skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My gut instinct from reading about quantum computation is that we need a new paradigm, or several. Maybe it makes less sense to be trying to do binary logic at that scale, for instance. Or maybe we should be engineering at a quasiparticle level.
I just go all the way and call it "antisocial" - antisocial media, antisocial networks, antisocial marketing. Works pretty well.
A major pain point with JVM even today is the startup time. This is especially true for command line tools. I use hdfs tools and it is really slow to start. Someone wrote a Go replacement that is 100X faster to start.
None of the JVM sophistication means anything if it cannot solve simple common world problems. The java community has failed in this regard in my opinion.

[1] https://github.com/colinmarc/hdfs
Are we sure it's really all human sacrifice and not just an ossuary?

For example a major tourist attraction underneath Paris is the The Catacombs where you can walk through tunnels paved with the skulls of over 6 million people. It's an amazing sight but would be extremely creepy without the context of a huge modern city above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catacombs_of_Paris
> I guess there are valid reasons why Apple don't ship new Macs with FileVault enabled from the factory.

Should we assume that when it could also be likely there's no good reason? Especially given common practices like this - which I also experienced when I had my entire 2016 MBP in for a battery (and therefore full topcase) replacement: https://www.troyhunt.com/apples-desensitisation-of-the-human...

(In own my case, after questioning,
I gave them a non-admin test account after I modified ~/ permissions away from 744 - yet, it was I who felt like the crazy one for not simply handing over all my active browser/email login sessions. Imagine what a great attack vector that would be for most Apple customers.)
"The huge problem is that it's not that much better than Java"

I always see the .net fanboys tout how much better C# is than Java with generics, await/async, etc. but at the end of the day it's not that much better when you can achieve the same thing in Java with better open source support and across oses.

I know there's .net core now but I am not going near it until it matures.
I choose to ignore irrelevant questions to avoid derailing the conversation.
I've had freelance recruiters ghost me. It makes me wonder if it was more convenient for them or if they were themselves ghosted by the company they applied me to.
> There's hardly anything you can't build in Java.

I do bare metal/low level embedded, kernel drivers, and occasionally shared libraries. Java is useless for practically all of my typical use cases.
As a user of a C library in Cargo, you don't need to deal with C tooling, just have it installed.
Yes, I've had similar viewpoints.

I personally think tying of the soul to intelligence seems a weird distinction. Does that mean that if person goes into a vegetative state, they have lost their soul? Do animals that are less intelligent have a less likelihood of a soul? If you can breed animals without mental faculties are they soul-less? Does the fact that we can't understand if plants are intelligent meant they lack souls? These seem like petty distinctions.

To me there is a notion that life has some intrinsic value to it. In parallel there is a notion that to exist as life, humans have to rely on destroying life. To me these are equally important, recognizing that life has worth but also to exist you must end life. I find this paradoxical duality to be beautiful.

Now from a practical point of view there are social rules for how you end life. So some cultures thought it was ok to eat all forms of life as long as that life wasn't part of your tribe (societies with cannibalism), other societies thought it was ok to eat all forms of life except for your pets (most Americans), some exclude animals based on religious beliefs (pork in Islam and judaism, meat and beef in Hinduism), and some think it is ok to eat all forms of life that are non-animals (vegetarians).

I think its hard for any of these groups to claim moral superiority. The truth is in order to exist we need to destroy life, but at the same time, most can see that life is precious.
Like header/code in C or C++ ? I'm not a Java programmer but it seems like an abuse of interface if it's done systematically.
The long term solution CAN'T be the MS store. It requires asking Microsoft for permission to compete with them. It gives MS permission to bar entire categories of software globally or in your particular market.

Giving the party running the store 30% of all revenue is a hard sale to start with.

More importantly it gives MS the position to impose whatever dictates it or even more likely every government in existence the right to impose whatever restrictions they like on any app maker in existence with the threat of instant non existence.

Want a social media platform to ban anyone who disagrees with the king no problem do it or you can't do business. Want your browser to censor whatever your locality wants? No problem if it doesn't it doesn't get distributed. Want your OS to refuse to install apps that don't follow the store rules? No problem its in the governments interests and the companies.

Linux package management works like an app store with an official source and the ability to add whichever sources you choose. A search of available packages shows results giving sources the priority set by the user. Updating the system updates packages from 3rd party sources same as others. The major limitation is the labour required to create packages for all the different platforms users prefer not artificial limits or money paid to the platform "owner".

On windows nothing much is on the store mostly because people don't want to give Microsoft 30% on Linux charging 30% is downright impossible because people would trivially publish an alternative source instead.

