skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> They just had a vision about how X or Y technology should be , and just created something

And the money for covering expenses and living came from..?

> It's about having a vision.

I have the vision that crap like Hadoop should be rewritten in Go. Shall I dive in and start re-writing?

Where are all the crypto visionaries nowadays?
> Other JVM languages like Groovy are significantly ahead of Clojure in all rankings.

Apache Groovy fluctuates on TIOBE a lot. Six months ago it was at the same 50-ish position as Clojure, which is its usual ranking. It's shot up only in the past 6 months, which has also happened a lot in the past and is always followed by a sudden fall -- perhaps someone's gaming the search engine rankings. On Redmonk, Groovy and Clojure have ranked equal-ish for a long time. In the CloudFoundry report, Groovy is at the same very low rank as Others which would include Clojure if present.

So Groovy and Clojure are at the same ranking in all rankings I've looked at.
I love JavaScript and hate NoScript.
Golang errors library
I left another comment here [1] with some of my introductory JY thoughts and recs! But to be honest I've never read an English translation of his work, so I have no idea what the quality of it is like. He writes in extremely poetic language that is rooted deeply in the Chinese grammatical structure that I imagine will be difficult to translate. That being said since you do have some experience with reading asian literature I would definitely recommend The Legend of the Condor Heroes as a great intro-JY book.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18352268
As always, the burden of proof lies (knee slap!) with those who claim a lie detector does work.
Machine Learning marketplace for onnx, pmml or pfa?
> This License Means More Open Source Code

I don't think that will happen. I think they will just sell more commercial licenses, which seems to be the entire (valid imo) point of this license change.
Do you think there is a market for onnx,pmml or pfa based machine learning models?
I am trying to build one https://machine-learning1.sharetribe.com/infos/about
What is your opinion on this topic?
Would you sell your pre-trained machine-learning models as pfa, pmml or onnx if there existed such a market?
Who would be your target audience?
Thanks for your help.
Block third-party cookies.

Keep local data only until you quit your browser.
Secession has pretty much always had to be fought for (US, Ireland), but peaceful (Czechslovakia) and semi-peaceful (India) secession is possible.
its a start....
It's strange to see this thread full of outrage over China's acts and demanding they give the Uyghur their sovereignty when Xinjiang borders Afghanistan. Nothing they are doing is worse than the seventeen years that the US has held sovereignty of Afghanistan, resulting in hundreds of thousands of dead.
I think that it's quite reasonable to consider Tolkien as one of the best world-builders in the Western canon. But that is unsurprising, given that the man basically devoted his entire life to constructing a single imaginary world - he was a world-builder first, and writer second (and far better at the first than he was at the second, IMO). Most authors create a world to tell their stories in, and it's only as detailed as the story needs it to be. Tolkien wrote stories as, basically, illustrations to his world-building. Most of them didn't even get cleaned up to be publishable until long after his death.
I'll accept a pull request with no CLA so long as the code is of decent quality.

If you accept contributions without a CLA, you are not the sole owner of the copyrights anymore and you cannot offer a proprietary paid branch, unless all contributors give you permission to relicense their AGPL code as proprietary.
Can I get JUST the embeddings out of the model for lets say:"My cat dance in the rain" and compare that with the embeddings from "my dog runs in the rain" to compare math-wise(vector-diff) how close they are ?
I used to love LOTR, but after reading Malazan book of the fallen, I can't hold it in very high regard anymore. It paved the way for sure, created a genre even, but as for pure gripping story and overall enjoyment during reading (my primary goals when I choose to read fantasy), it has been surpassed by huge amount.
Or at least the only adversarial interaction.
When I was at Google I started both the login risk analysis project and the Javascript-based bot detection framework they're now enforcing, so it's a pity to see so many angry comments. Maybe a bit of background will make it seem more reasonable.

Firstly, this isn't some weird ploy to boost ad revenue. This is the login page - users are typing in a long term stable identifier already! The Javascripts they are requiring here are designed to detect tools, not people. All mass account hijacking attacks rely on bots that either emulate or automate web browsers, and Google has a technology that has proven quite effective at detecting these tools. There's a little bit of info on how it works scattered around the internet, but none of the explanations are even remotely complete, and they're all years old now too. Suffice it to say: no JS = no bot signals.

Google had the ability to enforce a JS-required rule on login at least 6 years ago and never used it until now. Without a doubt, it's being enforced for the first time due to some large account hijacking attack that has proven impossible to stop any other way. After so many years of bending over backwards to keep support for JS blocking users alive, it's presumably now become the weakest link in the digital Maginot line surrounding their network.

