skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Looks cool and I love its openness - though I hope I'm forgiven for saying that the examples, especially the guitar, doesn't quite look up to professional standards.
I save it as a bookmark, surprisingly still works after years, doesn't require a facebook account.

javascript:window.location="https://m.facebook.com/l.php?u="+encodeURIComponent(window.location.href);
> (that is, not through IV, though I'm not sure how Ketamine behaves in the digestive tract)

The main problem with sustained use (abuse) of ketamine nasally are severe crippling stomach cramps (think agony, rolling around in pain screaming) and scarring of the bladder causing you to urinate every few minutes just a few drops due to bladder damage. In severe cases bladders stop functioning and in some cases removed altogether.

Urban legends are these are caused by the "drip" after snorting large amounts, so if you spit the drip out you are ok. No idea how true this is, but some people swore by it
It cost 43,200 to make and it sold 42,500 net, that's ok if he did it himself, for a first effort, nicely done.
considering this come when bitcoin it's falling for months and someone wanna bring media attention to bitcoin and push price higher i am certain it's hack, just look for the motivation
So which is it, chocolatey boxstarter issue or Node.js installer issue?

This title must be changed if it's not the Node.js installer itself.
I agree, dealing with Google open source is never a pleasant experience.
Loop unrolling is useful only when it enables other optimisations. The most common is constant folding.
If I was subscribed to that guys YouTube channel (which I'm not, since the guy is an idiot), someone pulling a stunt like this would probably prompt me to unsubscribe.
Curiosity Rover Just Spotted This Super-Shiny Object on Mars
I don't see anything regarding Angular, they're obviously very knowledgeable, but it's pretty much focused on low-level: https://stackoverflow.com/users/922184/mysticial?tab=tags&so...
>Han unification.

I am still hoping some day down the road we can fix this without overstepping on each other's culture and fonts / glyph.
In Toronto it's beneficial to buy property as investment. Condo value usually doubles in price over 5 years.

https://toronto.listing.ca/condo-price-history.htm

Which means rich people end up hoarding property. You don't even have to rent it out. Just wait a little bit and make a bank.
I like it, but I would ditch the super heavy fonts. They are needlessly difficult to read. You only have to look at the Governance page to see that you’ve gone a few weights to far with the font choice.

https://beta.rust-lang.org/governance
> EDIT: I read this wrong. I agree with what you're saying, "related to" would have made more sense as "leads to".

Yes. Thank you. "Leads to" is what I meant. :)
Answering a rhetorical question to the detriment of the other person's argument isn't anger.
But they aren't doing that. They are explicitly telling people it's not ready yet. If you interpret that to mean that it is ready, you're the only one to blame for that.
> (Each session uses less than $20 of ketamine, so it's quite the markup!)

Are you sure? That is a lot of ketamine
>If you're saying that Tesla claiming hardware support is tantamount to claiming full functionality, then how do you suggest they describe the situation?

Less dishonestly.

Your entire argument boils down to "people should be expected to parse Tesla's (intentionally, I might add) obfuscated language". There's a very good reason why the language used in marketing is regulated in just about every country on the planet.
I HAVE PROOF THAT TESLA HW IS NOT CAPABLE OF FSD. [1]

Tesla says “Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars”. The implication is clearly that the cars are perfectly capable of fully self driving. Hence the misleading advertisement.

The claim is not substantiated in any way. Simply the assumption that technically a few cameras, sensors, and a not very powerful processing unit are enough to enable FSD. To this point there is no actual evidence that the statement is true.

My phone has all the hardware needed to crack any non quantum encryption. Also to solve the teleportation problem, world hunger, and is able to cut any cake in perfectly equal slices. It just needs the right software and perhaps infinite retries.

All Tesla has to do is provide in eqully large typeface and placement evidence that the HW indeed can do it but not at this time. And in case you’re wondering yes, all manufacturers should advertise clearly what the product can and cannot do, and when. Whataboutism is not an argument that the problem isn’t there, just that we should ignore it because that other guy does it.

