skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>Your citation uses a very narrow definition of parks - government owned, set aside for that specific use.

No it doesn’t. Did you just make that up?

>It doesn't include things like the walkable areas often around sports fields, which are pretty much everywhere.

Sports fields are generally in parks, which are included in the data set. The vast majority of parks in rural and suburban areas are sports parks--definitely included in the data set.

Publically available sports fields not in parks tend to be part of schools. They aren’t always publically available, and they are never available during school hours. You certainly can’t use them to host events, grill out etc... Most of the school fields around here won’t even let you walk on the grass, and most of them keep the gates to the fields locked when school’s out.

>It doesn't include private parks or

Did you read the source? It even mentions that the dataset doesn’t different between private and public parks.

>areas which are implicitly - or quite often explicitly - open to the public.

An explicit public greenspace is a park. I’m not sure what an implicit public greenspace is. Undeveloped land that doesn’t have a no trespassing sign? Do you have any examples? Can you have a cookout on implicitly accessible land? Can you set up a volleyball net? Who’s cutting the grass? Clearing the trails? Can you even be sure you aren’t trespassing? When does it close? Will the police show up?

What implicity accessible land do you regularly use?

>The vast majority of the population lives in cities or inner suburbs,

When did we start talking about the majority of the population? I’ve specifically been talking about lower density areas throughout this entire thread.

>and for them a walkable space is rarely even half a mile away.

But while you’re on the subject... I assume you’re still talking about publicly accessible greenspace when you say “walkable space”. The median distance to a park for a person in a city center is 0.5 miles. That means that half of people live farther than that. For the suburbs the median distance is over a mile. Living farther than half a mile certainly isn’t rare.

Check out ParkScore. One of the metrics is percent of residents within a half mile of a park--it’s not rare, particularly in low income communities.

>And you're the one who started the pissing contest, by trying to claim that I'm unqualified to comment.

I never said that. You should go back and reread what I did say. Stop ignoring the topic and focusing on perceived slights and straw men.

>Don't whine that you lost…

There’s no point in declaring victory--no one else is reading.
Ah yes, one of the very few brands that wasn't taken over by foreign competition.

To be honest I don't remember if I ever tried it - emphasis on remember.

If you are into mean spirits(pun intended) I recommend "Śliwowica łącka", although to try it you'd have hike the mountains od Lesser Poland because this type of liquor is technically illegal and available mostly in that region.
>That's just... a fundamental limitation? I don't think there's a way for an unskilled ("normal") person to dissect and analyze the information outside of their understanding in a meaningful way, no matter how creative you get.

This is discussed in depth in Augmenting Human Intellect:

http://dougengelbart.org/content/view/138/000/
I suspect that if a different country started producing fentanyl on the scale that China does, but offered it at a 10% reduced price, we would purchase the drug from that country instead.

then the blame would shift from China to the new country.

maybe instead of blaming others, we should fix ourselves. stop buying cheap dangerous drugs and decriminalize the drugs we do have
They've been for a long time. It's a way to tell cloud customers: "we're catching up with AWS, don't worry".

It's malpractice, but still legal.
I think the term "poorer", and the monetary analysis done here, is too high level to extract real meaning.

The average young person/couple that I know are able to do and buy far more than their parents (e.g. eat out, order takeaway, take holidays, go to bars, buy things for hobbies, buy clothes, ...).

They just don't own property and have no path that leads there.

In some sense you could say that they have higher incomes whilst having lower wealth, but that doesn't really capture it.

Housing just went bonkers which makes retirement impossible.
There is one other area of their economy that has gotten interesting in the last decade. Thanks to a leap in modernization, their wheat production doubled over ~15 years and it looks set to continue expanding. They have the potential to be a considerable agriculture power.

Their oil industry, which used to be towering, is 'only' worth about the annual sales of Apple, or Google + Microsoft. With their current approach to political leadership, it's hard to imagine where the economic growth is going to come from to enable them to devote a lot more resources to their non-military space industry.
People are in debt yeah. I lucked out but I know a lot of people with student debt.
It's painful to see that younger people are worse off - poorer and life expectancy I see is down again. I thought we were trying to give our children a better life? How did we become so narcissistic that we don't even want to make future generations better off?
Is it just me or does the article provide zero evidence that Millennials are poorer? The graph is just spending, not income.
Million?
All the visitor data is based on faulty data - there is no connection between the numbers his sources report and reality. If you have your own modestly popular website, go check and see what those sites report for you. Those numbers are totally made up.

That of course also means, that the revenue estimate is absolute speculation.

