skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That must be why all aircraft are unmanned now. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

Thanks for demonstrating my point on conflating. I'll use your quotation to illustrate. "every car sold with self-driving hardware" - So you are claiming that they are not sold with hardware that will ever be capable of full self driving? Seem to be a bold prediction given the video and what I can achieve with two eyes and brain.

Also, I don't recall Tesla advertising "Autoland" that you linked to.
If you use awk, which has associative arrays, you avoid sorting, and can keep everything POSIX.
> TNG, Voyager and Deep Space 9 all at various points made an issue of how the replicated food was not quite the same, without really trying to explain why

I believe there's a good hint when you combine some stuff from across TNG/DS9/VOY: Replicator patterns are relatively low-resolution for storage.

They only go to the molecular level, not the subatomic/quantum level [0], and even then occasionally have issues [1]. And even if you had a high-quality pattern stored, the replicators themselves are built around that low quality, hence why the genitronic replicator was needed for Worf's spine [2].

Transporters are built on the same technology, but work at the much higher resolution necessary to break down/rebuild a person. However, the amount of memory needed for that is insane [3], hence the specially-designed pattern buffers, which under normal circumstances degrade very quickly [4].

[0] http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Cold_Fire_(episode)

[1] http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Enemy_(episode)

[2] http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Ethics_(episode)

[3] http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Our_Man_Bashir_(episode)

[4] http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Relics_(episode)
Here are the easter eggs in action, on a production vehicle: https://youtu.be/1GrNv3ow9H8?t=640

Weird, the tweet was dated 2018-05-22 but the Youtube video shows easter eggs already deployed by 2018-05-23. I know all Tesla vehicles have automatic over-the-air updates but that's still surprisingly quick. Must be Musk playing around with his time machine again.
In my experience: They tend to be clearer, "brighter"(more white), and more "brilliant" (reflectivity) than natural diamonds. One of the best ways to tell? They reflect more of a distinct rainbow vs. natural diamond.
More overpromising and deadly consequences. He has overpromised on delivery dates, autopilot abilities, he has underestimated capital requirements, and timeline trips to Mars.

Perhaps Tesla should consider a new CEO and Elon take a move to a more figurehead position?
How to Set Up Gmail in Outlook
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/gmail-outlook-settings/

Import Gmail to Outlook
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/import-gmail-to-out...

Google Chrome Browser Security by usb
http://www.gbotstudent.com/chrome.html

Gmail Use a Security Key for 2-Step Verification
https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6103523?hl=en

How To Make your Gmail Account More Secure
http://www.tomsguide.com/faq/id-3704782/make-gmail-account-s...

Windows 10 Configuration Tutorial by usb
http://www.gbotstudent.com/win10.html
> Surely there are many other exploitation factors such as running up the CPU...the primary use case would be ideal to help me understand.

You're probably running untrusted JavaScript in your browser right now. The difference between the V8 in Node and the V8 in your browser is that one is heavily locked down and the other can do essentially whatever the OS lets it.

If you have untrusted code to run, you can eliminate a whole class of security concerns by just not having a way for the code to do those things (i.e., making syscalls it shouldn't, forking, reading and writing to the disk or network, etc.). Sure, resource use can be an issue, but that's a problem that's more easily solvable further up the stack with VMs or containers. Just putting an instance of Node running untrusted code in a VM doesn't solve much, since the mechanism whereby you give it input and collect output can be manipulated by the untrusted code itself.

By making the runtime secure, you get the security of the browser (i.e., being able to visit a website without having to wipe your machine), but designed to run in a server environment.
What do you mean by "aren't real". In what way is a manufactured diamonds not real?

My understanding is that they are in every respect indistinguishable except for perhaps being too perfect under magnification.
Yes. There is zero chance I'd use a system like this. Regular freeway driving is already boring enough that I worry about losing focus. (I supplement with things like caffeine and audiobooks.)

There's some threshold of interventions/minute that I think humans just aren't very good at. Which is why there are systems like Threat Image Projection, which turns baggage scanning into what is effectively a video game: https://www.rapiscansystems.com/en/products/rapiscan-threat-...
> How to find a good trade-off between high coding standards and not getting in the way of research?

I think you can have both. Unit tests and good coding practices should make you faster once you have more than "1 screen"'s worth of code and you are relying on human memory when navigating and maintaining code.

