skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
is there some option i'm missing? i'm trying to switch over on tablet, but ff touch detection or 'guessing where they meant to touch' is just horrible. i have to zoom in like crazy to hit the upvote button on hn while on chrome it just works, or i might be trying to click on an article on the front page but end up hitting the comments section.

i usually prefer the desktop version of websites since mobile often times looks more awkward on tablet. but with ff i almost have no choice.
Tryed to answer your patronizing problem:

> hint://deviantart.com/conversation-culture/gallery/

the comic-strips are 'named' 1...2...3 - hope that will help

Maybe... i am drunken enough ('Frühschoppen') to expand my forgone lines with: "To see energy as a wave with a fixed start- and endpoint, 'shorten by time'" (-:

Edited: i thought my original posting was 'too offensive,
and rejecting' in terms of HN-Guidelines.
>> no matter what the domain

How ? Triz is great for mechanical stuff, but how can you use triz for software ? Or electronics?
> "They are just using the information that identifies you, that they already have, and are tying it to your face in a 100% verified way. By which I mean that they now have a database of people’s IDs along with what is most certainly a scan of their face."

They're using your passport number, and either matching that with your passport file photo at the Department of State (for US citizens) or from the immigration entry database (for everyone else). This part's not that sophisticated.

Not to say there's not plenty of things to be concerned about here, but this information has always been readily available on the government's end. It's just the most visible use of it to date.
Hi Osmely,

When you say UX, what exactly do you mean?

UX comprises many things.

What are your goals - what would you like to work on in the future?

There are many great resources and knowing what your goals are will help to point you in the right direction.
Facebook announced that they are using ML to fix compilation errors just yesterday. They said they were contracting out companies to build ASICS for the AI. We are a long way from AI making good medical decisions.
In the early plans the harpoon was launched at a moving target. But in addition to the complexity and the risk associated with that, this prevented having a close-up look at the target after the operation. A harpoon for debris removal is only useful if it does not create too many debris and you cannot really assess how many were generated if the harpoon and it's target are floating away.

I concur with you in the drag sail. So many LEO projects are planning on using propulsion for deorbiting, which requires having a fairly working spacecraft. Drag sails or other deployables do not require a lot of power, are completely passive once deployed, and make the object even more trackable.
I have no idea. Normally younger people could be a catalyst for change, but they are all leaving. I think the effects of this are going to reverberate in Italy for generations as they fall further and further behind.
This system was designed by CBP, not Delta. So yes, it has access to the passport database. (See my other post here for details.)
1. Because the health industry is about as regulated as it gets so even if ML/AI is possible there is zero chance of it being allowed to replace the advice of a doctor.

2. Because most people like seeing their doctor and talking to someone about their issues. There isn't exactly an appetite for disruption here.
I'd say the Nokia 8210 from 1999 is a better contender. Very design-focussed, launched at Paris Fashion Week. Has to be among the smallest candybar phones made too. A much better phone than the RAZR.
"Most important", not "only important thing". Read carefully and try to be less salty.
> Society has the right to make judgements about behaviors that are deplorable, undesirable, immoral, etc

Well, sure. Could you explain why you think BDSM is deplorable, undesirable, or immoral?
You are absolutely correct in that SpaceX has access to tons of research conducted by NASA/ESA and other space agencies. However, BFS is fundamentally different than what Apollo did. Arguably, developing a rocket capable of providing the required amount of delta-v to achieve free return trajectory around the moon or Mars is the easy part in a crewed mission. Hell, the BFR in the proposed specs is only slightly stronger than Saturn V and that was half a century ago. The hardest part is man rating the whole thing. That takes a lot of time.
Does anyone here have any experience in getting photos off of old RAZRs? I have a similar phone that (I believe) uses the same firmware. It looks like the software to do so (Motorola Media Link?) was offline, or at least I couldn't locate it anywhere. I've got some photos of an old friend who passed away on there, but no way to get them off.
I'm sorry but you are embracing yourself.

