skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is similar to what is presented in Minsky's Society of Mind. What you're calling archetypes, he calls agents.

Question for you...I agree with your observer idea. But why have an observer? What purpose does it serve? Couldn't we make do as just a collection of agents?
Biometric photos which can be used by two people
> You don’t install Visual Studio on your build server.

Ah, you never used Enterprise frameworks with VS plugins it seems.

The joy of building Sharepoint plugins

.NET applications are for the customers, not for running on our computers.

Before it went open source we surely needed Studio to do any kind of meaningful development and respective production deployments.
And even if you don't do it ... chances are a friend of your already has so your contact info is already burned.
I have been a Firefox user for years. I have realized that in spite of it being more open, it is absolutely necessary to keep up to date with what Mozilla is up to. E.g. came across this today - https://blog.ungleich.ch/en-us/cms/blog/2018/08/04/mozillas-...
Regarding western media, I can't say I get that impression in my corner of western europe; the image I see is of a nice place with nice people, and a messed up government. Even the online newspaper comments are usually nice!
Very good article. My grandpa died from black lung as well. I never met him and that really sucks.

Work safety is not something given, it is almost always taken by the workers themselves.
yes, was trying to find a demo button ctrl+f'in for "demo" and "try it"
Easy way to convert NSF data file to PST file
Now it is very easy to access Lotus Notes data or emails into Outlook mail client, it is possible with a perfect conversion application where you can convert your NSF file data into PST file, So I suggest you the best application to convert your
Lotus Notes NSF file data to Outlook PST file in Easy steps, This is really very proficient and affordable conversion tool
that easily transfer all NSF files of Lotus Notes to Outlook PST format without altering any data.
Using this link you can try free demo: http://www.nsf-to-pst-converter.recoverydeletedfiles.com/
Facebook is adding the effort to teach student programming in the classes
I think it's a rather classic problem. Does it move? Is the arrow there the same arrow as it was here? How did it get from here to there? The problem here is of course cutting time into intervals where the arrow (or the self) has a state. The problem (or myth) probably lies in the eye of the beholder.
I've used one of their lower end thinkpads (s540) and have gotten 4 years of use out of it doing Java work with vms and running a ton of things without issues on Ubuntu.

I've had next to no problems the whole time, second monitors,webcams,printers,sleeping have all worked straight out of the box.

I've flown upwards of 50 times with it during this period, dropped it, spilt water on it and it has survived it all (almost!). The only reason I'm even looking at replacements is I spilt a full litre of water on the keyboard and a few keys have died forever.

If you're looking for a good development machine I'd recommend the following ThinkPad lines:

* X range: Smallest and lightest, maxes out at 16gb ram (new X1 extreme doesn't but it is $$$$).

* P range: Most power in terms of CPU/Ram/GPU whilst being fairly portable.

* T range: IMO the sweet-spot between X and P. Portable but still with enough grunt, the T480 takes up to 32gb ram.
That's where GWAR came from, right?
This stuff never scales. No one can remember the class names, no one want's to search through the examples and style guides for a project, no one want's to standardise naming of their own hacks etc and so you start of with good intentions and end up with a lot of duplication and a whole lot of shit.

CSS is an expressive markup. You shouldn't try to turn it into programming.
That is already the status quo really from other forces. Repairing usually doesn't scale, automation allows for very fine details to join cheaper faster and better like soldering instead of ribbom connectors. Security by obscurity isn't.

Trade secrets are bullshit as a doctrine. Why is the rest of society obligated to protect not advancing at their own expense for the sake of private greed? The proper response to breech of trade secrets in a court of law should be "You never registered it for any sort of protection in exchange for disclosure and chose to keep it secret. Go to hell."
It's not supposed to tell you what it looks like. Why is it a goal to be able to tell exactly what something looks like from reading the markup?
https://www.android.com/market/terms.html is just a 404.
What I'm saying is you have files client-alice.css and client-bob.css, and you define different profile-card:hover rules in each. But with functional css you have nothing to hang your rules on.
Yes. Parental influence would be tough to deny. Normally developing children use modeling (imitation) to instruct their behavior.

