skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are many tools (paid and free) that assist with managing multiple kubernetes clusters but we still need to make it easy for human intervention.
When an issue is happening with your kubernetes cluster and you need address it immediately, having the information that you need already at your finger tips is insanely useful.
(3am me is going to appreciate it)

However, the problem of managing multiple kubernetes clusters isn't an easy problem to solve but a good problem to have.
It creates a space open for new ideas on how best we make this part of the industry better and kubernetes itself has looked at this problem and suggested a solution with federated cluster.
I don't have a straight forward answer, but I am excited to be part of the solution.
- "Startupland: How Three Guys Risked Everything to Turn an Idea into a Global Business"

I just finished this, and really enjoyed it. It's about the founding of Zendesk. I personally liked it's perspective because it's founders were 30 somethings (instead of the usual out of college types), and they are from Europe.

I also really enjoyed:

- "Hatching Twitter: A True Story of Money, Power, Friendship, and Betrayal"

- "The Airbnb Story: How Three Ordinary Guys Disrupted an Industry, Made Billions and Created Plenty of Controversy"
Yeah that bothered me immensely. It is an assumption of 'rational' market/consumer behavior that is extremely and inaccurately reductive.
Such captive portals are a pain anyway, even more reasons for providers to stop doing this — hijacking DNS requests.
If facial recognition was considered a bio metric, would I Phone users have to click through a screen that says "I will not use this in Illinois". I don't see how this would accomplish much more than coffee causing cancer in the state of California
Interesting, I only saw a few over a period of a couple of weeks in Tokyo.
Hmm... I’m still sitting here waiting for that “magic” of compounding interest to take effect. So often HN (and r/personalfinance) investment advice reminds me of the ol’ Draw the Rest of the Owl meme[1]. Just “do mutual funds” and you’ll one day be a millionaire because Compounding Interest. Ok well thanks to a few recessions, poor timing of grad school and bouts of unemployment, my retirement is not much more than what I put into it. So there seems to be some other secret step between “buy mutual funds” and “retire comfortably“ that I’m missing...

1: http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/572/078/d6d...
The city of Portland, OR hired falconers and their birds to keep the crows from hanging out on certain streets downtown:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BdDP_xwhg62/

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2018/02/latest_...
> They tend to hide the fact that they went into the process with an inheritance to fund their their nest egg and are working nearly full time in their "retirement" as paid frugal advocates.

Whoah, do you have evidence of this? I mean, yeah, some people have certain advantages, but if they are being paid for advocacy and if it's a trust-fund baby thing that would be really interesting.

On balance though, I'm not really opposed to a message to live frugally. We live in a culture that continuously bombards us with materialistic advertising, and this doesn't really lead to long-time happiness. I'm skeptical that being frugal implies some kind of deprivation or overwork. In fact if you're frugal then theoretically you can afford to work less.
That is absolutley false. Look closely at the 'benchmarks' shown in the above article and tell me if they are at all compelling. They measure Julia's startup time and compilation time. IF you wanted to compare Julia to C there, you'd want to include the time it takes to compile your hello_world script.

Julia's performance optimizations have to far been mostly focused on intensive numerical computations where the startup time and compilation time are merely a constant overhead that are irrelevant to high performance numerics.
I wonder what is the real reason why HSBC had to pay a fine. I don't buy money laundering charge, as the law is setup so that cartel existence is natural, so legislator had to take into an account that resulting huge black market will need banking facilities one way or another. If legislator didn't want cartels to exist, drugs wouldn't be made illegal in the first place.
No. The reason why computation in P is considered tractable is because the exponents in polynomial coefficients in complexity analyses tend to be small. Linear-, quadratic-, and cubic-time algorithms dominate P, and we pride ourselves on finding ways to reduce those exponents. Some problems in P, like matrix multiplication and context-free parsing, have been analyzed to death this way.

