skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Note how this email includes a password. This particular form of scam relies on taking weak passwords acquired from database dumps and sending the scam email to the password owner, in the hopes that they'll recognize the password and think the email is legitimate (this is especially effective if the owner reuses passwords).

I'm not sure how a mailing list would end up in a dump like that though, as people don't generally sign up for sites using addresses belonging to mailing lists.
As a matter of fact, the "President of the United States" represents the "People", Jim Acosta represents "CNN", which is a "for-profit corporation".
Hmmm, i didn't know that about the openBSD devs. Good to know. I'll have to take good ol' openBSD for a little test drive on my thinkpad. Cheers!
Different layers, perhaps? The DMAing around of physical packets, and the parsing of ARP/IP/TCP headers, require different safety guarantees.
ARIN and RIPE are two of the five regional internet registries:

AFRINIC: African Network Information Center
ARIN: American Registry for Internet Numbers
APNIC: Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre
LACNIC: Latin America and Caribbean Network Information Centre
RIPE: Réseaux IP Européens
The soldered RAM is really bad, making adding RAM impossible. I get it. They want you to buy a new Mac every couple years. It's really annoying.

I've considered adding SDXC 512GB card to the SDXC slot to expand storage, less thing to lug around than an external Thunderbolt drive.
I follow them. You really have no choice if you care about your own and others safety.
Probably $5K/ish.
I have it routed... I have a couple of personal machines off of it.
Linode is still a little better in Hardware Spec, but DO has caught up to all other advantage that it used to hold. IPv6, Private Networking, pooled bandwidth etc. Its block storage and Space offer CDN by default and its faster than Linode. It now has Managed DB solution in beta. At the rate things are going there will be no reason to choose Linode over DO next year.

You could also take a look at upcloud, which is also very good.

I could only wish next year upgrade of DO will up the CPU optimised Droplet to 1:1 CPU Ram Ratio.
I guess the way it feels is subjective — and I certainly have strong opinions about that.

The two class action lawsuits against Apple for the butterfly switches however is some objective proof that something has gone terribly wrong.
You're making an assumption about best. What is best?

Is it personal liberty within the confines of enough law to provide some semblance of stability? The US is straining with that and it is arguably the most free of the Western Nations. Before the EU apologists jump on, keep in mind the EU Human Rights Court ruled that no one is allowed to speak against Mohamed (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/european-court-ind...). Gun violence appears to be leaving the ghettos and moving into more civilized neighborhoods.

Is it an authoritarian power that feeds, houses, and medicates its population? China does a lot of this. Hunger is down dramatically. People are still largely free to go about their daily lives.

Is it in-between? I don't know. The EU is starting to fray there. Nationalist movements are seeing that countries have to give up their current individual identities to conform with a Brussels/German worldview. Is this wrong? How are you to say?

My whole point in all this is that you've alluded to some truth claim as an attack on Google. Can you a) clearly define your truth claim, at least to yourself, and b) say why it's more true than the Chinese view that people are sheep and need a shepard? The Left in the US holds this view to varying degrees. That's why we need all this regulation. No one should be free to buy plastic straws.
>Our society has been set up so that orders of magnitude of more money is spent on advertising technology than clean energy, sanitation, sustainability, and ethical food production.

>It's part of the same system to maximize short-term profit and the whimsical wants of billionaires.

Maybe we should organise our production, decision-making, control and incentives structures differently then, rather than sticking to an old, disastrously inefficient, enormously wasteful and unfair model. Maybe some democratic, social system, if I do make myself clear...
No it hasn't. Paper works great. So great in fact, many security experts recommend returning to a paper backup system (1). The reason we don't have a secure election process is because no one with the power to do anything has any incentive to fix it (a bit of an over-generalization).

(1) https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/05/opinions/to-keep-our-votes-sa...
wow - true that..