I'm not a "unit test all the things" kind of person though.
Use dep for now, it's the closest thing to a stable package manager for go. And you'll also have the smoothest path to a vgo migration in the future.
Nothing. Use dep now. In fact, since you are just starting out, see how far you can get using only the standard library. Later, there will be a seamless upgrade to vgo.
It is funny how rather than debating the point and relying on what words actually mean resolves to pedantry on hackernews.
> "wall clock point in time"

The tricky thing to realize is that this is not a datetime. This is more of a contract/condition saying "when localtime will be at this value" or better yet "when localtime will have exceeded this value for the first time" because you know someone will put a date on a leap second or missing DST hour at one point.
Sure, but that's like pointing out that Toyota Corollas exist.
Good thing for Amazon then that the only tech company with worse customer support is....Google.
But they are not actually that rare. It's simply a controlled supply by a cartel losing its grip.
SLAM:Simultaneous localization and mapping
“From a little after two o'clock until almost sundown of the long still hot weary dead September afternoon they sat in what Miss Coldfield still called the office because her father had called it that—a dim hot airless room with the blinds all closed and fastened for forty-three summers because when she was a girl someone had believed that light and moving air carried heat and that dark was always cooler, and which (as the sun shone fuller and fuller on that side of the house) became latticed with yellow slashes full of dust motes which Quentin thought of as being flecks of the dead old dried paint itself blown inward from the scaling blinds as wind might have blown them.”
— Absalom, Absalom by Faulkner
Nothing whatever like Machiavelli. I don't understand that last part you wrote, sorry.
The benefit for Tesla would be selling more cars because people think they are getting a technology that isn't really ready but Tesla's claiming is (but also claiming not really, read the fine print).
Thanks for posting this. It's much more fleshed out than my hazy memory of a GitHub comment although I still don't agree that all this effort it is worth the "simplification" of not having a lock file.
Why the Heck Is Bird Potentially Worth $1B?
diamonds can burn, and temperatures reached in house fires are sufficiently hot enough to burn diamonds. cubic zirconia, on the other hand, will survive a house fire.
The patient claims the following in the article:

> [The doctor's office] posted my entire medical record, including notes about my mental health, my bills, my insurance info, my driver’s license, birth date and home address.
I'm here to hear your views on data science. Drop your questions/comments/feedback.
I think the idea is that the UI needs to force you to always pay attention.
I love how, even after using Unix-y systems for probably 10-odd years, I still occasionally stumble upon something like this that refers to a command that I've never even heard of, and when I check (on my Mac, no less), it's right there sitting in /usr/bin. So many useful little utilities.

I think the same thing happens to a lesser degree with vim features.
I'm not sure I'm ready to sacrifice CCGs on the altar of "think of the children!" just because it might knock game companies down a peg.
5 DNS Servers Guaranteed to Improve Your Online Safety
From my experience in knowing a few scientists, the pattern seems to be:

- Scientists try their best to be good programmers, but are scientists first.

- Someone the scientist knows, or someone on the team with more programming knowledge, turns what the scientist produced into something maintainable at some point.

- If they're lucky, the grant will have resources for a script/software maintainer.

Scientists are scientists. I know a few who can do things with awk that probably should never be done, but they use the tools they know to get the data to look the way they need.
> why do you blame the tabloid?

Because a common tabloid tactic is posting technically true statements in a misleading manner.

For example, the woman's statement could apply to having introduced her medical records into the court transcripts, which would be entirely normal practice. The wording in the article leaves us thinking they uploaded her records and driver's license in a Yelp reply or something, but I think that's unlikely.
nope https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docke...
Your statement is true, but leaves out some facts. The issue is that diamonds are not naturally rare, they are artificially rare. De Beers buys diamond mines to shut them down and only lets so much of the product on the market to inflate the price. Used gold vs. used diamonds also reflect the artificial pricing. De Beers is a cartel, trying to protect their cartel. The marketing scam of the last 50 years is showing cracks.
Like how you're ignoring the repeated assertions that Tesla salespeople and Musk are misrepresenting or outright lying about the "autopilot's" capabilities?

If you want to debate the point, you can't just ignore all the parts that you inconveniently have no answer to.
Same author, earlier exploration: The Man in the High Castle (1962) explored it in the context of otherwise-identical objects, one of which was involved in some historic event, the other of which wasn't
I thought it was more the fact Elon didn't like the aesthetics of the roof equipment, like he's trying to design an automobile the same way Apple designs a laptop
Star Trek frequently discussed things being slightly off when replicated. Troy wanted "real" chocolate when in a seriously bad mood. Picard kept cases of real caviar for special occasions. I mean, it's a writing trope designed to point out that they are far away from home and play with the concept that scarcity creates value and thus is interesting to human(oid)s.

