skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, but if someone has managed to convince the internet to route a packet addressed to 10.10.10.0/24 to your subnet then you've got bigger issues.

Also, every competently designed router has a rule that blocks that address range on the external interface.

The whole NAT isn't a firewall meme is pendantry at its finest since NAT is implemented as part of the firewall.
High quality on the web player should be 256kbps AAC, so it should have no audible issues. That said, I find the web player absolutely horrible to use.

The desktop Electron app may be a bit of a pig, but on the other hand it runs on Windows, mac OS and Linux with very few issues, so I'll accept that trade-off.
This still depends on trust and tamper-proof devices. You don't need the keys if you can alter the input stream.
Well you better get to work, because the precursors to this are all in place already.
What else is new?
The Instapaper one - #1 - is troubling for a non-obvious reason. One of the tenets of GDPR is that you have to be told how your data is being used. So the only explanation for this behaviour is that there's some shady shit going down that they want to stop before they have to admit to it.

If I used Instapaper I'd be filing a complaint with my local DPA about this.
shaming seems to be down currently.
I agree with you. I don't personally have a problem with the claims around Enhanced Auto Pilot, but the FSD option is really bad marketing, IMO. It is nowhere close to being ready to do the things that they talk about and may never achieve some of them.

The owners who buy that are really donating a few thousand dollars to Tesla without getting anything in return. Its really strange.
Where do you live?? If you are within the EU you must have been living under a rock for the past 6 months.

GDPR is new legislation that evolves most data protection laws to make it better for consumers to be in control of their digital information.

This includes your name and email address for marketing purposes as well as so much more. If the organisation didn't follow best practice and full gain consent to be able to contact you to establish this beyond a point of doubt.
The entire lower Puna area is open to residents only to facilitate evacuation should it become necessary. The main road into the area is suffering from massive cracking and SO₂ emissions. The other main road is only a hundred meters or so from one of the inactive lava flows. One of the minor connecting roads is now buried under lava, and the final one is an unpaved dirt road.

The nearby ocean is closed off to boats due to laze (that's steam mixed with hydrochloric acid and glass shards) hazard.
Exegesis: OpenAPI 3.0.0 support in Node.js
No worries -- I actually agree with you. We actually don't do very much scripting at my company in general -- Java, Go and JS (for Lambda) are roughly what we've standardized on.

We have a bunch of Python scripts for operations work and it's rare that performance becomes a major concern (...except in/regarding Ansible). Development isn't my team's primary responsibility so this state of things is fine -- our SysEng team can grok Python pretty well, whereas with other languages I wouldn't say this is true.
After visiting the bay area ... it makes me wonder if Tesla done f'd up by not working with them on an OS for their cars. It seems like such a natural fit for the two.
Sandler is what I did as well.
Similar ideas were once floated to stop email spam problems.

But it's untenable.

First, think of the impact it would have on lower-income people.

Second, think of how people might "game" the system. Anytime anyone is unhappy with a caller for any reason, they can falsely report the caller for spam.

Third, think of what position this puts phone companies in. They then have to be the arbiter of whether every reported call is actually spam. They'd probably have to set up an appeals process. It would be a nightmare, logistically.

Fourth, who would get to decide which charity the bond goes to? That decision alone is a hornet's nest.
Hell no.

It is unbalanced to the point that only tradition is viable and anything other then a ranged units is a joke(minus for capturing)

It also ha some of the worst game mechanics ever seen in a 4x:Global happiness.It is designed to curve both tall and wide play style yet does neither.All it does is annoy the player while the ai does n't care about it.

Speaking of ai,it is a joke.The ai is absolutely useless at playing the game,especially the combat.It will dance around cities,send workers at you,etc.

