skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think it would be built. Were my SO a corporate lawyer, I'd sure as hell built her software to make her life easier. At scale, there's probably always someone on this planet with some basic programming skills that's a close friend or a partner to a person in any possible occupation.
Hey bemmu,

Thanks so much for taking the time to reply!

Also, thank you for finding this issue! I'm going to fix this right now. Great point. I'm also adding in my email for feedback! :)

Look forward to your questions!
Seems like my decision to migrate off Firefox was the right one.
I look forward to read this. Thanks for posting the link.

> "You might well ask why you should study assembly language, given that I think you should avoid writing in it. I believe very strongly that the best programmers have a good understanding of how computer hardware works. I think this principle holds in most ﬁelds: the best drivers understand how automobiles work; the best musicians understand how their instrument works; etc."
/r/ElectricUnicycle/

local facebooks groups are more active than than reddit though.
The explanation is in the article.
The country was undergoing decolonization following WWII and got caught in the middle of two nuclear powers who couldn't openly fight each other without risking a nuclear exchange. It's a miracle that Vietnam isn't split in two like Korea.

I'm not trying to rationalize the conduct of the US, there's plenty of blood on our hands when it comes to removing/installing foreign leaders, but this was a very complex situation with many players that lasted for over 30 years following the end of WWII. It's disingenuous to reduce it to 'American imperialism'.
Sure, I don't NEED it right now, but it feels like DNS-over-HTTPS will become non-optional at some point.

I hope I'm wrong about that, but I'd like to prepare a little bit in case I'm right.
And lets not forget that their CEO will arbitrarily censor and stop serving people he doesn't like. He's done it before. He'll do it again. Cloudflare has already lost my trust.
>>>In a past life I ran email services for a small business, and then a medium business it was a full time job, just keeping us out of the spam blacklists

Running it onPrem using the ISP the is connected to office I bet... That is a common problem with small businesses as they do not properly setup the ISP service and many SPAM lists automatically add the dynamically assigned IP ranges of most ISP has these are not setup to allow hosted services across them so by default no one expect to see a email server on that type of connection. Thus it is blocked.

Outside of that companies like MailRoute can help with routing to email traffic, and provide some level of HA for your email services.

>> ecosystem changes (e.g. new DNS records every few years, new security requirements, etc)

SPF, DKIM, DMARC are not really new, nor have they changed much in years. Thought most people still fail at getting it right. I am dealing with an issue with my bank right now where one Division is not talking to another division but they all use the same main domain for sending email so of course SPF record does not have ALL of the mail servers listed ... sigh...

>>filtering incoming spam/malware/philishing attempts.

There are many 3rd parties out there providing these types of services, I would use them. MX Gaurd Dog is probably one of more reasonably priced services but there are all kinds of other from Mimecast to Proofpoint, and many many others

>>I tell them outsource email to a major provider and use your limited time/effort elsewhere. Better rate of return by far.

I am not opposed to that persay. I also advice my clients if they are going to do that, at minimum they need a email archiving solution that is NOT with that same provider so they do not have all of their critical communications locked up in a single point of failure. For better or worse many companies live and die by email and if Email data is lost that can be DEVASTATING to a company. Having it all locked into a service you do not control is a high risk business ending decision IMO
There was a frontpage yesterday about literary clock.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17688324
What else is there?

Biggest producers of most consumed products are on the stock market.

People buy procter & gamble stocks because everyone is buying the products.
The only way to get big returns is secrets, just like always. Insider trading has given way to insider investing or insider hiring, which is insidery just like always. The problem with the stock market is that it is too easy for people to invest in, relative to other options (private companies) where you are still welcome to (encouraged?) to learn about secrets. So people blindly buy indexes (past returns = future results somehow, even though by definition people are overvaluing whatever is in the bucket) instead of finding secrets.
What will prevent the mega-corps from trample democracy? Do we have to trust the wealthiest 1% to be ethical?
Or should we tax the 1% percent until it becomes, say, 5% - "decentralized" enough to keep democracy in the safe zone?
Fang stocks have generated enormous returns relative to the S&P 500 though.

Facebook was worth $35/share at $100 billion in 2013. Now make that $170/share, far exceeding the S&P 500 in that period. Same for Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, which were already very big but became even bigger.
The easy answer is that somebody can photograph you putting the cash in the machine. Cameras are pretty small these days and facial recognition is cheap.

