skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Your time isn’t free.

GitLab may well be the right choice for many teams, but I’ve not yet seen price be the winning factor over the long term. Between general sysadmin tasks, scaling with the size of your team, doing upgrades, and performing database migrations, the cost of running GitLab will probably be the same ballpark as GitHub.
>Let's focus on the real problems at their source instead of putsing around with micro feel-good-measures.

On that, you and I are on 100% agreement! It is just that in my experience, the real problems are staggeringly prosaic, and thus hard to drum up real support for. Not many people (although I am willing to bet quite a few here on HN!) get excited about proper waste management/sanitation. But it is one of those comparatively cheap things that reaps vast societal and environmental benefit. And plastics provide a lot of benefits for very little cost- it's why they are used so heavily. Switching over to paper packaging would require vastly more energy and resource inputs, for example, and it is not immediately clear that this would, or would not, be a net benefit.

A truly biodegradable plastic that still had the required physical properties of what we currently use would be a big step forward, too.

As a slight aside, I am leery of banning as a first-choice tool for dealing with these kinds of problems. Look at what happened in California when anticoagulant rat and mouse poisons were banned from use. What was an excellent idea (reduce poison loads in the environment, stop additional kill of non-target wildlife) has instead become objectively worse, and the neurotoxin introduced as a replacement has no treatment, unlike the Vitamin K shots that could previously help stricken pets and animals, and is a far more agonizing way to die to boot.
> As a user being able to install packages without root and start my own services and mount network drives without root would make my life a lot easier.

... but that's not a problem of linux, that's a problem of your company rules. They would put similar rules whatever the OS.
That's a cop-out.

It has to start with someone saying no.
The name is quite strange. Does it mean anything?
>The pill was already part of HIV trratment, it does nothing to change the effectiveness of HIV tests.

Where is that stated?

>But: Anyone in that situation is already covered by the questions about recent partners and already is not donating if answering the existing questions in good faith. If they are donating in this situation at all they are already just ignoring the questions.

I think you missed the entire point of the GP this isn’t about someone acting in good faith or rationally.
that's assuming your compiler even ships any kind of library outside of a header for your hardware's specific functions
Oh I find the relation very unlikely. I was just trying to think up a potential connection for fun/curiosity, as the coincidence is pretty crazy that two huge sites known for very few/little outages had major outages in the same week.
What did the server cost? How many hours did you spend on it? What's your SLA? Who will be woken up at night when there's an outage? What's your backup and recovery procedure?

I mean kudos to you for setting it up but it's a bit naive to believe it's better than a hosted solution right away.
Yeah, sounds like a backup restore or a RAID synchronization is in progress.
Scholar.py – A Parser for Google Scholar, Written in Python
Continuations by Albert Wenger: World After Capital: Economic Freedom (Intro,
This is probably a dumb question, but can you explain what you mean by "it's not open source"? Is this not the complete source? https://github.com/RedisLabsModules/redis-graph/

Edit: Nevermind, it is answered in your link.

> Applying the Commons Clause to an open source project will mean the source code is available, and meets many of the elements of the Open Source Definition, such as free access to source code, freedom to modify, and freedom to re-distribute, but not all of them. So to avoid confusion, it is best not to call Commons Clause software “open source.”
PGAdmin 4 3.4 is finally usable
PGAdmin 4 1.x, 2.x was really bad. [1]

Well, I just downloaded PGAdmin 4 3.4 and it has improved quite a bit. Those who missed PGAdmin 3 should give it another shot. Thanks to the maintainer, Dave Page [2] for improving it.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14884713
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15411690

[2] https://www.enterprisedb.com/de/user/254789/published_articl...
11 Things That Set the Best Salesteams Apart from the Rest – SaaStr
If you could share some of that data, that would be helpful.
Someone posted a comment on an open issue, I got the mail, but there's nothing on the web interface.

What I don't understand is why they don't set it all to "read only" until the problem is sorted. Looks like any update goes to /dev/null, just let your users know!

(unless they plan to replay those updates, somehow)
chick, dude, guy, gal
Travis supports both Bitbucket and Gitlab
What some insiders make of those articles: http://infoproc.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-truth-shall-make-yo...
Not the OP but I bill around that per day, so the investment would only be a days worth of billable time to stay cutting edge, so makes sense in that perspective.
There is more than 9000 bird species and yet we have two web frameworks with the same name.
Naming projects proves the-letter-agencies theory that people passwords are chose from very limited word space :) (https://falconframework.org) was there already.
I personally created a stackoverflow account this year, and while not being an expert on any programming language or framework, I have still been able to contribute and answer many different people's questions along with asking a few questions myself that got some good responses.
And if you want the second derivative... You have hyper-dual numbers! http://adl.stanford.edu/hyperdual/
How can I access online multiplayer on PlayStation 4?
Don’t you have an nginx/Apache in front? If you tell it to serve HTTP/2 don’t you already get 95% of the benefits?

