdev so I have a lot of hours ahead of me.

I might actually deploy it like this, why not?

If anyone has any good book or other resources to get started in building a website like this for people who already have back-end and programming experience but lack html, css, js etc.. please reply them to me! Thank you
10 Business Constants Flourish in This Age of Change
Ok. I see your point. So I just hope (not actively as a free agent - of course this was determined too) that we are determined to use logically more consistent explanations for our behavior than classical libertarian free will. ;)
I thought emacs is a text editor, it appears here you're using it as an OS? do you boot directly into emacs?
Because free will merely requires the ability to understand the choices we're making and learn from them, like I said.
In POSIX, many functions return -1 to indicate errors. So I guess the value (uid_t) -1 was reserved to avoid confusion. Also some functions (chown()) allow specifying (uid_t) -1 or (gid_) -1 to mark an omitted argument.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_identifier#Special_values
Wisdom from https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
and his life style is extra-ordinary https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/30/warren-buffetts-breakfast-ne...
>So people only claim to be incompatibilists when they confuse determinism with fatalism. Regardless, they tended to agree strongly with Compatibilist moral reasoning.

I pretty strongly disagree with this statement. I am not a compatibilist, but I am fully aware of the differences between fatalism and determinism. If I believed in fatalism then I would believe that If am fated to recover or die from an illness, it would happen regardless of whatever actions I take, etc. With determinism I believe the outcome from whatever illness I receive will depend on the illness, the actions taken, my overall health, etc. etc. etc., all the way back through the causal chain at the start of the universe.

I believe everything adheres to causality. Compatabilists and I would both agree that we cannot determine our motivations, but then we would disagree if there is "free will" in the choice we make based on those motivations. My brain is a physical entity, ruled by the laws of physics. Every decision I make is ruled by those laws, because my brain cannot work in any other way. If we had perfect knowledge of how the brain works (and I believe this is possible), you can boil down the thought process of "I have a memory of stubbing my toe and it hurt, so I will make the conscious effort to avoid stubbing my toe" to the composite physics that result in said thought process. Given all of the same inputs, the same outputs will come in to play.

This somewhat ignores the randomness of the quantum world, but I don't think it particularly effects the outcome - if time could be rewound to the start of the universe, and the play button pushed, quantum effects would likely mean that we do not end up with the same universe we have today, but I don't see how having randomness fundamentally would mean that I as a human being have any increase in my ability to come to a decision. The inputs would be different, if I were to exist at all, but I would still be bound by the same laws of physics that determine how my brain functions.

Compatabilitists and I sharing similar ideas about moral reasoning doesn't change that. My "moral reasoning" is that things like the laws we create are still all based on causality, and that the actions people take are in turn causally related to the inputs we give them, such as the laws. Changing this inputs results in different outputs when considering things like potential futures, which are then inputs into the decision making process, etc.

But I also believe that it doesn't really matter, as far as day to day life goes. At current, humans lack the ability to perceive life in such a way that we can figure out how any of that shit actually works. I can behave and think in a way that is similar enough to how free will would work that it doesn't matter. To change this, we would need perfect knowledge of how basically everything works, have the ability to measure every necessary input in the system, and calculate the outcomes. If we are ever able to reach that point, I'm pretty sure it'll be so far into the future it's nothing worth worrying myself about.
That is a fair point, but if, as this story implies, by the end of the process sleep deprivation was the main impediment to the patient's recovery, and might have led to additional procedures and the problems they bring, then there would be an issue here.

I also wonder if, like 'emergency room', 'ICU' has lost some of its meaning in some places.
The Elementary school comment rings so true. We have to get my seven year old up at 6:15 to get to school at 7:30. That's if we take him, if he caught the bus he would have to be AT the stop by 6:15. Every day is a battle against exhaustion. On the days that school is delayed due to weather and he can get up naturally at maybe 7:30, he is so much better. He feels better, his attitude is more positive, and he does so much better with learning.
I'm surprised you mentioned Terre Haute, but not Bloomington, IN (where Indiana University is located), which is really much, much, much nicer than Terre Haute.
I'd define free will as used by the average person to mean the ability to make decisions that are based at least in part on something other than your makeup and environment.
>An asteroid hitting Earth is predetermined by early stages of universe too. Is the collision just correlated with dinosaurs extinction, or was it the cause?

It was the cause but it was predetermined itself.

Note that the free will of the dinosaurs or the asteroid doesn't enter the picture at all here. Similarly, and this is the argument, in the drop-in-crime case, our "commitment to punish certain behavior" is not any more of a commitment than the rock was "committed" to extinguish the dinosaurs.

>Why is it different when people are involved?

It's not different physically. The actions can't be said to be decisions is all or to have caused a particular chain of events is all (that chain was the only possible one).

>In the case of criminals and punishement assuming determinism - our brains deterministically evolved to deterministically respond to punishement by deterministically changing the behaviour when punished.