Civ 4,hell even civ 6 offer a much better experience.
it always blows my mind that so few people really know how to use it at a decent level

I'll second this -- it's by far the most used swiss-army knife in my arsenal[0]. A little part of me dies when I see scripts doing grep|awk, using awk simply to print a column. After taking some time to actually read the gawk user manual a few years ago, I've found that I can do most things in awk that I was previously using grep/sed (and to a lesser extent) perl/python for in the shell. In my environment, it also comes with the benefit that I know the awk code I'm writing is supported by the version of gawk that's installed on every server/computer I come into contact with -- no having to ensure the right python/perl is available.

One thing I wish there was better documentation on, though, is creating complete gawk scripts. With @include directives coupled with AWK_PATH, it's really convenient to build up a handful of utility functions that do frequent things and I've found, on several occasions, that I end up writing an .awk script instead of a bash/zsh script and it ends up being a much more straight-forward set of code.

[0] Well, specifically, the 'gawk' variant
Apologists have used the same argument for the last several hundred years and have done nothing to push the discussion forward.
I'm going to guess they don't have any.
I think this article has seen HN a few times.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16785396
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16720011
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16900545
aws S3 Select might be a good fit.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/s3-glacier-s...
Canalys had earlier reported a global smart speaker sales forecast for 2018 of 56.3 million.

Article says that's 56.3M projected sales worldwide.

From below link (from Mar 7), 47.3M U.S adults have access to a smart speaker. Or about 20% of all U.S. adults. Access meaning own or live with someone who owns one.

https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/07/47-3-million-u-s-adults-ha...
The #2 one seems a bit off. "RE:" stands for Regarding. Yes it makes people look at your email, but it isn't "fake."
Not sure why I keep reading that as sandwitchus.
Antennagate was a none issue. There was one week of bitching, then a grumpy Steve Jobs had the press event were he handed out free bumpers and showed other phones also had the death grip, then the iPhone 4 sold tens of millions and was kept in the lineup even after the 4S next year.

Many of my friends had a 4 and used it for years and none ever complained about reception issues. (They did complain that the button broke after years of use, a real issue of the 4, fixed in the 4S, but with no media frency behind it.)
There are lots of tech companies, relatively speaking. But also I've found software developers in some less obvious and surprising places. For instance, the mom and pop funeral home in town maintain their own software. My first development job was at a warehousing business on their inventory management system.
Why? This seems like good behavior. They're original product is supported by a business model that relies on user data. Now they are offering a similar product that doesn't make money off of user data but instead charges the user. I am all for the GPDR, but the regulations don't say you can't suck up all user data _and_ you still have to provide your service for free/discounted
The point is that when you have NAT you already have a firewall because they come as a package. For practical purposes complaining that "NAT ins't a firewall" is silly because when you have NAT you always have a firewall too.

In the real world SOHO routers that implement NAT also include the absolute bare bones firewall functionality of "block private addresses on the WAN port". Hand wringing over "but if someone convinces my ISP to route a 192.168.x.x packet to my home it could bypass NAT!" is pointless.
Their cash isn’t just sitting around, they invest it via their hedge fund, Braeburn Capital, which I believe is actually the world’s biggest by AUM.
Show HN: CryptoHorror – horror stories on cryptocurrencies
Is there a fast way to detect duplicates when you first generate the records? If so, could just keep a continuously updated counter for each client, incrementing it every time you add a record, and decrementing on duplicates to avoid double counting.
US President Blocking Twitter Users Is Unconstitutional, Holds US Court
My credit card gets stolen yearly. Sure, they can reverse the charges but changing the number everywhere is annoying..
Hugged to death already?
I'm not sure why you say "more and more like Trump". He always sounded like someone with a similar approach to handling a lot of things.

OTOH, that doesn't make some of his charges less accurate. The media does engage in a lot of hyperbole about Tesla crashes and always has. We don't get hyperbolic reports every time some other car has an AEB failure. We definitely don't get them about every other car's post-crash fire. And a lot of the financial opinion pieces are only marginally better.

