skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sarkari Naukri 2018
To get the latest Update About Government Jobs, Visit India Jobs Dekho
From looking at the photos on the latter article, I'm guessing zero people crashed expected it to do everything for them. The UI is a knob on which you set the speed you want.

The state of the art in computers at the time was the RAMAC 305, a vacuum tube computer which featured IBM's first disc drive. The computer itself was meant to be installed in a room 30'x50'. The disk drive itself was 4' across, weighed about a ton, and held 5 million characters (6 bits each). All this could be yours for only $300k/year (in current dollars).

Given that, and given that the transistor radio was introduced only a few years before, I doubt anybody expected the sort of magic we see as commonplace today. And if they did, they would let go of the wheel and find out in about 2 seconds that it was not staying on course.
> I wish they had just copied Rust/Cargo

Cargo is really a suboptimal design. With vgo Go advances the state of the art of dependency management.
You’re arguing around the point here.

Almost all reasearch domains live on a log curve; a little bit gets you a lot to start with, but eventually you exhaust the easy solutions and a lot of work gets you very little improvement.

You’re arguing we haven’t reached the plateau at the top yet, but you’ve offered no meaningful evidence that is the case.

There are real world indicators that we are reaching diminishing returns for investment in compute and research now.

The ‘winter’ becomes a thing when it becomes apparent to investors that their financial bets are based off nothing more concrete than opinions like yours, when they don’t work out.

Are we there yet? Not sure, myself, I think we can get some more wins from machine generated architectures... but I can’t see any indication that the ‘winter’ isn’t coming sooner or later.

Investment is massively outstripping returns right now... we’ll just have to see if that calms down gradually, or pops suddenly.

History does not have a good story to tell about responsible investors behaving in a reasonable manner and avoiding crashes.
You can't test most of high end physics at home. I hope that doesn't mean you don't believe it!
I think one day - when we will have dimanond extruded from thick air by nano-robots, this craze over what will be "brick" for future generations will be incredibble alien to future generations. DeBeers and the likes of them will be the tulip traders of todays tulip-mania.
Not for me - last week I signed a contract on the now-deprecated HA-420.

One thing that made me giggle is that in the elite they threw a seatbelt in the lavatory, meaning you can legally carry one more passenger now. Who's the lucky person that get's strapped in the shitter?
The "minimal versions" strategy basically just replaces the lockfile with your dependency list.

Two branches want to update the same dependency? With a lockfile, they both update the lockfile and will have a merge conflict (assuming the updates aren't identical). With "minimal versions", they both update the file that declares the dependency, and, you guessed it, have a merge conflict.
I assumed [s]he meant to say YouTube doesn’t make a profit. Or at least doesn’t seem to make a profit as a stand-alone entity. Not completely sure if that’s true but it seems like it still is or is unknown.
We don’t dispute climate change. We dispute that man-made CO2 is the cause of it. Still waiting for the apocalypse promised in An Inconvenient Truth that was promised by 2016.
All the same I'd rather the developers at Tesla were working on improving the autopilot functionality instead of developing easter eggs.
I feel like a big part of having a private jet is looking and feeling like a baller and I can’t see how that happens with those corny engine pods sitting way above the wings.
From the slides, these bullets struck me as things I have wanted for a while (to the extent that I have my own toy language that addresses some of them):

- compiles faster than C

- Produces faster machine code than C

- Seamless interaction with C libs

- robust/ergonomic error handling

- Compile-time code execution and reflection

- No hidden control flow

- No hidden memory allocations

- Ships with build system

- Out-of-the-box cross compilation
I don't want to live in that kind of world either, but it goes on existing around me all the same.
Cara Menang Mudah Bermain Poker Online – Asiapoker303
You can export and import your follows. Yes it would be a different account. There is an option to mark your old account as "account has moved" and specify where you've gone, which an app could treat as a redirect.
Let's stipulate that there is nothing the physician could say in response to a fraud accusation that would cause you personally to doubt that accusation. That seems a novel combination of the judgmental and the credulous, but life takes all sorts. It would still be better for the physician, for you to have this reaction while reading Yelp than for hundreds of thousands of newspaper readers to be reading TFA.
For those curious about the unusual overwing engine pods, Wikipedia says:

