skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Funnily, the description of the accident makes it the human driver's fault for failing to properly merge into traffic though it implies the robo car was at fault for "boxing in" the other car.

Back when I drove trucks I put many a Californian driver on the shoulder under the exact same circumstances -- law says trucks must use the right lane and can't exceed 55mph so that's what I did to the detriment of people yacking on the cellphone and Oh, Shit, truck!!! as they come barreling down the onramp without even giving a basic attempt to safely merge.
I wonder how this compares with Tabula (https://tabula.technology/) and I did read the section but Tabula can also be tweak albeit not in the web app.
I love the idea of a formal hanseikai (反省会).

Perhaps a Museum of Software Accidents is called for?

https://raygun.com/blog/costly-software-errors-history/
And will they be same set of people proficient enough to make paid software on mac platform?
It is startling how ineffective basically all educational interventions are. I remember reading a quote to this effect in the introduction to the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire:

“Teaching is a skill we have not yet mastered, save for to those happy people for whom it is almost superfluous.”

We have known intelligence is heritable for a long time. Anyone who has lived for a great length of time in a small town has seen this in their neighbours.

We have had twin studies basically confirming it for ages; and soon cognitive genomics will confirm it beyond the smallest shadow of a doubt.

It is a testament to what epistemic hacks humans are that we allowed these extreme priors to be overwhelmed by empty political fashion.
Many current programming languages and libraries go with start/end rather than left/right precisely because of RTL languages. Clarifying "start (left)" doesn't seem unreasonable to help readers of English documentation understand, though it should probably say "start (left in left-to-right languages)".
Word embeddings as the bones a chef would set aside to make a broth
Didn't these old stories get acted out as they were told? Perhaps the emotion was expected to appear on the stage, on the performers, not in the lines?
The name definitely made me think of Rust's mio. On the other hand, `namespace cplusplus` and `mod rust` maybe are disjoint.
PFS should put your mind at ease.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_secrecy
its not always true (hash functions are in some sense designed by brilliant people to be as hard to learn as possible) but it’s true often enough to be surprising.

if there was some score that would look at lighting etc, you probably could just tack it on to one of the loss functions somewhere and expect to see improvement.

maybe not enough to beat the system; or perhaps it would increase the lighting score but make the image obviously unrealistic in other ways we haven’t thought of.
I do not get that point of view. You still need to trust the intention behind whatever is cryptographicly verified. You will never have a verification of what happens inside of someone's skull (or for the scifi counter arguments: inside of whatever else they store their thoughts in).

Having cryptography without trust in some form of desire for teamwork in your fellow humans defeats the whole purpose of cryptography... But I admit this is more about my ideology and reasonable people can disagree about it.
Rather than launching into an uninformed rant about bureaucracy, you should read the background to the Ghost Ship fire.

The place hadn't been inspected for decades, and didn't have basics like a fire alarm, multiple staircases, or a suitable electricity supply. People who had warned the owner of problems had been ignored.

> Shit happens. If adults burn in a building, it's a risk they should be willing to take

Ridiculous — those adults aren't in a position to evaluate the risk. Are they supposed each to check the fire alarm works before entering, or just ask to see a certificate showing the building has been inspected recently? Can they do a flammability test on the staircase?

And what about the 17 year old who died?
I would also like to see this started on a state level. I’m not sure why we have to do it “all or nothing”. Id it presents so many economic benefits then they can make it work on a state level.
> put relevant ads in front of people

I'd say the main problem is this. Nobody has ever asked for ads to begin with.

The unethical part is not better ad targeting, it's simply the fact that advertising exists and is depriving the world of millions of man-hours that could be put to better use.
An omnibus form of direct mail marketing.
google pays well only if they really want you. If you are part of the "pack", there is no need for them to pay you over market as there is an infinite amount of people drinking the google Koolaid that would love to work for them for under market salaries.
Yes, please share it.
Almost certainly faster than any of the ones you list for large data. I would expect the perf to be more comparable to the other aesni hashes (t1ha and falkhash), both which bench around 4 bytes/ cycle while meow claims 16 bytes/cycle.

Meow does include implementation for smhasher, so benchmarking should be easy enough

https://github.com/cmuratori/meow_hash/blob/master/meow_smha...
Yet there's the exceptional young man from the local solid and dependable farm family, who got a philosophy degree at Auburn, first in his line to do so.

The political 'fashion' is perhaps more about not pigeonholing people by fallible means, and more about giving them a chance regardless?
You just won that thread. Congratulations.
This is a good looking hash, just from the construction I can see that it should be extremely fast for bulk hashing of large objects and with strong statistical properties.

I do want to comment for the wider audience why the details of this construction does not lend itself to small keys, and how you would fix that. I have an (unpublished, I'm lazy) AES-based hash function that is very fast for both bulk hashing and small keys, which required a mostly performance neutral (likely fits in an unused ALU execution port) tweak to the bulk hashing loop.

