skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This might help in the future if you use Firefox: https://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/posts/tweaking-referrer-for-pr...

A quite safe value from there is

network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy = 1

which will not send a referrer to third party domains outside of the base domain.
> "[B]ringing" peace sounds like the military's purpose is to force outsiders who may be viewed as unpeaceful to adopt new culture which is viewed as more peaceful.

Well, that definitely seems to be the purpose of the US military.
Messages in iCloud is end-to-end encrypted. It's iCloud Backup that has issues.
You get silenced by karma when you have unpopular opinions.

You know, just how people used to tell homosexuals to not be gay when other people thought they were freaks because of it.
Yes but this is a trivial problem to fix on 64 bit machines. There's so much address space the kernel can just be told to never pick certain address ranges for unfixed mmaps, leaving the rest of the address space free for persistent heaps.

The actual hard part of persistent heaps isn't the persistence part. It's transactionality and upgrade management.
Even if P ist not equal NP, hardness of efficient markets could be in APX2 i.e. computing a solution that is at most twice as bad as the optimal solution is in P.
First, "non-zero" is an extremely high bar, especially for mere "contribution". Knowing that there is non-zero contribution tells us nothing about whether it's a problem we should care about.

Second, there is massive survivorship bias (well, actually the literal opposite, I suppose) going on here. There is a massive bias towards hearing about the deals that go bad. There is little effort to chronicle the times this worked out well, and a LBO saved a sick company.
I hope their RubyKaigi2018 presentation will be online soon.
>Apple would be insane to comply with these demands, because it just opens the door for every other regieme to do the same.

But they already did in China, right?
I had never heard of it but was curious enough to google it: https://archiveofourown.org/

"A fan-created, fan-run, non-profit, non-commercial archive for transformative fanworks, like fanfiction, fanart, fan videos, and podfic"

Lots of stuff for fans, apparently.
They talk about being compatible with RSS.

What is RSS in this context, ? My guess is that it's not this RSS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS because I do not see how/why you should need any rule at L4 to maintain compatibility with an XML based protocol.

Is it possible they talk about : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_interface_controller#R... ?
Same here. Since I started listening to audio books a few years ago my commute became so much more enjoyable - I even look forward to longer business trips now-a-day, especially with the new genres coming out, like LitRPG. Sometimes I even look forward to gardening or cooking if I can have the headphones on. A also frequent YouTube, but more as a replacement for TV (try watching John Oliver in Europe over regular TV on demand..).
These read like cold-reading for money - broad generalisations that apply mostly because of their broadness.
There are a multitude of reason why this is the case. It might be that Telegram in particular did something that pissed Apple off, or that Apple is ignoring third-party clients.
The "true if enough people operate under the assumption that it is not true" is funny and somewhat intuitive:

If you know markets are efficient, there is no reason to haggle about the price.

But haggling is the mechanism that enhances price efficiency.
Yea totally not a monopoly-like move to buy out a competitor even though they can't fully integrate it because their competitor was built around privacy and they are not.
I don't think most people in the US will care about such issues until there's a program similar to the 1033[0], where hand-me-down autonomous drones are deployed agaisnt the civilian population stateside and weddings start getting double-tapped by MQ9 descendants.

Loin des yeux, loin du cœur.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1033_program
The macOS client supports end-to-end encryption.
The idea of the military preserving peace is like thinking a group of horny boys will preserve virginity.

