skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Why does this need to be a kernel extension? Is there really no access to MSRs in macos as shipped by Apple?
It's hard to respond when even your personal opinion post is getting dogpiled. I'll just say that I completely agree with you. I did not inherit the sins of other Americans when I became a citizen. Mine is to look to the future and look out for the interests of me and mine.
Aquaman official trailer 2018 Jason Momoa
It’s the same formula that recent documentary makers use to stretch out a relatively simple true crime story that happens to have a weird twist into ten one hour episodes.
my guess is that New Braunfels, Texas is planning to invade Warsaw, Indiana in the second half of 1939.
Wild About Tech, China Even Loves Robot Waiters That Can’t Serve
That's part of the point of Worse is Better, too. https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html
I think it can drop or stay the same if the costs of driving by yourself and owning a car rise sufficiently.

You can do this by implementing congestion pricing and heavily advantaging carpool vehicles on the road by giving them more dedicated lanes, or by restricting single-occupant vehicles to a single lane on highways.

In urban areas, renting a parking space for your own car is already quite expensive. It's an easy decision to give your car up if robo taxis are cheap and plentiful.

In suburbia the calculus is a bit trickier because there's still a bit of keeping up with the Joneses. But there are many who'd jump at the chance of getting rid of their garage and driveway and have more living or personal work space.

I agree with you about Tesla autopilot.
This article seems to romanticize the ride's creators. Why? They built a ride that injured and killed from their own intentional neglect. The men should be regarded as murderers.
When i see someone with less than 500 connections I am more likely to interact with them. Its a signal that they don’t blindly accept all connections.
Aquaman – Offical Trailer
This is a bit reductions. There is a lot of research chemicals that are very safe analogues, e.g. 4-ACO-DMT or 1P-LSD. Often times more safe because when you purchase these its from a lab that does testing and you know exactly what you're getting.

The real danger of Research Chemicals is the large amount of cheap drugs of other classes produced that have similar effects and are labeled and sold as LSD. Very few people are buying those type of drugs and taking them on purpose. And they are incredibly dangerous.
I was looking for a way to send one single invite. The FAQ gives the direction, but it turns out you have to let LinkedIn access to your email account. Also, when I first started using LinkedIn about 7-8 years ago, I gave LinkedIn access to my Gmail account and I clicked "invite everyone" by accident. LinkedIn spammed everyone, including mailing lists, which was very embarrassing.
Fck this stupid sht. Isn't this supposed to be news for Hackers and not this other stupid sh*t? Come on, you pathetic children. Get it together!
There are some people in this thread asking for advice on using psychedelics.

If you're in this thread and likely to use psychedelics, please do your research first.

My recommendation is to at least thoroughly read the following resources before beginning:

- https://tripsafe.org/how-to-take-shrooms/ (I started this website, it has quite a few users, and it's important that people who are likely to use psychedelics are aware of this info for everyone's benefit.)

- Then, next perhaps the book "The Psychedelic Explorer's Guide"
I see what you are saying here, but I think that is a different argument than the one you made in the first comment. My question still remains, do people who view Assange positively not care about his involvement with Russia or do they think it is excusable because the ends justify the means? Whether Assange was a willing participant in that involvement would likely impact people's answers, but I don't think that unknown invalidates the question. I also don't think the question loses legitimacy just because I might not have chosen my words carefully enough in the setup to the question.
How work kills us
This Physics Pioneer Walked Away from It All (2016)
If you’re looking for fast legislation, you have to ‘gut’ an existing bill because the CA constitution requires a 30 day wait after you introduce a bill (with an exception for budget bills).
I just think it’s a really sad way to live.

And of course someone can then ask: Why is that a really sad way to live?

Thus is the infinite epistemic loop.

There is no "root" in the field of epistemology - it's turtles all the way down. The French existentialists recognized this reality, and the response was: "make your own root and proceed from there." Ok fine, all that does is make the illusion more meaningful individually, it says nothing of the grounding of the illusion.
Their UX is super interesting. On mobile you can swipe to the right at any time to get a new article.
Big tech firms agree on 'data portability' plan
The four-day work week really does work
There are lots of reasons why prosecutors dismiss charges unrelated to whether the accused is guilty. "The defendant is currently enjoying the protection of the government of a foreign country" is high among the list of reasons why a prosecutor might choose to do so.

There is no doubt in my mind that Assange is a rapist (as well as a useful idiot at best in service of Russia's interests).
In CL case the "is an error" wording generally covers all of C's "implementation-defined", "unspecified" and "undefined". And surprising amount of normal looking constructs are in the implementation-defined category.

When you add type declarations and (optimize (safety 0)) into the mix you get similar scope of UB as in C (another thing is that in reality nobody actually writes code like that)
Why no mobile app?
Yes, that is less creepy.
And what if these actions end up being a net negative not only for Germany, but even on treatment or acceptance of migrants in the future perhaps throughout all of Europe? For instance, I think we can agree that the sharp growth in European nationalism is strongly connected to this situation. Brexit was certainly strongly connected to this situation.

