skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is not Reddit. You first need to show evidence that women are paid 60% of what men are paid for the same jobs. Once you can’t (because the evidence says the opposite) you then need to show evidence that women choose jobs and make career choices different from men because of cultural reasons. Once you can’t do that either because the evidence shows the opposite then you’ll need to adjust your beliefs in light of the evidence like a proper reasonable person. After which you can stop telling all women their decisions to live life differently from men makes them inferior to men. It’s both hateful to men and women when you do that.
But they get to leave in lifeboats first along with children, so men get compensated with extra pay for that service.
That's backwards reasoning.
How do you manage team passwords?
We using in one ops team a central keepass for external web services. This brings a lot of effort when an employee leaves the company. Basically we need to change all passwords. How do you handle this?
The lobsters they were given were pretty old by the time they got to the consumer so they were more than likely rotten.
"Do you need to go potty? Maybe yes, maybe no; why don't you sit and try to go?" has been immensely helpful. There's a Daniel Tiger song for every situation!
What kind of school are you referring to when you mention “elite math school”?
didn't bother to read the article, but is it perhaps partly due to the fact that women are more likely to report their injuries compared to men? There can be a lot of pressure on men to just "suck it up" and not report injuries.
Yes! You use the trace.on_selection method to register a callback function. Here's an example: https://github.com/jonmmease/plotly_ipywidget_notebooks/blob...
I'd publish the name and maybe a small photo of the person so that he/she can get opinions by people he/she happens to see during the day, but adding any personal address would be like inviting criminals to stalk the person.
No matter how much we hate those corrupt lowlives, we must fight them from within the law fence. Keep in mind that those people control most of the information sources, and those they don't control are mostly aligned on their side anyway, so it is safe to assume that everything will be used against us.
A news announcement such as: "Activist burns politician's house. All safe including their loved puppy" (cue photos showing the puppy big sweet eyes) won't bring a single person to sympathize with the cause, but rather make even more enemies. This is a war where every move has to be planned with extreme care; hic sunt leones.
I'm always amazed at how scripts intented to use only POSIX features become buggy when dash is used instead of bash.
I get that Democrats and Republicans have very, very different views on the role of government, and especially the EPA.

Still, Scott Pruitt seemed almost cartoonishly evil in this role. I can understand if you believe the environment is better protected by some other means, but when your primary goal is to basically continue acting as a coal industry lobbyist, methinks head of the EPA is not a job you should have.
I would think insect protein could easily play the role that soy protein does in lots of 'mystery meat' processed foods like hot dogs or hamburgers. That said, I am skeptical it could be produced more cheaply than soy.
There is still accountability when a driver causes harm to someone on the road, pedestrian or otherwise. He's suggesting that AVs shouldn't be accountable when they harm pedestrians under abnormal circumstances. I think that's a lot different than simply making roads amenable to drivers.

In regards to my initial point, government made regulations around cars after there was already an overwhelming market demand for them.
> “It has been scientifically proven that overall physical fitness — not gender — correlates to injury,”

I think the takeaway should be how do we reduce injury with respect to different body types
The problem is that when Wal-Mart shows up all the local businesses die but for the ones that sell stuff that Wal-Mart doesn't. That's usually just porn and adult toys with the occasional guns and/or liquor store.
The common workaround is to pass in a dictionary that's then used for return values. Workable, but seriously? Is that the best they could do?
Also, it seems to be questionable how efficient crickets actually are when it comes to Protein according to some studies:

> Although it has been suggested that crickets reared for human or livestock consumption may result in a more sustainable supply of protein, this study finds that such conclusions will depend, in large part, on what the crickets are fed and which systems of livestock production they are compared to. When fed grain-based diets at a scale of economic relevance, populations of crickets in this study showed little improvement in PCE compared to broiler chickens fed similar diets. When fed processed, organic side-streams of relatively high quality, cricket populations achieved a harvestable size. Yet, whether crickets could be raised economically on substrates of similar quality and level of processing requires further analysis. The unprocessed and lower-quality organic side-streams tested in this study could not support adequate growth and survival of cricket populations. Therefore, the potential for crickets to supplement the global supply of dietary protein appears to be more limited than has been recently suggested.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....
Well, that depends.

You can take 25% tax free.