Besides that, though, the entire mechanism of Bitcoin is one where all transactions are recorded publicly in perpetuity. It's really the polar opposite of private in that respect. It means that if your identity is ever linked to a particular bitcoin address (as in the not-so-unlikely scenario that the authorities or some other attacker are monitoring bitcoin-for-cash machines), then all transactions linked to that address can be linked to you.
> besides for having money to invest

That is the exact barrier of entry I'm referring to. Ballooning stock prices of well-performing stocks and shrinkage of the number of listed companies in a stock market narrow the opportunities for middle-class investors.
He means there are fewer stocks at an early stage in their lifecycle where you can book a 1000x return by investing well.
The Rockett 25/7 Company Inc Fan Base – Home
Fewer but higher-quality companies helps retail investors.
A powerful, customizable, multi-mode scrollbar plugin based on Vue.js
Yuval Noah Harari extract: ‘Humans are a post-truth species’
This is why I don't support universal health care. Health care is expensive because of basic supply and demand, everybody needs health care and doctors and drugs are expensive to train/develop. Government regulation can't just magically make a few million nurses and doctors appear, can't make cancer drugs develop themselves. It will only kill investment and innovation in the medical field.

Investing trillions in universal health care would just be wasted money on a shitty system, like trying to make horses faster rather than inventing the car and plane. The solution to affordable healthcare will be a combination of AI for diagnosis and surgery plus cloning and stem cells for organ transplants.

People need to be patient and put things in perspective, 100 years ago the richest person on earth could die from an infected scratch because we didn't have antibiotics. We've come very far in a short period of time.
I can't see myself ever supporting this as opt-out rather than opt-in.
It's not investing in the currently public companies that's the issue...it's all the private companies that never go public...or go public so much later than they would have in the past that all the value has already been extracted by VCs.
Almost: It specifies which addresses or ranges the remote peer can send packets from. Basically, if a packet comes in on the interface with an address that's not in AllowedIPs, it gets dropped. That's why for the "tunnel everything" example, the AllowedIPs are "0.0.0.0/0", i.e. a wildcard, so that packets from all addresses are allowed to come in from the remote server.

EDIT: I've updated the article with more information and a link to the official docs, which explain this better.
I feel like this is the part the other comment or is either ignoring or not seeing. We’re not talking about non-verbal communication, like the hand signals of a 3rd base coach. Of course it’s forbidden to hold up fingers for the numbers on the card you have.

That rule doesn’t forbid your natural actions and reactions.
The S&P 500 has good risk -adjusted returns. Look at Bitcoin, which fell 70% this year. People are always looking for the next big thing, and often these fall short.
Nanowrimo, I love trying to write 50k words in 30 days every November. I usually fail but there's great camaraderie and a year long build up
It's interesting how there used to be publicly traded apartment buildings, and now it's more the place the financiers go to cash out once the real money has been made. The exchanges delist low cap and low price stocks, and the idea of starting a company with a public offering is now considered absurd.
That is the endowment effect https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect
I've had this feeling frequently in the past. Many years ago, when I was just learning computer science related concepts, I would be repeatedly surprised to see solutions discussed for which I had already had an inkling. It would usually turn out that my ideas weren't really novel or perhaps weren't really workable. With more experience and education this changed, and I've had an enjoyable career problem solving problem and inventing.

Inventive minds like yours will often have insights that aren't original, but over time and with more practice, some of these will be original and practical and valuable, and you will more often have the satisfaction of making important discoveries.
RAN: Routing Around Nation-States
Which is a goal to strive for as well however this endeavor is still valid as the client can be mobile and transient across ISPs. So until you can trust all Is as you might come into contact with, having a secure and hardened client is the better of the two.
The barrier is that the valuable growth stocks aren't actually stocks, they're privately held, due to fewer IPOs and more private capital available without recourse to public markets.
Yes, but only from the global perspective. For an average Vietnamese rice farmer, who doesn't give two hoots about the global proxy war, it had become a war for survival and the aggressor was clearly the US.
The obvious but unpopular solution would be to make it easier for companies to go public.

The trade off is that Theranos would be public, but so would, for example, Stripe and Slack.
I don't think it's harder, there's just less incentive to do so. I was shocked when I realized that dropbox was the first and only yc company to go public.

Now it's only the giant tech companies that want big liquidity events who'll go public. You almost never see tech startups younger than a decade old go public.
> Where? Neither a search nor a brief manual inspection of the protocol design mentions such a feature.

Pages 9 and 10 in the whitepaper, see IDENTIFIER and CONSTRUCTION.

