skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And init systems are, unfortunately, not a common feature of containers so far. I really wouldn't mind seeing both of them in the same project.

Both init systems and container systems are concerned with dependencies, logging, and managing the lifetime of processes, and systemd is way better at the last two than Docker, so I'm optimistic.
Reminds me of Kant’s Axe ...

Is it ever morally acceptable to tell a lie? Kant thought not. His example of the would-be murderer explains his reasoning. Read by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.

https://youtu.be/x_uUEaeqFog
At least with my nation, the US, while neither side is really for the people one side is so vastly against the interests of the majority in general and the interests of me and mine in particular that I expect there is no reasonable middle ground.

When one group wants people like yourself to lose medical care and die where is the middle position?

Ultimately I expect them to eventually react violently to losing power and have to be put down by force in order to preserve some notion of democracy.

On perhaps your side of the pond it seems that one side wants to strangle the medium for culture and civilization in order to make a few bucks in hopes that a fraction will stick to their hands. These people are surely personally your enemy whether you recognize it or not.
Mister Rogers' interactions with other people are the purest and most kind I've ever witnessed, so I pondered for a long time how it is that he could be so humane and kind. Finally I realized the whole thing comes from his ability to take others for exactly who they are in those moments.
In some states only one party needs to know about the recording. In some state all parties need to know about it. If you tell them up front, they can refuse, but then it's just evidence that they're being difficult.

Certain keywords like "lawsuit" can break the strictly regimented conversation tree too.
Violence persists, and may be increasing in certain areas but it's definitely less prevalent when viewing in a global sense. One figure that really struk me when taking a world history class was that the rate of violent death (as in, the percentage of people that died at the hands of other humans) in pre-agricultural societies was estimated to be between 10-20%. In the 20th century, despite two of the most destructive wars in history, the global rate of violent death was estimated to be 1.7 to 1.8% - and this was less than the preceding century.
I am surprised. I have a current subscription and my online account allows me to cancel. I also paid via PayPal so canceling the recurring payments would also cancel the subscription. Edit: looked it up and saw the link to cancel in Account->Subscription - https://myaccount.nytimes.com/seg/cancel .
Also http://www.crockford.com/javascript/little.html (scroll down)
Look up persistent volume claims and dynamic provisioning. If you cluster is properly configured, then you are one yaml file away from having that. By "configured properly" this means having the correct cloud provider set, otherwise it cannot talk to the APIs.

To be fair, this stateful containers in general are a relatively new thing in K8s and support has been improving.

Also, K8s is trying to do and abstract away a lot, it is more like a distributed operating system by itself. So it is more complicated than swarm.
That works until the merchant you’re dealing with is a monopoly or duopoly and you need them more than they need you.
What Does Clickfunnels Do?
Honest question, how can one look at themselves unbiasedly and determine if they're a mediocre programmer?
IBM Wants to Track Code Milestones on a Blockchain
Free tech photo stock
"Seriously fuck that guy" is low-grade internet sludge. We don't need that here. If you post it, others will post more, and we will get all sludgey. That's point #1.

Point #2 is more subtle and more important. You picked an uncharitable interpretation in order to get snippy at it. That's a self-referential activity, not the thoughtful engagement we're looking for. This is why the site guidelines say:

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize."

That applies to articles and quotes as much as to fellow commenters. If people just rail against weak versions of what others say, the only ones interested in reading it will be others in the same mood. Everyone else will get bored and leave, which in the long (or maybe not so long) run amounts to the death of this community. That's a downward spiral we really don't want, so please make an effort not to do that.

In short, please follow the rules:
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I was a guest of a member of the directors guild. My friend is a director and regularly invites me. It’s always a good time.

*My original post should say director, not author.
Facebook accidentally flagged the Declaration of Independence
I am aware AMD has been making great strides lately, but you have to remember that AMD has a decade-long hole to dig themselves out of.

The only game in town has been Intel for almost 12 years now. When the Core lineup was released in 2006 [1], the wind quickly went out of AMD's sails. [2] AMD had almost matched Intel in market share, they just need to keep the innovation coming. The problem was Bulldozer and similar architectures just weren't competitive. Even with double the core count, Intel's chips were simply better for the vast majority of workloads. [3]

The CPU wars had gotten so one-sided that I believe Intel stopped pushing. With the exception of Gulftown [4], four cores was the name of the game from Kentsfield in 2006 [5] until Kaby Lake in 2017 [6]. Intel released it's first desktop dual-core processor on April 16, 2005 [7]. Quad-core Intel chips came January 8, 2007 [8]. Less than two years led to an extra two cores in the consumer level CPU market, and that was the end for over 10 years.

