skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In a perfectly mathematically coherent version of Everett: https://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2211, the idea is to integrate out the wave function to get a mass density on 3 space. This mass density on 3-space is a mess at any particular moment, but one can witness its evolution over time to pick out particular correlated histories. There is no particular splitting into separate worlds. And, indeed, the whole picture of discrete spin measurements is misleading. It is always spatial measurement stuff ultimately going on and so plenty of smearing.

The relevant probabilities are not derived by number of "worlds". Pick some particular moment and correlated history, look backwards (what is recorded in the current "configuration") at experiments, and one should see the proper statistics appearing in the "vast majority" of experiences.

However, there will be plenty of experimenters who see wrong statistics. Everett predicts this with certainty. There is a "world", according to this, that just split from the moment I am writing this, in which all future experiments have spin up coming up 100% of the time from that moment on. Over time, we all end up correlated with this as the experimenters report their fantastical findings.

If they truly believe in Everett's theory, they would accept that they just happen to be in the branch where this happens. In Bohmian mechanics, they would say something else is going on. The odds of seeing something like that in Bohmian mechanics are so vastly, incomprehensibly small, that it is more likely to see cracked eggs reassembling themselves from random thermal motions. But in Everett, it happens with certainty to some universe.

This is the difference. Bohmian mechanics can be readily falsified based on statistical outcomes of experiments. Perhaps not with 100% certainty, but certainly with 100% practical certainty. Everett can never be falsified based on statistics. It could be falsified if something that was supposed to happen with a literal 100% certainty failed to happen, but with anything statistical, it simply can't because the theory says it does happen.

One could modify the theory to cut out the "outlier" worlds. This is, in some sense, what GRW with a mass density ontology does.
Brain Drain Within the EU?
You do know that men face the same "starvation level" wages outside of tech, no? (they're not really starvation-level, just pretty bad poverty...)

Human trafficking happens just because men are desperate for sex, especially with good looking, young women. And in the West they are willing to pay what are huge amounts for it, relative to salaries in Bulgaria. It would happen to men, too, if there was a market for it...
Life is messy an there are grey areas. That doesn't mean that the abstract concept has no meaning at all, Theranos is an example.
There is cppyy, which is cffi for c++. Boost python is not being maintained, in the cpython world pybind11 is more popular but cppyy is pypy freindly
This is incorrect. The Japanese were trying to negotiate surrender through the Russians, with their sole condition being that they could keep their Emperor. The Russians had not informed the USA.

The USA knew all of this, because they had cracked the Japanese codes and read their messages.

So yes, dropping the bombs was a straightforward attrocity.
tl;dr: It looks like there no opportunity for Italian scientists and engineers: they're all moving to Germany and the UK.
For the healthy improvement of programming language, it is vital to have a multiple independent and competing implementations. Python doesn't allow that.

For this, I think the Python will follow the same fate as Perl did.
Be careful, because the ways around the law would be possible for your opponents as well. This plan in particular sounds like an excellent way to get murdered by sniper bullet with a simultaneous full spectrum EW attack to prevent a killswitch signal getting out. Possibly accompanied by simultaneous SM-3 attacks on whatever you have in orbit.

And this is just one of the many many ideas. You would also need near perfect infosec to make sure your orbital weaponry doesn't get stolen away from you and you are the biggest, shiniest target imaginable.
the language server protocol doesnt support everything jetbrains does.

they can extend the server as much as they want, if the protocol doesn't support the additions, they'll be useless features unless they'll implement protocol extension, which could potentially be incompatible with the original... and they're back to the starting proposition.
There are many species that contain psilocybin. I don't know China at all, but I'd be surprised if some weren't endemic. So you'd need to do some research. I my experience, they tend to grow on cow shit. And they're somewhat unusual, in that they turn blue when bruised.
It's possible they book or publicize revenue like 'ad sales' in which they only take a commission. So their gross margins wouldn't be huge.
You can also don't use animation at all. I really don't like animations even when used correctly.
Are there any such people?

I tried to figure out what was going on from your story but it's like coming into the middle of a family fight that's been going on for years. The stuff they're currently arguing about is probably not how it started.

In particular PayPal says specifically in that article that they don't have any policies against ASMR (which apparently is mostly videos of women making weird sound effects?). So why are they suspending accounts, well presumably they think they're doing it for other reasons. The article goes on to talk about YouTube being "anti sex" or something so presumably there's more to these videos than is being let on.

At any rate, I think it's dumb that payment processors suspend accounts for sex-related stuff too, but that's at least something with a basis in US law so PayPal may feel they are legally forced to do it. FOSTA is mentioned.
Can anybody explain what this is about and what a "credit report" is?

