skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> I would love a popular movie (maybe even one for kids) where at some point through the movie we get to see things from the "bad guy"'s point of view and discover that it actually makes sense

Lots of movies with bad guys and good guys do that, but mostly just without...

> leaving the viewer undecided on whether they support the good or the bad guy.

(Or, if they do that for a while, they resolve it, for most viewers, by the end.) In fact, any movie with a well defined “good guy” and “bad guy” does so specifically because it either doesn't do that or resolved it before the end. Otherwise you have at best a winner and a loser.

OTOH, lots of movies that aren't action movies are driven by character conflict where there isn't a well-defined bad guy and good guy, and where the protagonist is differentiated from other characters by focus and arc, not by superior virtue, and where it's quite possible to disagree on whether the protagonist or someone with which they had a conflict was more right, because “good guy defeats threat of bad guy” isn't the story model.
Whether all moments of time exist in a hypothetical fashion or not, only one now exists to me subjectively - or at least so my memory of my subjectivity claims.

Further, memory itself gives the impression of irreversible time.
Two different measures on the same set can put "almost all" their probability in different places. I guess it depends how you are discovering anime. Speaking as someone who started at zero and just started watching the most popular and highly-rated films, I encountered very little that's childish and oversexualized -- quite the opposite as compared to classic Disney. So via my discovery process, almost anything anime is great and compares well to Disney for kids. So from my limited experience, I think dismissing the genre like that with a negative stereotype is misleading.
A couple of thoughts:

- sell it to large businesses that have "innovation labs" based on "coolness", see their use cases and needs, and then double down on developing custom solutions for that. The whole issue with BD in a civilian sense has been as a solution looking for a problem. It might help find their problem with some in the wild.

- battery life might not be a massive issue if they walk themselves back to the charging station and can auto-rotate as a pack.

- I can't see the use case either, but perhaps attach a monitoring camera to the arm and have it perform remote inspections of aircraft? Guessing some kind of in-person work that could be done by a central operator, but needs a bit more autonomy/environment sensing than a glorified remote control car?
I think it fundamentally boils down to how you see the data. People that think in RDMS terms see the existence of the record as an implicit existence of the mapping key, since every record of a table has every attribute. If the record is not there, then it truly is None as in non-existence (no key present) but that operates at a different layer in our applications because the missing object doesn't have the methods or attributes of the class. It's a different class entirely! So in that sense the conflation issue with key => null vs no key at all is itself a mishandling, since it's operating on different classes of objects.

This is what you call "paper overing" but I don't think it is fundamentally wrong, I think it's just a different way of reasoning about the data. It's also why I think the functional programming community prizes maybe monads more than the object orientated community. Functional programming is fundamentally about managing streams of data with functions that match up types, so the distinction between none and null matters because the data doesn't drag along it's methods from place to place.
I'm still unsure how a country could switch from gas to EV. Could a city keep up with the power demands when everyone plugs in their EVs at night? I am assuming we'd have to build more power generation capacity, and what is the source? How do you transmit all the high capacity power to quick charge stations on the highway when you have 200+ cars an hour needing to quick charge?

It all sounds like an enormous infrastructure upgrade. Europe is already committing to EV and outlawing gas engines in the next 10-20 years so it will be interesting to learn how they plan to accommodate the huge electricity generation and transmission demands that go with that.
Lol id bet that 90% of googles in the US are in European /UK terms centre right or wet/one nation tory's
Someone conducted a simple experiment to see if the facebook app was listening to their conversations. Spoiler: it's listening to your every word.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0SOxb_Lfps
Thunderbird disables remote loading by default. It's vulnerable only if you take measures to override this, which is to say, you either:

1. Use movemail to receive email instead of IMAP or POP (there's an interesting vector to get your remote resources loaded by using movemail. If you read the code, you can probably guess it).

2. Enable remote loading for all senders by default.

3. Try to send an email with a sender you think will be whitelisted.

4. Convince the user to click on a link.
It does seem like there is a procedure to refuse mail- http://refuseyourmail.cooperjr.name/how-to
The point of 'agile' is that it's self-organizing. If a team isn't empowered to self-organize, there there's little value in holding retrospectives. Same goes for those agile teams that don't have the means, motivation, or too much inertia to change. A better question would be "why don't more industry use self-organizing teams (aka be agile)?" To a large part, many industries have already been optimized in some aspect and set in that way.
And all employees who are being "let go" shortly will claim they left because of this
I figure he probably was referring to private health insurance.
It can value itself. After all, that's what it's doing now via us. It doesn't necessarily have to configure itself into something like a human to perceive and appreciate itself.
iOS is free
Thats why you wrap them in api or rather your architect should. You can and abolutely should abstract yourself from cloud provider. Difference with Docker is that in case of such a move (already did that in my career) the amount of boilerplate you have to review and adjust is magnitudes lower than what he (OP) proposed in his article.
Coalition for Cultural Freedom
So what would you expect GPG to do when invoked to operate on a pipe (rather than a file¹)? Buffer (possibly) gigabytes of decrypted data in memory, just to be able to discard it once DECRYPTION_FAILED is detected?

