skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
No, he's wrong. Aliasing between union members has never been defined behavior. It just happened to work.

Now that optimizers are getting better, these long-standing issues are starting to surface in the real world. This is no different from when programmers do something dumb like

j = i++ * i++;

which works until it doesn't. Or worse, someone runs Stroutroup's book through a static code analyzer and finds a wall of errors so the language is changed [1].

Code around it and move on -- as in the patch mentioned.

[1] https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/eval_order
No, that's exactly backwards. In fact ICC and Clang (I have no idea about VS) both follow GCC on this particular feature, largely because important software like Linux relies on GCC's useful and practical feature set. See also support for GCC's struct initializer syntax, statement expressions, inline assembly constraint system, etc... GCC invented all this stuff, and software developers everywhere (Hi!) love them and use them, and the industry follows suit.

Fundamentally you're still missing the point. Standards are important. Features are more important. The best standards are ones driven by features and not paper. GCC has been a far better, more innovative, and more practical driver of "standards" than any committee.
> The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides the Data Protection Authorities with different options in case of non-compliance with the data protection rules

> - likely infringement – a warning may be issued;

> - infringement: the possibilities include a reprimand, a temporary or definitive ban on processing and a fine of up to €20 million or 4% of the business’s total annual worldwide turnover.

> It is worth noting that in the case of an infringement, the DPA may impose a monetary fine instead of, or in addition to, the reprimand and/or ban on processing.

> The authority must ensure that fines imposed in each individual case are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.

In the official disclosure about enforcement, they state that warnings are optional ("may"), and only apply to "likely infringement", and they have more or less no standards determining what is "effective", "proportionate", or "dissuasive", and to me "proportionate" and "dissuasive" or "effective" are somewhat conflicting constraints. In some cases surely an effective fine is not proportionate, or a dissuasive fine is not effective or proportionate, or an effective fine is not dissuasive (that is, does not dissuade future infringement). I don't know what you consulted to get your information, but I would suspect europa.eu[0] is a decent source.

Heck, you even contradict yourself, first you say:

> That has never, EVER been said. Not once.

But in the next breath, you say:

> In fact, the vast majority of guidance says that they will seek compliance BEFORE suing people.

If you "get the basics right", surely you realize that it can't be simultaneously the case that it has never, "EVER" been said that a suit will be filed before compliance is sought, but also that the complement of the "vast majority", the petty minority, say that they will sue people "BEFORE" seeking compliance, by your own statement.

[0]: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
Which is why it nice to have famous but intemperate people like Torvalds to keep things in balance.
Instructure has an office in pleasant grove now too (but you are right, they are HQ in SLC)
https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/15-inch

Under the new models, the old non-touchbar 15" with deeper keyboard is shown.
It's Harvard. They'll figure it out if push comes to shove.
What is the most scarce resource for average developer. Is it CPU? Is it memory? Is it network bandwidth? Or is it his own time?

I guess for most developers it is reasonable to trade-off to blow few megabytes here and some kilobits there in order to save even few hours of precious calendar time. When everybody contributing to the dependency graph does that, it adds up.
Now we have a web of spinners
Clang now follows GCC's behavior with regard to that specific example, which makes sense, as Clang more or less explicitly aims to correctly compile the GNU dialect of C.

I think it's reasonable (and even important) for Linus to emphasize that the kernel is coded in GNU C, not strictly standards-compliant C.
Do be sure to at least consider supporting no colour! http://no-color.org
>Our most ambitious so far has been setting up each student in the course with a p2.xlarge machine with cuda and TensorFlow so they could do deep learning work for their final projects.

Wow! How expensive was this? Do you do any sort of shutdown/startup work or use pre-empt instances?
Can you prove swearing is ineffective? (Fuck no.)
No, and I never asked.
It's true that they also make widgets, but the proportion of people who use GitHub because of their desktop client has to be vanishingly tiny. GitHub became popular originally because of pull requests. It stays popular because of network effects that counterbalance its deficiencies (terrible search, weak bug management, short analytics window, etc).
I agree. My point is that a large number of businesses are likely to sign up because the service has a large number of users.
If they really were being supportive, the church would ban all mention of MLM's around the church.
> but when is this bug gonna be fixed: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/11375

Looks like whenever 3.0 is released.
Or you can refuse compensation out of principle.

This is kind of my point though, Google is entitled to compete for and win defense contracts. I’m not arguing that and I agree that Google is entitled to payment for their costs.

