skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Yet Microsoft did just that....

No, you run the .net code on the .net runtime. If you use UIKit namespace, for example, you will run with the dotnet shim.

> Microsoft had the inclination to do just that....

Because Microsoft doesn't have emulator or simulator. Not anything comparable with what Apple has, or what Google has (and what Microsoft is shipping for Android).

> So first you said that thier was no way to run on any OS, you couldn’t write your own emulator, etc. but now that I’ve shown you that you can do all that, now it’s that you can’t write against the native frameworks.

It is not a first-class solution.

> Guess what? You can’t write the same binary against different versions of Linux.

Actually, you can.
Then delete the comments. If we're not supposed to respond to something that terrible, don't leave it on the site.
I don't think it's reductive, and this is definitely not rules lawyering. There is just no ambiguity here. The rules mention multiple times that there are to be no secret signals or information sharing.

In addition to that there's a spoiler section printed upside down for people to read after they've played the game, to explain how anyone could possibly succeed at the task with no communication. And that section is not about reading non-verbal queues. It's about the players perception of time getting synchronized.

It's great that you're having fun playing a game with the components of The Mind. But the game both you and the original article are describing is pretty much diametrically opposed to the game that the designer intended it to be and described in the rules.
You're forgetting the salt added. Compared to the original post I commented on, 512 mil is way larger than 10k. So it's 512 mil known passwords, times however large the salt is...it's not trivial -- and their 10k list was expected at 6hours...

Extrapolating, 10k:6hrs == 512m:35 years
I didn't know Lynx can handle the Gopher protocol -- thanks.

Unless I forgot installing it, or it came along for the ride with something else, it's already in/on the default Ubuntu 16.04 desktop image.
I suspect your being downvoted because labs, training, and mentors are knowledge.
I was at a Google sponsored hackaton focusing around page speed. They were pushing AMP. What I feel was completely missing at the time was data, testing results and case studies showing where it has improved a business ROI.

They have some published now but it’s really so high level that you can’t conclude your business will get similar results. Some measure click through rate, others conversion rate or bounce rate. It’s not like for like.

I feel like the data was deliberately vague. I work in ecommerce and need to know this improves conversion rate and average order value. That’s what drives revenue and profitability.
Imagine if they wouldn't have held back the telephone- the danger that device could have wreaked. Thank you bell labs, for protecting us from all those market-destroyers, and all those evil copy cats.
Dora: Implementing a JIT-Compiler with Rust
What do you mean "in return." Sounds like they want something for nothing. Your equity and voting rights are already yours. You are negotiating to stop working as an employee? You could do that tomorrow for signing nothing.
A libertarian view would allow you to take legal action against people putting your kids at risk.

Don't strawman that which you do not understand.
Sad to see how quick the downvotes came. It really wasn't that long ago that medical advice was to use formula instead of breast milk and sleep babies on their stomachs.

Many/most of the pediatricians/nurses who parents interact with have no idea about the details of the vaccines. They are just blindly following protocol because they are told to. They have a million other things to do and concern themselves about.
Collaborator needed for ML tutorial with 2900 stars on github, check issue #37.
The problem is the non-children-of-crazys, too young to get their MMR vaccines, are going to die of Measles.
You should. Some of the paragraphs are quite long for a watch, though ;)
Pretty sure arXiv would remove slander with a court order as well. It's an unrelated issue.
This wouldn’t be a problem if science 1). Wasn’t underfunded and 2). Made up of sellouts trying to shill for industry research. The latest scandal involving the NIH and alcohol funding that involved $100 million going to waste is an example of this.

I’ve also wondered about this with global warming. Obviously it’s true, but what if you found something as a scientist that said the heat increase will be 5% less than expected. Would they let you publish it?

