skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> No you don't.

How would we have made the 32-bit ARM-to-AArch64 transition if the Web were not portable? Remember that Apple cut 32-bit support very quickly, and no longer ships with it. For that matter, how could Apple have gotten away with shipping a usable browser at all on the ARM architecture in 2007, in the native world?

Remember that the x86 architecture is proprietary to Intel and is covered by a patent thicket. You'd be handing Intel a monopoly over the Web forever.

> For example, browsers could have some kind of functionality that makes it so that end-users do not need to choose the correct type of executable themselves (such as choosing between x86-windows7, x86-windows10, Linux, etc) and instead just click a single installation button

They've had this for decades [1].

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Us...
AT&T announces that it will bring 5G to three new U.S. cities
Have there been any cases under this rule about "incorporates springs"?

I mean for things which might vaguely count as running shoes... not oscar pistorius etc.
The solution is therefore pretty simple: taxes will subsidize "industries of national interest". It is for the same reason as the US would never buy Swedish fighter jets, Israeli ICBMs or German submarines. This has been true since the beginning of the nation state.
I believe Germany makes you renounce your old citizenship in most (not all) cases to gain German citizenship, but you have it listed as allowing it?

Though I believe they recently made an exception for Americans getting charged ridiculous fees to renounce if it was more than a month of income, or similar.

Thanks for making this! I'm a US citizen applying for naturalization in a few months. Here's to 7% more territory! Though really, the EU ought to be something of a block since it means the right to live and work throughout, not just in one country. For now, at least.

Also, worth noting that Republic of Ireland might get a bonus factor, in a sense, for soon being the only passport that lets you work throughout the EU and the UK.
I use Shrook. It is native, lightweight, fast, and free.
Agreed, to a point.

Having been through several more recessions, since the mid 70s, all have been different. Different symptoms, different causes, different sectors.

+ 1970s - Oil crisis & OPEC

+ 1980s - Deliberate govt policies and adoption of monetarism

+ 1990s - ERM, Black Monday, US S&L

+ 2002 - dot Com bust, post y2k contraction

+ 2008 - Global banking crisis

The nearest I've seen to being able to "recognise the top" is some young person, usually looking too young to drive, turning up on national TV financial news explaining why "this time it's different", why the boom will continue, or why the property market isn't overheated. This is usually a clear sign that the economy is now having a Loony Tunes moment, in mid-air and not yet noticing there's no ground any more.
my question is: do amateur runners even buy $250 shoes? I don't think they do spend that much money on a Running Shoe at that stage. Also, how can this be not good marketing if the Shoes does exactly what the marketing message tries to portray?
> If you're using my machine and my bandwidth to host or transfer your video to another person, you're going to pay me for it

That's a bit ridiculous. No one is ever gonna pay you for that. You get something for free, the video you want to watch, and the deal here is that your unused upload bandwidth gets used to help transfer it to others. It's a social contract thing, and thinking you might get a better deal magically by refusing it won't make that deal appear.

> You're slowing down my connection

In which way? It is using your upload while you download a video. That does not harm you.

> causing me send data to someone I do not know

You never seeded a torrent? You never connected to an internet site you did not know the owner of? It's pretty much the same thing.

> You're going to be liable for anything malicious that gets sent back

Who is the you here? A Peertube instance won't be liable for malicious data, how would that even work anyway. Even if it were possible: The websites spreading malware with their ads were not liable either. This won't happen.

> if you're MitM'ing it to scan it properly, why are you wasting my bandwidth and storage?

Right, that would be a bad idea.
But podcast creators all give off frequent signals that they wish podcasting were centralized.

Specifically, I'm thinking of how they all ask you to leave a rating on some centralized podcast aggregation service, usually iTunes. Many also specifically ask that you subscribe through iTunes. That's because rankings and ratings on iTunes are as essential to their monetization strategy as Nielsen ratings were to over-the-air TV.
Because the laws of physics (speed of light) makes a decentralized discovery service slower which means it's extremely inconvenient for typical users.

