skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The bees are highly social, and it is possible that it is primarily this fact that “lifts” their mental power into the realm of consciousness.

As far as I understand it, a theory of mind is a hard requirement for consciousness - you understand that other beings have minds, then you model them, then you turn that in on yourself, and the loop is closed and voila, you develop tools and culture and anxiety.
As things stand right now nuclear power is a single point of failure because (as the OP rightly points out) it has been used and is still being used by different military organizations in order to build nuclear bombs, which nuclear bombs can literally wipe us all at this very moment, not in 10 years’ time, not in 20 years’ time, now. Yeah, I know the whole talk about how nuclear bombs have stopped a possible WWIII in its tracks (which is only proof of how schizoid we are as a species at this stage of our societal development) but I also know that single point of failures are really, really bad.
Minor nitpick with your nitpick - the DSM used to make a distinction between Sociopathy and Psychopathy, but as of DSM 5, they are both described under the umbrella of Antisocial Personality Disorders (ASPD). The distinctions now are only cultural, and made outside the DSM - usually by researchers trying to explain ASPD traits in nature vs. nurture constructs. In that regard, one could say there's actually no distinction between the traits describing the two as defined in DSM 5.
> Congratulations, they beat you into submission.

This is not really an acceptable attitude towards this opinion. You can not mind the current state of tracking, acknowledge benefits, etc and should not be demonized or told your opinion was beat into you. And then congratulate them some rude way?

I used to wonder why so many people were surprised at recent presidential election results, assumed propaganda must be the cause, assumed ignorance of those they don't understand, take elitist attitudes towards others' preferences, etc. But now I'm starting to understand this cognitive dissonance. It's ok that they don't see tracking as a big deal, it's ok they don't want governments to step in, they aren't just dumb victims beat into submission.
With These New Additions, AWS SageMaker Is Starting to Look More Real
He is mentioned here pretty regularly, so many may already be aware, but Matt Levine discusses this and its variants a lot in his newsletter, most of the time under the heading "Should index funds be illegal?"
That’s sort of my point. If you can’t afford those things are you really living a life of “incredible luxury”.

As for travel, it depends. I have a lot of friends doing “Instagram travel”. Literally deciding where to go based on where they can snap the best shot. There are also a lot of people doing very touristy things that don’t provide any sort of insight or deep meaning.
Depends on if you care more about the benefits of getting at your enemies than the consequences of legitimizing criminal behavior and/or the inevitable "friendly fire" incidents.
A New Security Header: Clear Site Data
It's not that complex. You can have a paypal.me address or set up a stripe account with buymeacoffee.com. There would be many more but these two are at the top of my mind now.
Gym 7:00 a.m. doesn't work for me. That would be the best time from schedule perspective, but I simply can't. I'm talking about gym training with heavy free weights, not fitness club with stationary bicycles.
Right. I'm not discarding the value of the details. But right now I just want to know, "does it seem like I might have a problem?"

As a non expert I wouldn't have been surprised if someone said, "yeah it's pretty common for furnaces to run non stop in cold winters. That's their design."
It advertises itself as "prevent Google from tracking you around the web", which I consider a false and misleading statement. It doesn't prevent it. It is not "not perfect", it is not even far from perfect.

I think it is very important to make Internet users aware that cookies are the red herring in all privacy issues that are plaguing the World Wide Web. Cookie feature in modern browsers is just a tiny puzzle piece in a larger picture, consisting of wide range of entry points used for collecting data. It includes invasive JavaScript fingerprinting that can easily extract a list of installed fonts, local IP address and list of media devices from WebRTC, device capabilities, WebGL/Canvas fingerprinting, content filter list detection and much much more. Even with JS disabled most browsers share so much explicit information that is enough for precise identification without the use of cookies.

Is it impossible? For 99.99% of Internet users it requires so much hoops to hop through it might as well be impossible. However, I believe that awareness could slow down this privacy decline. I hope users will finally start demanding more native privacy controls in their browsers. Native JavaScript filter in Firefox would be a good place to start.
If only there was a unique aplhanumeric blob representing a name.
My experience with firefox add-on reviewers has been hit or miss - One of the most frustrating things is that reviews often happen long after your add-on has been published. I'd rather have a longer waiting time, but once an add-on is published then it means it's been approved.
From the developer point of view it means that it's very hard to communicate on releases, because you never know when your addon is going to be reviewed. From the end user, it means that if someone maliciouly changes one of your addons, you may already have updated to that version before the review.
I also feel that the guidelines around reviews aren't well explained, and the reviewers comments are often terse, bordering on the incomprehensible : at least with Apple, you get pointed to which part of the rules they think you didn't respect - with firefox, we often get broad comments that require a bit of back and forth to figure out what it is they're actually thinking is wrong.
As a fellow practitioner, it's reckless to offer any medical advice, opinion or not. You're not licensed and you don't know what you don't know.
If the variant of the homomorphic encryption you are using is secure, then the bad guys can not generate specifically crafted cyphertext that would decrypt into the result they specifically want.
Yes. Season 2, part of the Homicide Energy Drink plot-line. EndFrame lures PP into a meeting, ostensibly to discuss funding, but instead brain rapes[1] PP.

