skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In what way? Dive right in. Set your own shortcuts, and just use it. It's not terribly different, you're just not dragging windows around and everything is fully maximized unless you use some sort of gaps system. Check the i3 documentation, reddit i3 forums, and also /r/unixporn can be useful for finding things that will assist you with tiling wm's.
I’m addicted to fifa, and EA just announced that the ultimate team web app comes out on wednesday. It always comes out mid september.
Great, a password generator that looks like it does something but just happens to "generate" the same password for every visitor and pageview.
Advice from someone who had a similar choice and went the startup route: choose the Google option. It will not only open doors for you for all your future jobs, but you can invest the money now and create a nice start for yourself.

There will never be any shortage of interesting startups to work for in the future.
> Which is basically what the bill reinforces -- so the question from a simple person like myself is, "If you believe in not blocking or throttling or interfering with someone's ability to access/navigate the Internet, then how exactly will a law meant to prevent such things affect your business?"

They're saying they support something that everyone wants (basicaly, net neutrality) while not really wanting it to pass, but are arguing that the only way to implement it is to do things that completely undermine it. It's a common tactic I've seen other companies use in other fields too. Basically a "we want to redefine what <blank> is in such a way that it suits us and undermines what everyone else thinks <blank> should be."
People are very adaptable and will consider all that data collection less and less 'grossly inappropriate, creepy and a violation of their dignity'. XIX century Americans would consider an income tax in a peacetime 'grossly inappropriate, creepy and a violation of their dignity' after all.
When I google "anti-inflammatory diet" I see recommendations to eat whole grains. Can you explain the contradiction with your recommendation?
Don't be greedy. Google is a gold-plated brand name that will offer tens if not hundreds of individuals smarter than you.

6% options is about average for a co-founder-level tech lead at a very small company.

You have to be realistic about your expectations for equity. It is more likely the company gets acquired than goes IPO. If the company gets acquired for $100M, then you may bring home around $4M post tax.

What is the company's competitive advantage? Usually, especially in AI/ML, it is the people already working there. Who is working there that will be smarter and more experienced than you that you can learn from?

Or will you be the chief cook and bottle washer?
California is one of those sates where net neutrality is a state law. On other hand Poland does not have net neutrality law. There is zero correlation of the net neutrality laws and consumer prises.
Correct, except markets have been around longer than 2,000 years ago in Europe and elsewhere.

The answer to the economic problems you detail is worker owned cooperatives. The reason is that small business capitalists have too much incentive to being bought out by a larger conglomerate. They're also easy to run out of business with the Walmart model of running a loss for years.

We won't all have or be able to bank on a capitalist coming in to give us all jobs. Keeping the money local is imperative as you said, especially for the majority of economic activity worldwide, which consists of guaranteed, proven business models. An example would be your local 7-Eleven, there's no reason all of these essential services should have a board of directors in Japan rather than every worker being the board. You might get better service too.

I intend to turn my sole proprietorship into a worker owned co-op and at least coexist with Accenture if not run them out of the city with far more caring employees producing superior product.

If you want a healthcare.gov debacle go with an inefficient capitalist enterprise, which has a singular goal of selling you the most expensive product made by the cheapest possible employees. Otherwise support your local worker owned co-ops.
If you care about the compensation, go with Google.

If you feel like the startup is doing something unbelievable and you want to be onboard, go with them.

Google will still be around in a few years, and if you got an offer from them now you are likely to be able to get one again in the future.
"Our consumers are using dozens of entertainment devices for free" raged electric power providers. "They watch films, play video games, and even binge-watch Netflix shows for hours, using our power for which we receive no special compensation. Why should we sell electricity for a fixed price for all purposes? Clearly, we should be able to charge premium fees for premium uses! Our customers couldn't watch Netflix without our power, yet Netflix pays us no fees for supporting its business model. Where's our rent, err I mean, proper piece of the action?!"
https://www.atrium.co/blog/work-at-a-startup/
scsh, CLISP, ...
> any android phone worth buying

Seriously...?

> without the ecosystem and software support provided by Apple to ensure that the notch works

Well don't know about the "notch" but the immense ecosystem around Android is so far beyond what Apple has that I wouldn't even know where to start. The stupidity of some manufactures to copy that design failure is a different topic but it's defiantly nothing to be proud of. Neither on the Android nor on the Apple side. Mine doesn't have one and I wouldn't buy one because it's just ridiculous...
Password 'generating' and password 'checking' webservices should be outlawed. They're a ridiculously easy way to build a rainbow table from unsuspecting users.
Obviously pick google. Google signals that you are in the top 1% of human intelligence (which you must be if you passed the interviews). This is enormously helpful in future interviews and to VCs if you go the startup route yourself. Outside of FB and a handful of top startups and finance companies no company offers such a signal - some like Amazon SDE1 signify the opposite.

