skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4L1CWH... seems OK
Hey, I'm the one who made the site. Thanks for your feedback. Most of the models listed on the site are taken from lists of deep learning resources (and framework specific model zoos), so I did not validate every repo to ensure they actually offer pretrained models. I guess a more accurate text for the link would be "view code" or "more info" instead of "get model". Indeed a lot of papers don't release their models but just the code.

The goal of the site was to create a common platform to search and aggregate models (or code) available for reimplementation. I'm planning to add tools to allow users to flag or report errors on pages, since most of the content is automatically scraped.
Yes, I guess writers are creative people
To be clear: I'm asking about what HN thinks is the real reason, not the officially stated reason.
> An illustration of the Weber–Fechner law. On each side, the lower square contains 10 more dots than the upper one. However the perception is different: On the left side [10 vs 20], the difference between upper and lower square is clearly visible. On the right side [110 vs 120], the two squares look almost the same.

This is exactly what one would expect, since you are adding a smaller fraction of the total population in the second case (i.e. 110/120 > 10/20). If you kept the ratio equal in both cases, then the RHS would also look very different. This would work, up until the point where the dots begin to saturate the medium.
Most of the models are retrieved from "awesome" lists or other framework specific model zoos - I didn't have time to check all the models. I'm planning to add tools for reporting non-functional models for this purpose.
I suppose the same could've been said about SpaceX in the early days. Those huge Tesla battery banks too, come to think of it.
Reading the headline I couldn’t help but think “But why?”. Actually quite interesting and valuable implementation info if you’re ever doing threading with CPython.
Is that true for surgeries that use the microkeratome as well? I remember researching quite a bit and reading a few well sourced studies about the effects of trauma on the flap, but I don’t remember where.
Some time ago I saw bold font in console and I thought - why not render entire website into console?
I need a genuine advice. I own Google Pixel 2 because I needed a good mobile camera, I also have a Chromebook with Cruton as I needed a cheap Linux notebook. I use Google Maps, Gmail, WhatsUp, Google Photos, Google Drive, Messenger ( the only thing I don't have is a FB app).

Given all this information how I am supposed to disconnect from all of this? Cause surely simply having something blocking tracking of you in a desktop browser is not enough? Also, I really enjoy services provided by Google, why should I give it all up and replace everything with "safe" alternatives? I know I am a product and my personal info and preferences are all of over the place. But I always understood this to be the price I pay for using this services ( taking about Google mainly ).
> Massage doesn’t cure tonsillectomy

Tonsillectomy is prevented by figuring out why the tonsils are becoming inflamed in the first place.

I said "bodywork (massage/etc)" because most people aren't familiar with the different kinds of bodywork that were developed over the course of the 20th century. I would place the emphasis on "etc". Massage is a general treatment, while other forms of manual therapy are more specific in their beneficial effects. You might know some "physical therapists" who can work magic with their techniques.

> The treatment cures (in around 97% of cases) tonsilitis.

Removing the tonsils will prevent the tonsils from becoming inflamed, on account of their removal. But certainly you would agree that if the cause of the inflammation could be determined, it would be better to address that factor than to just remove the part?

The girlfriend I mentioned in the post was born with her umbilical cord around her neck, which is how I knew that she'd probably benefit from "bodywork". When she came back from a class trip to Mexico, a few weeks after we'd met, the lymph glands on her neck were rather puffed out. I'd already made her an appointment with the good "physical therapist" (to hopefully deal with the unresolved somatic problems associated with her tonsil extraction ~15 years before). The "physical therapist" found that one of her ribs was out of place (certainly due to carrying a heavy bag over her shoulder while stomping around the border cities). This displaced rib was pinching on the lymphatic channel (maybe not the correct terminology). After releasing the rib to its proper location, the therapist said the lymph glands would probably go down over the next 1-3 days, and that if they didn't normalize she should seek further medical care (x-ray/etc, to rule out conditions she could have caught in Mexico). The swollen lymph glands entirely went away over the following week.

I recently took a new friend to an actual physical therapist with similar training. This woman sprained her ankle ~6 to 10 years ago. The post-injury surgery made her ankle problem worse (I understand the surgeon accidentally cut a nerve that shouldn't have been cut)... This woman was just trying to hold herself together, but was collapsing. The physical therapist helped this woman out quite a bit, and she was surprised at being able to make several trips to unload her car a few days after the appointment.

