skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How is it related to this post not from 2 days ago:

Show HN: Tweet encrypted messages
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18517991

?
It's an algorithm for allocating groups, not necessarily one that specifically targets families. Splitting up families might be just a sideeffect.
[Citation needed] because as near as I can find that's really not on the table.

Remember temperature is very nonlinear, eventually adding atmospheric methane has a reduced effect as their is enough of it to block the spectra and adding more does little.
That assumes the stripped content is important in some way.

How about when the extra scenes are literally useless to the point of the content and are just "wedged in" as fanservice to increase viewership, in a way where the content is better off without them? This describes nearly every sex scene in a Hollywood movie that I can remember.

Though also, separately: I'm an adult, but I'm imagining going home for the holidays to my parents, sitting around at night, picking some movie to watch on Netflix, and it ends up having a sex scene in it. I don't want that to happen! It's not a matter of maturity—I just don't want to share the experience of watching a sex scene with my parents. I'd rather be able to tell Netflix/the streaming box/the TV, to skip those scenes.
Why your mental map of the world is wrong
There’s a broader story about poor regulation in the medical implant industry as a whole. [1]

Unlike drugs, implants don’t need to go through clinical trials in most cases.

Furthermore, there is no central registry for aggregating problems that patients experience with particular devices.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/nov/25/revealed-fau...

Edit: Summarized main problems from The Guardian article.
Drivers have no problem avoiding other cars, which move much more quickly, are much less manoeuvreable, and have longer stopping distances. Strikes me that avoiding people on foot ought to be pretty simple.
iStat Menus 6 Crack for MacOS Full Version Latest
Yes! I looked at a bunch graph visualization libraries in the past. Cytoscape did not impressed me. Anvaka's ngraph and VivaGraphJS seemed pretty closer to what I wanted.
I use Outlook all the time. Format the text with Courier New to have fixed width.
A few months ago I built a Chrome extension that replaces the new tab page with an anki window, in an attempt to improve my browsing habits and it seems people overall are finding it useful so far,

You can find the source code and links to the web store listings in https://github.com/corollari/ankiTab
Yoga/meditation can get you all the way there. It takes time though. Along the way there are many benefits.
Not sure you can use paypal to put money in an account and then use a card to withdraw it at cash points and pay for coffee etc. Also I once sent a US friend $500 with paypal and got charged $25. Transferwise would be way cheaper.
You're being downvoted but I agree with you even if it's slightly hypocritical coming from the Trump administration
New York Times Experiments with Link Previews to Help Guide Readers
> When I see one side trying to force others into their belief system by shame, emotional blackmail, violence, character assassination, career destruction etc. I am generally very skeptical of that side's message as propaganda. To be very clear, beyond what I have read, I've personally experienced this at the alter of progressivism and know others who have as well.

Both sides do this, almost equally.

It isn't a progressive vs conservative thing, it is a "someone wants to crush the other side" thing.

Conservative commentators are forced to tow the party line or become outcasts. Progressive commentators, same thing.

If one of Trump's policies works out well, NYT isn't going to run an article about it, nor is Fox news going to give serious consideration to any of his failings.

Both sides will however name and shame anyone who doesn't tow the line.

> Before things got so politically charged I used to enjoy learning about the views from the other side and having those discussions. These days a mono-culture has taken over and we have lost that which I reject.

The problem is both sides are working to stifle free speech. Conservative trolls have no issue ruining the life of anyone who they decides deserves it, and many progressives have no qualms about doing the same!

It is sad that people cannot have even polite public discourse in this nation anymore for free of consequence from their fellow citizens.

Someone a world has been created where we need not fear the government, we need only fear ourselves.
EV is everything
> UK has never had jaywalking laws. Most countries don't... A pedestrian crosses when they feel it is safe to do so, and anywhere along the road they choose. Having started to cross they have priority over traffic.

That's really interesting! I wasn't aware of that.

What happens when a driver hits a pedestrian? Is there an investigation into whether the driver could've stopped in time?
The subheading is:

5919 Default Passwords for thousands of systems from 777 vendors!
It would only be unconditional if you could program it without if/then statements.
Unfortunately for Apple, I do think the App Store being an exclusive and default way to purchase and load apps on iOS is in fact causing prices of Apps, in many cases, to be higher than they should be.

The perfect example of this is the subscription services, right now you can get a cheaper subscription to a service such as Spotify if you buy it off the App Store. That is a prime example of how much the 30% payment to Apple is hurting developers and ultimately consumers... Apple is so upset about this they won’t let developers like Spotify link to buying the subscription on their own website anywhere on the app that is sold through their App Store, if that’s not Monopoly abuse I don’t know what is.