But is that more important than end-state diversity? To these protesters, yes. But I don’t understand their priorities or at least the rationale behind them. This is a very important issue to them, and it seems odd.
3: I hugely appreciate you taking the time to reply. This is incredibly helpful, I now see the ridiculousness of my half-thought-through point.

2: The reason I connected current activity with long-ago activity was based on sentiments I read that Microsoft were still behaving in some of the ways they used to. But a 20 year stretch is kind of pushing it, particularly in the tech industry.

1: Fair point.

Thanks for the feedback.
Two of my nieces are out serving their "3 month pest control mission" as I write this. I hope they don't come back promoting the bro culture.

In all seriousness though, a few years ago, the bro culture in some of these Utah Valley startups made my job search a literal nightmare.
> only the wealthy

Roughly $40 billion in revenue, divided by 2 billion users. Only the very poorest wouldn’t be able to afford it.
Wouldn't a more fair comparison being buying a car, doing the speed limit on the highway all day but also going much faster on the track? But of course you can't drive at full-tilt on a track all day without additional parts?
Point taken. Competition IS good (rather than just copying, which initially put me off to GitLab).

And how nice it is that there are good products that fit multiple mental models, so neither of us has to compromise. (Again, for the record, I still host everything on GitHub but mainly am looking to GitLab because their stuff is so integrated).
Supposing there's a 1955 Cadillac Series 62 Coupe in the middle of Antartica, which most likely there isn't, it didn't fall there from space.

I have no particular stakes on this discussion besides this one, I just dropped by to say this: I don't see any problem with the construction of that statement. At least as an informal or "folk" logic argument.
That is the music industry. The rights holders and creators (IP owners). The distro channels are part of it, but wouldn't necessarily change (you want to distribute everywhere you can). If google bought all the music IP in the world, the distro channels are unchanged (unless Google decided to limit distribution!).
How many popups do I need to swat away in first minute of reading this post. Second one doesn’t even have a close button it just hovers over text on the bottom. How about letting users read the article before forcing them take make a decision to subscribe
Sorry about that, but Chrome auto updates for almost everyone. If you're using an old and insecure version you should know you'll experience problems.
I was cured of HIV with the used of natural cure. I loves Traditional Medicine so much. Most times, injection and drugs are just a waste of time and money. I was cured 2yrs ago, i suffered from HIV for 13yrs but with the help of Dr. TEBOR herbal medicine, i was cured within few weeks of drinking the herbs he sent to me through courier delivery service. This same man also cured my Aunt from herpes, as soon as i heard she had herpes, i referred her to the doctor and she was cured after drinking his herbs.I have referred more than 15 persons and they were all cured from their various illness. Have you taken herbs before?. You have spent so much money on drugs,injections,surgeries etc and yet you have no good result to show for it. This man is a herbalist doctor, i assured you of cure if you drink his natural herbs. He have herbs that cures Hiv, Herpes, diabetics, asthma, hepatitis, etc. Contact Dr. TEBOR on email: TEBORHERBALCENTER@GMAIL.COM
Phone/Whatsap no: +2348153052125
What these people don't understand is that if urbanism was better adopted in the US they would be able to get to their "leafy suburb" (as the article puts it) without the neck breaking commute.
And it didn’t happen with FB’s API. Your friends could see their private data. You could see yours. The apps were not able to show your private data to friends and vice versa without breaking their contract with FB.

It would be like being concerned because both you friends both use Chrome to access your individual, private bank accounts. Google accesses your private information, with your permission, to display data on your screen. It’s only bad if they misuse that data.
They need them clicks.
Show HN: SWI-Prolog Community's 8 Week MooC Starts June 8th
Please direct questions to @swi_prolog on Twitter!
Awesome Thanks.
So much better than the workaround here: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/3960#issuecom...

type TemplateTypedSelect = new () => Select<Template>;
const TemplateTypedSelect = Select as TemplateTypedSelect;
return <TemplateTypedSelect {...props} />;

Our codebase was sprinkled with these, which was both silly and error-prone. This will be a huge quality-of-life improvement, and encourage people to create type-safe React components that ensure a match between their inputs and callbacks, rather than just having them put a union of all the types they can handle in both.
and you know where to find a particular setting.
now it can be in the new or in the old version or in both....
The difference is that political leanings don't come up during interviews, so any prior on conservatives' IQs won't skew hiring. Sex and race are visible, so the interviewers' priors on their IQs will skew hiring, hurting the chances of people in disadvantaged sexes and genders who do have high IQs. That is what implicit bias training aims to counter.

