skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> Browser Reset -> Your Reset -> Setting all Resetted Elements -> Probably more styling after.

I get the feeling the author doesn’t completely understand how this all works and what normalize.css and other resets are for.

There is no “browser reset”. There are browser defaults which vary slightly from one to another.

The point of normalize.css and other resets is to level the foundation when starting a new project.
Are your Lua changes public? I couldn't find a relevant repo. Thanks.
Server-Side Spreadsheet Injection – Formula Injection to Remote Code Execution
Anybody above 220lbs without the weight or muscle mass to justify it, i.e., has high bodyfat, is by definition unhealthy... That's... Biology lol. And yet even still I saw nothing supporting your claim that unhealthy people are less deserving. I think you're creating drama for no reason here.

There was no bigotry. Nobody said overweight people don't deserve segways. Once again, we were commenting on how it was weird that Segway had such a low weight limit. Once again, you're attacking people that at some level were probably allies.

I could have sworn I saw a comment where you used the word idiot, but maybe it's dead now? Maybe I never saw it.

I'm happy to compile evidence of you being unnecessarily inflammatory though, because I think that's fun!

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17298326

A totally uncalled for and unsourced attack on someone's economic knowledge, presumably because you disagreed, and rather than spend the time illustrating why you disagree, you chose ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy. Luckily, hn called you on your bullshit and downvoted you. Thank God for self moderation.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17303263

In which you call someone an asshole for attempting to connect your understanding with theirs.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17229419

While the op wasn't exactly "nice" they were definitely polite. But unfortunately for them, that question was a challenge to your intellect, and therefore you decided to go with snark.

Yup, some people weren't very kind to you, but I'm noticing a trend - it's two or three comments deep, after you've shown your colors. If someone came up to your friends while they were chatting at a bar, and said "ACHUALLY, THATS NOT HOW COMPUTERS WORK, SMART GUY!", I wonder what sort of attitude you would adopt as the conversation continued.

I dont group people by some sort of status or moral tree - I think you're telling me you do, or perhaps victimize into some box of assuming everyone is as hateful as you seem to be? What's that about? If you want to talk about morality, we really should grab a drink, because that's my most favorite thing to talk about irl.

Nobody has to be popular, but the "but BART SIMPSON DID IT!" defense is pretty childish.

Why aren't you interested in talking to me any further? I'm having fun :)
The other side is that this "developer" made a game of questionable quality, which received a suspiciously good review, and when the gaming community dared to question the integrity of this review, the entire incident became symbolic of the typical kind of false, weponized victimhood characteristic of Anita Sarkeesan et al.. Suddenly any criticism levied at women in gaming development or gaming journalism is immediately sexist, regardless of merit.

There is a clear conflict of interest when reviewers are sleeping with developers. Calling attention to this fact is not an attack on women or any such nonsense.
>Now if I accidentally put the cursor in the wrong place, anything might happen.

That literally happens to me sometimes when using Gmail (in regular, i.e. JS-enabled mode, not in HTML UI mode).

Sometimes when I move my cursor around with the arrow keys (e.g. up or down), the cursor suddenly vanishes when it reaches some part of the email I am writing or replying to.

Sometimes it happens near the quoted part of the email (the part I'm replying to), or something else. Irritating. Then I have to scrap the email and rewrite it, and maybe if I am lucky I can copy (some of) the text I've written and paste it into the new version.

I think it is some issues with their JS or CSS, also maybe related to monitor size and resolution.
NFS had (presumably still does) a private(?) key security option, but the Solaris fileservers I last used had given up on that in favour of Kerberos.
Thanks for your outstanding reply.

There is a tremendous amount of context that is critical to fully understanding a person’s situation. Most often, there is a lot that doesn’t get revealed. It’s extremely tough being in any condition mentally or physically that, even with our supposedly best tools and research, can’t yet be addressed. the weighty of that could also conceivably fuel a cycle of degrading the condition of the other (physical -> psychological -> physical etc..).

