skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Neither your nor the GP's point seems relevant to the quoted text, which seems pulled specifically to paint the SCOTUS decision in a bad light. I read it as a direct response to the claim of the employees in this case, which is that the NLRA intended to displace parts of the Arbitrage Act. They are just saying that, among other reasons, this was not a common policy and unlikely to have been meant even in spirit.

They further explain their approach to resolving claimed conflict between two pieces of legislation:

> And in approaching a claimed conflict, we come armed with the “stron[g] presum[ption]” that repeals by implication are “disfavored” and that “Congress will specifically address” preexisting law when it wishes to suspend its normal operations in a later statute.

And specifically for the Arbitrage Act, because this is apparently a tactic that people keep trying:

> In many cases over many years, this Court has heard and rejected efforts to conjure conflicts between the Arbitration Act and other federal statutes. In fact, this Court has rejected every such effort to date […] Throughout, we have made clear that even a statute’s express provision for collective legal actions does not necessarily mean that it precludes “‘individual attempts at conciliation’” through arbitration […] And we’ve stressed that the absence of any specific statutory discussion of arbitration or class actions is an important and telling clue that Congress has not displaced the Arbitration Act.

So they're not saying "we can't decide," they're stating (I think): Congress can give employees more protection in this arena, but the laws as written are (1) not unconstitutional and (2) are not being interpreted incorrectly by lower courts.
I'll throw a data point in here: Three vehicles (2014, 2009, 2006), no accidents, rural Midwest. ~$2,000/yr for insurance with standard 100/300/100 coverage.
Comply – Everything You Need to Complete SOC2 – Open Source
In fact Google is doing exact the same thing - pushing their browser using possibly the worlds most wanted ad spot: the front page of Google.

It's almost a one-to-one to Windows pushing their browser by default in the OS that almost everyone used at that time.

Edit: I like some other things Google do but they definitely should talk about this internally an do something about it before EU as well as relevant US authorities wakes up and punish them for anti competitive behaviour.

Or maybe the relevant authorities should slap them on the wrist first; Microsoft seems to have learned the lesson and is a much nicer company to deal with in many areas now.
Considering the modern role of BGP it's probably a bit like playing battleship on the controls of two nuclear power plants using the power grid.
Also the author of _When Genius Failed_, about the LTCM crash, which is a great book.
Let's hope this is a joke and move on.
Effect after 1 month:

1.) People stop trusting/valuing the circle

or

2.) Instagram changes how they highlight stories.
Sure- a couple of (oddly specific) details:

1. Long lists (>100 items) don't perform well if you have to reorder them. Initial render is a bit slow but not that noticeable but if you have to reorder or add/remove from them on the fly it can be resource intensive.

2. Animation behavior varies between Android and iOS depending on what you're animating.

3. Re-rendering is expensive so you need to be careful when you update your state if you're using redux.

4. Easily fixable but console logging is expensive so be sure to remove all JS logs from production.
My point is that what you suggested above is significantly less onerous than the requirements already in place.

As for insurance - most people who carry firearms regularly actually do have insurance to cover potential legal defense costs. Liability insurance doesn’t make much sense because the potential issues there are criminal, not civil.
Here's an example: A Clojure list is a Java list, but Clojure is untyped. However, if you create a list of strings in Clojure, you can call any Java method that takes List<String> even though Clojure has no such concept. AFAIK, on the CLR, Python requires special treatment to call such a method. Also, Kotlin's and Java's variance strategy is very different. Nevertheless, Java's generic data structures are reused in Kotlin.
His libraries were licensed to a number of vendors. Specifically, the STL is covered by https://www.amazon.com/C-Standard-Template-Library/dp/013437... and there is a third book covering the rest of the standard C++ library: https://www.amazon.com/Draft-Standard-Library-P-Plauger/dp/0...

However, the "Draft Standard C++ Library" book was finished just before the standard was radically overhauled for the STL, and the STL itself and the language have evolved massively, so in my opinion, those two book have not aged as well as the C library book has.
What a co-incidence I crossed this question when I am reading "Titans of History" by Simon Sebag Montefiore.

Here's how he describes her at one point -

"She was probably not beautiful-her nose was aquiline, her chin pointed-but she possessed a ruthless aura like Caesar himself and shared a taste for sexual theater and adventurous politics"
(Hint: I am trying to make libui's in-code documentation match the Go style, which no existing C-based documentation tool seems to do...)
> Or you can use a query language mostly similar to what MongoDB uses

Yes, provided you started on 2.0, as I specifically stated in a reply.

> That's a feature. If they don't usually change together put them in a separate design documents.

Unnecessary computation and I/O is not a feature. They should hash the views individually. A database that makes me do extra work to keep it from doing unnecessary work is not helpful.

