skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
How to Find/choose Income Tax Consultant in Delhi?
Let us explore the need of an Income Tax Consultant in Delhi. The need of an expert Income Tax Consultant in Delhi requires mostly because a team of skilled professionals who in confluence with the right IT environment providing expert services in the field of Income Tax Accounting in Delhi, GST Registrations in Delhi and much more with the help of Income Tax Consultants and GST Registration Consultants is must. The Income Tax Consultant’s Firm must be a leading as well as the best Income Tax Consultant’s firm with a team of dynamic Income Tax Consultants in Delhi and other professional associates rendering comprehensive services with sound knowledge of Income Tax Consultancy in Delhi with all rules and regulations of the government in the field of Income Tax Consultancy, Corporate Governance and Financial Management services. The Firm must also strongly favour in the highest levels of integrity and must have committed towards providing excellence services to their clients looking for Income Tax Consultants in Delhi.

Url: http://www.sktaxlawfirm.com/income-tax-consultant-in-delhi/
I read the article. I'm sorry, but my impression about it is the following: Why use Kubernetes in your personal projects when you have got no idea about it?. One think I have experimented after working with Docker for two years, is that once you know it, you will put every service inside a docker. It only takes 5 minutes to do it and the benefits are huge. Kubernetes might be an overkill, but containerize the apps is another thing.
I'm not sure I understand the market of your product. Is the intent to trick people into gardening by making it seem "high tech" or trendy or something? Are people actually willing to do more work to grow food if you make it sound new/different? Most people don't garden the easy way, so it just seems like a tough sell to get them to do it a harder way.
To me, this is perhaps the most worrying part of the story.

Did Bloomberg, a widely renowned and distributed news outlet with immense resources, sacrifice hard evidence for sensationalism and clicks?

Or are these companies, all widely renowned with immense resources, bound to silence due to any multitude of shady reasons?

No matter the facts behind the story and these denials, this whole thing reeks of FUD.
> I understand (although do not have evidence to hand) a number of LAPD beat cops manage to go quite a long time between instances of having to draw a firearm and point it at someone's face

You're absolutely going to need a citation for that. I don't believe US cops have to even report instances of upholstering their sidearm - It's such a common occurrence. Discharging a firearm is a different story.

Of course, my friend was a cop in the late 70s, 80s and 90s, and did all kinds of things that would land him in very deep water today. i.e. to disperse an angry crowd you just rack a round in a shotgun. He said it works extremely well without even firing it.
The problem is that these decisions are rational - you get personally rewarded for getting yourself promoted or putting neat projects on your resume (which will increase your salary in your next job), but not for helping the business long-term. Avoiding blame is far more personally valuable, in terms of reward for time, than building good things.

If you take "I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine" seriously, this is the end result. Why should any IC or low-level manager at Taggart Transcontinental live for the sake of the Taggarts? But how can the railroad succeed without ICs and low-level managers?

If you want to fix this, don't ask people to live altruistically; instead, fix their incentives. Giving people cool projects such that they feel personally fulfilled when they succeed whether or not the business recognizes it is one option, but not particularly reliable or scalable.
Look at the stock of supermicro, since 2015 (the year of revelation) it's been going down for them - reason might be because none of the companies bought new hardware from them.
Here are the top ways people die while taking selfies and “being cool”
> Nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent

That’s arguable. I would hazard a guess that unsuccessful men without talent may be a larger group.
^ This gave me a much needed smile today, thanks for sharing.
Or, alternatively, 4-ish cans of Pepsi One.
Jeff Geerling even wrote an Ansible role to do all of the heavy lifting for you. I've used it alongside vagrant to spin up a three node cluster in ~15 minutes.

https://github.com/geerlingguy/ansible-role-kubernetes
Seems a bit tacky to pick on Musk and Bezos here. How about any other big money endeavor as well like arms manufacturing and tobacco and war?

Good example of how celebrities are easier to target than faceless enterprises and realities that do far more harm.

And while we’re building our
feel-good kumbaya wishlist, it would be cool if drug cartels solved our lanternfly issue as well.
Agreed. Also lying to your shareholders is illegal, providing additional incentive not to write the press release.
There are essentially two types of people in Mensa: those who think they're smarter than everyone else and decide to take a Mensa IQ test to prove it to everyone, and those who took an IQ test for some other reason and then decided to check what's all this Mensa thing about.

You don't need Mensa to meet some smart people, but it's an easy place to find them, for better or for worse (both of which can be interesting experiences, BTW).
I didn't fail, I just couldn't see a strong ROI after doing a spike.

I did use kubeadm. It required considerably more than just 3 simple steps required to get a basic working cluster up. Two days was more like it.
Could anyone find a list of the server models that had this compromise? I haven't seen much if any technical info in either of the Bloomberg articles.
It's a possibility but I think not more likely than the possibility that we are not.