When the Zen architecture was release to consumers on Febuary 28, 2017 [9], Intel checked under the couch and magically found two extra cores. Coffee Lake was released on October 5, 2017 [10]. Funny how real competition changed a decade of stagnation, isn't it? If Zen didn't do as well as it did, I can see the 8th generation chips staying quad-core.

The supercomputer market is also dominated by Intel. I count two (2) supercomputers using Opterons [11]. Everything else is POWER or Xeon. All Apple computers use Intel CPUs.

Ryzen, Threadripper and EPYC are great products and offer a staggering increase in performance over what the previous generation chips. It's far from "game over".

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2#Models

2: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/market_share.html

3: https://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/10/11/amd_bulldozer_fx8...

4: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_i7_micropro...

5: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentsfield_(microprocessor)

6: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake

7: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_D#Smithfield

8: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentsfield_(microprocessor)

9: https://www.mobipicker.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-1700x-1700-rele...

10: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_Lake
11: https://www.top500.org/list/2018/06/
This is great. It was so hard to cancel Adobe subscription
One possible reason is that a lot of corporate networks use 10.x.x.x. If you’re using a similar subnet at home, using a VPN can get awkward.
Yeah in it's early days, the torrent network was small, and peer counts were limited. The original, and many later Python implementations used event loops, which side step concurrency implementation overheads (like threads), and very often do a lot of heavy lifting in C. I'm not sure that Deluge is Python for the torrent part. The standard is to use libtorrent these days.

Python can handle a torrent client with appropriate tools, but you just have to be extra careful about algorithms etc.
> "What would be the response to a nuclear power using one of these in combat? Escalation? Retaliation in kind? The damage to the surrounding environment could be small, especially if used to target submarines and ships."

Look up "Escalate to De-Escalate." The apparent Russian nuclear doctrine involves small-scale nuclear devices (escalation) used in a regional capacity. Their theory, supposedly, is that if only a small nuclear weapon is used in a limited capacity against a military target, a full-scale nuclear response against civilian populations (aka nuclear Armageddon) would be completely unreasonable and consequently the other side would choose to back down (de-escalation).

Now, whether or not Russia actually believes this or merely wants America to believe that Russia believes this is something of an open question. It could be the case that Russia wouldn't actually dare put Escalate to De-Escalate into practice, but merely claim they think it's a good idea as part of their deterrent strategy.
Why? If I were a business that took phone orders, why would I care what's on the other end?

As long as it's reliable and intelligent enough, I don't think people will mind. I know I wouldn't.
So if the autonomous vehicle hears the sirens, does it start to pull over, or wait until it can also detect flashers? What about a loud stereo playing a siren sound or a car with flashers installed on it? I'm just wondering, because although I know this sounds like a pretty simple problem, I don't think that it is.
I don't know why people are knocking the vue forum. I find it comprehensive with fast response.
> I think the issue is that people keep expecting something from React that React has specifically stated it does not do, which is handle everything.

Ok, but people learning React - with no guidance from the library or its maintainers, as you said it's only the view - are going to search for "react how to route" or the like. They end up using things like react-router, and some of them run into problems like I did. You did ask originally what makes one easier to learn than the other.

> to give people to freedom of choice to choose or omit other libraries or frameworks. [...] Those pieces of functionality were easy to implement on my own.

And I listed some problems that I had using those other frameworks which were recommended to me. "Just do it yourself" isn't exactly helpful.

> (Redux itself is incredibly small)

Ok, but it has had some API churn as well - EDIT: I was wrong about this. See replies.

There's definitely boilerplate that goes along with it. There are libraries that deal with that to an extent, but there are many. Which one does someone learning choose?

> I remember working on Angular 1 projects...

What's that got to do with Vue? Vue isn't Angular.

> Personally, I think it's silly to use Vue. I mostly hear either minor grievances from the Vue crowd

I gave you my examples. You seem to compare only the view layer functionality. I'm examining the ecosystem and preexisting examples of how to implement functionality, which is going to be important for someone new to the library. Of course you can write this yourself, but for people trying to learn React, only having the view layer makes it more difficult to figure out how to "implement it on your own".

> I also don't think Flux was vague, it just lacked an implementation.

Not having any public implementation is pretty vague!

> There just seems to be a big fear in the JS community about writing code instead of pulling in a framework

Well, again, my response was from the perspective of someone learning React and how one might architect a SPA using it. As stated, there was no official flux implementation in the beginning, just a diagram from Facebook and some hand-waving documentation. Vue has official and router library and state management library which are linked to from the official documentation.

