skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>You're already paying a fortune

>you can't even trust the people working for you

>Horrible people everywhere.

This is literally every tourism destination ever. Also rampant substance abuse during whichever season is the off season.
More importantly, it gives the reader a keen insight into the father's perspective -- which the author is trying to convey, and not many people would be familiar with.
Wirecast Pro 10.1.0 Crack with Serial Keygen Full Free Download
One thing I've been wondering about recently, is if we should have a compile-time vs. runtime distinction? What if the language was running on a tracing JIT, where the JIT output and runtime tracing from last time was cached and available immediately?
I'm not excusing their behavior, but it's worth keeping in mind the context. They have an extraordinarily risky job that they are not paid much for, compared to the people who pay them. See, for example, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/04/21..., but googling around is easy to find other articles from other sources talking about the high risk and low pay for Everest Sherpas.
I think that's only a post hoc rationalization -- the point being that culture "fit" is also very easy to hide behind for people who are attempting to preserve a perceived consistency.

Obviously all of these are just mental abstractions, but I contend that one is easier to think about as someone who cares about diversity.
From the article: "Our desktop, iOS, and Android applications, however, make use of a single C++ media engine built on top of the WebRTC native library — specifically tailored to the needs of our users."
This may be unfair, but I've become disillusioned with Ted talks, especially TedX talks.
The Known Known: Review of Recent Literature on Privacy
Same reason people take the Federal Reserve seriously, even after failing to see literally every single recession on their watch.

A very human bias is to believe and follow those in positions of authority, despite long and verifiable records of abject failure and incompetence.
Yes. Different strokes for different folks.

Some people like the comics, some people like the naked horrific rfc docs (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2818) complete with the phony typewriter linebreaks.

Many prefer something in between. Something for everybody.
A Lucrative Apple Farming ( Complete Guide ) * Sivapex
Sometimes you have to fail to suceed
I hate it now, but it was the only thing I could read without getting completely overwhelmed, back in my early days.

Without beej's guide to networking I wouldn’t have understood TCP.
Grandparent:

After getting frustrated with all the other WebRTC libraries over the last 4 years, I finally wrote our own ( https://github.com/amark/gun/blob/master/lib/webrtc.js ) which is capable of using a set of decentralized DHT relay-peers in GUN for signaling - and once peers are already on WebRTC, they can signal (daisy-chain "DAM" as we call it) to other WebRTC peers via WebRTC!

Meaning, you don't/won't have to run any servers!!! Ping us on our chatroom if you want the list of DHT peers.

Parent:

Chuck! Sounds like you'd be a very useful person to know. Me, Feross, etc., plenty others have been requesting additional API/protocol access over the last 4 years (some of which FireFox is adding in libdweb extension!). Any chance we could connect and chat? Ping me at mark@gun.eco ?
No. By definition remembering an answer is not the same as doing.

Additionally my experience tells me otherwise.
Ask HN: Tips for Cleaning a Rancilio Silvia
I know a few of you have a Rancilio Silvia coffee machine. Do you have any cleaning tips?

If you were making two shots a day, how often would you clean your Silvia?

Do you backflush the group head with Cafiza?

How do you clean the water tank, especially the hard to reach corner between the cross and the sides?

Do you ever descale the boiler?

Is Cafiza safe to use when cleaning the water tank separately (obviously rinsing it all out afterwards) or will it react with and degrade the plastic?

How often do you replace the silicone tubes?

Bonus: How do you clean your Rocky grinder?
Is there a reference for that? That would convince me that it is a bad idea to use that naming scheme then.
Humans can't really tell the difference between real and simulated risk.

Even so, some of us have our kids play baseball-like games where they're not even allowed to strike out.
reddit used to do a lot of remote work. Then they decided to ditch it all. Lost a bunch of good engineers that way.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17919811
we have new terminals all the time, like browser javascript console
Err, I think going much further down that line of reasoning, you will discover something unpleasant: The winning, for some, isn't as important as someone else losing.
Demo updated, thanks!
Index funds don't necessarily need to react to price changes.

