skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm a professor (in mathematics), and there are some reasons why I personally might say "yes" to review a paper. (1) If the paper is so interesting that when I see it I think "I really, really want to read this paper!", then I am likely to peer review it because as a reviewer when I read it, I get to ask any question and the author will take my questions and concerns very seriously. (2) I owe the editor who is asking me to peer review the paper (or maybe even the author of the paper), e.g., if the editor put a lot of work into ensuring a paper I once wrote got properly reviewed. (3) Even if I say "no" to fully reviewing a paper, as an expert in the area I can often provide quick valuable feedback about the relative value of the claimed contribution, and who is most likely to be suited to review it; I'll do a quick informal review like that in some cases.

From the outside, it is easy to forgot the extreme extent to which academics are motivated by (or view themselves as motivated by) principles of "good citizenship". This is selection -- the people who aren't this way, often do not get hired or promoted. Also, many academics (at least in pure math) view motivation for money as a "lower order term". It's a good thing for them, because for much of your long career in academia there is little you can do to impact your salary, besides applying for a job somewhere else. For me it's always been: each year you get some maximum possible merit raise of between 0% and 4%, depending on external economics that the department has no control over. Academic book royalties might also raise your yearly salary by 2%. Being highly money-motivated in some parts of academia would end up being very frustrating indeed. E.g., even when I've got a big NFS grant, that doesn't change my salary one bit; instead, it changes how many students and/or postdocs I could support.
I'm not sure what you mean exactly. If you mean what kind of paradigm may be used to try to get performance to inordinately depend on hippocampally-mediated binding processes? See Konkel and Cohen, 2008 Hippocampal amnesia impairs all manner of relational memory or my own paper, Lee et al 2016: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733390/
..although these were not under incidental encoding.
The Personal MBA: Master the Art of Business
You can't undo colonialism by suffering communism after gaining independence.

You just get 2x of famines, mass executions and freedom impairment.

Or maybe 3x since communist regimes tend to be more violent than colonial regimes.

You also can't colonize yourself but you can install communism and suffer famines, mass executions and no freedom.

You can say that Eastern Europe didn't have famines or mass executions after WW2. But hey, Russians still did!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1946%E2%80%93...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novocherkassk_massacre
worst. porn. ever.
In salaried positions, "overtime" is either rewarded with a raise or promotion.

For the types of job you are thinking of where overtime is entirely uncompensated (such as a lot of developer gigs), you are not really working overtime. You are working exactly what was expected from your employer. Any less, and you'd risk losing your position. Different jobs have different expected baseline work.

However, work above the expectation should still be compensated, and if it isn't, you're also within a group of people that is likely able to quit and find a different position at higher wage, or just a position where hard work will be rewarded. That is definitely the case for the developers here.
So if Ann's a developer and doesn't want their payment processing, and Bruce is a consumer and doesn't want their curation, then the buyer and seller should be able to dispense with the surcharge if they dispense with the "service." But they can't (without jumping through hoops.) And what's more, if Trusty App Corp. were to come along and set up a 20% cut Trusty App store that could be conveniently installed via an exploit, they would be undoubtedly sued for IP violations, due to the state protecting Apple's exclusive right to Apple IP. This is pure rent-seeking on the part of Apple, and ultimately antitrust laws exist to discourage rent-seeking even more than discouraging monopolies per se.
Can someone well versed in Docker explain in their own words what this does and why it is useful? Thanks in advance! I'm definitely not a docker poweruser...other than build start and stopping..
They make a pretty good counter-argument in the article:

> “The few devices that get attention at any time in the press is fewer than the devices we may put on the market in a single business day. That to me doesn’t say that the system is failing. It’s remarkable that the system is working as it does.”

The bigger problem seems to be responding quickly (or responding at all) to real life injuries/issues with medical devices than the approval process.
I developed an interactive visualization just for that purpose a few years ago. It's called ArchitectureTree.

https://github.com/marmelab/ArchitectureTree

The tech stack is a bit outdated (it used Angular.js), but the idea (using JSON to store the architecture) and the UI (powerful search, "bush" look) are still a good answer to the requirement of vizualizing complex software architecture.
Or Daria
You can import entire articles into Supermemo and break them down into flashcards without leaving the program. Anki just gives you flashcards. There's an incremental reading plugin for Anki, but it doesn't work very well.

Incremental reading works by breaking down an article into flashcards. Basically, you go: article -> paragraph -> sentences -> flashcards (usually with cloze deletions). But, because the algo manages when you see everything, I don't have to worry about doing all of that in one step.

Polar Bookshelf (getpolarized.io) is more of an open source solution for archiving documents at the moment. You can export annotations/extracts from Polar into Anki, but you don't get the spaced repetition with the actual reading of articles like you do with Supermemo.

