skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It does entirely.

In an org consisting of hundreds of thousands of people, "culture" is a pretty local phenomenon.

The Amazon experience is entirely dictated by the team on which you land.
You might want to check what your shell does, as this relies on auto-completion doing the same thing if you replay the same keystrokes, even if that happens faster.
Specifically, try to intercept the output of the last pipe into a

less -U
and look if that seems to be what you were typing. If you want, you can replay the special chars by pressing Ctrl+<whatever symbol is followed by the caret>.
Try to not use a fancy auto-completion like fish or fzf provides you with, as they tend to not be the same when doing a replay.

This should not be hard, I used bash succesfully. I hope you did not forget to run it on the same filesystem state, as far as auto-complete behavior during the asciicast is concerned.

Also, this could be improved by delaying the replay as long as specified by the asciicast. But I couldn't quickly figure out how to get that done without further dependencies, so I won't provide that (now).

This script filters for input keys from the asciicast with the

select("i" == .[1]?)

and then extracts only the string itself with

.[2]

. I'd like to understand what is going wrong, but this style of debugging isn't working.
I won't debug it on your system unless you find a way to make that sufficiently productive for me.
And I really hope you created the file with --stdin, but judging from ls barfing on a non-existent file/directory, I assume the shell it spawned just did not result in ls being called with the same name, due to auto-complete changing it's behavior.
Agen Judi Online Gaple Uang Asli Android Terpercaya – Asiapoker303
China is building a rain-making network three times the size of Spain
Lest We Remember – Cold Boot Attacks on Encryption Keys [pdf]
I don't understand what the problem is. You can turn off location tracking in Google Maps. You can see all the data it has collected in your activity page, and you can delete all of it too. Sure, the fact that it's opt-out instead of opt-in is dodgy, but to be fair, the majority of the features we use everyday such as traffic estimation wouldn't exist without this data.
Well, that's kind of my point. Yes, you could hypothetically transmit 1 GB/month batched to use wifi, but the article in question is saying it's using your mobile data (to sow FUD). There is no evidence that Google is sending 1GB/month of data over wifi either.
The talk here about sticking at a job that makes you cry, when you have in demand skills and can work anywhere, is nuts to me.
Adolf Hitler said the same thing.
This is the right way to look at it I think. I've been looking at a blockchain based solution recently, and there has been an awful lot of negativity, and people wondering if it would have been possible to implement the same solution with an oracle database.

Well, yes, it would have been possible. There are a couple of minor things the blockchain does better and a couple of things it does worse for this use case, but fundamentally, I believe the blockchain based solution was cheaper to build and will be cheaper to maintain.

People need to consider these solutions in the context of whether or not they solve business problems effectively, and put aside knee jerk reactions based on technological prejudices.
Wouldn't it be racist to force an intelligent entity to disclose its nature?

This argument is hilarious, but I'll play along. First of all "racism" is about superiority, not about differentiation per-se. There is nothing inherently wrong about acknowledging differences, it is wrong when it becomes the sole reason for assuming superiority. That is the textbook definition of racism, so to answer your question: No, in my view it would not be wrong to force an intelligent entity that is not human to disclose this fact.

It matters so that my approach to dealing with this "intelligent entity" can be adjusted accordingly, as per my needs.

Why does it matter if the person chatting with you on the phone is made of meat or a super-being who's having thousands of similar conversations at the same time?

It matters because today we do not yet understand anything about the drivers and motivations of this "super-being" and before we are clear on that, I would like to know who or what I am conversing with. I am pretty sure you are referring to "Minds" from "The Culture" series, which a) is fiction, and more importantly for the sake of this discussion, b) Minds have a relatively well understood context of motivations, morality and history of mostly benign interaction with Culture citizens. The "Robocall version 2.0" touted by Google doesn't have that, and given Googles past track record, they don't really give a flying fuck about the general population. When it comes to the proprietor and owner of this technology today, we have been comprehensively identified as "the product" instead of "the customer" -- it is my right as a private citizen to know who or what I am interacting with, especially if it is a Google product.

Finally, whereas dealing with other humans can be understood on a base level of expected intelligence and wits, as well as shared identity, history and culture, interaction with "super-being" would by its' very definition be an unequal exchange. I have every right to know if my interlocutor had any kind of extreme advantage over me (you know, because it is a "super-being").

Or am I being speceist now?
Tolkien was more influenced by World War 1 than WW2.
What were the messages and ideas of the original Anderson The Little Mermaid?
Critical PGP and S/MIME bugs can reveal encrypted e-mails
>It's too easy for some Internet comment in a few words to write off the serious, long...

