skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
(I didn't downvote you, though I can think of several reasons why others did - and a few not to)

I'm sorry for the situation you are in. You are apparently angry at the world, and whatever led you to this, I hope you can fix it. Please don't take my words below in the wrong way, I mean well.

Playing "woman", "poverty" and similar cards usually doesn't help when getting a job / work. Managers (smart ones at least) will want to hire good hires, not because they are white / black / male / female / ..., but because they will do a good job. Even mentioning such things is a strong signal not to consider you for hire, because it tells the manager that you will bring a lot of baggage. Nobody wants that, they just want a capable writer.

Open Source is not about helping people. If you know how, you can use it to build a reference, if that's what is missing from your resume, if you have time, if you know how, and if you find a suitable project... a lot of ifs.

Good luck!
My personal guess is that most people need "warm up" time to make progress on their projects, the time needed to build up the mental model of the whole domain. This can go from hours to days to weeks depending on the person and the type of mental model. But some people have certain domains where they can just instantly build up that model in their head and immediately begin making serious progress. You sound like you're one of the rare ones that can do this for a large number of domains (3d algorithms, project architecture, database structure, feature interaction). I'm only like that with a few very specific domains and I suspect most other devs are like me in that sense, so we stand in awe when someone has that natural in-built capability. (I think this not only goes for making progress but also learning new concepts, as I have seen other graduate students who can blaze through certain things like Haskell where I struggle as through molasses.) If this theory is true, then you probably aren't spending more than 3-5 hours on projects like this per week, but you're making the same progress most of us would need 2-5 weeks for. Btw I'm the guy who posted your project and emailed you, thanks for coming here to answer our questions and thanks for making such a cool project and making it freely available for all of us to learn from!
How much is it? (It seems like there is no way to see without creating an account - yuck)
[Continued from the Post]:

I think Hosted PaaS platform is the most scalable of the 3. Once you figure out core features needed by the vast majority of your users, you can automate these nicely and build a company worth 100s of millions of USD relatively quickly. This gives you substantial revenue to become self-sustainable. From this point onward, you can take the long-term enterprise support approach to scale it further. The bigger users who can't fit in Hosted PaaS model can always go for option 2.

This is the reason I think Database companies like RedisLabs and Dgraph have chosen the Commons Clause License. They essentially want to keep options 2 and 3 to themselves while giving away the full set of features for those who want to master the operations of the software only for their in-house use.

I think VCs have seen that the Open Core model is very hard to scale for core infrastructure projects. Bigger cloud players can put a lot of money to provide hosted PaaS for "popular" infrastructure projects. Since these cloud players have years worth of reputation going for them, users trust them more than a small VC funded startup (or an untrustworthy one like Oracle). We have seen this with MySQL (RDS and Aurora, and other cloud players) and Docker (Kubernetes Vs. Swarm).

However I think, Commons Clause is the wrong way to approach this as it prevents "consulting" companies to earn from the software. In Enterprise, generally new infrastructure software is introduced via consulting route. So it can help to create evangelists for your product.

It seems Mongo DB is executing things successfully with AGPL. As per this link: https://investors.mongodb.com/news-releases/news-release-det...

>> First Quarter Fiscal 2019 Financial Highlights Revenue: Total revenue was $48.2 million, an increase of 49% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $44.6 million, an increase of 53% year-over-year, and services revenue was $3.7 million, an increase of 14% year-over-year.

There are projects like Cockroach DB (Core) and Kafka who have gone with Liberal Apache License. Only future will tell how it affects them.

What do you guys think?
If user does not see that she is operating in a new tab, she can still click "back" and would still be vulnerable to the "Fake Google Serp" trick.
Installing a downloaded APK means you miss out on Google's identity verification process, and maybe on Google's malicious code scanning -- but Google Play Protect says it will scan all apps on your device, and may upload your apps to Google[1], so it might not be that big of a difference in practice, if you get linked into the appstore by a shady website, you can get a shady app.

There's a bigger difference on iOS, if a similar setting was even available, because Apple curates much more strongly than Google.