If we are, then it pushes back 'reality' one step back but the question of what 'reality' is remains. And that even opens new questions.

In my view this is similar the question of the origin of the Universe.

Both questions boil down to either a singularity or to infinity. It's difficult for the mind to make sense of either.
I'd love to see what Clarke and Dawe could do with that idea...
Dutch Defence Intel and Security Service Disrupts Russian Cyber Operation OPCW
They probably mean defender of cybersecurity for China.
AdoptOpenJDK Java 11 release
I wonder how performance sensitive this code has to be? Clojure is a pretty bad choice for numerical work in general since function parameters are usually just Object and this leads to a lot of boxing. You can type hint them as primitives but it's pretty funky internally once you start doing that. If code can offload the numerically intensive bit to either Java or something native (as Neanderthal does) then it's more tractable, or of course if it doesn't actually require very high performance.

Still, awesome effort - it looks like a ton of work.
We built our iOS and Android apps in Java and Kotlin – one year later
And private prison companies lobby state governments to make sentencing more strict, and ask to keep them 90% full.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_1272143
Optimal Hiring Process: Reward vs. Effort
100%. Work at a company that provides equipment to the government. There where people that have a clearance and know why and how thing where being used, but the exec staff up to the CEO just knew who the customer was and no details beyond. It’s prtty normal.
Now that you've mentioned it, I can't unsee it.
why? if he is a tech founder, and there are co-founders that work on sales and marketing, why should he give up the CEO position?
or do you mean to say that from his behavior he is obviously not qualified?

greetings, eMBee.
There can be measurement errors, like with any metric, but statistically speaking, a person with an IQ score of 160 will be more intelligent than somebody with a score of 150. And significantly so. 10 IQ points is a big deal (2/3rds of a standard deviation). Increasing the average IQ of any population by 10 points would be a total game changer.
I don't understand your comment. In the Everett Interpretation, the wave function never collapses. Everything is always entangled. "Decoherence", however, causes the perception that the wave function collapses, and consequently this interpretation is often called the "Many World Interpretation", because the theory results in a different "world" (for all intents and purposes) for every possible outcome.

Hence, in the Everett Interpretation, if you shoot yourself using such a quantum gun, every time you pull the trigger, there will end up being one "world" in which the gun didn't go off and one world in which you put a bullet in your head.
I've never liked the marshmallow test. I think it is fundamentally flawed as others have found.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jun/01/famed-impu...
Next week: The real hardware plant was counterfeit sources claiming to be Apple.
You should talk about "our technology" only if you are a big stock owner or, maybe, a naive employee. They are not called "global corporations" because of their patriotism.

It's not called "global capital" because it cares where to reproduce.

This is the system working as intended.
> I live in a pretty gentrified and wealthy area and when police show up it looks likes when a shark is moving near fish. The place usually heavily depopulates just by seeing them. I don't mean when they show up to an event either. I've seen them casually walking down the street and there's just a wave of everyone coincidentally realizing they have other places to be.

There's also the fact that being near police means you're more likely to get into trouble, even if you're just a normal person doing normal things. Sort of like how everyone who drives regularly commits minor ticket-worthy infractions, even if you're a good driver. It's super-uncomfortable to have a police car behind you, because you know everything you're doing is probably getting analyzed for opportunities to punish you.
You’re comparing household statistics to individuals.

Plus, totally anecdotal, but even if every house in the 90s had a PC (and it was really more like 40% around 1997), they weren’t used anywhere remotely like the TV in the household was. Like, a couple of teenagers maybe spent all day on it, and everyone had the tech savvy aunt or uncle, but it just was nothing like today where it’s typical to see grandma and grandpa FaceTiming.
Gotta define success first. Seems we're ascribing it to mean power and wealth. Which is different from invention and technological innovation, or athletic achievements, or happiness, or longevity, or health, or lived experiences, or total percentage of time spent laughing, or comfort, or number of children, number of romances, sexual prowess, etc.

I feel our culture currently holds a strange definition of success, that of wealth mostly. So in that sense, ya, IQ might not matter that much.
Actually no, Louis Rossman has uploaded a video where an Apple-branded charger observes this behaviour. So no, this doesn't work with a vast majority of chargers, including the ones Apple is responsible for.
> It's either a giant conspiracy by the FBI and multiple mega-corporations to blatantly lie, on public record, about a matter

Like, say, the matter of secret surveillance on the mass scale? I mean, the track record here is not exactly pristine.

> Bloomberg didn't do their due diligence and were too eager

That is a distinct possibility too. But I think we are now beyond the point where we could say "major tech companies would never lie together with the US security apparatus on a matter of public importance". They would, if they think it's worth it.
Everything is added to 'the system' as one of the following entity types:

- Area (area of focus /context)

- Contact

- Group (e.g. an organisation or group of people)

- Message

- Target (a 'task')

- Event (something that was undertaken, to move a target towards completion)

- Item (tangible or intangible)

- Reference (a piece of information)

- Location

- Template (something repeatable to provide repeatable structure or considerations to another entity type)

- Argument (an argument, reasoning, statement, claim etc).

