skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The skeptic in me is very wary of romanticizing the campfire model. For me it has generated a lot of short term happiness but very few lasting, deeply committed relationships. And if you look at human history, this model is the exception, not the norm; virtually all civilizations across time have relied primarily on enduring family networks for support. In the past couple hundred years workplace and university networks have become sources of enduring relationships as well. We have good reasons to believe that these relationships are important to health, longevity and happiness.

I would not hesitate to start a campfire and see what it yields but I also wouldn't expect it to yield what truly matters.

The modern (western) world provides very little bedrock for people to build a psychological foundation. We argue with our families, our employers can dump us at any time, we divorce our spouses, friends are always moving on or marrying off. Contrast that to the model of multi-generational family based ties which has endured throughout history and I have to wonder, is our society even going to last in its current form?

> Sometimes I feel that it can be a lucrative trap to become invested in a single person, and then accumulate expectations that far outweigh the responsible obligations of any friendship.

This fixation on the spouse is kind of a modern oddity as well. In many societies past and present, your spouse, your parents, your kids, and maybe even your grandparents and grandkids are all of roughly equal importance.
Bundle size is rarely equivalent to size of initial executable code. i.e. I can have a giant photo of my dog in the bundle but it won't necessarily affect the start up time of the node index.js. I think there is some kind of effect in that the bundle must be downloaded to the Lambda container server from S3, but that seems pretty fast, and it's likely cached there for a while.
> Do not serve as editor, reviewer, or author of a paper in a for-profit journal.

Unfortunately, non-profits are not the end-all-be-all either - or at least, not all of them. Many scholarly societies are non-profit but, given that they are unable to fund their activities otherwise, they fund them through subscription revenue.

Now, I'm not saying that these scholarly societies are doing bad work. However, I do think it is wrong that these activities should be funded by people needing to access academic literature, rather than by the people who benefit from them.

Other than that, I consider this point the most important one:

> Change evaluation policies for faculty that reward open science models and decrease value on publishing in and with for-profit journals and publishing houses.

That's the engine that keeps the machine going. Unfortunately, it's not clear yet what alternative evaluation policies would be good substitutes.

(Disclaimer: I'm working on an experiment implementing one such alternative.)

Edit:

> Unfortunately, I am not aware of a list of not for profit or non-profit journals.

It's a small list, but the Free Journal Network has a list [1] of journals complying with the Fair OA principles [2], which includes being not-for-profit.

[1] https://freejournals.org/current-member-journals/

[2] https://www.fairopenaccess.org/
You'd think Google would prioritize shipping the ability to replace the underlying video file for a video since it's impossible to do so: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/55770?co=GENIE.Pla...

But no. You can trim your video. You can delete it entirely, and suffer the consequences. But you can't simply fix and replace a video that may have had erroneous content and videos which had been "patched" by annotations in the past will now appear without context (aside from descriptions perhaps).

That's some impressively lousy product stewardship, and I say this as someone who mostly disliked annotations as most people
here seem to.
No, we're mocking the idea that Apple would use "courage" as an excuse for stupidity while also pointing out that they go hand in hand. Yeah, a guy running up to a bear and punching it in the face is "courageous", but it should be no surprise when the bear gets sick of the guy's antics and decides that it's maul o'clock.

In this simile, the consumers are the bear, and Apple is the moron punching it.
I don't think this is the same thing, it's CO2 emissions, which of course are vastly greater in rich northern countries with a majority of the power plants, vehicles, heating, industry.

Biomass loss seems to be largely due to agriculture/fishing. Of course, again rich countries are consuming much more per capita by eating more meat etc, but what are the overall impacts, especially taking into account agricultural practices, polution-control practices, etc, around the world?

I think agricultural technology, especially factory farming (hydroponics etc), lab-grown-meat, on-land fish farming, etc, could play a big role in future reduction of our footprint - along with more responsible population growth, healthier eating habits/more vegetarian diets, worldwide ecological regulation/certification/enforcement etc.
I don't do Aix since 2003, does it still follow Windows model in how .so are created with export definition files?
Could it be that people who use your OSS think you have an obligation to them, because you marketed your software in a nice and pretty gift wrap package (eg. web page) and they chose yours over and alternative (ie chose to invest their time and effort on it)? They chose to "fall" for your marketing over that of another project.

Maybe they feel that by choosing your software over an alternative, they're also helping you (since it's your project after all) and they atypically expect some things of you?

P.S. I'm not taking sides. This is just a shower thought.
Python is currently adding a “thanks” command to their package installer pip. There are efforts to wire pip to monetary rewards. I believe that’s the right direction: identify where the rubber hits the road most of the time, and insert positivity and gratefulness.
You shouldn't have hidden his name. We should know who it is, in case we meet him or something.
Correct. It really isn't a big deal.
A more mature project wouldn't have just React as a dependency. Point is, it's a lot of code to vet. React may have 5 indirect dependencies, but in my projects, I have 30 or more direct dependencies.
Depends on which generation Outback, based on your description of better ground clearance, I think it's 4th of 5th generation which is marketed as and considered an "SUV". That's the exact vehicle type that is replacing cars.

