skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The space argument makes sense in theory, but one very dedicated person added a headphone jack back to his iPhone 7, and it was possible only because there was a suspiciously empty space where the jack used to be:

https://strangeparts.com/bringing-back-the-iphone-headphone-...

I'm also not persuaded by the "most people won't base their purchase" argument, as that applies just as well to adding another 5-10% to the battery. Most people don't base their purchase solely on anything. I may have to go by my local phone stores and chat with the staff to see how much this matters in practice to people.
yay!!!!
Because the vast, vast, vast majority of small companies aren't turning over millions of dollars. That's the same logic as, "some people cheat on welfare, so lets defund it." This logic gets pushed around a lot by GOP pundits.

The law may be good as a whole but be overly burdensome for small companies. You should at least acknowledge that instead of just dismissing that outright.
The "Pirate Bay guys" were persecuted in Sweden, nothing I can find on the coverage of their arrests and trials mention American copyright law. Extradition treaties are voluntarily made by the countries that establish them.

Again, if a country doesn't want to abide by the DMCA then they don't have to. Extradition treaties and the Pirate Bay do not disprove this claim.
There have been studies going back as far as Peopleware and The Timeless Way of Building that suggest people are generally adversely affected when the noise is more than noise they personally generate (e.g. keyboard clicking), and not in their control (e.g. choosing to listen to music may be fine, but when you’re forced to listen to music because the alternative is a distracting conversation between teammates it has adverse effects).

The other thing, especially mentioned in The Timeless Way of Building, is that you need privacy to reach a state of flow. It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re isolated or that no one can interrupt you, but it means nothing in your immediate vicinity is triggering your peripheral vision or any sense of a fight vs flight reflex because someone’s walking around right behind you, etc. Most of that research advocates that individuals should be allowed to customize these aspects of their personal space, like privacy, quiet, lighting, ergonomics..

More generally though, it’s not about what works for you or for me. It’s about what we can empirically learn about states of flow, and on that front it’s utterly beyond dispute that open-plan offices are disastrously bad.
Why is this here? Why does it contain a picture of seventeen people standing in the dark? What are any of us supposed to do with this information?
When E is true and stative, the state of E obtains.

The meaning is current and has absolutely nothing to do with "succeeding": http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=obtain&sub=Sear...

> (v) prevail, hold, obtain (be valid, applicable, or true) "This theory still holds."

The mistake in the section you quote is labeling E an "event" rather than a state.
People have no idea how much of their favorite music is built on the same handful of chord progressions. And it's fine because the real magic is in the notes you lay on it, the sound design, the way the different instruments work together.
Do Cities Actually Save Money When They Merge? (2013)
> It will be a sad day for me when there's nobody left who has walked on our nearest neighbor. It feels like a turning away from possibility.

It's quite possible that will never happen, depending on the next few years of spaceflight (and their health).
I wonder more and more what Elm offers that langs like ReasonML don’t?
>>If only it were so easy to know what the mission is or what is in service of the mission.

If only.. Maybe we could call it hmmm a Mission Statement... Yea that would work...

Now let see what Mozilla's mission statement [1] is

>>>Our mission is to ensure the Internet is a global public resource, open and accessible to all. An Internet that truly puts people first, where individuals can shape their own experience and are empowered, safe and independent.

Seems like it pretty easy to understand that the mission of Mozilla is and from that it would be fairly easy to say if a person is working for or against said mission.

[1] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mission/
Why subprocess is the safe way to execute commands in Python
Is it recommended to editorialized the titles in HN? I posted this same URL a few hours earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17162884 but it didn't work audience-wise.

BTW, it is interesting to read the third party smart contract audit since Open Zeppelin are one of the top auditors: https://medium.com/nomic-labs-blog/zeppelinos-smart-contract...
If you liked this piece, please also consider reading https://pabloariasal.github.io/2018/02/19/its-time-to-do-cma..., which is a modern (2018) guide to what you should and should not do in CMake.

It's very enlightening.
That's unfortunate and likely will require a flexbox/float-based fallback.
Hey, I just checked your project out and it's awesome. One thing id like to see is a way to filter submission types. Specifically it would be nice to filter out products likes apps and books.
Bekas – One of the Best Premium WordPress Theme
No, they still would. People do amazing things under constraints.
> Meme is something you publicly posted it is not your personal info,

Very generous assumption on your part. Article 9 specifically says that anything revealing personal info like ethnicity, political affiliation, etc. is covered by GDPR. If I look at a Adam's list of authored memes and there's a bunch of pro-Democrat memes and I look at Bob's and it's all pro-Republican memes, then it's very easy to see a court ruling that a memes reveal political affiliation.
The sure things principle comes from decision theory and economics.
It's obvious in the sense that it constitutes one of the axioms that define rational behavior.

