skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's a cool project, but the code is pretty incomplete.

At the end of a turn, the only thing that happens is that units are healed (gold, science, production aren't implemented yet):

https://github.com/Venerons/CivJS/blob/master/js/game.js#L17...

There's no AI or anything like that implemented just yet.
Why We Need Decentralised Cryptocurrencies Now More Than Ever
Which companies don't extend that courtesy? Any company I've worked at gives 1-3months notice for low performers. They call it a "Performance Improvement Plan" or somesuch, and basically pay you while you search for another job. For layoffs, there's a severance payment equivalent to several weeks. No salaried job at a going concern would skip severance, because severance is on condition of promising not to sue the company for anything.
That's really nice, usually when I start playing with something like this the UI glitches out or is just un-intuitive but this one is pretty solid, nice work.
There is no RFC. There is an internet draft making its way through the DNS over HTTPS working group.

The current draft requires support of the application/dns-message media type which is basically an standard dns request base64 encoded. The draft also allows for other media type but does not define them.

Although the Google implementation isn't compliant with the draft since it significantly pre-dates efforts to standardize dns over https, a draft compliant server can accept and return JSON formatted queries.

I will agree that the dns-message format is easier in the case of a traditional dns resolver but it is not easier in all cases. JSON is easier for a web app to produce and consume which is the use case the Google dns over https project was originally designed to address.
I'm not sure if you're crotchety. I had a grandma frantically signal me to slow down when she was out walking with her grandchildren. I was doing 12 mph in a 25mph zone. The road is sketchy in spots, but this stretch is perfectly straight and fairly wide and I gave them about 15 feet of clearance by essentially driving as far as I could on the opposite side of the road. She's definitely crotchety.

That said, I think people are terrible at judging speeds. I keep my car in a low gear on the hills around here for control. As a result the revs are sometimes on the higher end and my car is generally pretty loud and looks fast. So people assume I'm going some great speed when I'm actually going relatively slow.
I've been caught by surprise before when I've been following too closely...

There, FTFY. I tend to follow too closely, too, but let's call it what it is and not blame the driver in front of us.
So they'd file suit in the EU and... what would happen? Some sort of judgment that would prevent a company from starting business in the EU at a later date?
Turning off notifications for all apps is a good (and simple) first step if you want to reduce your habitual smartphone use.
Well, this way you know what websites you should just avoid, because they're selling your data? The web is a large and open place, you don't need to give consent to anyone.
Amazon calls Bernie Sanders’ claims ‘inaccurate and misleading’
Be careful to not use anecdotal evidence as support for an argument
Not exactly the same entity (British India ended up stretching further east) but Mughals ruled it as one country too, and the East India Company kept up the fiction that the Mughals were still in charge for as long as possible.
I think maybe there's some nuance here to how to think about tooling. A data science team without any sort of data warehouse is probably going to be ineffective.

Maybe one way to think about it: some tools try to model and streamline the things you're already doing, and some tools expand the set of things you're able to do. I think the first type is the one to be more skeptical of. Face-to-face conversations, whiteboards, and Excel sheets are all extremely flexible and powerful. It's possible for tools to improve on these, but it's a high bar.
I seem to recall that efforts to demonstrate reproducibility in published cancer studies were not going well. Some of that was due to problems even attempting to reproduce them, but one wonders if some of the rest is due to problems like this.

I have the feeling that we are using terms like "lung cancer" and "skin cancer" to refer to a large group of diseases that are not only not the same, but perhaps qualitatively different.
I mean, why shouldn't you have guns?

As a counterpoint, gun culture (sports and hunting) is really strong here in Finland. Removing people's rights to do what they want is infringing on freedom, and often for no real purpose.
Bye Aerospace StratoAirNet Completes First Flight
Not everyone -- especially salaried professionals -- works at a toxic company like yours.
Ah, the demo I saw pulled in a camera feed and processed it, but it's not clear to me what formats are supported.
What authority would make them comply?
The Curb Cut Effect (2017)
You're a minority because following the letter of the law isn't always the safe decision. It's illegal to cross the double yellow lines, but if a car is pulled over on the shoulder then I'll cross the lines to give them more space. It's illegal but it increases safety for me and them.
How Ketamine Treats Depression: It Acts Like an Opioid
You can burn the Library of Alexandria, and you can make copies of tweets. There's nothing inherent to the art form in the way that copies are stored.

My point is that there is a form of literature that is native to Twitter (or public IM in general), which takes advantage of the specifics of the medium (in particular, unfolding the story at piecemeal bits in real time, and reacting to users comments to tweak the next elements of the story).