1 - Erlich's term, not mine.
Yes it doesn't match the ad-hoc stuff finance people do. That's in fact my point.
Thanks for your feedback, There is a working example of Tabulator on the home screen, and clicking the examples link takes you through to over 30 different working examples complete with formatted source code when you click the "view source" button. if you feel you would benefit form a more specific example, i would be happy to update the home page to make things cleared :)
I mean I don't have any context, but surely this is a similar technology they have implemented with their Google Home speaker system?
Often the schema is already enforced - e.g. in healthcare you'll find that somebody else has already normalized the wonderful world of names down to two Unicode strings called last and first. Names that don't fit that schema will be coerced by this wonderful technology called "an admissions clerk".
Kotlin for Python developers
Just because you are giant, isn't it!
I watched the new mini-series about that just last week. Horrific. Not a cool thing to joke about.
A double has 15 digits. Which counts more money than exists anywhere added up. Not a problem I'm thinking?
I don't consider myself very savvy in investing, but I guess if "half of all stocks" are owned by index funds that's a concentration of ownership that might be considered unnatural at best.

I didn't read past the paywall but one good thing if more and more people own index funds then they are participating in the success of those corporations represented in that index. Might tend to tone down some of the shrill agitation that everything "corporations" do is evil and greedy.
Surely there should be a clear appeal process, and escalation if there is to be an app store like review for addons that can remove something. Particularly if they are assessed by volunteers who may vary significantly.

There seems something off when spyware infested stylish remains an acceptable addon and this gets arbitrarily blocked.

A vague "try and reach out" doesn't, to me, seem to come close to an appeal process.
Waterfox should be able to do it: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/en-US/
That's not how I read it...more like "watching a movie about facebook and building my hopes and dreams on this being me in x years" is what you should avoid.

FB/GOOG/etc are the very rare outliers. Don't hedge your business (or mental-wellbeing) on the expectation to replicate their success.

It's good to have high ambitions but have a plan B & don't expect to be the unicorn. It would be analogous to starting a band in the hopes of becoming the next Beatles.
I'm willing to bet that they haven't calculated _anything at all_ and they are scrambling to put out the fire.
Yes, I was a little terse there: what I meant was the system serves little purpose for the demos who maintain it. The deal is that the inventors get their monopoly in return for the disclosure. So, without any benefit on the side of the public then their would be no purpose in maintaining the system.

Of course it also serves the public to encourage inventors by giving them a limited exclusive use. But primarily when instigated the purpose is a mutual benefit that is best embodied by education of the public arena as to the mechanisms and working of an invention.
Video: Funktronic Labs lives on the cutting edge of virtual reality
I wish ASCII had a few more symbols and didn't waste 32 values on control codes.

Missing characters imho:

fixed width space, degree symbol, copyright/trademark symbols, the opposite direction of `, maybe a few more like pilcrow, section symbol, dagger, generic currency symbol, card suits, arrows and a few mathematical ones like +-, roughly equal, not equal, ...

Why I care about ASCII here? Because programming language source code is still written in that, and it's also those symbols that appear on standard US keyboard layout.

I think those extra symbols would have made life easier in many cases, more than some of the more obscure control characters it has (such as the useless line break vs newline we are still suffering from). They could have gotten away with just 16 instead of 32 control characters imho, even in the times when they had mechanical machines with bells :p
Rocket Report: Russia’s nuclear rocket, airspace wars, BFR changes explained
That's an entirely separate decision from deciding to control what goes into the shop and by that not really part of the discussion, isn't it? And Apple asking for a fee to allow uploading apps is also a separate issue, after all, Mozilla is doing it without a fee by using volunteers to screen apps.

Both points are true and a problem but it's distracting from what this is about, no?
Haha, how did you conclude I am Odia? By my last name?
Why is happiness valuable?
Thanks for responding. I'm on mobile and still don't see any example or a single line of code on the landing page. I'm sure there are examples in one of the big stack of fat button links, but you haven't quite snagged my attention and buy-in with those! :)

Edit: if I switch to desktop view I see a table.