This is why kids like to pretend to play kitchen or use a broom. They see you do it.

Anecdotally, I have seen children who have ‘bad attitudes’ do a 180 when the parents make an effort to model calmness and positivity. Anxious, stressed out or negative emotions in parents affect the kids.

In most settings, mood is contagious and is set by the leader. The catch is you have to keep it up.
Introducing Cloudflare Registrar: Domain Registration You Can Love
in much the same way that the pizza delivery driver could just drive home and take his truck and the pizzas.
Or that someone could 'just' rob an armoured truck taking money to a bank.

Why don't people do it? Generally, very few people commit crimes in the first place. Especially if you make it difficult, and extra-especially if they are backed up by rule of law in your country.
Best Application to convert NSF file to PST file
The smartest way to convert Lotus Notes to Outlook mail client is to use a best and smart software that can easily convert NSF
file to PST files. Such functionality is inbuilt within this Powerful software that performs an efficient conversion of NSF
database files into PST format. Exportation of the entire mailbox data from NSF database to MS Outlook. You can also try this effective Converter tool to convert NSF file emails item such as calendar, address book, draft, notes, meeting, task and Outbox
to Outlook PST file into PST file without facing any kind of problems. It has also facility to convert address book into several formats. I have also used this software before. According to my experience it is best software.
you can download this software from here: http://www.nsf-to-pst-converter.recoverydeletedfiles.com/
> That has now been replaced by a more detailed Code of Conduct - which retains the acronym, but attempts to be more inclusive and eliminate insulting and derogatory comments and behaviour.

To include only this short paragraph about the new CoC and omit any reference to the huge controversy this have generated in the community is extremely biased reporting on BBC's part.
I like Thiel because he:

1. As far as I know, mostly finances things without marketing hype.

2. Takes immortality research seriously. (Yo, get Countess Bathory on the phone). This is more important to me than space. Though I feel like any true advances will be kept under wraps.

3. Doesn't seek attention or hype and is reasonable about things. Frankly, the fact that he doesn't draw attention to the fact that he is gay is endearing - it's just irrelevant. Anderson Cooper type of deal.

I do question his bitter lawsuits, but I am too lazy to research the details.
Almost all countries has categories of clothing which is considered decent and proper based on culture and norms. The French law want extend which specific items should be excluded, while those opposing it want to include specific items. However it is not politically right to saying you want to exclude or include specific items in the set of decent and proper clothing, so what we get is one group making general laws that forbids "types" of clothing while having a disproportional effect that focus specific clothes, while the other side argues for general rights (religious or otherwise) but which never will be implemented in ways that actually removes the distinction between decent and proper, and indecent and improper clothing.
Using websockets to easily build GUIs for Python programs
I'm also based in Ireland, would you mind giving a range for what you consider 'silly' money? My impression is that Contracting works well at lower salaries but once you move into the higher tax bracket (40%) then the the disadvantages of contracting start to outweigh the benefits as most of the additional income is eaten up by tax.
99% of the typical .NET apps aren't buildable with that bundled compiler, due to lack of associated tooling, windows services and additional libraries.

Those free versions of Visual Studio weren't allowed for production when they were called Visual Studio Express.

Visual Studio Community only allows production use for companies up to 5 employees, with a specific yearly revenue. Better read the licenses.
Some people are true leaders; some people are true bullies. This is a free world, you can choose your role. I'm choosing to stay away from bullies.
>I’d define the term as more as a combination of somebody’s personality and how they act and think when not consciously trying to act differently.

