skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Pixlee | SF and Toronto | Onsite, Full-Time | https://www.pixlee.com
Pixlee helps brands market and sell using the voice of their own customers by leveraging user generated photos and videos. Today, one in four Americans interact with Pixlee-managed content before making online purchase decisions. Pixlee offers a unique opportunity to thrive and grow rapidly at a global scale in a small-team startup environment. Our customers are some of the largest brands in the world and everything you do here affects millions of consumers.
We are looking for passionate back-end focused developers to help continue to scale our product, and work closely with customers to integrate their eCommerce stores with the Pixlee platform. You'll get a chance to work on a wide range of problems in big data analytics, eCommerce integration, and API development just to name a few. You'll have a chance to explore brand new areas of interest while leveraging your experience to create robust and optimized data pipelines and third-party integrations.
We love product focused engineers with excellent communication skills, the ability to work with a multitude of languages, and a desire to continually step out of their comfort zone.
Here are our open roles:
- App & Partner Platform Engineer (SF): https://www.pixlee.com/careers?gh_jid=1267300
- App & Partner Platform Engineer (Toronto): https://www.pixlee.com/careers?gh_jid=1267422
- Senior QA Engineer (Toronto): https://www.pixlee.com/careers?gh_jid=1209290

If you'd like to learn more, pablo@pixleeteam.com is the best point of contact
Wow, never thought of there are so many contenders in this area. I thought Google is the only one having the tech to provide the service in a large scale that possibly can transform the industry.

Then your statement makes sense. I was fantasizing that Google is actually innovating before others. Turns out there is indeed no new ideas in IT.
Back door as in OTC trades perhaps?
It's not quite "Just like email" because email has systems in place to authenticate this, while phone systems do not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMARC
> Not an easy process to determine net worth of anyone let alone someone like Vinod. Most likely he does not even know his net worth.

Maybe it's not easy, but he definitely has the ability to figure out how much he's worth, even if it means he has to pay a team of accountants.

I think such a system would be workable if it mandated the offender provide a good-faith calculation of their net worth. They'd also be required to show their work, and be subject to harsh penalties if they were found to have deliberately cheated. This is basically how the tax system already works for income.
These easements aren’t usually documented, but it would be blindingly obvious to anyone who bought the property, especially anyone with an attorney worthy of representing a billionaire.

He absolutely knew, and figured he could bully, buy, litigate and delay his way out of it. I’m betting the whole strategy was written up before the sale was complete.
"In patients with schizophrenia, 1054 (13.2%) had at least 1 violent offense compared with 4276 (5.3%)"

thats a 2.5 difference in patients with schizophrenia compared to the general population

> When trying to predict risk of violence knowing that someone has schizophrenia tells you almost nothing. Knowing they have substance misuse tells you a bit more.

That is simply not true though. Substance abuse changes the rate at which it happens but Substance abuse seems to have a high comorbidity with Schizophrenia and while the rate is significantly lower when there are no substance issues it is still higher.
Substance abuse, per the link you provided, creates a 3rd and fourth population subset (1: schizophrenics 2: neurotypical 3:Schizophrenics with Substance abuse 4: NT with Substance abuse) Which after your response, seems like you're being intentionally misleading in order prove your point.
The kernel has to restore registers, including the stack pointer, on a context switch. But it doesn't care about how big the allocation underpinning that stack is.
Raytheon CSI
Based on the question, I'm guessing that you're either 1) not a US citizen, or 2) there is an ulterior motive... but I'll take the bait anyway.

Its interesting that you start off with not wanting to discuss Elon (or Telsa) because I would argue that the answer to your question is entirely and inseparably related to both. The case and its eventual settlement were emphatically because this is Elon Musk and not a different executive. Since you're posting to HN I would assume that you have been reading the supplemental articles related to other high profile SEC cases (Martha Stewart, Elizabeth Homes, etc... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/business/elon-musk-tesla-...). I would argue that the SEC actually uses cases like this as public demonstrations to show that they do have the power to regulate, and to serve as a notice of caution to persons trying to manipulate the public markets. If you look at the SECs actual enforcement history though (look at the ramifications to the banks that caused the financial meltdown in '07- '08) they struggle to protect normal investors through regulation and enforcement. This settlement is explicitly about Elon, and Tesla.

