Well, since Jim has taken it upon himself to speak on my behalf ("developers want more options ") allow me to rebut:

No, Jim. Developers do not want more options. Developers want a well engineered, single platform with excellent development tools and support, so that their code can target hundreds of millions of devices without any customization. Specifically, developers do not want more "options", because every "option", which from what I can tell is code for yet-another-me-too-iPhone ripoff with a random screen size and configuration and very limited storage capacity means an order of magnitude more headaches for anyone doing anything more significant than a twitter client (excluding, of course, the really well designed twitter clients who would also have this problem, such as twitteriffic.)

Developers want an appstore with reliable terms. Developers don't want to pay outrageous fees for the "privilege" of selling software on your platform. You may have reformed, by copying apple's better terms, but at least this developer-- who you purport to speak for-- remembers when your terms were disgustingly hostile. Some developers have a memory.

Developers want a store where there are a lot of customers, happy to buy apps, and happy to do business with us. I can't count the number of happy letters I've gotten from satisfied customers. As a developer, I recognize that, while you may copy the appstore, and provide an SDK, you are not providing a developer experience anywhere close to the one Apple provides. Higher quality tools mean higher quality products and more letters from satisfied customers, and lower developer stress. What me-too products don't understand is that Apple products are not popular because they look good (the easiest thing for you to copy) they are popular because they work well. IF you're serious about developers, (and this goes for android as well) you'll start making good developer tools.

I do find it hilarious that people try to bash Apple by talking about how Apple doesn't have flash on their platform. How does? As far as I know adobe still hasn't managed to deliver a version of flash for mobile devices that doesn't suck, and it has been half a year since Steve called them out for it.

As to "customers want to fully access the overwhelming majority of web sites that use Flash", I have flash blocked in my browser, so this consumer doesn't want access to flash.

I must also be navigating the web very carefully since the "overwhelming majority of websites" don't seem to have any flash on them at all!

"We think many customers are getting tired of being told what to think by Apple. "

Apple has never told me what to think. Apple has simply told me what they think. You are now purporting to tell others what I think, without doing the courtesy of contacting me.

"even people inside the distortion field will begin to resent being told half a story."

I've been a fan of Apple since I got an Apple II nearly 30 years ago, and I am pretty sure I first heard the phrase "reality distortion field" sometime in the 1980s. Yet the reality is, I've never heard Apple distort anything. Apple has never promised me a product that didn't live up to the hype. Apple has never blatantly ripped off another companies product and pretended like they were innovating, like you have, RIMM.

But of course, what is so great about the "reality distortion field" phrase is that it is designed to denigrate and marginalize anyone who thinks different. Anyone who appreciates the extra-ordinary, and apparently beyond duplication effort of Apple to deliver a great customer experience is just a cult member incapable of thinking.

So, you'd have us believe that this reality distortion field has caused us to break with the majority, and go seek out a company that your kind has spent decades saying is a failure?

Was I imagining it yesterday when an Apple employee went above and beyond the call of duty to fix an issue for me that he didn't have to? Was it Steve's "reality distortion field" that has left me unhappy and feeling dissatisfied with so many competitor products that were purported, and even pretended to be the same thing? For instance, your poor quoality touch screen devices that you design to look like the iPhone but then cheap out on the hardware and software so it works nothing like the iphone.

Who was it engaging in distortion of reality, again?

One thing I will say about RIMM. You did a fantastic job when you named your company. Perfect name. Don't ever change it.