skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Datafication, Distribution and the Future of Archival Science
This answers the "who" part of the question, but not the "how".

Like reasonable, responsible members of any community, what people want to take away from this is "where is the line set" and "where did IW's trajectory take them over the line"? If those questions can't be answered to satisfaction, then this is not custodial, it's political activism coming from the top down i.e. tyranny.

(My personal belief, having looked into a few of IW's productions, is that they are disingenuous provocateurs, and I generally support their sort of product being sidelined from mainstream discourse on the basis that it's an anti-pattern, or a kind of virus that infects and deflects rational discourse.)
I think it's because botters have taken to cloud gaming to more easily scale up their bot networks.
Subprime loans (all a subprime loan is is a loan that doesn't have the best interest rate)

That way over-simplifies, and misses a key point: the loans don't "have the best interest rate" because they are assessed to be loans at higher risk of default. The way you say, it sounds like the house buyers just didn't shop around enough for mortgages.
Insurance against a launch monopoly would be more effected by competition in general, no need to build your own rocket. I have also never heard anybody from ESA make that claim.

Ariane 5 is reliable but the primary reason it is launching rather then ULA is not reliability but politics.

> Ariane's goal is not to win the most commercial contracts or compete with SpaceX on price.

That is false. That was exactly what their goal was all the way up to a 1-2 years ago when they finally realized how badly they fucked up.

They spent the last 10 years laughing at SpaceX and telling everybody how stupid SpaceX is and how nothing is gone work and how much better they are.

> This is also the reason reusability doesn't make sense for Ariane. With less than ten launches per year, fixed costs make up a large portion of the cost. If they only needed one rocket per year, it wouldn't really get all that much cheaper because they still need the factory.

You are repeating what is essentially propaganda that ignores important facts.

The reason Ariane can only launch 10 times a year is because they totally failed in innovating and rested their success for a long time and now that they got 3 billion to develop a new rocket, that they claimed would be competitive. However the totally fucked that up and are not even close to being competitive.

The very reason they go all this money for Ariane 6 was to build something competitive so they could continue to capture commercial launch so that government flights were cheap.

So it is not that re-usability is not worth it, its that they failed to make a commercially viable product and without that they are just monopolistic launch with a low launch rate.
> if I get a cert from Comodo and change my CAA record to specify Let's Encrypt immediately afterwards

Why would you do that?
They're also piloting a program similar to moviepass or AMC's offering.
How is the article misleading? It said the same thing you did in bold....

Warning: Once you have pushed a commit to GitHub, you should consider any data it contains to be compromised. If you committed a password, change it! If you committed a key, generate a new one.
That's slippery slope. They are not censoring based on bias. They are censoring propaganda, disinformation, hate speech and incitement to violence. They've set a very low bar for acceptable content. No reasonable person will miss Alex Jones. If they ever get too heavy-handed you can vote with your feet.
OnLive seems to have failed in part because of it's terrible latency, in the 150-200ms range. That's a far cry from 20-80ms which you can get on these newer systems.
Why did i miss it?! :(

I think first it was planned for 28th now i read it one day later :/
I am just one of those internet health "scientists", check some keywords of what I am saying for yourself. There is no conclusive data on all nutrition/eating habits. People like me gamble against the supposed average. Sometimes these hypes have been shown to be in fact detrimental (see antioxidant supplementation and cancer risk).

To your question: I doubt it's the same as many speculated mechanisms of fasting benefits are tied to your body's usual maintenance workings which just require some time. I suspect that some mechanisms are tied to a "low glucose signal", but the majority are things which are always present, but get interrupted or are less efficient when digestion is triggered and nutrients flood the blood stream.

Example 1: Glucose and complete (animal/soy isolate) protein trigger steady, increased IGF-1 secretion, which translates to "oh boy this is good, grow everything, store everything, who knows when we get something like this again. Noo, no maintenance! Build!". Higher IGF-1 levels are linked to cancer. Less nutritional "efficient" diets, like plant based, vegan diets are linked to an decreased cancer risk.

Example 2: Autophagy is always done (although increased when fasting), it's not hard to imagine the results to be much more protective when the garbage collection comes out ahead of the trash production from time to time. Mind that one problem with cancerous cells is the cloaking, hiding from the immune system, which might be done by accumulation of extracellular trash through increased cellular metabolism. Cleaning this up, might help the immune cells to target and kill cancer and precancerous cells.

Since eating became always accessible pleasure, I speculate some metabolic expectations of the body to be not met and humans tend to be in constant celebration mode. It's worth noting that cancer is naturally a rare event and absolutely linked to life style changes in humans and toxic byproducts of human civilization for all animals.
YouTube Bans Alex Jones, Following Facebook's and Apple's Lead
Cloud gaming sends video and not actual game data. For that reason latency compensation is impossible and will feel worse on the cloud than in-game.
Ah, so it was provided by Power itself, I see. Thanks!
Yes, I would argue it is in fact an axiom: a statement that is regarded as being established or self-evidently true.

