skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks. Didn't know that. But then, how does this apply to takedowns handled by Facebook etc? From what I've read, they aren't actually DMCA takedowns.
People don't care for privacy and freedom as much as they care for features and convenience.
A bash script would have to automatically install all the dependencies. Over time, there is a growing chance that some of the versions required will conflict with whatever is already installed on the machine, and someone will have to go in and fix them... then fix them in a way that it works on everybody's machines.

With docker, you can just ignore all that. As long as there is a single person capable of updating the dependencies on a single machine with docker, it'll work the same everywhere, always.
lxd/lxc containers are a tad more flexible than docker in my experience, notably because you tend to run a full distro in there instead of just a single app.
Yes, when that's the case, will you?
Problem is, a star is curved, with the limb being over two light-seconds farther away from an observer than the center. Sure, you can switch the whole surface of the star as fast as you like, with bandwidth limited by how accurately you can synchronize the switching components. An advanced civilization might be pretty good with attosecond-level stuff, but the signal gets spread out over seconds regardless of the synchronization superscience you apply.

You can phase the switches and "aim" the star's signal at a point in the sky. Lower-frequency modulation can get signals to observers not on the direct line, at a lower bandwidth, and you can probably sweep these. Worst case you can blink the whole affair slowly; a star with a five second light curve is going to be pretty interesting.
Ah, yes of course. Though if your disc is large enough, such a transit should still be detectable.
In order to achieve a Rayleigh length (effectively the "range") that is smaller than the distance from Earth to the nearest star, a (visible) laser should be approximately 40 kilometers wide. The effective range scales as the square of the beam waist, so you can communicate with the Andromeda galaxy using a laser just a little smaller than Neptune.
client side cookoes are already inherently unsafe.

on the server, the chance that your cookie is for auth is high, so make a secure cookie the defaul. force http headers that say server only, etc. Then allow for the security to be dropped via the extra arguments, not the other way around.
Installing and configuring Caddy to serve a static site over HTTPS is dead easy, and probably less work than setting up Docker.

Caddy has built-in support for Let’s Encrypt.

I use the dns module which required a little bit of extra work to enable because it’s not included by default but other than that it’s very simple like I said.

Here is the config file for one of my sites:

www.crusaders.pw {
root /var/www/pw.crusaders.www/

expires {
match .htm$ 4h
match /assets/.* 1y
}

tls {
dns cloudflare
}
}

crusaders.pw {
redir https://www.crusaders.pw{uri}

tls {
dns cloudflare
}
}

Then just stick the config file in a git repo.
Voting for someone who is willing to take this battle at a higher level?
I am running RancherOS and Rancher where I have everything as docker images. Easily manageable and updateable. Using docker-compose automation, but in my setup with nginx as reverse proxy I have a lot of configuration options, and am a programmer at heart, not a DevOps guy. Don't know yet if I can use this out-of-the-box, but it will certainly save me a lot of time having it all together.
It's for Linux only, and I run illumos-based SmartOS on my own infrastructure.

That's not the point. The point is that all these generation Y kids grew up on PC buckets and still don't understand UNIX and the concepts behind it, and yet they use it to power their applications. This can only end badly unless they start making an effort to understand the concepts behind the substrate they are writing software for.
I really can't stand how articles like this bury the actual information (in this case, basically just CBT) deep in anecdotes and other context that I don't care about. Is it just me, or has it gotten worse lately? Maybe in the Age of the Short Attention Span, journalists have to come up with other ways of making the reader stick around?
Boeing making navy MQ-25A refueling drone
> Which is because they're computer geeks.

I'm not sure that's necessarily the reason to choose Android over iOS. Many use Linux on desktop because it is good enough or better than other choices, but might be ambivalent towards or disapproving of stock android. Android has its flaws and is far from being strictly better than iOS.
Nobody has complete control over any government, anywhere in the world.

Companies are also not citizens, they are abstract structures designed to deliver value to customers and make a profit in doing so. A corporation has no specific loyalty to the government beyond following the laws and paying the dues required for operating. Corporations are also not able to judge what the "ethical" amount to pay is, which is why the government sets those rules on behalf of the people it represents.

You're turning a government issue into a corporate issue because it sounds easy, but ultimately its just treating (or rather complaining about) the symptom rather than enacting any solution. Again, perhaps you should join the government and enact the change you want to see?

Also since you are talking about responsibility and actions, I assume you donate all the spare cash you have that isn't going to taxes. Or is that not ethical in your case?
> We don't know if the cause is hacking

Unlikely.

> but it's likely that gas main pressure is controlled by a computer.

But the failsafes are not. Overpressure is something the system is designed to handle, and those gas substations that you see every now and then in fields are the places where the overpressure regulation devices are located, and they are purely mechanical.

> It'd be shocking if a software failure could cause dozens of fires.