EDIT: e.g. bottom of https://www.speedshop.co/2016/01/07/what-http2-means-for-rub...
Exactly this.

For most developers there doesn't seem to be a differentiation between example code on a blog post and actual producation code.
Upvoted for thoughtful, accurate points, but mostly for giving me the phrase ‘feature bulimia’.
This sounds great! Are there any things I need to watch out for before switching from Puma to Falcon? And is it production-ready now, or does it still need some time to mature and have feature parity with other web servers?

This is a great article about the different Ruby web servers (from 2015): https://www.speedshop.co/2015/07/29/scaling-ruby-apps-to-100...

Would be great to have a comparison with Falcon. Also, speaking of performance, I still need to set up jemalloc. Have heard lots of good things about that.
Bullet Messenger is going to be the next WeChat in China
This is the best advice I found in the whole thread. Yes, devs don't generally buy from devs, but other fields have a lot of things that need fixing.
Those five concepts are not random, they go from the assistive technologies world: most if not all desktop APIs use these terms.

Agreed, the state concept (or even role concept) can be technically mapped into attributes, but I keep using them just to stick closer to existing terminology.

When it comes to ARIA, all browsers map ARIA taxonomies into desktop APIs, and thus I think it's fair to say ARIA is mapped into those concepts as well.

But this post wasn't an attempt to define accessibility concepts as such. It was rather about answering a question, whether a large set of accessibility problems can be solved, if the web came with a technology that provides greater access to express semantics to web devs.
Welcome to eventual consistency.
This is a direct competitor for starship?
If this is such an obvious issue in E mercantile capitalism, then it seems an obvious choice for other places that money and power come into play.
GitHub: October 21 Incident Report
Open source is not just the ability to see the source code. It must obey 10 rules - https://opensource.org/osd

1. Free Redistribution

The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

2. Source Code

The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in source code as well as compiled form. Where some form of a product is not distributed with source code, there must be a well-publicized means of obtaining the source code for no more than a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably downloading via the Internet without charge. The source code must be the preferred form in which a programmer would modify the program. Deliberately obfuscated source code is not allowed. Intermediate forms such as the output of a preprocessor or translator are not allowed.

3. Derived Works

The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original software.

4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code

The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in modified form only if the license allows the distribution of "patch files" with the source code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. The license must explicitly permit distribution of software built from modified source code. The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original software.

5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups

The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.

6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor

The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

7. Distribution of License

The rights attached to the program must apply to all to whom the program is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license by those parties.

8. License Must Not Be Specific to a Product

The rights attached to the program must not depend on the program's being part of a particular software distribution. If the program is extracted from that distribution and used or distributed within the terms of the program's license, all parties to whom the program is redistributed should have the same rights as those that are granted in conjunction with the original software distribution.

9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software

The license must not place restrictions on other software that is distributed along with the licensed software. For example, the license must not insist that all other programs distributed on the same medium must be open-source software.

10. License Must Be Technology-Neutral

No provision of the license may be predicated on any individual technology or style of interface.
I think the license is interesting. I've been looking for a license that lets people tinker around with my software and use it in their commercial software, but protects me from getting my work or ideas stolen and resold...
The prices are literally unbelievable to me. What’s missing? These sure look like the spiritual successor to the Sears homes.
For sure you can do that on Android, and I guess with the new iOS file extensions as well.
For x86 this is ignoring a lot of the Intel NUC sized things you can buy and remove from their cases, some of which have soldered onboard cpu. Add your own RAM and m.2 format nvme storage.
I agree that most of these are good points, although they can be worth it depending on your priorities.

As for this:

> Who will be woken up at night when there's an outage?

Unless they are working with teams around the world, does it matter if their server is down the whole night, as long as they can get it back up first thing in the morning?
> PWA beginners increasingly obviously pointless, wasteful soul-crushing make-work with progressive automation and increases labor-market friction obstructing adjustment.

I don't know what this sentence is supposed to mean. Can you clarify?
I guess I'm dubious that you can engineer "surpluses are mostly derived by the state" while maintaining the credibility that makes an apartment in Vancouver so attractive in the first place.

Those apartments have secure title, under stable property rights, because they are under the same system as every ordinary Canadian voter's house. That's what protects them: there would be a revolt if you messed with all the ordinary voters.

