skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Home assistance and nursing assistant jobs require competence in a large number of highly varied tasks and many require human-style intelligence which is among the hardest to automate from our experience with AI research. (See Moravec’s Paradox.)

It will be at least a couple decades, likely longer, until we can really automate those jobs cost effectively, which gives us time to reconfigure socio-economic systems to suit the burgeoning new industrial revolution.

Check out the following predictions by a noted roboticist and former director of MIT’s CSAIL

https://rodneybrooks.com/my-dated-predictions/

Example from the page:

Dexterous robot hands generally available. NET (Not Earlier Than) 2030

It will take at least a decade and often longer for a hardware product to become affordable to the masses. So we are talking about 2040 or later when most of home caring jobs will be at risk.

Even then, the need for human interaction will still be there so it is unclear if most elderly would not want human services if it is accessible to them.
Coding Dynamic Behavior with the Strategy Pattern
I think the beautifier part refers to it applying syntax highlighting to the web output.
Waymo’s driverless cars have logged 10M miles on public roads
Jack Dorsey runs two multibillion-dollar companies without using a computer
Swain launches new pan-European service – Supply Chain
I was thinking more Diamond Age, but yes.
Of course the government would deny.

It doesn't make sense for them to proactively deny it. If it was government propaganda, why would they attack the Bloomberg story. They could just say we can't confirm it, which would leave the door open to it being true. Denying it is counterproductive if it was a planted propaganda piece.

It is a fascinating story, anything is still possible, but the momentum is starting to swing against Bloomberg.
Technical support number
Call +1-888-887-7208 iPhone, iPad, itunes, macintosh, macbook, apple id and Mac, technical help. Contact to apple customer service for any technical query related to apple
if you are facing Any Apple related problems call +1-855-553-4777 for instant resolution by apple support experts

https://www.technical-help-support.com/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/apple-help-number/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/apple-id-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/macintosh-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/macbook-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/iphone-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/mac-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/apple-ipad-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/apple-tech-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/itunes-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/apple-customer-service/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/apple-support/icloud-support/
The Myth of "Macroeconomics"

https://mises.org/wire/myth-macroeconomics
Prior Art Archive aims to improve patent process
Portal Is a New Voice Enabled Hands-Free Video Calling Device from Facebook
I love the visual design of the UI. It looks like something out of a hacker movie.
I believe that study shows that the affect of race on SAT scores when a more complex model of income and parental education is taken into account is halved (i.e., the observed 100 pt difference drops to 50). So I think it still doesn't excuse the original post from taking income into account.
Thank you for your reply!
Not necessarily agree with grandparent.

>There is zero harm to others downstream

Draconian IP laws and content filters and DCMA abuse and cost of complying is harm. DRM software itself already has been proved to be a security problem even when handled by the biggest of tech corps.

These costs are externalized for copyright holders. These costs are real because those things already do happen to people. Unlike these existing costs, opportunities lost are only hypothetical. Saying that we should abolish IP is ridiculous but so is claiming that current laws and industry is reasonable in their reach for media control.

We should also consider the fact that someone not being familiar with a piece of art and not creating art being unable to use other work is harm. Though these costs are on par with hypothetically lost profits and hypothetically lost creators in their ephemerality.

>a product that was created in express reliance on the copyright system

This system severely overreaching and limiting freedom of people without showing a connection between implemented laws and technologies and the ability to produce. It may rely on some parts of system but not the other. It's up to copyright lobby to demonstrate if it does at all.

>It's precisely because this scarcity is artificial that it's moral.

So is price collusion and human torture. If drm and music are to grow on trees it wouldn't change a thing about the moral aspect of the thing. We're free to decide on the morality of copyright enforcement without looking at its nature.
Is it counter-intuitive to think that people are much more productive when they are happy, having arrived at the work through their own initiative, with their own inspiration, and in their own time?
A security doesn't require a common enterprise, it simply requires that one thing represents an interest in something else.

True, it even works with past and future music royalties.

David Bowie (together with his financial manager and an investment banker) was probably the first to come up with securisation of non-tangible assets.[1]

It's a fascinating story.

[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/business-35280945
Technical support number
Looking for Pogo number or Pogo support phone number? Contact Pogo Support by phone and get pogo help from experts. Call support number +1-866-600-0870
Pogo Customer Service games remote support from pogo experts Call +1-866-600-0870 and get complete help and support for EA Pogo games for all problems like java error, pogo games not loading, etc
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/pogo-screen-size-problem/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/pogo-games-java-problem/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/pogo-games-flash-error/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/pogo-technical-support/
https://www.technical-help-support.com/pogo-support/pogo-customer-service/
20’s Is the Preferable Time You Need to Build a Brand for Yourself
I tried to read it but the code sections appear very small on my screen. Almost unreadable.