This is why I would take the opposite view. I do not think that people holding themselves in shame over something they had no direct role in is productive for society. It is bound to lead to emotional decisions which may make one feel good in the short run, yet blow up in your face in the longrun.

By contrast had Germany handled the migrants with more consideration to quality, integration, and what their country could comfortably support then we might have seen a huge boon for all parties as an example of how immigration can help both migrants and host countries. But it would also have been seen as heartless because that more responsible action would also have entailed turning away people who were suffering. Short term heartlessness or long term negative outcomes?

We can perhaps even see the longterm echoes of this sort of problem in the US. For instance Andrew Jackson wanted to free slaves, but under a system of transition. He proposed that existing slaves only be freed as they were trained and given compensation to start 'proper' lives for themselves. In the mean time new slave children would be taken from slave owners for a modest fee and then educated, trained, and sent abroad (to Santo Domingo in particular) to live life as skilled freemen. This system could be seen as cruel compared to outright freedom, yet here we are many generations after the fact still trying to solve an ongoing problem that the compassionate solution arguably produced.
This seems to me to be a very dogmatic approach.

One can be sure of what one is getting with proper testing. Some are dangerous, others less so.

Personally I enjoyed my experiences with some of them.
Assanges position at the embassy is similar to being in prison, so I wouldn't say he got away with repercussions.
Caleb was my nephews best friend, and the families did a lot together. My brother-in-law said that he talked to the father after and he said the hardest part was that they all got in the car to go home after and had an empty seat.
Keeping ranges undefined doesn't satisfy these wants, either.

Using code points would at least allow for ranges to have the possibility of being usable to someone in a standard, predictable fashion, outside of the C/POSIX locale.

For example, specifying a-z plus each umlauted vowel is still shorter than specifying all letters individually.

Perhaps there is some wisdom in William S. Burrough's "If you can't be just, be arbitrary."
* Slack is for general conversations.

* Kanban is for task management.

* Wiki pages are for knowledge storage.

* Mind maps are for topic organization.

You pretty much can use any of these tools to do any of the others' jobs, but each one is best at its own kind.
That's quite clear, I have no idea why people assume I confuse the two. I just said the article helped me to understand why Cmder has certain problems.
Indeed, semantics.

Wherever Americans specifically call out their gratitude for veteran's service, they're not thanking them for their allegiance to government institutions that may or may not be on their side. They specifically perceive veterans to be selflessly protecting 'the people'
Too many tweets to listen, but some of the most egregious claims he made:

- Spain were going to physically invade Catalonia and cause a Tiananmen Square-like situation

- The president of Spain wanted a "1000 year Reich" (ironic since that president was ousted by a no-confidence vote around a month ago. Guess the Reichs in Spain don't last long)

- Spanish federal Police warned jihadist terrorists that Mossos were following them (Catalonia police)

- Spanish people routinely mob Catalonians with total impunity

- And my "favorite" one, the one time when he said that there's 7.5 millions of Catalonians and if they were mobilized they could oust Spanish armed forces. So yes, basically asking for a civil war.
> While the mentioned browser functionality have existed for decades, then that does not change the fact that for the past decade then almost everytime I have had to download a native application I have had to select the correct type of executable myself.

Think about why that is. It's because Web site authors frequently don't "do the right thing", and they instead do what is most convenient. Following that line of reasoning, it is naive to think that Web site authors would have offered ARM executables at all back in 2007. That is the entire problem.
Of course, it's also possible that by the point genetic engineering is sufficiently well understood and accessible to the public that someone could create a doomsday plague in their garage we'll have medical technology sufficient to deal with the threat. We've sort of followed that trajectory with computer viruses, after all.

This still doesn't say good things about the survivability of the 3rd world, though. Even though modern server, desktop and handheld devices (let's call these "people with high-tier healthcare") are rather well hardened, older systems (people without that healthcare) and IoT devices (pets/farm animals/crops/nature) are notoriously vulnerable.
The IDE is built into the client. You can choose whether you want to make a script's source code available, or if you want to ship your work as a black box. So while you can collaborate on scripts, you can't make a script that downloads, compiles and deploys other scripts off the web.
The Second Life world is made from prims (primitive shapes), these prims can be textured, adjusted and grouped together to build objects, buildings, pretty much anything.

Each prim can have event driven, procedural scripts attached to them. There is basic RPC functionality available in LSL and objects can communicate with each other via chat channels, email (if I remember rightly every prim has a UUID and email address) or via a XML HTTP request.

Prims can be programatically moved or altered, there is a system for drawing particles, rendering dynamic textures on surfaces and much later I believe surfaces became capable of rendering web documents on them.

