skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
(ffjson author here)

The main feature that ffjson has that most of the non-stdlib JSON libraries is stdlib compatibility. Eg, the same struct-tags and interfaces used in stdlib are used by ffjson. It's just trying move most of the reflection / allocations / etc to a `go generate` step vs runtime.

If you abandon trying to stay consistent with the stdlib JSON, and make new APIs/interfaces for propagating the encoder or decoder state, as Gojay has, it will undoubtedly be faster than ffjson or stdlib.
I understand that you are not a professional, but the cognitive behavioral therapist is.

I would liken this to going to a Java developer with your business problem and seeing if this would help. There is a chance that they might say "I can't help with this problem but approach XYZ might be worth exploring." Sure, this might not be an optimal approach to architecting your application, but it is at least a step in the right direction.

Furthermore psychologists are licensed, highly regulated, and must commit to an oath of doing no harm.

I think one of the most important things for someone who is having mental is that they reach out for help. I think any advice which slows that down is dangerous.
not just that there’s a cost to keeping this kind of software useful, for the subscription agilebits is actually adding value.

unlike say adobe.
It's the limited domain that I can see making it feasible. I'm not convinced how well it will work with accents.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17103450.
Human translators need not be subject matter experts. So, it's really a question of depth of understanding.

Clearly deep understanding is useful, but just as clearly you can make a useful translation without it. So, the question is how superficial can 'understanding' be while still being useful. And at what point do you need to treat it as something other than understanding?

As far as I can tell any trained model can be useful, but that's a long way from saying any useful model means it's understanding.
I'm not sure the user realized how inhumane the word-choice was. After all, it was just an adjective in an otherwise wrong, but rule-compliant comment. And "useless people" is not a rare expression in online discourse.

I was aiming for "sarcastic", not "irritated".
and most of public cloud i want to developpe in the futur some of application like: https://luckypatcher.pro/ , https://kodi.software/ & https://plex.software/
I read that it's no longer possible to micro target ads in this way. Is it accurate or are there still ways to do it?

PS: The link at the bottom of the page says that "This typeform is private" http://www.ghostinfluence.com/register
But hasn't this always been the case? Some people write or say stupid shit; other people believe stupid shit. The demand for stupid shit that motivates writers and speakers comes from people who believe it, or from the wealthy and powerful agents who want others to believe it.

Education helps, to a certain extent. But treating fake news as some sort of a new threat seems strange.
Personally, I always found odd numbers easier, once I got past 5. But I never got past doing seven, failing eight, and having a shot at nine, so I'm not in the same territory.
The Impact of Gender on Conference Authorship in Audio Engineering
Containers, Security, and Echo Chambers
There is no reason to believe that. I paid for 1Password as a standalone app THREE TIMES, only to discover later that my versions are all being orphaned, will not be updated, and will not receive key features.
This seems a long-standing problem.

Even with very early Python, it was possible to have objects providing an API of C pointers, to be dynamically combined with other such objects, to create runtime assemblages of C code, with only C's dynamically-linked function call overhead between the parts. And with cached runtime invocation of gcc and dynamic loading, it was possible for objects to provide C macro apis, and combine them into runtime-specialized fully-optimized code.

But the approach didn't catch on. The community built C monoliths. Often multiple semi-abandoned monoliths with heavy feature overlap, but never code sharing. And then Windows slowly became important, with its lack of compiler access.

So the problem seemed a social one, rather than technical. Far fewer people using python, and not enough of them cared about such things to achieve critical mass. And so the approach never matured or gained momentum. Was never embraced as "pythonic". In an alternate timeline, we did such very neat stuff with it. :/
I absolutely love Enpass. Cost me a fixed $10 for all my iOS devices. I host my database on my local WebDAV (but there are many other options).
https://www.bustle.com/profile/kaitlyn-cawley-1912533

"She has a bachelor's and a master's in comparative literature from The American University of Paris and Trinity College Dublin, respectively."

My daughter's in college, so I know personally how expensive college is in the US. I know of many kids who did have to make tough choices due to financial constraints, even for middle-class families.

And you simply don't choose comparative literature as a major and study in a private school in Paris and then Dublin, if you can't afford. There are clearly cheaper (but possibly inferior) options. This person clearly chose more expensive option and now complain that the choice was too expensive. It's like buying a Mercedes and then complain that auto loan payment is too high.
UJson: fast, flexible and intuitive JSON for Scala
Regulatory compliance, risk management, security controls, business continuity/SLAs, and cost.

Financial services industry.
The developer's comments on the article contradict what you're saying:

> 1Password 7 from the Mac App Store will only support our hosted service, as that’s what you’re purchasing with a 1Password membership. If you install from our website, you’ll have to option to use a standalone vault synced via iCloud if you purchase a standalone license, or use our hosted service if you purchase a 1Password membership.