The point is that they couldn't have evolved any other way, and the crime couldn't have been any less or more than what it is. So those measures can't be said to have dropped crime (since it could never be anything else).
Distributing panpipes is no system of governance at all.
Is there any judicial oversight or is it just a warrantless free-for-all?
Is there a link to the code/implementation?
Hi,

Some tips from me:

- Take a nice holiday
- Don't rush into investing. Take some time to think about what you want to do.
- If you invest in stocks, do it in a staged plan. Resist the urge to sell when it's going down, and the urge to buy when it's going up. (I could not resist buying when it went up beginning January this year). Start with small amounts first. Be there for the long run (don't sell/buy all the time). Be prepared that you can go up/down a lot in one day.
- Rather invest in index funds then specific stocks
- Don't invest everything in one type. Don't just use 1 broker. Stay away from leveraged, turbos, bitcoins, etc...
- Be careful about tax impacts on your decisions, depending on where you live
- Be careful about private investments. Only invest into something which you understand and have knowledge of and can help and make it possible. Only take market risk, and not the execution risk. (I for instance have not yet done any investments so far)
- I put some of my money in hedge funds (Millenium, etc..) through a private bank (additional yearly fee + performance fee).

And:
- Think about what you would like to do. For me that's starting a new company (since I already did that before and succeeded). If you like your job, then stay.
Ironically, because of government reach and close technology company collaboration, including significant minority stakes in such companies, it would seem that malware groups operating in China have to be a lot better than their counterparts operating in other countries to remain at large for very long.
100% libre RISC-V and 3D GPU chip for mobile devices
someone mentioned free will not existing because every decision made is the result of past decisions. Given a choice between A or B, I will only choose given who I am and therefore there was really no choice to begin with. When you're born you have no past to rely on but there sure seems to be a lot of randomness in a baby/child. Maybe randomness is free-will but it slowly erodes away with time.
MicrosoftDocs/live-share – Release v0.3.1011 (VS Code / Visual Studio)
> Free will has no room to survive in a clockwork universe.

Reminds me of this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1TVZIBj7UA

Effects of electromagnetic waves you emit will appear random to you, even if you produce a rather orderly amount (and distribution) of them. Did the universe take away with no reason? Well, it did go and drained off a good portion of your emitted energy because of the many places they go and the many effects they can have. I'm not entirely sure what I'm trying to say here, I just think the actual pipes through which you send information (waves) in this universe are quite a mess, and that's probably being gentle.
Peer review is broken. The assumption with peer review is that the review filters out bad research in a fair way. The reality is that it is neither fair nor particularly effective in preventing bad research slipping through.

Part of the problem is the review quality is almost as inconsistent as the article quality.

From experience I can tell you that rejecting papers is a lot more work than accepting them. It requires arguing things in such a way that it survives editor scrutiny. This in turn requires actually reading the paper, doing some background checks, etc. Of course editors getting involved also means work for them. So negative reviews tend to trigger a lot of work. So much easier to just rubber stamp the reviews that give a thumbs up.

And editors have the problem of needing to fill their journals with stuff. Nobody reads these things cover to cover. So, there's a lot of filler content that will never be cited that got rubber stamped by reviewers taking a five minute glance at the text. As long as the article is not too blatantly bad, nobody cares. A common practice is to invite accepted authors back as reviewers. So, there's a notion of bad articles leading to equally bad reviews.

It is not surprising that there are researchers that game the system by publishing in friendly publications where the reviewers/editors are known friendly. They all need to keep their numbers up.

A possible fix could be to review out in the open. Publish reviews along with the article. Allow scientists to challenge these as well. It's one thing to say "this is probably fine" anonymously than it is to say, please publish this with a message stating that I approve and endorse the content of this article.
That would be nice. I wonder if C would ever consider adding that. Types are tracked by the compiler so it doesn't seem theoretically impossible.
Most companies (not startups) don't have their employees work much more than 40 hours.

Lack of sleep is very rarely an issue with your employer.
Yeah. I mean, I get that hospitals are 24-hour operations that need doctors & nurses available at all times. So some people are going to get the crap end of that stick and have to do night shifts. But is it really necessary for them to work 80+ hours while they're at it? It seems like there's enough people trying to be doctors that you could cut that down to a healthier 40 hours+ 15 hours on call if it's really necessary to. Heck, even 50 hours.
Deep Learning based magnifying glass: Super scale your low-res images
Introductory tutorial to RegExps in JS
As opposed to another crap solution some small band of programmers could come up with?

If it works...
In such a situation it was not knowledge of the future, but something else.

There's no paradox, just a wrong assumption.
I feel Firefox could be quite a bit more attractive, if it did less. I don't want my browser integrated with one particular VPN. I don't want Pocket on by default and hard to get rid of.
And for each such professor that gets discovered there are a dozen still hidden and a hundred covering each other, all of the hundred three doing the same stuff, just slightly smarter.

I don't believe anymore that this stuff is a new phenomenon though. It's more like a group of people trying to discredit university these days.
Ok, so I imaging that the fact I heat my home with far less bill that my ancient and smaller apartment was a figment of my imagination... Also I imaging that the total (semi-public) skyrocketing high cost of public transportation in my old city per capita are higher than the cost of private transportation in the countryside again per capita because of someone conspiracy...