We give importance to this question because it is open, it is big, it relates to many other parts of computer science, it has real-world implications, etc. The fact that you don't think this question is important likely means that you don't have the complexity-theoretic background required to appreciate the stark deepness of the question. This isn't bad, but it's myopic.
Because it may be (already) overpriced, and maybe somebody will stop investing in the stock? Because automatic systems (e.g. AI, HFT) will lessen investors' faith in the stock market? Because better investment opportunities come out?
When I wanted to solve this problem for a project I wound up going with mespeak.js. It's self-hosted and there are plenty of tuning options and preset voices you can use.
http://www.masswerk.at/mespeak/
Not an EU citizen or a lawyer (NEUCoLa) so, yeah, nothing leaped out at me (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj) as requiring a site to give access to someone, regardless.
> And sometimes the best way to save lives of your people is to bomb other people.

Hello, it's 2030 calling. Yeah, that recent nasty terror attack? Carried out by people born between 2005 and 2012. They grew up in the wartorn cities of Baghdad, Kabul, in the mountains of Afghanistan, in the little towns hit with little "pinpricks" of drone strikes for the past 20 years because the big brains in the USA thought that "BOMBING THEM FIRST" was the best plan. Those young kids who carried out that attack have known nothing but war, while you have known nothing but peace and have the gall to suggest that they and their neighbors should be subject to constant, round-the-clock, death-from-the-sky TERROR. They've known people who got hit by drones. They've known people who were collateral. They've seen the craters. Arms and legs blown off. Brains. Dead bodies. Charred remains. From machines in the sky, operated by people sitting in airconditioned offices half a world away. You don't think they know that? That drone operators sit in airconditioned offices and blow people up? War is fucking hell. And that's been their reality. And our reality has been playing video games. They fucking hate us. God damn, how could they not?

Welcome to the endless cycle of violence your myopia brings.

If you think the best way to defeat ISIS and Al Qaeda is by blowing up random people who seem important now is a good plan, then it's going to be a fail. Al Qaeda and ISIS need to be defeated and expunged by and from CIVILIZATION--their networks dismantled and defunded by detective work, cooperation with local governments, the rule of law, and lots of arrests. They are going to be defeated when the local population is sick of their shit and doesn't believe what they believe. They are going to be defeated when being part of Al Qaeda is a poor alternative in life, because life offers you so much better alternatives, and their ain't shit to be that damn mad about.

There won't be Al Qaeda when people chill the fuck out, on all sides. Instead, everyone has absolutely lost their minds; they are incapable of seeing threats at their true scale. But no, some kind of insanity has taken over the thinking in the military and intelligence agencies where every threat is clear and present, and every single terrorist anywhere is just five days from hitting NYC with a nuclear bomb....
Tell the world that you respect the good intentions of the open source community
>1. Is the package actually promoted and actively maintained by the Julia developers?

Yes.

>2. Is the package part of the default Julia installation?

No, mostly because it's not done yet and only experimental right now.

>3. Is the package documented on the Julia site, as part of an officially recommended process?

No, mostly because it's not done yet and only experimental right now.
And what happens when I stay at a hotel and need to access the login page of the local lan?
There are many entities claiming they found some chemical process that outputs a flammable gas (or heat) and the whole process is carbon negative, somehow. But all of these claims are all vapourware, still.
Why does the Tor Browser Bundle ship with HTTPS Everywhere? Surely if you're connected through a Tor circuit, HTTPS provides no extra security?
I read on the Pi-Hole forums that 'fallback' is a misleading term because clients don't work that way - they will happily spread requests between two functioning DNS servers. Can anyone confirm this or provide further insight?
And who is going to enforce they pay that? If the EU tries to flex its muscles FB could just pull out. And highly doubt the EU is going to do anything controversial in the near future with the Union begining to fragment
Show HN: VisionX – Open Source Low-Code Platform
If you want to sign your code on multiple platforms, it's not just hundreds of dollars per year, it's thousands!
I've really enjoyed "Disrupted: My Misadventure in the Start-Up Bubble".