"The HondaJet’s overwing engine mount configuration was designed to maximize cabin space,[5] and achieve lower wave drag at a high Mach number."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_HA-420_HondaJet#Design

The source document has more discussion of the issues involved:

http://www.hondajet.com/Content/pdf/FlightInternational_Cove...
There are a lot of companies who try to be like Facebook and copy everything about them. Look at how do you open work spaces are becoming popular.
Your attitude is inhibiting progress. Everybody knows the technology is not ready and everyone is fine with it and willing to face the consequences of refining it. Everyone except Tesla that is, which insists their self-driving tech is so advanced they even call it autopilot encouraging people to treat it as such and refuse to admit any fault in this mess.
It started at Facebook and made sense for Facebook since nobody’s life is ruined if they can’t use Facebook for 5 minutes. It’s not appropriate for Tesla or even Google.
If their life is on the line they'd be stupid not to. Which, of course, a lot of people are. But the fact it's common doesn't take away the blame
All I see is this:

"Unfortunately, our website is currently unavailable in most European countries. We are engaged on the issue and committed to looking at options that support our full range of digital offerings to the EU market. We continue to identify technical compliance solutions that will provide all readers with our award-winning journalism."

Maybe we should develop a habbit here on HN not to link to geo-fenced sites?
Simulation of impact of adaptability to change and its impact on success
For me Google is attacking on 2 main fronts
1. Quntam computing
2. Machine Learning/AI

If they are able to combine the 2. A big if though the cost analysis will change for AI quite dramatically.
Interstellar travel now seems a lot more hazardous than it did before. To quote one of my TAs in college, "it's the stuff you can't see that gets you" ...
Pirnar Luxury Entrance Doors in Dubai, UAE
They are falling way behind in blasting errant pedestrians. Stories from the last 24hrs.

https://www.google.com/search?q=pedestrian+killed&prmd=nvi&s...
You ever play the video game "World of Goo?" That's my image of what shortsighted engineering can get you.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-A_JfkzPwww
How did it come to pass that only whales are untouchable among animals? In various countries, dogs, cows, pigs, and horses are seen in different lights. Why do we care so much about whales and not the above? Why isn't it like the other situations, where we choose not to eat dogs and horses, and leave those who do in other countries to their own devices? Because whales can't be bred, or because they're too smart, or something else? It's a curiosity for which I haven't arrived at an answer.
Hi, it appears that "sensationalist garbage" triggered quite a bit of a discussion. This is typically indicative that the topic is "sensitive". Perhaps because many people feel the winter coming as well. Maybe, maybe not, time will tell.

And FYI, Tesla is in the business of making self driving car. If you read the article, you might learn that Tesla is actually the first company to sell that option to customers. You can go to their website right now and check that out.

Uber, like it or not is one of the big players of this game. I agree they may have somewhat toxic culture, but I guarantee you there are plenty of really smart people there who know exactly the state of the art. And their failure is therefore indicative of that state of the art.

I also omitted Cruise automation and a bunch of other companies, perhaps because they have more responsible backup drivers that so far avoided fatal crashes. But I analyze the California DMV disengagement reports in another post if you care to look. And by no means any of these cars is safe for deployment yet.
The way I'd do it is set up a bot account that toots your twitter timeline, make it a locked account and only approve your mastodon account, make your replies to your mastodon bot then be tweeted from your twitter account. Build your own bridge, heh
Almost anything that has to do with image understanding is entirely AI. Good luck writing an algorithm to detect a bicycle in an image. This also includes disease diagnostic as most of those have to do with analyzing images for tumors and so on.

