skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The point in making is, the injuries you listed are the result of actions, not words. Trying to equate words with actions of a few people that act on them is a very dangerous line of thinking. It's the same logic behind people that wanted to ban Muslims from entering the country after 9/11. After all, if 11 people shot dead is sufficient to warrant suppression of speech, then surely 3 thousand does as well. And for what it's worth, many of the groups to which I belong have been and continue to be targeted by extremists. Your claim that, "When you are the target, you have no choice" is factually incorrect.

And whether or not the NSDAP would have still siezed power if the crackdown had been more onerous is speculation. Perhaps it would have further incensed the party and only made it stronger.
> threatened me when I tried to collect

That part is not really clear. My understanding is that if he physically threatened you, you could file for a criminal case and he'll be in much deeper trouble than just not paying.
I thought Lennart created systemd before he joined RedHat ...
SF is definitely a hub with about 50% market share to United. It's also a hub for the smaller Alaska (mostly via their acquisition of SFO-based Virgin America).

As a SFO-based frequent flyer, if you fly to numerous destination (instead of doing the same commute each trip), your choices are likely: fly United or take an extra connection.
In .NET Core you have the option. You can do a standalone deploy or depend on the system wide installed version of .NET Core. In the latter case it is an sysadmin issue.
This dissipates any doubt I had about the influence of lobbying.

FDA, a federal agency that is fully aware of the harmful and addictive nature of opioids (and its impact on the public health system) approves one of the most powerful opioids ever, disregarding the fact that its unique advantage is the fact that this is a non-intravenous administered opioid...

Ohh, and the argument for approving is basically that they believe is good to have more alternatives to existing opioids. Really? Like is not fentanyl strong enough to address every possible medical use case for a powerful opioid?
Oh you're right. It has speculative execution, but is otherwise strictly in-order, my mistake.
The greatest medical expenses tend to be unplanned trauma and emergency room visits.

Agreed that medical tourism for general procedures is a great value for many Americans that can afford this alternative.
LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/estiens/
"Travel should be seredendipitous" are the words of somebody who can afford a lot more travel than I can.
Agreed that if getting a job is hard then getting the money that ensues is hard. But for the vast majority of people getting a job and living below your means is possible. Does that mean it's necessarily going to be a comfortable lifestyle? Maybe not. But it is possible. And if your goal is to start your own business you should expect some sacrifices.
One hundredth the size of a grain of salt vs. one tenth for fentanyl? Imagine if a piece of dust from that blew into your eye.
After 10 attempts it's going to wipe the phone.

Given how sensitive FaceID is I don't think this is a realistic bypass approach. Not that it was even confirmed anyway.
The supply of Fentanyl on the streets is not coming from FDA licensed manufacturers anyway.
I hadn't thought of that, thanks for the idea. I'll do some tests and see how well that works.
For some reason, that movie never ever resonated with me, compared with other Wall Street movies like "The Big Short". What is it that people like about it?
You'll get more responses if you narrow it down a bit, as there's more than one sort of intellectual stimulation - from military strategy to abstract geometrical reasoning.
Cryptography During the French and American Wars in Vietnam [pdf]
No no no. Vagrant is for spinning up dev environment VMs with a virtualization tool like VirtualBox.
Why would the DoD have a hand in this?
That's a bit of a stretch to justify posting on HN. We could use this same type of logic to allow lots of other unrelated topics on here, but IMO we shouldn't.
I really despise TikTok, from the limited experience I’ve had with it (namely, someone sent me a TikTok video). They do this thing where they watermark your video with the company’s logo in the corner, but also make it vibrate, making it impossible to not focus on it instead of the video (oh, and it moves around between corners to make it harder to remove or ignore). In my mind, that’s a warning sign saying the company cares more about their brand being noticed than their user content seen.
Read the article (again). He didn't have a computer at home and was presumably just using the local storage on a machine in the café.
I'd say Horizon Zero Dawn, it kept me hooked wondering what 'zero dawn' was etc. The game itself isn't really intellectual but thinking about that scenario etc can be.
> That thing everyone except the intolerant seem to understand remarkably well

I'm not sure I agree with that, since the definition of intolerance is obviously rooted in societal norms. In 1950 the statement "two men should not be allowed to marry each other" would not have been seen as intolerant by almost anyone, regardless of political affiliation or sexuality. It would have been considered practically a tautology - so obviously true that no one even spent any time thinking about it. Today, many people in the USA would consider the statement intolerant. So I think your definition just kicks the can down the road to "how do we define who is tolerant?"
"The java is networking the groovy"
You usually use Vagrant to provision a machine with a suitable image and then use some other tech to setup your environment on that image. Common choices are Chef, Puppet or Salt, last time I checked.