For the people asking for the risk analysis to be disable-able: you used to be able to do that by enabling two-factor authentication. You can't roll back your account to just username and password security though: it's worth remembering that account hijacks are about more than just the immediate victim. When an account is taken over it's abused and that abuse creates more victims. Perhaps the account is used to send phishing mails to your contacts, or financial scams, or perhaps it's used to just do normal spamming which can - at enough volume - cause Gmail IPs to get blocked by third party spam filters, and user's emails to get bounced even if their own account is entirely secure. The risk analysis is mostly about securing people's accounts, but it's also about securing the products more generally too.
Making 'Heros' accessible to anyone
Tolkien is the Tolkien of Chinese literature. His books are translated into multiple languages and his ideas travel well.
Stop posting extreme hyperboles all around the discussion, please
You seem to be getting a bunch of criticism; so I'd listen to them. I don't like you might translate to "hey - can you improve your communication skills", and I'm rewriting your code to "this works, but is unmaintainable" etc.

Sure, some people are just jerks, but not usually consistently. So when someone doesn't like you, defuse the situation and ask what would help instead. You win listening points and also improve at whatever you were maybe messing up. And with people who are just being mean, you make them realise it.
Herein lies the problem. Notice you said "I believe that... but could be interpreted".

I've worked with some copyright lawyers that basically said "it's impossible to know, and we'd rather just avoid the question to begin with", and forbade us from using AGPL in any of our deployments.
Πόσο Σημαντικό Είναι Το Σεξ Για Έναν Άντρα Τελικά; – ATHENS CALL GIRLS
Indeed, a aviation company ( Miles Aircraft ) in my home town took a license from Bic in the late 1940s to start manufacture of their roller-ball Biro pen.

I have a hard time believing that China couldn't replicate that technology for 70 years.
I don't think I've ever spoken to an on-duty police officer in my life.
They have been at https://www.wolvessummit.com/ - they are preparing for a funding round. You can find them at other events listed on their page: https://fingerprints.digital/event/
We didn't care that the Saudis were killing dissidents in their own country and slaughtering civilians in Yemen for years. It wasn't until they killed a US resident that anyone gave a single shit, there won't be any objection to China's acts.
I agree that they might have a legal right to do this, but it doesn't mean this is aligned with the interests of the general free software / open source community and thus it is entirely their right to shun, criticise and disapprove of this move and this licence. Particularly so because they are (arguably) violating an implicit social contract it had with its contributors in the past.

This might be a good thing in the end because it exposes a new downside to CLAs and might make people think twice before signing them in the future.

> If the outside world wants more open source code, I don't see why they'd giving MongoDB any flak for this. All this license will do is result in more open-source code. After all, isn't that the point all along?

It would be a good thing if we could reasonably expect the effect to be that companies might release more open source code as a result. Yet the licence is so vague and broad that the much more likely intention (and effect) is that other companies will be forced to buy the proprietary licence to avoid the impracticability of using code under SSPL. I also don't think this kind of overreach in what is required to be open sourced just because you're using a component X is acceptable.
Stockholm says no to Apple 'town square' in its oldest park
Furthermore, on Firefox 55 and uBlock Origin only the first 2 paragraphs are shown. Luckily outline.com works once again: https://www.outline.com/eACAzB
If something shitty is happening, you don't have to shrug your shoulders coswhatyagonnado. Understanding the human reason why something shitty is happening doesn't mean you have to accept it. So it goes, until it doesn't.
To me, that feels more like a hidden contract. Giving away for free a software only to require the user to do the same.

That's why I prefer BSD-style licenses - when they write "free", they mean "free".
I built the cmoy. It was easy. But I know nothing about how it works, and I remember reading warnings on associated web pages like "this is not a guitar amp" etc. I'm curious to know a little more about how these (amps generally) work, why they're seemingly non trivial to design at a reasonable quality level etc.
> I would like to make it explicit that only flesh and blood individuals should have access to freedom 0.

So basically, turn freedom 0 into not freedom 0.

For reference, GNU freedom 0 is “the freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose”.

What you are saying seems to go against the principles of freedom 0, and I don’t get your motivation either, because at the same time you don’t seem to mind proprietary software.

My main issue with what you are saying is that it’s not clear what you mean by “removing freedom 0 for corporations”. Do you mean specifically when they are offering software written by someone else as a direct service to customers? What about using it in the backend? What about employees using FOSS?

There is a lot more to be said and discussed about this.
I find the parent's Einstein example odd, as I would have called him exactly what you suggested no one would call him. He was German born, but I wouldn't hesitate to say he was American, Swiss or Austrian
I think you've missed the point of most of the uproar. I haven't seen anybody claiming MongoDB doesn't have the right to use whatever license they like. I have however seen lots of people claim that it's a bad decision to use this latest license.

And people are free to criticize decisions all they want. It's really no different from the usual claims of bad technical decisions by MongoDB. Now people are just saying they're making bad business decisions too.

The rights discussion is largely irrelevant at this point.
The Boss Katana is an ideal beginner amp that can handle bedroom practice through small gigs.