The US is the most aggressive military on Earth. There's no peace in its presence.
Use Signal Private Messenger if you want something that is open source, audited and well trusted. Alternatively, Briar is an option, though it is not as polished and has a different feature set.
I think OP's point is that the risk of catastrophic failure and damage to other parts of the machine is bigger, if it is powered up when the caps fail.
A "country's interests" are not that of most of their population. Okay, gray and fuzzy area: When most citizens of European countries where enthusiastic when WWI started, does that mean that war was in their interest? So let's add the condition that you are not under the influence of propaganda and group-think and ha time to assess and feel the effects of policies. It's still fuzzy though: If you, directly or indirectly, depend on income streams that flow through the military–industrial complex, is war in your interest if you yourself are not negatively impacted?
There is one CA (forgot the name) that provides EV certs (for websites not code signing) that looks up data in national registries, they have a lot of stuff automated so it's quick and relatively cheap. So in theory it's possible for code signing. But Let's Encrypt repeatedly refuse working on code signing certs (it's not that cheap to operate as website DV).
I mean that what you posed is a false dilemma: we must be able to solve our coordination problems or face extinction.
While there are differences between Clang and GCC language extensions, most of them are compatible or at least can be worked around with some relatively trivial hacks.

Compare this with trying to support MSVC, which supports none of the extensions and has a poor track record of getting even the standard stuff straight (especially in the C, not C++, compiler).

By dropping MSVC, you gain a lot of useful language extensions that work with Clang and GCC. For example you get portable SIMD, atomic operations and cache prefetching and a lot of other __builtin features which are unambiguously useful.

The alternative is to support MSVC but then have to maintain some kind of middleware layer to work around compiler incompatibilities. Since the platforms supported by MSVC are already covered by other compilers, you don't gain a lot.
I think the headline blows things out of proportion. The ECM Syndicate banks overstated demand for a share sale, by the house bid....that the joint lead managers would've been on the hook for anyway (if the demand wasn't there, they had an underwriting backstop).
Yes they should've stated the booksizes included the joint lead manager interest but it isn't the as bad as the article and respective comments on here make out.

Slap on the wrist at worst i'd say.
ring.cx

Ring is a free and universal communication platform which preserves the users' privacy and freedoms.

Official GNU package
Released under GPLv3 licence
Supported by an active community

OpenDHT protocol
Decentralized communication
Peer-to-peer discovery and connection

End-to-end encryption with authentification
Identity managed by X.509 certificates
Based on RSA/AES/DTLS/SRTP technologies
You can skip adding payment method: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204034
Khghg
IIRC WhatsApp also cared a lot about making the app available on all kinds of phones. Not just iOS/Android. So all those people in the rest of the world could start using it and bring their families on board.
There are ways to do clustering on-device without sending everything back to Facebook.
They also provide their own "build-your-own-Telegram-client"library, at least for Android.

I never though of that before but the current situation might be a very good reason for making that library available.
Now just wait for your browser (or any other random application) to stop using your OS's resolve completely (at least Chrome does at times already by simply accessing DNS services via port 53 when it considers the configured OS DNS 'not good'. I have no idea about the exact criteria) by accessing its desired DNS-over-HTTPS server and bypass your carefully setup DNS filtering / monitoring.

Notes
1: I have NO idea if Chrome (or any other random application) accesses DNS-over-HTTPS already since I have not paid too much attention to it.

2: At least Chrome (on OSX) likes to access 8.8.8.8 & 8.8.4.4 & your configured DNS server on port 53 (happy eyeball protocol). This might only be on flaky networks like mine, where I tend to make all sorts of configuration experiments.
but trying to devise a program that can predict somebody's password without using brute force is a NP problem? Since its hard to discover what the password is, but trivial to check if it lets you in the vault?

I get the reasoning why people aren't sure if P = NP.

Here is another question.

What defines time? And what about a solution?

Consider the fact that in the theory of general relativity we have the twin paradox.

What if I sent a computer on a rocket at close to the speed of light and then on earth I had the same machine running the calculation that takes a million years, and then when the other computer gets back from it's interstellar vacation, I just have the computer ask the other what it's part of the solution is.

According to the computer that flew away the amount of time that it takes to solve the problem can be considered ~P in a way.

My intuition is telling me that this is probably the wrong way to think about time complexity though.
The comment that you quoted is missing the point a little bit. We are talking about using AI to power weapons. That is uncharted territory and a decision that should be taken lightly and be done behind closed doors.

