skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you can't trust yourself, sure. But most people do have the ability to simply not spend more than they have in their bank account and then pay off in full even before they receive a statement. Even if you lost your job, you'd still be fine.
Sorry for the long delay, but would encourage you to at least translate the key parts into English.
Yeah originally I paid mine off every few days, means there's essentially zero risk
The core of the issue to puzzle over: How was the buyer of the gift harmed?

The buyer demonstrated intent to purchase an item desired by the list owner, but was deceived into purchasing an article that did not meet that criterion. The buyer expended resources on this purchase that could have gone toward an actually-desired item, delivered at a socially-appropriate time (ie in time for a baby shower).
Python Interview Questions – Senior
In the past two years, I've probably recieved dozens of YouTube Red/Premium/etc marketing e-mails, pop-ups, etc. Every one of them highlighted some high quality, exclusive content, which I can't remember.

I don't remember a single marketing message mention that they'll remove ads, and in fact, your post is the first time I heard about it. I doubt I'd pay google for premium YouTube content, but I probably would do so to remove ads.

Maybe YourTube's problem is more about messaging than content/price.
You did remember it; "MySQL". It was an joint stock company so it is actually MySQL AB, but that postfix is quite similar to LLC, S.A. or A/S. AB literally translates to stock company, I think the english term is joint stock company
It doesn't matter--the number of PhDs is an order of magnitude larger than the number of tenure positions opening.

MIT graduates about 400 PhDs per year and only has about 40-50 tenured positions open each year.

I suspect every other program is similar. There are simply too many PhDs being graduated, but the universities are dependent upon them for slave labor.
Trump admin takes first steps to overhaul H-1B visa
Lessons learned from trying to configure Jira
A lot of other commands require parameters that the attacker may not know the values for. Those require more knowledge about the system that first needs to be exfiltrated. Not every (hacked) query has its output directly plastered back in the UI, webpage or API response. So that would need more hacking, even if the "sleep" tells the hacker they're on to something. Disabling "sleep" would take away the canary, would it not? Maybe the hacker isn't even interested in dropping tables.
I think your story proves the point. As long as humans analyze your name and see it in context, no problem. But once a computer sees your name, and potentially mistakes your nickname for your last name, it can't be terribly good.
I'm inclined to agree with you about this not being new. But, I feel that in the past, a good portion of the persecution and censorship came from the powers that be. And when mobs did gather, it was usually against a widely despised person (be he right or wrong). But now, the Internet and the anonymity it affords allows for the formation of virtual mobs against ideas or people even when society is evenly split on the matter and authorities are not in the mood to persecute.
Not true at all.
One can only eat so much lettuce and herbs though, I believe they’re the most economically viable, but grains, and potatoes not so much.
It is certainly hard to not react with extreme cynicism to the daily onslaught of negative feedback from determining our world is suffering and good portions of are dying. But we need to as entities capable of thought and planning attempt to try new ways of coordinating our activities. We built a global communication network that allows us to talk in theory to any other living being on the planet with minimal effort and we don't know how to use it yet. Perhaps we need to really work to transform our society to disrupt the shackles that bind us to activities that are harmful instead of trading human bosses for algorithm as bosses. I can't speak for everyone and it's very easy to disparage others as uncaring, ignorant or incapable of action but I do think we need to try to save this planet from ecological collapse.
Apache James – Java Apache Mail Enterprise Server
Luckily it's not necessary: you can still enable a flag in ESR releases that allow installation of unsigned add-ons, so that solves it for company-internal tools.
Yes, i noticed this after downloading, and even quoted it it my comment.

The feature is called "baseline" everywhere in the text, not "preloading feature", and that's why i got confused.

For example, "As expected, when I start uno with the baseline and don’t do anything with my laptop, it is almost silent since everything that comes in has been seen before."
Mines are "perfect" farms? I remember hearing once that in order to grow, plants need this thing called light.
Average joe is not educated enough/has to worry about everyday living, to actually pay attention to those companies practices. Its on the goverment to regulate them in such a way that would allow our spicies to thrive in the future.

Unfortunetely fast gain motion sparked by capitalism is also in the vains of people responsible for legiatlation.

Humans have too many self-destruct mechanisms embedded in them to accomplish anything in the long run as a civilisation. We either have to change drastically or face extinction. Untill the people who CAN make a difference start to care - there is not a lot masses can do. Grouping in modern age to the size that can influence those people at power is very hard.
Scrolling through https://littlelingua.eu/resources , I noticed a few blank entries. You should probably fix those.

Also, I nominate https://tatoeba.org . It's a great source of example sentences and many apps make use of their data. If someone wants to contribute to the corpus, remember to only translate into your native language. Many people overestimate their second-language skills and write awkward sentences that waste other's time correcting them.
> This is the likely cause of their eventual downfall, ...

