skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The main reason cargo bikes are up for sale where I live is either because the kids get too big and have their own bikes or because the cargo bike ends up not being used after a spell of 'green thinking' and then people end up in bad weather or have a near miss with a car. (A near hit, according to Carlin.)

The one I ended up buying needed some tightening up of the main support bearing for the box (the weak point in any cargo bike with three wheels), adjustment of the brakes and shifter cable and it needed new lights. Since then it's seen a year of heavy service and it still rolls along just fine (took it for a 30km spin just today with a lot of gear and two kids in it).
delegated democracy (page rank) is pretty ideal but complex
Yes, landlords are limited in the reasons they may enter and renters do have rights but at the end of the day the landlord still owns the property. A tenant changing the locks has to be illegal under any sane jurisdiction.
Have you considered fading the text of low score claims?

Currently my attention is drawn to good and bad claims equally. Only after reading do I check the score and realize the claim is incorrect.

It wastes my time reading bad claims and the thought will stay with me regardless of quality.
I agree it's simple to use aws in this case. I meant specifically the claim that "No open source product will meet the requirement". It may not be the financially optimal solution, but that's not "open source" specific.
Because the class also involved students who had Macs.
Expect a bill for a new door.
What about high end chefs gender balance? One would argue the education shouldn’t stay in the way here.
I'm of two minds about this. Like most everyone, of course, I have this fear. I ponder the ways it is not adaptive. I find it lessens over time as I consider this.
Are there simpler heuristics than page rank? Perhaps a reputation score determines how much your vote is worth?
I feel after a brief initial read of the landing page that Kialo might be trying to do too much... It seeks to have debates over hot-topics in the public, but also wants to be a tool for private debates, or just for "private discussion?"

Then there's also a catering towards this being used in enterprises? I'm not sure if this is supposed to be a product, but the entrepreneur in me screams "too large of a scope!"
My piano has 92 keys. (Bosendorfer 225). 85 keys was pretty common until the 1920s. And the third pedal is relatively new. Some pianos (Fazioli) have 4 pedals.
It took a fair old while to spin up. The design is idiosyncratic but consistent.

Thinking about your habits will always be useful to you. Be the architect of this living art and your artful living. Go forth, sir, and be that which creates itself. Build your existential lifetool, reconstruct yourself, and ride your liferaft down the river of happiness

It is about time I reconstructed myself and incorporated a decent existential lifetool into my river journey.
DNS66 is pretty much always running on my phone for a more pleasant web browsing experience (ad blocking)

DNS66 establishes a VPN interface, and redirects DNS server traffic to it. The VPN interface filters the traffic, only allowing queries for hosts that are not blacklisted.

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.jak_linux.dns66/
Light switches should disappear. Lights should turn themselves on as needed or when asked to.
The generation before my parents (i.e., my grandparents) were born around the time that The Jungle was published, which describes food so tainted that the outcry lead to the formation of the Food and Drug Administration

The 50s were full of canned and processed foods too.
His book, "The Nature of Order" is also worth reading, even if it goes practically mystical. There is a theme in thinkers like Alexander, Hofstadter, and less known but tangentially related for his "constructal law," Bejan, where there a kind of aesthetic abstraction yields useful heuristics for more concrete problems. I'm sure there are many others, but these other two were on the brain recently. (Availability bias, surely)

Hofstadter gives you an intuition about complexity and formal hardness of problems. Alexander provides intuition about a kind of quality of reasoning, where from Bejan there is a sense of quality of relational change.

Reading Christopher Alexander is weirdly meditative and good for a technologists soul. I'm always happy to see him rediscovered.
As an American, I've never understood why those god damn oversized bathing suits are such a thing.

Also I find it pretty funny that the parent comment is afraid to be naked in the bathtub with their 4 year-old. That seems...sorrowful, to put it lightly
I did everyone a benifit by opening the holy war: https://www.kialo.com/tabs-vs-spaces-16646/16646.0=16646.1

I'm surprised this was not yet posted on the platform.

As for the platform it was very easy to use. The UI is simple and it makes you flesh out both sides of the argument to the best of your ability before it is publicly visible. This dynamic is very interesting as even before the topic is visible it will appear as if there is considerable participation in the topic's discussion. I bet that will definitely drive participation.

I'm very interested in seeing how this shapes up. Love the idea and the implementation!
Isn't it far more likely, given all we know, that western governments and elites will follow lead?

They are already heavy surveillance, and have a long history of suppressing dissidents (from labor massacres to McCarthyism, and from the '68 Democratic Convention and Kent State, to black rights demonstrations, OWS, and such -- to name but a few).

If they have such tools at their hands, they'll use them.

It's not a love for freedom that doesn't let them, but that without full enforcement, they risk having such measure come against them. But once full enforcement is feasible...
Good list. I'm also a HUGE fan of Antennapod [0], a podcast player app. It's simple, easy to use, and has built-in speed adjustment, so I can listen to some lower-information density channels at 2x speed.