And yes, you have to pay tax on the lot, but If you are paying 60% then momma, you are having a retirement and a half.
The Secrets of the Wood Wide Web (2016)
Don't think there would be much evolutionary pressure to have less pain during childbirth but feeling less pain when injured during hunting (a historically male activity) would certainly be useful and I could see it being selected for.
I think that's an acceptable requirement. After all, you wouldn't expect an app to work without downloading it. If instead of using lzma, gzip were used, I bet you'd be able to include some code that would unzip itself using the browser's unzip capability. I am not sure how much code that would take though.
Great non-profit: pro-bono SEO help for startups
The thing is you haven't asked anything, you've made your own assumptions and presented them as facts. There is a single accelerator that provides the proton beams: the LHC, and there are two independently designed and built huge main detectors where collisions happen and two independent collaborations, one for each, that actually make the measurements and then analyze the data of just theirs. At the LHC there's ATLAS and CMS, they don't share any data nor staff, and both of them have found the Higgs. Once they publish their results, they are statistically combined so you have a single value for whatever property at the PDG. This is how it's done, for obvious scientific-method-done-right reasons, at CERN at least since 1978 with UA1 and UA2. But you're not interested in what's really going on, because you're well versed in politics AKA bullshit, so you can't even grasp that there are competent people actually doing their job, with stellar standards let me add, and I know because I've seen a lot of bullshit in action almost everywhere in this fake it until you make it society we're building so merrily, but not there. You wouldn't believe it, people actually working? surely they're scamming us honest maligners, eh?

I left out a relevant factoid. It's almost impossible for a scientist to become CERN staff, they mostly hire engineers. There are about 25 physicists at the Theory division and a few more scattered around with a fellowship. Usually scientists are paid by universities or investigation institutes from all around the world. Countries pay their contribution to the budget because it's not a very good idea for your R&D to miss it.
Step one: Alienate existing users.
It doesn't work that way. Waymo's remote control does not even support direct manual remote control. It just lets the remote operator give some direction to the onboard systems.
To some extent, this is not surprising. However, the conclusions that are going to be drawn from the evidence are pretty unsubstantiated.

Women and men have different physiologies, particularly in terms of how the typical "average" build works out and in terms of the configuration of hips. The finding that women are going to have more hip injuries than men should not consequently be surprising, and other injuries relating to, for example, carrying more than they should be carrying, being relatively higher in women is also to be expected.

However, the problem is that the methodology ends up being poor. People advocating for integration of women into the infantry or other physically intensive jobs are not expecting to use different physical fitness criterion for women and men for these jobs, so comparing average women to average men is not the appropriate metric to be evaluating them.
Hi - thanks for outlining your case. My Cython know-how is limited to qualify any kind of comparison with Cython. Its just that my attempt with Nim went surprisingly smooth for me. Coming from some of the older languages I use and love, the reliability of the newer Nim is pleasing and coding is fun. I ended up eliminating all Python code from my back-end. Because Nim is statically compiled I can deploy pieces of it anywhere just like a compiled C program, without dependencies, and it means a lot in my particular situation.
The New York Times doesn't allow you to cancel your subscription online.
“The White House cited this nuclear nexus in a May memo instructing Rick Perry, the Secretary of Energy, to force utilities to buy power from unprofitable nuclear and coal plants.”

I hope people noticed the part about subsidizing coal. Natural gas is so cheap that coal is no longer competitive, which is a good thing.

The administration is extending the life of coal plants that aren’t profitable.
It's funny/scary how much less sophisticated we humans are than how imagine ourselves to be.
I was scratching my head at the popularity of this article before seeing the author. In my opinion, it's a rose-tinted picture of success as filtered through Patrick Collison's extremely unusual life experiences, and comes off as terribly naive without that context.
What a wonderful story.
It all comes down to risk and reward. Would Northrup go all 'agiley' and get this done quickly? Sure if you paid them Time and Material for the work and let them off the hook for any operational failures.
No-one wants to do the work for 5% profit. No-one wants to hear the USAF want compensation when your program gives them a wrong answer and you lose a plane.
So, we write a spec, and all agree. The we do a design, and all agree, Then we deliver and requirements have changed. The nature of the world we live in.
This is the wrong way to go about things; I'm a very strong beleiver in the principle of equality, that is, the equality in all social dealings of men and women, between races, abled and disabled, those of different nationalities, of different professions etc. But it must be stressed that asserting people have the same capabilities isn't the right way to go about it. Your principle will fail the second that we get to some imbalance which can't be whisked away as you're doing now - for example, you wouldn't make the same claim about someone with Down's syndrome being compared to someone without.

Your failing is that you predicate the idea of equality on utilitarian grounds, that is to say, you believe people should be treated equally, and so you try to justify this by saying they're actually the same in mental and physical tasks. This doesn't work, and it can't be generalised. There are differences, but we should be saying: those differences shouldn't matter to the worth of a person (if we really must go about considering people in the economic sense of having value, which I think is a concept worth repudiating).