Since basically all of the evidence we have available to us suggests that fewer guns lead to fewer shootings, and more guns lead to more shootings; since the only real objections to that logic are rather contrived "find the subset of guns such that removing them leads to more shootings" logical toys with little if any foundation in the real world; and since it's, I mean, just clearly correct - I'm curious why you think such a proposition is not obviously true.

Clearly there is a debate about the effectiveness of gun control in America, the one country on the planet that has yet to make up its mind about this. However, I would suggest that such a debate is not being carried out in good faith.
>When and where was that never the case?

For very long stretches of time in rural life. Even medieval peasants had it much better than most people think. A lot of people conflate disasters and incidents from millennia of history (1 to 1950 A.D say) and across countries, and create a mix of disasters as if those were constants in the pre-modern era.
"It's nice!" ... or at least that's what I would say if my phone wasn't limited to Android 7.0
> Not yet. Costs haven't fallen.

That is false. You already pay 10 million less. That is 15% of the launch price. And 15% of the extremely cheap price that SpaceX was already selling.

The reality is that SpaceX simply increased its margin. The technology is still epoch defining.

If any competitor comes even close to SpaceX in price, they will simply drop the price again.
Not quite banned but definitely an improvement. As I understand it, the bill imposed a fairly significant garden leave requirement on companies looking to exercise a non-compete. It also prohibits companies from retroactively imposing.
What about when an activity in app A opens an activity in app B? Can I still go back to app A's activity from app B's activity?
now that i think about it, if you can make the array of probes, you don't need any moving parts.

vvvvvvvvvvv
'',,','''''
^^^^^^^^^^^

build two in opposition and pull up or down for each state.

far far easier said than done i'm sure. :D
When they demo'd this over a year ago, they gave the human player a laundry list of instructions and the bot was still defeated once the keen human player used their intellect to analyze what was going on and 'break the bot'. The fact that the bot didn't recover or understand how it was being broken examples the true nature of what's going on : It's just a dumb bot w/ lots of training time. If intelligence were present, it too would understand like the human being what was going on and change things up. This is actual the crucial thing that needs to be demonstrated and targeted but you see .. This gets in the realm of the class of 'hard problems' that a number of these well funded and popularized groups aren't attacking.

As for Dota, indeed the broader game was designed and is constantly updated to be an intellectual challenge. Cheese strategies exists. When discovered, game rebalances are conducted to ensure players don't settle in on brute force exploits.

In just 5-10min of watching some of the matches, I already know a handful of characters that would 'break the bot' on this 5 bot ensemble. This is powered by human intellect (the truly significant part). The bots trained across time horizons greater than a human lifetime in this unorthodox and slanted arrangement. Human beings seasoned on a more well rounded and balance game are then thrown to the bots and showcased. I know who would be sold on this and its not your average Dota player.

Again, the fact that it is possible to 'break the bot' examples that the whole thing is a charade. I have no doubt they might have gained some experienced/understanding with engineering this solution but the actual result is lipstick on a 'backpropaganda' pig.

More fundamental deep research and less theatrics is in order.
I'd also advise becoming seasoned in the thinking behind a particular game if you're trying to test and develop an artificial form of intelligence to navigate it and beyond.
Check out simplecontacts.com - they do a renewal exam that takes like 2 minutes and they'll sell you contacts too. I checked my brand - Acuvue Daily Moist and it's cheaper there than on Jetlenses
Right now, they are catching medium level drug dealers, prostitution rings, massage parlors, etc using SAR reports filed by banks. Basically, when someone deposits $4000 cash every month for a couple of years; expect him to get busted.

Once the guy gets busted, he must be thinking about how he got caught. It is banks' active spying: under regulation, banks have become active spies. It is a new way of spying: force private entities to comply for suspicious activity, with a huge discretion given to regulatory bodies on the scope of what the word 'suspicious' entails.
Construction, trucking, farming: Industries having difficulty finding workers
Healthcare would be cheaper as a percentage of GDP of it was single payer. If you put healthcare as part of the gov't GPD graph, the USA would be higher than places like Canada.

South Korea also has single payer and has equal gov't GDP consumption as the USA.
Here's Microsoft's notice:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/...

I don't know anything about Gordon Bock (credited with that page), or indeed Microsoft's PM for their root trust programme, Mike Reilly. All the trust programmes (except Mozilla's) are run in a way that doesn't give us (as relying parties, or as subscribers) much insight. I'd love to know more about why it took so long to approve ISRG, but likely we'll never be told.
> As far as places to go watch classics, or cult movies, I haven't found anything that isn't just streaming/buying. What a shame!