But glad to learn about APL. In this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZXpgCjaxU4 he uses aplcloud.com Looked very nice but the price is very high. Can you recommend a similar free service to play with the language?
Global Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) Market Report – Forecast 2022
If these companies lobbied instead to end software patents, they could be a thing of the past in a year or two.
You overstay your visa you get picked up by the police, you get put in a jail, you go to a court represented by a lawyer and represent your case, and either receive punishment (deportation and banned entry) or achieve a settlement with the state (e.g. asylum or a visa exception).

As I said, it duck types as a "crime." Pragmatics matter.
> But by-and-large, it provided a system for a person to go live the "life of the mind" and exchange art for money instead of something else, and it's unclear to me that copyright did more than, say, the patronage system to that end.
There are problems with the patronage system. For example, almost all the people who could live the "life of the mind" were either the privileged few, or the people who appealed the to the privileged. While this certainly is one way to fund works, and I'm a huge fan of Patreon, as well as a Patron of many people, it's also going to only hit a subset of the kind of art we care about, and a very specific subset too (things that interest rich first-worlders that are economically better to target.)

> I think it's incumbent upon the rent-holders and copyright owners to explain how, absent their Byzantine system of moving money around, our public spaces would be silent and dead, devoid of creative works.

The history of humanity and our simple desire to sing makes that strike me as profoundly unlikely.

I don't think anyone seriously makes that claim (or at least, I don't). I think my claims were:

1. On a practical level, this is economics 101 - if we up the reward for creative works, we'll get more creative works.

2. On a moral level, as long as we are in this capitalistic system, I think that one person creating value should have the same reward as another person creating value, and just because one happens to be easily copied and one doesn't, shouldn't make a difference. I can't find a moral reason to say to someone that, should they choose to become an author instead of building furniture, and should they happen to create works that please millions, they shouldn't get rewarded for that.

You make it seem like the rent-holders and copyright owners have never explained why they want the system - but these things have been discussed since the dawn of the IP system. For one thing, have you talked to authors/musicians/etc and asked their views?

I particularly remember reading a British parliament member talking a lot about this issue, including the problems with patronage and the problem with pirating - in the 1800s!
Waze Carpool is now available across the USA – Waze – Medium
> for example in games, where an ECS design using IDs is generally preferable to direct references

In scripting/gameplay parts of games maybe.

In rendering or other performance-critical components, pointers are just faster. They are single RAM reference, IDs are 2 RAM references (and in case of languages like C# or Rust, plus bounds checking).
Investors are betting $75M on AllTrails and its content for hikers
I like the movie elysium.
Facebook Releases a New Video Calling Device Called Portal
Top 4 Causes for Tooth Sensitivity
How to Dockerise a Scala and Akka HTTP Application – the Easy Way
Nothing could make me want this company to fail more than knowing the Murdoch’s are involved.
The Hotmail front-end ran as an ISAPI filter inside IIS.

Messenger had lots of standalone binaries for different functions: CS, SB, DP, etc.

BitTorrent is used in Dropbox, Twitter, MSN, etc to distribute binaries throughout the server platform, not to end users.
Dropbox doesn't offer privacy. Anything done on the service is visible to them and whoever else convinces them to hand over the data.

They're exactly the type of cloud service that shouldn't be used by businesses or privacy-conscious individuals.

Security's also questionable. They had an incident where one could log into any account a long time ago. More recently they were presenting a fake admin dialog to syphon the admin password on macOS and perform some admin tasks on the machine.
I suppose we should just give up the whole enterprise and not bother trying at all, or what are you saying? Maybe we can't ever solve the "last mile", so what?
Everyone has automated testing. What Arista doesn’t have is 20+ years of features (bloat).
WASM is then the new JVM. Birth and Death of Javascript indeed.
The story is not correct.
>Bit of an odd stance from someone who is just posting links to Microsoft's view on the case, which is obviously going to be in favour of the decision (and as above possibly incorrect).

How so? I posted a link to Microsoft's legal counsel stating their case. I've yet to see any third party lawyer make a claim otherwise. If you want to dispute a lawyer and the justice department and their take on the law, the very least you (op) can do is provide a reference to an opinion from another lawyer.
That is often a function of having good (or convincing) reports available to them.
Introducing Bitbucket Cloud branching model support
Oh man, here comes the grey goo.
> Only one of our positions is hypothetical.