The claim you're making seems much more like a strawman, so I'd be inclined to say you're trolling; a strawman very similar to yours was made by Tugan more than 100 years ago, and quickly put down by V.I. Lenin[0]:

>It goes without saying that in this respect men are not equal. No sensible person and no socialist forgets this. But this kind of equality has nothing whatever to do with socialism. If Mr. Tugan is quite unable to think, he is at least able to read; were lie to Lake the well-known work of one of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, directed against Dühring, he would find there a special section explaining the absurdity of imagining that economic equality means anything else than the abolition of classes.

[0] https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm
I had a famous cancer researcher at a world famous cancer treatment hospital tell me (paraphrasing) “we won’t ever see the kinds of breakthroughs we saw in the past because we were reckless back then, foolish even. It was the Wild West.”

I’m not saying I want the highways to be a Wild West for self driving cars, but it’s worth admitting it would probably accelerate the pace of innovation.
The Wikipedia article mentions that chitin's degradation products are still recognized. Do you think these chitinases would break the bonds enough to bypass immune recognition?
The lawsuit alleges Harvard didn't even meet the applicants.

It looks pretty bad for them.
Same here. I read GEB in grad school, as a distraction from the hassles of my thesis work. And I skipped over parts that mystified me.

But then, many years later, I read IAASL. And then reread GEB. Which I could then appreciate much better.
> In the context of a messaging system anything other than E2EE is pretty worthless as far as I'm concerned.

To each their own. I've made a choice that I'd rather take the risk of leaking data to Telegram (real but I've reason to belive kow risk) than leaking metadata to Facebook (a given).

I'm considering Signal though.

But don't lie and say not not encrypted when you mean not end-to-end-encrypted.
You know, I think you're right. I just went to their admissions page. They have no mention of "being the best", etc. It's all about affordability, diversity, inclusiveness, etc.

I guess at this point the myth is self-perpetuating, and Harvard just lets it be.

They could probably end the lawsuits in a minute if they just up and said "we're not the best and don't care about wanting the best."
OK now here's an excellent use for Google Duplex. Using a robot to fool a person: annoying. Using a robot to fool someone annoying: fine!
Giant 'Trump Baby' could fly over London for president's visit
As a fellow rut feeling 30 year old I would love to hear more about your experience. If you’re okay sharing of course :)
I agree. I studied at Cambridge, then did my Master's elsewhere, and there is a qualitative difference between the two. The difference in the amount of work you are expected to do is vast (Cambridge was more than double the workload, on average), and the instructors drive you forward, even if it means going beyond the strict confines of what you need to know.

There's also a difference in mindset - there's an appreciation of knowledge for knowledge's sake, and there's a presumption that you can get up to speed with the basics of things quickly even if it is outside of your subject. I distinctly remember discussing calcium channels with the medical students (at an event where there was also a lot of drinking), and discussing economics with the economists.
Alternatively, backup your Google stuff before you get locked out, then figure out a way to read the backup (MBOX format), and you'll have that answer, exactly.

https://takeout.google.com/
Can we fork religion to support this feature pls?
I'll definitely be giving it a try again at some point in the future, or one of the alternatives. I learned a ton even just dipping my toe in the waters.
Of course it is unlikely but the history of the world is long and statistically it is a certainty.
Not sure if you are a die hard social constructivist or just trolling, but your last point was true. Each gender should have the same opportunity.
The breakdown of incidence reports strongly suggests that the cause is entirely predictable: loading up individuals to carry more than they can carry in good health, which is going to affect women (which are disproportionately smaller and less massive) more than men. The study made no attempt to control for that, which is quite frankly irresponsible.
You write the 60s, but wasn't the FKA passed in the 1930s? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Kidnapping_Act
A blockchain software project case study
I really like a lot of things about Vue. I was apprehensive about using JSX when I first started using React, and I also did not like setState. I think the real issue, though, was that I wasn't thinking functionally. I now rarely write a stateful component, and when I do, it's usually once, for the entire application, or maybe for a few large subtrees if the app is very large. State kept alive by parameters is extremely powerful and elegant (just read about gen_server in Erlang or the State monad). I am never a fan of two way data binding as an alternative. It's extremely hard to reason about, and it's not nearly as composable or simple as a tree of functional transformations. So I think that, if you compare Vue to React Component classes, Vue can be quite nice, but the reality is that idiomatic React should have you writing 80%+ small, simple, composable functions with no state, and you really can't get any syntactically barer then that. It's also the way I teach React. When you first see a function going from state to jsx, it really just makes so much sense, and you ask yourself why you'd ever bother with anything else.
Yeah, I know about OS/400 using the extra bytes on hard drives for the pointer tags (not a checksum), but what I had in mind were data CDs, whose canonical sector size was 2048.
Please listen closely, our menu options have changed
There's a thought. The evil of IVRs goes far beyond cancellations, though. Warranties, insurance claims, anything where the company "wins by default" admits labyrinthine IVRs as a dark pattern, and some of those are "interactive" enough that certified mail winds up introducing as much friction as the IVR itself.
I heard that women are more stoical with visceral pain and men cope better with "exterior" pain. This makes sense but I've no idea if it's really true.
How not to review code
It's absolutely true. Take a look at these papers, they have data on how much test prep increases scores:

* http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/Briggs_Theeffectofadmissionst...

