skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
These matters are, strictly speaking, outside the purview of science.

I would say that what you're looking for is impossible to describe, the best I can do is point you towards what is called "spirituality", which is different for each person.
Ok going back to the mathematica version that does it the slower primality testing per terms in cell way I am seeing the deviations meaning the gcd triangle is not an exact match to what we have here.
No, and neither is this book -- it also deals heavily with less tangible factors.
Agreed. I'd say, a big part of what makes smarter people smarter is encountering more varied problems and environmental conditions that allow more kinds of pruning in more areas.

Wild horses are far smarter than domestic ones, for example.

Your comment fits with my citation of a cavity-IQ correlation, here.
Oh sorry. Corrected the comment.
Thank you! I tried doing this with the observablehq version and got really "lost in the Ulam Spiral" of opening and closing functions.
Agree you're correct. My broader point is that the actions are quite different and express different forces on the jaw, triggering different growth.
Yep. This is how I conduct my interviews. I don't ask trick questions. Many of my candidates can quickly notice the simple solution but fail to write the solution in code.
Seems tough in this case. The DRC is huge.
I guess you are EU-based, unlike the guy whose text we are debating here.
right but a clockwork orange is a work of fiction whereas these are real-world examples.
I would suggest an alternate interpretation: China (and maybe Russia as well) don’t actually know what their GDP is either.
The meaning of life is survival. Perhaps you lack eudaimonic happiness. Introduce struggle towards goals that are meaningful to you. If nothing is meaningful, you have depression. If only a very small number of things are meaningful, struggle at those. Meaning is built by you, no one can give it to you and it doesn't happen by default once you graduate from extrinsic rewards.
But what does it count now, exactly? Only the number of bees in the air in some space before the hive, right? It doesn't even say if they're going in or out? What exactly can be measured with this metric, apart from a very generic 'activity level'? Can it detect swarming, robbing, total bee count of a hive, bearding, anything useful?
But I should be able to hold on to IP addresses for as long as I want, since they aren’t PII.
Appropriate juncture to repost this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD0NjbwqlYw

"Visualizing the Riemann zeta function and analytic
continuation"

(Watch the last 30s or so if nothing else. You'll not regret it.)

There is a kind of 'real' Ural spiral [or really a kind of chaotically decaying 'orbit'] related dynamic that gives the prime numbers (assuming the RH.)

Conceivable that OP's pattern might have some relation to this dynamic, and fun pondering to boot.
How to use a concurrent task queue in your Redux-Sagas
I couldn't disagree more. The raw transcribed text made me feel immersed in the storytelling.
Selecting All Columns Except One in PostgreSQL
OP here - really it’s just a matter of I found a cool thing and wanted others ideas/input. I never had a pretense of a proof or a formalization just a cool pattern that emerges from folding the Ulam Spiral up a certain way. I think we were over zealous in the gcd triangle being an exact correspondence now as it clearly is not for some cells.
Good advice. I have a B2B lead gen system that I offer - built on 19 years of experience - for 75% of the price of someone who has 2 years experience.
> Quite frankly, yes. I don't mean to belittle your condition or be a gatekeeper, but cluster headaches and severe migraines can be so bad that you are physically incapable of doing anything but laying still. It's not a choice. It's not just "knife in my eye, I should lay down and try to tune it out", it's "firecrackers are constantly exploding inside my skull and it's affecting my cognitive functions so much that I cannot walk straight, I cannot speak clearly, I cannot see things two feet in front of me, I cannot chew, etc". And it is simply impossible to "tune out the pain".

You're mixing the two up I think. What you've described is severe migraines. During a "typical" cluster headache episode, you're restless, because movement doesn't make it worse. You are gatekeeping pretty bad. The MD I've seen have given me the diagnosis cluster headaches with symptoms of migraines. Last time I had an episode, I was laying new flooring, noticed it coming and do the only thing I could, take some painkillers and power on. Before long I was cutting boards wrong, trying to lay them the wrong way around, and at some point my wife directly asked me if I was okay because of the atypical behavior. I wasn't and I made my way into the bedroom and didn't emerge again for 3 hours. Any sound, light, or movement during an episode is pretty bad.

> not belittling other people's experience with them by implying they can "just take a paracetamol and tune out the pain".

I've never implied that. I've said that is what I can do. You seem to be incapable of accepting that cluster headaches can range from something manageable, to something that makes people commit suicide. As I've mentioned, one of the leading MD on headaches in Denmark have diagnosed me with cluster headaches.

> A single, severe cluster headache/migraine the likes of which some people get would have sent you to the ER immediately begging for any medication to ensure that such a headache never, ever, ever happened again in your entire life.

