skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure..

The idea is that the issue with tags is they can be difficult to trace to all their referenced locations. I find myself not using them because they are difficult to keep track of.. you can't 'see' them at a glance.

But we don't need to see all the referenced locations, just the tree which leads away from the item you are looking at. So you get strict split between, and easy to understand, [left / right], [hierarchy / reference] organisation. Would make it easy to position and re-reference information. And would let you see referencing visually. Below for a really rough idea of what I am talking about.

- list 1 - sub-list 1 - item A | - sub-list 1 - list 1
- item B |
- item C | - sub-list 1
| \ sub-list 3 - list 2
- sub-list 2 - item D | - sub-list 2 - list 1
| \ sub-list 3 - list 2
- item E |
- item F | - sub-list 4 - list 2
- list 2 - sub-list 3 - item G | - sub-list 3 - list 2
- item C | - sub-list 1 - list 1
| \ sub-list 3 - list 2
- item D | - sub-list 2 - list 1
| \ sub-list 3 - list 2
Gogs renders well behaved org files also. The VS Code extension should get the update to allow folding soon. After that the Ctrl-c Ctrl-v crowd could use it nicely with Orgzly and Syncthing say bypassing Emacs until they need a full development environment. You could use Pandoc importing/exporting to other formats without Emacs. For note taking it's promising. Sharing to Orgzly on mobile captures a lot.
Ha ha ha... oh.
You were probably in a bucket...
> We know many companies donate equally to both parties

That is more lobbying than "donating", no?
TherML – Thermodynamics of Machine Learning
Operate on russian VPS :)
Further isolating ourselves would hurt in other areas. As someone else said, we need a cultural change, one where we need not to have to constantly distrust other people because they respect boundaries. One of the best ways to do this would be to reduce the amount of value stupid internet popularity points seem to matter and push dopamine buttons.
He wrote a great book "Silicon Snake Oil" that is full of things just like this he was so very wrong about, it's a great read still. He complains about how bad things were in the late 90s, but somehow misses how things will get better. It's really worth reading.

Somewhere there's a great review, written somewhat recently, on all the things he had wrong. I can't seem to find the one I'm thinking of. I guess he was correct about how things on the web are never permanent.
And while they're at it, I hope there have been consequences, if only some serious soul searching, for the Alaska Air and T-Mobile PR people who apparently jumped on this.
Ask your classmates with jobs if they have any leads. They know your work and they have inside information about the companies where they work. Professional networks are often more productive than cold applications to strangers.

Good luck.
I would argue that if a solution is more expensive or harder to maintain, it is not simpler. Teleologically speaking, being simpler is a bigger umbrella which covers many facets of the intended solution.
If they did that then they'd have to admit to themselves and the world that they're only making the situation worse, not better, by focusing on these types of stories.
You can actually drag and drop multiple notes into a tag, no find and replace necessary. Minor point though.
You might want to re-read the "all Google Cloud Platform services require a credit card and billing account" in the first sentence of that. (-:

Which agrees with "Is a credit card or billing account required? Yes." on the other page.
The car industry needs to embrace open source
The whole story was just odd. If it wasn’t a fake stunt, it was sad and pathetic for an overweight woman with no sexual capital to take creepshots of a fit healthy couple for her own pleasure. For some reason, women were allowed to get away with this and I’m glad there’s finally pushback.
Telling a few friends used to be the default, and telling everybody took more effort. Now the default is for people to share their comments with ~2 billion people. It's actually more work to tell only your friends.
Magic Leap One Passes Through FCC Certification, Setting the Stage for Release
Yes, either start with always attack, or always retreat.

Another (practical) solution could be to spoof a message, making it appear as if from Eve. Some kind of steganography might work as well (or alternative forms of communication such as pigeons or smoke signals). And if all communications between Alice and Bob is discarded, this would worry either one of them to send a personal messenger who is human. This person could be captured and tortured, sure. But if they get "burned" as well, that'd be an act of war. Plus, if they are able to predetermine that if they don't hear from each other after X time, they attack after X + Y time (e.g. 3 months and 1 month [to prepare]) then the problem can be solved. If they cannot create a clear way of predetermined action based on actions then they'll always retreat.

Actually now that I gave it some further thought this "two general problem" can be observed in the cold war as well via (the nuclear threat of both parties). The nuclear threat from both sides created an equilibrium akin to what could happen in the described situation.
I fear we are all one misstep away from going viral for all the wrong reasons. In a world where people die taking ill-advised selfies and YouTube is glutted with pranking videos that all try to one up each other, it seems that exposure and attention is the new currency. The problem is that they can use and discard you if you are doing something that fits their narrative for attention.