Basically your cure is worse than the disease and since Microsoft wont fix the situation in a reasonable fashion so the only solution is to move off their platform.
That was probably me :-). You got the essence of my post correct. I was observing that human's wants, desires, aspirations seem to grow exponentially and as soon as you get what you wanted you want more. Yet back in the village my relatives have less, they want less and yet are less stressed than me the city dweller with more than them.
But there's an upside, no? There is no way to reference an undefined variable in go? So if the compiler is correct, so will be the result, and errors would be found compile time.

(written by a non-go-expert)
This is the world these companies have created. They show no loyalty to employees, rarely train people or pass on professional norms, and rarely reach out when they drop employees at different stages of a search. I wouldn't ghost a recruiter for various reasons, but I hardly feel like recruiters or companies much deserve the respect they seem to think they deserve in this article. The shoe is on the other foot.
You are referring to law created by a theocratic form of government during a time when there was no separation between church and state.

You can argue there was a law, and different rules, and a bunch of abstract concepts... in the end it is someone being killed for making God angry, and the form of execution is no different than a ritual.

For example, if we sent an average Hacker News reader back to the time of the Inquisition, they would start trying to share their scientific knowledge with others, talking about the laws of physics, chemistry, etc. Immediately after, they would be accused of witchcraft (chemistry back then was alchemy, a form of witchcraft) and that person would be tortured and then killed in a bonfire. That system is the one you seem to be defending now.
Ive read about them using both systems. Seems like teams have flexibility to choose what they want. As they should. And some prefer GitLab.
Thanks for linking the issue. I'll discuss it with our product leaders.

Regarding the documentation we see many people switching to static websites generated with GitLab pages. This allows you to separate the change from the approval. Is this an option for you?
Point is that it broke and you’re trying to figure out why and how to get it fixed. Sometimes looking at the code is the most expeditious way to get there.
I've started reading French books again recently, and found some great ones:

Les Choses, Georges Perec

Alcools, Guillaume Appolinaire (poetry)

Francois Mitterrand, l'Abeille et l'Architecte (essay/diary)*

Bernard Henri Levy, La Pureté Dangereuse (essay)*

*AFAIK The last two don't have an English translation.
What makes you say Hindutva in a derogatory sense?
Implement it yourself, rendering to WebGL (with a canvas fallback if you really care). When you're done, show HN! We'll probably mock you, unless it's somehow awesome. The DOM is horrible, and knowing what we know now we could at least make it less weird, but some of the big annoyances really are its greatest strengths.
If you want to respect your users, use self-hosted shariff.

https://github.com/heiseonline/shariff
You seem very confused. FileZilla wasn't "caught". They openly say that they bundle crapware. Sorry, this is not a productive conversation. Goodbye.
When you only have one implementation, you often have no concept of what a second implementation will look like and you have no idea what concept or task you're delegating to the interface. They just become header files for the single implementation.

Now, you can be good at planning ahead and know what the abstraction should be in many cases. This is still much rarer than all cases. Indiscriminately creating an interface for every class means you're probably not giving the interface much thought.
This already is what we do. We observe whether someone just uses the word or if they show the respect of at least referring to it as “the n-word” when there is a meta-context of discussing it.

That’s no different than what you propose, except that there’s far less risk of either incidentally triggering someone for whom the word itself materially carries a weight of trauma, and far less risk of making it seem like the word is OK to say so long as you do mental gymnastics about the context of how you said it (something which people who want to use it racially would like to do to avoid punishment).

Allowing people to scapegoat their clearly racist usage of the word, under the pretense that it’s OK as long as the intended usage is not meant to be offensive, is particularly terrible, as it shifts the blame of “being offended” onto the class of people for whom it is a racial slur. It’s tacit racism endorsement 101.

What you describe seems like it contributes nothing in the way of actually bolstering free speech or better identifying slur usage from discussion usage. The current way already serves those purposes better, and without the extra risks that your described point of view carries with it.
I miss all that from C#, some of it a lot. But Java has a community so large that they've basically hacked these things into Java anyways.

LINQ -> streams, QueryDSL, RxJava, JOOQ etc

Async/await -> Comsat/Quasar

The type system is lightyears better in C# but it was rare that I needed those features. Usually you can hack around the limitations and end up with something (slightly cruftier) that does the same thing in Java. Mockito, Retrofit, and RxJava are good examples of hacking about the type system until you have something good enough. That said, there are definitely times I still miss C#'s stellar type system. Easily the best of any language I've touched besides maybe Typescript (which is designed by the same guy)
It's weird, I started in C# but haven't touched anything Microsoft for roughly 10 years. That's how long they've been asleep, maybe longer. I would have killed for official cross-platform C#, if only for a decent UI toolkit (Mono was too bigger pain), and I'm sure C# would have significantly dented the popularity of e.g. Python. Instead C# never outgrew Windows, while many developers and companies did. Meanwhile, Java has kept evolving and taking chances, so much so that Java 8+ is pleasant enough. Only now has Microsoft realized the error, but way too late.
It’s funny to see defense of a program that intentionally included adware in a previous version.
Hmm, 2014. But a good read.
In GitLab the owner can do more than the master/maintainer.
His autobiography "John Barleycorn". Even exploring a lifetime drinking alcohol, it ends up as a book to cherish.
>When did people get told that their lot in life was to be productive.