For example, go to youtube.com and see how fast it loads the main landing page with 20+ suggested video thumbnails. On my computer, it loads in 1136 milliseconds. The same centralized-system's speed advantage happens for video search results such as "3d printing".[1]

A decentralized system with DHT[2] or other peer-2-peer scheme cannot match that speed. Think about trying to query dozens (or potentially thousands) of p2p nodes to return a page of video thumbnails. If you try to "solve" the slow performance by "caching" results, you still have to cache it on a server somewhere. That "cache server" is an example of feature-creep towards centralization.

People will put up with decentralized's inconveniences for illegal things like bittorrent pirated movies. For the vast majority of mainstream content, a centralized service is too attractive for billions of web users.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3d+printing

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_hash_table
AirPods were actually completely rushed to market and were hand-soldered according to teardowns. There were tons of supply chain constraints and bugs. I don't feel like this is the best example for your argument.
See How Apollo-Era Scientists Thought We'd Live on the Moon
>> If you took from the post that I think SQL is shit and needs to be replaced, you weren't paying attention.

Why, why, why, why, why???? I didn't even have to look it up and I could already tell from your attitude in your blog post and this comment that your company is based in SF and backed by a bunch of VC money. And why is it that the systems software startups always have the worst attitudes to boot? Usually, when a bunch of people take something from an article that wasn't intended by the author it's because the author did a poor job not because a whole bunch of people don't get it or aren't paying attention. The arrogance is unbelievable.
Going up to those altitudes without supplemental oxygen sounds absolutely insane to me. Studies via MRI have shown brain damage even in climbers climbing Mont Blanc (4,808.7 m (15,777 ft)).

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/brain-cells-into-...
> there's just no good reason why amateur runners should care

Qualifying for marathons is a good reason to care. If these shoes could make the difference between me qualifying for Boston, and me not qualifying for Boston (or same for NYC, Tokyo, London, etc etc), $250 would be cheap if that's a big goal for me.

edit: really, $130 or so since my shoes _already_ cost $120
Believe it or not, but people without iTunes are also listening to podcasts.

I've yet to come across a podcast I wanted to listen to without an RSS feed available through a website. For discovery there are several good alternatives to iTunes, for example https://player.fm
For me both code and pycharm are way too heavy for my celeron work-provided pc. I am really happy with gvim and notepad++.
I've been using ReadKit with very few issues for 4-5 years now. Maybe it's just that specific integration but it works fine with Feedly.
Very good idea, but the documentation is not very intuitive.
Yeah you’re right. I stand corrected, and I even read that section last week.
> In the common case for Apple users (listening to iTunes), the AirPods will have the same quality as wired headphones, since they play back with the same codec/bitrate either way (256kbps AAC).

Are they literally piping the AAC-encoded bitstream as it appears in the iTune files straight to the AirPods with no manipulation? Because if they're decoding then re-encoding (e.g. decoding the file to raw to pass to the OS, then re-encoding to sent to the AirPods), there will be quality loss even if both codecs are exactly the same, since you'll have generation loss.
> any bounces off the ground or something will just add a couple of meters.

I have raw data captures showing a multipath signal being more than 1/2 mile off from a hiker in steep mountain terrain. It's not as simple as you think.
The Man with 15,000 Pieces of Chopstick-Wrapper Origami
Hey guys, I saw a few people quoting my interview here and I appreciate the criticism and wanted to clear a few misconceptions is the word? up!

For reference: http://remotehabits.com/interview/interview-with-john-a-full...