¹: where GPG does the right thing
I think the idea that "law and order" is an approximation of morality is giving to much credit to the law, it enforcement, and all of things that have grown up around it. For sure, some laws clearly have some basis in someone's idea of what moral behavior might be, for instance the prohibition of alcohol. But there's also a lot in there that's really just keeping society's machinery churning in a practical sense (parking tickets, speeding, small claims court), or in the case of finance there's bits in there to preserve clearly immoral behavior (tax "loopholes", etc.)
You certainly seem to be the mirror image of tolerance. Sigh. Have you ever considered that you're projecting?
As to what? Or you just wanted to say that?

Surely not the the discussion here, which is about "how to start a Go project in 2018" -- or the subthread, about the kind of tooling Go lacks.
can you recommend a beginner friendly resource for those?
Comparing PCMag’s VPN ratings to their sales commissions from each VPN
Let's make email great again the sexiest Gmail/O365 app
Email No Longer a Secure Method of Communication Critical Flaw Discovered in PGP
> This is also one of the few shows where they try not to kill the bad guy every time.

That's actually fairly common in TV shows. Police procedurals, for one example, where they try to kill the bad guy every time are kind of exceptional.
Yes, but that's probably something most people won't do (with the prevalence of HTML email and no plaintext alternative). Also, it was a reply to the parent who stated "If you disable remote content, it can't be exploited on thunderbird".

Ruling out the presence of an exfiltration channel is hard. It's better to prevent rendering of messages with invalid authentication code in the first place (and not rendering it and showing a warning).
The big problem with stirling engines is the power-to-weight ratio; they are much heavier than internal combustion engines for the same power output, too heavy for any practical use in a flying machine.
Electric cars alone won’t reduce oil consumption
The modern Battlestar Galactica series was excellent in this regard. Although, target audience is not children.

Started with a black and white view of good vs bad, but started pulling that apart as by mid way through there was no appropriate label for any side. You began to question what was good and what was bad and why.
It certainly did. Isolationist sentiment was quite strong in the US in the 40s. Hence the Neutrality Act of 1939, for example.
I'd buy one to carry my groceries.
To me this quote right here seem to sum it up perfectly:

The company’s recent political fumbles, like its sponsorship of the Conservative Political Action Conference and its struggle to address internal diversity concerns, have also played a role.

The company does not want to be a left leaning liberal company. It wants to be a neutral company that doesn't get punished by the winds of our two party political system. I'm sure after Trump won in 2016 a lot of higher ups at Google let out a collective sigh of relief about their 2012 decision to support the CPAC.

Calling that support a 'political fumble' is all that you need to see how biased this article is.
Not movies but...

Avatar: The Last Airbender the cartoon tv show is a perfect example of this. For kids and adults alike.

Also Star Trek DS9 did an excellent job of getting into the villains heads, spending time with them and showing their perspectives and motives.
Is there a use case for AWS API Gateway if one is not using Lambda ? Can it protect a web application against DDOS ?

I am not convinced API gateway+ Lambda can substitute for a Web Application , atleast for J2EE apps. The Lambda "boot" time is way too high unless we resort to tricks to keep the lambda instance active. I find the extra $30 or similar is well spent on a a AWS Elastic Beanstalk with auto scaling. The packaging and deployment is cleaner and simpler.
Nice guide.

Going through the motions of setting up my first API Gateway and Lambda was eye opening to me.

There are a ton of options in these two services — rate limiting, authorizers, concurrency, monitoring, etc. — that point to how much power you gain building an app like this.

If you’d like to see an automated, infrastructure-as-code approach to setting up an API, check out my boilerplate app:

https://github.com/nzoschke/gofaas
The HTML form submission vector has been fixed in Thunderbird.
>Toyota models, including Lexus, have figured in almost half of the carbon monoxide fatalities and injuries identified by The Times. Toyota says its keyless ignition system “meets or exceeds all relevant federal safety standards.”

That's quite significant, and I wonder why that is?

I have a hypothesis:

Personally I've had problems with Toyotas (specifically, Prius GenIII and Camry XV50) where trying to shut off the car too fast, eg using "muscle memory," results in the car not shutting off.

At first glance (and according to the manual), the steps to shutting off the Prius / Camry appear to be:

1. Shift the car into Park.

2. Press the ignition button.

3. Exit the vehicle.

Simple, right?

