skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The email prep Q/A CSS is broken. The answer boxes cover up the questions. (Firefox Nightly 63.0a1)
You could cache files per requesting domain. That way repeat visit of the same site is fast, but nothing is leaked cross-domain.
Yes, when you look at the history of AI, a "quantum winter" is an obvious worry---i.e., a situation where the hype about QC becomes so unmoored from the reality as finally to cause the popular narrative to switch its polarity. Picture a pointy-haired boss who's now pouring money into QC, for no better reason than that it's new and faster and it's the future and people are talking about it and it could speed up his company's data mining by trying all possible answers in parallel. If something spooked that boss, one could imagine him joining a stampede for the exits with no greater understanding, canceling good research along with bad. If it happened to AI, then why not to us?

The fear of a quantum winter is one reason---if any reasons were needed besides the truth!---why I've spent so much effort on my blog over the past decade trying to counter irresponsible QC hype. Like, if anyone ever comes to me and says "you lied to me! it turns out that scalable QCs are really hard to build, and a lot more basic science needs to be done, and even if you did manage to build them, as far as anyone knows they'd only give you exponential speedups for a few special problems, not for most of the stuff my company cares about," I'll have a pretty enormous record that I can point to when I reply, "I WAS SCREAMING THAT AT THE TOP OF MY LUNGS AND YOU DIDN'T WANT TO HEAR IT!" For all the good it will do. :-)

Then again, maybe the worry is overblown. Some people claim that we've now passed the point where there will never again be an AI winter, any more than there will be an "electricity winter." The train just has too much momentum. Likewise, so long as the pressure continues to get more and more computing power and stave off the end of Moore's Law, it could be that QC will continue to entice people, regardless of the naysayers and regardless of how hard the engineering problems turn out to be.

I honestly don't know. I feel like I have a hard enough time understanding and communicating the truth about where this field stands in the present---and sometimes, trying to advance it by a small increment---without also prognosticating its future. :-) The latter involves all sorts of questions of economics, politics, and psychology that I have no special expertise about.
Tesla and PG&E are working on a ~1 GWh Powerpack battery system
I’m always annoyed by the waste of cooling (or heating) a whole building when what we really need is just our body temperature to regulated. My thoughts drift towards clothing that has cooling built in, but become my usual muddle of 1/1000th baked ideas.

But try putting a reusable cooling pack right on your body, it’s pretty great when you’re overheating.

Back mounted compressor that runs cooling pipes to your underwear, that could be amazing!
> Content-Length: 7666451

No thanks!
I would say python. It's written like English and it's pretty fun .
Okay Mr. Pedant. Actually Dai isn't backed by either one. It's backed by an ERC-20 token called Pooled Ether.
it sounds awfully enticing now we're loading up on the supreme court forever,Then we can get rid of title 9 and demand thateach city build a backup NFL football just incase the other stadium gets injured. Unchecked male privilege rock my crazy naked world. Opens the for door for my comeback at UBER even more sweater.

sincerly,

TK1
On the opposite side of the spectrum, there's Chuck Moore (Forth creator) who in trying to find the simplest combination of software and hardware for his projects devoted a lot of time into a DIY VLSI CAD system. Fascinating history behind it, although the actual OKAD system is essentially trade secret for his company.

His site has been down for a while, but someone thankfully mirrored most of the pages here:
https://colorforth.github.io/vlsi.html

More history about OKAD, plus links to more about Forth both software and hardware:
http://www.ultratechnology.com/okad.htm
By the same measure isn't there just as many invested in other coins that would stand to benefit from negativity around tether and bitcoin? You can't believe many things in cryptocurrency.
My appologies, I work largely on client/personal projects in the high speed digital/RF domain so my assumptions can be all over the place. Client budgets/deadlines leave little room for mistakes and my dexterity isn't what it once was so I use a PNP or make funky assembly jigs (my CV implementation/hands makes it easier to align with pins).