The ideals of a moneyless society by virtue of just being in the freaking future in TOS and then later because of replicators in TNG and beyond had to be adapted for the multicultural bazaar on Deep Space Nine by introducing Gold Pressed Latinum. Something that replicators couldn't reproduce. I think that is an interesting thought experiment. The only currencies on a federation ship are friendship and duty, but once you add in a mix of cultures and the complexities that develop because of their clashing goals and desires, you need a scarce item to keep accounts. We've done it over and over throughout our human society. My favorite is the Rai Stones[1] from the island of Yap, where they can't even be moved for the most part. The transfer of ownership is purely a social construct.

Diamonds are interesting and I think unparalleled in their arc as a store of value because of how technology is eroding and changing that. Not just the ability to produce them, but information technology swaying trends relating to their status and ethical usage. You can't tell a blood diamond from anything else once it's mixed with others. Some people see diamond jewelry to be akin to wearing fur. Some other people still find the suffering that came from their extraction to be part of the value. Not going to debate the morality of that issue, but I've heard it expressed more than once. Suffering will always be more bespoke even if the item can be identically reproduced. Some might prefer to soften "suffering" to "effort", but I'm unaware of an ethical diamond mining operation. Like lab grown meat, a strong case can me made that once we can make the thing in the lab at scale it is absolutely unethical to extract it from the earth at scale for vanity. No excuses.

In some ways suffering as a store of value is sort of like the social construct of a rai that floats with the idea of the item. Maybe we can build a crypto supply chain technology to verify chain of custody on natural diamonds so you can correctly track the bodies on it and their value in relation to your net worth. I'm only sort of being glib here, making it an accurate record would undoubtedly make them less romantic prizes.

Surely the tools and equipment to create synthetic diamonds will continue to drop in it's price to own and operate. It will be interesting to see how De Beers handles the first online custom gem shop where you can set your specs via your browser and have your gem grown to order, cut, and drop shipped for the price of a latte.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones
UI is ugly, I’m porting it to react. We are speeding up dev time. I hope to fix your frustrations!
IIRC Google uses 4am as the cuttoff. So saying "tomorrow" after that cuttoff will be the following calendar day.
If you need to stay alert and have your hands on the wheel, why is the damn thing called "Autopilot"!? This should not be legal.
First of all, they do call it that. There is no “turning on AutoPilot”. You turn on “traffic aware cruise control” and “Autosteer” separately. You can turn on TACC and not autosteer, or turn them both on, or drive yourself and switch between these modes very easily. Collectively the self driving features come in an “Enhanced Autopilot” package which you can purchase to have those individual features enabled.

Secondly, I have a Model 3. The idea that the name is misleading people is the dumbest thing i’ve ever heard. Even if people were confused, their confusion would be cleared up very quickly within a few days of use. When you pick up the car they talk to you extensively about what it can and can’t do, and there are many warnings in the car that explain it. People who make this argument probably haven’t tried using AutoPilot.

Put this is context. you can’t just release a perfect system on day 1. In order to get the software to that level earlier versions need to be seeded into the public. I am 100% convinced the software is a huge safety and convenience win as it is.
I've discovered that Google, Amazon and Netflix all slot me into categories based on searches I've done and items I've looked at in the past. They don't seem to understand the difference between gag searches and a legitimate desire to buy something, which is how Amazon kept trying to sell me a 20-gallon drum of personal lubricant for so long.
I work in a tech-related healthcare field where I'm required to undergo HIPAA training and (often) end up needing to educate clients on potential violation risks. Nowhere as good as a lawyer but I deal with it on a daily basis at least. So take this as the typical "I am not your lawyer or pretending to be a lawyer - go speak with an actual lawyer" disclaimer.

>Wasn't this a HIPAA violation?

100% yes that was a HIPAA violation and honestly anything shy of giving your information to people who actually need it (aka: any hospital/practitioner you visit who should be aware of your medical history) is a violation with very few exceptions (mostly legal ones). Gossiping about patients is probably one of the most common violations.

>If yes, what do you even do about it?

