skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That's probably because it's being inconsistently applied and you're not in Europe. If that's the case it's all the more insidious! Or you accepted the Tumblr terms in the past.

This is what I get in the UK: https://imgur.com/a/zlWOByh
> 1.1 Account for the limits of working memory

Tanking in consideration how much information your brain can hold in given moment, what is the maximum amount of study hours you should have per day?
Wikipedia is the best website for following:

1. Current events.

2. Sports tournaments.

The information entropy level is quite high, with basically no ads, extremely good formatting (relevant tables, charts etc.), and relatively unbiased.

This doesn't even mention the benefit of getting simple background information on the subjects with just a simple click (or even a hover these days)

It's really a treasure.
great job getting by my mission impossible style laser beams, hackerman

now please enter your non-SMS two-factor authentication code
> The public benefit of a patent is that the information is public -- inventions which might previously have been kept secret are instead put into the light where others may use them

Can you come up with siginificant patented innovations that are not easy to reverse-engineer? I have thought that the raison d'etre of patents is to foster innovation.
AnyChart 8.3.0 Release: Coloring Formatters, HTML Tooltip, New Indicators & more
We run our builds within containers (using the Jenkins k8s plugin) for repeatability, but the generated artifacts (jars and Docker images) are pushed to our artifact repository (Artifactory) as part of the build process. Our final deployable artifact is our base image with a single layer added to include our app.jar.
You have lots of control, this isn't WinRT, its windows 10. I use the subsystem for Linux anyway as the Linux tablet experience is subpar but having ubuntu shell is awesome and xming works as an x display great. (i own the Surface pro 4)
To be fair, Vault and Lemur cover slightly different use cases. Lemur is nice for controlling the distribution of certs from a variety of issuers, including Vault.
Maybe I am old school. But I kinda like a WAR-file, run/deployment via a maven plugin and a simple servlet container (like Tomcat). If you run a pure Java stack why not keep to this stuff that has been around for ages?
The difference is between a specific invention vs. a law of mathematics or nature. The latter absolutely should not be patentable.

The negative opinion of patents around here comes from the fact that most people here are programmers and the vast majority of software patents are trash. I've seen very few patents on software that are not "obvious to anyone skilled in the art," patents on abstract mathematical concepts, or patents for which there is ample prior art in the literature or open source code repositories.

Telling the difference requires a great deal of conceptual thinking. Patent examining is "strong AI hard." I think it is possible to expand on these ideas to some useful extent. Obviousness for example could be explained as first-order connectedness is the evolutionary/learning state-space graph. Something is obvious if getting from current art to the new idea requires only one "hop" through state space or traversal of a densely connected region of state space. Non-obvious means some kind of great leap across state space or long journey through many indirections was required. It's basically a measure of creative labor.

The RSA patent is often cited as an example of a decent software patent: original, a specific well-bounded invention for a specific purpose, and non-obvious in the extreme. Another example would be if whomever Satoshi is had patented proof of work block chains since that would also meet those criteria. Of course patents on cryptographic systems tend to result in them not being used, but that's a separate issue.
> sockpuppet problem

Ah, I long for the good old days when sockpuppets weren't a "problem" but a "feature", and a useful one at that.
It does become easier to focus on situations in which imminent death is anticipated and possibly observable. Think of the resources and attention devoted to the exoneration of death row inmates as they near execution, versus the attention given to them in the years/decades leading up to the execution. Nevermind the many, many more people who may be unjustly sentenced to life imprisonment.
That's great to hear, many many thanks!
I said snack intake because most people do eat some snack, and it's the easiest area to cut calories. Of course, he could alternatively have cut down his dinner portion by a slight amount for the same effect.

500 grams is ~10 calories per day for a year, and 10 calories is 1/25th of a Snickers bar or about one eight of a potato.

Either way, he'd get the same effect has the extra $3500 would have, which was what I found amusing and why I mentioned it.
Hey I'm kind of a libertarian and I haven't been diagnosed, and I like TFA. Keep searching for your "perfect piece"!
Before refrigeration and large glass tanks the time between edibility and putrefaction was probably on the order of hours.
I took a look at the coreos fedora project[0] as listed by you and others, but it looks immensely experimental right now. From the FAQ[1]:

> Fedora CoreOS is under active development and there are currently no downloads available. However, you will be able to download the images from one canonical location via the CoreOS and Fedora websites. The discussions around this development will happen on our community channels.

I actually really like Ansible -- it plays well with other tools, scales from small to large infrastructure management needs, and has great documentation with enough escape hatches to make hacky (but functional) solutions possible. I have less of a problem with ansible and more being forced to move more and more into tools that push me towards OpenShift when it doesn't make sense for me.