On the other side of the coin, you have the company's misleading marketing materials. Some will say that is just as bad as the bad journalism, I guess.
The GDPR is about not intentionally deceiving users. That practice is clearly deceptive and clearly violates GDPR.
"Whoops, we can't secretly sell your data anymore! That means you can't control your smart wifi lightbulbs from now on!"

For me, this is a refutation of the "If you don't pay for the product, you are the product." There is no inherent reason why a company would only do that for a free product. If it works for free products, it works just the same for paid products.

Even if GDPR has flaws, and is gonna cause some disruption, I think we really needed something like this.
Appeals to authority are generally not great, but this is made even more bizarre given that our current economic systems seem to be teetering on a precipice. Think about how truly desperate we are when we need to resort to quantitative easing, zero interest rates, and even flirting with negative interest rates - just to desperately try to maintain the status quo.

This doesn't mean any alternative is better, but rather that trying to refute alternatives by appeals to authority is an even worse idea than it usually is. And it's usually already an awful idea!
NASA is bringing cryosleep chambers out of fiction
Yes, this is terrible. We're going back to the "dark ages" when a horrendous crime could happen in broad daylight around multiple witnesses and nobody would be found or sentenced.
An MVP is not a business.
As of 2012 food costs as a % of spending are the lowest in the US than anywhere else in the world. [0] During the Obama administration there was a massive increase in enrollment with the SNAP program. [1] Between government programs and charitable organizations I'd argue it is practically impossible for someone to go hungry through no fault of their own. You'd have to be unlucky on a cosmic level.

[0] http://www.ibtimes.com/us-spends-less-food-any-other-country...
[1] http://www.trivisonno.com/food-stamps-charts
FTTC DOCSIS is what most DOCSIS users get I believe. It’s still got most of the issues of DOCSIS, mainly being a shared medium within the entire building, leading to potential congestion issues.
All of these packages are created by Jon Schlinkert (https://github.com/jonschlinkert). So if you want someone to blame...
Lol. This is the IT equivalent of the hairy dog story about the itemized million dollar invoice: $1 - drill a hole, $999,999 - knowing where to drill the hole.

And by that I mean sometimes it seems easy to solve a problem because you have the skill to do so. It looks easy but that's only because of the time invested in making it easy for you. For anyone else the challenge remains.
There is a fruitful discussion that can be had on helpful ORMs vs harmful ORMs, and it usually ends up describing a category of marshalling helpers that don't quite form a regular ORM as the ideal situation.

My take-home on the whole thing is, you need something that makes working with relations in your code easy but you don't need something attempting a ridiculous abstraction like "relations are objects."
How Is Growing Micro-Mobile Data Center Market Forecast Report 2025
Because you can't route a packet addressed to 10.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x or other private network spaces directly over the Internet, which is the attack people are talking about here.
It's already possible, but nobody has written a public-domain implementation of it. Probably because it can sell for a lot of money. I bet someone has this software right now.
Buku v3.8 bookmark manager released with self-hosted http server
Sometimes I feel like these sorts of articles are written as a sort of indulgence to the aspirational class of people who will continue striving for more and more money. For those on a high-net-worth track, but under $25m, this article teases them, and motivates them. But for those over $25m it provides a bit of self satisfaction.
Monkey-patching is not in itself a problem though since it just overrides the built-in functionality. The problem in shooshgate was (if I understand correctly) specifically monkey-pathing Array and relying on the added property to be enumerable. This meant JavaScript could not introduce a non-enumerable property with the same name without breaking code.

While monkey patching in general is problematic, monkey-patching Array or Object is much worse than monkey-patching Window.
Volvo diesel cars avoid turbo lag by storing compressed air. Not very relevant but interesting nevertheless
https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/news/a2...
You are not the product. Exposure to you is the product.
Mirror: http://archive.is/BCZCB

EDIT: Updated with new post
Of these, the worst are the "embedded" ones: the IoT lightbulbs and the Razer devices. Nobody ever expected their lightbulbs to be processing personal data on behalf of third parties.