Even better: The original question "where did these files come from?" is not even answered.
Generations has been a concept long before marketing. I do wonder about who draws the line for where a generation begins/ends, but the concept is pretty clear: you are one generation, your children another, your parents another, your grandparents another. Hence the base word "generate".
Thank you. That is the best answer to comparing languages I have seen by looking at your two codes. I never really thought of Nim as being that close to Python in syntax but seeing the two codes together I saw how you were able to achieve that and it was really insightful.
You can specify multiple digests for an asset, so a non-versioned one can be updated sans downtime:

1. Provider informs clients that a new version with digest X will be deployed.

2. Clients add the new digest in addition to the current digest.

3. Provider switches to new asset version.

4. Clients remove old digest (optional).

Versioned assets are obviously better unless you're in a really weird situation, but SRI doesn't particularly require them.
Another way of phrasing that is the market cap is determined by the people who have the information, and resulting conviction, to put their own money on the idea that the company may be worth that much.

Further, the reason why the market cap works is because every transaction has a buyer and a seller. The seller believes the price they are getting is above what it should be, while the buyer believes it’s below what it should be. As a result, the actual price is a consensus between people who have very different outlooks on the company, and as such almost necessarily incorporates a lot of different, and likely non overlapping, information.
It's a convenient shorthand for talking about and summarizing continuous statistical distributions. Shorthands are okay. As to your question, if you draw the lines between differently, you only get slightly different results, because it's fundamentally measuring the dependence of various factors on age, and the exact way you draw those lines isn't important.
They tried that with universal apps. No one was going to invest money on good games without the users being there and no users were going to buy the phone without the apps.

Even if Windows Phone had Nintendo level third place success, what would it have gained them? No company besides Apple and to a lesser extent Samsung make any real money on phones. I doubt the phone division even makes any really money, Samsung makes most of its mobile money from the parts it sells.

Google doesn’t even make that much from Android. They make some from Google Play Services and advertising but they also pay Apple billions a year to be the default search engine for iOS.
Apple seems interested in keeping things fairly secure, is this a theoretical fear or an exploit I've never heard of?
MIT AI: Stack Overflow and Coding Horror (Jeff Atwood) [video]
It's good to see a study that quantifies what we have suspected for a while now: millennials aren't doing as well as their parents were at any given age. This is why certain "life thresholds" such as getting married or buying a house are delayed, sometimes significantly.

The annoying thing is that this is typically blamed on imaginary negative traits that millennials possess, such as laziness or spite borne out of feelings of entitlement. Whereas the fact is that Boomers had it really, really good, having grown up during an age of unprecedented growth, especially in contrast to the rest of the developed world, which was recovering from World War 2. That's the main reason they have done so well economically: America's rising tide has lifted all their boats. Unfortunately, this has come at the expense of subsequent generations, who now have to live with, and pay, their debt.
Unfortunately US 'aggressive debt collectors' can leverage legal loop holes and corrupt officials to take your possessions by force.
The 2008 housing repossession stats from lenders such as wells fargo are a good example. in some cases they were repoing houses that had no late payment or mortgage issues whatsoever.
Amazon has used 3rd parties for a long time, but they weren't shoved in your face as "Sponsored Results" until maybe a year or so ago?

Honestly, it makes shopping on Amazon feel more and more like a flea market. I especially don't like how Amazon now obscures the source of the product by emphasizing the "Prime Shipping Available". I find myself having to manually look to see if the product is sold by Amazon, or merely "Fulfilled by Amazon".

It's honestly an ugly experience these days. Is it worth bringing down your UX to Ebay/AliExpress levels for a little more growth?
Well, Jenkins does.
Nicotine, Valium, Vicodin, Marijuana, Ecstasy, and Alcohol ....C-c-c-cocaine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAXPUN2z2CE
The i and the b tag are now superfluous as the em and strong tag has taken over their semantic meaning.

This frees their use for other things.
Do Security Robots Signal the Death of Public Space?
The github page comes right out and says "[it] is ideally suited for high performance trading financial systems". Clearly, that's the intention behind the library.

This would be essentially useless in game development (which is my field). In gamedev it's pretty much 32-bit floats all the way down, and very little else. Very small fixed point types are occasionally used in shaders (Cg provides a native 12-bit fixed point type) to represent colors, but a library like this is pretty much pointless.
Securing your practice
I'm 99% sure this is not a thing and if it was it would be incredibly broken and not secure and most non-trivial pages relying on it for security would be vulnerable to the third party script.

Anyway. This can easily be proved one way or another. `Here is an example that shows a third party script accessing a first party domain. There is no CORs as far as I can see:

https://jsfiddle.net/aopmtn46/

If you open the console you will see "STATUS 404" which is not possible if same origin on third party scripts is enforced.
I think it's based on the trope that teenagers rebel against their parents' beliefs, mixed with the idea of generational progress. So each generation of teenagers rebels against their parents' ideas that they believe are "outdated", and then supposedly grow up retaining this new framework of belief. So what was cool becomes uncool, what was progressive becomes conservative, etc etc.