[0]: https://coreos.fedoraproject.org

[1]: https://coreos.fedoraproject.org/faq
Even if we agree he's guilty, the guy just spent 18 days in a cave with a bunch of kids, 10 of those without knowing if anyone would come or if they would all drown or starve, and never knowing if any - including him - would die.

Is prison really needed? Didn't he pay enough for his crime?
If thickness and mass market appeal really are not issues for you, you can probably make something like this yourself with small x86 boards:

https://hackaday.com/2016/09/30/very-very-tiny-x86-systems/
Sign up for a chance to test new AI powered calendar app
Hi, we are looking for early adopters to test + feed back on a new calendar/scheduling app.

http://catchapp.mobi/beta

If you are selected, we will send you the beta to try and then contact you for your feedback. As a thank you, you will get free access to the PRO version.

Thanks!
Building in a container gives you the portability benefit of having tools installed in a container.

But not building in your productiom container makes it smaller.

Dockerfiles can actually do both, via "mutli-stage builds". You can build in one container and in the same Dockerfiles copy files from that build container to your final container.

Some take a really extreme stance where the production container has nothing superfluous, not even a shell.
https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless
I think there's a limited market for them, because the value of aerodynamics depends heavily on how you ride.

Wind resistance increases with the square of the speed. Pros can ride at 30mph average on fast stages, where managing wind resistance is huge. A typical road bike commuter might average 15mph. All else being equal that's 1/4th the wind resistance (1/8th the power needed to overcome it), which is still big, but not the overwhelmingly important concern it is for the pros. A commuter on a utility bike who doesn't want to sweat might average only 10mph, so 1/9th the wind resistance (1/27th the power needed to overcome it). At that speed it doesn't feel so important.

For the pro, speed is the top priority, but the commuter also has to consider comfort, reliability, and visibility of other traffic (recumbents put your head lower down so it's harder for you to see over cars, and it's harder for them to see you). On heavily congested roads, e.g. central London, traffic might prevent you from going fast enough for wind resistance to be a major concern. If you commute over steep hills then reduced weight might benefit you more. But if you have a long and flat commute with light traffic, I think a super-efficient commuter bike would be valuable, and it's a pity that UCI rules discourage development of super-efficient bike technology.

EDIT: added power values as per HankB99's comment.
~20%. The difference however is a max of ~2.3x in that direction. 100% of the code is there, what do you suggest is 'messed' up. I probably ran the benchmarks 100s of times over 7 days trying to understand. That particular I posted seemed aligned with the others, but that was the stddev of 3 runs provided by Google Benchmark --benchmark_repetitions=3 I made it 10 and not much difference there. That was the point of 768X anomalies. The values are never like that w/ capped frequencies.
PEP 572: Assignment Expressions – intention to accept, near-final draft
Customers do "care" - the brand has a strong following. Is it the cult of mac? no, but the surface line is a strong brand bringing in billions.

What makes people make comments like this though? seems arrogant.
> you can't decouple commodity needs from the market

Why not? Isn't that what agricultural subsidies are for?
Steve Jobs talks consultants, hiring, and leaving Apple 1992
I thought I read about this thing a long time ago, maybe on Brian Krebs' blog (?) but I can't find it. It was in the context of ATMs but the idea seems the same.
All I can find at the moment, also on ATMs, is this from last year:

https://www.albany.edu/iasymposium/proceedings/2017/Study%20...

EDIT:
That paper is actually cited in this work. They don't discuss the novelty of their approach compared to this though. Just a bigger search space due to more keys?
Partly it is. I had issues with both sequelize and any-db. However, since not using them resulted in a lot of bespoke SQL and object mapping, I found MongoDB preferable to SQL without these libraries as well.
I also wonder this ... is McDonalds in SV a 6 figure job?
Maybe consider that it's how taxes are actually used instead of just higher taxes?
12 kids and 1 adult trapped in a cave is a discrete, solvable problem. Millions of kids in poverty much less so.

We're much better at dealing with time-bounded, localizable problems.

Stalin's quote about tragedies and statistics comes to mind.
OTOH maybe you shouldn't have to pay extra to keep your privacy?
Microsoft office syncs over OneDrive which just doesn't sync when there's no internet.
Recruiters can do ... what?

I'm also not sure what you mean by "ask for money to pass a test".
Well, I'm not and (do not want to be) a manager, but I've turned into lead dev of this project after the former lead left (we're friends though so I had a heads up way ahead of time).

But we started this procedure together after just miserable results from "just talking" to candidates. Keep in mind most of the candidates were (and all are now) contractors. We did whiteboarding at first. It didn't seem effective and I hated it anyway. We could only ask very simple things, write a for loop, write any kind of recursive function that counts to 10, etc.

So I setup a project with create-react-app and IntelliJ IDEA. I give a brief intro to the IDE, showing that saved changes are built automatically, and usually reloads in the browser automatically and they just have to worry about the particular fetch call in one case, or adding the code (I don't say event handler) to handle a button press.