I seem to have really strong opinion on things that you really don't seem to know much about.

> I doubt BFR even exists outside of graphics renditions.

We know what exists and what doesn't. The most important thing about a rocket is a new engine, and they have showed videos of it firing 3 years ago and have since then shown many more videos of it firing for different duration and so on.

They have bought a factor and they have shown of structural tools to build the frame of the BFR. They have started to construct sections. The have already build and tested a carbon fiber tank for example.

So, yes, it doesn't exists yet but they are very clearly building it and working on it right now.

Its not some hype where everybody just believes Elon because he has a mindspell on everybody, they are actually showing of hardware all the time.

> Mars colonization is well beyond their technical capabilities even if there is a market for it.

Mars colonization is incredibly difficult and of course it is outside their technical capability, and everybody including Elon would agree with you. The important point is that they are working towards resolving this, unlike most people.

> NASA for example didn't start by putting a man on the moon. Space exploration is a dangerous, slow, expensive, stepwise process. They did mercury, gemini, and then finally Apollo.

Yes and SpaceX started with the Falcon 1, then the Falcon 9, then Falcon Heavy and then BFR.

The also started with Dragon 1 then made that reusable, now they are building Dragon 2 (Cargo and Crew) and they will fly those for a couple of years. And they are working on the next generation after that with the BFS.

They will start by sending humans to the space station, then around the moon and probably do some other stuff before sending people to mars.

Your narrative that they are ignorant and just make a mars shot is false, the have a very deliberate and systematic growth in their capabilities.

Raptor:

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7kqFt3nID4

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb2IEU1taFs

- https://youtu.be/zu7WJD8vpAQ?t=45m30s

Tank:

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93rBH4Ysb8Y

Structure:

- https://youtu.be/zu7WJD8vpAQ?t=44m40s

Your constant claims that everybody is just "drinking the Kool aid" and your the only one smart enough to understand what is really going on is just false. I and others understand exactly what SpaceX current capabilities are, what they are doing in the short term and what they are devloping in the longer term. That's why we are exited.
Fwiw, lots of those Nokias on Amazon Prime UK
Nginx: hg.nginx.org/nginx.org
Debounce in Bash
Show HN: Adburner. DNS based ad blocker with DNS over HTTPS support
Solely a comment on the comic: moneyuser.com also has a hommage to this one: https://www.monkeyuser.com/2018/focus/

If you didn't know about the monkeyuser comics so far (as did I, a couple of months ago): You're welcome :)
Picking n = 60 compares Falcon's first n attempts with Ariane's best stretch. It conveniently ignores Ariane's initial mis-steps that every complex system is prone to.

By the same token I can cherry-pick n=30 and claim victory :-) Neither is a fair comparison.

Honestly, I think it's remarkable that Falcon has had only 5% failure rate considering that the launch vehicle has undergone constant tweaking for reusability. I am not familiar with Ariane's evolution but I would be surprised it it's seen similar amount of change.

Maybe we should wait until Falcon catches up with the total number of launches and compare apples to apples then?
https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Python/blob/master/Graphs/b...
I had to make our software work on it, that was certainly not a fun experience... IIRC, the main issue with the Razr was memory though. JSR support often didn't mean much anyway, as many features were optional (probably intended for lack of hardware support, but phone vendors would abuse this to provide a minimal "let's just get that checkbox marked" API).
I just realized I raised confusion between proponents and practitioners, sorry. I never reached for a naturopath, only hear about alternative medicine from people into it.
> For the Internet to thrive, content providers must be paid for their work. The long-term prospects are good, but I expect a lot of disappointment in the short-term as content companies struggle to make money through advertising or subscriptions. It isn't working yet, and it may not for some time.