Regarding the rest of your post, if you read the filing (https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/business/us-secu...), the "open and shut" aspect might not be as clear as it appears to be in the media. I personally believe that the SEC would have prevailed, but they could have been slugging this out in court for a while... and if the Saudi Fund were to provide testimony to support Elon, it could create even more of a ruckus. Given their current 5% stake in Tesla, they would benefit by supporting him. So in a way the settlement probably just expedited what the net result would have been anyway.

But to answer your real question... the implications for a harsh penalty versus a light penalty have an even amount of gravity, and the SEC took the middle road on this one. Elon/ Telsa have a ton of enemies but they also have a lot of support. Removing Elon from the helm would/ could cut off the lion at the knees... and cause a huge stir from a large number of investors (and political progressives). If you look at the history of the public markets (I would personally recommend the Story about Piggly Wiggly from "Business Adventures") there are loads of examples where decisions have been made that follow the intent of the law and not the word of the law. And so it goes with Elon and Tesla. $20M for one tweet hurts even the wealthiest people, and Elon's stated goal is to move the world forward towards sustainable transportation... no doubt he would rather have that $20M being used on something towards sustainable transportation and not going into the super-massive black hole of the US government.

Who knows though? Maybe if the SEC had gone all the way it would have been better for US citizens and investors?
If you don't care about the managed Google Play store, you could always use Google's TestDPC app (or create your own) to create a work profile ("do-not-use-in-production" warnings notwithstanding): https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.afwsamples...

That said, it might be more straightforward to just use another user on your device
By your definition, neither is learning to code. Just pick up a book that describes the programming language you are gonna use and boom. You are a coder!

Excel is easy. Knowing what to put into excel is not at all easy. And yeah you can get a template but if you don't know how that template is created or why the creator did what they did you are gonna set your business up for failure. Accounting is not just math but an art.
The internet archive is great for static pages but what will happen for today's interactive content with complex data stored across different domains?
When you're a 1099 contractor (i.e., self-employed), you pay all of FICA yourself because you are both the employee and the employee.
Sure, but you lose vote secrecy.
It's no suprise wikipedia is not as good as it could be, given dedicated corporate editors adding propaganda and stripping out criticism, and random editors with taglines like "independent blues artist" lacking credentials and education in subject-matter seemly deleting and alterting articles almost at random because they don't know the facts or what's important.
I've had an Asterisk box for about 10 years now, mostly to deal with the tide of junk calls, and it has worked nicely. I first just blacklisted numbers (and sometimes whole prefixes), but now I use a CAPTCHA that handles the robocallers beautifully. Calls from known numbers get to ring through without the CAPTCHA.

Still, I've been paying too much for that crusty old landline, and finally got motivated to do something about it. I just ported it out last month, and the new VoIP service I'm using costs less per month than what AT&T was charging just for Caller ID. Even funnier, they offer telemarketer blocking like I've set up, at no extra charge.

Farewell and f*ck you very much, AT&T. You didn't even lift a finger to insure that the Caller ID I paid for was accurate.
Good idea. I tweeted at them.
BuildZoom (YC W13) | San Francisco, CA | Full-Time, Onsite Only | https://www.buildzoom.com

BuildZoom simplifies the process of selecting a general contractor and improving the outcomes of remodeling and construction projects. By gathering and analyzing information on 3.5 million licensed contractors and 100 million improvement projects, we bring new levels of transparency and accountability to a notoriously difficult industry.

To learn more about who we are, our engineering culture, and whether this is the right place for you, read our Key Values profile: https://www.keyvalues.com/buildzoom

Our open positions:

* Lead Software Engineer, Data Platform: https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/5d98e8d6-b8be-4871-a1de-109a...