If you can, I'd really recommend talking to dentists who are retiring in your area or buying an XRay machine on ebay. They're pretty cheap and relatively safe and will open up a whole world of PCB fab. The problem with BGAs is the lack of feedback: if you have a chip with hundreds of pins and precise requirements for power boot up timing or dozens of impedance matched traces, figuring out what went wrong with your boards is literally impossible without proper inspection.

Since you have an intuitive feel for soldering BGAs already, I think that with a visualization of the solder joints you would be able to solder high pin count chips at small pitches. Most issues that I've experienced with complex BGAs are caused by mass manufacturing where you dont have the room to reflow every 10th board and you find out too late that a variable (from personal experience: el nino) has changed and reduced your yields by double digits. If you can take the time to do it right by hand, the sky's the limit.

If your back is against the wall you can also hotfix design mistakes like swapping two LVDS MIPI2 pins by using a laser drill to strip the plating on microvias at an angle to preserve the trace above it and resoldering them with wire only slightly bigger than IC interconnects. An almost completely useless skill but nothing beats the feeling you get when you can command RoHS compliant surface tension to do your bidding. Fair warning though: here be dragons.
Yeah, but they’re actually collecting all this new data for autonomous vehicles. Improvements to their maps app is just a freebee. For autonomous cars, mapping data this detailed is probably a several billion dollar competitive advantage that they don’t want to give away for free.
I'm sorry to say it, but I always feel incredibly cynical about longevity tech. If we had a treatment that could extend people's lives indefinitely, what would that do? It would essentially put a price tag on life in a more direct way than we've seen before. It's hard to imagine that the powers that be would want everyone to have fair access to it.

Obviously, this kind of treatment wouldn't at first be widely available even if it worked. So how do we decide who gets it?
And, given Apple's business model, which is selling hardware, one would think they could really afford to give back a bit more to open source.
Another example of how "untrusted by default" results in a better system.
Show HN: Xvideos Node.js API lib
6 years ago in Jersey City I had Fios, while across the river in Manhattan, it was very difficult to get. In my part of New Jersey in 2012, I had far better internet than I did in 2018 France — and much cheaper.
I am still trying to find a good balance for requirements format. I have looked at Gherkin in a few books on specifications. The Microsoft press book on software requirements lists every possible way to represent requirements. I am working through the book Telling Stories requirements book by Ben Rinzler. I still have not found anything ideal that would be easy enough to teach to a business side that has no training on writing requirements and still provide enough detail to the technical side. I am getting close to settling on some form of diagram, user story statements, and use cases with Gherkin.
The free version doesn't have 64 bit support - to be fair though this tutorial doesn't seem to either.

That's too bad because almost everything is 64 bit now, even arm.
The Bay Area isn’t densely populated. San Jose to San Francisco is mostly single family homes in suburban neighborhoods. Even the “dense” parts don’t hold a candle to East Coast cities.
iOS 12 Beta: iPSW Why You Should (Cydia Install iOS 12 Shouldn’t) Download It
The Inconvenient Legal Troubles That Lie Ahead for the Trump Foundation
It's really not a bad way to build something when you already know for certain exactly what you need to build.
Sorry! It is the second time I misspell "losing" :-) I am not English native speaker.
User manuals are (ideally) not technical documents. It shouldn't imply any specific system design if it doesn't have to.
This Guy Roasts Logan Paul Its Hilarious  HAHAH
Seems like a really shallow analysis.
Hello HN! I built Fastbmk.com as a fast, lightweight and reliable bookmarking service. You can create bookmarks with tags and notes. List bookmarks by tag. Search bookmarks. Import and export bookmarks.

Browser addon is available for Firefox and Chrome. Using addon, you can create bookmark and check if the current page is already bookmarked.

I intentionally used a minimal set of web technologies to create a tool for everyday use, which doesn't waste resources of client's computer.

Minimalistic design Low CPU/Memory usage Quick server responses

I already use the service on a daily basis and it works just fine. So I invite you to try it too :) Currently the service is more like a minimum viable product. A lot of features are planned to be implemented in the future.

