skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> This can be a problem with buildpacks, since you'd need one buildpack that has both the ruby and nodejs runtimes.

This isn't strictly true of v2 designs (both Heroku and Cloud Foundry have schemes for multi-buildpack support) and in the v3 design explicit consideration is given to making mix-and-match a triviality. Buildpacks can cooperate quite easily and in multiple groups.

Where this shines is in updates. If I have an OS base layer, a JDK buildpack and a Maven buildpack, the layers they generate can be independently updated without needing a complete rebuild. So far as I am aware, this is not currently possible with a Dockerfile, multibuild or not. If you invalidate the OS layer, everything else gets rebuilt whether it needed to be or not.
The story is a bit more complicated than that but long story short it came out of nowhere and left me emotionally crushed for more than a year.

Now I struggle to get the company back on track (as he « sold » me his shares without leaving me another option), and it’s a bit complicated but on the way.
> As one of the maintainers of Herokuish - a tool that manages the application of buildpacks to repositories and is used in quite a few Buildpack implementations - I am super happy that CNCF reached out to us and included us in the process. Oh wait, that didn't happen...

All jokes aside, this looks great. Super-early of course - seems like there are quite a few issues in the `pack` repository to be implemented - but I'm excited to see where this lands. Buildpack detection and application is not a straightforward problem.
> the effort is there

The United States set a precedent for insolubility in the Civil War. Secession is not an option. The EU, on other hand, has an official exit mechanism. Texas talks about it in the same way New York and California talk about it; it's punchy, funny and rallies a crowd pissed off at whoever is in power.

Breaking up is not a realistic medium-term risk for the United States. It is for the EU.
Then someone needs to first let them know about this situation, because there is information asymmetry afoot.
Your disagreement here, as far as I understand it, is the central point of disagreement in the debate around the impact of the FB/Google on behavior. On one side, you have people saying that internet use can be indicative of personality type. Others say no: because they can’t discern the reason behind why you do what you do. I have done some statistics, multiple regression and the like a long time ago, but I’m not entirely expert enough to be fully confident in my conclusions, but look at it this way: (1) you may visit a gun site, not because you are interested in guns, but because you are doing market research for your employer or because you accidentally clicked on a link, (2) however 90% of people clicked on the link because they like guns, and that says something about their personality. Now of course 90% is not perfect, but the predictive power at large scale of that insight is huge.
> And here is the notated phrase as it is generally heard after it has been played repeatedly:

Can this point possibly be made without using the key of B, requiring a key signature with five sharps?
So your customer is using IPFS on his site? How do you manage that? Do you run the IPFS node for him and put the uploaded videos on your node?

Is your SaaS fetching from IPFS, then reuploading because your customer's visitors upload using js-ipfs, then you fetch from your node, totally unrelated to the website's backend?

Just wondering.
Brett Kavanaugh's High School Yearbook Now Online
Assuming its all crowd sourced, why can't we just verify the details that were linked instead of shooting the messenger? Isn't that the behavior we would want to see in persuit of information and the truth? Character assassination, regardless of how bad a source is, doesn't mean that the source is always wrong.

For instance, National Enquirer was the first to break the story about Monica Lewinsky.
But this is where the Marxist has to step in and point out that "the invisible hand" doesn't work. It's how you get robber-barons and child labor and unlivable wages. Having a system in which a group sees such little representation begs the question of WHY. The conclusion being drawn (accurately or not) by the progressive liberals is that the game is being fixed (perhaps intentionally, perhaps not)

The argument between "classical liberals" or libertarians or whatever they're calling themselves that day and progressive liberals is the belief that this will all just sort itself out if the government looks the other way and lets the economy run itself. We have seen time and time and time and time again that all that does is lead towards monopolies and exploitation of the masses. You can't possibly pretend that pure unadulterated capitalism is the best choice, since it just winds up leading to people being enslaved (literally or figuratively), murdered and oppressed.

Anarcho-capitalism is a horrible thing. It's impossible to tell what's market forces, and what's unfair advantages. The progressive liberals are of the opinion that in order for the whole to be better, sometimes the state needs to step in and act force people to play nice where it believes they aren't. It's not perfect, but it's a long slippery slope from totalitarian gulags to "put one fucking woman on your board you idiots".
Bans should be on the merit of the individual fact. This seems like an entire publication has been judged as "being incapable of being a source", which is a hell of a castigation, and speaks to the bias in the Wikipedia editor community.
Yup, it's slow for me too. I like it anyway. I want to like links, which is way faster, but w3m is just so simple. If I had to guess, I'd say it's because w3m doesn't support gzip compression.
Wake up jolt needs to apply 240v to the backside of the driver.
Having worked in the food industry, I can tell you that "ugly food" was never wasted. It gets used in applications where aesthetics doesn't matter (shredded carrots used in soups or frozen dinners, etc) or at least used as animal feed. So there's a point that it is a "marketing gimmick" to get more profit from food. And this could have a side effect of making food more expensive for people who used to get a larger discount on imperfect food.