This article is about how personality is shaped by memory, and how flawed memory is. I'd say that definition is fairly close to the one used in the article, and there being no "real self" supports the shift over time and need for outside views that you have noticed.
Today is the day I deleted last atomic class in my project. It was a long journey but it was worth it!
What I'm saying is that Business is different from Government/University.

If a Business is wrong, they go out of business.

If a University is wrong, they teach it for the next 10 years.

If a Government is wrong, they go forward with the policy until the next regime change.

One of these is different from the rest.
You were using the $100 USG?

https://unifi-xg.ubnt.com/usg-xg-8

https://www.ubnt.com/unifi-routing/unifi-security-gateway-pr...
People of multiple platforms dislike me for discrediting facebook. Simply talking about facts and what they could expect. They think they know it all. Some corps are good some are evil. People tend to forget that an evil person could also be your most trusted and reliable one. I work as a cyber security engineer and the things i have see flying by are crazy. The fact that information is sold without you4 knowledge is real. Its a dark world out there in disguise.
It's interesting that Torvalds describes himself as "not a people person", when he's a gifted communicator who has been tremendously successful at managing the community around Linux over many years. His current refinements are making a great thing even better.
If I recall correctly creating a Facebook account today requires a phone number. So, consider yourself lucky that you have the option to protect that bit of yourself.
The conflation of slavery with capitalism is too easy a target, so I'll address a highlight:

"what’s striking about capitalism is that we’re all trying to escape it — even most of the capitalists — because it makes us so miserable, mean, and foolish."

Philanthropy is not "escaping" capitalism. Going to mars is not "escaping" capitalism. Achieving financial independence is not "escaping" capitalism. These are all choices that are enabled via the autonomy that capitalism grants. Yes, some people are consumed solely by the pursuit of money, but capitalism is about choice, not money.

Many choose to exercise their capitalism-granted autonomy by giving things to others. There is absolutely nothing contradictory about charity in a purely capitalistic system, and is in fact, given that charity by definition is voluntary, only possible sans coercion.
If you read what Linus himself had to say about it, it seems like BBC was honoring his interest in not having this piece contribute to the shouting match.
He's an uncut (but polished) diamond, a bit rough around the edges but trully brilliant.
I actually initially thought it was a reference to http://functionalcss.com/ where you use CSS in place of JavaScript.
There are like dozens of hypothesized particles outside of the standard model. The standard model is not the be all and end all of physics as we know it.
Biased towards what, exactly?
Honestly, considering how cheaply you can implement this (I resurrected an unused OrangePiZero), how easily it can be used (just plug it into a router LAN socket), it's crazy that the creators aren't actively looking to monetize this
I'm not particularly good at identifying satire, but this is a joke, right?

I mean, the ONE BEST THING about CSS is its ability to promote consistent styling across a site by creating REUSABLE, NAMED styles that are SEMANTIC and applying them consistently.

Let us run through the author's claimed list of advantages:

> You don't have to write any CSS of your own (which, to me, is fantastic)

This one is an obvious troll.

> You can likely build things faster (obviously non-scientific, but anecdotally I've seen many people confirm this)

The combination of "likely" and "obviously non-scientific" undermines this claim (and rightly so) in the middle of making it.

> You don't ever have to think about naming things

Again, I presume this is a troll. Naming things is hard if you care about having meaningful names. If you don't care, then naming is trivial. This approach eliminates meaningful names so it is hardly a benefit.

> You can tell what something looks like by just reading the markup for it

That one is an actual advantage, and makes me wonder slightly what's going on.

> You don't ever have to worry that changing the styles for one thing will break something else (which may make visual regression testing irrelevant)

Another obvious troll. If you never reuse anything, you'll never have to worry about a change breaking anything else. Also true if you never change anything. Also completely meaningless.

> You never have to deal with one instance of a thing needing a slightly different style than the other instances, which screws up your reusable classes.

True enough... if you never reuse anything, then you never need to worry about the impacts of reuse.