The one that might be legitimate is the "cheap flights" one; after all, they require your consent for email marketing, and they can't offer you a discount flight without it.
This is one in a number of papers exploring how biological phase separation/condensation may have provided favourable microenvironments for early life development.

For a nice primer on what biological phase separation is, see this (non-paywalled) general audience article from earlier this year in Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-03070-2).

Some other work on phase separation as a means for primordial evolution and biochemistry includes a paper from Christine Keating in 2012 (WAY WAY ahead of the curve) [1], elegant work by Frank Jülicher [2], and more recently a nice paper from Keating and Phil Bevilacqua [3].

These papers (IMO) tie rather nicely into some theoretical predictions on self-organization from Jeremy England [4].

[1] Keating, C.D. (2012). Aqueous phase separation as a possible route to compartmentalization of biological molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 2114–2124.

[2] Zwicker, D., Seyboldt, R., Weber, C.A., Hyman, A.A., and Jülicher, F. (2016). Growth and division of active droplets provides a model for protocells. Nat. Phys. 13, 408.

[3] Poudyal, R.R., Pir Cakmak, F., Keating, C.D., and Bevilacqua, P.C. (2018). Physical Principles and Extant Biology Reveal Roles for RNA-Containing Membraneless Compartments in Origins of Life Chemistry. Biochemistry 57, 2509–2519.

[4] England, J.L. (2013). Statistical physics of self-replication. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 121923.
They mint Tether during market crashes because that's when there is the highest volume on USDT pairs, and when Tether needs to create tokens to maintain the exchange rate around $1. Have you read their whitepaper?

Further, there is more proof that Tether has the funding to back up the USDT than proof that Tether does not have the funds:

https://blog.bitmex.com/tether/

https://blog.bitmex.com/tether-addendum-new-financial-data-r...

Reddit memes, medium posts with no research, and "correlation implies causation" assumptions does not make rumours true.
> So the only explanation for this behaviour is that there's some shady shit going down that they want to stop before they have to admit to it.

No, it can something as simple as "we cannot guarantee that all your data is deleted with our current storage system". It would be a lot better if people stop being so alarmist.
Yup.

http://archive.today/2018.05.24-124106/http://gdprhallofsham...

https://web.archive.org/web/20180524111054/http://gdprhallof...
Kick-Start Your Career in Cloud Computing
Unmanned expeditions provide more useful information per currency unit, which is the measure that matters.

Colonisation would probably cause permanent destruction of useful information through pollution: negative scientific progress.
And if your data is really big then so long as it is structured something like BigQuery lets you carry on using standard SQL queries...
Whenever I see a title that's posing a question, I like to immediately assume the answer is "no". It makes the headline seem pretty ridiculous.
Ive been enjoying all the emails from companies and watching them put on a show how they support user privacy and just needs me to continue agreeing to accepting being the product.

I dont think so. There are very few companies I actually use in my life, and less than a handful of them are online. The rest - bugger off.
If they are offering the $79/month service in the EU, it doesn't matter that they have a GDPR compliant version.

They won't be able to sell the non-compliant version right?
I think you've confused "if" with "if and only if"
Because the internet generally does not route RFC1918 addresses, and in particular not to you. But that is not a security feature, as there is no guarantee that noone will ever send such packets to you, it's simply that those addresses are not (uniquely) allocated to you, and therefore, your ISP doesn't know to route them to you. Also, many ISPs won't accept routes for RFC1918 addresses from other ISPs because it is well-known that they are not allocated to any particular party, and anyone announcing them risks being flooded with packets leaking from local networks that cannot usefully be delivered anyhow.