And then you have online mobs. With wildfire falsehoods. For example, people were killed in India because of false rumors spread on WhatsApp:

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/07/02/asia/india-lynching-whats...
How to Give and Get Better Code Reviews
Learn python3
Go has always had a very strong dependency on GOPATH and the other path-based semantics that are quite core to the language's import system, so it's understandable that a large change would be quite hard to pull off (for political reasons if nothing else). Personally (having been burned by this mis-feature regularly ever since I started using Go almost 5 years ago) I don't really like this design, but to quote George Lucas "it's stylistically designed to be that way".
All-Time Great Books for Java Programmers
Don't forget Scala, it remains an interesting language. There's now a "native Scala" initiative...

Regardless, having the flexibility to program in the most appropriate style is nice.
I think that haskell is fine when your data structures are simple, for example tuples of length < 10. When you need more general structures, like lists of lists of element of any type, then Lisp is a better fit. For example, I don't know any computer algebra system (cas) designed in Haskell, but have the free CAS Maxima programmed in Lisp.
Think a better definition of Idris would be Haskell with theorem proving and not forcing lazy everything.

It's compiled with C compiler or to JavaScript currently, no JVM implementation. You might be confused with Scala.
Well, much like in buying options, you have to guess both the outcome of a bet and the time at which it happens.

The author right, in 2003, I doubt you saw many people reading books on the beach with a clunky laptop or whatever version of kindle existed back then. So, from the mid 90s to mid 2000s, the author was decidedly right for 10 whole years, which is a long time.

Now, if he continued to say that not many people would read ebooks on the beach from 2008-2018, he would have been wrong about that bet. But I doubt he would have felt that way, because by 2008, it was much clearer where the internet was headed compared to in 1998
QNX is mainstream as hell, just not anywhere you'd expect there to be an OS. It's an RTOS and gets used in automotive, medical, and network technologies where software latency needs to be tightly controlled. You wouldn't use it in the same place you'd use Linux anyway.
> “We do it everyday to celebrities. No difference. Outrage culture is so dumb,” wrote one Instagram user below a BuzzFeed News post on the story.

I don't think this commenter understands that celebrities choose to put themselves in the spotlight.
Huh? Which parts? Last I checked, both the STT software (Mozilla DeepSpeech) and TTS software (Mycroft Mimic) are open source, as are the core and skills.
But if the config file has a comment like “here we deviated from the default...” it suffers the sane risk of being out if sync as the documentation would suffer anywhere.

So then, instead of forcing someone else to dig around a file like that, why would you put the docs about your modified config file somewhere else, and in a format that’s much easier to read?

For example you could make a whole git repository solely to hold a certain config file, allowing it to be versioned and even including an “install” script so that some other tool like docker could be used to faithfully reproduce a config setup.

Basically the only examples I have seen anywhere in this thread where people think in-line config comments matter are large desktop applications like Transmission or Postgres which have the unfortunately bad practice of letting users modify complex config files (instead of forcing all overrides of defaults to be ENV variable based).

And even in these cases, it seems more like lazy people who just personally prefer to sling a config file around rather than doing some minimal best practice like putting it in a repo to wrap it up like a mini-package and give much better documentation to someone who might “install” that config than what crappy in-line comments can give, and to enforce code review even for your own local config changes.
So she's retained counsel and preparing to file a suit? Against whom? $TWTR?

The only viable strategy in the current media saturated clime is to embrace the attention. Every human on earth now possesses a mobile news studio in their pocket. There is no such thing as bad publicity for your own personal brand. If caught with your pants down. Put it in your bio. And re-invent yourself as the #planebae matchmaker offering services at a discounted rate for followers!

There is another viral media piece today about the discovery in Mythic Ireland by dronespotters. Circulating around the hashtag #NewHenge. It's the discovery of a lifetime. Has spread around the world in a matter of days. And will probably result in eternal archaeological renown for the finders on a Heinrich Schliemann level of glory. Or at least, they'll never have to buy a pint in County Meath for the rest of their lives.

There is no hiding from the World anymore. Just embrace your own true authentic self.
I started to switch to Apple Notes a year ago, loved it, then discovered there is no good way to export all notes as text for backup.

Any suggestions?
In a lot of cases, using a $4 Arduino clone (or $2 for a Nano clone) is going to be faster/easier/most certain than a $0.50 circuit, especially if you keep a handful of each on the bench.

For one-offs, that seems like a good tradeoff.
But Quicklisp exists today. Are you suggesting testing is unnecessary or ineffective? If it is effective, why wouldn't Quicklisp use it?
What would the game theoretic outcome be if this kind of thing were facilitated at scale by an AI? Ie, imagine a world where your chance of being globally exposed like this was a non-trivial measure due to ever present AI generating memes based on public human behaviors? I wonder if the end result is a society wide abandonment of "fan in" [1] capable media like Twitter.