- Resolution (a resolution to be made / an agreement that is met / a contract, committment or promise)

- Statistic

- Rule (triggers and automation for the above entities - e.g. 'apply template x to create target y every thurs @ 9am')

All of the entity types can have many-many relationships with any other entity.

Therefore, for example: I could look up a target in my system called 'Deploy helpdesk module'
- I can see when the due date is, what the hold date is ("hide this entity until X"), what the notes are, what the status is etc.

- I can see all of the 'sub-targets' - I.e. there is an unlimited nesting of tasks.

- I can see that it is linked to my 'Service Delivery' area, which is a child of my 'Business' area.

- I can see that I have added 2 completed events to it (showing what I have done so far)

- I can see what relevant locations are linked to it (and why).

- I can see what groups are linked to it (in this case, the primary 'Group' is the client that I am developing the module for)

- I can see what relevant items (e.g. tools) are linked to the target. For example, relevant online platforms (and credentials) are an example of an item.

- I can see all references attached to the target (For example, my personal considerations list / best practices for helpdesk modules, or perhaps ITIL reference information pertinent to Service Operations.)

- I can see all relevant Resolutions (in this case, it is the agreement I have made with my client to develop and deploy the helpdesk module)

- etc.

I believe that the above is more accurately representative of 'correct' entity theory than any software currently provides. I am currently using a complex spreadsheet. I have courted most productivity/task/project/time platforms.

The closest application ever available (that I am aware of) to this functionality was IQTELL (defunct) - And only as it was heavily customizable.

I have therefore resorted to developing my own application - I hired a remote team to assist me. It's for my own personal use, but I am considering opening up to other users in the future.

In my opinion, Todoist and other productivity platforms (either corporate or personal) are vastly immature, and tend to completely miss most functionality/scope/correct entity theory - We simply have so far to go here. I wish this space was 10 years more advanced than it is.
Interesting that Apple didn't give the FBI access to its datacenters for the investigation. Didn't trust them?
When I worked in telecom (a while ago) the manufacturing was shifted from China to Thailand/Other SE Asia due to this. The Thai companies weren't as efficient, but were much more open and honest when problems would arise., plus they didn't blatantly steal tech
Interestingly, peanut butter is near the bottom of the scale for being insulinogenic (the food insulin index). That means it's less likely to be put away as fat according to The Personalized Diet by Drs Segal and Elinav [1]

[1] https://www.amazon.com/dp/1478918802
> And does it make sense to talk about "containers" when it's such a vague concept.

Well at some point we have to be able to talk about the widely-used and glued-together namespaces+cgroups+... concept. "Containers" is a perfectly fine thing to discuss (especially since the history of namespaces was definitely based in more "fully fledged" container technologies like Xen).

> Also, there are now "VM containers" such as Kata.

... which are just VMs that can interact with container tools. I'm pretty sure that most people would not call these "containers" from an OS point of view because they do not share any of the primary properties that containers (or Jails/Zones) have -- the host kernel actually knows what the container processes are doing.
Do they make the assumption that everybody want to be eminent? I mean, the way I interpret the article is that IQ is not the only thing you need to achieve success. Of course, you have to want success in the first place isn't. So I guess I would be more interested in a study done on determined people (for example YC founders). I bet suddenly IQ will play some big role but who knows.
I have caused production outage during one of our reviews of the rack with the HSM. The procedure required opening the rack, inspecting and accounting for all devices and cables and then checking the status of the HSM itself. At the end of the procedure the rack had to be closed.

Visa/Mastercard required that there are two people present and that there are two people required to open the rack.

We had it modified so that it has second lock.

The additional lock did not fit perfectly. During the procedure when I tried to close the door the door snagged on the lock and then slammed shut. It wasn't a lot of force but it caused the HSM to loose its keys and required a lengthy procedure to get three security officers to initialize the HSM with components stored on their smart cards during which the whole system was unavailable.
I also feel that the hack described is only borderline technically feasible.

They describe a microcontroller the size of a decoupling capacitor that is installed between the main CPU and main memory (as far as I can tell from the vague description).

I assume this would have to be done without layout changes. On a part of the board that is quite sensitive to layout changes. It just doesn’t seem likely that you’d do a hack like this. You’d need a micro controller or ASIC that was running as fast as main memory. You’d need to make it cope with different kernels... and edit memory such that remote servers could reliablely be contacted.

Why not just swap out some other part? Like the IPMI controller? Or the Ethernet controller? Something that has access to main memory, that would hide the functionality even better, and that would give the attacker more space to work with?