And that was back in 1996..
A better title might be, "For Some Hackers, Anonymity Was Once Critical. Now, They're Corporate Sellouts."
There is nice online course in russian to learn TRIZ:
https://universarium.org/course/734
https://universarium.org/course/481
This is a universal system design, not just for Mozilla. The mainstream is already blocking ads and cookies so it's not like we aren't already there, instead this is a way to get back to a good equilibrium on both sides while protecting privacy for those who want it.
8210 was incredibly popular, and desireable at the same time, although it was release quite a few years ahead of Motorola. I’d buy one now if I could find a NOS somewhere.
This plugin just shows you the graph, right? VNote can scroll the corresponding element into view and highlight it, which is very helpful when the class diagram is really large on a small screen.

By the way, when you double click an element in the preview graph, VNote could highlight the originating definition code in the editor.

The Live Preview Tunnel, I think, is what makes VNote different from other editors. :)
humans are a robust people
Hi Andrew, thanks for the awesome sharing. Is there anyway I can have your email? Thank you.- Allen.
VNote is a Markdown note-taking app. Markdown is excellent to hold script such as PlantUML, mermaid, and so on. So it is possible to support DSL, too.
Flying in Cyberspace: Policing Global Travel Fraud
thank you. What about learning how to present things (or sketch them) ? are there good resources to learn that ?
Sex is not just shock value though, the same as toilet humour is not just poop jokes.

Here it seems it goes beyond and Apple doesn’t want disturbing content. For instance in these terms I’d expect a blackmirror style social ranking commentary to be refused if it hit too close to home.

Or to get back to sex, LGBT subjects including suicide, depression, domestic violence or realistic bullying would also be out.

Apple is a small player in entertainment industries, so I don’t care what they value, but I hope every producing company doen’t do the same.
Set up a CoreData implementation embracing the static, type-safe nature of Swift
GPs do not exist in a vacuum. They follow the advice dictated by the authorities. And the whole point of that advice is to be conservative. They aren't there to prescribe you the latest drugs or try some new cutting edge technique. They are there to present the best practice at that particular point in time. You know that whole saving lives part.

And so in your case. You are coming to see your GP and are presenting some analysis that you read off the internet and are now upset that they didn't jump up and down in amazement. Well sure. They probably get that 100x a day and 99.99% of the information is probably wrong.
Med student here. The majority of us do research starting from day one of undergrad. It's not uncommon to graduate med school with 5+ publications. It is effective at showing how little we know, but so are the lectures we have everyday that have unknowns in them.

We're also taught by "genuine" scientist, people with PhDs, PhD/MD, and MDs on a daily basis about what we don't know.
They are not the same. Even though Nokia is infamous for not being able to produce a solid smartphone platform that would actually attract app developers, their feature phones (and Sony Ericsson's, too) were always known for having more finished, polished and faster UX when compared to competition like Siemens and Motorola.

The Nokia-branded feature phones produced during Microsoft's ownership and ones produced currently by HMD Global are based on somewhat horrible generic Chinese feature phone platforms and lack the finish and localisation. HMD likes to call one of them Series 30+. Nokia's Series 30 is easy to use and reliable feature phone platform, Series 30+ is not.
Google CEO Sundar Pichai warns employees: Don't get too political
EU membership played a key role in this project though. The consortium would not have had the same funding from the European Commission if the UK was outside EU.
The Socratic Method in an Age of Trauma (2017) [pdf]
See Motorola Phone Tools, and note the different OS support on Windows. https://motorola-global-en-aus.custhelp.com/app/answers/prod...
> A major reason paying for content doesn't work very well yet is that it's not practical to charge small amounts. The cost and hassle of electronic transactions makes it impractical to charge less than a fairly high subscription rate.

> But within a year the mechanisms will be in place that allow content providers to charge just a cent or a few cents for information. If you decide to visit a page that costs a nickel, you won't be writing a check or getting a bill in the mail for a nickel. You'll just click on what you want, knowing you'll be charged a nickel on an aggregated basis.

To think this practice still isn't widespread 22 years later...!
That is certainly something that I have seen as well. The problem lies in validating the spreadsheets. Often, the amount of validation is minimal, whether that is the actual formulae used or the relationships that bare created or even the data that is used.

