skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Possible explanation: because this guy doesn't spend his day looking for patents to challenge; he read about that particular one on the news due to Waymo vs Uber case, and decided to take a look at it, only to notice it's bullshit.

That's the official story, but it also sounds pretty plausible.
Socrates/Plato as well.
I just keep a google docs with username/password/recovery question, with website abbreviation as header.

As long as my google 2fa isn't compromised, I think this is safe.
GDPR has a broader definition of PII than is used in the US, and includes any data that can potentially be used to identify an individual (even IP address), so it’s almost certain that it is within scope.
When i first worked in Finland for a very successful mobile game development company, the project manager told me, whatever you are working on is complete shit, we can't afford you to be wasting our money on this. Every single minute you spend in arguing for your idea is paid by us which is true.

After that i got a blow to my ego and started doing what manager told me to. Looking back, i was really wasting their money and once i got blow to my ego, my productivity drastically increased.

I used to be fast learning workholic and yes, i need constant blows to my ego to prevent me from derailing myself into oblivion. So, i would have respect Steve jobs, if he would have been asshole to me.

Edit: I simply detailed my personal experience, so I don't understand your downvotes.
the Redmonk ranking [1], which is imho much better than TIOBE

What I think many fans of any sort of language popularity survey miss is that there are huge swathes of the industry that simply don’t actively participate in things like SO and GH. All of these results should be qualified as “amongst webdevs” (sorry “full stack engineers”).
Feels like a trap.
Paul Allen said Monday that his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has returned
I'm curious how the parsing must work because I can't unambiguously see how this line is parsed

fib x ← fib x − 1 + fib x − 2

Why is that parsed to behave correctly like

fib x ← fib (x − 1) + fib (x − 2)

And not,

fib x ← fib( x − 1 + fib ( x − 2 ))

Or even this, though it wouldn't produce a sane program

fib x ← fib ( x ) − 1 + fib ( x ) − 2
For anyone who's curious, here's the best video I've found that breaks apart the idea of an "asshole": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRRvjZ_XNog

Essentially, people can be dicks and non-dicks, while simultaneously being givers or takers. Nobody likes a taker, even if they're nice, because that person doesn't help one grow. On the other hand, someone can be a real dick, but in a "giving" way that helps achieve a better outcome for both individuals.

In the case of Jobs, one could argue that his personality was justified not only because great work came out of it, but also because the people doing that work became the best version of themselves in the process. If someone is capable of great work and they produce good work, there's a certain kindness to telling them that's not acceptable. But saying the exact same thing to someone who's less capable can be mean.
I'd guess about 95% of them give or take a few percentage points.
Ask HN: Drawbacks of Solid project by Tim Berners-Lee?
Solid is a new interesting project backed by famous Tim Berners-Lee. Project is focusing on giving control back to Internet users. Everyone can have his own "container" named POD for data, but data is also interconnected fe. your POD host your images but if someone comments it he hosts his comments, so it seems like a good way of having control but from technical point of view it's not great (one could assume everyone starts to cache data anyway on his side breaking Solid principles).

I like main concept of a project, but I'm also courious of any known drawbacks. If performance issue is not a real problem it seems like nice way to have more control where your data is and how it's processed.

Description from project website:
"Solid is an exciting new project led by Prof. Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, taking place at MIT. The project aims to radically change the way Web applications work today, resulting in true data ownership as well as improved privacy."

Sources:

https://solid.mit.edu/

https://solid.inrupt.com/how-it-works
> Free cigarettes for kids to smooth their breathing.

How was this “evidence-based”?
Also might be interesting to point out that the “feet” referred to in the titile and opening line are those of a young Jesus. A medieval story claimed he visited England and connected him with the mythical Kimg Arthur.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_did_those_feet_in_ancien...
Interesting thread as Atlassian swings up their licenses costs every year, i am also looking to cut our costs. However finding something that integrates with Jira, Bitbucket, Bamboo as well as confluence will never be possible. If anyone has suggestions to cheaper products that has those integrations (to some extent at least, or allows for the development of plugins that can do it) i would be super happy.
The way I understand the story from this article, the patent wasn't magic, it was just obvious and plenty of prior art existed. When this guy challenged that patent, Waymo started rewriting it, and this is when the "impossible magic tech" was introduced.
I mean this:

>represent addition and multiplication

It's the simplest possible explanation. Stop being a pretentious jerk. Yes, I know about primitive recursive arithmetic. I first learned about it about ten years ago.

EDIT: Wait a second. Look, I said this:

>depends heavily on the properties of Peano arithmetic, as defined by addition and multiplication

I said it right there. How could you not know this? When I said "the properties of Peano arithmetic", I meant the presence of addition and multiplication.