Even real SUVs (Tahoe/Expedition/4runner) are becoming replaced by CUVs.
Annotations are a quick and dirty fix that isn't really a fix at all.

It's really confusing if the voice in the video says one thing, and an annotation is displayed that says "this is not actually correct ..."

It would be much better if the video creator spent five minutes to actually fix the video and reupload it.
> Additionally, the audio industry has a different obsolescence timeline than computer equipment

This I have studio headphones I bought in 1995 that I still use nearly daily (albeit not with my phone). I've replaced the earpads on them at least 5 times.
It doesn't surprise me at all tbh, in fact I expected that would have been a lot higher. How many kids are watching YouTube on mommy's iPad throughout the day? I know my roommate likes to have video guides and such playing when he's gaming, it's just easier to have his phone propped up than mucking around switching between the game and a web browser. Recipes, DIY projects, tutorials, I can think of a million use cases where YouTube is just more viable and easier to access on a mobile device than a laptop or desktop
Isn’t this what Zscaler does?
I use my AirPods a lot (like 1h to 2h daily for commuting and chores) and after one and a half year, I have no battery issues. I don’t recall depleting the battery ever.
Say they're stupid all you like, but whether something is "courageous" and whether something is "stupid" are completely separate issues.
Yes, and we have AMIs available:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/...

The Arm build for the ECS agent is not published to dockerhub just yet -- but we plan to start publishing soon.
Video URLs always pointing to the same content is a critical guarantee for a service like Youtube.
I have seen a number of (like, many many) videos where annotations were used for corrections on the content, so now all of that content is going to be wrong :(.

I realize that these things are sometimes annoying, and that mobile users couldn't see them... but they existed, and were part of the content--in many cases I have seen, because the video publisher didn't know how to do editing and so used the annotation feature to do it instead--and now that content is going to be damaged, forever.

FWIW, this was effectively the only way to fix content after it had been posted without changing the URL... something you would expect to be a critical feature of any publishing platform, and one that Google themselves has used at times and offered to close partners because clearly they need that feature themselves, but which YouTube doesn't really provide and apparently has now decided to provide even less :(.
That's not exactly Google's problem. That's '80-20 economy' for you, AKA dictate of majority. If some feature is too hard for 80 per cent of users, tough luck for 20 per cent who used it.

The typical Google is the decision to delete annotations instead of just turn it off by default.
I totally get it, it's all a question of balance, I guess. An _occasional_ thanks you mail is great. On the other hand, getting pass the 100 stars on a project on github is a big moral boost too, and probably wouldn't feel so great if each one was a mail :)

But actually, I realize both can easily be reconciled : we could send a "thank you" message to projects with low amount of github stars, and just star those which have a high amount. This would both cheer solo dev starting their project and avoid annoying bigger teams on well established projects.
That would reset the views and comments.
@zackbloom, @kentonv hint hint. Isn't this roughly the same memory footprint as a Worker? CONTAINERS ON ALL THE CLOUDFLARE THINGS!
Then you loose/cut off all previous comments/views/likes
They would have to upload it to a new URL and so none of the links to the old video would see it anyway, which is kind of useless.
If you can implement it by tomorrow afternoon before the Andy Jassy keynote you might be able to steal some thunder.
Yet even European lifestyle is anything but sustainable base on IPCC report.
That's a contrived "no true Scotsman" right there. Also quite a few people argued that democracy should be replaced by dictatorship on similar grounds: "look at America, it's clear that democracy is shit".

Imperfect realization doesn't mean the ideal is invalid (except when that imperfection is inherent to the ideal). You can argue for more equal, more meritocratic community; tearing it down because it's not already perfect is disingenuous and destructive.
Snapseed for PC 1.2.0 Full Keygen Free Download with Crack
I'm sure there's no way that could be abused.
I think that it is great that they do not give the ability to replace the video. If I am linking a video that I watched in the past to someone I expect it to contain what I watched, not something entirely different. Same for upvotes, what if someone replaces a video with content that I find misleading and that I would not have up voted?
Yeah but one of the main ways in which gVisor provides security is by intercepting system calls and strictly limiting which calls can be made. Firecracker may use KVM instead of running entirely in usermode, but as far as most of us are concerned, that's an implementation detail. The pertinent question is whether the price of security is limiting the possible system calls, which means that Firecracker won't be able to run arbitrary containers, just as gVisor doesn't guarantee that it can run arbitrary code (which may require filtered system calls).
Creators are strongly disincentivised from doing that since deleting the old version would throw away their views etc for that video. It would also delete comments, and while this is often no great loss, I do run across useful or interesting YouTube comments sometimes.
Bumble Friends/BFF is that.
If I send a someone a video it should not be ambigious if we saw the same thing.
I totally understand that youtube doesn't want people replacing video files. That feature would be abused like hell.

