skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Jeff Dean is a great example of 10x (or more) developer. To really appreciate what he has done, just read what infrastructure abstractions he created that helps everybody who's working with big data.
Black bears are pretty small for the most part. Athletic, but on the smaller side.
Your points have been thoroughly debunked in sibling comments so no need to go over them again, I'm just wondering why your friends have chosen to live here "way too long" if the situation is as dire as you say it is?
Ideally, I don't disagree with the concept behind that approach. Clean, streamlined CSS is nice because it's generally easier to work with. Browser page inspectors help with that, though. You aren't searching up and down a file sheet to figure out what rules are applicable in a given context.

Resets (normalize.css or any other) are about consistency. Both between browsers and between projects. When you import one, you know what you're getting and don't have to think about it outside some edge cases. This micro reset eliminates that and forces you to figure out your reset needs each and every time. Odds are, you'll miss something at some point. That's especially likely when it comes to accessibility; good resets try to take it into account to avoid screwing users who rely on screen readers and other assistive tech, for instance. They don't always manage it, but their shortcomings are at least consistent. That makes it easier to fix.

Besides, there are already a lot of tools and options to accomplish the stated goals. You could wrap less commonly used reset rules in conditionals and set variables to disable certain ones (forms being the example given). Build tools have improved a lot in recent years. You can use things like cssnano[0] to help you optimize your stylesheets when they're built.

On the other hand, how important is this anyhow? Browsers are highly optimized. Having tons of duplicate media queries throughout a stylesheet (common when dealing with preprocessors and media query mixins) doesn't impact performance, for instance.[1] No reset is going to have a measurable performance impact in adding a handful of duplicate selectors. As for file size, gzip is extraordinarily efficient when it comes to dealing with property and selector names. If you're implementing something like this for performance reasons, the time spent crafting the smallest possible reset for each site you work on would be better spent elsewhere.

0. http://cssnano.co/

1. https://helloanselm.com/2014/web-performance-one-or-thousand...
> In fact, they've been strenuously stating, over and over again, that these aren't self-driving cars.

They only state that in response to "Tesla car involved in crash"-style reports. Otherwise, the messaging they send out is "our cars are basically self-driving." At best, Tesla is guilty of sending out severely mixed messaging, and at worst, they're lying to people and claiming that it's not lying because there is a footnote that's telling the truth (that is designed so that no one will see it).
Indeed. I hope someday people would hold as much disdain and shock as this for statements justifying/rationalising things like gun ownership, immense private wealth when others around you suffer and need for private transport.
Those who still have a few brain cells to rub together, think of Anne Frank.
> Having wireless providers who are able to provide landline-level speeds ...

Are they going to cap me at 1000GB like Comcast, also?
Should I use caching?
I've found in many areas (I've moved around a lot) few Drs and therapists are accepting new patients.

I wish I could find a psychiatrist who also does psychotherapy. Psychiatrists are focused on drug maintenance. Finding a good therapist is difficult, and I've almost given up.

I'm moving to a new area, so I will probably start the search over again. I wish I could offer more advice, but I think it comes down to just trying out a few therapists. And make sure they actually listen to you.
Find out if it works for you by typing your employers name (or your spouse's/parent's/etc - coverage seems to be for "family") here: https://care.lyrahealth.com
Almost like The Eraser (1996), just add squad railgun rifles and X-ray-like targeting.
Linux appears to have patched things to avoid this problem on Intel and AMD more than 2 years ago, with the reasoning being that modern CPUs are fast in "eager" mode and "lazy" is not needed. So no, no performance difference for AMD as a result of this issue.
Percy, 3 years and 75M visual diffs later
... as opposed to all other times, when its value is finding a natural balance and not at all driven by speculation, no sir. ;)
I regularly message/email my group of contacts asking about job openings, but they always say some form of "sorry, I don't know of anything right now" every time. Could be just a lot of bad luck and timing, I guess?

