skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, it's completely nuts. I'm a believer in the right to own firearms for various reasons and it's still insane, there's absolutely no consistency to how products are regulated. In fact, it's a frequent gripe of firearm enthusiasts. Full auto is banned, but bump-fire stocks aren't. A rifle with a barrel than 16 inches is subject to special rules, but a handgun with a 2 inch barrel isn't. There's even a joke that goes around: "If OSHA were in charge of the ATF, suppressors would be mandatory".
The Error Model
I want names out there. Who is responsible for this!!!! Who was the CEO of smyte? Who is the manager at Twitter that gave the comand to shut down everything?
Yeah, and it makes a barrier to entry, so a lot of potential economic activity does not take place, or it takes place off the records, and generates no tax revenue.
Fujitsu prototype of ARM chip for post-K exascale system
Par for the course with Youtube celebrities then.
I'm still owed money from a start-up that went bankrupt, got bought by another company which is operating it as if nothing happend
In our Tcl based application server (many eons ago), we followed exactly that approach.

All configuration files were Tcl data structures that were sourced on server start.
Waking up at 5 am doesn't imply sleeping any less (just going to bed earlier).

In the similar way, taking a nap doesn't mean that you sleep more, just that you schedule your sleep differently.
While it is fine for Google to require monetization, since you are right that it does cost money to host video, I think you are missing the reason people got upset. They provide an option in the channel mgmt UI to turn off ads, and they changed their minds without any warning. Had they given blender a month or 2 to change this setting, I expect people would have been less upset. If it's such a problem for them, then why do they offer the option to disable ads in the first place? This is just another example of YouTube acting capriciously, which doesn't do much to encourage people to trust even more of their revenue to them.
I credit any of my "success" to the struggles I had as a child. Our world isn't perfect, and some of us experience different & harsher aspects of its flaws. I think the earlier some experience these flaws, the more they learn to adapt and realize truths of human nature. We learn that many things aren't going to be handed to us and to get what we want we will have to work a bit harder, or struggle a bit more (In the military we called this "Embrace the Suck").

We learn that our families aren't the same we see on our favorite TV shows. It hurts & its sad for young children to experience a struggle, but I think they can ultimately strengthen them -- unless the difficulties are so severe, or misguiding, that they lead children down the wrong path of life (i.e. severe psychology disorders, crime).

Again though, the world/nature is a tough place, and its nice to want to enforce being easier on and conceal realities from children, but I think there is something of value in experiencing "realness"/struggle -- a simple & less-harsh example is the losing team getting no trophy.
You are right about shitty jobs not being the solution.

About the last part of your statement though: society has already implicitly accepted the crappy minimum living standards (at least in the US) that it's willing to accept. That doesn't make it right for the people stuck having to live according to that minimum.
Also, as you can see my screenshot it's look like "Engagements" & "Maintenance" ignored on "Summary" charts. So, as result there only horizontal lines on the graph, instead diamond-shaped graph

> send me your report URL

Here[0] it is.

[0] https://gitcompare.com/report?packages=librecad%2Flibrecad&p...
How I hacked Apple.com
Indeed, one wonders what sort of due diligence the investors conducted.. I suspect (since convoluted shell structures are not (at all) uncommon in practice) it could have been that they weren’t actually aware of the full potential ramifications, or to the extent that they were, they didn’t imagine it’d go to the (literally) extreme scenario. In any case, a tale of caution this certainly is.
I3 Verticals Prices Initial Public Offering
Related: "How is Twitter supposed to know what we want?" https://theoutline.com/post/4936/what-do-twitter-users-want
They banned people, because they were on other end of political spectrum as Patreon management folks are.
It's the second time that I click "back" because of the idiotic Oath GDPR thing.

Either I accept it, or I can't visit the page. I don't see what GDPR has to do with reading an article, and/or why they won't let me read it unless I agree to whatever is they want me to do.
I recommended it before, but I maintain a playlist that focuses on very quiet, soothing ambient, moody soundscapes and slightly experimental music that, in my opinion, works as well for sleeping as it does for being productive and focused:

- https://open.spotify.com/user/michaelfeihstel/playlist/10IcC...

Alternatively and if you prefer a more eclectic, diversive selection that covers a wide range of moods and genres, but should still serve as a soundtrack to a relaxing sunday out in the sun or on the couch, there's this little mix series I work on - I think these particular episodes might be a good starting point:

- https://soundcloud.com/michaelfeihstel/sunday-debrief-005

- https://soundcloud.com/michaelfeihstel/sunday-debrief-006
A group of Quakers drafted a law in the 60s that would have allowed them to pay their taxes to UNICEF instead of the US treasury for that reason.

The concept is called “Conscientious objection to military taxation”
There are many ways it can be sexist.