Let me explain it another way: Goedel's theorem is a theorem about math. Math as it was understood in the 18th century. That's what makes it interesting. The halting problem is proven with an abstract machine that was invented, mostly, to use as a basis to form analogies with other machines. So it's general by construction. (If the integers were not already interesting, Goedel's theorem would be like proving a variant of the halting problem for some weird computational structure that has no relevance to anything and is absurdly cumbersome to prove equivalent to other systems. But for the integers, the analogy is why it's interesting. Nobody expected the Goedel numbering.)

Yes, Goedel's theorem applies to all interesting versions of the integers, but it does not apply to all interesting mathematical systems. IIRC people usually cite the theory of "real closed fields" or something like that.
That's a lot more paperwork, especially if you want an actual employee, not a "soulless contractor" that is not attached to your company.

I am a remote employee in a startup, and it requires way more paperwork (options, vacation, legal) to do things right. For a small company, that's just too much when you can hire someone in your country.
What I've seen is that people who take it up with HR get blacklisted after multiple complaints and will not find much success. You need perseverance to take every blow and still stand on your feet.
Can confirm. I got a board games group and we meet almost every week and sometimes multiple times a week.

Its also a good jumping off point for other activities
They did a first pass obfuscation which replaced local variable names with gibberish and then applied some minification. Then they applied an obfuscation tool 2-3 times for each of the three code snippets, causing the code to bloat up quite considerably. However, at least two different obfuscation tools were used - one simpler one (used for the antidebugger hook) and one more complex one that looked almost like a virtual machine.

The output looks a little like the output from your link, but there's a lot of structural differences so I'm not sure it was the same tool.
COWARD DONALD TRUMP CAN’T GO TO AFRICA HE SENDS HIS WIFE MELANIE
I worked at the Archive for a few years remotely. It permanently altered my view of the tech. world. Here are the notable differences. I think these would apply to several non-profits but this is my experience

1. There was no rush to pick the latest technologies. Tried and tested was much better than new and shiny. Archive.org was mostly old PHP and shell scripts (atleast the parts I worked on).

2. The software was just a necessity. The data was what was valuable. Archive.org itself had tons of kluges and several crude bits of code to keep it going but the aim was the keep the data secure and it did that. Someone (maybe Brewster himself) likened it to a ship traveling through time. Several repairs with limited resources have permanently scarred the ship but the cargo is safe and pristine. When it finally arrives, the ship itself will be dismantled or might just crumble but the cargo will be there for the future.

3. Everything was super simple. Some of the techniques to run things etc. were absurdly simple and purposely so to help keep the thing manageable. Storage formats were straightforward so that even if a hard disk from the archive were found in a landfill a century from now, the contents would be usable (unlike if it were some kind of complex filesystem across multiple disks).

4. Brewster, and consequently the crew, were all dedicated to protecting the user. e.g. https://blog.archive.org/2011/01/04/brewster-kahle-receives-.... There was code and stuff in place to not even accidentally collect data so that even if everything was confiscated, the user identities would be safe.

5. There was a mission. A serious social mission. Not just, "make money" or "build cool stuff" or anything. There was a buzz that made you feel like you were playing your role in mankinds intellectual history. That's an amazing feeling that I've never been able to replicate.

Archive.org is truly only of the most underappreciated corners of the world wide web. Gives me faith in the positive potential of the internet.
Cool demo! One thing you could do to improve this is use quaternions to handle rotation of the cube. There are some great articles on implementing quaternions out there if you search for them. For example, I noticed when you turn a cube "upside down", the dragging to the left or right (with ctrl pressed) rotates the cube the wrong way. Quaternions are a great way to solve this issue
> I'm in SF, and there are some neighborhoods (Pacific Heights) where your risk of getting the cops called at you is pretty high just by walking around at night if one of the nosy neighbors doesn't recognize you. I assume being black would increase those odds.

If you really want to see blatant racism, sign up for nextdoor.com. My Cupertino neighbors are constantly posting about a "suspicious person", and when you press them as to why the person is suspicious, it always boils down to, "because they're black". Usually they don't outright say it, they just imply it, but sometimes they do say it outright.
We used to firmly believe in what you said too. However, we've seen advantages to the open web:

1. You're not beholden to the app stores' whims.

2. It literally is "write once, run everywhere"

3. Webassembly & WebGPU add performance & language independence

For most cases, the web is a viable, nay superior alternative.