Buying someone a drink becomes surprisingly hard to do with only $48 in the bank. Some of them I can't meet locally, also, because they have moved out of state.
maybe so... but only external walls right and even then dont you want wifi in the back yard?
> With virtual dom library I'll just update my data and rerender everything that depends on this data

So you have to visit every data node, and then also visit every changed UI node. Where if you have deltas, you only visit changed data nodes and then changed UI nodes.

Re: data snapshots, it's easy to design your own service to use a delta protocol. But even when you can't, you can separate the code used to construct your reactive objects from the code that initializes them. This is just basic function abstraction, and it doesn't really add any work. From the example on S.js site:

const //
a = S.data(1), // a() | 1 3 3 5
b = S.data(2), // b() | 2 2 4 6
c = S(() => a() + b()), // c() | 3 5 7 11
d = S(() => c() * a()); // t0 // d() | 3 15 21 55
a(3); // t1 // +------------------------>
b(4); // t2 // t0 t1 t2 t3
S.freeze(() => { //
a(5); //
b(6); //
}); // t3 //

Now becomes (quick and dirty to convey the idea):

const
a = S.data(1),
b = S.data(2),
c = S(() => a() + b()),
d = S(() => c() * a());
update(3, 4);
S.freeze(() => update(5,6));

function update(aval, bval) {
a(aval);
b(bval);
}

S.js will detect whether the value you're providing is actually different, and will only propagate what has changed. Roughly the same number of lines of code, just more reusable.
Re #1: It's not catalog size that matters; it's more like revenue per minute of video, or views per minute of video

Re #2: This is a fairly standard batch-vs-online compute mix tradeoff faced by large enterprises.
Nope. VSTO actually shipped and is used to create office addins. VSTA was an embedded IDE.
Why the Phrase “ I'm Too Old to Do This or That” Is a Complete Bullshit
If you evaluate it in an environment where only the functions you choose are defined, the security risk is nil.

Validating a document is a complex, domain-dependant problem. It is far easier to create a secure Domain-Specific Language to handle this than to end up with an accidentally Turing complete abomination like XSLT: http://www.unidex.com/turing/utm.htm
> Now we are entering the everything as miniature. Want more RAM? Throw out the whole thing, because it can't be fiddled.

Development of some technologies seems to happen on some weird curve like this:

end-user control / flexibility / repairability
^
| ........
| .. ..
| .. ..
| ... ...
| .... .......
| ..... ....
+-------------------------------------------->
power / money-making capability

(Not really sure about the Y axis label; I'm having trouble expressing the quality I'm thinking of.)

Things start as prototypes - hard to sell, hard to use, hard to tweak on user end. Over time, they become more flexible - think of e.g. PCs with interchangeable components. This is the golden era for end-users. They can fix stuff themselves, they can replace or upgrade components. The technology reaches maturity, and the only way from there is downhill - as businesses find new ways to fuck users over, both purposefully and incidentally. Make things smaller. More integrated. Sealed. Protected. The end result is the ultimate money-maker - a black box you lease and can only use as long as you're paying for the subscription.
Too Small for Big Muscles, Tiny Animals Use Springs
or Syncthing
He's put his own special RMS twist on the classic 'vagrant in the library' model of internet use, taking it a step further by shunning browsers entirely and not using cellular devices. IIRC, he does explicitly mention privacy as being one of his motivations.
Is there a paper or talk you could link to that describes their system?
May be they will even Open Source the Windows Kernel some day.

Only after they have rewritten it in JavaScript.
That's a tiny ballpark:

> During a roundtable, VP of network support Mike Haberman, some other Verizon folks, and the assembled journalists agreed that an average data cap in the vicinity of 180GB/month would satisfy the average consumer.

> "That shouldn't be a problem with 5G. What does 4K video use? Think about how many 4K TVs you can put on a service that's a true 1 gigabit to your house," Haberman said.