The code is 30 lines in one, and 40 lines in the other problem, including braces, imports, etc. I understand how intense interviewing can be but these, to me and our team, are super easy problems.

I've gotten a fair bit of heat for that post, but no real suggestions on how to improve the process.
Efficiently transporting food or growing it where people need it is certainly a technological/logistical problem.
It seems like a limitation of this attack is that you must have the camera pointed at the keys ~1 minute from the last time it was used. (Presumably because the heat dissipates quite quickly.)

With that in mind a TOTP solution probably won't help, most systems that use 2FA will allow two adjacent codes to be considered valid to cope with "minor" clock-drift. If you're already using the computer 1 minute after the real owner has left it is possible you could reuse any valid code - if you captured it.
Here is the full YouTube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gk-9Fd2mEnI
In reality, though, the problem only gets slightly more different. Addresses are relatively uniform, and easy to Regexp (especially if you do not care for a few false positives).

That being said: No, you cannot just hide the address in an image - that would be illegal (the imprint information needs to be "easily parseable").
Personal tools and small projects are firmly in SQLITE territory for me. It just works and I can easily scale it to Postgres if necessary.
Thinking of nuclear weapons, why is there too little mainstream political support for unilateral nuclear disarmament in western democracies. I do not think there is much necessity for atleast UK and France to keep and further develop nuclear deterrence. For now atleast in UK the major reason for maintenance and renewal of nuclear weapons and their delivery platform seems to be that, they needs to be done lest thousands lose their jobs, which is a reason so out of 'Yes, Prime Minister'.
> the only drawback I was able to find is if you get a dud, you need to send it back to China for repairs which can run 80-100 USD.

Depends where you buy. Gearbest will ship and service it for you in EU. No idea about US. No affiliation. I hear Banggood is also fine but no first hand experience.

Also I’d rather get this Cube: https://techtablets.com/cube-i35/review/

It has the major advantage of being an actual laptop. It still has a touch screen if you’re into that sort of thing.

I really don’t understand the point of a mobile device that you can’t put on your lap or in your pocket. To each their own, I guess.
Typo in the title. Should be "Netflix"
He's not wrong.

I still maintain that debuggers are a design smell.
It needs to be a bluetooth replacement. No wires. Set it on top of a wireless charging station at a maximum.
I would challenge anyone to find a better computing platform for gaming than Windows. It's not about the hardware, it's the compatibility. People have been worrying about MS locking the platform down since Windows 8 was released nearly 6 years ago, and we're no closer to that now than we were back then. I'm an Apple user, but I'd be surprised if Apple didn't turn macOS into iOS before Microsoft turns Windows into iOS. That's just not how Microsoft operates.
Airbus Renames CSeries Canadian Jet as the A220
"there is certainly nothing to indicate that the on-screen non-warp acceleration is limited to 50-100G,"

The indication I refer to is that when you see a ship moving on screen from the perspective of another ship, it never suddenly blinks to "near lightspeed", because what that would look like is that in one frame the ship is there, and the next it isn't. That is never what happens. What happens is that the ship lumbers off, and slowly turns over the course of a couple of seconds, and can be seen to visibly accelerate in a way that the ship doesn't even cover its own length in less than five or six seconds. If you work the math it comes out on the order of 50-100G. Accelerating to near-lightspeed in a couple of seconds is several orders of magnitude larger than that.

Of course the ships don't blink around at near lightspeed; it wouldn't be photogenic. So all ships on all shows in all screens move within roughly a single order of magnitude of screen speed, no matter what the tech manuals say. Similarly, no matter what the claimed ranges of the weapons are, all engagements take place within a range where the two ships can clearly see each other, meaning no more than a handful of kilometers at most. No matter how far the ships are nominally apart from each other, a bolt of energy fired from one ship to another will take on the order of half a second to arrive. Almost no matter how zoomed in we are or are not, the energy bolts will subtend roughly the same amount of our eyes. If the ship is, say, firing on a planet, the bolts will perspective shrink maybe by a factor of two or three, if they shrink at all, rather than doing what they should do which is disappear entirely (except for perhaps one lit pixel if the bolt is sufficiently emissive). There's this one ST:TNG episode where the Enterprise uses phasers to quickly mine holes in the ground and when you start to see this sort of thing it's hard not to see the Enterprise as firing on a roughly 5-mile-diameter ball sitting right next to it, because if you follow the perspective of the "beam" that's what it implies about the size of the target.

