skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Oops to clarify, I meant if children can master iOS 12 (and if iOS 12 on its face would seem complex to people a couple generations ago), then perhaps SciFi interfaces that seem ridiculously complex or opaque to us now would in that universe seem intuitive to adults.

Because they would have had decades of familiarity with the building blocks of those interfaces, and the hidden actions that manipulate them.

And because they wouldn't have had other ui experiences to block them.

Like how our parents struggle to learn new user interfaces not because they're necessarily complex, but because they're fighting against past experience.
Tesla is too big to fail but not for the reason you might think
I'm reluctant to say which company, as I'm not sure how public that information is.

It's worth pointing out Starbucks has several competitors in the cafe-chain space in Australia. There are cities in Australia where Starbucks tried opening & then closed down because they were unable to beat the local incumbent cafe chains.
Mat2: metadata removal tool
So did I get it the wrong way round, people have kids so they don’t risk failing in a business?
America though part of wars, the mainland itself has been protected for many years unlike Europe of constant invasion. Europe has been though all that and doesn't want to again, it understands the cost.
OpenSSH 7.9 – bugfix release
>How can you be against cruelty to animals and still regularly consume meat?

Immediacy is an interesting beast. I can see some lamb chops in the freezer and not really connect them to the fluffy bundle of cuteness gamboling across the pasture that I might see out on a walk that same day.

On the other hand, I'll tear up at the idea that anyone might ever, in even a minor capacity, be cruel to creatures that I hold close to my heart. I would straight up murder anyone that wished ill on my family, and all manner of beast falls under that umbrella.

I know, rationally, that this simply isn't consistent. But from the human perspective... I guess the distinctly human perspective, it's entirely ... not consistent... comfortable.

Work in progress, at least for me.
This one is also fun, just challenges to create different shapes, and shapes-within shapes in under a certain number of moves -

https://sciencevsmagic.net/geo/
https://www.gizmochina.com/tag/samsung-w2019/
Arduino Founder Looks Beyond Free
PostgreSQL: General Configuration 1 by Alex Allen
Ask for a buddy / mentor. They will help you familiarise with the environment.
That and ask any question that pops in your head. People like to see you being inquisitive and getting clarification! That means you’re thinking along and are growing.
That sounds like a pretty nightmarish tactic ...

Is there a way where the government could either purposefully disclose classified information (or retroactively classify it) so as to force certain individuals into making particular statements or denials via the threat that if they said otherwise they would be guilty of disclosing classified information ...?
Are you saying how our brains work never evolved and we think the same as primates?

That seems really far fetched.
The Museum of Accidents Offers a Glimpse into Japanese Introspection
You can (currently) distribute unsigned Mac apps on your website. If I remember correctly, Parallels Desktop is actually an unsigned application.
Winamp, that music player you started up, once you installed windows, audio and video drivers and ready to chill with a nice music.
11 Most Useful Travel Photography Tips to Improve Your Photos
I think you can assume most people write characters that think somewhat like they do.

And is it true that schizophrenic and autistic authors do write the same?
Am I being stupid? I can't see how to move on past the first puzzle when it's complete.
really? does for me.
33 concepts every JavaScript developer should know
Thank you for putting into words what I experienced with my past job.

In just every single previous job, I was either the lone coder (small companies or startups) or mostly expected to figure things out on my own and didn't have to discuss architectural decisions or issues I was having too often.

But in my most recent job, I suddenly had to start explaining things in detailed and technical terms multiple times a day to coworkers and managers and was finding it really difficult to have anywhere near as precise of language about it as my peers had when they spoke about the same things.

I've gotten better at that over the past three years of being here, but I still struggle with it, and sometimes feel awkward when I have difficulty finding the right words when it seems my peers have no issues describing with precision.
Meow Hash: A high-speed non-cryptographic hash function
Orca: differential bug localization in large-scale services
In EU 2G is just fine (yet?), Italy here, but never had problems in EU and near countries.
A curated list of static web site generators
>
Why did Alice want to know whether Bob knew if Carol was coming, but didn't want to know if Carol was coming?

Because Alice wanted to find out whether Bob and Carol know each other well enough that Bob knows whether Carol will come or not.
That’s reasonable, sure. I have know plenty of people that bemoaned the limitations of GUIs compared to the power and expressivity of command like interfaces. But they learned the command line first. It’s not the most intuitive, but certainly what you become familiar with first can affect your future preferences and ability to accept and take advantage of alternatives.
Having the read information sent from one location (presumably where the write occurs) and then read from another is a good example of one of the few times this anomaly can occur.