I don't see that 180GB lasting long at all...
Netflix is in fact working very hard to optimize the quality per bandwidth at low bitrates. Megha Manohara from Netflix had a conference talk about it last year:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9E9xUbcYAM

Their goal is to have video of acceptable quality at 250 kbit/s, which makes Netflix an option for a lot more people worldwide.
Note that when he said it affects linux, he is wrong. From https://lwn.net/Articles/375888/:

> Only privileged users can call open_by_handle(); otherwise it could be possible for a malicious local user to bypass the normal permission checks on the directories in the path to a specific file.
We will see. Would be a first for wireless in a metropolitan area.

(WISPS in rural areas are a bit different)
>Maybe more advanced technology enables interstellar travel (maybe not, maybe is not practical at all)

We have practical interstellar travel today if you don't artificially constrain your thinking to sending blobs of mostly water with lifespans measured in decades.
Yeah. I think markets are amazing when you have the right conditions such that you get plenty of sellers, plenty of buyers, and switching vendors is easy.

But the US market mostly doesn't have plenty of sellers. You really want at least 3 to get good competition, and that's very rare:

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/50-mi...

My first choice is strong competition, and I live in one of the few US areas that have that. It's great! I have a gigabit both ways for less than my mobile bill. But my clear second choice is locally owned municipal broadband that can be held accountable by the people.

My very last choice is a local monopoly owned by a giant national corporation, because then we get the the worst features of communism (incompetence, poor service, abysmal customer support) and the worst features of capitalism (high prices, exploitative behavior, use of profits to buy legislation).
There was a time when I would just add

*{margin:0;padding:0}

at the start of every project and call it a day. That was my reset.

Later I found that was considered a bad practice, but honestly? I found CSS is very unlikely to be the bottleneck for performance in most things I deal with nowadays.

Anyway, I like this micro-reset but I rarely start css from scratch these days, otherwise I would just memorize these rules.
Things Highly Authentic Creatives Do Differently
Watch: Headset-Free Augmented Reality Created on Water Surfaces
What made ARPA work well
I avoided retail work after having lived through this (no notice schedule changes) over a single Christmas season. At least when I worked construction sites and warehouses the shifts were static.
Probably "bitfinexed". I think I know the article you're talking about, but could only find another quickly peeking through my history, but perhaps it'll serve as a breadcrumb for you.

https://medium.com/@bitfinexed/meet-picasso-the-painter-on-g...
>for many who have two choices, the decision is between not-actually-very-Fast DSL or a single cable provider

Very true. In one city where I have a house, the choice is 4 megabit DSL for $60/month, or 300 megabit cable for $101.

Both are considered "broadband" by the FCC because the DSL is "up to" 8 megabits. But they are not equivalent services.

There's also a wireless ISP, but it's $95/month for 5 megabits.
This is cool, but Termux gives you this and more.
>> I just fail to see how Comcast or Verizon are going to be selling you their internet connection if you won't be able to connect to the things you want to connect to (like Netflix, iTunes, YouTube) through them.

It will be more subtle than that. They will have some seemingly high limit with all sorts of exceptions in fine print. It will be like your typical Verizon plan where you sign up for a $50/mo plan and magically get a bill for $112/mo and all sorts of exceptions, nuances, and backstabbing legalese.
> the Android app requires no device permissions

That's not true, it just uses the new way to ask for permissions. E.g. when you want to scan a QR code it requires the camera permission. But it only asks at that moment, not upfront as older android apps used to do
Regulations aren't fixed. They aren't laws. They are reverted just as easily as they're made in the first place. Regulations are executive branch power only. If you're worried something you care about might change when the political winds change, you'd write up a bill doing exactly what the regulation does, and get it signed into law. They could have done this in a day, and they didn't.

Democrats were either incompetent at predicting the GOP would unwind this when they said they were gonna. Or they liked the idea if it being unwound and being able to blame the GOP for it.