Also, while a lot of these can be seen as "improvements", in many cases, that improvement put it past the threshold of actually being usable or useful. Self-driving cars for example need to be at least a certain level before they can be deployed, and we would've never reached that without machine learning.
Is it though? Piloted means human controlled, often by a highly trained professional. I agree that auto pilot is a confusing term, but in an aircraft auto pilot systems are actually more primitive than Tesla's offering. To me, it just sounds like a cheesy way to mimic the name people are familiar with for self-driving features without infringing trademark. Because taken literally, it suggests a more capable system than auto pilot does.
They seem to have impressive repair costs. If I was an insurer I'd quote high because of that, not because they were more likely to crash. (eg https://cleantechnica.com/2018/05/20/heres-what-7000-of-dama...)
> where there's little traffic to worry about

I don't think you are aware of how much traffic on the "air roads" really is....
Also the article explains that the main wealth of the 9.9% is that they live in the best neighborhood, with the best schools and the best neighbora. They use their zip code to recognize themselves. So it make sens that they place a big chunck of their wealth into their house because your house is your social status.
Thumbs up for Coronal Breaking Manoeuvre!
Why can't we treat diamonds like the commodity they are?

Don't give me a story, give me a MOQ, spec sheet and a quote.
Soros-backed campaign to push for new Brexit vote within a year
But see, any debate at all is blasphemy. The inability to accept skepticism is anti-science. There was a worldwide scientific consensus that Eugenics was a good thing in the early 1900s. But somehow the overwhelming “evidence” of its “benefits” suddenly fell out of favor. People that are hysterical about climate change are, incidentally in favor of the government curtailing freedom and controlling the means of production. To me, climate change is an acceptable trade off to avoid living under Bolshevism. When scientific “truth” becomes a political rationale for totalitarianism, then there’s a problem.
Yup, exactly. The man-made diamond industry should just counter by talking up how they can make perfectly "pure" diamonds with zero imperfections in color or clarity, superior in quality to mined diamonds, and with no human lives lost. Just keep drilling that point home in all their sales and PR until it changes the dynamic. I'm sure the millennials will be receptive to that - cheap, better, not immoral.
I totally didn't bring up crypto as a source of scarcity. I brought it up as a ledger to keep track of chain of custody.

Your points are reasonably related though.
We used to do that, but splitting with an app is easier so we've gradually stopped. Especially because many restaurants don't like doing separate checks, or have a limit to how much they will split, or it just feels mean and inordinately complicated to ask the waiter to do it when we have a way to sort it out ourselves.
I might not be understanding your scenario correctly, but isn't it stated that UTC has 00:00 offset and should be stored that way? You would then add an offset based on current tzdata for that timezone string which would make it dynamic and accurate for the situation you described.
You don't need amazing transcription to search a video. A video about X probably repeats X multiple times, and you only really need to detect it properly once.

As for the users, sure the translation may not be perfect, but I'm sure if you were deaf had no other way of watching a video, you would be just fine with the current quality of the transcription.
Indeed, but it does seem like a central repository is possibly the direction it's headed, or at least away from source repositories. Personally, I won't be too upset by MVS if it's one of the only deviations, though I do agree with Sam Boyer on the matter, who I actually had the pleasure of speaking with a bit ago.
Yes, I agree, and it really is a feature (flaw?) of human psychology. As much as I want to say that I want to make sure that I research something before doing or buying it, more often than not I just choose something based on emotion. Even for something like programming, I wonder if I use libraries based on their utility or on the star power of the guy who built it. It takes a lot of mental power to weigh pros and cons versus just choosing and hoping for the best.
People don't carry cash as much as they used to, because they don't need to, because apps can do it.
Facebook may have invented the slogan, but others still took the concept and ran with it. There's various incubators in SV that repeat that same mantra to startups because they heard it from one of the big boys (Facebook) or read about it in some VC Medium post. I'm not pointing fingers, but just saying that even in such innovative places people will still blindly follow those paradigms like it's conditioning.
I don't think that's such a good example. Climate change should be debated. Not if it's happening but to what extent and effect. Science after all is about questioning findings and theories. Discussing climate change shouldn't be about politics first and foremost but about science.

