skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There were no secrets here. This was work, which was publicly published and promoted, which a third party then tried to not only plagiarize but also to lock others out of using.

I'm from a scientific background. Plaigarism is the most serious allegation you can level against someone. This is a whole 'nother level.
I'm a little confused. Does the "layers" concept mean the data which is stored in the core can be accessed in any valid manner that the layers allow? Or stated differently: if I've got a dumpster fire of data in a MongoDB that should have been in an RDBMS but moving to SQL would be too risky/slow would this allow me to schlep my Mongo data to FoundationDB and have the app continue to use the Mongo access methods while I start switching APIs over to querying by SQL in batches instead of One Big Volatile Move?
My insurance company helpfully offers a service where you can video chat with a doctor or nurse for minor ailments.

Then they charge you the full rate as if you had gone into the clinic.
Everyone who knows about security already accepts that everything either already is hacked or will be hacked eventually and no one can stop it. There's a famous quote and I'm not sure if it's originally from former FBI Director Robert Mueller [1] or former Cisco CEO John Chambers [2]:

"There are two types of companies: those that have been hacked, and those who don't know they have been hacked."

[1] https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/speeches/combating-th...

[2] https://www.networkworld.com/article/2952184/cisco-subnet/jo...
This would be great, especially if it made it easy to find specific examples of how to do certain things. When I am trying to figure out how to do something I usually find several examples that are decently close of the core idea, then look at the documentation. It helps understand the documentation better, so if I could search for a list of examples, it would be invaluable.

Somewhat related, I put in "std::string" under cpp and it didn't return anything, but "string" returned plenty of instances that included "std::string". Being able to use namespaces would help in finding obscure functions with a name that is common, but has a specific module name to make it unique.

Any and all improvements in context awareness would be nice too, but probably more difficult than they would be worth for any short term implementation.
Facebook has had major ethical issues every step of the way and Mark himself has made some serious mistakes over the last year or two. Plus, arguably the most innovative part of Facebook was the go-to-market strategy.
stuff like this makes me so damn angry. It so scummy and is completely against the spirit of innovation and sharing.
I think it's also more space efficient when dealing with foreign languages primarily. I agree that UTF-8 is the better default, but that's one of the most compelling arguments in favor of it (aside from it being the default on Windows).
I don't see a problem if you're presenting them with more information, but not an expert opinion. Guiding them towards an answer is still very helpful.
I do not envy their ops team.
What is the mailing list for?

I mean no offense, but it may be time to join the 21 century and use a tool like FB groups or Google groups.

Best of luck!
That would be a good reason to quit using Google services altogether.
mi gringo. i accepted this fact a few years ago hah. If your sh aint hacked already, you better believe our Googlie Amazonian Apple overlords are listening to every word we say, logging every keystroke in browser etc. Have our overlords hacked our own life to steal personal data? Kind of seems like it. Oh well we are just one drop in bucket of millions of hacked americans. I'll just keep going with the flow, loading up my retirement funds and hoping the world dont crash in the next 70 years so i can see my family grow, retire, and spend time with the wifer
Best Practices for Large-Scale Deployments
Creating an extremely tiny, 17 KB style transfer model with just 11,868 weights
"You get what you incentivize..."
Bewatec is looking for Go developers for new Hub in Berlin
You could say the same thing about any form of property.
Your comment aligns closely with this excellent dystopian Alexa/Google Home parody: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfqM63CAC8g

The video portrays a future advanced home speaker which terrorizes its family through ads, AI, and "helpfulness" through data mining and the occasional benign hacking of remote systems.
the problem is it isnt just the table element, it is the thead,tbody,td,th elements as well

Complex interactive tables need a great number of elements to make them run and these wont conform to the standards of using a table (you cant just put a div inside a tbody element) but that is exactly what you would need to to to get a table with a virtual DOM to work correctly.

There are a lot of different styling tweaks that would need to be overriden for each element, some of which arnt consistent across each browser.

Also people have a tendency to put styles on the generic table tab to style tables across the site. if Tabulator was to then be used on the page, it could have any number of unknown CSS properties set on it, so would essentially have to look at overriding all possible style properties.

where as no one generically styles divs or spans and they come with very little built in styling making them the ideal choice for a library that wants to keeps its functionality isolated from the rest of the site
> She has an impressive resume.

Does she? Or does she just have an impressive patent portfolio cribbed from others' work?

Or, in fairness, did this not happen as told because there's another side to the story?
The resulting discussion here makes this post worth it. Such a fascinating and insightful thread!
Apparently not safe for work
Strip joints with dogs?
Cursory reminder that using Waterfox is very risky[1] because it takes a huge amount of labor (more than Waterfox has) to secure a browser and because forks tend to be behind the latest patches.