It's something you get with top end 'art' cinemas. The BFI cinema in London, for example, has regular retrospective seasons for particular directors and so on.

But I suspect it is also in receipt of a lot of public money and philanthropic donations. People who show up for a Kurosawa retrospective are not typically going to have a bucket of popcorn and a litre and a half of mountain dew for company. The dosh has to come from somewhere.

It's worth mentioning because the obvious flaw with moviepass is that it cannot possibly become profitable, but there are ways to show movies that do not require profitability, merely the willingness of taxpayers and private individuals to dip into their pockets to protect a perceived public good.
Sure. I expect that in cryptocurrency when the current bubble pops.

It's likely that the most interesting things in cryptocurrency will be introduced during the crypto-recession. Right now there is too much noise.
>Why would the parent mean anything else than what they wrote?

Why would someone ask for more details about something if they already understood it?

Just because something is clear to you doesn't mean it's clear to someone else.

In other words, asking this question is very self-centered of you.
Similar: draw an ant, top-down view.

Where DO the legs go?
as another point of data:

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/women-and-pain-dispariti...
Surely there can be some kind of balanced situation where drug and technology development can still be profitable in the US but impoverished people can still get free healthcare instead of avoiding doctor/hospital visits and dying?
My Moto 4G finally got it's upgrade to Android 7.1… last week. Better late than never, I guess.
> Also what's a good use case? I can play games on my powerful home PC from the crappy laptop at the office?

I'm interested because a 27" iMac is front and center on my desk, with a 24" second monitor to the right. My gaming PC is hooked up to the second input of the second monitor.

Playing a game either means turning my head to the right while the rest of my body faces forward (to have good keyboard and mouse position), or turning my whole body right, and then having to reach left for the keyboard and mouse. Can't do whole body right with keyboard and mouse inf front of body, because that would put the mouse in free space and the keyboard right side sticking off the desk. Neither of these is comfortable.

Moving the gaming PC to its own space with its own monitor would take major rearrangement of the living room.

Something that lets me use the Mac as a display for the games on my PC would make things much much nicer.
I've been more and more picky about movies over the last few years. I think that the OC was probably just exaggerating, but I'd say I watch all of 3 movies per year in theaters.

I don't mind wasting a lazy evening watching a movie at home, even some lackluster ones if I'm being honest, but if I'm going to take my wife out and spend $40, I'd rather go do something interesting, eat something fun, do anything else, typically.

Usually the only movies I'll pay money to watch in theaters are ones that I don't want spoiled while I wait to watch them at home. Work usually takes us to a few movies a year and I always leave thinking "I wouldn't pay money to see it...but it was fun I guess."
For the record, we should be destroying root not securing it.
That may have actually been a result of the ordering and poor query design.

Given that commits.id is a primary key, IIRC, it must also be NOT NULL; thus the LEFT JOIN is uselessly equivalent to an inner join; which most database engines seem to prefer expressed as a WHERE clause (since it's more trivial to re-order those operations).

Were it an 'inner join' equivalent where clause or the smaller table specified first, at least the full-table scan should have been on the smaller table.

Your database storage engine of choice might differ or have other options (E.G. in PostgreSQL an index on the result of comparing the two source keys COULD be created and a carefully structured query written to use /that/... I think, I haven't tested it but it'd at least be worth the experiment.)

MySQL (mariadb presumably?) can't. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8509026/is-cross-table-i...
I never said I didn't like it.
> This brings to mind the war on drugs, war on terror, etc. Typically war is used when we are meant to take sides in support of drastic action without too much thought getting in the way.

No, it isn't meant to dull anyone's thinking or whatever you are implying. It's quite straightforward. Recognize when war is being waged upon you, and act accordingly. Thus the category error attributed to your earlier comment.

> I'm honestly not sure from this comment if you are deliberately trolling/baiting

No, I'm being quite literal. You don't need to do any interpretation, or look for some deep motivation. Recognize when war is being waged. Simple.

> Some people think that a picture of two men holding hands is morally objectionable content, and they seek authority to make their view dominate the public discourse. How is your goal different from theirs other than in the small detail of which content is objectionable?

The fact that you draw an equivalence between a picture of men holding hands and Alex Jone's incitement says that you aren't really engaged in any meaningful discussion. This isn't a classroom, you aren't Plato or Socrates. You aren't interested in debate, you're just trolling.
`certbot --certonly` + `heroku certs:add` + cron?
Now you're just adding on features hoping to win a battle you've already lost. But while we're on that topic: spam can use on-server text filters, AI processing, and IP blocks...