In the particular situations I’m thinking of, these considerations need to be made and the complexities explored. It can be tricky at times, but I try and take the time to understand what the context is that I might be missing. What problem are they really trying to address? What’s led them to seek X treatment? Were there negative experiences in the past that either failed them or complicated their situation? I say it can be tricky, because I never want to see them do harm to themselves or others, but what they’re doing might have potential to do that. Often times it is just a matter of realizing that this person is going through some struggle and trying to find something that works for them. I won’t fault a person for that. Trying new workout routines that I find on YouTube is something I do, but with no particular expectation that I can expect anything definitive from the variety of sources I’m using. Others, such as the hypothetical, but not unrealistic case of a Naturopath who might have sold a bill of goods to a cancer patient, leading them to go off radiation therapy and subsequently die, are a bit different.

Your attempt at finding a balance between the polar opposite and probably unhealthy approaches your relatives have taken is an admirable effort. It’s tricky to break habits you might have been raised with and I can definitely relate. My father has, to minimally variation, eaten peanut butter sandwiches on white bread, along with large fountain drinks and no doctor appointments for the last 20 years or so. If you’re a person who wants to improve your well-being, already you’re off to a good start. That keeps you above the extreme of not caring. If you’re a person who seeks information from multiple sources and can critically examine it, you’re likely to come across confounding evidence quite frequently, which is less likely to get you to the upper extreme of thinking that every problem can be addressed or that there is a definite solution at all. Things are not clear cut in this world.

Everyone has their own self-care problems. The best we can do as individuals is more than nothing but less than everything. Look for good information, and try to do well for yourself.

Lastly, I do get your point and agree that things are puzzling. Puzzles can be fun though.
There are a lot of tradeoffs involved in deciding who is and isn't allowed to listen to something, and I want to hear about them. But I think starting off by putting the concept in scare quotes is going to poison the whole thread.
Shall we place a wager? I'm willing to escrow money on this.
Sure. My rates for consulting start at $500/hr...
I'm increasingly thinking that a problem with search is inconsistent and nonstandard (or nonexistent) conventions, protocols, and APIs.

It seems to me that a fair bit of the search problem could be addressed by sites themselves serving wordlists, tuples, statistically improbable terms (there's another term for this that's escaping me), etc., rather than consenting to being heavily crawled by numerous spiders.

Vastly improved content metadata (particularly for largely fixed "article" content), including author, date, and (a reliable) topical categorisation would help. For realtime information, APIs are probably more reasonable than text search, though those would likely be front-ended by specific applications.

This still leaves the very nontrivial problems of reputation, relevance, black-hat SEO, and information manipulation (propaganda, misinformation, misdirection, disinformation), and just plain street-grade idiocy.

But several elements of this strike me as amenable to either localised or distributed solutions.
I mean, increasing what's given for the same price doesn't equate to nobility or generosity or anything. Even the most evil dictator wants to keep their people from rioting.

If anything, Comcast's past behaviors warrants not giving them the benefit of doubt.

edit: I guess a downvote indicates that I'm wrong. The lowering of price is definitely due to the overwhelming generosity of Comcast. /s
This just sounds like you are missing required layers of your application.

I haven't used Postgraphile, but it sounds like you are just exposing your database directly out through a GraphQL wrapper. You'd be experiencing the same pain if you tried this approach with any API technology (gRPC, REST, SOAP, etc).

You should still have code for authorization and business logic, and your API should probably be exposing a focused subset of your data model unless your clients really need to be able to traverse the entire database.
Try an online Therapist first if that is easier for you. It goes via chat, instant messenger, or e-mail. From that you can move on to a face to face therapy later.
And also read books written by Yalom ;)
> At any rate, at least it's not Pandas and matplotlib...