In the end, distrusting science causes it to become distrustful. Ironic.
If strangers must die in order for us to live in a world where we can raise our children however we want, so be it. Their deaths indicate weak genetics that should be flushed from the gene pool anyway. Mewling, limp-wristed, hapless techno-weenies will never understand this.
Replying too frequently puts a timer on your reply. This can either be good to learn impulse control with explaining or to control heated argumentation.

For problems that lead to identification of other problems, taking notes is useful. Mentally imagine setting aside each problem to maintain focus on one at a time.

I understand the compulsive mentality where it feels like you created a problem and you need to fix it, where the steps leading to the solution of the problem lead to identification of other problems.

Any way of recording each one to maintain focus on solving one at a time is useful.

Finding connections, patterns. Decision problems.

I understand sort of the transition word, but more like, 'trend' or 'direction' or 'flow'. I tend to analyze my own behavior to meticulous detail, and correct, over and over.
That doesn't sound like it gets quite as many clicks, and people tend to fund more exciting research. I'm thinking that this problem wouldn't exist, except for the perverse incentives. This is probably particularly true of the substance-hysteria research. If you do research to show that tea tree oil is completely safe, that leaves less room for follow up studies.
"Healthy children" has nothing to do with vaccines. Vaccines are for preventing specific diseases a population is at risk for. They don't prevent your kids from getting fat.
The engine was never intended to support WebGL. We only used WebGL to quickly prototype the lighting system.
Island of Somoa Is Going 100% Renewable Energy with Tesla's Help
> No medicine is 100% safe in all circumstances. Vaccines do have published risk of complications and while tiny are not zero and sometimes are greater than the risk of contracting the disease itself.

Yes. But the risk of a pandemic is the risk you are to compare with. Not the 1% risk of a side effect compared to a 0.01% risk of contracting the disease. Also: herd immunity means that those who can't take the vaccine are protected. Anyone who doesn't take e.g. the smallpox shot, is getting a free ride on those of us who DO take the shot. The reason they could dodge any side effect and STILL run almost 0% risk of getting smallpox, is because everyone else took the shot. I think this is what is lost on antivaxers. They think that the vaccine protects THEM and that they can thus weigh that benefit against the risk on THEM. But that's not how it works. Their shot protects ME.

> As a general rule, I don't want any government telling me what to put in my body or my kid's bodies.

As a general rule, I want my government to ensure the society is vaccinated. Government already tells you a lot of what you can and can't put in your body. Having them say you HAVE to put something is going one step further, but I don't see how it's a very big one.

> Vaccines are required for kids to come to public school in CA, but not required to go to placed where they're in even closer contact (sports, pools, etc.), why?

Presumably because of how laws work and how it might be legal for a school to require vaccines, but not another public location (perhaps because the school isn't a public place at all?).

> punishing dissent doesn't seem right.

Excellent point. Give a tax break to those who vaccinate etc. instead.

> I think understanding that non-vaxers have legitimate concerns helps create a better solution than enforcement and blame.

I think it's important to meet their concerns with information. But we can never ever give parents the idea that vaccines are somehow a controversial idea. It's not.
phones and tablets don't contribute an issue to the aircraft operation. Finally the industry got called on their BS and you can do what you want, and buy their in flight wifi.
Never seen one that does this, but I only ever saw a Samsung (from 2012 and 2013), Lenovo (2016), Xiaomi (2018) and Huawei (2018) because my girlfriend and I don't swap them out every other year (heck, not even every four years). I feel like friends might have mentioned it as well, as the topic of a good, FOSS QR code scanner came up a few times in some chats.
This is very sad. We are using GitLab.com because the terms of use says:

21. Governing law [1]

This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Netherlands.

Is there a code hosting service in Europe or any place of the world that cubans can use?

1. https://about.gitlab.com/terms/#gitlab_com
Patrick Stewart Is Returning for a New Star Trek Series
I wonder whether someone made a boarding pass display out of these. Zoom will be tricky, I guess.
> Science is underfunded.

Citation needed[0].