[1] Proof only available under certain conditions and subject to local regulatory approval.
Or maybe the screens would have retailed for something like $5000 each, in a market with little to no demand (eg: consumer video conferencing prior to smartphones).

There are no bad ideas, just bad timing.
Technically you need a registered company to "sponsor" you, but it can be your own company, where you are CEO and have 100% ownership. In the end, it's just a formality, the visa is granted on a personal basis. Compared to H1B where USCIS relies on a company to establish your credibility as a skilled worker, with O-1 they evaluate credibility themselves via multiple factors mostly involving peer validation (i.e. publications, articles, etc).

So yes, technically you need a job offer for O-1, but it's just a formality. Personally, I agree that it doesn't make much rational sense either, but then again barely anything makes sense when it comes to (US) immigration laws.
after experiencing this line of inquiry on many forums, yes, that is consensus.

autopilot is the lane guidance of the skies that maintains basic stability not a level 5 system. people hear autopilot and think it means it does "everything."

further muddying the waters, tesla maintains their car has all the hardware, sensors and computation to support fully autonomous driving. it's just that pesky software missing.
New to web dev. New to node. Looks like a complete mess to me, deserves criticism, as does much of the web dev ecosystem.

Package maintainer should indeed have found someone to pass it onto (see Cathedral & the Bazaar). And that doesn’t include the first person he’s never heard of stepping up.

BUT this applies to all package managers, maintainers, and OSS at some level.

The idea that say a startup has time to audit every line of every dependency is absurd. Even a big business can’t do that. The idea that you “don’t have to trust” the authors is untrue, in the current workflow. FOSS relies entirely on trust.

I’m not convinced FOSS is even a good idea at this point, but with the advent of widespread cyberwarfare we need to either introduce a sophisticated accompanying trust model, or exclude FOSS when working commercially.

This is a business opportunity. Audit FOSS and sell your audit guarantees in a contract. Offer services to audit more recent versions on the proviso that you can sell that audit elsewhere.

This will have the incidental benefit of encouraging clean software to be written in languages that minimise audit costs, as those projects will get used more.

Some commercial arbitration of FOSS now looks inevitable.
chocolatey boxstarter explicitly disables auto updates. You can see the code here: https://github.com/chocolatey/boxstarter/tree/master/Boxstar...

I'm not entirely clear why they need to disable it (they only say "to prevent installation conflicts and minimize the need for reboots") but it's meant to re-enable it afterwards.
We should auction these spots off, so the companies which get the most economic value from bringing people in can do so. I like implementing this by ordering applications by salary, but you could also have some part go to the government.
Be part of a team you'll love. Come and join us at Streak as a Product Engineer
The definition of a monopoly is when there is only one seller of something. That exclusivity can be achieved in a number of ways such as patents, trade secrets, or some other monopoly moat.
Airborne collision avoidance system are part of both civil and military aviation. If nothing else Aircraft do need to deal with mountains.

Military aircraft go a step further and avoid hills. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrain-following_radar
This would be the worst answer.

Technology like that will certainly be abused.
Neither gold nor concert tickets have intrinsic values.
Google employees debated burying conservative media in search
Show HN: A sum-type decorator for python
I wrote this quick decorator for sum-types and was looking for feedback on if it makes sense. I had to do something similar for work with weird looking if-else blocks with type checks.

I'm also looking for pointers to existing libs that add this and other FP features to python. Comments on the state of FP-like python at work are welcome!

https://github.com/stangirala/python-sumtype-decorator
> Your entire argument boils down to "people should be expected to parse Tesla's (intentionally, I might add) obfuscated language".