I was referring to the official dissent of the NAACP, which I clearly specified. The official NAACP remarks are as follows:

"The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People recognizes in "Song of the South" remarkable artistic merit in the music and in the combination of living actors and the cartoon technique. It regrets, however, that in an effort neither to offend audiences in the north or south, the production helps to perpetuate a dangerously glorified picture of slavery. Making use of the beautiful Uncle Remus folklore, "Song of the South" unfortunately gives the impression of an idyllic master-slave relationship which is a distortion of the facts."

As you can see, the entire argument rests on the, as I stated, erroneous assumption that the movie is depicting slavery.

I did not say there were no valid criticisms as there obviously were and are. But that specific and most famous criticism is not.

I don't really have a comment on the rest of your history lesson on racism except that I agree and that this movie does not seem to apply. But good work with the virtue signaling.

I'll have a sit down with my African American wife (with whom I watched Song of the South) and explain to her why she should have been more offended.
> I assume implicit to this statement, is that some heuristic algorithm needs to be created to turn the car off.

If you say so. I'm pretty sure just turning the car off if there's nobody sitting in any of the seats and the key is not in the car would be a good start.
I think your realistic options are to move the EU or to stop using Google. Maybe one day they'll offer a subscription based fee for it's services, but for now you pay with your data.
> The pushback I have received from some is that "with docker it shouldn't matter, and whatever I do on my PC you can just pick up and drop in place", with a complete lack of regard for the fact that their PC is not that same as our production environment.

Yes. This misconception is the main promise made in Docker's marketing, so it's no surprise that people who've gobbled it up are unhappy when confronted with the fact that the pixie dust and the lands of eternal rainbow-sunshines are fantasies. (Sidenote: it's sad how non-admin-capable developers interpret the promise of demoting ops to mindless button-pushers as fantasy fulfillment, but that's an issue for another time).

Docker had a massive bonfire of VC money to perpetuate these false beliefs, and the message has been magnified by BigCos like Google, who've placed it at the center of their corporate strategy to retake cloud.

Unfortunately, in most cases, the Direction-Setter is not going to take the credit for being misled and needing to double back and fix it. They just lob it over the wall to RealOps, courtesy of DevOps(TM), and expect them to be grateful for it.

Meanwhile, RealOps's job is much harder than before, because you have the ignoramus shouting "What are you talking about?! You just don't know how to use this revolutionary new technology from DOCKER and GOOGLE! Are you smarter than Google, Bob? I coded up a whole Dockerfile over lunch!"

We have a lot of naive, self-important dilettantes in tech these days, trying to act like the 4 minutes they spent skimming the Docker manual make them smarter than the greybeard who just doesn't have the time for every painfully empty fad on the block.

We should talk about how we can stop that infiltration.
> If I were hiring for a basketball team, and had to choose between two candidates neither of whom had experience playing basketball and were alike in all ways except that one was an avid soccer player and one was equally fervent about pottery, I would choose the soccer player.

That’s not at all what happens in programming interviews that use algorithmic puzzles.

You have candidates who already have a professional track record in basketball, and instead of focusing on that profile and whether it’s a good fit for your team, you give them a timed soccer workout because it’s somehow a more objective measure of athletic ability.

Any basketball team that hires like that wouldn’t survive for long. The quiz interview format in the tech industry is a form of “anti-Moneyball”. It works for the SV giants because they have an enormous supply of candidates and they need generic competence that can be shuffled around. Smaller companies would do much better to hire for the actual role, not for “Cracking the code interview” memorization performance.
1. Governments enact regulations preventing entities other than banks from distributing currency

2. The end
Other commenters: just because employees _are_ resources doesn't mean that managers should make them _feel_ like they are. There are companies that do a good job of making employees feel more of a sense of being valued, and so at least on that dimension Amazon seems to be doing a poor job.
Not if the police claimed it was consensual (see the article)
Maybe it should, but in my experience Android is perfectly happy to automatically update Play Services and Service for Instant Apps (whatever the hell that is) over the cell network, despite settings being set to manual update on WiFi. Which is a Windows 10 level of obnoxiousness. So I wouldn't be surprised if they were sending stuff over customer's metered connection.
1. It depends on the company (Amazon vs AWS) and it varies from org to org, and team to team. Just like in every place there's going to be great and crapy people. In 3 years at Amazon I had the opportunity to work next to great people, but also with people at the complete opposite side.

2. In my case, it did not. I decided my happiness/wellness and health (physical and mental) were more important.
وظائف دليل الاتحاد اليوم 14 مايو 2018
Plus the fact that they can also average your interests from information volunteered by your friends and family because "birds of a feather, flock together".

IOW, Twitter followers may be total strangers to many IRL, unlike Facebook followers.
"Bitsavers is an arm of the Computer History Museum which has the goal of making scanned documentation and engineering drawings, and machine-readable source code and object code of old computers available on the Internet.

It has a number of mirrors around the Internet; requests to the main Bitsavers site are automatically re-directed to one of the mirrors."