Hacker News is the worst about this. It's very creepy, the constant talk of "productivity". I recall a comment in one of the threads about Anthony Bourdain's suicide bemoaning the loss of productivity due to his death.
That makes perfect sense if you have a job that you would still go to every day even if you weren't getting paid. But unless that's true, it's clear what the benefit of more money would be, and it has nothing to do with "stuff": having the freedom to choose what to do with your time.
Knowing what I know these days, a bigger reason for eating meat is that it is hard to get adequate B vitamins from a vegetarian diet. In most cases, it's not that hard to get adequate protein from a vegetarian diet.

I don't remember the book very well. I read it around 30 years ago. Back then, protein was generally considered to be The Big Issue. It was the basis for Diet for a Small Planet. When the book first came out, it emphasized protein complementarity to solve this issue for vegetarians. It was a political tome. Half of the book was about civil wars and the like (causing starvation). The other half was vegetarian recipes. The follow up book indicated the author had since concluded that it wasn't as challenging as she once thought to get adequate protein from a vegetarian diet.

So it is possible this book I read was basing its hypothesis on the dominant thought of that era that protein was some big limiter. Perhaps protein per se was not the critical detail. We (probably) won't ever really know.

What we do know is that the Aztecs were a very warlike people, human sacrifice was very widely practiced and they also routinely ate their victims, not solely as some barbaric religious ritual, but for dinner.
Aztecs didn't need to eat people to survive.

The idea was popularized by this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Harner

In this paper: https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525...

It was immediately rebutted a year later: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5901/8ba520161d2cb4ff55dd91...

And more recently in 2005: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?cc=mdia;c=mdi...

Skim the 2005 paper if you're interested in a TL;DR

P.S. The capital of the Aztec Empire, Tenochtitlan, is underneath what is now Mexico City (not South America).
Not touching a wire is easy to do. If you can't do that perhaps you shouldn't be participating.

Accidentally touching a live wire is very easy to do, all it takes is a moment of inattention when you put your hand down or a reflexive action to catch a dropped flashlight.

That's why electrical code doesn't allow any exposed wires, even in breaker boxes in a locked utility room.
if cryptocurrencies are crude, cash is also very crude... crypto currencies are more secure in some sense if you dont account for the value that is not very stable
"Long John Silver" by Larsson (https://www.amazon.com/Long-John-Silver-Bjorn-Larsson/dp/186...).

I have read some other books by Larsson, but this is definitely the one I liked more.
It is sort of a retelling of "Treasure Island" as narrated by the eponymous character (including how he became a pirate, and what happened to him after the event in the novel).
Celestial lights are quite bright when away from light pollution
Interfaces can also provide read-only references of a instance. Consider interface Foo with accessors only and a MutableFoo implementation with accessors and mutators. The creator of the MutableFoo instance can make all sorts of changes to the instance but then pass it around as a Foo that can't be modified. Another option is to simply put all the state in the constructor so that a Foo never needs to be mutated; however, that might not be elegant in some cases state is incrementally accrued.

I do acknowledge that XImpl is kinda ugly as name.
So when superstitious Europeans kill their own for religious reasons in a ritual to please their god, that's not human sacrifice? Change my mind.
pietroglyph's point still stands. Well I guess Go is the obvious example to sort-of-refute your assertion, since the designers emphasize simplicity so much. It's almost a defining feature of the Go approach, just as the borrow checker could be considered a defining feature of the Rust approach. Of course, the designers of Go made compromises that shift some complexity to the language users and library writers. It seems that many find the result useful. I'm very glad that both approaches are now realized each in a popular language, but like OP I hope Rust won't go too far on the path of increasing complexity, as to me it would then lose its appeal.

By the way, it's probably a bit early to say that Go's dependency management system is broken, and anyway it has little to do with the language's complexity.
For a few years I was sleeping about 4 hours a day on weekdays. I thought I was fine until I started sleeping 8 hours a day and realized I had been almost in a permanent bad mood for years due to bad sleep. My life completely changed.

Now even though I can still get through the exceptional sleepless night/day, the difference is so evident that my daily life is planned/scheduled to make sure I get plenty of sleep. Life feels a lot happier and fulfilling now.
I think the long term solution would be to forbid deceiving users by software vendors. Users should know exactly what they are paying with.