When I say charge $10 USD that is what I started charging personally as I felt it gave me the most competitive edge as I was a recent graduate and JUST starting out. The minimum wage in Puerto Rico where I live is $7.50 so it definitely made sense to me and I'm the type of person who doesn't like overselling themselves or feeling like I'm being cocky/arrogant, plus I was starting out I barely knew anything haha. It's a personality thing you know. I am however by no means saying hey charge $10 USD to start out, that made sense to me and worked for me because I was a recent graduate, have no debts and no family to support. Someone with all these things to consider $10 USD would be DISMAL to even accept and I get that. What I was trying to convey above all is be reasonable with your pricing, charge something that for you recognizes your value and needs and ALSO Values your client and their needs if that makes sense!

Also someone mentioned me being a lead front-end dev at OpenSea which YES is backed by YCombinator but I wanted to clear up one thing which is I said main dev not lead front end dev as I have been with them from early on, that title belongs to the co-founders haha I'm sorry for that confusion and wanted to clear it up, I hate taking credit where credit is not due! I am/was the lead front-end dev for a startup called freshChefs in shanghai for their food delivery app though which was an AWESOME experience!

Finally, I have upped my rates considerably from my early days starting out and now usually charge $50/hr so I definitely climbed those up over time, I just started at a reasonable price that worked for me but in no ways mean works for or should be done by everyone.

Thanks guys! And I hope the article gave you some insights and it's crazy to see it somewhere like HackerNews!

PS: I'm actually 24 and that picture was from my graduation day back in 2015 because I abhor pictures, I still have a baby face though XD
These days, the Internet is more akin to infrastructure than a product per se.
Many things could go wrong, but the Apple codebases and engineering processes should be pretty robust to architecture changes at this point. NeXT went from 68030 to Intel/SPARC/others, and then to PowerPC with Mac OS X. OS X went from PowerPC to Intel. And large chunks of it are shared with iOS on ARM already.

(Fun fact: even classic Mac OS was running on Intel at one point before the 680x0-to-PowerPC transition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_project)

So there's good reason to think that they could pull this off.
>>> “Are you buying a Mercedes because it is cheap?”

>>> Ranzo, sitting nearby, chimed in and referenced the India-based maker of the world’s least expensive car. As he put it, “We don’t sell a Tata.”

Not with that attitude ;) There's nothing wrong with cheap spaceflight, as long as they're human-rated for crewed missions. I hope they also know that Tata owns Jaguar Land Rover.
Running shoes are funny things. Due to the fact that they are basically a weight at the end of a long fulcrum, the heavier they are the slower you will go. Plus they are full of padding which messes up the natural springs you already have built into your feet.

It is not surprising someone invented a shoe that is somewhat lighter which makes it faster. I find the spring idea somewhat dubious but maybe they do give you a slight boost. My question would be how fast you can run in these vs with no shoes on at all.
This only works if you have two graphics cards, no? Either onboard graphics + dedicated GPU, or dual GPU. And some CPUs, such as first gen Ryzen (e.g. 1700), do not have built in graphics. And that assumes you always want your better GPU to run Windows rather than Linux.
CoWorking, Meditation and Yoga Come Together in Berkeley
I wouldn't draw very many conclusions from that study.

The study itself says:

> This was an observational study where people chose whether or not they wanted to run; therefore there is always the possibility that people stopped running because they had knee pain.

That's a pretty big flaw in their study.
That's great. Will it get updated to the new dark mode, will it get fixed if the new beta version breaks it? I was just trying to get a sign of life from the developer / developers. As someone else already said it has a history of activity and being abandoned for long stretches of time.
Show HN: Musoq – Use SQL on various data sources
Planks created by riving can have a triangular cross-section rather than a rectangular cross-section. The first picture at http://lumberjocks.com/MattNC/blog/37466 is a good example.
People made this argument about cars when they were still riding horseback.

Let's not defend the worse thing here.
I'd do something more like 13-15 miles.
It is irrelevant what may have happened between Apple and Intel.