But the argument that this one company is hurting "the poor" is a stretch.
Not dystopian at all, if you've got the right sort of scans. Otherwise welcome to the unwashed masses.
This won't work, contact centres are more complicated that you'd imagine.
I don't know how the government can claim with a straight face that these substances have no known medical use, and are harmful. That's the criteria I think for Schedule 1, but there are clearly known uses for them, and the harm is relatively low.

I really don't like thinking, "the government just wants to ban dangerous thoughts" but mushrooms - really? Compared to alcohol they are so incredibly safe.
What technology do you think will be on Chinese soil from this?

There's no reason to bring source code over.
I'd like to add:

Remember your days as a Jr. Dev.

You catch more flies with honey.

Promote growth.

When mistakes happen speak soft, but convey ramifications of the mistake.
1. question everything.

2. trust no one, not even yourself.

3. hard work, is money in the bank.

4. with two paths in the road... take the scarier one.

5. pay off your debts faster than expected.

6. give more than you get.

7. listen more than you speak.

8. always be prepared, to find another job.

9. love unconditionally.

10. try not to think in absolute terms.

11. everyone has a story

edit: format
Scroll down. It has the stories inlined on the page.

I agree though that there's no real reason for it to lose the links to the comments or the vote/comment numbers.
Why do they do this, though? Shouldn't they have realized from the start that such messages are not helpful, and should have given messages related to your Clojure program? (Or is there some difficult technical issue related to achieving this?)

Asking because reading about this issue in the past is one thing that has kept me from trying out Clojure.
SaaS setup template
You are correct and I fixed my comment to reflect that.
Show HN: Appgain ,App Marketing platform for Users acquisition and engagement
How to profit from M&A announcements using Twitter
transcript at https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Oct-1...

AIUI, observation creates reality. quantum effect does exist at macro scale.

The problem with his argument, and perhaps the discussion is simplified or I didn't read it well enough, is that if observing a chair creates the chair, what creates the observer?
Run

In seriousness: get exercise. If you aren't in good shape it's draining, and making your life harder. Coding is hard enough
At least now we can feel good about being exploited... because they are inclusive!
Why limit that bill just to executive positions? Why not force companies to have women in every type of position that the company has?
Yep I'm the same. When I first read it some years ago, it didn't ring true but did stick with me. Over time it appears more true. The implications are unpleasant, and I think that's why there's a strong urge to reject it. But, ironically, it isn't false just because I want it to be.
That's a shame, since this one is announcing the kickstarter, and those weren't. And there was obvious interest, as well as interesting discussion, on this post.
I second this recommendation. it's a well thought out and well-organized exposé of this topic. Could be tightened up a bit, but the prose makes a pretty inpenetrable topic quite accessible
Or perhaps `JonnyDep` or `JonnyDeps`. A whimsical allusion to someone else can be playful and respectful.

But to appropriate someone else's full exact name for another purpose is kind of rude – especially if that person makes their living from their public image/name.
Woof. That's one way to do it. The way that'll get you either unelected from whatever municipal elected power position you have or fired from whatever unelected position, but one way.
Yes but if you're a libertarian you dont believe in the enlightenment values anyway. This law is to reduce the power of the dead over the living and to allow them to chose their own path. This concept is similar to democracy where the monopoly of physical power rests in the hands of a majority of the populous.
yeah, I really like this site design. I'm in need of putting up a new website and this design is very appealing for ideas!
Err, is corn not a vegetable?
In your zeal to make a political point, you have selectively quoted from the article and the journal note. For starters, while a valuation firm can appraise art for more than the taxpayer acquired it, that valuation is subject to audit and the IRS can (and frequently does) disagree. As the deduction is a % of the value of the art donated, the deduction could never be higher than the value of the art, let alone "exponentially."

Second, while private museums are a thing, the rules that a private museum must satisfy to qualify for non-profit status are fairly rigorous, and the scenario you describe would not qualify. Thus, a "donation" to the "museum" in your hypothetical would not yield a deduction. A donation to a DAF that loaned the artwork to that museum would likely violate self-dealing rules and lead to various sanctions, including potentially prison.