Space isn't photogenic. Even today on earth, real combat takes place at ranges where you don't have a direct visual on the target a lot of the time. Any even vaguely realistic space combat will take place across ranges where you can't see a mile-sized ship with the naked eye. But that's not what they want to show. Consequently there's a massive, massive mismatch between the numeric claims of performance and what we actually see on the screen. So you might say something like "oh, the screen is maybe being symbolic", but then they routinely do things that imply what's on the screen is the real truth, such as in the one TNG movie where Data leaps between two ships. That's just one example, there's plenty of other situations like that.
"Still, all investors should probably sell their coins within the first six months, the study found."

This is a baffling statement, mostly because if you sell your "coins" to someone and they keep them too long, they will lose everything. Which could lead to liability questions.

I mean, you buy those coins and sell them as fast as you can, because you know that they won't be worth anything within in days or weeks, it could be argued that you committed security fraud. Well it could also argued that the ICO itself is already fraud, because of the huge risk involved.
Containers give control over the application's JRE version (without making a self-extracting executable).
at first, this seems completely harmless, but there are a few scenarios in which this could potentially be a viable attack.

I doubt it's much use on computers, but imagine someone rigging a candid infrared camera across the street from an ATM. You'd block the cameras view while typing, but then you leave and it's game over.
Considering how for Microsoft is moving to open up their services, I have a hard time believing the sky is falling crap. They're embracing Progressive web apps, keeping their js engine updated, allow apps on xbox/windows and they've ported everything to every common platform on their core suite(s).
There often isn't even any "investment" in patents. Richard Feynmann would describe how his superiors would just walk around the labs and say, so! who has some ideas we could patent? And Feynmann's fellow scientists would say, well, you could grab this nuclear reactor and stick it into a submarine to power it, but that's pretty dumb and obvious. "Nonsense!" replied the superiors. "Patent that right away!"

I don't know how true it is that a lot of patents come just from employees sitting around navel-gazing in their free time and aggressive management telling them to write down those ideas so they can file more patents, but it seems believable that it would happen at least sometimes.
I tried it this morning (lineageOS). Got the arm binary from github, `chmod +x`-ed it on my computer and scp:ed it over to my phone. Ran the binary and got a quick flash of the screen and a `exit status 1`.

Have not looked into it more than that. Since `browsh` depends on headless firefox, which is not in the termux default repository (it seems), I guess it won't work because termux does not have access to the firefox system app, if that even shits with the headless-functionality. (but here I'm just guessing, a work around may be available)

Would be cool to see working though.
A Brief Guide on How to Get Business Value from Reinforcement Learning
This is mostly just a rant about someone's semantic pet peeves, in which they set up and knock down a bunch of straw men in succession.

Nobody thinks you can start from a completely blank slate and learn something comprehensively in five minutes. But if you're already a JavaScript developer who has an environment configured, an editor you like, an understanding of what days looks like in JS, and you know what a function looks like, yeah, I can probably convey the marginal knowledge you need to know the very basics of react in about five minutes.

It'd be wrong for me to act like I could teach you EVERYTHING about react development in that time, and it's equally absurd for the author to claim anyone really believes that.
Conversational Design and Modern Front-End Approaches at Front End United
Hack your landscaping to be edible
> The public benefit of a patent is that the information is public
[..]
> The cost to the public of patents are that such use must be deferred

But who does this benefit? The author points out that it benefits big/old ("stagnant") corporations rather than innovators. And that still holds, no?

Here's a thought experiment: if you're a small innovator and you invent something new (let's be evil: a software algorithm), what benefit does disclosure bring you? It's better to keep it secret, because big/old ("stagnant") companies will find legal loopholes in your patent application to work around it. Or, they will run it in the cloud and not tell you at all that they're running your exact algorithm. The innovator would never know.

Big/old ("stagnant") companies, on the other hand, have enough legal manpower to sue you out of existence regardless of whether their patent is valid or not. It's not the patent, it's the legal process that will bankrupt the small innovator.

Can patents be molded to protect the small innovator? Because isn't that the intent? Regardless of whether that protection results in monopoly, disclosure or both.
Russian spacecraft breaks record for fastest trip to space station
It was the middle of winter in the arctic compared to any shooting engagement between the Warsaw Pact nations and NATO.

Proxy wars every decade are basically world peace compared to any realistic scenario as to how a shooting war between the major powers would have played out.
Wouldn't "well-tuned" in this case mean "an emotional system which improves reasoning where logical thinking fails". And in that case isn't the title of the article a tautology?

I think most would agree that a "good" emotional system can be an aid to reason. The reason many think we shouldn't trust emotions is because most systems are "bad" (as in, it acts counter to capacity to reason).
The $549 model with 8gb RAM and 128GB SSD storage interests me. I currently own a 10.5" iPad Pro but would have considered the Surface Go had it existed when I bought the iPad.
It's what happens when profit is not your primary (or even secondary) goal. That's why my personal company will never go public. From what I understand it would force me to put profit as my primary goal, even if I value quality more than profit.