skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
IP address by itself is not enough to be considered personal data. Only if they gathered other info would it become so.

There seems to be disagreement about this. You might be right, but I've seen passionate arguments on both sides, with links to various opinions, etc.

And on analytics, I think it's reasonable that you're OK with it, but that doesn't make it compliant. And you blocking GA doesn't make it compliant either.
Completely backwards, violators have a choice, either play by the EU rules or move their business elsewhere.
Link/source ?

Btw imho the worst part about RPi is that it has poor ethernet performance. This improved a bit with RPi 3+, but still meh.
They keep sending it to me. Apparently, even asking them not to and trying to block them is not enough for some people.

Just to be clear, I treat all my users fairly and protect their data, and I am not intentionally targeting any EU users with anything I do online.
Agreed that binging after fast as compensation is a common trend and not a healthy one. I think the way one practices the fast definitely will lead to differences in productivity. Personally, I work fewer hours but find myself to be more productive for those fewer hours as I have generally prepared better to get work done during those specific times - which isn't something I do for my "normal" workflow.
Then reask: whats the gateway to 0.0.0.0/0
I don't have any valuable commentary on the IPO, but I will say that as a completely unaffiliated consumer I've been consistently impressed with Anker's quality and specifically seek out their products.
Nor do they supply the aircraft and fund their own travel.
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions you might have for vocal-free drum n bass. DnB works best for my productivity, but vocals ruin it. Here are some that I've found:

https://youtu.be/CL-vqNpGVQs
https://youtu.be/-e-jXfHeUy0 (terrible transitions)
https://youtu.be/TmENer4RPhw (anything by Monrroe)
https://youtu.be/Q0dK7_3mkQM
https://youtu.be/_QVbDoVT9Ro
https://youtu.be/-qiMuebvq9E
https://youtu.be/LYgNN8lDQ5s
https://youtu.be/egd1cC5hH7s
https://youtu.be/tRCvp0DI-Qg

Unfortunately, a search for "Drum and Bass no vocals" gives you every genre of vocals you can imagine.
I'm on Reddit's dev team and yes, we're reading this. We read as much of the criticism as we can and incorporate it into our planning as much as we can. We have a team of developers working on performance, and one of the nice things about the redesign is that we can make radical changes to the stack, if needed, to support better performance.

There are a lot of core Reddit users that just like it how it is, which I get, but there is so much that can be improved. I could write pages about this, but just to give one example: one thing many people aren't aware of is how much work the moderators do to make Reddit a good place. Right now they rely on some pretty janky tools to do that work. The redesign allows us not only to give them better tools to do that work easier, but also allows us to add things like submit validations that prevents users to posting garbage to their subreddits which they then have to take down by hand. If you think we should just add those features to the old Reddit, all I can say is you've never looked into the sad, tired eyes of someone who has worked on that codebase.
I'm proud to say I worked with WFMU and Cuban Council on the initial release of this project.
The 508 in my Nexus 5X is not quite quick enough to be smooth all the time so I can definitely see an improvement jumping to a more modern SOC. But the improvements have slowed down as mobile hit the same sort of limits that desktop had already exposed and now it is on for the same very slow progression of improvement.
I'm the same way. People always nag me to eat breakfast but that actually just makes me hungrier and throws off my schedule. Generally if I don't eat anything I won't get hungry for a few hours after waking up, until 11-11:30 like you. I'll have a "big" lunch, like chipotle burrito size, then a light dinner 7-8 hours later. No snacking and stick to drinking water, black coffee, and alcohol. I remain at the same weight I was in high school and haven't fluctuated more than +/- 5 pounds over my entire adult life. It honestly rules and I don't even know how I got into this routine, just that eating breakfast usually seems gross to me.
You borrow $600,000 to pursue you dream education. You earn more money than 95% of all Americans. You live in a "seemingly" nice neighborhood in a home that costs $400,000.

And then you are a victim.
this was beautiful:

Every step in a software project is solving problems.
You don't know how long it will take to solve the problem.
You don't know how many new problems you might run into along the way.
I had mood issues with one meal a day regime, I managed to resolve it with Tryptophan supplementation (an amino acid known to act as an antidepressant, avoid if taking SSRIs) for two months and upping my cruciferous vegetable intake significantly (half a kilo a day). This was after reading The Diet Cure by Dr. Julia Ross. I have since stopped taking the Tryptophan and mood remains stable.
Right now where I am (SoCal, USA), Fajr (first daily prayer) is around 4:30 and Maghrib (prayer at sundown) is around 7:30. So ~15h fasts this year.