0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_research_...
Yet here we are with the ability to buy cigarettes, alcohol, and candy.
This was all very interesting, thank you. But the first time in years? That story is begging to be told. As you walk by the bank of pay phones, you will hear them all ring, one after another, until you tell that story.
Its only been a viable option to self publish for about 30 years, and more like 10 if you didn't want to invest large amounts of personal resources.

Open access review and channelization is still an open problem. The for profit journals actually do provide a service of worth and note.
Yes, you're anti-vax because you share misinformation on this topic and try to pretend that rather than irrational fears you're spreading "truths". That chart is garbage, the main thing they've done is sort a column chart by height with the implication that this signifies something, but it doesn't.

The US has higher than expected childhood and especially infant mortality because it deliberately doesn't provide decent healthcare to a substantial fraction of its population. If anything the US has lower than desirable rates of vaccination, which is why it keeps having problems with outbreaks of preventable diseases.
Fair enough! I'm intrigued to know your opinion of the game from what you've played of it. Do you enjoy the synchronization/counting aspect?
> Or you can just hire a publicist

Unless you’re in the press every day, this hasn’t been—in my experience—worth it. Better to pick the relationships and delegate managing the messaging yourself.
Would you call it a fundamental feature of an externality?
Why Big Stuff Cools Off Slower Than Small Stuff
What you're not supposed to do is take someone else's bad comment as a license to violate the rules yourself.

HN does 'delete' comments in one way (flagging by user or moderator), but this is not a complete solution because such comments appear before they are killed.
This could be discouraged by having many more cards in the sequence than you distribute. With large random gaps, sleep sort would make a slow game.
> At some point people gave up on fact-finding

Of course, irrationality is new! /s
Uhm, what about religions?
It’s VERY important to question the make up of vaccinations, so important that most governments have huge teams of qualified people dedicated to evaluating the safety and effectiveness of vaccines (and any other licensed medication for that matter).

Are you one in of those teams? No? Then maybe don’t do your own “research” and maybe get your advice from a qualified person. Maybe someone you can see whenever you need to, perhaps someone who might have spent 8 years studying medicine in university? Maybe a doctor could help?

I dunno though maybe Facebook and news reports about Chinese vaccines are a more reliable, reputable source of information.
On system rollback and totalised fields: An algebraic approach to system change [pdf]
Free.fr does exactly that. Any subscriber can use a small amount of bandwidth on any free.fr wifi nearby, with a lower traffic priority than the owner.
Show HN: Find out the cost of running EMR clusters in AWS
Bookmarked! (so that's what propel actually means...) I don't know how I missed it in my initial search for polyhedron resources.

Of course I know Wenniger's books! Though I haven't had the chance to actually read them yet.
Kindle-sized e-ink displays themselves are quite cheap and can be driven from a microcontroller:

https://hackaday.io/project/11537-nekocal-an-e-ink-calendar

...to do things that the huge expensive modules with builtin controllers can't, like more intensity levels:

https://hackaday.io/project/11537-nekocal-an-e-ink-calendar/...
"So I will go with "forced" medicine, and fluorine in my tap water."

Unfortunately comments like this convey misinformation and could help to spread anti-vax positions.

There's very little research to suggest that ingestion of fluoride has any positive health impact. Comparing the two issues is quite misleading.
They got the vaccine but it wasn’t 100% effective for them. Because enough idiots didn’t vaccinate their children the virus was still able to spread (no herd immunity) and infected them.
Should any vaccine we have be given, or are some diseases better to "live with"? I'm not talking about the nasty ones.
> We want our work to be disseminated as widely as possible!

Of course! So few people in the world read these papers already, it is absurd to deny access to interested minds. Publicly funded research needs to come with open access strings.
Where "academic profiteering" is not profiting the academics, they were already paid by us through our governments to do the work and neither see nor expect
anything from these fees (if they did they would be going through their institution's Tech Transfer office).

