skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The main ingredient yes, but there is other stuff added to get specific properties.

https://www.plasticsintl.com/blog/what-are-the-ingredients-i...

Just like "metal" isn't 100% Fe atoms (or Cu or whatever the base metal or metals is/are).
Introduction to ML Fairness
Why should the court reward eBay's poor business controls?

Their messaging system, and they permitted the messages. How is this Amazon's fault?

eBay is taking the ridiculous stance that it's TOS provides liability to the customer for using their service wrong. If I made a website with a TOS that said "Anyone who browses to this website and fails to click the 'get lisence' button in the footer on EACH PAGE owes me $1 Million Dollars!", I'd be laughed out of court trying to enforce it.
If your video is on youtube, check "Analytics" and limit the display to "Embedded in external websites and apps", which will be most likely the YC views. If it still shows 45 views, congratulations. I estimate YC has <20 partners reading applications. 45 views means you are very interesting to them.
I didn't mention money.

You don't need to have read The Wealth of Nations to know that it's possible to increase the GDP of a country without decreasing the overall savings. Service driven economies are the best example of this.
Integer and fp is indeed separate in many modern processors.
What's the risk of turning it on? A short, inside of .. the concrete?
Podcast charts still being manipulated by click farms
It will be interesting to see the left-wing/right-wing proportion. Ie: do they shill and troll both sides to increase division and reciprocal hate.
This reminds me of a sci-fi story from a few years ago where people didn't want to own cars, since one just showed up when you needed it due to a combination of surveillance and fancy algorithms. Prediction:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw-nvo4BzOM
> basically unenforceable

That's different than "totally". It's harder for a janitor, who might not have the means to fight back, to try and call that bluff.
This is one of the core messages of Strong Towns (strongtowns.org).

In general humans get really excited about building new and transformative things, and we have a big blind spot to ongoing maintenance. In particular we've come to utterly depend on the things that were "shiny and new" back in first generation of suburbanization (50s - 70s), while many of those things have been poorly maintained, and in many cases the economic returns on that infrastructure don't actually justify the ongoing maintenance cost.

It's a dangerous drag on the economy, but we're stuck with it now, and the lesson learned is we should prioritize maintenance in our thought process and make sure we're getting a positive return out of the infrastructure liabilities we already have before creating new ones.
* Windows VMs
> But feel free to mouth the CCP line of China being a great victim

This crosses into nationalistic flamewar, which we ban accounts for, so please don't do it again. More generally, please don't post aggressive snark here, or any snark.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Might be a bit heavy for the use-case. That's all I can think of.
Too much of a lot of things (i.e. water poisoning, or too much vitamin A) are toxic.
Sounds like an attempted murder charge.
This post is a little ironic on the pro-Amazon front, what with the complaining about Ebay's checkout process while Amazon holds the one-click-buy patent...
I was once given an employment contract upon starting a new job, which I read carefully. One clause granted the company the right to use my name, voice, and likeness in any marketing material they produce. I objected, stating that I didn't want them using my name, voice, or likeness for marketing purposes at all (administrivial stuff, like work ID badges, etc. was okay and couldn't be helped). I felt strongly enough about it that I was prepared to walk out of the office and forgo the job if they didn't acquiesce.

HR drew up a new contract without the offending clause that very day.

Point being, if you don't like a bit in your contract, challenge it. They may just take it out to not have to start their hiring process over again. You have to be unafraid to lose the job, but losing the job is nothing compared to being sued over cripplingly onerous contract terms.
I hope they add DNS resolution to the network activity tab.
Depends on what this dev would be building, if you have to build framework or you build a library then I agree. If you build next off the mill "business" system then...

Single responsibility principle, yes nice but we have deadlines and no time to argue if that one function should be somewhere else, fix it when we have some slack.

Open closed principle, you don't have to think about if you use DI and have interfaces.

Liskov substitution is useless, you should not use inheritance but composition.

Interface segregation, you have to think about it but it is a lot like SRP.

Dependency inversion, interfaces plus DI framework takes you far enough.

So IMO if one senior guy sets up project with DI framework and gives general direction, someone who can't formulate SOLID still can be good OOP developer.
I recommend reading The Shallows by Nicholas Carr before reading Deep Work.
It probably is the right tool if you have an enterprise problem that needs an enterprise solution.
Personal attacks will get you banned here. We've warned you about this before, so please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and don't do it again.
Yeah, it's a good reminder that our views on all other countries (and also groups within our own countries) always lacks a lot of nuance.
A government has no credit itself build up a credit system for its subjects. Before CCP grabs power in 1949, they promised a western democracy system. 30 years ago until 1 or two years ago they push for a one child policy and promised that the government will take care of old people. Both promises and many others not listed here they now just pretend never happens. This whole social credit system shit is just try to have a more strong control to the slaves who can not vote and take their organs etc easily when necessary.
Your interpretation seems to differ from that of legal sources.