I think it's a stretch to say that including a single timestamp in the link is too hard for developers. It happens by default across queries within a process with the Fauna drivers, so the database is preventing it; the only place you have to think about it is multi-process, multi-location reads. Also, having a loadbalancer jump back and forth between two replicas would not normally occur because of a geo routing, a soft form of datacenter affinity, but it is possible. Note that in your example, even if the link didn't include the timestamp, once they visit the webpage, the webserver should begin managing the timestamp in process or in a session cookie, preventing the the balance from disappearing once seen for the first time.

In my experience as a DBA the legacy database experience is much worse because in practice there are always physically distinct read replicas in the mix for scalability and hot failover that have no consistency guarantees at all, due to various faults like statement-based replication desynchronization, the lack of any ability to share log cursor information, and the like. I am not making a worse is better argument. I'm just pointing out that you don't get any C at all for the feeble amount of A gained under CAP in practice with most “single node” systems.

You are correct that the latency argument does not hold if you do not pass the timestamp information across queries. But if the observer can observe multiple replicas in the database topology, it is always possible to use the observer itself as the communication channel for the timestamp to avoid the anomaly. If you want to maintain strict serializability in all cases, but minimum-latency reads, the writer could block on transaction application acknowledgement from all replicas. Obviously that gives up availability for writes under partition, but it may be reasonable in your asynchronous example in order to avoid sending the txt message too early. Perhaps, for example, the message is "go to your local ATM" instead of a link with a timestamp. Although I would expect the ATM had the latency budget to do a linearized read even in a global context.

We are always happy to make the descriptions of the behavior and consistency levels more precise.
Transparency Report – ProtonMail Blog
I agree that CryptoAPI is nasty, but if your key doesn't have the CRYPT_EXPORTABLE flag set when it was created then it can not be exported by CryptoAPI, and can only be accessed maliciously by breaking the CryptoAPI (by patching it in memory, which requires full admin access to a running system) or accessing the OS disk offline.

CryptoAPI does not hand over the key and delegate signing and encryption to the application. Instead, it provides APIs for signing and encryption and does not disclose the private key.
I’m not sure if you are suggesting FB should face similar consequences as VW or that FB’s conduct is excusable because others do similar things.

Some differences are that VW plead guilty and paid a 2.8B $ fine, the CEO resigned, executives have been facing criminal charges, and a slew of international cases are still outstanding. Another difference is that VW’s deceit had direct human health consequences.
Camelot: Python library that makes it easy to extract tables from PDF files
Ultimate Guide to Execution Contexts,Hoisting,Scopes,and Closures in JavaScript
Thank you for bringing this up. I love this book. The thesis is breathtaking. But as you say, nearly impossible to test rigorously :(

I wonder if its plausibility will become more apparent as lifespans increase, allowing the typical adult human to be able to converse with more than just the generation below and above and hence be able to get at least a local estimation of the rate of change of consciousness in real life; vs. having to rely solely on literature as evidence for the mutability of human consciousness.
Yup - first line of advice I give to family now is "shut your social profiles, and get off of the internet. Failing which here are the things you need to look out for" and the proceed to list a fraction of the issues that I know about, and see them get uncomfortable.
How to stop using console.log() and start using your browser’s debugger
Indian crypto exchange moved to Malta
Don't you think a wall of references is more valuable than your anecdotes?
A guide to smarter-than-human artificial intelligence research
Which circles back to this question

> It would be more accurate to ask: “How the F can anyone make any money when Starbucks is on every other street corner and has the advantages of scale they have.

Specialists stores have specialist profits - they wont be hitting the mass market, because the mass market taste profile is different.

If you try to grow, then you may as well give up to starbucks which has the money to taste test and advertise enough to ride the wave of human attention.
> Our ancestors invented the script for a reason

Despite agreeing with the conclusion, I don't really think this is a reasonable statement. Our ancestors domesticated horses for a reason, that doesn't mean new technologies that weren't available then can't entirely supplant that need.
Shall we call this mysterious coffee chain Glorious Pants Coffee Company?
> student projects along with the IPv8 library, and never about that supposed deployment.

This release of IPv8 now has had 6000 downloads, through Tribler. Prior version 7.0 was 110000 downloads. This is real deployed software.

> making up statements for an academic publication

You are correct that the attestation part is not broadly used, it's only on the Google playstore as "Trustchain". No legal validity, we're aiming to get that with our notary partners. Nowhere in the world is there legal government-based recognition of a true self-sovereign identity for border travel. Talking to upper management of three responsible ministries (internal,safety,defense) is painstaking slow. We made a mistake and believed early on that municipalities could be quick plus helpful; however, they seem to also have little legal maneuvering space for legal innovation.
It is disingenuous to assume that all meat is produced cruelly.
I'm sure we share a dislike of factory farming, but just that the majority of meat is created via this method does not mean there aren't alternatives.
Wilful ignorance and indulging in the illusion presented by supermarkets and their suppliers. Such people dislike vegetarians and vegans because they are worried that they might remind them about the illusion.