My point is simply that people's conditions usually have a broader context than their presenting symptom.
Who holds the per device key? If someone holds all the per device keys (or parts of the per device key) you've painted a bulls eye on their face. In all honesty, I cannot trust the US government with secrets like this because I don't see us being willing to secure it at the same level that we secure our nukes. And dear lord even that level of security likely won't be enough to fend off internal and external threats.
I think you mean Quantumcurrency. Guaranteed to be cryptographically secure, and you'll only know if you own some by collapsing the waveform.
A convenient excuse: tech's discrimination problem
From Node.js to Go: There, and Back Again
> It doesn’t matter /who/ has that decryption key

Of course it matters. Apple already has nearly total power to modify their devices, and are clearly acting with caution. American courts are not going to give a warrant so an officer can steal nudes. There is no a priori reason that your phone should require a greater kind of warrant than your home or your bank account, and wanting zero access at all only makes sense if you think law enforcement has negative utility.

Personally I'd do something more like this: Print one code on the inside of each device, so as to make access strictly harder than physical access, store one code internally as per your other mission-critical keys, distribute one key each to choice governments, inside a physical module so as to prevent clumsy storage and reduce the chance of cloning (since singly-owned keys can just be revoked if stolen), perhaps with some protocol so multiple members are needed to agree, if you are particularly paranoid. That way you can only get access if Apple wills (either given a warrant or otherwise coerced), the court wills (either a genuine case or simply corrupt), and you had physical access to the device. Apple could not then backdate court keys, so can only be coerced by China into providing access for future phones exactly as they are already in the position to do, though of course OS updates means they already effectively have a backdoor.
When treating a patient, using the results of a study is a good starting point, but it may really have nothing to do with treating the specific patient. The patient may fall outside of the distribution of normal occurrences, as indicated by the study. They may be an outlier.

This is one reason why medicine is challenging - you're not treating a population, you're treating a patient.

If you are the patient, you want the doctor who is guided by science, but also not blinded by "well, the studies say to do X, but that's not working. I guess there's nothing I can do for you".

In my case, I had my tonsils removed as an adult and it is one of the best medical decisions I've ever made. Prior, I had all kinds of health problems. They are now gone, and while I used to get sick a few times a year to the extent of missing work, that no longer happens.
Using Agile in a Remote Team: Processes, Impact and Benefits
This is just more propaganda from Mr so called 'Bright'.

Sure some things in D are 'interesting', but it's also a very, very complex beast, full of bugs (some known, and heaps more not-known).

btw. Do not participate on the D forums either, it's just a propoganda tool for the D Foundation (i.e. they filter (or moderate as they like to call it), anything that says anything negative about d.

In the end, if D has anything interesting, that we can't live without, we can just take it and integrate it one or the many 'proper' programming languages.

Don't waste your time with d. You'll only ever end up wishing you had spent that time on a proper language, that has a well supported ecosphere.
Having seen the success of Musks's other projects I have high hopes for this. But I'm not seeing anything overly negative here, just some healthy scepticism and questions?
Yes, it's a remake.
There's nothing sexist about it. She was a mess, I helped her deal with her problems, she greatly appreciates the help.

My point was that people's presentations have a context. She was an emotional wreck because of all the different kinds of "stress" that she was dealing with -- unresolved "birth trauma" (umbilical cord wrapped around her neck), "adverse childhood experiences", etc.

Her tonsils were extracted because her doctors didn't know what else to do. If they'd known to look deeper than the presenting symptom, she might still have her tonsils.

I responded to robbiep's comment edit above, please look for that too.
In my generation, 100% of us had our tonslis/adenoids removed as children, but we have no significant differences in health issues whatsoever.
The commenter is saying that a particular person, who happens to be female, is / was an emotional wreck. How is that sexist?
Young people usually don't look for "secure" though. But I would say if you don't have rich parents it is even the quickest way with the most success. Even the chance to a successful startup increases if one follows a stable career path in the beginning. Everyone who succeeded without it, like Bill Gates, actually succeeded because they had a secret joker through the success of their parents.

I myself had to become 30+ before I understood this, though.
They did. Modern safety standards make them uneconomic (you're required to provide a safe evacuation route for disabled people). It's a regulatory arbitrage just like hyperloop (if you make a train line to car safety standards you will have much higher capacity than a train line that follows train safety standards, who knew?)
This is pretty much my perspective too, and why I'm very hesitant to declare religion the 'obvious' root of so many problems, and its decline a solution/victory, despite the fact that I'm pretty much an atheist myself too.

EDIT: "Chesterton's Fence" comes to mind.
If it's true, as the article said, that this is occurring within the same families, that is to say within Norwegian families, rather than within new migrant families, then this result is highly disturbing.
To get a VFR license, yes, you have to know about everything you mentioned. You must learn about all the instruments. What kind of instrument scans to do in various kinds of situations. Ascent/descent, climbing turns, level turns into a heading, etc. VFR pilots do learn about reading the instruments, but at the same time they learn about the dangers that come with focusing too much on the instruments— such as not watching for traffic or other awareness issues. They also must learn a ton about weather.