Large key performance is entirely in the bulk loop algorithm (an AES round in this case) and small key performance is entirely in the mixer/finalizer algorithm. If you have a very wide bulk loops with no mixing of the individual lanes then it usually requires a deep mixing stage that makes small keys very expensive since that is a fixed overhead. The question then becomes, how do you cheaply "bank" dispersal of bits across lanes in the bulk loop to shorten the mixing stage without creating an operation dependency between lanes that will massively reduce throughput.

As an important observation, vectorizing the AES lanes makes it difficult to disperse bits because there are no good, cheap operations that move bits between lanes. However, the CPU will happily run multiple AES operations and other 128-bit operations concurrently across ALU ports if they are in independent registers. This allows you to trivially create a "mixing" lane that solely exists to aid bit dispersal because you no longer are trying to do sideways operations on a vector. So what does a mixing lane look like that doesn't create dependencies on your hashing lanes? It is so simple it is embarrassing: XOR the input data lanes. The mixing lane is worthless as a hash but it only exists to represent all the bits from all the lanes.

At the mixing stage, you simply fold the mixing lane into each of the hashing lanes by running it through a round of AES -- one concurrent operation. This allows you to avoid the deep mixing stage altogether, which means small keys can be hashed very quickly since almost all of the computation is in the finalizer. Using this technique, I've been able to hash small keys in <30 cycles with concurrent AES lanes.
When used as insurance. However health insurance is really just the way we pay for healthcare.
Why did it take so long? Scummy apps have existed for years.
Top Gutenberg Compatible WordPress Themes for Modern Blogs
Interestingly, the Japanese museum is open only to employees. While Hanseikai is a good idea, its important it be done in safe company, with people who will not judge but are interested in learning.

A public software-hanseikai exhibit would likely turn into a shop-of-horrors, an exhibit for its own sake?
Freedom requires responsibility. And probably checking the electric facilities and placing some smoke detectors should be considered self-evident. Laws try to make sure everybody acts responsible by placing lots of obstacles to trip over long before anything bad can happen. Now in this case it would have been a good thing - then again though, the laws existed - now the consequence is that dozens of people are still dead just that the guy gets punished harder.

In Hamburg we have really nice planetarium. Recently a guy in a wheelchair wasn't allowed to just attend the show sitting next to a seating row because in case of a fire he might block the corridor and who would be able to quickly evacuate him? Of course the reasoning makes sense but where do we end up when everything needs to be extremely safe or is otherwise forbidden?

This development is a systemic effect which cannot be stopped as far as I can tell. The desire for freedom will be satisfied simply by people refusing to be super strict in practice. Also too many regulations usually will be harder to enforce.
It's her maternal instinct kicking in.

I know some female scientists who wouldn't want to hear anything about attributing differences to IQ or genes and become very emotional if the topic is ever mentioned. "I don't want to think of my friends from X as N".
dyslesia for the win
My experience is that the type of day-to-day work shifts pretty significantly as a company gets bigger, generally from "build new things" to "maintain existing things". At a big company, my view of "good engineering" was writing well-factored code and making systems robust and scalable. At a small company, my view of "good engineering" is intelligently taking shortcuts for faster prototypes when the final product is uncertain, or recognizing clever product solutions that can be built quickly to satisfy a user need.

If you want space to find a perfect solution for a well-defined technical problem, you probably want to work at a big company, and if you want messy open-ended problems where you get significant ownership over the product direction, you probably want to work at a small company.
Are you imagining something akin to the Y2K-style surge in COBOL consulting jobs? I imagine it could be lucrative, but I also imagine most companies will just drag their feet as long as they can, so it will be a frustrating sales experience as it always is absent a clear deadline or at least significant time pressure.
I would love this to be the case. My problem with this approach is that every single news report that I have actually had personal knowledge of has been ridiculously flawed. I just can't bring myself to believe that there is some protected elite cadre of journalists I should trust when 100% of my actual experience has been the opposite.

Their direct incentives are getting sales (and now clicks), which doesn't appear to be highly correlated with accuracy. Additionally, my experience in college was that it wasn't the best and the brightest going into that field, though I deeply hope that it was a skewed sample, and believe that there are many deeply intelligent people working there.

However, I think it likely that many people are not drawn to the field for the pursuit of pure objective truth, but because they have a particular agenda and want to enlighten the world with it.

There is a quote about a logical fallacy that I can't quite remember, it goes along the lines of the following: You read an article about something with which you are deeply familiar. You laugh to yourself at the childish misconceptions of the journalist. You then turn the page to something you know little about, and assume that everything that is written is true. That doesn't make sense.
I would quote some of the scary parts from the wiki page, but there's just too much.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Oakland_warehouse_fire?wp...