This is all covered in The Matrix.
I don't think entitlement is as tightly coupled with a single economic philosophy as you'd like to think.

Yes there is entitlement evident in the example you're citing, but there's plenty of entitlement evident in other scenarios – e.g., colonialism, feudalism, the behaviour of banking executives in the 2008 financial crisis.

It'd be neat if we could simply assign a single political/economic philosophy as being the one that's characterised by entitlement, but like most things in life, the reality is rather more complex.
What's the #1 objection?
My wife and I love to travel, but we've reached a point where we don't bother with cathedrals anymore. They all seem to be identical to the last one. Oh sure, little touches here and there that are unique, but rarely worth the wait in line and time spent. At St David's in Wales last month, we were way more interested in the ruins of the Bishop's Palace than by the actual cathedral next to it.

The Sagrada Familia is such a different place. It is art with a function.
Tiny Island Nation to Host World’s Largest Microgrid
FYI, Elipical Curve Cryptography is also broken with the quantum computer using the same Shor’s algorithm.
Athena Tây Nam Kim Giang – Kiến tạo miền đất xanh – Lê Dũng Villas
Seriously, go over to reddit and read /r/legaladvice for a while.

The almost daily litany of posts of "my employer is doing (list of highly illegal things involving wages), what should I do" will be a pretty big wakeup call for you. And if you think "well they can just sue" is an easy answer, remember employees who are identifiable as the source of wage complaints are at risk of being fired. That's illegal, too, but do you really think an employer who's already breaking labor laws will be scrupulous about not retaliating?

Also, these folks will really open your eyes (click through to the full report linked at the bottom):

https://www.epi.org/publication/wage-theft-bigger-problem-fo...

Their data (2012) showed that the amount recovered from wage claims against US employers was three times the dollar value of all robberies in the US combined. Just the amount recovered; the amount actually owed but not paid is likely to be larger.
The genetics of university success
I don't think Apple is making any significant money out of these $100 subscriptions. The payment fee is the best SPAM detector out there.
It has been standardized meanwhile, see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...
Ok, mostly makes sense to me.

This part however still sticks out IMO:

> Like fi358, I consider subjecting someone to unwanted noise to be same as violating their personal space by coming too close to them.

I'd say there's a fairly huge difference between making noise outside my house (or worse inside my house) and making automatic announcements on a bus.

When traveling in the public we have to live with other people.
Certificates very much do use RSA. The ephemeral handshake commonly uses ECDH.
>I've noticed a pattern: the people that look "on point" are often clueless, and the ones that look muddled are often heading in the right direction.

It's because it has nothing to do with intelligence, and everything to do with presentation. This is why some people work in sales, and some people work in engineering. If someone that has no clue keeps insisting they do understand, at some point you'll start doubting yourself instead.

Richard Feynman, who is without much debate one of the most important physicists of all time, said something about asking "dumb" questions, and how people often misunderstood why he was asking the things he was asking. He was trying to look at something from different angles, but if you can't look beyond the question, you might think "why is this person asking me something a child would ask". They're not stupid, they're trying to initiate an exploration of ideas.

In my opinion, when you ask a "dumb" question to someone who is more concerned with looking smart and presenting well, their first reaction will be one of confusion, or even mockery. When you ask a truly intelligent person a "dumb" question, they will humor you, and start looking at the problem from different angles, usually trying to involve you in the process. Smart people love to discuss things, "presentable" people hate it, because for them it's just one long continuous risk of being "exposed". Smart people do not fear being exposed, because they know very well what they don't know, which is one of the most common traits among intelligent people, and ironically is why intelligent people feel dumb.

One of the most important lessons in my professional life is perhaps similar to yours, and that is that it's easy to recognize true intelligence when you encounter it. Truly intelligent people are normally humble, curious and intense. When you encounter people that are arrogant, narrow-minded and lazy, you're not the one in the wrong. They are just hiding their insecurity.

So to the point of the post, what should you do in a situation like this? If you're extremely introverted and not used to working in teams, that is a huge hurdle, because that is how human beings normally seek assurance: through their peers. So if I could give only one general advice here, it would be: work on your people skills. Try to pair up with colleagues, discuss their work, your own work, and be humble. Be open about your doubts, and you'll quickly realize that there is no line of business more full of people with impostor syndrome than IT.
Asterix is the practical proof that comic is an art form, in an accessible, non high brow way. Besides being hilariously entertaining.
So they cannot scan apps signed by a 3rd party cert authority?
Mathematical and physical models toward building a more perfect flying vehicle
I was curious about this as well and did a bit of searching around (I didn't dig that deeply and IANAL) and found this:

https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/warrant-canaries-and-di...

Specifically Section IV, subsection C

"Canaries and the First Amendment Status of Compelled Lies"
I'm not against cruelty to animals.
I wonder if you could significantly increase the qubits required by layering or interleaving cryptographic functions.