If you have 2 companies A, B worth both worth X billion each and you own 1 billion$ of each. Then if A's value doubles you now own 2 billion$ of A and 1 billion$ of B which is also the correct ratio.
If a person can add to a culture, then a person could also subtract from a culture. Getting the wrong people on the bus can be very damaging to a company. This is not to say that companies always do a good job at selecting people for addition rather than subtraction.

Any place that could be deemed a "brotopia" is likely bad at building positive culture--I know I wouldn't want to work there. But still, different people will have different effects, some of them being net positive and others net negative. And what counts as positive or negative will vary a bit from org to org. If you can call culture fit a "culture addition", a lack of culture fit may be a case of "culture subtraction".
I'm pretty suspicious about most conversations about culture fit: I think they are more smoke than fire.

Especially in technology, where it's a seller's market for labor I don't think a lot of companies are actually screening on this criterion. Do they think you are smart and can do the work? Then companies are going to want to hire you with the possible exception of if they think you are a huge asshole or complete weirdo.

I don't think anyone cares all that much beyond that.
> we have seen 1000 people taking turns speaking

Wow. Has anyone here been in a channel like that? I'd imagine it to be complete chaos.

But I suppose it's possible with good moderation and/or bots to ensure people take turns? Is that what they do?
Joseph Stiglitz on AI: 'We’re going towards a more divided society'
It does indeed. You can deploy to Azure (of course) or to AWS, GCP or on-premises.
There is no untainted data in the subject. Any company that finds itself systemically rejecting protected classes of people through the "culture fit" label is asking for a lawsuit if they made it known to anyone.

This is generally a problem with discrimination cases, it is extremely rare to find a real "smoking gun", usually it's just the end result that looks abnormal
Do you mean that the candidate is too inclined to say "that's not my job" when they might be called upon to perform tasks that lie outside their narrow area of focus?
Looks like Taiwan is not an ITU member and has a space program, several active satellites and their own launch vehicle in the works.
Most loans require both: (1) an ability to pay (payer stubs, tax returns) and (2) a history of paying back loans in the past.
The glass is still going to be under the act of gravity and will form convection loops but in a different direction to the loops if drawn horizontally.
Ouch! That really sucks...

Is there a ticket number or blog post or something I can research to learn a bit more about the reasoning behind this change with them?
I think 'dogma1138 still gives the correct answer for the main question. An orbital-capable rocket is also an ICBM, so at any point on the road from no rockets to orbital capability, you'd have first neighbours and then everyone else asking questions and exerting serious diplomatic pressure on that country.
I haven't looked at a For Dummies book in years (maybe since the 90s), but I remember them having far more text to visual illustration than this.
Culture: "we have a billiards table and like craft beer. YOU SIMPLY CANNOT FIND ANOTHER STARTUP LIKE US!" /sarcasm
OT:
actually what I always wonder, is how Discord will make money.
I mean they offer this huge free service for everybody (2.6 million concurrent voice users) over 1000 servers that must be a huge GCloud invoice
Note, "80 / 100 of these functions are never called. I'll just remove them from the program image to save load time and locality of reference" is already an optimization compilers apply: dead code elimination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_code_elimination
SPOILER ALERT: Sounds like the plot of the sci-fi book Artemis by Andy Weir. Great Book and there's also a kick ass Audible version read by Rosario Dawson
>but why?

Content marketing and SEO purposes for the parent company, dnsimple.
That sounds really weird. The only time I noticed such weirdness was when a colleague and me were simultaneously editing a notebook on Google Colab. The code was shared but not the state, super weird...
At one shop, I think it was more of a question of, "Will this person work 70 hours a week as salary exempt."

If you have a toxic manager asking these questions, you get employees who will work long hours to fix bad planning decisions. If that manager makes the wrong call, they get an employee who refuses to week over 45 hours a week and they are usually let go so other people don't get the same idea.
True, one of the few ways that I have seen "cultural fit" used meaningfully is in this context.

