skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
People keep making this technical argument

Technically Sodium reacts with water, so if you keep them apart it should be fine.

Does not translate to

Carry sodium in your pocket, as long as your pocket is dry.

------

In non analogy terms - this is not how forums work anymore, at all.

This was maybe how they worked back in the bbs days or slashdot era.

Today - theyre just places to generate noise and saturate human attention.

The battle has moved to another level entirely, and people who bring up incorrect information are literally predictable props, used to confuse the audience.

Trolls KNOW how a comment is going to be refuted, and form statements which will either

1) dodge the filter,

2) be not vile, but will smuggle/trojan in arguments which are vile

3) overwhelm the ability of people to defend

And if all of the above fail, they will harass or use other methods to "win".

The objective is screen real estate, to be the dominant thought.
I think Azure is pretty damn good for certain things.

http://muratbuffalo.blogspot.com/2018/08/azure-cosmos-db.htm...
The idea that objective truth about reality not only exists but is accessible to the sufficiently enlightened, at least if they use the right "tools and frameworks", is a bold philosophical thesis that has undergone quite a lot of criticism in the past few thousand years. The idea that advocates of 'perspectivism' are simply trying to confuse people is absurd. "There are not facts, only interpretations" people are just as passionate about trying to make themselves understood as anyone else.

Your comment is exactly why it is so important that we continue to value free speech. Many people are utterly convinced that their views of reality represent absolute and objective truth, totally unaware of the philosophical assumptions underpinning their woldview. History is full of people convinced their view of reality represented absolute and objective truth. They seldom agreed.

Giving such people the tools to censor their opponents is very dangerous. First, the set of people who are wielding those tools will inevitably change. Secondly, well, where they burn books, they will someday burn people.
Hmm. It probably wouldn't be too hard to build a Truffle runtime for bash ...
Ryanair strike hits 55,000 customers across Europe
It's not the only one on that show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfHuZ5qrYX4
Amazon Makes $525,000 Donation to Canada Learning Code – IT World Canada News
I added a basic React component that also has the values in RGB computed

https://github.com/sbrichardson/react-cividis/blob/master/RE...
That's the problem: You're locked into one particular library. You can not combine libraries without sacrificing massive performance. There is just no way around that.

The numba story in that github issue mirrors my own experience: Excitement! This works! It's fast! Ok here are some limitations that I can work around. Hmm I would really like to use this library, in principle it should be possible to JIT its output/make it JIT compatible. In practice this turns out to be way to subtle. Ok I'm giving up, either I reimplement an algorithm directly in my hotloop or run slow code.

So yeah, as long as your problems do not cross the domain of one package, Python and its ecosystem is great. Stay with it. But I fully expect that we'll see a lot more innovation in Julia. Already now there are classes of problems for which no Python solution exists but which actually have library support in Julia. That's really really remarkable.

Despite my misgivings about the state of tutorials, the release handling process and the aproach to tooling, this is why I switched already. I also hope that all these aspects will improve post 1.0 massively.

It's genuinely a liberation to no longer be confined to silos of DSLs that do not allow for low cost abstractions.

It's fine if you don't need it. I just don't understand why you hang out in a thread about Julia insisting that I don't need it either and could just use numba + Python when that's exactly what I've been using prior to Julia.
It´s also possible that then as now, the idea of spending summer away from parental control was an excellent motivator for the younger members of the tribe to find new digs.
A new complex network-based approach to topic modeling
Just for clarification, when you say public do you mean open to everyone (the internet) to make a code review or open for everyone in the team to see and comment on.

Personally I find the first idea fairly bad since the amount of constructive criticisms you might get from people far outside of the problem realm seems limited.
Having them open to the entire team on the other hand seems like a good way to spread knowledge and to get input from different sources
On-chip optical filter processes wide range of light wavelengths – MIT News
AI core startup targets IoT
A New Kind of Clinical Trial
Intelligent design by BMW. Keep it vague, even though it should totally be able to differentiate between a sudden G-force, a button press, or an electrical issue (wire cut), but the car/call centre doesn’t specify the exact causative issue.
It "worked" for Reddit because people moved over to Voat or back to the chans. Just because the community moves off a certain platform doesn't actually change the existence of either the people or their opinions. I want to make clear that I agree with you that an opinion that terms any member of genus Homo as subhuman is wrong; and that killing is also wrong. On the other hand, I for one am curious about how these memes originated and continue to propagate; and I feel that direct engagement is the only way we'll find that out. Massive cultural impact cannot be made by simply avoiding other opinions. After all, Columbus massively underestimated the circumference of the Earth compared to Eratosthenes - but the Portuguese still funded his travels, and his trip was successful, even if by complete accident. Engaging with those who have wrong opinions can sometimes have unexpected positive impact.
> Overall, hacking political system has shown to have ROI of 10,000% or more and it should make a perfect economic sense to businesses and external governments.