By interleaving I almost imagine something like an AES algorithm where the rotated bits actually reference new keys and ciphers that are actually used on the data.
Wasn't there talk about removing support for client side certs, either in the rfcs and/or major browsers? (citing ux problems)

I can't seem to find any relevant links/bugs now though - maybe the decision was reversed? Or I'm simply wrong?
Have a remote job and opened a gallery with a friend. Was ultimately a frustrating experience.
I am currently using an early 2008 MacPro and I too had a time in my life when I expected I would have to build a new computer every two years.
What is the difference between FoalTS and Sails.js?
Another point is that 2600k was good for OC and 4.8GHZ OC were pretty common(not sure about 5Ghz).

Newer intel CPUs turbo higher at stock (you could say that OC is sort of built in) so single threaded performance looks better than it really is.

Now 32nm at 4.8Ghz would be quite power hungry but that is not the issue here.

Pretty much all the progress Intel has achieved in the last 7 years since Sandy Bridge has been in achieving the same performance for less wattage focusing on mobile use cases.

(on server side Xeons have increased the core count substantially but again single threaded performance IPC has stagnated)

Thus mobile i5-8250U gets to claim that it does about the same in 15W that 2600k did at 95W.

Remember we are still on the same Skylake Arch from 3-4 years ago, just a few minor process tweaks on 14++++nm plus obviously 2x the number of cores.
Substandard mobile phones and the harvesting of data
> And because you aren’t independently wealthy and/or don’t have a spouse who makes six figures, you’re probably going to be non-profit.

I don't understand the logic behind this. Wouldn't not being independently wealthy rather imply attempting to be for-profit?
Boy, have we written a song for you!

https://open.spotify.com/track/7s2a3oMmGUuc14LxPYu4yx?si=-SZ...

From asking around the band, and other people, it seems like the thing that helps best with this is time.
A lot of iphone SE users just bought it because it was cheap though. That's the "niche of a niche" comment above.

I like smaller phones, so we'll see how much people care about them now that the iphone 8 is the smallest good phone apple sells. Am hoping they do make a smaller iphone X style phone, but....we'll see.

Btw, for anyone reading this, popsockets go a long way to making larger phones more comfortable.
> In that case can we start computing cryptographic products with quantum computers such that there is no gap?

QC solves one kind of problems, that are hard for classical computers, but not another (see all the links to post-quantum crypto in the comments). OTOH there will be a very large window during which QC will be cheap enough to rent by the hour on AWS, but equipping every lightbulb with a QC will be prohibitively expensive (think current GPU prices).
Here are your C examples for easy viewing: https://godbolt.org/z/5j-QUj
Of course it's a review process. That's why you need a developer ID. The only difference is that the app will be reviewed "later". Here is an example:
You sign an app like "uTorrent", all is working great, people can download and run it. Then mpaa tells Apple to ban your application because it's used to pirate their content. Apple now "reviews" your app and suspends your developer id. O top of that it tells gatekeeper to stop running the installed instances. Review done! Any question? Please review our TOS to find out why we blocked your app...bla bla blah
This is a non-issue IMO. Contrary to popular belief QCs are not magical oracles that can do arbitrary exponential calculations in polynomial time. Instead QCs can do only very specific things better than conventional computers and there are a surprisingly low number of known algorithms for QCs even though people have been looking. While it's true that Shor's algorithm allows a QC to potentially factor integers in polynomial time breaking RSA, there are other popular encryption schemes with no known quantum weaknesses and there's a whole field called Post-Quantum Cryptography looking at this property explicitly.

And just like upgrading SSL 3.0->TLS 1.1->TLS 1.2->TLS 1.3 was done due to discovered weaknesses yet mostly transparently and with no Y2Kish hype of "the internet is broken", so will we upgrade to quantum resistant algorithms if and when QCs become a reality.
This is a thinly disguised rant of your tastes vs. Starbucks as opposed to any kind of actual answer. And kind of hipster pretentious douchey to those that may like it. Try again?
>I'd love to see Apple's market research behind the SE to see if our use patterns are normal for fellow owners.

I think the're many more like you, and that Apple is aware of it. My theory is that they don't want to cannibalize watch sales, or basically regard the watch or wearable market as their future, and the Apple Watch as device to cement their leadership role in this market early on. I mean it works for them, they are the number one wearbales brand now.

It's not only watches, the're the headphones and maybe AR glasses in the future, a distributed wearable system if you'd combine them. That's where things are going I think.

If the'd have continued pushing sff phones (pocket watches), their real watches might not have gotten this traction.
Smaller companies if you want to work for free and have no benefits.

Big companies if you want the company to spend money on training you, good salaries, extra benefits and being to drop the job after going home for the day.