[1] https://codahale.com/fan-in/
Great essay, e.g.

"There should be a word for the ambiguous kinship between translators who share an author. It’s a bond marked by tender antagonism or light rivalry, mixed with a uniquely intimate solidarity."

It does seem interesting that such a word does not exist in light of the bitter feuds resulting from translations one of the foremost being Nabokov vs.Wilson (summary: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/09/books/review/feud-nabokov..., read Wilson's scathing review of the Eugene Onegin translation that's a textbook case of a hatchet job: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1965/07/15/the-strange-case-...).

If you're interested in her, another good essay is by her other translator, Benjamin Moser, adapted from his Introduction to Collected Stories : https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/the-true-glamour....

A good essay about the Bishop-Lispector relationship is https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/70270/its-complica.... From what we know of Lispector's development, Bishop's assertion that “She’s never read anything that I can discover” sounds either like gross naïveté or an outsider's bumbling misunderstanding. But it agreed with the carefully constructed self image by Lispector, e.g. see https://www.thenation.com/article/not-the-word-but-the-thing....

“What if Clarice Lispector had not been a disconcerting beauty?” is an interesting question examined lightly here. Again, I'd say that the beatific, straight pose is an important part of the image that Lispector herself created rather than the one imposed on her by "the male gaze". Almost all images of her have the rather unsettling straight on gaze, more of a glare really, and she never smiles.
I'd say that semantic embeddings already capture abstract conceptual relations, what remains is to figure out how to extract and relate this information unsupervised.
consent to record someone is a thing. Some states are only one party consent, some require both.
Informal and manual testing was a thing back then, though. Building a large project is usually a good, nearly exhaustive test suite for a build system.

Also, if memory serves, things that I had to deal with in late 1980s and early 1990s were vastly simpler than what is normal today. Manual testing was more feasible.
Why don't they just look at Medicare records? We have the data...
I like the directory full of .md and txt files. Similar to Notational Velocity and nvAlt - but cross-platform is terminal_velocity. https://github.com/terminal-velocity-notes/terminal_velocity - it lost the maintainer recently, but it works fine!
Confusing? Is having a pin code and a fingerprint reader confusing? You just pick the one you want to use.
Work with friends or whatever to find a new position before you end the one you have.

Unemployment is very depressing. Avoid it. One week or two is okay.
I’m glad there’s finally push back on this behavior. I remember just a few years ago when a woman was made a Hero by posting photos of a group of man, one of whom—-and which one wasnt revealed—may have told a joke about “dongles” to the other two.
The point of the Two Generals problem is that it's impossible to solve. No matter how many acknowledgements you send or receive over a lossy medium you can never be sure that both parties will agree on whether to attack. It's a fairly infamous restriction on distributed system design.

Working distributed systems have to work around this (and other) restrictions that are implicit to the properties of a distributed system. So TCP still works perfectly fine even though a perfect version of TCP (that didn't have timeouts) would be mathematically impossible to implement.
Several people have formulated the same idea.

Bill Gates:

> We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten.

Roy Amara:

> We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.

Kurzweil has called it ”the intuitive linear view” vs ”the historical exponential view”:

> Most technology forecasts ignore altogether this “historical exponential view” of technological progress. That is why people tend to overestimate what can be achieved in the short term (because we tend to leave out necessary details), but underestimate what can be achieved in the long term (because the exponential growth is ignored).
> If the poor woman wants privacy, how about theatlantic stop writig about the "Plane-Bae Woman"?

That honestly oversimplifies the issue. There's a narrative out there, that is clearly affecting how random people are interacting with her, not to mention her perception of herself.

Sometimes you have to control the narrative with the other perspective after the problem happens to mitigate the damage.

Stuff like this is never simple, it affects real people. Real people have to be talked about after real people are talked about unfairly. Not everything can be generalized, abstracted, and distilled into a philosophy.
Is it? In France it is just "OK" at best. Guess depends on where you are.
APL is cool - but the non-standard non-ASCII keyboard is a non-starter for reaching mass-market. Q sitting on top of K is the gateway drug to people using more APL-like languages and vector programming. However, we need an open-source alternative to KDB+. If you want to reach mass-market you need to be free and open and you need to provide something more than just a cool language.