Then it's yours, because there are many documented cases of fatalities occurring as a result of the suppression of inconvenient facts.

> Says you.

Says the Union of Concerned Scientists.

https://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy...

> You're running under the (faulty) assumption that such censorship would be unregulated. I also wouldn't support such a system, but thankfully that's not what I'd propose either.

It's impossible to actually regulate censorship because for regulations to be sound they have to be vigorously debated, but the public can't, by definition, debate whether something should be censored if nobody can talk about it because it's being censored.

> Yes, the actual harms of unrestricted censorship are widespread and well documented. But most of the EU censors things that are free to say in the US (antisemitism, as an example), and yet somehow manage to rate higher on independent ratings of press freedom[0].

In-spite-of, not because-of. And the US scores poorly largely because of this new radicalized censorship where crazy people are now committing acts of violence against journalists that publish stories they disagree with, and because of all the abuse of power (arresting journalists on charges that won't stick as retaliation for undesired coverage/investigating). Succumbing to populist censorial sentiment or creating new opportunities for more of that abuse obviously wouldn't help matters.

> No, the US just took a strong turn toward isolationism post WWI and the great depression.

Those were the reasons they didn't enter the war when it just seemed to be a war. Knowing what was actually happening could have overcome that sooner, or at a minimum spurred people to do more to facilitate the escape of Jews from the affected countries.

> The atrocities of the holocaust were not some perfectly kept secret.

Their full scope was not publicly known until near the end. We recently learned that the government knew earlier:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/holoc...

But even that was the year after the US entered the war.

> Immediately jumping to "the Nazis and Stalin censored people, so censorship is bad" isn't an argument

"The Nazis and Stalin censored people and they were bad so censorship is bad" is not an argument because it applies equally to building roads or using radios.

"The Nazis and Stalin censored people and as a direct result of the censorship more people died" is a cautionary tale and a strong indictment of censorship.
It's not bypassing the borrow checker; it's bypassing references. C++ doesn't have a borrow checker, and the same pattern of forgoing references for integer IDs is seen there. References are a just a tool to express certain pointer patterns, and like every other tool they have contexts for which they work well and contexts for which they don't. Really the most surprising result of all this is the broadening realization that references aren't the end-all abstraction for reasoning about pointer-like behavior (familiarity with smart pointers like C++'s shared_ptr makes this less of a surprising realization, but it's easy to initially dismiss a library-level feature as being less intrinsically fundamental than a language-level feature).

This isn't to say that futzing with integers is the best imaginable solution for these tasks. Language-level support (or at least stdlib support) for generational indices would be an interesting subject to pursue.
Where's the board? The original Bloomberg story showed pictures of a motherboard. Supermicro motherboards are not rare. Why hasn't one with this strange 6-pin chip surfaced?
My point is chances are you can't visit https://github.com/contact to paste your debugging result, if you're "Having trouble connecting to github.com".
Given the amount of stunning fraud in the ICO market, it was only a matter of time before it was regulated just like every other security. The interesting question is whether or not ICOs have any actual value beside fraud.
Could you “clean the air” by creating many such breaks and having it pull co2 out of the air?
To be fair, I don't think most people know about a random comment pg made 10 years ago. You could certainly make the case that it changed the ethos of the place, but I know that I personally disagree with him, and try to make sure never to downvote something I simply disagree with, but thought was well argued.
It's a shame. I rather like the language, but failing to fix the deployment story for this long is frankly unacceptable.
I'd suggest that uniqueness typing is a special case of refcounting..
a. needs a 2013 tag

b. it’s nonsense.
Marx knew though and is still relevant as teaching material, regardless of your ideological leanings. I've only read the comic book(!) though, "Marx for beginners", so im just a happy amateur. "happy"
Yes. Intel Management Engine.

The easiest way to implement a backdoor for Intel CPUs is to get your own code into the Management Engine somewhere in the supply chain. That's if it doesn't have one already.
I often find that when I'm tired I'm much more effective and less prone to procrastinate. I've always wondered how to achieve this effect while not messing with my sleep.
Guess it depends how much you like your family.

Less glibly, you commute every day, even those that live close-ish to their parents will typically see them less than once a week. Obviously this is range dependent, but there are plenty of moves that would result in increased quality of life without complete elimination (or even reduction) of family time.

