skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, that's the point of the commentary that I read - there are unintentional leaks in the production, transport and use of natural gas that are much larger than one might assume.

Pipelines, for instance, are quite "leaky".

These leaks are unintentional and difficult to find/monitor, so they are not burned off ...
Or you just overestimate how many kids who were dumb enough to get an ARM wanted to settle down and buy a house. More likely, the numbers are misleading in some way.
This is correct, and why cities like New York are literally becoming infested by banks on every corner. For every branch they open they can count on some kind of percentage of the people that live in a close radius to end up with accounts.
Sure, but dying is even less convenient.
The brain doesn't work like a photo camera. It remembers strictly the minimum required to do it's job, in a highly abstract and compressed form.

How a bike fits together it's kind of irrelevant for most people, even if you ride one or if you must dodge one.
Though the other comments are correct, I want to point out that you can get some nontrivial behavior with only linear functions. For example, low-rank matrix factorization is kind of like a neural network

f(x) = U * V * x,

where U is an n by k matrix and V is a k by m matrix, where k is much smaller than n and m. Basically, we are constraining the set of allowed linear transformations, which is a form of regularization. Convolutional layers in neural networks similarly restrict the allowed linear transformations.

Nevertheless, the power of linear neural networks is far less than that off nonlinear networks.
I looked at using Let's Encrypt for this, but it's much simpler to use AWS Certificate Manager's own certificate authority for this, because it's also free and it's built in so it will handle renewals for you. It's basically a checkbox in CloudFront; just put your files in S3 and set up a CloudFront distribution.

(If you're hosting an apex domain, e.g., example.com and not just www.example.com, it also makes things easier if you can use Route 53 as your DNS host, because CloudFront IPs keep changing and you can't make a CNAME for an apex.)
... does not change the odor of his answer.
Much to the chagrin of anyone who lives on the free side of the NH line
Hi. If you have out of network benefits in your insurance plan , then we can provide you with the necessary paperwork to make a claim. We can also process HSA/FSA cards at checkout. We aren't an in-network provider for VSP yet, however.
They're not even renderings of 3D models; they're all done in Photoshop! I'm impressed with what can be done with an image editor to create new shapes out of thin air.
I can't find it but recently (within the last week) there was an article (HN, Ars, reddit??) about a new record of about 768 Tbps (not Gbps) but real world about 650Tbsp. It used different colours/wavelengths of light, 23 or 43, and did some frequency alteration plus kept most of the overhead at the source not via repeaters.

So yeah the roughly 650Tbps seems usable in such a situation.
Both of these are about creating a virtual experience, one is presented as study and the other got someone expelled.
Ask HN: Could startups stop the drug war, or do we need non-profits?
I'm wondering if stopping the drug war and improving criminal justice require non-profit companies.

Advantages of for-profits:

> 1. Focus. Non-profits inherently have a bifurcated business model: raising $ on the one hand, accomplishing their mission on the other hand. Rarely can you find an organization good at both.

> 6. Built-in Scaling Mechanism. In for-profit, if the idea is good, it scales, and if it's not, it dies. Whereas non-profits tend to live forever, rarely getting larger or dying altogether.

Hypothetical experiment: If you were a philanthropist and could only fund for-profits, but you wanted to stop the drug war, would there be anything worth funding?
That might not be a bad thing. I've used Android for a while, but I'm not always clear if/when the back button will do in-app navigation vs. return me to the phone's home screen.
The back button is not gone. Yet.
its those couple of individuals prerogative. it was never a discussion about the platform it was a discussion about the legal entity. what is there a need to be honest about, what segment of the society is confused about that, I'm personally not familiar with those people and it doesn't anything about what I understand is congruent with the constitutional social contract of the privately run platform to exercise their free expression to boot off someone is also exercising their free expression.
I read that based on his ignoring tunsafe's author's comments, and the fact that he apparently unilaterally blanned the author from the wireguard subreddit.

I don't know either person at all, I only found out about tunsafe and the "controversy" a few hours ago after seeing this post and googling for the windows alternatives that "are not recommended" but are mentioned on the wireguard site.

I admit I did editorialize a bit more than I should have.
Doctors Grapple with High Suicide Rates in Their Ranks
The back button shows up when you open an app.
I'm thinking a lot about your OP.

I'm still developing these thoughts, but I think the critical difference lays in the difference between "VR experience of Hiroshima bombing" and "watching Schindler's List."