[0] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/de.danoeh.antennapod/
Depends on what you mean by "rational". My understanding is that many flat-earthers of course don't seriously believe the earth is flat, and the argument is made as a form of artistic expression, which is to say that it is meant to demonstrate that rationality can be abused and does not inherently lead to truth.

One of Asimov's I, Robot stories did a similar thing, with a robot on a space station making rational arguments against the existence of earth.

Of course, there are also nutters...
The OS Armageddon Is Coming
Have you considered implementing a sentiment API for topics on this site? I imagine the data of what people are liking, viewing, and interacting with will be a goldmine.
Dr Rhonda Patrick and Peter Attia are two very prominent researchers that I follow in longitivity and neural degeneration. they discuss APOE4 as being a strong indicator of Alzheimer’s susceptibility. If you have It in your genome it’s scary but also a lot of research goes into preventative means.
For example anti inflammation diet is a strong factor because any diseases especially Alzheimer’s is triggered by chronic inflammation. They swear by tumeric (curcumin) extract and probiotics.
Also a lot of biomarkers are good for measuring as well as some activittieis like of course exercise but also saunas.

Alzheimer’s is definitely terrifying but leaps and bounds have been made in prevention.

I’m working on a tool to help monitor and track some of these preventative measures: Meports.com
It's may be that Stonehenge's labourers concentrated from sparsely populated remote locations in Britain and overseas.

Analysis of pig bones at Durrington Walls - probably a work camp - showed that this animal had been brought in from Scotland.
Can't tell if trolling or serious.
Perhaps this "war on science", however naive and inarticulate its proponents, is actually a war on the abuses of technology, such as the parent describes.

In which case, not only it's not the real origin of some upcoming dark age, but the last voice of freedom before it.
Is per capita the right way to rank this? A camera covers an area. The same picture can have 1 person it or 10000 people in it.

If you're the only person on a route, and I have one camera at a point on that route.. is that really the same as 100 people on a route, with 100 cameras along that same route? I would say not. In the 2nd instance, I've taken 100 pictures of you (and 99 other people), and know in more detail what you're doing.

US and China have a similar land area.. so we can assume in China you're caught on camera more frequently. I say assume, because we don't know how much area these cameras on covering--which is the more important stat. There's a big difference between a wide area camera, and a security camera outside an entrance pointed at the ground.
It's also a color shift that ~1 out of 20 people don't perceive. (~8% men, ~0.5% women). Red is close to a universal color for alert/danger/warning, but green much less so for the pro. Something to consider, at least.
Regarding democratizing, the problem are the troll hordes out there. One person with many followers tweets out a particular claim and then you'll have the strangest things suddenly appearing at the top. It's the same reason Internet polls don't really work. And the reason we consider the default perspective ALL votes, problematic (we are building something here soon). This is especially a problem due to our topics, primarily very controversal issues. These are the type of topics that very often get edit-locked on Wikipedia because of edit wars and we deal exlusively with them. That's why we built the suggestion system (https://support.kialo.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003791445-Sug...) and 5 permission levels (https://support.kialo.com/hc/en-us/articles/115003877705-Par...).

Suggested claims that were not accepted, aren't deleted. users often argue back and forth with admins on those claims, often edit them and then get them accepted. Very often it's really just a clarification or "could you please add sources" or "do you mind moving this claim over there".

Duplicates are thornier. What we have considered, is linking them to the ones that they supposedly are duplicates of, so you could see them there.

That's possible and we might do it, but we really don't get that many complaints about them. It's really just a problem in the debates with >1k claims. but as more debates grow, this might become more of an issue and then we'll build that.

Thanks for your input.
As if we really need any more reasons to encourage software engineers to bathe less...
This is in no way typical (and 10% seems very high but it obviously depends on deal size). There will be certain cases where management carveouts are part of a deal, but it's far from the norm. Executives who join at a later stage also receive the same type of common stock / options that the founders have, and they typically don't receive much of an equity payout in comparison.
>Where is the NYT article about the US' dystopian dreams?

Well, you don't shit where you live, or where those that pay you live.
This is exactly like arguman's approach:
http://en.arguman.org/
" I know this isn't actually true "

It's true.

A confluence of vague definitions, poor implementations, bad documentation ... and this is the web we have. It's the tip of the iceberg, and the painful life of anyone doing html5 work, it's 'not fun' for anyone who's been exposed to regular programming because the problems you spend your day solving mostly should not be problems to begin with.
iPhone X – Memory
I don't know, as a man I would rather my wife know more about cooking than lock picking. There is nothing greater than a woman showing her appreciation by cooking you something nice. On the other hand they are much more happy when I buy them a designer handbag, and the lock on it is just symbolic. Basically they don't need to know anything except from bearing kids, the rest men can and are doing better anyway, including cooking.
> Remember the round cornered buttons? Yeah, I remember too. The only way it's okay for a designer to use them now is if it's #ironic. So keep it functional, not decorative. The round corners were never suiting any purpose.

