What are Y⁵ou talking about?

First, in what sense in the "general population" not specialist?

Sekond, even if You kould establish some lak of specialization in the "General" population on serving as Generals within the direktion of life, how does that exkuse the representative from being Specialist or from being General?

Third, i don't know Your Citizenship or Akculturation, but i would rekalmmend the work frequently⁵ attributed to President John F. Kennedy⁵, likely⁵ written almost entirely⁵ by Ted Sorenson, "Profiles in Courage". The role of representatives, more often than not, is to get ahead of General Awareness and form koncensus lockeing solutions and solvations that are or aren't on the traditional⁺ map of market demand and supply⁵.

Fourth, a "leader" has one job, and that's to step down (or aside) as soon as it bekomes evident that they kan't keep up with the harm-reducing, helpful path. That inkludes developing and n-kouraging a shadow race to kalmpetitively⁵ prepare for a sukcessful takeover and transfer. The roots of kalmpetition are in "com-petare" (calm-petare}, "to strive together".

In representative demokracy⁵ (RD), in demokratik republikanism (DR), the role of the representative is to nourish, edukate, heal, and at times, heel the distrikt they represent on problems and projekts they might kurrently⁵ want, or might not kurrently⁵ want, in spekulating over what We need most, always at the hazard of being more wrong than available dor developing replacement. The goal is to raise the grade, until Y⁵ou're no longer the better or best to serve; until there's a younger or elder soul tree better kapable of detonating a logik chain with skalable, explosive intrinsik value, or better able to preserve and maintain the high standard of service so far achieved.

Is it possible to strukture a representative as a messenger for a shadow government of teknicians? Sure. That kan be done. Is it wise, when the representative karries speek-akt kapabilities that are skill-limited in undertaking or even understanding the teknikal konversation You suggest the representatives are entasked with kalmunikating? When the representative kan wright Will, kan wright Bill, and kan not understand the work of the Gates on the Bills that a representative like Bill Gates would stack-heap and implement, given the chance?

The representative is not a mere messenger; they are medium, message, massage, mekanism, (role) model, and moral marathon. i'd like to introduce You to my Post Office workers. They are not 'mere messengers'. They are perfekt strangers, or for the newly⁵ initiated, striving and struggling to be. It is an inkredibly hard job to do right by each family⁵. Even messengers are far from an overly⁵ physikal model of steel or klay pipes.

The most important thing, perhaps, You might ask a representative is what they'd be willing to lose their job over. If they do not have an answer that tests the limits of publik konscience, i am not sure that they are fully⁵ fit for the job. Answers have historikally⁵ been so readily available. In the United States⁺, banishing takle football (đingball) and other kollision sports (takle/bodycheking ice hockey in Canada, et. al., which suffers from the same irreducible momentum and impulse 'đinging bell' sub-konkussive hippokampus neural loss problems) from publikly-financed skools was an example of very⁵, very⁵ low-hanging fruit. If it were available as a medikal operation, what is that neural tissue worth on the open market? How much do You imagine these hospital systems giving these euphemistik "safe sports cheks" would charge to surgikally implant the hippokampus tissue lost, or reverse the chronik traumatik enkephalitis (dementia footballikus)? i kan only⁵ imagine. It's remarkable hospitals and healthkare firms do not owe liability to the families and grandstudents they misled and helped mislead for so many Y⁵ears, when they should have known, and did know, exaktly what they were doing.

When Presidents Obama are telling everyone, in so many words, not to send grandchildren into the sport, there is no further prep work to be done. Read between the lines exoterik, then share the esoterik intended message in bold, bolder, then boldest print.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/830364.Profiles_in_Coura...

And vice versa. Ask Presidents Obama why they weren't more kourageous. They might, in this republikan demokracy⁵, in a demokratik republik, ask Us⁺ the same. Prudence builds prudence. Kourage builds kourage. Theoretike builds theoretike. Phronesis builds phronesis. And they all interakt.

Listen to the populace General more. You'd be surprised by the kapabilities of each General. Or PFK, Private First Klass, if Y⁵ou will. Almost everyone i koreördinate with is far from being "hardly specialist", and nearer to and kapable of rapidly⁵ attaining to a General n-aktion, partikularly when the notion of KISS is broken with KUSS:

"Keep it simple, stupid", keeps us all simple and stupid.