That being said, supporting broken crypto is a bad idea. Should any of the crypto primitives be broken, the way to move forward would be to replace them, not have WireGuard support 2 protocol versions simultaneously.
French school in row over tracking pupils electronically
https://www.google.com/search?btnG=Search&q=synaptic+overcon...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2001237/

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.016

The overall picture seems to be local overgrowth/overconnectivity and global/cortico-co-cortical underconnectivity (especially to the frontal lobe). Cortex tissue appears to implement universal epistemic circuits, since they are known to learn arbitrary functions e.g. one can rewire visual input to the auditory cortex in animals and they learn to see. So, too much of those circuits might both imply heightened focus on the details and more intrinsic reward (=reward from pattern prediction/completion for information gain/exploration) which might as well explain the overall difference in value function, deemphasizing reward from social and normative things by relative magnitude. Norms and social stuff is rather processed frontally and subcortically in the insula and amygdala, AFAIK, but there is no reason to believe this is not also partly wired into the cortex too. Evolution has likely encoded most functions all over the place as it likes to do with the genome itself.
Just wondering, what's the actual use-case for an URL shortener in 2018?

I would understand maybe like 10 years ago when SMS was still king and you were limited in characters, but now?

URL shorteners now look shady (and can be used to conceal malicious links), could track you, and even if they have no nefarious intentions it's still an extra DNS lookup, HTTPS negotiation and redirect.

TLDR: good project as a proof of concept, but seems completely irrelevant nowadays.
In general, highways seem like a pretty logical starting point. There are some potential complications like car accidents and debris but they seem far more tractable than random pedestrians, cyclists, and all the complex driving behavior on city streets resulting from traffic lights, trucks stopped to make deliveries, etc. etc.

It doesn't enable end-to-end autonomous taxis, so you need a sober, licensed driver in the driver's seat even if they don't need to be able to take over on a second's notice.

Handling long distance highway driving would actually be a big win. It just doesn't stir imaginations the same way that completely eliminating a driver door-to-door does--especially among people who really want to get out of car ownership and driving entirely.
So essentially Donor Advised Funds are better in every way for the donor, including but not limited to being more private, way less arbitrary restrictions (donate 5% a year -- why?) and allowing them control of where they donate. And this is competition for non-profits of other kinds, that are mostly just a way for people to pay themselves giant base salaries, relative to a donor-controlled fund. And further, this article is basically calling out a person in particular for putting $500M into a fund for the purpose of philanthropy (sooner or later) and then not having made enough donations (it would better if he had to donate 5%/year -- again, why?). Then goes on to quote a professor calling it fraud, despite it still being legitimately a way for people to donate assets like stock to charity in a one-way vehicle that they control, as if that is bad somehow. Evidently people are so angry at successful people at this point, they are not going after their charity too, again not clear on why.
This is how I want music to be sold. Actual money goes to the artists this way instead of it trickling down through middlemen like Spotify, Deezer, Apple Music, etc
It's not just VCs (who will be looking for an IPO eventually); it's also growth equity, which has a more moderate payout expectation, more easily achievable with acquisition, or even straight up sale to private equity.

(Yes, growth equity is a category of private equity, but it's a developing middle ground between VCs and more traditional PE which is usually focused on cost cutting and loading up on debt to juice returns from mature companies.)
This is something that varies wildly with which part of the world you're in. For me, anything below 65F is "too cold" with 85 being a comfortable temperature.
Yes, didnt look at the details of the next methods. He adjusts for this in the next examples by taking the cube root of the uniform sample(not square root as in my post), which is the correct adjusting factor, as a small shell will have weight in proportion to difference between cubic powers, which is proportional to r^2.
How are these two things contradicting? You can have universal health care and still have the rich paying for private services and research, with their own money and with their taxes.

(In my country we have a relatively-to-the-US wonderful UHC system, and we still see a lot of research, experiments, competition and innovation)
Patrick Stewart on returning to Jean-Luc Picard role
> intellij idea have excellent git integration.

I find all the colors and ques distracting while I am coding.
How long do you think it will take for our coastal lands to be flooded or our farming lands to become deserts? 10, 20 years? What do you think we'll be doing during that time? Just sitting around?

> Will anyone help the US, knowing we did nothing to avert catastrophe?

Just to be sure we're on the same page here, you predict we'll do nothing while all those cities start to flood, over the course of years to decades. Then, the rest of the world (who is as guilty as we are of your “sin” of ignoring the issue) will be required to save us from what sounds like damnation, and they will cast us down to suffer our self deserved fate (even though they depend on us as much or more than we do on them)?

Oh yes, sounds completely reasonable... /s

What really will happen, is if the climate models are correct, then it will become no question to anybody that there are big problems with the climate, and at that point we will have the motivation, and years to decades to solve it.

