skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And if the schematics were there, you'd hope for a complete metallurgical breakdown of each of the wires inside. ;-)

If went out and bought the PSU yourself, you wouldn't have any more information. I think that's a reasonable standard to hope for.
Very thorough review!

Phone reviews are pretty tough to go by. I'm including users comments on phones. If you're going with a major brand like Google or Apple chances are that your phone will be damn good. For the other tiers do some research to make sure the phone is obviously not bad or you can live with purported issues.

Hopefully you can go with a phone that has a decent return policy in case it's not great.

The reason I'm typing this is because if you go online for phone reviews you will probably only get an iPhone. There are plenty of great phones out there where minor issues get blown out of proportion.
It's not great, even in 4.13. Price I pay for stable is that "new" features take a while.
From now on, if the arguments of a method call are to be splitted across multiple lines, the comma must be at the end of the line, before the line break.

Out of curiosity, what's the purpose of this change? Style enforcement? Simpler parser?
I've often wondered why universities themselves don't publish each others papers. I understand that there will be cliques as that is standard human behavior but:

-They can maintain their own web servers and have a service charge

-It's an extra project for IT departments that holds real world importance

By eliminating the publisher wanting to make a profit the cost of publishing an be decreased.

Is this a viable start?
I'm not really sure what you mean by accepted and interpretation here. Feynman diagrams encode the idea of particles traveling backwards in time very strongly -- it's one of their principle features. Feynman's 1949 paper on "The Theory of Positrons"[1] states as much in the abstract (I would recommend reading at least the abstract -- effectively he succinctly contrasts the new theory with the old one and how the model of positrons being backward-traveling electrons allows you to explain many observed effects).

And given that Feynman diagrams (and many other things based on them like Feynman path integrals, QED, and QCD) are the backbone of quantum theory, I think it's more than a safe bet that this view is widely accepted. One of the many predictions using them is the existence (and method of synthesis) of the Higgs boson.

The reason I said "maybe" is because it's important to have a distinction between models and reality (maybe bringing this up in this discussion was a bad idea). Physics is all about constructing models that approximate reality with strong predictive power, it's not really interested in what reality is but rather how it can be modeled so we can predict it. Obviously, the models have to be true on some level in order to be reliable, but many examples (like fields for instance) are not real objects.

So while saying "the particles are traveling backward in time" (theory == reality) is the most accurate statement you can make with modern physics, I would say "at the very least the particles act like particles that are traveling backwards in time" (theory >= model). Even if newer theories are discovered that invalidate the current theories the latter is still just as true of a statement -- otherwise Feynman's models wouldn't work and we know for a fact that they do.

Does that make more sense?

> a single particle oscillating through spacetime gives rise to all matter everywhere by doing the loop in indefinite cycles

This is the idea of the "one electron universe" (which attempted to explain why all electrons appear to be so identical that we've never detected discrepancies)[2], which was arguably one of the inspirations for Feynman's 1949 paper. To be clear, this is a non-standard interpretation of the implications of Feynman's ideas (though this was actually an idea pitched by John Weller on a phone call to Feynman very late at night). Like most interpretations of quantum mechanics, it doesn't make much of a difference to your life -- at the end of the day the maths is the same either way.

[1]: https://authors.library.caltech.edu/3520/1/FEYpr49b.pdf
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
I think concrete5 is decent. Not sure if it's open source or not.
If the system identifying "automated" accounts (in thousands) is run by a party-affiliated entity, what confidence should I have that it is accurate?
>Do we agree that harmful inaccurate information should be screened for and eliminated?

What prevents them from removing say, any information about workers rights because THEY deem it harmful? This is a very dangerous road to go down, that leads right to fascism.
“Grokking Deep Learning” – All Code Examples Now on GitHub
Global conspiracy is not improbable. Think about Cold War, the drastic culture difference and the fear from the fact westerners know little about China
Thanks.
However I am not much into Crypto and Blockchain, just distributed systems (not necessarily decentralised).
Still waiting on what terms they would have broke. It's not hate speech, it's not illegal, it's not disturbing.
To be honest, it would surprise me if they are not already doing this.