KDB+ adds a lot of important features for handling time-series, websockets, web programming and generally scaling up to a distributed system where you could connected different nodes to form a message bus or add your own micro-services framework on top. You can't do that yet with any of the open-source APL and APL-like frameworks I've seen.
That's absolutely right. This was clearly obnoxious on the part of at least a couple people as well as the "mob." And it may have violated some clandestine recording statute depending on what jurisdiction it took place in. But I can't feel that the solution is some sort of right to be forgotten on steroids where anyone can get media that don't like for any reason to be taken down across social media and search. (Probably not practical anyway even if people were OK with that--which they wouldn't be.)
I would say that there is difference between understanding the scientific method and knowing about scientific results. People who do not understand the scientific method will value scientific results differently than those who do. Doing science is very hard, and there are very few people in the general population who are able to do it properly. Even in STEM there are many people having troubles with applied statistics.
How do you organize the Google Docs? We use a lot of Google docs where I work and I've found looking for documents to be a struggle.
> .NET’s LINQ cannot be expressed in LISP

That's an extraordinary claim. Do you have extraordinary evidence to back it up?
Maybe we should think about fact that celebrities are people too more often.
Well yes, that one is obvious. But look at my history of the past, let's say, 10 or 15 comments, you will see the same pattern.
wow cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :0
My suspicion is the author just didn't know how to use sbcl for this. I quickly tried this and did not receive any such message.
This is childish: "AmigaOS can do ALL of the mentioned things above, including browsing OpenStreetMap maps better than on ANY other operating system out there."
>way too hungry for internet points

The most disturbing part of all of this is the presumption that there is some inherent motivation to do this kind of thing. To me, the whole behavior is so unnecessary that mere consideration of whether it justifies exploiting a stranger without their permission is unquestionably shameful. But yet, we are treating this like something our (grand)parents never taught us.

(I say “grandparents” becuse the Great Generation has generally more respectable standards for personal interaction than baby-boomers, for whom exploitation in the name of personal gain is what so often gets them out of bed in the morning.)
Does it support saving to sync.com?
A Turing machine is Turing-complete.

Good luck expressing LINQ syntax, or Lisp syntax, or even Basic-80 syntax on it.

Syntax is important, it's a tool of thought.
There are large gaps above and below, plus the hinges are plastic and the walls are plastic covered chipboard (or something similar.

The bench lifting is part of the system - you can't leave rubbish or water on the bench.

You could solve a safety access issue by having the bench corner removed and replaced with a breakable component; but I'd speculate the materials are such the hinges already serve that purpose and changing the corners would lead to a lot of accidental breakage.
You don't understand how politics work, just stop.
I have been thinking about this a bit.
[0] covers it in more detail at the local level with a map of the places it has happened.
This is something which has been happening in India and is not limited to a particular state. There was a recent article about how the cops discovered one of the videos responsible for lynching to be fake and taken out of context of a NGOs promotional video.

Makes me wonder the motives of persons involved - what do they gain by inciting this violence. These are not your vote banks. But considering its pan-India nature, this activity is somehow organized.

This is not a law and order problem. In the sense that it is beyond that. Those who say it do not understand the scale of mobs in India. You cannot police this, especially in places where this is occurring. The police have been helpless, even threatened.

The real problem is indeed the people of India. WhatsApp is just a medium - though it makes it very convenient. I would even say this outcome of whatsApp usage is inevitable in a country like India where you will find abundant people ready to go berserk and people who want to exploit it for no apparent reason.

Frequent reading about this really makes me loose faith in humanity. I don't know how to change a billion people.

[0] https://indianexpress.com/article/india/murderous-mob-lynchi...
> Against whom?

Against the woman who posted the Tweets, I would imagine? Perhaps also against the companies which encouraged it, like T-Mobile?
> Who the hell even prints anymore from a personal computer?

Dude, I print fsckin' source code to read. I specifically bought an
office-grade laser printer with a print server built in so I could do so.
I also occasionally print parts of books and helpers for role playing games
(character sheets, snippets of the handbooks, tables with prices and test
difficulties and whatnot).

Printing for personal use is very much alive.
I guess the post is supposed to demonstrate that there should be no "wild guessing", and instead each browser should be producing the same result.
I think in that case the client would essentially be another broker. It would need to understand the cluster topology and manage replication awks etc. It would resemble a p2p protocol like BitTorrent.

I think that might also make split brain situations more likely if all the client brokers didn’t have the entire cluster topology known. You’d end up with different data in different places if the clients are partitioned in addition to the brokers.
Go has always been extensively opinionated (gofmt is just one example of that). This is also the beauty of Go - everything is just as expected once you understand the "opinions".

The rather late support of "out-of-tree" building might be caused by a conflict between groups pressing to refrain from the $GOPATH approach (rising in size due to rising Go popularity itself) and Go Dev Team / early-adopters especially as the $GOPATH approach is a central part of Go.

While I can see the intention of Go modules, I believe that many people which belong to the first group migrated from other languages like JavaScript and expect to migrate the workflow as well. I highly encourage everyone to try the $GOPATH approach before rooting for any side.