skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think XARs are much simpler. snapcraft (and AppImage and other tools) seem to be much more invasive to the development flow and more opinionated about what the contents of the image look like (directory structures, yaml/xml/json files for metadata, etc).

XAR is much simpler. All it needs is a shell script (or raw executable) to run inside the XAR. Everything else is up to the bootstrapping. Note this isn't always a good thing -- opinionated software has its place. For what we use XAR for, though, having it "just work" with standard Python tooling without expecting open source libraries or modules or build tools behave differently is a strong plus.
I'm not entirely sure what's so interesting or novel about this. There are a large number of these companies in the UK already and you can achieve it pretty affordably using lab produced results + capillary blood in about 24hrs and offer online dashboards with tracking and some advice. Perhaps i misunderstand the focus on the value of automation.

https://werlabs.co.uk/

https://www.forthwithlife.co.uk/

https://bluehorizonmedicals.co.uk/sample-collection/finger-p...

https://thriva.co/

https://werlabs.co.uk/

https://www.letsgetchecked.com/

https://www.getlivesmart.com/

Most of these end up at somewhere like http://www.countypathology.co.uk/ (Thriva and forthwithlife both use this lab)
It was commonly synthesized from sassafras oil (safrole) so you can add it to the list I think:

https://erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/safrolefaq.html
Most, I mean upwards of 60-70% always search for charging point the first thing they arrive anywhere (be it airport, Hotel or even office). Always the devices are on charge. Always.
Not really, lot of parallels actually. But it does have higher level constructs than WASM currently has, but they are quite specific to Java the language. So I wouldn't say higher level, just more and larger scope currently.
> Don't make any promises you can't keep

What, like delivering a keyboard that actually works reliably?

It seems very much the opposite of under-promise, over-deliver in that they promised it and the touch bar would be better. The most that can be said is both are proving hugely subjective and controversial.

Now, had they managed to get Thinkpad feel in 2mm travel...
I don't do any Golang, but I do find myself agreeing with this sentiment in general.
Fitbit for iOS missing food logs for the last days
The problem is just flipped. Now internet users will spoil it for cable users.

Good luck getting the cable companies to agree to a delayed signal.
Try EMDR?

I met an EMDR person once who I think roughly accurately describes CBT as how to deal with issues, and EMDR solves them so you don't have to deal with them in the first place.

Worth a try.
It also applies to catering applied for onsite events from the article
Apparently any, or almost any(?), element of a language can be replaced with a file path, which is then transparently read and used as if typed directly in that place. It works even for type annotations and is type-safe. This allows for easy factoring of the code into many files, and - by extension - to files on remote hosts as long as they're accessible via a (built-in) HTTP support.
> and at a disadvantage if we don't

How, exactly, are we at a disadvantage? We can rain destruction on any point on the Earth's surface, and have proven technology for shooting down satellites (and inevitably bringing down our own because suddenly there are billions of new objects in orbit from destroying 1 satellite.)

Where are the gaps? Do you anticipate an alien invasion? If so, we'd be fucked. Do you think the <insert current trendy US enemy here> has some secret space technology to turn the entire US into a parking lot instantly, and somehow we have to put $35bn BB guns on satellites to combat it?
I was precisely thinking the "throw it over the wall" anti-pattern. Now that I understand your sentiment, I concur with it.
Congrats for the launch! Looks good.

Is there a way to import or sync existing browser bookmarks? I'd prefer to keep bookmarking in Chrome (cross-device), like many other users I suppose.
Interesting, there's a great video on the governing system of the Iroquois Confederacy, which is surprisingly intricate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4gU2Tsv6hY
Another major difference to Java is that WASM doesn't come with any library whatsoever (as already implied by some sibling comments). The only interfaces to the outside world are function callbacks and shared memory. Callbacks have to be set up manually when loading the code into the VM.

While this makes integrating WASM code into applications a little awkward—you're basically down to peeking and poking addresses in memory, see [1] for some code I wrote that does exactly that—this has some key advantages.

First, the WASM designers cannot make any opinionated decisions regarding what a library should look like. Providing a library is entirely up to the particular toolchain you're using (e.g., Emscripten, which provides a partial libc). And it's up to you what toolchain you use (if any). Second, this facilitates perfect sandboxing. All you're doing is placing your input on a sliver of memory, running your program on the virtual WASM CPU, and reading back the result from memory (and/or responding to callbacks).

[1] https://github.com/astoeckel/linprog2d/blob/b557f69d00dcadfe...
I really like chi[0] - I think it strikes the right balance of being small and understandable, but also solving common problems (e.g. nested routes, URL parameters, etc.). It also uses standard Go conventions, so it's very interoperable and would be easy to migrate away from, if necessary.