What you do not understand is that we do not live since today for today, we do not build new cities and houses from ground to the ceiling today. We need to evolve and we can evolve far more in the countryside as a result while in theory tall buildings are more efficient than single houses, in practice we have more "newer" individual houses and less newer tall building so in the end the practice is the opposite.

Perhaps you do not even understand why speed trains does not gain traction in the USA but works well enough in French because of the urbanization level of certain area those density are so high that the cost of "pierce" the urbanized area is so high nobody try to sustain.

Essentially you study too much the details that you loss the sight of the big picture, a common mistake these days.
Achronix Anounces Availability of Speedcore Gen4 EFPGA IP
The news would be different. This news item is focused around the driver and safety. They are slowly changing their messaging from being about self-driving to being about safe-driving.

They can't come out right away and say "guys we failed at self driving, it doesn't work", that would tank the personal careers of everyone important in the company. They have to slowly move the needle away from self driving, and then they'll give us the bomb drop, "we could only build better safety systems, not self-driving systems" and nobody will care because they are happy with safe-driving.

If they truly had self-driving tech, they'd be doubling down on that with their messaging. Not only to let everyone know there's a new sheriff in town (bye Uber!), but also to let their competitor's know to start their death clocks.
Fundamentalism is a recent branch of Protestantism. TFA is about exorcism as a rite and only mentions Catholicism. Scandinavia has always* been traditionally Lutheran rather than Catholic or Protestant. Lutheran and Orthodox (and maaaaybe Anglican) have exorcism rites, otherwise it's going to be a preacher doing an exorcism he invented after the DSM was created.

(* not "ALWAYS" but you know what I mean)
Yeah, seems like "well, we're getting rid of all the drivers ASAP" is the unspoken premise of all Uber arguments. They're currently happily running a deficit to gain marketshare under the expectation that before the bank busts they'll be able to cut all those costs and go driverless.
Why do doctors not get sleep? It is still the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Start up founders? Fine. Grocery store bagger? I don't care. BUT A PERSON IN CHARGE OF TOUCHING (inside) MY BODY? I want their Fitbit sleep records for the last month showing a consistent 7 hours of sleep.
Mostly Go these days, still a bit of Python and Clojure and on rare occasions a bit of Rust (although those aren't really daily anymore).
Consider what hospitals optimize for (at least in the US). Not what they say but what they do...

For example, putting lots of money into fancy buildings. Fancy buildings attract patients for non-emergency things. That money doesn't go into things like enough nurses and techs to care for the people, especially at night.

Or, consider someone with a lump finding out it's cancer and getting setup with everything to get it treated. It's numerous visits to numerous places (some in Hospitals). This is not optimized for patient care.

If hospitals prioritized and optimized for patient care they would look a lot different.
It has some additional. Because so much code is generated on the fly during compilation, and because of frequent use of auto, IDEs have a hard time understanding the syntax to provide proper autocompletion :(
I've been so down on Healthcare in the US for the past 10 years that this kind of thing doesn't even phase me anymore. I see things like this and I now think:

"Of course it doesn't make any sense, the whole system is busted and any competence and intelligence that might exist in the industry is buried beneath red tape and scummy insurance practices."
(And I think you're probably right that they've miscalculated how far they can stretch the patience of investors and how quickly they can achieve reliable self-driving tech)
My best semester in college I managed to have a schedule of classes that started at 2pm and finished by 8pm.

Pretty sure it's the only time in my life where I've literally slept as much as I wanted...and felt great.
It costs me money (past a certain number of freebies) to access Equifax's data on me--to get a credit report.

I get that this is not their main business model, and that their customers that they bundle and sell consumer data to are more valuable. But end users, in this case, are still customers. They still pay money and get a service in return. Contrasted with e.g. Google services, it's a different scenario.
nitpick: Yahoo paid $1 billion for Tumblr; Verizon/Oauth paid $5 billion for Yahoo, and it’s a bit difficult to guess how much of that is Tumblr.

(IMO they paid billions of dollars for the privilege of being the email provider for my parents.)
He's talking about losing 1% of your future life not 100%.
> during pre-med training: with on-call work hours up to 120 hours a week.

Can someone please tell me why they still put medical students through this institutional hazing?
That makes sense. At least, outside of massive companies like Google, who would see the value in a compiler that optimized code for their use even a fraction of a percent better. Then compilers become the "shiny object" for them.
Or better yet, give me a native app that I can download to my machine and use forever no matter what happens to your startup.

The reason word is gonna continue to exist long after all these fly-by-night productivity startups have gone under or been bought up and wound down is because it doesn't rely on the cloud to work, though ms seems to be trying to head in that direction unfortunately.
If somebody made a motherboard with a BMC for this, it could really give Xeon-D a run for its money in the server space. For the same core count as the D-2183IT, the Ryzen 9 3800X costs 1/3 as much, likely supports 2x the PCIe lanes, supports higher speed memory, and likely also supports ECC.