skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Depending on the hash, an attacker would look for collisions to get something running that could then change settings or launch other things. Failing that, you would look for flaws in the system or vulnerabilities in the OS in order to bypass it. Going deeper you run into trusted computing issues, of how do you know the verification firmware hasn't been tampered with?

The simplest approach though is if you're running Chrome, and I exploit Chrome, I'm now running as Chrome and could persist in memory at least until you shut down.
infecting only targeted plants was half of its goal you dumb ass.Your infomation is shit. Where did you get your info from it is written like 99% of bs click bait papers. Look at securelist instead of this shit
Data Science Is America’s Hottest Job
Reddit's new design is inaccessible
You don't ship HSM's with keys (you initialise them on-device yourself) nor can you read read keys out from one (at least in theory).
Reminds me of the old joke about a scam company who breaks up all of their problems into interview questions and never actually hires anyone. Obviously the composition, decomposition work and quality control would be more labor for worse results but it is easy to see how frustrated interviewees got the concept.
And http://elasticluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/playbooks.html... (disclaimer: I work on it)
Yes, you should be able to do that, unless you are reasonably certain that the information might be used to commit credit card fraud/identity theft.

If you think they might be used illegally, I believe there are already laws to charge you with that relate to facilitating a crime.

If you don't think they will be used illegally, then what's the harm in selling them to someone else?
Glad to hear that's back up. The last thing I heard about it was CloudFlare giving them the boot.
I'm not talking about copyrighted or otherwise shady stuff pushed to GitHub. My concern is what's supposed to happen when a GitHub user requests GitHub to delete their entire account and all the personally identifying information they have on them. Clearly GDPR calls for this to be possible, yet that would mean that GitHub would have to delete this user's commits (which usually contain full names and mail addresses). Clearly they can't reasonably do that though.
>"And noone was so far able to create an experiment that managed to falsify that theory (it is a perfectly falsifiable theory), but not for lack of trying."

It was falsified by the aberrant rotation curves way back in the 1930s, the "dark matter" save was allowed for awhile but still no other evidence has been found for that. The only evidence is that GR predicts the wrong thing. It doesn't matter how many successes your theory has when we are talking about taking it as fact, only whether there is a single fail.

Regarding your individual examples:

>"Mercury's apsidal precession computed precisely"

- GR was designed to fit this, which is great.. but doesn't count as a confirmation.

>"time delation by gravity measured by placing atomic clocks on mountaintops and airplanes"

- Looks like they had to modify the original predictions to fit the data, ie Einstein didn't anticipate accounting for the rotation of the earth:
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Hafele/HafeleKeating.html

So, like the case of mercury's precession it is more a post-diction.

> "observed gravitational waves"

- There still hasn't been one independently verified, they need to detect a GW, calculate the coordinates, then tell other people where to find a GRB, kilonova, etc. So far this has not happened.

>"gravitational lensing"

- This idea predates GR: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1165. Also, don't the quantitative predictions here rely on the dark matter fudge factor?
Your standard docblocks, even if the docblock explains what the function does if it's not clear. You'll basically have a function with zero comments. It's painful, I've never been given a reason as to why.
>(and investing in compliance with European - absolutely not international - regulations)

Did you think about this before typing?

Clue: how many countries does an EU-wide law directly apply to? One? Or many?
The Openstack deployments first failed while trying to download different pieces of sotware. As each part/script seems to use a different tool to download or get packages, we had to chase each one to find where the proxies should be configured.

Once the cluster started, again, you have to find which tool is trying to use the proxy and now can't connect with the rest of the cluster. Sorry I can't be more specific, I gave up with this some months ago. I don't think we have the scale for Openstack.

Same problems, maybe in different steps, occurred with the other tools.

To solve the `docker pull` problem, we are trying with Nexus to proxy the global registry. But given that some of the scripting/tools that deploy kubernetes do some magic starting things that we can't directly control, we can't configure docker to pull from a proxy (not that we have found how to tell the stupid thing how to avoid going to the global registry and only use our proxy/registry). Once again, when we finally managed to pull those images, we have to guess how to unconfigure proxies to be able to fully connect the cluster.

The connection between clients and servers is another concern we haven't yet got to, but we can see it won't be a simple solution.
No it sounds like the rough equivalent of stonehenge. Their ancestors made calendar markers out of sun positioning.
> The EU regulators see their job as ensuring compliance, not as creating a source of income.

I thought one of the objective of EU is to make US social media pay their fair share. Citing same article:

> European holdings or that use the EU to avoid paying taxes rightly worry about this particular aspect

So, what is it?
That's false though. You don't have to start out committed to anything. You can simply pick up a religious book or attend a religious service and see if it speaks to you.
MasBitcoin CEO’s bodyguards gunned down in Mexico
I do not believe that the vast majority of companies which are significantly impacted by the GPDR were storing data in a reasonable manner, no.