> Your CSS always stays the same size rather than expanding over time

Well, sure! If you move all of the intent out of the CSS file and into longer and more complex style attributes, then the CSS file itself will get shorter (while the length of the CSS file PLUS the style attributes will get longer).

> It's easy to un-apply a style by just removing the class (as opposed to the traditional cascade where you typically have to override, adding even more CSS)

This isn't even well-considered. Using a fixed set of single-visual-effect-not-semantic-intent styles will have no effect on the complexity of cascading. Choosing to apply styles only to individual elements and eschew the use of cascading WILL avoid all the complexity of cascading, but the choice to do that is independent.

> Rendering speed performance is supposedly improved (though I have seen no proof of this)

There is no reason this would be true, and the author isn't even claiming it.

After reading it through, I am beginning to seriously doubt that this was intended as satire. In which case the author is very, VERY wrong. I continue to hope that I am simply missing the joke.
The article has no photograph of the "badgir" (wind catcher). I had to search and see a few photographs to appreciate the design.
No, I took this job to free people from having to do unnecessary work.

I just wish it resulted in people having more choice in how to use their time, rather than cutting regular people out of their livelihood and concentrating wealth.
What Is the Difference Between Web Development and Web Design
First of all, yes the languages have a ISO copyright, that you are supposed to pay for if you want to get ISO document, even in PDF.

Any compiler writer that wants to write a conformant implementation needs to buy the ISO document, otherwise there is no guarantee that the compiler is actually ISO compliant.

Additionally most compiler vendors that care about ISO certification need to pay extra to companies that sell ISO validation suits like Dinkumware.
Both "solutions" don't address the problem of repeated class names, they just help repeating them in a correct but not less obscene way. Bloated markup cannot be defended.
> since the code is now in ring 0, you get all the consequences of that

No you don't. Because WASM does not provide many of the facilities that real assembly provides. So, for instance, there is no way to stack-smash using WASM instructions, regardless of the any security problems in the code itself, or even outright malicious code. It just can't do it.

More generally for VMs, there are secure VMs which provide a mathematical proof that the code will, for instance, observe memory safety. Such a proof is much better than ring-level protection, because :

1) You can verify the proof. Good luck verifying the hardware implementation of ring-level security in processors

2) It doesn't take any resources at runtime

3) the proof can be verified at code load time, so insecure code (accidentally insecure or otherwise) just doesn't start executing, ever

4) It doesn't allow for manufacturers to hide "secure coprocessors" or any other bullshit like that
I'm glad I'm not fussing with Linux on the desktop. Far too expensive.
I came here to ask what it was, this comment was super valuable and resonated ( gimp is awesome and difficult).
Hey, I've been using Rancher for a year, and I love it.

Just wanted to bring your attention to a YouTube channel from Rancher Labs, where "Learning Rancher" videos are posted regularly. But the content is all the same: boring 10min intro to every video, after which developers go through the same stuff, painfully slowly. Is it meaningful to produce this kind of content over and over again? IMO there are already way better Rancher tutorials by indian dudes on YouTube.

I've started with k8s thanks to Rancher, and I presume that the vast majority of Rancher users are doing the same. Rancher without k8s does not make sense, and it seems to me that k8s stuff is actively avoided in docs and tutorials. Maybe it would be better to make a series of tutorials on Rancher+k8s, and go through concrete topics like networking and CI?
Unfortunately, I have no idea which studies GP has in mind and what exactly they measured (whether things related to what I observed or something entirely else), age of kids in question, whether parents had significantly different approaches etc.

I don't think there is scientific a consensus on this yet. I strongly doubt that there is reasonable study that would make the split 50%, 50%, 0%. It is too round, too nice to be true.
This is what I don't understand, who hires a lawyer to represent them and then gives them an open remit to go after anyone and everything?

At some point I would have thought, heads of creative or marketing would be going, "so what's our customer base saying about us lately? Oh, everyone's angry because of something our lawyers did, maybe I should look into that before we lose more valued fans."