You have to understand that many people both at HN and at Google are not Americans. The United States is founded on great democratic values, but in the past sometimes failed to uphold them in relationship to other countries (dropping an atomic bomb on Japan, the wars in Vietnam and Iraq, torturing in Guantanamo and the NSA's prism program which directly affected Google).
He's also a really good poet.
Gordon Moore’s Desk at Intel: 50 Years of Silicon Wafers
The Assassination Grid: The Infrastructure and People Behind Drone Killings
I don’t have experience to say beyond seed stage, but at seed stage, especially given the explosion in funds, this is most definitely true. Even as a YC startup, VC interactions I’ve had have ranged from “I could give two shits about you” to “I’m a mensch even when I have to say no”. Founders remember who belongs in what camp and talk to each other about such things a lot.
This should be a no brainer.

But do fair housing laws allow a developer to limit rental property to its employees? I presume they could use an "includes room and board" salary model, but that would mean eviction upon a break in employment.
I wonder about the exact same thing. Some time ago I compared the features of GitLab with similar solutions and found that the OSS version is pretty limited. If you want all the nice features for big projects it is more expansive than the Atlassian stack.
Graphs, Drones and Phones: Social-Graphs for Drones in the War on Terror
Ghkgh
Having worked in some Fortune 100s we never counted software development as R&D unless it was true blue-sky work unassociated with a project.

All the routine work was included in Run The Business budgeting just like tangible material purchases.
There is research hinting that we prefer/are more inclined to mate and is beneficial to mix the genes. Evidently the opposite is incest and the direct result is not desirable.
That's what court cases are about, and why we don't declare innocent or guilty before the verdict. The evidence (or lack of) will come up during the court proceedings, you'd expect.
It looks like you are correct. I wasn't truly sure of that statement when I made it. It was just mis-remembering something heard in the lecture here[1] and somehow I formed the idea that RAM is a big consumer in standby mode (even though the lecturer did not make such a claim)

[1] https://youtu.be/wHVyshkyZ4w?t=1h20m44s
This is about the economic environment composed of teams and games won where the medium of exchange is talent, and how the rules for how access to talent and other restrictions enable a more level playing field that keeps any one team from dominating the talent pool and winning all the games.

It's not about the economic environment of billionaires and how they leverage their cash hordes to underpay their employees. The regulations mentioned would apply no matter how the pay range for talent was scaled relative to the owners.

We can talk about the economics of something without shitting on socialism or shitting on capitalism or having disclaimers about which system the speaker does or doesn't like best.
I agree.

I believe the only reason American civilians like us have been able to enjoy peace is because we dropped a ton of bombs to blast tiny countries out of the sky and we also have a history of fighting wars not to win, but not to lose. If Americans are willing to sacrifice their people and resources for a tiny country in the middle of nowhere, imagine what they would do to you if you attacked them or their interests.

I was watching a documentary about the Schwarzman Scholars, and Schwarzman said something like out of the 4 or 5 times where a superpower was challenged by a new rising superpower, it led to armed conflict 3 times. I haven't been able to find an article to back up this claim so would appreciate if anyone could point out if it's blatantly wrong or if there's a source. Either way, there might be a new superpower.
Predicting Crime in a Big Data World
CodePlex archive is blocked from Chrome
It shows "The siteahead contains harmful programs" for all old projects. For example: razorengine.codeplex.com . Many links around the web still point to Codeplex, so it is a big hinderance. What can Microsoft do to fix this?
I've read a little bit about turing machines and there is also a variation that includes what is called an "oracle" machine. Do you know anything about that?
mostly opposed by local homeowners

Source? (Hint: how many "local homeowners" even exist on the Bay side of 101?)
June update changes in net worth updates for asset plus
Intel Leaks Model Numbers of Entry Level Xeon E-2000 CPUs
The difference is that the wars nowadays are less about ideals and more about profit. Yes muslim extremism is bad and those people are bastards, but the military isn't fighting them as effectively and there is no way to win this war - like the "war" on drugs it's a self-reinforcing, endless cycle kinda thing.