Except a 10yo can not just go to the ER for that, and when you grow up being told to get over it, you find other ways to manage it.

> These are the types of headaches that paracetamol has no chance of even touching. Only incredibly powerful opiods/barbiturates even have a chance of relieving them. And that's just talking about the acute pain. The other terrible part about migraines is their chronicity.

Paracetamol is not handling it, they often stop it, or rather, it stops the thing that is causing it to develop. Why it's working, I have no idea - but it's, according to the MD, normal that medication in the initial stages can significantly reduce severity or even stop an episode.

>> and I would feel guilty not doing anything with a headache, because people around me constantly said "I have a headache" but acted like nothing was wrong.

> This is essentially what your comment is doing right now, and that's why it's insulting

Let me get this straight. I'm saying I've been diagnoses with it. I can often successfully stop it, and when I cannot I'm "out of service" for hours. How on Earth is that making people with the same condition feel guilty?
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-da...

https://gdpr-info.eu/art-6-gdpr/

> Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

Consent is one:

> the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes;

Here are all the others (see especially the last one):

> processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party or in order to take steps at the request of the data subject prior to entering into a contract;

> processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject;

> processing is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person;

> processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller;

> processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.
I’ll have to ask an employee next time I see one.
It's generally understood among mobile developers that much of the money is on the Apple platform, not that other one.

Or at least, it was, the last time I had coffee with my mobile developer friends.
I struggle with spirituality. For starters, nobody in my 'community' is deeply spiritual, really spiritual at all.

Add the fact that I do not believe in a god in any traditional sense, and I am stuck wondering what exactly I can be 'spiritual' of?
And most of the interviewers asking these questions just want someone who can help develop yet another software as a service CRUD app....
Tree of Life Jewellery, Tree of Life Necklace, Pendants, Bracelets
Your country is also (likely, I don't know where you live) much more homogeneous in many factors. It's easy to keep the place safe when you don't allow anyone different to live there in large numbers.
> Also I find it quite telling that Lionsion still refuses to respond to any of my points.

Ok, I'll bite. Here's my response:

You need to go outside and take a walk, because your "points" have been off topic, literally paranoid, and bizarrely personal. You're accusing me of being an "agent provocateur" and either a Chinese or Russian troll. That's crazy talk and utter nonsense.

Ignoring you isn't "telling," it's frustration and a lack of better options.

The truth is I'm a guy who was frustrated by a thread yesterday that was totally ruined by people who derailed it, perhaps like the 50 Cent Party would. Just to make it super clear: I don't think it was disrupted by the actual 50 Cent Party, but by people who maybe should consider learning to not act like it.

Edit: I apologize to everyone who reads this thread (or the dead comments below). In situations like this, the correct action is to ignore someone like my interlocutor, but that's difficult when he makes personal attacks. I should have held firm despite them.
They won't even manage to precisely decide what actually means 'large' let alone if it applies to you specifically, before you die of old age.

The above statement will apply to everybody or nearly everybody (still not you).
It's not just science reporting. One of the reasons I hate the Olympics is that I like to watch sports on TV: Not heartfelt stories of overcoming adversity to become one of the world's elite. Not teary eyed medal ceremonies with semi transparent backdrops of national flags blowing in the wind. Not endless medal count standings. Not interviews of people with three medals around their necks, with insets of proud parents in the upper left hand corner. I just want to see the sporting events.

Today's society values drama above everything else. It's a shame (either that they do, or that I don't fit in ;-) ).
> If nothing is meaningful, you have depression

I almost certainly do have depression then. Not the kind where I am suicidal, or lack the ability to get out of bed... but rather, the kind where I would rather not exist because I do not enjoy life.

I struggle very much with meaning, obviously. That's part of this existential crisis... Nothing is meaningful. We are all going to die and I ask what will it mean then? What will some service or app that I made mean when I am dead?

Has anyone yet lived for some purpose, some greater meaning? It appears not, and I am not special.
There's a lot of experimentation with pedagogy, and the gains are marginal. Student/teacher ratios have a mild effect on academic outcomes, but academic outcomes have very little effect on anything measurable in terms of building human capital or long-term retention.

School funding is similar to the ratio question. Most increases in school funding over the last 50 years get captured by the state and local administrations, which provides even less for outcomes than teacher pay, ratios, or increased resources. Pouring more money into them doesn't usually chance that allocation -- it's like giving money to a homeless family and having one of the parents take the money to buy non-essentials.

In the mean time, kids are wasting away, bored out of their minds. The opportunity costs are massive, and the social returns are negative. We can talk all we want about how we can make the system better, but until it actually gets better, the waste continue and victimizes more kids.
but if you are criticizing something while doing the same thing, it's just hypocrisy.
I think you're seriously mistaken as to how one-off (and maybe all) import into the US works.