Is there some enshrined rule somewhere that says, "Lawyers get to burn the house down, if they're doing it there's probably some complicated legal reason. Ho hum."

Are people like John Van Citters the apparent "CBS Vice President for Product Development" holding vanity positions that have no real power in the company so the organisation doesn't feel the need to back any statements they make?

Or is it just that fans need to learn the lesson, "feel free to enjoy what we give you, just not enough to make anything too much like it, or we'll hit you with a lawyer"?
Reimagining of Schrödinger's Cat Breaks Quantum Mechanics
This is more of a question than a critique on your comment, but:

Couldn't he still not be a people person _(perhaps a poor communicator)_, and still manage a successful community? I say that because historically it's been a bit of a meme around how forceful and abrasive Linus is. Yet, he's often right, or at the very least very informed.

He's a very smart man who has done very smart things. I'm not sure if the Linux community inherently means he's a gifted communicator. Eg, I don't think I could behave like Linus and make a Linux-like community - I think his talent and intelligence carry his lack of communication skills. Which is not a discredit to him, we're all different.

Thoughts?
Not before someone else is willing to fork over hundreds of millions of dollars to sponsor Java. OpenJDK is Big Open Source. The majority of the hundreds of developers building it[1] do it as their day job, and the vast majority of those are employed by Oracle (and others by Red Hat, IBM, Intel and others). Oracle has sponsored OpenJDK for the last 8-9 years, and has now completed open sourcing all of the previously closed bits of the JDK, some dating back to Sun, and some to BEA's JRockit (JFR, now part of OpenJDK 11), not to mention all the new work on the language and JVM including new GCs like ZGC and the new compiler, Graal (I just hope you don't feel too exploited by all this). Companies like Amazon, Netflix, Google, Twitter, Apple and many, many others (some of them have even forked OpenJDK internally) have not contributed significantly, despite depending so heavily on OpenJDK.

So, like it or not, this is the reality of open source. A lot of companies are happy to use it freely but less happy to contribute the significant resources necessary to build it.

(I work at Oracle on OpenJDK, but I speak only on behalf of myself)

[1]: http://openjdk.java.net/census
I have no regrets as such on choosing this profession, since its been a passion since the very first time I saw a computer. The regret however, is doing this for over 6 years now and not having upgraded with a post graduate degree i.e either a MS or MBA. This gradually becomes a regret when I see my colleagues from engineering having moved on to higher or better positions financially.
As a frontend developer of 15-20 years now I've been pretty dumbfounded and unconvinced by any arguments for this style of css, I think it's especially hard for frontend developers of such duration because this is effectively the first ever style of css you write, and then you were force fed xhtml, semantic web and then later responsive became the "Told you so!" of the methodology.

Despite my scepticism of extremes of semantic web, I realise now when I read articles talking about switching to this style of css, their problems are entirely unrelatable to me because I implicitly see the conceptual structure of a design vs its visual specifics.

This just feels like a new age of developers don't see the need for the abstraction and so it's a constant mental burden for them without any benefit.. I think what has propped this up is that some of the problems that semantic css has historically only ever been able to solve (such as responsive) are now being solved differently, either through more powerful css layouts that implicitly layout better responsively, or that they rely instead on javascript to switch classes/html/components out with media query listeners.

Ultimately I think whatever you decide should be based on what your team aligns to best, don't feel guilty about 'not getting' this pattern, but I think it's important you pick one way, as mixing these worlds just doesn't work (at a project level), but certainly you should always try new things for new projects or experiments.
Concrete boats.
Are there examples of other fields being so staunchly/abusively conservative? I'm struggling to imagine a physicist, engineer, or attorney being forced to undergo a mental examination for suggesting a radical new theory or procedure.
> And I think Apple made it "easier to use SMS 2FA" in iOS 12 for the same reason.

Wait. You think Apple is selling your phone number to advertisers?