skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is so cool. If I had money, a shop and no job I would build this kind of stuff all day long. What a blast.
I don't think it's silly to come up with a pricing method that is simple and uniform to apply.

However, "4" can just as easily morph to "3" or "5" if the fundamental costs change industrywide.
Those aren't commercial products by colloquial definition. Sure you made money, but they're not up for sale with thousands of customers.
I have looked at Dragonfly with interest, due to how they manage VM. I really like how they shard the page queues to be per-cpu. With that said, a lot of work has been done by jeffr in the last 6 months to a year to improve NUMA performance (which we partially sponsored) which has dramatically improved VM scalability even on single socket boxes, and which has allowed us to remove a lot of our local hacks.

I considered giving Dragonfly a try in the past, but just never had the time. There would be a depressing amount of work before we could even consider Dragonfly, mostly centered around our async sendfile (which is now upstream in FreeBSD), our TCP changes: BBR (not yet upstream), RACK (now upstream) and TCP pacing (now upstream). Not to mention unmapped mbufs (not yet upstream) and kernel TLS (also not yet upstream). Also, the last time I looked, Dragonfly did not have drivers for Chelsio or Mellanox 10/25/40/100GbE NICs. Without even just one of these things, performance will be so bad that any comparison testing would be meaningless.
In fact the only times I ever called 911 I was calling for someone else, and I wanted my identity protected. If 911 would have broadcasted my identity I would not have called.
This is an organizational culture problem and needs a serious push from multiple levels of leadership to adjust. The F-35 started as an idea to actually save money by consolidating multiple missions onto one plane, which proved a terrible idea for multiple reasons and that wasn't cancelled because there would be no other option for some of the roles it should cover.

A simplistic solution would be to design weapons around common, proven components and, if possible, interchangeable ones - designing engines and weapons to have similar mount-points, avionics that can be used on multiple vehicles and be field-upgraded and build everything about as much incremental improvements as possible (yes, I know nothing will make an F-14 a stealth fighter so some big steps are needed, but if the follow-up plane could use similar engines, that'd make logistics much simpler)
I'm not american, so this is cheap talk. I'll start with that.

I don't have an outright objection to these positions. They're not crazy or nonsensical. They're matters of judgement, taste & perspective. Cars/roads have been very successful, as a transport technolgy. It's not wrong to be pro cars.

What I do have a problem with is the Das Capital-esque, think-talk-esque, manifesto-esque statements. The position isn't presented as "I like cars better," it is presented as:

"Cars are better. This is an absolute truth. I proved it.^" I can prove it using complicated philosophy with roots in America's founding or Bastiat. I can prove it with Adman Smith & Ricardo derived philosophy. Here is my horrendously complex econometric analysis, that only ever seem to convince their own authors.^

This type of argument is ironically bolshevic, and has all the characteristics that oponents of marxism took issue with, from fredriech hayek to Karl Popper. More importantly, it is fanatical and this makes it hard to engage others of different opinions/tastes. This is particularly frustrating here in this case, where the arguments so clearly involve matters of taste and subjective preference.

Cars need public infrastrucure too, all the asphalt you see everywhere. The infrastructure is costlier in land use. Consumer choice.. I'd say you could make the consumer choice argument both ways. People certainly like (judging by house prices) to live in (and visit) less car-centric cities.

This way of presenting politcal cases is not unique to the american right, it permeates all places & all parties.

^Al la: You are an ass. I can prove that mathematically.
That's indeed a fundamental problem with Magic. Most modern TCGs have some form of mitigation.

You may look into "Force of Will" (the game, not the card). It plays a lot like Magic but mana is in a separate deck. Each turn, you have the option of playing a magic stone (same as a land in Magic) directly from that deck or do some other action instead.
(personal opinion), but to me a process that encourages these kind of drills is pretty broken, these drills are ( most of the time) not related to the real world problems the company faces on a day to day basis, imo, a better process ( but not perfect) would be to test candidates on problems related to the ones you face at the company combined with cultural fit / pair programming sessions, even tho not perfect it can attract more candidates that are more fitting to the company and the team.

this doesn't mean the tests and problems need to be easy or an easy pass, they can be just as hard or even harder to solve, depending on the problems you guys face, i often hear people defending the drills because "people just want a for loop problem and fizzbuzz and easy pass", which is not the case for many seniors engineers that would like a decent challenge related to what the company works on.
I'm married to one, and I see crowds of others every day.

In a big city, public transport can be much more convenient than driving. You don't have to fight traffic, you don't have to find parking, you can read or watch videos while you travel....
This works only as long as people having these high salaries do work with high added value and you are not relying much on international trade. Otherwise they can be effectively undercut by people who can do the same thing cheaper.
Hi folks!

