skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Note that WireGuard does have an "entire protocol" version;

Where? Neither a search nor a brief manual inspection of the protocol design mentions such a feature.

> it's possible to support more than one at a time

Just a moment ago you were cheering on WireGuard's simplicity and lack of vulnerability to downgrade attacks, and now we're talking about how an implementation might actually offer more than one, whereupon you're back to worrying about downgrade attacks.

TLS has a number of specific anti-downgrade countermeasures, it will not surprise anyone to discover that WireGuard's paper as well as not describing this "entire protocol" version feature you've mentioned also has nothing about downgrade prevention...
Vue components are structured in such a way (props, methods, data, computed properties, etc.) which is the same of the file you can find within the SRC folder of the project.
This is the longest I’ve ever written that makes sense to me
The section about the bronchoscopy is this article is terrifying:

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37311038

Stem cell science must above all avoid another Jesse Gelsinger case. Superstar researchers will always want to take chances, but the risks have to be strictly managed by the community or else there will be a backlash and progress will be set back by decades.
We're down-voting questions now? Wow.
I really dislike the characterization of Vietnam as US "Imperialism" when it was more a proxy war between US and USSR and/or futile involvement in another countries civil war. Many, many people appreciated the US fighting back against a communist takeover. Hiding behind "nationalism" was a PR move by revolutionary leadership, and not the real/main driver for it
Because people build these projects in their spare time.

Just like you have observed there's no perceived business value to managers yet in WebAssembly etc. for companies yet that aren't directly involved with 3D (like AutoCAD Web, game engines, ...) or other visual rendering (like PDFKit), so most of the things that are being created are just cognitively stimulating for the developers creating them, and that's not necessarily creating UIs.

Building things like this physics engine is like playing Lego for adults.

When you create UI, people always have opinions and you suddenly need to justify why things work differently than what they think is how things should work. That's exhausting.

You could make a startup out of it..
While developing, I hack my /etc/hosts to point at a local dev environment. Is this to say that Firefox would ignore that as well?
Windows has what Microsoft calls inbox drivers, these come with Windows/Windows Update. Stick with those drivers and it all looks a lot easier.

In general though I agree, it's a mess and as a developer of output management software it causes me no end of problems.
You implied this, but Google does use k8s internally. I saw a recent tweet where two employees (both kubernetes maintainers) said it's used more and more.
rizon ircs for programming. People make fun of this place a lot
Why not cut out the middle man and just apply the css directly
Well one could extend this and argue that there's not need for frontend frameworks as you can manipulate the dom directly. Two way data binding is awesome.

I have no idea about the lazy loading.
And yeah, it's "kind of image processing".
The android versions are notoriously badly implemented/written.

The command line client toxic seems to work even when unable to write to the filesystem at all.

Solution: comment the part out where it got stuck, and sideload.
Good reminder. Although subconsciously I realize that, I didn't remind myself that way and after re-reading that paragraph, I thought: "hmm, maybe I should up 'risk-seeking' dial a bit more"—which can be evaluated independently, though, depending on one's "risk profile".
> This can't be automated because everybody ignores bots

They can't ignore the fact that their work won't get published until they've finished their required number of reviews. It's easy to build in the right incentives, and review work should be part of thier professional responsibilities, and can be baked into the publishing platform they use.
What a doom and gloom-ish video. I understand that AI is a powerful technology that can be misused, but so just like all other technologies.

This is plain FUD, using popular science fictional dystopia to send some kind of political message. It's trying to appeal to the lower intelligence of people to pretend something bad can happen.

In the end, the military will work on those kinds of techs even if the public doesn't like it.
What I don't understand is why nearly everyone switched when it comes to temperature.

For the other metric units, such as meters and grams, the new units had a clear advantage over the old: decimal based subunits.

That was an advantage that you could not simply add on to your existing units without making a total mess of things.

This does not apply to temperature, because we very rarely use subunits with temperature.