On a side note, when you install, launch and maximize TOR browser, you get a warning advising you not to maximize it. Web servers/attackers can use max screen size as an additional point to determine your identity.
Crypto Law – October Recap
Can anyone tell me: are all these accounts phone activated? I remember trying to setup multiple accounts on Twitter before (as a small experiment - I have too much free time) and was prompted for my phone number, where Twitter would then send a code to my phone for verification. I only had one burner sim at the time to use for one dedicated account. So I imagine whoever is behind these info ops has a lot of sim cards to use exclusively for Twitter? It boggles my mind how these people manage to setup so many accounts. They have to be buying sim cards in bulk.
It doesn’t sound any more complicated given that. “I had no idea they would have a problem hosting my anti-Semitic writings or calls for violence, because the rules aren’t well defined, and they’re constantly changing, it’s so arbitrary!” is not convincing at all.
This is clearly a DoD play. The federal government as a whole is thirsty for cloud services and having a services provider like Amazon literally at their doorstep is going to win them a lot of work. If they do bring good experts to government work instead of what the typical government contractors in the area provide this will be a good thing for taxpayers.
Not me551ah, but the problem with Android is that:

1. iOS is an Apple operating system. Every iOS device has a daemon running a service that connects with Apple's APNS (Apple Push Notification Service), and that service routes the notifications of every App to the user's device. APNS is non-negotiable, every iOS device has it running, and every App that wants to [reliably] deliver notifications must use it. It's part of the OS, so the OS won't kill it, in fact, if it crashes, the OS restarts it. It also means it's "well behaved", meaning it won't mine cryptocurrencies in the background (unless Apple breaks bad and decides that it's $1T value is not worth it anymore).

2. Android is not a strictly Google operating system. Google has it's APNS analogous, GCM (Google Cloud Messaging), but not every Android device has ties with Google, its open source, meaning millions (billions?) of Android devices out there are running without any Google ties. So in turn, many Apps device to have their own background tasks running all the time, with a persistent connection to the server to watch for notifications. Problem with this it's okay when you have 10 Apps with notifications, not when you have 100 Apps with notifications, each one having it's own background service. Some Android OEM's want their users to have great batt life and kill those background services, leaving notifications dead.
They don't want people to know they're deleting accounts of real people who are simply expressing dissent.
Are you trying to argue that the Supreme court is just an irrelevant fluff job? Probably also the same argument could be made for general officers and diplomats?
Sure, third parties can request access to the graph API by asking the user for permission.

But Facebook issnt selling that access! Access to the APIs is free.

Now users just giving any random app access is a whole different can of worms...you have the same issue on Android and iOS with permission dialogs...people worry about Amazon Alexa recording everything they say, but will give any app microphone/camera access to do just the same if the app creator is ill intended.
Howard Hughes Jr. is much more likely.
They could disclose their warrants after cases have closed and there are no loose ends.
> 90% of scientists have no choice.

100% of scientists have an option to publish a copy in arxiv or biorxiv. It's not happening.

> are directly linked to where you publish

And therein lies the problem, which, if solved, will make open access redundant. I have never seen a conference with a panel "how to change funding criteria". Publishers like elsevier act as a trusted "third party" that validates scientists, and are trusted precisely because they are a third party (i.e. they are perceived as immune to academic politics). Whatever solution is to be found, it will probably have to include such a third party, but in the form of a reviewer who gives grades, not one who withholds the world's scientific output for its own gain. It might be a simple third-party ratings system , like how ratings agencies rate banks. It is a discussion that should have started years earlier.
ADBiast
What kind of company is AdBlast?
AdBlast is a very powerful Internet legal enterprise in the United States with operations in many countries around the world.