Just in 8 months, we grow our Slack bot from zero to $25,000/mo. Moreover, it keeps growing like crazy.
Based on our learnings we prepared a step-by-step guide on how we did that. I hope it will be useful to you.

Feel free to ask me questions here.
My uncle was the computer guy of the family. I remember playing on his Amstrad 1640 when I was very young. I always wanted a home computer desperately but my dad never had an interest or saw it useful to encourage my passion for it. It wasn't until my uncle eventually upgraded from his 8086/640KB Amstrad to a Pentium 60 then he gave me the old Amstrad and I was hooked. This was probably about 96/97 so this was already vintage hardware and my attempts to run anything contemporary was frustrating, but that didn't stop me trying to squeeze out every drop of performance from the old beast. I had it for many years and eventually my experiments in trying to get more out of it broke it and it went to the tip. I could probably have repaired it easily just a few years later but I guess that's the tragedy of youth. I'm tempted to buy another 1640 to remember those days but I know it would never be the same.
You could use that argument to defund any infrastructure you wanted, existing or proposed.

In the long run, not funding infrastructure has the same effect as killing it.

Once a sizeable populist group decides that taxes are theft, it will frame every policy decision we make, until we destroy our once-great institutions.

There was a time when the USA dreamed big, believed in itself and invested in itself. We had a growth mindset.

We have all been told to "look out for number one." They say that our government is corrupt and incompetent. They say we should drown it in a bathtub like an unwanted kitten.

Some A+ fear mongering out there in the austerity universe.
Now, perhaps, because it's a highly specialized skill. Maybe it will become commoditized in the future.
I don't think the US plays fair either. I think everyone should play fair. Domestic subsidies I don't personally care about as it should be up to each country to deal with internally.
Hi, I live in Montreal. The bus isn't crowded btw, it's very pleasant, and it takes me everywhere.

We also have bike sharing stations.
Car owners in any place which has bad traffic should be in favor of improved public transport. The more cars you take off the roads, the nicer the driving experience will be for people who want to keep driving!
Hey, If you'd like to organize it in some sort of web format that runs weekly/monthly, I volunteer to help out with the site.
No road system makes a profit either, but very few people seriously discuss getting government out of the road business.
Like you said the easiest way is just do it. "Real artists ship" and all that stuff. The good news is, absolutely no one will read your blog at first. You could have a live blog on the Internet for years and have no one actually read it. People just don't visit websites anymore.

One thing you can do, open up Word and write there. Pictures and everything. Just practice, offline, where no one can see it. See if it sounds good. Write stuff you want to read, and read other blogs to see how they do it. As for the critique, unless they're correcting factual inaccuracies that you should fix, I just ignore it all. Haters gonna hate, and you should be glad someone's paying enough attention to you to have an opinion on your writing. More realistically, the people who don't like what you're doing will just not read your stuff. Negative criticism I've found to be pretty rare unless you're talking politics.

And if your target audience is under 40, you're in luck: their attention span is almost nonexistent. You can get away with a good picture and 200 words and that can be your entire article. You don't need to write SAT essays for every post because no one's gonna read all of that. Save your words for "evergreen" content where people will be reading it for months/years in the future.

Oh, and read blogs about blogging so you get to know and understand terms like SEO and evergreen and stuff. There's a whole culture behind crafting a post.
I agree its not going to happen. I like your idea of a starting point though
Poor sleep associated with cardiovascular risks in teens
Wireshark is fantastic. It also great for listening in on USB connections. The only issue I have with it is I have to use a secondary program to capture the loopback. But rawcap is small lightweight and easy is its not a huge issue
> It's fair to point out that you find it jarring, but it's so embedded in the western hemisphere that your appeals to sense aren't going to change anything.

I am in the "western hemisphere" (by any possible definition), and this nomenclature is not by any means embedded in my culture. In high school, we learned latin as the language of our ancestors, we studied latin civilization and latin culture as part of the ancient Roman empire, etc. I remember being taught about our latin culture of southern europe of romance-speaking peoples, and they compared with the germanic culture of the north. At home, my father pushed into me the (of course, ridiculous) stereotypes of the serious, hard-working germanic peoples of the north, which are probably more intelligent but they have less creativity than us latins. I can call myself a "proud latin".

It does not seem that this usage of "latin" that you mention is particular to the western hemisphere, but rather to the U.S.. Moreover, the term "latin america" was precisely introduced to refer to the french-speaking colonizers of the continent.
When Americans pronounce their name as "Coke", is that a mean-spirited jab at the troublesome byproduct of Fred C. Koch's petroleum cracking process, or is that how the family pronounces it themselves?
Not really. I don't think it would be terribly useful to anyone else - it's a reflection of how I understand and process certain techniques... and I really don't want the mental overhead of knowing that there's the chance that strangers on the internet could be judging my work.