As a rule, you don't kill 36 out of 50 people without putting some effort in.
So, basically this a replay of Orwellian "1984" where the tables have turned. Now Apple is the Big Brother and it is there to dictate. Who is going to throw that hammer nowadays?
TLS 1.3(with AEAD) &TLS 1.2 cipher suites demystified:how to pick your ciphers
It's still a legal entity, just like any other private business. Liability should still be held by the company.
Why not 'her social responsibility' kicking in? Because there it is, attributing 'weak' motivations to women, because of course women are all the same.

This would be funny, a comment that exhibits precisely why the argument it 'refutes' is true. If it wasn't sexist and demeaning as well.
I mean there's the stereotype of the "thank you" note for the birthday gifts. You bring a gift to someone hosting a dinner party at their house.

There's of course a cynical tax play here. But it is entirely possible that people also _feel good for helping their hometowns_. Sure, there's the vouchers, but there are also the (not super resellable) plums!

It's maintaining emotional bonds in the community. At least that's the most optimistic way of thinking about it
I've published this article 5 months ago. Mine doesn't require global consensus for all commits, just local one and it works from there.

What's even more annoying is that I tweeted this article to them and they didn't say anything.

https://medium.com/p/optimistic-acid-transactions-4f193844bb...
https://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/9ov7p7/tls_13_with_...
That and college textbooks we weren't able to resell
You are opening a Pandora’s box :). There is truly no easy answer - too much depends on your budget, needs, OS of choice, etc.

A good way to start is to follow a few subreddits, like r/datahoarder or r/homelab to get some inspiration and understand what are the options etc.

But since you still need an answer, here is something to get you started: 1) For fanless and ease of setup, buy a Synology/QNAP NAS, and install additional software there - $300+ w/o disks. 2) For future proof, buy Dell T30 on eBay for $300 and install FreeNAS on it.
Jaynes' work is wonderful anthropological scifi, and I recommend it to anyone for that purpose. And I'm not being snarky there; I think it's really enjoyable as something to stimulate the imagination.

As actual science, the book should set every cherrypicking alarm bell ringing. For example, he talks a lot about right vs. left positioning of religious imagery, which is a key part of his theory. The problem with that is that if you come up with any theory based on right/left, you can expect about 50% of the evidence to support you, even if you're wrong.

And the whole book is like that. Lots of enthralling examples, with speculation about how they connect to his theory, but very little systematic analysis of evidence.
I mentioned things we evolved not to do, which obviously wouldn't fly in a biology paper, but perhaps gets across "things we lack the evolution-provided hardware to do".
You have answered your own question with the word "exceptional". This individual is truly, as you say, an exception to the rule.
>Is there some implicit negative value attached to the hypothesis that human worth could be predetermined?

I think so, yes. It runs counter to the idea of a free and equal society, and necessitates setting up standards (subjective ones imposed by an authority) as to which qualities are good and which are bad; this very easily leads to narrow-minded elitism, for instance, preferring mental abilities over physical ones, or general intelligence over emotional intelligence etc.

The notion of social equality is important, in my opinion.
Every idealistic "business" based on assumptions and wishful thinking instead of demand will inevitably fail. Demand and demand only is what makes any business possible.

One has to be an exceptional, way above average artist before making himself a brand. Actually, a branding follows being exceptional.
https://crates.io/crates/memmap is the most used mmap package, followed by https://crates.io/crates/mmap
Adding to that: I heard that in modern chemistry there are trillions of experiments to be run and not enough time to run them all. Using QC to cull the search space can lead to discovery of some very interesting compounds. This could be “the industrial revolution” of the field.
A lot of times if you update iOS, the app does stop working.
>What's more, because the barrier for entry as well as people's own expectations were that much lower it meant you saw a hell of a lot more individuality in the content posted. People would literally put a website up about their favourite designs of bridges, the shapes of snail shells, cartoon trivia no normal person should care about, or some local landmark

You can still find those types of sites if you want.

>These days the signal to noise ratio is so far tilted the other way with people obsessing too much about contributing what they think people want read or boasting about stuff they feel is boast-worthy that it almost completely drains out the purist content from people who just post stuff that genuinely interests themselves.

With more people joining the web, that will be a side effect of it. On the flip side, there has been so much massive positive change on the web too. Online transactions, many government services becoming online (many times reducing corruption), email and IM connecting people around the world in a way never before, and many many more things. Just focussing on the negatives by commenting a few types of sites like fb, insta, twitter etc is fainting a very one-dimensional picture.