As for De Beers, throwing marketing dollars at misinformation pretty much has been their business model since the 1930s. Diamonds are a girl's best friend ...
It's Facebook's motto, but the mindset is far more widespread.
Nitpick: The HTTP examples will only catch v1 traffic, not HTTP2
The Diamond Invention (1982)
Number of tweets as reliable data points? Very dubious. Simple explanation: They are busy working, so less time to tweet.

Maybe they're working on something so cool, that the AI winter may not even come. Sure, there's a lot of marketing-speak around AI at the moment.

But this wave of AI seems a lot stronger with better fundamentals than 20 years ago. At the very least, at least we have the hardware to actually RUN NN's cost effectively now as oppose to grinding your system to a halt back then.

Before AlphaGo, it wasn't even clear when a computer could beat a top professional in go, let alone crush humans in the game - low bound guesses were 50 years.
No, because the insurance policy rental car $$ runs out first. Trust me on that one, personal experience.
How can something be biased when it's listing facts?

If there are 100 facts that indicate a coming AI winter, and Brin just talks up the 15 facts that indicate AI's unalloyed dominance, that's definitely biased.
> Hi, it appears that "sensationalist garbage" triggered quite a bit of a discussion.

Yes. Sensationalist.

> I also omitted Cruise automation and a bunch of other companies, perhaps because they have more responsible backup drivers that so far avoided fatal crashes.

So your explicit reason for omitting Waymo, as I understand it, is that it didn't support your argument?
Also why does every single result has to be breathtaking? Here's a quick example, at IO they announced that their work on Android improved battery life by up to 30%. That's pretty damn impressive.
If there was a security fix in a package, MVS allows build infra to automatically upgrade (assuming packages imported are well maintained by their owners) where as lock-files require manual intervention.

Imagine the packaging and development ecosystem in internet scale.
That's a bit reductive. Retail diamonds are usually priced on their size and the maker of the jewelry that surrounds them. There are investment grade diamonds, but as the article "Diamonds are Bullshit" that is currently at the top of HN[1] illustrates, appraisers sometimes deviate by 100% on that estimate. However if you buy a $7000 ring from Tiffany and walk out the store to a buyer and can get $1000, it is still storing value. It's just an extremely depreciating resource and unstable. It has value, it stores value, it just fucking sucks at it. If you can find another sucker to pull one over on like the retail shop just did to you, then it holds it fine.

I mean, I think I covered all of that pretty well but yeah, to stay it's not a store of value at all just because it's a bad investment is inaccurate.

[1] https://priceonomics.com/post/45768546804/diamonds-are-bulls...
Blockchain has shown its usefulness when recording events like transactions. This usefulness could be extended to medical records, which often suffer from inaccuracy and discrepancies.

Healthcare professionals are responsible for ensuring that sensitive medical records are accurate, complete, and only available to authorized individuals. All of this can prove to be difficult when healthcare providers all have different systems for storing information.
TO KNOW MORE PLEASE CHECK OUR SITE:- http://www.blockchainhelp.pro
Has anyone done something genuinely useful with ml/ai/whatever outside of advertising or stock trading? I am genuinely curious if it has really been applied to real commercial applications.
He's playing my laptop like a fiddle, too, a really high-pitched one: all the videos are keeping the CPU at 100% CPU so I had to downclock everything to keep the system below 64°C.

So: the first time I ever found a paragraph like the one the GP has quoted, happened on the same site I've ever been on where the autoplaying videos are making my whole system (including typing this comment) lag worse than any other site I've been on.

At least it gave me one good idea for the Extension I'm Making One Day™: watch the CPU and if the current page is killing it and it has autoplaying videos and/or CSS animations, automatically kill both.