But you have to choose some shape for them to be; why is square the default/baseline, and round the modification (the one with 'something added')? You could equally well say to, "just use round corners, keep it functional, not decorative—we austere users of the internet don't require any flashy straight-edged ornamentation."

I'm sure someone can give me an argument about how the straight edges make it easier for the eyes to associate aligned items or something like that, but if you're just slightly rounding some rectangles, not using ovals or something, the difference will be negligible.

The problem isn't introducing aesthetic qualities for their own sake—it's only a problem when you exchange something with a concrete purpose because you give higher value to the purely aesthetic thing.

(The quote uses the term 'decorate,' which ordinarily I think is a good choice, since in the case of decorations, you're adding content, which can lead to useless clutter—but! my opening argument here is basically that choosing round over square is not decorative in that sense.)

So, I'm left with the feeling that the quote really just comes down to justifying the newer bandwagon.
There are also religious extremists who believe that a flat earth is strongly implied in the Bible. If I remember correctly, they point to a passage in which someone is shown the whole world, and the “idea” is that obviously you can’t see the whole surface of a sphere at once. sigh

Plus yes, nutters, obligate contrarians, and conspiracy theorists.
Yeah that's not actually true for a minimum wage (7.25 USD per hour is fedral minimum) employee in most states. Start by at least making the minimum wage a living wage for most individuals as the bare minimum.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/budget-...

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/14/only-point-1-percent-of-us-m...
>Yeah the only end of it is gonna be when people with such diseases stop having children, but just pointing out such an obvious solution generates all kinds of scorn from the people you are talking to

Perhaps because not having existed can be equally as tragic as having existing but having a disease?

Lots of people are living today who were born blind, or with this or that genetic tendency. And they live their lives as best as they can.

Is the argument that these people better they weren't born at all?
But it doesn't seem unreasonable to see present-day China as a potential future state of the USA|Western Europe and want to prevent that. (Not to mention wanting to think about how change might be effected in China. Hearing about what regular Mandarin citizens face is rough enough, and the situation for the Uyghurs is of course worse.)
It seems your logic has been overriden by your fear.

If, as you hypothesize, one loses "conscious experience forever" when they die, how could they consciously experience "endless oblivion"?

How is fearing nonexistence different from a child fearing nonexistent monsters under their bed?
I misread your comment, thanks

These terms are by no means confined to distressed finance. Many unicorns got their “billion dollar” number using adverse terms such as these

Which explains this outcome, Fanduel was a “unicorn”:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4010443-fanduel-unicorn-bac...
> I'm very interested in solutions to this, as a bay area resident - somehow separating units into "the poor people houses" and "the rest of the people houses" doesn't quite seem like the right long term solution to anything.

The real problem is that we do taxes wrong. We have a progressive tax schedule on the tax side, but then we want to have benefits phase outs on the benefits side. But these are really opposites that cancel each other. It's also very hard to reason about, because if you have multiple benefits programs that phase out in the same place, you can accidentally produce these >100% marginal rates at specific income levels.

And progressive tax schedules are very expensive. If you e.g. reduces taxes by 10% on incomes under $40,000 then someone who makes $40,000 pays $4000 less in taxes. But so does everyone who makes more than $40,000, because they now pay $4000 less on the first $40,000 of their income.

The answer is to not phase out benefits whatsoever, let that be the progressive component of the system, and use a single uniform tax rate. The uniform rate supplies the revenue to compensate for the lack of phase outs, but will never produce a cliff.
I find myself wondering if there's any correlation between (a) enjoying being in a hot tub surrounded by snow and (b) preferring to sleep covered by a heavy blanket but with your feet sticking out.
> Perhaps this "war on science", however naive and inarticulate its proponents, is actually a war on the abuses of technology, such as the parent describes.

No, it definitely isn't.

It's the willful and deceitful spreading of lies and portraying of scientists as bogeyman rather than the bringers of bad news. It's the purposeful act of dumbing down citizens and putting lies instead of facts in their heads to use 15 years down the line when those in school today become tomorrows voters.

That has absolutely nothing to do with abuses of technology (of which there are plenty, no argument there). The biggest abusers of tech tend to be those in power, closely followed by corporations, but the second is happy as long as they make bank, the first as long as they can use it to cement their position in power.

Look no further than what has happened at the EPA to get an idea of how incredible this whole story is.
I'm confused. Why can't you use React?
For milk to come the cow needs to deliver a calf. How long will you allow the calf to drink her mums milk, before you decide that calf hurts your bottom line?