AdBlast is a multimedia social networking platform with as many functions as FACEBOOK, and it is the only enterprise with sharing economy mode in global social media. Its advanced business model is unprecedented and it is at the leading level in the world. It can be expected that AdBlast will quickly become a very popular "we media" in the asia-pacific region, combined with the network information operation. With the support of big data, it is bound to create a steady stream of revenue for the entire platform. The smartest place for AdBlast, AdBlast charges for advertising packages and allocates AD revenue according to different AD package quotas!

Why does AdBlast respond to such high AD campaigns? Because what AdBlast needs is big data. What it needs is more people to use its software and its platform. Let me give you an example. When didi dache was first promoted in China, what was the method used? It is the way to send the customer to ride in the car, and finally burn the money to give the driver!

Such as WeChat, youtube and so on that we use daily... It doesn't sell anything, but most people use it, the people who use it, what's the concept of hundreds of millions of people? Explain a matchless huge market, no matter sell what product to be able to sell, also can help the product of other people home make advertisement, collect advertisement fee! Does that make sense? That's why doing AdBlast makes millions! ! ️ company stability is the key! Register for free https://adblast.org/r/aaa139
Marginal utility of time spent working usually declines.

That is to say that time off will pay off in increased productivity.

Another way to say it, insufficient rest has its own cost.
This has happened many times before in more localized settings. The big difference to our situation is that the pertaining cultures were most likely plain ignorant about the dynamics that lead to their demise.

We are lucky that we do have all the knowledge but instead of taking action we constantly bathe ourselves in dystopian fantasies and social media whining (Q.E.D.) without any vision other than what seems like a global death-wish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Chimpanzee#Environme...
> All he had to do was research.

And that's the problem. One platform offers, mostly, sane defaults with strong privacy guarantees and no bloatware, the other requires you to invest time and effort, first to research, then enact.
But “mainframe” was exclusively used for big batch and time-sharing iron

In return, I will respectfully disagree with you, and back up my assertion with the following citations:

"Don't worry any more about wiring hundreds of wires in your Altair to expand the mainframe" - Byte Magazine, October 1975, page 21

"Need Altair IMSAI/POLY 88 mainframe, memory or what-have-you." - Byte Magazine, January 1977, page 98

"Our modular systems use common Vector 3 mainframes, boards, and printers." (Vector was a Z80A desktop computer that ran CP/M) - Byte Magazine, December 1980, page 89

"Z80 CPU, 4 Mhz, with one serial port; 12 slot S-100 mainframe, disk controller, 64K Dynamic Ram, CP/M 2.2... $1,645" - Byte Magazine, December 1980, page 156

"The OSI Challenger is the only completely- assembled, ultra-high-performance, fully-expandable mainframe computer that does this much for this little" (The OSI Challenger was a desktop computer) - Byte Magazine, November 1976, page 19

"MERLIN (trademark of MiniTerm Associates) is a new concept in peripherals modules for mainframe microcomputer systems." (Merlin was a dumb terminal for IMSAI and Altair desktop comptuers) - Byte Magazine, November 1976, page 64

"That's why we offer three mainframes including the Altair 680b, Altair 8800a, and Altair 8800b; ten peripherals including a multi-disk system; and over 20 plug compatible modules including our new, low power 16K static memory board." - Byte Magazine, December 1976, page 17

As I stated, it wasn't until the 1980's that "mainframe" changed to only refer to big iron.
There's nothing wrong with it.
- reading ext4 is possible but hard (OpenBSD doesn’t support journaling filesystems); you’re better off with ext2 or FAT
- video support with AMD GPUs is good, much better than NVIDIA
- OpenBSD has a good sound stack that supports most audio systems
- full disk encryption is easy to set up and mentioned in the article
- UEFI and GPT work wonderfully on recent versions
Unfortunately not.