Depends how much you care and how long it has been since the event happened and you became aware of the violation. If it happened within the last 6 months you can report it online through the process xapata linked you. If it's been over 6 months it's too late to report. I'm not sure if "it happened but I didn't know it was a violation until recently" counts as a start date for the "aware of the occurrence" limitation. Would be a great question for an actual lawyer.

You also don't know what else could possibly have been said about you or your medical history - so I'd keep that in mind when deciding if this violation is a "big deal" to you personally or not.
“Woke up, fell out of bed
Dragged a comb across my head
Found my way downstairs and drank a cup
And looking up I noticed I was late
Found my coat and grabbed my hat
Made the bus in seconds flat
Found my way upstairs and had a smoke
Somebody spoke and I went into a dream”
Artificial scarcity successfully implemented is still scarcity. For example, trading cards printed in low numbers can drive the prices for those cards high.
ebay or auction websites. Lots of places dump their equipment at 3-5 years.

another secret is 'you don't need the latest', in fact, almost nobody needs the latest.
They are useful for when you want the semantics of UTC but still a human readable time. One example is logs that people will actually read. People have a hard time doing mental math but 14:00-05:00 is just as valid as 19:00+00:00 and easier for people in Eastern Time.

It's also useful for disambiguating a local time:

2018-11-04T01:45-05:00 America/New_York
2018-11-04T01:45-04:00 America/New_York

That said, I do think they are mostly around for less noble reasons: they are way easier to serialize than actual time zone rules.
Yes I am talking about git tags.

I purposely followed semver 2.0.0 which doesn't mention anything about a "v" prefix. Thanks for finding an old mention of version control tagging!

At the end of the day it's not a big deal. I will just duplicate the tags so it won't break any dep configurations.
There's a movement towards this; look up "Vehicle-to-Everything" or "V2X". The idea is to enable things like one vehicle transmitting sensory information or intent to others around it, helping to prevent rear-end collisions, etc. My personal take is that it's well intentioned, but there will always be things that aren't part of the corpus of communicating devices that will then limit the utility. I suspect the communication of sensor data is the more useful part than some of the demos I've seen so far of, for example, a car sending an alert to a person's phone so they don't step into a driveway when it's reversing.
Twelve ASX stocks with record growth since 2000
And if the insurance companies are limited to a % of paid claims... then they are incentivised to increase the payout and/or # kidnappings. That's a recipe for disaster just like the medical market.
JupyterHub allows you setup research clusters on GCloud, AWS and Azure. You can set CPU / GPU resource utilization limits, disk usage, memory, network. Even limit scaling to your budget. Once your experiment is up and running. It's simply another service running in a container. Have used it for a small distributed team. But can be scaled to corporate R&D teams with 1000s.

Core environment is still the Jupyter Notebook. So should remain familiar to most data scientists.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

https://zero-to-jupyterhub.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Is a vmotion'ed VM the same as the original one? Is it kind of like a transporter?
maybe you mean 'patterns'
Yep. That's exactly what we did :-) For the short time we were running the service (about a year or so) it worked great ;-)
it was interesting to see from the comments that there have already been corpus analyses filed as SC amicus briefs (not just law review papers).
Learning Through Mistakes: Java's Three BlockingQueues
Its only ageism when other people do it.
I ignored what Tesla sales people say because it is anecdotal and contrary to what I experienced when I bought mine.

Far from ignore the parts "I have no answer to", I acknowledge the parts that are misleading like the video. I can only presume that you ignored reading my comments and enjoy misleading yourself.

I'll place it here for you again to read.

"I will admit showing a video of full hands off video, not on a highway, underneath a statement about the hardware, showing off software being used in a way that is not recommended in the manual is bad."

Good on you for editing "smug pedant" out of your comment.
I hope that people will buy their manufactured diamonds elsewhere and evil DeBeers can go out of business.
Obligatory Erik Naggum essay -- possibly his best ever:
http://naggum.no/lugm-time.html
Yeah I misinterpreted the constraints. Still, this model has no lower bound on sodium and no upper bound on potassium; ideally both would be bounded on both sides.
Ask HN: What's your favourite non-US movie/series and why?
Preferably non-USA, preferably not in English. They're already vastly overrepresented in online lists. Your favourite, or maybe top 3, and why. Thank you!
its utterly insane

uh, isn't a self-driving car you have to drive an oxymoron?? does anybody understand words??
Thanks for the reply -- I'm so accustomed to people claiming that "you should have been shorting X" without actually doing it that it was a real pleasure to hear that you've made the shorts. Bravo.