There is scope for a ridiculous amount of stuff. One of my favourite little projects was the Stargates you found on the grid, they all have unique addresses and work accurately just like in the show, they're pretty neat for getting around.
"Weird how Facebook keeps signing lucrative contracts with companies whose behavior then surprises and astounds them."

Another way to put this: perhaps the morally and legally culpable behavior is. . . Facebook's.
The article makes it sound like the only remaining samples are tightly controlled. Remember just a few years back the NIH found some samples lying around in a closet: https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/11/health/smallpox-found-nih-ali...

I doubt that it was the only sample in the world to escape eradication.
Of course there are online video rentals available. We have Apple TV and just rent movies on that. I’m sure other services are available on Android based devices.
You're absolutely right about having no legal recourse at all on youtube. That's a very important point.

But for individuals acting in a personal capacity that doesn't matter. For them youtube is the no recourse, no financial risk option. People upload random stuff, not everything completely legal but often not interesting for copyright holders either (e.g very old episodes of TV shows). Sometimes it gets taken down. No harm done.

For professionals, relying on youtube is risky though. They could lose their entire audience over night if they get suspended.

So it sounds like decentralisation could work for professionals, but of course the catch is that without the huge volume of random stuff uploaded by non-professionals the platform doesn't have mass appeal because it's not the go-to place for video search, and that means professinals won't find the large audience they are looking for.

Insurance doesn't work in this case. It only works if the likelihood of getting sued is low and you cannot be accused of having broken the law knowingly, neither of which is compatible with working in a grey area.
No, you are thinking of Polio. Live smallpox only exists in two research centers, one in the US and one in Russia.
A World Split Apart
No. You cannot rationalize someone's malicious intent to exploit and profit off of trust people place in you by getting into your cab on the gig economy, or anything else. That's a slippery slope where bad actors place blame on non causal issues for their actions
>Wouldn't that hurt men even more?

More than the internal injuries that could be caused by water forcibly entering the vagina? Probably not.
Wasn't the army involved in getting the LA riots under control?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots
> Polio is closest with just a few remaining countries.

Actually Guinea worm disease is closest to eradication: closer than polio. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eradication_of_dracunculiasis
At the time, Lotus was faced with a choice on where to go with Lotus 1-2-3: OS/2, Windows, or text mode. They backed the wrong horse. They were a big company at the time, could have easily bet on all three, and stayed in business.
What is the expectation of privacy in a vehicle in a public place, according to the law?

I’m not weighing in on what it should be - not being a lawyer I’m curious what the law or precedent dictates.
I've just learned that vaccinating people suffering from AIDS makes any sense at all (that their immune system benefits from it); thanks. Do you have any pointers to a more extensive treatment of that topic (it's hard to search for due to popularity of articles about research into vaccinating against HIV)?
I am neither rationalizing it, nor justifying it. However, having spent several years homeless and found that classism, sexism and other societal crap were huge barriers to me getting my life back, I think it is unrealistic and cruel to not criticize the sick system that helps foster such bad choices.

If you make it hard enough to make good choices that you approve of, don't be shocked when some people's moral fiber fails the test and they get on with meeting survival needs instead of ethically and high-mindedly starving.
The main difference is that none of the ones you mentioned really spreads.

bioweapons and computer viruses are made to spread in a viral way, without the explicit intervention of humans. So once it's out there, it can't be stopped. In the future, nanobots could potentially be a third one too.

So yes, while biowarfare is banned, the consequences of doing it is far different.
If openjdk doesn't make it's own JavaFX builds, it's time to move on to other languages, far better than Java on licensing base..
Buy a T-series Thinkpad. They're sturdy, have really good Linux support, and even the older ones are extremely robust. Look for an older one, such as a T420; or, if you want a newer one, the T480. Those are going to have easily-replaceable memory, battery, and storage.
The answers bring up the topic of updatable views, which got me curious.

In what use-case are updatable views superior to updating directly on the underlying table?

Views are great for bringing together data from multiple tables, but it seems that such views cannot be updatable: (from the docs) "The view must have exactly one entry in its FROM list". Thus it seems, while it might be handy, views can't help you spread an update across tables.

Presumably, a view with `LOCAL CHECK OPTION` or `CASCADED CHECK OPTION` could be granted to a user, providing fine-grained control over the kind of data that user can update. Is this accurate?

What am I missing?
This is a bit more oriented towards social relationships, but it might also work for your use case: https://www.monicahq.com/
We use Github’s projects AKA kanban. It’s nice to tie in directly to the repository features sure as milestones, labels, pull requests, issues, etc.

