skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I did one as well. It's a no brainer: a semester to do whatever you want as long as you get someone to agree to mark it.
> was planning to eat some again only if she killed the animal.

Or if the animal fell out of the sky. (2 points for being old enough to know the reference).
The hacker was exposed because of poor OPSEC (due to tracking of his IP address).

> Rigmaiden had received boxes and boxes of criminal discovery that would help him understand how the government planned to prosecute its case. In the penultimate box, he saw the word “stingray” in a set of notes.

The authorities were exposed because of poor OPSEC as well. They weren't supposed to ever mention “stingray”.
I use sugar in the dough for making it slightly brown and a tiny bit crunchy.
I think people are just making up those numbers. It costs a lot to design and implement new infrastructure, and it will cost much less to use it to make the next 5 or 50k cars than it did to get to 5k a week.
> Obviously Linux is no use for hard real time

While it's true that the mainline kernel is not currently capable of delivering hard real-time performance the PREEMPT_RT developers keep chipping away at the remaining issues. LinuxCNC users have been achieving hard real-time performance on their controls through the use of the PREEMPT_RT patches for some time now.
Or what you can get from Honda for around $20-25k.
It's an interesting question: is there value to certificate identity verification ?

This is interesting to me, in part because I've argued again and again against the idea that HTTPS must involve verification of the legal identity of the operator of a website, and for many years I always had people push back and insist that the encryption part was only a tiny, almost worthless portion of HTTPS -- identity verification was the real benefit. I even had people claim that encryption without identity verification was actually worse than no encryption at all! It was as if they lived in a completely different world than I did, where eavesdropping/recording of unencrypted transmissions was incredibly rare and not worth worrying about, but ten trillion googolplexes of HTTPS spoofers were lurking around every corner.

Now, of course, people have done a complete 180 and realized that the encryption is the important part, and the identity verification is at best a distant secondary or even tertiary concern. Identity verification doesn't significantly add anything to end-user security; the avenues for phishing and other malicious uses of the web rely on a general public so technologically illiterate that prominently-displayed identity verification is probably several hundred steps down the list of the top thousand things you can do to protect average users, if it even cracks the list at all. Which is probably why all the prominent identity display stuff seems to be phasing out in browsers; the vendors have recognized that it doesn't contribute useful additional security (and some notable cases have shown that it's easy enough, if you want, to spoof even "verified" identities).
come on, that's a silly fear mongering ignorant post. They've had designers and engineers from many other car companies working on their cars and you can see endless pictures and videos of people driving their cars on tracks since even before 2012, when the S first came out.
> throwing in those Jewish words like she asking from them too

What does this mean? What is asking from them?
Anki calls this cloze deletion: https://apps.ankiweb.net/docs/manual.html#cloze
I thought it was because blender refused to allow ads on their videos? Was it something else?
>4) If you put a frozen pizza in a cold oven it will always be burnt because by the time the inside is cooked the outside has become overcooked and burnt

This seems backwards. The hotter the oven, the less time for the heat to diffuse inwards before the outside is burnt. The lower the temperature, the more even the heat.

I'd imagine the reason not to put it before it's done preheating is standardization. If my oven takes 5 minutes and yours takes 10 to get to 400, there's no way to write one single set of directions for how long to cook it from the time of powering it on. It's hard enough with everyone's different freezer temperatures.
I... don't know about that. I reckon lots of folks rather read the comments at HN than the piece itself.

The journalistic 'style' of journalistic pieces seems 'too fiddly' for some, and even 'infantilized' for other people. It's a matter of taste and I'm sure this style is set as standard because it works, i.e., pleases the majority of readers.

I have an interest in this bacause I accidentally studied a bit (one of my majors shared some of its credits with the Journalism program at my college).

The things people dislike, as I see them:

1- Giving context through elongated prose or "fluff", instead of straight to the point facts.
Some people would just rather have a list of the games Synergistic worked in instead of the five first paragraphs of this piece, for example. Also: "Blizzard’s protests fell on deaf ears. CUC was determined (...)" vs. "Blizzard protested but CUC did not comply".

2- Using examples when they're not needed (for that audience). Explaining what happened of relevance in the 70's for someone who was _there_ during said period, for example.

3- Nonlinearity in telling the story. Going back and forth on quotes from different people. Presenting the controversy kinda like a conversation. Makes the editing clear and some readers reject pieces where it's clear some stuff was left out or is out of order.

Anyway, maybe I've written too much about this. In any case, I really do believe that, in this age of personalized content, there are enough people who reject the 'journalistic style' to warrant publications that actively avoid it.
Show HN: Hey Tea
> Of course the retail guy gets hurt.