> So managing documents yourself is kind of what you do. Isn't it?

This doesn't have anything to do with the unnecessary index rebuilds. CouchDB has all of the information it needs to avoid this unnecessary computation and I/O.

> So have more shards

More shards spending time serializing and deserializing JSON instead of doing useful work. Throwing shards at inefficient code might help, but it doesn't address the underlying problem.

> Shared memory IPC doesn't magically solve problems but it is a minefield of bugs.

Lots of database systems manage to use it just fine. You probably use one of them. And it does solve a problem: it avoids serializing and deserializing all of your data down a pipe.

> Large blocks of allocated memory use malloc instead of brk so memory allocation uses mmap.

Yes, with MAP_ANONYMOUS. I'm not talking about anonymous mappings.

> Hmm, seeing kswapd being active is not something I look forward on a production server.

For swap? Sure. For file-backed mmap pageout guided by madvise? I actually do. It means the VMM is being used for its intended purpose.

> bulk docks is not a transactional feature

It was an example of the one way to achieve an atomic write of multiple documents, which comes in very handy for any nontrivial application.

I'd honestly be fine with them just deprecating the entire external view server protocol – but as it stands now, it's a supported feature, the performance documentation in 5.2.5 of the manual is nonsensical, and it performs very very poorly due to excessive serialization/deserialization and inefficient IPC.
OpenStack spins out its Zuul open source CI/CD platform
Well, my sample size is also one: myself.

I wouldn't say that Scratch was my gateway to programming, but I played with it a lot in my early teens. In my opinion Scratch is very good, for the following reason:

Programming is about achieving something by abusing the tools you have, right? (This is not all of programming, but I would say it's ~86% of it. You might call it technical sophistication). And for that, Scratch is wonderfull. The tools are colorful, easy to understand and while there are a lot, it's limited in size. You're learning the soft skills of programming with a lot more fun.

What about the limitation? In scratch, you will explore the borders yourself and will have much easier time to understand why the solutions which exist in other languages are usefull ("Oh, finally I can automatically spawn a lot of the same object in")

Limited, of course, to my own expierience...
It doesn't help that your third sentence starts with "I've completely botched this attempt at communication, so I'm going to go completely off topic for the rest of this comment" which somehow translates into "why can't people understand what I wrote?"

You've come across a great way to start a conversation with 'dang though. The mods here really don't like comments like this, trust me. I've been on your side often enough. I would tone it down.
I don't mean to be a downer here but you're essentially saying that paying for someone else's asset depreciation costs is cheaper than paying for your own asset depreciation costs plus the remaining value on a car.

The reason it's more expensive to own a car is because you also own the asset. And sure, cars depreciate ridiculously fast and are horrible stores of value, but your solution is mostly saving money by offloading some risk to another party.
I don't know what we do about the bigger part of this problem, which is that the only people 'exploiting' the virtuous side of this equation (manipulating your brain to get things that build you up instead of break you down) consists almost entirely of non-profits.

That is, if you are in the business of giving people a legitimate reason to feel good about themselves, you're either not 'in business' or soon won't be.
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://norvig.com/python-lisp.... has 2000 so we can go with that.
The point was requiring regular updates to stay safe, so yes, security updates. The attack surface of a password manager would be infinitesimally smaller than that of an OS.

As far as general updates go, I agree with you, but these shouldn't need to be that frequent. I still have software from the XP era running on my computer.
>The only problem with that statement is it puts the blame with the consumer.

There's nothing wrong with that. You have to. It's where the change will most immediately happen. Grandstanding about how society is at fault etc etc won't change anything in the near-term. Corporations don't give a shit about the ethics of the situation. A more informed citizenry is the only way anything will realistically change.

Edit: Thinking about it more, it's 100% the fault of citizens. If everyone decided "you know what, fuck McDonald's" and stopped going to them the following day, the company would be sent into a death spiral that would have rippling effects of various degrees across the entire global economy.
Am I correct in thinking that this is working as intended, and not actually a vulnerability? Many people seem to be sharing this as "look at Microsoft screwing up ssh-agent security", but I can't actually see any evidence of this in the article.
Is deep learning a passing fad?
dupe https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17105411
Claudia's in San Mateo is great!
Law says X. New condition Y shows up. The law does not magically become X' where X' accommodates for Y.

If you want X', then pass the law that changes X to X'.

Edit: I'm editing this as NH blocked me from replying:

> Sure, we agree on that. But Law X will interact with condition Y somehow, so the question is what property of X is preserved when addressing Y. This is a pretty fundamental debate between constitutional scholars, not just a lecture on how laws work.

I apologize if it came across that I was trying to lecture anyone on how the law works.