Furthermore, the other base units are frequently used together in very commonly used derived units. For example, force is length x mass / time^2, pressure is mass / length / time^2, and energy is mass x length^2 / time^2. Those are all important enough that they have their own names.

There are no commonly used named derived units that are based on temperature (and I can't actually offhand think of any named derived units based on temperature).

In short, a government can make a pretty good case to its citizens to switch to meters and grams, despite the costs of dealing with that obsoleting a whole bunch of existing rulers, scales, and written records, because it is actually a better system.

But as far as I can tell, meter+gram+F would work as well as meter+gram+C, so it is hard to make a good, let alone compelling, case to your citizens that it is better. All they've got is "everyone else is doing it".

For meters and grams, "everyone else is doing it" might be good enough, even if meters and grams were not actually better than the old system, because of international trade.

People choose dimensions and weights of goods to come out nicely in the units they use, and they want to buy goods with nice dimensions and weights, so if you are trading internationally in goods, you have to deal with length and mass units of your trading partners.

Length and mass cross borders in trade.

For temperature, that is generally not the case. If I'm importing stuff from, say, France to the US, for almost all goods it does not make one bit of difference if France and the US use different temperature units.

Temperature does not cross borders in trade.
But what advantages does a Vue component offer over just doing the same thing with CSS? It's not going to be any more performant because it's not addressing a part of the rendering engine that Vue has any influence over. And you're not saving keystrokes because you've still got to instantiate the component and pass values to the props. All it does as far as I can tell is abstract away something that's trivial to do manually.
Trial patients?
Let me introduce you to https://safepass.me ; My current pet project
A lesser-known TLD will massively increase the likelihood of your outbound emails being filtered as spam.
Assembly hexdumps were worse variation of that.
> Do the rules prohibit intentional information sharing or just information sharing?

Maybe you're just being silly, and if so I apologize for playing this straight, but how are you composing intentionally and unintentionally? If someone has the intention to (somehow) unintentionally share information, I don't see how that differs from intentionally sharing information.
I don’t think that’s true. Marginal utility can explain the directional component but not the reference point component.

Let’s take the example from the comment above. A car salesman gets $100 in the morning and has to give it back in the evening if he doesn’t sell enough cars. Compare that to just handing out $100 if he’s successful in the evening. From an expected utility view both of these arrangements are equivalent.

Loss aversion argues that they’re not, because the salesman’s reference point for loss/gain shifts after obtaining ownership of the $100.
Note that his last way does cos(acos(cosϕ))) after generating cosϕ uniformly. Which is a waste, you can just set sinϕ = sqrt(1-cosϕ^2).

After fixing that, this way is faster for me. Some trig, but no branches.

Edit: https://pastebin.com/UExZ5Siw
the government's spy satellites have very high resolution, but that claim was just bogus.
I have had the same thought, and I have sometimes wondered if this approach has not been widely pursued because it is potentially too disruptive a technology - disruptive of the current patterns of vehicle ownership and use, that is.
Xenharminic has a lot of nice info about alternative musical tuning systems. (Note: they are in the process of migrating away from wikispaces. I'm not sure what the current state of the processes is.)

http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/
The article is wrong.

Nothing in Mozilla’s communication even hints at DoH becoming default on any time in the nearer future. I’m certain Mozilla would like encrypted DNS by default, but not at all cost. It will probably land as a generally available feature in September, but still default to off and still be behind about:config. There are many expert features hidden in about:config that might never become default or only after a substantial shakedown period. Third party isolation, for example. So it would not entirely surprise me if DoH would remain an expert feature for a long time. And I’m certain it won’t become default on without a very clear config UI. Messing with name resolution has massive impact on a lot of setups.
Either way it is not realistic. People losing a few cents on what they know is a simulation is far, far different than people watching their life savings evaporate in an uncertain environment.