> Also, I have yet to figure out how to unhack the hackers from my Instagram so if you change your mind and want to restore my Instagram to its original form as well as help me secure my account from future privacy breaches, I'd be extremely grateful.
What exactly is the claim here with regard to the law of excluded middle? Maybe somewhat naively it seems rather obvious to me that the law of excluded middle can be true or false depending on what objects you are dealing with. Maybe not the best possible example but in classical mechanics a particle is either inside a region R or it is not inside region R while in quantum mechanics the particle may be inside region R or it may not be inside region R or it may be somewhat inside region R.

It seems rather obvious that the logic you are using has to match the behavior of the objects you are applying the logic to or you will of course end up with wrong conclusions. If we change the example a bit, the particle is in region R with probability zero or the particle is in region R with a probability larger than zero, then we again have a case where the set of possibilities is nicely partitioned into two mutually exclusive and exhaustive sets, probability zero and probability not zero. But I guess I am missing something or there wouldn't be a lot of smart people fighting over the issue.
do you think plumber or family doctor are future proof occupations?
Have you ever been through sexual harassment training? Did you feel like it was helpful?

I've been through several and found that no one really takes it seriously. If the things they tell you in sexual harassment training are new to you, you probably aren't going to learn your lesson. Problem employees aren't going to change their behavior. Enforcement of standards is much more critical.

Sexual harassment training is a CYA move by companies.
I disagree. Technology is the very solution to our problems, the driver of social change.

Why? Because our social instincts don't change terribly fast, being coded in DNA. Our hardware/OS is more or less what it was when the last ice age ended. Nobody has extra arms or hearts. People still use "look each other in the eye" and other old school tropes to decide if they are comfortable with a new person.

The only thing that changes us is when some guy figures out you can melt certain ores and turn them into sharp tools. Or when some lady finds out the seeds she harvested from a certain grass can be nurtured into new plants.

Innovations like this change the economy and allow us to organize society differently. People no longer need to spend a large part of the day washing clothes. These days you don't even need to know how to farm or hunt. That means you can do other stuff while still having your needs met.

The only way to solve our social problems is to try to think of better ways use the planet. That's technology.
On what grounds would it be appropriate for the reporter not be allowed to finish their question? Can the White House just silence anyone that are asking difficult questions?
Should've worked in finance, like this guy!
Divide and conquer at it's best. We, the people, are supposed to stop making decisions based on rational thinking and vote according to a social identity that is shoved into our faces constantly. And if enough people have nothing to trust anymore, and think there are conspiracies everywhere, it is easy to fill the void with just one loud person to trust. It is the last resort based on emotions and identity. Well played, well played indeed.
Password Cracker – Generating Passwords with Recurrent Neural Networks (LSTMs)
Avalonia UI Framework – 0.7 Release
There's already a separate interface for that: stick, rudder and throttles.
> Nobody follows these rules.

This is exactly the reason why I ride my bike on the sidewalk even with a bike lane that is divided from the automobile lane with a white line.

I don't care what laws exist, I am not risking my life riding in a bike lane that is really seen as a large automobile lane.
No. The bikes are "e-assisted" and you're supposed to pedal. The e-scooters are not designed to be "e-assisted". You're only supposed to kick to start your ride and the motor takes over from there. There is a max incline the scooters are designed to handle. The intent is not that the scooter goes into an e-assisted mode on a steep incline.
Okay let's just assume I figured out a clever way around your constraints while still avoiding the answer you want us to give. Are you just going to add another constraint to hide from the truth?

Can you at least accept that the burden of proof is on the guy who wants to go bomb random people not on the pacifists.
I believe it would be quite ridiculous as well, any elected employee representative would probably be somehow bought out by the company/board and become useless.
That's what Union Reps in my country do at least - they are basically friends with upper management/board and just strike deals that benefit them rather than the workers
And the MacBook and MacBook Pro w/o touch bar still have the older butterfly keyboard without membrane.

