skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks for explanations about visa for US. I also tried European and Canadian companies, however there was no chance. I will try to apply for US companies on January to increase the odds.
Eating 5000 calories of veggies is impossible. That's like 25kg of tomatoes or 35kg of lettuce. You can't eat that in a day.
Mac sales massively happen on machines with retina display though.

A 1x monitor will be a cheap second monitor or something attached to a Mac Mini (please keep it alive Apple) or Mac Pro (one day it will come). From Apple's point of view I imagine all of these are just super small niches.
Like Mozilla, per-file copyleft and clearer patent licensing, IIRC.

Some prominent former Sun folks have publicly claimed the GPL incompatibility was intentional, other equally prominent folks have disagreed.
A brief look at North Korean cryptography
There’s some evidence to suggest milk isn’t really good for you either
Do you have any good resources for the light versions of websites?
It's actually the example that Aaron Carroll (one of the co-authors of the article) used to explain what an RCT is, and why it's one of the strongest study designs possible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkr9YsmrPAI
I've heard, mostly from libertarian small government types, that I should fear government tracking. I'm not sure exactly why. I'm already tracked by IP and cell towers and using my credit card. And I'm not sure what the government is going to nail me with.

I'm not even making an argument about "I'm not doing anything wrong, so why should I fear the machine?" I have assault rifles and thousands of rounds of ammunition purchased with my credit card. There's a non zero risk that the disarmament Inquisition might use my credit card to seize my property or worse. But the risk is... Quite vanishingly small. And I think it's not unreasonable to suggest the risk is vanishingly smaller for ID cards.

Additionally, I'm completely uninterested in warping our legal code around illegal immigrants. They are irrelevant to the conversation. We make laws for the benefit of citizens. Not the other 95% of the globe that aren't American citizens.

I'm additionally not sure how giving, let's say black trans women, a free national ID card and requiring her to show it for purchasing cigs, alcohol, driving and voting is a problem. It's non-onerous.
If you're talking about people making fun of his weight or appearance or other strange behaviors, then I agree.

But RMS didn't descend from Mount Sinai with the Four Freedoms carved into stone by the finger of God or anything. He's just a man with an opinion, and his ideas are not above criticism regardless of what he's done for the community.
If that tube sprang a leak, anywhere along it's ~2km length, they would have nowhere to run. They are having trouble just getting divers and air to and from their location, engineering & installing such a passage on a short timetable doesn't seem realistic.
What do you think is blindingly obvious?
Personal attacks will get you banned here. Please don't do this again.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
My only difference is prune juice. Because my 2.5yo has only had other juices a couple of times, he thinks prune juice is a huge treat. I give him 2-3oz as a quick and easy source of fiber to promote regularity which is rrrreally helpful when potty training (side note: parenting is sooo dignified).
> Booting from ZFS seemed like a hassle, without clear benefits.

I'm running ZFS on a single boot/user partition on an XPS 13 (9370.) I was unable to get the built in WiFi working with Debian Stretch but it seems to work well enough with testing (Buster.) I have apt-buglist and apt-listchanges (or similar) installed to warn me of possible problems, but I feel more comfortable thinking that I can roll back a system that becomes borked by a buggy upgrade. (Haven't had to do it yet.) Ordinarily I'd have a separate $HOME partition but I'm settling on a $HOME filesystem (which is covered by `rsync` backups.)

It was a bit of a hassle but not IMO w/out benefits for my use case.

I have other servers running Debian Stretch and Ubuntu 16.04 that are using ZFS on the storage drives/partitions and EXT4 on the root partition. (These are for personal use.)
There’s such a thing as a provisional ballot.

For all the studies that show voter fraud is not prevalent and a complete non-issue, we can say even more certainly that “election hacking” is an even more egregious smoke screen.
Another plus to this "ramping up" of tools as necessary is when you get to a certain point where your entire UI is sophisticated enough you can cut the views out of your rails app and basically transform it just a REST API with another service responsible for serving the UI layer.

Rails makes a fantastic REST framework, especially if you build your app that way right from the start.
Double-voting is only one thing people are paranoid about. The other is the 12 million possible votes from undocumented (a.k.a illegal) immigrants.
Thats interesting.. so does that mean eating a lot of protein cannot make you gain fat? It would just be a tax on your kidneys instead?
Something that I think the Barbican does well, and The National Theatre (another London brutalist building) also does well, is interesting interior spaces - openess, multi-levels, "floating" staircases, interior views, visible structural elements etc. I find both of these spaces energising and interesting to be in.