Having to spend some effort to make sure you are in compliance with a huge new piece of regulation is expected and I understand that people complain about having to do it. However, after the initial bring-up pains any business which continues to have a problem with the GPDR most likely has a business model directly in conflict with the spirit of the law.
A fairly good track record in which its own member states are constantly threatening to leave and one has already successfully left. As an American lokoing in from across an ocean, it does not look like a stable region that I would put trust in
Sounds like that's a solution everyone can be happy with!
Do people hate whiteboarding in general or the questions they're being asked to draw?

I can fully understand dislike for puzzles and being asked to implement irrelevant algorithms in pseudo code. The interview should reflect the job being interviewed for.

I've found whiteboarding to be mutually helpful in questions about system architecture. Plus, it's something that we actually do on-the-job.
Without cookies they can't log you in so if you have a paid subscription it'd not work.

From what I see they also store on cookies where you've stopped so if you return to the article it's on the same point.

In that sense it's not the same experience without them.

And it's not unimaginable that they track how many articles you've read a month so they can show you a modal to interest you in a subscription.

I can see how you'd not want to be tracked as a visiting user, but even then it's not really sensible to complain when the other option (paying for the content) requires you to activate cookies anyway.

Honestly, I don't think it's reasonable to expect (or find it odd) that websites need cookies to function inside a browser in this day and age.
I really like them for Infrastructure or systems diagrams, too!
We don't whiteboard at my company, as we favor a take home technical exercise and debrief/walkthrough format for interviewing our engineers. That being said, I'm super turned off by the incessant whining from the community about various interviewing practices. Here's the tough truth I think: Some companies simply do not understand how to properly engage in employee selection. They get some quick guidance from a google search and have too much autonomy in the process to make their own decisions because the company hasn't really empowered their talent processes to be well thought out and planned. This happens frequently. The real shame in it all it that it focuses the conversation on these high level exercises - be it coding on a white board or rallying against take home exercises or demanding to be paid for interview work, and ultimately to the employer you're put in a spot where you can't help but feel a little reactionary as the transactionality of the relationship is constant: I need to know you can do the work, prove to me you can, I will then hire you and pay you to work.

What a cluster it's all becoming on the software engineering side.
You didnt even dive into the varients which had different uses and exploits. Fucking hell. Harvard my asshole. Where did you get your fakes from? спп?
The church was plenty interested in debating scientific theories. The church played a massive part in advancing science ever since the middle ages. They did expect scientific theories to fit both the scientific as well as the religious knowledge available, something that seems absurd now, but was perfectly workable based on the number of scientific discoveries made the past 1500 years.
You do not store certificates on an HSM, you generate the private key on it and use that to sign things. Certificates that end up in actual use are further many chains removed from the root keys.
They certainly wouldn't be calling lots and lots of API's, as that would likely trigger some antivirus software or at least leave traces in system logs.

The sophistication of this software is that it did all this undetected.
In theory, theory and practice are the same, in practice they're not.
I think one's feelings on racoons vary by where you live. Here in the semi-suburban New Hampshire they're not much of an issue: if you have a decent trash can you'll never know they are there. I imagine a owning a farm would color one's perspective, especially based on the author's suggestion that they kill more than they need.

I'm fairly neutral on coyotes but we've never lost an animal to them. I like their haughtiness, though I can get the same from the fox that lives around here somewhere without as much worry about what she might do to our pets.

It's really just the bear paw print that worries me.
I’m sorry, but this is simply the naive opinion of somebody that has clearly never had to deal with compliance before on a meaningful level.

My customers are all happy with my privacy policy, and not a single one outside of the EU has expressed any interest at all in the GDPR. We are actually compliant with a majority of the regulation, however there are some areas where we would have to re-architect to gain full compliance.

This is not in anyway a signal that we’re “not good enough” to handle our customers data. It is mostly a sign of a poorly written piece of regulation, that has more undefined edge cases than it has defined use cases.

We’re not going to be the only company that comes to this conclusion, so you can go around slandering anybody you like, but that’s not going to change the facts behind what is a rather simple business decision for a lot of people.