Most commonly the calf is removed from the mom in a few hours, after which the mum is crying for her kid for several days.

Dairy is super cruel, besides it being very unhealthy for humans (especially humans after their weening phase).
I understand that most western countries have societal controls grown over the past centuries. The Chinese did not, and are catching up quickly by implementing similar controls as we have. But now, it's the digital age, and as such they are using any available technology to implement these societal controls. From this perspective, it's completely normal what the Chinese do. Seen from western eyes it does look a bit scary though. We must realize however that our society also has firm societal controls setup in many things we do.

China is now the dominant world player, this year it has surpassed the US on many areas (IT and military-industrial complex are the only US-dominant areas). Much more importantly, China is full-throttle developing it's trading strategy: The silk railway to Europe, trade dominance in Africa, footholds in Greece, Poland and other EU countries, large export deficit to the US. It won't be long before China will totally dominate trading in the world market.
At that point, China can set the requirements. When that happens, traders are likely to need a WeChat account, too. No good rep? No trade.
Nice! The http://wttr.in website shows a nice report too.

If you use emacs, I've made this [1][2] which gets its data from DarkSky.net.

[1] https://github.com/cadadr/elisp/blob/master/forecast.el

[2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cadadr/elisp/master/foreca...
Is it possible to link to a duplicate claim?

If I start to enter a pro or con to a claim, and it shows me a duplicate claim with a different parent, what is the correct action for me to take?
That's silly. This is God we're talking about, if God wants to show you the entire surface of the earth at once I'm sure they can pull it off. Probably still has the blueprints if nothing else.
Dairy is very unhealthy for grown-up humans...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3c_D0s391Q
I think you are wrong. It will be hard to roll back any system which abolishes violent crime. The people will accept it as long as it not abused that much.
I recommend doing these under three separate but related domains, or at least separate subdomains, and on separate infrastructure.

This way, you can allocate an entire domain (or subdomain) for each function, and if you run into problems with your marketing mail going down the tubes because someone decides to put your IP address ranges on a blacklist, that doesn't automatically nuke your main corporate mail and your transactional mail with your existing customers.
No, you'll never get preferred shares working for a startup, so don't even ask for them; it would also highlight a misunderstanding of what those shares are.

Preferred shares are for investors, and they have 'preference' during liquidity, i.e. if the company is sold, they get their $X back first, then the rest is split among all shareholders etc..

'Clawback' terms are almost always applied to investors, not employees, in which case, by virtue of type distinction, you'll never get those.

Though it's reasonable to ask about certain aspects of share rights, there's no way on earth a regular startup is going to give you all the details and fine-print on their stocks that'll give you all then information you'd be after.

Unfortunately, basically nobody gets this information when joining a startup. Even later stage investors don't necessarily get to see all the terms of earlier investors, depending on the situation.
Support is a big thing as well for business software. When you buy "off the shelf" package from commercial vendor a large chunk of the cost is usually in support contracts.

If you have a bespoke system built from open source components it can be difficult to find people able to support it.

I think there are pros and cons to both approaches. Sometimes it can be frustrating trying to shoehorn the vendor supplied peg into your business's particular hole.

I've heard a lot of people over the years complain to my manager "XYZ is crap I could write a better solution using ABC" the reply is usually along the lines of "Yeah but are you willing to spent the next 10 years supporting it."
I’m with you, but religious extremists and rationality are like oil and napalm. It always struck me as odd that for religious types, “because god said so” isn’t enough. I guess it highlights a difference between just faith and scriptural literalism.
I saw my father die a slow painful death.

Even the opiates, and benzodiazepines weren't enough.

His last words to ne were, "When will this end?"

I kinda died with my father that day.

He was an angry man, but I loved him. His painful death, along with all the sibling greed ruined the rest of a very fragile family.

My sister was fooling around with his meds so he would give her more money. Yea--I wrote her off that day, and haven't talked to her in 14 years. She is a very cunning business women in LA now, but is personally misserable, or so I've been told.

My point is I saw an ugly, painful experience.

I know I will commit suicide before going what he went through.
You couldn't just let it go...next up emacs vs vi? :)

At least we have a >1k claims Star Wars The Last Jedi (https://www.kialo.com/7055) and Rebel alliance would defeat the United Federation (https://www.kialo.com/9394) debate already. :)

Thank you for your kind words!
Shawn Hargreaves first created the allegro game library on Atari st that was eventually ported to dos, windows and everything else. It had GUI framework inspired by GEM. That was my gateway drug for software development. Really straight forward and easy to comprehend stuff. We’ve lost a lot imo.
High Speed Running and Sprinting Profiles of Elite Soccer Players
Oh, neat! I'm currently taking the AI for Robotics class through Georgia Tech OMSCS, so this is a topic I am interested in, and in the language I currently use professionally. Thank you for sharing!