skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> When you trade money for stuff, you get the benefit.

People exchange their money for all kinds of benefits, tangible and less so, and 503.c status is an extremely poor measure of whether a person is getting a benefit for their money. They could be funding their kind of artists - or buying their favourite art for a "museum" next door, open only by appointment to them. Lobbying for their preferred political causes, investing in their businesses, hiring their friends... plenty of ways to benefit.

Certainly it is absurd to imagine that state and local taxes (which are spent in a democratically organised way) are somehow more for your own benefit than private "charitable" donations to foundations you control, and it's obscene that the latter should be more tax deductible than the former.

> If we’re taxing failure to keep and spend money on yourself, we might as well tax based on failure to earn as much as you can — we’re subsidizing teachers that could be paying taxes like VCs. But no one thinks like that.

Income tax isn't about how much you spend on yourself - if that were the intent it would be a consumption tax rather than an earnings tax. It's about how much you control. If you want to direct a big chunk of society's future production to particular ends, the rest of society gets to take a cut.
That was a joke, I suspect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishmen...
When we get to a point of automated food production, these goals aren't that lofty.
Young people are rewiring capitalism with their McStrike
Its still there - storage is still mainly HDFS, but computation layer morphed into Spark on Yarn (Mesos as a scheduler is barely used). Barely anyone runs classic Mapreduce jobs, Spark all around, written in Scala(or java or python).
This isn't about Pitcairn Island of the HMS Bounty descendants that I initially mistook this as.
However, if you fake (or, as in this case, completely make up) your evidence, then you'll be able to get false things published - the peer review process has no ability to verify if what you claim is true, it does not and will not re-test the theory, that might be done by other teams after your results are published but not before.
I suggest you check out fable if you haven't already, v2 just dropped the experience was pretty smooth (http://fable.io/)
You would hope some kind of control would be ran so as not to provide a false positive. Kind of crazy something so specific even exists..
Ancestry has the better chip at the moment:
https://snpedia.com/index.php/Testing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_transplant

I don't think its outside of the realms of possibility for the mega-rich. Grow a clone for 20 years, and transplant your brain into a fresh body.
Tesla has the most popular brand.

Availability will be a huge problem for traditional makers as well, as we have already seen with all their electric cars. Its not clear at all that they can simply massively scale electronic cars. People who say that as soon as VW makes a electric car they can just produce millions is wildly optimistic.

And quality of the interior is one of the easier things to improve.

I think range, acceleration, mobile phone integration and digital features, 'autopilot' are far more important.
MapR is great while you are in their ecosystem - once you step outside and try to bring in technology thats not supported by them, you run into little showstopper bugs and complete lack of documentation and community support.
Was it unethical for Homo Sapiens to out-compete Neanderthals? Same concept applies here. It is merely the continued advancement of humanity biologically and genetically.
Are EU Markets More Competitive Than Those in the U.S.?
> You're suggesting that you'll only learn something if there's a smooth, continuous path to its mastery from what you already know. That basically leaves you stuck in whatever connected component of programming expertise you're already in, incapable of making a big jump anywhere else.

Indeed it does, but I think it's the right choice. How many times can you afford to "not be productive for months" for the sake of learning some new paradigm that promises the world - and how many actually deliver on what their advocates claim? There are dozens or hundreds out there, and while I now know from experience that the advantages of Haskell-style functional programming are real, a priori there was no way to distinguish it from all the oversold-but-useless approaches that are out there. Indeed my experience is that whether you can do it incrementally is actually quite a good signal for whether there's real value in a paradigm, or it's a load of hot air.
How was this not catched during QA?
Yeah look, I do think you're wrong.

I respect your courage in just coming out and saying that.

You've given yourself a very tough set of constraints (has to compile to binaries, has to have a GC, can't be in preview, can't be under v1.0, can't have a slightly unstable API, has to have "good" libs for an arbitrary selection of tech, can't target a VM) that makes Go the only viable option

Half of that is "I want something stable", which is almost universally appreciated among programmers. The way you've said that makes it sound like I chose Go then decided "I want whatever he's having". No. I have a list of many "nice-to-haves" and Go satisfies more of them than any other language/ecosystem. It's as simple as that. If I was going to settle for 2nd place, I'd probably just use NodeJS. I am extremely productive in NodeJS, and I'm still not 100% sure I won't choose it for this next project.

I'm not suggesting you use my personal favourite language, merely use anything but Go.

Although I find that a strange position to take, I appreciate your honesty.
There were a series of interviews I listened to a while back that form a nice primer for understanding the eurodollar system:

https://www.macrovoices.com/edu
The problem is that the original concept of websecurity doesn't apply to the current time anymore, but it's very hard to change anything because you have to be backwards compatible to literally the whole internet.