Disclaimer - I’m an Amazon SDE1.
I think it's satire.
When you find a phishing email, do you have a program that spams their "docusign" login with vast quantities of plausible-looking but fake credentials?

IMHO active countermeasures are always the best approach to stuff like this. Attack, attack, attack.

Also I could imagine giving them special fake usernames, such that when they try to login via that special fake username, it turns on extra metrology and slowbanning/cpu intensive operations etc.
I think the two things are what do you want to do and where are you in your career?

Being at Google is the safe easy money and will most likely work out better than your startup from an odds perspective. However, you'll be a cog in a very large company whereas the startup you'll probably be able to have a huge impact in (presumably if you're getting 6% in options, that's like first/second engineer there or you're an exec).

If this is your first job one thing to consider is that having worked at Google definitely is a good spot on your resume, recruiters like it, you'll get reached out to by lots of other recruiters, it'll be super easy to find another job which can honestly be more challenging if you just have no name failed startups on your resume.

There is probably also more potential for title advancement at the new startup also vs. google.

In my mind Google is a lot of sure money and you get to have a small impact on something with potentially huge impact to the world/people/whatever

Small startups are a very small chance of some amount of money on the levels of (car, house, fuck you) and you get to have a large impact on something that may or may not have any discernible external impact.
Try Google for a couple of years. Move around and work on different teams. Leave and join a startup of your choosing. The Google brand is like going to Stanford or something. You'll have many more options and better connections. Maybe you'll also have enough cash to start your own thing.
Does it always give: H4!b5at+kWls-8yh4Guq
That may work for an application, but there are many errors that occur while using a library that are expected/handled etc by the application. Perhaps separate logs can help.
This exactly. The number of parties involved in any information transaction can be reduced to three: the consumer, the immediate producer, and the canonical producer. Prohibiting one of the participants from paying is not good for economic distribution of resources.

Whether or not this is "bogus" is political economics.
Exactly. What people fear is not "identity theft" but bank libel. I could care less if a fraudster borrows money from a bank using my social security number and other public information. That is the banks problem when they try and collect the money. The problem is when the bank libels me by writing to a credit bureau and tells them that I have defaulted on a loan. If this libel was a large crime and prosecuted vigorously, "identity theft" would go away.
Did for me, this is hilarious.
New CSS Attack Restarts an iPhone or Freezes a Mac
If you're young, choose the startup. Say things work out: great! Say things don't work out: you'll have had an interesting experience, and can then go work for Google.

1. If Google has offered you a position now, they absolutely will offer you a position later. You wouldn't be burning any bridges, especially if you choose a startup over them.
2. It'll be a lot easier going from a startup to Google, than from the comforts (and money) of Google to a startup.
I took it as a joke on the ridiculous password requirements of websites.
Not sure what you are saying since the whole issue is about who is going to pay. In the west you are paying $40-$80 as a consumer while a lot of companies make money. In Asia it is common that high speed Internet access itself is cheap, but traffic costs more money for the companies providing services.
Pasting it here for convenience: H4!b5at+kWls-8yh4Guq
+1 for that. Later either join a post A round startup with traction or start your own thing.
because this is the most secure.
I did the startup thing. The ROI was crap compared to working at Google.

If you want to do the startup thing go ahead. You will have more stress and less money at the end of it compared to Google but Google will still be there to hire you at the end.
Similar comparison point:

I paid accident claims for more than five years. A one vehicle low speed car accident typically meant whiplash and physical therapy. Similar accident on a motorcycle could result in broken bones that needed repeat surgeries because they weren't healing properly.

The difference in outcomes between similar scenarios for car versus motorcycle was pretty dramatic.
The most secure password requires the most random seed: https://xkcd.com/221/
To me it sounds like Google...

Take what Google offers as a baseline. Convert the difference per year to stock at a realistic valuation (as in, if you were a VC what would you give). Compare it, factoring in the strike price (so at a strike price of 0 you will be offered 6%/4 per year..)

Perhaps throw in a 20% rebate for "more fun job", but then again remember that the "VC valuation" of the stock is what VCs with a lot more capability for risk than you, so perhaps you want a 20% risk penalty (or more!)

"But the startup cannot afford to pay market". No, but they should compensate through sufficient ownership. Otherwise you will just be working hard to try to make someone else rich.

You don't say what stage it is, current valuation etc which is very important here.
In the burning man sense, yes
Same here! :)
You didn't say what you'd be working on at Google, what the startup does, or what your motivations are.
> For me, the upside is in coaching and growing talent, or finding the right chemistry to enable work otherwise not possible.