I don’t get it.
Fashion is such a driver for IT study. Just try to find a good book on modern AIX -- they aren't really out there. But AIX is still very much in use at the enterprise level.

Computer trends and actual use don't always match up. Which can be a boon for those who realize they can specialize in unfashionable technology.
FWIW, Usain Bolt trains about as much as a motivated amateur athlete (roughly 90 minutes a day). The big difference between the two being that motivated amateurs have day jobs, whereas Usain Bolt does not. His success is almost entirely talent, in other words.
So basically the author proposes replacing Pull Requests with "Cherry-Pick Requests", where each commit is a single reviewable unit (replacing separate branches with the PR model), the local master branch represents a list of unreviewed commits, and the remote master branch represents reviewed, "merged" commits.

It's an interesting idea, but even after reading this article I'm still not convinced it offers any serious advantages over a more traditional workflow. It also has the downside of requiring extensive use of more advanced features like interactive rebasing. (Which I personally have no issue with, but seems like a potential nightmare for developers who aren't as experienced with git.)
This would have gone up to CEO level. If anybody blocks this, is senior management.
Can you finance the license fee? Ie borrow to get it, and if all doesn’t work out, the corporation goes bankrupt? Or can you lobby the issuing agency to give you a payment plan?

My only concern with such a large investment is that at the beginning you don’t know what you don’t know. You think $13m is a big problem, wait till you have that license and uncover all the reasons why people with $13m in their pocket have avoided the problem you’re trying to solve (just a maybe, but I’m sure there are other problems you’ll encounter you should look to resolve before you try dump so much money on a business).
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18136654.
The same way YouTube and those other websites did: Ignore copyright laws as long as they possibly can.
It sounds like you're saying your quality of life is better on the whole post stroke. Is that right? Pretty interesting if so.
Curious what you mean by this (especially since no one had even commented when you said it). Do you mean because the article was up voted? Isn't what makes HN great is that we look at the data and seek empirical evidence, and not just take action based on emotion?

This article is a clear refutation of a commonly held misbelief (or worse). Unfortunately it was dropped from the front page almost immediately, without commentary.
The ag industry doesn't care about what some people would like to do for a living, they care about making money. That's why they shut out small operations deliberately rather than supporting them. As an example, the big pork producers own all the pork processing plants. They set the rules, and the rules require very uniform hogs. So small farms who grow heritage pork breeds on natural diets instead of growing the single commercial pork breed on a corn+soy diet can't get their hogs slaughtered and processed. Everything in agriculture has been massively consolidated into a small number of huge corporations who exert tremendous influence in trying to make it even more consolidated. Small farms have to market directly to consumers and jump through lots of hoops to work around legal barriers lobbied for by huge agricorps. We end up spending more time as food salesmen than as farmers, which is far less enjoyable.
This is pretty cool from a low powered 144 computer chip.

http://www.greenarraychips.com/
I guess the CI would have to cherry-pick the PR onto master before running the tests?
This seems like a grumpy and lame rationalization of not wanting to learn something new
The extra 3% interest being earned that you're not spending (remember the goal is spending 4 of the 7% of interest ) SHOULD cover inflation. Hopefully. I'm not the sort to bet on that though.
Here is a demonstration with an apple-brand charger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7tf4JASzlI

A USB Power meter does not inhibit the function of a charger, they only tap the power lines of the USB line with a low value resistor to measure the voltage drop. You can do it with a hall sensor too in which case you don't interrupt the voltage line at all.

I see no reason why a current sensor should in any way inhibit a charger's function unless it's deliberate.
Sales at SaaS startups? Help with choosing my next career move
The tips on this board to land a job at a SaaS company WORK--the proof is in the offers. All guidance and opinions welcome:

The Question: Does anyone have experience starting out in sales at a unicorn or later stage startup w/ a target IPO date--what was it like?

Disclaimer: No prior SaaS experience but 2+ years experience selling advertising and digital marketing at the Mid-Market level as an AE (Fortune 500)

I have a 3 job offers from seed startups where a majority of the funding has been secured through a seed accelerator e.g. 500Startups or Y Combinator and 2 offers from companies that have a $1B+ valuation aka Unicorns and $100M+ in Series C+ rounds.

3 SDR roles in which I and a few others would be the first "hires" for a true SDR/BDR dedicated role

1 hybrid SDR/AE role that would be closing small deals and generating opps for Enterprise/Mid-Market AEs

Early Startup Equity packages are similar (<5% Shares to Outstanding)

Late Startup Equity -- Restricted Stock Option at <$5 strike price

Early Startup Location: San Francisco--Bay Area and Remote

Late Startup Location: Atlanta, GA

Without giving too much away here are a few industries from the companies above:
Cybersecurity, Conferencing/Communications, eCommerce Marketing, and Drone Software..