Besides, the point of that particular study isn't a stock, it's that they have a 50-50 chance of losing money they were just given. The stock is just a placeholder for anything.
No. It makes sense to use a library that implements a VDOM and efficient Dom Diffing because that's hard to implement yourself.

And there is no need for front end frameworks at all. They should be avoided entirely.

And two way data binding is for fools.
I guess it could end up being like the Turkish 'coup attempt' where it's mostly used as an excuse to arrest a lot of people.
Author claims that vanilla vim would never support async linters, but that's changed now: https://github.com/w0rp/ale
Considering Google Cloud is offering $300 credit and their Console is top notch AND offers browser based SSH. DO is not as obvious of a choice.

Sustained use discount and top notch network further the case.
As a user whose trust has already been broken by both ISPs and governments, I see no drawback in participating as a user in this public experiment. What you describe as a drawback is a privacy improvement for me.

The DNS implementation used by every non-Tor user around the world today is already subject to warrantless spying by every ISP and government in the world, due to the property known as “cleartext”. If you opt-in to the Cloudflare trial, you are only at risk of warrantless spying by Cloudflare — rather than every ISP — and the US government — rather than every government.

My cellular ISP sells my DNS queries to advertising networks, and my home ISP is wiretapped warrantlessly by the US government. This experiment decreases the chances of the resale of my personalized data to data warehouses and decreases the chances of success of warrantless wiretapping by my government.

I envy those of you that believe you can trust your ISPs and governments.
But the SAH is supposed to explain the sudden growth in brain size, which is a genetic change in the history of the human species.
I like to stay updated of what the Kindle hacking community is up to.

https://www.mobileread.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=150

My PW3 Kindle got way better with the many hacks I've learned there.
Python: Copy contents of one doc file to another, image part tricky
You can break windows by installing third party apps too. Or by well-aimed edit in registry.

All systems can be broken by incompetent user with root or administrator password.
If only 17-year-olds and interested amateurs had access to email and could write the authors in the same way that academics can...
See also Iron Mountain Mine in CA. It's a Superfund site and it generates pH -3.6 water (which is absurd).
> But how does it help you stay anonymous? You are still paying for that server using your CC and they'd have your address and all other info. Unless I can rent the server anonymously, I can't see any point to run my own VPN server. That's why I'm paying a third party, PIA for example, to rent and run that server for me.

I don't see the purpose of VPNs as anonymity, and I think many people are making a mistake to see them that way. If anyone really wanted to know who you are, they could file a suit and subpoena PIA. Now you're trusting that PIA really doesn't keep any logs. You have no way of verifying this. Or, if someone has some suspicions about who (and where) you are, they could subpoena their billing information. If someone (particularly a government) really wants to find you, a VPN does little to stop them. You've just introduced a single middleman.

On top of that, you can only take PIA's assurances that they themselves are not tracking you.

I run my own VPN server, hosted in a DO droplet, to get around networks that filter certain ports and websites. That's it. I have considered adding a VM with read-only access to my NAS to the VPN but that's all.
The history features are incredible and also the only ones I use, eg diffing, showing changed dirs/files/lines, blame, file/dir commit history.

I've never used it for anything else git related because the ui is strange.
Not sure if it's considered 'niche', but I enjoy /r/mechanicalkeyboards
Furries

The best part is you not only get to hang out with lots of fluffy animal people (who often share your variety of not quite cis and straight), you get to bring all your hobbies along. Lots of furry musicians, programmers, writers, etc.
Optimizing for anything more (or less) than three dimensions is premature.
Or shuttles like this:

https://trl.co.uk/news/prev/35671

The last mile if far more interesting at the moment, with shuttles, Ofo bikes, e-bikes and scooters and "baby boomers" on their mobility devices. What it really needs though is more infrastructure to support it, ideally dedicated lanes.
I think you misunderstood something. You can export all your photos via Takeout... or flip a switch that makes them appear in your Drive to use more convenient sync tools.
Hey, I'm interested in this. Can you please reach out to me via my email later in my profile?
That's a great community. Everyone's level-headed (no pun intended) and not at all snobby or elitist about various modules.
>Let me know if I am wrong.