I think it's mostly nonsense though. I think the underlying grouping that generation is a proxy for, is age group. 18-25 year olds behave differently from 25-35 or 35-50 (with some fuzziness at the edges). In other words it's loose grouping based on age/maturity.
I think there's definitely scope for a 'Weathermap' style monitoring overlay, however I'm not (personally) digging graphs overlaid isometrically with the infra. Perhaps a 2D overlay of charts? (Just my opinion, may not look that clean in reality)
Monitoring Backups Across Instances
Google Assistant will now be nicer if you say “Please” and “Thank you”
I guess if it would be signed by the language authors, it would be a nice thing to have. :)
I was born in 1980, which means I don't fit neatly into either 'Gen X' or 'Millennial.' I grew up with computers, but I'm able to walk down the street and watch where I'm going rather than stare at my smartphone whilst walking into other people, lampposts, cars, etc.

But really, it's all arbitrary and pointless, I agree.
That may be the spending on education. That is mostly debt.
The majority of individuals and households spend all of their money. That's the 'how'.

The more salient question is 'why'.
> People should be getting way more education about what these drugs are, what they cause, how they should be taken and how you should stop taking them / what risks it bears if you don't.

My experience is that it's too complicated for people. My parents can just about understand don't take more than 8 paracetamol/tylenol per day, or don't take advil if you've got high blood pressure, but any more complex than that and they just can't really understand it.

They can't (or don't want to) understand that certain antibiotics mix poorly with alcohol (Don't drink on antibioitics) or that some painkillers are _not_ suitable for hangovers (headache == tylenol). They don't understand how statistics of side effects work (10% of people have one or more of the following side effects means "It won't happen to me"), or that some supplements can interfere with medication (warfarin and St Johns wort), and that this is bad, even though they're not medicines.
Scrapy has tutorials around https://doc.scrapy.org/en/latest/intro/tutorial.html

Or you can take an entire course http://www.datasciencecourse.org/lectures/
I think that, like most stats now, it's inflated by the bullhorn of the internet.

Basically it probably happened but the world at large didn't have the ability to hear about it. Sort of like crime rates, even though they are lower than nearly any other time in the US the fact that the internet and 24 hour news cycle constantly talk about crimes the population as a whole feels its a bigger problem than it used to be.
What you are talking about is having higher quality of life, despite having lower wealth.

But that's a separate subject in my opinion.
They haven't provided one, but I'm guessing if someone provides a source, it'll be a link to Microsoft's ads products. They'll argue this information _could_ be used to target users for advertisements, even though it might not be.
You're confusing 'source available' for 'open source'. Source available is where you can look at the source but don't have any right to do anything with it.

Open source is libre software.
Sextortion Scam Run by Inmates Nets $560,000 from U.S. Service Members
> I think you'd have to treat `.` as a lexical token as well. So parsing `./link/..` would first resolve to `/home/me/link/..` then '/home/me/`, no?

You could, but that doesn't really change the point of my comment -- "." is very trivial to handle either lexically or as a directory entry and generally Linux's handling of it is basically a no-op (though it should be noted that it's a no-op compared to $path/ not $path -- which is an important distinction with symlinks-to-directories or mountpoints).

The key difference is whether the symlink is actually resolved (and thus ".." applies to the partially-resolved prefix of the path resolution) or if it applies to the symlink component itself (and thus it never gets resolved).

> A new kernel call, fd2path, returns the file name associated with an open file [...]

fd2path goes from fd -> path, which is the inverse operation to path resolution. All path resolution in Plan9 goes through cleanpath() (as far as I know). fd2path is similar to readlink(/proc/$pid/fd/$fd) on Linux.

The two things are separate concepts.
Many people are just too stubborn to go to the doctor. And many people go, knowing they can’t pay, because they’ll just never pay the bill and will dodge the bill collectors. Plenty of people receive free healthcare in the USA by virtue of never paying, but getting treated.

It’s the middle class who pays their huge bills. Insurance doesn’t cover why these days and deductibles are insanely high. The poor get treated and just skip out on the bill.
Google Lighthouse custom audits tutorial
A new app flags the old tweets that could get you fired
this was a great video about this topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HFwok9SlQQ
I started using Dokku in production a few years ago. It tries to provide an open source alternative to Heroku and ia compatible with their buildpacks. Deployments work via git pushes. And there is a large number of plugins available for different services like Redis, a plethora of databases, letsencrypt e.t.c.

You can host it on any compatible server.
This sort of covers that:

"Older people love to gripe about the entitled, lazy millennial generation. But it's nothing new – by delving into the archives, we found plenty of parallels stretching back 2,000 years."

http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20171003-proof-that-people-...
Or on average they stayed in school longer than their parents, which tends to delay everything, including high earnings years.
> I personally don't think religion has a large effect on opioid use or suicide but if it does have one it's a positive one.

