skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most apps are 90% table views, buttons, lists, images, nav controller transitions or modal slideups. Since Ionic gets all of these pretty much right, every Ionic app that makes heavy use of these components will look like a native app.

I won’t post my app here, since this leads to opinionated discussions that serve no purpose. You will always find something that looks off (but you can find off-looking things also in pure native apps).

So to turn the question back to you: what bothers you and what makes it hard to have native-looking apps?
Lavish Expense Accounts Can Make or Break a CEO
I would feel "put on the spot" if asked to tell you about myself. It's a good opening line for an interview but for general conversation...
In my resume writing business, I get a ton of kids who've taken their cues from the student books put together by university career centers. Everything possible is jammed onto one page in as small a type as can be minimally read. Real disservice to the applicant.
> That use of the word liberal is quite obsolete.

No it isn't, and in the era of social justice warriors, it's relevance is on the rise.
Relevant xkcd, https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/

> Let's imagine what it would look like if you were speed-walking across the Earth's surface at 8 km/s.

> To get a better sense of the pace at which you're traveling, let's use the beat of a song to mark the passage of time.[9] suppose you started playing the 1988 song by The Proclaimers, I'm Gonna Be (500 Miles). That song is about 131.9 beats per minute, so imagine that with every beat of the song, you move forward more than two miles.

> In the time it took to sing the first line of the chorus, you could walk from the Statue of Liberty all the way to the Bronx.
In C, always use 0 and check for 0, it's the only safe way. For C++, it depends on the standard you're using.
How is it the future of energy? As the article later states, "All the social and environmental issues associated with fossil fuels apply to gas hydrates ". It's later awkwardly explained as a transitional energy source, sure methane is more short lived but do we really want to gamble with the possible tippings that we have set ourselves up for?
Actually motorcycle are popular in India. Most people use motorcycles in India. It wosen the traffic as bikes can cut between cars.
If you go to isstracker.com/historical and search for the time 2018-11-16 18:25:44+0000 you'll see the ISS right above this area. Pretty interesting.
What's insulting about saying someone from a middle class background (presumably in the United States) is "not as familiar with the depths of extreme poverty or working class families as I am."

To me, this sounds like a shared opinion based on personal experience.
PSA: one man's pedantry is another man's pro-tip.
There's also "repo" from Google. And many other tools.

Git is not a panacea for bad design. If you have interdependent repositories (I read that the same as a cyclical dependency, A needs B needs A), then you should fix that first. I mean, if you have the described setup, you will have other problems too...
And I see no problem with that. Why would being liberal mean to support extreme leftist regulatory policy here? Why would we consider, letting those government officials, who may not have the expertise understanding the subject at hand, in this case technology, dictate how business should run and put harness on it, as part of the package of being liberal?
Even then that salary is nothing to sneeze at for a head of state. I believe Angela Merkel makes ~300k EUR in salary.
To be fair, the parent comment is slightly misleading. I don't know the exact story of MSCHAPv2 but note that it is an informational RFC published by the pppext WG: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2759

For an RFC to be published by a WG, it must first be "adopted" by the group, which means a first draft is submitted by the author, and then debatted (sometimes lightly) until the group agrees that it fits the topic and is suitable for adoption. Similarly, once the RFC is adopted, it goes through a series of calls by the WG chair where people have opportunities to comment, until it is finally published. Informational RFCs have lighter requirements than standard tracks one, so they are easier to get published, but they still get some amount of review and comments before publication.

It took 14 months and 4 drafts for MSCHAPv2 to get published: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc2759/

In fact, even "independent submissions" with "experimental" status (that do not go through a WG at all, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026#section-4.2.1) get reviewed before publication. The reviews in that case are private, but a RFC editor is responsible for sanity-checking the document and sometimes requests additional input from reviewers specialized in the domain area covered by the draft.

[Edit: the actual WG for MSCHAPv2 was https://tools.ietf.org/wg/pppext/, not "Networking" which is just the generic name on top of the RFC]
I agree with what you're saying about the tone of fzeroracer's comment, but as someone who comes from extreme poverty, there's a lot of truth there. There's a lot to poverty that can't be explained in a tweet storm or a TED talk, and a lot of what I know to be very real causes of poverty are often dismissed as political narratives.
We are all on the same planet and we'll all suffer as temperatures rise.

Let's agree that a carbon tax should be revenue neutral (via a dividend), and not fund either a progressive or conservative agenda. The purpose of the tax is to internalize CO2 externalities. Other issues can be hashed out on their merits.
And this is meaningful only in the context of a lazy language.