Separately, there is the issue of correcting the education of people with low IQs, but that is a problem whose solution lies outside the hiring funnel.
I think you're being unfair.

You've conflating the much simpler task of changing the label with a much broader change (ie, throwing away the entire practice in favor of a completely different and more difficult one).

Which do you honestly thing is more realistic and more consistent with what we know of the history of the state?
The frontend is reactjs. Very simple.
Are you going to add this disclaimer to everything you do now, or is the idea to just take the name over with your capital? It's their name that they've established by being a prolific, well-respected developer; it was also the only search result for it before you appeared, because it's a unique name without an another established meaning. There's no explanation for why you'd choose it outside of not doing due dilligence or just lack of morals.
Considering my day job, the third paragraph is particularly ironic :D
"Guys, we've been giving you a free ride for 30 years while you write your crummy software and we made it faster. That's over!"
-- John Hennessy

"Our job is to tell them: it's over. The free ride is over. There's no magic. The cavalry is not coming over the hill."
-- David Patterson
Try to contact them and offer to fix the errors.

I did something like this and when I reported the URL with the vulnerability they didn't answer, but when I tried to access that URL I got a page that said "the bug is in uranus". Unfortunately if you added any parameter to that URL the admin panel was still public.
Dunno, whenever I dig into one of the "shitshows" I find I mostly agree with it. I'd say a decent fraction of the ones that make hacker news are some form of "Don't break userspace". He obviously feels it's quite important, and there's been several cases of failed perception (like the gnome folks breaking userspace "like linux does").

Sometimes it's worth being a bit over the top so that the entire community you are working with gets the message loud and clear. Seems like other communities (like bsd, gnome, debian, etc), often have extensive documentation, policies, and best practices... which are often ignored because every developer doesn't keep 100% of the best practices in mind at all times.

I suspect a big part of why user space is broken so rarely in Linux is exactly because Linus has made such a big deal about it in the past.
It's gcc defined behavior. Not the BS (his words) C standard behavior.
They aren't contributing to the compaign - Citizens United was about spending money on your own advertising. You are allowed to buy whatever airtime you want to say whatever you want.

If you happen to want to say something nice about one candidate or mean about another in the airtime you bought it's hard to argue that's not covered by free speech rights.

You can argue that this has perverse effects - but the courts have consistently held that free speech has wide latitude even when it has negative effects. Exceptions are extremely limited and the harm has to be immediate and direct.
Bonding with Your Algorithm
> what a waste of money.

Uh, you know its Harvard we're talking about right?
Does it?

- it’s barely outrageous
- doesn’t seem to be about the first amendment
- nor is it much of a violation
Removing chronological feeds was the straw for me to quit facebook and linkedin.
> People who really want to contribute will find a way to, always.

Self serving bullshit
The answer for this particular course was, "very expensive". Each students machine shuts down after 20 minutes of inactivity (defined as no Jupyter process currently running), so that saves money, but in this specific instance many of the students were running extremely long jobs, so that didn't really help us.

The average cost over all of the other courses was something like $2-3 per month per student. The deep learning course ended up being closer to $20 per student. Thanks to Amazon Educate almost the entire cost was covered with credit.
But what does neutrality even mean? It's the git protocol, what is there to make non-neutral?
> the reality is if the military were in the business of making a profit, retaining employees, or pleasing customers, it would fail miserably.

Is that because of management issues or because of the intrinsic issues that come from being in the business of killing people to gain land, resources, power, or whatever?
I suspect you missed the point earlier: GKE offers a free managed master, even if your cluster is a single node costing you $5/month.

Disclaimer: I work at GCP, but not on GKE.
PowerPoint 2016 Chart Types Support and Exporting Shape to SVG inside C++ Apps
I'm a huge Tesla fanboy, but I would be willing to bet money that we won't see Roadsters being delivered to customers until mid-late 2021.