So a VFR pilot is trained in some of the basic instrument reading things needed for low visibility flight. But there’s a lot more expertise involved in safely flying instruments than in visual flight. Precise, mentally demanding procedures, multitasking. VFR pilots are also required to learn about why instrument flying is so much more difficult. A big part of the reason is spatial disorientation[1]. Your senses tell you one thing while the instruments tell you another. And the scary part is that when the equipment fails, sometimes it’s your senses that are more correct. Pilots either blindly following their senses when their senses are wrong, or ignoring their senses when their instruments are wrong— both of those kill people.

To compare flying in a real small plane versus a simulator: When you go into a stall in a small plane, the feeling of dropping feels a lot like a roller coaster, with your stomach coming up into your mouth. That woozy feeling is much the same. And certain kinds of weather can cause a similar rapid change in elevation even without you changing the attitude of the plane. The small plane is so much more (potentially) wild than a big jet, it’s a bit more like being in a flying lawnmower. A simulator does teach lots of the skills you need to know, and is especially useful for establishing muscle memory for things like instrument scans and other procedures. Then doing that in a real plane is like doing the same thing, but on a wild roller coaster, and with the full knowledge that if you mess up you’ll die.

You should go for a ride! Tons of places offer very cheap introductory flights where you get to take the controls for a bit during that first flight.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_disorientation
> Note that this code will not run if you will try to execute it, because it's missing bytecode execution logic.

So much for "implemented".

Incidentally, apparently PyPy has a GIL too[1], complete with a detailed description in a source-code comment, similar to the one quoted in the linked article[2]. It's written in C. Isn't the point of PyPy that it's written in a Python subset?

[1]http://doc.pypy.org/en/latest/faq.html#does-pypy-have-a-gil-...
[2]https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/src/00f8eae1/rpython/transla...
How to prototype your web cookie banners the right way
Looks really interesting, which platforms languages etc. does it support?
I've heard that Kaggle data sets encourage people to do "supervised" ML only. Is that true?
I don't use R to write programs. I wrangle data, run analysis, and plot results.
It has a great number of solid stat packages for mixed modeling, clustering, ordination, etc. That is why I use R.
Machines, Blockchain, Banks and Jobs
Well I don't think I've ever been caricatured as homophobic before, that's one for the books.
Just look at phone browser's User agent and you will be up for a surprise.
He has specifically said they are making smaller tunnels to dig faster and will use transportation tech that fits in smaller tunnels to take advantage of this efficiency. I think many industries could benefit from this kind of thinking. "Because that's how we've always done it" is a great way to stagnate
Unless you are speaking about something like DDD, not really.

Also it has to do with IDE, because in an IDE there is two way communication between both tools, like the ability to do edit-and-continue.
To me survivorship bias is looking at someone who made it. Assigning some charateristics to that person. i.e. Hard working, motivated etc etc.

But, forgetting that lot's of people who didn't make it also had those charateristics.

Then you have to factor in luck. 2 Entrepreneurs with the same work ethic and idea but one gets lucky. The difference in money generated can be huge.
I see a lot of parallels between Elon and Isambard Kingdom Brunel's careers.

Brunel was an excellent marketeer who consistently over-promised and under delivered. He also drove technology forward more than anyone else of his generation.

When Brunel was making the Great Western Railway, he decided to survey the route himself because he felt the existing surveyors were slow, expensive and crap. He did this on horseback. During the process he concluded that the horses he was hiring were slow, expensive and crap, so he started his own horse hire company. Somehow, despite this insanity, we got a railway, and it was good.

Disclaimer: it's twenty years since I read a Brunel biography. I might have some of the details a bit wrong.
Brightness too should be done this way.
Unless Verizon buys Netflix, or Amazon buys Sprint, or any other similiar combination of content and carrier, how is that comparable?

Edit: if you’re talking just about owning exclusive content I would say Disney is above Netflix or Amazon.
Show HN: AWS best practices for IT managers/system admins managing AWS
24GHz will require line of sight. I can't see how this is going to work for anything more than cell backhaul or fixed wireless access in very rural areas (without trees)?
*Brunel
At Snapchat, Redrawing the Bounds of Reality
If you can't beat them?
And that excludes even more countless examples of those who work hard and fail.

There are vastly more of the latter than the former.

Work - if it’s the right kind of work - can only ever increase your odds. It can never guarantee success.

What’s needed is hard data about the relative influence of market fit, hours worked, personality, network and wealth of origin, and so on.
An extremely picky developer's take on PHP static site generators
that would not be an obvious bow to draw from your comments, and frankly, and medical practitioners who are not looking at holistic health when presented with a patient are missing the point.

However, you are so far off point on the tonsillectomy.

Let's take a slightly different condition.
A patient has gallstones, causing ascending colangitis.
The treatment (which you would describe as treating only the symptoms) is to remove the gallbladder, a cholecystectomy.