Quoting from the first paragraph of the ACLU link I gave: "With the notable exception of the Thirteenth Amendment’s ban on slavery, the individual liberties guaranteed by the United States Constitution protect against actions by government officials but not against actions by private persons or entities."

Quoting from https://academic.udayton.edu/race/06hrights/GeoRegions/North... : "the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude encompasses both governmental and private action. Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3, 20 (1883). The U.S. Supreme Court has held that Congress may regulate private conduct under sec. 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment, which provides that "Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968). Such power includes determining what constitutes the "badges and incidents of slavery and the authority to translate that determination into effective legislation."

Quoting from https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs... : "The Thirteenth Amendment is one of the few constitutional provisions that directly implicates private conduct. That amendment, the first of the three "civil war amendments," flatly bans slavery and involuntary servitude. It acts directly upon private entities; slaves were owned by private businesses and individuals. The Thirteenth Amendment, however, has not been interpreted to provide a significant source of constitutional proscription against acts of private discrimination."

Quoting from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/PROJECTS/FTRIALS/conlaw/thirtee... "The Thirteenth Amendment, unlike most provisions in the Constitution, is self-executing, in that it directly reaches-even without action by Congress- conduct by private individuals (slave holders)."
The Hollywood sign wasn’t always considered an icon. For many years between its initial construction in the 1920s and its restoration in the 1970s, it was poorly maintained and considered an eyesore: https://theconversation.com/the-history-of-the-hollywood-sig...
The idiots are out in force on hacker news today. This is absolutely moronic. After reading this comment, I'm surprised you even know how to use a computer.
Unenforceable in Court, that is. If you are someone who doesn't have the money to retain an attorney, and you don't have experience with these things, then you very well may believe that it is enforceable, and therefore to you, it is.
Hey, as an WW2 buff, do you where I can get a list of ALL the bomber nicknames (Picadilly Lilly, Memphis Belle, etc)? I'm trying to train a neural net on them for generation of new 'authentic' nicknames.
Sure, kind of like direct mail marketing except the victim gets the money (minus a bit) instead of the post office. It wouldn't be very profitable because non-activity would show up in the metrics and podcasters would not distribute to them--unless the podcaster is just indiscriminately spamming everyone, in which case, they're just paying people to ignore them until they go broke.
Just to add on to that.

Very few programmers know the prior art wrt. OOP, or have worked with the kind of code in which OOP is done well (I guess "OOD", using the terminology from the article). Instead, almost all junior (even senior) programmers I encounter parrot something along the lines of OOP being too enterpris-y and crufty, and something about inheritance being stupid. OOP is dismissed out of hand. It's high time for a correction in that mindset. The ability to structure your data and the operations on that data together in place is incredibly powerful, and OOP is a good approach to do that.

Schools are partly to blame. They teach OOP as if it is an exercise in abstracting some sort of reality (e.g. "a dog barks, a cat meows, and both walk"). But that approach falls apart for the sort of concepts programmers work with. OOP is at its core a way to structure code, and to do so cleanly, to avoid repetition, and to enable easy navigation through a program. It is not intended to be mental map of some external reality.
Wow this is so awesome. I'm sleep deprived, not really willing to learn more about any math but the prologue and intro are so captivating that I'm still reading it.

Well done!
Mh, did you ever tried modern shell like zsh or fish, with a reasonable config? Or even better, despite a bit steep learning curve, eshell (Emacs) if you already know Emacs and elisp a bit or xonsh if you are already familiar with Python.

As an Emacs (EXWM) user I agree that pure CLI is limited and pure text-based interfaces without terminal emulators limits are far superior but... Well, today outside Emacs we only have CLIs, the rest is so limited and limiting that can be used only for desktop end-user stuff. Even Microsoft Windows mandate CLI for serious system use/management...
No, you can see the breakdown here from the BLS [1]

Most jobs are relatively safe from calamity. Though there is ugly turnover, the same applies - in retail in particular, companies do not want to layoff - this would be very bad. They want to hire, it's just that the jobs suck. As for manufacturing - that's generally the one where 'laying off' might be good for the company as they would move the jobs overseas.

But this idea that companies are always looking to layoff and drop people is not right, it happens in specific places.

[1] https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-...
> It's a civil suit, so you don't have to have broken the law.