As much as I love Apples products I do feel that they have gotten away with a lot here, especially since there is zero other ways to load apps into iOS devices, in the very least consumers are paying 30% more for apps if there was a competing App Store on iOS that charged less to load apps.

Edit: whether the Supreme Court will see it this way or not is a whole other issue.
You essentially said Steve Yegge had a moral obligation not to be an hypocrite, and therefore to not join Grab the way he did.
The article explicitly says “accusing it of breaking federal antitrust laws by monopolizing the market for iPhone apps“

I’ve never heard of a market being divided up like that legally. But it’s in the Supreme Court so it can’t be completely without legal merit.
my whole post described how cryptocurrencies are the tail end of rampant speculation as it is further out on the risk curve and that there is an irony as this isn't what the monetary policy distortions were intended to do, check yourself.
There was a review performed via pull request. In this case,a small typo was corrected - no further action required.
Being from Europe: Many more tourists from Asia, beginning of touristic boom from Africa. Many Europeans (and Americans) will be priced out from vacations they can enjoy now.
> Even more, it isn't like rakes don't have a horrible sound of their own, as soon as you get a single paved section involved.

I can't hear your rake through my headphones two blocks and three stories up.
Secrets of the Magus (1993 article about Ricky Jay)
I guess the issue is that side loading apps or an alternative App Store is not supported. That and disallowing purchases or rentals on amazon video or kindle apps for iOS.
Go 2 Generics: Contracts are too clever
Two Linux kernels revert performance-killing Spectre patches
I am lol as I changed the profile picture for one country's central bank a long time ago because I was dumbstruck by the offer to "Claim this business" and just had to try it out.

It has been fun watching the edit wars over the hours of the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site. There are times it has been OPEN and times it has been CLOSED and times when it is OPEN for 2 hours on the weekend, presumably for a pickup of household radioactive waste.
They probably like that it is useful to a ton of people. Work on an open steet database - how many people will see and appreciate your work?
I don't really understand how the technique described in the vimeo video makes the visual effect. It would have been nice to see what the camera is actually capturing and how it gets stitched together to form the final effect.
why would it be spam?
Google settled with a contractor after complaints of racial profiling
In stark contrast to Georgia, which has actively made access to its laws harder through copyright enforcement.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/10/appeals-court-tells-ge...
Can you go into some more detail about the scaffolding thing?
Cars don't suddenly become visible unexpectedly unlike pedestrians, so that seems like a strange argument to me--with the notable exception perhaps of right-on-red, which isn't universal for sure (presumably for this very reason). Even then, the moving traffic has the right-of-way there.
You can actually and legitimately sink a robotic fishing boat if it does unlawful fishing.
Also the operators of a computer system should always be held responsible for any errors of that system. Mistakes by the system are your* mistakes. Any decisions made by the system must be explained by you. All costs rectifying those mistakes must be bared by you.

*Obviously "you" means your organization, company, etc. and not necessarily some random office clerk.
Is Ecwid GDPR Compliant?
Similar to ink cartridges for inkjet printers
Interesting! I didn't know that.

Also curious as with the other poster: What happens when a driver hits a pedestrian? Do they do an investigation into whether the driver could've stopped in time/was traveling the speed limit/etc?
The only issue I have with keeping it illegal is that so many people already do it. I don't commute by car but I drive a couple evenings a week through the city, and in every single intersection on my trip (5 miles) I see people jaywalking. I see people do it right in front of cops, and nobody cares.

What is the purpose of a law that few people follow, and which is never enforced? Shouldn't the laws of a republic reflect the will of the citizens?
Don't know how it works there. For traffic court here, NJ, I've always taken matters into my own hands. The last ticket I received was for failing to update my address. I argued to the prosecutor that the law only required me to have an address where I received mail. He only cared that I updated it by the time I made my appearance and quickly dismissed. However, the court cost was actually more than the ticket and I made a point to ask him to waive that as well, which he did.

There are other sorts of 'administrative' fees that are nearly impossible to waive. Things like license reinstatement, points surcharges, and costs from MVC (DMV) usually can't be waived by the court as it isn't the court that imposes them.
> But it’s in the Supreme Court so it can’t be completely without legal merit.

From my understanding, the lower courts haven't looked at that argument yet, since the question "do these people even have standing to sue" comes before any arguments.
Have a look at transferwise, you don't need a bank account with them to transfer money round different curencies/accounts. I've used them a fair bit and saved hugely on fees and currency conversion rates.
Lots of companies here are enjoying good times overwall. All the finance/trading companies have been doing really well the past year or so. Plus there has been some investment in the crypto industry including coinbase with their huge pockets
Same here. I'm relatively new to Docker. I've taken a public jessie image, and tweaked and committed locally. I can see that layers exist when I pull images, but just what they are has been a mystery.
And how is it that the paper got reviewed and accepted for publication without somebody pointing out the obvious?

