skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Likewise, .sh domains are pretty popular but an incredible pain to deal with. I managed to transfer mine to Hover, but it's expensive and buggy (you can't update your registration address, for example; you get an "internal server error").
Signing an NDA is required just to write apps to run on the Switch? What are your thoughts on this practice?
>> I mean, the comparison should be against the stock market, not high grade corporate bonds.

A pension fund has ongoing annual liabilities, so they cannot invest a majority of their assets into the stock market because they cannot afford to suddenly lose 40% of their assets. That is why they are usually spread across asset classes and have a lot in corporate debt (which are providing more than US Gov debt, but have higher returns are almost never suddenly lose 30% or 40% value across the board.)
I said it before, but: ever read War and Peace? I think you could easily adapt Tolstoy's thesis to business: executives are mostly there to ratify the decisions their subordinates made on the spot. Tolstoy stakes out the most extreme position, but I think we could at least say executive control is more attenuated than executives would like to believe.
Landmark Court Decision Impacts Businesses Everywhere
http://www.thesuccessfulcontractor.com/coachs-corner-a-plumb...
Because taking a company private is material to investors and he screwed overa lot of people by lieing.
So you think slow websites are such a terrible problem that you are willing to sacrifice (other) peoples' perfomance, just to teach someone a lesson?

Your idea alone disproves the problem: You are upset that nobody is actually hurt by these transgressions against your esthetic sensibilities. So you want to force some actual harm onto the public until they indulge your special little fight for justice (and bandwith).
We provide email support to all of our customers. I believe free customers see a response within 8 hours on average (we have teams in SF, Austin, London, and Singapore, to cover every timezone). That 8 hours can become as little as 30 minutes for customers who also subscribe to our Pro or Business plans, or use our Custom Domain Security product.
> My main question about cryptocurrencies has always been the "faster, cheaper" thing. Last I heard it was pretty expensive to do a bitcoin transaction, and slow. The quote thrown around:

It's not about global network tps – it's about being able to dependably move money anywhere in the world in a timely fashion without having to rely on another party to take custody of it and greenlight it, regardless of amount.
What are the odds that someone dumb enough to install this would be scared off by an insecure site warning?
> You’re being hugey reductive

Like a dictionary? It's just semantics
zizek says that the book of job is the first critique of ideology, and he calls himself a christian atheist because he thinks becoming an atheist is only possible by going through christianity.

so you have it exactly backwards. or maybe not, who the hell knows with hegelians.
I think what he means is that it seems like a lot of trouble to hack someone who is not necessarily hackworthy? Like what kind of things would you expect to gain from someone who would be as computer illiterate as to allow all that to come to fruition?
> Are there any previous examples of someone doing something similar to what Musk did and the punishments they received?

If you look at the facts of what Musk did...yes, there are literally hundreds if not thousands of examples, and they mostly go to jail or face, as Musk is, stiff civil penalties. It's pretty clearly fraud; he made false statements, which he knew or should have known were false, and he did so with the intention of manipulating his firm's share price. That's open and shut, and Musk hasn't really tried to deny it.

> compared to the slap on the wrist that many people were predicting.

If you squint a bit, there's a lot of reasons why what Musk did "feels" different. Maybe you think he had good intentions; maybe you think he was stressed. Maybe he was on medication that interfered with his cognitive abilities, maybe he's just a great guy, maybe the fact he wasn't financially profiting from the fraud makes it different, maybe Tesla is just really cool, maybe short sellers are just really unsympathetic, maybe this somehow just doesn't "count". All of those are plausible reasons why the SEC might give him at least a partial pass, and a lot of commenters were sort of expecting that it would happen.

But fundamentally, the legal system says that what he did actually is really bad. CEOs of public companies who lie about material events in order to manipulate their share price are committing a serious crime, which is why outside of penny stocks and scammers, they never do that. Even if they were tempted, their legal team would tackle them and sit on them until the urge to set their career and company on fire faded, and the legal team would have the opportunity to do that because other CEOs don't just tweet whatever occurs to them, in large part because they know that's super dangerous, because this exact thing could happen.