And like I said, not their first day at the rodeo, so the former is impossible. They are definitely not incompetent, they definitely knew the regulations would be unwound. And they definitely did nothing about it as if their either didn't care, or they liked the idea of using it to rile up their base for campaign donations and votes.
How Writing Can Help You Avoid Stress and Enjoy a Healthier Life
It always infuriated me that Tesla called the same tech (Mobileye) "Autopilot", while Audi (and other OEMs) have used the exact same tech but didn't go as far to call even semi-autonomous driving. Audi & Mercedes systems do exactly what you mentioned, the tech is used to warn the driver (audio/visually but even with vibrations in seat and steering wheel) of impeding danger. It's a good case of Silicon Valley's "break stuff fast, iterate quickly" mindset that may be acceptable if it's the latest photo share app, but absolutely despicable business practice when human lives are at stake.

Disclosure: I currently own an Audi vehicle with this technology that has been available since 2009.
Here's a recent summary of GlassDoor observations.

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-its-like-to-work-at-amaz...
If you are in RI, MA, or NY state, the website https://www.zencare.co/ might work for you. It comprehensively listed all of the mental health professionals near me that were on my insurance provider's search portal, with much richer profile information. I liked it because I could very easily find a professional who specialized in the types of things that I sought care for and who I would likely feel comfortable with based on my reading of their background information.
I would add D to the list, and eventually C# although its AOT compilers depend a bit in what toolchain you end up using.
You missed the part about the owners of Bitfinex running a pretend currency and bidding up BTC with it. That's why Bitfinex is different than Coinbase. It was like clockwork, you'd see a dip, a huge amount of Tether's would come online and boom huge volume at Bitfinex buying the dip and surging to new heights.
With hardware support as bad as it is, isn't openflow basically dead?
and yet you still managed to misunderstand the point :)
Smelly air is "coming", so prepare for it by eating lots of onions? Nah.

> I've heard quite a lot of people that talk about post-privacy, and they talk about it in terms of feeling like, you know, it's too late, we're done for, there's just no possibility for privacy left anymore and we just have to get used to it. And this is a pretty fascinating thing, because it seems to me that you never hear a feminist say that we're post-consent because there is rape. And why is that? The reason is that it's bullshit.

> We can't have a post-privacy world until we're post-privilege. So when we cave in our autonomy, then we can sort of say, "well, okay, we don't need privacy anymore, in fact we don't have privacy anymore, and I'm okay with that." Realistically though people are not comfortable with that. Because, if you only look at it from a position of privilege, like, say, white man on a stage, then yeah, maybe post-privacy works out okay for those people. But if you have ever not been, or if you are currently not, a white man with a passport from one of the five good nations in the world, it might not really work out well for you, and in fact it might be designed specifically such that it will continue to not work out well for you, because the structures themselves produce these inequalities.

> So when you hear someone talk about post-privacy, I think it's really important to engage them about their own privilege in the system and what it is they are actually arguing for.

-- Jacob Appelbaum
No possible improvement to a SWAT team is ever good for a target. But I think this will prevent false positives a bit. Knowing the posture and stance of the people inside a room can help with where you aim as you go in.
How this senior citizen started her own business
I've found mine in a therapist directory (for the UK): https://www.bacp.co.uk/search/Therapists

I remember I was so nervous and full of doubts about doing it, I had nobody I trusted I could talk to at the time but I was doing really bad. I first tried to find a familiar face on that directory, just based on pictures, someone I could see myself talking to. When I did find someone, it took me a few days before finally trying to reach them. It was extremely difficult to be honest. But I did it. It's been a few years now. Couldn't be happier with my decision.

Good luck. And feel free to ping me if you need any help.
Why, ashamed of your bigotry being public?
Right, and if the job is "forward in the NBA," then maybe you'd rather know height. Fair enough, but it's not really responsive to my point about the general case.

Perhaps to help clarify your thoughts on this, imagine the case where you don't even know the job requirements.
What are your parameters for practical?

Like, how much mass, how fast, cost, etc?
> Well, fact of the matter is, users do do that, so account for it.