Apple decided to put a CPU into a case that can't handle its heat. We can safely assume Apple knew full well about this and still threw the thing onto the market acting as if nothing was wrong. The question is if they seriously didn't expect the customers to notice or just don't care.
The article was hosted on hurstwic.org, which is a website dedicated to teaching Viking martial arts. It does not claim that riving is purely a Viking technique. I suppose it could have mentioned that, but I doubt the author ever considered their article making it to the front page of HN.
I grew up in Hong Kong, one of the densest place in the world. Most of my childhood, getting to places was either walking or taking a bus (with family). I moved to the US / SF Bay Area in my teens and while here, experienced living in both the suburbs and the city, as well as my college town ("deep suburbs", if you will). My feeling is that living in the suburb (either where I currently live in a suburb in the bay area, or my college town) is way more pleasant than the city (either HK or SF). I felt this way before I had kids, and I feel this way even more now after having a baby.

Yes, you have to drive everywhere. It seems that for some people, "having to drive everywhere" is automatically a negative point, by definition. IMO, it's only negative when you do that in San Francisco, where traffic is everywhere, and you can't park anywhere or have to pay exorbitant parking fees.

Take some anecdotes of my current life now. People in SF and cities love to bring up the point of being able to walk to coffee shops, restaurants, bars, parks, and not having to find parking (which is an SF problem). I don't drink, so bars and DUI is not a thing for me. I reach my favorite coffee shop in 10 minutes of local driving (no traffic any time of the day, any day of the week), and there's always ample parking, and there's never a line. Same for all the restaurants I frequent in the east bay (Fremont/Newark/Union City area). Places in the city always have a line; whereas the longest line I've had at my coffee shop was 2 people in front of me. There's always seating available there, unlike most coffee shops in SF. I spend $3 on my favorite coffee there, not $6. This same example works similarly for every other aspect of life really, whether it's restaurants, parks, even urgent care/ER at the hospitals. Drive to get there in 10-15 minutes, there's always parking, no line at the place, and it's cheaper. Same applies for friends, even those who live a city or two away (Milpitas, San Leandro, Castro Valley) -- 15-30 minutes to get there, no traffic.

I live in an older part of town, where houses are generally 50+ years old, so you can imagine the kind of neighborhood. I know each one of my neighbors by names. It's not like I grew up here too; I've only lived here for 5 years since I bought the house.

Pulling from my own experience, I really don't see how the car keeps us apart, and how living in the city is better. Everything is more expensive, there's more wait time, more transportation time, and people are ruder in general because everyone is understandably frustrated with everything, whether it's patience, gentrification issues, homelessness, etc. In the suburb crawl, everything is the opposite of all of above. People are nicer to each other.

I commute to the city for work (because the jobs are mostly in the city), and it's the least favorite part of my life.
>youtube is great for building an audience, but not nessesarily good for keeping it.

I wouldn't make that youtube's fault. People just grow out of content or like other content.

And the overzealous community guidelines and copyright strikes are a result of hundreds of lawsuits against youtube by the movie industry, and a need to appeal to advertisers for their platform.

Youtube barely makes any real income, just barely.

People seriously seriously underestimate the amount time and tech that has gone into youtube.

PeerTube/alternate youtube will also be subjective to the same things and similar things will happen.

Copyright system has to inspect billions of hours of video in a day, you can't expect people to do all of that. Will the alternative that isn't already a huge company have the assets to deal with all the copyright infringement? To have the enourmous CDN and advanced AI filtering algorithms that is better than youtube?
It’s fun and exhilarating to run faster, but very few people, almost by definition, enter the ranks of elite runners. One of the best pieces of advice I heard while training for my first marathon was “No one here in this (beginner) training group is going to finish in first place.” Obviously, I knew this was true about me, but it always reminded me to keep my goals for doing a marathon in perspective.