At the same time, Ramadan shifts up the calendar ~12 days every year, so during Winter fasting the days are much much shorter and I agree with what you're saying.
Smaller measures were taken. The Data Protection Directive was adopted in 1995 and hasn't worked at preventing EU citizens' human rights from being abused.
"Boy, Were We Wrong About Dinosaurs!" [1] is a great book that I love to read to my children. I hope it helps them understand that scientific knowledge changes all the time.

[1]: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27579.Boy_Were_We_Wrong_...
They're at the top in brand reputation and at the bottom in market share. People who care a lot about food and are willing to spend on it accordingly shop at Whole Foods. There are relatively few of these people, hence their small market share. (A similar dynamic happens in most consumer industries: Apple famously has only 18% of the smartphone market but makes 87% of the profits, because they market to people who are willing to spend a lot on a cell phone.)

This is a pretty rational choice for Amazon, because Amazon's core competency is making things cheaper and more widely available but they have little experience in making things better - and indeed, their whole value proposition is largely in making things commoditized, helping you buy a "good enough" product more conveniently for less money. With Whole Foods, they're buying the brand and the expertise in quality, and then they can apply their existing strengths in logistics and supplier management to wrangle down the price and expand market share.
I don't think you can classify anyone making 200k+ as a "slave" of any kind.
If it is while the customer is in the EU.

If the customer joins your Japanese site while in Japan, its governed under Japanese law, not EU law. Your citizenship is irrelevant.
Bear in mind GDPR seems to have become some sort of totemic issue for the small minority of people in Europe who are true-blue died in the wool ideological supporters of the EU project. They are flooding GDPR discussions with these sorts of views. A good give away is they say "speaking as a European" or use the term "EU citizen" (there is no such thing, the EU as an institution does not have citizens or issue passports, it's only member states that do that).

But Europe is full of people who aren't so in thrall to the EU as an idea, as evidenced by one of its most important countries voting to leave despite the population being threatened with massive chaos and severing of all cooperation and trade relationships with their neighbours should they choose to do so. Bad regulation was one of the most common talking points during the Brexit campaigns and GDPR is a good example of why.

These sort of people aren't posting so much on HN but they are quite common.
You would want the performance for new deep learning applications (for example better images with low light conditions)
I wonder if something like this [0] (looks like moving liquids without pumps or power) would be possible to miniaturize this idea further? (maybe smaller amounts of electricity like in the brain combined with this kind of tech)

The stuff I have seen tends to be large on a scale reminiscent of the very first computers. (ie, large mechanical switches powered by solenoids or spinning gears)

[0] http://www.surnetics.com/
Neither one does matter to me actually. I already expressed similar views before. It's cool to have music suggestions based on what I like and not what's popular overall. I'm fine with my city's transit department optimizing stuff for everyone, and me being one of hundred of thousands of users. I don't matter, individuals overall don't matter, and there's a significant gain from it for the community. I don't know what is so wrong with it and why people are so offended that some tech literate people don't care.
If I'm not mistaken, many food companies have their own logistics. This is probably more efficient than adding Amazon. And I'm sure food companies won't be happy for Amazon to become part of their business unless it's necessary(I.e. Access to Amazon users).
I forgot to add the interfaces versus classes, inner classes, and lambda notation, with the tons of trivial FunctionalInterface interfaces to deal with a smattering of the combinations of number of inputs, void or primitive or class output, which inputs or inputs can be null, and which exceptions can be thrown by the evaluation method (having many different names, etc).

Almost all of these monstrosities are caused by the “object purity” mindset that kept the designers from including first-class functions in the language. Avail attempts to include a large set of paradigms instead of trying to “axiomatize” the exposed surface (although we do axiomatize the construction of these constructs).
That would be a tremendous band name.
You can make fun of it, but there's a reason that Silicon Valley venture capital goes to software engineering (where regulations have generally been lower) while significant disruption in the automotive space is coming from incumbents and one company founded by a guy with a net worth of $18 billion.
You’re presupposing that “freedom of movement across national borders” is something that exists, like freedom of speech. It does not—it has never been recognized by any society. Nor does it make any sense. Borders demarcate territory controlled by groups of people. Nobody has a “right” to trespass across those borders.

What you’re positing is that groups of people don’t have the right to control and govern physical pieces of territory. That’s facially wrong.
Depends alot on the codec too. Light weight codecs like Tico/jpeg-xs and some jpeg implementations can use very little ram (~12 rows worth). Others need alot more for rate control, motion estimation, etc.
Kubernetes is opinionated in ways that Mesos is not, and fits together significantly better than Docker swarm does - And we're still only seeing the tip of the kubernetes iceberg.