We have a board per platform. All boards have the same 5 columns:

Backlog - not in current sprint but can be added if spent complete
Current Sprint - can be picked up by anyone if not assigned
In progress - someone working on it
Testing - Completed issues / pull requests that get assigned to a coworker to review
Done - once reviewed moved here
How does adhesive tape win a Nobel Prize?
You are thinking of scheduled flights. But general aviation is 80 times more dangerous. So we have refrained from applying an extreme safety culture to all flying. Obviously because there is a trade-off between people being able to do it and safety.
Waybox – An openbox clone on Wayland
I agree with this. This article is like a hit piece and I feel sorry for the scientists who were attacked (even if the scientific merit of their paper is questionable).

The author could have made his point in a more diplomatic way.
>messed up serotonin pathways, antidepressants are the cure. Just like for a diabetic an insulin shot is.

We should be careful when saying psychiatry is "just like" biological science, it's not.

"psychiatric diagnosis still relies exclusively on fallible subjective judgments rather than objective biological tests"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Frances

While it's true many people have experienced positive results with antidepressants (many have with placebos as well), "messed up serotonin pathways" and "chemical imbalances" are marketing slogans, not scientific facts.
What a time to be a mouse
Wouldn't that argument go both ways? You say that psychedelics cured your depression. Then doesn't it stands to reason that they also can cause depression? The argument I've heard from psychonauts is that you should be careful and treat drugs with respect. For example, if you are tripping you shouldn't not have any weapons such as knives within reach. But given how dumb the average person is, I wonder how effective such advice is.
He's the one doctor whose stuff I've read that I think make most sense. You get a lot of people saying he's crazy, though. Wonder if anyone on HN has ever had any success reversing hair loss? The ultimate hack, if you ask me.
Another comment spelled it out: LinkedIn's mobile app has several dark patterns, but the worst is the one that spams everyone in your Gmail. This is particularly a problem for Gmail because it makes a contact for everyone you ever emailed, so this includes personal relationships and it is a mortifying professional embarrassment. Over a dozen people I know have been fooled by it over the years.
Then there is the data collection, but my phone is used for work and personal. All of the data they collect and analysis of that data is up for sale. No thank you.
Show HN: Calculate the total cost of your digital subscriptions
he gently tossed the tip of his nose?
Ok this was riotously funny, but in defense of LinkedIn, it's a great place to hire and a great place to get a job if you take the time to write a quality, genuine profile — which is certainly a rarity and makes good people stand out.

I just ended a hiring campaign on LinkedIn. The stats were that it lasted 35 days, cost $704, our job ad was shown to 1001 people, and 233 applied through the platform.

I didn't keep exact stats of qualified / non-qualified people, but there were at least 5 people I thought were wow good, and another dozen or two that I wasn't sure immediately about but who were possibly really good. We hired two people.

These numbers outperformed their algorithm — they estimated that we'd get 40-60 applications for $600 across 30 days, and we got considerably more. I think our ad was pretty good and unusual, it was a condensed version of our team hiring page —

http://ultraworking.com/work

As for whether "fake social networker" cred helps... I don't think so. I make a quick checklist of things I'd skim rapidly for when looking at profiles to do first pass analysis. Basically, I'd look for any sense of ownership, service, or self-direction.

Things like genuine volunteer activities, excellent academics, leadership roles in student clubs are all obvious examples.

But actually, there were a bunch of things that are doable for everyone that I looked for, and which surprisingly few people do.

For instance, the vast majority of candidates wrote their profile in first person tense. "I'm a skilled marketer with X years of..." or "I'm looking for a job doing..."

Very few people wrote in any second person tense at all. EG: "If you're looking to hire a marketer and you have a great company, I'd love to help you develop your..."

I also saw only 2-3 profiles out of 300 that mentioned being happy, smiling, or service oriented. One guy didn't have any fancy brand name education or work experience, but he wrote something like, "I did this job with a smile every day and looked to make everyone I worked with happy." Okay cool, yes, I'd be delighted to talk to you.

Your culture will vary of course, but I was also impressed with people that had a mix of any kind of art/aesthetics alongside any math/engineering/analytical pursuits, and noted anyone who mentioned a disciplined history of sports, martial arts, or athletics.

What didn't factor much at all for me were the self-descriptions of jobs (I skimmed briefly to make sure they weren't a total non-fit, but otherwise don't really trust it) and in the Hiring Portal, you can't even see how many connections someone has easily. Or maybe you can, but I must have just parsed over it if so — I didn't notice it once.

I was skeptical of Linkedin for a long time. The "LinkedIn: The Game" thing. But it's a legitimately great way to put good opportunities in front of people looking for a new job, and a good way to seek companies doing what you're interested in if you're jobseeking. I'm legitimately very impressed with Linkedin excited to work with the two people that joined the team. In my book, a very good use of $700 and 15 hours.
Yes,"the wild 90s" vs Putin's Russia ("stability") is often brought up by people for AND against Putin.

WRT to Putin's popularity, Kasparov said ~"if there's one restaurant in town, is it popular?"