What's wrong with uploading a new video "Original Title [Update Nov 2018]", and linking to that in the description?
I love these words so much. They hit home in a real way for me. Thank you for sharing them!
No way they would allow you to replace the video, it would open them up to all kinds of abuse and trolling.
I have disabled annotations long, long time ago. I was tired being forced to click on those silly boxes to uncover the content beneath.

On the other hand I don't see why Google couldn't just disable adding new annotations but left old annotations in peace. Maybe there is some underlying technical reason why they don't want annotations.
Well, I have an Asus laptop that doesn't have a fan...
They could use the video description.
They don't need to delete the old version, they can link between new/old version in the description.
anecdotally, the adapter Apple provided me broke after about three weeks, and it seems like most of my family/friends are in similar situations
But annotations aren't hard to use, just the opposite. Google is removing them because they don't really work that well on mobile.
I'm surprised it's not higher than that considering how common mobiles and tablets are.
It's wrong, though.
View counts, and any learning 'the algorithm' has done to understand how popular the original title was, get lost.
Might just be "figure it out for yourself".

I doubt it's that hard if you're using a language with a reasonable cross-compile toolchain. That will probably influence choice of technology for new things aimed at this kind of performance envelope.

No doubt a lot of existing software will be left out by cross-compilation being too much of a pain.
The obvious solution is to tax automakers based on their overall fuel economy instead of breakout by cars/trucks. The problem is that it pretty much kills the US auto industry since they're almost always the least fuel efficient in every segment and bias heavily towards making large vehicles.
Instead of making annotations useful on mobile UI.
How to hard match user accounts in Azure AD
Austerity: difficult economic conditions created by government measures to reduce public expenditure.

> Federal Spending was increasing modestly, year on year, in the mid 2000s. But it jumped by $700 billion a year in the Great Recession to bail out the banks and provide “stimulus.” Since the recession federal spending held steady at about $3.6 trillion per year for a few years, before resuming growth in 2015.
Viewed from a GDP perspective, federal spending was steady at about 19 percent GDP in the mid 2000s and then jumped, in the Great Recession to almost 25 percent GDP. But in the subsequent economic recovery federal spending has steadily declined as a percent of GDP down to about 20 percent in 2014. But in 2015 federal spending started to increase as a percent of GDP.

The federal government never cut public expenditure. It went up considerably due to the stimulus and was magnified in terms of percentage of gdp due to drop in gdp. Over the years following the crisis the expenditures dropped as a percentage of gdp from the new elevated rate due to gdp growth, but saying there was austerity by the federal government is not true

https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_spending_chart
Jerry (YC S17) is hiring Software Engineering Team Lead in Montreal, Canada
Trying to remember how many of these I have seen via places like coursera, freecodecamp videos, edx, udemy and the like.

Again google goes after spam with a bazooka instead of a scalpel - collateral damage - meh. The spammers will just edit the video before uploading and those who don't won't get the annotations.

But I get it, at that scale it's probably impossible to one by one surgery the issue.

Perhaps a link to offer information to see annotation that were removed (and the time stamp) in case important info conveyed is being removed?
> and that mobile users couldn't see them...

Which is ENTIRELY on Google.
Not sure if you're ironic, but what you have is literally Gin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gin
What you mean by that? I stay away from Windows ;-)
They have dedicated YouTube mobile app to make it work really well on mobile, you know. With dedicated team of developers.
I recently bought a $5 pocket AM/FM radio and found that on AM mode (in between radio stations) I could pick up the radiation from every device in my house. When I moved the radio to my balls (phone), and to my bed (neighbors smart TV), it was very loud there. Sounded like demonic screeching.

Carry my phone in my backpack now, and moved my bed.

Now I just have that smart meter... that one soaks the entire house in a steady whine.
> If the original author has no use for the project anymore and someone offers to take it over from them, why should the author be expected to refuse?

People who use your project place their trust in you. If you pass that trust on to another developer without your users' involvement, then that developer's actions reflect on your reputation. Why? Because you've not given me the option of only trusting you. Your policy made it a package deal.

It's kinda like how I can't tell Bob about anyone's Christmas gift. He sometimes tells Fred the Loudmouth, who tells everyone and ruins the surprise. Bob never ruins the surprise directly, and he always asks Fred to keep it a secret, but it doesn't matter. I still can't trust Bob, even if Bob's only mistake is that he trusts in the wrong people.
But because their masters in Moscow wanted to hear there
was potential for a first-strike, to please their bosses,
that’s what the spies delivered.