I have seen some outstanding examples of well written spreadsheets but these tend to be the minority case. Depending on the organisation and the priority it puts on validation, the spreadsheets can range in quality from vry poor to mediocre.

I have seen critical spreadsheets that were a disaster of coding.

Many times, the IT costs for getting the IT developers to do the work for you is so far above what it costs for you to do it yourself or even to get a developer in specifically to work for you, outside of any controls that your IT group would exert. Plenty of the work I have done in the last 20 years was based on the end-user employing me to do the work taht was not cost effective or even allowed for by the company IT teams.
Why does this graph show only 4 countries as if they are the top 4?

Per capita, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, Norway all have more Nobel prizes per capita than UK.

https://www.nejm.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/mms/jour...

Their statement "Accounting for population, it is the British who have accumulated the most Nobel prizes" is wrong.
Capitalism is about individual freedom and individual responsibility. The British giant Marks & Spencer started as a market stall, Michael Marks borrowed £5 to set it up, it now has revenue of £10bn and employs 84,000 people. He could have bet that money on a horse, but instead you would like to steal everything he and his later business parter worked for in the name of 'justice'. Communism and Marxism have been tried many times, they're supposed to be based on empirical evidence and scientifically based, but the experiment has been tried over and over again and it's failed every time.
Was young and stupid. Joined a startup (Kno formely Kakai) as #12 employee. Made $0. Would have been negative amount if I hadn't ripped up my early exercise papers before leaving. Company took O($xxxM) and due to mismanagement & nepotism sold for O($xM). Nobody made any money. Some lost a lot.
> A major reason paying for content doesn't work very well yet is that it's not practical to charge small amounts. The cost and hassle of electronic transactions makes it impractical to charge less than a fairly high subscription rate.

> But within a year the mechanisms will be in place that allow content providers to charge just a cent or a few cents for information. If you decide to visit a page that costs a nickel, you won't be writing a check or getting a bill in the mail for a nickel. You'll just click on what you want, knowing you'll be charged a nickel on an aggregated basis.

> This technology will liberate publishers to charge small amounts of money, in the hope of attracting wide audiences.

> Those who succeed will propel the Internet forward as a marketplace of ideas, experiences, and products-a marketplace of content.

I wonder what happened to the future of 1996..
TIS-100 is a nice step up from human resource machine while keeping the feedback.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/370360/TIS100/
And if you are not only working with DBs you can get it bundled with their IDEs. Eg phpstorm has most of datagrip functionality built in.
> Many (most?) doctors work as if their knowledge was exact and exhaustive

No they don't. They try to give you the best advice that they can at that point in time. But I've never met a medical professional who thought they knew everything and anything.

What are you saying is really quite rude and dismissive.
100k is completely unrealistic for a German software engineer, especially after only a couple of years.
I think the word you are looking for is multimodal.
There are more alternatives to "violence, politics and risque" than Hallmark. For instance Apple wants to produce a Foundation series based off Isaac Asimov's work.

Even Morman TV, which is similarly prudish, has the freedom to create exciting stories, like Extinct.
It's a shame because the Centriq[0] was objectively an excellent and very fast chip. Last year I was doing make -j46 kernel builds[1], but even single core performance felt better than Xeon. And then they dropped it out of the blue in about May this year.

[0] Codenamed Hawker and Amberwing, based on the Falkor core: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/qualcomm/microarchitectures/fal...

[1] https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2017/11/20/make-j46-kernel-builds...
Could you buy a cheap PAYG SIM and MMS the photos to another phone?
Can you use it while asleep? There is one breastpump out there that claim it can be worn like a bra and you can pump while sleeping (so, laying on bed). That gives a much bigger advantage.

Also, what's the quality of the pumping? Is it hospital grade?

