skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
In the US the failing banks' owners would have shared in the loss along with the govt to the extent of deposit insurance, but the remaining institutions would have been smaller, perhaps smarter, definitely better disciplined in the knowledge that they had "skin in the game."
Unfortunately I'm not longer on the team that created the app. But feel free to create an issuie: https://github.com/CMP-Studio/DawnChorus.
That's why I love containers... you definitely write your code to not leak resources, but if there's any unexpected state, your recovery strategy is to report the error, bail, and the whole container is blown away.
Exactly, this is where he lost me. The pitch is incredibly naive.

If the latest presidential election in the US has taught us anything it should be that middle class people with stagnating wages couldn’t care less about the troubles of the worlds poor.
Internet mainstay StumbleUpon shuts its doors
> I don't just worry about it because of the tracking, but also pushing false over the air updates.

Pretty sure OTA updates are signed, and signatures checked, so you'd need to steal a vendor's private key. Those are almost certainly kept on a hardware security module, so it's not an easy task at all.
You're right, my derivation is mistaken for failing to take the z component of the force. EQ. 19 is more like it although you'll note, also goes as 1/z^3.

You're also right that all that is moot from sheathing. But an ion still begins it's journey out at the bottom of a large potential well; one which is particularly steep because of the debye length, but still just as deep.
I just anglicize the french.

So in french Leeb-grre (kind of like a throaty r, sounds a bit "gruh" but short)

and in enlish Leeb-ru' (kind of like a very short "ruh"). More like Libra truncated.

Its half way between a consonant and a vowel so I was torn. Glad we're facing the big issues here.
Getting Started with Rust, React, and WebAssembly
Pay to be tracked? I already avoid smart phones, now they want to accost my vehicle? What new vulnerabilities will I find on these devices?
curious what you mean by not feeling right or seeming off? Those are very vague reasons. I'm not a user of this app, nor a developer.
1. Go to Home Depot or similar.

2. Buy a small hammer, a box of brad nails, and raid the wood cutoff container. Total cost $20.

3. Give these things to your kid.

4. ???

5. Profit
In the US Army, they'd make us pose for shoots like this after something we jokingly called "Mandatory Fun". You can come to this totally optional event to promote $SOMETHING this weekend, and if you do, you get the day off Monday. If you don't, you get to scrub the halls, wax the floors, and inspect the vehicles at the motorpool.

It was optional "technically", but mandatory in reality.
> Kind of my point really. Why does how LibreOffice is compiled matter to the end user who is installing LibreOffice?

It doesn't, and so indeed most users like the package manager because it makes installing software easier.

> Most of what you're saying is agreeing that all the reasons I personally don't like package managers are indeed true, we just disagree about whether or not those are good things. I don't think they are.

I suppose that's one way of looking at it, yes. But you must be a rather alienated individual: you can't use virtually any Linux distribution, nor most of the *BSDs, and macOS has an App Store so that's out the window too, ...

> And that's the problem: The system is pushing the new paradigm. Package management will be the rule and simple application directories will be the outlier. That's not a convincing argument for me to use the system.

No, I mean you could make "appimage" style HPKGs, that installed with no dependencies and no repositories. Would anyone use those when they can already do one-click-installs of any application they want? I dunno, probably not.

I'm glad you think "simple" application directories are really that "simple." What happens when one library, used by 6 of your installed applications, has a security flaw? You need to update all 6. Or if you have a system package manager, you need to run one command and it will update the 1 package for you.

> If I were going to do that, I'd just use Linux because it has much better hardware and software support.

Well, the "copy directory to install" was never really the reason Haiku existed, and if you think in losing that we've lost some huge part of our identity ... I really think you're mistaken.
Is this referring to copy/paste on the early iPhone?
You aren't though. The majority of people do, so the median household (by definition in the majority group) fits that group of people.

There's plenty of 1 or 2 bedrooms for those who don't find a life partner, end their relationship, etc.
The confusion in the example is the choice of names "start" and "end". If we rename them "some_array" and "some_totally_different_array" the undefined behavior is clear.
Do grades even matter anymore?

Unless you're applying to a gov't job, you're connections, friends, professors that like you, github accounts, art or MBA portfolio are the tools that move you "up" in the world. And in that order.

Online education dilutes GPA too. As well as more tech skill degrees (devops certs), aka those were called trade/vocational schools in my day.

I've never seen a GPA on an intern application/resume in the last 3yrs. Unless and (unfortunately) its from a visa student. Hmmm.
It was a random choice of big-name framework; I could say the same of Rails or Spring or anything.