It would be, but this isn't that. The actuators on these systems are made with the express purpose that line fluctuations will always be slow enough to catch up with. But if a regulator fails in a bad way that might cause a prolonged overpressure with the initial change arriving as a spike, which may expose further weaknesses downstream.

So the signature of an upstream regulator failure (a big one, and a sudden one too), is fairly consistent with what you are seeing here. The software actuators would not cause a pressure rise fast enough for that initial spike and the limit settings on those actuators (which are mechanical) would not allow those actuators to move beyond certain minimum and maximum set points for each line that they service.

The people that designed these systems were anything but stupid and it is failsafes layered on more failsafes, the big killer for systems like this is a very simple one: back maintenance.
I'm also still not on the docker-wagon and would like to know what I'm missing out on. Most of my stuff is python. Why is docker better than virtualenv with a requirements.txt file?

From this description it seems to solve the same issue.

I could imagine something like environment variables, but on the other hand that's something I've learned not to keep in version control, and putting it in docker would be exactly that, no?
A() and B() could return two different classes that both support foo and bar methods.
If your refactor is to rename one of those methods for one of the classes this code breaks and it's not trivial to update automatically, is it?
On iOS, at least, software updates require the user to enter their passcode, to prevent a San Bernardino-type backdoor. Though, I believe there are some assets that can be updated without a full system update.
Google is so deep-rooted in our life and they are doing it so elegantly without making much noise and the majority of people are least bothered about this. I want Google out of my phone, and I need it now.
What am I going to do about it? Nothing because Google is so convenient.
I bet they think they're special for finding a unicorn.
The main scrolling didn’t bother me, but scrolling inside the “hamburger menu” made me feel sick almost immediately. I think it was a combination of the scrolling and the motion of the video I was mousing over. Be careful with this stuff folks!
not every dependency is written in python.
One approach would be to record 100-to-1000 trials of how human drivers navigate each particular edge case in vehicles instrumented for autonomous driving.

Sadly, no one seems to have figured out a way to economically motivate human drivers to do this.
SpaceX signs first private passenger to fly around the moon
it's fun and works quite well. I liked the vector racing one, don't remember the name.
>So it's cool to invade countries next door if you have a dispute with them.

Straw-man much? It's not cool (and I didn't say that), but it's understandable. Neighbors have disputes, and that has been the case since forever, and it's understandable because they have common borders to settle (which are not god given), shared history, and so on.

Countries meddling with countries in the other end of the world just have imperialism and "national interests" to cheap oil and enforcing their preferred policies and ideology.

>What if they're technically not your neighbors, but still only like 100 kilometers away? Is that okay?

What if we stop asking silly questions and apply the principle of charity and/or common sense?

And yes, with nearby countries it's still natural to have disputes over e.g. this or that natural resource you both claim, this or that past war or whatever.

Now, France with Vietnam, the UK in Cyprus, or the US in Korea, not so much.
>Agreed that it's a flight of fancy to speculate on these yet unknown capabilities, but that doesn't mean they aren't highly likely to exist.

It's just as likely that there are constraints on what is possible that we are not aware of. Take Newtonian physics for example. It turns out physical systems are significantly more constrained by relativity than Newton would have supposed. Relativity makes less possible, not more.

We might assume that super advanced civilizations can do things based on our understanding of physics, but we might be wrong. A Newtonian physicist might assume an advanced civilization could accelerate rockets to arbitrarily fast speeds and get to the nearest star in less than 4 years, but would have been wrong.
Why do you guys love complexing so much? Why not use one click wp instance from DO images?
Apps and websites that drain power will be quickly killed by the OS. More likely, there's a system daemon that's running amok, which should usually be fixed by a reboot.
Chernikov tail lights
maybe 3 years? (just a guess)
I did not create .deb's because my client uses a RHEL-based operating system. The point is that I had to do it because CRAN simply decided to re-invent the wheel. I did not contact every single one of the 170 authors to create RPM's: if they really wanted to, they would have done that by now, not to mention it would be impractical for me to contact 170 people and attempt to explain to them what it means to design for operational maintainability.

Yes, I maintain the RPM's. It's easy because I always build .src.rpm's (SRPM's) by default, and a binary .rpm (RPM) ends up being a product of one of the steps in that process (`rpmbuild --clean -ba ...`).

But all of that is almost irrelevant. The relevant bit is that if done correctly, if done cleanly, as operating system packages, organizations need neither Docker nor "infrastructure as code" (copious amounts of amateurishly written glue in a scripting language) and the software is easy and fast to install and maintain -- for both system administrators and end users. I even do very large scale configuration management with operating system packaging, rather than with applications like CFengine, Chef, or Puppet.
Pretty cool. Does it handle multiple resolutions of the same video (Eg: 1080p 720p 480p 360p ) ?
That's not a paradox, it's just the property that good communication medium should have.

