skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
you did not get it.
Dr Bredesen does reverse Alzheimer in 9 out of 10 patients.
No theory or BS here.
Maybe they just wanted to play with splendid stuff like http://wordperhect.e-2.org
Simple ICO: the Basics
Unfortunately, this IR level is not readily accessible to third parties, for political reasons -- RMS does not want to make it easy for third-party code to integrate with GCC at this level, for fear that some of the code that uses that interface might be proprietary. See, e.g.,

https://lwn.net/Articles/582697/
Nobody is arguing that religion did not have a substantial and dramatic impact on western culture, though it's disputable whether much of that impact was at all positive, let alone a net positive.
Oof. Real names and addresses are two of the things I don't think should be required by social media. Scares me off.
By declaratively I mean that in React you typically declare how an element should be render given the current (props, [state]).

For example, in vanilla JS, you might have something like:

const btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.className = 'btn red';
btn.onclick = function(event) {
if (this.classList.contains('red')) {
this.classList.remove('red');
this.classList.add('blue');
} else {
this.classList.remove('blue');
this.classList.add('red');
}
};

In React instead:

class Button extends React.Component {
state = { color: 'red' }
handleChange = () => {
const color = this.state.color === 'red' ? 'blue' : 'red';
this.setState({ color });
}
render() {
return (<div>
<button
className=`btn ${this.state.color}`
onClick={this.handleChange}>
</button>
</div>);
}
}

I find it simpler to understand, because render, given its state, describes exactly how the UI should be.
Sounds like using a TI-89 calculator to solve "what is 2+2?"
Thanks! Also, what are some sources for stats that would be available for free online? I've looked at some 538 stuff, some Statsbomb stuff, whoscored, and football-data.
Actual hand-washing 20+ times for 2+ minutes each every day is extremely rare. Sanitizing for 20 seconds is a different story. Further, doctors don't do this on their days off which ends up being really important.

In the first case you would severely irritate the skin and end up with noticeable medical problems. Which IMO is a reasonable line for sanity in terms of day to day impact based on belief vs reality.

That said, sure there is something of an exception for religion.
Georgia was traditionally a red state so even if the votes were changed it wouldn't have affected the result.

Are any swing states suspected of having their voting system hacked to have changed the final result?

It is weird that the electronic voting system is u likely to get fixed. I guess it will have to get much worse in the future to cause action?
Also the ones most likely to be able to install an extension to do the same job.

That said, if you want Mozilla (or other organisations, for that matter) to make decisions based on how you're using their products, then it doesn't seem like an unreasonable expectation from their side that you tell them about that usage, i.e. through telemetry.
The biggest problem would be open sourcing everything, not just the software that used. The OS, the network configurations/setup, access controls/policies, etc. Even then, without a verifiable and private way of verifying counts, we could never be sure about a vote count.
Why on earth is this being down voted?
Debate is impossible if you're going to be merely absurdly argumentative.

You can be a customer if you have the money part of the exchange, otherwise you're clearly not a customer.
To me, this sounds like an excuse to pretend that systematic inequality doesn't exist, and thereby imply that not being able to rise above it is a personal failing.
It still certainly seems like it would limit your exposure to practical consequences. If a health insurance company decides to use DNA databases when calculating premiums, it would certainly be more difficult to use your DNA data if your identity is merely inferred by genetic analysis rather than voluntarily self-implicating yourself.
I wonder how many people will notice that your non-jQuery example actually contains a subtle bug.
Not that I have specific issues with the recommendations there, but from a conceptual standpoint, why should I trust recommendations on every subjects from a centralized non-specialized site when I can search for sites specialized in each subjects and take their recommendations on their own subjects instead.
In my anecdotal experience, this is a common problem: if your open-source project has an option for spying on users, the ones who pay attention to privacy and security opt out.

Debian's popcon survey has a worse version of this problem: it reports back the packages in use -- and nobody setting up a bunch of servers wants to leak that information, so they only get home users reporting in.
Clojure threading macros in ES6
Warren Buffet may not have used AirBNB service but he may use Pobyt
You may also become a better landscape designer.
That assumes neither side is in a disadvantage when it remains unmentioned. Which isn't the case.
More of the same easily-jammable schemes is not a real solution. But all wireless location/navigation/time-distribution mechanisms will be easily jammed. The only solution is fantastic improvements in inertial navigation devices.
If you're in a country that still broadcasts Teletext[0] then it's available over analog or DVB-T. VCRs used to do this to set their clock automatically in Europe.

Also, if you already have a time, you can keep it using the 50/60 Hz of the electric grid (which is specifically regulated to keep cheap alarm clocks in sync) or the TV refresh rate (which was also kept in sync deliberately for clocks in the analog days, dunno about now)

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teletext
A new quasiparticle lurks in semiconductors
For context, here is $fb stock for the past 12 months [1] https://i.imgur.com/R0NwgSb.png

They've fallen and recovered from way more than that (edit: not) this year.