Nope. Retail traders get better prices; it's the big hedge funds that lose.

> Who do you think buys the mutual funds that pay a higher price.

The big index funds are paying a lower price.

> Why does everybody keep repeating this lie?

Because it's true.
I am just sharing thought base on personal experience.

I never mention 5000 years of History, only 1500. I am trying to not related with any politics here.

By your reasoning if there exists some propaganda then my personal experience should not be trusted?

In addiction, the long history is not created by CCP but following the Chinese scholar tradition. It is correct that CCP used it for creating nationalism, but they did not fabricate the whole thing.

To know more about Chinese culture not from [politic fueled](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ross_(academic)) books, I suggest you to read The [Problem of China](http://www.freeclassicebooks.com/Bertrand%20Russell/The%20Pr...) by Bertrand Russell. It is authored by a well-known scholar and written before the CCP exists in case you accuse me of suggesting you propaganda. The opinions by the book may be too old but at least the facts are unbiased IMO.
My question: if great none of the essayists, thinkers, writers, etc. have used and endorsed such a method, why am I going to care enough about the method to even read such instructions? If they have, why isnt this explained in the introduction?
As Troy Hunt has been at pains to point out, some of the largest, most important and most spoofed/phished sites on the internet use only DV certs.

Google, Amazon, Facebook, and eBay are all DV. If they don't see value in EV/OV, then who on earth is it meant for?
Responsibility in communication is a two-way street, and also depends on incentives and relative power.

- Are security researchers grossly incompetent for failing to convince the IT industry to adopt best practices?

- Are voters in democracies grossly incompetent for failing to police their politicians and keep them honest?

- Are media outlets grossly incompetent for not squeezing out 'fake news', whatever your definition?

- Are epidemiologists and public health officials grossly incompetent for not convincing anti-vaxxers of their foolishness?

Anytime there is a breakdown in communications, both the listener and the speaker should probably shoulder some of it.
Any specific fun recommendations for a similar target audience as OP?
How to Uninstall Cydia from iPhone or iPad on iOS 12, 12.0.1, 12.0.2 or Earlier
My point is that this is not a city to use in any argument. Their situation is so unique as to be irrelevant to any aggregate statistic.
Yes you can tail oplog, but in a sharded setup with multiple clusters this becomes a pain.
It may be true that a digital decentralized ledger will be used, but in the end, the government will still run the ledger. Banks aren't going to be hurt at all by this, and I don't think paper is going anywhere anytime soon; of course, governments do want it to go away..
Show HN: Harmless Harvest
‘Laser AK-47’ that can set fire to targets a kilometer away
I'm not going to tell you that there won't be problems caused by increased migration. Anything that changes the world so much will cause problems. I'm not going to tell you that America's material wealth is the result of "random chance", either. But I do think that quite a lot of it is the result of centuries of immigration, each wave of which was met with much the same objections.

It's one thing to caution against removing all barriers literally overnight. I don't know that it would be a disaster, but I don't know for sure that it wouldn't, and it's reasonable to exercise some caution. But, at the risk of making an inflammatory analogy, it would have been morally defensible to ask if there was a way to end chattel slavery in the US without a civil war that killed ~3% of the population. It was not morally defensible to oppose ending it. Global apartheid is an evil of a similar scale, and first world governments its active cause, not innocent bystanders. It is our duty to figure out how, not whether, to end it.
Lebron James, Signs with Los Angeles Lakers
Of course there is. If you don't care who you're talking to, it doesn't matter if your message is encrypted. The anonymous mystery person who decrypts your HTTPS connection might be the same person who would have MITM'd your HTTP connection.

The entire concept of encryption presupposes that you care who you're talking to. If you don't, then why not just broadcast your message in the clear?
For anybody interested in making pizza at home, /r/pizza is a fantastic resource.

Making your own pizza is fun and you can make some decent pies with only a little bit of practice.

For home ovens use bread flour. If you end up getting into making pizza, then go down the 00 flour + wood fire oven route.. but until then your home oven can produce some really outstanding pies.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Pizza/wiki/recipe/dough

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Pizza/wiki/recipe/sauce
Adam Smith pondered this 250 years ago. His writings on the subject are still some of the best.
Higher heat capacity, higher heat transmission.
If you read the exposition you linked, equation 14 gives an expression for the field which is linear in the area. Again, it's pretty important that the capacitor be infinite in extent, otherwise it behaves differently.