* Senior Software Engineer, Back End: https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/ec706cb2-dd89-4e57-8815-1dd7...

* Software Engineer (New College Grad - 2019): https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/7e5403c6-1bcf-497f-a360-efcd...

* Software Engineer, Data: https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/03ea7dc4-0156-461e-bcc1-7613...

* Software Engineer, Full Stack: https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/de320f7b-65b9-492a-b1fe-bb51...

* Software Engineering Intern (Fall '18): https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/4b6958f3-b039-40df-ba45-395f...
It's hyperbole to say everything effects interstate commerce as a legal matter. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Lopez, where the court struck down the Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.

On the other hand, that's a really low bar for the Federal government to meet. Especially in light of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Raich, where the court upheld Federal criminal prohibition of homegrown marijuana for personal use, and where everybody stipulated (IIRC) that her marijuana wouldn't enter the stream of commerce. Note that both Kennedy and Scalia upheld Federal powers here, which is why their vehement opposition to Obamacare's individual mandate was so hypocritical.
Thanks for quick followup there.
Sure my argument is

* He bought the business with full knowledge of what his obligations were under Californian law.

* There is a huge difference between compelling an individual to run a business, and compelling him to not restrict access to the public.

* This lawsuit was not because he stopped maintaining the road, or the bathrooms, but because he closed a road that allowed people access to the beach.

* Government compels people to do all sorts of things, and not closing off public access to a beach after you paid $32 million for a private beach house seems like one of the least onerous.
In email the From: address rarely delivers the mail. From: and To: are the ones that you see in your mail client and correspond to the addresses on the letter within.

For example here are some headers from some spam I received:

From: "Jeremy Adamson" <jeremyadamson@illusion24.com>
Reply-To: "Jeremy Adamson" <jeremyadamsonr@yahoo.com>

From: is what I see in my client and Reply-To: is where a reply would go to.

This one is much better, note how I'm BCCd and To: is complete bollocks:

Reply-To: dr.ahmed.faruk@outlook.com
From: Dr Faruk Ahmed <dr.faruk.ahmed1@gmail.com>
Subject: MANAGER AUDIT AND ACCOUNT DEPT
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
BCC: <gerdesj@blueloop.net>
Return-Path: dr.faruk.ahmed1@gmail.com

Given that Reply-To and Return-Path are in different domains, where would a reply go to?
Ridiculously flawed system in itself, as income can easily be faked. In this case, he's a well paid executive that receives most of his income as income.

However, the genuine wealthy will receive most of their income as capital gains and dividends, and will hold most assets through companies.

Income wise, they are often paupers in comparison to their (true) net worth.
I'm personally somewhat nervous about what voice phishers will be able to accomplish with call ID once voice sample synthesis gets good enough and cheap enough, which is well on the way from what I can tell. Shades of that old Uplink game, call up a family member or friend and just get them to talk into the phone at all, not even give up personal information but literally just speak enough. Then the phisher can call up the target, spoof that number, and directly have the voice sound just like someone the target knows. The voice and the Call ID will both check out, and this should actually be a lower target then the kind of voice synthesis work currently being done because phone calls are highly compressed and tend to be not great quality anyway.

Once that hits general usage along with the kind of ML and social network graphs being done up couldn't that just plain be it for phone usage if companies can't come up with a proper cryptographically verified call scheme (which would require new phones, for everyone)? I mean, if a call coming in directly from a "trusted contact's number" that is literally in their voice becomes generally a scam too I think that'd have to be a real tipping point for the general population. I can't see any choice at that point but to disable all incoming calls period, and move my family over to something else as well. And that tech train is coming down the tracks pretty fast, there have to be at least some phone providers who can see that right? Heavily automatically run personalized ML powered social media and ad network profile fed phishing calls in a relative's voice, yeah that'll be really fun.
I used to do a language popularity thing, langpop.