> React itself is just reactive functional programming. The sell of not writing it yourself is that you get to work with a nicer API while the React team improves the backend for you (a la Fiber).

You can apply this your own argument. React is just reactive functional programming. Why just pull in a view library when you can just render using functions? Why not write it yourself, if you're writing everything else yourself? Are you afraid to? Why include a 240kb library to render functional components?

What do you get out of using React over Vue, which also uses the virtual DOM and has functional components?
Would be interesting to see birth rate/death rate by race/religion. I think over next 50+ years there will be significant shifts in demographics.
You're associating the word scalable with the typical web-scale definition. Don't do this. The OP didn't specify what kind of scaling, and a torrent client has a lot of scalability (vertical?) in the way it manages connections and DHT.
Only applies if you sign up online, not in-person.
I don't think it's bad at all to have an action trigger an API call that doesn't save anything to the store. However, as @mmcnl said in response to your original comment, you probably want to abstract the actual API-related code into its own module, so that you don't implement the API calls in the actions; then your actions become thin functions that simply call that code with the necessary parameters.
Plenty of companies, universities and even small ISPs use 10.0.0.0
The Army has Jyn Erso. The Air Force has the Kessel Run Experimentation Lab. Is Disney sponsoring the DoD now?
Isn't it legal in every state so long as you disclose that the call is being recorded?
I gotta try out the 127.0.0.x thing at the end of the article. I never knew the range was so large!
Well lucky for us, the law doesn’t call it a subscription either.
Tesla adds autonomous parking mode to Model 3
Sydney Airport launches face scan check-in trials
There's another startup, for self-driving trucks, which does have direct remote control. Their idea is that the trucks are self-driving for long-haul, and then the final non-Interstate part is remote controlled.[1]

[1] https://phantom.auto/
Usually the company is recording the call for "quality assurance purposes". They've already notified you of this and by staying on the call you consent to the recording. It is always legal to record if both parties consent.
I suggest creating a form letter where you threaten to file an ADA action against them, as well as notifying your state's attorney, etc. Plus cc: the local TV station consumer reporter. When they give you static, they get a copy of that letter sent to their registered corporate agent, return receipt. Their lawyer has to handle all such legal threats. ADA actions are extremely expensive for corporations.

People without an ADA issue should send their cancellation notice to the registered corporate agent, return receipt, which sets the date of cancellation and gets their (expensive) lawyer involved. Threaten to sue them under your deceptive trade practices statutes if they continue to bill your account. Lawyers shed these kind of nuisance things quickly and cut through the bureaucracy. Your file will be stamped "service terminated" posthaste. There is no better way to communicate your desire to terminate service than to notify their registered agent in writing.
This is exactly why I changed my payment method with them to a virtual credit card. When I want to stop my sub I'll just block the VCC via my online banking. There is no way I'm spending time and money calling internationally to unsubscribe.
Never threaten the profits and capital. They will find you.
Not sure if I got the scenario. Are you installing K8s on bare metal using a previously installed OS that you do not control?

If so, that will be harsh. I am not sure how to help you there. There are many things that could go wrong as you say.

If you do have control over the OS (you are providing an ISO or virtualization image) then it should mostly "just work". My company is doing a similar thing, only we ship boxes with everything pre-installed. There is another scenario for hybrid cloud, but even then they download a VMWare image.

Also if you do have control over the OS: can you use CoreOS instead? It is very well suited for running K8s and has less things that can go wrong. RedHat bought them anyway. With Ignition (or even the old-fashioned cloud init with a config drive), it is a no-touch deployment (you do have to generate and inject the certificates beforehand).

One thing that sounds weird is that you are "telling folks to do X". Can you avoid telling them anything and have it automated?
It’s not hard to understand - land doesn’t vote, people vote, and measuring party share by the wrong metric is silly. Tango’s explanation was very clear and perhaps helpful to others but didn’t tell me anything I didn’t already know.

Ed: Your comment elsewhere in thread about districts helped the most in realizing we were talking about different things. MB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

Among other things, they were investigating the use of nuclear bombs to create artificial harbors (probably a lot more feasible than digging a canal across Mexico, but it sure would make one hell of a mess.)

The Soviets had their own version of this program: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Explosions_for_the_Nat...
How about just sending a notification of cancellation by snail mail?
Be a bit careful with the "l" word - many companies instruct their reps to immediately stop dealing with people that threaten legal proceedings over the phone and tell them to contact the company attorneys.

Remember that any company that doesn't empower the phone support people to help you probably didn't empower them enough to go off-script.
The real innovation here is pollution reduction and avoidance with the technique while being profitable. One can technically recycle with more primitive techniques and make a profit if willing to pollute.