(from http://gunkies.org/wiki/Bitsavers)
How do they earn money? Working long hours? Do they dislike their bosses and co-workers and compensate with high-end purchases?
Yes, and they're needed because GPS is much less accurate in the vertical direction.

Even the fitbit in my pocket has a barometric sensor, to be able to count stairs.
Don't get me wrong. I find most of these "bit hacks" to be quite simple individually. But they add a layer of necessary comprehension.

In most cases you won't see these alone. They will be surrounded by tens of thousands of other lines of code. And where there is one "hack" there are usually others. And at some point you end up with a bug somewhere because one of these smart little hacks is failing. You don't know which one.

This does create unnecessary problems for maintenance in the future. So use it, but use it only when absolutely necessary. Not because you think the code will run faster.

It's also important to note that many things people think make the code faster, don't. Like vector vs. linked list access. Intuitively the linked list seems much simpler for inserting an element. But in almost all cases the vector is faster, because of cache locality.

So what I'm saying is. Do things that make the code probably faster like using a vector, if they don't cloud understanding. If they do, leave them out until you have a reason to use them. The only reason to use micro-optimizations like these is if you measured execution time and know there is a performance bug in this place in the code which your "hack" could resolve.

No measurement -> no optimization. Because the performance problems are almost always in different places than the average developer assumes.

And then add a comment explaining what you did to a 5 year old.
I don't trust the cloud, so I self host everything.

Internet facing:

1. Custom SMTP Mail Server. Does specific filtering and anti-spam (using SpamAssassin)

2. Various Websites, both personal and professional:

- http://www.Jaruzel.com (personal bits and bobs)

- http://www.MattOwen.com (.net, .org, .co.uk)

- https://www.weegeeks.com (rss reader app)

- http://www.fuzzybuttons.com (small webshop, self written e-commerce code)

- http://www.writersgifts.co.uk (small webshop, self written e-commerce code)

- http://www.Greblord.com (keeping the memory of a dead friend, alive.)

- A custom web-chat server that works through ALL corporate proxies. ;)

I'm in the process of migrating to a new Webserver, and then I can finally switch to SNI based HTTPS, and secure ALL the sites properly.

Internal Servers:

1. SpamAssassin (Ubuntu)

2. 2x Active Directory Servers

3. File Server (12Tb) (Windows Storage Server)

4. IoT Server (runs tasks, listens to events etc)

5. MS SQL Server

6. MS Exchange Server

7. Several other small single-purpose servers. (Various OS's)

8. Dedicated set of VMs for Lab work (I'm a systems architect)

With the exception of the File Server, everything is virtual. My Production VMs run on one large HP Tower workstation and my Lab VMs run on another similar HP box (both are 32Gb, 4Tb, 2x Xeon CPUs). My File Server is self-built tower PC stuffed full of disks as several RAID arrays.

Future stuff:

1. I'm about to launch a Gopher Server, running on my own custom software.

2. I've installed a weather station and will be logging all that info to a dedicated website.

3. At some point I'll start re-running my MUD server as well.
Right, I should've been clearer. There's no evidence provided to us public readers. To be throwing such a bold claim out there though is often intentionally reckless. They are either baiting views or trying to chip at Google's image. Until we get the specifics, there is nothing here to discuss really.
I'm self-hosting a tool to monitor our cashflow and keep our expenses (open source if anyone is interested [0], though only translated in Dutch at the moment). It runs on an Ubuntu Azure VM, with a SQL Server database.

[0]: https://github.com/Sebazzz/financial-app
I agree. But in my experience, even when VPs expose a vision of their culture, directors/GMs are the ones who end up exercising their vision/culture to their teams.
Ya, not clear if you didn't read it. The article clearly talks about the registry. It says that the registry is stored in a separate building from the samples.
Many thanks for the overview, NeWS had lots of great ideas, pity we got stuck with X11 on UNIX systems.
PostgreSQL Monitoring and Alerting
I really do not understand why this is getting so much hate?
I really think this new time based release versioning is much preferred to alternatives.

I think the biggest problem is that it is in the nature of most developers to want to live on the bleeding edge. We want to have these new shiny purple things. And it just hurts us deep down inside to go with the safe and mature option.

Again, nobody is forcing you to adapt a new version as soon as it comes out.
One need to take special care about snaps as they need to be a sandboxed gui apps. According to OMG ubuntu report this incident installed system services. And we know that snaps can ship even kernel modules.
This appears to be a decompilation, not the original source.

However, it appears to be a very old decompilation, perhaps done while the worm was still live:
https://github.com/arialdomartini/morris-worm/blob/master/st...
because of the yet still lack of privacy I am not sure that right now it is most compelling for unlawful transactions. There are many use cases (like you mentioned) and most are used only by a handfull of people, but growing by the day the more stuff getting developed (lightning, ...)
Too many to list. DLR - Germany's NASA - is a key player in Europe's space industry, so it draws all kinds of space companies to its neighbourhood.