What's the dimension that you're proposing to increase of the capacitor? The total work done across the capacitor will be fixed regardless of distance across.
I agree. China is more isolated geographically and hence less diverse than Europe and hence it is still quite different. It is definitely not the only culture that passed that long though.
I'm waiting for the full story on endocrine disruptors. Maybe there's nothing there, but it also doesn't seem like we really understand their total effects.
Because by the 1970s, Capital was a fully globalized force whose political projects exceeded the power of individual nation state’s ability to resist them. Only transnational labor solidarity has comparable power, which is something that Capital owners had specifically sought to (and succeeded at) undermining in the context of the Cold War.
I think it is hard to get as good as google without spending tons of money and/or time and then get the market share to start possibly make any money.
Eye in the sky: Drones are being taught to spot violence in crowds
In the US, a contractor is strictly BYOD...

If I'm using a company phone, computer, or anything else, I fully expect that everything is monitored and locked down. Add your email and other login stuff at your own peril. Be wary of your browser history.

I don't care what a company says. If I'm working for them, my personal life is my own personal life. I don't discuss where I work with anyone that is online. I definitely don't mention it on social media, and I flatly refuse to give my social media accounts to any place I apply to. I go home and do nothing related to work, and all my social media revolves around promoting things that do little to betray who I am.

Here's the thing. An employer may say "do whatever, we don't care," but it only takes a coworker to see you made an off-color joke or, by horror, said something that isn't along the generally accepted marching of everyone in the company. Office politics seeps into everything, and while the company itself isn't monitoring you, your coworkers are. This isn't malicious, but a slip of the keyboard can have ugly consequences.

It's my personal responsibility to protect myself at all times.
Yeah, that kind of thinking still exist in China. Even in popular fictions the ancient masters are always better than younger generations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuxia
Reaper of Souls and loot 2.0 really redeemed Diablo 3.

The season 14 tier ranking video has 350k views in 2 weeks[0], which is great considering patch 2.6 is essentially 3 seasons old now and RoS is several years old.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQDmMoZTKYs
What was it like to work there? I know it was a decade ago but I am still curious what it would be like to work at these mostly forgotten companies that still manage to exist.
How White People Handle Diversity Training in the Workplace
> we have a complete understanding of what's going on, so there are no beliefs to update.

This is not true, unless by 'complete understanding' you imply that everything must be deterministic and we understand every single variable.

However, probabilities can be interpreted as statements of lack of knowledge at certain points of a process, even if the entire process itself is understood completely.

For example, if I have a process where randomly half the time I get a 55% heads biased coin, and half the time I get a fair coin, then I flip it 10 times, I can absolutely apply Bayes' Theorem here to figure out probability I had the fair or the biased coin after seeing the result of the flips.

This is a system that I understand completely, and part of that system is a single unknown bit, which we're trying to put bounds on.

A correct Bayesian treatment of the Monty Hall problem is given in a cousin comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17438740
> The 15mm calibre weapon weighs three kilos (6.6lb), about the same as an AK-47, and has a range of 800 metres, or half a mile, and could be mounted on cars, boats and planes.

So they are calling it an AK-47 just because of the weight?
AFAIK Brackets predates both. It's a very pleasant IDE for web development while the other two have more general goals.
KiwiSDR isn't the only affordable SDR available these days. There's also the HackRF, BladeRF, LimeSDR USB, LimeSDR PCIe, LimeSDR Mini, FreeSRP, and the XTRX mini PCIe.
Seems like all around a poor decision.
Indeed. I was spanked as a child (I was very stubborn and looking back it's clear that nothing else really worked with me). As a result, I suffer from a condition known as respect for others. It's a terrible affliction to have in this day and age.
Yes. Even when Mongolia occupies China, in textbooks it is called the dynasty of Yuan. But it is not invented by the communist party, it is told in this way following the tradition by the Chinese scholars. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholar-official
GM/Toyota have the resources to start operating in the same markets that Tesla has ambitions for. And they are certainly keeping an eye on Tesla's actions.

After watching what Tesla is doing, they have chosen not to invest those resources even though if they did, they would beat Tesla at its own game quite easily because they eclipse it both in capital and experience.

Either their analysts are wrong and failing to see a winning strategy here, or there is no winning strategy. One of these two statements must be true. I've put my money on option #2, but I'm aware that large competitors aren't idiots and there is a risk here.

Elon Musk has also publicly stated that he wants the other big players to compete with Tesla. He doesn't actually care if Tesla is ever profitable or not, he just wants to force the world to transition off fossil fuels by dispelling the myths sown by the oil industry with concrete examples of success. It is stupid to ignore Musk's stance on this matter as an investor.
In undergrad I had a history class that started with the unpacking the knapsack of white privilege[0]. A lot of the student responses were similar.