A movie is a narrative. Otherwise it wouldn't be entertaining and nobody would watch it. Even documentaries have narratives. Narratives require good guys, bad guys, etc.

A VR "experience" is just that - one little slice of experience. I really don't think that can be biased (maybe, depending on the experience). It's just "putting yourself in someone's shoes." I don't see how anybody could be biased about how terrible a city being nuked was. It was terrible. Someone might argue that "it was for the greater good," but it was still terrible. Maybe it'll make it harder for a future (now child) president to make the decision to drop the bomb, good! Is that a biased viewpoint, to not want suffering of anybody? I guess maybe it is.
The general consensus amount Samsung users from my experience is that that they do these features better than Google. Samsung's multi-window support was better than eventually came to Android. Samsung's handling of app badges was WAY better (message counts!) and that went away with Oreo's terrible implementation (a dot indicating un-dismissed notifications).

My impression after upgrading to Oreo and getting more Google-designed features and less Samsung-designed features has been pretty disappointing. I lost a bunch of features that were extremely useful.

Unfortunately, as you said, reconciling the two code-bases means that Android updates are slow-to-never. The promise of open source and upstreaming patches for features doesn't happen with Android. Every manufacturer does many of the same enhancements themselves and then Google re-implements it a few years later poorly.
Coupling solar with hydro to recycle some water and allow the dam to operate at a greater capacity even when river or storage levels are low is an interesting idea [0]. Though perhaps only applicable in a few locations (I think the Waitaki power scheme in NZ could be a candidate, one day)

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/24/business/ener...
I'm still using my Galaxy Note 4, and I have no complaints.
Samsung doesn't enjoy being thrashed around by Google making countless sub versions of Android and adding tons of UI updates years after they've made them. OEM's like Samsung must choose to either be horribly behind Google or jumping the gun and having an ecosystem large enough to rival Apple's. I've switched to most Samsung products over Apple and it's amazing how much easier my life has gotten.

Samsung really nails the UI of their phones and the experience makes stock Android feel like a buggy unfinished mess.
Oh, I agree that they cannot now be trusted. I was just trying to indirectly make the point that from our POV SpiderOak acknowledging they made a mistake, or them deliberately covering for a NSL look identical.
He did not. He is talking about the Mac Pro not iMac Pro. The former goes from 3000.0 to 4000.0 USD
https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-pro

[update]Sorry he said $20,000. SO you are right
> A bicycle is an incredibly simple visual form

I disagree, compared with most objects a human daily interacts with - doors, furniture, lifts, cars - a bicycle is one of the most complex visible forms. I'm talking about what can be seen from outside, since obviously a car is much more complex on the inside.

Most of the stuff we deal with is composed of square/boxes and circle/tubes. Triangular shapes are quite rare in human spaces (I don't have any in my house), and the bicycle critically has two triangles at it's core. Chains are also very rare. So I don't think it's a surprise that many struggle with the core - two triangles and a chain.
It's not gone in all of the screenshots the home, back, and menu button are all still there. I think swiping up is just going to be an additional feature to reach the new recents+home row screen.
You can override things like that with an extension called Stylus. Inspect the element and then add a new CSS rule (globally, by domain, or by URL). Stylus will remember it.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/styl-us/

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/stylus/clngdbkpkpe...
I can see the back button in two of the screenshots.
Movie theaters already have that, it's called in-theater advertising, which nearby synergistic businesses have the greatest incentive to participate in (and create movie patron offers, sometimes in partnership with the theater, to promote in the ads), and do.

There's no need for the middle man.
Lip-Reading AI Could Help the Deaf–or Spies
My feelings exactly, Google literally plays catch up to Samsung in terms of features in it's OS and it's phones. So really I feel sorry for those poor people using Pixel 2 XL which has been slowed down to a crawl by the updates Google pushes out on the regular.
You don't pay any taxes because nothing is forgiven. You lose the house. The loan is secured by the home but nothing else, as opposed to being secured by the home and yourself as a guarantor.

Non-recourse loans are the standard across the entire country. It has nothing to do with jurisdiction, at least not within the U.S. The people who get regular, recourse loans are speculators, people buying 2nd or 3rd homes, and commercial developers.

This has to do with the terms of the mortgage contract, not with the law. Some states do have laws which regulate mortgage matters, but those typically only matter when there are problems with the contract, such as when people sell directly to each other (e.g. a prior owner holds the mortgage). The vast majority of people purchase homes through a bank, for which the standard terms are non-recourse.
This seems like moving the goalposts.