This trope amazes me. If this were true, you’d see a lot more campaign donations. Instead, you see a few billion out of an economy of trillions. There isn’t an investment opportunity like that just sitting around without investors jumping on board and bidding up the price. It’s not logically possible for this to be true, without making a bunch of other hand waving and dubious assumptions.
Translucent is somewhat close to what you're looking for.
$4,800 made in their first month -Avatoon
It is just part of the padding needed to fill out a one-paragraph idea into an article.
Gmail for Android and iOS: You Can Disable Conversation View
You can checkout but you can never leave.
Man I wish I worked on an application that needed graphql :....
The bug could totally happen in Julia. The point was your question: "What happens for that scientist when they have to dive into Julia’a stack to debug something weird?"

And then claimed that this was somehow better in Python + C, which is not my experience. I expect this to be easier in Julia than in Python and C.

I totally agree that the tooling is not where it needs to be, btw, but now that the target has stopped moving I expect it to get there soon.
Citizenship has historically been defined by military service, in that you are not merely subject to the security apparatus of the state, but a part of it. Because you are a part of it, you have a say in it. It was the removal of the draft which necessarily removed the role of service from citizenship.

What do people who are not a part of the military care about non-intervention? There is a reason we viliify the draft-dodger who becomes a politician and sends others sons off to war.
A lot of people conflate that situation with First Amendment rights. It actually has very little to do with the First Amendment, rather it should be covered under the Civil Rights Act.

The First Amendment only stops the government from restricting speech and expression; the government can't force the bakery nor the gay customer to say or not say a specific message. Likewise, if the bakery wants to refuse service to someone, they can't claim 1A protection as a cover for that refusal because it simply doesn't apply. The 1A allows them to not be charged and prosecuted for speaking out against homosexuality, but that's it.

However, under the Civil Rights Act, they cannot refuse service to a protected class. Where it gets murky is that homosexuality is not explicitly defined as a protected class, only sex (male or female at the time of enactment). Today though, we are learning that "male" and "female" are not the only recognized sexes and there are non-binary definitions coming out all the time. The question becomes, is homosexuality a different sex as it pertains to the CRA?

I don't know the answer to that question. The way I see it though, if you are proclaiming to be a Christian yet you use that proclamation to discriminate against a particular class or individual, you are going against the teachings of Christ. According to Christian lore, he went out of his way to help the lowest of the low in his society, even those who were considered immoral or sinful by that society (prostitutes, lepers, thieves, etc). I'm not overtly religious (I was raised Baptist but I reject a lot of that sect's philosophies), but when I hand spare change to a homeless person on the street, I don't ask for sexual orientation before doing so. I see someone in need of assistance and I help where I can, because who they are doesn't matter, it's what they need that matters.

By the same token, I don't feel a business owner should care what someone's lifestyle or orientation is no matter their own beliefs, but in this nation it seems the Religious Right feels empowered to use their take on religion as a crutch to be cruel and dismissive towards those who are not perfectly in line with their own beliefs. Yes, they have a right to refuse service in certain cases, but when doing so steps on another person's right to even exist as they are, I feel it crosses a line that should not be crossed.

To put it another way: a gay couple's existence is not an aggression towards a homophobic person; there is no harm intended nor is there harm done by simply existing. But, the homophobe's negative actions towards that gay couple is an aggression.
We're about to see what happens with APK side loading at scale... Fortnite is bypassing Play store. I predict massive pwnage.

https://twitter.com/APKMirror/status/1027580291374702592?s=1...
I couldn't find it in the article (perhaps I overlooked it) -- but what do they mean by 'mini'? Especially considering the LHC has a circumference of 16 miles...
I appreciate your love for dogs, but don't you think that cloning a dog because of your love for the original is ridiculously self-centered? It's basically creating and imposing life to satisfy one's own emotional needs. It's taking living-thing-as-property to another level.

By the way, I love my dog but kind of struggle with the ethics of simple ownership of a living thing.
But this situation will come up organically when you are getting started with a client. Everything you do costs money and it is ethical to be transparent about that. Because the client may not want you to spend thousands on a particular part of the project that they don't actually care about. And there could be an oppurtunity cost in terms of other objectives.

Of course there are exceptions to this. Sometimes it makes sense to overprice work because you know the client will uneccessarily nitpick minor details. It makes sense to accomodate this up to a point, but you can't be completely transparent about what it costs. You don't always know how fussy the client will be ahead of time.
> There is very little cryptography involved

Wha? That may have been true about twenty years ago, but not now. BMW was using 256-bit RSA keys to validate ECU firmware and authenticate privileged access in the early 2000s (they're up to 1024-bit keys now) and write-once memory in their instrument clusters for about as long. Other (Euro) car makers using the same vendors offer similar features.