[1] https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/2812853?hl=en
As someone launching a coding camp for kids, Eventbrite has been instrumental for us. We do free classes to generate leads and the free offering of EB has been more than enough to accomplish this. Good to see them succeed.
That is exactly the problem I see as well. Basically it is so hard to get it working "correctly" (and by that we mean in a way that isn't trivially exposed to the full frontal Internet), that engineers under pressure just punt after getting it to work at all. Sort of "Ok, here it is working, we'll fix the security concerns later, in the mean time try it out." and they get swept into another project because this part is "working" and nobody comes back to to do the hard work of figuring out the right way to make it work.

As a result 'war driving' through the S3 namespace continues to yield up PII, and CUI nuggets of gold to bad actors.
The Don Davis painting at the link you provided is so nice. Then below is such a crappy CG image...

Man, I love the old "artist's concepts", hate the new CG.
Try going the left direction. Way more fun.
It's not bad, it's wrong, since they make reference to the "entangled photons in the light coming from the quasars," which is entirely not how the experiment worked. The light from the quasars (which weren't measurably entangled with squat!) were essentially used as random number generators, in order to perform standard Bell test experiment [0] using a standard laboratory entangled-photon source.

I recommend reading the paper instead, if you're interested [1].

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_test_experiments
[1] https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12...
Non-paywall, different source: https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/08/23/vw-mexican-crops-...
Translations

Chinese:
http://jiyinyiyong.github.io/monads-in-pictures/

French:
http://www.leonardmeyer.com/blog/2014/06/functors-applicativ...

German:
https://github.com/madnight/monad-in-pictures-german

Japanese:
http://qiita.com/suin/items/0255f0637921dcdfe83b

Korean:
http://lazyswamp.tistory.com/entry/functorsapplicativesandmo...

Portuguese:
https://medium.com/@julianoalves/functors-applicatives-e-mon...

Russian:
http://habrahabr.ru/post/183150/

Spanish:
https://medium.com/@miguelsaddress/funtores-aplicativos-y-m%...

Turkish:
http://rimbi.github.io/functors-applicatives-monads-in-pictu...

Vietnamese:
http://zinh.github.io/haskell/2015/09/16/functors-applicativ...
>My belief is so self-evident that anyone who comes into contact with it must agree with it, therefore if someone doesn't agree with me it must be because they haven't come into contact with it, and the idea is everywhere so therefore if they haven't come into contact with it they must not be open-minded!
Hey,

there were a few reasons behind this.

- ease of migration was a big one, we had 100+ instances of bitly's oauth2_proxy, and were able to seamlessly migrate them to this, without any changes to the services being protected.

- ease of deployment was also important. Our solution doesn't have any datastore dependencies, and is stateless, so was straightforward to deploy into our PaaS ( https://tech.buzzfeed.com/deploy-with-haste-the-story-of-rig... ).

- when we built this, there were far fewer solutions than there are today. For example, Ory's Oathkeeper ( https://github.com/ory/oathkeeper) was released after we were already using sso internally at BuzzFeed.

thanks!
If I were being pithy, I find that when you're doing this type of thing it's more a feeling of "working fun" rather than "working hard".

(Of course this means that one is probably not always going to do "production ready" things, but it's for fun, so it doesn't really matter. Sometimes it's fun to just go nuts and sprinkle "undefined"[1] all over the code base and just go from types to implementation as fast as humanly possible.)

[1] This is a Haskellism, but basically means any of:

assert(false)
throw new NotImplementedException(...)
???
etc.
You could make sure you put on all loan applications that they will not check Equifax. Probably they won't even know how to handle that though and will either reject you, or ignore it.
Apple and Google should update their policies where they take a much smaller cut if the user got to the App Store page directly (via external link) or a direct search. They deserve the 30% cut if users find the app by browsing the store (which doesn't happen nearly as often).
We don't know how Oculus will turn out to be - it may be a very isolating and addicting technology.

And there's no need for VR - high quality video conferecing does the job.
Syd Mead.