EDIT: those two links might give you a quick overview:

- https://spaceindividuals.com/space-companies

- https://spaceindividuals.com/space-jobs?country=Germany (over 50% of all listed, but not surprising, since the site's owner is in Germany as well)

Right now, I'm trying to map the industry myself.
Adding GDPR Compliance to My Rails App and Technical Blog
Can I read a bit more about this? In any case, you can still use the --no-referrers option, don't you?
He may have said that, but his work is very clearly infused with a particular worldview and inspired by historical and mythological themes. I think Tolkien disliked the kind of allegory where things in the story directly correspond to something, e.g the ring war is actually WWII, the hobbits are the English, the Orcs the Nazis and so on.

But you will see very strong parallels between Tolkien and Christian mythology and pre-Christian myths. Like in Silmarillion you have blatant parallels to God and Satan. Tolkien likely did not consider this allegory. Like the sacrifice of Aslan in Lewis is not intended as an allegory for the death of Jesus but rather as a retelling of the same (universally true) myth - but come on, it is obviously an allegory for Jesus.
Your proposed system would not be censorship resistant: The central control point could decide (or be forced to) to block MrControversialGuy's from sending and receiving money. This point is not just theorethical, e.g. wikileaks got booted of the normal bank system when they dropped their big leaks, but they could still take bitcoin.
It's in Google play services, which is "separate" from Android, but good luck installing your favorite Android apps without it.
We are using Hive OS to manage ~1500 GPU and ASIC rigs. Switched to it from our custom developed management layer. Saved us a lot time on development. Though it lacks true industrial datacenter management capabilities we are hashing 10-12% more on m-o-m basis.
> But drugs are produced in other countries, too, and they manage to do so without charging what US companies do.

It's a global market. Companies can develop drugs in other countries and recover a sizable chunk of their investment by selling in the US market.

In other words, the other countries aren't paying their fair share of the research costs, and that is causing a global underinvestment in medical research.
Yes, Docker is mainly a consequence of Linux package management practices, and in particular shared libs and dependeny management, being generally misunderstood and perceived unfit for the job. Docker is perceived as simpler, because it doesn't solve the central problem at all: that of maintaing shared libs for security updates. Using Docker is equivalent to using statically built apps (up to the fact that Docker needlessly runs as demon and with root permissions).

*) That, and tens of millions of investor money/ad spend to implant the idea into people's heads that you need Docker
> I guess that sort of death goes under the “drowning” category

How could it be? Do you plug your drain when you shower? Are the investigators in your area too lazy to find head trauma?
I might be wrong, but I don’t think that this is allowed under GDPR. They have to offer to you the same services with or without the consent to collect your data.

Also, under GDPR, you can always request export and removal of all your profile data from their data stores.
Effectiveness of face masks used to protect against air pollution
https://github.com/nucleic/enaml

We're just starting. IMO, if we started from a better language than JS, we would take stuff like data-binding in react for Granted, since it would be much easier to this stuff it in other languages.
I’d actually enjoy slack if that existed :)
google sold that one as a security feature.

instead of all apps with access to your sd card (virtual internal shared storage) having access to your photos, they created a secure photo storage, and apps can subscribe to it. they just happen to conveniently offer a bloatware photo app, shipped with every device just like internet explorer, that also happens to upload all your pictures to google servers.

gphotos is the first thing I disable on every phone (because you can't uninstall bloatware system apps). chrome is the second, because I must use it to download f-droid and firefox.
Codenvy and Microsoft collaborate to make agile development continuous
Isn't it a self-fulfilling prophecy though? Dynamic IPs and widespread NAT'ing made IP addresses borderline useless to identify endpoints. If everybody had a static /48 IPv6 in the 90's and early 2000's maybe things would have gone in a different direction.
But then those 160,000 other patients are either getting medication that they don't need or are getting medication which is inferior to something else which they should have gotten but has inferior advertising. I'd rather pay more and either only use the medication when I need it, or get the most effective medication.

One of the reasons why the US spends so much more than the rest of the world is because of the share amount of prescription drugs that people have. Here it's extremely hard to convince a Dr that anything other than paracetamol and rest is required for most ailments, yet life expectancy is higher than in the US.
Perhaps I'm being oversensitive, but this seems a vile comment.
There are much more examples like these. And then at some point Google seems surprised people hate them. There is a huge contrast between the outlook inside G (we're an ethical company, still based on do no evil unlike the rest) and how others see them.
either they own the data or they don't. you can't go about making extremely granular arbitrary clauses.
From what I've heard, Facebook has the most chill culture out of the big three.