[0]: https://github.com/go-chi/chi
Speaking from just a purely technical point of view, doesn't facebook track so much of your data that its smart enough to find out who the owner of a facebook profile with fake name and does piracy and who he is in actual life,where does he live, what places he is at?
I've been using Go for quite a long time (since before the 1.0 release); I've never heard of Iris before.

It looks interesting, but appears to be an "all in" approach. I gather that folks who like Django may like this a lot, but for me personally it rubs me the wrong way.

This may be due to my "anti-framework" mindset, but in my experience a lot of other Go developers have this same mindset. YMMV
In the 1980's the backup flight control software for landing the space shuttle ran on a HP-41 calculator, though they never had to use it AFAIK, with the multiple redundant onboard computers.
The Wasm tool chain is built around llvm. So, you can take some complex C code and target wasm instead of X86, ARM, or whatever. That works right now and you can already do things silly like compile emulators and vms to run in a web browser and get them to boot e.g. windows 95 or linux.

So, you could try to recompile the entire python ecosystem (interpreter, libraries, extensions, etc.) to wasm. This might be tricky right now because not all stuff readily compiles to wasm yet probably or uses gcc instead of llvm. Als, python has its own vm and compiler that would need to be reengineered on top of wasm.

Of course people have been working on moving python to llvm for some time so this might actually become feasible.
web frameworks aside what's really missing an ORM. i'll get excoriated for even suggesting that i shouldn't just use sqlx or whatever but using django/python makes me hate using go for web backends.
The bare necessity here is food in general. An employee has to eat when on business trips, so they can't a avoid the issue. They either have to accept the financial loss, or accept the dietary change.

There are of course alternatives to eating meat, but the real question is whether it's appropriate for a business to use financial disincentivis (effective pay reductions) to encourage lifestyle/idealogy change in their employees.
I don't know about the numbers but you're probably speaking something close to truth here. So I'd guess the reason for the downvotes is the tone of your implication that because of this the preceding doesn't matter and is... wasting our time or something? I think it does matter. I work on a fairly small team that has to manage a lot of stuff, and we probably fall somewhere in the middle of your rough ranking. The wiki page might even be older than 2 months :). We're always looking for smarter ways to automate things (and then hoping to get the time to work on them). So to people like us things like this do matter quite a lot.
wordpress :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo_bird_verdict

I don't know that there's convincing evidence that medically-certified talking is any more effective than any other talking (if that talking is without significant ulterior motive.) There is, however, evidence that talking about your problems helps. Therefore there is a case to be made that getting people talking about their issues is more important than the qualifications of the people they talk about those issues to. Hell, in 12-step programs and other support groups, people with similar problems just talking to each other clearly helps.
According to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar

In the 1980s, unified models were developed in which quasars were classified as a particular kind of active galaxy, and a consensus emerged that in many cases it is simply the viewing angle that distinguishes them from other active galaxies, such as blazars and radio galaxies.

..also...

A minority of quasars show strong radio emission, which is generated by jets of matter moving close to the speed of light. When viewed downward, these appear as blazars ...

To the best of my knowledge and interpretation they can be a type of "Quasar" but are really a type of galaxy with an active galactic nucleus (AGN) where their jets point towards Earth:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazar

A blazar is an active galactic nucleus with a relativistic jet (a jet composed of ionized matter traveling at nearly the speed of light) directed very nearly toward the Earth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_galactic_nucleus#Types_...
This really irks me. On the bright side, they are doing really well with on time updates but hey, allow me to do what I want to do with my phones, at least offer root somewhere deep down in settings so that normal users dont mistakenly enable it.
Oh god. Forget about keyboards. I once watched a droplet of water so small that it had to have been affected more by subtle air currents than by gravity hit the edge of the trackpad on a pre-force-touch model and then vanish inside the gap, say around 2011, at which point the trackpad promptly stopped working properly for several days (phantom touches, cursor jumping, dead zones). Be careful out there with the expensive toys, eh?
Building a system out of a handful of services, databases, caches, and queues is table stakes for a backend engineering intern, not "epic skills."
True that the gentleman academics did find much of the more obvious stuff (not to denigrate). I was thinking more after 1850 or so (more like modern times). (Not prepared to parse how much the European finds were in public schools. Good topic!)

OTOH, I'll stick by my claim that 'basic research' done by privates -- (Bell notwithstanding ... e.g. Jansky was looking to solve a -private- problem, not discover radioastronomy) and especially nowadays -- is much likelier to have a particular pecuniary bias. So, not so 'basic'. Unlike, say, NASA.
Iris has been mired in drama since starting, which is good enough reason to avoid it.

One example, of many, https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/pull/1137
> They aren't stopping you from doing it.