But nothing prevents your ISP from sending you packets addressed to RFC1918 addresses. Or anyone who happens to have compromised your ISP('s router), for that matter. Also, it happens that ISPs fail to properly isolate customers, and neighbours who are customers of the same ISP can directly send layer 2 packets to your router. Or it happens that ISPs forget to disable routing protocols on customer-facing ports, and if your router is misconfigured as well, it might be announcing your RFC1918 prefix to your ISP, which then would start routing packets from its other customers addressed to that prefix to you (probably not from other ISPs, as BGP peers usually would drop such routes--but even that is not guaranteed).

It's just a convention to not route RFC1918 addresses over the public internet for the simple reason that they are well-known to not belong to anyone in particular, and in any case your ISP generally wouldn't know who of the many users of those addresses to deliver packets to. I guess that's a bit analogous to writing "to Joe by the big tree" on an envelope and dropping it in the mailbox. That is not a clear, unambiguous address, belonging to one particular person, so chances are the postal service won't know what to do with it and it won't ever arrive. But that doesn't mean there is a guarantee that it won't arrive. Some postal worker might happen to know Joe and that he is known in some circles as Joe by the big tree, and the letter might arrive after all.
A. Using Lisp with a couple of minor convenience macros can be a very good idea.

Z. Writing an entire language and ecosystem just for a game is insane.

These are not binary choices: there is a very smooth continuum between these two, and is one of the major advantages of Lisp. Naughty Dog just took too many steps from A towards Z. Each step probably seemed reasonable at the time...
App GDPR-Compliance: Checklist for Business Owners
"He disagrees with me ... he's a shill".

Not a great level of debate for this place.
why not write something about the @include directives like a blog or some posts, that will be awesome.
If you get a packet addressed to 10.10.10.11 delivered to my home over the Internet then you kind of deserve to get in.

There will never be "no firewall involved" because NAT functionality is implemented as part of the firewall in the real world. Your point that it doesn't necessarily have to be part of the firewall is academic.
This is simply wrong.
wow that's terrifying.
Hey there – Brian from Instapaper here – we have a pretty clear and accurate privacy policy around the data we collect and how we use it, you can find it here: https://instapaper.com/privacy
The universe is chaotic and insecure
My first guess would be perhaps he is helping with the investigation...
Let's be honest -- people only use what everyone else is using because it lowers the bar to getting hired to 90+% of programming jobs.

I can count the number of tool-agnostic development teams that I've met on one hand. Many more have claimed they are when they are not.

If you aren't aiming for the top 10% of jobs (vague quality metric that you can interpret as you wish), then you want to have above-average knowledge of _just_ Python, Go, React, Docker and Kubernetes.

The situation only changes when high profile current/ex-Googlers (or similar) start talking about a language/tool a lot. Then the mass hops on board that train too.
I don’t, but I’m worried over the course we are taking as an industry.
Like majormajor below, I think the flexibility from increased income is going to be just as much or more of a factor as the tax incentive.
I want to know if credit card companies Mastercard, Visa, etc. are subject to GDPR. They definitely sell or use your purchase data for purposes unrelated to the service.
Yes, but... not b/c the dream stage includes the possibility of succeeding. It's all the other possible outcomes that make it richer and preferable to the reality stage, where one and only one thing will be. Even if that thing IS success. This is the unknown vs certainty, the unfortunate and mind-bending nature of desire. The reason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_on_a_winter%27s_night_a_tra... is so great. And the reason I'm not doing what I should be doing... :(
No its not just showing you ads. Its selling any information they have on you to ad networks without you knowing about it.
The main value of C is being the most compatible, well-known lowest common denominator. As soon as you add anything to it, it's no longer the C language, and you lose the benefit of universal compatibility and acceptance. This creates network effect in the C ecosystem that is so strong, that C99 is still "new", and C11 is an experimental curiosity.

Anyone trying to improve C has to face the dilemma that being "C but better" doesn't seem to offer enough for C users to switch (you get all the headache of a "new" language for one or two features), and languages adding enough improvements to justify cost of switching have to evolve to the point of no longer looking like C.
Thanks to facial recognition, a third person is arrested following a pop concert