That was my point.

As for insulting people, that isn't my intent. I have only my own observations to go on, and I don't know other people's situations or story, especially religion. My personal experience has been rather shallow. No one asks hard questions, no one talks about God unless they're forced into it, especially at church.

Part of my (rather sad) interpretation of my experiences is that I have questions that are hard, that no one wants to answer. And I'm not able to ask those questions and get a useful answer. So, my interpretation is stained.
And I'm wrong.

Prosecutors can press charges on any case, but customarily don't if the victim isn't willing to cooperate.
But it kinda is though. Honestly, I don't know why but this doesn't really surprised me at all. China is, and continues to go crazy serious with their AI business so the Chinese government knowing your location shouldn't be a shock to anyone anymore. However, it's nice to finally hear the Chinese people voice their opinion about this. I mean, it's a good idea for tracking criminals, but for common people, yeah, that's just creepy.
If China can stop fentanyl from pouring out of their country, why can't the US stop it from pouring in?
Forget the code challenges for a minute, and just look at that beautiful font and text-shadow combination on the logo.
> It's hard for me to even grasp the idea of it.

It's just an arbitrary label for people born in a certain period of history. These people generally have shared experiences that are different from the experiences of other generations.

> Who draws a line between generations and why?

Same people that draw a line between lemons and limes. It's sometimes a useful distinction so people remember it and use it.

> People do not stop being born, nor do they magically change because they supposedly belong to an imaginary generation.

There is no sharp dividing line between lemons and limes, either. Fruits in the citrus family can be crossbred with each other and you will end up with hybrids that cannot easily be classified as lemons or limes. There's no sharp line between "tall" and "short", or "white" and "gray". That's just the way names generally work, outside of fields like mathematics where you can use more precise definitions.
I wonder how much money Tron has in total.
Walmart's treatment of the customer is terrible - a direct reflection of their treatment of their employees in my opinion. The same will soon be said of Amazon.

Which is a shame because I can remember a time when both offered amazing customer service.
> homeless families stay in hotels, and tourists stay in houses.

Great quote that applies worldwide. And agreed its dumb. Hotels should be most efficient, I dont know how houses can be cheaper.
I don't quite see the point of this?

"Crisp chat" - there's tonnes of these things, what makes this one the one to know? Where's Let's Encrypt, which i'd argue is more important than the lot?

"10 web services I use and like" would be a better title imo.
They reference this paper: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2018080pap...
It's part of https://github.com/WebAssembly/wabt

I think I had to build from source.
As a heuristic, after looking myself for a couple decades for a residence that didn't participate in the global real estate mania we're still in the grips of, the MSA boundary works "good enough" as a starting point for median households setting up a search for a place to live that still follows a conventional 30% DTI ratio (or a safer 15-20% DTI to account for the greater income precarity for median US households today).

We're mostly in a cognitive elite echo chamber here on HN due entirely to a historical anomaly that prices most of our labor high relative to more conventional labor pools (though IMHO not commensurate with yielded productivity benefits), and our sense of what is fiscally "reasonable" is highly distorted and privileged. The MSA boundary is not a hard and fast binary switch, where inside the boundary land is crazy expensive relative to prevailing local incomes, but outside the boundary it suddenly is crazy cheap. But it serves as a useful starting point to look for the pricing gradients in your local area for a median household.

A heck of a lot of Millenials got debt-trapped by the higher education scam, and I applaud those who are "once burned twice shy" about taking on another unsustainable debt load in real estate. For those in the US looking for a chunk of land to inexpensively park their possessions (and if you are the kind of Maker-type that enjoys HN, tools alone can take up a lot of space), without becoming an investor in the real estate business itself, then the choices for the past few decades of cheap credit that I've experienced have been get extraordinarily lucky finding a good deal, wait for a bust, or locate outside of where there is lots of land banking activity.

Land does get much cheaper on the outer rings of an MSA, but IMHO still not nearly cheap enough for median households. They're still stretching, and compromising their quality of life a hell of a lot at the same time. We're pushing tons of stress onto them as an unseen externality, and calling it all good and patting ourselves on our backs that we have so many "homeowners", when we should be holding a frank discussion on why our real estate land markets are so dysfunctional.

YMMV of course.
I've been an AWS evangelist because they are Not-Microsoft. But, after having to use Azure for the past 4 years where I'm at, I have to say that Azure's REAL portal (and naming scheme) is a LOT easier to navigate than Amazon's. I hate Microsoft as much as the next guy who ran Linux on the desktop for 19 years, but they've leapt past Amazon on this piece. (I'm not even saying it's GOOD, just a lot better.)