Once you have physical access all bets are off though. That's why the thieves cut the alarm sensors.
This might be just my "ignorance", but am I the only one who thinks that "where" actually hurts readability?

I mean, it's not a problem when it's just a few lines, but when you have a lot of code, and you have to scroll further down to see, what do parts of it mean, and then jump back... It just seems backwards to me.

And yes, I know there is "let ... in", and if I ever start writing in functional languages I will use it, but when reading functional programs, I see way more "where" than "let ... in".
How do plastic solar panels stand up to UV radiation over a long time? UV radiation degrades most plastics.
He was just doing isometric exercise. Nothing illegal about exercise.
> There are no down arrows on stories. They appear on comments after users reach a certain karma threshold, but never on direct replies.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
Same, Headline got a click, I was interested. But the UI lacks and your needs to have a feature set. What sort of Social media app? How do I use it? Who is it for? Just some thoughts...
You may want to look into rewiring your OBD port so that it doesn’t work without you flipping a switch somewhere, or building a “key” with a male and female port + some wires, then storing the “key” in some hidden location (spare tire?).

Or just expose two data lines from the OBD wiring harness and jump them together. Remove the jumper to operationalize the OBD port.

FYI: cutting off VCC may not always work since some devices may derive enough power through other lines that have pull-up resistors to function. I’ve seen it happen in other industries.

Not sure if such products exist commercially, but it would have some value for someone to build them.
If you're in the US, that's now illegal, and you can file a complaint: https://www.fcc.gov/media/policy/loud-commercials

Other countries have similar rules, complain to your regulator!
I've aced every whiteboarding interview when the problem was the same or similar to some problem I solved before, and I failed pretty much every interview when the problem was new to me (except when the problem was trivial, ala fizzbuzz). I think that proves how whiteboarding just tests whiteboarding skills and nothing else.
A car is not a bike. Whatever happened to the concept of context?
ITS REALLY A GOOD THING TO DEAL WITH YOUR ISSUES YOURSELF,

ARE YOU SEEKING A WAY TO RETRIEVING ALL LOST FUNDS THROUGH BTC BINARY OPTIONS???

But Here is the good news !!!
You don’t have to RISK Finding a hacker yourself;
“that’s the number one step to being or getting scammed” (AGAIN)
To ensure that who you in contact with is a real hacker
We are here to link you up if you ever need a legit hacker to deal with you cyber mishaps without any risk involved.

Cyber shield hacking agency can link you to many legit hackers that you won’t believe you could ever come across to getting your jobs done,

Eg:
◾ALBERT GONZALEZ ⭐️⭐️⭐️
(an overall 3 star hacker that specializes in credit card mishap and BINARY RETRIEVAL).

◾COSTELLO FRANK⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
(overall 5 star hacker that deals with criminal and blog cleaning).

◾FRANS ROSEN$ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
(overall 4 star hacker, MAINLY FOCUSED AT RETRIEVING ALL YOUR MONEY LOST THROUGH BINARY OPTIONS)

◾JEANSON JAMES ANCHETA ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
(4 star specialist in social site And BLANK ATM CARDS).

Websites and means of contact will be sent to you according to the mishap you need help about.

◾OUR "AIMS" HERE◾

Are:
1◾to assign a qualified️️ agent⭐️ of specific rank to particularly any sort of cyber issues you intend dealing with in short and accurate timing.

2◾ to screen in real hackers⭐️ (gurus only) in need of job with or without a degree, to speed ️up the availability of time given to for Job contracts.!!
Thus an online binary decoding exam will be set for those who seeks employment under the teams Establishment.
write us on:
◾Protocolhacks(at)gmaildotcom
◾Cybershieldnotch(at)gmaildotcom

Or drop your message to us on WICKR (Btcbinaryhacks)

ADMIN signed
⭐️Thank y’all.....!
The BBC is funded via the TV License, they're not a commercial broadcaster.
Worrying
Alien Paintball Shooting Arena Battle
Some seem to be appalled by the idea that this thing is a test or trick. But in the end, the essence is to find people who understand the problem space and that they should not eliminate options because they think they are unreasonable. Instead, they should present all available options to you and add context (like recommendations). In the end, you should be able to see a clear picture of the situation, all available options, and related consequences before deciding which way to go.

Often you can conduct such 'tests' without some hypothetical situation and just present them one of your harder problems you are currently trying to solve and look how they react.
I think the term makes sense, because that's what it is, and that's the reason why people want to shut it down. It also brings into focus the main point of: where do you draw the line? When is a political opinion unpopular enough to warrant shutting it down?
This is amazing, thank you to the author for creating this wonder!