It's amazing if you look at it from that point. You can't have security by default because the old standard is insecure by default (by todays means) and that's what legacy applications depend on, yet there has been a lot of progress that you can opt into.

My favorite example are cookies. While everything else is origin based, those are still based on a model that is very close to dns (everything psl+1 is the same thing). This opens you up to a large number of attacks, especially in a man in the middle situation (even with https). You can secure your own application by using secure cookie prefixes, but everything else is doomed.
Ask HN: How can I analyze my own browsing behavior with only local tools?
How can I analyze and make statistics of my own web browsing behavior using only local software, and without giving out my personal browsing history to any 3rd party?
Demo it without the license such that investors can see that everything is in place to the degree that they think it would work. They should feel like "now all this guy needs are the licensing fees." It isn't so much the large initial investment as it is the large gap between the typical MVP and actual product launch.
That was my first thought: "ZFS, Jeff Bonwick!"
* Windly News
* http://windly.news

* Windly News is a curated selection of the best articles and longforms delivered weekly to your Kindle.

* Early stage, launched 2 months ago.

* Getting to break-even (!!!) + launching on Product Hunt
Often, lowering the limit is another option when dealing with road maintenance: can’t be bothered fixing one? Bump the limit down to 30km/h (car gearboxes aren’t even designed to drive at these speeds for long any more) and call it a day. If shit happens it’s someone else’s fault
Quite so. I'm not sure he realises his feelings on this are probably not shared by most people.
> By the way, diesel is now typically more expensive than gasoline in Europe too

Really? Which countries? Not in the european countries I'm familiar with.
> You can download the original source video from YouTube later

Unless you're in a jail cell, of course.

I figure we should be thinking of the worst-case here. If your salvation is locked up in a silo somewhere, that's a real downside.
ZTE hit with 2-year ‘monitoring’ extension after breaking probation terms
Very good observation & totally agreed.

In Germany, police is generally perceived as trustworthy, your "friend and helper" as the slogan goes.

I was surprised by the antagonism and belligerence in the US.

A few observations:

* guns certainly play a big role, and the risk of escalation.

* I wonder whether silly laws also play a role. For example: a 20 year old drinking alcohol, having a cold beer while watching a sunset on the beach, prostitution are all illegal if I'm not mistaken (or smoking a joint, depending on the state). So, in the US, the police might often be the killjoy. In Germany, those things are either officially legal, or in a gray area that the police ignores. So when the police comes on the scene, it's generally an actual crime or problem, and everyone is eager to help and cooperate and fix whatever real problem there is. In short, police have a relatively positive image.

* My experience with the police in the US was much worse when I was on a bike than when I was in a nice BMW. The issues of power differential, authority, lawyers, confrontation seem to loom much larger in the US than I've perceived them in Germany.

* With all these factors, employment with the police might seem a less attractive choice of work in the US than in northern Europe, so people with few other choices (or a penchant for exercising authority) might end up there more frequently than in other countries. This, in turn, could result in a downward cycle and a "besieged" mentality.

At any rate, I'd much rather interact with police in Europe or Asia than the US.
When has "subsidy" become the go-to narrative to argue against any sort of deference to real-world usage?

You could just as easily frame CORS as "antibiotics for the people who dared to leave their house".

(There's also a no-true-scotsman fallacy going on in your argument)
Browsers already send the referer header on all those CDN requests, provided that the CDN is loaded over https. If anything, the origin contains less information.
Yeah - but it's on the student to seek out those additional resources, just like it is at College for students to seek out extra textbooks, use office hours etc.

Ultimately, it just comes down to how much the student wants to learn the material and MOOC's are just another helpful tool to do so.
When you're judged for a liver donation it's not by your bank records but by your liver condition. When you have your phone in your pocket you still generate a list of establishments you frequent (maybe cash machines too). Even if you were famous who'd have access to that information?

You have good points but bad examples. China is the only country where there's a known link between purchase history and government/quasi-government decisions. They have a lot of facial recognition technology so cash wouldn't help. If USA started this too do you think the NSA/etc are far behind?
About the ZipCPU
That would mean each call made by the client would require a preflight OPTIONS call.

That means extra delay, extra db connections and calls, etc.

How do you deal with them?
World economy at risk of another financial crash, says IMF
I grew up in a country that had no Transformers toys (and I had no idea that these exist at all) but I still liked the show. Why? No idea..
authorizing invasion of the Hague if US officials were to be tried in the ICC

Source? That would be unnecessary given that the US can simply opt out of jurisdiction of the ICC in any given case and has done so several times through history.
Lifetime psychedelic use is associated with reduced suicidality.