And everyone else can go home. ;-)
The platform fee should be treated as a platform tax, just add it to the price, then user can choose to install via platform store and pay the extra or side load it and pay normal. Or is there something in the publisher agreement that prevents this ?
What is finish line networl- review
Android doesn't have system wide sideloading anymore, if I allow sideloading for one app its still disabled for other apps.
Jerk? No, Steve Jobs was an asshole, across the board. He was also a visionary and he was able to achieve great things. Guess what, being a highly achieving visionary is orthogonal to being a good person. People need to stop conflating the two and stop idolizing people just because of their achievements.
RISC-V Boom CPU
And then jump on board?
I always knew Timmy was just like Robin Hood... only different.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/private-equity-firms-are-the-ne...

Note to self: one flavor of Kool Aid is good, the other flavor is bad.
I work on things that save me time and make me more productive when working on other projects. For example, after I was doing a lot of web development work, I created https://www.checkbot.io/ because I couldn't find any good tools that would test whole websites for various SEO, speed and security problems.
Most individual investors, including younger, should have little or no money in individual stocks but instead in something like a Vanguard diversified portfolio of cheap index funds/ETFs. If you want to take 5% or 10% of your worth to the stock casino, sure (after paying off all your credit cards and maxing your 401k/IRA).
I see

Some of that crowd does to the area on the 4th of July week now. They say its more like how it used to be
Here's the order I read them in:

I, Robot (1950)
Foundation (1951)
Foundation and Empire (1952)
Second Foundation (1953)
The Caves Of Steel (1954)
The Naked Sun (1957)
The Robots Of Dawn (1983)
Foundation’s Edge (1982)
Foundation and Earth (1986)
Robots And Empire (1985)
The End of Eternity (1955)

I haven't actually finished the final two because it took me a while to find Robots And Empire. I'll have to reread from the beginning.

Here’s Asimov’s recommended order. This one is pretty much chronological for characters, I think, which would spoil some narrative twists. Kind of like how watching the Star Wars prequels first would spoil The Empire Strikes Back.

Either The Complete Robot (1982) *or* I, Robot (1950)
The Caves Of Steel
The Naked Sun
The Robots Of Dawn
Robots And Empire
The Currents Of Space (1952)
The Stars, Like Dust (1951)
Pebble In The Sky (1950)
Prelude To Foundation (1988)
Forward the Foundation (1993)
Foundation
Foundation and Empire
Second Foundation
Foundation’s Edge
Foundation and Earth

And here is an Expanded Chronological order, which includes books written by other authors after Asimov died:

I, Robot
The Rest of the Robots (1964)
The Complete Robot (1982)
Robot Dreams (1986)
Robot Visions (1990)
The Positronic Man (1992) (co-written by Robert Silverberg)
Mother Earth (1948) (minor inconsistencies)
The Caves Of Steel
The Naked Sun
Mirror Image (1972)
The Robots of Dawn
Mirage (Mark W. Tiedemann) (2000)
Chimera (Mark W. Tiedemann) (2001)
Aurora (Mark W. Tiedemann) (2002)
Have Robot, Will Travel (Alexander C. Irvine) (2005)
Robots And Empire
Caliban (Roger MacBride Allen) (1993)
Inferno (Roger MacBride Allen) (1994)
Utopia (Roger MacBride Allen) (1996)
The Stars, Like Dust
The Currents Of Space
Pebble In The Sky
Prelude To Foundation
Foundation’s Fear (Gregory Benford) (1997)
Forward the Foundation (MINUS the final section of the epilogue)
Foundation and Chaos (Greg Bear) (1998)
Foundation’s Triumph (David Brin) (1999)
Foundation
Foundation and Empire
Second Foundation
Foundation’s Edge
Foundation and Earth
The End Of Eternity (not really in order apparently, kind of in its own time)
Nemesis (1989) (not really in order, kind of on its own)

I got these lists from somewhere online years back, I think a stackoverflow site, but I'd avoid them because they also talk about spoilers even in listing the names of the books.
The two biggest drawbacks of Caseta for me were the vendor lock-in, and the cheap feeling switches.