I would suggest having an absolute minimal code + rendering on the front page somewhere. It tells me so much about your library than anything else could!
> It seems there were only rumors that Soros had anything to do with it, all the while someone else was more profitable than him. And given that he was already famous for the GBP trade why not blame him?

because it's a conservative, anti-semitic trope. he is the ur-villian, the mega boss after people tire of you complaining about the clintons. it's been this way for twenty years
Seems like there has to be some method to solve this? Maybe the transaction is part of the page load? You don't get the page until you pay via anonymous cryptocurrency. No need for any post-transaction verification and reconciliation? The problem there will be if the page fails to load, how can I safely get a second attempt without creating some kind of "double-spending" problem.
HTTP Header field registrations (RFC 4229) – Python helper
This is true in more places than software. Heck, even signing a check involves rendering a name in ink on paper, which is a restriction for some names I imagine.

Sure its true people have different renderings for their name. So choose one that fits into the software form you're filling out. Not rocket science.
www.haveibeenpwned.com will help you with that

also using unique passwords as well as aliasing your email address such as gammateam+starwood@gmail.com helps you isolate which breach comes from where. the spam emails you get will start having the alias on it
Pulsar doesn't support transactions e.g. producing to multiple topics/partitions atomically.

So, you cannot have exactly-once delivery consuming from a topic and producing to another topic. Kafka starting from 0.11 supports this.
Cryptocurrency and Climate Change: How bad is crypto for the environment?
One of the things that always strikes me with Tesla is the history.

They're at the old NUMMI plant, [1] which was a joint GM/Toyota venture so that GM could learn how to build cars as well as Toyota. Toyota's philosophy has two things at the foundation: continuous improvement and respect for people. [2] When This American Life did a piece on it, they talked to some of the GM workers, who spoke very movingly about how it was a deeply different experience to have such a different work culture. [3]

It's sad to me that Tesla didn't do more to learn some of the lessons that were taught right there in that building.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUMMI

[2] https://www.lean.org/womack/DisplayObject.cfm?o=755

[3] https://www.thisamericanlife.org/403/nummi
For the most part sure. I was pointing more to the nifty left to right viewer the presenter was showing and more generally the qualities of a "live" system.
The thing about search is that it is only useful if it lets you find obscure results. Anyone can find common results; they clog every search engine and suffocate functionality.

For example, if I enter “UDP broadcast” into your search, I find all the usual java and cpp results that I can find anywhere. Ho hum. If I wanted those, I could go use Google or probably just trip over them in my living room.

But I want results in Swift because it is relatively new and obscure. There are only 4 Swift projects on Github that match the term “UDP broadcast” out of 319 total results. I have to do an advanced search on the native Github engine to find them.

I think you might want to start by making your search useful for finding the weird obscure things that people really have to hunt for. Then expand it to everything else while finding a way of not drowning the oddball stuff with the common clay (of the New West).

This is where Google, for example, has gone wrong lately. I almost can’t use it for anything meaningful because any meaningful search (example ‘MacOS gps”) brings back “5 Amazing GPS apps for Mac that you can’t live without!!” and many other links with no actual content.

If you want to make a useful search, you have to return the stuff that is hard to find instead of the easy and useless stuff.
"normal" letter sounds rather judging, doesn't it? Altough I suspect it is probably a product of an undereducated person.
Why is “2 * (i * i)” faster than “2 * i * i” in Java?
who did you write that for given that the post you replied to says

> under a different federal agency for non-securities related advertisements.
The author's email address is in there and it sounds like they were soliciting for comments... who knows if they are still maintaining this or not.
GM Announcement Reveals First Signs of Autonomous Vehicle Bubble
Red Hat Talk OpenJDK, Garbage Collection
We need something integrated directly into the browser with microtransactions for each page load (or X amount of pages) paid for anonymously via cryptocurrency.
Simplify Your AWS Billing for Multiple Accounts Using AWS Organizations
Note the date of the RFC.
> more than some of the more obscure control characters it has

It's perhaps an oddity now, but these control characters were most definitely necessary when ASCII was formalized in the 1960s from teletype machines.
Ahh i see,

Yes the version for mobile is much less revealing im afraid, it was tricky to fit everything on the screen so i scaled back the homepage to something simpler.