There's a certain yin and yang to the space, isn't there? You get to choose between a hacky language that has pretty good tooling built on top of it, or a pretty good language with hacky tooling built on top of it.

I think that Python is probably winning because being a decent language gives you a decent escape hatch, whereas no amount of great libraries can save you from having to go through the bizarro language.

That said, R may be bizarro, but at least, once you learn it, it's predictable. Whereas I'm not sure even Pandas really knows whether a given call to .loc will copy or refer to the original data.
> Who's to say not doing type coercion isn't weird?

Well, if someone has to do it, I will: not doing type coercion isn't weird, and doing inplicit type coercion (not strict promotion[0]) is both weird and dangerous.

But, in any cases that's not really the point. The point is that in this...

> Every dynamic language treats things slightly differently.

“dynamic” is irrelevant. Languages have a wide variety of approaches, doing promotion, coercion, neither, or both (though where both are done, it's often just called coercion even when it is promotion), and dynamic vs. static is mostly irrelevant.

[0] that is, where the “from" type has a range that is a subset of the range of the “to” type.so that there is never a change in meaning resulting from the conversion.
It would seem like tenure (making it hard to fire people) compounds this problem.
Tesla short sellers $2B in the red for June as shares soar
I assuming he wants 2 things:
-get a better control of which shareholder is calling the shots
-get the shares of the market to fend off the short sellers
Many stay in the city but move out to the burbs the moment they have a baby on the way (some stay in the city with kids of course, but few). The reason is both that it's kind of expected and that there's very few affordable apartments suitable for families with more than one kid. Other reasons like that the city is unsafe for children etc, is just a result of few families in the cities and bad urban planning.
Articles from scholarly journals usually cost money. Nature of the beast for narrow-interest publishing with no advertiser support. The fact that Nature links to the source articles is a big plus in my book.
Indeed, a cynic would say Bitfinex were just copying the Fed's QE.

Creating tether out of nothing to buy bitcoin is similar to the Fed creating dollars by QE to prop up asset prices.
I have some medicine; how can I find out what's actually in it?
I bought some medicine in Mexico City and it works really well. I bought the exact 'same' thing here in the UK and it doesn't work. Does anyone know how/where I can get the pills tested to find out exactly what its made up of?
Why do you think centralised management is going to be any better?
Startup working on Pentagon AI was hacked
> This is a very bad example of what factors are for in R, because it makes it seem like factors are for defining variables or keys in key value pairs

That is the approach for tidy data, which is used a lot in the R tidyverse (http://tidyr.tidyverse.org/articles/tidy-data.html)
look up gamejournospro on Google. gamergate would have not existed if not for a bunch of "journalists" colluding in a private mailing list, more interested in pushing intersectional activism than reporting news. one cant insult its audience and the expect the latter not to rebel against that. "gamers are dead" / "gamers don't have to be your audience" is what led the divorce between the gaming press and half its readers.

off course these "journalists" caught red handed are not going to report on their misdeeds. they'll quote tweets then claim they are victim of the internet mob.
Let's see them try to sue space! Hopefully Starlink will be successful.
I believe this study was done with purely an interest in the facts and not a political agenda.
Is there any reason to believe Wirecutter or NYT has compromised the integrity of their reviews? That seems an unfair allegation to throw around absent any evidence beyond it possibly being in their financial interest.
Take a look at the "selfdestructing cookies" FF extension.

The problem with simply blocking cookies is that you'll break session handling at web hosts. That's probably why Reddit fails to work. And you don't need all that to avoid cookie tracking.