One of the takeaways is that there are different metrics and none of them is perfect.

So I grabbed what I could, combined them, and even had a JS thing where you could weight them differently.

Stuff I looked at: raw search, source code, books, job advertisements.
I disagree, I find it to be much more along the lines of “hey this thing is sort of like this other thing, isn’t that cool?” and rather impressed with itself. And it’s extremely tedious when it gets to the place of trying to re-derive formal logic. I don’t really understand why people consider it such a classic, I don’t feel I got much from it at all.
How so? Have you remained technical after graduating?
Why US only remote? :-/
When the IRS is enforcing a corrupt law,

The IRS is not enforcing a corrupt law, and the story Fox News doesn't want you to know about the IRS' conservative "charity" crackdown is that all of those charities were openly violating tax laws to the private inurement of their executives and challenging the IRS to do something about it, knowing that they had members of the House GOP in their pocket to prevent IRS action.
BuildZoom (YC W13) | San Francisco, CA | Full-Time, Onsite Only | https://www.buildzoom.com

New sales/ops role!

https://jobs.lever.co/buildzoom/e4e758b4-88f2-4885-bf10-4441...
> I.e. your position is that state should be able to compel individual to run unwanted business?

I'm sure the state would be fine if he just opened access to the beach to everyone for free. No need to operate any business.

This question about being "compel[led] to run unwanted business" is just a smokescreen to obscure a campaign to deny the public its rights.
Just to reply to one of your lines of thought. Measuring a clients worth. How do you measure who's a waste of time? How should you factor in fixed costs vs variable costs, opportunity cost, legal costs, license fee structures, travel costs, whether to bring on new employees for clients, everything that entails what a client's actual worth is to you beyond simply saying "you're a waste of time"?

I think everything you said makes me appreciate my MBA more and how I can truly understand the finer points of running my successful business.

(And I like your comment about learning Excel in 7th grade...truly the key to a successful business is knowing Excel)
Introduction to Views
I think he talks about configuration and scripting (elisp).
Yeah I remember burning CD-ROMs for a product at Microsoft and the burner being around $5000 and only 2X speed. The CD-ROMs in bulk were around $15 each. Not exactly something most people would have had access to.
MoviePass Is Now Re-Enrolling Former Customers Unless They 'Opt Out'
I have a problem with HOA's. They're almost always run by the worst kind of people that you don't want to be around. They're almost always evil to the core and extend their powers beyond reason. I will never buy a house with a HOA.

There are countless stories on how they do more harm than good. I have so much disdain for them, I cannot express. Fuck HOAs.
Also have two accounts:

- Account #1: salaries and deposits go here, no ATM

- Account #2: gets regular transfers from account #1, whatever you spend each week on your ATM, has an ATM, blocked on overdraft

If ATM is compromised the only money at risk is whatever is left in Account #2

This minimizes your exposure
Yes, he has to do a very minor thing (file a simple form) and then, unless the State gives him everything he wants (which is very very unlikely) he can litigate further.

I do not think that is nitpicking.
Thanks for the pointer, some good reasons there to avoid DEP.
Surely this is some kind of joke.

What, a college textbook that doesn't require the purchase of a new edition every year, or local insert that isn't part of the public text, or online homework code? Yeah, right.
There was a story written in 1949, apparently using the concept of antimatter albeit not the word, about humans building the first starship and discovering that everything outside our solar system annihilated on contact. Thus the first attempt at landing on an alien planet created a catastrophic explosion. The humans of a follow-up mission gradually realize that they are not at war, but they are quarantined - there is a whole galaxy of life and civilizations that they can never participate in.
I don't know what GNU is, but I know what it's not.
The Archive's crawlers will improve.
Sounds like my setup. That original Yami, Dual Pentium Pro 180, dedicated scsi cache drive, Windows NT4.

Added together with the early MP3 scene on IRC and it was like having a super-power.
> Every electronic device is hackable with physical access. Every process that has humans involved is exploitable.