I've owned and used bank accounts and credit cards for my entire adult life, that is to say, several decades (in the EU) and I've never come across this concept.
meta: dead comments / shadow bans can be for other reasons than down votes. some new accounts get shadow banned immediately; I assume there's some anti spam stuff working on the backend. This was @jaspwn's first comment, so that's probably what happened.

It's a great use case for vouching.
The intuitive way to exit anything is Alt + F4.
What Voltron can teach us about improving open source development
Yes, but the proportions between "bad", lets rather call them inexperienced, "coders" and experienced coders varies strongly in different ecosystems.

PHP and JavaScript both democratized programming, as BASIC did years before, but that also meant that more tutorials and howtos for PHP were written by people relatively new to programming compared to say howtos on Haskell or C.
I agree with your sentiment - there really isn't a use for animations in the context of most UI.

Except when there is - for example, first-user introduction/onboarding segue's, which guide the users attention around the app by highlights/flows, perhaps overlaid in a fashion that makes it clear that the overlay itself is impermanent (by fading it) .. but only if its got a real purpose, as you state.

I appreciate this degree of assistance in learning a new app personally, especially on mobile.

Animating the UI is what we want the user to do anyway - and many users are very animated about how they use their apps (i.e. selfie culture), so using animation to train the user to use the app properly, such that the user animates back, seems obvious.
The converse is also true when you want to do side-effecty stuff in Haskell.
Building a Streaming Fraud Detection System with Kafka and Python
Looks like the github account has been deleted?
Like, the IAT has problems, but it has been shown to have some predictive validity in behaviour. I am entirely unsurprised that the IAT finding replicated in this data, and it actually supports the structural racism explanation propounded by one of the measure's harshest critics.

To be fair to the IAT, while it has very low test-retest reliability and lots and lots of state variance, there's definitely something in the reaction time differences that is meaningful. How meaningful it is, and whether or not it makes any practical difference remains to be determined.

Anyone who hasn't done one, try this link and see how you feel during the process: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html

And at least there wasn't a massive profit motive behind the IAT, at the beginning anyway :)
Apology Critics Who Want to Teach You How to Say You’re Sorry (2017)
The claim is that there may be a market for AI-powered technologies, but that market is suppressed by non-AI competitors exploiting information asymmetry.
Yeah, I agree. I should also add that in order to avoid "accidental communism" we should stop using phrases like "shared resources", after all if you at the first linked wikipedia article you will find why it's relevant.

It true that writing is a tricky thing since we can't convey intonation and the use of emojis in docs usually is not somethings that's helping the cause. I don't know how it can be solved but if we'll take the way of the word policing you should be inclusive and surely ban: "shared resources", "killing processes" etc etc - there should be no end to this until we reach Farrenheit 451, how "hystorical" (intenstionally misspelled) this might might seem to you. Cheers
Tips to Simplify Finding the Best Wedding Vendors in Your Dream Wedding Location
There are many kinds of investors, while SV more interested in unicorns not pennies.

> Chinese venture capital firms and technology giants are increasingly taking note of Canada’s technology scene, with artificial intelligence as well as clean technology and life sciences some of the areas attracting interest.

> As well as the research capabilities, the lower valuations of Canadian technology companies compared to their US counterparts make them attractive to Chinese investors

https://www.scmp.com/business/article/2130409/canadas-tech-f...
It looks like Go implementation exists for ARM Cortex M (based on transpiling Go to C):

https://github.com/ziutek/emgo/blob/master/README.md

https://github.com/ziutek/emgo/issues/14#issuecomment-398670...

https://ziutek.github.io/2018/03/30/go_on_very_small_hardwar...
You talked about bitcoin. That's entirely different to a "private blockchain". So that is why I think the target keeps moving in this conversation. Or are you suggesting proof of work or something? If so, then I am exiting out of this conversation :-)

Anyways, perhaps a better exercise to clarify would be: Find a single example where a (precisely defined) type of blockchain makes sense vs possible alternatives such as solutions along the lines of Git, CT, etc. I conjecture that there are none beyond cryptocurrency.
The ironic thing is that the LSP was started by a corporation.
Modular.im – hosted matrix service
Probably accessibility.

Because MySQL for some reasons is more accessible[1] to beginners, juniors, average developers, and other people who may prefer a lower barrier of entry over correctness/safety (e.g. full-stack devs, managers, people who don't have much time); who form the bulk of the community combined.

It's the same for languages, frameworks, and other tech; as several people noted already.

[1] Or maybe "was"; in which case the answer becomes "historical superior accessibility".
Maybe but only after extensive proliferation.

Initially, every Tom, Dick & Harry script kiddie will try to blackmail people whilst the public and justice system is not really aware of the technology possible.

When eventually enough of the public is made aware to not trust photos and videos anymore then these types of blackmail attempts would be less effective. But there will still be less informed gullible targets.
> Just like ctrl-c generates INT and ctrl-z generates STP.