To put it bluntly, Kubernetes benefits from all of Google's borg expertise while Mesos and Swarm are trying to reinvent the wheel, and there's a lot of chesterton's fencing going on - They're adding and removing features without understanding why those features do or don't exist in Borg.

Mesos requires you to run too much - There's barely a default scheduler. Swarm doesn't require you to run enough - There's barely equivalents of "Services" and it's all designed for plugging in packages without thinking of how they fit together. Kubernetes strikes a balance.

Extensions to Kubernetes like istio are what's next on the horizon, and good libraries to deal with the additional details in the k8s ecosystem (things like grpc-channel balancers where you specify a service and a mode and it automatically routes your requests and deals with failover and retry logic). We don't have a good Kubernetes Mapreduce framework yet, but it's gonna show up soon. There's a lot more as knowledge leaks out of Google.
Patents, copyrights, trademarks etc all keep competition from from benefiting from your hard work (or stealing it) to give first to market a true advantage. This is not anti-competitive but rather things built into the system to reward investments in innovation.

If Apple had an open platform then they'd be required to compete on quality and services. Instead they lock-in users and lock-out competing services from even being able to exist in their platform. This is anti-competitive.

Note that I say this as a user with a MBP, iPhones, AppleTV, iPad, etc... I admit I would probably be fine switching to Android (for example) if I felt the quality of the platform was better without fear of not having access to other services (but IMO the quality isn't there).

Let's look within the platform itself, though. This is a platform en-composing millions upon millions of users across over a billion active devices (https://www.theverge.com/2016/1/26/10835748/apple-devices-ac...).

Apple leverages its control of the platform to give Apple services an advantage over the competition. If Apple is not careful this will almost certainly end in anti-trust litigation.
Burger shops IN the EU are a completely different thing.

My primary argument is that the GDPR's attempt to regulate companies in other jurisdictions because EU citizens go INTO those jurisdictions and do business is a dangerous precedent. If there was an enforcement mechanism for all such laws, it implies that any business or individual anywhere in the world with a website should therefore have to comply with any laws from any jurisdiction that are similarly constructed.

If my website says things about Islam that Saudi Arabia passes a law against, I should be fined.

If my website disrespects the king of Thailand, I should be extradited for imprisonment.

If I encourage NK citizens to revolt against their oppressive regime, I should end up in a labor camp.

After all, those governments have a right to say that if I want to "do business in their jurisdiction", I must respect their laws, right?

(To be clear, I'm not talking about enforcement of these kinds of laws, because all of those countries might do the above if given the chance. I'm talking about what I SHOULD do as a matter of morality or ethics or civic duty or whatever, or what my government should cooperate with those governments on, because it's just.)

But the problem is that they're describing "doing business in their jurisdiction" as a citizen from their country (maybe even one who is currently visiting my country) going online and sending my server requests, data, and money. And apparently explicitly telling those citizens to please NOT do that, or blocking them, is not sufficient. The only way to make the majority of the EU users on HN happy is to comply. Why would that same logic not apply to all other kinds of laws?
How to Get a Product Management Internship in College
This seems to say that forests were gone, so all tree dwelling birds died out and thus all modern birds are descended from ground dwelling birds. Looking at the paper [1] it seems to only say 'reduced flight capacity' which makes more sense, considering we only know of 4 times flight has only evolved so this would be a big deal if birds had evolved it twice.

1. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(18)...
This is great except for the enforcement of double-quotes around all strings and spaces around slice operators. These two choices contradict the standard Python documentation, most of the standard library, and the behaviour of the interpreter itself.

When the language itself has an established convention, Black should follow that convention, not fight it. These two weird choices just generate needless churn, which is surprising as it seems Black has quite the opposite goal.

It's a shame, because all the other design choices in Black are pretty good!
>GDPR only applies to EU citizens.

No, it doesn't. It applies to natural persons in the EU.

Article 3 GDPR:

---

Territorial scope

1. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.

2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:

(a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or

(b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.

---

Note that the above does not reference citizenship.
That house is freaking HUGE. Nobody needs 5,500 sqft.
For a large codebase that uses Black, you might want to look at PyPA/Warehouse or Fabric 2.
Why do you think most people don’t believe this? Aren’t those major points of the most popular religions? I feel (I haven’t searched for hard data) those views are shared by billions of people.
> 1) what happens when evaluating is going to take a lot longer that usual?