EDIT: Yep, looks like it's not compatible with the latest versions.
Is it possible there will simply be "Office 365" standalone apps that are basically just baked-down versions of the web apps (like typical Electron style apps), but distinct from the official desktop apps? I could see there being some utility to this such as speed vs running in the browser, large-scale enterprise deployment, convenience reasons (why I always run the standalone Slack app myself), etc..
If people would learn about how to reverse their myopia before doing crazy surgery like Lasik’s there would be less problems.
It took me 1 year to reverse it and I know most people are too lazy to do the research so I try to ignore posts like that but it’s not that easy...
Surprised were _, _ and of course _.
I'd say this is actually more similar to https://mobius.network/
Cases like this? What makes you think the cases described here are not "real"?
Exactly, all we need to do is give women power over men and sexual harassment won't exist anymore.
The Pi Zero can do this as a USB client device for a host PC, including the QRCodes with the Pi camera, buttons/switches, and a small touchscreen for host-isolated verification and pin entry. Beaglebone Black (possibly also Pocket Beagle) can do it too, and the am335x does have some minimal crypto acceleration.

They're not high performance, they aren't "security focused" hardware, nor are they perfect fit for the task, but they're reasonably well understood and broadly available. The Pi Zero does have a closed "GPU" firmware, but there is an effort[1] to run open firmware on it.

However if you expect the host to attack the device, USB OTG (i.e. Linux USB gadget drivers) may not be a good choice, you may want to access it via network instead and that opens up more choices (though most will not be as small).

The other alternatives are basically going to be micro-controllers, for example FST-01[2]/Gnuk[3], and FPGAs which are still more of a black box than CPUs at the moment.

[1] https://github.com/christinaa/rpi-open-firmware

[2] http://wiki.seeedstudio.com/FST-01/

[3] https://wiki.debian.org/GNUK
> she slept with multiple reviewers

That's a false accusation.

What actually happened was that an angry ex-boyfriend accused her of sleeping with a gaming journalist to get positive reviews. No such positive reviews ever happened. The journalist in question made a single off-handed mention of one of her games (in a non-review context) before they'd ever actually met in person.
I'm very anti-Comcast, so this isn't a defense.. BUT, aren't data caps.. fine? Nothing is unlimited, so why pretend you can get an unlimited amount of data?

Now that doesn't mean data caps themselves are the right solution to the "problem" (conceptually!), I'm just speaking to change the frame of mind of this.

Imo, what we should be demanding is an SLA for normal customers. Cap speed or data, I don't care, but give me what I'm paying for at all times.

As I see it right now you're getting capped on bandwidth, total data, and absolutely no guarantee about any of it working. It's the worst of all aspects.. for customers, great for Comcast I'm sure.
Many architects are not anti-classical buildings/designs. Architects are relatively powerless at reestablishing classic motifs and construction styles because of the economic reality of building in the old tradition.

ie. Labor costs have risen dramatically, while labor quality (craftsmanship) has declined. New buildings are more like an assembly of products than a collected effort of artisans to make a lasting, beautiful structure.
And if you want to just load generic pre-trained classifiers for a variety of tasks, ml5js (which uses TensorFlow.js under the hood) seems promising!

https://ml5js.org/docs/quick-start
> a suspiciously good review

I'm sure you can provide a link and evidence of the "suspicious" part, right?
Polanski raped a child. That's a whole different level of awful than everything else being discussed here.
I agree the Rosenhan experiment is rather silly, but if you look at the placebo medication vs actual medication studies it does make you question the long term effectiveness of the drugs.

There is more recent study done in 2007 with the same results but I can't find it right now.

This is the 1967 one. Antipychotics really haven't changed as much as most people suggest.

This NIMH study looked at one-year outcomes for 299 patients who had been treated either with neuroleptics or placebo upon their admission to a hospital, and was the first long-term study conducted by the NIMH. The researchers found that "patients who received placebo treatment in the drug study were less likely to be rehospitalized than those who received any of the three active phenothiazines (thioridazine (Mellaril), fluphenazine (Prolixin), chlorpromazine (Thorazine)." However, in spite of this finding, which the researchers wrote "was so unexpected," the NIMH investigators stated that they "were unprepared to recommend placebo as treatment of choice." In other words, the NIMH researchers decided they wouldn't develop treatment guidelines based on their own research, which found that placebo patients did better than the drug-treated patients. SEE PAGE 991.

http://psychrights.org/research/digest/chronicity/comunityad...
The Web has fist-mover advantage.