In the context of strict, statically typed language an algebraic Option type is good-enough.
Automatically minifying .cshtml files in .NET Core
The content of the files isn't showing up (Safari), and I suspect it's to do with a series of errors like:

> Blocked a frame with origin "https://www.centennialsoftwaresolutions.com" from accessing a frame with origin "https://social-blog.wix.com". The frame requesting access set "document.domain" to "centennialsoftwaresolutions.com", but the frame being accessed did not. Both must set "document.domain" to the same value to allow access.
arrest them. simple. discharging a firearm at people.
distributed ledger, replacement of intermediaries
"Symmetry" is reflective not rotational. Currency exchange is a map not a graph.

"we" is "i".

if physics is simpler than economics than using economics as a metaphor for physics is the exact fucking opposite of useful.

There is no cited proof that "An extra dimension is not a necessary assumption, only the symmetry is."

The Maxwell equations bare no resemblance to exchange rates.

It turns out
that the mass of the particle is related to the energy cost to excite a very long wavelength
wave. This is related to the famous formula
E
=
mc
2
. Unfortunately I have not found a
short way to explain this, so you will have to trust me on this. In our economic analogy
we have not talked about energy. Let us simply say that the energy increases as the gain
available to speculators increases. This makes intuitive sense, the more the speculators can
earn, the harder it is for the banks!

Okay I admit this analogy makes no sense but lets keep going...?

3.1 Apologizing for one oversimplification

ONE?!
Yes I saw that not long after our discussion. Definitely interesting stuff and I agree, marvelously presented.
I agree, but the 3rd world countries would save a fortune if they paid their top leader $1Million a year and $100K to ministers provided they don't steal.

Road costs $1.2 Billion? $200 MILLION to me, make the road a little narrower and pour x cm less asphalt. Buying and selling electricity? 20% to the leader. They are shameless and they know how to keep power, they let those downstream wet their beak too.

But ultimately they know that they have to have clean cash. I make $600K and spend just $50k a year so $550K is invested year after year. No matter what, I can keep the $xx that derived from that. The stolen money is in secret accounts, companies, in other people's names etc. Not always easy to get a hold or keep the state away.
The US has a much larger loading gauge than most of Europe and especially the UK. "AAR Plate H" allows railroad cars up to 20 feet 3 inches, which permits double-stack container trains. Most UK track can now handle one-high container trains, and that took upgrades. That's what allows those huge passenger cars.
Puerto Rico is attractive to US traders because if you live there for six months out of the year you pay zero capital gains tax. On the other hand programmers still have to pay income tax so are more likely to seek inexpensive tourist destinations.
Since when does the whole thing hang on the reputation of Al Gore? What a ridiculous argument, unworthy of HN.
> Not sure what you found negative about my view.

Cool reading your other comments too I realise I’m getting trolled at this point so I’ll finish up here.
It will take a really long time before any off-planet colony could be self-sustaining. Just think about how long the supply chains for even the simplest things needed for repairs are. Until then Earth is either fucked due to climate change or we have a local solution to the problem.
I agree they’ve made savvy acquisitions, mostly in stock, which boosted their perceived value. Facebook are really vulnerable - they rely on trust from advertisers and clients, and have one stream of income - advertising. This will be very vulnerable in a downturn (which incidentally is what destroyed yahoo).

Say what you will about the ethics of the company but

Thanks. They have always been entirely lacking in ethics, from they trust me, to zynga, to fake ad metrics, to illegal Russian ads, to Soros smears. This makes it hard for anyone to trust them.
A carbon tax is the most market-friendly approach on the table, so is de facto the free market solution, short of "do nothing."
Interesting. I can't imagine that working at a dinner conversation. Starting with neutral guaranteed points of commonality are likely to be more successful in my experience (in observation and in practice).

The neutral small-talk intros (travel-to-venue, number-of-people, weather) segueing rapidly to how-you-know-host, and then on to learning about the person without asking them to come up with a narrative usually does well in that setting.

The key is to induce load on your conversational partner at the level that they are willing to accept and not to put a disproportionate load on them. "Tell me about yourself" is high load IMHO. They need to figure out what aspect of themselves they wish to represent.

Then again, perhaps I inhabit different social circles from that of a top-flight radio host and things are different there.

In an interview, I like "tell me about yourself" as a starter but not with passive listening for the most part.
It was said in a different direction. People who hold political opinion X must be from this background because they don’t understand the issue like I do.

I’m from a working class background and arrived at a different conclusion in my own experience. But I get lumped in with people raised upper middle class just because I couldn’t possibly have such opinions. Granted, this is why I try not to be defensive about it: who I am doesn’t really matter (nor should it for anyone else) when we’re discussing ideas.
i found the shinkansen to be smooth and blissful. (sorry can't remember which one. from tokyo to somewhere to ski)
I guess you are referencing Nazi?

Without going into a history lesson, let me just point out that China fought against Germany in both WW1 and WW2. So our parents and grandparents do have some ideas of experiments and consequences.
Funny video. Bitcoin and Gold
The people I talked to didn't say it wasn't unique and wasn't its own cuisine.
What?