You can use NixOS to replace both the OS image and the configuration tech.
It likely means a much more profitable product, since they can get the same effect in 1/10th the dose.
Avios is extremely useful for getting cheap domestic flights last minute. SFO-LAX day of departure starts at $180, but costs 7,500 Avios only. PUS-KIX or HKG-TPE cost a measly 4,500 Avios. They can be a real life-saver.
> Deplatforming is a dangerous step for a free society,

Deplatforming is simply the a natural consequence of the operation of the marketplace of ideas, a central necessity for a free society. If ideas don't have to compete for the privilege of access to resource to relay them, there is no marketplace of ideas, and society drowns in noise.

> The big risk is this: when only a few entities funnel so much societal discourse or control our communication infrastructure or process payments, those entities making arbitrary decisions about who they serve has similar impacts and risks to the government imposing similar restrictions through the law.

It's arguable that the concentration of these organizations is too great as private businesses and they should either be broken up or regulated as monopolies with common carrier style neutrality and government price, access, and service regulations. But unless you are going to advocate that—and strangely those who selectively dislike deplatforming when it targets right-wing extremists never do, and in fact often oppose sich government intervention universally and support explicit legal protection for denial of generally-offered services based on religious disagreement, especially when the actor so doing is a member of the dominant religious community—the idea that businesses cannot exercise their right to free speech, free press, and free association to choose not to participate in relaying
certain views is incoherent.
Is making the physical product a substantial cost of any non generic medication?
Less heat, easier to move desk.
I've learned that some of Bloomberg's journalism is bullshit, and this article helps me stand by my opinion.

FaceID? ECG monitor? AirPods and the general continuity between Apple products? Seems like Bloomberg is just an attention whore. I can see an argument for the Apple customer market becoming saturated, but Apple has not lost its inventiveness.

The idea of becoming a landlord who is unable to bring in new people with exciting technology is only true if you consider
anyone have experience using bhyve[0] on any BSD flavors?

I am thinking about building a large FreeNAS deployment and virtualizing with bhyve... a few people I asked on IRC recommended against it due to its 'green-ness'

[0] http://bhyve.org/
Sorry, what's going to collapse if all Linux users have the same visual interface? Stagnate? Like a shell, you mean?
It’s the the binding strength which has direct impact on addiction and withdrawal which is a bit scary since Fentanyl is 100 times stronger than morphine already, heroine is only 5 times as strong for comparison.
"O Lord, this zealotry to punish the heretics could easily escape from the control of God's chosen and not only destabilize society but also cause us to perform un-Christlike deeds that the Church shall repent of for all eternity!"

"Let's inquisit that heresy when we get to it."

SOME TIME LATER

"Truly, monsigneur, this escalation of the Crusade to extirpate the Lutherans could spiral out of our grasp and trigger a continental conflagration that would disturb the harmony of the Catholic Church and cause us to finalize the fracture in Christendom in its entirety!"

"Let us rupture that schism when we come to it."

SOME TIME LATER

"O Puritan Lawyers! I cannot abide this constant seeking of devilry amongst the burghers; for though thy use the Devil chained and cowed, if the Devil escapeth thine chains placyd upon hym, might he wreck also thine own soul's of pleasant Albion forevermore?"

"Let us burn that witch when we come to it."

SOME TIME LATER

"Je dis, this never-ending mission to purify France of the Anciens Regime could easily escape the control of the Bourgeosie and not only destabilize society but also cause us to perform inhumane deeds against the Third Estate that we will regret in the Eye of Providence for all recorded history!"

"Let's get a-head of that when the time arrives."

SOME TIME LATER

"I say, these attempts to civilize the Savages of the outer colonies could easily escape the oversight of the Provincial Governments and not only jeopardize our economic interests, but enable the performance by Europeans of barbarisms that would surely be worse than the practices of the Savages in the first place!"

"Let us lift the White Man's burden when we reach it."

SOME TIME LATER

"I don't know Comrade, this ten-year-old five-year plan to purify Russia of the Bourgeosie could easily escape control of the Central Committee and not only jeopardize the Revolution, but also cause us to engage in the same Tsarist evils of terror that the Revolution was launched to eliminate!"

"Let's rehabilitate that kulak when we get to it."

SOME TIME LATER

> We run the risk that the act of deplatforming can become as extreme as the hate speech it seeks to banish.

Let us cross that bridge when we get to it.
If they are that desperate, you’ve got bigger problems.
A Visit to the Foremost Annual Festival for Weather-Predicting Caterpillars
A better way to interview software engineers (2017)
In the article, they discuss a few times how a consideration for this drug is servicemen in the field.
I'm a "tech person".
In my perspective? Arrogance by the devs that they know their users without knowing their users.