"Lifetime classic psychedelic use was associated with a significantly reduced odds of past month psychological distress (weighted odds ratio (OR)=0.81 (0.72-0.91)), past year suicidal thinking (weighted OR=0.86 (0.78-0.94)), past year suicidal planning (weighted OR=0.71 (0.54-0.94)), and past year suicide attempt (weighted OR=0.64 (0.46-0.89)), whereas lifetime illicit use of other drugs was largely associated with an increased likelihood of these outcomes."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25586402
Upgrading FreeAgent to Rails 5.2
ProGlove, the smart glove that is changing the way that cars are made
I don't think there's the ultimate solution to anything. On a high-level anything seems like it can be done easily, but the issue always lies in the details.

Maybe it isn't great in all the ways, but at least it's something that works and is flexible enough for all sort of things.
You could try crowdfunding, but I can't for the life of me remember the name of the website. "Kick"-something.
Even though this is obviously not as far down the road as the article makes it out to be, it's an amazing achievement that it works at all. I'm pretty surprised that something like this is possible. Considering that for my laymen mind, this sounds like you are "writing" on the brain, I'm gonna pass using this myself though. Seems possible to alter something in the human brain that you really didn't want to tinker with.
There has been market research and this 'attached to ICE' is true as long as people don't see a viable option that the can compare to.

There will surely people who will hold on to ICE but if you can buy a produce that has electric drive train and competes on all metric its is incredibly unlikely that it would not find a market.

Specially if it has features that ICE don't have, like the ability to attach power tools.
I think most of the positive statements across this thread are generally correct, and most of the negative statements show a lack of awareness/inexperience:

My experiences are:

1. Staging environments are typically imperfect and have issues

2. Staging environments often help with product stability despite (1.)

3. Having staging envs is common, and could be considered standard in many companies, but..

4. Staging environments are a cost-benefit trade-off and should be considered on a product-by-product case.

5. CI and Unit testing are also common approaches to increasing product stability, and should be subjected to the same cost-benefit analysis per-product (yes, even unit tests), It's not an either-or with staging environments

6. staging envs should be prod-1 but often they end up being (prod-1 + some workarounds + some cruft left over from a failed deployment + other noise) over time.

7. Running a fully prod-equivalent staging environment can be prohibitively expensive (exact replica of prod configuration including infrastructure, realistic copies of prod data at volume, etc..) so usually some compromises are made to give a best-effort simulation of prod (fewer resources, etc..).

8. 'Battle testing' in staging is not always done, it's not uncommon for staging to be largely not looked at, except for whatever automated testing/alerting is running in that environment

9. It's ok for staging environments to test multiple changes at once, the typical intent of a staging area is to identify the presence of problems before they hit prod. The debugging & isolation of what caused problems is a secondary issue.

Your experiences may differ from the above, but they still stand

[edit: formatting]
A filter that does filter out the vast majority of obvious noise is very useful even if it lets something through. And the current peer-review does that, it throws out almost all of the spam; it pushes useful work of lower quality/impact down to less selective venues (generally with more specific subfields, so that I can read impactful work of domain X and less impactful work of subdomain X.2 but not X.1 and X.3); and even for accepted papers the process often results in significant improvements to them as a result of the reviews.

Explicit fraud isn't that common, since it does have risks to the submitter that far outweigh the (limited) benefits of getting an extra publication on your CV.
Part of it is training but part of it is also what police officers face. In my country the odds a police officer will pull over someone for speeding who has a gun in the car is 1:10000. In the US in some parts I wouldn't be surprised if it's more than 1:10.

If you then look at inequality, mental health issues, crime rates etc... which are largely a function of socioeconomics, man I wouldn't want to be a police officer in the US, either.

It's not necessarily the case that I love the police officers in my country (north-west europe), either. They lie, they don't enjoy it when you verbally challenge their power with an argument, they're fallible.

For example at one point I saw an officer harassing some homeless guy, asking for ID etc. I know they're not looking to help them get shelter, but just looking to get them out of the park because people complain. So what they do is they ask for ID, they obviously don't have one, so they put 'em in a police van, hold them at the police office overnight and then release them outside the city centre the next morning. If they do it often enough, they stay out of the nice city centre where the rich folks live. So I talked to the officer about it, but you immediately get told to stay out unless I wanted a problem: i.e. arresting for obstruction of justice, held and later released. There's very little you can do in this situation, either you shut up or you have to call work and say you've been arrested and can't come in etc. It's not the end of the world but it's an effective deterrent in many cases for having small injustices go unchecked.

Same with racial profiling, happens all the time as well. And every single time I've reported a theft, they did absolutely nothing about it. Even if I gave evidence of the crime and the person's identity etc. Lack of resources... It's understandable to some extent, but frustrating too. It almost invites you to get your own revenge if I didn't know better.

So I don't love the police, either. Police officers are not all that different from most people in their human flaws, except that they're typically relatively lowly-educated (and in the US, lowly trained), combined with far reaching powers and an institution that backs them, it can be problematic in any country.