That doesn't make sense.

Not all countries need to do it. Just most.

In in actual fact, the sooner leader countries like the USA do it the sooner other countries get their act together.

Don't act like this is all or nothing. It's not.

Furthermore, the sooner the USA does it the sooner technologies improve, the sooner other smaller countries are suddenly enabled by said technologies.

That aside whole "we all need to do it" is utter nonsense. No, you don't. Other countries taking advantage of you is still not a socially moral excuse. Mind yourself first thanks.
(trying to) publish in CS conferences isn't as painful as in other disciplines, but without help from someone with an academic background, it's likely your work will not receive much attention, as you might lack paper-writing skills / knowledge of prior work.

If you can't find a local professor whom you can trust and who is willing to help (which you should try first), you might want to ask on r/MachineLearning. Many users there are grad students / researchers working in ML/AI, and I've seen someone in a similar situation (asking for endorsement to submit on arXiv) received help.
I wonder if those who participated would give the same responses on Twitter as they gave in private emails. In all communities (liberal or conservative), there's a strong pressure to conform.
The Crash and Burn of D&G in China
Please reread the guidelines. Intentional obtuseness is not conducive to healthy discussion.
It's a community of millions of visitors and countless thousands of commenters a month. It's free for anyone to join and comment.

Topics like this will always attract comments from people with strongly held positions from all perspectives. In my observation they generally balance each other out. If they didn't, the site couldn't really survive, as thoughtful people who value interesting discussions wouldn't stick around.

People who claim that there's a strong bias towards a particular point of view are likely subject to the hostile media effect [1].

Anyone can succumb to this, as it's natural for us to pay more attention to positions that we find threatening than to those we find benign.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_media_effect
> The only point of a Monad is that in a lazy language it desugars into an implicit nested functions, which guarantees the order of evaluation.

That is not true at all. You seem to confuse side-effect-free with lazy and the state monad with any monad. Monad instances like options or either data types allow for the simple composition of functions that yield them. In any language. Promises form a useful monad because there is no other way to talk about values that have not been evaluated yet.
Article is about German university. You can't assume it is the same as American experience.

My university was not about broadening anything either and peer group was way more homogenous then high school or extracurricular clubs.
There is a lot of variance in $15/hr offshore developers. For example, you can buy a shirt for $10 in various places in the world, some of them will be total crap and some of them will be exquisitely tailored. The selection becomes the challenge and just because someone failed doesn’t mean someone else did.
'Tell me about yourself' is trying way too hard and comes of as calculated.
IIUC, the stream identifier is not a persistent client identifier but more similar to a TCP connection.

So yes, as opposed to TCP, it will be able to work with changing IP addresses, but other than that, it's still a relatively short-term identifier. Google et al will still have to use cookies and whatnot to identify users over longer times.
I've been trying the Terry Gross approach at dinner parties, and I can tell you it's usually pretty awkward.

In fairness, I probably shouldn't start every interaction with "So what was it like collaborating with Philip Glass?"
I didn't say treating them badly, but treating them with reciprocity. At this point the GOP is actively committed to making things worse overall. There is no reason to accommodate them, because as an institution they have repeatedly acted in such bad faith that continuing to play along is to be complicit.
I agree with some of the other comments that “tell me about yourself” feels a little too direct and personal.

I prefer something like “so what are you spending your time on these days?” It’s a question that can be answered with something work-related while not making the person feel that they’re defining themselves by their work. It also allows them to talk about their hobbies (or things like video games or Netflix) if they so choose.
I'd like to see the GOP go out of existence as an institution and its major power brokers neutralized. I'm not interested in what they do with their lives once their power is broken.
Corporations have proven these past hundreds of years that they are completely unwilling to act in a way that is remotely moral or beneficial for the greater good. And yet people continue to go “no we should let them poison the earth for their profit! We should allow them to underpay people and let society pick up the difference! We should allow them to pay politicians to make rules that benefit them! Because rules are bad!”. It’s baffling.
This is just a question of labels. Maybe having just two parties is what creates the habit of dividing all the political ideas in two camps. But that's absurdly reductionist.

The social-democracy has wandered worldwide from its economical foundation to another set of causes: ecologism, feminism and identity politics. In the USA the democrats are holding, but in Europe most socialist parties are having a bad time.

Now Hillary (news that have been downvoted here to death) says that maybe inmigration should be curbed to avoid the raising of populism.
I didnt get it, what’s the point? The LEGO shouldn’t not be an issue even for toddler to pass. Assuming, it is not LEGO Duplo head.
I think starting with a compliment or a conversation about anything related with your current location, would work better. Then, take it from there
I agree.