So your opinion, questions, suggestions and ideas are greatly appreciated :)
They do have x64 ever since they updated the freeware from 5.7 to 7.0..
Super Proteins to Fuel Fitness
Xilinx supported their flavor until ISE 10 which is still available to download. They also had a code converter to the HDLs so you could still theoretically target the latest FPGAs using ABEL with some scripting to orchestrate the mixed tooling.
Sprintly Is Not Shutting Down
>If you think of your room like a rack mount server it totally makes sense.

I'm not sure how good that analogy is. Generally a box fan is loosely fit in the window and has an open interior with no shroud, as opposed to server fans which are tightly mounted to a fan-sized hole and have a close-fitting shroud around the blades. This has a big effect on the optimum configuration, because the box fan's suboptimal design happens to be more suboptimal at sucking than blowing (while a server fan is good at both, being closer to an ideal actuator disk)

I have observed that, in general, a box fans work better at blowing out a window than sucking in. At first this confused me. Why should this be the case, given time reversal symmetry?

Here's my hypothesis. The fan produces a high velocity jet of outlet air, but sucks in any air nearby (that's why you can blow paper across the room, but you can't suck paper across the room, another seeming violation of time symmetry). Since the fan is located nearer to the interior of the window, it can either A) blow an outward jet that maintains its momentum through the window, or B) attempt to suck an inward jet of air through the window. That doesn't work, so it mainly intakes warm interior air, resulting in mostly in-room recirculation with very little flow through the window and very little static pressure created to drive whole-house airflow.

Think I'm full of shit? Good, then your skepticism is working! Don't take my word for it. Anyone can test this using a phone with a barometer. Put the phone on a table (for constant altitude) in the room with the fan. Compare the pressure drop (exhaust fan on vs. off) with the pressure rise (intake fan on vs. off). If I'm right, the absolute magnitude of the pressure drop should be greater than the pressure rise, indicating greater airflow in an exhausting configuration.

If you only have one fan, definitely have it pointed out, not in. The moving column of cold air cools the entire place, not just a single room. Also this arrangement keeps the noisy fan in a separate room, while you enjoy the cool air quietly wafting through a nearby open window.

I've transformed many friend's apartments from sweltering to comfortable by implementing this tip.

TL;DR blow out, not in.
I think you underestimate Apple as an engineering organization. They have repeatedly pulled off stunning technical achievements in widely disparate domains.
I was never able to give up smoking long term until the vapes turned up. Then a persistent decades long problem disappeared overnight. Funnily enough my tobacco habit got entrenched when I was in a job that allowed me to deal with it’s boring aspects by voraciously reading lots of psychopharmacology literature.
Have you ever worked with arrogant ones?
Probably because (and this is personal opinion, not researched facts) the US is in a huge advertising bubble. We have found out just how effective advertising is at selling products and we have numbers to back it up so and decent sized business is throwing money to advertisers like mad to drive sales. If sales start to drop though, they double down and throw more money for more advertising; but what they top level administrators aren't considering is the non-linear nature of advertising and exposure and eventually advertisee fatigue enough. By time the sales numbers come back for your second or third round you already paid for the advertising and just burned through tons of your initial profits for minor gains. At the end of it all though you likely still have positive overall numbers from advertising, they don't show how badly advertising performed per cost near the end because the big initial exposure brings up the average. Rinse and repeat!

Also, there aren't much of any protections for consumers against false and deceptive advertising unless you have a million dollar legal team to take on the business's multi-million dollar legal team.
I also haven’t figured out how to get links I click on in my phone to open in Google Maps, so I accidentally open Apple Maps all the time.
Well I am interested in what other features you considered in your analysis (not to disputed them, just curious about what elements spoke to you).
1 per month? As a daily smoker, how?
Amazing! The website still says they don't. https://www.hex-rays.com/products/ida/order.shtml "IDA starter does not support 64 bit files"

If this is the case, they should update that! I will be trying for myself now.
Can I ask what you mean by "Bilbo Baggins phrasing"?