As a 1980s high school student my first thought of how I'd find the area under a curve with a computer was basically to pick random points and see if they were above or below the curve. At the time I had about one year of exposure to Apple II basic. My math teacher said "yeah that's the Monte Carlo technique."
Traditional GOTV apps and phone / door-knocking procedures certainly worked well for the Obama campaign, but that was in a different era where people weren't saturated by pushy telemarketers and the like. I briefly tried volunteering in the last election and stopped because I disliked the pushy scripts that we would work off of to do targetted get-out-the-vote.

Seeing this article about Reach and its effectiveness was really refreshing; talking to random people on the street and organically generating interest was exactly the kind of volunteering I wanted to do.
Call a number and get a FedEx? That's so impersonal.

Yes, I'm being facetious, sorry. But it's a good example of how automation enabled more than just cost-cutting.
You sound like you work at a really bad place. Your experience is not universal. You should try searching for a new job.
Cars aren't often completely unlighted and painted in dark matte colors while they are in the roadway at dusk or night times.
I definitely see your point, and I have mixed feelings on it to be fair (for the very reason you noted). I think it's more about establishing right-of-way for me, more than punishing pedestrians for jaywalking.

I don't think it's smart to allow pedestrians the right-of-way at all times, but I'm also learning that other countries do this already so I'm certainly willing to admit I could be wrong here!
The basic is just to run away from Gmail, but it's not easy.

Alternatives?

I just tried Protonmail (the paid account, of course), but it's a pretty sad experience so far. The huge gmail feature that is missing is the lack of full text search: yes, you cannot search in the body of your past email (to me this, in 2018, is not acceptable)

The other big issue is import data from Gmail. I had 10Gb of data in Gmail, so I paid Protonmail for a 15GB storage, then realized soon I could not import my data: here there are some issue

1) you cannot connect to protonmail IMAP without their Protonmail/Bridge (which is pretty understandable for security) and using a Thunderbird/Outlook client, in theory, but:

2) there is no Protonmail/Bridge for linux (only Win + Os)

3) the Windows version of Protonmail/Bridge crashes very often (I did file a bug of course), and it crashes mostly during an import (so I even ended up loosing emails)

4) the Protonmail/Brige is, after a while, very slow: I see I am not the only one which thing there is a throttling check

From the Gmail side, keep in mind there are very strong limits on the amount of data you can transfer, so keep it in mind before purchasing Protonmail storage https://support.google.com/a/answer/1071518?hl=en
Pretty much. The same exists in the UK in all sorts of fields.

My preferred strategy is repeated escalation mixed with what I'd call some variant of baby language.

"You owe me X, please send me X, your internal processes are broken, please send me X".

"No, I don't care about your internal processes, you owe me X, please send me X."

"You haven't sent me X yet; can you send me X or do I need to initiate legal action?"

So far this has always resulted in me actually getting the X I'm rightfully owed. One day it probably won't. Sigh.

Amazon in particular have been amusing WRT this. "Our internal procedure takes X days..." At that point I usually cut them off and remind them that it's none of my business how they run things internally; what I want is resolution for the issue I'm facing.
Passport card is something I recommend. When traveling in states out of the area, some don't like my license as primary ID. There's a second privacy benefit too, the passport card does not have your address on it for bars that scan licenses and keep the addresses in database.
This pretty neat. I liked the visual aspect of the maze generation but how annoyingly long it is depends on random chance. For me it was just a little too drawn out (Firefox). Anyway this is a good implementation of a cool concept. Matchmaking over socket would be cool but I have a feeling that's not what you're trying to show off here.

Good work, I'd be very curious to see the code.
To add to that, California's Unruh Civil Rights Act is broader than the US federal law, and the federal laws related to the EEOC don't require that complainant be the one that was discriminated against.

The laws against retaliation hold so long as you have a "reasonable good faith belief" that there may be a violation of the laws, and the court has a generous interpretation of that phrase. I'll quote from https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/litigation/briefs/jordan2.txt :