It's hard to overstate how unusual Tesla and Musk's behaviour here is for a multi-billion dollar company. Other companies of this size only communicate to investors through carefully vetted press releases, which is boring, but makes sure they don't accidentally step on a landmine. Tesla (or Musk) chose a different path, and here we are.
Riding Solo to the Top of the World (2006) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0903013/

The Atomic Cafe (1982) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083590/

At Sea (2007) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1829648/

The Vietnam War (2017) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1877514/

Lessons of Darkness (1992) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0104706/

Tim's Vermeer (2013) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3089388/

Weiner (2016) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5278596/

Jodorowsky's Dune (2013) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1935156/

Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379357/

The Art of Japanese Life (2017) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7002974/

The Great Happiness Space: Tale of an Osaka Love Thief (2006) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0493420/

The Triumph of the Nerds: The Rise of Accidental Empires (1996) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0115398/

The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst (2015) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4299972/
> Am I supposed to strictly segment everything?

To be honest, I found that easier than prudence and caution. New access point, stick all my IoT devices on there, then I don't have to particularly worry about what they are doing, they can't access anything interesting anyway (no outbound traffic, inbound traffic is only allowed from one device on my LAN).
relational databases are secretly supposed to be logic programming languages like prolog, each “table”, (relation) representing a predicate function. each row (tuple) representing a fact about the world that satisfies the predicate. with proper structure and labelling you can ask very sophisticated questions. somewhere along the line people forgot this and typically just dump spreadsheets in, to satisfy the fields in a form or an app screen, then think they need a graph database to represent relationships. it is unfortunate that SQL based systems became accidentally synonymous with the “relational model” as it actually mostly gets in the way of implementing the relational model. oh well.
Pure Binance Clone script
There were several things in addition to the adjustments they made to the clock frequency curve others have mentioned.

There were a couple of fixes in Autolayout constraint resolution that were at least quadratic but are now linear.

The prefetching in table views was optimized to make scrolling them smoother.

A lot of RAM is saved by big improvements to the backing stores for image resources.

They made app launching faster.

The on screen keyboard comes up faster, and they made it respond to typing faster.

Opening the camera from the lock screen has been made faster.
It sure looks that way. I'd argue he wants it to succeed but this is what happened. 1/ A few years back he looked at all the strategies available to him to run the business. 2/ He found the one that screwed the most people and looked greediest. 3/ He chose that one.
12TB is only about $7000 in chips. I buy them for my own products. There’s a lot of ancillary things you need but raw dimms aren’t anywhere near that experience.
Someone on Capitol Hill Just Doxxed Republican Senators
Tony Stark in real life
Best Smm Panel Script with Free Services
Just had a follow up from Ted.
He says that legal received a complaint but ignored it, and perhaps the leak vector was via historical whois data.
Historical whois data says otherwise. Hard to draw a firm conclusion apart from the facts.
What are the odds they got paid?
A $40 drone is usually an under 2” device that fits in the palm of your hand with an operating range of under 100ft and barely can be used outdoors (due to wind). I’ve had similar size devices fly into me (including in the face) and I didn’t even get scratched, let alone remotely hurt.

If it hits your windscreen, you were more likely driving where you shouldn’t be rather than someone with a literal kids toy doing something wrong.
Yeah, that's mostly because wordpress is a dog. It really uses a lot of resources to serve the smallest of content. We use a CDN, a caching layer, and object caching in both wordpress and php, to make our site perform even half-way decently.
> Bitcoiners have settled on the fact that nobody is in charge. Bitcoin Cashers are still arguing about who's going to be in power.