WW2 was different; the nazis had invaded most of Europe, were committing genocide, etc.
Announcing Cachix – Binary Cache as a Service
I also work at Google, my opinions are my own as well.

I don't work in the US. I'm not a US citizen.
I don't support the actions of the US military. Hell I _really_ don't want to be involved with the weapons development branch of the US military. That is one reason why me and a lot of Googlers are opposed to this.

Would you be happy for Google to work with the military of another country you have zero control over that has very questionable motives?
Most people seem to read this as a proof that markets are inherently flawed and as lending support to their ideological distrust of market economies. I think that if the authors thesis holds true and p indeed != np, this kind of conclusion could spell an even bigger problem for those who advocate to agument or replace market economies with another, typically more centralized, form of economic calculation. Allende's cybersyn famously used linear programming (P) in order to centrally 'simulate' and improve upon more regular market mechanics. If the authors thesis holds I think it's actually an argument in favor of the economic calculation problem talking point of Hayek and the like: efficient calculation of economic distribution problems is impossible and flawed dynamics of the market are probably close to the best approximation we can afford.
I haven't heard of EMH before today and can't really comment on that.

But it seems to me that even in the example from your note the stock price will tend to reflect the the correct price. As you realease new information the factorization becomes more feasible and once it's feasible enough the stock price will get the correct value. Maybe we should amend EMH to say that asset prices fully reflect all the facts that are feasible to compute from the available information.

Anyway, the reason I'm writing this comment is to say that you should no be so sure of your proofs, especially because your proof of the infinitude of primes is wrong. This proof does not show that the new number (the product of primes + 1) is prime. It shows that none of the primes are factors in this new number and from that it follows that there must be more primes, but it does not follow that the new number is necessarily prime (it might be a product of another unknown primer and the others).
I was around the corner, the Mac network admin at Chiron. Hundreds of Macs, running on single-pair UTP. Good times. :-)
No, the banal statistical explanations are not applicable here. If one does not see this point, they are very detached from reality.

>The whole point of this is that explanation isn't true. Productivity is not a conspiracy theory. 80% of the output is done by 20% of the people.

To begin with, what mainstream economists count for productivity is, excuse me, purest BS. Making money out of thin air does not count for producing anything, by the very definition.

You deny a simple fact that the richer the person is, the easier it is for him to secure a loan on a more favorable terms than a poorer person. This also works without any "conspiracies," this is purely a feature of the economic system where somebody can print and loan away money.

This works to the extend that a person with person with good connections with bankers in 1st tier banks can secure a deeply subprime loan in many Western countries.
I have this on my mobile device. I'm using Wireguard as a VPN and the DNS sinkhole is on the server. I haven't noticed any severe latency problems, but yea, I've noticed that the battery runs out sooner. Encrypting/decrypting adds enough overhead that it's noticeable.
I miss one factor and that is egocentrism. Why have children if you have your inner child still being enticed to all that is.

This era is marked with individualiTy. What is the statistic on entrepreneurs, on indie developers to name a few. How many people would play (video) games in their 20's all day in previous generations.

I seriously think this factor is heavily overlooked.

Showing pictures of your kids was the defacto social exchange, now it's showing pictures of yourself.

Many parents report a "hole", a lack of identity or general anxiety after kids leave the nest. This suggests raising kids means it requires a lot less me time.

I also suspect life-behind-a-screen is an accomplice to this somewhere in the equation.

Tldr; The selfie way
Nothing wrong with running their emails or servers but helping it identify targets with AI brings it very close to everyone's nightmare scenario of fully autonomous killer drones.

I don't know the details, probably everything will be verified by a human (for now) and we're maybe talking only structures and patterns instead of persons.