It's more about people/companies but it still fits, also it's super funny, especially if you've been working in this kind of environment and can relate to a lot of things said in the book.
Good point -- I would agree with that.

Express is what I have mostly used and loved it, it deals with a lot of the lower level stuff while I was learning my way around developing web apps and APIs. But now with each new project I am faced with dealing with user auth, emails, billing, migrations and what have you, I'd love to transition to something that allows me to focus mostly on business logic.
There's a problem with that argument.

http://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2018/05/23/birth-rate-drop

Stephanie Coontz, professor of history and family studies at The Evergreen State College:

"I think the most important and concerning thing about this is not the number of people who are voluntarily childless, but the tremendous gap between the number of children women said they wanted to have and the number that they will probably have. Early this year, the gap reached its highest level in 40 years. I think we need to think very seriously about what it is that pushes people into this kind of 'delaying.'"
What is luck really?

Determination + Opportunity = Luck
Agree, but these were typically limited to "peripheral" transactions, where it made more sense for someone external to invest in infrastructure because each customer uses it rarely.

Main difference that IT provides is that it is now more practical to outsource core, everyday transactions that your life/business depend on, because somebody else can do the matchmaking and bookkeeping.
This is the biggest misconception about Tor. Tor provides anonymity, but any node (EDIT: any exit node) can read what you're sending if it's not encrypted. You need both.
OSv: The Open Source Cloud Operating System That Is Not Linux (2013)
Displaying achievements yes, but obtaining them has to interact in some ways with rest of the client. Trading cards and inventory probably too.
Empire GUI – Empire Client Application
Crypto Shouldn't be Cryptic
Let’s see how long the reproducibility crisis takes to show up here too
You -> Tor node -> Tor node -> Tor Exit node -> http/https clearnet -> NSA/GCQH/BND/you name it -> destination server
Maybe apply that specific bit of scientific rigor to regular science as well.
Same. I used to swear by Intellij but they just kept on changing things, and even breaking things on me the odd time.

This latest emacs upgrade has been seamless and hasn't required any cognitive overhead to transition.

That said, I'll always be back to IntelliJ for heavy edits. There's nothing better for Java.

I find for less structured languages the less-structured approach engendered by emacs is an advantage.
This is only true for iOS apps, not for Mac Apps. You can get Xcode and compile whatever you want with it.
it is. English is really rich in this aspect. My favourites are:
- A Conspiracy of Ravens
- A Vortex of Vultures
For what it's worth, I got involved in the Julia community about a year ago and people have been nothing but friendly to me and toleant of my sometimes excessively dumb questions. I don't doubt that some people have gotten into nasty disputes but as far as I can tell, that seems to be pretty far from the norm.
Dealing with these crows seems like it would be a good computer-vision/ML/AI/data/drone/"weapons" problem. Killing baby crows in the nest in Tokyo a la [1] would necessarily remain human work, but open-air operations could be done with drones.

Would there be a non-lethal approach to harassing crows that would drive them away? If a program chooses the lethal approach, what weapons and disposal methods? How much would a program cost, and would that cost be offset by savings on the extra garbage-collection efforts that crows cause in [1], and other factors? How would crows adapt their strategies? Could similar approaches be used for rats in NYC, for example? Would there be downsides to a NYC without rats, a Tokyo without crows?

How long till technology would make a program like that viable? If Google is working on automated drone human targeting, the crows-in-Tokyo seems like a much more constrained problem.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWw_87A1t-o

EDIT: technological viability.
Essentially everything we do on forums is useless, I don’t know why calling a company immoral is any different.