But police violence is very rare, police drawing guns is rare, let alone shooting them. People in all countries have issues with their police (like they have issues with bad teachers, bad doctors, bad judges, bad politicians, bad hairdressers and bad chefs!), but within OECD countries it's basically only the US that has this level of (lethal) violence. Guns play a large role, as do socioeconomics. But there also has to be strong institutional oversight, it seems the police is institutionally far more inoculated from the consequences of their actions in the US than elsewhere.

Where I'm from, every damaging use of a gun by a police officer will get an automatic investigation, not internally but by an independent national research team that falls under the national prosecutor.
Interesting.

I would be hesitant to give access to a company without a single name on their website.
didn't we just have this article a few days ago and the consensus was you don't actually get that much money for knowing Cobol?
Centenarians in 1960 would have been 79 in 1939. Far too old for military service. A dip in the numbers, if realised, would only appear many decades later.
> The server has to transmit validation rules for the browser to enforce (with vendor specific caching differences), rather than just enforcing access itself.

That's not true. You can set CORS: * and validate all requests in your server. The extra rules are for vast majority of servers that never inspect Origin headers.
You're quite right -- mea culpa.
Police misconduct declines.

Except when they try to fake video evidence:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/us/baltimore-police-video...

He was only caught because he forgot that the previous 30 seconds prior to pressing "record" are buffered and will be included in the video.
Well, yes, in fact, I was complaining about the Same-Origin Policy, and CORS is just the consequence of the way the SOP works. Nevertheless, this doesn't really change the situation.

If the browsers separated the session by origin (as blauditore wrote), the whole problem space would look very different.
Enforcing speed when the intent is public safety rather than revenue generation requires more nuance than what the current system in the US has to offer.

Does it make sense to strictly enforce a 20 or 25 mph limit in areas with residential/pedestrian traffic? Certainly, especially given that pedestrians crossing a street are essentially at a 25 mph speed difference relative to perpendicular traffic. But if we apply this arithmetic to semi trailers traveling at 65 mph on the highway, a 25 mph difference would suggest a speed limit of 90 mph, even neglecting the safety difference in a vehicle-vehicle collision.

Where are most current speeding tickets issued? Is it in low-speed, residential areas where drivers know that an extra 5 mph won't save them any time at all (and would greatly increase the risk of injury in an accident)? Or is it in high-speed straights on the highway where an extra 15 mph can save you hours on long trips (where a speed limit effectively grandfathered from the malaise era still applies)?

Another consideration: if speed enforcement on highways was so critical to public safety, why are radar detectors and even laser jammers legal in many US jurisdictions? My perception is that physics-based policy decisions never get far in the US system. Ultimately, automated enforcement/better technology seems orthogonal to the policy problem. We should get the policy right first.
My english sucks.
I'm a former demomaker, that's more precise.
https://csdb.dk/scener/?id=21588
Yes, it’s called Driving While Black:

> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driving_while_black
The downvotes are probably because your proposed solution is ridiculously overengineered. Knobs have worked well for centuries.
Can someone explain why this is better than branch, commit and rebase from master if needed, then submit the pull request?
"In the mid-to-late 1980s, Xenix was the most common Unix variant, measured according to the number of machines on which it was installed."
What's /e/? Could you provide a link? Because that something non-googable, non-duckable, non-bingable.
Thanks for the link and the motivation to keep reading the AWK book I started a while ago!
what's presented to me as "popular" is only "popular" for a small set of people.

... or maybe "popular for a set of small people" :)

Many folk trashed shows like Teletubbies or In The Night Garden for being banal, and thus 'damaging' young minds. But those shows were informed by child psychologists who, unlike the detractors, understand that child brains work differently to adult ones.

I suspect ChuChu hits the same buttons.
The biggest problem with UK limits is when they reduce a limit for an unrepresentative peak in accidents.

When the figures regress to mean next year or two it's taken as proof the new limit was correct. So we slowly deviate from the 85th percentile rule, and get weird stretches of dual carriageway at 30 or 40 with a speed camera in the middle.
One of my favorite transformations by Escher: http://www.josleys.com/article_show.php?id=82
I think this needs a "(2017)" string in the title. I also remember seeing this on HN (probably in 2017 then).
As far as I know Infura let's you pin for free yes.
The financial industry is highly regulated and it's a good old boys club; shenanigans like that don't fly and it would land one in jail faster than one could bat an eyelash.
More like a brain telegraph than brain social network. Also sender doesn't actually thinks just focuses attention on one of two blinking lights.
I had this problem... Was one of the best in primmary school, not the best but in the top of highschool, then I spectatulary failed my university :(
CSS3 Cube Sign in Form