1: https://www.google.com/search?q=%24fb&oq=%24fb&aqs=chrome.0....
BUT if you do the whole package, Alzheimer goes away.
I suggest to read https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221920/
I'm amazed you're getting downvoted. I would love to share this article with conservative friends, but potshots like the above make it pointless. If you want to inform anyone other than your own echo chamber, this article is pointless.
That would solve part of the problem. But publishing a hash would solve the same part without any need for key management.
Sorry, I lost you at "bazel".
Do you believe constructing clang command lines in addition to gcc command lines is harder than setting up a particularly complex build tool like Bazel? Not to mention that it doesn't appear to support GCC and Clang on Windows.
I think I got it: the plasmids (plural) contain the Cas9 and the gRNA targeting rpsL in the host organisms [1] (plus the DNA template for the homology directed repair).

[1] http://www.the-odin.com/crispr-bacterial-guide/
You really should have internal DNS records for everything, and internal reverse DNS that matches your IP address management system. Can't afford not to, for internal management networks. Also allows you to use autodiscovery and monitoring tools that discover and name devices by their rDNS. Having monitoring systems with hundreds to thousands of devices and things with only IP addresses and no hostnames is a nightmare.
Hacking Reality [Official Film]
This is a really weak article that does not support its headline and veers into conspiracy theory territory.
So Britain stopped trading, and traded legally with Chinese people who themselves smuggled the opium ... see to me that sounds like the smugglers are doing the worst thing there?

The Chinese seized and destroyed opium from merchants from several countries, Britain sent forces to release merchants, ships, goods and was demanding compensation for the destroyed opium, which compensation they then fought to acquire.

If the Emperor/Lin Xehu(sp?) at any time ordered that selling tea to foreigners was illegal(?), then it looks much worse for the outside forces; if not then it looks like balance of trade was a prime motivation on both sides, rather than (im)moral considerations.

(https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/opium-war-1839-1842 https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/6304d1/what_... based on other tertiary sources I've read seem like good synopses.)
Ironically, when a growing number of people decide to act cautiously in anticipation of a potential downturn, their aggregate caution may help trigger or increase the odds of having a downturn.
It did come to Android.

For a while before being terminated, Flash got a native code backend.
To me it sounds like you don't like anyone who dares challenge your personal orthodoxy.
> What a rat. Recommends his own book over two others. This is exactly what is wrong with University textbook selection. They're often just picking their friends, or someone who picked their textbook. Crooked and corrupt.

My professor for Political Science recommended his own book.

He also donated all of the money he would have made on it for our class into the general fund for the students. Which meant that he lost money because not everybody in the class bought the book.

Textbooks are a racket. Especially the "rental" model which effectively admits that the textbook has zero utility beyond the class.

However, the professors are neither the cause nor gaining the profits from that racket. The act of writing a textbook takes so much time and effort, that it really isn't profitable for the vast majority of professors.
I thought we'd cleared this up on HN last week with 'Alzheimer's risk 10 times lower with herpes medication' https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17540094

and subcosmos's comment "Right on the heals of the recent publication that shows that beta-amyloid in the brain specifically wraps around HerpesViral particles in order to prevent them from spreading!" (1st comment on the above).

There seems evidence the amyloid is a body defence against viral infection, mostly herpes 6&7.
There once was a time on HN when it was customary to respond to a comment like this with a referral to Paul Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement, suggesting that it might be better to aim higher than "responding to tone."
Yes, I also loved this. Bookmarked it.

Amusing anecdote. I'm entirely self-taught about computer stuff. I mean, it barely existed when I was a student. So anyway, descriptions of packet structure seemed so abstract and handwaivy. So for a few Ethernet and TCP/IP packets, I used Wireshark to get bytes from each field as hexadecimal, and crunched the data in Excel. It was incredibly tedious, but ultimately satisfying.
Is the name chosen based on the Slavic word? "Pobyt" means "stay" in Czech and others.
The Kubernetes Third-Year Anniversary Is Just the Beginning
Sorry, not yet. There is a new study going on with ~100 patients and the only comment that was made is "the results are similar to the first one".
From societies perspective there is no difference between someone with free will choosing bad (illegal) decisions from a bad entity programmed to make bad decisions. The society will have the exact same incentives to take exactly the same actions to prevent such behavior. Nothing about free will or lackthereof makes it unfair.

Someone making involuntarily actions that harms others are a danger to society and should be dealt with. If it is coupled with intent that is very bad, but if not it is unfortunate - but still needs to be dealt with. No reason to involve free will in this reasoning at all.

It's unfair to punish someone for an intentional but involuntary action.