Of course they do that. The functionality is completely useless if you still have to fully engage with driving the car. Cruise control is useful for resting the driver’s leg. This doesn’t require a reduction in attention. Partial automation’s benefit comes specifically from relieving the demand for attention. To turn around and say that you still have to be fully attentive and in full control is to say that the automation is entirely useless.
Not through walls. Radio penetrates a lot more than heat.
Am I correct in assuming they are using a Walabot sensor as mentioned in footnote 2?

https://walabot.com/

EDIT: I see from section 3 that they created their own FMCW antenna array that is somehow similar to a Walabot.
Yeah, I know the spirit of the term. I'm really not trying to play dumb here or anything. I agree that other people can be more productive than others on an individual basis.

I just disagree with using a "10x" quantification without a clear way to measure individual productivity when you're working in a team. It's not like we can just point to something like.. hey, Person A has 10x as many line changes as Person B, therefore Person A is 10x as productive. And unless we have two individuals working on features completely alone, we can't say Person A shipped 10x as many widget features as Person B either.

I dunno. I honestly don't have a good answer for how to measure individual productivity on a clear, quantifiable basis, again not trying to play dumb here I'm admittedly not sure on it and was hoping to get some feedback from others about it.
This is true. I stopped worrying about designs being pixel-perfect across browsers around the time I stopped consulting.

But I know people who are perfectionists and still care about that level of control and I'm just happy that I am not.
It's simply that the people doing the development only get to use VBA. Not that having a chemical engineer teach themself C# over their lunch break is going to turn out great software...

Having worked at a big company as a mechanical engineer and produced a few crappy VBA apps, I did it because it would take significantly more time and effort to get approval for an IT project, than to learn VBA and do it myself.
It's true that this problem is not unique to container tech -- it's a problem that every packaging ecosystem faces. Who polices what packages are available? And how many eyes are on these packages, to make sure that they are safe?

It would be pretty difficult to sneak a covert Monero miner into an officially approved mainline Debian package.

However there is a sense in which this is a problem with container tech, in that there is no container equivalent of `deb http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch main` (yet!).

This is a statement about the maturity of the ecosystem, rather than a criticism of the technology itself, as you say. But I think that it's meaningful to say that this is a problem that containers currently have, that Debian (or other Linux distro) packages don't face to the same extent.
One of the reasons I love HN is that the commenters here usually have a much deeper understanding of this sort of thing than I do.

Which is why I'm left wondering why nobody has mentioned Firefox Incognito mode (chrome too I think).

At least on firefox, incognito mode does not store cookies on disk. They persist for the duration of the tab/window you logged into.

this would circumvent cookie tracking, I think. I mean I guess not if you opened one icognito window and did all of your browsing inside of it, and never closed it?

am I missing something?
Delft scientists make first “on demand” entanglement link
When it comes to core infrastructure, government run is better than state run. The government is incentivized to provide service and pricing that maximizes the public good while a private company has to maximize its own profit.

You could strictly regulate to fix this but eventually you end up with a funny pseudo government agency which has to fund itself. As I understand it (not American) this is what the Bell system ended up becoming.
Thermal doesn't work through/around walls.
Note that they are speaking about encoding complexity. The point is that decoder complexity increases are also needed (although, not as much !) and every time that encoder complexity has increased in the past, decoder complexity also grew.

The really interesting question is how much decoder complexity increase is acceptable.
not too hard. kraken and bittrex both do USD/USDT pairs (which, at 1.0 is a good metric of USDT health)
As to code review effort being lower than writing, sure in most cases (although finding well hidden backdoors is likely harder than writing software)

That said even at less effort there it seems extremely unlikely that anyone is doing actual code reviews on the software being packaged up into all the Linux repo's out there. Even automated static analysis over that volume of code (as error ridden as that would be) just isn't practical.

That's not to say they're not more trusted than npm et al, as the developer can't push directly to the repo., so an attackers life is more complex.

Although that said it does introduce a new possibility, that of the malicious/compromised package maintainer...