The end result may be transcribed to more persistent written storage, but it's not the whole experience (just like reading The Three Musketeers as a book is slightly different to what people waiting for the next chapter in the newspaper would have experienced).
Yes, I think so. IANAL, so you'll want to get a referral for a good medical malpractice lawyer. Maybe there's a class action that makes sense for you to join. Or maybe your case is well documented enough that a good lawyer can negotiate a settlement as a one off event. No matter what, it's still shit, you won't be made whole. But if you get back 1% of the dignity you had, that's worth it. It's a demand that they need to do better and the only thing they really understand is money. So, yeah lawsuit.
The P is capitalised. What more security do you need?

These are the same people that want all Australians to move their health records online and made it manual opt-out. Amongst every other system uses old methods. The tax system doesn’t use 2FA.

At least the credit cards use a chip and PIN... oh wait, now on contactless payment.
As stated elsewhere in this thread, social media is about collecting your data. This includes what you like, what you hate, what makes you happy, who you love, who you look up to, etc...

Now, this can be used to set your(not you but the social media user, no need to be an addict) mood and thus your emotions. This is what advertisers use to target ads or design them.

Your "intellect", in the short therm, is heavily dependent on your mood and your emotions. By "intellect", I'm referring to how you interact to the environment. (E.g. a sad person would interact with other people differently than a person that just made a million dollars).

So, if social media has such a handle on your emotions they have a handle on your intellect (its manifestations, which is the only thing other people can perceive ).

I would say "that intellect" is vulnerable. Because it is not serving your best interests. Because it's been manipulated to make you want to buy a new car, for example.

PS: I know this is controversial opinion and a lot of people will hate it. But I do believe this is the case given my current understanding of machine learning capabilities and human cognition.
>But you're not a special snowflake just because you don't have an app installed on your phone

I don't think this elitism is the biggest reason people quit social media. Quitting social media has bigger consequences for elitist mindsets-- that is, having a social media presence involves more opportunity to curate an image that is seen by others as "elite".

This kind of thinking is also a coping mechanism. Going against common practice is isolating but if you can think of it as elevating or distinguishing then you can more easily accomplish your goals or follow through with what you're thinking and feeling on a particular issue. It's hard to quit social media, even if it's no longer benefiting you.

So, ultimately, your complaints of this kind of elitism are pointless and change nothing. They say nothing valuable about the state of the world or the state of this change.
It also does not mean it's going to stay under a limit making it a poor yardstick. As throwaway5752 said, the limit of log(x) -> infinity is still infinity even if it starts growing really slowly.

Really though we don't need to kill / sterilize all humans, getting off the planet could work just fine.
VMware Fusion 10.1.3 Torrent Full Crack Mac Free Download – Crack4Mac
Maybe ProtonMail?
The consequences of indecency
I think the degree to which driving is a social behavior is underappreciated.

By social behavior, I mean we learn to read the "body language" of the drivers (cars) around us, pedestrians, bikers, etc. Have you ever thought to yourself, "that dumbass is just about to pull into my lane" or something like that? That's you being a social animal, making a social judgment about a fellow animal.

This is ancient stuff. Nature is full of animals who have no spoken language, and even no verbalization at all, who nonetheless operate together physically to great effect.

Think of a herd of buffalo, or a school of fish, or a murmuration of swallows. Now, you want to put a robot in there, and have it keep up with the animals? That's a hard problem.

I would argue that we work the same way when driving. So a robot trying to operate in human traffic is going to face the same hard problem.

Instead of tackling that problem, self-driving cars fall back on the written rules of the road. But it's crucial to understand that the rules were written by humans for interpretation by humans. They are not a fool-proof algorithm for safe robot driving, and they were never intended to be that.

Sure, you can argue that conservative driving is safer. I'd argue that that is a cop-out that simply delegates the argument to how we define "conservative." It's conservative to drive 5mph in a 25mph zone; it's also totally legal. But is it good driving?

We can design a conservative robot to put into a school of fish. The real fish will avoid it and leave it behind. The robot fish is safe, in that there are no collisions. But is it fulfilling the mission of being a good fish?
Disagree. I don't think of covering my expenses when traveling as a "perk". I consider it part of the minimum standard of fair dealing.