I don't claim to know what the solution will be, but I have the feeling that given all of earth's population working toward a solution can succeed. And this will happen once it can't be denied that it exists (if it will actually be a problem. Yes, models can be wrong)
Once DNS-over-HTTPS starts creating problems, port 443 to well-known IPs will be also not guaranteed to work everywhere.
Some is consolidation, some is delisting, and some is leveraged buyouts.
ohh I would be in heaven to have an office at 62f....

BTW 73-74 is not "like it cold" that is standard temp most offices should be at for the balance.

62f is liking it cold, and I like it cold. I have been known to wear short sleeves, and shorts outside in 45-50 degree weather.
Tech Support #Scams Improved with Adoption of Call Optimization Service
I would call that a work around, not a solution. For a project that cries about privacy, the fact that all the implementations are so .. anti privacy like that is pretty bad.
There is also a factor where investors, individual and institutional, invest more through funds and ETFs rather then individual securities. Investors in funds sometimes get exposure to growth sectors through investment in VC funds.

A great example of this is the lack of splits. It used to be that companies would split their stock if the price got above $100 a share or so. The idea was you wanted an individual investor to be able to trade even lots (100 shares) of your stock. Now individual investors hold your stock through a fund or ETF so stocks like Google, Alphabet etc. are expensive per share, but no one cares.
Can I get a source on this? 36C isn't that uncommon a temperature where I'm at - it'll even hit 36+ on a hot winter's day.
I am of the same opinion and this is an experimental feature turned off by default which is why there is no UI for it.

I am imagining that if it goes live the UI will probably be like the Search Engine configuration with a default you can easily change.

Still annoying to have to change and almost impossible to notice if it should change, but not as bad as it's being made out to be.
This is a great community, very welcoming.
You don't need Growth stock to retire, index funds and income/dividend stocks are all that's needed to retire comfortably. Individual investors should not be trying to pick individual growth stocks because it's highly risky.
I think you are misreading that comment. He’s saying that stubby is fast, not grpc. In fact performance is the big unknown with grpc adoption within google. It definitely isn’t on par with stubby today and it has to get there before anyone significant will switch to it.
When everyone is going 60 mph, going 60 mph gets you nowhere fast. Going that fast takes up a lot of space. To go that fast in cities we had to rip out the places to go to make room for the means of getting to those places at 60 mph, and for room to store your giant protective metal shell when you're not using it.

We stopped building the sorts of places where you can still get somewhere going at a reasonable speed around the end of WW2, and made it illegal, so it's now very expensive to live in a sensible neighbourhood, there aren't many left. It's a simple supply and demand problem, though not so simple once you attempt to unpack the reasons as to why we have this simple supply and demand problem.

There's a banality to true evil. It's a quirk of human social psychology that when everyone is doing the wrong thing, it stops being the wrong thing. This why rape=bad, and destroying the planet=pretty alright if you ask me.
EDIT: I’m mistaken and should take my own advice :)
The problem are hidden industry-wide monopolies by huge funds.
Don't need 1000X return to retire. Index funds and income stocks are all that's needed.

Edit: Got to like the down voters who think individual investors should be out picking stocks. Even though experts and basic investing advice tells people they should not be picking individual stocks.
That's the only feature request I have as well. Something where you could reference a file would be ideal, for example your config could be:

PrivateKey = !peername

Publickey = !peername

And the actual credentials could be in a separate file with a specific name, with one peer per line:

peername:pubkeystring:privkeystring

That would make deployments much easier, as the credentials could be handled separately.

However, the peer address assignment is another good question. One file per peer would be better, I think, but you'd need something like another directory, and, at that point, you might as well write a script to take all your config and concatenate it into one file. That having been said, I don't know why that can't be a part of wg-quick.
Weather forums run by serious weather geeks, some of which are actual professionals. Especially towards and during extreme weather events these are a lot of fun.
It's not at all a bad idea. When I had a look at all the pricings it seemed to be price per user. I have a few domains and loads of "users" on my $2.5 server. It's only me using it but I like to have different addresses for different things and it doesn't look like other hosts support this without paying the per user cost.
I think you substantially underestimate the number of networks that use split-horizon DNS for their functioning, and where hijacking the DNS is going to cause significant breakage.
This article is complaining about the dearth of small companies and blames... big companies and R&D, ignoring that the biggest issue for most companies is the increased regulation requirements that make it uneconomical to be publicly traded until you're so big that you need to follow most of those regulations for internal purposes anyway.
This is one reason I invest more in emerging markets. I also weight my investments more international.