Naming things is hard, and the same pattern is constantly rediscovered in different places. If anything I'd say Haskell's difficulties come from the other end: being too willing to respect the "original" name of a concept from an old mathematical paper rather than coming up with a branding that programmers will be more comfortable with.
Well the obvious advantage of using React Native is portability to Android. The less-obvious advantage is partial portability to the web (would still take additional dev work, but some code could be shared) and the ability to hire JavaScript developers instead of Swift developers, of which there are lots more.

But if it's definitely an iOS exclusive and you don't plan on scaling your dev team up massively in the future, then there's no reason not to just use Swift.
This might work for slow moving teams with a few contributors, but I can't imagine using this in the way I've seen github used on projects with many contributors... Email just doesn't scale as well
Tesla does a live webcast of these calls on their investor relations site at http://ir.tesla.com/

The next quarterly update will be sometime early August.
If creation is intended, not accidental, then there is a final end for each and every thing in creation. If there is a final end for creatures then for those who are given free will are given it for the express purpose of choosing their final end ("choosing" as opposed to "determining" - you could also read "accepting" as an ... acceptable alternative).

If the Intender did not exist there would be no objective morality because final ends would be merely illusions. All morality would therefore be subjective to the (local) intenders and would involve a "will to power".
This is also one of the reasons I prefer Kroger whenever I go shopping. Most Krogers in my area don't have conveyor belts, and instead the cashier personally takes all the items from the cart directly to the scanner. At Tom Thumb, Albertsons, and Walmart, there's a conveyor belt and I'm expected to unload my whole cart onto the belt before the cashier touches anything.
Any language adopting s-expr would instantly be called a Lisp.

Arguably, the s-expr syntax is what enables the rich code-as-data metaprogramming that you find in Lisps. Working with full macros in a sexpr language is already complex enough, the an extra layer of complexity that non-sexpr language add really breaks that camel in half. The point is, you really need code == AST parity to make a powerful macro system workable. You don't necessarily need the parans, but complaining about parens is really missing the point.
If you have rooted, try f.lux on Android too. Personally, I can't stand Twilight's "orange tint over content".
I don't get the hate. I just love to have a good information system.

People hating those messages never had to live in countries with failures occurring without any feedback.
Also Cordova/Ionic
How can good grades ever be a minus?
The article describes a lot about the workflow, but only two sentences about the advantages:

> A very large body of email-related software exists and is equally reliable and well-understood. You can interact with email using only open source software and customize your workflow at every level of the stack - filtering, organizing, forwarding, replying, and so on; in any manner you choose.

Using email software in general is well-understood, but using it for Git is much harder than using GitHub. Customizing the workflow is also something you probably shouldn't want to do unless you're really working with a massive project such as the Linux kernel.
> But we‘re done here, you‘re clearly not discussing in good faith. Stay in your web bubble if you want to.

Thanks for your well detailed argumentation, that was convincing.
I guess the "Why not Linux?" part of our FAQ is as much of an excuse as one can make, besides pure curiosity of course: https://www.haiku-os.org/about/faq#why-not-linux

> Linux-based distributions stack up software – the Linux kernel, the X Window System, and various DEs with disparate toolkits such as GTK+ and Qt – that do not necessarily share the same guidelines and/or goals. This lack of consistency and overall vision manifests itself in increased complexity, insufficient integration, and inefficient solutions, making the use of your computer more complicated than it should actually be.

> Instead, Haiku has a single focus on personal computing and is driven by a unified vision for the whole OS. That, we believe, enables Haiku to provide a leaner, cleaner and more efficient system capable of providing a better user experience that is simple and uniform throughout.
How Fortnite Captured Teen-Age Minds [video]
That just bumps the question back to evolutionary dynamics, largely a subfield of game theory. Why are we "wired" to produce these cooperative "nice" social systems?
Never heard about a "Big Green Egg". Thanks for mentioning it.

Are there versions that don't cost the equivalent of a small car?
i means you can use it as a development machine and not have to rely on haiku team releasing every programming language and db version.
I get the point: we love to rename things, and Haskell is using the proper mathematical name. There must be a balance somewhere though.
The nice thing is that you can actually build stuff like web servers in a total language :)
Using something called co-induction a total language can model things that are potentially infinite, e.g. a web server. Co-induction replaces the requirement that every function must terminate with the requirement that the next step (e.g. the next value of a stream) can be calculated in finite time. So, the event loop could be modelled using co-induction as long as long as the event handlers do not contain infinite loops.
you can run your toolchain whether or not it already works on haiku
I thought this when I first started my gender transition and I was buying women's clothing while still presenting as male (in suburban Texas at that). I insisted on using the self-checkout for a while before I eventually realized two things:

1) At the self-checkout, I'm constantly calling over the attendant anyway because the machines are shit.