1. https://www.howtogeek.com/335712/update-why-you-shouldnt-use...
At the end of the day you’re benchmarking a strategy. It doesn’t matter that Linux is the underlying thing executing that strategy. All of these tools have branding and marketing around them... It’s important to see which ones live up to claims.
Loading images on the web
I think the Satanists actually have this mindset. Seems like I'm frequently seeing headlines about them doing good works and stuff.
If you do have a denormalized "this is a current name" column, sure, go ahead. But the example is right above you: you might need to match not just on a current name, but on historical names as well. People change their names a lot.
is that what a parallel machine economy in the context of IoT implies? i recall an year ago or so a looooong thread of IOTA bashing circle jerk here:) which did make sense at the time, of course & was packed with valuable information and references.

but an year has gone by since. and a lot of other things have come to light... would love to hear any non-plebbit "bitcoin maximalist" (or even "cryptocurrency") input/commentary (which is why i thought of sharing this here, i guess).
That’s another topic, and they are. We’re talking about an executive of a public company and the NYT isn’t the only one pointing out the problems, which are real.
Examples?

IBM is an extreme version of this, and once you’ve outsourced all your R&D, are you really still a tech company?
Here we have an example of how all the deconstruction of society is resulting in ever cascading and mushrooming abstraction and complexity.

Ok, so let's assume it is valuable to have caused and produced the majority of those "falsehoods" that were largely the result of only the last couple decades, outside of regional/language complexities. Why stop there though?

Why is it not a "falsehood" that names must be written in text?

Where is the support for names that are only phonetic?

Where is the support for names that change every n microseconds?

Where is the support for names that are only images?

Where is the support for hames that are mathematical equations?

Where is the support for names that are JS injections?

Where is the support for names that are graphed in a dot plot?

Are you discriminating against those who graph in bars, you bigot?

Of course you would not want to prove you are a Nasi for discriminating against those who's name is expressed in video and only in 5k form that rotates between 50,000 clips every 5 minutes, would you? Where is your support for that?

... and the list of deranged deconstruction and destruction can continue ad infinitum.

Of course that is all ridiculous in a somewhat exaggerated manner, but I can assure you that the vast majority of the subject "falsehoods" we are being lectured about would have been equally as ridiculous in a far more efficient and effective and cohesive time just a few years ago.

Wait, where is your support for that symbol that The Artist Formerly Known as Prince used? Darn, is "The Artist Formerly Known as Prince" title capitalized or just regular capitalized or at all???

BTW, if I were more offended, I would protest that my name ... that is written in neolithic stone age hieroglyphics ... is not supported and would call everyone that does not know how to pronounce my name a bigot.

Is this satire, or humor, or am I serious? We have lost out collective ability to tell as we descended into madness.
I would agree with this sentiment, however, there are a number of things that you can to to make the job of the attacker harder, or to notice internally when there is inappropriate usage. Service abstractions to encrypt/decrypt the data will limit the surface area where you might store keys. Logging usage to know what operations were made. Also, you can use a system like vault such that the keys are not extractable to do all the crypto operations offline thus massively increasing the chances you would detect such a breach / unauthorized access.
It really depends on the person. I've had interns come work for me who were in the middle of their CS master's program, but unable to write complete software. How we've gotten to the point where you can actually earn a bachelor's with just theory and math and no coding is beyond me.

Conversely, the best developer I know is self-taught.

All I'd ask from a new grad (other than coding) is to keep in mind that experience teaches you more about what NOT to do, and keep your ego under control. I can hire coders right out of high school if that's all I want, engineers take a little bit of seasoning to be valuable ;-)
But what about data science?

/s
N-Track Studio 9.0.2 Build 3566 Crack and Apk Unlock Mac and Windows
You can use qemu to run macOS. It's probably agaist ToS, but it works. But it's best to just ignore Apple if you can. It's their problem anyway, if they want to discourage cross-platform developers that don't own or have interest in their HW.
70 years? Are you 10 years old?
The other obvious example is changing names when you get married.
Bewatec is looking for react/react native developers for new Hub in Berlin
The fact that a $16.4B endowment exists doesn't mean that any of it is available to fight a pissing match with Google (whose market cap is still ~45-50x MIT's endowment) - in my experience at a similar institution, I was told "we have $X in endowments, but all of it is essentially already spent" - it had been earmarked for various projects 5+ years in advance.
> AmpMe app can sync audio across multiple phones. (I was also really surprised to find out that they're a pretty huge company with 20 full time employees.)

The owner is a sketchy guy that made his money using adware (and still is) named Wajam.

I guess AmpMe is what he hope will be his legit way to make money. Until it happens, it's probably bleeding money and is founded by his adware company.
Re: "my code is messy", if it's code you're willing to share, I wouldn't hold messiness -- either in the "it's not properly formatted and all the variables are i, ii, iii, ijk, ..." or in the "I realized the overall structure was wrong and it needs a major refactoring" sense -- to be a barrier to sharing.