In decision theory, we try to define behavioral axioms in a way that choices under uncertainty can be encoded in mathematical functions (utility functions or reward functions as Machine Learning has renamed/rediscovered these things). Connecting properties of these "preference orders" with utility functions and probabilities is the basis of a lot (but not all!) of modern economics.

Check for example Savage's proof of the existence of a subjective probability measure and a utility function based on only handful of "trivial" axioms.
If these axioms hold, we can do meaningful mathematical social science.

The issue is of course that people don't actually behave rationally. The examples (or paradoxes) by Ellsberg and Allais show that most people violate the sure things principle.

If you are interested to learn more, here are some excellent notes by Gilboa
http://www.econ.hit-u.ac.jp/~makoto/education/Gilboa_Lecture...

I can answer questions as well.
These are maximum fines IIUC.
So now you need a 3.6V power regulator, in additition to the 3.3V one you likely already have for all the components built for 3.3V.
http://ngrid.io feedback appreciated.
I agree this is part of it. For example, as a high-achieving and socially outgoing introvert who is very sensitive to background noise, I found this paper really depressing:

< https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55dcde36e4b0df55a96ab... >
Tesla Model 3 Road Trip – Statement Regarding Autopilot Collision
There's also so many awesome details. How the crew still wears uniforms with "Tachi" logo. How Alex consistently wears MCRN uniform and Naomi doesn't. How different Mars and Earth ships look inside. How they actually think about debris, richochets and loss of gravity in case of combat. So much drama is driven by physical constraints that are just waved away in other shows and that makes is awesome to watch.
All Rulers of Europe Over the Past 2,400 Years Presented in a Timelapse Map
Science Based Medicine: Black Salve Quackery
Sorry if this is a bad question. I only buy meat and vegetables from whole foods, does it shield me from the ill effects of meat.

Only thing holding me back from keto diet is amount of meat I have to eat.
OK so I'm 7 years old. My parents are my parents, so I've got constraints you would give a child who sometimes wets the bed and can't always put all their own clothes on.

I've got a bunch of paper and crayons.

See you in a couple of hours, cause I'm just gonna draw.

(or is childhood that different, now?)
In a classic stack-based calling convention, every function takes one parameter: SP
Pasting from the FB page
_____

I want to make it clear that I take responsibility in regards to my actions. With that being said, I do not believe that there are many Tesla owners who, when using Autopilot, always keep both hands on the wheel and provide their undivided attention to monitoring the road and the software. This collision was directly caused by the Autopilot software seriously malfunctioning and misinterpreting the road. This collision could have happened to anyone who does not expect a car travelling at a fast speed in a straight line to suddenly and without warning, veer off course. After tens of thousands of kilometres worth of Autopilot driving without major incidents, I have learned to trust the software. Autopilot provides users with a strong sense of security and reliability as it takes you to your destination and navigates traffic on your behalf. Clearly, I had become too trusting of the software.

Autopilot is marketed as a driver assistance feature that reduces stress and improves safety. However, the vigilance required to use the software, such as keeping both hands on the wheel and constantly monitoring the system for malfunctions or abnormal behaviour, arguably requires significantly more attention than just driving the vehicle normally without use of Autopilot. Furthermore, I believe that if Autopilot even has the small potential of misreading a clearly marked gore point, and has the potential to drive into a gore point and crash into a barrier, it should not be tested in beta, on the open road, and by normal consumers. My experience is not unique as many drivers have reported similar behaviour from Autopilot, and a fatal crash involving Autopilot on a Model X may have been caused by a disturbingly similar malfunction.

Many Tesla fans will likely dismiss this as fully my fault, but I implore those who believe so to take a full step back and put themselves in my shoes, as a driver who had used this amazing software for so long, and who could not have anticipated such a sudden and violent jerk of the wheel to one direction while travelling at a fast speed. I hope that my fellow owners will be less dismissive of various incidents regarding Autopilot, and understand that the general public views these severe collisions differently from the owner community. Tesla is moving quickly into the mass market, and potential customers in that segment aren’t going to ask, “why were both of his hands not on the wheel while the car was in Autopilot?”, rather, they are going to ask “why did the car swerve into the gore point without warning?”. The autonomous driving movement as well as the Tesla community can only get stronger when we tackle these questions and resolve the issues behind them.
The difficulty is that your language ability needs to be at such a high level that you'd lose more nuance from a translation than you would from lack of vocabulary etc when reading the original. In my opinion it's worth it for poetry but prose less so.
Wow, that rule is stated horribly.

You'd get much more value from phrasing it as

((p implies r) and (q implies r)) iff ((p or q) implies r).