I had set a goal for myself and a faster set of shoes might have gotten me to the Boston marathon a year sooner, but it was the journey not the destination that was so rewarding.
perceived incremental improvement. in golf especially, it's way easier to blame the equipment than yourself. doesn't matter the actual result. it just feels like you're making a move towards progression when you change your tools.
Solving the rubiks cube may have some benefits
Yeah, while it might be interesting to know what Gmail's system user is, it's not really related at all to the vuln. I wouldn't be surprised if payment of the bounty was contingent on some kind of ToS acceptance about responsible disclosure...
It doesn't seem any worse than Twitter itself.
Thanks Paul! It sounds like the amount of work is equivalent to what it would take to do a write up and submit it to a patent service, so I might as well skip shelling out a thousand dollars to have someone basically proof-read my application, and just submit it myself.
I love the smell of Expropriation and Nationalization in the morning. Smells like Communism.
>You seem to have read an entirely different story. The customer Google is losing here is clearly willing to pay, not expecting a free ride.

Yet they spend the entire post whining about it.
Podbean is pretty good for searching, and they even have a creator platform as well.
clearly, they're selling these shoes to enthusiasts, rather than just targeting elite athletes.

It seems to me that enthusiasts are the perfect market for it. People with serious hobbies are often fairly comfortably well off and also may have neither the time nor ambition to train harder. Poor people often can't afford to be enthusiasts. They are too busy scrambling to survive and too tired to do anything other than stare at the TV or something like that when they aren't desperately trying to make their life work.

Given that you can apparently make money playing video games by grinding for items other people value and selling them for real money to players who have more money than time, I don't see why you couldn't sell pricey shoes to running enthusiasts.
All it takes is someone to fund it..
I disagree; I am introverted and I enjoy interacting. It's my inability to control when and for how long that poses an issue in an open office environment.
"We do need a new model for tech journalism and indeed all journalism - we need journalists who are more interested in neutrally reporting accurate facts and news rather than engaging in poorly thought out social advocacy..."

That is the best summary of the problem I've heard yet. Much better than this article, for example.
Contact the peertube host. If they choose to leave it up, you can contact law enforcement / a court who can make a genuine judgement as to the legality of the content and take up approrpriate enforcement.
DoorDash CTO on optimizing for career growth
Learning Diffusion using Hyperparameters
There's also the psychological aspect of training harder because you just bought new expensive equipment. You feel guilty over wasting the purchase, letting it sit idle or not investing more time to get your money worth.
Here's the entire thread (tweets combined):

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1019955719964160006.html
It's nothing new in the cycling industry. Lots of recreational cyclists ride high-end race bikes. It's not all that unusual to see an age-group triathlete on a $10,000 TT bike.

If you're enthusiastic about something, I think it's quite natural to want to do it to the best of your ability. It's also quite natural to covet shiny toys. You can't buy youth or good genes, but you can buy a little bit of speed, a little bit of prestige, a little bit of the aura that surrounds professional athletes.
That's true but the bigger issue with a lot of trade press is that there's expected to produce a lot of pieces quickly, often across a rather broad range of topics. The better journalists still do a pretty good job of it; I'm constantly impressed with how much readable and, as far as I can tell even in areas I know a fair bit about, accurate prose some turn out. But you're not going to get much truly investigative journalism out of people who are on the hook for 2 or 3 stories per day.

There are also often incentives to be provocative rather than "just the facts." But that's another issue related to incentives.
Transgender men talk about life on the other side of the gender divide
Do you have any actual examples of people like that?

The grind and checkboxing mentality extends to many walks of life. Game players. Bird watchers (I think such people are explicitly known as "tickers" in that field, but I couldn't tell you where I picked that up). Collectors.

and almost everything done in the mountains is done easier on flat ground

Sure. And how many mountain ultramarathons are on flat ground? None, I bet. The flat ground ones attract the obsessive marathon runners; those who have a target of fifty or some such and grind away at them.

I'm not decrying these people. The event happens inside their heads. They're clearly getting something out of it.
If you're trying to invoke the old myth about slaves being used to build the pyramids, that was disproven a very long time ago.
Being rich is not same as having passive income.

Own 1 Share of AAPL and you will get about 12c/month in passive income.