I think you may be mixing in the history of the Knights Templer there.

The Sovereign Military Order of Malta had no “eventual downfall” to any Christian King in the way the Templers did.
Persecution and people disagreeing with your ideas are different. Why should we suppress the free speech of those that disagree? Protest is a legitimate means of speech.
Residential neighborhoods don't want nature.

Nature means snakes, possums, bats, all kinds of critters that do well with lots of small brush and tall grass and then find themselves inside somebody's house.

That's the reason I was given to not plant lots of brush around a house I was renting. If you make the land around the houses inhospitable to life, you're less likely to have life living in your air vents, attic, etc. Just a perspective to why lawns are kept tight.
Just found that while searching for servers with JMAP support (https://hn.algolia.com/?query=jmap&sort=byPopularity&prefix&...), and it seems James was not yet discussed on HN. The project seems alive enough (https://github.com/apache/james-project).

Does anyone have some experience running this?
They typically do not, how this works is Amazon buys out your store and puts in under their own white label ie: amazon basics brand. Lot of FBA businesses have this exit strategy planned out from inception and are building stores simply to sell them in the end, rinse and repeat.
> I'm one of those weirdos who thinks movies aesthetically look better at 24 frames for the "dreamlike" quality.

That’s not weird, that’s what the majority of people prefer. Otherwise they wouldn’t keep doing it.

It would be more weird if you said you preferred films at 60fps
No programming language design survives first contact with the programmers. This is also holds on project level if you are 100 persons working on the same project it's very easy to mess it up.

I've seen lots of bad python code, I don't think it's hard to do the wrong thing.
I'm so excited for

Eugenics: a misunderstood idea?

and

Making the case for phrenology in an intolerant world
A consequence of the Romance languages simplifying/removing declensions, I suspect.
Can I take the cynical extreme long term view for a second?

No matter how much we destroy our planet, it's damage will be a blink of an eye in cosmological terms. Even if we nearly exterminate all other species, plenty of genetic material will survive by dumb chance alone, and in a few million years there will be a whole other ecosystem/society to worry about.

Earth doesn't care about biodiversity, beauty, or longevity, even if we mess it up, it'll be able to recover in its lifetime.
They manage to do it (just sound, not keypresses) with a 60fps DSLR camera at the end by examining the rows of the video - does this mean that for any videos already in existence, sound can be decoded from the images?
Show HN: The Vim advent calendar
Without UB it must be very hard for the compiler to optimize arithmetic. Even obvious things like (2 x A) x B vs 2 x (A x B) are only equivalent without overflow. I guess it can be specified as being up to the jitter to decide - so not UB but not known from looking at the source either? Would be interesting to know what .NET and Java specifications say on it
Isn't this largely a myth? (actually not sure, I've seen articles going both ways and I'm not a neurologist myself)
And another one, quite important from the perspective of the whole society, because it actually the shapes the general narrative in the media and the society as a whole ("Scientists discovered that..."):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8780256
Checking this out in a few areas near me:
1. Many golf courses are identified as maize or wheat fields.
2. Nature preservation areas are generally identified as grass or maize.
This "AI-based approach" seems to be off by at least an order of magnitude. A great idea but it certainly needs serious refinement before use by any government or company.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html ("Guidelines" link at bottom of every page)

> In Comments

> Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say face-to-face. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more civil and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
"...study actively. Don't just read it: fight it! Ask your own questions, look for your own examples, discover your own proofs. Is the hypothesis necessary? Is the converse true? What happens in the classical special case? What about the degenerate cases? Where does the proof use the hypothesis?...it is not a good idea to open a book on page 1 and read it, working all the problems in order, till you come to the last page. It's a bad idea. The material is arranged in the book so that its linear reading is logically defensible, to be sure, but we readers are human, all different from one
another and from the author, and each of us is likely to find something difficult that is easy for someone else. My advice is to read till you come to a definition new to you, and then stop and try to think of examples and non-examples, or till you come to a theorem new to you, and then stop and try to understand it and prove it for yourself --- and, most
important, when you come to an obstacle, a mysterious passage, an unsolvable problem, just skip it. Jump ahead, try the next problem, turn the page, go to the next chapter, or even abandon the book and start another one. Books may be
linearly ordered, but our minds are not."

(P.R. Halmos)
Then it sounds like people are doing something quite far from science. That's not a criticism, there is lots of knowledge which isn't scientific... for example if you want to know how to run a restaurant, you need to talk to lots of people who do, and try to learn what they know about the art. Maybe you even go to trade shows and listen to talks. But if you follow what they said and you fail, it's not really a replication crisis.
I think "business" is far too grand a word for what's being described here. This is old school trading - buying something, and selling it for more than you bought it.