IKEA isn't a US charity, so none of the rules we're discussing apply.
I can just see the attack ads from the opposition now. "So-and-so voted to strike down legislation that would promote diversity in the work force"
Unfortunately you're categorically wrong, since the aide in question was Karl Rove.
You call them roaches. At the very least, I think you resent them immensely. I don't mean this to undermine you, but rather to provoke thought: are you sure you don't blame them?
> not getting much if anything in return

Wow - security, both from war and crime, a legal system, safety in everything from water to food to airplanes, almost the entire transportation infrastructure, most of the education everyone receives including college and post-grad, research in everything from history to cancer to basic physics to fracking to computer science and integrated circuits (let's recall that the industry that probably employs you was founded on government research), a stable business environment both domestically and internationally, healthcare, democracy, freedom ... I kinda feel like I underpay.
Daily life in a federal prison (2014)
It breaks the site guidelines to reply to egregious comments and continue to feed the resulting low-quality threads. Please don't do that.

Instead, flag the egregious comment and move on. For more about comment flagging see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html.
Fix the problem you can see then deal with what's left

I was working for a company that made lighting equipment for touring bands. One band had decided they wanted the biggest lighting desk in the world (this was in the early 80's). We cobbled together two of the company's latest digital desks as master-slave, and it nearly worked. Two problems remained as we got really close to the band's tour starting: a weird flickering in some of the indicator LEDs in the slave, and the output level (controlling the lights on stage) would sometimes wander around unpredictably.

We had a quick look and decided that the output level thing was a major issue which had to be dealt with first. The LED flickering problem was a) minor, and b) caused by a simple clocking problem which we could deal with later. We spent 48 hours or more with no sleep, trying to fix the output level thing. Got it just about useable, but not perfect.

The tour was due to start the next day so we decided to give up on the output level problem and fix the LED flickering, so that there was only one issue, albeit a bad one. Spent an hour fixing the clocking issue so that the LED's were OK, and lo, the output problem was sorted.

If only we'd dealt with the simple problem first, then we'd have managed to get some sleep!

And before you say that was a one off and bad luck or bad triaging or something, I've used the same heuristic more than once and it's always paid
He also gave a great talk about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuhmZSFvhL0

Well worth a watch for anyone even remotely interested in the topic.
It's bad both ways: having these news creates sort of unconstructive discussion, but removing it creates a perception of bias/censorship.

I think between these two bad options not removing them is a better option: news of this magnitude are rare and it will blow away after a few days. It relates to California corporate law and thus is pertinent to HN nevertheless I think.
Great response, the historical Puritan context is something I hadn't considered before.

I mention in another response that I'm looking for a description or model that isn't reactionary, but your reply makes me wonder if that's even possible. Is Liberalism more of an emergent, regulating social phenomena than a proper political alignment?
How much money do you save vs using Heroku?
We believe that you have the potential to fill this position but we are sorry to tell you that you may have brain cancer. We have already filled the position with someone else whose less potentially tumorous brain was a better fit.

If you survive, we encourage you to pay attention for future openings. Thanks!
If you think about it, it kind of makes sense. OP is in a situation where he haas much more money than time, however due to his position in the world, he can see many opportunities--generally this is true for professional investors, too. For a normal person, pursuing one means there is an opportunity cost, but for an investor it makes sense to buy a slice of the action in an opportunity they believe in. Being a proper investor (mentoring, introductions) also takes time, so that's another disincentive from OP's perspective to being a founder vs a funder.

Also, investors have things thing about inventing the future by funding it. Generally, individually or as a group, they'll decide something is going to be the next big thing and start cultivating deals in that area. One you can see happening in real time is space: Randomly in the last couple of years, investors have put together huge funds around space ventures, even though serious commercialization still seems to be a ways off. Even OP referenced it in his blog post.

As for why a founder vs a compensated product owner? Because a founder presumably has spent a lot of time thinking about the problem and is intrinsically motivated to solve it--so much so that they've done all the legwork to assemble a team and gather enough data to be investment-worthy. If as an investor you're wrong about the opportunity in this space, it's a whole lot of risk and cost and time you don't have to take on yourself. By advertising a pot of money, instead of searching for the right person, the hope is that the right person and team will eventually come to your door.
“We’ve seen people try to log in to accounts they’ve opted to delete after the 14-day period. The increase gives people more time to make a fully informed choice.”

I'm thinking most people try to login after the grace period because they just want to see if the account is truly deleted. At least that's what I would do.
actually, I'd love to talk with you about this. I find that writing my own tools gives me what I need but takes me longer. I wrote my own ncurses spreadsheet that lets me add lambdas to be executed each cell (if the cell denies one)

I could use some advice on modeling itself too...
It was actually about a bill being passed on compelled speech.
That'a brilliant. The world needs more satire, the (only?) good answer to the crazy, lying ideologues. It's like we've forgotten how.
Inside Danske Bank's 200B euro 'dirty money' scandal
I just finished the book and would recommend it to those who are interested in the long history of psychedelic research and the future of it. However, I think most of what I took from the book can be captured on the few podcasts he's been interviewed on. Specifically his chats with Tyler Cowen [1] and Kevin Rose [2] were particularly interesting.