You’re incredibly naive if you think complying with regulations like this is going to be cheap and easy, and your even more naive if you think that compliance is going to mean anything other than a rubber stamp. I’ve seen PCI, Fedramp, ISO27k, SOC2... organisation that have been certified as compliant, but were in reality less than 10% compliant. The compliance industry is a joke worldwide, and everybody knows it.
No, I don't think any of the code is of any value, it's the time and energy up-front investment is increasing significantly. I understand they are trying to protect their investment (2 years at Facebook would have been over $500K in cost to that company all things considered) but when is it too much and how would we stop it before it gets there?
If you were the PM of Israel, would you stake the lives of 6m people on that? It would be Iran's end, but it would be too late for Israel if it came to that.
This may be internally consistent, but what of applicants following up on their applications? A sizable portion of the workflow believes - and is advised by job search coaches - that the correct response to being ghosted is to follow up on the application. Do you not waste more time fielding and diverting followup calls than simply sending (at minimum) a quick form email to remove all doubt?
Ultimate Startup Guide to Becoming GDPR Compliant
Do you think Facebook is taking pictures of whiteboards after interviews and putting the code into production? I agree day-long interviews are a problem, and homework problems are offensive (plenty of folks refuse them btw), but it's a stretch to say companies are using interviews as a way to get unpaid work.
People are still keeping mirrors of 29a :)

http://dsr.segfault.es/stuff/website-mirrors/29A/

And mirror of z0mbie (mistfall author) site http://z0mbie.daemonlab.org/

I am really interested what happened with z0mbie... he just vanished at some point...
I'm curious about this. Are you saying that relying on storage latency and volume is energetically cheaper than relying on compute?

I see a few flaws in this. First of all: all fast storage media consume energy even when idle. Secondly I think this neglects the embodied energy (energy to manufacture) of storage media. Lastly if a proof of storage mining scheme became popular you'd probably see ASICs that incorporate onboard fast memory controllers with huge caches and other approaches that would improve performance to the point that this would just become another proof of work.

Comparing full life cycle energy of different approaches to securing a cryptocurrency is actually pretty tough. It's also pretty hard to compare it to the energy requirements of more conventional approaches to currency since the energy cost of those is so spread out across society.
I implemented JavaScript Safe Navigation using proxies as an experiment to learn more about proxies.

This is similar to the TC39 Optional Chaining Proposal https://github.com/TC39/proposal-optional-chaining

https://gist.github.com/dakaraphi/6a87168db66fd8f032d2
Article is totally wrong about parallax. It’s relative apparently motion, nothing to do with brightness.
I'm not sure that it would be ruinous. Isn't RSA still trusted? People have a tendency to overlook or even defend broken protocol when it's "the good guys"
What s/he is saying, if I understand correctly, is that two and only two kinds of discontinuities in derivatives (and second- and higher-order derivatives) can exist: jump derivatives and those exemplified by the pathology inherent in sin(1/x) at the origin thereof; given that spacetime continues beyond the Cauchy horizon but the derivative does not, the first kind (the abrupt ”vertical step” kind) must be ruled out, leaving only the second variety as a candidate. Graph that function, and it’s first and second derivatives around the origin, and you will begin to realise how bizarre this behaviour is and what strange implications it may have. (Then again, this is deep within a black hole, in an area where time and the radial dimension of space are switched, so it’s just a new kind of devilry in an already fraught area.)
It’s Friday
Not sure how much that really buffers anything. In a lot of mature markets, the fact that the whip-hand is held by another corporation doesn't make much practical difference - what happens if someone finds an attack that bricks every Caterpillar tractor and hauler?

It doesn't matter if C&C is corporate or state, they break the same way.
Google still buying up office space in Dublin
Or just ignore it, take on EU customers anyway, deal with the risk.
This seems pretty reasonable to me.
mTurkers get to pick and choose which hits they want to work on. They see a list of available hits, and each has a title, description, submitter, estimated time, and reward. The submitter matters to mTurkers because this allows them to see the hit acceptance rate (how often the submitter pays out on submissions, or how often they reject submissions).

So it's simply a fact of the platform that mTurkers know who they are working for.
I suspect that's part of it too; in house counsel are surprisingly (or maybe not unsurprisingly) not big on change.
All this speculation is wilder than what I am willing to get into. But I think the fact that the 'leader of the free world' and his buddy will wreck you beyond your worst nightmare if you go rogue should be enough motivation to not to.
Where is the form on this site that claims to be GDPR compliant to get my IP removed from the server logs?
> (also i simply can't wrap my head around rust since i never really learned programming from the ground up...).

If you want to learn, alternate between studying and doing.

Read up on the basics, then go to doing mode, study something a bit more advanced, rinse and repeat.

Start the doing part by modifying existing code; perhaps some command line utility, they tend to be simple. Then add some features in it. You could also cut out all the functionality and implement something different in the skeleton.

It's a good idea to use version control even for your experiments, so you can go back when you inevitably break something so that it no longer compiles or works correctly. Sometimes breakage is obvious only much later. One thing is for sure -- you will break things, and version control will watch your back.

I'd recommend git (or hg), because they can be used locally without a server. Or a github account. (But really even zipping the directory is better than no history at all. But seriously, use proper version control tools.)