EM waves have this property thanks to effect of resonance in the reciever. Neutrinos will have this property (but better) once we learn how to emit and detect them efficiently.
There's no way prosecutors and courts would actually commit to an Espionage Act conviction of an astronomer for looking at the wrong part of the sky. That's absurd.
'"FAANG-style" multi-round interview process.'

Small nitpick: in most cases, these companies make a hiring decision with just one round of interviews (if you exclude the technical phone screen, which is a way to reduce wasting everyone's time when it's obvious it's a poor fit).

As both a candidate and as a hiring manager, I much prefer to have a single round of on-site interviews, vs. having the candidate come on site more than once. Good candidates probably have a good job already, and asking them to take multiple half days off to interview is an unnecessary burden.
In older use, "coding" meant only assembly and machine language programming, which would be a separate process from writing a high-level algorithmic version. A paper on FORTRANS claims that it will "virtually eliminate coding and debugging" Thus the statement that the class is no coding could be considered truthful.

http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/FORTRAN/BackusE...
Why shouldn't I? If I was just going to use this to host a single website, what's wrong with running docker-compose?
11 Reasons We’re Too Dumb to Resist Clickbait
Another old timer here.

I'm a front end dev, and at my latest contract I wanted to help out our back end developers with some .NET stuff. Can you imagine trying to setup a full .NET stack on a Macbook a few years ago? This time what I had to do was:

* install Docker
* install Visual Studio Community and .NET Core
* run docker-compose ... up

Then I had their entire .NET software stack up and running, including MSSQL, ElasticSearch, Kibana, redis, all with one command.

I don't like doing DevOps personally, but I definitely appreciate how Docker helps me in situations like this!
Common, why are you posting an article with no substantial information? Is this just for a clickbait? First time I encounter an article which just contain a trailer. Pfft.
Have you used a Windows program that comes with all its dependencies (e.g dlls)? Have you used OS level isolation to deny some resources to some processes?
They don't start with C, they start with Arduino, which incidentally requires C++. The big difference is that you can easily have blinking LEDs, sensors and what not, which makes the act of programming more "concrete".
This is a really, really cool idea! I may try and use this for a product demo video. What do you expect the primary use case of Mindstamp to be?
Rant: Entity systems and the Rust borrow checker  or something
I was homeless for nearly six years. I did no drugs, but I had the myriad underlying personal problems that so frequently lead to drug use.

What I'm trying to tell you is people blame drug use when it is really more like a symptom than a cause. It's like saying "The pain killers did it."

The conclusion winds up being that if people wouldn't do drugs, their lives would work. The reality is more like if their lives worked, they wouldn't do drugs.

Again, it's like saying "Chemotherapy causes homelessness!" because some folks on the street are having a medical crisis. If you just stopped chemo cold, it wouldn't get them off the street and now their cancer is going unchecked.

There are things you can do that help, like improve the crappy American health care system. But "Just don't do chemo" isn't an answer but that's exactly how substance abuse gets addressed.

Think of it this way: Most people on the street are male. No one goes around saying in all seriousness "Just don't be male. Problem solved!"
We also know that, other than via gravity, if it does interact with matter or EM radiation at all it does so spectacularly weakly.
How to get into shape like the Hulk
Why not if it works for their use case?
They definitely should, though. There are many uses for this technology, and research is necessary.
What helped me understanding computers more as well, is fiddling with arduino C and in extension build electrical circuits. Computers become more and more advanced, but in the end it's still an electrical circuit.

Things like loops and memory management, become pretty doh, when you learn about shift registers, and current applied to a gate on a transistor on/off.

Programming languages when becoming more abstract, become less computer like. Learning a high level language is good to learn programming, but in a way it also takes away from understanding a transistor based computer (ie. basically all computing devices on the consumer market today).

When you ask someone how to drive a car "turn the key and hit the pedals", this is abstract modern language.

The reality is, you turn a key, electrical circuit engages a spark, igniting the fuel, which then moves valves, which through gears move an axel, which then transfers energy to the wheels, which makes the vehicle propel.

This is not absolute, but I hope u get the point in different mindset.

I would learn (a bit of) C, before going into assembly, just to get a feel for the fact computers are "dumb" in nature at the hardware level.

All the abstract stuff like map functions and fancy constructs like async behavior is great for productivity, but is just really fancy juggling of very basic structures and basic imperative operations.
Analysis: Do AI startups get bigger rounds?
> as long as we lived somewhere EM existed had a noticeable effect, which is just about everywhere.

You should have understood that I meant otherwise. Of course, if we could notice the effect of EM, that could trigger an investigation eventually leading to the discovery.

>we know our sensory understanding has sever limits...

Did you really think I implied that no one knows the limits of our built in senses? When I said sensory capabilities I meant the stuff we can sense, directly or indirectly (By indirectly, I mean by the help of another device, to make it very clear).
No, establishing where it should have been naturally.