Their line-up is quite a mess. I don't see why they haven't updated the MacBook Pro without touch bar or the MacBook 12". If you want a MacBook Pro without a touch bar, you are basically screwed, unless you can accept a potentially unreliable keyboard.
Seeking Craftsmanship focused/Test loving full stack web dev -Python, SQL, React
In the iPads, the RAM is not stacked onto the CPU, it's normal separate chips. e.g. two Micron here: https://d3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net/igi/WHKDR5ZU6SSQA3qa
Do they own them, or is that a figure of speech?
Probably should be rented so that the unused eventually come back to the pool.
This guy seems hilariously full of himself: http://www.ischiaproject.com/purpose/ (linked from the OP)

> The purpose of the Ischia Project to to provide a visual, personal, and informational perspective of the Island of Ischia in its present state. This project does not serve to be a travel guide for the island, however, it does promote itself as a chance to visit the island through the lens and words of a fellow traveler. Through photos and interviews the reader can start to understand what it means to physically observe Ischia today. It is important to note that the stance in which this project is present is that of an outsider looking in rather than a native to the island.

Shorter: "I was a tourist in Ischia and this is my travel instagram/blog."
That btc address started receiving txs last month and has almost 3 BTC in it. At time of writing that is worth ~20k USD
The other day I was working to build a minimal docker image with a command line tool to interact with http protocol to download a SDK. Other than curl and wget, are there any other commonly used *nix tools for that purpose?
Because they made the decision to be S-compatible, as many statisticians used S+ at the time. At that point in time, the real lispers all used X-Lisp Stat: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XLispStat (in fact, some people objected to the journal of statistical software on the basis that it would only cover XLispStat).
> You could argue that the problem of the bomb is more-so a problem of finding a bad technical solution to the problem of war, but it's quite difficult to think of a beneficial application of the atomic bomb, and thus, very difficult to justify its invention from a moral/valued standpoint.

Well, we know why it was invented in the first place, so it's justification is based on what you think of the II World War, and United States' involvement in it.

As for direct beneficial applications, those are after-the-fact, but two comes to mind:

1) Nuclear propulsion as currently the only feasible way we know of to move large masses through interplanetary space in reasonable timeframes.

2) Russians did some experiments with large-scale landscaping using nuclear bombs. Not sure what's the opinion of specialists in earth sciences, but it looks like a pretty useful tool to have.
SEC fines DEX EtherDelta $400K for operating as unregulated securities exchange
>From now on, I advise you to use good antiviruses and update them regularly (several times a day)!

This is my favorite
I worked for Halliburton as a sysadmin for 12 years.. during that time they owned 34/8 and 134.132/16.

Looking now:

134.132/16: still LGC/HAL

34/10: HAL

34.64/10: Google

34.128/10: HAL

34.192/10: Amazon

So I guess they decided to make some hefty profit...
The company making bombs is the same as the company making software to deliver those bombs via drone.

Both are working in service of making it easier for the government to kill people.
CGNAT will hopefully drive people to IPv6 because it's really quite bad. This talk is really interesting in explaining why it's so bad: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbk4H6EmZzI

Edit: Changed likely to hopefully... as let's be honest, we'll probably still be using IPv4 in a few decades.
Jim Acosta turned question-asking into political opinion generation. Are reporters even supposed to render judgment at a Q&A?
>Can the White House just silence anyone that are asking difficult questions?

Yes, there is no legal obligation, only optics.
> people don't generally sign up for sites using addresses belonging to mailing lists.

And yet some dingus in hyderabad keeps using my email address to sign up on all the job boards in india. Users are weird.
It needs air.
A hundred million cars run curl yet Daniel Stenberg is unable to get a visa for the US.

https://daniel.haxx.se/us-visa.html
They did the same with their e-bikes and then capped them. Quite a dysfunctional solution.
An extremely lucid and concise comment. You are spot on, especially when it comes to how corporations have pushed to erode and corrupt the allegedly "democratic" government institutions.
Beyond Infinity
Hey, Google is becoming an interesting place to work again! :)

(Only partly a joke.)
Speaking of ad-hominems, what you compress as "terrorists and fellow travelers" unpacks to people like Stephen Hawking, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt, Erich Fried, and others... vs. Netanyahu, a Trump sponsor, and others... hmm. Adjectives like "cost effective privately funded" aren't sufficiently inspiring to tip the scales IMO.