Actually the documentation and example links are on the first paragraph of the site, just above the table, but i must have removed that whole section from the mobile view to make things fit in better. I will have a look into that now.
British people.
British people. It was even worse in Scotland and Wales.
Thanks. Remember, I'm just one data point. My opinions and feedback don't demand change.
Google Domains is nice but I'll probably switch to Cloudflare's new domain thing when it's ready.
Natural Gas Prices Fall Below Zero in Texas
I have a hard time seeing it as unintended. If you are not promising any differentiation between yourself and the index than the only thing to really compete on is cost. There are economies of scale in finance, specifically if you need to optimize solely for AUM.
Try it, it doesn't take long to figure out there's no good way to do even basic features without fighting very hard against the built-in behavior of tables. Also, for even just 1000 rows, all browsers still suck at redrawing if any little thing changes, I believe it's because the entire layout of the table has to be recalculated no matter how small the change is.
Bitcoin's fundamentals are strengthening despite price decline
Simple skinnerism would also explain consumerism. Oh look! Shiny! That could stimulate my dopamine receptors briefly, I'll get it.
You realize Waymo uses remote pilots, right?

https://www.wired.com/story/phantom-teleops/

Disclosure; I attempted to patent this idea before they were public with it, because I know the autonomous claims are baloney, and there was an obvious way to look like it wasnt baloney.

I also just spent two weeks driving an Audi A-8 around Germany; most advanced 'autonomous' technology there is in a production car supposedly.
If the stock market becomes dominated by copycats copying each other, can it price equity risk accurately?
Interested to know if you mean "any" in the absolute sense? Is this viewpoint particularly American? Would it not be reckless not to offer advice if I though not doing so would be harmful?

Real questions I've been asked:

- Can I dissolve these tablets? Turns out the answer was in the Product Information - yes, you can.

- What happens if I mix my SSRIs with illicit substances? I don't know, could be bad, please don't, if you do consider standard harm reduction strategies.
I can't claim to have it on my bookshelf anymore, but DID have the original hardcopy on my bookshelf for many years back in the 70's and early 80's when I was programming some low-level math libraries and needed to refer to some approximation techniques (e.g., Chebyshev for logarithms).

EDIT: oops, just realized that you were referring to a later version of the classic. I was referring to Abramowitz and Stegun's Handbook of Mathematical Functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (1964).
If this looks cool you might also be into Google Code Search https://github.com/google/codesearch
It's a thing of its own. Used to be called informatics in some countries. Much better name, IMO. There are large parts of computer science that have nothing to do with computers. They're about information and can be applied outside of computers.

I'm with Alan Kay when he says "computer science" used to be an aspiration and eventually became a misnomer. Same with software engineering.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyIQKBzIuBY

(Doesn't mean CS and SE are always "worse" than science and engineering. But they are currently very different.)
one risk is that if too many people are invested in index funds (passive, not buying or selling based on new information), then the price of those stocks is determined by a small group of active investors
I'm disappointed. I was expecting a recipe for the goo that Neo was forced to eat in the first movie.
Why don't touch screens work with gloves: a simulation based study
Have you tried the Brave Browser? You basically just requested the 3 primary features it advertises:

https://brave.com/features/
It took a look at your first link - Lucidity looks pretty neat, but is there a way to try it out? I didn't see it in your GitHub.
If i can make money grinding babies into a fine powder, that is clearly the "rational move", nobody can fault me for it.
CMS's Procedure Price Lookup Tool
I made a flat file database for an imageboard script a couple of years ago in which I found a lot of value in using the control characters, to separate the content of posts (group separator) and the attributes of a post within that (record separator).
My comment didn't present my full view on the topic - I was seconding the warning that "don't reason from fictional evidence" applies to both dystopia and utopia visions. In truth, I am more hopeful about the post-scarcity scenario than that comment might have implied.

I am (currently) in favour of UBI, though there are two things that I'm not sure about. One, what's to prevent prices immediately rising to eat the entire UBI, returning everything to status quo but with no welfare budget? Two, how to deal with migration from countries with no UBI to countries with UBI?

As for Star Trek itself (the TNG/DS9/VOY timeline, at least), I do consider it a good vision of what the world could be like. The question that's always in my mind is "how do we get there". I dream humanity can get to a post-scarcity era; the trick is surviving the transition.
https://www.quora.com/Do-any-companies-give-a-bonus-for-pate...

> Google paid generously for filing patents to help create a defensive portfolio.

> ...you would receive $1000 post-tax per person, up to $3k total

> I left Google in 2009 and the program may have changed since then.

(The events took place in 2014)
I can make a truck bomb from commercial fertilizers, or I can grow a whole bunch of wheat and corn. Just because you can fuck things up with a particular technology isn't a great reason for disallowing the positive usages of it.
Or recipes that make everything taste like chicken
FWIW, I didn't have to click too many times to find a very clear code example that explained exactly what this is for. I hope I remember it in six months when I need it.