skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is the chipset, not the cpu, which is brought from 14nm back up to 22nm to make room for more cpu production at 14nm.

From what I can tell AMD’s chipsets are at 55nm, so intel is still at a smaller process node for chipsets.
> until you need to upgrade, then you have months of no business value delivery and need to bring...

This is not the case in my experience. I've upgraded pretty decent sized apps (hundreds of models,lines of routes, etc) and in my experience it would take a couple hours a day spread out over a few days a month and then I was done (for versions: 3-4 and 4-5, never done 3-5).

I would say most of the problem is making sure everyone on the team just keeps all functionality as-is. It can be tempting for team members to refactor as they go through but this then becomes a huge time-sync. Anyways, thats my exp on rails but I have no other frameworks to compare it to.

Has anyone migrated a massive app from some PHP Framework like Symfony or from a java framework like Play, or any framework with a large code base?

I have had to upgrade massive systems that were not done with any framework and full of one-off solutions with in-house developed libraries and it was an absolute nightmare, but I'm sure this depends on the language and team. However, in general I think an open-source library used by millions or even hundreds of people is going to have better documentation, bug coverage, support, etc. than something done in house, just IMHO.

So I guess my question would be, what does the alternative look like?
Yes we tried this once, with webpack 4, and realized in about an hour that like half our packages were incompatible and had patches weeks out.

I'm talking big packages, less-loader. Htmlwepbackplugin still requires @next for webpack4 to work right.
> You only get to see your own profile.

Well, when it doesn't have a security hole.
Comet/asteroid landings have been done, but this is the first time rovers have been deployed on one.
It's funny to hear someone only ever make this argument when what is being censored is conservative. If it were the opposite way, and they were blocking results on, say, the travel ban, or competing startups, people would be up in arms.
At what cost? Are you interested in ensuring that additional voting restrictions actually prevent more illegal votes than they prevent legitimate votes? What makes you think the base rate of non-citizen voting is even high enough to be a problem that can be addressed without invariably causing more harm than good?
I'd love to see that result, purely for the hilarity of watching the people I share a house with, who voted for Brexit, explode at the idea of the UK government not policing an external border.

The only reason they voted for Brexit was because they think it means they can get rid of all the migrants, they tell me this quite regularly.

One of them moved here from Bahrain, though apparently this means their family were ex-pats, not migrants. The other is from a long line of Christian overseas missionaries.

If they thought for a second that Brexit would mean leaving the border with Northern Ireland wide open, they would be screaming blue murder.
Might as well continue this tangent. I haven't lost nearly enough karma on it yet. :)

I think that, if you're going to be a very small brewery that has that many different beers, they basically have to all be IPAs. The high alcohol content will help make the beer more resistant to going stale, and the hoppiness will cover all the flaws and consistency issues that you're very likely to have if your brewmaster is spreading themself that thin. By contrast, if you're making something like a helles lager, any problems you have with finicky things like the mash or the primary fermentation will to have nowhere to hide.
If memory serves, there are still vast areas of policy that can be voted on by a simple majority.
With regular inheritance, you affect behavior from the bottom up.

With the "Curiously Recurring Template Pattern", you affect behavior from the bottom up and from the top down.

To be honest, I don't know if it has value for most tasks people care about (outside of libraries, I mean). But it was fantastic for optimizing OOP-abstracted desktop applications. If you have some subset of functions that need to be called a lot, then avoiding virtual functions really helps.
I know especially as an old Lisper, however, J's succinctness allows you to fit a lot on a one-line REPL idea. No blocks, curly braces, or indents like when using other languages' REPLs. Also a simple backspace, and you've deleted a noun, and one character or two, and you're creating a lot more than full words in other PLs. Tools for Thought by Ken Iverson, like using math symbols, but on a REPL.
>Of course, if we did have an official written constitution, that would make it immediately clear what was and wasn't constitutional. That is why, for example, there is never any disagreement over such matters in the US :)

I appreciate the joke (really!), but that's not what's perplexing, here. Even if there are disagreements in (e.g.) US constitutional matters, the reference documents and their order of succession is well-known.

Are there ever cases in the UK where two different canonical documents disagree?

I've been living here for a year now... I really ought to know this stuff :/
That was my immediate thought. Is the livestream cancelled?
We had chocolate covered digestive biscuits (both kinds of chocolate!). I got through them like nobody's business, but I only ate the chilled ones from the fridge (marginally healthier).
Elon Musk Is His Own Worst Enemy
Apple wins patent infringement appeal against University of Wisconsin
Cellular automata as convolutional neural networks
... until the mechanism turns out to have an exploit, as just happened here.
Was everyone logged out automatically or only those who were affected? Is anyone here who wasn't logged out today?
I like that asteroid footage, I like anything about minor planets and dream that there will be a trillion people living in the Kuiper belt.