Personally I'd argue that giving children more time with their parents is more important than "denying" the grandparents access, but I also don't have kids, so what do I know?
Download Free PowerPoint Templates
Slidebazaar is a dedicated team of energetic designers who are specialized in Presentation Template creation. We want to offer you our best works of high quality resources that will take your presentation to the next level.
For more details visit:https://slidebazaar.com/categories/free-powerpoint-templates/
pretty cool.

quick question, why not just make

- https://github.debug or

- https://debug.github.com
Indexes aren't references to objects, they're references to slots. The lifetimes of the objects are determined by whoever puts them into and out of those slots. That doesn't have to be determined manually.

Sure, objects aren't deallocated when the index is dropped, but that doesn't mean it isn't being automatically deallocated somewhere else for some other reason.
That looks like a guy who's cracked open a few baby skulls and swallowed some DMT if I've ever seen one.

Oh and who the fuck cares.
That's not a fair assessment, specifically towards open source in Microsoft. Big closed-source corps, such as Microsoft, are often the biggest contributors to the open source projects they use.

The free time of thousands of developers is not as efficient as a team of developers working full time under a PM. That's why I think it's really counter-productive when we call out those companies who are top contributors. We should recognize good when we see it and encourage more of it.
Test out what happens to you when you alter sleep habits. How much uninterrupted sleep do you prefer and when? What are the effects of naps during the day on metrics you care about? Keep the traditional sleep log, and track your other related behaviors & habits like eating/nutrition, exercise, etc. National averages are useful, but nothing beats learning how our own bodies function in various situations.

Here is one example paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545315 and while it isn't a direct example of how to find your own ideal sleep patterns, it does highlight the relationship between sleep and body weight in the study population and it again mentions the 6-8 hour recommended minimum sleep period. This source might be better https://www.sleepfoundation.org/excessivesleepiness/content/...
Fraud by definition is non-consensual, since it means someone not consenting to a material fact that was withheld from them about the interaction. It's fundamentally theft through misrepresentation of facts and should always be illegal.

Someone saying "We believe this token will go up 200% in two years" is probably not a misrepresentation of facts, and thus not fraud, and should probably be allowed, and they should suffer the reputational damage when their predictions don't pan out.

But if we created laws that did prohibit people from hyping up the investment potential of a token they put for sale, or laws that require token sale organizers to disclose the general risks around investing in speculative assets, like requiring them to include a statement on their website like "this is a highly speculative asset that has not been registered with the SEC. Speculative investments have a high likelihood of losing all of their value. It is recommended that you get professional investment advice before making an investment into a speculative instrument like this, and that you avoid investing a large portion of your wealth in them", that would probably be fine. It wouldn't be a major impediment to voluntary exchange.

Like I said though, what the SEC is seeking to do goes far beyond barring token sale organizers from hyping their project's profit potential, or requiring such warning messages on their websites. If that's all the SEC wanted to do, I wouldn't be nearly as opposed, if at all.
How Microsoft is making its most sensitive HoloLens depth sensor yet
Sure. The greater problem is how do we achieve that.
With a growing population, deforestation has become necessary to meet agricultural and accommodation needs of humans. As sad as it sounds, people need food and shelter.

The problem boils down to controlling population and also handling population. If people want to keep buying new houses, there is more demand for deforestation. The agricultural demand for deforestation increases with the amount of food wastage we observe these days. Such incremental improvements in lifestyle could help us save forests.
Is this open-source, how can I make one for my company?
QROPS Specialists – Pension Transfer Specialists
> The borrow checker only cares about memory safety, and index accessors are implemented in a memory safe manner (whether that's panic!ing or returning an Option<>).

Reductio ad absurdum: Implement the entire heap as a single array with typed views and you have the asm.js model. Memory safety is ultimately just another class of bug and it's worth keeping the end goal in mind. (And the asm.js approach is resistant against smashing the return address even if the hosted application has buffer overflows out of every orifice, and of course it provides isolation from the rest of the host process, so segregating the heap into a separate memory space has real security value.) I use indices and tagged handles instead of pointers in low-level C code all the time for sound engineering reasons as it's often the superior solution (and the move to 64-bit pointers created further incentives), but I think skepticism is warranted towards the growing Rust prescription of indexed arrays whenever you're dealing with non-tree-structured data.

Probably the greatest thing about pointers is that they enable generic code without any abstraction cost. It's painful enough to work in a language like Java with object references but without interior pointers to array elements or structure fields. You may feel tempted to introduce a case-specific 'fat pointer' pairing of an array reference with an index, which is not only awkward to work with but puts you in the absurd situation of having an index type which will often round up to 16 effective bytes on a 64-bit platform due to packing alignment for the next value in memory, when often one of the goals of replacing pointers with indices on a 64-bit platform should be to reduce the size from 8 bytes to 4 or 2 bytes.