And, for those who don't see a problem with this, do you see a problem if some other company specifically won't reimburse for Mexican restaurants?
I've been lately trying to get myself accustomed to DDG, and while I appreciate the bang feature immensely, I find myself spending more and more time using !g to revert to Google Search. It probably has something to do with the fact that I search a lot in Japanese as well as English; While English search results are somewhat good, DDG's Japanese search results are just plain bad. I suspect the similar is also true with other non-English languages as well. Hope the new money gets spent on improving search results on non-English.
trust? what is that?
I'm not the biggest fan of UML everywhere, but one benefit of it is that certain diagram types are standardized.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Modeling_Language

Check out interaction diagrams for what you describe. Two parties (A and B) would be represented as two columns, moving down the diagram means moving forward in time. The arrow going from one to the other is a message (either an actual message or a function call or something). So A->B means A is signaling (the text and context describe how) B. If B is requesting information, you'd have two arrows. First B<-A, and then A->B with the response (attempted plain text version):

t A B
0 | |
1 |---->| A sends data to B
2 | |
3 |<----| B requests more information from A
4 |---->| A responds

A and B could be people, processes, classes/objects, servers, whatever. The interaction points are described with the context of the diagram and text. (NB: t is not meant to be explicit here, I've included it to illustrate the passage of time going down the diagram.)
Sorry, when did anyone talk about a limit? If the slowing growth continues, then eventually it will cross zero into the negative. Look at the relative growth, by 2100 it's predicted to get close.
Peak kids has already happened https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/08/reached-peak-bab...
Part 1: KYC/AML – Must Read for FinTech Entrepreneurs (Crypto or Non-Crypto)
is hacker news not social media?
I understand what you're saying. On the idealistic side in the battle between idealism and pragmatism, you're trying to negate the premise that the other side's instruments are even useful. If you can't be certain what the closed product does, how can it be a reliable source of data?

Put another way: if your goal is to not ever harm your child, how can you responsibly feed them applesauce or let doctors administer them medicine when you can't be certain what went into the making of the applesauce or of the medicine?

With a very rigorous standard, you can't. With the most rigorous standard, you can't even if the chain of trust has a single link, and you'd only use food or medicine that you, yourself, produced. But we know that few, if any people, use such rigorous standards, and that, if they did, they'd be much worse off. It's not a perfect analogy for software or hardware, but it's certainly a salient one. With your standards, it's malpractice all the way down[0].

0. http://wiki.c2.com/?TheKenThompsonHack
A new mantra – “People are lazy”
Part 2: MSB’s – Must Read for FinTech Entrepreneurs (Crypto or Non-Crypto)
I haven’t checked, but perhaps this is something that can be made using github.com/HackerNews/API ?
I think code generators are a better path than having the compiler generator the code for you. It's nice to look and see what is about to be built instead of waiting for it to be built then trying to debug with breakpoints.
We Discovered Helium 150 Years Ago. Are We Running Out?
What's less? What is your approved number of children for each couple? If someone remarries, does that x number of children carry over from their previous?
You Are a Language Inventor
I ride clipped all the time in the city and don't have this problem. If you can't safely use clips in the city, it's your choice to use them anyway. Saying that due to clips, "Coming to a full stop on a bike is downright dangerous" may be precise for you and your usage, but it's not a general rule as you made it sound.
I wanted to have an easily searchable collection for security solutions posted by AWS and the community, and something that could be updated on an ongoing basis.

I would love to get some feedback or suggestions for content, layout or any other details.
same here. some liberals are so fanatic that they can't hold a dialogue with a person of opposing views. I've got a friend who stopped speaking with their father because of Brexit.

I have no issues being friends with right wing people, even if they're more extreme. I just don't very often discuss politics with them, but we hang out a lot.
For those of you who claim to not use social media. HN is social media..
Free speech in Australia is weak. The constitution is excited about voting as protected speech. But not for private individuals. It takes acts of state governments to provide the necessary framework.

For those playing along for the thrill of reading long text:
https://www.humanrights.gov.au/freedom-information-opinion-a...
We use yEd, it's a free, cross platform written in Java that's served us well for many years.

https://www.yworks.com/products/yed
This makes sense. #1 feels like building a product/business, which I've tried many times and the marketing part is ALWAYS hard!

I guess iOS, front, and back-end aren't exactly niche, though.
Kids today miss out if they're not online (which largely takes place on phones) and on social media. They miss out in social interaction, which is arguably even more vital to their development than reading books. Even when I was younger, so many interactions outside of school took place on AIM-- whole friendships and relationships were built off of these online interactions.

Nowadays kids have to be on top of the latest viral trends and YouTube videos and Twitch streams in order to keep up with what their friends are talking about. Like it or not, the digital world is pretty much essential for kids these days.
Within some decades, text-to-speech and speech-to-text will make it unnecessary for the average person to know how to read and write. Reading and writing as we know them will be limited to a fraction of the population that engage in high-level symbolic manipulation. Literacy could go back to 12%, especially as a myriad of mundane administrative jobs are obsoleted by AI.
> If the slowing growth continues, then eventually it will cross zero into the negative.

Err, no. The growth of log(x) is always decreasing and yet it always stays positive. This is true for a huge range of functions and one of the reasons limits are important.