It's extremely versatile and sounds great.
Snail mails without consent from Vodafone. I want to be forgotten
Yes, JY stories are his own. One could read Romance of the Three Kingdoms and have a reasonably textual understanding of that time period. One could not say the same of JY; he simply borrowed setting and context and time.
Dmytri Kleiner has something to say about this and published a Copyfarleft license called Peer Production License.

http://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%233notebook_telekom...
While I see why you might feel this way, I wrote an article about this and would appreciate if you give it a read. https://medium.com/@dan_abramov/making-sense-of-react-hooks-...
Approximately. I don't think there is anything special about his work being banned before - it's typical to ban works not aligned with the communist ideology before the reform in 1980s.

On exile: like many intellectuals, he fled mainland China before the founding of PRC.
Forgive me for being thick, but is your point that we'd need to have a politician's insight to understand the decision?
We throw ourselves on Termux and in fact it works. This vuln in Tw allows exfiltration methods and we can even try steganography...

$curl 'https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DqteCf6WsAAhqwV?format=jpg' > output $ file output output: JPEG image data, JFIF standard 1.01, aspect ratio, density 1x1, segment length 16
$ strings output.jpg | grep PK $./binwalk output.jpg
$7z x shakespeare.part001.rar
$ file shakespeare.html shakespeare.html: XML 1.0 document, UTF-8 Unicode (with BOM) text, with CRLF line terminators
Credential stuffing more commonly refers to the practice of getting valid sets of creds from various password database dumps and retrying them across common/popular systems.

2FA is a good defence against it, but lockouts are less as they attacker will be going broad and not deep (could be a single request per user account)
This would mean that corporations will have no incentive to use or contribute to free software -- 80% of contributions to the Linux kernel are people working for corporations.

I also don't see why limitation of liability is the point where right to use free software should be curtailed -- there already is no liability in software (see the no warranty clause in literally every software license). Why not put the line at making a profit at all? (Because it's obvious that disallowing users to make any money at all with a free software license would clearly be an issue.)
That&#39;s All – Skunk Radio Live (SRL Networks) Music Downloads – MP3/WAV/FLAC
Potos, saving money faster as a group
This won't lead to more open source code. Reading the actual clause lists a myriad of potentially implicated kinds of software, all of which must be open source licensed, and not just that but also under SSPL.

Let's forget about the potential concept that GPLed software like the Linux kernel could very well be implicated, as LWN points out. Regardless, this clause is a literal legal minefield, and I would bet my life savings companies are going to buy commercial licenses rather than open their internal code under SSPL.
I have stayed for too long for too many errors and bugs. There should be NO REASON a registrar should "LOSE their clients domains settings - when you buy email" shows me the quality of their back-office !
Anyone else you can recommend ? Currently looking at GoDaddy. WHats most important to me is good track-record,and private whois
Hi, you might be interested in the discussion around copyfarlft/copyfair touched by Dmytri Kleiner.

http://www.networkcultures.org/_uploads/%233notebook_telekom...

It is sort of similar but includes worker-owned coops. So basically either an individual person or a worker-ownder coop can use a Copyfarleft work for profit.
"In my opinion, his characters tended to ask morally difficult questions more often than Tolkein's."

I'm so sorry to read this, because it doesn't even begin to scratch the surface.

I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor. You cannot pass! The dark fire will not avail you, flame of Udûn!

Ever wondered what those mean? And from those, being references to objects, characters and events prior, Tolkien didn't even attempt to convey morality or ask morally difficult questions: his is the position of a saddened bard, painstakingly documenting the epic tragedy and endless suffering of the elves at the hands of an intelligence greater and far more powerful than them. For Tolkien, it's always cause and effect: "when this then that" or "if this then that" ("if He gets the One Ring, He will rule all of Middleearth") - it's a simple fact, not a moral conundrum or a lesson. He is a saddened yet passive observer and never was about teaching or conveying morals. What you are comparing are two completely unrelated things.
If you are interested in LISP but want to have a much lower risk of having an aneurysm or becoming a hermit, I'd recommend Clojure/Clojurescript
To paraphrase, the question was "why is this legal when we all know it won't work?" and the answer was "we aren't the people who write the laws".
Thank you for doing this. I'm currently working with deep learning but have never had Linear Algebra in school. Resources like this one, and the 3Blue1Brown video series on YouTube are a really nice way to get started.
> I am pretty sure Tolkien books were way less popular before the movies were made

The Lord of the Rings has sold more than 150 million copies over a period of 60 years [0]. The first American edition sold a quarter of a million copies in 1965 alone, and was the New York Times' Paperback Bestsellers list number 1 by the end of the year.

It's not quite up there with the Bible and Koran, but is definitely 'tier 2' if those are 'tier 1'. The films were made because of the massive historical popularity of the books.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_books
Go ahead. After trying many options I settled on XUbuntu. But any of them will do.