It's very different. Ctrl-D does not generate signals. When written into the tty master, it forces the kernel to answer any pending read() syscalls on the tty slave, even if it means returning 0 bytes.

Programs then apply the convention of treating a read() that returns 0 bytes as meaning EOF (because that's how it works with all other file types that are not tty slaves).
Firstly, you'd probably want 50% data people, 50% engineers to make that work acceptably. Secondly, that kind of stuff is totally viable to throw automated grid-search at, especially if you've just been acquired by a profitable company.

Finally, I reckon that the comment upstream about GDPR is probably correct. Suddenly facing way harsher terms for 30% of revenue (assuming standard breakdowns) is double-plus ungood, which may have sparked this.

To be fair, if I were them, I'd totally have taken the money and ran.
About 12 years ago I was working for a PC Magazine competitor when they cut the Managing Editor loose, a man who'd worked there 20+ years and was in his late 50s.

I ran into him in the bathroom, tears in his eyes, asking me what he was going to do now? That this is how they reward decades of loyalty?

Ironically that magazine, dedicated to predicting future technology trends, would go down the toilet some years later because they didn't see technology trends like Google and internet advertising coming.

Companies have no loyalty folks...neither should you.
Privacy First, Spam-free Email service
Does nim have a concurrency story yet? That’s what gave me pause last time I checked it out.
I'm curious how being very wrong is a liability for a journalist? Can you give me some examples where the being wrong part violates the ideal, and maybe explain what that ideal is, in the tech world?

To me, a reader of his since the very beginning, Dvorak has been wrong about a lot of things - but him being wrong has prompted much discussion in the broader world of things, and he is truly one of the very first 'social media influencers' of the tech world. I spent many a day in the 80's and 90's discussing mag articles with colleagues, in the ops centres, the desktops, the laptop and now the pocket era's, and .. it seems .. whatever Dvorak has to say about something, is going to get a rise.

But if there is some other standard by which such a rabble-rouser might be judged, I'd like to know. I seem to have missed something.
My sense is that in the post-Snowden era, most of his articles focus on hypocrisy of some sort. At least that seems to be a dominating theme. I don't read every article he publishes but that's what I associate with Greenwald - he goes after people pushing certain views but then not living by them. Even when he was reporting on surveillance, a lot of his articles had as a theme "the NSA say X but they do the opposite".

When it comes to specific policies and what the best policies are, Greenwald is mostly silent, except for his open dislike of mass surveillance and wars.

Journalists make for an easy target for such a guy because they claim (implicitly or explicitly) to be neutrally documenting events, but then try to actively change the course of those events through manipulating their coverage.

He also targets the Democrats in some stories yes, but usually from the angle "they claim they support X but here they are doing not X". Is this partisan?

You could say that Republicans have the same issues, but I don't see them talk about fiscal conservatism anymore, Trump certainly didn't run on such a platform. Trump is many questionable things but most people I've heard express opinions on him say something like "I disagree with policy X but huh, it's weird to see a politician actually doing what he said he'd do for once". That is, labelling him a hypocrite is tougher than perhaps with other politicians.

Maybe that's why he's hard to pigeon-hole. His latest article on the Intercept is about Michael Moore's new movie. In it he says things like:

Moore’s film is highly worthwhile regardless of where one falls on the political spectrum. The single most significant defect in U.S. political discourse is the monomaniacal focus on Trump himself, as though he is the cause – rather than the by-product and symptom – of decades-old systemic American pathologies

He then goes on to criticise the narrative that America was "good" until Trump was elected, whereupon it became "bad". He criticises a swathe of US policy stretching from the Bush era to the Obama era.

That doesn't sound like he's particularly partisan to me. Instead Greenwald argues for a systems-oriented take on politics. In Greenwald's world, Trump is merely a symptom or byproduct of deeper issues, and it's those issues that are the most interesting to study. This is probably why I like his writing.
I think their target customers are not banks. The article says it would "take deposits from financial institutions" but this could mean insurance companies, pension funds, credit unions, securities exchanges, etc. Anyone who might have substantial cash reserves as an integral part of their business, but who does not actually have a banking license.

Edit: from the Matt Levine piece linked further down the comments, the target customers are "money-market funds and foreign central banks".
For Hackers, Anonymity Was Once Critical. That’s Changing
Yep. Concurrency is achieved via async await. Parallelism via `spawn`.

Here is an example from my book that uses both: https://github.com/dom96/nim-in-action-code/blob/master/Chap...
That is a lot like what Nikola Tesla describes himself doing in his autobiography when inventing the alternating current electric motor – he could, in his mind’s eye, see the motor, turn it off and on and make it go backwards and forwards, and even momentarily forgot that the other people who were with him could not also see it.