Would you be as keen to buy an apartment that instead fell under some special laws which are designed to squeeze you, the foreign investor, to the benefit of the voters? I think you'd be pretty worried that next time there's a pension crisis, or an oil crisis, they'll be very tempted to squeeze you a bit harder, and then a bit harder...

I wish there were ways to exploit this export market with less side-effects. There are smaller ones, like Nestle's roaring trade in trustworthy powdered milk. But in general it seems hard.
If you’re willing to take this guy’s money after reading Hatching Twitter, I doubt there’s anything that could convince you otherwise.
Fair questions.

We're a company making WISP/ISP software here in India and our cloud (hosted) offering is also hosted on servers at our office itself[1]. Our infra manages hundreds of thousands of internet subscribers in India.

We're a small tech company with 25-30 people or so, with linux kernel experts who have experience of running software on questionable hardware so that service providers can take internet to new places in India, that experience helps a lot in keeping all our services up with minimum downtime.

Our office runs 24x7 with support. If anything goes down our business will be in jeopardy so we have protocol to be back up in minimum amount of time.

How many hours we spent on it? Less than a couple hours on setting up the self hosted gitlab instance. More time on getting people to get used to it and setting up the runner for CI, but I would have to spend that time on other paid solutions too.

As for time costing $0, definitely not, but people in India don't cost nearly as much as they do in the USA. Also because of experience with self hosting it is less of a deal for us to spend time on this.

[1] we have multiple bandwidth backup, electricity backup, etc needed to self host and we've always stuck with self hosting.
Misleading title. They are just advertising an existing affiliate VPN service
You're a benefit-at-all-costs kind of guy?
Posix OS on the browser
Could big-game fishing return to the UK?
Protip: if you find a crap product that's being shilled for in the reviews, you can talk your way into getting paid decently for your silence. I know someone who was paid several hundred dollars to not leave a bad review for a something that cost under $50. One scathing review that exposes their scheme might lost them tens, maybe a hundred multiples of their unit profit margin.
Locked means a regular, slip-free friction clutch housed inside the torque converter. Unless that clutch slips (which would be a mechanical failure), then there will be no slippage during heavy acceleration.

The torque converter is most likely to handle a bit of slippage at low speeds, or just to provide a smoother activation than slamming a clutch. It's also supposedly a low-slip converter, unlike the normal "comfort" type.
Much, much better transcript version https://martinfowler.com/articles/agile-aus-2018.html
It basically sounds like the car's "stuck in 5th" with electric boost to make up the shortfall in torque when the motor's at low RPM. They're not getting maximum engine power out of it at 100km/h, you're right there, but they don't need to because the electric motors make up for it when accelerating.
HOW CASTRO SENT UGANDAN SOLDIERS DIAGNOSED WITH HIV-AIDS BACK HOME
It would be very funny if Amazon gets back to where Internet started... curated directories.

Not necessarily à la Yahoo! but a modern collaborative system, with help from some ML would do. My friends at Slant would agree :)
I also heartily recommend this. I’ve been watching the videos whilst ploughing through the PDF book version [1] on my Kindle. He really is a very good teacher.

[1] https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf
I don't think that iMac would last for 12 years. I would save that money for Mac Pro which they promised to be good.
[Infographic] Why Use Our Uber Clone Solution for Your Business?
Social security is funded via FICA which is mandated by the Federal government. You aren't going to get a more sure source of funding than that.
I doubt your numbers. According to [1], average per capita consumption of Raclette was 1.35kg per year in 2006, and that includes infants. Gruyere was even >1.7kg per year, and I'm sure a lot of that goes into Fondues. I don't know about you, but I can't down 1.35kg of Raclette in one sitting, and I don't think Swiss have changed that much since 2006 ;).

[1] https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/record-growth-in-swiss-cheese-c...
It sounds like you're using GH for ticketing also, which means that your R&D org's productivity is tightly coupled with an external companies uptime. Self-hosting Gitlab is easy, as is running Jira, redmine, and a dozen other tools.

If you can't do your job without a tool, then you need to have a plan B on hand for when that tool fails. Both in the micro sense of the tools you use to code (editor, browser, laptop, mouse, coffee mug, etc) and in the macro sense of tools your organization uses (ticketing systems, chat, bathrooms). Show some initiative, figure out some mirrors for your dependencies, and try standing up a local caching proxy for your team. It'll probably take a lot less time than you think.
> This feels a lot like what happens when a brand is sold. Is it really the same product?