Now the vendors who sell software that doesn't have hidden functionality lose competition to such "free" products monetized with adware, data collection or other shady behaviours. It is easy to see in mobile game market.
Trang hat deo tay phong thuy – A Listly List
Channel takeovers aren't really a thing on modern networks with good services.

The Freenode decloak trick still works, though.
If a website loads third party JavaScript into a page using a <script> tag then by default it loads with a security context of same-origin – this means that it often it can do whatever JavaScript hosted from the websites’ server can do, so likely:

Read any content on the page it is loaded
Read your user details and often session cookies
Modify (add/change/remove) any content on the page
Add a username and password field, capture the values

I always* wondered why there isn't more data breaches out there. Most websites have trackers and shady scripts that can do a lot of harm... Even on banks websites or payment pages !

Thing is, I don't see why technically it's the company providing the website 's fault. They are sending a webpage, and it's the user's browser who is sending it's own data to facebook.com / google / twitter / metrics scripts / shady stuff... What would be illegal would be for company to make direct connection from their servers with your data.

* i.e. since I learned web development
Your comment seems largely unnecessary.
I get the sense you're being contrarian. Op isn't saying it's the best choice, but being in that field, you should know that even those things people have tried to do and sometimes done with Java. For example, Java-based smart cards or Java Micro Edition.
I've had a project in mind for several years now that would be ideal for injection molding plastic parts, the only problem is a $10-20k in mold creation would take a long time to pay off and become profitable for a niche product (lego related for example). Does anyone have experience doing this?
Articles like this scares me greatly. About 2 years ago, I went about 3 weeks with maybe less than 3 hours of sleep. I am sure it is hard to believe, even I can't believe it myself, it was a crazy experience, where my mind was just passed the point of exhaustion that I could not feel tiredness at all. After that my sleeping have never been the same, went through almost a 2 years of waking up every 3 hours or so. It's just about a month ago where I was able to finally sleep without waking up every couple hours. I am so grateful these days but I still fear the day where I may just start waking up again in middle of the night, it was a living hell, no other way to describe it.
Why I Gave Up Making a Twitter Bot After a Week of Trying
This is whataboutism, I think.
Climate Change First Became News 30 Years Ago. Why Haven’t We Fixed It?
1.3mb binary size, untyped elements (compare to Typescript/JSX), and a Makefile that will inevitably rival webpack.
This is largely not true. Most housing assistance in most places is in bands. For example to receive low income housing you need to have income below a certain fixed level or else you’re not eligible at all.

Many other benefits are lost entirely if you get a job.
>It's not type safe.

Yes, I get that, but that's also moving the goalpost. The post claimed that "you can’t write a generic map from an array of T to an array of R", but you can (if you take generic to mean "general" and not "specifically using the mechanism of generics").

I think the author just didn't know that this was possible, or his concern would have been about the lack of type safety with the reflection method.
Not really, that's kind of an invariant: As long as you have enough money to not have to worry about things, you can choose not to work. Sure, that raises the question of how you make money, but my point is that you don't need a lot of it to be happy.
Not that I'm an anarcho-libertarian, but the ideas he's advancing don't seem very scary when you remember that you can reformulate institutions very similar to governments in a world without states.

They wouldn't technically be government institutions, because everyone subject to their rules would be a contracting party that consented to the arrangement, but these institutions could have many of the same powers that governments have now, including the power to tax, regulate trade, and provision goods.

Anyway, a state-free world is neither plausible nor seen as desireable by the majority kf libertarians, so no point in worrying too much about it.
Implement the better model on top of current tech and show us. It is a competition, it's just that noone is competing.
This is actually being addressed, eventually. There's work being done to lower the startup time in Java 9-10 but I'm not sure what state it's in. Basically cache everything from the first run to make future launches almost instant
That’s almost certainly impossible, but I bet there would be some value in doing the conversion without wrapping anything in unsafe blocks and letting compiler warnings guide through making it safe.
>I always wondered why there isn't more data breaches out there. Most websites have trackers and shady scripts that can do a lot of harm... Even on banks websites or payment pages !

They do, constantly. You just only hear about the massive ones at public companies. That's why we have GDPR now. The web has become a complete utter nightmare in terms of security. Users have absolutely no idea how critically dangerous it is to plop a third party CDN script into their pages.
Or maybe c-salt
Thermostats, Locks and Lights: Digital Tools of Domestic Abuse
The Aztecs may have had trouble getting enough protein for the simple reason that they were primarily a heavily agrarian culture dependent on Corn (Maize) as their primary staple. Of course it seems like most agrarian cultures, regardless of their staple crops, have suffered from this same problem.
Mirillis Action 3.1.6 Crack and Serial Key Full Latest Version Download
Thank you, I'll check that - on the other hand are the current models taking into account cosmic rays that are just reaching it's maximum? https://spaceweatherarchive.com/2018/03/05/the-worsening-cos...