EDIT: Quote:

I started by first picturing in my mind a direct-current machine, running it and following the
changing flow of the currents in the armature. Then I would imagine an alternator and investigate
the processes taking place in a similar manner. Next I would visualize systems comprising
motors and generators and operate them in various ways. The images I saw were to me
perfectly real and tangible.

[…]

The images I saw were wonderfully sharp and clear and had the solidity of metal and
stone, so much so that I told him: “See my motor here; watch me reverse it.”

[…]

The
pieces of apparatus I conceived were to me absolutely real and tangible in every
detail, even to
the minute marks and signs of wear. I delighted in imagining the motors constantly running, for in
this way they presented to mind’s eye a more fascinating sight.
Check out what Citus are doing with PG https://www.citusdata.com
That doesn't seem to align with job functions (education, training, writing/editing) and the fact that they're recruiting tenured university professors for this job.

And "almost military" doesn't mean military; military is exempt from ADEA, but FBI, in general, is not.

Maybe someone copy-pasted key requirements from an army-type position for this desk/teaching job, but even then they explicitly say at the bottom that they don't discriminate based on age.
Look up vim lsp plugins.
PointerEvents for WebKit/Safari
> and probably say nothing about it in specific

I get "harmed" emotionally every day reading the words on the internet, not probably - but there isn't any way for me to be able to point a finger to every direction and show even a small proportion of those people how wrong they are (hell maybe I should quit twitter...). If every sentence would be redacted to suit my feelings as well as all other "harmed" individuals" we could as well ban the whole text communication on the internet.
Could we just communicate in binary and be done with it allready /s
There's an interview of the HardKernel CEO at https://magazine.odroid.com/wp-content/uploads/ODROID-Magazi... (page 26), which provides some insight relevant to your questions.
It does marginalize the whole BDSM community though. If it's an "an easy win" it surely isn't for everyone, it's never is.
Surely lawyers will know about the tech soon enough to simply show the same video evidence with the judge in place of the defendant -- reasonable doubt right there.

The blackmail angle I expect will work for a while. People falsely accused of sexual crimes can have their lives ruined by the accusation.
MyISAM made it popular back then, and the rest of it is inertia.
Different for girls?
Sure, if you don't mind writing garbage code. Otherwise, if you don't understand it, you can't say for sure it's correct, and it's usually wrong.
Are you sure they're amateurs, not professionals don't it for fun (/pro boner/!?!).
My comment was merely mad as a consumer.
I don't think there's going to be a long period where this technology is being used and isn't widely known about. It'll be used extremely quickly to abuse people using their Facebook pictures, and once there's a Facebook angle the media will be able to run with it and everyone will get it.
JetBrains' IDEs have Postgres data source support, I find that GUI really rather excellent for anything I've had to do and couldn't remember the syntax for.
Like what though? Historically what tech does did governments have that was unknown to commercial domains?

People are motivated by money, governments pay little and there’s no way to get rich working there so it doesn’t make that much sense.
I have read recently it helps protect your brain cells from damage due to lack of oxygen. One article I can find now:

http://beckleyfoundation.org/2016/09/15/the-first-study-to-s...
> twice the ordinance dropped in WWII

Nit-picking: it's "ordnance", not "ordinance".
You don’t Care but some consumers will care that it’s real people going through all their data and not just a machine. And claiming to have AI but using manual labor is straight up investor fraud on a Theranos level.
Isn’t this the guy who was upset by the idle process and rubbished the mouse?
x.ai is, or at least was, powered by humans.
It would be interesting to see the applications of this technology with the use of thermal cameras. Extracting environments from thermal imaging would be nice.
Ummy Video Downloader Mac Crack 1.10 Key
A simple method to make animations less frustrating for experienced users could be to speed up the animation each time it's played. The first time, the effect would be made very obvious; but with continued use, it becomes so fast that it's instant.
snowflake crybaby didn't get fired after 30 years like he wanted.
> “build it safe and then make it fast”

I have a lot of respect for the PostgreSQL team. But I think they don't care about the second part, or the constraints of the first part make it impossible. A simple example, the performance of a simple un-indexed DISTINCT on a single string column on a single table, is still quite bad for millions of rows.

Also to note, PostgreSQL has too many features for my taste. I get it's the selling point. But that usually correlates with poor performance and code complexity, too.

Of course, there's a problem of all modern fast database engines being proprietary. But by not addressing the performance problem, perhaps with an smaller engine lighter in features, open source is left biting the dust. And that's not good for the industry.
My first thought was, oh no not another “whatabout” post. But no, you’re making a good point in a fair and informative way. Thanks.
GridinSoft Anti-Malware 4.0.12 Crack Full Keygen and Activation Code
Black Mirror did this I think - if we can make video, then why not VR (down the line if processing catches up), Second Life iterated.

Heaven on Earth?
Why can't they just use an intravenous drip?
John is a special snowflake! He needs special attention after 30 years you see.