No, my argument is as follows:

1. It is reasonable for Tesla to distinguish between having hardware capability and actual functionality.

2. It's necessary for them to make this distinction in order to offer the hardware upgrades for pre-sale.

3. Other vendors do this without people complaining.

Do you disagree with any of those?
Is America Actually Metric?
> Audit FOSS and sell your audit guarantees in a contract

Pay Redhat enough and they will do that. Although you will be limited in what you can use.
Because you can't access the market without giving in / setting something up in China.

Which is the whole Trade War argument about Free market, access and IP. I am not sure how long before the West learn they can expect whatever International "Standard" and "Values" to ever work in China.
The claim is that intels remote management tools can be hacked.

I personally think its true simply because Intel has no incentive to spend money on them being secure. (they are usually bundled with T and other enterprise laptops which live behind a firewall).

I would highly recommend getting a bios from reddit.com/r/thinkpad. I don't think you need to reinstall windows if you bought new but if not then reinstall windows.
Another sexual assaulter.

https://medium.com/@quinnnorton/robert-scoble-and-me-9b14ee9...
I meant with regards to the loss for society when this disappears into some private collection. I’d be better in a museum. I am sure he’ll earn enough short term money from the auctions.
You are making way too many assumptions here for my taste. It's easy for me to assume that having autopilot probably did influence his decision to drink and drive.
You haven't said who your adversary is, so it's difficult to give sensible advice.
Okay, I need to object here: You can't say that reported lies of the officials are the same as fiction made by media even if the outcome was the same.

Media not doing good enough job to scrutinize public figures and officials are fundamentally different from media that creates content that is intentionally misleading or fake. One is screw up and the other one is fraud.

Are you going to be equally mad to a friend of yours who hears that your SO is cheating on you and tells you what he heard(and the story turns out to be incorrect) and a friend who makes up a story about your SO cheating on you?
The common consensus is that building JS apps without an endless list of dependencies is so slow that you're going to get creamed in the marketplace due to inefficiency. Why should we spend $5m re-inventing the wheel when we could spend $2m re-purposing a bunch of other people's work?

Whether or not that's true is largely irrelevant, since the decisions are made based on what people believe, and since the same decision is made every time, there's not much data for the other side of the comparison. When was the last time someone deployed an app with less than 10 (total, not direct) dependencies? Hell, even 100? Some people have probably never built one with less than 1,000.
If you kill this comment too, then you had better supply a reason. Sick of HN censorship.
“Once the originally desired resource is created, there are two alternative ways to deal with the temporary task resource:

API client must issue DELETE request, so that server purges it. Until then, server responds with 303 See Other status. Once deleted, 404 Not Found will be returned for subsequent GET /queue/12345 requests.
or, garbage collection can be a server’s job to do: once task is complete server can safely remove it and respond with the 410 Gone on subsequent GET /queue/12345 requests.”

How do you distinguish between an id referring to a finished task that no longer exists (410 Gone), and an id that never referred to any task (404 Not Found)? Other than the obvious solution of keeping every task in the DB with a “finished” flag, which doesn’t scale...
Anybody here who used this pattern in practice and found out it is not as good as this article portrays it?
I can't tell if you're being intentionally obtuse or if you really don't understand that the way you say something is different from what you're saying.

It's completely irrelevant whether or not it's reasonable for Tesla to distinguish between having hardware capability and actual functionality, the way they are describing it is demonstrably and indisputably leading consumers to believe their cars are actively capable of full self-driving, which is absolutely not the case.

Tesla are misleading consumers, their intention is thoroughly irrelevant.
I think it's more important to keep up motivation rather than finding a silver bullet. To me enjoyment is more important than efficiency while learning in general.

In my case, I'm learning Japanese. From the get go I knew it's a long process to reach real fluency.

I began with a traditional teacher based course. I learned basic grammar, which was really great. What I didn't like was the pressure to perform on time. Juggling a job and a billion projects made it kinda difficult to perform week after week.

After the course was over I had a big sigh of relief; I'm an engineering grad, but this was something completely different. I'm used to study more esoteric, not as applicable stuff as real languages.