Furthermore, a lot of it contains stuff that I'm doing for work at any given moment. Some queries are designed to run against databases at work. I don't know what kind of hot water I could get in for letting that code loose on the internet, but I'd rather not find out.

I may consider making some sort of "best of" project and putting some stuff out there, though. It would be fun pick 5-7 concepts that I've struggled with, and spend some time writing about them and making them presentable for the public.
"Latin@" is also sometimes used to avoid denoting male or female, but many people prefer "Latinx" for exactly the reason you mentioned.
The gentrification argument is strange to me.

Gentrification as an effect happens when an area becomes more desirable to live in. That means here that people place a positive value on public transport.

To deny an area the benefit of public transport based on some weird altruistic and paternalistic motive doesn't really seem credible.

It's really tail wagging the dog too. To say we should just keep areas shitty or undesirable to avoid gentrification seems totally backwards.
It would be quite useful in a general sense to develop a technique to transfer modest amounts of data over a voice call - location, obviously for 911, but also for plenty of other applications where installing an app (never mind developing it) is overkill. Such a technology could also be used for automatically transferring reservation/membership numbers when calling customer service, or even enabling some kind of secure challenge/response for calling your bank.

I suppose it could work with some kind of low-speed acoustic modem combined with an "intents"-style protocol. You'd hear a short sequence of beeps, your phone would vibrate and show a dialog "Caller wants to know your GPS location", and when clicking OK, your phone would send back your location. In the other direction, when initiating a call with metadata, the receiving party would play a beep when ready (like a fax) and your phone would play off the metadata for the call -- this would basically be implemented like query string parameters on the phone number URL.
Big cities never seem content to let public transit compete with cars on a level playing field. Instead, they adopt anti-car policies to force people to behave like they want them to. See the highly inefficient HOV lanes, the purposeful underdevelopment of roads, exorbitant parking prices, punitive fuel and car taxes, closure of lanes, and so forth.

If the people really want public transportation, why do you have to punish them for using cars? Could it be that people value the freedom and privacy of having a car and living in the suburbs? Of living in quiet suburbs free of street crime and roving gangs of ne’er-do-wells? Of being free from the inherent restrictions to freedom that come with being in closer proximity to others?
Wireshark is great, I used it a while back to diagnose why a rogue DHCP server was routing DNS through Germany.
As the under-handed C contest (http://www.underhanded-c.org/) demonstrates it's perfectly possible to write code that both looks innocent and apparently is innocent when run in a testing environment. You cannot produce a set of tests that show 'this code never causes anything bad to happen' so a sufficiently skilled malicious programmer could certainly write something that could cause issues that would pass stringent code review, testing and other quality control processes (especially when they have an in-depth understanding of those processes themselves).

I have no idea what has happened at Tesla, it's perfectly possible they lack processes they really should have, but you cannot prove that from the information available.
Oh you want someone to explain something specific about European nations motivations? I suggest that you then be more specific with your own request.

http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1892376,00...

> Ever since a civil war brought down Somalia's last functional government in 1991, the country's 3,330 km (2,000 miles) of coastline — the longest in continental Africa — has been pillaged by foreign vessels. A United Nations report in 2006 said that, in the absence of the country's at one time serviceable coastguard, Somali waters have become the site of an international "free for all," with fishing fleets from around the world illegally plundering Somali stocks and freezing out the country's own rudimentarily-equipped fishermen.

> High-seas trawlers from countries as far flung as South Korea, Japan and Spain have operated down the Somali coast, often illegally and without licenses, for the better part of two decades, the U.N. says.

They do it because there were a lot of fish there and no functional government to stop them or enforce quotas.
hence tariffs.
Economically, not everyone can afford self-driving cars. In the near future, they appear to be luxury items.

Trains move more people more efficiently and cheaply. That should remain the case even as driverless cars become popular, at least for another generation - maybe two.
Somehow it very much resembles German's Stuka WWII fighter plane, both in appearance and role.
تحميل متجر جوجل بلاي Google Play للموبايل رابط مباشر
I remember hearing about JPEG 2000 when they were working on it. Of course it was marketed to be the ultimate image compression. I've only see it used once in the wild, I think it was Trillian that used to for screen captures.
>One logo can be only given to one project. This project will have all exclusive rights of the logo.
Who / what is ICE, please?
I believe nobody should have tariffs. Understanding that is never going to happen, it should at least be a starting ppoint
One logo can be only given to one project. This project will have all exclusive rights of the logo.
Every logo has one github issue that you can introduce your project to and claim.
Community can upvote your comment and you can upvote other projects as well under these issues.
I don't think I've read the same things as you. Do you have sources for the cronyism and ghost workers?