With Z-wave you can pick your hub and devices. If things don't work how you want out of the box, chances are someone has already written the code you need for whatever hub you're using. If not, you can write it yourself.

I am currently using (and pretty happy with) all GE switches with SmartThings hub (soon Vera?), Schlage Locks, Visonic door sensors, Ecobee Thermostats and Harmony remotes for control/automation overrides.
Derp. OP here - yep typo and corrected thank you!
Looks super interesting. I'm looking to do something like this for my personal stuff, but I'd rather avoid the dependency on Google. Does anyone have suggestions for how to set something like that?
I miss the idea that a platform, applications, and marketplace were not a vertical stack owned by one entity.

As a consumer, I’d love to buy a phone, not a content distribution straight jacket.
Because I have questioned for decades if it is possible.

Similar to an alcoholic finding comfort in Alcoholics Anonymous, I would love to find someone who has been lifelong obese who has shed the pounds for more than a year.

Do you mean that it is wasting a doctors time because they don't owe me motivation? I am talking about my obesity specialists. They are giving me diets and exercise plans that I am doing. I don't feel like I am not trying.

Do you mean that I am not trying because I am not successful?
Yeah I doubt anyone has ever learned about Netflix through Google/Apple app store. Netflix is a huge brand.
Nobody denies that they created an amazing ecosystem. But their ecosystem also has no competition: they’ve captured the market, just like Standard Oil did with the petroleum market in the beginning of the 20th century. And neither is good for consumers.
> links with the domain different than the open one should not be allowed to be added to History

This is already the case, and AFAIK it's always been this way.

From [the HTML standard for pushState][1]:

> Compare newURL to document's URL. If any component of these two URL records differ other than the path, query, and fragment components, then throw a "SecurityError" DOMException.

[1]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/history.html#dom-hist...
DJI’s new Mavic 2 drones have upgraded cameras and zoom lenses
Even if their products don't hit market adoption, they at least have a future in Bioshock and Fallout cosplay.
30% of a single app purchase might be reasonable, we can argue about that.

30% of a recurring monthly subscription (like netflix) is bonkers.
There's really no such thing as a "classical light source". Rather there could be an explanation of observed behavior derived from classical mechanics. What the experiment seeks to do, and claims to have done is to make an observation that can only be explained through non-local quantum entanglement.

It's the explanations that are "classical" or "quantum mechanical" not the things in the experiment.
thank you - We know from our own experience using other open source projects that having documentation, and guides to get started really helps.

We know there is more to do there too (some of the feedback in this HN post has helped highlight areas we need to improve the docs) and we will be adding to the docs so over the next while.

We will also welcome PRs improving the docs!
Does that mean hyperthreading is effectively unpatchably insecure?

Cloud Providers are gonna have a bad time if this is true.
Apple and Google not only created the device and funded the R & D for the features, but also created the APIs, the tools, the infrastructure, and attracted the (hundreds of millions of) users. The 30% cut they ask of developers is more than reasonable.

Want to bypass that cut? Build a web app and make it play well on mobile.

I can understand the argument that they should accept the 30% cut to be listed in and downloadable from the App Store. However, an iOS device is also the property of its owner and the owner should be allowed (morally) to install software outside the app store. Even if that comes with potential security problems. Android already permits this.

A world where you can only install software accepted by a gatekeeper is a world that is similar to one where you can only read books that are accepted by a gatekeeper.
Not much to add other than thanks!

Home Assistant was a key piece of not having to fiddle with lights while moving to a living room to do an early morning feeding for a baby.
My willingness to do this is counterbalanced by the fact that I don't want to relocate to, for example, Thailand.
In prior speculation on space-related forums, the only non-military application that seemed likely was space tourism. (The extra flexibility you get on launch site and timing could enable unusually quick rendezvous with a space station already in orbit -- which also has kind of obvious benefits to a hostile military.)
Funny story is my company at the time looked at acquiring EventBrite about 10? years ago, and as part of the integration eval, I happened to run the ab command against their endpoint. Few minutes later VP ran to my office and told me to stop as EventBrite called saying we were DDOSing them.