Let's start with "which he is comfortable dealing".

There can be many reasons why a person could be uncomfortable. One could be that he does not believe women are not authority figures, and that Sandler's role as director is a figurehead.

So, if he is "comfortable" dealing with Kuhn, but not with Sandler, simply because Sandler is a women, then actions which make him more comfortable is supporting a form of sexual discrimination.

You ask "Is there an obligation that ..."

The obligation is to speak with the person who is most appropriate for what you want to do. In the case of making a donation to the Conservancy, it seems the most appropriate thing is to talk with the current Executive Director. Who happens to be a woman.

I see no need to posit there is an implied obligation to "speak to a person of an opposite gender or I will appear sexist".

You write "isn't she getting the donation her organization needs, and having her employee do the work that is his job?"

An organization depends on a long-term continuity of structure. If that structure is undermined by doing whatever is necessary for the short-term gain of a single donation, then it risks the organization as whole.

As an example of a no-win situation, suppose I were to offer $10M to the Conservancy, but gate it on having a date with Kuhn, then one view is that Sandler should pressure Kuhn to go on a date with me, because it will result in a donation. On the other hand, Kuhn and others might decided they don't want to work in that sort of environment, and leave.

Thus, it's not always the case that "getting a donation" is something that an organization needs.

Also, regarding "that is his job" - how do you know that private meeting with a potential donor is part of Kuhn's job?
Long-Term Storage Is Free or Is It?
I’m not saying it’s easy- there’s probably a reason no one’s done it yet. But the comparison seems a little off. There’s no decades long darpa research grants required, and probably very few phds. There’s no predicting what other humans will do, there are no lives at stake (other than food safety precautions). The amount of capital alone that’s been invested in self driving tech (and it’s still not good enough) compared to the amount invested in burger tech makes pretty clear how hard one problem may be.

This is basically a precision automated assembly line, and to be honest plenty of things just as complicated as burgers have been assembled automatically.
I made a tiny app to solve this kind of disagreement; I was annoyed by the unjust dominance of the ENIAC over Hoelzer's 50 Jahre Computer and the Z3, but also over the Manchester Baby, which really was a massive step forward.

There are about 2304 "first" computers, by my model.

http://gleech.org/first-computers
Android Studio 3.2 Beta
If your restaurant grosses $138K/year, you're out of business pretty fast.
As far as I am concerned, the issue has always been, and remains, that passive alertness - the assumption underlying the claim that partial autonomy is viable - does not work. All arguments about what drivers ought to do is irrelevant in the face of what they actually do.
The sine, cosine and tan plots hold the key to our very reality.
What's the difference between your licence and the licensing model of qt?
Bill Gates is no longer active in Microsoft acquisitions, also dont forget this was 42 years ago, when the market was tiny and Microsoft was a scrappy little startup dependent on software licensing to survive. Interesting, but not relevant to GH acqusition or MS hate.
Data Migration Is One Thing the Cloud Make Worse
A Guide to Undefined Behavior in C and C++, Part 1 (2010)
> You first have to recognize that the system is failing or about to fail

For that to work, I'd like that cars that have features like this show you what they're seeing. Tesla does this a bit by showing all the cars it has detected in the dashboard. But it should go further and other car brands should do the same.

Without that, you're right, you can not be sure if the car is going to react to something on its own.
Squeezing light at the nanoscale
SpaceX Falcon Heavy Muscles Way into $130M Military Contract
but real-time promiscuity where you spread your users info everywhere and have no backup plan is much more FUN. (/s)
I 100% agree and should have said that in the original post. I’m not exactly sure how I feel about those laws (though I flat out oppose attempts to require cause for firings in general), but I mainly wanted to point out that principled libertarians trying to square the circle, the way the person I was relying to was, are trying to have their cake and eat it too. Unions can only exist and be effective, in the vast majority of cases, because the state uses its coercive power to give them artificially-inflated bargaining power. Whether that’s for the better or worse is a different question.
An old spite building could be the Rocca Paolina in Perugia, Italy, it was ordered by Pope Paul III and it has been built atop the Baglioni family's houses after they revolted against the Pope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocca_Paolina
That's a good idea. I've never thought about it this way
Thank you for a valuable input
10 Techniques to Help You Understand Other People’s Code
Why is the UK running out of CO2 and what will it mean?
I too had a difficult childhood and overcame some moderate difficulties. Then I proceeded to waste my adult youth (20s and most of my 30s) in a multi decade pit of depression and withdrawal from the world. So let's not forget survivorship bias.
The closest you can possibly come is to have your hands on the wheel and feet on the pedals and mime each action you think the car SHOULD be taking... but I suspect that would lead to a shitload more 'intervention events' being recorded for things the car was just doing differently to the particularities of the particular human driver.