Well then that makes two of us. Watching the junior people grow is among my favorite things. I have seriously considered teaching as a profession though economic incentives are what they are.

It's very refreshing to see such a viewpoint on chemistry. I've never even seen the chemistry be considered in any staffing or team decision (at least openly), or a manager put effort into fixing a broken relationship. It feels like interpersonal chemistry is almost entirely ignored in favor of skill set or basic resource allocation.

For example, I had a coworker I simply could not get along with (and the feeling was mutual). We were on a two person team so all of my work went through that coworker. I told my boss (repeatedly, over the course of most of a year) that I would rather work with anyone else in the company, and I needed to do so at least some because I was getting burned out. His solution was to make that coworker (on our two person team) my boss, since he didn't have time to manage the relationship.

It made sense from a pure resource point of view; the relationship was showing signs of needing managing and not getting it, so by promoting a new manager, that would happen. There were two of us in a somewhat isolated area, and nobody else really had the skill set for that area, so technically we were the best match.

But it totally ignored the people chemistry - the fact that the two of us would argue for hours over the most ridiculous things (quite visibly), and both feared the other's reaction to any work we did. I don't question my coworker's competence, we were simply on opposite ends of ideological extremes on too many things for that to ever have worked. It would have been far better to have me switch roles, split my time, train someone on the skills needed, just about anything else. The actual solution, naturally, felt like a slap to the face.
Except they sold a small phone and it sold poorly?
Google. Your expected value for options should usually be $0.
This reminds me of functional data analysis, where they favor spline models (avoids Runge's phenomenon and leverage-point issues), and also heavily emphasize thinking about and modeling derivatives.

The name "functional" also emphasizes the intention to approximate "y = f(x,z....)".

Unfortunately, splines generalize extremely poorly to increasing numbers of dimensions. Even partitioning a seven dimensional space into simplices (ie, Delaunay triangulation), and then trying to keep some number of derivatives continuous across the exploding number of faces becomes computationally burdensome.
Google is also a very good learning opportunity; there is lots of training available to employees, you will be working with very talented people, and will get to see how the planet-scale dogfood is made first hand.
Isn't this now irrelevant since Pep 553[0] (adding breakpoint()) was introduced in python 3.7?

If not, it's not very clear how this differs from breakpoint().

0) https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0553/
>newLISP was the butt of half the jokes on #scheme over a decade ago. I'm surprised it had enough uptake to stick around

Because #scheme itself is so influential?
How did you get through the Google interviews? Genuine question. How did you prepare?
HN is full of very try hard contrarians. People disagree for the sake of it. Very often comments have theme of "that's okay or meh, but this or that".
People are extremely passive aggressive on HN similar to people from Bay area. They try hard to appear nice.
I also wonder if most men and women here practice "cuckold" lifestyle. At least, that's what it looks like from the comments.
Have been using it for two years on every service and I can confirm that it is very secure.
Wait a moment...

so this is not well defined as with Earthquakes? So why not build a better clasification system?

I also suppose that their system is well defined...
Genius at Work
Funny, I only ever see demos of movies and games on the iPhone X with all of the cutouts.
The latter. Every time I install i3, I like the flexibility it offers for first few minutes, and then suddenly I find myself unable to do some old thing which is very easy to do in GNOME, and then get frustrated and revert back. Also, the documentations are very long and complicated for a relatively new GNU/Linux user like me.
Best analogy I've seen so far. Wonder if it could be improved by substituting an ISP instead of Netflix.
Looking at the bill, it does prohibit:

>Requiring consideration, monetary or otherwise, from an edge provider, including, but not limited to, in exchange for any of the following:

>(A) Delivering Internet traffic to, and carrying Internet traffic from, the Internet service provider’s end users.

It's not clear to me if that prohibits charging an interconnection fee (often charged at a per port rate), or just prohibits charging based on bandwidth used. It doesn't appear to require offering interconnection to edge providers either. It may be unlawful to discontinue existing edge provider interconnects, but it doesn't seem unlawful to simply never upgrade anything.

Generally speaking, ISPs tend to have congestion in two places -- at or near the last mile, and where they connect to other networks (transit, peering, etc). Interconnections with edge providers helps with congestion to other networks, but depending on the size of the ISPs and the traffic flows, ISPs may have been charging someone for that flow, or using that flow to justify settlement free peering with a larger network. Historic norms are that when data flows are unbalanced by a significant amount, the sending network pays for the bandwidth; but also historically, most ISPs were using some amount of paid transit to receive some of this traffic. Early content networks were able to negotiate settlement free peering by reducing the amount of paid transit the ISPs used. As residential ISPs consolidated, they have become vendors of paid transit themselves, so it's gotten pretty weird.