This extortion is inflicted by non corporal parasites.

And sorry the costs of copying and storing bits grows smaller every day, as it has since forever.
GitLab doing so would be arguably a deliberate violation of sanctions. While GitLab is not responsible if users decieve them about origin by using a VPN, they absolutely are if they choose an compliance mechanism that can be tricked by a VPN and then point people from sanctioned countries to a VPN provider that will trick their compliance mechanism.

The law can be stupid, but it's rarely as stupid as the people suggesting simple hacks around it think it is.
In America's big tech cities, more people are now living in their vehicles
One of the points link to a second article that reads:

(The fact that φ is zero outside a finite interval mean the “uv” term from integration by parts is zero.)

Can anyone elaborate on this? I'm not too sure how this trick works.
Yes, I totally agree (and often argue) that fines that are not income/wealth-variable are a way to give liberty to the rich while restricting the poor. Only Norway has a system like this, afaik.
I've been building something similar with a Nook Simple Touch. They run Android 2.1, and you jailbreak them in a similar way.
There are YouTube videos where people attempt to render 4D scenes, usually by slicing a mesh along the fourth component of its position, then drawing it as 3D. But since we lack the intuition for 4D space it just looks like a bunch of objects popping in and out of existence.
> Finally you can xkcd your password and make it something like "maytheforcebewithmyfriendmark"

No, no, no. The rest of your comment is spot-on, but I've done projects on passphrases and everyone gets this backwards. That is not what XKCD says. Let me quote the XKCD:

> four random common words

Random words, not a phrase like "may the force be with" and "my friend mark" (I'm sure you can find those two online). When cracking public hash dumps using phrases from public sources, I get hundreds of thousands of hits. If your phrase (partially) exists online, it's not a secret one.

Someone else mentioned diceware. Six random words from that dictionary (potentially generated using real dice) is pretty much unbreakable, though it has only a small security margin for when a protocol gets weakened but not broken.
I don't have gltf, but you can download the .obj files (e.g. at polyhedra.tessera.li/tetrahedron/info), which three.js can read.
گچبری
No. Historically, particularly in recent times, medicine has been more right than wrong when giving out advice. Generally speaking if you ask for medical advice from a qualified person it will be good advice.

You’re cherry picking specific scenarios where a recommendation was given that was later proven incorrect.

There is no evidence to suggest vaccines are going to be one of those scenarios. What we do know is that not vaccinating will lead to unnecessary deaths and serious illnesses.
Is the number not being even a good reason to create policy that favors some over others?

How impractical is it to make fines income/wealth-variable?
That's awesome! Up until now the only reason I have jailbroken every kindle I've owned is to have the screensaver be the book I'm reading rather than the dull preset ones. Finally I've found reason 2!
Although herd immunity is good for the entire community, medical ethicists insist (for sound philosophical reasons) on requiring that any treatment be a good idea _for the patient themselves_.

For example, many countries began vaccinating young female children against HPV on the rationale that understanding of cervical cancer says if we prevent HPV infection we prevent almost all of this type of primary cancer, and the vaccine seems to prevent infection with some strains of HPV implicated in cancer.

Now, you can immediately see that vaccinating their male colleagues could induce herd immunity, this is almost always an STI. But ethically that doesn't justify classes of boys.

What did subsequently cause some countries to vaccinate boys was the fact that HPV also causes cancer in other places, and vaccinating the boys protects them against that. It's a narrower call (fewer cancer cases prevented) but for a relatively safe vaccine it can still make sense.