For cases with special sensor access & ultra high speed (rich games, Video encoding) native apps are the only way.
Trauma bonding:

A psychologically abusive relationship is a rollercoaster, with punishment and then intermittent reinforcement of kindness when you “behave.” This means the body is going through its own turmoil, with high levels of the stress hormone cortisol, paired with dopamine when given affection as a reward.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/trauma-bonding-abus...
I suspect it's individual - I've always found myself more productive at night, to the point where I can be sleep deprived and borderline passing off, but I know if I make it another few hours (to around 1am) I'll start waking up again (then start falling asleep again as the sun comes up).
> Steve Wozniak refused to answer questions from CBS on the subject, but a statement from president of Woz U made a short remark about working to improve the program’s quality and said that “Wozniak reviews the curriculum.”

That’s sad to read about. I don’t expect him to be the legendary engineer that he was when he co-founded Apple, but I’ve always been just as impressed at his kindness and generosity. Hopefully this is a case of him also getting misled/screwed-over, rather than being someone who was knowingly negligent in this.
You could keep the time limits where they are, if only they required that the inventions "actually" be novel and non-obvious.

They need to stop issuing patents for basic reorganizations of existing tech. Idiotic things like a "one click checkout" or "sending email" or "packaging a media file into a podcast" should have been kicked back with a big red "denied" stamp from the USPTO after about 10 minutes of wasted time by the examiner.
If you "eject", you are not supposed to be able to upgrade. Hence the hacky workaround.

If you didn't "eject", upgrading is as simple as 'npm update react-script'. This is the norm in JavaScript.
Exactly this. Create React App is awesome except its not TypeScript, and unfortunately the key point of Create Reacte App is that it is opinionated which is its magnificent strength, but it's opinion is not TypeScript as the primary language choice. It's a pity TypeScript isn't the default.

I'd list Create React App as the number one best JavaScript technology of all time, awarded for the massive pain saving it confers. It allows the most fabulous thing in the world, which is to avoid using the JavaScript tooling.
It is really funny that a conspiracy theory posted by an anonymous person with no backing evidence whatsoever is sitting at the top of this thread.
Case Study education is extremely valuable and it is a shame that it is locked away in Ivy League curriculums.

It is valuable.

The opportunity cost (time, benefit, other opportunities) for people in tech is still too high. There becomes a time when it is worth it. The Executive MBA may be up people's alley, but even then the network itself is the most important.

For me, I ended up finding a cofounder who was a generation older than me, all of their connections have already done this stuff or floated to the top of the organizations they represent.

An MBA is not in the cards for me.
Attorney here! (Not giving legal advice.)

The good news is that, at least in the U.S., a warrant (not a subpoena, that’s for civil matters) needs to be issued by a judge and can issue only if probable cause is provided. That’s a much higher standard than a border search, where no such limitations apply.
Aware of that, however I don't see how it can work in any situation to be honest.

A ) I have an illegal thing in my house, but I register for "please dont shoot me etc". Party B calls the police, door is still likely to be kicked in.

B ) I don't have an illegal thing in my house, I register for "please dont shoot me etc". Party B calls the police, door is still likely to be kicked in.

And at what point does it become meaningless if the majority of residential addresses are on the list?
So before anything else - congratulations and thank you for releasing something as open source, under a business-friendly licence. Regardless of the project itself, that should be commended.

However. I've never paid much attention before, so perhaps I'm missing something.. but this "just" seems to be the code intelligence you'd expect to find in a good IDE.

Is there more to it? Or is this the 'solution' for the lack of such code intel in the plethora of text editors people use these days?
Before being railroaded into Confluence, I argued vociferously for XWiki (https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/). It's powerful, clean, and about as close to a Confluence replacement as you'll find anywhere. It can in fact import from Confluence. It has a number of useful extensions for it, though nowhere near as many as Confluence. Plus, it's open-source, and if you prefer the company behind the project also does convenient hosting.

Of course, it doesn't integrate seamlessly with the other Atlassian products, but if you can do without that, it's definitely worth checking out.
Turns out some times the authorities are morons, dude. Once upon a time we dumped radioactive material off the coast of SF and shot holes in the barrels to make them sink. I’m sure there was someone running around saying “there’s probably a good reason”. That dude would have been wrong.
> Jobs probably wanted something done that day or that week and had to get pissed to motivate everyone..

That's possible, but I think "Jobs got angry because he angered easily, regardless of whether it was necessary to motivate people" would be the more parsimonious explanation.
Yes, except that won't happen. Why would those men who can take the bullshit stop? Why would they make their job more attractive to their competition?
Haha, typical China. There's something we don't like? Let's censor it. Pathetic and scary at the same time.
> ...organised crime groups are becoming a lot more sophisticated in the ways they're trying to get things across the border.

So if it can be got across the border digitally, why would they put it on their phone that can be seized and searched?