* https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/89/2/435/223527...

There is very little room for training in the SAT.
The fact that all SGX instructions are implemented with microcode makes it insecure since microcode can be overwritten and the process using the enclave will never know it.
Cool! I'll have to give it a look then!
>What you can say for affirmative action is that it tries to game the system towards those who generally get screwed over otherwise.

Judging people on their immutable characteristics is always ignorant, counterproductive, and polarizing by definition. There are a myriad of ways for us to help people who have been generally screwed by society that don't involve judging them based on their race or other physical traits. A color blind, class-based affirmative action system would be far, far preferable to anything that Harvard or other proponents of race-based affirmative action are doing. Give an automatic bonus to people who went to school in a poverty stricken area. Give an automatic bonus to those whose parents didn't graduate from college. There are tens of millions of poor, white Americans whose families have lived generations in poverty who rightfully seethe while they sit in their sweltering, air-condioner-free trailers and listen to rich, entitled people talk about the "historic privilege" of whites.
Excel spreadsheet on a highly secure, intranet-only SMB share. Not even joking.
Tesla seems to have focused on getting lane following to behave well. That gives the user the impression that the system is competent. Obstacle detection, though, is not reliable, as has become painfully clear from crash reports.
“When it comes to execution, I think people need to understand that the death penalty is not a humane act.” -- Robert Dunham in http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20180604-is-there-a-humane-w...
The only reason this even looks like a problem is that humans don't follow the law.

In most jurisdictions if there's an emergency vehicle running flashers and/or siren behind you on the same side of the road you're supposed to slow, pull over, stop, then proceed only when the vehicle passes you.

If the emergency vehicle parks behind you then you have effectively been pulled over.

Pulling over safely is practically the first thing a self-driving car team works on. It is very easy to detect flashers and sirens. So... no problem.

Well, except that self-driving vehicles may accidentally be pulled over by firetrucks.
Why is the nuclear industry plagued with cost and schedule overruns? And shouldn’t they have thought by now, “hey our estimates are always off so let’s double them”?
As someone who participated in building the first wave of NoSQL, I have to agree with the sentiment here. Except tabular inflexibility hits everyone.

I wrote a blog post about how FaunaDB offers the best of relational and NoSQL models here: https://blog.fauna.com/unifying-relational-document-graph-an...
Fair enough.

I do not like corruption in government officials, regardless of any particular policy positions.

EDIT: I am still curious as to the actions he took, as an officer that people here might disagree with...
Sure. Basically, fear from lock-in, fear from having to do major rewrites because version+1 is completely different, or because vendor ditches the whole thing or goes bankrupt.

To be fair, Java and .NET fared well since then - both still exist and it it is very convenient to e.g. drop an old JAR in a project and just use it without issues.
Don't you have to carry the same amount of equipment, and thus equal weight, as a soldier of any gender?
That has got to be the default, right?
Do you have any suggested resources for learning React in this way?
I am as shocked as you are are, but apparently they exist: https://www.cookmellow.com. A bit like a remotely-programmable slow cooker, but then for the limited amount of ingredients a sous-vide will cook.
110% agree
My daughter loves Mr. Rogers. We don't watch him very often, though. There are only about 15 episodes available through Google Play. (Nothing on Netflix or Amazon.)

I really wish there were more episodes available. She finds him captivating.
Can’t it be as simple as caffeine boosts your metabolism and mutes blood sugar spikes?
Interesting timing with coming across this article for me. I have started developing re-designing our site frontend to use Vue with Vuex and the point this author makes about where to put the API logic also made me scratch my head a bit. Sometimes I just need to make a simple API call that does not alter the application state and just needs to grab some information and render said information in 1 component. Technically, in the component, I can just call Axios and get the data then and there, but then I have other components such as the Login that does need to set some Vuex state and therefore that's abstracted away further in the actions/API class as all documentation seems to suggest that's what you should do. I suppose I am just finding it a bit of a challenge to keep things a) consistent and b) not overly abstracted for the task at hand.