No need to have a special rule stating that when you also have (p or q), you can resolve all three to just "r" in one step instead of two steps.
I agree one hundred percent. There isn’t really a failure mode to this. Worst case you lose some money, but like when you rejoin the workforce you’ll be somewhere else. Right now I’m like 20x the programmer I was when I quit.
Beware Avast Auto Updates CCleaner Old Versions
Because the market doesn't demand it. If you truly care, speak with your money and buy a WiFi system from a vendor that provides software/security updates and patches. There are a few out there doing this, but it's not cheap.
> I’ve been reading hacker news for about a decade, and

> it’s getting to the point where I don’t think there are

> many entrepreneurs and/or technical people on here

> anymore.

Not sure, I tried my luck with co-founding 2 companies but I work now as an employee. I notice that the number of Stars on popular Github projects is rising every year, leading me to the conclusion there is an ever growing number of technical people. More over I realize it becomes easier every year to deal with more complexity.

That said, it becomes more feasible to handle more business logic - or compliance logic if you will.

I know that especially Lean Startup proponents say one should start with low tech solutions. Also I attended an accelerator program and was surprised that most startups there were not tackling exactly super complex things. In fact one Startup worked with some kind of modified Wordpress or so - which has GDPR logic already included.

So yeah, things become more technical and complex but I think it's for the good. Also when handling other people's data I guess there should be some responsibility. For the 2 companies I co-founded data-export would have been trivial to implement as the Web Apps were AJAX powered, I would have had just to provide a link to the user. In case of Startup #1 users were anyway only there to train for some test, so it would have been no problem to delete the user records. Probably delete cascade would have been fine as I worked with backups. Deleting data from backups would have been fine as well, they take up only precious space and use up bandwidth. Startup #2 was more about producing content that was not from users.

Also I want to note that in times where TDD is something even known to barely technical people, delete cascade is safe and a no-brainer.

Anyhow, the most challenging thing looking back would be all those 3rd party tools. To name some: Google Analytics, Mixpanel, managed DB/Redis/etc. I was never a fan of any of those tools and in times of Docker, we can run our software on whichever computers seem most suitable.

> My biggest fear is that all of these complex

> bureaucratic laws are just raising the bar for doing a

> startup. Maybe the days of two people doing a startup

> in someone’s garage should be in the past? If so, that

> makes me kind of sad.

GDPR isn't really complex, it's more like a collection of vague rules and recommendations. Basically most of them are like keep only the data you need, offer export and deletion following best practices.
Quite funny: you're more describing the US than Europe. Maybe because you're only interested by US and not by Europe..?
;-)
Yes, but Firefox's Sync is open source [1], so you should be able to set up a private instance. IDK how easy or hard it is though.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/CloudServices/Sync
I belive they've done this before.

In one case they went to court to get an OK from a judge to use the malware and seized domain(s) to then activity remove it from people's computers. They asked a judge because while they can seize a botnet, actually altering people's computers might be seen as bad so it seems they went about it the right way.

If they were going to be all evil I doubt they'd be talking about rebooting routers and such ;)
If you don't have GOTO loops, how do you leave infinite print loops running on the demo TRS-80's at the local Radio Shack?
That's a great idea, I definitely plan on doing this soon. Thanks for the feedback!
>GDPR could end free internet services.

They are not free. Someone pays for them. If someone wants to pay for an internet service by giving advertisers access to their PII -- that's fine. But it doesn't mean that this monetization scheme should be applied to anyone using the service. Internet companies should provide a paid, tracking-free, and GDPR-compliant access mode, as an alternative to a free ad-based one.

Who knows, maybe brick & mortar companies would also accept this double-monetization model, so that when you come to Starbucks next time you would be able to get a free coffee in exchange for your PII and a non-removable tracking bracelet.
Thanks for your insight. That’s pretty much what I was expecting in a web framework produced by Red Hat. (Not to completely disparage Red Hat - they do have some good stuff.)

How’s the CoreOS transition going? My buddy worked for CoreOS and it seems like he’s incredibly busy now. It’s upsetting to hear that they’re forcing shitty tech on y’all.
Makes you wonder how much is protected sources and methods. One good mole (digital or human, really) would make technical analysis a secondary consideration.
I don't see how significantly reducing the number of people on the planet is practical.

Yes, current models predict global population capping, but it will stabilize higher than it currently is.

There are two actions that modify the population count. Birth and Death. We can decrease our birth rate while increasing freedom by offering better reproductive healthcare to those without access, but I don't think it will decrease the birth rate enough to make it lower than the death rate.

To reduce the current population to a level with "far fewer" it would involve involuntarily death increasing (war, murder, fatal accidents, illness), or involuntary decrease in birthrate (China's one-child-per-family policy, forced sterilization). Both of those seem horrific to me, especially if the motivation is to give more luxury resources to the living.
Not so, it's about basic accessibility, so blind readers can use your site. The EU could and probably should dig into that at some point too, and the rest of the world will (hopefully) benefit. (I added hopefully because, unfortunately, a number of websites have engaged in dick moves; namely implementing GDPR protections for EU users only or blocking EU users entirely.)
Revo Uninstaller Pro 3.2.1 Crack with Serial Key Full Version 2018
From the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

> Are reposts ok?