Most of the problems with sharing messy code are purely in the author's head ("please don't let other people know how terrible my code is") and once you actually bite the bullet and just push the code, it turns out to be like most secrets, really stressful to keep secret and actually not that big of a deal once everyone hears it.

And for the real code problems, the broken corner cases and unfinished tests, well, if you put it on Github someone else might fix it for you :-)
Nothing stopping that, and they do that to some degree (I get emails from Vanguard once a quarter or so asking me to submit my proxy votes). But realistically, through my Vanguard funds I own very small pieces of thousands of companies around the world. It is in no way worth my time to try to make an informed decision on the shareholder votes for all of those.
More exploration off the beaten path and sharing with the outside world just like in this example
That's hilarious. 3 months is far too short of a time to actually invent anything meaningful and get far enough along with it to determine whether it would actually be worth patenting.
Remember when Equifax set up a "have I been hacked" site and that site was then immediately hacked?
A name, or a person? The first one is a bit easier; person:name is, at the easiest, 1:n. But yeah, a name can have multiple representations, even before multiple languages come in (Peter/Cephas/Petros).

(Pedantry: Jean-Claude van Damme doesn't fit into the alphanumeric requirement on two separate counts)
I think this is almost true. It would be true if index funds held all the stock. But since they don't and managed funds still exist, the stock price will go down when managed funds decide to sell. When the stock price goes down, the shares become a lower fraction of the index, so the index funds will also sell some.

I think the main point is that index funds still rely on traditional market players to effectively allocate risk. And as index funds take up more of the market, they become less able to do that. Right?
>A lot of tropical places are both hotter and more humid than this limit

Where? As far as I can tell, the highest wet-bulb temperatures are around the Persian Gulf, and although they sometimes come close to the human survival limit, they do not yet exceed it.

https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/12/22/humidity-may-prove-...
I think that often people judge programming languages, or frameworks, based on how it would work for them when working on a medium sized one man project.

I believe the designers of Go are onto something.

It's not just the code, but how the code will evolve over time, after a few years of having dozens or perhaps hundreds of programmers modifying it.[1]

In a large shared code base the following dynamic plays out.

* A programmer is assigned to fix a bug, or add a feature.

* His reward for that task is limited to whether he succeeded in achieving that task.

* Even if he is rewarded for improving the codebase overall (refactoring), this introduces much more risk than simply making his changes and getting out.

Basically, everyone wants to get in, make their change, and get out. Now iterate this a few thousand times.

Really it's just the tragedy of the commons, and codebases rot because of it.

The problem is magnified if the language encourages lots of complicated abstractions and meta-programming, because abstractions are difficult to evolve incrementally.[2]

Honestly, I just see Go as a reaction against C++ in this regard.

I still believe however, that the Go team went too far in leaving out features, especially in the areas of generics and error handling. I mean both create more code, so what if it's simple code?

Then the problem becomes that you just have more lines of code to maintain and test.

[1] And for twenty years I was a freelance consultant brought in to untangle big pile of mud codebases for projects in crisis.

[2] See the concepts of assimilation vs. accommodation in psychology. Once your abstractions need to accommodate an inconvenient new fact, then it takes a lot of disruptive effort to fix the problem.
Windows10 did a good job right now from what i've seen, but the first time i went back on windows after a year of code on linux/mac with a friend high on tuning your tools and workstations to your needs, it never really felt "good". Granted, i had to use netbeans and this was on 7 (or 8), but when you're used to the tools and you understand the system (not system as in OS, but how everything work, where to look if you have issues etc), it's really hard to switch.

On the other hand, those 6 month using windows made me really respect windows sysadmins.
Stephen Wolfram explains neural nets
Yeah I used to go often - but it's more that afterwards I thought their diagnosis was wrong.

It is actually not as bad anymore now that I am older, somehow :)
The docs are so light on details. The example code is weak. The website doesn’t share any examples on how this is used.
I'm currently developing a browser extension, and was a bit shocked that I couldn't just load it on Firefox like on Chromium. It seems like such a basic thing, maybe that's because I'm a dev and expect that they will cater to development, but it was one of the first usability things where I preferred Chrome. I ditched iPhone for Android for similar reasons, and it seems that one thing Google does really well is make the developer workflow easy.
In some cultures a signature is somewhat like a signat-ring, a written emblem not necessarily related to alphabetic sequences. An 'X' for instance, signed on a contract by an illiterate and countersigned by a witness (well that was alphabetic but you get the idea). I knew a fellow from Bangalore who's signature was a graphic, some symbol written above a line and some letters below the line.
I had a similarly simple experience.