I agree with your point, and think I can guess what that phrase means, but I'm not quite remembering why Bilbo Baggins would be associated with being intentionally vague about something :)
I would propose a potential user as someone interested in some of the meta considerations and patterns of statistical reasoning, aka machine learning. There are is a vast amount of particulars the second hand on my watch operates (e.g. vibrating quartz, digital), but I can use that mostly reliable device to investigate higher level phenomenom, like calculating distance of planets by timing their movement. This library opens a direct line to these algorithims such that one might intuit, and apply, their high level behavior; as I could not time planets if consumed with the fidelitity and reliability of resonating quartz, it would slow my ability to explore this kind of reasoning if concerned with the minutiae.

That said, all points taken. If this sparks interest in someone, as is stands, it would be on them to dig in to all the considerations you've outline.
I agree that a GPS solution would not trigger backlash. I just think that GPS are not cheap enough.

Lo/Jack is the perfect example. For around $1000, you could protect your $30K car. Sounds great doesn't it? Seems like everybody should want one. Actually, I don't know a single person that owns a Lo/Jack.

It turns out that Lo/Jack struggled for years. While pulling in revenue of a little over a $100M/Yr, it had seen a string of losses, and was eventually sold to CAMP a few years back. If Lo/Jack couldn't make a market work for a device to protect a $30K investment that is in everybody's driveway and a ready source of electricity to power the unit, I don't know anybody willing to do this for a bee hive. (Or perhaps this will be the next great kick-starter, and I'll eat my words!)

The key here is not "if" something like a Lo/Jack can be done, but at what point does it happen at such a low price any cover everything that you owns. Video Surveillance is approaching this point rapidly, and it not restricted, I think it will be another victim of Jevons Paradox.
It has multiple PR problems, including the one you mentioned. :-)

Everyone who follows QC knows that simulating quantum chemistry could be commercially important, while breaking RSA is not. And as far as I can tell, no one cares anymore about doing tiny demonstrations of Shor's algorithm, to factor 21 into 3x7 or whatever. Over the past 5 years, the experimental interest has shifted to
(1) demonstrating sampling-based quantum supremacy (which has nothing to do with Shor's algorithm),
(2) demonstrating the building blocks of quantum error correction, and
(3) the prospect of doing useful simulations.

(A central reason for this is that, until you have a full fault-tolerant QC with millions of physical qubits, you almost certainly can't run Shor's algorithm in a way that will outperform a classical computer, even if you wanted to. By contrast, people are excited right now that they might be able to learn something new for physics or chemistry with just a few hundred good physical qubits.)

So anyway, we all know all of this, but popular expositions still like to concentrate on breaking public-key crypto because of its wow-factor (and, of course, the undisputed theoretical importance of Shor's algorithm, and its possible eventual security importance). In addition, there's often a time-lag problem, where the people working in the field have one set of concerns, and then the broader discussion is still stuck in the world of 1997.
I've noticed it a lot going to trade shows that the North American market has turned so much to the high end that most people assume you need all this fancy gear to make anything. Its really stifling innovation in my opinion. People think they needs tens of thousands to get an MVP prototype out the door and most of the time it kills the idea. If you are a big company and already have the resources then by all means use them, but someone with a good idea shouldn't think its required to build something new.

On the high speed digital front we do have 1Ghz DDR3 and its worked very well - we don't even use controlled impedance. Of course we are extremely careful to keep traces short and length matched. Our application can handle a very small error rate, however in practice we haven't seen any corruption at all in testing.

Its not the right approach if you are pushing the envelope of technology. But if you need a bit more grunt than an atmega by all means design in the ARM SoC and DDR3. You don't need fancy gear to do it.