> As it stands, though, how you purchase 1Password is intrinsically tied to where you store your vaults and how you sync them
> 'Security questions'

Not only should you do this for privacy, but also security.
It's quite simple to get the answers to some of the questions websites will ask you..

Switching to random strings saved by a password manager (in a different file, with a different master key preferably), or written down on paper and stored securely is probably the best way to handle this
> I don't object to the government stopping their subsidy. I'm just saying what I expect the result to be: either loans would stop being issued overall, or they would only be issued to certain majors, which the public would find unacceptable.

The government could certainly choose to subsidize those students explicitly by providing loans on better terms itself. It's not like there are no other solutions.

Regardless, we as a society should get beyond some bizarre idea that there is no other way to provide university education without allowing the loans to be dischargeable. That's exactly how it used to be in the US. Furthermore, many other models are used elsewhere in the world. We should call it what it is: a government supported subsidization of the loan industry taking advantage of naive students. Of course it works out well for some people, but there should be recourse for those it does not. That's exactly the point of bankruptcy.
I love to work from libraries when travelling - quiet, free good quality internet, and no one looks at you sideways if you stay there for hours. The only challenge is having voice calls/meetings; I have to pop out to my car or just wander around outside (depending on traffic noise in the area), so it's harder to have ad-hoc quick calls. That's good for focus though :)
Back when I was a kid sailing dinghies, we did a competition on the lake of the designer of Miss Nylex. An early and primitive wing sail design, it still kicked ass in high winds and could apparently tow a waterskier.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miss_Nylex_catamaran
They don't seem to have. It's still shown in 1Password 7's betas, anyway.
Here's the question: are you willing to bet 20 million euros on your best practices?

That's the maximum penalty as I understand it: https://gdpr.report/news/2017/06/16/gdpr-guidelines-conseque... - and that doesn't count the cost of litigation before being fined.

This has already been posted in here, but I count GDPR compliance as being able to respond to this: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/nightmare-letter-subject-acce...

Even if I think I'm completely compliant, I think I'd make the decision to limit it to North America until I had enough revenue to hire a separate data protection officer.
Sounds like a get out clause from the co-founder.

How many requests do you actually think you'll get in a year? Some industries mandate data retention which overrides GDPR.

Is your business model going to implode if 0.01% of messages are deleted with due cause? You are only liable if you fail to complete the request in time. Plus how much longer until you have a GDPR friendly agreement which lets users know once a message is sent it is no longer personal data? If the sender gets deleted the recipient would see from 'deleted user'. This is kind of how stackoverflow.com do it.

GDPR is extra work but it's not shut up shop work.
On macOS, Keychain Access.app (built in) can be used as a stand-alone app to generate and store passwords.

WFIW I’m using a plain text file in an encrypted disk image, because I started before I found out about Keychain Access.app, and I never actually trusted third party apps for security reasons and possibly paranoia, so I can’t compare UX quality, but it is available in a form on the desktop.
Georgia tech didn't always use to be a top 5 engineering school.

Through cheaper (than other states) tuition and programs like the hope it rose in rankings
Well, I think it's because there's no more fines like that, at least until now. If the government (worldwide) will think seriously about cracking them down and give such punishments to them, I believe such spammers will stop harassing us. People should also try to report them or even filing lawsuits against them, like what I just read at http://www.whycall.me/news/my-4500-payday-from-a-telemarkete....
The trouble is that I always see the inverse too: people deflecting any criticism of American foreign policy by citing other countries with worse human rights records.
It’s hard for me to believe the they have diverged that much. I’d expect that the one would drastically influence the other. But then I don’t know French.
As time goes on, I've gotten less and less comfortable using proprietary software for critical tasks. If 1Password were open source, I'd actually be pretty happy to subscribe. But as it stands, I have no faith that the product won't change out from under me in the future, whether due to a pivot, an acquisition, or some other reason. The incentives align in favor of the business, not the customer. IMHO, subscriptions are already pointing in that direction.

I'd rather use something like pass and deal with the downsides. (Though I admittedly haven't switched yet.)
This issue is fascinating to me as it so perfectly straddles the dichotomy between personal responsibility and harmful systemic problems that individuals can't manage alone. Both sides have very strong points.

Of course, with this view, some sort of moderate compromise seems necessary. However, I wish I had more I could say about the issue with confidence.
This is, in effect, an exploit against vulnerabilities in US anti-trust law. Using dominance in online commerce and computing infrastructure to undercut food sellers is exactly the kind of problem anti-trust laws are meant to stop.