A country with shared borders and centuries of shared history with a nearby country is quite understandable to have disputes and even go to war with them.

With a country that had never interacted with it, and they have absolutely no reason being there (except entitlement and greed), not so much.

That's only controversial if one has blinders...
It would be better to use a real concurrency-safe language like pony or distributed pascal for the fast ones, or e.g. clojure or perl6, ..., and not rust which requires a mutex on all stateful objects. But hype-driven worse is better always succeeds.
The law there is admittedly vague about making the copy, but it does not say how the copy must be made. I also don’t understand what you mean by “...if the copy is of your exact physical thing. It’s not...”

If it’s bit for bit identical, and a copy is made over the internet, wouldn’t they have to explicitly forbid the act of copying over the internet?
We are not looking for data. We are looking for slow, noisy beacons to know where to look for the data.

Much like WiFi AP beacons are on a lower frequency than data transfers or how lighthouses are hard to miss.
It could be considered a non-lie under the concept of mental reservation. In older usage, coding a computer meant writing assembly or machine language only; thus, a report on FORTRAN indicates that "FORTRAN virtually eliminates coding and debugging". This is a standard usage of the word coding although slightly archaic.

http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/FORTRAN/BackusE...

Otherwise, presenting informal proofs to students in engineering or science that would not be considered mathematically rigorous would also be a lie and unethical.
Wow, throwback! I played a few games over Hamachi with some fun European folks back in 2008 or so.
HI,

Similar situation, sometimes just getting noticed or fighting these algorithms to get noticed is difficult. Luckily I found socialplan.co which totally helped me accelerate my career. The hard truth is there is no correlation with grades and distinctions to future income earning potential.

Become the best at what you do "skills" then promote your personal brand like a fortune 500 would, with no shame.

Cheers,

Hanna
Women's Fashion Designer Herald Ladies Handbag Women's
The longer you stick around, the more ads can be shown.
Bitcoin doesn’t really count. It’s about all of the Also Ran shitcoins/ICO scams that bitcoin spawned.
I must say I am conflicted to write on this subject. On the one hand I am a person who has a humanities background turned to coding (bachelor's on philosophy; master's on sociology) but on the other hand I am burned out now and unwilling to do anything code related thanks to previous employers so my outlook isn't a nice one.

The problem I experienced was most of the companies want a bachelor of science or an engineering degree on their job postings. I think this is because the workshop kool-aid has proven ineffective in creating good programmers but rather code workers who are good at menial jobs but unable to provide good solutions. So if a foreign policy major decides to go full on coding by self-teaching skills to himself he'd get slaughtered on job applications, without being able to show his skills on the technical interviews.

Secondly, the job politics of most companies are just dreadful. After all those humdrum job interviews, skill tests, certification badgering; what I experienced is writing code that generates a sql query to the parameters that's taken from the frontend which had NOTHING to do with interview questions or the skills demanded by the employer.

In sum, I have to emphasize that these are my experiences and maybe limited to where I live and tried to earn my keep by coding. So I hope that it is a local thing and where you live has a better environment when it comes to employing programmers who are outside of the field.

Thanks for reading anyway.
> Is this normal for other gas utilities?

I've never heard of "mini gas leaks" that are supposed to be fine until I've seen this thread. Every gas leak that's reported here must be fixed. Gas-related explosions still happen, I'd say it's 50:50 people messing with gas piping and people attempting suicide.
It's cool that a single dish telescope discovered so many FRB within a short time but the fact that it was done with SETI time on GBT doesn't make FRB as a concept a SETI thing. It's an unexplained thing but broadband radio bursts aren't exactly uncommon in nature. FRB are just really far away.

The swept curve as shown in the spectrograms is probably because of distance to the signal and frequency dispersion due to charges along the line of sight. FRB are originally broadband pulses that distort in the medium getting here.

It looks like these ones are pretty simple quick burst. The latest discovered by the UTMOST all-sky interferometer recently had a complex bursty structure over time, http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/research/utmost/?p=1475

Instruments like UTMOST and other all-sky digital processed arrays (like SKA and children) should get some every hour once everything is running and optimized.
Well rounded article.
The securecookie from Gorilla works quite nicely. A good feature is that you can have key-rotation in the server-side signature function and can gradually introduce new keys to sign your cookies
REMOTE OK with Timezone?
FBI PSA – EdTech considered risky
- Maemo (2005)

- OpenMoko (2006)

- Symbian (2009)

- MeeGo (2010)

- Mer (2011)

- Jolla (2011)

- Tizen (2012)

- Ubuntu Touch (2013)

- Firefox OS (2013)

- Web OS (2013)

So it is a bit more than just lack of marketing.
Breakthrough Solar Cell with 85% Efficiency