There are four scenarios to consider:

1. You do what’s best for the world, and the world is saved.

2. You ignore the big picture and the world is lost.

3. You do what’s best for the world, but the world is still lost because too many others didn’t do the same.

4. You ignore the big picture and the world is still saved because enough other people did the right thing.

Regardless of what happens, you’re personally better off ignoring the big picture and hoping that other people fix the problem. If disaster is coming, at least you’ll have a better life in the remaining time you have. If it’s not, why hurt yourself?

The exception to this is if your own personal actions make the difference to avoid disaster, i.e. that you go from scenario 2 to 3 above by changing what you personally do. But the chances of that being the case are extremely tiny. You need collective action to solve these problems.
Thank you for this tip: I saw your comment this morning and went today (am visiting London). Great stuff. Not as much vintage “modern” computing as the Computer History Museum in Mountain View but lots of amazing things, and of course lots about the Enigma and code breaking.
See citations in the comment I posted above.
One can consider opportunity cost without forgetting non-economic value. I take more vacation than most Americans, probably more than most Europeans, too.
Huawei phones are still great in terms of affordability with high end spec. Tell the nonrich people more about the eavesdropping and most don’t give it shit
I would agree. The west had a chance to reform their education systems to become different with the new information age, but most countries choose not to. In fact they have been going the other way. Today in most countries things like housing, grades, connections and insurance are even more important than it used to be. Turns out people really do not want to compete on similar terms in the open market.
Leonardo da Vinci could visually flip between dimensions, neuroscientist claims
New insights on comet tails are blowing in the solar wind
Does anyone know if OpenBSD can run properly on a Macbook?
It's incredible how many participants in this topic don't seem to grasp the delicacy of earth's ecosystem and see it as something that is easily replaced or that humans can exist without.

Let's not kid around; if the ecosystem of goes the way of the way of the dodo, humans will go along for the ride.

You might (or not) have noticed that humans don't exist outside of the ecological system that our plant harbors. We're part of this ecological network, we're fully, totally, non-negotiable dependent on it. Techno-utopian dreams (nightmares, more like it) of being independent of the 'natural' world are not going to save mankind; we're part of 'nature', we exist within nature, there's no existence for humans outside nature. We need an ecosystem that provides us with calories and oxygen. The only ecosystem in existence that is capable of providing that is the very ecosystem we're working tirelessly to dismantle and destroy. So yes; we might die out because of lack of resources. We very probably will.
There's only so much damage that an ecosystem can take. And there are tons of signs that signal that our earthly ecosystem is reaching it's breaking point; - we've lost about a third of the arable land in the last forty years. - we've lost about 30% of bio diversity in the last twenty years. - we've lost almost 75% of insect biomass in the last thirty years.

The loss of insects is especially alarming; insects play a major role in all food webs on earth. The disappearance of 75% of insects (biomass, not species) has a catastrophic impact of everything further up the food chain. Yes, including humans.

We're currently working non-stop to destroy our ecosystem's capacity to carry animals in the upper food chain. Guess who's on top of that food chain. Yes, us humans.

Don't kid yourself; we're currently rushing full-speed ahead towards a full-scale ecosystem collapse. And don't fool yourself on our ability to create and maintain a man-made closed ecosystem as a replacement; we're not able to do that and we probably won't for many, many, many decades to come.

The only ecosystem we have to save our collective asses is the one we're currently punishing every day with our overproduction, overconsumption, with our fertilizers, insecticides, pesticides and waste.

It's so past high times that we - humans, as a collective - have a hard talk how much longer we want to exist as a 'civilized' species, with global trade, no struggle for survival, boundless capitalism.

Because if we keep going, we've got a dozen or so decades left. It's back to hunter gathering for the rest of mankind's existence after that.