2) The cashiers don't give a fuck. It's a repetitive mind-numbing job and the customers all blend together into one long miasma of scanning.

Also, hilarious story: one of the first times I bought stuff, I had filled my cart with a bunch of stuff and then went to pay and found out the self-checkout was down, so I had to go to a cashier. As the cashier started scanning, I felt really embarrassed so I just blurted out "I lost a bet". That was probably the stupidest thing I could've done because now I called attention to it when it would've just blended into the miasma of scanning if I didn't. Hell, even if the cashier did notice what she was scanning before, they could've just thought I was buying stuff for my girlfriend or something, but I scuttled any chance of that happening...
Your quote is disingenious since it cuts the following, quite crucial sentence. The full paragraph reads:

Sexism

Using gendered terms like “dude” or “guys” to address a
mixed-gendered group of people contributes to furthering
exclusion of underrepresented individuals. We strongly
advise avoiding gendered pronouns as well as gendered
terms.

The whole short paragraph is listed in the "please pay a little attention to this" section of the CoC under the following introduction:

Inclusive language

In our commitment to a harassment-free and inclusive
environment we strongly believe it’s important to pay
attention to harmful language patterns.

It's a fair assessment. It's certainly not obvious to foreign speakers - it certainly wasn't for me - but isn't it fair to ask people to think about the words they're using? To point out common speech patterns that may make other people unwelcome and ask them to avoid them? Why not use "folks" or "people" instead of "dudes" and "guys" to refer to groups of people of all genders? Would you as a presumably male person feel included if someone refers to your group as "girls" or "ladies"? Would you prefer if people used that in their talks?

Now, that this pattern has been pointed out to you, you can still feign ignorance and deliberately still use "guys" and "dudes" to refer to people that do not identify as guys and dudes but that would just make me refer to you as "boneheaded impolite dick" even though you might not identify as such.
The thing there is indeed not the validity, but the introduction of extra memory references and variables.

The code with the arrays compiles to immediate value loads with load-time fixups to the code; and if this is linking to an assembly language module the necessary assembly language is just some labels against the data.

The code with the pointers compiles to loads from data memory, with (in the more usual paradigm where the start and end are bracketing some vector of initialized data in the program image) load-time fixups to the initial values of the variables; and the assembly language has to be different, some variables with these labels whose initial values are the addresses of some other labels against the actual data.

Notice that the Linux Kernel developer in 2016 did not immediately appreciate the need to modify the concomitant assembly language and linker script stuff to match the change in the C language code.

The approach that I mentioned keeps the immediate value for the start, and uses a load from initialized data memory for the count. Other approaches are possible, but they need more work in the build process. For example: By generating the C/C++ language declaration and definition from a script or suchlike, one could calculate and declare the number of elements in the array, making it possible to use sizeof.
I have no idea why I was downvoted. To even touch the surface of Ken Wilber’s critique of Nietzche would require on the order of 10 pages, and I know that because I’m writing it right now.

I also find it extremely ironic that a person in a different comment is criticizing me for not being able to quickly boil a philosopher’s entire approach down to a few sentences, in a comment where we are arguing about people wrongly boiling Nietzsche down into a few sentences
I worked in a GaAs fab a couple years ago, they still do.

Although with all the other fun chemicals in use, safety training could be summarized as "and this one will kill you in this horrible way if something goes wrong/you do something wrong".
I love it’s old school interface. It’s C++ API is old-school, for better or worse, so developing for it isn’t as nice as I would prefer, but for computing — documents, personal information management, and so on, I find it very enjoyable to use. And damned snappy, too.

Would I prefer a Linux distribution with a window manager/desktop based on Haiku/BeOS? Probably. A modern one that supported HiDPI would be amazing. One can dream...

If more and more software continues to be ported though, I’m not wedded to any one kernel. If I could do my entire job in Haiku, I would. It’s amazing to watch it get better and better as the years go on!
It’s not like traditional car companies never suffer delays. For one example I wanted to buy but couldn’t, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV had a delay of five years for its US release.
I think the UI is cool. I like the way that windows can dock together. The application APIs are (reportedly) very good. Still destined to be a curiosity.
I teach. I can say that I have never had direct pressure to pass students or raise grades, but there are two issues that I run into related to grades.

First is the ever-growing methods of academic dishonesty. I do not have enough hours in my life to create and design new homework that prevents cheating. It's possible for some assignments, but not all. I don't give up on cheating detection, but this leaves tests and participation (be it simply turning in work or in-person) as the primary grade-changing events for many students.