Agreed it's too difficult.
Help people with learning disability live longer: tackle causes of early death
Green and politics rarely go well together methinks, this will never be seen as a valueable politician time (and I'm sure they'll despise having less shiny on shelves).

You'd need some economical model to make packaging too costly and thus explain why a law reducing them interesting.
There are plenty of Lenny stock punters who gamble full well knowing they don’t know what’s going on underneath. They expect larger returns in exchange for the added risk.
The 2015 model can still be bought new as well, but not with dedicated graphics. That would’ve been AMD/ATi anyway, though.
> Wasn't the victim the real offender,

No. How can you write something like this without thinking realising what you're saying?
My initial (learned?) reaction about automation is also that it's a good thing. But when analyzing it, automation only provides very temporary gains. Even if those gains were distributed evenly, people in the end would not necessarily be better off.

Pretty much almost all (time) gains from automation get immediately filled with non-automated tasks instead of giving you endless free time.

Otherwise at this point in time in history no one would need to work. But we keep coming up with more stuff to do and fill up our time.
This is me speaking for them but it seems to me that they mean to say that the point where they draw the line is where you take a contract/business from the military. In other words, if they are paying you that is over the line. Working on missile guidance for NASA? That's okay. Working on a text processor for the military? That's not okay.

This seems like a reasonable way to draw a line. Obviously things get questionable as they might work for a company that has a contract with a company that has a military contract. How can they be sure that their work won't be used as a part of that contract?

But as a start I think this framework isn't so bad. Probably better than something I would be able to come up with on the spot
Two Titans’ Rocky Relationship Stands Between Comcast and Fox
> No, I'm saying you are denying people who want to change the current status quo the right to do so by calling them freeloaders

Changing the status quo is a political action. The military largely isn't political, they are a tool of the politicians, a loaded gun that the politicians point and sometimes shoot. The focus on the military is simply incorrect.

> Communist government wasn't all bad, there's a reason why plenty of people yearn for return of the "good old days" - it has succeeded in many of the "for the people" goals, but failed spectacularly at others

Very debatable, but your argument is simply invalid. Many also yearn for "the good old days of racial segregation", but that doesn't somehow imply racial segregation succeeded at some things that we ought to admire.
Tldr would this work on a pi3?
IMHO, 10K or even 100K GPUs bottle necked by bandwidth/network speed might be hard to compete with giants. And there is a also problem of optimizing the ML/DL training to work in distributed architecture.

But this must happen for
1. It's a research area that should be explored!
2. 10K GPUs are still better than 1000 or 3000 in lab GPUs!
Welcome to round N of "Google company only fixes farcical behaviour after it garners huge publicity and/or someone knows a well positioned staff member."
Bitcoin Investment , Invest in Cryptocurrency
Actually, it shows you plebeians the power of unions.

I have a handful of friends that work in Hollywood as actors and producers. They get paid amazingly well and get insane amounts of time off.

...all because they have organized labor. Most people would be amazed how much an extra gets paid once they have their SAG card.

Many take advantage of unemployment as well since they typically work on contracts. Have several friends that will work for 6 months on a show and then take 3-4 months off while collecting unemployment and figuring out what contract they want to take next.
As far as Uber being negligent for putting an easily-distracted human in charge of a car that ostensibly (even if they claim otherwise) needs little attention, I totally agree they are negligent. The reason for that is I believe it's unreasonable to expect a human driver to pay 100% attention to the road while in a car that only requires 5% attention to the road. However, I also believe as well as telling the driver "pay attention to the road 100% of the time" she would have been told "Do not use your phone while driving" which I believe is a totally reasonable request and expectation. With this assumption and if the blame has to fall on only a single party then I think this news puts it squarely on the driver.
Not seen this yet but: negotiate hard. Ask for whatever would keep you happy: hours, money, whatever. And don't undersell yourself!
Correct my possible misunderstanding but isn't this fabled "power" at best x4 performance gain and not really in the same league as GPU-esque?
This the problem; once you have to pay attention at that level (and I agree that you do to avoid accidents) whats the point of the automation? The taxing part of driving is not the physical act of slightly turning a steering wheel or break pedal but the mental processing power it takes to know when.
You are not a 'product' you are a vendor and companies have to maintain good relationships with their vendors or they will lose them.
Seek and ye shall find (1996)
I believe all other driveless tests work the same way, with sensors but requiring human driver at all time. Would you also consider Waymo, Cruise, et al, negligent?

The technologies are not ready. They are being tested. Aircraft get to such a safe state like today after so many iterations and improvement, both in technology and process.