I read a bit of the article, decide if making an extract of that portion is worth it, and then click next repetition when I'm done/bored reading it. I'll then get another article/flashcard/extract (of another article).

You also have tools for marking up articles and saving your place.

Every day I review around 30-50 flashcards, and 30-50 articles/extracts of articles.

With Supermemo, I don't have to decide (or rather, I give up the ability to decide) what I'm going to read next; in favor of having everything scheduled by the algo.

I go through about 800-1000 items in my RSS feeds once a day, save them into read it later/polar/bookmarks, and once a week, I throw the ones that still seem interesting into Supermemo.

I probably spend 30min to an hour going through everything once a day, and another hour or so on Supermemo. Most of the items in my RSS feeds are admittedly junk around 95-98% or so (HN and HN comments, reddit rss feeds and comments, lobste.rs and comments, some news sites, a few personal blogs, and some forums), but I do get a few gems throughout the week.

The newer Supermemo algorithm also tolerates breaks better than Anki (the last time I checked). So, for example, not using Supermemo while on holiday isn't an issue.

I also keep aha moments from programming and some documentation in there as well.

Edit:

Here's a demo of incremental reading in Supermemo. He marks up articles much more than I typically do. There's a lot of features and functionality in the program.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoQoeK53bP8&
Wealth does not imply income. You could be a retired with a massive fortune and no income. You could be born into wealth, not actually earning any yourself.

They are different concepts. One can lead to another, by neither implies the other.
Well, I've never heard of Lacanian economics, but there are plenty of fields in which understanding a bit about Lacan is essential if you want to appreciate the canon.

Lacan as a person/analyst doesn't seem appealing to me, but some kind of psychodynamic therapy surely has a future in the long term, as insight accumulates into the mind. So Lacan seems like something to cautiously sift through for insight.

The social as a subjective entity, or at least an apparently somewhat integrated/regulated entity that individual humans can interact with (the big Other), certainly exists as a concept in people's minds. It's a very formalistic, broad-brush picture of social interactions, of a kind that would probably appeal to computer scientists. There's not a lot of scope for nuance at the level of individual interactions. From that point of view, I suppose it could resemble the crude regulative ideas that control the bicameral mind.
Not in California. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_California_Proposition_13
Please write an essay on how to attack WASM based code and how to structure your codebase to mitigate the outlined flaws.

[edit this was not snark, I believe the parent has important insights]

I believe it is possible, but the severity seems orders of magnitude less than native code.

The host controls the VM interface boundary. Native code can only get this partially via process isolation.
https://news.ycombinator.com/hn.js is quite small and I don't see any related code. Any chance it's something that gets inserted by a browser plugin or (worst case) ISP?
Ask HN: Will Ukraine Declare War on Russia This Time?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46338671

Will they declare war finally on Russia? Could this mean the beginning of a bigger war?
As someone who's been in software development for only a couple years by comparison, I don't see huge architectural changes happen too often for any of our products. This is something that I'm currently trying to improve upon within my company, but I've gotten pretty discouraged with all these comments lol. Is there any way to mitigate the obsoletion of these models?
Fair, but I think this all amounts to "A linear patch of memory is fine primitive to build an allocator or standard library on."

The "not faulting on address zero" thing is interesting but not crazy -- only broken programs will break.
Show HN: Vnlog – a toolkit for manipulating data in an ASCII table
Thanks for the fun and informative reply, tea person.
Pull Request: Make arrest system more bug-resilient.

Unit test: drop bug while typewriter types out "Tuttle", make sure it doesn't type "Buttle".
In the past, Facebook's moderation (outside of user flagging) has involved some automated Facebook processes flagging the photo for review and then a human looking at the photo and decided to issue a account ban.

My friend lives in the mostly drama-free midwest, has a mostly drama-free facebook life, and participates in WWII reenactments seemingly a couple times a month. It seems very unlikely that this photo was flagged by a friend of his.

So it would appear that Facebook's automated tools are now sometimes thinking that WWII German soldiers are Nazi's. And either Facebook human thought the photo was worth a temp ban, or an automated tool is now banning anyone it thinks is a "Nazi". These are new things that haven't been happening in the past.
Yeah, I didn't, in my first comment. I guess I was a bit afraid if they got popular they'd "go away" or something -- even though they are "buffered" by YouTube.