Which is fine for me, because I probably won't be able to afford mine until probably 2023.
Recruitment for his foundation?
In this case, it's not so much "SSH" as the ability to install files, as root, onto the server. For RDS/Cloud SQL, the inability to do that both restricts you from installing your own extensions; and restricts you from being able to use the Postgres COPY command with local/network-mounted (rather than network-streamed-to-STDIN) CSV files, majorly increasing the overhead of the operation and preventing parallelism.
What sort of extreme ignorance?
Not only could you check which data is going where on your own device, the journalists behind this reporting did in fact do this with a Blackberry for their previous story: https://twitter.com/laforgia_/status/1003619319736143872

They sniffed the network access of the Blackberry as they logged into Facebook via the built-in support, saw it pulling down a bunch of information direct from Facebook to the local device and nothing else, and wrote it up as though it were somehow scandalous and a breach of privacy that Facebook didn't see this as giving a third party access to that information. They didn't let the fact that they knew the third party wasn't receiving that data get in the way of fearmongering then, and I doubt they would here either.
Guys,

Great idea. I would focus on specialty media. Think things like banking regulations, utility work, law reviews, etc. I think there is pretty strong willingness to pay in those markets and the credibility of the individual authors may carry more weight than magazine brands. Giving those writers a bigger cut might also attract them to the platform. Clearly you need to think about an advertising model here but those are the types of markets I would try to compete in - not serialized fiction.
How about looking at more blue collar industries and see if your theory holds up. Say auto mechanics...I doubt there's a "problem" in that industry that keep more women from becoming mechanics. I can't tell you why most women are not that interested in cars, let alone working on them, but I know that it's true. The same could be said for garbage collectors, oil rig workers, etc.

I've worked in tech all of my adult life and I rarely see women in this field. The few that have come through my places of work usually stay to get some basic computer experience and then move on to whatever they wanted to do in the first place. I have yet to meet a woman that has the same passion for all things tech that I and a lot of my male friends have.

But let's say you're right...how would you propose that tech companies generate more interest that would appeal to women? I mean we all know women love to USE technology, apps, games, etc., but how can we get them to crossover to the side of creating, maintaining and supporting these things?
Are you going to stop people from buying $2000 of ad space in their local newspaper and using it to personally endorse a candidate? Or endorse a candidates' stance on a range of issues? Or push hard for the same side of an issue that a candidate is taking?
Yeah weather has been pitched by a lot of ad tech, and beyond some interesting creative for car companies I don't see much value. Imagine the car driving in snow if it's snowing, or in the rain etc.
People go to LinkedIn in for the feed?
You just said games don't count.
The only "breaking" change is a stricter type check for keyof, and strict type checking is the entire reason for existence of TypeScript.
not sure if I remember it correctly but what happens is alcohol molecules consume water molecules in your blood and your brain does not get the usual amount of water molecules delivered to it by the blood in circulation. I think.
That would be a neat way to drive most companies into the ground.
It’s irrelevant whether they had a functional business model or not - the issues with this system were known. And Facebook isn’t the only threat in the world.

It was obviously privacy invasive and the harm type any of those systems could do was obvious. They didn’t have a business model when they started out - but that’s only because they had the runway to ignore it. Otherwise there was an obvious way they were going to make money and that was Ads. Powered by data harvested about you.

I mean that’s the whole point of the site? What else is it going to do?

This is facebooks business model - it’s also the business model for many other sites. And yes those other sites are also a problem.

Hey, I’m not stating an opinion, I’m stating a fact.

I don’t have a Facebook account and always viewed it as a threat to privacy. I’m not the only one.

All that’s happening now is one of many adversarial uses of this information is being made known to people who Don’t visit slashdot and hacker news.

Facebook was going to use your personal information to make money for itself. It was going to be harmful to you.

This has happened.

The business model for other parts of the web is the same. Those parts are going to cause similar issues but at smaller scales.
I find it so strange that this is a problem... like the top legal minds of Germany can't figure out how to interpret the concept of public domain from another jurisdiction in a way that's consistent with German law? They can't just make a ruling that says, "OK, everyone consider public domain from other jurisdictions to be the most permissive possible license under German law" and be done with it?
But is it effective? That's really the point.

I also feel like we see every single abrasive Linus email hauled out of context to make this point that he's an over-dramatic asshat, and not the mountain of mundane ones where he isn't torching somebody to make a point.
Competition is a good thing.
I read it as based/headquartered in the European Union.
I was referring to Volta launching in mainstream GeForce GPU line. I understand it is launching soon.
Developing Apps for Your TV the Easy and Open Way
Speaking about statistical averages, not individuals.

There are more men who can lift 50 pounds over their heads than women. It does not mean that a woman cannot be hired for a job that requires her to lift 50 pounds over her head. It means that there will be a smaller pool of candidates so expecting a 50/50 hiring is stupid.