Intent is exactly what is fair to punish someone for. What can be fairer?
Definitely Carol Ann Duffy. It's the final poem from her 1993 collection Mean Time.
See lecture 15 of cs231n 2017: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT1JzLTH4G4&list=PLC1qU-LWwr...

Further, while all these tricks are amazing, they are not currently of much use to fungible data scientists at FAANG and in the greater Fortune 500 because they haven't been added to any of the major frameworks in a manner that is braindead/automagic. Further, most of these are but one GPU generation away from general availability if they become popular like FP16/32 mixed precision did.

That said, the acquisition of DeePhi by Xilinx ought to be a sufficiently strong signal to add them to said frameworks, no?

https://www.xilinx.com/news/press/2018/xilinx-announces-the-...

Finally, my gut instincts (based on the monotonically decreasing speech recognition quality of my increasingly powerful Android phones over time, and the bizarre spelling errors it now makes such as "tech kneeq" as one example) is that one cannot rate the quality of these techniques from a single metric, and it seems like the decision to foist them on users may be based on one. #ItsAdversariesAllTheWayDown
Legally, there isn't much. Most of those sites are powered by Opta data, which is exclusively for-purchase.

Statsbomb is a little different. They've started collecting their own data and are offering some free data from various Womens leagues.
So Georgia rather then let DHS look at their machines decided to delete and wipe them clean? and the backups? Why would they do that unless something was wrong?
Well noted. I pulled 2020 from the Wikipedia article, which is sourced from Elon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BFR_(rocket)#cite_note-34 And several years ago at that.
Regarding global events, it looks like reasoned behavior prevailed in the end and the friendship is still in tact. None of my conditions were violated.
The FBI made full images of all Georgia machines.
Most industries have practices that can be considered shady. It's not unique to the text book industry is my point.
Pruning, Weight Sharing and Quantization are commonly used techniques and can be done in tf.
Well, to give credit where it's due, The Personal MBA is not a bad book. It has a slightly misleading title though. It should have been called "extremely short pieces about various aspects of business".

The real value of it, at least for me, is inspiration. I read a small chapter (which is often just a page or half) and think how it relates to my actual situation. This gives me some food for thought, and very often for action, for a couple of days. Then I go back to the book, read the next piece, and so on. I sometimes disagree with the author, but it's a positive experience overall.
> It's just business. Everyone tolerates it because money talks.

Sometimes "business" must bow down to things like ethics, otherwise it tends towards corruption and exploitation.

Hocking your own book in a list of the "best textbooks on every subject" is definitely a kind of corruption. It may get you some sales but it abuses the list and any trust placed in it. Recommendations like that should be made without such conflicts of interest.

Also, repeating "it's just business" a bunch of times isn't a very good argument in favor of anything, it's nearly totally free of any content.
I wish there were more clarity in the point where your ISP sends the packet to "your computer." The packet goes to your modem, which is plugged into some network adapter (this is the network "device," right?). Then the network adapter sends the signal to another network device? That doesn't make sense to me. Certainly the network hardware receives the signal before the OS?
Among other answers, clang supports -Weverything, which I was using just last night.
Why wasn't Huawei sued? I would assume that Huawei acquired the code and design legally if there was no lawsuit.
I'm not sure if you really understand the peril or how deeply AMD cut back on their R&D Efforts.

Small Cat (Puma cores) were cancelled and that entire department was laid off. This is the core that won AMD the Xbox One and PS4. Small Cat was also their low-power architecture designed for tablets (notice that AMD literally gave up on the growing Tablet market?)

AMD cut DEEP to stay out of bankruptcy. They were cutting known, successful projects and were still losing hundreds of millions of dollars per quarter.

Lets be frank here: if AMD were today, in a position where they had better ROCm or OpenCL or Tensorflow support but say... no "Zen" or "EPYC" ?? They'd be worse off. The CEO made the right bet to focus on Zen as their comeback strategy.

Zen is successful because it demonstratively does something better than Intel. It also doesn't need much software support or tooling, and was designed to be relatively cheap to make. I don't think AMD would have done the same with the NVidia GPGPU compute world, especially since CUDA is a proprietary technology. Even if AMD were to make something better than NVidia, they wouldn't reap any rewards because CUDA is a big moat.
To me, this article strongly recommends reading textbooks and softly recommends this list. They even go into detail about what methods should be used to validate textbooks generally!
It might be impossible in the same way that it is impossible to beak an RSA key. To many underlying components making it impossible to extract the underlying components unless you already know what they are.
I'm unsure of what your purpose is with this post - if you want to compete because you think it is a good business - costs << price - go for it.
I see what you mean but in the absence of free will "beliefs" changing are just yet an other event steering your course. It's like a rock tumbling down a mountain and changing path as it hits a tree, sure the tree changed the course of the rock and therefore influenced the state of the universe by existing at this location at this given moment but that doesn't really get us anywhere. If you can't choose to believe in something then the whole concept of belief is just yet an other consequence of external stimuli and the chemical and physical reactions in your brain. You deciding to believe something is no different than you getting a flat tire and getting late to work. It's happening to you, not by you.