But it's being done in a highly competitive environment, where everything is commodified. Alibaba has commodified manufacturing, shipping was always a commodity, and Amazon has commodified the marketing and fulfilment end.

The problem with commodities is that it's very difficult to create a competitive advantage - if you do happen to find one, it'll be transient and fleeting as others cotton on to it.

I hope the author is also keeping track of the time he spends on this. At $7.64 profit per item, assuming he does sell all 200 handbags, that's $1528 in profit. If he's spent 152 hours on this, that's just $10/hour for his effort. If he ends up spending 211 hours, he's earning less than the US minimum wage.
Detalles de Novia para tener en cuenta
We depend on the evolved complex systems that sustain a planetary-scale agricultural society. Taking a sufficiently large-scale view, perhaps not even the survival of the planet "matters" (surely there are other planets? other ecologies?). But that's no-one's actual viewpoint. We live here.
Depends on whose rules and to what extent those rules are being enforced.

I think 'they' as a gender-neutral pronoun is widely accepted in speech and may have greater acceptance in writing than once it had thanks to modern conceptions about inclusiveness in language, especially by those who challenge/have challenged the notion of gender as a binary.

For me, that use of 'they' shall remain incorrect in writing (by virtue of introducing ambiguity relating to number) except in reported speech and prose that intends to invoke a casual, perhaps intimate, feeling in the reader; but perfectly acceptable in speech itself.

That makes it different to the other languages where gendered pronouns don't exist at all, or are so limited in actual use that they might as well not exist.
I don't get it. "This makes discovery very slightly easier (only in the most awful sql-injection code you can imagine)". Why should we care about that?
Professors have always needed extra protection for free speech, and at least in theory, tenure was that protection.

However, over time, tenure turned into a career goal-post rather than a necessary security blanket, and it's basically lost all of it's enforcement credibility, e.g., tenured professors are fired/"resign" all the time after making comments that are viewed as racist/sexist/etc.

So now that it's clear that tenure doesn't protect professor, it's not surprising that they turn to other methods, anonymity being an obvious one.

Invoking anonymity is everyone's right, but it's still sad. Professors are supposed to embody the ideal of free and open thought, and by publishing their works anonymously, it's a sorry and self-enabling acceptance of their own irrelevance.
Yeah some of the entries need updating as it's crowdsourced, they're all from the spreadsheet so there must be a few duds in there.

Thanks for the suggestion of tatoeba too, that's excellent!
We are seeing different results.

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/artic...

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/oct/26/gay-sperm-dono...

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/child-support-case-invo...

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/sperm-donor-liable...
8K is completely pointless, you need to be sitting about 50cm from your already-giant TV for it to make a difference over 4K.
Viruses don't always exploit bugs. Most cryptolockers generally just trick people into executing them, for example.
I'm playing around with an HTML-only page where I want to load lots of resources in iframes, couldn't find much guidance on the web on how bad of an idea this might be (I seem to remember being told each iframe has a similar overhead as a new tab, since it is a whole other browsing context)

Does 25 iframes cause any slowdown? Do you have any tips to keep performance up, like setting display=none to iframes out of view ? I'll test all this soon, I just would appreciate any knowledge you've gained along these lines :)
It's a long view, sure, but it's one that doesn't include humans. Most people would like humans to be around.

The conditions under which we live won't be in play if the fisheries all collapse and the clathrate gun fires.
What strikes me the most here and there in this interesting blog is how the OP found immediate solutions to some of his problems just looking outside his door, instead of the internet. Why do not go with the full local route then, next time? Less adventorous than moving threads globally but hopefully more rewarding economically (time vs hassle vs ROI)?
Once you reach a certain level of experience, the mechanics of making a turn become second nature and the degree of conscious active control depends more on the type of slope. A well groomed piste is the equivalent of a freeway and you spend more time checking the traffic (the other skiers) than looking at the road. In contrast, (for me at least) a steep gully or a natural mogul field [0] requires more active conscious thinking about when to turn.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mogul_skiing
Yes and no, people tend to drive their cars outside of a given jurisdiction as in a Tesla owner in California might drive to Nevada or even Canada or Mexico.

Also I don’t think manufacturers would want to develop 500 system so when the first demand comes they’ll likely implement it across the board.

I would also not be surprised if they find a way (or at least try too) to charge LEO’s for this “services” similarly to how cellphone companies charge for wiretaps, call logs and telemetry data.
previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18469230
In mathematics as well as in programming, there are rigorous and less rigorous texts. Compare “Linear Algebra for Dummies” with “Principia Mathematica”, for example. I haven’t read the first or more than a page or so of the second, but I think you’ll find the latter more rigorous.