Second is the issue of student "litigation". It is not unusual to find a student that will fight to get their 4.0 by attrition, and that requires very good record keeping on the professor's part, taking away from time for other tasks.

My situation is at an extension of a very large university. We focus on teaching and student connection, not research. I know that these experiences change drastically when professors have graders and a research program taking their time away from teaching duties.
I always liked the mid-80s GRiD laptops with red-on-black gas plasma displays

https://imgur.com/VGwYtMc

The terminal you're thinking of may have been an IBM 3290:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f3/ef/53/f3ef53c11973a83b2109...
This is standard practice at a lot of universities. At my university results were scaled based on the class performance in that exam and the performance of everyone in other exams. So if you're all 4.0 students, but the exam is horrendous and everyone only gets 20%, you'll probably end up with a good grade still.

I studied physics. It was possible to game the system to a certain extent. If you took the (subjectively) hardest modules like gauge theory, you could get a high grade even if you only answered half the paper. So if you were smart, but not top of your class, you'd be better off taking the hard subjects because every mark you got was effectively worth more. If you took the easy and popular modules, every mark would count and it might even be normalised down.
A few developers do, and I know of one company that deploys Haiku commercially (TuneTracker: http://tunetrackersystems.com/).

I haven't reached that point myself; I'm still missing WiFi support on my laptop (hence why there's so many commits from me working on that area of the system recently ;) But I'm getting close.
Fascinating. Excellent reference.
1) agree, probably between awful and tolerable
2) yep, but in most home it isn't available(maybe in most homes in all remembered areas, excluding countryside)
3) yes(but one another time i have pyroelectric autocleaning oven and accidentally burnt accesories in it)
4) partly agree, but partly have ideas like ihm and franciscop https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17439057

sorry for slow answer
Pretty sure you can say that about most folks. We tend to run on the selfish side as a species.
I think he's saying that if you are applying to a job and have more than 0 experience, you shouldn't be relying on your GPA as a selling point.

And I agree - GPA is pretty irrelevant to anything in the business world. All it proves is that you can play by the rules in the school system - not a real indication of your experience, skills, or relevant knowledge.
>7,000? 10,000? 15,000? It wouldn't be enough to remotely satisfy the demand.

Honest question: where on earth do you get this idea? You actually think there is global demand for ~800,000 vehicles with an ASP of ~$55k USD?

What are you basing this insane demand off of? Tesla won't even report the current backlog numbers. If they were increasing, you don't think they'd be boasting about it?

Where does the unlimited demand come from?

>And when they finally do, in 2-3 years or so, are you going to take a chance on one of the first competitive EVs from VW, Mercedes, BMW, Ford, General Motors, Hyundai, Fiat, Toyota or Mazda or are you just gonna stick with Tesla, which by then comes with even better specs than today?

Wait, you're saying you're not going to trust manufacturers that have been building and servicing millions and millions and millions of cars for, some of them, over 100 years, but instead you will trust Tesla who hasn't even proven they can sustainably build and service the few hundred thousand they've got on the road? Aren't EVs supposed to be simpler than ICEs?

I simply cannot understand this thinking.
That's why it's pointed out in the CoC - to make people aware that not all people feel included by "guys". I know quite a few that don't.
Since he mentions Linux as the primary example of a project that uses email, I think this particular criticism needs some refinement.
Yes, because the pointers are different at -O.

As there are no guarantees as to the relative placement of auto/stack variables relative to each other, that is perfectly fine.
I think the reality of this is fairly well captured in the 4th to last paragraph

> Even human readers, who may have two minutes to read each essay, would not take the time to fact check those kind of details, he says. "But if the goal of the assessment is to test whether you are a good English writer, then the facts are secondary."

I would go a step further and say the goal of standardized tests is probably not to test if your a good English writer but rather to see if your good at that test. AI has tremendous ability to streamline the grading of standardized tests which are narrowly focused measure and I think that's fine if it comes with proper checks. As many people mention here I don't think AI will be able to objectively measure good general writing and I doubt we'd fully cede artistic evaluation to a computer as a society but I agree with being weary of this.

Standardized tests in general though seem to me like one of the greatest examples of a measure becoming a target and loosing a lot of its effectiveness (Goodhart's law). I can't help but be reminded of Paul Grahm's essay on nerds[1] by this article because the effective point of school from an evaluation standpoint is these tests. However now we've built a computer that grades these test's nearly as well as its human counter parts and its glaringly obvious that this evaluation is tremendously game-able. Which resonates with Paul's argument that: "The problem with most schools is, they have no purpose."

[1] http://paulgraham.com/nerds.html