If you choose to keep going down the rabbit hole, please learn first about how email works.
Ed Yong at the Atlantic looked into that:

"These differences persisted even after the team accounted for factors like the doctors’ years of experience and the patients’ age, ethnicity, other diseases, educational level, or the hospitals to which they were admitted."

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/women-mo...
Your comment was misleading, not the article, which is why I quoted you comment and not the article...
You need a prescription to buy contact lenses in the US?
Pills and such makes sense, but what can you do wrong with contacts, apart from having the wrong strength/astigmatism?
"Garden leave" meaning the employer needs to pay the employee during the non-compete timeframe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_leave
Awesome Machine Learning: A Curated List of Machine Learning Libraries
If you can get hundred years experience in 24 hours by wall clock, why not use it? Maybe it's better to teach AIs to create simplified, but usable models, they can use to simulate and train on.
Currently, we have no short-term plans to offer cloud services -- we see more than enough people installing Rainway on existing providers, so we are focusing on building a solid consumer offering. There is no telling how that changes down the line.
Slightly off topic, but given Amazon is off conquering the world, does anyone else feel as though Barnes & Noble could put together a data driven blog regarding trending books, topics, how different books are read, etc. much like OkCupid did for dating a while back? It might not be as sexy of a topic, but it could captivate an audience to think about Barnes & Noble when you buy a book?
> Also, organization structure aren't transparent to everybody (how many of your non-tech friends would be surprised if google.com had a certificate issued for "Alphabet Inc."?).

A clear example of this is KLM, where www.klm.com's certificate is registered to "KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V." (try that on a mobile browser!). It's sufficiently different to what people expect (which is, admittedly, just an initialism) that I've known various people who actually understand EV certificates get thrown by it.
Oh, that thing where iOS shows a oarticular app icon on the dock that I don't want there, but then hides it again before I have to remove it. Gee, thanks for that Siri. I guess the Android version will also have no Off switch for the user.
I use my android phone frequently on the go, keep it in my purse connected to the powerbank to recharge, and have headphones plugged in to listen to music (e.g. when cycling the whole day, or when I’m in trains).

Without a separate headphone jack, that’s pretty inconvenient.

Especially as my headphones are all expensive 3.5mm jack Sennheiser headphones, and I need to use them with my phone, laptop and desktop.
That was almost certainly blocked by an automated policy against gore for posting genocide scenes. These sites have an absolute avalanche of content to police and make mistakes pretty frequently which is why you can appeal and get the block overturned as this one has been. The video is on her FB page right now.
For a long time, downloaded code could only run inside Apple’s WebKit or JavaScriptCore, but since June 2017, you can use any language and interpreter. Apparently, almost nobody noticed: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/06/07/apple_relaxes_devel...
> have suffered decades of decreasing employment and wealth as a result of economic shifts in manufacturing and resource production.

It's the counterfactual basis of your argument that makes it absurd. It is undoubtedly true that this describes some people in that age cohort, but it doesn't describe it generally. They are much wealthier than both their ancestors and their descendants. While every generation faces its particular challenges, only one living generation faced those challenges by intentionally impoverishing the future.

As for the remainder of your points -- morbidity, mortality, educational attainment, and whatnot -- it is the case that the USA has underperformed all other advanced nations in these measures. You'll excuse me if I don't credit Boomers for falling behind countries like Cuba, Portugal and UAE.
The article to me seems to be pushing a specific viewpoint which is essentially jumping to a conclusion that male doctors treat women patients poorly.

Without context these numbers don’t mean anything. There could be many factors why these statistics exist - are older / more severe female cases more likely to see a male doctor? As an example.

I really dislike this being presented as news and having all sorts of negative connotations towards men. It’s a finding that requires more investigation and is meaningless without context.
We are in beta and not willing to charge for an unfinished product. We have plans for some premium offerings down the line.
> Adobe made a really gutsy move IMO.

Indeed. It's hard to make changes like that since it often results in existing users getting pissed off. Even if it's for the better in the long run.
That sounds interesting, but if you've been prescribed the Acuvue Moist, you can only purchase the Acuvue Moist as per law. So, although this info would certainly be interesting (and maybe reduce some customer confusion), it wouldn't actually be actionable.
Business Intelligence Roadmap by Moss and Atre
Yeah. Here I think is an article I’d read about it: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/10/heart-dis...
The prisoner's dilemma demonstrates how decisions that are individually rational can create worse outcomes collectively. The incentives for the individual {prisoner,nation} are not compatible with larger group dynamics.

The solution is to create an environment where individual decision makers are strongly incentivized to make decisions that are collectively beneficial. This is where modern telecommunication technology and - in spite of it's problems - economic globalization can help a lot: nobody wants to drop bombs (atomic or conventional) on another country if their friends or business partners live there.