If we leave enough prey species alive, that is. Otherwise that will be the end of mankind's short stint.
And worth it to step inside Alan Turing’s office (to be clear, that’s in a nearby but separate museum at Bletchley Park).
You're just repeating the same invalid argument. Go and look up the history of widespread small scale anti-lefist incidents in that era that occurred before the HUAC existed.
EVO PDF has a .NET Core version

http://www.evopdf.com/netcore-html-to-pdf-converter.aspx
Hardware experts disassembled every single phone and put them back. Good luck with that(oh! It brings manufacturing back to US. MAGA!)
How do we trust that these were "automated" when we have no example accounts or actual evidence?
You can run as Guest on a Chromebook. No Google account required.
I imagine that won't be the case for long I'd the rumors are true
And sometimes the very people saying we have to get rid of one awful system are the ones sitting behind the controls of another one.

-poorly paraphrased Chomsky
While the term "mainframe" was common in advertisements, it was also used in the article text of magazines.

For example:

"MERLIN (trademark of MiniTerm Associates) is a new concept in peripherals modules for mainframe microcomputer systems." (Merlin was a dumb terminal for IMSAI and Altair desktop comptuers) - Byte Magazine, November 1976, page 64
Truth (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
I believe it's called the "Vapor Chamber": https://www.vapor.io/chamber/
You misunderstand. The DCCC just informed Twitter, which they should have the right to do. Anyone should have the right to report accounts. Twitter alone made the decision to remove them.
The phone is good, but the price is nuts. I'd rather have a disposable Chinese phone and spend the difference on Sony A7 III.
Can just eat less meat and gain 10x efficiency.
It’s much more popular to hate China nowadays. Blame China to rob everything from us
I think everyone agrees that outsourcing work to third world economies creates immense wealth in first world economies. We also know that burning fossil fuels is the cheapest way to make useful heat. That doesn't mean it doesn't have a lot of negative unintended consequences.
> concrete5 is an Open Source
Content Management System (CMS)

source: https://www.concrete5.org/ -- https://github.com/concrete5
Just sent you an email, thx.
Isnt it different use case, though? If you want code executed - use replit, if you want editor use ACE.

But replit is not opensource, what would I use to have a repl on my site?
"Go with your gut" is code word for "which HQ2 city offered the greatest tax exemptions" ;-)

Oregon gave Intel a 30 year property tax exemption, worth $2B, to establish their their HQ2 fabs near Hillsboro. Wouldn't be surprised if Amazon is asking for similar.

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2014/08/...
I came here to recommend Django, it’s really productive.
> they enjoy being blocked.

They won't give a shit. They make their billions from university subscriptions not home-users.
It's a data center; why would it have different security properties than any colo facility?
The deal with Apple's metallurgy team 'New Discovery'
According to the formula I provided, to slerp for example, rotors require lambda and theta. Whereas quaternions only require the lambda. Is there an alternative I'm missing?
Which username? I use @b on Aether.
>Twitter is being brazenly used as a propaganda tool by terrible actors with terrible agendas. It's infested with strange accounts of dubious authenticity - which I think is fairly obvious looking through the replies to prominent political accounts.

Look through Rebel HQ's Youtube interviews and you may be surprised to see that these "strange accounts" are probably just heavily brainwashed and weird Americans.
Simpler code. This style of code was accepted by the parser but not the automated code formatter. We decided it was easier to disallow it, as the style was uncommon (especially so as ruby doesn't accept that style either, and a lot of crystal's style guidelines are based off ruby's)
it's one of the reasons why we don't need NN
What the parent post is demonstrating is how much the OP's question is a non sequitur. Quality is always going to be measured by domain so asking for a list of measurable qualities outside of context is unanswerable.

Skills that amount to the "hello world" of web development can be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to an expanding or new company, but are worth less than pennies to a Netflix. Trying to measure quality without context is, imo, one of the biggest drivers to the cluster fuck that is tech recruiting.
As much as I appreciate the software efforts put in this but hardware wise a Chinese phone offers the same stuff for half the price.
Clojure wrapper for XGBoost4J (machine learning)
Which full stack?
I thought about doing something like this with orbitdb. maybe large content, like video, could be using ipfs.