You're wrong on multiple levels.

1. Generating random values for x^2, y^2, z^2 and taking their square root will only give you values in the x,y,z > 0 octant.

(But let's say you "fix" this by randomly multiplying them with -1.)

2. Taking the square root of a uniformly distributed random variable is no longer uniformly distributed.

3. Randomly reordering the coordinates won't fix your bias.

Here's a demonstration in 2D: https://jsfiddle.net/tz85wnxy/59/

Uncomment line 17, 18, 20 to see how it's still not uniform even if you randomly multiply the coordinates by -1 and reorder them.
If you editor has a correct git support, you never need to do git status because it will show you which files had been edited since the last commit.

Unless you're on someone else's machine. Then you'll still need the cli.
I’m not suggesting https is a complete failure. I’m saying that HTTPS hasn’t yet achieved all that it intended to cover. It does the best it can given current real world constraints. That requires tradeoffs. But work is done to improve the situation and I’m generally happy for every feature that pushes the needle in the right direction.
I found it similarly hard to configure, so when I finally managed it, I wrote up how so you can try my configs: https://www.stavros.io/posts/how-to-configure-wireguard/
http://osdev.org/

Hobbyist Operating Systems Development!

We also have forums: http://f.osdev.org/ and IRC: Freenode/#osdev !
So what ends up being the general purpose method for uniformly distributed random numbers in some arbitrary shape? (other than the rejection method of course)

If arbitrary shapes always requires the rejection method, what are some "classes" that have easier algorithms (the sphere is obviously included here)
Remarkable. They’ve sampled the space of possible tessellated structures and quantified their behaviours.
Let me get this straight. You think the SAH is a plausible hypothesis for the sudden growth in brain size, but you agree that it fails to explain or provide a mechanism for favouring genes for larger brain size?
What is the terminal running in the 5th movie? (ThemWare)
Interestingly, it seems to be all about bending some distribution and then unbending it again. Orthogonal dimensions are independent, so choosing three random numbers generates uniform in-cube distribution. But once you bend it via polar coordinates or vectors, you “wrap” many points of polar/vector abstract space to near the cartesian origin. And then you have to bend back, to make it uniform again. That raises interesting question on whether it relates to topology problems. Since generating N randoms is a fastest primitive operation, is there a quick and uniform translation from a cube to the sphere, such that all points are still uniform? Can we apply space-filling curve magic here (like Hilbert’s)? I feel like there is much more geometry power under that, but sadly I’m just a guy with no math bg.
The printing press existed before Gutenberg, even in China. Gutenberg’s invention was movable type.
The strategy appears to be working, I notice GitLab announced a migration from Azure to GCP and the reason given is to have better Kubernetes support. https://about.gitlab.com/2018/06/25/moving-to-gcp/
I feel like this particular issue happens most often when one uses a catchall, as spammers like to try common usernames and this setup will allow all of them to be received.

In those cases, I found that it helps to use an obscure subdomain that doesn't have a website attached to it (e.g. mailus.example.com).
The country devolved into civil war after the US deposed and had executed the country’s leader, who they had previously corruptly installed, but I guess found insufficiently compliant.

If it’s not “imperialism” to fix elections, then overthrow and murder the people you help elected, pushing the country into horrific violence (which you then exacerbate), I’d like to know what rises to the level of your definition of the term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1963_South_Vietnamese_coup
There are a few things necessary to make friends: close proximity; repeated, unplanned interactions; and a setting that encourages people to let their guard down and confide in one another. See here https://nyti.ms/MmWvQn for more on this.
My suggestion would be to find some hobby you enjoy that allows for frequent interactions and a space where failing is commonplace. It will take time and putting yourself out there will be difficult, but hopefully it help you gain friends.
Some possible examples of this include a sport, dancing, cooking, reading novels and analyzing them, electronics, board or table top games, etc. Ideally whatever you choose has a lot of social interaction. For me this meant a climbing gym but I know many people that do the things I listed and have made friends doing that.
So.. in some future Mozilla might select a default DNS provider on your behalf.