Environmentalism like many things in life is about trade-offs.
> In short, for much of the Cold War the USSR had such a numbers advantage over NATO when it came to tank forces that the only chance NATO had to hold off a full-scale tank invasion by the USSR would have been the use of tactical nukes.

Would it be effective against a tank invasion? I would have thought tanks were solid enough that you'd almost need a direct strike to destroy them, if the tanks were spread out it wouldn't be more effective than conventional weapons. I'm not sure about the soviet era one's but the current Russian ones are designed to operate on an irradiated battlefield.
Recording phone conversations secretly without the prior consent of all participants is illegal in many states. No state I am aware of disallows the recording of phone conversations entirely. For instance the law in my "two party consent" state, MA, defines the offense as

> 1. Interception, oral communications prohibited. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section any person who? willfully commits an interception, attempts to commit an interception, or procures any other person to commit an interception or to attempt to commit an interception of any wire or oral communication shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars, or imprisoned in the state prison for not more than five years, or imprisoned in a jail or house of correction for not more than two and one half years, or both so fined and given one such imprisonment.

and defines interception as

> 4. The term 'interception' means to secretly hear, secretly record, or aid another to secretly hear or secretly record the contents of any wire or oral communication through the use of any intercepting device by any person other than a person given prior authority by all parties to such communication;...

https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Cha...
You can also say: "Because I was convicted and I am going to prison by next week."
Every reactor design which had something mechanically or chemically complex going on inside the radioactive zone has had major problems. Pebble bed reactors jam. Sodium cooled reactors have fires. Helium cooled reactors have leaks. The interior environment is hostile, unmaintainable, and has to work for decades. That's why we're stuck with water-based reactors.
My dad used to use "I'm unemployed and have no money" on telemarketers, with some success.

Though nowadays, in the era of pervasive financing and Wall Street investors that care more about revenue than cash flow, I wonder if that would even work. Maybe "I'm being investigated by the Feds and all of my financial relationships are considered suspect, and so would prefer to have as few of them as possible"?
I found Vietnamese people were usually happy to help you out if you needed to find something.

When I got a flat tyre, I just stopped near a local, pointed to my flat tyre, and they gestured directions to get to a mechanic (not that they're hard to find in Vietnam).

I'd imagine it would be the same if you only had a paper map with your destination. Just show the map to a local and in no time they'd tell you where you are and the best way to get there.

Outside of the touristic areas, Vietnamese people are generally really nice and helpful people, who don't try and rip you off. I needed to get the front shocks replaced on my bike. The mechanic next to the hostel wanted something like 800,000 dong to replace them, so I declined. Later, my shocks blew out in Da Nang and I actually had to get them replaced. The mechanic, who couldn't speak word of English, did them for me for 400,000 dong without even haggling. I'm fairly sure that's the local price, because I can't imagine it's possible to get two shocks, plus an hour of labour for under US$20, back home the same job would cost me probably $200 at least.
> Bringing up such a minor illegality implies you care about the morality of it. If somebody was speeding and I said “hey, you know speeding is illegal right?” they would rightfully think I have some sort of weird moral problem with speeding.

Huh... that's actually very much the opposite of how I would interpret that sentence, but okay.
Finding a stamp and a post office box is significantly more annoying than two emails.
IIRC, I used to have one of the old Apple Airport travel routers back in the day and it used 10.0.0.1 by default. I've tended to prefer that block for my home network ever since.
>Having some real-world consequences what is quite literally meaningless is absurd the very least.

"Quite literally meaningless" is a massive stretch. At the very least, you're opening yourself up to legal hilarity (it's not cost effective to pursue individual cheaters beyond terminating their accounts generally, but then again, bot makers have been sued) - the reason this is a thing is that you're ruining the service for others.

Oh and let's not forget, if people lose more than just the satisfaction of winning when someone steals their win with cheats I'd say they also have issues they should deal with.

Please don't presume to tell other people what they should and should not find important.

And if cybersecurity people can't learn without ruining other people's limited downtime, perhaps we need less cybersecurity people.
These two are both as old as the hills and well known to people who read sales manuals as the "door in the face" and "foot in the door" techniques respectively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Door-in-the-face_technique
Very similar to a standard SV Google one except much more stock.
You’re incorrectly assuming that a solution to the problem of self-driving a car is a superset of the problem of passive accident avoidance.

If the software is in active control pretty much everything that goes into that is different from software that is deciding if and when to emergency brake.

To put it another way, a self-driving system will become safer than human drivers, not because it knows how/when to emergency brake really well, but because it won’t have to emergency brake as frequently as a human does.