Well, it's not. If you don't wait ~1 second between step 1 and step 2, the car has a race condition where it doesn't realize that you already put it in Park, so it displays a "Shift to Park" message and fails to shut down. To fix, you have to shift the car into Reverse (or really, Anything-But-Park), shift it back into Park, and press the button again.

This sequence is extremely confusing, especially if you don't notice the error message. Neither conventional shifters nor conventional key-based ignitions make you wait -- when you put it in gear, it's in gear!

Toyota's system has hidden state that's related, but separate from the physical movements of the shift lever and the start button (unlike a conventional key and shifter).

So if you want to reliably shut off the car, here are the actual steps to shutting down a Prius / Camry:

1. Shift the car into Park.

2. Wait a beat (for the vehicle to realize it's in Park).

3. Press the ignition button.

4. Exit the vehicle.

The proper way for Toyota to do it would have been to buffer the inputs in order, so the same sequence of actions always results in the same result, and the mere act of speeding up one's muscle memory doesn't result in unexpected operation (ie, acting just like the old, more-easily-predictable physical controls).
Health insurance doesn't have a terrible reputation in the US?
Empty 99% of the time - no, they are generally used in busy areas of larger cities where multiple bus-lines overlap (at least that goes for Copenhagen)
Pretty sure the jail in the article is run by the county and is not privatized. Private prisons are bad and I'm categorically against them, but US public run jails are overwhelmingly more common and they aren't so great either.
I am a paid subscriber to NYT and it’s still an adfest.
I think it's a fair point to say "the move from 2 -> 3 caused an enormous burden for library maintainers, and many packages aren't going to be upgraded for 3". There's no question that this is true, inside the scientific computing community and out. It was arguably worth it to get a better language, but still, the transition doesn't come without cost.

However, that's an entirely different point from "the move from 2 -> 3 means that there's a bunch of science that isn't reproducible anymore". No there isn't, just use older versions of Python. Python 2.7 isn't going to self-destruct in 2020, you can still install it if you want to verify and examine an old result.
Can you explain this a bit more? Also no content created by the user is stored in Peerdium server. Everything is stored in the browser of the user.
Seems like a solvable problem, stick some googly eyes and bunny ears on it. Maybe add speakers to make squeaking noises when it walks.
I wholeheartedly agree with the author that representing "nothing" or "unknown" is essential. I read the previous article and had my feelings put into better words by this one.

But I think - beyond having wildly inconsistent notions of null - many languages do a much worse job of dealing with null than they could, which is why it causes so many errors in the wild. Java is obviously the archetypical example. It sounds from the comments, though, like Objective-C and Swift and Ruby have interesting strategies which I didn't know about.
Microsoft Build vs. Google I/O: Comparing the two major developer conferences
I'd say its more about how LLVM outperformed their previously handwritten assembly (the latter was impeded by crud from the asm! macro).
It may have existed - but it wouldn't have mattered since the US government essentially controlled the production of critical industry and companies through the OWM, under threat of price controls, seizures, and establishing government corporations.

Not quite the iron-grip that less democratic nations had on their economies during war-time, but not what you would call a free-market economy nowadays.
I once agreed. But three months ago I broke my leg in a skiing accident and my insurance (fuck you, Cigna) has refused to cover it because I didn't get "prior approval" for my emergency room visit. Thats right, I was supposed to call my fucking insurance company while lying in agony with a broken leg on top of a mountain waiting to be med-evac'd.

On top of that, they've refused to cover my physical therapy, sending me a letter saying that it is their belief that I have full mobility and will not need further therapy sessions covered... while I was on crutches, in a boot. Probably a week or two after I got out of a wheelchair. Fuck you Cigna.

Fuck Cigna.
That exists. Here are the 2018 profiles (they are split into basic/advanced): https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0387.html

They are only part of the solution however because:

- Open-source projects are developed by volunteers, and implement what their users (actually typically their developers) want implemented. Having a document that says "you should implement these things" is good for guidance, but it doesn't magically get them implemented.

- Commercial projects will implement the things that they can get revenue from. Having a document that says "you should implement these things" doesn't magically make those things earn the company money.

E.g. in the open-source category, Pidgin is the classic example of a once-popular client that has fallen behind (with feature requests for some "new" protocol features open on their bug tracker for many many years). The document doesn't fix this part.

But yes, I do agree it's an essential part of solving the problem.
Cops Realizing SESTA Made Their Jobs Harder While Making Traffickers' Job Easier
Just curious, why didn't you submit a patch?
And yet when I data science with my dirty SQL, knowing that I've summed a collection that has a null value is super helpful because it shows that the query that I've made is fundamentally unknowable.

Of course there are alternative ways of doing it:

https://i.imgur.com/ENtJs.png
Well... yes and no.. AI research is funded and has developed out of darpa contracts. If you rule out the abstraction then we’d have no research. But it’s fine if they say they don’t wa t to do this particular work.
Pretty much.