This method will work for Rust or anything else that can be similarly iterated.
This is "what will you do if the lightning strikes you" thinking. Only about less probable things.
There was a good article that popped up on here a couple months ago about this: "Organizational Skills Beat Algorithmic Wizardry". [1]

If you're asking candidates to balance a binary search tree when no one in the history of your company has ever had to do that, you're asking the wrong questions.

[1] http://prog21.dadgum.com/177.html
It can be, but "inherently" is a bit strong. There's also the question of "the best Rust programmer vs the best C programmer" vs "the average Rust programmer" vs the "average C programmer" here too.
I find the Brainstorm/Green Needle audio to be far more interesting, as you basically can make it hear whichever you want (including combinations of the two).

https://youtu.be/5pRY3wlKwm8
To be clear, I wasn't making the case for a motive or even suggesting this was a plausible scenario. My point was death from a nuclear weapon is not the worst form of death.

Modern history is littered with examples of millions of people starving or being slaughtered because societies collapsed economically or politically.

> Who stands to benefit by destabilizing the western world to such a degree?

Who's limiting the conversation to the western world? Let's think beyond ourselves for a second. Wouldn't it be just as tragic if cyber attacks were used to destabilize other places in the world? Imagine an African country that has become entirely dependent on some sort of mobile money transferring platform. Maybe their neighbor launches an attack on that platform to destabilize the country for whatever nefarious reasons.
Whiteboard problems are used to show that you can work through a problem, while communicating well about your thought process. They're also good general intelligence tests, if administered correctly.
Discontinuous derivative. If you want a visual analogy, think of the transition from a smooth fluid flow to turbulence where fluid goes from moving in a simple direction to going every which way at once. See https://www.ethz.ch/content/specialinterest/mavt/fluid-dynam... for some pictures of that.
Thanks. I did not insist too much on the high returns on the article. For me this is the kind or overrated stuff around startup. It's similar to changing the world or working 80 hours a week.
Take a read of Tao Te Ching. It's written 2500 years ago about spirituality. Find a translation you like. Don't read explanations of the poems - It's designed for you to find the meaning yourself. Once you've gotten a meaning for each of the poems in relation to your life (Chinese philosophy is generally experiential rather than rational, subjective rather than objective), I'm hopeful it will help you get "there" wherever "there" is. I don't think it'd take you more than a few months to a year to get through the book.

So I'd go for "embark on a spiritual journey into your own mind".

My life is completely different than 4-5 years ago. Most of the acquaintances I knew then probably think I've gone nuts, (and IMO selfish to show them how good my life is now), but my best friendships have become even better; I really like where I am right now in my life - every day I wake up and enjoy it - At this point in my life I've spirituality, health, family, finance all sorted. I've met hundreds or thousands of people in my life, have not met anyone else who've got these four things together as well as has happened to me yet (except my wife) - and I don't know if it will last; but it all started when I started poring over those poems.

Anyway - most people these days tend towards an atheist/rationalist point of view and have no interest in books on spirituality & religion from 2000+ years ago, and if you did not ask the question I would not have written this comment. I do hope it helps you on your way.
Also the Grails ORM, but that's probably taken from Rails as well. I actually really liked it back when I was using it. Is there a good argument why automated function synthesis is a bad thing? Not trying to argue, just curious.
That does not seem like a recipe for a solid society. And suggesting the poor are the cause of the rich's mental problems & substance abuse is . . . well, it's something.
Awesome news, I have been following the beta for the last year, upgrading versions every couple of weeks. The TypeScript definitions were perfect to catch changes especially in property names. Will get my site upgraded ASAP. Can't wait to see where you take this next.
Except some of us already have full-time jobs and don't want to spend the weekend working on quizzes, whether it's paid or not. And unless you're very generous with timing taking a day off of work can be a logistical issue, not just a pay issue.

This type of interview self-selects for people with fewer family/non-work obligations, who are willing and able to spend their free time still programming.
The laws you talk about are, I think, laws about stalking. I'm not aware of any laws that apply to that kind of thing if it happens on a massive scale. Singling someone out is an important part of stalking.

Keeping detailed information about everyone that enters your store isn't illegal, as far as I know. Especially not information that is gained from observation (what color shirt they're wearing, their IP address) and information that is submitted willingly (their name given for a reservation at a restaurant, their username).
Sole proprietor has to be the DPO in that instance.
>Maybe it won't be the latest CC version, but it should get the job done.

I need the latest and I’d go crazy with some glitch or graphic acceleration missbehaviour due to Wine.

>Instead I donate that money to a handful of Linux organizations, distros, and devs to support an ecosystem I love being a part of.

That’s a nice atitude.
Spacemaker.ai