I went to Japan that summer and figured out that I didn't understand anything. I already expected this. Listening was the big issue, and reading, and speaking...

Reading is my key to learning. I remember learning how to read Swedish (my native language) by reading subtitles to James Bond movies. That was my beginning of learning English as well. Japanese is pretty dang hard to read due to the thousands of symbols you need to know.

At the same time of learning Japanese I began learning Javascript. I began building my own tools, catered to my own learning needs. By this process I've been able to create fun web-stuff, and to imprint over 1000 symbols in my thick noggin. Now I'm able to understand about 75-80% of the symbols used in writing. I'm finally able to read easier texts and learn vocabulary in a different way than pure memorization.

Tl;dr: you probably don't need fancy chatbots to learn a new language. If you want tools, try building them yourself.
1) Lots of headlines

2) A new hope to find out his identity. He couldn't really pay someone anonymously without using a tumbler, the tumbler he'd use would gain a ton of PR and could become the quasi-official Bitcoin tumbler.

3) Depends on the amount, but I think there'll be a great fear that he could move all of it - that amount would almost certainly being the Bitcoin economy down since its value is (I think) based on the assumption that the coins will never move, so the BTC price would decrease sharply.

That's my guess.
>It's accurate to say the capital from the deal likely helped AMD finalize, produce, and distribute Zen / Epyc.

It didn't, it just gave a pass / access to Alibaba and Tencent as well as other Government related project to use AMD CPU.
Oh, no, that guitar is my favorite :-(
The main focus of this software is the modeling speed, for example, that guitar only took less than five minutes. So I can make more game asset as an indie. Actually, the model made recently is already looks far better than several months ago I made, I will keep improving the mesh generating quality of the algorithm. Thanks!
The answers to all of those questions are going to depend pretty much entirely on the people involved and their personalities, goals, and values.
There are people that will argue any form of sequential data signing is a "blockchain". But now secure messengers are blockchaining, ZFS is blockchaining, bitcoin had no technical novelty... I think it's a bad definition. If the system can still run without a consensus algorithm, it's far from being a blockchain.
I've actually read this being suggested in a "popular science" magazine.
The "just have a reference photo" approach really appeals to me as someone who has never been great at sketching from scratch. I'm going to give this a go for creating custom assets for some little mixed reality projects.
javascript isn't even usable out-of-the-box without a few (hundreds) libraries to make it comfortable to use. I disagree, PHP is nothing like it, its standard modules library is chock-full of stuff that is fast, useful and based on existing C/C++ libraries or standards.

but sure if one wants want to classify incompetent developers in the PHP bucket, then everything is "the new PHP"
Gitter sends you an email when you’re being mentioned.

Our experiences are wildly different.

On Gitter, on the channels I hang out, I think I got answers to my problems in 99% of cases.
I wonder how much longer is it going to be until we get a regulatory required pull over signal for autonomous systems and how in the hell you would secure it considering it would need to be used by countless law enforcement agencies world wide and would need to be implemented by multiple manufacturers.

I’m pretty sure it would be some emergency stop button in the cabbin at first but then someone somewhere would want to pass a law that would enable the police to remotely initiate it.
Several non mammals produce milk like substances for their young. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_milk includes antibodies, protean, and fat.
A switch for maintaining bearing and altitude would be pretty useless in a car, but it would definitely cause fewer misunderstandings than the current illusion of autonomy. Supervised autonomy is dangerous no matter how it is labeled, but some labels are worse than others.
Do any cars pull themselves over when they detect flashing emergency vehicle lights? That would’ve probably worked here and might be the ultimate answer.
Exactly, this is a good example of what I am saying in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18576417

The Onion was wrong to publish that article. Now the poor people who are not able to recognize satire will be left with an impression that America's crumbling infrastructure is a bigger threat to American way of life than Al-Qaeda. This threatens the funding for important counter-terrorism activities of the FBI and Department of Homeland Security.
I half-ironically support this.
Coinbase Secretly Adds Paypal Withdraw Option
Unconditional Parenting by Alfie Kohn has a great perspective on the reward/punishment question. Doesn't check all your boxes but worth checking out alongside other options.
These patterns are geospecific. They are only known to work within the vicinity of the town of Theory.