“These people were close to the West, they lived in the
West and knew there were no plans for a first strike but
they reported what they were told to report,” Jones
explains.
[...]
It was a dangerously vicious circle. “It’s a failure of
the Soviet system,” says Jones, “Soviet intelligence did
not act rationally.”

Modern western governments will do precisely the same thing; the politicians ask for a dossier saying Iraq has weapons of mass destruction they can launch in 45 minutes? Then that's what they get.

I always assumed this was seen as a feature rather than a bug - i.e. that politicians choose and instruct spy agency bosses to be politically compliant, rather than to produce reports that are unbiased and strictly factual.
A privilege for us. For my boy landing on Mars and rockets that can be reused are as normal as the bus being on time. Is it any wonder that older politicians struggle to serve young constituents?
Also link rot.
Plastic Injection Molding in China – Plastic Manufacturing Company
> if only all the lonely people could find each other, and had the social skills to initiate contact, all would be well.

I'd say I have very good social skills, never have a problem getting to know people when I take the time. The problem is I'm simultaneously a bit lonely (not a desperation level though) - but also not interested (in meeting people). It's really weird. Note that the "not interested" does not come from a(ny) level of depression, there is none (I know because I used to have a noticeable level of it many years ago, so I know how it feels to be incapacitated by even a small bit of that affliction). I just don't find most people interesting enough. That's not a "looking down" kind of feeling, but merely a mismatch.

A big part of it is the way we all live our lives though, I think. I want (a larger) community and cannot find or even see it, no so much "the one" friendship, or even "just friends". Having superficial talks now and then just isn't enough for me, I'm looking for a larger purpose.
This still fragments your audience.
Ah yes, let me just throw out the hundreds of dollars worth of apps, not to mention the rest of my investment in the ecosystem, because I might have to buy, once, an adapter that costs 1% of the sticker price of the phone and can just be permanently left attached.

“Easy”.
No, I meant to say that open source libraries are especially dangerous.

I get why you may object, but open source libraries have failed us a lot and by contract the .net framework library hasn't.

There are a lot of great open source libraries, that are both well documented and maintained, but there are a lot more that aren't.
We don't just need to consider accessibility for the elderly. I need to regularly reconfigure my Bluetooth connections on my phone. They just randomly stop working. With the latest version of Android, I couldn't figure out how to even access the Bluetooth settings. When I connect some devices, they don't show up in the list of paired devices. Somehow it still ended up working, but I don't know how or why.

When I walk into the bathroom wearing my Bluetooth headphones, my podcasting app starts detecting disconnections and pausing, so I have to turn off the feature to stop playing on headset disconnect. This makes everything else work poorly. My podcast player also often crashes when I connect a Bluetooth device.

My problems get a lot worse when I try to pair a speaker or headphones with multiple devices. I often have to factory reset the device to get it to work again when switching sources.

I'm clearly not the only technically-minded person dealing with random nasty Bluetooth issues, as evidenced by this article and https://xkcd.com/2055/
Is it just me or are we constantly repeating the same lessons, the same messages, over and over and over again?
Clearly the solution is not going back to a 3.5 mm audio jack, but to invent a new standard that everybody will support. We could alsa call it pulse jack and audio will be fixed forever.
> I don't see how opposition to the Stasi or GDR government automatically makes someone a conservative.

His opposition didnt make him a conservative or a liberal. He just is a conservative.
Apple Entrepreneurship Camp for Women
Top 15 Utility Tools for Testers
I don't think it did. I was just like OP here, getting involved in the anonymous boards around 2004 because they were spreading funny images and links.

But I was 19 at the time. And around the age of 26-27 I stopped spending time in that culture.

So I think you just outgrow it.

But those cultures are still alive out there. New people come in, some old people stay.

There are always going to be kids who refuse the "normal" trends like snapchat. Who seek out alternative places and those alternative places are imo still websites. Apps will never breach this space because apps are too easy to adopt by large groups of your peers.

The alt.kids want something tougher, a challenge. And most of all they want to get away from the throng.

I'm just waiting to see persistent community forums in darknets. Of course I don't make an effort to track these things anymore but I'd love to know that it has become a reality.

Anonymity is important because just like games lead to programming and hacking, anonymous forums lead to free expression and sub-cultures. It might look like they're just goofing around but look at what 4chan became. We were just goofing around but enough people came to goof around to make it a potential movement.
It is quite possible for intelligent people to be wrong, especially when they venture outside their area of expertise.

And the cliche about "dominant paradigm" ignores the actual reasons the theory is rejected. Quantum Theory shows that a theory will be accepted even if fundamentally breaks with the dominant paradigm - as long as it can be confirmed by evidence. So that is not really the issue.