The cause in this instance is being a mid 50's woman, slightly overweight, genetic predisposition, high fat diet.

Your implication is that because the Doctor is treating the symptom, they are doing a disservice to the patient?

The reason I am defending this so strongly, is because it is only a stone's throw from the implication you initially started with - 'that doctors treat symptoms, not causes', to 'Doctors/The medical-industrial complex is with-holding the cure for cancer, because if they fix it they don't make any money'.

As though no doctor, or scientist in the field, has ever died or watched a family member suffer through that or some other insidious disease.

Doctors are human, they make mistakes, they act on evidence that is only partially formed (and have to in order to act in a timely manner), and their actions are often not fully explained to those who they are treating.

We can and should do better. But slinging mud on my profession I can not sit idly by and abide.
Speaking as a relative non-snob, I'm always a bit baffled when people cite Joyce like this. I mean, he clearly had an unrivalled mastery of language, but do people actually like reading prose like that? Even his supposedly more accessible stuff like Dubliners and Portrait of the Artist just seemed so dense and obtuse that while I could objectively admire the skill on display, I never once really found myself enjoying them.

I'm not saying art should exist purely for the sake of entertainment. But, ultimately, if I'm investing the time to read a book, I need to get something out of the experience from moment to moment, and generally I find I get more from reading a bad writer with fun ideas than an expert stylist who makes no concessions to enjoyment.
Yea, saw this too just now, in a comment to another post here on HN by the creator.

I have only been able to scan the surface but initial reaction one of utter awe. I have not seen anything similar anywhere, have I missed something?
I had my tonsils out as an adult and it's been great. I'm much healthier now. YMMV.

Are you in the US? Get an opinion from a different ENT.

Not in the US? Try these guys:

https://surgerycenterok.com/specialists/

A lot of people fly in from other countries where they lack medical choice.
And there is the mistake: production.
Most people I know who use R don't care a whit about production. They run an analysis to answer hypotheses.
Interpretations have nothing to do with logical inconsistency. They've got even less to do with the Theory itself. You, on the other hand - are putting interpretations and the theories in one bucket.

Godel's metric have nothing to do with reality if you actually read about it's properties. For example, the universe described by it would have no reshift for distant objects.

Please, check your facts. Otherwise you sound just like an uneducated new-ager looking for "truth".
Or strong enough drinks. The few times it has happened to me i've drank some stupidly strong beverages (rum or absinthe).
ABI stability to support binary-only loadable modules is probably the most important reason.
Introducing an Easier Way to Design Applications in Docker Desktop
My thinking is that commonly activity on master halts for months/years because a v.NEXT is being worked on, so it's worth checking if that's the case and whether it's worth waiting for the new version or adopting the alpha/beta.
I occasionally click the ads when I am shopping online, by 'could' I meant just seeing (not clicking) another options/alternatives of the same type of product helps.
> Isn't the point of PyPy that it's written in a Python subset?

That subset is rpython (which beyond a python subset is a framework for implementing dynamic language runtimes: https://rpython.readthedocs.io/en/latest/).

You'll note that the gil is part of rpython.
Also on that project, he designed a brick arch bridge that everyone thought was too low profile to stay up. It's still there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maidenhead_Railway_Bridge
Apple is updating iOS to lock out police iPhone hacking tools
Plain CSV is ‘slower’ for whatever reason in my experience.

(I have no idea how other formats are structured)
There are two clients in progress at the moment. By far the more complete one is for Java; the other is for javascript.

Since I've had such a difficult time communicating the potential benefit of the fully general piece of software, I've been exploring applications that I can build on top of it which do visualizations for more specific things (rather than leaving it to folks' imaginations to roam the wide possibilities of general data structure visualization :)).

As an example, my sister and I started building a 'code tutor' app in Electron, where you would be presented with problem sequences—but when you tested the code for your solution, you could watch what your algorithm actually did to the data (imagine a failed attempt to sort a list). This was the motivation for writing the javascript client. I integrated Lucidity's visuals by running it headless and streaming frames over TCP to the Electron app.

I think the next thing I'm gonna do though is just finish general object monitoring for the Java client, so that you could get something a little like the Chrome dev tools object printer in Java—but of course this one will allow you to watch algorithms performed on your objects :)

Btw, source for the (rather incomplete) javascript client is here if anyone's curious: https://github.com/westoncb/JS-Watcher
Yes, that is why Visual Studio team started doing talks about how to use the debugger.

They started to realize that there were many developers doing feature requests for stuff Visual Studio already supports.
But for mild acute depression almost anything works about as well as anything else. The only things that stand out are some talking therapies (CBT especially, because there's lots of research) and medication.

The disadvantage if pushing exercise, without providing an accessible course of exercise, is that people find it hard to do and that increases their feelings of guilt and wortlessness.