Edited to add: This gets interesting for a "Chickenpox Vaccine". The virus that causes Chickenpox in children (Varicella-zoster) has much nastier consequences in adults. So if we vaccinate children so they don't a nasty but rarely deadly illness, but as a result more adults get infected without prior exposure, that might suck... Different countries have made different choices about what to do here.
You can do it without MDM, just distribute via an https webpage. Most universities do this, because it is 90% byod or guest access (you can only be enrolled in one MDM).
We are hiring Engineers at Swiggy | Bangalore, KA | Full time | Onsite
Swiggy is the fastest startup entered in Unicorn club after last investment, we're high-energy, focused on our users and our product. We receive 300K OPD. If you are interested to be a part of Swiggy, send your CV to sandesh.d@swiggy.in.
> If you walk directly up to someone and it isn't a natural connection, everyone will always assume your trying to sell them something or bother them in some way.

The point of my comment is why this is happening. The reason "everyone" (in the US) assume that is because that is typically the reason. Because the typical people who approach us in the street are panhandlers and marketers.

It's like the early year of SPAM. When email just started, messages would usually receive attention, since they were usually from genuine people looking to connect. Then SPAM started, and many people started ignoring email completely, to the point it became effectively dysfunctional as a communication medium. It required an extensive, aggressive campaign to fight off SPAM, until email because a functional medium again.

In the same way, if somehow panhandlers and marketers stopped approaching us, we would be more open to socialize in public spaces, because we wouldn't assume (quite appropriately, as of now) that any stranger who tries to talk to us is just looking to get something from us.
Agreed entirely; it seems like a bad idea, but the flip side is that anything they do feel comfortable sharing with you can be readily shared with others. That second fact, coupled with the reality that many people like to tell their own stories, at least in part, is more powerful than anything learned through anonymity.

Viewed another way, if the goal is to get to the truth and share it, it is useless to learn an unshareable truth.
This doesn't even remotely scale how many 17 year old are you willing to email papers to per day?
Re-offending rates are lower in counties that do provide rehabilitation rates, it’s pretty well known. So the US government is wrong on this point if that’s what they’re judging against.

Most people in positions of influence aren’t stupid though- clearly there is something else swaying the decision. I would imagine that for-profit prisons are probably the root cause.
All I'm saying is that I'd rather go with the scandinavians when it come to a health care protocol that involves shooting substances in the veins of young children. I'm certainly afraid the US has the public health care system that is most "lobbied" by pharma, and the scandinavians have one that is most impartial.
Already ahead of you! You can see the .obj download links at in the Info tab (e.g. polyhedra.tessera.li/tetrahedron/info)

And yeah, the same operators can be used on 2d tilings (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway_polyhedron_notation#Oth...)
This is brilliant. If you panckaged this up as a product you could sell a tonne of pre orders on Kickstarter
Better statement would have been science is funded in a very controlled manner. There is so much gate keeping with the funds to access them, that much of the funding winds up being used to pursue funding for the next round.

I can understand why the system was set up, and it is the way it is, but alas.

Peter Higgs (of Higgs-Boson particle) talks about this here: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/06/peter-higgs-...
> Maybe because he's studying computer science and his mom thinks languages are a waste of time?

Very close. I feel that studying regular computer languages is not as exciting and challenging as studying a real spoken language.

I was encouraged to post this by the article about "Learning French" from earlier today (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17682100). In the article, it cites an analogy to those Internet ads promising language acquisition in X days or even X months as akin to those that promote the magical X day diet.

I felt that this particular fiction piece was a beautiful representation of the stumbling/halting/humbling/unsteady progression up the intermediate mountain slope of language acquisition, as one progresses from being able to talk solely in the present to describe events in the past and ideas and concepts.

To be able to express yourself in a non-native language, even if done imperfectly and garbled-ly, is a win if the other person is able to get the gist of what you are saying. Eventually, you will be able to have those deep conversations and little stories about your life (good and bad) that you already do among friends in your native language. I'm not there yet (in Spanish), and I've come a long way in 3 years.
But good point about the extra data in the chart, I replaced it with a chart only shows one data point.
Researchers go through tens of papers before they find a paper they find relevant to their interests. To go through a 2-3 day process per paper is a drastically inefficient.