Did you consider the upside?

Mozilla can negotiate on your behalf. Mozilla can obtain favorable terms of service, concessions in privacy, third-party reviews. Things you would never be able to negotiate for.

If you think of Mozilla as negotiating on your behalf, they have motive to protect you, and they have the leverage to get concessions from 3rd party vendors.

Think of Mozilla as using the collective bargaining power of it's user-base to get favorable terms. This could be a game changer.
The Stock Market Is Shrinking
Halal market
You should try listening to noir jazz or spy jazz. Those subgenres might be your edge of accessibility now.

For Classical music, just listen to all the works that have been used in movies endlessly.
Satellite Turla: APT Command and Control in the Sky (2015)
RxJS Methods. Part 1
NB, another submission has garnered more discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17689416
Checking in from an un-airconditioned New Orleans house with a window unit or two. Missing the transoms that got taken out in the renovation. Good thing I'm moving out.
I think running your own server is hard - hard not to wind up on spam lists almost impossible to be removed from. What I do, to keep a local copy of my email, is I run a pi that crons offlineimap twice a day to one disk, then another cron to rsync to another one.
Michael MacInnis: Oh a New Unix Shell – BSDCan 2018
That made me chuckle. I’m afraid it might even be half true. Someone should write a good blog post on how Kubernetes is a tech marketing success story. Same could be said for Docker of course.
I believe Mozillas goal is to use the collective bargaining power of it's user-base to get favorable terms and conditions from vendors like cloudflare.

This could include 3rd party reviews, etc.. Who knows?
Disrupted yes but by tunnels. Tunnels will be vastly better than flying cars. Much faster, electric powered, and safer. City centers will be more more pleasant and quiet when surface traffic is all pedestrian.

The manufacturing learning curve has been the path to lower costs through mass production and tunnels will be no exception.

“Without tunnels we’ll be in traffic hell forever” -Elon Musk
swirling moods makes me think of Brad Mehldau, Ben Monder, Pat Metheny Groups "The Way Up", maybe some of the Chris Potter Underground or Donny McCaslin records.
My only technique is to calmly ask them questions based on their beliefs. I also don't really set out to change minds, but occasionally it can be amusing to watch people walk you through the goofy logic of their fringe beliefs.
Very close over human ranges:

C = (F-30) / 2
F = 2 * C + 30

Exact conversions:

C = (F-32) * 5 / 9
F = C / 5 * 9 + 32

Table:

C F
-40 -40
0 32 (Approx water freezing point)
10 50
20 68 ( ~ 70)
~21 70
30 86
37 98.6 (body temperature)
40 104
50 122
... ...
100 212 (Approx water boiling point)
I think this is a fair comment, it’s relevant and sparks an interesting debate about psychology as an overall discipline. Not sure it’s fair to call it unsubstantive.
> I find this concept terrible. The eventual, theoretical end-point is that only the elite, social-media connected individuals will get help with their Gmail issues.

Another, better outcome would be if Google get tired of getting bad PR and decides to 1. remove traps like the one we are discussing and/or 2. fix their support system.
Well, if you think that, why are you arguing over a submission about a component for one of those frameworks?
You think it's useless just because you don't use something like Vue?

I'm not sure if you're trolling or not at this point.
Hehe, I worked on one of these last year when I took a music theory class! You might enjoy this: https://github.com/kach/recreational-rosette/tree/master/mus...
I second this. I ran my own mail server for a couple of years (a good educational experience), but after a while I figured it was far less hassle to pay someone else to deal with it.

FastMail have been an excellent email provider, and support has always been responsive and useful.
BitTorrent / TRON Partnership Raises Important Questions for File-Sharers