Amazon isn't actually monopoly in any industry, yet, but it's difficult to see how this is different to the approach a monopolist takes in entering a new market.
What do you mean there is no reason to believe that? The very latest 1Password (the one that's in beta and not even in wide public release yet) you can purchase without a sub right this second. What's the part that you don't believe?
You can get it to recognize fingerprints or a short version of your password if it's even been fully unlocked for the current phone session. It's a little fiddly and may not meet the level of security you're looking for, but it's an option.
Collection of free courses
Four is genuinely different, but there are now many, many exercises you can do with three which once mastered that makes four almost trivial once mastered.

The same is true with going from four to five, etc.
Thank you for the info. If anyone is here from AgileBits/1Password please chime in.
Just gonna piggyback off this and say the family plan is an amazing value if you have aging parents.

I recently upgraded to one, set up each of my parents with accounts, and moved all of their passwords out the physical and digital notes that their passwords were strung across and into 1password.

This means no more iCloud password resets every time they need an app or call me for IT support. It means I can help them securely manage their financial accounts and photos as they get older. I can share with them my Netflix login. And I sleep better at night knowing they’ll be aware when one of their previously common recycled passwords is compromised.
The whole article reads as a “it’s not MY fault, it’s the crooked banks’ fault this happened”.
There are plenty of interest calculators online where she could have predicted this outcome. This isn’t rocket science. With every story like this the writer had zero issues with taking the money and the moaning only starts when they are forced to pay.
This isn’t even a reasonable way to compare product pricing. Xbox Live Gold costs nearly as much as Office 365 Personal annually, and it is barely useful unless you own games to go with it. Or we could compare Office 365, at $70, to Apple iWork, which is free. Sure, Office has more functionality, but does it have infinitely more?
They’ve announced it will not be built into the Windows client as they would have to rewrite it for the new codebase.

It’s still available for the Mac client, but they’ve essentially said they won’t be supporting it in the future.
Would it still work if you use the method in the edit?
You’re the second person who’s tried to correct my interpretation of my own posts this week. What’s that quote about losing grandparents? :)

Anyhow, my point was that there is plenty of data about the sort of cat behaviour which humans collectively find notable.
Oh nice! Small world! Are you also pursuing a career in science?
$10k a year could easily just be a difference in living expenses between the US and Netherlands.
Thank you! We've added “Selenium”.
Fair enough, I wasn’t familiar with this client.
> a truly equivalent program would have to offer all the same run-time dynamic type manipulation and nearly arbitrarily modifiable object instances involved.

In actual production code, I rarely need this though. I mean, sure, for framework code, but in C++ I can do quite a lot with the standard library and templates. Sure it’s not so runtime flexible as Python, but for normal production code, I’ve rarely found it necessary. Don’t get me wrong, I absolutely prefer Python for most of the use cases that it’s conmonly used for, but I don’t agree quite agree that the quoted text above matters for most uses.

> What Python really proposes is this: “I’ll give you 100x more flexibility in exchange for 40x worse performance for certain classes of operations.”

Have you used a recent version of C++? I think the 100x might have been true 15 years ago, but, while Python has a lot, lot more runtime flexibility, modern C++ is a pretty productive environment, without sacrificing performance.

I’m not arguing that Python isn’t more flexible, especially at runtime, or that it’s not more productive. Of course it is. But you’re paying a performance premium for it and I don’t think the productivity gap is as large as the performance gap anymore.

With all that said, I do agree with your overall message. Python gives you productivity and flexibility and it’s important to focus on that rather than performance and, as you say, Cython gives you options when you do need performance. But the difference between Python and C++ nowadays, for normal production code, isn’t that huge anymore in my opinion.

Of course, there are plenty of reasons to prefer Python though: fantastic web frameworks and batteries included libraries, fantastic community, fantastic documentation to name a few.
Removing default risk from loans provided to young people for education is so perverse it almost goes beyond words. Re-introducing the ability to default would actually set a fair price on these loans -- interest rates would skyrocket, tuition prices would go down, or students would shift towards cheaper universities. If doing so results in massive outflows of tuition from universities for relatively worthless degress, and a large number of students deciding to forgo college altogether, that is what you call a "market correction" and would be extremely healthy.

The reason we are in this mess is because the loans are not priced properly because, other than the debtor dying or being unable to provide a steady income stream, or the government deciding to reverse policy, there is zero default risk. These loans are already yielding 8% in a market that has a risk free rate of about 3% over 30yr, and these loans cannot be defaulted on without a change in government policy! This should tell you just how fucked things are -- if students seeking degrees that will earn $20-30k/yr could default on these loans they would probably have a 20-30% interest rate (if not higher) or probably just wouldn't even be offered, since the default rate would be hilariously high, so the higher education market would be forced to correct.

Loans should not be a de-facto life-long indentured servitude to a lender. It's an abject moral failure of our society that this has been allowed to go on as long as it has. The day of reckoning will come eventually, maybe in a year, maybe in a decade, but when it does it's going to leave a gigantic crater in the interest rate markets.