It is why brands are sold. Someone buying a trusted brand wants to give their product starting levels of trust that it doesn't deserve. It's an effective way of cheating customers.
I'm no git master and after searching around a bit I wasn't able to find a clear answer to this so I'm hoping someone can enlighten me:

Say I accidentally push some private info and overwrite the commit with a force push. The commit history doesn't show the mistake commit at all, but is it actually still accessible through reflog?

I'm pretty sure I've done this with some of my smaller projects so now I'm concerned that some of my passwords/keys are actually floating around somewhere. I read some info about reflog automatically pruning, is it likely that this is the case for my projects and I have nothing to worry about?
already using it, but i'm worried it'll disappear one day
> Using Win10 without a specific program that isn’t available for macOS/Linux is bordering on masochism.

Some of us like 100% laptop support without speeding weekends tweaking them instead of being at the park with friends and family.

Even buying from Linux friendly hardware stores isn't always a success, as proven by my own Asus netbook.
The labor and the land. Those are by far the most expensive components of a home.
Tally ERP 9 Crack Release 6.4.8 Full Version
Impraise (YC S14) is hiring back-end engineers in Lisbon (Ruby, Elixir)
This is actually an idiotic question. The molecular biology does not employ a concept of a number (or any concepts whatsoever in principle), since this requires an intelligent observer (to form the abstract notion of a number) which is not available at that level.

The "concrete", real-world biological systems, including our brains, however employs frequencies and "weights", which corresponds to wideness of a pathway, which does not require any numbers or counting.

Mother Nature Does Not Count (and it does not compute any probabilities, of course). Higher level intellect does.

Math and logic are superimposed on the Universe and Nature. It is naive to assume that the Universe and Nature is based on math and logic, as ancient Greek views suppose.

Yes, there is basis behind Modus Ponens - in a certain conditions having Hs and Os inevitably leads to H2Os because universe has its laws, and because it has its laws it produces certain regularities and certain patterns which could be matched and even generalized by an intelligent observer, but it is not the other way around.
This is true, we've always had troubles with amortizing costs for time spent on doing something.

We're a profitable software company that intends to remain in business forever, we're well staffed though and people do have time to try out things and even do R&D on the side. Frugality is built in to our DNA and having spare time on top means failure at amortizing time costs.
Why do you believe none of the nation states in this region will "make it?"
It’s a myth that people “needed” saudi oil. Men are greedy and will use any justification to satiate their greed. It is up to you to accept the justification or not.
It's good that you are concerned with the principle of charity, perhaps you should apply it here?

It's pretty obvious that evolution didn't "invent" anything because accident or not, to invent requires an originator or discoverer which is to say an entity with agency. It's as absurd as saying relativity invented black holes.
Yes, please. Would use it for my blog.
Well, please do correct me if am wrong, but I have always had the notion that most instances of extreme wealth throughout the history has always been built on some kind of unethical (unethical is a very mild word in my opinion) activity, or let's say some activity that was unfair to a large amount of other people.

Consider the wealth generated by Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg. I can't take away from them the fact that they worked hard when they saw a great opportunity and made themselves insanely wealthy in doing so, but history will may not judge their actions in a way that they are shown as messiahs.

So I find all this discussion just a bit hypocritical to be very honest.

Comments most welcome to change my, rather cynical, opinion.
There is even the older phalcon framework from 2012.
My team at work has been studying CT. Every week we read one chapter of Category Theory for Programmers. Then every Thursday we discuss the chapter and our problem solutions together.

It's been very fun. Our discussions help forge links between the category world and our day-to-day programming. We're only 3 chapters in, so I can't say it's given me some huge insight into programming. But as we move from Go to Rust/Typescript, it gives us a useful way to think about the correctness of our programs and a useful shared vocabulary for talking about types in a language-agnostic way.
Was it never a garbage?

I really don't get the point of it.
GitHub Status Generator
Or you could behave ethically and not allow yourself to be bought.
This is unfortunate, but at the time I only checked RubyGems.org and didn't think to check another language or package repository. So, I apologies, but there was no bad intentions, perhaps just a little bit of bad luck and ignorance.

That being said, it's actually named after the Peregrine Falcon, which is the fastest bird in the animal kingdom, and it was a friendly poke at Puma :)
"most mirrors online are hosting old, insecure versions"

The same can be said for every Windows software. Heck, even Windows itself. Although it offers you the option to install updates before exposing your computer to any security risks, I doubt many people are patient enough to take it.
you are basically assuming that your deployed version of GitLab is bug free and your hardware will be able to serve you 24/7 without downtime in the next few years.