The efficacy of this law wrt. the new challenges we face is at best questionable.
When is a formal system a logic and when is it not?
We do Python/Django as well.
I was wondering if something like that existed. A lot of times I add to my YouTube WatchLater list, which can often times be much later in tim that by the time I get around to it it’s not unusual for videos to be removed by the user or deleted for unknown reasons. And there’s no text to even see what the video was.
You should definitely use our Quickstart instructions :) You can deploy it to your existing Kubernetes cluster (or any other Docker environment).

- The Quickstart instructions[1] describe how to set up a single-machine single-container Sourcegraph instance, which is recommended for small teams. Our Data Center[2] offering is for large teams and runs Sourcegraph across multiple machines in multiple containers for high availability, scalability, etc.

- The Docker Hub image sourcegraph/server is the official, free Sourcegraph build is called Sourcegraph Core and it includes various paid enterprise features built in so that upgrading to Sourcegraph Enterprise is easy (you only need to supply a license key, rather than migrating to a new Docker image). So, the exact recipe for building it is not open-source. However, we use the same exact Dockerfile in Sourcegraph OSS[4] which you can take a look at.

- Each language server providing code intelligence will run as separate Docker container. By mounting the Docker socket into the container, Sourcegraph can automatically start/stop/manage these containers for you. However, this is not required, and in the case of Kubernetes deployment we do not recommend it, please see the "Manual Installation" section of our Code Intelligence docs[5] for more information.

[1] https://about.sourcegraph.com/docs

[2] https://github.com/sourcegraph/deploy-sourcegraph

[3] https://about.sourcegraph.com/pricing/

[4] https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/blob/master/cmd/s...

[5] https://about.sourcegraph.com/docs/code-intelligence/install
What I've seen of kimhi's drafts has been pretty dense, harder to read than Kripke(!), but important. In particular (IMHO) he ties a common thread from hermeneutics, continental deconstruction[+] and, for me, modern computational semantics, without the rigid and, IMHO, artificial platonism of American analytical philosophy.

Why do I think it's important? When your cars have hand-built planners you can't really call them (except metaphorically) "self-driving" no matter how many CNNs you put in their vision system and to do so fakes you out to the point where you end up running over women pushing bikes because nobody thought to put in a handler for that case.

[+] I mean the point of early Derrida, not the fatuousnes of most deconstructionist writing.
In betting on opportunity, often times they have everything riding on it.

Where does the "harm" you talk about come from? Usually it's because there are other responsibilities you're engaged with. If you literally give everything else up to focus on one thing, these barbs aren't in your life. I'm talking forgoing rent to crash with family/friends, eating ramen, selling/getting rid of your things, live on credit cards, etc, and have a 24/7 focus that keeps you going.

You'd be surprised how much that frees you from the immediate "harm" you describe, but you also have nothing to fall back on, because you pretty much have nothing else anymore than your pursuit, and can be amassing enormous debt (financial and otherwise). It's a huge amortized, pushed-forward harm in the hopes that the gamble pays off. For many, it doesn't.
Interesting, I wasn't aware this could be the case.
Attorney here! (Not providing legal advice.)

The power to conduct border searches, even without probable cause, is considered well-settled under the law as not contravening the Constitution. See, e.g., U.S. v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606 (1977).
Entry Level Help Desk Jobs
Find Entry Level Help Desk Jobs in USA. Help Desk Support is responsible for handling first level support of service requests in a first class professional manner. Get the right job with company ratings & salaries. https://www.jobrino.com/entry-level-help-desk-jobs
Are you recommending an app imposed rendering timer (say 15ms) or is there an in built API for Opportunistic scheduling of Dom updates?
The principle here is people can agree to surrender some of their privacy for safety. The problem isn’t that searching my bits is a greater violation than searching my atoms, but that it’s not useful. Right now there’s no pattern of bits I can carry with me to blow up a plane and in any event I could easily bypass the search.

I’m not thrilled by the social contract, but it’s a good deal more convenient than driving across country.
You can't bet on an opportunity if you don't have any money to bet. I've lost count of how many ambitious and talented people I know who had ideas they wanted to bet on, but couldn't because of lack of disposable funds.

Having the resources to take risks is the number one factor to succeeding, I think. Being able to identify good opportunities comes after that.
> In both cases, the language you are using does not describe what you really mean. In the first instance: "I am experiencing a hallucination of rain, but it is not raining". In the second "The fictional character Santa Claus is said to live at the north pole. I do not believe Santa Claus is real".

That's not the case. Your sentences are not my intended readings.

My original is perfectly expressible in (intensional) predicate logic:

(Rain(w,t) ∧ ¬Rain(w',t))

(where w,w' are worlds, t is a time)

The conflation of psychology and logic makes no sense to me.
Or he hired a law firm to write it for him? Not far fetched.