The enemy of my enemy isn't my friend though; Israel is indeed under constant attack, and Palestine often used more a tool to try and damage Israel rather than help Palestinians, and while Palestinians don't really need enemies with friends such as Hamas etc. ("fun" fact, suicide bombings against civilians were first done by Palestinians)... criticism of Israel must never imply excusing any of that, and the other way around.

Many people seem to have problems with that, because if the "other side" does bad things and is therefore bad, they can't be bad, too. Which is really problematic when they factually are, and waste a lot of time, and deform many generations, because they consider the correct answer out of bounds. These things will not change. When you forgot Leibowitz for good, he will not cease to be correct, you will be doomed, that is all.

To make it so that one would have to be blind and pretend two wrongs make a right to be a friend, or otherwise be considered an enemy, a "fellow traveler with terrorists", is also not exactly intellectually honest, and only moves flyweights. As Schopenhauer said, ignorance starts to become really shameful when it is combined with wealth.

That it took a slob like Trump to recognize Jerusalem, something not even Bush did, or that the sponsor of this moon expedition also sponsored Trump, that's not "fellow travellership", at all. That's just coincidence, a broken clock being right twice a day, nothing to do with the spirit of it.
This is valid R

sum(1:10)

This is also valid R:

(sum (1:10))
I mean, yeah? I know there have been cases where drone strikes were justified, but it really only takes one instance of "We think there's some terrorists at this wedding, so let's fire a fragmentation missile into the middle of it, and then another one a few minutes later to make sure we kill the paramedics and firemen too" to decide that the US military is not responsible enough to be allowed to make these decisions.

Edit: Actually I'll go further than that. You lose all moral authority to wage war the moment you start deliberately targeting civilian medics, and that's standard policy with US drone strikes. See "double-tap."
I'm not sure. He's specifically saying technology can't achieve idealistic goals, even with careful and strategic thinking.

It requires "humanity" to achieve those goals. So if idealistic goals aren't achieved, it's not because Google did the wrong thing, it's because Google's users didn't do the right thing.

So it's a diversion of responsibility away from Google, which frees them to take a less vision-directed and more financially-directed approach.
Specially when your bedroom light fail because of bad wifi or when your roomba's AI doesn't recognize your cute dog's poop.
The Essential Guide to High Performance Teams
And we all get to decide whether or not we think that instruction was appropriate.

Personally, I don't. The federal government answers to the people. If we, the people, are not well-informed about what the federal government is doing, we can't make good decisions about how we're going to vote.
I disagree. Bike lanes are extremely dangerous for cyclists and the current implementation of bike lanes in this country are really just big automobile lanes.

It puts all the risk on the cyclist. I have had numerous friends get hit and run while riding bikes on bike lanes, most recently a friend died from it.

I'll happily receive any citations for riding my bike or e-scooter on the sidewalk, and take full responsibility for any accidents I get into. It's not even up for discussion in my mind.

In the UK:
> In 2015, two pedestrians were killed and 96 seriously injured after being hit by a bicycle. But every year more than 100 cyclists are killed and more than 3,000 seriously injured on British roads

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cycle-safety...
> They belong in the bike lane (which should exist in the first place)

A bike lane really isn't safe enough to get people on bikes and scooters into it. It needs to be a separated cycle track like what is common in Copenhagen. This takes more space, but increases capacity of the whole road (the cycle track has more capacity than the driving lane it takes away).