Someone had fraudulently purchased a 23andMe kit on my card (weird, right?) and I only caught it because my account was abnormally low (~250 CAD). I phoned the bank right away and they cancelled the card number, put my account on watch, reversed the charges and I was able to go into the bank and get a new card on the spot. (VISA Debit, not a CC)
Nature.com and really, really a clickbaity title :/
Cool ours syncs audio on any IP device..desktop, laptop, tablets, phones, IOT devices, whatever
So long as the pool is large enough that doesn't matter. Index funds just need the price to be close to reasonable to work out. When the price is not reasonable index funds do well. In general active investors work to push the price to reasonable levels.

Of course there is such a thing as price manipulation which active investors can try - if there are only a few and they work together this can work out. However the investors have incentive to cheat when working together as the cheater wins against his peers, thus this currently is confined to "penny stocks" (for example the company behind the stock doesn't exist anymore but they didn't properly delist their stock so technically it can be traded - you can buy such stocks for say a penny each and then hype them to suckers as the next big thing and sell for 10 cents each and make a killing - since the company doesn't exist no one else pays attention and the scam works.)
This reminds me of an episode of the '90s sitcom Frasier. In S05E24, "Sweet Dreams", Frasier (a psychiatrist who has a call-in counseling radio show) gets fired after refusing to voice a radio ad for a tea that guarantees happy dreams as it veers too closely towards medical advice.

That's TV though, and Frasier was written as a character with high professional integrity. Real life isn't so cut and dry. Some Doctors already have a shady relationship with pharma companies.

Given everything we know about how FB makes it easy to advertise to targeted populations (in this case, desperate people and the extremely naive), I can see this becoming a problem 5 years down the line when these students have completed residencies and are full-fledged doctors.
Seems like it. Bank vaults are difficult to get into, sure. But they're especially difficult to get into without being detected. Go ahead and force your way in if you want to. You most likely won't have long to enjoy it since you've been witnessed in person, by security cameras, and are now carrying marked bills.

Perhaps in the digital world as well, intrusion detection is more valuable than intrusion prevention?
How do these financial institutions vote their shares?
Is PG’s Tweet on Darwin or Marc Lamont Hill?
How does it works ?
Not quite. The signature is to ensure users install from the addon store. You can disable this if you wish to run non-store addons. Otherwise any website or external program (remember your A/V installing their safety toolbar?) could start adding fishy code to your browser.
I think all the photos are beautiful in this article. There's a sense of peaceful harshness in that type of climate.
As a result of many real world experiences I've started to see ridiculously impressive looking resumes as a contrarian indicator.

When I see a resume that cites multiple company foundings, dozens of patents, dozens of projects, etc. I know the person is either stealing or taking credit for others work or just padding their resume in the more conventional sense. It says this person is a liar, exaggerator, narcissist, or sociopath.

It's simply not physically possible for a human being to do the amount of stuff I see on some resumes/CVs. There are not enough hours in a day to actually invent (as in actually conceptualize, research, and prove) a hundred things in 20 years or found (as in actually shepherd to success) dozens of companies. Founding one successful company takes several years and a ridiculous amount of work. Founding two or three in a life time is possible but off the charts impressive and the number of people who can realistically claim this are few. Dozens? Physically impossible, but I've seen such things claimed... by people whom I later saw were total liars and sociopaths.

Edit: it's different if they accurately claim to have managed people who have done these things, like "managed a research organization with over 200 patents and 1000 publications" or "founded company X and also contributed as an advisor to companies Y and Z" etc. It's also important to note authorship positions in long lists of publications since some science teams add everyone who ever touched a project as an author. Being listed on a bunch of publications with 15 authors is not a contrarian indicator, but claiming to be a primary researcher on absurd numbers of things can be.
I thought the same thing. I like the typography and layout of the site overall, but they should consider changing the color of the link underline.
> Mozilla's aim is (likely) the same.

Nothing prevents me from compiling my own binaries and running them on my Mac.

But the issue here (AFAICT) is that Mozilla won't even let you sideload your own stuff on your browser. This is horribly broken.
People who don't understand surrogate pairs and think that UTF-16 == UCS-2 tend to argue that UTF-16 is better because (in their minds) it's a fixed-sized character encoding (it's not).

Even UTF-32 is not a fixed-sized character encoding!! It's a fixed-sized codepoint encoding. Characters can be composed of more than one codepoint. Even if you think "hey, I'll use pre-composed codepoints", you'll fail because not every legitimate, canonically decomposed character has a single-codepoint pre-composition.

The disadvantages to UTF-16 far outweigh its one advantage (the one you mentioned).

(There is one more advantage to UTF-16, and it's that Win32 uses it all over the place. But that's not much of an advantage, and Windows does seem to be making progress towards putting UTF-8 on an equal footing (if not better).)
It is indeed unfortunate, although in general the internet will still have lowered the barrier to publish.
You could just allow them to draw/upload an image.