To bad, I liked the older OS Xes.
That is exactly what I was trying to say with the final line in my comment: I do believe that this is necessary; it's just unfortunate that it comes with the tracking side-effect.

So no: the take-away is that this improves reCAPTCHA. A side remark to that is that it also improves Google's ability to track you, and hampers your ability to fight that.
glassdoor? Or check expat forums in germany for the same question (I am sure they will be annoyed to hear it a millionth time, but you should find useful info)
Not exactly your answer, but microsoft is developing an open-source tool, that's visually similar to VSCode, to work on databases [1]. Sadly it only supports SQL Server, Azure SQL DB and SQL DW for now, but people are asking for additional database engine [2].

[1] https://github.com/Microsoft/azuredatastudio
[2] https://github.com/Microsoft/azuredatastudio/issues/56
Our team has been using it pretty consistently for the last three years. There's a few other teams I know of that uses it, but I wouldn't say it's common.

We rewrote more than half our systems from Java to it. We've kept the Java code that was already in good shape, moved the rest to Clojure.

Most of the new systems we've built in the last three years were done in Clojure. Though it's up to the engineer in charge of the project, eventually most everyone on the team has embraced Clojure, and willfully chooses it as their JVM language of choice when starting a new project.

Maintenance wise it has been way better then Java. Even with our team being around 10 devs, which is pretty big. We've had no issues extending our systems, adding features or fixing bugs. We have more stable systems actually, and our tickets count has drastically gone down. Though it's a little unfair, in that some of those systems are rewrites from Java to Clojure, thus our second attempt, and so we might have learned some things from that also.

Most everyone eventually seems to come around to loving it. Like once they are familiar with it enough. At least with regards to Java they like it better, and some who've had Scala experience also seem to prefer it.

All in all, I don't think anyone on the team has any regrets in choosing Clojure, and are actually quite pleased. We're planning to continue to use it, and hopefully have the whole code base be in Clojure.

The weird thing is, you always feel like you wish you had types to help a little with the data flow, and knowing what part to update if you ever change the data model. As well as miss a bit of the auto refactoring tools java provided. But, when we retrospect, it's never really because it's causing us issues like the code base being unmanageable, or refactoring taking us longer to do. It is much more of a feeling, than an actual practical issue. Akin to how driving without your seat-bell on gives you that constant unease of not having it there just in case. That said, we love not having types everywhere adding noise to the code, and the ease of interactivity it offers from the REPL, and being able to focus more on our data model in terms of data (as opposed to types), and focus on our code's behavior (as opposed to types). So its a trade off, that for the last three years, hasn't caused us any issues.
I was working on something similar this weekend! (Well, kinda)

Basically, I had an ugly CSV from my bank and importing it into Excel yielded horrible results. So I wrote a processor with customizable rules that splits values into defined colums.
In the end, I had all my payments for past 3 years split into defined categories, added some stats, got rid of useless or empty fields and nicely formatted it.
No he doesn't. It's the licensing equivalent of trying to hold your breath until your opponent's face turns blue.
I found this to be an incredible resource, not only for Japanese prints (a relatively new but definitely cool acquaintance) but also for the various open source technologies used.

Especially interesting to me is the https://github.com/mongaku/mongaku library for image searching. Haven't used it in a project yet, but expect I will. Thanks for this (and the other amazing things of immeasurable impact like jQuery you authored)!
Congrats on your achievements.
Could you detail a bit more on your studies and the jobs you had? I'd like to take a similar path.
Way to run with the anti-GPL FUD, LWN.
What would make you think there's a lack of outrage related to the US and Iraq + Afghanistan? Did you miss the massive global marches against the Iraq invasion? It's routinely brought up in discussion threads here and everywhere, and has been for 15 years now. If you want to criticize the US on human rights, the #1 go to point in every discussion is either the Iraq/Afghanistan wars (or incarceration policies in the US). It's immediately brought up, without exception. There has never been a lack of outrage about the US involvement in those countries.
They're allowed to license Mongo on whatever terms they see fit, but we're also allowed to judge them on the licence terms they choose.

If they had a source-provided, not-for-commercial-use hobbyist/educational licence and a proprietary licence, nobody would bat an eyelid. What they seem to be doing instead (this might or might not be correct, but is definitely the point the article is making) is burdening their "open source" licence with enough gotchas that it becomes quite unclear as to whether it's allowable in a commercial production environment (while still getting to claim it's Open Source Software), thus pushing people towards the proprietary licence without outright demanding it — which might be 100% legal, but is also profoundly dishonest.
Vulnerability scanning comparison in containers
This is just another try to demonize that country. Do these people (especially those from CNN and BBC) really care about the fate of the prisoners?
The imperfection is large enough to cause serious concern.