If I buy something mail-order from Canada, I'm considered the importer and would have to pay duty on it, just as if I had driven a truck over the border, bought the couch over there and driven it back.

If it's something as big as a couch, chances are it's going to be held at a customs warehouse for me to pick up (after I've paid the duty).

If I need to do this on a regular basis, I'm going to hire an import/export broker or possibly go through an actual furniture importer. That's the company that's doing business in the US that owes US incomes taxes, has to comply with US consumer protection laws and any of those other regulations.

In all of these scenarios, at no time did the Canadian couch store do any business in the US, even though I, the customer doing the "buying" may have been initiating the transaction over the Internet (or phone or with a paper mail-order form) physically in the US and/or with a US credit card.

If that Canadian couch is a fire hazard, the US's recourse is to stop it at the border and not let it in (or punish the US company, only in the case of the furniture reseller), and possibly punish me, the importer, since I'm the one legally attempting to bring it into the country. AFAIK, they have no recourse against the Canadian company.
Imo one approach is not going to work for all communities. A project like this which wants to satisfy the entire spectrum on various criterias should cede control to its users. Let the communities decide on every parameter that affects them. Decentralization.
Isn't that's either: a consultant if you get paid in money, or a co-founder if you get paid in a share of the product.
This has been the way people have been getting engagement since advertising started. Twitter is actually the most efficient form of it. It's not going away and it's better than the alternatives.
I'm criticizing A while doing A. You shouldn't mention I'm doing A!
> I’m not going delete them because somebody requested.

Why do you think you need to delete them when requested to do so? Can you point me to the bit of the regulation that makes you think that's a requirement?

Here's the Right to Erasure: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/

Which bit do you think applies?
But it's great, because once you have all that foundation you can quickly iterate on your top layer and quickly discover new pieces you are missing and must build before completion.
If your standard for operational security is the military, I have very bad news for you. Or good news, if your opsec goal is "be way better than the US Military" (that news is: you are already way better than the US Military).

The military obtains what security it has by attempting complete segregation and isolation; because it's the USG, the world's largest IT department, there are "public" and "private" networks, both clones of each other, both running the same insecure software. Both public and "secure" networks have been owned up comprehensively by malware in the past.

To get a sense of how bad the situation is, go look at the Common Criterial EAL vendor list, note which vendors have obtained EAL4 certification, and then compare to the security track records of those versions. That'll give you the spirit of the situation without requiring to you actually endure an EAL validation, which is something I have had the misfortune of participating in.
It's not so much that philosophy has definitely answered the "great questions" that makes the field cumulative, so much as it is that philosophical works are immensely context-dependent. Certain assumptions about the reader's knowledge are implicit, and if you lack that knowledge, it becomes significantly harder for the reader to grasp various arguments. At best, you miss things.

Individual Platonic dialogues aren't self-contained; they all make reference to concepts from other dialogues as well as Plato's contemporaries and pre-Socratics influences. Works by later Platonists along with critiques often make similar assumptions about what you know. Honestly, there's two thousand years directly influenced and shaped by Plato alone. Almost all of which assumes that you've read Plato. Beyond that, both direct and indirect references to various ideas by Plato can be found throughout nearly every philosophical tradition.

Take Plotinus and The Enneads, for instance. When Porphyry edited Plotinus' writings, he ordered them according to a non-chronological principle meant to make them more approachable. As a result, multiple arguments in one treatise will reference arguments made in another. And throughout all of them, Plotinus takes it as a given that you're familiar with Plato's work. If you're not, you'll be almost hopelessly lost. There are plenty of other examples; for many if not most philosophers, their body of work can include extensive seminar notes (Lacan, for example), letters and correspondences, etc. Or look at Nietzsche and how his writings have been distorted and misunderstood by so many. His sister's systematic edits and falsifications of his writings were an attempt to twist Nietzsche's writings into supporting anti-semitism despite the fact that throughout his life he repeatedly denounced anti-semitism and the nationalism he saw it linked to. It took decades to repair Nietzsche's reputation and that was accomplished only by returning to his original writings themselves rather than the bastardized versions his sister put out.

Secondary sources can do an excellent job of highlighting, summarizing, and explaining arguments that might be split across years of different writings or multiple philosophers. They can't replace reading the original philosophers' work, however, because you can't divorce a later exegesis from the source it's attempting to interpret. Later work is tied to the earlier works to which it responds; the latter's value is present even when the former seeks to eviscerate it. Philosophy simply can't escape earlier works, and that's a wonderful thing because it forces us to better understand the ideas and traditions of ideas being discussed in their totality and context.
> I completely and utterly care about privacy

and

> allowing people to request removing them are a bridge to far.