Bitcoiners are silenced as soon as they start asking questions. Bitcoin Cashers have carried on with the original experiment and are currently trying to figure out governance.
Because it'd be more expensive and complicated, and thus nobody would buy that stuff. Was slightly different at some points in the past, where more enthusiasts had them, but back then CPU speed was something that really mattered for consumers. + market segmentation: if you really need multiple CPUs, you likely are willing to pay for it.
> He made it sound like he just constantly engineers things, but I find it hard to believe that at any point he's sitting down with CAD and fluid dynamic applications and mapping out experiments for rocket prototypes.

Ah. That's where you're getting it wrong. He's hired a bunch of people to do deal with the noise, so he can focus on the signal.

Yup.
https://gmail.com.inbox-redirect.pro

This will seem like a valid website, especially if the phishing site is done well. Not just non-technical users, I'd wager some tech familiar users would be fooled too.

The focus always being on the lock icon might not always cover it.

Safari will prevent this though.
He didn’t screw anyone over. Wall street gamblers lost money, and our culture coddles Wall Street bros like helpless babies.

Traders who lost money wouldn’t have had the stock to trade without Elon in the first place!
Is this somehow tied to SBCL, or generally useful across all implementations (e.g. Lispworks) ?
You are wrong. Apple’s pace of innovation has slowed dramatically. This latest phone is but one example.

Here is what would have happened under Jobs:

http://magarshak.com/blog/?p=234
I've noticed a pattern in among python developers where the faux pas of assigning a lambda is used to signify "I'm going to use this function in a vaguely functional programming manner". For example, by passing it into map, or filter, or sorted.

For this reason, I don't really mind it. It's a sort of cue to the reader about the style of programming that will follow.
This is how quite a few State parks in California came to pass. I'd rather that enduring preservation is the long-term result even if it is some rich person's oversized backyard for a while.
Personally, I don't doubt intent. But "Beyond a reasonable doubt", as well as the necessity for a "malice" in the DoJ's case makes me think that... the DoJ has way too hard of a case to pull together.

I mean, I might be proven wrong. But... showing off a couple of rage tweets in court to prove malice doesn't seem plausible to me. Would a Jury of 12 (and remember: all 12 have to agree) be convinced over a couple of "who likes short-shorts" tweets?

If a SINGLE jury member, 1 out of the 12, disagrees, then you get a hung case aka a mistrial. As per the rules of the DoJ investigation anyway. That's why I don't think the DoJ will go anywhere, because proof and evidence is at a way harder standard in a criminal case.
I never thought I’d ever love to see both a contradiction and a confirmation embodied in a single statement. Thank you!
A $40 quad won't fly that high or far. We're talking about something that fits in the palm of your hand, here. These things weigh like 30 grams.
When a URL is manually typed in, and HSTS or HSTS-preloading isn't enabled, the initial 301 redirect would be http.
> they said I missed a requirement and that it was a “big f’ up”

It's free to say things, doesn't make it true. Too often we assume because someone is in a position of power - or is wealthy - that whatever they say must be true. It's not. Sure, we have to nod our heads and pretend it is to keep the job but that still doesn't change the reality.

Shit rolls down hill with exponential momentum. I've seen many instances where a CEO says something innocuous like "I'm a bit disappointed in X" but by the time it gets to someone that can fix it the management in between transformed it from a simple comment into a condemnation. People like to exaggerate things to make something seem more important or impactful than it really is.

There's also a big difference between an interview and dealing with work everyday. I know plenty of people that shine under the pressure of interviews but not under the job itself (and visa versa). You cannot determine these things about a person from an interview. Period. Performance in an interview has very little correlation to job performance (if any).

> you really need people who can keep their wits about themselves.

I need a diverse group of people that I can collaborate with to get things done. If they can't keep their wits about, it's my job to deal with that issue and get them back on track and protect them from organizational crap. Might as well expect every girl or guy you date to be a model with a PhD.
Apple had issues like this when Jobs was there too. He's the reason "You're holding it wrong" is a common phrase
My theory here is really sloppy, but in this topic I think there are two concepts worth examining:

* Baudrillard's ideas on the hyperreality, which is basically a simulation that doesn't actually relate to any underlying reality. He argued that a lot of the signs and symbols in our postmodern society have become hyperreal, purely manufactured artifacts.