As far as I can tell the only way for free will to exist is if consciousness somehow transcends the physical existence and is more than a series of physical reactions. An other poster mentioned randomness but that doesn't really help, if there are absolutely random events occurring in the universe (for instance at the quantum scale) that means that the universe is effectively unpredictable but that doesn't grant us free will. Free will requires unpredictability but it must be the consequence of the conscious choice, not God rolling the dice while playing DnD.
>And it's also the main influence on anything that happens in our universe, no matter if it's deterministic. If Earth wasn't there you wouldn't write this comment. Who caused your comment, then - you or Big Bang?

The key difference determined by the existence or not of free will is whether the comment is solely or partly caused by the Big Bang (or the first cause).

What we're discussing is not whether the writing of a comment is possible in a non-free will universe. Of course it is.

But we're discussing whether free will exists (the very subject is "Discovering free will"), and then, what does that entail if it does or if it doesn't. It surely doesn't entail that comments can't be written.

>It's our arbitrary convention to stop looking for a root cause when we hit a person. It's useful for social organization, but it's not objectively more true than looking up the chain of "why" till you hit the Big Bang, or stopping on the first step.

Well, it's not just a convention. You seem to take for granted what one should prove: whether free will exists or not.

Society stops looking for a root cause when it hits a person not as an "arbitrary convention", but because it does believe in free will.

(And it also believes that it's limited by external events. So that it doesn't stop looking for a root cause always on a person, but can go beyond that. E.g. "yeah, the driver caused an accident, but they were forced to swerve because a rock fell on the road, so they're not to blame").

>Influence = cause change. When you're born you interact (and influence) very many things. That's true no matter if the universe is deterministic or not.

If the universe is deterministic you don't cause or influence anything. Those things would have happened anyway. At best you're a medium through an already determined casual chain moves.

But you can not be said to influence something to happen, because that requires that not influencing it was also a possibility.

>Even assuming your weird definition of "influence" this is still not true, you can have nondeterministic universe without free will.

Not really "weird". It's the very dictionary definition.

"influence: the capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behaviour of someone or something, or the effect itself: the influence of television violence | I was still under the influence of my parents | [count noun] : their friends are having a bad influence on them.
• the power to shape policy or ensure favourable treatment from someone, especially through status, contacts, or wealth: the institute has considerable influence with teachers. • [count noun] a person or thing with the capacity to have an influence on someone or something: Fiona was a good influence on her"

You can't have an influence on something happening (or someone's thoughts etc) if that is beyond your control.
Wow! That was amazing. I'd love to see that applied to Reddit / Subreddit / User networks.
Any government agency tasked with securing the electronic voting systems would be the next government agency accused by the losing side of being under the orders of a foreign power.
I personally have been running a RX480 8GB since the day they were released and I haven't hit a game that can't run at an excellent framerate even for my 144hz monitor, so I don't have a concern yet :) It was a amazing deal for just $263.98 at release. From the looks of the benchmarks the Vega 64 is leaps and bounds faster as well.

As far as VR goes, I think they're in the early stages still -- they need to improve the lenses, resolution and refresh rate before I will be buying in so I don't yet need the VR frame rates. At the current level I'm sure the Vegas would handle VR fine though since it seems to outperform nvidia slightly.
I think the low hanging fruit would be making all gag orders expire in a year or less. Long investigations can issue new, overlapping gag orders.

As it is, good luck inquiring about the status of an investigation you're forbidden to talk about with anyone.
And a third category, whatever Spain was doing against Russia.
Part of the problem is that voting is up to the states, it's not a function of the federal government.
Does it? Or does it just mean it isn't relevant to this scientific article? I think the latter.

I grew up very poor, got my degrees on academic scholarships, and have published scientific findings. I'd hate it if my work attracted media attention, only to have the bulk of it focus on my impoverished childhood. What about my work? Why doesn't that merit a focused discussion?
How should we organize?
> Georgia was traditionally a red state

Georgia has been becoming progressively less red, and was early on in the 2016 cycle seen as a potentially swingable state.

> I guess it will have to get much worse in the future to cause action?

At least, it will have to not help the party in power in the state.
Even stronger evidence shows the Republican Party worked with Russian intelligence to obtain the voter rolls that they used in their micro-targeting ad campaigns, but oddly enough nobody is talking about that. Aaron Nevins literally bragged about recieving stolen property from Russian intelligence and using that to further his political goals of electing republicans.
Out of something from science fiction.. would an "issue" like this ever be the type of problem where the AI can "understand" the cancer better than we can and see where a certain treatment might be more beneficial than we've thought of?

Or is this just a plain old failure?