Hiring for a startup : "They seem like more of a big-company type"

Hiring for a big company: "They seem like more of a startup type"

It's not really company specific.
A Battle Plan for a War on Rare Diseases
It'd have been nicer if they had lost it.
Nothing is "forcing" the internet into a "box of nation states". It already is and always was. The Internet is not above or outside the law, and it's not above or outside nations.

Every piece of the Internet, every server, computer, router, and switch, is in one country or another (barring the few floating out in international waters), and every single one of them is subject to the law in the country where it is. And every individual or business entity operating them is subject to the laws in the countries they are or operate in. This has always been this way.

The Internet is not any different than any other communication medium. We don't perceive a phone call as being something above or outside the law of the nation it takes place in. We don't see mail as being above or outside the law of the nations it traverses. The Internet is just another medium of communication between people and businesses like any other.
Because you don't add to a team which is highly dynamic by adding a person who expects a straightforward top-down decision-making process, and the same is the case in the reverse situation. This is not about pristine or not, but simply about the average.

You do add to a team of programmers by adding a marketing person, salesperson, technical support or test person.
How many times has this thing been re-branded?

1. Team Foundation Server (TFS)

2. Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS)

3. Azure DevOps

Imagine if GitHub renamed itself every few years?

Or is the idea that this is going to be marketed towards Azure users and GitHub will be promoted to the new VSTS once it gets a few more features for project management and PRs?

https://twitter.com/styfle/status/1032702016064286720
I wonder if the difference in PTT vs voice activated has to do with the common games being played at the time.

PTT is mandatory running an MMORPG raid with 40 people. Voice activated is perfect for playing a game while talking with 3-8 people at a time.
Or, at least, the interviewers perceived that that would be the case. Perception might be out of phase with reality there -- members of sub-optimal cultures don't necessarily realize they have a problem.

(Then, I suppose, there's the further question of whether it's even possible to add to a culture that doesn't want to be added to.)
To me the whole culture fit is a circus and there to make people believe they are being virtuous, etc. It’s BS.

That said, there is some value in sharing some important core principles.

However, to me either someone can execute their responsibilities, or they can’t—but it’s dufficult to infer that from a pre-work interview.

As it is non conforming cultural fit might be someone who doesn’t drink like a fish, or someone who needs to take care of family obligations after working hours, for example.
Personally, I hate the sound of people chewing and smacking their lips directly in my ear as they work their way through their 'fresh that afternoon' gas station nachos.

But that's just me :)
If you skip the use of ICE, why is it that 25% of the time I get a message relating to ICE and it gets stuck there?

"CONNECTION_STATUS_ICE_CHECKING" ICE Checking.
I'm counting the days until I can just plug my smartphone into a KVM dock and have it be as useful as a full-blown desktop.
Do they think you are smart and can do the work? Then companies are going to want to hire you with the possible exception of if they think you are a huge asshole or complete weirdo.

"Culture fit" is the justification for who they see as problematic, starting a bit short of being a "huge asshole or complete weirdo."

I don't think anyone cares all that much beyond that.

We know that such companies can be suffused with groupthink, to the point of mass hysteria and virulent hate. It's documented in public at this point.
I dunno I quite disagree. I get what you're saying, but I definitely don't experience it being vegetarian or vegan. In my other message I wrote in this thread, I'd say I get shit about... 1 out of 50 or 100 interactions dealing with food?
Yeah. Typically it starts with a priority speaker giving a speech, ends with a Q&A moderated via text chat.
I agree on opening the protocol but if what you want is a gateway, it's already open enough for that.

https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge
Taking your map, let's imagine I create a company in Western Sahara and launch a satellite from there. What would happen?
> named after words in "toddler speak" by adding -y or -ly to the end of a word (e.g. dog -> doggy)

Can you provide some examples of "toddler speak" involving the -ly suffix? I don't mean company or technology names -- words like "doggy", but using a -ly suffix.
"Ooh, cool fancy ice cubes! They look like shards of broken glass!"