>The only good thing about the modern web is that while the barrier for entry writing a website has gone up, inversely the barrier for entry publishing content has gone down dramatically

I actually think that is a bad thing, not good. What made the web the web was the low barrier to entry. Also, if you think that is the only good thing about the modern web, then I really don't think you truly realize the scale in which most people take the web for granted nowadays in their everyday lives, which affects them in a positive way.
Yeah, I'm very skeptical about the claims that north koreans are doing this. It just doesn't seem possible that they could have built up such an advanced level of exploitation when they have such minimal infrastructure.
Gimlet did a Startup podcast series about this, they called it "Church Planting"

https://www.gimletmedia.com/startup/church-planting-1-the-mo...
Constant forced updates are a problem, whether their development process is pristine or trash. And it's trash.
Possibly of interest to others, Jacquard Loom also inspired a song by Boards of Canada:

https://bocpages.org/wiki/Jacquard_Causeway
> Yet there's the exceptional young man from the local solid and dependable farm family, who got a philosophy degree at Auburn, first in his line to do so.

Why do you associate farmer with lesser intellect?

Change it to:

> Yet there's the exceptional young man from the local family of village idiots, who got a philosophy degree at Auburn, first in his line to do so.

Now that'd be surprising.
Getting downvote without reply ...

OK, I will hold your hand:

Suppose you want a collision free (hence reversible) 512 bit hash Reversible512().

Suppose you have a colliding 256 bit hash function that otherwise suits your requirements (speed, diffusion, other properties ...), call it Collider256().

Let me denote the 512 bit concatenation of 256 bit values H(igh) and L(ow) as < H , L > .

Then you can use Collider256() to construct a Reversible512() as follows:

Reversible512( < H, L > ){

H2 = H + Collider256(L) ; // wrap around addition modulo 256

L2 = L + Collider256(H2);

return < H2 , L2 > ;

}

And if you are interested you can define the inverse function:

Inverted512( < H2 , L2 > ){

L = L2 - Collider256(H2); // undo last step

H = H2 - Collider256(L); // undo first step

return < H, L > ;

}

Theres many variations you can do...

I agree my comment would have been more helpful if it contained a concrete example, but is it really necessary to downvote someone for not holding the reader's hands? Couldn't this person simply reply with a request for an example?
Bit of a plug here. But I used this library in a small side project (C++ publisher-subscriber library) and it worked like a charm. There are a few things you can customize with mmapping but most use cases will do fine with this. Great work.

https://github.com/drali/pubsub
It looks like a common setup [1], and of the ones with pictures several don't have a manual override.

[1] https://wiki.hackerspaces.org/Doorlock
You’re correct, but I’m gonna have to nitpick your nitpick and say that NP-complete problems have not been proven (or disproven) to be in P. “Probably not” is an opinion.
Have definitely thought about this type of situation. We have the technology that you could do it, even mostly off line as storage is cheap enough a person could take a go pro and have it running at all times. I like the gps stuff but think people don't like being tracked so that wouldn't work. So instead of a service this all has to be done locally on the device so the person ultimately has control. We don't need to give out the information unless there is a reason.
This reminds me of the Star Trek episode where Data figures out his “mom” is an android because her blinking follows some mathematical pattern.
Silly Wedding Video
I think releasing it on yet-another-open-source-license instead of some of well-known ones severely degrades the possibility for this code to be used by companies.
Still not sure if the hours I spent as a kid scrolling down the names in the phone book and deciphering the foreign-sounding ones were well spent.
Yes, that situation would suck, but you can’t use the law to stop people reminding you of things you did. Not every bad situation can be fixed by laws, not without creating even worse problems.
This is cynical in the extreme and essentially not true.

Doing coursework and showing up for class, is not 'compliance to authority' - it's just the process - and fyi voluntarily chosen by the student in most cases.

In most schools you don't even have to show up or do much frankly, you can just 'write the final' if you think you're a genius.

The workload in most programs surpasses the ability of 'just smart' folks to wing it, and so grades are definitely a measure of conscientiousness behaviour in the student as well as intelligence.

After 20 years of hiring I will take the 'good grades, reasonably bright' student, who was diligent and conscientious over the possibly genius person who didn't do much. 95% of even eng. work requires diligence, competence, focus, the ability to work with others, assumption of responsibility and a hint of leadership. I've never once seen a 'genius move' in my entire career where the totally brilliant dude made the difference. Maybe in some highly specific R&D things, but that's rare.

I should add: that 'someone is good at University' doesn't make them a better person, it doesn't make the more creative, moral, more suited to a whole host of things, it doesn't mean they're geniuses etc. etc.. It mostly just means they are 'good at University'. Which might happen to be a good benchmark for 'good at being a white collar employee'.
This is not social responsibility. It's an emotional reaction to a scientific study. There is nothing irresponsible about the study.

Science doesn't have to care for the emotions of specific groups. Then we're doomed.

And yes, neurotypical women are close to identical at the meta level I'm talking about. Same for men.
In NYC the CUNY schools are affordable and have good courses