I can think of maybe half a dozen examples in the past few years where this would have been useful. Not all IT stuff is kubernetes or plain containers, so a well-defined bash-based language is something I can see certain shops embracing.

Great work!
The End of the TV Writers’ Room?
Yes, I got that part, but "stay investors in a private Tesla" doesn't mean that this will magically happen by default. Depending on how your broker operates, you will at the very least have to sign some documents. I don't know enough US securities law to know what happens with the currently listed shares, but they will probably disappear and be replaced by some other ownership structure.

There is also the possibility that your broker won't do the necessary paperwork and will just liquidate your position, or require you to move your shares to a legal entity that can assist you. Granted, they probably wouldn't do this without notifying you. And if you're a non-US person, there are probably issues regarding transfer of shares, potential tax realization and so on. Not to mention the requirement to be an accredited investor, which I'm not sure how Tesla will skirt. There are a lot of open details here.

I can see that my initial comment could be misinterpreted, but my point was that "You will be able to continue to hold" is not quite the complete picture.
Unfortunately fair use is merely a defence, not a right.
IP reputation by API
This is awesome! I particularly like being able to spin up a local instance of GraphiQL against any endpoint (with auth headers and everything). I tried it with GitHub's GraphQL API, and it took me less than a minute to get going.
I presume a typo....
Crickey. I am onboard with your actual point, but consider painting the picture without such broad strokes. There are something like 320 million Americans, and their culture is an impressive mishmash of every other culture that the world has ever produced, held together by string and elbow grease. Give it a little respect, even if you do want to lay out a little of the realpolitik.

"Not supporting the troops" is a conversation ender up there with accusations of racism and sexism. But the issues there are much more complicated than no-one being interested.
I agree, but I also think there’s some effect of censorship that drives people toward the censored idea. Part of it is a rebellion against authority (“who are YOU to tell ME what ideas are fit or unfit to consume?”); I think there’s some related effect that is driving Trump’s popularity—some people are rebelling against the cultural authority of the left (by which I mean major news publications, entertainment media, university faculty, social media companies, etc—powerful cultural institutions).

Another problem is what happens when bad actors come into power and get to do the censoring? We’ve just handed them a nice precedent, have we not?
Why hack voting machines? Instead, hack the counting. I can't tell you how many times I've seen the following pattern:

Republican wins by slim number of votes. Recount #1, some more votes "found" Democrat candidate closer, Republican still winning. Recount #2, additional votes "found" Democrat now has slim lead. STOP THE RECOUNTS, OMG!!!!

This happened in Oregon and Washington governors races, and notoriously in Minnesota with disgraced former Senator Al Franken. It happens all over the place in small elections. There is only one party cheating on elections in the US, it is the same party that has been conducting a witch hunt about Russia and is lying to public using their lapdog media mouthpieces in order to bullshit the public. Articles like the one from Columbia exist to sow confusion, to muddy the waters, to distract your eye away from the real goings on. "Russia hacked the election" is a gigantic lie, possibly one of the biggest ever told in recent history. No, Russian did not hack the election.

Are Republicans lily white? Nah, nobody is. But they don't cheat in elections the way Democrats do. If you want to see how vote fraud works, go to urban Detroit or Philadelphia, those two spring immediately to mind.

Lastly, there is plenty we can do about voting integrity if we wish to do so. There is a defense-in-depth strategy that can makes elections fair. The only problem is that there is a large faction out there that wants to continue cheating.
Oh, and get a dashcam with parking mode!

Front and rear. Maybe the sides too?

They’re increasingly inexpensive, and you can move them car to car as you buy/sell.

I originally bought a forward facing, and as i’ve upgraded, my old forward facing is now my rear facing.
I was looking for a table too, and found https://github.com/pnnl/cmaputil (colormaps/ directory)
Yes it does, actually, whether you like it or not. But maybe you'd like to call into question whether such speech should still be protected as free speech. The difficulty is in establishing where you draw the line.
Isn't there anything that this cancer called advertising hasn't consumed yet?
The research is about an hypothetical alternative acceleration method, not the one used at the LHC.
Actually, as the quality of service continues to decline, it will bring traditional cable TV to an end that much faster. For the most part, people don't accept this stuff, and they're rapidly moving away from it.
They are in the process of doing exactly that.
I totally agree in principle but social media is a bubble, people don't befriend people with opposing views on Facebook, if someone posts something they disagree with they'll make a passive aggressive post and unfriend the person, further insulating them from ideas they don't like.

This is one reason every issue has become so polarized these days, people don't hear the detractors they just get their own views amplified back to them.