Other brutalist buildings are just horid. I worked in Sampson House (just behind Tate Modern) for a couple of years which is also brutalist but the interior is dank corridors and dingy spaces. I also worked at the brutalist IBM offices next door to the National Theatre and it was also a souless space inside. They have absolutely zero-ambition and are the polar opposite of the spaces at the Barbican and National Theatre.
You're assuming the point of this page is to actually gather data and not just to avoid "please get show X" or "how do I submit show requests?" support requests that are costly to field with human support.

My guess would be they don't outright throw the data away, but it is probably just used as one (very weak) signal in the complex show selection process.
Oh, I agree, but what you describe seem to be latent / possible-in-the-future breakthroughs. Until they see the light of day they are irrelevant IMO.
I like to use uBlock Origin's element picker to remove parts of websites that I don't want to look at. I don't think uMatrix can do that, although it covers the most basic adblocker functionality.
Join Forces Against Natural Disasters with the Call for Code
This isn’t an exercise in rescuing children or building a submersible for Musk, it’s an exercise in PR. The best that can be said is at least he’s not doing any harm. Designing, building, and deploying a sub for such a challenging environment, to be used by kids who don’t even drive a car is a bad joke designed to create media buzz like this article. Even if they run the O2 line in, and that’s proving difficult, one more good rainstorm and this is over, and reports talk about a brewing storm.

It’s going to be risky, but their only realistic chance barring lots of luck, is SCUBA. That will not be easy, but at least it’s a chance. A highly technical dive with three tank swaps for a bunch of weak, terrified kids who have never dived before is a nightmare. I really hope they make it, but it’s hard to be optimistic here.
If one person in the hiring chain knows German, you're out of luck. And more than likely, if they can't find a university, you are probably lying. Universities are big, kinda hard to not be able to find one.

You should not lie on your resume, but if you're going to lie, just find a way to make it harder to verify. Presumably the for-profit schools that got shut down in the last few years would be hard to check with. Obviously they aren't accredited, but that's not your fault. It'd be, at least, a believable lie.
Let me rephrase: the majority of people in my society would _agree_ that requiring an ID card to vote is reasonable. That is true based on an observation of the status quo. Voting is also a right in Canada. In the US, being an imprisoned felon erases your right to vote. Hence, voting is not a God given grant as you claim.

You're also making an ignorant generalization about my background. I was brought up by a single, disabled mother. We lived below the poverty line for the majority of my childhood. You'd do well to discard your arrogant approach.
Can you provide any references? These claims seem extraordinary.
Farmers have historically benefited little from advancement in technology and this is no exception. If I think I'm worth more than my employer is paying me, I can shop my services around for a higher bidder. And while the concept is true for a farmer's output/services in reality most farmers (I grew up on a small family farm) have little choice but to sell at the price the local market will give them. Likewise they have to buy input goods (seed, fertilizer, breeding stock, etc.) at the price others choose. Holding output product is often not an option as banks (and other bills) need paid and food needs to be on the table. I'm thankful for a fairly healthy (by comparison) tech market.
Unrolling the Loops (2016) [video]
The Economist is more “liberal intelligentsia” than “top-hat and monocole robber baron,” and more pragmatic centrist than libertarian extremist. (Consider the number of NGO management positions advertised in its pages). Beyond basic human empathy, its patrons generally want a stable and productive environment in which to live and conduct business. UBI (like its cousin Negative Income Tax) has some traction in this intellectual circle as a more elegant, less side-effectful way of delivering on those goals than other welfare schemes with more populist appeal (which tend to pick winners, diminish productivity, or function more as working-class catharsis than economic optimization).
I doubt anyone in the modern era thinks about 60's hardware when evaluating Lisps. If this is what you think of them, you're reading some odd stuff. Check out Paul Graham's On Lisp, or Seibel's Practical Common Lisp. Most people using lisps aren't implementing them.

People are drawn to them for various reasons, among them: strong metaprogramming facilities, real homoiconicity, DSLs, multiple paradigms, REPL development, hot-loading, and sheer elegance.
San Francisco Home Prices Soar by a Record $200,000 in Six Months
Because real content lives on the microSD card?
If you look at Glaeser's publication[0] (page 10) he defines the rate that he is citing as "the share of men who are not currently employed, or one minus the employment to population rate for prime men". That is a much broader measure of unemployment than even the already very broad U6 measure that NYT is reporting as this would include every single person without a job regardless of the reason that they don't have a job. This number would include full-time students, stay-at-home parents, disabled people, retirees and so on. For comparison, using that measure the absolute lowest level of unemployment that the US has ever had for the age 16+ population as a whole is about 35%[1] (this source reports employment to population rate, so it will be 100% minus the rate that Glaeser is using) or 18% for all people age 25-54[2].

Men in that age range are actually employed at a higher rate than most other demographics. He is making a point about men in that age range being employed at a relatively low rate compared to historic rates for that same demographic, not their employment rate compared to other demographics now. Men age 25-54 have at times had rates getting close to 5%[3].