Yes, you do.

> Breaking a contract or ToS is enough.

Breaking a legally binding commitment in a contract is breaking the law which makes it binding, and breaking a contract otherwise isn't sufficient for legal recovery; breaking a ToS is only sufficient for success in a civil suit if and to the extent some law makes it so.
I had success with that design as a kid. It was called "the bishop's hat" in the book I had.
I would be very curious to know if there are naturally occurring polymers that create similar particles that we have already been living with.
ECS as they are using it in this blog is about Data Oriented Design. It's not just OOP plus favoring composition over inheritance.

DOD explicitly advocates separating data from behavior, and is strongly opposed to OOP in general.
The eBay terms of use are not law. Breaking those kinds of agreements is a civil matter. The lawsuit is alleging serious criminal things, like fraud, in addition to breaking the terms of use.
Thanks! I hate it :)
Thermal paper is toxic, and you should avoid handling it whenever possible. It is only a matter of time before it's banned due to its BPA content (which may, fingers crossed, accelerate the advent of digital receipts). DO NOT use hand sanitizer before or after handling thermal paper; it speeds the absorption of BPA.
We've banned this account for repeatedly violating the site guidelines and ignoring our many requests to stop.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
DNS resolution is visible in one of the about: pages, iirc about:networking. But yeah, in dev tools would be much more convenient.
> A couple of more points. The architectural registers are real places. Say you write to RDX, don’t do anything with it for a million instructions, then read from it. Where does the data come from? There is an architectural register file and RDX is a specific register in it.

This was true on all the P6-derived cores, but is no longer true on any modern CPU that uses a PRF.

On PRF cpus (SNB and everything after it), the final backing store of register data is the PRF, and the architectural registers are just pointers to this file. Every instruction gets renamed in the frontend, and there simply is no architectural register file.

Also, ROB does a very different task on those CPUs, to the point that still calling it ROB is misleading. The current architectural register names are held in the frontend, as part of the register rename hardware, not in the ROB. ROB holds on to instruction status, and the PRF register names for all the sources. So an used PRF entry can be garbage collected when it no longer exists in either the architectural name file or the ROB.

For a more detailed explanation, read: https://www.realworldtech.com/sandy-bridge/5/
Brooklyn has always been "up and coming".
And that is why all the program source code, and compiler options, and program output is shown on the benchmarks game website. (Any underlined text is a HTML link allowing you to drill-down to more detail).
The minor differences I was referring to were between loss of citizenship by formal renunciation and loss of citizenship by performing one of the other potentially expatriating acts voluntarily and with intent to relinquish citizenship (making the potential expatriation into actual expatriation).

Both of these paths cause a loss of right to enter the US. Neither one automatically bans re-entry if one otherwise qualifies to enter as an alien. I agree differences in these areas would be major.

The minor differences I know of: formal renunciation specifically for the purpose of avoiding taxes makes one inadmissible, but this purpose is so hard to prove and enforce that only a very small number of people (I forget precisely but around 2-5) have ever been ensnared by it. Also, renunciants are ineligible to possess firearms in the US, even if they'd otherwise be in one of the nonresident alien categories which would be allowed to.

Taking the wording of both of these provisions at face value, they don't apply to former citizens who relinquish but don't renounce.

Courts probably haven't yet been asked to rule either way on this, but at the very least, I don't know a court ruling finding that all former citizens are covered by either provision.
Nothing going on in the world today compares to the low points of the 20th century. Even if you want to ignore the first half, we had Cambodia. Genocide, Korean War, Gulag, Vietnam War, endless Cold War chaos, multiple Arab Israeli wars, Rwandan genocide. We are now enjoying the dividends of prosperity created then. But to claim things are worse now is absurd. And thats ignoring the first half which had two world wars and the most killing and death in human history, all without cell phones to blame.
They are not equivalent situations. There's a concept of binding. When the Amazon employees created their accounts, that's when they agreed to the ToS. Importantly, it's before they took the actions for which Amazon is being sued. No one agreed to a ToS to visit your website.
With no added nutritional value that isn't already there in your food
Customers I've worked with that have small datasets would typically range into the 10M order of magnitude for a primary fact, though we had smaller outliers. Additionally, it would be common to have wide dimensions that could be KBs/record, which can add up quickly.
UAU, nice :D

anyway, for accidental files operation protection nilfs2 is a very effective protection, despite super-slow development and actual limited features, it's rock-solid, mainline, live resizable (both grow and shrink) and in years does not loose a bit of information for me :-)
The sabotaged info point could (would?) happen anyway. There's very little into securing the CAN, and that's how you get things like [1], even without V2V communication. There are a few papers out there describing similar attacks over bluetooth as well. I'd argue the security portion will become just as important as failure mode.