The article states that it applies to any onsite event with catering a customer might hold. Perhaps I misunderstand. Given most events hosted there are done in cooperation with or illustrating a relationship between wework with no commercial payment from the third party, i dunno where the lines are.

> "We [wework] don't want to pay for what we see as murder"?

The questionable predicate for doing so is the environmental impact. Where do you get that from? They absolutely would not win any fans imposing moral absolutism on the eating habits of the majority of people.
What I'd like to see is a comparison of psychotherapy to just paying a normal person with common sense but no psychological training to sit and listen and talk to people to help with their issues.

I'm convinced that the latter would be more effective most of the time, but I'd love to see it studied.
My comment was definitely biased towards big tech companies where I have worked so not all of the fortune 500. That being said, I have worked on a 2 and 5 person team each managing hundreds of terabytes of data and both companies have tens of thousands of engineers.

Both companies are just are part of the large tech scene hence my skepticism about there not being many engineers that have to manage tons and tons of data/distributed systems as there are probably hundreds of thousands if not millions of engineers that have to think about these problems outside of the two companies I have worked for.
I'm surprised that there appears to be no link to the Github Repo on the homepage: https://github.com/stencila/stencila
Having read not more than a little amount of your take on my material, I suggest you look to your own reading comprehension skills.
It's sad the CBT is pushed to the forefront by regulation and funding, but there are certain conditions where we know it may not help, and beyond that may be harmful.

I know for GAD, SPD and similar illnesses where anxiety is a core component, that a combination of methods, where at least one is DBT, is one of the recommendations. However, there are fewer practitioners for it.
DO NOT USE IRIS [1][2][3][4]

The author of this framework, who calls himself Kataras, is very unethical.

He fell into a big controversy with the management of his repositories, stealing several chunks of code from other popular projects without giving credits to their respective authors, and then using them to write benchmarks to make his own project look better than it is. He also spent several months creating bots to upvote his articles on different news aggregators and star his repositories to increase visibility in the GitHub Trending page. He also created several accounts in different websites (mostly Reddit) to act as a supporter of himself. The last time I heard about him, he had forked his own repositories multiple times to re-brand Iris with other names, hoping that people wouldn't notice, specially people who are just starting using Go.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57tmp1/why_you_shou...

[2] http://www.florinpatan.ro/2016/10/why-you-should-not-use-iri...

[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/57w79c/why_you_real...

[4] https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/pull/1137
Online forums are great for this. At various points in my life I've spent times on forums which provided exactly what you're talking about - a chance to talk openly and anonymously with other people who've faced the same challenges.
pfft I like to ask every doc I go to, what outcomes they have produced in cases like mine and how many such cases they see a year. The CBT ppl just blink at me like the question is not on their manual. And one even said no great outcomes but here are the things you should do. Why would I spend my time doing them if they haven't produced results?

I mean these are nice people with good intentions but so is a priest in a church or a temple. The whole thing feels half baked. Ya ya I know reprogramming the mind is complex and this is a work in progress. But my experience from work and coaching team sports is people follow authority figures when in doubt/outcomes are unknown. And most shrinks and counsellors in my case atleast are unable to establish authority.
I started a project about a year ago and I specifically wanted to answer this question. As a result, I wrote that project in revel.

Ultimately I don't hate revel and the result is an operational system today. I don't exactly regret the decision to use revel, but I also think that revel ultimately didn't bring many useful things to the party. I do know I'd have a better, more extensible easier to understand application if I had not used revel. I do know that if I was just using standard net/http I would have developed things faster. I found myself more often fighting against the framework to bend it to my will than benefitting from it.

All that said, I don't think I would have the confidence that "just use net/http" is the correct answer had I not done a project in revel.

I did a few projects before and after and in-between the revel project, while still actively developing and maintaining the revel project. Ultimately, I now find myself dreading working on the revel project to the point where, when I have time to spare, I'm much more likely to work on one of the non-revel projects.
One thing I am concerned about is startup performance. On my (slow) Chromebook, some of my multi-megabyte WASM files take 10 seconds to compile. Seems we need either faster CPU cores, faster code generation, or some kind of staged JIT compile -- though I guess the latter could be accomplished today with sufficiently clever tooling.
I'll cautiously mention: https://github.com/valyala/fasthttp

It's a net/http replacement that is close to x10 in performance -- however it is not a drop in replacement and you should avoid it unless you really actually need the rps.

That's pretty much the opposite of a web framework.
That's completely beside the point. Are we supposed to shed a tear for each of that 50 %? I can do that, but it won't help me, at all.