In the meantime, I had to close the article as it was unreadable. (Wow, getting my low typing latency back is wonderful!)
A quick search gives me this http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2016/08/automatic-emergency.... In particular "At 45 mph, the crash-avoidance systems slowed the test vehicle by 74 percent, on average, and prevented collisions 40 percent of the time.", i.e. it fails 60 percent of the time.

Do you really believe other cars' automatic emergency braking works 100 percent of the time with perfect reliability? They don't show up because it's non-news.
Here's the exact spot on that road that matches the picture in the article https://goo.gl/maps/pj3X4gAuG672
This is false, stop this Tesla propaganda with false facts.
I've Written About Cultural Appropriation for 10 Years.  What I Got Wrong
So Wikipedia's consensus that I linked to is wrong?
Introducing a new plane from a new company in a stagnant market is slightly different than another model from companies already in the car market. But thanks for coming here to tell us all how uninteresting it is for you!
Cambridge analytica comes to mind
AI is favorable for big companies to better scale their services. It seems that Facebook have also faced AI scaling drawbacks and they are developing there own AI hardware for it https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/18/17254236/facebook-designi...
A diamond is forever was a brilliant marketing campaign. This, however, is condescending and an insult to the intelligence of their customers. Synthetic diamonds have the same chemical and physical properties as natural diamonds with virtually no flaws. In other words, it's actually better than the real thing.
First, what are said 100 facts? The article looks at fairly mundane metrics such as number of tweets or self-driving accidents...

Second, I'm not quite sure that's how it works. Like in mathematics, if your lemma is X, you can give a 100 examples of X being true, but I only need a single counter-example to break it.

In my opinion a single valid modern use-case of AI is enough to show that we're not in an AI winter. By definition an AI winter means that nothing substantial is coming out of AI for a long period of time, yet Brin listed that Google alone has had a dozen in the past few years.
There's two distinct things at play here - storing times in the past and present, and times in the future.

For the past and present, UTC is fine, and a source timezone if necessary. To track the exact instant when something happened to me, just storing UTC is fine. If I want to know what where the hands on my clock were when that happened, you also store which clock I was using separately (timezone), but this is optional and doesn't prevent accuracy.

For future times, relating to humans, like on a calendar, there's a very important distinction - I want to set appointment when my clock shows a certain time, irrespective of what the timezone rules (Daylight saving time rules can change) are at that point. Here, storing the UTC time for my appointment according to today's rules is a problem - you must simply store what I expect to see on the clock and apply the timezone rules lazily at the last possible minute.
However, we do know, at least since Kant, that perception is not a simple matter of apperception. Reality is beyond reach and we have to resort to internal combinational capabilities to assert reality, thus considered a construct. Constructed reality always adheres to broader frameworks, retroactive interpretation, etc. Moreover, when it comes to abstract concepts, perception isn't really a means of asserting reality anymore. How could we check a proposition like, "The US is ruled by the deep state" by simple perception? In fact, when we are confronted with a proposition like this, it is much more for the overall credibility that we allow to be attributed to the proposition and/or its source and how it fits to our own broader world view, whether we tend to acknowledge the proposition or to reject it. (Fact checking may be here seen as a sophisticated approach to rejecting the proposition at first.) So, yes, ideology is a thing and is to be considered as part of what we use to acknowledge as truth.
Which region gives me the most form submissions?
Improvements in search, translation, image recognition and categorization, voice recognition, and text to speech off the top of my head. I'm sure there are a lot more.
> A commercial pilot doesn't flip on autopilot and start browsing the internet on a phone or take a nap

Commercial pilots are trained professionals; Tesla drivers are not.
> The speakerless sound system ... the speakers are integrated into the side panels.

So NOT speakerless, then?
The word "kernel" is 10 words away to the right, so the first (and traditional) interpretation, "Operating System".
Open defecation- a threat to women’s safety, health, and dignity