You also don’t have to draw “free eye”. There are plenty of tools you can use like tracing paper, photographic references, coloring books with the lines already drawn, ...

None of my illustrator friends use french curves or compasses to do their sketching, and usually even skip using a straightedge, but through practice can make very nice straight lines, right angles, circles, other curved lines, etc.

Hand-eye coordination at the level that professionals have takes an incredible amount of training/practice. It’s hard to imagine how you would even disentangle their practice at mental visualization vs. practice at proprioception, etc.
It's also important to point out the grid is archaic in many places and the knowledge isn't omnicompetent across the system. In the US, we have three major grids which are also connected to Canada's (which I can't speak too). [0] From my understanding, with an amateur interest, we know a lot about where those major grids connect but very little about the distributed nodes that make up the network; The Northeast Power Blackout of 2003 is a really great example of this. [1] Essentially, there was a grid failure that occurred in Ohio which overlapped into the other sections of the grid. In short, a wire contacted with a tree in Ohio which caused a cascading failure to NYC.

So, let's now bring IoT into the mix. You and I have smart houses, with smart solar tiles. John attacks our tiles plus all our neighbors and directs a major electrical spike towards our local substation. Now it's a physics question, where are all those joules of energy going? It's a heat problem and right now there is no way to dissipate that heat from the system which will melt our substation. Let's say our neighborhood is between several other neighborhoods and the main power station, we just killed a node and guess who else doesn't have access to power because they don't have tiles like we do.

That's the basic concept on why security and authenticity are important in relation to the energy grid. It would be nice if there was an effective way to dissipate an "electrical DDoS"? I'm not sure if it's called something else. If you're interested in the energy dissipation within the energy grid, this is a great question on SE. [2]

That all said, is also a major reason why the government is consistently freaking out about our power grid being hacked.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_U.S._power_transmi...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_2003
[2] https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/117437/what-...
As Richard Feynman would say, there's plenty room at the bottom.
Android P is available for the Essential phone[0] the same day as the Pixel. Technically, every device in that was enrolled in the Android P beta could have also had it day one.

[0]https://www.essential.com/
Honestly curious - I wonder how many people on here that are arguing in favor of limiting access to Infowars have actually spent time watching/listening to it? Or have they formed opinions based on 'what they are told' it is, or blog headlines etc... I see a lot of that these days. A headline comes along and describes something, and a whole bunch of people accept it as literal truth, without bothering to spend time really learning about an opposing viewpoint.

A great example of this is Jordan Peterson - he's sort of an interesting guy who got caught up in limelight for various political reasons, but the bulk of his lectures are truly interesting to me, looking at Christianity from an evolutionary psychology perspective, etc... but to read the headlines, you'd think he was out there whipping up Nazi sentiment and trying to crush democracy. I see a lot of people cherry picking small sentences taken out of context, and repeating them to mischaracterize an "opponent". See the painfully uneducated criticisms of his discussion about 'enforced monogamy'.

I freely admit I haven't seen a lot of Alex Jones' stuff. I've watched it a bit, out of curiosity. What I saw was colorful and impassioned. I saw a dude getting riled up and speaking more from emotion than critical analysis. That's not my favorite thing, so I haven't spent more time watching it.

I just wonder if he's being given the 'Jordan Peterson' treatment because his views are unpopular, and sometimes disagreeable? I saw at least one comment on here accusing him of inciting violence directly. That's the sort of thing I'm talking about. I wonder if that person actually watched/listened to him incite violence? Or if they were just repeating something they heard somewhere else. Several other comments followed that argued that he'd never done that. Hmm.

Like I said, I don't have a valid opinion on Inforwars itself, because I haven't really spent much time watching it. I wonder if our discussions about a topic like Infowars would be more positive and constructive if more people were able to withhold judgement until they'd actually researched the topic directly.

Or maybe they have? Maybe the dislike is valid from people who have spent time looking into it? It just seems questionable when there is disagreement about basic statements like "he incites violence".
I agree this would be a reasonable response if this were the actual justification. But in fact, all the coverage I've seen of this cites his hate speech as the justification, not illegal activity.

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2018/08/apple-pulls...

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/06/apple-rem...

Hate speech is correctly generally protected by the first amendment, and it should likewise be protected as free speech by private parties.