Typo reveals essential truth.
What are you referring to with the "even when anonymous" comment?
There is no evidence that anybody reviewed her after she slept with them, let alone that they were biased by it.

Her boyfriend mentions multiple incidences of cheating in the post, but only one appears to be with a reviewer.
> which is also a thing which exists in USA law.

That's exactly it, this is clearly not incitement according to US law. Here are the two important concepts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_and_present_danger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

According to the latter, the smell test is:

> "Advocacy of force or criminal activity does not receive First Amendment protections if (1) the advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and (2) is likely to incite or produce such action"

The pug case in no way comes close to either of those clauses. I'd argue, from a legal standpoint, this is absolutely simply teaching his dog to salute. It's crass, rude, and offensive but also perfectly legal under any meaningful definition of free speech.
But a basic notion of effect size and units are often included in popular news coverage of statistics. That's a basic expectation, involving zero nuance or statistical rigor.

"This is a newspaper" is a reason why they might leave off details about methodology, metrics of uncertainty, etc. Not a reason why they would make an entirely unqualified claim attached to no notion of the effect size.

Essentially you're saying we should hold the New York Times to the same reporting standards as some clickbait site that fuels confirmation bias with sensational headlines, and not expect large world-spanning newspapers to have even the slightest of better practices than that.
Very little trading volume, and I'm not sure how easy it is to withdraw USD from them either. There's generally a lot more volume and market depth available for trading Tether to Bitcoin and that to USD. Also, for some curious reason, during most of the time the Bitcoin price was going through the roof that Bitcoin was actually worth more USD than it was USDT - the effective exchange rate via this route valued Tether at a small but very noticable premium to its face value.
> if you have a money-printing machine, you don't need to manipulate markets as a business model

"Money laundering involves three steps: The first involves introducing cash into the financial system by some means ('placement'); the second involves carrying out complex financial transactions to camouflage the illegal source of the cash ('layering'); and finally, acquiring wealth generated from the transactions of the illicit funds ('integration')" [1].

TL; DR If Tether just printed Tethers and sold them for dollars, people would catch on. Tethers being printed to buy Bitcoin (placement), such Bitcoin then being exchanged for other coins or tumbled (layering) before being sold for real money (integration) is tougher to untangle.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_laundering
Yup, and a good tech campus as well
> Yeah, I think it's more what lgats suggested, and simply that they have a naturally impermeable building in the middle.

That kind of contradicts the OP... since they said that it was only recently that the signal stopped working, and that the building was not being remodeled during that time. So if the building is now impenetrable then something changed. Maybe modern phones just have a horrible time falling back from LTE to 4G/3G.. But if that’s the case then I feel like the OP would have checked for that since he seems to have already been tracking his connection strength over different locations and over time.
What suspiciously good review? The reviewer who she was accused of sleeping with never reviewed her game.

There was an intentional misinformation campaign regarding her in order to suggest that the harassment was in some way OK.
That may be behind the Eero move to go subscription only. Could be good if implemented properly but much more expensive that just buying a high end router.
In one of the neurology labs I was in at UCLA, I saw the same exact thing: publishing tons of garbage and not doing real science. There were some professors of higher integrity, but the PIs that were doing the garbage publishing were getting millions of dollars.

One of my PIs, who was doing this, had a term for his publishing strategy: "salami publishing". You try to cut as thinly as possible your research and publish as many papers on it as you can. That's actually less harmful than the real problem which is that the papers were just rubbish and people in the lab seemed to all kind of know, but disliked discussing it.
> And, their Gigabit plans have no cap at all

False in north california
Stick and Rudder: An Explanation of the Art of Flying (1944)
Comcast tops Disney's bid for Fox. By a ton