This is a useless statement. Security is a continuum, and it's perfectly valid to point out voting machines suck on that continuum.

I store my private key on a yubikey, and sure if you had physical access and spent about $300k you could decap it and recover the private key (with a success rate of maybe 10%, an expensive hardware lab, and expertise only a handful of people have).

That's a whole different ballpark from voting machines which don't use a hardware TPM [0] to attest votes, but instead store them in csvs while running windows CE such that an attacker with a jumpdrive can plug it in and alter records using exploits which have been public for years and years.

> Sometimes to fix a broken system you have to become a part of it and change from the inside.

Unfortunately, various people have tried to change it with no success. The voting machine companies have contracts with the government that preclude new entrants to the business.

Security researchers who contact voting machine companies have no impact.

Technology such as TPMs exist, but the voting machine vendors have little apparent interest in these new ideas and technologies.

I don't think it's fair to discount other commentors from providing information and discussing their views just because they're unwilling to go into politics to attempt to fix this silly government contracts (with a low chance of succeeding)

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module
If anti-matter falls "up" wrt ordinary matter, but still self-attracts, then there wouldn't be any gamma producing zones.
Google's Advertising and Search Chief Departs to Join VC Firm Greylock
There are zero valid interpretations of quantum mechanics where you can tell me which particles will come out of an event, even in principle. It seems silly to suggest that describing your certainty in your results is incompatible with "advanced science," when the reason you're doing it is because of a direct law of nature. The Higgs boson might have never been observed - there is a certain chance that it was just lucky photons all along.

If you are in a field where you don't need statistics, it is not because they aren't at play, but instead because they all have -9999 in the exponent and you have implicitly decided not to worry about them.
Right!! It's like saying you could DoS a car by removing it's spark plugs.
Can any new Tesla chairman stand up to Elon Musk?
Can anyone test this on a Raspberry Pi 3?
What if Apple offered a configurable "hardware blessing" license for sale (perhaps tied to the purchaser and a specific macOS version, not the hardware, and non-transferable)? It would allow you to legally run x copies of macOS 10.y on non-Apple hardware (either directly or as a VM). If Apple did that, I'm sure our IT department would jump on it. They're very frustrated about having to maintain Mac Minis just to host macOS VMs.

Failing that, what exactly constitutes Apple hardware, legally? Could I run a macOS VM on a big Dell server if I zip-tie a Mac Mini motherboard to the enclosure?
I've had a job since I was ~15 years old and have a masters in CS. No one has ever wondered about the overlap.
I work in aerospace. We have a large group of people dedicated to archiving software. When we send them something to archive, we need to provide not only the software itself, but also provide (or provide a link to a previous archive of) all related libraries, build tools, compilers, operating systems, etc.

The idea is that absolutely anything could be rebuilt, if needed.

Not sure what they do for old development hardware! An interesting question, if you can't run Windows 3.1 on the latest Dell, or whatever. (Or... VMS...) Virtual hardware, perhaps?
Seems similar to me, I've been exclusively using geforce now for the past 6 months. Works extremely well if you're just a casual gamer with no dedicated gaming computer (I'm playing on my Mac). I'm curious to see how it stacks up against it and what the price of it would be
>Most popular sedan is being the biggest fish in a small aquarium

And it wasn't even that. It was the most popular _EV_ sedan, which is like being the biggest fish in the water pale my son plays with in the backyard.
I've always wondered this - How does Archive.org work in terms of storage? Internet is massive and caching every single site periodically for years on, isn't that unreasonably huge amount of data?

Edit: I just checked Wikipedia, it says they're using about 15 PB of storage.

Edit 2: 15 PB cost => 15,000 TB x $30/TB = $450,000. Ofcourse, back of the napkin cost (no maintenance, power, etc). That's not too bad actually.
Yeah looks like a cascading failure though.
Atomico – Great companies can now come from anywhere
Good luck getting agreement from the game publishers.