I have known people who would not move to the next chapter in a book unless they understood the one they are reading in its entirety. I have pointed out the inherent impossibility of such an endeavor. They do not listen. I think this obsession with tech stack or architecture is related to this.

I am extremely passionate about a lot of subjects. However, I am not passionate about "technology X or Y". Technologies and programming languages are just tools for me. I like some more than the others, but they are just tools. It is like saying that I have a great novel in my mind, but I cannot write it down unless I have the "Pen A" or "typewriter X". Also, I will not write the next page down unless I get the current page 100% right. Never gonna happen.

Heck, when I began learning C# a few years ago and people would question me "where do structs in C# live? on the stack or in the heap?" I would get mightily pissed off. How was I supposed to know the internals of a closed-source (erstwhile?) language\framework? What if they change the internals tomorrow? Would this "knowledge" be of any use?

I have ideas. I need tools. I need results. The universe is all about entropy. The internals are constantly changing. However, as a giant mechanism it is always working, always producing results.
Maybe is an algebraic Option type. It just happens to implement an interface that abstracts away the if(None) checks that you would be doing anyway. Lazyness has nothing to do with it.
You have it backwards. Liberal economics means fewer regulations, less federal planning, etc. In their more "socialist" phases, China and India had the government in control of a lot of manufacturing, trade, etc. After their economies were liberalized, private companies had a greater say in their own affairs (they got "liberated"). In India, the government started selling off its factories to private owners under a liberal economic regime.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_liberalism
Write clean, simple code. Don’t over-engineer. Use version control. Document design decisions, dependencies that aren’t obvious, and installation/build instructions, and keep those current. Did I mention USE VERSION CONTROL?

My freelance business is taking over legacy software when the original developers quit, get fired, stop answering emails.
http://wondermark.com/1k62/

If you have better answers for skeptics, which is your responsibility

No it isn't. Climate change 'skeptics' have such a long record of bad-faith participation that I no longer consider them worthy of response.
If demand dropped, initially supply would drop offline as prices could no longer support the more difficult wells rather quickly. And as actual production falls, the amount charged that the market could bear (if the market was mostly the non-fuel, high-value uses) could be significantly higher than what we see today. A scary time to be an investor in an oil company, absolutely. But taken in the broad view, leaving oil for later will almost certainly enhance total future potential profits, if not the rate of profit per unit time.
“Should” doesn’t matter. If I can use my vote to prevent my job from going to a more talented and more desperate person in Cameroon I’m going to do so, right vs. wrong be damned.
I don't think there is much dispute that developers tend to come from upper middle class families, which is exactly what the parent said.

He didn't say they must come from there.
The word libertarian has been wrongfully stolen by capitalist, yes. Same with a term like anarcho-capitalism, which has nothing to do with anarchism, an ideology which is always staunchly anti-capitalist.
Yea i agree with others here. In my experience people dont do well with vague questions esp with strangers. If you were asked that you may feel intruded upon or surprised / not sure how to answer the question. Same reason this question causes so much stress for interviewees - how do you select the best points, in the right conciseness? You are wondering what the other person is interested in, and you dont know shit about them. This situation is even compounded because it’s unlikely you expect this question and you know even less about the person.
SMIs Are EEEEVIL (Part 1)
How the CosmosDB Bulk Executor works under the hood
"wealth is created literally from nothing."

Most of the real wealth I see being created has ultimately come from the exploitation of natural resources. Far from being 'nothing', most of these limited resources (which in another theory belong to all life on Earth) require underpaid 'human resources' to turn them into the highly-profitable 'nothing' of which you speak.

Much of which winds up in the garbage. (E.g., here in the U.S. we build housing to last for maybe two generations.) If anything, much real wealth comes from turning valuable resources into nothing.
SMIs are Eeeevil (2005)
Shouldn't it be quite clear to us right now that this theoretical assumption never worked because we have limited resources on this planet?
This is affecting me on Chrome for Android as well. Symptoms at least; I can't confirm the exact errors.
Improving acceleration by using electric trains is significant appeal in Europe on lines still using diesel.

Making the whole train lighter should be similar, but I don't have any numbers.
> One of the core tenets of capitalism (well, in theory) is that wealth is created literally from nothing.

Yeah, and that theory is nonsense
> The point about vegetarianism is that eating meat is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO inefficient that climate change won't be solved until we ALL stop eating meat (or at least the majority of the planet).

Any source to back the claim that climate change cannot be stopped unless we convert to vegetarianism?
It looks very similar to the free and open-source BookStack platform.

https://www.bookstackapp.com/
Well for the mainstream VMs: Hotswap on the JVM is very limited, likewise with edit and continue on the CLR. Xamarin has live XAML updates, only for markup though. V8 is better at hot reloading, but then suffers on the performance front, since it's basically impossible to do efficient AOT for it.

So which languages/platforms do you mean?