[1] https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-hig...
Great article and data, thanks for doing this.

Small note: you have a typo, "long tale" should be "long tail".
Sure, but applying pressure on the Soviets is a bullet point that covers a lot of ground.

Think about the scale, scope and impact of the Apollo program, which ultimately was done for similar reasons.
Matter: Researchers Explore a Cancer Paradox
Well, the process did exactly what it was required to do, to classify countries by income levels. China is not that rich, not even passing as a newly industrialised country.

Were it to pass as such, say, Kenya and many other African countries would've too.
I’ve been back and forth on this and I feel like your argument has just convinced me that workers should take advantage of this. If the government is now only accountable to PACs and big donors, is the end game that corporations will be the only lever of power for citizens? It will be like a weird capitalist dystopia where depending on how successful your company is that’s the proportion of power you get as a worker.
You are more or less correct, he was wrong. Architectural registers are just pointers to the PRF these days.
It's difficult to monetize the network
Fraudulently creating accounts for the purposes of performing activities known to be against the ToS prior to even creating the account.

"The Amazon employees acknowledged they were breaking eBay’s rules and actively tried to avoid detection, the lawsuit says."
Yep, also, we are starting to think to build a shuttle they are easy to build :-)
Sounds like they’re running the experiment. The first scenario you described is a good illustration of the kind of effort it would take to ensure no effect. The second? I’d be interested in knowing how they find families and decide what books to include. I’d expect (and I admit I hope) it will have a measurable efect.

I’ll search for it but please post a link if you have one.
Are you sure about that? The HDL I've seen doesn't appear to do it that way. If I'm reading BOOM's source correctly for instance, there's not a separate architectural file.
> But that's the whole point of JAVA. It's an opinionated platform with a hyper-standardized workflow.

That may have been where Java wanted to go, but, when I'm working in Java, I don't feel like that's where I am. Ways of doing things in Java tend to be wildly inconsistent from project to project. Partially, I think, because so much core functionality in the Java ecosystem was allowed to be federated out to 3rd-party projects for so long. Take the long-standing popularity (and rivalry) of Guava and Apache Commons for handling even basic tasks that are hard to get done using the core Java APIs. If there's such a thing as a "platform smell", I'd say that certainly qualifies.

With Python, on the other hand, there is a fairly consistent common understanding of what "Pythonic" means, and, even when there really is more than one way to do it, the question of which one to use can usually be quickly resolved to a predictable outcome by simply pointing out that one option is the more Pythonic way to do things.

(edit: Though, to be fair, Java was first released into a world where languages like C, C++ and Common Lisp represented the status quo. Expectations were lower at the time.)
> Slightly amended regulation is necessary, not some sorta social uprising.

And here I'd just broken out my leather chaps.

In that case I totally agree with you. What was once a tool for a company to protect itself against someone with leverage is now a method to discourage and oppress those at a disadvantage.
Here's a good Twitter thread on preliminary findings from the dataset: https://twitter.com/benimmo/status/1052545119826706433
most posts on the site aim to "debunk" the myth of Chinese products being a security risk and that Westerners just overreacting
This comment breaks the site guidelines. We already had to ask you not to do this recently (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18159536). We ban accounts that won't stop breaking the guidelines, so please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow them when posting here.
Looks like fun to me.
Internet Archive has the shareware version.

https://archive.org/details/PAPERAIR
"By taking part in the Survey, the participant hereby declares that he is of legal age required by his jurisdiction"

And here I thought the Python Software Foundation was against such gender biased language.
Yeah,
so we replace a simple stuff for a complicated and uncertainly one, nice classic modern move... Also I suppose humans must be wearing some communication devices also... Do not make be vulgar about the kind of device and placement...

IMVHO V2V coms are good ADDITION, but only addition, no more.
It's not you. It's a combination of startups and incumbent tech behemoths attempting to operate outside of the formalized process for internet standards by using their market power to push for the change they deem appropriate.

There are benefits (censorship circumvention) to be reaped, but also great peril.
Yeah, but is that actually criminal fraud according to the law?
Nice. I have the Martin Gardner version of this.
They can't, because that's handled at the OS level, not the application level.

If a browser starts (purposefully) subverting the hosts file or not adhering to resolv addresses, then we've got a bigger problem.

Think, a fat client resolving an address differently than a browser; then that's all sort of Pandora's Box.
And the other corollary is that the malicious use the phrase to fool the stupid.