Are dissonant. You will have to pick the one or the other but you can't both care about privacy and not allow people to request removal of their data. That should be fairly obvious.
just disconnect. you waste your time.
I had an adsense account to profit from an IP address i randomly purchased from an ISP, which was formerly apparently a somewhat popular porn site. Racked up about $950 in a month, then they turned me off, something about violating terms etc etc.

It was a glorified 404 page with a google search widget & adsense ads on it.
That's different from "just passing an infected person"
Can Housing Supply Solve Affordabilty Crisis? Evidence Neighborhood Choice Model [pdf]
Note that he has still refused to respond to any of my points (for example, that most of us can juggle multiple issues in our head at the same time) and instead is now resorting to personal attacks and avoiding anything of substance by claiming that he is "frustrated," which is the exact same tactic he used last time.

I aim to leave my comments on this thread intact for the record, and I'm archiving this in case it proves relevant in the future.

EDIT: We're starting to see the bizarre inconsistencies in his position rear their head as well. He writes in the exact same comment that

> You're accusing me of being an "agent provocateur" and either a Chinese or Russian troll. That's crazy talk and utter nonsense.

and then that

> The truth is I'm a guy who was frustrated by a thread yesterday that was totally ruined by people who derailed it, perhaps like the 50 Cent Party would.

What sort of bizarre hedging is saying that people are just acting "perhaps like" paid Chinese trolls?

I am sorry if I have wasted others' time in reading these comments, but I am not exaggerating when I say that I think putting these things on the record is important for everyone.
The GPL is a license, not a Contributor Agreement or a Copyright Transfer. The author remains the owner of the copyright when they let others use it under a license, even open source licenses like the GPL.

Licensing a software out does not mean the author can no longer "claim any ownership". In the case of OSS licenses, it just means that they can't claim sole ownership.
Agreed. A DE job is based on more traditional software skills, expecting you to understand the priorities and purposes of an given ML technique, without having to choose, architect, or defend the choice of that technique over alternatives. I can see most of the OP's objections as being more appropriate to the superciliousness of hiring software PhDs into DE jobs rather than DS. The DS role is more quantitative and theoretical (befitting a PhD), while the DE is more an engineer and experimentalist (befitting a less academic mindset).
Remember, it's also an existential opportunity. Granted, most of us seem to rely on Professional Sports Leagues to create meaning and significance out of pure air, but you have the chance to find something that both helps others and is highly enjoyable to you by wrestling with some of that angst.

Bertrand Russell's answer was that the more you involved yourself in helping young people and future generations, and shifted meaning beyond your singular mortal self (Conquest of Happiness, book) by doing that, the happier you'd be. (Since things obviously aren't going to end well for any of us, as individuals.)

It is a way of fooling yourself (because heat death of the universe) but ya get to help others and enjoy yourself at the same time. Win-win. A kid's laugh is pure enjoyment, worth adding to the world by and despite any logic. My version of Utilitarianism holds children laughing as the highest good worth working for. Kid's enjoyment is totally real.

Beyond that, meaning or purpose ain't much: hammers have a purpose 'cause they're mere tools. Slaves can have a purpose and meaning for their (continued) existence, similarly. But that's not a good thing. A free human being doesn't come with a purpose 'cause we're the thing that confers meaning on other objects. That's a good thing.

As the wise old ones say: "Enjoy the show."

Or join the Mormons. Or get hired by SpaceX. Meaning can be a contact high.
Indeed. Is it really Orwellian to not want a homeless encampment in front of your business?

The author should stick to reviewing music itself, and stop whining about the "abuse" of same.
Trump urged U.S.P.S to double package rates for Amazon: Washington Post
Nobody is going to hand you meaning on a silver platter, and anyone that claims to have all the answers is lying to you. You have to find your own meaning in life, and that means you have to choose what matters and choose what you spend your time on. There's nothing inherently meaningful in being alive, true, but our nature as thinking beings lies in giving meaning to things that are meaningless.

If you don't have a purpose, find a purpose for yourself. Everyone is insignificant, so why try to be significant to everyone? Just be significant to your friends. Show up in the world. And do things that matter to you.

Forget about the unanswerable questions. They're unanswerable, and they'll only trip you up. Go be around people, and let them remind you why you're alive. Go whistle in the dark for a while.
Looks like the whole thing is up on GitHub so you're free to do what you want with it.

Honestly, your comment comes off as complaining that the in-flight wifi is too slow. He found an interesting problem and did a great job documenting his process + approach, if that doesn't belong in HN I don't know what does.