> Law X says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". Condition Y is the development of new types of arms after the amendment was ratified. Textualists and original meaning scholars say that the text of the law should be preserved - the right to keep arms should remain uninfringed. Original intent scholars say that the intended effect on the world should be preserved, and then we have to decide what that is - to keep flintlock weapons legal, to keep military-grade weapons of the day legal, or something else?

It is the "Freedom of the press" argument. Does it mean that only "press" as it existed at the time is covered? The answer, in my opinion, based on the current body of law is "No" because we do not have a law on a books that restricted the freedom of the press to something other than a totalitty of abstract idea of "press" and abstract idea of "freedom". If we did, and if that law was found to be constitutional, then the newer law would have trumped the old one.

This applies to the existing argument. I simply believe that Gorsuch and Thomas arguments have been misinterpreted. They are not some evil masterminds that are able to speak out of two corners of their mouth. They are originalists and they are applying a very simple "is there a law that has been passed which is more specific and was not found to be unconstitutional that affects the current issue? Yes => defer to new law. No=> defer to the original law"
From my outsider perspective I mostly agree, I've read a few papers that weren't available for free. But for the opposing perspective, consider that they index curated content and don't curate anything themselves. This is a frequently debated argument. For comparison I'm considering youtube or torrent sites that are swamped with low quality content or outright malware. In effect, the inception of the internet, as far as I know, was motivated precisely by the need to exchange scientific material. But we are still far from a global library, on-line. Coordination does take a significant amount of work. So, if anything, it needs more investment. But whether that needs to be direct financial investment or just a lot of voluntary work from the people for whom the system is kind of working alright at the moment, is not even in the question. Because journals and universities acting as gate keepers setting barriers to entry is seen as elitist and pejorative by the vast majority of the excluded. That involves a lot of indirect criticism of the financial market system. The whole problem involves marketing. Just look at wikipedia, stackexchange or even the stock-exchanges to see what kind of imbalance, for lack of a better word, huge projects incur, virtually invariably.
> automotive dealerships typically install an ECU interlock

Is there somewhere where I can learn more about this? My quick Google search didn't lead to much, mostly people talking about ignition interlock devices for DUIs...
Ah, so you are saying the quantanization noise can't be averaged out, as with decimation after an ADC.
Cookies That Go the Other Way
Jesus, I would have hoped they would achieve more noble pursuits instead of jumping straight into artificial child porn.
No, the law did not address the new development. To address these developments, a new law should be passed.
Slightly OT: John Oliver did an interesting, albeit satirical, piece on rehab centers last night.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWQiXv0sn9Y
I have a dji drone, even if you break the wifi connection, it will just return to "home". Unless you can spoof a gps signal, I don't know how you'd capture it.
Is it your grandfather's axe if you've replaced both the blade and the handle?

I take it you're opposed to prison sentences lasting more than seven years?
Before hybrid apps where a thing I would build HTML/CSS/JS web apps and put them in an android web-view with no controls. Easy peasy.

You can use local storage to cache for offline use. TBH I don't think most apps really need the overhead of these new libraries. Half of the apps on the app store just display and update data from a DB.
As an African, I can tell you the biggest issue for investment on the continent is governmental leadership. The incumbent governments tend to hold a large amount of unilateral legal power and generally don't wield it well when it comes to economics (exceptions to this would be a lot of legislation from Kigame in Rwanda, and Mauritius).

Assuming this was fixed, though, I would recommend looking into infrastructure and technology products and services, especially those that are homegrown. These are what most countries need the most and the potential for their growth would be tremendous given the continent's population size.
> Amtrak owns the Boston-DC segment and does not share with freight rail.

Wikipedia says that several companies run freight trains over sections of the NEC, as well as the line is also used by commuter trains.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Corridor

As a comparison, the TGV connection between Paris and Brussels may be a high-speed track, but train speeds grind to a halt way down to 20km/h when passing through track sections used by commuter and freight trains.
When I was in college I really thought I wanted to make video games. But I watched my friends and I struggle with tuning out and falling behind on our schoolwork.

I got a job making new software and learned what a Skinner Box was and changed by plans. I don't need to be part of that.
You're mixing up two different things: does the new thing fall within the old language, and would the drafters have used different language had they known about the new thing.

Is a semi-automatic rifle an "arm" as the term was understood in 1789? Yes, almost certainly, in the same way an aircraft carrier is a "ship" as the term was understood in 1789. If semi-automatic rifles had existed in 1789, would the framers still have used "arms" as they did? Maybe, maybe not, but that's irrelevant. We don't care about what they thought, just what they wrote.