That is not trash at all.

The Buddha says that "enticing speech" is a sin and the primary difference between low brash trash and high brow trash is the size of the market.

I think if you want to be transhuman in 2018, other than swimming with fins, you should be hacking your attention.

I spent 4 years without looking at the mass media regularly and I then I got more normal and I can point the fallacies in my younger self's argument and find that there is something good in television, video games, etc.

Facebook on the other hand turned into something like cigarette smoking in less than ten years.

So if you want to get better than normal results consider your own attention and innovations that help people pay attention differently: anti-Facebook could be the basis of many a business.
Can Universal Basic Income Achieve Economic Security?
Isn't this the second time this feature has been exploited? I thought I remembered a similar issue from a while ago.
Uninstalling an app doesn't clear all of its data, you'd have to clean install iOS with a new apple account. Once you install an app it can leave markers/identifiers everywhere on your device and in your account, and there's basically no way to get rid of them.
This whole thing is nothing more than just world fallacy.

Instead of looking at individual circumstances, people falsely assume (backwards logic) that bad things could have only happened to bad people (e.g. convictions) are dead set on revising their view of an event (well, if it happened, they must have deserved it!)

> If the US wants to truly embrace the ideals of free speech, then we must also accept that there will be actions that are immoral but legal.

And illegal, but moral.
We've certainly embraced the devops approach, releasing many times per day with lots of automation on k8s, but I don't see this as being incompatible with using LTS releases.

Having an LTS release available offers the flexibility to choose when to upgrade based on any number of factors affecting the business and engineering cycles, the same way we pin software libraries to specific versions so our own stability and build consistency isn't subject to the varying release cycles of the package authors.

There's definitely a balance to be found between waiting so long to upgrade that it becomes insurmountable, and having to frequently run disruptive, mystery-downtime-causing upgrades for unneeded new features.
> Plugging a device into your network doesn't make it magically see all the traffic.

Isn't that exactly what Wireshark's "promiscuous mode" does?
We should routinely red-team elections. It would literally be amazing if I were kidding.
I am more surprised that this kind of coupon trickery still pays off and the retailers are burning money on it.

The way I see it, you only search for coupons once you see a product at a retailer and you want to buy it (or even once you already have a shopping cart built up, and are on the checkout form where the coupon field is). So the retailer already acquired you as a customer, and you're ready to checkout. Most likely you'll end up checking out anyway even if you don't find any valid coupons (which is what's currently happening, since most coupons don't work anyway).

So why are retailers still paying out affiliate revenue in this case? They have the customer already. This shady affiliate doesn't bring them anything they didn't already have.

They can easily fix this by only paying out affiliate revenue for actual, legitimate affiliates, those that brought you a brand new customer. If the user already spent time browsing your website and built up a shopping cart, don't pay out affiliate revenue even if they do end up clicking on an affiliate link after.
Introducing new APIs to improve augmented reality development with ARCore
Well you're going to need something that reacts to magnetic fields in some way. In that sense iron isn't an odd choice.

Anything that isn't susceptible to magnetic fields is not going to do much, even if its conductive that can only help against brief bursts.
there is also prestige associated to big names like Facebook (and Google, Apple, etc)
Or Walmart makes a profit because they dupe the real referers.

They can identify and cancel those SEO accounts and deny payout. Meanwhile, the real advertisers have lost their cookie and don't get their deserved payout.
I am not trying to insinuate anything, but could you please introspect for me if your mind only changed because the vote did not match what you wanted both times, but this time you feel its more important, so your reasoning flipped to justify?

Again, not attacking, genuinely curious.
I'm not sure what's behind the recent prevalence to this theory but that is false.

Also we should all want section 230 protection it's what preserves free speech online and the principle on which the whole web economy is built.
If you push off against it to gain velocity, you'll fly away from it very quickly and not spend long enough pushing it to meaningfully change it's orbit.
What do you think the vast majority of people's facebook/instagram/twitter/reddit feed's look like. The answer is those things too.
Fun fact: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/09/security-update/ was published at 16:42:44. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/technology/facebook-hack-... was published at 16:45:41. NYT writes fast :)
Sometimes the truth is hard to accept
Stealing the access token is the worst possible attack, because it wouldn't get logged or lead to any sort of notification. If they were only able to steal the passwords, this would have gotten caught immediately.
Facebook Hacked: Up to 50M Users Affected
The sigil thing is definitively a bikeshed. For one thing besides Python I don't don't know why you consider that JS, Java or C# don't use many sigils, these languages just happen not to have C-style pointers so they don't need that particular bit of syntax.

More generally using C-style syntax means that C and C++ coders will be at home, while people from other languages will have to familiarize themselves with the concept anyway, sigil or not.