--

This one is still working:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8LY9oqqzXM

looking SE towards the north end and east side of Shin Osaka station:

https://goo.gl/maps/LqVgRHNWu7H2

--

The following one has been down since the typhoon. I haven't tried reaching out -- I don't make comments on YouTube -- but if it's a matter of the cost of replacement, I wonder whether the person it belongs to would be interested in donations to pay for its replacement. I rather enjoyed it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F-Aw9t1VC8

Located across the street and tracks (and the other street) from Italy Park, looking to the SE:

https://goo.gl/maps/2154UmjBYu72

--

P.S. For the Osaka location, once in a while you'll see a commercial jet's shadow approach and cross the forefield. 2 pm local time, or sometimes an hour either way of that, has seemed to be the time for that, this fall.
One cynical/cute view is that farming subsidies will start disappearing when Iowa is no longer the first primary state.
They have what you describe, and moreover such a thing has existed in paper form since th this country was formed.

Real time access to laws as they are drafted is a Really Bad Idea. Good ideas need time to incubate. The system you want would lead to the sound byte version of legislating.
On some broad level, this is similar to csvkit, but a core design principle is that the toolkit is very light, and mosly wraps standard, exising tools. Powerful tools with a very friendly learning curve result.
It's a dire state of affairs. Some people on HN will go on never marrying, having kids, or ever being in an intimate relationship. Race and culture also plays a big factor but society tends to only look for whatever elevates them, gloss over the uncomfortable truths, almost a collective ego which it shields itself the true side of human nature: The race towards monopolization of violence in the tribe through which the actors and directors of this selected group are able to exploit the mass and writing the rules of reality. One set of rules for us, the other for the rest.

I just don't find this human world exciting or interesting. I've come to loathe it. I am bound by karmic law so it's not like I can do whatever the fuck. I almost feel like my religion binds me to a life of a eunuch. Unable to indulge in one of basic human needs, unable to connect, because I've been trying to numb out this world since I was a kid. It's no wonder I am alone and others like me find themselves all alone. Our inability to bond, communicate, express is conditionally instilled through environmental circumstances you can't change. So I guess that's how Karma dictates who gets born to a nice loving rich family to everything that isn't. But society blames people like me, it's my fucking fault, there's something wrong with me, that if I just said the right things or meet the expectations in some quantitative manner. No more. The will to fight disappears and a sense of calm and wellness from submission to the present offers a warm refuge powered by the extra serotonin floating around due to medically induced state of inhibiting the reuptake process.

The present is the only Truth. The past and the future lives only in our memory and imagination.
My initial impression is the same as the parent. Juxtaposing microservices and KISS seems weird as the "architectural complexity" of microservices is several times higher than a monolith. You're not only multiplying the points of failure but also increasing the difficulty of translating the domain into code, especially when it comes to reading and writing from a db in a safe and efficient manner. Someone will need to come up with an answer to handling transactional operations that span multiple services sooner or later (or I guess the team can just accept some small percent of data corruption, which is what I'm guessing most companies that do microservices actually do, willingly or unwillingly). Ironically I think the benefit of an architect is a lot more evident in a microservice architecture than a monolith.

Edit: though maybe my view on what an architect should do is different? I think of a software architect as the person that lays out the skeleton and foundations of a project and has the answers to hard questions. Very likely someone who actively codes or has solved very similar challenges to the ones being solved.
I agree a little bit, but I think you're swinging the pendulum a little far the other way. I work in a highly regulated area with consequences similar to "bridges falling down", and guess what? At an individual level, everyone is still winging it. What we do have though is a lot of processes: mandated things like checklists, written down procedures, standards that we work to and second-checking by peer or senior colleagues. It's those that stop the "bridges falling down", but at a personal / career level - people are all still exhibiting those people-like behaviors - rushing their work, making all kinds of mistakes, big-noting themselves, saying stupid things, etc. We design processes that kind of concede that "everyone is winging it all the time", so that things still be ok anyway.
I wonder where the line is drawn on obscenity for most people? On the NSFW, you can make out some the textures or shapes of different body parts, but none of it is clearly obscene. But there's a general feeling that it is obscene. I wonder where we would draw the line.
Not affiliated with Udacity, but typically anything 'career changing' implies that the student would be starting a new career in a different industry.
The kind of porn one would see in hell after being condemned for sexual gluttony.
How to update large tables in PostgreSQL (2015)
If you don't finish a Udacity nanodegree on time you lose access to the material and you have to pay again. It's certainly pay per month.
Pretty much only glibc malloc still uses brk. GNU being GNU I guess. Modern mallocs like jemalloc use mmap exclusively.

FreeBSD straight up did not implement sbrk at all for aarch64 and riscv – very very few things broke because of that (one of the things that did break was, IIRC, GNU Emacs).
The world in a nutshell
Novels that turn on scientific or technical breakthroughs
> I'd pay $100,000 for such a studio

Illustrating why they aren't available for $50,000.
Which is why of all of those the only one that does it remotely right is Linux.