On the other hand, I can use Dhall to generate Kubernetes/Helm configs, which will be more DRY, less duplicated, and not a pain to work with. I know that this would help me quite a bit, not only because I hate my current "DevOps" team members with burning passion and I'd enjoy watching them try to figure out what is happening (well, I'd at least add the source files to a repo, that's already more than they do).
I find myself thinking about whether the comments will have anything interesting in them. If I think there will be then I click on the comments page and read through the top few comments. If there's a lot of discussion about the OP link itself only then will I actually click the link. I do the same for reddit.

Side note: I think that there are many articles/blogs on the internet that have less information than a good reddit/HN comment and this is why many users of HN and Reddit go to the comments first.
The article talks a lot about storage. Is an SD card not possible? I have a somewhat average Huawei phone that's a couple of years old (sensible charging, battery still good though not great) and a 32GB SD card carries all I need in terms of photo after photo, and app data from less used apps.
I wrote a simple extension for hckrnews.com to hide submissions based on words and domains: https://gist.github.com/ivmirx/66a0015884d44297ea05a8c54d935...

I filter out all the languages and tech that I don't use, corporate news, US news, crypto news, and some bad journalism.
Same in Toronto. 22+ is Instagram only. A few years ago you would add each other on Facebook. Now it’s Phone or Instagram socially, Twitter in tech circles, LinkedIn in business circles. People over 30 yrs will add you on Facebook but nobody younger bothers anymore.
Who cares? I don’t want to argue on the internet but either take your laptop to get the keyboard replaced for free or... don’t.

I don’t get the rage about all this. Life is too short to care about a MacBook keyboard problem this passionately. It works pretty well and feels great to type on: the end.
chi is cool, but, isn't really a framework. Chi is just a router and that's a lot of why I think `chi` is quite good.

I happen to be a fan of web[0] even though its basically a dead project, it works fine and is minimal enough to not need any changes.

[0] https://github.com/gocraft/web
I finished Never Split the Difference a month back. Fantastic read.

I am almost finished with Thinking Fast and Slow. I kinda wish I had read it years back given all the useful insights.

I just bought a copy of the 1961 version of Stranger in a Strange land.
{
“_comment”: “The comment goes here!”,
“name”: “foo”
}
Thanks for sharing, this looks very exciting! Bring on more docs and examples!!
And knowing how to architect it so that it actually scales well is beyond most senior engineers. You underestimate the difficulty I think.
Hashtag facepalm
Yes, I was really confused by the AppImage comparisons in this thread until I realised this wasn't the XAR I already knew. It's hard to imagine they couldn't have easily checked the name before claiming it. The (Darwin) XAR page on Wikipedia was created in 2006 [1]...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xar_(archiver)
If the domain is a mainstream tech/political/general-interest/news organization, then I ignore it.
Therapy has really helped me, for a number of reasons:

- It helped reduce my stress level and helped me cope.

- My therapists have made constructive, useful suggestions and provided insights that I hadn't thought of on my own.

- I've faced and dealt with things I've avoided facing and dealing with on my own.

- I've come to understand myself much better.

Those things alone are worth their weight in gold for me. That said, I've completely avoided CBT and related short-term, "evidence-based" therapies. Instead, I've preferred to work with therapists who have more of a Jungian, depth psychology approach, which are a much better fit for me.

In addition to therapy, in recent years I've been eating a lot healthier, started exercising and supplementing nutrients that I was deficient in and all of these changes have had a very positive effect on my mood, health, and energy level.

I also journal a lot, and that also helps me to destress and put things in perspective. It's often almost as good as talking to someone.

Back to the subject of therapy: I believe it's absolutely critical to find a therapist that you like, respect, and can easily talk to and open up to. The other half of the equation is your own willingness and ability to put in the hard work of both confronting the difficult issues you need to in therapy and following through outside of therapy. Without all of these things coming together, the results are likely to be disappointing.
> Was anyone ever legitimately inconvenienced by the thickness of the 2010 MBP?

My tinfoil hat theory is yes - Apple's supply chain folks. Thinner and lighter laptops means more fit on a cargo airplane, which means lower shipping costs.

Tim Cook cut his teeth on Apple's supply chain as COO before becoming CEO, after all.
An Illustrated Proof of the CAP Theorem
Can confirm. I always shop at the second closest HD, because the difference in on-floor customer service is night and day.

Try a different location if it's not much further away.
It says that in the first paragraph of this article.
This site has pretty detailed bios of their coaches. https://www.ace-up.com
You could put the whole thing in a faraday cage and look at the emissions with a spectrum analyzer. There's probably a bunch of wide spectrum noise though, thanks to all those squarewaves running at various frequencies. If you were smart, you might try modulating one of those signals(sort of like the 'spread-spectrum' feature of many BIOSes, but with information doing the modulation and not just noise). You might be able to sneak other signals in amongst all the noise. Hell, spread spectrum signals can sit below the noise floor... I don't really think there's a way you could be 100% certain that the laptop wasn't exfiltrating data.