This is the big fail of MIME, that literally concatenating different sections together into one document is the intended way of implementing much of multipart handling.
A new Wi-Fi standard could let different mesh routers work together – The Verge
Stop projecting, back to your cave nigger monkey
Yeah they're undertaking a big government contact to that end. Great theory.
Oh wow! Fuck Cigna is right.
Presumably they believe this should not be done at all.
It stops being okay when you're not opening the door "at the same time". Such a rule has minimal gray area and shouldn't cause mistakes.
LMFAO I have to try this now. I will report back tomorrow.

I have to get a Faraday cage now.
Next step: A Startup Founded by Ex-Googlers is Transforming the Widget Industry
What matters from a copyright law point of view is whether you've formed a derivative work or not. There are a wide range of legal views on when exactly that happens. But almost everyone agrees that the technical details of how your program talks to some other program that it makes use of are irrelevant. If you're linking into a single executable but the parts only invoke each other using a simple, generic interface, there is most likely no derivative work and license compatibility doesn't matter. If you're running two separate processes communicating via pipes, but this is a deep integration where you pass complex datastructures back and forth, then most likely they form a derivative work and you do need to think about license compatibility.
We used to differentiate between projections and event handlers

Projections only create/update/delete views and are idempotent.

Event handlers could do side effecty things like emails or generate another command that goes back into the system.

While playing back events, just didn't hook up the event handlers at all.

Worked beautifully and it was very liberating to be able to wipe out your entire read side and recreate it either exactly the same way or tweak it to handle evolving requirements.
I think because in many cases they deny legit benefits on technicalities or by process or negligent actions.
Why do you think so? China is pretty much the only one that may be a threat. North Korea is a blip on the radar at worst. Russia is fading away and fast.
Internet access should be one of inalienable human rights.

And prisioners should be able to call home any time in addition to normal visitations.
@ksahin, have you thought about having a social media presence? For example, you could create a twitter account that post particularly good deals for that day.
QAnon is one of the most fascinating things happening on the internet. Spinning an obviously false narrative that somehow still ropes in more and more people.

It's worth examining because it sheds light on how the less obviously false narratives most of the rest of us invest in are spun. Since it's so crazy, the mechanisms are more clear. Since it still works on many people, the mechanisms aren't that different.

I don't know who Q is (other than clearly not who they claim to be) or what their objective is, but it's definitely worth keeping an eye on.
I don't disagree with you- insurance does perform an essential function in risk management. However, this doesn't mean that individual actors in this space have always performed in the "best" way. Not to mention the nature of insurance in general is adversarial against the customer- if you pay out on too many policies you're underwater.
For some people's tastes, it's not the same thing. Those are about making bad guys relatable and struggle against the good guys. OP more likely meant if neither side of the conflict were good or bad.
"On Social Sadism" by China Mièville is a really good guide to the social processes that produce this.

http://salvage.zone/in-print/on-social-sadism/
> Of course they had to change a lot of things, the books were not written as movie scripts. The primary responsibility of a movie director is to make a great movie.

It's OK to make cuts from a great book in order to fit the essentials. It's NOT OK to completely change the story, like making characters go to Osgiliath for no good reason, making Gimli a constant buffoon and transfiguring every motivation from protagonists, motivations well thought about as Tolkien revised its script during 14 years of writing.

And the second and third movies of the trilogy were not even great movies if you forget about the books. Dialogs half taken from the book and half-written like modern American English, general lack of consistency, and a x-parts ending that did not make at all cinematic sense and was all fan service for book lovers. Except that the Scourging of the Shire was missing. What a mess, really.
No adults use the term SJW.
Perfect is the enemy of good.

Although i understand Voltaire was using an cracked version of HoTMetaL Pro to make his web pages, so the whole premise is a little questionable.
Be sure to appeal. Also file a complaint with the state insurance commissioner. Any ER is covered.
The problem is that decrypting software will do: "Here's the message and some 'extra stuff'".

Now, this 'extra stuff' might not be HTML, might be something which might trigger something else. I really do not know but some smart guy might figure out how to exploit that part. Or might not.
Hey,
Thanks for your answer.
That's definitely something we will work on!
I can produce good english if necessary, but too lazy on net forums. I understand what joke is.

I (and many of my friends) do consider Apple a joke for enterprise use. Joke in sense of "useless" or "inadequate".
'Genius' in some store does not really cut it.
Why I’m Over Airbnb
What other factors played a role in your decision to use rust over other languages when 128bit arithmetic played such an important role you wrote inline assembly for it?
I think you could probably turn up similar stories about most insurers.
Their comment must have been the result of a recent spawning of Pepes.
What kind of specs?
Parent didn't say insurance is not necessary/useful. You can think something is a good idea and be disgusted by (large parts of) the industry around it.
* compared to Rust 1.25