* Deleuze's concept of virtuality which he defines as something isn't actual, but is nevertheless real.

Is a virtual reality any less real than physicality? If sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic, then sufficiently advanced artificial reality might be indistinguishable from reality.
There is one daughter board per socket but it is a single system.
I can only think of Elon as the only person to create THREE multi billion dollar companies in wildly different industries.

Elon is a fantastic CEO AND visionary. I personally know people who could be making double specifically work at spacex because they believe in his vision. Elon is able to get Supreme talent and productivity for pennies on the dollar. He’s able to market Tesla and spaceX to billions with such a positive favoriability unlike anything we’ve ever seen. SpaceX and Tesla don’t have a marketing budget because of Elon. Car companies spend billions marketing, Elon tweets saving billions for Tesla which he reinvests in r&d.

The entire world will lose if Elon is forced out. He’s the biggest fighter for climate change and space travel in modern history, greater than Al Gore in marketing and execution, greater than Buzz Aldrin, Tyson, and cosmos. I’d much rather have an honest relatable Elon Musk than a suit. I’d rather have creativity than suffocating structure.

Elon is a great CEO. I would pick him over almost anyone alive.
Not parent post, but to me, Nim is very easy to write coming from Python. For virtually zero effort, I can get near C speeds in a tiny self-contained executable.

Rust is probably more mature (more users) but requires me learning a lot of low level concepts. If you already know Python and just want fast code and easy deployment, Nim might be a better choice. Crystal is similar for Ruby users.
Still need task manager though
It happens so often to me that I'm not sure if I'm a human or a bot.
You can't take the day to day price variance of Bitcoin as an indicator of anything at all. It is completely unpredictable and yes, if you intend to spend your money tomorrow, it is not the right currency for you.

I'm not intending to give investment advice. People can take what they want from my comments. If you're waiting for the price to stabilize before you "invest" in Bitcoin, then I hate to tell you, but you're probably going to be paying a premium on it. The price of Bitcoin is only going to rise in the long term, and the earlier you get in, the less you'll be paying for it.

Hacked exchanges and fraud have nothing to do with Bitcoin as a store of value. It's a case of bad security and decision making. Gold will also not retain it's value for you if you leave it lying on your lawn. If you take the necessary steps to make your Bitcoin secure and fault tolerant, they can be more robust against any kind of attack than Gold or cash.
This misses two important points about interchange fees. First, is that fees already vary based on fraud potential, with higher fees charged for online transactions than in-person PIN and chip transactions.

Second, a large portion of the interchange fees are remanants of older less-digitized systems. The surplus from improved systems has been transferred into benefits for consumers in preference to reducing the cost to retailers (rewards points, extended warranties, bundled insurance, and extension do credit to riskier classes of borrowers). There have been class-action lawsuit launched by retailers in Canada and the US which sought redress on high fees, but only resulted in modest anti-trust actions (eliminating the clauses that disallowed retailers to give discounts for paying with cash, or charging a surcharge to customers who use rewards cards that carry higher fees for instance).

Contra to this is the example of Australia which took a regulatory approach and capped interchange fees at a level that allowed banks to cover thier costs, including fraud (a fraction of the fees in North America). This resulted an massive reduction of rewards programs, and greatly reduced the fees paid by retailers.

TL;DR: the costs associated with credit card fees is an accident of history and contingent on the actions taken or not taken by regulators. They have less to do with fraud or the cost of processing transactions than most people assume.

Reference (though there are better ones with more detail if you dig around for reports from the Australian government): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interchange_fee#Australia_and_...
The variability in value already killed it for everyone else. The only other people who would even consider a cryptocurrency are the drug dealers, and XMR took over that market.
Some might argue the opposite, that said I agree that the way many people approach religion makes it basically equal to an ideology.