Just checked: It evaluates it in another thread - and around 1e6 actions it stops evaluating. There is no noticeable slowdown in the devtools.
Clicked to read the article, Firefox begins to suck up all of main memory and heavily utilizing the CPU. After blocking some 1-st party script all of that ceased. Is there a crypto miner active on phys.org?
Here's a link to the text only version: https://text.npr.org/s.php?sId=611609366
From that article:

> Compared to explicit decomposition of the problem, such as lane marking detection, path planning, and control, our end-to-end system optimizes all processing steps simultaneously. […] Better performance will result because the internal components self-optimize to maximize overall system performance, instead of optimizing human-selected intermediate criteria, e. g., lane detection.

One can imagine that it might be more difficult to get a network to solve this large problem all at once, and that there might be easier to decompose the problem and solve each part. Would it be a good idea to guide the end-to-end system by first decomposing the problem and solving each part, then using that solution as a starting guess for the whole problem? I mean, the decomposition might perhaps be a reasonable approximation of how the whole problem should be solved. (Then again, it might not.)
But companies that do invest massively still get hacked. See: Google. Yahoo. Microsoft.

It's also not even always clear what hacking actually means. A common way users get hacked is by reusing the same password on every website. One of those small sites gets hacked, the hackers try the users password at bigger sites to see if they work. Big players like Google and Facebook have heuristic systems that try to detect and block that, but sometimes they don't work.

So who's at fault then? The user for losing control of their password? The small site, probably not EU based, doesn't give a shit? Or the big guys who tried to protect the user but failed? Given the way the GDPR is being done my guess is the big guys will get taken to the cleaners even though they did nothing wrong.

Basically, you can't stop a big company from getting hacked no matter how much you spend on security.
Probably not, there is line wrap.
The BigTrak was my first exposure to programming, as well. I was so distressed when my family moved and it was lost/discarded. I used to work out path programs for it to drive from my bedroom, down the hall to my brother's room, and back, ferrying baseball cards or comic books or such.

For those who aren't aware, BigTrak was an electronic toy from the late 1970s, a treaded tank-like toy car with a membrane keyboard on top. The user could program in a path as a series of steps (forward, forward, right turn, forward, make sound, stop.) and I think it had a gripper claw on the front. (memory is a fleeting thing).

A google search shows I was close to accurate (no claw, though): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Trak
That’s like saying “I’m less free if I can’t move into your house without your consent.” It doesn’t comport with how we think about freedom and rights.
I specifically do not want to have the same experience on multiple devices.

I do not want to have the same experience on my work computer vs my home computer.

I do not want to have the same experience on my home computer vs my personal phone.

I do not want to have the same experience on my personal phone vs my work phone.

I do not want to have the same experience on my work phone vs my work computer.
How has it effected your biking? More endurance? Peak Power? or just being lighter?
Good point. You can avoid this by sending this request when you are logged in (by copying the message) or by verifying this via an email sent to/from the registered one
> Basically, you can't stop a big company from getting hacked no matter how much you spend on security.

I never said anything to the contrary, but the observation is irrelevant. You can't stop all pollution, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't pass regulations that ether ban it or impose liability for it.
I'm working on that. In the mean time use your Unix fu with `find | grep | grep -v | xargs black`.
Hah, I don't think anybody has, but I'd love to hear those stories!
MH17: Russia 'liable' for downing airliner over Ukraine
The same logic can also be applied to virtually any contract you sign that contains pages and pages of legal text. Should the same rights be applied to legally binding contracts that require only a signature? Shouldn't there be a required intermediary that explains the full details of what your signing in a language you can comprehend?
It would certainly be a fantastic discovery, but would it be that surprising? The amount of knowledge we can infer from the fossil record is infinitesimal compared to all that actually happened; and while going from 0 instances of an event to 1 is notable (it tells us that “it can happen”), so is 1 to 2 (it tells us that “it can happen more than once”), but is 4 to 5 that crazy?
A country is a group of people acting through a government to further their shared prosperity, defend their independence, etc. Countries aren’t abstractions.
You don’t. You focus on efficiency and throughput.

Complexity and high variability of estimates is the real problem. You can address that some by training developers on how to estimate, which I’ve heard called calibration, and then spend a lot more time digging in up front on those estimates.

Long term, a ball park can give a good idea but most aren’t going to be more accurate until we dig in. If you are choosing between projects based on expected ROI then diving in ahead of schedule to get a clearer picture makes sense.

If you are delivering a specific product no matter what, then you optimize for throughput.

It’s more valuable to tune the engine so you can drive 70mph than to slow down to 20mph with the goal of accurately predicting your speed.
That is not true I am afraid.