Beyond that, I don't think I've seen any serious study on the acceptable level of sigils to maximize productivity and readability in source code, as far as I can tell it's really just a matter of opinion. Personally I'd take C syntax over Python every day of the month, and I've written quite a bit of Python. My only sigil-related problem with C is that '->' should really just be '.' IMO.
I think you're conflating 2 separate people's statements. I've never had any focus on smaller sized payloads.

You could fairly easily find a drone with a 10 lbs payload. 40 pounds though isn't a realistic operational payload for those drones, which is why it says "max payload".

>Feasible drones for attacks will likely be larger, and this easier to detect

That's true, my point is that setting up a nationwide drone licensing and tracking system to track hobby drones isn't necessary when what you're really worried about is protecting high value targets from drones that are approaching the size of small helicopters.

> Instead, I get blanket rejections without evidence, or even much explanation of reasoning.

You haven't provided any evidence either, just a random assumption that such a system will cost $50k-$200k per site.

I clearly explained why that is too low. Increasing the density of radar coverage to handle drones above 400', trained personnel, towers, and drone take down systems are going to cost a lot more than you think. You can believe me or not, but I've provided at least much explanation and evidence as you have.
The Next Step: Application-Level Fault Injection
Same could be said for Google
I doubt it. The "View As" feature does not require the target to be currently logged in to Facebook AFAIK.
I had the impression GH switched Ruby for Scala years ago.
> Additionally, the people who want it changed are probably the people who can't easily vote on Tuesday. These people already don't vote

I'm sorry but there is a non sequitur here. If someone is inconvenienced by voting on Tuesday, it doesn't really mean they don't vote on Tuesday.

I don't know how it really is (non-US citizen and not in the US) but I strongly suspect there must a lot of people who don't fancy the extra hassle but still vote.
> I'd definitely include "Kill your dependencies" as a bullet point

Or at least your monkeypatches!
I'm logged on on my phone and hane not seen any security notices in my feed. Have not been logged out.

Edit: Same on my PC. Still logged on.
> although I wonder how long it will be until devices start communicating with each other wirelessly to exfiltrate cached data

At that point I'd have to reconsider. I did wonder about the devices finding a open WiFi point, but at some point you have to draw the line between reasonable precautions and paranoia, and there are none near me (currently) anyway.
I was still logged in. I just went and did the "log out all my active sessions" thing just for good measure, even though I didn't see anything unusual there.
Article looks recent to me.
Agreed on messing with small players and real estate getting favorable treatment, but did you miss the part where they were in million+ properties with shell corporations?

> Treasury this week expanded and extended a program targeting luxury real estate deals in New York, Miami, Los Angeles and other big markets to prevent the use of real estate for money-laundering by overseas buyers. The program was designed to prevent buyers from using shell company's or LLC's to hide the identities of the real buyers.
Only if the act of logging out explicitly invalidates the token on the server side
Something I proposed and sent to the experts many years ago; back then I was thinking of opposing ion rather than plasma engines of course. Plasma wasn't a thing, then.

A point they've dropped from my proposal is that used on a spinning target you can de-spin it. (Even if it's spinning along more than one axis in fact, with intermittent thrust.) This is especially useful to capture, move, and then utilize asteriods, say. Or as a way to stabilize the target (such as an asteroid), so that both engines can be joined to the target to move it. See "jacknife" below.

Very useful for cleaning debris from orbit.

A few years ago, I realized that what you want is a "jackknife" implementation with a hinge between the two engines that allows you to use both thrusters to move to and from the objects you want to move. Since no-one had picked up the original idea (except as modified to use gravity vs one engine), I made no attempt to publicize that refinement to the idea.
You think people didn't worry about it before we implemented vote-by-mail? This is a solved problem, and it turns out that there isn't much of an attack vector here after all.
> The "custom" and "proprietary" are largely irrelevant, in that they're merely internal implementation details.

Agreed. I was merely trying to convey that they wouldn't be the normal [E]ATX form factor boards.

The parent was asking for something "off the shelf", and I took this to mean purchasing a motherboard by itself. You could get something like that from SM[0], but I doubt you'd be able to find a compatible chassis for the motherboard from anyone other than SM. At that point it probably makes more sense to just buy the system[1].

[0] http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X10...

[1] http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/2U/2048/SYS-2048U-...
You can't make C++ simpler by adding more to the language.
You drank straight vanilla extract? This seems like determining how good a cake will be by eating raw flour.
> The problem is it seems they used their journalistic position to blackmail someone

Now, if CNN actually threatened the guy that's not ok. But, this comes down to what you assumed might have happened, not something that we know actually happened. Another possibility is they called the guy up for a story and he was instantly apologetic on his own initiative.

> Was the creator of the gif actually..

I said "if the guy started" as I assumed he had not done so.