There are a zillion other benefits too - more active/healthier population, higher retail spending along the cycle track (https://its.ucdavis.edu/inthenews/the-complete-business-case...), higher property values, only taking 30lbs of metal with you on every trip instead of 2000lbs, potentially local fuel source (food from nearby rather than oil or electricity from afar), etc etc etc.
A /23 with the router in the middle of it? Surely that can't be common. If someone actually chose that (to be annoying or security through obscurity or whatever) then they know what they're doing

DHCP giving out a client address of 192.168.1.0 in the middle of a lagre block sure, but a router?
A version of that is one of the more useful tidbits of advice I got from GTD. I'm not a big fan in general but there are a few tidbits and that's one of them.
Why is this even being talked about? The intern grabbed the microphone, he pushed her arm out of the way, it doesn't really seem like a big issue at all. Even in the gif it looks pretty minor.
Meh. I think reaching for the mike was OK. She didn't push, and disengaged when he made it clear ("excuse me ma'am") he wasn't going to comply. Literally, she reached around for the mike, their arms bumped, and she sat down. That is just not a violent incident in any reading.

But note that the complaint here isn't that it was sped up, it's that it was actually doctored; the motion of his arm, alone, was sped up to look like a "karate chop" while the rest of the video remains at normal speed. There is a superimposed version floating around on twitter that shows this trickery. It's... pretty scary.
You've entirely missed the point of the quote, and in fact, you're agreeing with him.
People already walk in them. Might as well bring another vehicle into the mix to keep those pedestrians out!
Hey, thanks for the reply. I'm browsing on my smartphone (android 8 / chrome), and all I see are 3 navigation cues on the screen:
1) feed
2) products
3) an "up" arrow floating at the bottom right to take me up.

Clicking on the logo takes me to the feed page. So I can't seem to find the left panel at all..or get to the main page (unless the main page is the feed page)?

Appreciate your reply! :)
Another journalist accused the president of being a white nationalist at this same Q&A. At what point do journalists become journalists again instead of political commentators?
This is mostly due to the keyboard still being part of the chassis.

And they mention having to remove the logic board to replace the battery as a downside.
That is such a false dichotomy.

Consider arming police officers with tasers. We were promised it would be an alternative to guns and help protect civilians but instead police officers use tasers a ton and still shoot people a ton as well.[1]

There’s always the excuse new smarter technologies will save lives but it ends up the “safer” they are the lower the threshold to use.

1. Da_chicken’s reply below has a good source!
Technology != Computers

Mass producable pens and paper, decent locks, and nationwide logistic networks have made elections accountable, verifiable, and secure decades ago.
Show HN: Find a trail to run near you
Object-capabilities design might be a net performance win, despite its overhead, if it can obviate some/all layers of “workload-oblivious” sandboxing (e.g. VM hypercalls, container network sandboxing, ring0–3 context switching, separate process memory maps with associated TLB cache flushes, etc.) Capability checks can be optimized away when you (the program loader, e.g. the kernel) know they’re not necessary; while you can never transparently optimize a syscall or hypercall into a regular function call.

Ideally, under a capability-based OS, you can just have a unikernel that directly loads user-supplied(!) modules in a bytecode format where instructions have capability-checking as an intrinsic; and then, after performing static analysis on those modules to guarantee that they don’t do anything crazy, the kernel module loader can JIT them into native code that doesn’t need to do the capability checks. Basically like if the entire userland consisted of ePBF programs—but with higher-level exposed semantics that allow for rich access to kernel structures, rather than just their handles.

Plus, you also get the benefit of safe sharing of higher-level data abstractions. A “native” userland process has to make syscalls using, at most, registers containing pointers to strings or fixed-size non-polymorphic structs. A capability-based userland module, meanwhile, could interact with the kernel even through reads and writes to a shared-memory tree or hashmap.

Essentially, with capabilities, you get all the benefits of every program having the same low-overhead access to the kernel that a kernel driver does, with none of the drawbacks of having to guard against corrupting the kernel’s state.