Like, okay, make an easy mode the default. But allow for that complexity to exist without completely writing full extensions for basic functionality.
>the Malaysian businessman they believe stole some of the money: Jho Low

Would Jho Low be pronounced "YOLO"?
Maybe it surpassed downloads because almost everyone in the planet already has FB, YouTube, etc. installed, and not as many has TikTok installed? So I don't see how this metric is really that impressive.
Like jriddell says in tfa, it opens up the door to the fedora-kde community managing the KDE packages through EPEL*. This seems like a win to me, all around, minus Rex and the crew having more packages to maintain.
> TikTok surpassed Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat & YouTube in downloads last month

This is not very relevant. The comparison will make sense in 5 years from now. If after months and years TikTok still gets more downloads then it's a game changer. Otherwise to compare them makes no much sense without a lot of interpretation.

People do not install Facebook each day. They install it when they get a new phone. But a new app will be installed in all preexisting phones.

This happens all the time. One app goes up in the charts as it becomes a new thing. Then it goes out of fashion. And in the end, the number of uninstalls is greater than the number of installs. Then the app disappears from the charts. But Facebook, Instagram, Candy Crush, Clash of Clans, etc. are still there the next month.
Nice website, and they only rank #9. Good job BofA: https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/top-100-parents
Opioids are measured in binding strength (and so pain relief) with morphine as the baseline which ranges from x0.5-x1 for light opioids like Codine to x100 for Fentanyl.

Non opioid pain killers like ibuprofen are usually 1/200-1/300th of morphine.
This consistently confuses me and the answer seems to vary between cases.
I just tried this on a 6S plus and it doesn't work.

The one that does is to rapidly press the power button 5 times.
Of course it is. Regulatory capture is a real thing. While the courts are far from perfect, judges don't routinely "retire" to take multi-million dollar positions with the companies they rule on the way that regulators do.
Building great API documentation
How, exactly, were they to know the gifts were purchased using fraudulent money?

At the time they would have received those gifts, Jho Low was believed by most of the world to just be an extremely successful businessman.
If you couldnt take laundered money you cannot take any money in the world.
Are you talking about binding affinity? Do you have a cite for the relationship between this and the relative addictiveness of opioids given at their normal effective doses?

Everything I'm turning up suggests that, in the clinical setting, the "strength of opioids" is a statement about the relative size of the effective dose (in mg). Presumably that's correlated with molecular properties like the affinity, but I don't think that's what the article is talking about.
They control all the hardware plus the software, yet the results are way more unimpressive than what I'd expect from that. I have bought an iPhone to port my game engine to iOS and setting it up was an unpleasant experience full of little annoying (although harmless) little glitches. Even LineageOS felt better that that, I honestly expected it the other way around - as I'm a Maemo user that got both Android and iOS phones only for development purposes, I tried them both at approximately the same time and could directly compare.
Lots of comments in here echo the initial gut reaction we all have when first encountering utility class composition.

"What about semantic classnames? Separation of concerns? It looks ugly, is going to be hell to maintain, won't scale.. may as well use inline styles!"

I did a conference talk about my own experience moving from BEM to utility-first CSS, you might find it interesting

https://vimeo.com/294976504
COM support is coming to .NET Core 3.0
>dos surface content that's preferred by whichever of your users

Glass houses, hacker news..
Beyond overt fraud, I feel like there's so much incentive for imprudent analysis.

Several times when I've worked on a project at work that involves data analysis, I get really impatient responses when I don't come to a firm conclusion. We're not even talking about highly charged subjects. I'm not aware if my stakeholders are biased toward one conclusion or another -- I think they're just very upset that my analysis contains uncertainty. They expect me to be able to massage any kind of data to derive clear and obvious facts.

Thankfully, I can refuse this without much consequence, but it's really opened my eyes to the potential pressures to corrupt the integrity of fact-finding in even mundane circumstances.
Not to mention but high status flyers make up like 80% of the airline's revenue.

Everyone else who flies once in a while, once every couple of years, who's trying to get the cheapest economy class ticket possible really doesn't amount to much individually. And it doesn't matter if you get mad and are never flying X airline again because you really don't make the airline enough money to worry about you. And someone else is never flying Y airline again and they'll fly X airline instead.

When I worked for an airline I heard every combination of I'm not flying A Airline for B reason you can think of. They're all the same. Just luck of the draw who you have a crummy experience with.
"platform" is vague and doesn't describe much on its own. .NET is vast, and the runtimes are what actually run the code packages on various devices.

.NET Framework has been the original Windows implementation and now we have a fast, lightweight and modern cross-platform implementation with .NET Core. It makes sense to consolidate on a single runtime that now works well on Windows and is at 99% parity with legacy features.
With Tailwind you use @apply to achieve this goal: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/extracting-components
I think that's a bit much. Most people who work there probably do believe in the "mission", and believe that they are protecting the interests of not just British citizens but a broader set of "goodies" against the "baddies". It's a long, long time since the average employee could have seen themselves in terms of a "ruling class".