But things may evolve quickly. AI can already drive a car and diagnose some illnesses better than humans can (there was a recent article about AI detecting melanoma).

The step to "decide who to kill better than a human" is awfully close. Personally I'm not against it all if better really means better. It's just crazy that cutesy Google with their maps and emails are now doing this.

It's shocking enough that Intercept would pounce on it. If it was Raytheon nobody would care.

I wonder if they'll update their terms & conditions. "Any selfies may be used to kill you". Al Qaeda better (not) be using Google Photos.
Let's encrypt for code. Tie a cert to domain. Problem solved. Overall security improved.
Choosing PM and collaboration tools: who has the decisive voice in your team?
They are working "properly". Living on the edge of what the law allows and sometimes going over it is a feature, not a bug, unfortunately.
Your parent argues that you probably can't make this illegal without fundamentally changing what it even means to own something.

This is actually a very analogous situation to DRM/right to repair etc: when you've bought a device, you (should) have the right to do whatever you want with it, take it apart, modify it, use it in unintended ways and even destroy it. The seller should not have any legal rights to curtail any of these actions.

The same principles applies to buying a company.
There’s a reason the alt-righters have gotten so far with using the term “soy” as an insult.
It was pretty good on April 1, 2006:

https://www.google.com/search?q=slashdot+april+fools+omg+pon...
Mitigate This
But one important part of their success was to invest their income. I know too many people that use their money to consume. Investing early in your life is what makes the difference. It's very easy to spend it on little things and claim to not have anything to invest.
Maybe I'm being super pedantic and possibly confrontational (I apologise in advance) but it jumped out on me here. I think you've misunderstood the 'famous elementary proof' that there are infinite primes. You do not create a new prime as you have suggested (quoted below).

"Multiply them together and add one. No prime divides the new number (because "every" prime leaves a remainder 1), so you've just produced a new prime. This new prime is larger than the largest prime in your finite set because you multiplied that by the rest of them and added one to get it."

Instead you have created a number that may or may not be prime but definitely requires a new prime number (not in your set) to factorise it. Counter example: Take your set of prime numbers to be {2,3,5,7,11,13} then

(2.3.5.7.11.13)+1 = 30031

30031 factorises into 59.509 so you have found two prime numbers that are not in your original set.

EDIT: Responding to the edit above. The problem is that you claim that you make a new prime number by multiplying them all together and adding one. You didn't multiply all the numbers and added one to get the prime number, you multiplied all the numbers and added one to get a number (POSSIBLY NOT PRIME) whose FACTORS are prime numbers not in your original 'supposed' finite set. Your proof essentially lacks the step: IF new_number is prime: proof finished ELSE: factor new_number and show that at least one of the factors is not in your finite set.

EDIT 2: Counterexample number 2. Suppose your finite set of primes is {2,7}
(2.7)+1 = 15
So you have found 3 and 5 as primes that are not in your original set and are SMALLER than the largest prime in your original set. This is now a second mistake in your proof. Whether you are trolling or just too arrogant to see the mistake/error I do not know.
”If you secretly despise wealth, it will elude you.”

How to be a Silicon Valley thought leader: talk like a Catholic’s handbook but replace “God’s mercy” with “wealth”.
a) There is no such thing as common law in non-UK Europe.

b) Common law was perfectly fine with slavery until it was outlawed by statute.

c) Even in the American system, common law is just one more source of law, alongside statute. Common law prohibits "unconscionable" contracts, but that doesn't mean statute law is prohibited from prohibiting other kinds of contracts (which it does all the time). Hence the boilerplate "void where prohibited" language in all kinds of contracts.
I disagree with everything that guy says and as of two months ago I am a millionaire before I turn 30.

Pessimism is what keeps you from following the herd of lemmings over the cliff.
My mistake, it was 5 years for projects that did trim. Most projects brought all bugs over afaik.