[1] https://medium.com/conversations-with-tyler/michael-pollan-t...

[2] https://www.kevinrose.com/single-post/Michael-Pollan
Thankyou, I appreciate the answer.

> For companies with compliance requirements, you're required to change the systems explicitly; this is one of the reason why Docker images work so well; you can target specific tags for deployment and nothing changes with the same tag.

This isn't really true, though. Tags are floating targets, only the digest is stable. Taking Kubernetes as an example, suppose I push an updated Pod definition where I've changed an image tag from v1 to v2. If the tag is not properly locked, then I can be running multiple versions of the software without even realising it.

Speaking of regulation, we find a lot of people like buildpacks for that exact reason. Operators know exactly what OS is running in every container, exactly what JDK is running in every container, everything up to the runtime (and as FTL matures, up to the package dependencies as well). The platform doesn't have to accept any old container, they can all enter through a trusted pathway.

You can do this with docker builds, of course. You build CI/CD, you have centrally-controlled images, prevent non-conforming images from reaching production and so forth. But then you've pretty much recreated all the stuff buildpacks gave you, except you're the one having to maintain it.

> Aside from that; I think its a bad idea to have things update automatically. What if the upstream fix breaks things? It reduces trust in the build system.

Rebasing layers is close to instant. You can rollback the change as soon as it looks bad. More to the point, if the OS vendor or runtime have broken ABI compatibility, rebuilding a docker image won't necessarily help you to notice that before runtime.
Ten (really Eleven) Lessons from Counsyl
Django 2.1 security vulnerability
I think it's considered more of a grain than a vegetable.
What are some specific things that should feel different? Turning, merging, accelerating (especially with overdrive off) all feel great. Turning radius isn't bad at all. Only thing is you can't take tight corners super fast unless you want to flip over.
If you're a bi-racial gay woman, you'd be in high demand!
waiting for the day you have new grad roles. I've been checking everyday for 1 year, sad.
This is standard since decades in non-electric train engines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel–electric_transmission
Here's Demis hyping up the AI (plus ca change...) to IGN: http://m.ca.ign.com/articles/2001/05/17/republic-the-revolut...

Compare these claims to the game as reviewed when it finally shipped some 2 years later. It probably did do some reasonably clever and even innovative things but it never really lived up to the hype.

He's a smart guy but his real genius appears to be drumming up breathless and relatively unskeptical media coverage, something else he probably learned from Peter Molyneux who also made a career out of some genuinely innovative games that nonetheless rarely quite lived up to the extravagant claims made about them years before they shipped.
The max rate was lowered from 180 to 150 about 2-3 years ago.
Less people able to afford groceries would mean the grocery store was less crowded, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing.
If the drone somehow misses the wing, no problem. But the question was: what happens if it doesn't miss?

Safety engineering is about what will happen when that thing that's pretty improbable absolutely happens or at a minimum, trying to plan for things that no one really planned for (like low delta-V deer mentioned above).
Sure. Go on a highway with your stock LKAS/ACC on your Toyota/Honda/Mercedes/mostSystems and don't touch the wheel or gas/brakes, and see how long before you feel the need to intervene.

Now do the same with Comma's Openpilot.
Title could be:
"single page with [THE FULL ARTICLE TEXT OF] the top 30 stories"

Feature-wise this is great, it's like an auto-inlined Safari reader version of all the articles.

Unfortunately re-publishing other people's work (written article) is generally considered theft or a copyright violation.

HOWEVER, things like safari reader exist, and I believe side-step the copyright issue by not storing or "publishing" the work and just "displaying" it differently to a single viewer. After all the browser is already display its own visual representation of the "text" (html).

So I assume if this was written as a browser plugin, it would be fine, or at least fine-ish? Is that actually true?

What about if it was writen as a Greasemonkey script? Still fine?

What if the "Greasemonkey script" was actually just a regular javascript that was distributed with the "list of links" that then queried the articles from the client and then formatted them "nicely"? I think that might fly but seems grey? Anyone have any (real) experience with this?

What if the client side script also stashed the "formatted" texts in the local storage for offline viewing?
Why are cities owning a pole used just by one company though? The only reason for a city to own the poles is so "everyone" can use them - electric, cable tv, telephone... The combined rent from them all should pay for the pole, not the rent from one.

I don't know what a fair rent is though.
> *operations that must be manually performed in assembly language must also be manually performed in C.*

That's not true and if it were it would defeat the whole purpose of C, being a higher level abstraction than assembly.

To give one obvious example, in C i can just call a function, no thinking required. Calling a function in assembly requires manually pushing stuff to the stack and then restoring it again.
Try squatting deep without being flexible. Squatting --> strength --> better posture, metabolism, & bone density.
I always took these numbers to be like a Switch's fabric speed. Not the speed an individual client would receive.