The real problem is, when all you (think you) see every day are "baddies", it's too easy to forget that the vast, vast majority of the world are not "baddies", and that what might, possibly, in the right light be suspicious behaviour for a "baddy" isn't even slightly suspicious most of the time. From there flows a slightly paranoid mindset of "we must stop ALL the evil in the world at any cost".

This is compounded by the fact that they appear to have rather less accountability than the typical civil servant. Some elements (but by no means all) do like it that way and actively campaign to limit any increase in oversight because (as they see it) "making our job harder makes the world less safe".

You often see the same thing in law enforcement and it's very hard to protect against that culture over the long term. We don't have enough people in politics or government who are willing to say "this will make your job harder but it's not worth doing unless you do it ethically".
That is not the case, since 1MDB wasn't supposed to fund anything in Hollywood. It was sold to the public as a unified state fund similar to the Norwegian oil fund. The funds from 1MDB were fraudulently directed to another bank account that was then used to fund all kinds of things, especially extravagant parties and a Hollywood film.
> Another example of trying to shut down discussion.

If I were attempting to shut down discussion, I wouldn't have included a more serious version of the definition, in addition to the observation that it's remarkable how often people who want to play rules-lawyer with terms like "intolerant" or "bigot" or "racist" or "sexist" seem primarily interested in carefully excluding their own behavior, or that of groups they consider themselves affiliated with, or in general how often they're speaking from a position as a member of a privileged group.

> For example, a substantial number of people around the world understand 'tolerance' to mean 'nobody insults my religion' which, of course, means 'nobody depicts homosexual relationships'.

Hence tolerating everyone except the intolerant. Membership in one marginalized group does not provide a free pass for intolerance against another, nor does it entitle you to attack another or make another feel unwelcome. You deserve to not be discriminated against or excluded on the basis of your religious beliefs, but not if you're using them to attack other people or deny their rights based on (for instance) gender or orientation. Likewise for cis women intolerant of transwomen, white women intolerant of people of color, LG in LGBTQ+ intolerant of the B and T, and so on.
It certainly would be fraud [1] the question is, would it be illegal? Not all fraud is illegal, and not all illegal fraud is prosecuted as such (or at all). Even if it's not illegal, if the startup owner told the investor that they were growing rapidly and used these figures to show that, the investor could sue after the fact for civil fraud and the founder would have a hard time explaining why it shouldn't be. The only reason to grow headcount and increase burn rate to unsustainable levels and offset those expenses in the books right before an investor presentation would be to give the investor a misleading view of your company.

You'd be at the very least inviting a lawsuit... that is, if you got caught.

[1]

"Fraud involves misrepresenting facts for the specific purpose of gaining something that may not have been provided without the deception."

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fraud.asp
The book this movie is based on was written by Belford himself. What would people expect as a result? They decided to create a movie depicting the point of view of the thief.
Transparent proxy was the wrong way to implement IPS, IDS, FW, NAT, LB, and WAN optimization. For the cases you have a reason to be in the middle these services should have been explicit proxies from the start.
Again, I'm not asking what is analogy to what. I'm asking is we can reproduce this insane wave-droplet duality of oil-droplet at quantum scale or not. You are refuse to say. You contribution to discussion is "you are wrong, your claims are false, I know the truth, but I will not tell you."

Okay, you made claim that I made claim (instead of asking me) that I made claim that everything is made out of particles all the way down. It's not true.

What we call particle/atom/object/planet/galactic/galianea is just system, which keeps energy inside and can transfer that energy to an other thing, when it in small radius to that system.

For example, galaxy is a supper massive black hole or set of massive black holes. Rest of galaxy is mostly empty space, but this black hole can alter courses of stars and other black holes, by transferring energy to them via gravitational field. Same true for star system, planet, atom, particle.

We can put emphasis on centre (black hole, star, planet, atom, nucleus, etc.), or at field, or at energy, or at radius of interaction, so we can say "everything is made of field/energy/particles", but truth is that every component of that is equally important.

I found, that in most cases is easier to convince a scientist by going up instead of going down, because everybody agrees that we can zoom up indefinitely. Try to imagine that we zoomed up to 1E40 or so, so our visible universe is of size of elementary particle. How this worlds looks to you? As infinite uniform field of universes like our, like fog? Or we will still saw something like we already see in night sky?
When it's the strongest signal you have in your business, as an entrepreneur you've got to sell it. And in self-interest, TechCrunch wants to help sell the story so they're going to use the strongest signal the business will give them to validate relevancy.

Those are likely the mechanics at play when the result is a title like that.

Like you're saying, it's not really impressive, but it's probably the most interesting thing about the business (fortunately or unfortunately).