Price range?
lol, for people from the US it probably is the definition of shock value
No disagreement there, just pointing out that a) a simple failuee rate percentage is insufficient and b) one should not discard Arian out of hand based on SpaceX hype alone. Again, SpaceX did an incredible job, no doubt there. Doesn't change the reliability numbers of the last launches. And yes, ultimately SpaceX will catch-up. And then we can have discusion about the reliability of the Falcon Heavy or BFR vs. the new Ariane rocket. Hopefully giving Ariane the same benfit of doubt in case SpaceX is further down in the rocket life cycle for a comparable rocket. ;)
Maybe this:

“the Qualcomm Centriq 2400 features up to 48 Qualcomm Falkor cores—our custom Armv8-based CPU core”

https://www.qualcomm.com/products/server-processors
Hi Jon! Thanks so much for this. Works amazing!
I really like the look and feel of Text and Merge. What UI libraries do you use?
You can use a lot of missiles to destroy any spacecraft easily, while creating a big mess. But this is not really true for the deorbiting part: satellites are not planned for high velocity impact. So either you have a low velocity impact but you delta-v is not high enough to change significantly the orbit of the debris, or you go full speed into it, and explode everything into thousands of small debris, with very random orbit.

The net is just a technique to catch a debris. After it is caught, you have many different ways of deorbiting: either the net has a solar sail and deploy it, or it has a small propulsion system and uses it, or if you hook the net to your de-orbiter, you can use the tether as a sling to release the debris in a shorter life orbit while your de-orbiter is raised to another orbit where it can find its next debris (the most promising system, but the sling part will be quite difficult to master)
there is one for the little mler.
1. You pay to see a doctor. You weren't forced to. You chose to.

2. You tell them you read about your condition on the internet. Even though the majority of the health information on the internet is utter garbage.

3. You then get offended when they tell you to not trust what is on the internet. Although again they are 100% spot on here.

4. You are confused why they are dismissive of you. When you chose to see them, paid money for their expert advice and then wanted to dismiss it in favour of your expert advice. Except that your expert advice = 5 mins of Google and theirs = 20 years of schooling.

I really do feel really sorry for GPs to have to go through this 100x a day.
Researcher Discloses New Zero-Day Affecting All Versions of Windows
> I'm sorry but you are embracing yourself.

I do love embracing myself.

In all seriousness, I am already aware and have seen everything you have posted. Nothing that I have said is wrong.

> So, yes, it doesn't exists yet but they are very clearly building it and working on it right now.

It is ingenuine at best to post things like this on twitter: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1043250540379926528

When they don't even have a launch vehicle yet, let alone a man-rated launch vehicle. Not to mention the other billion challenges in a crewed 7+ month flight. These are some of the challenges in human certification: https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/npg_img/N_PR_8705_002C_/N_PR_87...

Hell, forget BFS, Dragon2 isn't even human certified and isn't expected to be human certified till 2020 as per the U.S government.

> Your constant claims that everybody is just "drinking the Kool aid" and your the only one smart enough to understand what is really going on is just false. I and others understand exactly what SpaceX current capabilities are, what they are doing in the short term and what they are devloping in the longer term. That's why we are exited.

I am not the only skeptic calling bullshit on Elon's premature announcements. Also, just look at some of the comments in response to his twitter announcement about Mars base alpha.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2016/9/30/13099898/ma...

BTW, I think you're the one "embracing" yourself with the number of typos in your comment.
Given that Chrome on Android doesn’t support extensions and thus no ad/privacy blockers, it might as well not exist and Firefox is for me the only game in town due to supporting uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger.

Scrolling is irrelevant for me.
They do produce original research during university.

And you have a warped view of what Doctors are. They are not Research Scientists. They are not there to try out cutting edge techniques and medicines. They are not there to be the world's foremost knowledge on everything medical.

They are there to give you conservative, boring advice vetted by the authorities for specific ailments. Anything more serious they recommend you to see specialists.
> has always been readily available on the government's end

Exactly, the government, not some company that is building a database full of personal info connected to proper face-scans. This data is very valuable for advertisers/other ill-willed companies.