Similarly, in programming, “Teach Yourself PHP in 24 Hours” is wildly different from “the Art of Computer Programming” (a series of books that you may like reading)
Examples of slow TV:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18457671

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18458442
Recognizing Disguised Faces in the Wild
Fun story. I bought a very fuel efficient diesel car (build: 2001) 3 years ago. It does 94 mpg or 1L per 30KM. Since then, many cities in my country decided to introduce "pollution zones", banning diesels of 2000 and older. My old home city decided to go one step further and ban diesels of 2004 and older. When I visit family and friends, I actually have to actively route around it. Which is ironic, since my car is more fuel efficient then most cars currently produced. But I guess the NOx exhaust also matters (which is much higher with diesels).

To be frank, it surprises me that I can go around in my car still at all. Burning diesel to move people should be banned by now, especially with the market flooding with EVs.
Something that hasn't been brought up yet is sign language.

In New Zealand Sign Language, the sign language that I know and use, it is possible to reduce "go over to the other side of the room, pick up that suitcase, and bring it back over here to me" down to simply pointing at the suitcase, imitating picking the suitcase up by its handle, and then pointing downwards in front of oneself, all whilst looking at the interlocutor, possibly with eyebrows raised towards the end of the sentence.

To actually see it, it's a very efficient way to express not only a command but what object is desired without having to actually name it, where it should go, who should carry it out, and the eyebrows might imply that it is a request.

That said, it can be cumbersome and inefficient in many use cases; I would rather read English text when trying to quickly find a piece of information in an article than rewind or fast-forward through a video of somebody signing the article. In a real-time visual modality, though, it's very efficient.
Anecdotal, but perhaps interesting:

I rode a bike every few weeks with my father as a child. When I was 11, I had a pretty serious health condition including paralysis from the waist down. I had to spend several years retraining my muscles to be able to walk and run again.

I'm 22 now, and have just (literally in the past two weeks) started riding a bike again. I wasn't particularly confident but I was happily surprised to discover I had no issue just riding. I'm having trouble with U-turns and signalling, but this feels pretty cool considering that half of my life so far has gone by without riding.
There must be a lot of luck involved in getting the right DNA sequence to produce the right neural structures to get a smart creature. I mean lots of dedicated computer scientists are trying to hook up artificial neural networks to make them smart and are yet to get something with the general problem solving ability of an octopus I think. Maybe evolution only hits on a working sequence occasionally by chance and certain species get lucky such as octopuses, african greys and humans and others like cuttlefish, turkeys and cows were less lucky?

I sometimes think the account of evolution of man you tend to get in popular science writing may have things backwards - it tend to be our ancestors got good at hunting which allowed us to evolve larger brains but I'd imagine it was quite likely that a random mutation made our ancestors smarter first, then there were behaviour changes then we evolved some superficial changes such as changes in size and shape of some parts.
The ecological collapses are now occurring at such a rapid pace that it would require a turnaround of unprecendented ambition, starting right now. The race isn't exactly against natural systems breaking down - that's a process that's going to continue for millenia. It's against the fragility of our own societies, built on human constitutions designed by evolution to operate effectively at far smaller scales.

Tiny perturbations (compared to what's coming) cause major social convulsions (eg. Europe 2015). What do you think will happen when billions of climate change refugees flood the world? When the first agricultural collapses occur? Wars will sweep the world, what exists of global cooperation will cease, and a positive feedback loop ensues.
> Why don't the peer reviewers demand higher standards?

I'm not sure peer review can change a field's direction. Say the top journal in a field used to publish the top 10% of papers. If only 1% of papers meet some higher standard, then if the journal chose to enforce this, they would essentially cease to exist.

And the people who would otherwise have got hired/promoted/tenured based on publications there, will now win these tournaments based on their publications in the second-best journal. Their contests are with others in the same field.

I guess the more hopeful scenario is that, besides the 1 of 10 top papers that are actually solid, there are (somewhere) 9 other solid papers with less-flashy results -- presumably carefully proving things that everyone thinks, not counter-intuitive things which get you a TED talk. Here it's more complicated, as if the journal chose to publish these instead, it seems to me that hiring/promotion/tenure committees may simply start to view it as a less-prestigious venue.
Yes, learning everything in detail as an expert is impossible, we need experts, and because by definition we take their opinion at face value, we need some way to judge their credibility.

Of course we have those, i.e., "signing authorit[ies]" that validate that the opinion/["data"] of the expert is of high quality: they are generally called universities.

(I find it amusing when programming jargon is applied to the real world outside of programming, but presented as new concept. Especially like where, where we have had institutions that accomplish the same thing as "signing authorities" for several thousand years).
"a masterpiece in single player gaming."

why?