"That's 'cause they are shards of broken glass."

"...on second thought, I'm not really that thirsty."
> You know what made Bezos so rich in spite of a company that doesn't make much accounting sense? When everyone is betting on his success by blindly investing in index funds.

Let's see...

AMZN: up 62.93% YTD

S&P500: up 6.81% YTD

I don't think index fund investors are the cause of Amazon's growth.
In my experience, culture fit is exactly that - a nice way of saying that the candidate was "a huge asshole or complete weirdo."

It's shorthand for "I think they could probably do the work, but I don't think that I/we could actually stand working with this particular candidate".
Mark Zuckerberg Makes It Clear: Apple Has More Guts Than Facebook
They try to keep me away from the SQL, so I don't have the most enlightened answer, to be honest. But smart people that I trust tell me that Redgate's tools are really excellent for SQL Server and SSRS projects. And that they integrate nicely into a CI/CD pipeline for "Database DevOps".
Yes, except the future is wireless. So no dock required (let's say, 5 years from now).
These doxing sites don't actually allow anything new, they just aggregate and automate public records searches. It just didn't cause problems because the inconvenience was too high of a barrier for most people without a compelling interest (like a potential employer) to cross. The law is not good at handling this type of situation. It would be hard to have a law saying that this data has to be public and open, but not re-publishable and it has to be inconvenient to access. I don't really know a good solution to that.

And why should a celebrities and public officials have different standards? Either it's fair to judge someone by a certain past action or it isn't.
There's usually some sort of moderator, and a bot to facilitate turn taking, at least in the channels that I had these in :).
This is a feature that might pull me away from the JetBrains tool suite.
3 weeks ago there was a different outage that meant no hosted build agents were working in the west europe region, and it lasted for more than 24 hours.

Now, what I hated the most about this was the communication - there wasn't any. Why not email impacted users to let them know you're aware and working on a fix?
Part of the situation might be because of outsiders who try and learn these things on their own time. You might have a molecular biologist who finds themselves needing to setup up a webapp for some research and they were never formally educated as an "engineer".

Grown-ups also sometimes like to pass on what they know to children, teens and grandparent, so they might resort to cutesy stuff.

Then there are dummies like me who need lots of illustrations and everything explained from 10 different points of views before they start to understand. But, most of us hate getting in the way of the masters and experts.

We should have a "kids" version of HN and of various reddits. Everyone will be anonymous because your 50-yr-old co-worker doesn't want to be known around the office for reading comics that include cartoon superheroes showing you how to battle the evils of CSRF/SSRF.

(Thanks for linking to that page that explains TLS. That also helps.)

Any opinion of the "Head First" books? https://ssearch.oreilly.com/?q=head+first
They seem better than the 90s "...For Dummies" books.
PostgeSQL doc: If you disagree with this, please write your complaint to pope
That's a very uncharitable assumption. At a previous company, where I was involved in the hiring process, 'culture fit' almost always was either shorthand for perceived work ethic or lack of ambition. We were primarily concerned with two things: where are you now in your abilities, and where do you aspire to be in your career?

You don't need "culture fit" as an excuse to not hire someone you don't want to. If a hiring manager has an illegal bias, there are plenty of ways to avoid hiring a particular candidate.
> it's quite unclear why everyone assumes fed's authority over foreign satellite launches

If Swarm's satellite smashed into a French satellite and Swarm was unable to pay, the American government would have been liable (together with the Indian government) for the damages. This is how ITU rules work. Same for radio interference.

> Swarm can easily re-incorporate in the less regulated country

Most countries are ITU members. Certainly every one with spacefaring capabilities. Furthermore, the CEO may have trouble doing her work in another country under American anti-arms trafficking rules (e.g. ITAR and EAR).