But you can approach religions as a topic in countless ways, so I think it is fair not to reduce it to the lowest (albeit maybe most common...) approach people have
Blockchain for Business – Interview with Petko Petkov, Lead Dev on Ardor and NXT
Saying 1 Bitcoin is 1 Bitcoin isn't sensible. 1 dogecoin is 1 dogecoin. Hey, I have a currency, chrisbucks. There will only ever be 6 chrisbucks. Want one?
Bitcoin does not need governance. That's your problem.

It has a better model, which is every user is autonomous and has the volition to choose the software they wish to run to interact with the economy they wish to participate in.

Governance inherently means you want some people to tell other people how to behave.
The theoretical "go private" option under current circumstances is probably out. Tesla would have to rely on Regulation D[0] to privately place its securities in connection with going private. Being deemed a "Bad Actor" with respect to Tesla could eliminate that option as long as Musk is still a "Covered Person", which includes directors and executives, and, importantly, large owners of the issuer[1]. As SpaceX presumably relies on Regulation D to place its securities, this may have also already implicated SpaceX's ability to rely on Regulation D going forward.

[0] https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answers-regdhtm.html
[1] https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6a9b59e7-1b37...
Now there's also Blokada which is a little bit better (found it to block some ads that DNS66 actually let through; it was a random discovery, I am not a researcher).
Do you know where he writes about that? I'd be interested to read more.
I wish “your data fits in memory”[0] was still up.

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9581862
Thanks for the clarification -- I wasn't aware that clustered and non-clustered modes were stored differently on disk. I stand corrected.
It could just be a 3xx redirect over clear http, right? The http site can redirect to a https site with a similar name.
And, perhaps more importantly, Cloudflare admitted that was a mistake and promised that it wouldn't happen again. (IIRC.)
this sounds like me. I spend more time looking at a thesaurus than I do CSS articles
For someone not American, can you explain the significance of this?
Show HN: Kuku: python template tool for k8s
Wefunder (YC W13) Is Hiring a Full-Stack Software Engineer
Good work... I'd been rolling my own configuration by hand, I may give another look at create-react-app in the future. Good on them for dropping IE9-11 support by default. Lack of generators+async is a pretty big issue imho as the transforms and fills are pretty significant in terms of size/overhead. For a while I had been doing two build targets, one for modern es2017+ and one for older IE9+ browser. Recently dropping IE altogether.
Funny that Redis has en edit distance of 2 with certain word... and also rhymes with it.
> Facebook is a shitty project.

Hard to take you take this seriously with a comment like that. It's a technical marvel what they've accomplished and at the scale they've been able to take it. I'm not a fan myself, but I'm not going to crap on what they've pulled off because I don't like the service.
I think also he's applying many forms of incremental improvement all at once, and also in a field where the other players are stultified.

To some degree, you could say the same criticisms about Linus Torvalds (or, say, Rob Pike).
Well with Bitcoin it's trivial to prove that a transaction went through, and you'd only pay for 5 computers if you carelessly transmitted a transaction without reading the amount.
In the days when USB sticks were more common it was an easy tactic for someone to drop one in a company parking lot labeled “salary data” and with almost certainty that thing would get plugged into a device on the corporate network. The biggest security vulnerability in most cases is still users doing dumb things.
Sure it's not a western religion but it's a religion.

If you remove all the cosmology and mysticism from Buddhism, you are left with something other than the original practice.
Even literal garbage has some good in it. It's just usually not worth the effort of extracting it.
It's not the insights, I think piwik got that part right. The problem is when traffic increased piwik and the server it was on could no longer support it.
Elon has wasted capital, both political and economic; this I can't argue with. I agree with the mission, not the man's behaviors, but have also lived long enough to recognize what a necessary evil is.