Edit: Also thanks, we're looking into expanding more manufacturing in house and you've given me some ideas. I'll definitely look into an XRay machine.
While I admire your classical musings, they are irrelevant. It is a simple logical deduction for liquidity driven premiums and discounts to exist on assets that are NOT entirely fungible. Tether is NOT fungible back into USD. I can point you towards any number of highly liquid non redeemable ETF's that trade with a basis that is non stationary, or dual listed shares (e.g. China A/H equity classes, worth trillions) which are semi fungible at best due to RMB capital controls, that often trade +/- 5 to 10% 1 sigma away from each other. The fact tether shares many similarities and its basis does NOT move is highly suspicious.

>>"They are confounded that the data (USDT and USD have parity in value) doesn't fit their narrative"

What is your narrative? USDT I agree in principle does have some value, but it certainly doesn't afford to be given the benefit of doubt. In my experience Occam's Razor does not apply to Finance, where the incentive is to employ complexity and opacity to gain any pecuniary advantage possible. I am sure you agree that the set of circumstances Tethers operators find themselves in dealing with unsophisticated counter parties is rich for asymmetric abuse.

Some of the assertions made in the article are misguided; but taking a step back, simply they have produced NO commercially reasonable or acceptable audit of their holdings. Caveat Emptor.
TFA clearly states that these changes have been 4 years in the making. You can’t roll stuff like this out a year after reading some article on Hacker News.
Building the Company You Actually Want to Work at with Joel Gascoigne of Buffer
And thus people have internet to check a status page.
Once i comeback all my ubers will be outfitted with one LIKEE IN THE IMMC if the current current cuck in chief finds a way to fuck the unfuckable. We'll have to spray T-K=1 to deoterize
'
TK1
Ah. I was thinking something like the Prusa, which is $1000, and it’s derivatives which are $200-500. The BigRep is apparently around $40k. I think the cheaper printers ship in higher volumes.

As far as “decent”, I do a lot with my sub $1k machines. The expensive ones seem to work better, but the price is so high I don’t consider them. And I come from a background of CNC machining where I’m familiar with $100k machines. Now I’m really happy with my $500 printer.
Have you heard of iOS ? Samsung has Tizen that they use in smart watches.
Google Downranks 65,000 Pirate Sites in Search Results
Children making amazing discoveries was a constant theme of early science fiction.

Moreover, if Richard Feynman's biographical essays even slightly typical, mid 20th century kids actually did do a fair amount of experimentation.

Remember machinery in the mid 20th was simpler but less reliable, so a kid with the latest gadget, whether radio, hot rod or model rocket, had considerable incentive to tinker. In fact, I suspect tinkering/hacking is main story for boys of that era and science was more of an offshoot.
VCF West Upcoming Exhibitd
For a different perspective, I hate navigation by landmarks. I basically never pay attention to the names of stores I’m passing.
Nah. The 2020 Olympics in Tokyo are slated to have a man-made meteor shower: https://qz.com/689794/a-man-made-meteor-shower-launched-by-s...
So do the tail recursion in C.

Any decent compiler will handle it just fine. If you want to include crappy compilers, well, then we need to include the same for LISP and Scheme. Whatever the language specification may claim about tail recursion is not relevant when you sit down to produce code for the actual system at hand.
That's a joy to hear! Please fill out the survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/85GJ7GT) after you listen to the rest. Much obliged! :)
> Nicotine alone does not have detrimental effects

I think it’s normal to consider dependency and major withdrawals when stopping as pretty detrimental effects, whether or not any other symptoms are involved.

Not that everyone is bothered by that, but folks needing to vape every 10 minutes have a severely lowered quality of life (or the risk of having one), in my opinion — if only because their habit gets in the way of other things, or perhaps they forget their pod pack and have an incredibly bad day. I think that could be a whole lot worse than not having one’s morning cup of coffee.
Exactly. Expected payoff is only useful if you have infinite resources. This is why most of us pay for insurance even though in the long run it's guaranteed to cost more than just self-funding any repairs or replacements.
People come here for the content and not for the UI.
You both can be right at the same time.

CNP transactions (which stripe does) cost bit higher than CP transactions which require POS machine at mom/pop shops.
Oh sweet, Google Maps in carplay. Hopefully won't require a new-headunit.
look up 'cooling vest'