All businesses exist to make money but if the pushback to a publicly perceived immoral act is great enough then they won’t do the immoral things. For example, I can say as a software developer that I would prefer not to work at google over my current employer because I don’t want to do immoral things. I do have a perceived moral outlook of the company’s leadership as a whole and that’s a decision that I can make. Not sure why you seem to think that’s stupid

Also at the end of the day, nobody is absolved of guilt from doing something just because it made them money. That’s possibly the dumbest way to justify doing something as good
That way still exists, so not really "old way".
nitpick: exit node. The ones on the way can't, neither can any if you access hidden services.
This seems like it'd be worth trying out. I wonder what the barriers would be to try it in state elections?
Shop at Amazon as Long as You Follow the Rules It Doesn't Tell You About
At the same time, PG doesn't have this whole "I am righteous and the most intelligent guy around," sort of thing Naval has the impression he is.
Trump’s jobs report tweet before release appears to have violated federal rules
Based on impressive performance alone. Rust's Actix is worth a look.

If you stick with Node. Take a look at Hapi.js

Best of luck ;)
People being afraid of C++ is not as big a problem as people not being afraid of C++
It is not necessarily a question of "right" and "wrong" but what are the consequences of people seeing Google as a weapon as opposed to an information service?

If the whole world begins to see Google as a weapon then they will take defensive measures.
Researchers have identified 121 giant planets that may have habitable moons
Chatfuel’s ‘anyone can create a chatbot’ model, now with more power
As an American it baffles me that the EU has regulated themselves out of the growth that is occurring almost everywhere else. It's just a difference in cultural beliefs and preferences
He lucked out there. He retained merchandising because it was considered worthless. Star Wars set the pattern for this kind of film-plus-merchandising blockbuster.

Although there was no advance merch when Star Wars came out, this quickly changed when the toy manufacturing partners realized they had a real gravy train.
If you connect to a clearnet website, the clearnet website is fetched by the exit node. If it's not HTTPS, the exit node can change the website however it wants.
In my opinion we don't want TLS at all, but rather a UDP based protocol, so that the latency advantages of DNS aren't lost. I believe DNSCurve solves this.
The real solution is for the captive portal is to signal that there is a captive portal.

Unfortunately that has turned into an arms race: some operating systems switch to a different browser when they detect a captive portal. So captive portals try to avoid detection, etc.

Basically what you want is package that tries to detect a captive portal and when it detects one alerts the user and offer to start a browser that uses the DHCP-supplied DNS resolvers to interact with the portal.
I think if we were currently fighting the 3rd Reich people might be more for it. But currently the USA has a massive military for no purpose, which is often used to conduct evil, and thus some people do not want to aid it.
+ randomness
Yes, that was indeed my mistake. Thanks.
> where people within know the customers not only by an excel sheet

Unless you don't count individual actions, this is probably nonexistent.

My hometown had a very small regional bank with roughly 3 branches total. One manager was caught skimming funds out of the vault. She was responsible for the closing amount at the end of the day, but she didn't know that there was another person who double checked behind her.

The other was someone who was skimming funds from deployed military and fixed-income retirees. I don't recall the exact process for deployed military, but it involved removing extra funds from their accounts when an auto-pay transaction (wireless bill, mortgage, etc.) hit. I don't know the details like if she somehow bumped the transaction amount or added a small transaction fee.

The fixed-income retirees was simple. When an elderly person came in to cash a check, she would palm a bill or two and short the customer.
https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#CanExitNodesEave...

Yes, the guy running the exit node can read the bytes that come in and out there. Tor anonymizes the origin of your traffic, and it makes sure to encrypt everything inside the Tor network, but it does not magically encrypt all traffic throughout the Internet.