Likewise, is a class action "concerted action" as the term was used in 1935? Probably not. Would the drafters of the NLRA have wanted class actions to be protected had those been common in 1935? Probably yes, but that's again irrelevant.
I don't know that it's sad at all. If you want to make a language to be a research language, there's nothing wrong with doing so. If that's what you want, being influential, having other languages steal your ideas is what success looks like.

If you want your language to be used by working software engineers, that's a different metric of success. But then, you'd do things differently if that was your goal.

Haskell, in achieving some real-world use, has achieved beyond the wildest dreams of a research language.
Knowledge will eventually be communicated by adding new information to a universal network which represents all known truths ... the act of ~publishing~ will be to add new nodes and/or edges ... this network will get launched by seeding it from culling all existing published papers however once it goes live the very idea of publishing research to any journal will become obsolete and counterproductive
Wild speculation: Bridges and tunnels are more sensitive infrastructure, this is done for security reason. In case of some kind of emergency they could tell how many people/who might be in there. Collect data on usage that might be relevant to the unique maintenance needs of bridges and tunnels. On an island like Manhattan, for example, bridges and tunnels represent many of the ways in and out, so would be natural places to surveil for various reason.
If Ethiopians starve for a generation or two, maybe those who got rich by taking their land will employ their grandkids for minimum wage.

Maybe there's a better way without inherent suffering?
Yes, offloading risk. I hope Uber pays drivers enough to justify the added risk.
Alcest is very Opeth-inspired, you might give them a shot.
Also Fallujah, which I might call prog-death? They're not everyone's cup of tea but they've got some atmospherics going.
> Copyright law is extraordinarily restrictive, and you, me, and everybody you know is guilty of violation after violation...

That's a pretty extreme claim. Can you give an example of how the average non-bittorrent-using person regularly violates copyright law?
> We have a system that operates at the pace of 1776. That served us well for a long time, but since the post-war proliferation of mass media, it's hard to argue that it's adequate anymore.

I'd argue the exact opposite. The pace of our system is just a reflection of the current ideological polarization. Enacting Federal law requires a strong consensus (to prevent abuse), and the more polarized we are, the more difficult it becomes to shove Federal laws down the throat of a narrow minority.

If we can't gather this consensus at the Federal level, we have the levers of state legislatures to pass those same laws at a more local level.

Liberal states have the political will, the systems, and (if we're being frank) the majority of businesses that would be affected by Federal law anyway. They just need to have the will to compromise and pass their desired law at the state level until such a time that there's Federal consensus for that law.
I just listened to it last night. It was an eye opening episode. You could see how easy it is for desperate people to fall victim to the brokers.
An iOS Developer’s Opinions of Flutter
Not OP.

1) It's an avenue for exploitation- if you did x for free for person A why won't you do y free for person B? What if this overtakes the time you need for your day job, which pays you and in turn enables you to work for free at your other gig?

2) It devalues the actual cost of labor. Why pay someone to build this when I can "pay someone with experience"? This complaint pops up a lot in graphic design work as well.

This isn't to say "don't do side projects" or "don't do open source"- with the latter, it's something you're doing for a community rather than one entity for a business intent. But it's reasonable to be cautious when someone says "we need a website that's like Uber for X for $0".
Wow. I didn't realize that an analog synthesizer-in-a-chip was a thing that far back. Pretty remarkable. All the basics are there: oscillator, noise generator, filter, envelopes, lfo.

Although it's not quite everything. The VCF is for noise only, and there's no way to insert a filter into the VCO audio path externally. However, that pretty much defines the "chip tune" genre.
Here’s a C++/Eigen example implementation of something very similar: https://github.com/google/detectorgraph/blob/master/examples...

With autogenerated block diagram and description here: https://google.github.io/detectorgraph/docs/html/robotlocali...
New gel helps to regrow brain tissue after stroke
The last time the Democratic party had control of congress?

e.g.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodd%E2%80%93Frank_Wall_Street...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_CARD_Act_of_2009

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Afforda...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay_Act_o...

etc.
6 Simple Steps to Avoid Becoming a Cybercrime Statistic in 2018
well I guess the question is what can people do if they can't afford to pay for that option.
Yes. Also true is that toxic dialog does not move the discussion forward.
How a Pyramid Scheme Doomed the World’s Largest Amphibians
I sometimes imagine a thousand years from now where people are trying to figure out how to use USB-A flash drives and fry their contents since the voltage is wrong, after trying 5 times to get the correct orientation in the port.
If OP is genuinely wondering that, I guess OP didn't read the article. I'd also point OP towards all the (no pun intended) snake oil beauty products and techniques that bear Cleopatra's name, e.g.: http://www.stylecraze.com/articles/cleopatra-beauty-secrets/
shiiiisss https://github.com/teslamotors/linux/commit/6f13a69f3d72ac08...