Congrats to EventBrite on going public. Am glad you stayed independent, as my company would have ruined them, like many other acquisitions..
For some of this tone and context matter.

If you tell someone they smell like a toilet but you smile before and laugh after, or sort of squint and say it playfully, it might be a joke and not mean.

This is doubly true of a family member.
I guess they aren't thugs - they're just unreasonable rent seekers at this point.
Can you please stop sanctimoniously sprinkling “dishonest” all over?
I needed to hear this as I'm on the hate bandwagon too. Its unfortunate that they promised so much. Its like they told everyone they were going to create world peace, but only solved one military conflict.
They will most likely be scammed into downloading spyware.
Has there yet been any attempted legal action against someone who has "exploited" a software contract?

I mean, most of the smart-contracts crowd seem to be of the opinion that whatever a software contract permits must be its intent as well, but I don't imagine that conviction would prevent them from filing suit once they'd lost money.
I agree with all of this but would just note that Jobs wasn't an asshole every minute of the day, or even most of every day. He was often nice, charismatic, and inspirational.
Honest and In-Depth Analysis of Most Popular Email Marketing Services
Tendencias Y Estilos Para Tintes Rosegold
Does anyone know if disabling SMT has had an effect on vmd(8) performance in -current?
I don't think the app owners should get a free ride but 30% is waaaay too much of a chunk. Even 15% is a lot of money after the first year. I'm almost positive 5% would cover costs and sprinkle some profit on top.
In general, doing research in the US is a bad move because of the CFAA.
I was casually wondering the other day if Intel had hired some Oracle lawyers recently :)
Do you think this argument also applies to personal computers? If not, what's the difference?
>> Companies like Bugcrowd and HackerOne (both of which Ricafort has worked with)

This article is very poorly written. It leaves out a lot of key details that could sway ones take away. It mentions that he has done a lot of bug bounties and not gotten paid for some of them. Were they duplicate reports? Was he doing these on his own merit and not going through the bug bounty programs?

The staff at hackerone and bugcrowd will make sure you are squared away when you are submitting reports and dealing with payouts. If a company were to refuse to pay you even though you submitted an in scope report that qualified for payment, these sites would help you resolve those conflicts.

This article to me tries to paint a picture of: Here is a hard working bug bounty hunter who's efforts barely go noticed because so many mean companies don't want to pay him, he can only make a meager living.

I take it as someone who doesn't go through the proper programs and sites, so he's playing with fire on getting his findings reported. If you are just some random hacker who emails a company out of the blue with a random vulnerability finding, most will not take you seriously. Companies who want to be hacked, have bug bounty programs and disclosure pathways. If he's as good as the article paints him to be, he should be making a ton more money than it says he is. So either he is getting royally screwed out of payments by not going through bug bounty programs, or he isn't as good of a hunter as he may seem.
I wish automation platforms were language agnostic. That way you can mix scripting/programming langauges and take advantage of the libraries that exist in each platform. some vendors only release integration APIs in certain languages; they are hard to predict and also may not be the language you want to use for your backend logic, as opposed to your job logic.
This all seems far too fishy for me. It seems like someone is trying to Manufacture Consent for war with Iran and they're using fear to do so. With Facebook acting on a Fireeye report yesterday, they took down Anti-Israel/Pro-Palestine, Anti-Saudi, and Pro-Iran media [1]. What's the issue with being Anti-Israel/Pro-Palestine other than that it conflicts with 'American Values'? Saudi Arabia funds ISIS [2] and is a major player in Imperialism and war, why wouldn't Americans on the left be against this?

Mark my words, this new push by social media to take down "inauthentic" pages is really being used to crush dissent and alternate opinions that go against the grain of the allowed discourse in USA.

If China can do it, so can USA. This seems oddly familiar to the run up to Iraq.

[1] https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/08/more-coordinated-inauth...

[2] https://www.salon.com/2016/10/11/leaked-hillary-clinton-emai...
It accurately describes the behavior I'm talking about. Would you prefer I spice it up with some more "disingenous" and "misleading" too?