A terrible tragedy happened in this case. Hopefully it will help save a lot of lives in future.
I think they made a huge mistake in closing Consumerist. They lost a great marketing tool.
Here's the problem with that $100k/200 transaction law. Small businesses have to do one of three things:

1) Assume that they will hit one of those limits and collect tax from the start. Once they've told the customer that they've been charged tax, they will have to file anyway. I don't see anything that says the first $100k/200 transactions are exempt from the requirement. And if you hit the limits this year, you'll have to collect taxes no matter what from my reading of the bill.

2) Keep track of how much has been sold to South Dakota residents and stop selling if they hit the limits.

3) Give up and tell South Dakota residents that they're out of luck and that a state with less than 900k residents isn't worth putting up with the filing hassles.

If I'm not sure if my business will take off, I'm probably not interesting in paying taxjar or someone else $5000/year just in their filing fees (to make sure I'm covered), so I'm most likely to go with option 3 and start by limiting sales to my home state, those with no sales tax, and those that aren't going to try and make me collect the sales tax for them.
Proposed solution: it should be an offence for the manufacturer to describe a car as "self-driving" or "autonomous" if it is not capable of doing so entirely by itself. Systems which rely on the car driving 99% of the time and then throwing up its hands in order to make the human responsible for the crash are a ridiculous abdication of responsibility.

This system would have to be described as "driver assist".
Personalisation Is Asymmetric Psychological Warfare
The full title is: "Helping people with a learning disability live longer by tackling the causes of early death".
Samsung Launches 8TB NGSFF SSD
> Providing support doesn't mean hiring bunch of offshore low wage call center workers who patiently explains to you how to power plug cables and move mouse to click buttons on your side.

If 90% of you customers are phoning to complain the service is down and they can't reboot the modem because the lights are turned off because of the power cut, you can't have skilled support engineers dealing with them. Setting aside the money, the engineers would just go stir crazy and turn into BOFHs.

The trick is to either vet your customers, or enable a shibboleet protocol
From a mathematics perspective, they're a property of mappings between two categories (called functors). I think part of the confusion us simple programmers have (aside from no knowledge of category theory) is that these words are used without explicitly stating what categories we're dealing with. In the case of typed functional programming (e.g. Haskell), we're usually thinking about functors as mappings from the category of types, where the morphisms are function types, back to itself. But in the object-oriented world, these words are usually used in the context of a category of types where the morphisms indicate a subtype relationship.
Do you actually think a single line of description are going to change human behaviour?
You might find this animation interesting, it shows how few genuinely old buildings remain in London:

https://youtu.be/NB5Oz9b84jM
Yes, until people understand the nature of duality, they struggle with simple concepts. If I choose to not protect myself , am I enabling murders and evil to flourish? Life and death, peace and war, these things are necessary for the engine of reality to continue to cycle. Living itself is a fight against death- would you deny death it due?
I've seen that kind of thinking in the past and it's pretty popular view. I'm just not so sure about this moral aspect.

Why do you think it's more moral/ethical to abstain of supporting military? Maybe you won't do this but be sure that in some other country some similarly talented people will.

If you (and many others) abstain from it on similar basis you and closest people you know may be in danger of being affected by more advanced military equipment other (possibly hostile) armies can get.

Maybe it's just not in people heads that world and homeland safety is not given for free and granted forever.
When I wanted to make more money.
I use excel. My goal is to find out my monthly costs of living and how much I spend on extras like holidays and repairs.

Recently I have greatly simplified the process. It helps to have a separate contactless card (eg Revolut), everything spent there goes into the monthly living costs column, I don't care about the details.
More specifically, it stored the program in the same memory as the data. I don't think the Z3 did that, but I might be wrong.
can you expand on that? Is FCF free cash flow?
Amazon’s Face-Scanning Surveillance Software Contrasts with Its Privacy Stance
No matter what you're responding to, you need to make your comments more civil and substantive than this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
There is nothing better than being at a place with low light pollution and seeing something like this: http://theartofnight.com/

If you're interested in finding places with low light pollution, check here: https://www.lightpollutionmap.info
Is this really the best format to post this in?
examples? I'm just curious.
Is there a recording of this presentation by any chance?
Samsung Crams 8TB into Its Next-Generation PCIe 3.0 X4 SSD
The multiplication by 3 seems quite more complicated than just multiplying digits by 3 and carrying over the rest.
Parents’ Basement Skepticism
This is a surprisingly common way for Chinese companies to get listed in overseas stock markets. Netflix has a good documentary about the practice called "The China Hustle"
Did you kind of forget that Russia pretty much controlled half of Europe not too long ago, and sent tanks to fight citizens when it was needed to maintain "order".

Countries under US rule never faced such severe repression.
Not very surprising. I'd imagine it not being very common to find ovpn configs that both allow user-defined scripts and not require any authentication. This post should be a warning for any VPN services that -don't- let you look at the configs you're using.
Join Us the  Muse (YC W12) Is Hiring an Engineering Manager