Anyway, not being able to charge edge providers for bandwidth, is certainly a negative for ISPs; and to the extent that they were raising revenue through that activity, I'm sure they'll pass along those revenue drops to customers in the form of higher bills or reduced capacity through limiting network upgrades, including interconnections to other networks. I don't think this is necessarily non-Netflix users subsidizing bandwidth, more it's that currently any revenue generated from Netflix bandwidth fees are subsidizing the rest of the network. Unfortunately, network neutrality does nothing to increase competition; and without competition, there's not much incentive to upgrade networks. The only positive in my book is increased transparency -- one can hope that because there are a few markets where ISPs compete, the transparency requirements will encourage them to operate in all of their markets with the same levels of service they provide to competitive markets.
Any more anecdotes?
"In Search of Stupidity" by Rick Chapman covers stupidity before digital nomads (https://www.amazon.com/Search-Stupidity-Twenty-Marketing-Dis...).

But, it sounds like digital nomadry is a tool being misused like other tools in this Dilbert-esque environment you work in. How do I get a job in this marketing dept.? I have NO experience in marketing, but my common sense is good half the time. I'm sure I can make fewer blunders than the current team.
They don't 'arbitrarily censor comments' on HN either. Whoever the 'they' are.
There are many situations where those things won't make a person stand out, at least not in a positive light.

You describe a landscape that exists, but there are many other landscapes interleaved. We have some degree of control over which landscapes we choose to engage.

Feminism/Anarchism is not about making the "beauty+money" landscape go away, it's about helping people find situations when they can opt out of it.
>European investors are all ex-banking / private equity spread sheet modelling morons who do not understand risk capital and are looking for risk free bets.

And that's not prudent because?

Why don't you go there with your investment money and show them how it's done?
> His final argument is then, since the borrow checker doesn't provide "entity safety", it impedes on games development because Blow (and any other modern game developer) would have been smart enough to start with a proper ECS system anyways and the borrow checker wouldn't have bought him anything.

But even in C++ gamedev using a proper ECS, one is still using plenty of plain-old references all over the place for things unrelated to the world state, no? If so, then saying "the borrow checker doesn't help manage world state" doesn't imply that the borrow checker doesn't benefit the codebase in other places, especially considering that use of an ECS circumvents the places where we have determined that references (and hence the borrow checker) are already poorly suited to model.
"Up please!" - Yup. What a blast! https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/277378

"Space Taxi" added a bit more depth to the lunar lander concept by adding multiple pads and various vector fields for gravity to act in. Some game modes would accelerate you not downwards but instead towards the center of the map, away from it or around the center in a circle some way. Quite the brain-teaser for my kid brain back then that hadn't previously been exposed to physics/maths like that.
In a totally free market, yes. But as a utility provider ISPs should not be considered a free market. In exchange for near monopoly power over the internet access of a particular region (in the US), these companies have to play by extra rules protecting consumers’ access to 3rd party content.

Imagine if your electric company charged different rates because of the brand of electric car you charged. Sure, they can charge more per kWh based on time of day, total household usage, or total network availability of power at the moment, but charging more (or less) per kWh going into a Tesla than a Leaf would give that electric company monopoly too much power to pick winners and losers.

I like to think of ISP deep packet inspection using the same analogy; I for one would not like my power company to know the make and model of everything I have plugged in in my house, beyond total usage it’s really none of their business.

I recognize these aren’t perfect analogies but hope that they help get the point across.
Why some people never evacuate during a hurricane, according to a psychologist
To me, neutron stars are one of the most awe-inspiring astronomical objects. However...

> "Al dente"

> "Previously, scientists didn’t know how large a mountain nuclear pasta could support."

This must be one of the most pop-sci articles I've ever seen.
There is a reason that Coke hasnt patented the Coke formula.
Why do you think they flew? The top largest birds (by height and mass) alive today do not fly, and could never fly under their own power.
Those options are totally worthless for new startups, don't care about them. In 4 years chances says they will be still worthless. Specially if the startup didn't go over a funding round yet.

Consider only the job, what would make you happy. Would it be super cool, super distruptive, super inovative? The perspective of the future is worth the risk? Then choose the startup.

But if you are on this for the money, or if you care about risk, choose Google.
The solution is simple technically but complicated socially.

Simply, never send a customer a link for them to click. Instead, tell them to go to your site and to log in; then ensure anything important is easily found.
The backpacks for the Special Atomic Demolition Munitions (SADM) would be better, I think. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Muni...