> ... an employee should be deemed protected from retaliation by §704(a) when he reports conduct by a coworker or supervisor which, if repeated often enough, would create a hostile work environment. Several courts have held such complaints protected, often by applying a generous standard in determining whether the plaintiff's belief was reasonable. See, e.g., Alexander, 40 F.3d at 195-96 (summarized supra at p. 11); Reed, 95 F.3d at 1174-80 (summarized supra at p. 11); Moyo v. Gomez, 40 F.3d 982, 985 (9th Cir. 1994) (black corrections officer believed prison's practice of allowing white inmates, but not black inmates, to shower after work shifts violated Title VII; he complained and was fired; court held that even if these inmates would not be considered employees for Title VII purposes, plaintiff's belief might still have been reasonable, and the district court accordingly erred in dismissing his claim); id. at 984 ("An erroneous belief that an employer engaged in an unlawful employment practice is reasonable, and thus actionable under § 704(a), if premised on a mistake made in good faith. A good-faith mistake may be one of fact or of law.") (emphasis in original); ... ("[P]laintiffs alleging retaliation are not required to possess a good faith, reasonable belief as to every legal element necessary to succeed on such a claim, and are instead held only to a ‘lay person's' understanding of the violation . . . . It is the Court's firm conviction that . . . the
law should not leave unprotected those employees who experience retaliation for reports of what they believe reasonably and in good faith to be a violation of the law . . . .").

You can see that the corrections officer was protected from retaliation even though he himself was not the one being discriminated against.

But really, take Digory's advice and talk to someone with specific CA experience.
On one side it makes sense to have a public repository like git used for this, but having a private company being responsible for this it's bit strange.

The fact that a pull request was accepted was now that strange because it could have been done by the council representative.

For this kind of use case it would make more sense to me some sort of block chain, not controlled by a single company.

"This isn’t a copy of the DC law. It is an authoritative source. It is where the DC Council stores the digital versions of enacted laws, and this source feeds directly into the Council’s DC Code website at https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/."
Yeah? Have you ever tried pushing your software during Windows Mobile era?
The End of the Beginning [video]
I use Cloudcraft to express the architecture of a number of my smaller projects. It's very easy to throw a few key parts together and get a basic idea out there. Exports in lots of resolutions, to SVG, and has shareable links.
How the Inkas governed, thrived and fell without alphabetic writing
Do you think it's debatable to compare the deaths of concentration camps in Germany, and the deaths of the great famine?

You often see this comparison being made (whatever the reason is), to me those deaths are different because the intention was different.

The shoah was aimed at certain people, while the great famine killed indiscriminately.
Publications as Predictors of Racial, Ethnic Differences in NIH Research Awards
Sorry, I didn't mean to accuse you of anything or suggest you "should" have said something different. Just trying to engage in the conversation.

But the point I'm trying to make is that I'm _not_ sure that "it is inevitable that at some point we will have more reliable tests". The problem is not test reliabilily, it's that there is in fact no actual reliable way to map from DNA to "not entirely Caucasian", because there's a basic mismatch there. "Caucasian" is (really!) not a genetic category, there is actually no way to _reliably_ determine someone is "Caucasian" (or "Black", or anything else like that) from a DNA test. It just doesn't work like that. (Even though these DNA ancestry companies make money off people thinking it does).

It's true that at some point some neo-nazi, like anyone else, might have results that seem to tell them something that surprises them or that they didn't want to hear. But the problem is in fact with their ideology in the first place that thinks there is such a thing as "Caucasian" encoded in their genes, when there isn't.

This is interesting though, in the case where someone who thought they were Black thinks a DNA test told them they weren't -- my inclination is to say "Ignore the test, it can not tell you that you aren't Black, because the test just can't say that, don't let it make you insecure in your identity" In the case of a neo-nazi who has a similar experience, I'd _want_ it to make them insecure in their identity, because their identity is based on entirely scientifically unsound ideas about what race means.

That might be a contradiction in my OWN ideology. But it's not a contradiction in the science. Either way, the problem is not just that "the test isn't reliable enough yet", the problem is that "Caucasian" or "Black" can NOT be "reliably" determined by a DNA test, because these categories are simply not sound as biologically/genetically determined categories.
I've had two parking tickets in my life - one a few weeks ago and one almost a decade ago - Ive still got both receipts, on the off chance something like this happens.
>remember that British kid who sold a recommendation engine to Yahoo?

Nick D'Aloisio? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_D'Aloisio)

I was confused when you mentioned him, then I realized you think he didn't succeed because he's not a billionaire or didn't create the next Facebook.

Young millionaire studying at Oxford? I would trade places with that dude in a heartbeat. From everything I'm reading on his Wikipedia page, he seems to be doing quite well.
It's almost impossible to get people to _donate_ but pretty straightforward to get people to _buy_. If the product solves a real need, which it sounds like it does.
“Called out”? Sure. It was called out when Microsoft rolled it out and it’s been called out persistently for ten years, to the point that I’m used to being called an “apologist”. But public criticism is orders of magnitude different from a legal injunction. I simply don’t see how the definitions and aims of a theory of monopoly can be usefully applied to this case.
Caixin is a reputable magazine on financial news in China, its chinese PMI (Purchasing Managers' Indexes） are widely cited.

[1] https://www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1385987...