However, this can't entirely be blamed on a poor job market because it has become much more acceptable for men to take the role of a stay-at-home parent or caretaker than it would have when their employment rate peaked in the late 1960s. There are almost far more students in that age range than there would have been in the 60s.

[0] https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/glaeser/files/jobs_for_the...

[1] http://www.multpl.com/us-employment-population-ratio

[2] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LREM25TTUSM156S?utm_sourc...

[3] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LREM25MAUSA156S
OpenID doesn't provide API access like OAuth does, does it?
And basically no evidence that it's good for you.

Here's a great video on the topic from one of the co-authors of this article:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzyFZcuHmeI
Evie launcher works beautifully for me. Might not be restricting enough for your taste though.
Umatrix gives semi granular control over individual classes of loaded assets sorted by class and source.
You know that with every breath, you breath in tree sperm?
step one: universal ID cards

step two: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/04/us/drivers-license-tennes... take them away from poor people.
It wasn't designed to run on specific hardware, and originally ran on the IBM 709, which has registers. Lisp Machines were designed to run Lisp, not the other way around.

Why Lisp? For me, it gives me the freedom to get software written with the minimum of fuss in the least amount of time. I can keep my Lisp up and running, while I make changes to my code. I can type in and print out complex data structures without having to write parsers or print methods. I can experiment with data without defining new classes. If some functionality doesn't exist, I can add it: there's no distinction between the language itself and the libraries.

Maybe you should speak to more people who use Lisp, or try it yourself. If you don't know functional programming, you can still write basic Lisp until you learn it.
You called it "milk flavored water"
Unless they have also come up with a solid definition of "work", this will be meaningless. Does it include work done from home? Work done on your own time? Will it allow us to turn off the cellphone all weekend?

I say this as a government worker spending his Saturday night doing an online course I need to complete before a training day on Tuesday. I'm on salary and so do not get overtime. But to compete I have to pull the rabbit from the hat and somehow get everything done. That means doing work-related tasks in my own time. (This is a busy month. Things will get easier later in the year and everyone knows it. Nobody is complaining.)
Relevant bit from Dieter Rams: good design...

Is innovative

Makes a product useful

Is aesthetic

Makes a product understandable

Is unobtrusive

Is honest

Is long-lasting

Is thorough down to the last detail

Is environmentally friendly

Involves as little design as possible
I have a cron job that runs every hour and pings for any of several possible remote drives that may or may not be mounted. If it finds one it runs rsync to backup everything using hardlinks to the previous backup, saving space and doing partial de-duplication.

Then I mount and dismount USB hard drives at various locations on the network, swapping them in and out regularly. Every drive has a reasonably recent copy, thus getting redundancy with very little effort.

It was easy to set up, it's easy to run, it has significant redundancy, and every (*nix) machine is backed up.
Careful, because of nat that's also a way to ban potential legit users.
You need a decent resume. I graduated with a math degree and couldn't get a software engineering job until going back and getting a CS degree. I'd already been programming for years. There was another guy from my class that had to do the same too.
From the article:

Musk says he's continuing to work on his earlier idea: an "inflatable tube with airlocks" that could be inflated inside the submerged portions of the tube, creating a tunnel the kids could crawl through.

That sounds like exactly what you describe.
This.

I took a course for fun at a local community college: physics. There was nothing more fascinating learning physics from someone that did accident reconstructions for 30 years. It is a different feel than being lectured to by someone that hasn't finished their graduate program. Then for fun I tried again: Oracle. My teacher? A former executive at WellsFargo and Oracle. He was extremely wealthy, and taught for fun - he did not publish some book or beg for grants.
> * I know a lot of surgeons personally. Didn't cause a trillion dollar insurance claim.

We live in a sad state of affairs in which this disclaimer is necessary. :(
I don’t know of anyone else living alone at my household-name employer in SF. (I do, which means I save and travel less than most of them, but I get weird looks whenever it comes up).
I'm also wary of Musk's involvement. Lately I've seen a lot of stories about him over promising and cutting corners on safety to meet the goals, such as the recent story about removing a break test from the Model 3 [1] (presumably to meet the 5k/mo production goal) or the accidents directly attributable to Autopilot (slamming into a concrete divider while merging, hitting stationary cars while parking, etc - all of which may have been prevented by LIDAR. I'm logging off soon & don't have time to cite these, apologies.).

[1] http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-elon-musk-orders-engine...

Edit: More than Musk's involvement I think we share trepidation about how he is perceived by the media and even by people on HN (though I won't name names). I'm tired of seeing Musk portrayed as a superhero, and anyone who wants his companies to succeed should be, too. There is a popular narrative that the whole company is on his shoulders - as if he wasn't employing a team of engineers - and that he is going to personally deliver our species from peril. Those massive expectations can only precede massive disappointment, and such a careful cultivation of a superhero persona makes me wonder if he's trying to distract us from something rotten.
> Being forced to soften the rollout of the policy indicates how much the plan was driven by the government, rather than workers themselves that rely on overtime to earn enough money.