I've done a good amount of work in the small and micro-satellite spaces. Regulatory overreach is a problem, and the ITU is more bureaucratic than it needs to be. But the paperwork piles up with the FAA and Air Force (and is invoiced in the form of launch fees), not the FCC. Had the CEO consulted with a lawyer and radio engineer, she would have had no problems. Instead she took a shortcut.
See my other comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17949047
I'd have to agree with the parent. And it has nothing to do with personal knowledge/experience/expectations/biases. The linked 'comic' is bad in ways that I think many people would agree on.

I'm not talking about the content or even the "cutesy" style, but the layout/formatting itself. The lack of space or separating lines between the panels makes it quite difficult to follow the chronological order of the story. The font used for dialog is atrocious. And the harsh colors all placed on top of a stark white background isn't easy on the eyes. These are things that all detract from any possible learning outcomes, no matter what they are.

I think a lot of people in this thread are arguing that 'cutesy style = bad', but I think the real reason they might be thinking that is because it's actually just this particular instance of cutesy style is bad.
You can configure what Spotlight indexes. I turn off a lot of it so that it doesn't suddenly use a bunch of CPU indexing things that I don't care about.

System Preferences > Spotlight > Search Results
Tragedy of the Commons Clause
To clarify the last point, damage to roads increases exponentially as weight increases. A big-rig will do hundreds of times more damage to a road than a, say, Prius.

https://streets.mn/2016/07/07/chart-of-the-day-vehicle-weigh...

http://archive.gao.gov/f0302/109884.pdf
I have written https://github.com/azag0/knitj to solve a similar use case, but with an alternative interactive browser interface
The surprise that is coming is that the working class won't tolerate being robbed in the next financial crisis.

Working American's had to financially absorb the 2008 Mortgage crisis. 2008 was a direct robbery because Mortgage Orginators KNEW the mortgages would blow up, because their own Underwriting equations said they would. That is why they did fraud on the customer's income levels or worked with politicians to allow ignoring customer's income.

It caused a $5 trillion in transfer from the wealthy away from the working classes to the investor class in that 2008 Mortgage crisis.

The 2008 Mortgage crisis robbed the working classes, and transferred to the investor classes. Homes lost because of unemployment. Savings gone via rigged economy unemployment. Bail outs. Banks offloaded their worthless assets with government buying them. Wall Street over leveragged had huge wealth handed to them in money printing that was giving directly to their balance sheets.

The surpise will come the next time a Financial Crisis comes and the government works to sell out the working class
In my experience, "Culture fit" has always been the cover for "toxic" workplaces where sexism, bullying and worse run rampant.

If everyone acts professional then chances are you'll figure out how to work together. If you're unable to act professional then chances are the new hire isn't the problem, you are.
I think this is a simpler and more complete explanation: "The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is an almost-uniform background of radio waves that fill the universe" [1]

[1] http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/CosmologyEssays/The_...
Might be the reason why endurance running is on the rise.
I thought the same thing. A company is also its buildings, equipment, things that can be liquidated, it's founders, it's principal investors, etc..
There must be regions of the universe where this "not very dense" gas is dense enough to use a ramscoop
Thinking about this more, this approach is innovative but awkward. The point of licenses is that they provide a legal basis. "Calling out cloud providers" has no legal basis, but is instead an attempt at societal shaming. Shaming should be achievable without using licenses.

But I would rather have legal licenses than a shaming system. If we want contributions back, lets make a better AGPL. If we don't want cloud providers to sell the software, lets have the Commons Clause (but just don't annoy everyone by prepending Apache).
My theory it is QE and maybe Roboinvesting.
If you bought an actively managed fund 30 years ago, it was literally an index fund with more fees attached. Active managers actually just index, but try hard to obfuscate this fact to justify their high fees. If you dive into their books, they are basically buying the market. I think it begs the question, how active was/is active?

The math is clear, you are statistically unlikely to beat the market.