Developers and businesses in particular have grown complacent with flagrant and repeated usurpation of their user's expectations of privacy. It needs to stop.
C4 is my goto as well.
Even born separately from the same parents, or from different parents with the same available genes to generate the same haploids?
Richard Stallman: We Can Do Better Than Bitcoin
I'm a math professor, I can answer this.

We tend to think of journals as being run by their editorial boards -- i.e., by scientists in our field. The publishers are in the background, not taking a very active role, simply skimming off truckloads of money in the process. In particular, peer-review requests tend to come from scientists whom we know at least by reputation, and often personally.

When I spend serious time peer-reviewing a paper, it will be on a quality paper on a subject that I enjoy reading about anyway. (If I get asked to peer-review a paper that looks uninteresting to me, or something outside my interests and expertise, I'll either decline the request or write a quick report recommending that the paper not be accepted.)

It's interesting work, it's important for the health of the field, it helps me support other researchers in my field (if I like their paper and give it a positive review), and it helps my own reputation (the journal editors are often bigshots). From this point of view, it's a win-win-win-win.

Finally, paying for peer review doesn't make much sense because the time required is highly variable. I might take between 20 minutes and 30+ hours to review a paper, and I wouldn't necessarily expect the editor to be able to predict how much (even within an order of magnitude) in advance.

However, I see no reason why high-profit publishers should be able to insert themselves as middlemen and engage in rent-seeking behavior. I hope we figure out a way to give them the boot, and then continue approximately as we have been doing.
Horny slut Erika
Erika is a horny German slut. She loves sex and big cocks
Fastest Cannonball Run and countermeasures [video]
But thats not how git works. Everyone who uses the repo has a copy of it. Even if you hack GH the worst possible outcome is a hard reset of the repo, which would break pulls anyway. Unless a literal city council thinks its a good idea to not have local copies of their own law source code they are modifying regularly or something.
In certain cases they are required. For example - compliance audits of varying flavor require architecture diagrams. To be clear, I expect that auditors understand less than 1% of what they look at in a diagram or why certain systems look the way they do, but it is a requirement none the less.
A docker image is built in layers that stack on top of each other. Think of each layer as a commit in a git repository.

This project takes an image and shows the list of layers (=commits) and for each layer (=commit) allow you to see what was changed (=the diff).

A bit like a git log for a docker image.
That just depends on how you define it. You could also state: everybody pays the same fines, e.g., 5% of their monthly income.

See, sounds fair, right?
Add in that the quality of the system is massively massively broken...peer review is about as accurate as the flip of a coin. It does not promote gorund breaking or novel research, it barely (arguably doesn't) even contribute to quality research. I had a colleague recently be told by a journal editor 'we don't publish critiques from junior scholars.' So much for the nature of peer review being entirely driven by the quality of the work.

As one of those academics...I keep getting requests to peer review, I respectfully make clear I don't review for non open source journals anymore. Same with publishing. I'm not tenure-track so am not primarily evaluated based on output.

Publishing is broken, but it is really just part of the broader and even more broken nature of academic research.
Along with this, Simon has developed Structurizr, which uses code to describe architecture and then visualize it at different levels:

https://structurizr.com/
Others have pointed out that it doesn't seem possible to identify a single face out of millions with enough confidence to issue a fine with current technology.
It's already there with Terraform but it's not that pretty yet:

https://www.terraform.io/docs/commands/graph.html
Saying "Linux does telemetry" is wrong. I'm not usually one of those "Linux is just a kernel!" types, but, in this case, it's very important to distinguish between the kernel, which does no telemetry, and the whole enchilada, which might.

In short: If you can find me any on-by-default telemetry in Slackware, I'd be very interested.
If you want to abuse the law doing so in a public ledger that anyone accessing has a copy of (such that just reverting commits on github doesn't remove from them everyones histories) seems like a really unwise way of going about it.

Whats important is having eyes on what changes are made, and if you want to track changes and revisions to something... github (and gitlab, phabricator, etc) is pretty close to the optimization of that problem humanity has developed up to this point.
And thus set off the internet revolution without a $$$ barrier to entry.
Climate change will harm the entire nation if the U.S. doesn’t act now
It's easier to change from iOS to Android than it is to change ISPs in huge portions of the US.

At least changing from iOS to Android (or vice versa) doesn't require you to buy a new house and move—probably move far enough that you need to find a new job, too.
Horny slut Erika
Besides Wikipedia, is there a repository or curated list somewhere that outlines the privileged upbringing of the most successful company founders?

I never knew this info about Gates or Zuckerberg, fascinating to say the least.
Could just block all communication with Microsoft by the OS. Or, move to non-Windows OSes like the retail giants already have. Kroger and Walmart run Suse Enterprise Linux (relevant Uptime Funk reference) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYRlTISvjww
I wish there was a label for food that is grown without pesticides, but with artificial fertilizers.
HJKL or GTFO