That changes the story, doesn't it? With so many of us ineligible for overtime in the US, being "management", we may wonder why anyone would work quite that much.
A voting system based on blockchain. Each voter must first perform an IQ test and their holistic thinking ability is tested. Depending on the result, the vote of this person counts more or less. The program should be rolled out worldwide to replace all the monkeys (politicans).
> Socialism and capitalism are modes of production, they're not ethical systems.

I never said they were ethical systems. I said they rest on incompatible ethical systems or theories. This is where the debate lies, not in politics nor economics (i.e., production) where the question cannot be answered.

Politics and economics presuppose an answer to what is the good. Socialism, in all its variants, holds that sacrificing individuals for the benefit of "society" is the good. Since "society" is just a collection of individuals it has to mean in practice the sacrificing of some individuals for the benefit of others. This is its present and historical track record and an unavoidable consequence of that premise which can't be dismissed as an accident of history, errors, personalities or bad men but by design.

On the other hand, Capitalism rests on the opposite view that the individual is paramount and the purpose of the government (i.e. legal and political system) is to protect the individual from others violating his rights. The individual's right essentially amounts to the freedom to take action and the right to property. The govt's role is to protect the rights and property of its citizens from predation of others, including the govt itself. 51% of the people voting to expropriate the property of the other 49% does not make it moral, i.e., democratic socialism is an oxymoron. If the individual is paramount and his rights are protected by law, police and social norms, i.e. he is free, then capitalism is the economic system of production that develops.

Finally, every single one of your replies on this thread are long, overly-complicated, convoluted rationalizations for socialism that are not meant to illuminate the discussion but obfuscate it. Perhaps you don't even know it but you use the exact same arguments that were used last century to spread socialism across the globe and the death of millions. These arguments won't work in this century and last century, for various reasons, people fell for socialism and accepted it voluntarily. That won't happen this time around so you are wasting your time with intellectual arguments, socialism will have to be imposed by force. Do you have the stomach for that battle?
Machine Learning Flashcards
What's right is right, even if the majority is wrong. No argumentum ad populum here! :-)
> by making an AJAX request for any navigation and replacing the page body (instead of doing a full page reload).

This sounds like the "pjax" idea. I did this recently in a prototype; it's about 30-40 lines of JS (not including a shim for the pushstate-API) and maybe a dozen lines in the backend. It just works(R), and makes things as fast as the backend can deliver stuff. Much faster than stuffing hundreds of kB of framework CSS/JS down the browsers throat for each click, and far more simple than any JS-SPA-frontend-bingo-stack.
Why the U.S. Navy Once Had a Concrete Ice Cream Barge
> It also lead to a culture of staunch refusal to learn or do anything new in that job

I find one of the most difficult aspects of software is the very powerful "local minima" of effective (but not optimal) techniques combined with entrenched knowledge. People are so incredibly biased towards what they know well, and that bias is backed by objective evidence: when they do it X-way they are objectively faster AND better, and what's more, X-way has many objective benefits. This is the local minima in a vast multidimensional space of the benefits and tradeoffs of different possible technical approaches. The multidimensional problem of overall comparing X-way with Y-way is nearly impossible to accomplish, so we nearly always fall back to our intuition (aka bias) which nearly always leads us back to what we already know. And consequently most organisations are stuck in some version of a local minima that is very hard to escape, but ultimately represents a big disadvantage over time. But the question of when is the right time to move out of that minima - and incur the expense of navigating the hills between where you are now and the better minima - is really hard to solve.
O.O ZFS without FUSE?
What is your annual return rate since you started algorithmic trading?
The small step from ed to regular expressions seems like a giant leap in sophistication to me.
Wearing a tie may be restricting blood flow to your brain
The Wikipedia article on capital punishment in Japan is quite thorough.
The world's largest collection of rare Apple prototypes
The biggest component of the price is distance traveled so driving faster means you make the almost fare for a trip and finish the trip in less time so that you can complete more trips in the same amount of time. There is also a time component, but it is pretty small, so it wouldn't be worth the driver's time to take more time without also covering more distance.

Taxis often take this even farther and make the time component only include time where the taxi is going less than fixed, fairly low speed (in NYC it is 12 mph), so slowing down from 25 mph to 20 mph wouldn't gain them any extra money on the fare but would cost them extra time.
I see only one flaw. Who choses these top 20 results? Maybe he cannot imaging how something could be profitable. I'm kidding but it's an interesting thought. Thanks for that.