Also, the tax levels in NYC don't necessarily relate to the levels of subway support (e.g., NY state contributes to the NYC subway).

> I think it's fair to assume that most people expect that when taxes are raised to fund transit, that the taxes raised will be used for transit, not to line the pockets of the friends and cohorts of who raised the taxes.

This is a straw man argument - the implication here is that the NYC subway's sole financial problem is corruption. Is that actually true?
We're talking about food. You can't just put up a farm and start producing a few weeks later. Depending on the crop it can take years before a farm is productive. So no, new suppliers don't just 'spring up'. This sort of economic activity can lead to food shortages.
Some commenters questioning the benefit of public transit infrastructure in an age of self-driving electric vehicles have perhaps never lived in a city with good public transit. Road traffic in Victorian London was on average faster than it is now, but investing in underground tunnels for trains was still deemed necessary (even profitable). Likewise, buses massively reduce the road footprint per passenger, not to mention the increased energy efficiency, regardless of whether it renewable or not.

And finally, end-to-end transport offered by personal vehicles or taxis has been disastrous for public health. The difference between walking to your driveway or curbside versus a five minute walk to a bus stop or ten minute walk to a train station everyday would be enormous aggregated across an entire population. It would be a great missed opportunity if the idea of being able to summon a driverless electric car (we still have no idea how this technology will really pan out, whereas buses and trains have been around for over a century) kills public transit as an alternative to single-occupancy vehicles before it's even off the ground.
They massively fund political campaigns with the intent of pushing the policies they want. They're fairly successful at it. It's perfectly reasonable to say that they're "killing" things they're pushing against.
Yeah for Gmail or some other big website. The real targets are usually the smaller corporate sites which are not in the preload list, but you wouldn't use those to demo with...
> You don't have to fight traffic

A public bus has to fight the same traffic a private car would (my example)

> you don't have to find parking

Neither would a car with driver (my example)

> you can read or watch videos while you travel....

Same applies to a car with driver (my example).

Look, I'm not defending the original argument -- I clearly stated in my original post how wrong it is. I'm just pointing out why this rhetorical bullshit works as intended.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Immigration_and_Customs_E...
It pretty clearly says it both ways. "Public transit, Americans for Prosperity says, goes against the liberties that Americans hold dear."
That picture doesn't make sense, because cars don't drive that close together, nor do bikes ride that close together.

Show 60 cars at 45 mph vs 60 bikers at 15 mph for a better density view.
I definitely agree that in this case, the company is playing dirty. One-click opt-in, 338 click opt-out is downright malicious. I just don't think it's representative of everybody, or that one data point makes the assertion complete.

Honestly, I'd be surprised if InfoWorld even intended this behavior, while it seems just as likely that some requirements got lost in the shuffle of trying to hurriedly get GDPR compliance on the page.

Considering how few people still understand what GDPR actually does and doesn't allow, it's not really shocking to me that their attempt at compliance was done so ham-handedly, or that it might even have made them less compliant than they were before.
How to run ads: 6 super practical tips
I can understand that logic, however it looks like it isn't too far behind (2.2.x versus 2.6.x). The PPA points to 2.4.x, (https://launchpad.net/~wireshark-dev/+archive/ubuntu/stable) so even the PPA doesn't have the latest. The official website recommends installing it from the official Debian repository(https://www.wireshark.org/download.html).

My greater concern with recommending that is PPA's may not be by the official folks, and PPA's tend to be for Ubuntu rather than Debian, resulting in a "FrankenDebian" (https://wiki.debian.org/DontBreakDebian), and while that PPA seems to be run by the official devs, PPAs can be set up by anyone, which runs into the whole concern of blindly trusting other's code on your system.

EDIT: Here is what the official Debian website says on it: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSoftware#Footnotes (Footnote 1).
Those exist in many cities. The train to/from the Airport in Copenhagen for instance has no drivers.
I think anyone suggesting a technical solution to such affronts on our legal rights is either naive or has contempt for the everyman. Most people are being coerced into this and aren't savvy enough to avoid it. The only real option is enforcement of the law.
Cool, but mouse sensitivity is too high / doesn't scale with zoom
"In an emergency there are no rules" - my CFII
If you want up to date software, you should just run Debian testing (or some other distribution/OS). In Debian, testing lags a few days behind unstable to make sure that things aren't breaking and then pushes the update.