Now, you can argue that the way human growth is slowing suggests it might possibly go negative at some point. But, that's less obvious.
Yes but you can't let go of anger if you don't accept it. Rejecting anger doesn't work. Being a victim of other people's anger neither.
You may be missing what the other commenters are pointing out, so I'll try to be a little more explicit. The website you're pitching is very similar to Hacker News.

> a website where anybody can share contents related to startup and entrepreneurial circle

Hacker News is often used to share content related to startups, and anyone can share content.

> And people can mark those content as HELPFUL

This is loosely matched by the up/down votes available here.

> Therefore what about an idea of centralised website where other users can submit links of the articles or videos they found interesting and worth sharing

People submit such links on Hacker News.

I may be missing something, though. What would differentiate your site from HN?
Okay, but who cares if it's annoying? What is the point of bringing up the fact that sometimes people are annoying when they make certain choices? How does that add to meaningful discussion, how does that even create meaningful discussion?
Doesn't matter, if there isn't a dedicated arrow for the turn, I'll go when I damned well feel like it. Your definition of "yield" might differ from mine, but that is just too bad, according to the law.

And I say this is the kind of driver cuts my left turns closer than most. You know the driver that's already started their left turn before you've cleared the intersection, and it looks like they're going to hit you (but won't)? That's me; keep it movin' folks. But if the driver in front of me is less aggressive (to a point), that's cool.
> I've seen that stated many times.

The Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) impact testing procedure for bicycle helmets does not account for collisions with motor vehicles [1]

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/16/1203.17
People upvote just by reading the titles (in general, not just here).
From a friend who once worked on it: whole thing ran on a single rack. Redundant power supplies, but a single common plug.
Broadly speaking you should have a MQL -> SQL -> Deal model (i.e assumptions for ratios between the three) and assumptions for CPL and SQL per SDR/AE.

With these you can tie sales forecasts to marketing spend and sales hires.

Obviously these won't be perfect, but when you're off target you can see why (i.e which assumption was false) and then either try to fix it or correct the false assumption giving you a more accurate model going forward.
I have no idea how legit the article is, but I strongly believe that social media should be controlled.It's never the case of quitting social media all together, but redesigning it according to human values, respecting it, might be the way forward.

Personal Experience:
I tried quitting WhatsApp for 3 days, months ago and I still remember the amount of shock my friends had.Upon checking it after 3 days,
Most of the messages were like "Hey man are you dead or what??".But then, only one had called me.In no way does this show that others are not compassionate or something like that.It's because everyone is so used to using it that they can't imagine a world without it.

Then I did something more exotic I quit WhatsApp for 2 months.Huu man. It was difficult.The fax machine problem is inevitable, I didn't miss out much important stuff because it was during summer break, when classes reopened I had to take it again(Or I would miss assignments :/ ).But at times I feel that the shit I skipped over was really worth it.

PS: Go through http://humanetech.com/ I really wish every one adopted these as standards.Tristan Harris really seems to be talking sense guys.
>Diversity practices in hiring, for example

I’m a hiring manager, but I don’t work in HR. I follow HR guidelines and ask relevant policy questions. Nothing more. I don’t express an opinion about our hiring practices around diversity.

>moderation/curation of news feeds

The article doesn’t say that all these individuals raising the issue work on one feature. That would be a relevant detail. My reading of this piece suggests that a swathe of individuals don’t like company culture — the bits that bind employees above the work itself - and that’s the part I can’t grasp. I work at a Fortune 50 company and I have no idea the political or religious affiliations of my coworkers. I could guess, but don’t want to.

I just don’t see how a company culture can have an impactful political bias to people who mind their own business. The article doesn’t specify any specific instance, so I can’t form an opinion on the validity of their claims.
New playground and cheatsheet for learning Python
Why does it matter if some people think they are better than others? What are you trying to add to the discussion here? Your point in this thread amounts to, "apples are crunchy and sweet".
It's also possible that someone discovers a way to build a cheap commercial fusion power plant tomorrow. But we generally don't rely on these kinds of remote possibilities.
As one of the developers that at least contributes to yEd Live (our in-browser equivalent; yEd is based on our Java library which I'm not working on), thank you :-)

That being said, as a UX guy I always love to look at competitors and find ways how editing can be improved or streamlined (and yEd has many features already, so some parts of it can be more complicated than I'd like).
Over the last two centuries, you would expect to find a direct causal link between industrialization and intelligence, as governments have introduced mass education for the first time, to create a skilled labour force.

Because industrialization is also positively correlated with pollution and urbanization, especially during its first phase, you would also expect to find a long-term positive correlation between pollution and intelligence.

However, if you factor out the positive effects of mass education, then you will likely find, as expected, that intelligence decreases as toxicity of the environment rises.