I am simply saying treating such things as potentially serous signs of another possible newsroom shooting in the making is understandable. Not because of his actions are unreasonable, rather because of crazy people also doing similar things in the past. Organizations of this size are already paying people to do this stuff, the guy happened to hit the radar enough that he was next on the list.
> That's only possible if you sacrifice some of the stronger anonymity requirements

Untrue. You can use strong encryption to ensure confidentiality and zero-knowledge proofs to ensure integrity. Then, you can use methods from homomorphic encryption to tally the ballots. There is a whole area of research dedicated to this.
Gas prices in Southern California are rising toward $4 a gallon
The problem I have with statements like this are that they apply to every large framework, not just Rails. ASP, Django, Zend, Cocoa etc. A combination of libraries are bound to be hard to update two major versions later when methods and variables are deprecated.
I didn't say that it would be all funshine and icecream!
For wired Ethernet it depends on whether the traffic even reaches that port or not. Old dumb Ethernet hubs used to pass all traffic to all ports, but modern switches only send traffic to the intended destination.
http://law.slu.edu/sites/default/files/Journals/stacy_hickox...
Yes, it's possible, and it is an area of research in cryptography. For instance, have a look at Helios and Belenios.
Why do I get a feeling that this "breach" notification is related to the following news that appeared a day earlier?

“Facebook Is Giving Advertisers Access to Your Shadow Contact Information”

Source: https://gizmodo.com/facebook-is-giving-advertisers-access-to...
Yes, but the overhead is much smaller compared to other techniques, and it's simpler to predict runtime behavior because there is no nondeterminism when ignoring the runtime which would otherwise be introduced by collector behavior.
> 'Too many equate "legal" with "moral" and defer to the authority of the state when it labels someone officially as a "criminal," no matter the offense.'

yes, people do take that mental shortcut from time to time, but it's because the legal system is supposed to reflect our collective moral code. when it doesn't, we should fix the legal code to match.

but listening to the kavanaugh hearing yesterday, it looks like things will get worse before they get better. kavanaugh was unfortunately partisan in his rebuttal, but the appalling part is that no one--especially not politicians--is discussing partisanship as a legitimate reason for disqualification. no matter your politics, you do not want partisanship in the courts.

> "I blame compulsory state schooling for exacerbating the issue of blindly trusting the government"

this is too simplistically ideological. are you really completely against patriotism? while schools do contribute to teaching deference, it's because communities believe in living together harmoniously and benefit from such social norms.

what we really need is to apply better incentives to the legal system, which has long been insulated from popular influence due to the danger of partisanship mentioned above. as in the current medical system, lawyers make more money from increased amounts of conflict and more complicated laws. we need to flip that around so that the legal system makes a living form simplifying the legal system and reducing conflict.

and more to the point, we need to realize that there is no "law-abiding citizen". we all break the law from time to time and it doesn't mean we're all criminals. if anything, we need to address rampant cheating in schools, because that's disturbingly accepted shortcut to success. let's hold each other to a higher, more honorable standard.
This is a very short-sighted view. Yes it has some immediate benefit in terms of pay, but you have to consider the long-term societal tradeoff of not developing addictive mental candy for people or developing societally useful technologies (or vice-versa, as it now stands). We can focussed on getting paid a lot now, or improving the wealth of everyone and generative the value we can all enjoy later.
That was Twitter.
GDPR requires you to state the reason why you collect the data. Re-purposing it requires you to obtain updated consent from the user.
Possibly -- if the attacker accessed session IDs, they could potentially hijack the sessions of logged-in users. If you log out, most servers will destroy the session data on their backend, so there's no session that can be hijacked.
> there is also prestige associated to big names

I hate that this has happened. The Bay Area used to be a place where working for the big, shiny company that makes your parents happy wasn't prestigious. It was safe. But taking a risk and starting something new was admired. The present state of affairs reminds me of Wall Street.
I think that prestige only exists in the minds of some people who work there or have worked there. If I had a nickel for every time someone started a sentence with "well when I was at Google" for a scenario that is nothing like Google... Facebook's move-fast-and-break-things culture is fortunately a little less envied, in my experience.
Subpage-Aware Solid State Drive for Improving Lifetime and Performance
To throw in dissenting opinion: I feel like that gets the point across to C programmers like me.
Maybe he's paying one forward for favorable outcome regarding antitrust investigations. Cases like this don't appear overnight, and they take just as long to adjudicate.
I don’t feel like Mark Zuckerberg’s account is continuously updated with crucial information. Probably updating it once every hour or two would be sufficient.
I would submit an entry for my own project, Snabl [0]; but it intentionally doesn't support the algorithm since naive recursion beyond a few levels doesn't make much sense in practice. I added a separate keyword to force tail calls since that's usually what you want.

[0] https://github.com/codr4life/snabl#function