[0]http://www.interpretereducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/...
Large companies: go standard format unless your a designer or something.
Have you ever needed to write a blog article and for some reason forced yourself to use Twitter to do it?
It was something else but it took a while for them to figure it out because even the Google support staff were hopelessly confused.

https://www.blender.org/media-exposure/youtube-blocks-blende...
GDC postmortems in general are quite high-density in goodness.
Well, it sounds like in the Mayan village, a kid would have the opportunity to run off and interact with someone else, or do something else, a lot more easily than in an American suburb or city. I don't think we can conclude from the NPR article that the Mayan mothers actually have to put up with looking at the same thing 50 times. It sounds like Mayan children have a lot more physical space to explore, and a lot more other children nearby.
a friend of mine manages his "food box" businesses logistics with a spreadsheet (google). The thing that it does well is he can adapt it as he changes how he runs his business. It's not super pretty, but I think it works better than coding an alternative that he can't really adapt as easily. With a few manual steps he has it working with shopify, label printers and bar code scanning. He keeps tweaking it as he works out better ways to do things and integrates it with other analytic tools.

The only major problem at the moment I can see with it, is it's not easy for anyone else to know how to use it.
How robots are grasping the art of gripping
Yes I agree, I don't follow street cars near as close as I do race cars, so I was ignorant and too busy at that time to G it. TBH I am fundamentally adverse to self-driving cars (though I'd love to race against their future counterparts, but alas I'll be too old) but I am not a Musk hater-I find it astonishing that he can land a rocket on a barge. I am happy to hear he sought out expert advice, and now thanks to you, I have to look into that more myself :)
Red OnePlus 6 announced for July 10th release
GitHub is a great example of decentralization? In what way? I view GitHub as a centralized service.
not sure what you mean here because i pay for Drive (via Business G Suite, single user, unlimited storage) and use Filestream just fine.
Not gonna lie- I don't think I understand the difference. Every explanation seems to bounce off and over my thick skull.
This is very cool. Where can I learn more about stuff like this, and what are the prerequisites for learning something like this? I have a BSc in CS and understand OSes and programming languages pretty well.
At least we can buy a home for <400k here in Austin. Still, wow.
It's some kind of hyper bizarre, borderline crazy, Musk hatred syndrome that floats around parts of the tech industry.

The anti-Tesla posts are always overflowing with empty, overly emotional statements. No matter how many times Musk overcomes and ultimately delivers in the end, it doesn't matter, the anti crowd returns for the next fight with the exact same emotional arguments.

Maybe it's just all BMW, Toyota and Mercedes employees doing the trolling around the Internet (joking). Every ~$40k+ vehicle that Tesla sells comes directly out of their pockets (it's certainly not coming out of the pocket of GM and Ford). Over the next year, Tesla will take $20+ billion in sales away from the luxury auto makers. The bigger that number gets, the more desperate BMW, Mercedes and Toyota (Lexus) are going to get. Hundreds of billions of dollars are on the line.

If you go back and read forum threads around the time the Model S was launched, people were claiming back then that Tesla could never build it in any volume period, that it would be a failure across the board. Similar claims were made about the Model 3 right out of the gate; they weren't supposed to ever make it in any volume, the venom in every thread was extreme to say the least.

There's a type of person that aggressively hates successful people, and often success in general. They resent everything about it, they lust after tearing people down. Musk succeeding with Tesla is a perpetual open wound for those types.
I think the estimates I saw were a few hundred are being produced in the tents. In any case, the customers are who will deal with any quality issues. If there are issues, Tesla has a track record of making things right for the customer.
Google also seems to have done this with little regard for its effects on the balance of power in the eternal struggle between pirates and ninjas.
That's how the current patent/trade system works. If it turns out there are products made without proper IP licensing, the USITC can ban importation of infringing goods.
they sure do. Current fed rate is 2.0%
It's true that unauthenticated, encrypted communication is an improvement over unencrypted communication, because it rules out pure eavesdropping attacks. The question is, what's the risk of eavesdropping compared to MITM?

Once upon a time, "using the Internet" meant shared-medium Ethernet, and the only choke-points were things like routers (too stupid to be nefarious) and ISPs (who were too busy).

These days, nearly everything is star-topography, and one of the biggest potential bad actors (the NSA) gets Internet backbone ISPs to silently do their bidding.

Sure, phishing is still a thing and identity verification doesn't solve that, but at least promoting it requires continual, repeated effort. You can't just add a black box to a network closet somewhere and come back a week later to pick up all the intercepted data.
Exploration of Low Numeric Precision Deep Learning Inference Using Intel FPGAs
Jobs to Be Done [summary]