This is why you should always use end-to-end encryption such as SSL for sensitive Internet connections.

```

Fortunately HTTPS adoption is much better now :)
It is true that the total market capitalization may be connected with more companies being publicly traded. But the stock market won't create value on its own. It means that somebody pours money into it.
That's definitely not true if your endpoint you're talking to is an *.onion . A connection to an Onion is encrypted to the destination. That also means if you were running, say NodeRed with authentication, sending credentials "over the clear" (no SSL cert, because stupidity) it's not actually sent over the clear. It's encrypted to the public key relating to your onion address.

Now, if you're using Public Internet->Tor->Public Internet, then absolutely yes the last node CAN read the contents of your packets. In that case, you absolutely need appropriate encryption to hide the contents (sigh, not the metadata) of your packets.
Where are we compared to then (http://www.zverovich.net/2016/05/13/giving-up-on-julia.html)?
If you want UDP, DNS over DTLS also exists.
I don't know if I would be comfortable with TSA agents patting down my 5 year old daughter either; so even if you legally had a choice, it wasn't a great one :(
>It's a fucking space cowboy western with Buck Rogers quality sets, acting, and direction.

The acting and direction I'll grant you, and yes, it's supposed to be a space cowboy western, but I don't think anyone would describe the sets or visual design of Star Wars as "Buck Rogers quality," if that's supposed to mean shoddy or inexpensive.

The one thing Star Wars gets consistently right in my opinion (even with the prequels, which I despise otherwise) is that it always looks good.
> It seems to me the inherent infinite divisibility might change this?

No, because 100 cents are not worth more than 1 dollar. Increasing divisibility just means you can split existing value into more pieces, it doesn't change the overall amount of value.
Very interesting, i will try it :)
A link to the "DENY OXYGEN" image:
http://www.radiohead.com/rh0021.html
So could they just add a clause in the user agreements that states "You cannot use this if you live in Illinois" and be done with it?
Firefox has both soft-fail and hard-fail modes.. for a soft fail it will fallback to traditional port 53 DNS. Its likely that will be the most common deployment - you need it to deal with captive portals (i.e. the hotel wifi) and other split horizon issues as well cloud uptime incidents. But there is a hard fail mode if that is suitable for your environment.
this is way better (and more real) advice than a collection of disjointed, pretentious one liners.
>Fortunately HTTPS adoption is much better now :)

It's HSTS what we need in 2018
I find it hilarious that you praise your own critical thinking skills while citing the first Google result that you didn't read. You sound like one of these hypothetical Americans that never criticize themselves! The biggest problem in your country is lederhosen and Mozart in your opinion? And they say Germans can't be funny...

It makes sense to me that you didn't read your source though, you didn't read my post either. I didn't say America doesn't have problems, we have lots of them! I just said that we are aware of them, and often criticize them. For example, you just listed off a bunch of grievances that the majority of New Yorkers would agree with. (I currently live in New York and the people here are also somewhat disconnected with the realities of middle America)

I really like and respect Germany, and I especially agree with you that the news there is better than in the US. But isn't that the point? Many Europeans watch American news and get sensationalized opinions of what is going on here. It is also worth noting that your country is extremely homogeneous by American standards (partially due to your own country's racist history), and you seem to be assuming America has one unified opinion when that is not the case. We are constantly arguing with ourselves on a much wider range of issues than what Germany must consider.

You are clearly not immune to bullshit media, because you have just exaggerated every stereotype that Europeans have about Americans and stated it as a fact.
>What is "evil" about working with the military or developing weapons?

Well, they kill people, see.
Scientific computing is a major use case. Just as a data point, last month I needed a small library to test a signal processing approach and tried to write that in Go (a good, real problem to better learn Go). I did not get far before I gave up and re-did it in C++. Julia or numpy would work just as well (I just did it quicker in C++).

What killed me with Go was lack of generics (a lot of copied code to implement exactly the same integration approach for real and complex functions; different accuracies, etc.); clumsy way to express formulas (no operator overloading to provide a clean syntax for matrix operations) was a pain as well.

I have seen many times that the use cases of scientific computing would benefit from the functional programming paradigms, efficiency with basic math operations and ability to define operations that match standard scientific notation (matrix algebra, convolutions, etc.), but there are few languages that do well in all of those.
No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle
"Almost Perfect" by W. E. Peterson, the story of the rise and fall of WordPerfect Corporation

http://www.wordplace.com/ap/
I think you'd like working in Scandinavia.