This does not mean I am sympathizing with the people who have made poor financial decisions. Once corrected, these individuals should be free to declare bankruptcy and default on these debts, like any other, and pay the price for their actions in being unable to secure further lines of credit, potentially for the rest of their lives. This has real consequences: no credit cards, no car loans, no mortgage on a new house. This is the price we all agree to pay in the case of being unable to pay our debts: we cannot borrow money for many years if ever again. However, except for these poor souls, borrowers do not agree to being lifelong slaves if they make one poor financial decision or fall upon hardship that prevents repayment.

The loans are mispriced, and the lenders should have had higher interest rates on them knowing the risk of default was extremely high on a liberal arts major going to school for $50k/year. I am simply recognizing the fact that in this sector, the market has been distorted and is deeply corrupted by the removal of a fair market for student debt. These banks deserve to be wiped out on these loans.
I believe nations do this on purpose. Educating people on savings and thrift can have bad economic consequences
I have a massive problem with drunken 'laborers' hanging out outside my window from 6:30am (corner store opening) until noon. shouting, dancing, singing, fighting, laughing. as loud as you can imagine, shouts echoing back and forth between the buildings. nothing is really that amusing, I think the act of shouting itself is whats so damn funny. if you talk to them, or berate them, they will avoid your gaze, stop for 15 seconds, and then start up again as though nothing had happened.

after years of struggling with this, enter the classical music. apparently pure poison. they proudly try to stand their ground, but you can see the suffering in their eyes. some of them used to last a couple hours, but when they leave its always at a run.

anyways, to address your point, over time sensitivity seems to increase rather than decrease. as exposure increases, lower volumes and shorter durations are required to elicit the flight response.

you would think that the more aggressive, modern composers would be more stressful. apparently, just basic baroque chamber is the least palatable. after that romantic symphonies.

there are a thousand sad things about this situation, one being that I'm losing my appreciation for the music itself.
I had no especial antipathy to the cadaver lab in med school. A preserved cadaver holds very little relationship to a real body, outside of the relationships of anatomical landmarks. I -wish- we had had been able to study from prosections.

But digital cadavers completely fail to capture the three dimensional relationship of the components of a body. I have probably every atlas on the market, paper and digital, and I still occasionally go to our affiliated school’s lab to interrogate a body when I need a refresher.

There is nothing even vaguely approaching a replacement yet, though I’ve been hearing about how we can replace real dissections with simulations for literally decades. I do wish folks who’ve never had to navigate the internal landscape of a body would stop offering their opinions on how one should learn it.
Titles aside, it did get my curiosity piqued, I didn’t know lasers could be naturally formed.
The general framework is still possible; small groups, not individuals.

Here's a guide for how I've been using the strategy since 2014:

https://mythos.one/brianswichkow/d2a91e

Thanks for letting me know about the dead link!
The purpose of a password manager is some kind of multi-device password sharing. Plain macOS keychain doesn't do that at all. There are certainly ways to manually emulate parts of the behaviour of a password manager, whether it's with Keychain Access or post its in your wallet (or various combinations thereof). Password managers are about automating all that.
Thank you for this comment. JetBrains subscription also drops in price over time to reward you for continued patronage. It's the only subscription model i've ever been comfortable with.
53 Percent of Online HBO Subscriptions Are Sold via Amazon
It's a useful distinction to say someone walking through a room 30 seconds after a sick person left is or is not at significant risk. Especially when setting up quarantine etc.

Basically, respiratory droplets are considered a different category from true airborne transmission because they are much easier to contain.
What you say about the value of the long tail is definitely true.

But I would underestimate the value of pickup: from a point of view of a busy mom with 2 small kids, doing a grocery pickup is a much better experience, enough to be the differentiator that will determine to which store to go.
You spoke as if you were.
I loved your appearance on Numberphile :)
> budget tracking

You might want to check this out too: https://github.com/firefly-iii/firefly-iii#introduction
Yes, this easy credit environment allows colleges to rapidly raise tuition. They love it.
Dedicated hosting is much better bang for your buck, especially for bandwidth. If you do something like video streaming and have relatively predictable loads, I've found that you have to pay at least an order of magnitude more with public cloud compared to dedicated servers on OVH or Datapacket. Maxing out a 2gbps server on Datapacket would cost you just $320/month for 648 TB of outgoing bandwidth monthly, versus at least $6,480 just for the bandwidth on Amazon S3.

For venture-backed startups with an emphasis on growth or large scale enterprises, the convenience of the cloud may outweigh the cost premium. But for small to medium size organizations where server load doesn't fluctuate on a day-to-day basis, I haven't yet been convinced that the cloud offers a good enough value proposition.