> If a story has had significant attention in the last year or so, we kill reposts as duplicates. If not, a small number of reposts is ok.

It's not very clear, but the other post has only 4 upvotes and 1 comment, so it doesn't count as "significant attention".
I don’t see a lot of comments looking at the practical side of things. I am implementing GDPR and here are some suggestions:

1. Collect only what is necessary for providing your service
2. Make clear what you store and for what reason
3. Ask consent and give the opportunity to retract this consent as easily

Deletion:

1. PII means information that makes a person identifiable. This is the type of information that you need to remove
2. So if you are storing PII information for the use of profiling you will need to disconnect the profile from the PII information. E.g. you could use user table where you would overwrite the PII information with generic information. You can still use the now stale profile withou PII information (for example in statistics, aggregations etc), but you cannot tie it to a single person anymore. Ie. You should not be able to reconnect the person to profile you have stored.
3. As technical possibilities evolve you need to improve the disconnection over time.

There are legitimate business reasons to store some PII information. E.g. for security reasons, other laws etc. So IP addresses don’t need to be deleted from your web logs, but if not given consent you cannot use them for ads, sell them etc.

The required clarity that GDPR will bring to your data is actually going to benefit you. Your data scientists will love it, because the tooling that helps with Gdpr also helps with discoverability, data quality etc.

Enjoy GdPR, there is a lot of business opportunity in it.
Because of the hysteria and resulting "OMG DO SOMETHING," the US government has turned it from an opioid (pill) epidemic to a fentanyl and heroin epidemic. Of course the latter is much more difficult (if not impossible) to control, and much, much more dangerous. So as a result of "OMG DO SOMETHING," the US government did probably the worst thing they could have possibly done.

If only there was a long and ugly drug war we could have used to reflect on the success or failure of the US government and it's attempt to control drug use. /s

Every decade, there is a new boogieman drug, just like there is a boogieman -ism. Anarchism, Communism, Satanism, Terrorism. Reefers, LSD, Huffing, Cocaine, Crack, Meth, Nicotine, Jenkem, Pills, Heroin. I have no conclusions to draw, but it is an interesting phenomenon.

Here's how the current battle of the drug war is going.

https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/o...
I feel the same way. I loved QBasic and when I started college I had a leg up on a lot of folks.

I am kind of jealous of you. I tried introducing my kids to programming and they simply do not show any interest.
I found that instead of using antibionics, using probiotics on a sick animal works even better. I had a sick animal that I didn't think would make it and loaded their food with pro-biotics and she eventually powered through it. Maybe the solution is just the right bacteria vs the wrong ones. This might be a middle ground farmers might like because they can brew their own bacteria pretty easily (I use rotten milk and a bucket) and actually save money
I don't think the commenter meant healthcare as in hospitals and medicine being available; AFAIK the US has nothing like what most other countries has where it is facilitated for most or all citizens to access health care at minimum or no costs.
A platform for making things on a platform made for creating platforms.

I'm sure (semi-sarcastically) that you'll surely make a lot of money.
(GP here) re: the second part, I guess I consider most scraping 'unwelcome'

To the first part: I would characterize certain scraping, usually behind an authentication wall, as malicious--though admittedly that's not the right word. An example would be scraping Facebook profiles to build a marketing list.

So, by 'non malicious,' i mostly mean 'publicly available data'
What are you hoping to prove with the example? That folks that know and understand many of the idioms of programming can easily read this?

Not to mention it does invert many of the things that people coming to it will want.

Consider, you want to tell the computer to ask for something. Once it has an answer, put it in a spot.

name = input("what's your name?")

That goes the other direction. You start with what you want to store, and then you turned the input into a function. Of course.

Contrast with the BASIC.

INPUT "What's your name"; name$

You began with what you want the computer to do, input something. You did have to learn "input", but you had to learn that in both. So, it is a wash. There are the odd semicolons. I'd imagine that took some effort.

I'm not going to defend basic as a paragon of programming. But I don't think there is an easy answer. There are tradeoffs. BASIC was the answer in the past, as much because it was free and installed in a lot of default locations as anything else. There are alternatives now. None as widespread as Javascript, as much as the saddens me, personally. It is probably the best choice for people today.
First, cograts on your work and your deal with red hat! Second: Did you use any other css framework in the project before? If so, which one? What are the differences / your resume?
Third: How is working under red hat umbrella? I hope for using patternfly you at least force them to dump project atomic in favor of container linux ;)