You may find several deviations and compromises that occur outside this region, though the intention is often to emulate a loose collection of (sometimes) consensus based best practices.
Pretty sure it was already the “hip” thing to make fun of mongodb before 2012. Who doesn’t remember this classic?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
Luckily regulators don't look at only the precise meaning of a sentence, but how the average person in the street understands that sentence.
This is my thought as well. "I have creative experience and/or student loans but I don't know what to do for work so I'll take a Javascript course and become a web dev."

It's wonderful that programming is becoming a kind of "equalizer" on the job market. But without supervision from software engineers (i.e. people with the experience and aptitude to design software properly) you end up with a mess.
when Italy was on the lira yes, with the Euro no. Look at how the Greek crisis unfolded.
Well it probably doesn't help Google has all but obliterated the "don't be evil" value from the work conduct documents.
Oh Boy!! Another case of pre-determined surveys. CLS has already moved to production on blockchain. De Beers has done the same with Diamonds. Multiple insurance companies including our start-up are leveraging BC for direct claims settlement. Is it really difficult to understand that BC technology is not a hammer and all the use cases are not nails. You are trying to get rid of Big intermediaries, people. They are not going to make it easy. Every interaction between parties is going to be more difficult than the previous until critical mass is attained. But succeed it will and will most likely happen before we die.
Regarding GMX: I know it as a very German-focused service, so could we infer something about him this way?

I'm also sure he connected to the site through proxies.
> Tesla says “Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars”. The implication is clearly that the cars are perfectly capable of fully self driving.

What they have said explicitly is that they cars are not capable of fully self driving until the software and regulatory approvals are ready. Explicit trumps whatever you think is implicit.

A Tesla car is not just hardware. It's software as well. You are equating claims that are explicitly about the hardware as if they are about the car as a whole, when the page in question clearly makes the distinction between them.

How do you suggest they describe the situation? Do you think they should be banned from mentioning the hardware support?

> Whataboutism is not an argument that the problem isn’t thee, just that we should ignore it because that other guy does it.

So do you think that Apple were wrong to talk about 16-way FaceTime before iOS 12.1 was released? If this is so unreasonable, why didn't anybody complain that Apple were lying about iPhone functionality?

My argument is not that we should ignore wrongdoing because other people do it. My argument is that the reason people do ignore it for other vendors is because it's not wrongdoing.
Ah, liberal arts, consume - not create - fits. These tech people come later to the arts, they are the heart of our engineering and scientific achievements - the Teslas.
It is all well and good to create well socialized kids who grow up into rounders but these people create little except harmony - bees or ants fits...
I miss the Treo...
Right! thanks
It sounds pretty sensible to me, I filed it away for next time I need to do something like this.
Sure, it would have been misleading and dishonest for Apple to have marketed "hardware capable of 16 way calls" as a feature when the software for 16 way calls didn't exist and wasn't even close to being ready, particularly if it was far from certain that 16 way calls were a technically achievable feat and many experts in the field doubted the adequacy of the iPhone's hardware for that purpose.

Should they have been able to make the same claim about the iPhone 4? I mean, it's got the theoretically necessary camera and audio hardware, if you overlook minor details like Apple not actually introducing 16 way calls until that device was basically obsolete, and then not in a software update that would actually run on it.
I think you are correct but I want to add that most of the top programmers I have met have had zero issues with doing maintainance work. Just look at many of the big names in open source if you need some examples.

I think Google's culture is to blame, but this culture is ptobably created much due to only hiring top performers, rather than other companies who have to do with a mix of skill levels.