skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't think the tag actually is a property of the submodule steps itself (as in, it's not written in the .gitmodules), but yes you can manually check out a tag.
The id type parameter is not called phantom type, it's called generic type.
Since he was right to do so and also right about the underlying meltdown issue, perhaps deserves more than ridicule?
So I said, iL call the snmp API to read the data. Then he said, "no, you need to read the bin file to read the data". I thought, what an idiot he is. I lost respect, lost faith. Little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Plans are meaningless - I will believe it when I see Google explaining to their shareholders that they plan to systematically reduce the value of the company. Maximising time spent online in front of ads is literally their entire business!
My preferred one is Vasco, also working on ios. I wrote a comparison a while ago:

https://medium.com/@0x0ece/googles-advanced-protection-progr...

On a related note, has anyone already tested a FIDO2 key? I'm looking to buy one, but still can't find any, including developer previews.
Isn't part of the problem the fact that it's a pain in the ass to write unit tests for system time?
Well, look I don't have data at google scale but my mobile scale info suggests people do not turn their phones off and they won't.

You might say, "You should" and I'll say, "And if my family needs to get ahold of me for some emergency? Should I just ignore them calling about some emergency with my three year old daughter for dubious performative gestures?"

As for 2, once can imagine a world where Google doesn't want to have such revenue concentration in ads. Destroying the industry as they leave it is not a bad idea, if it gets them where they need to be. But of course, I'm skeptical.
Seattle’s proposed ‘Amazon tax’ would hit Facebook, Google and other tech titans
I would be careful relying on legal advice from a lawyer who is not your lawyer.
I have my own loony belief with little supporting evidence. My loony belief is that the overwhelming majority of "Flat Earthers" are joking, pulling your chain, and refuse to admit it because keeping a straight face is part of the joke for them.

Their motivations are varied. Some of them do it to make some sort of epistemological point, others do it because arguing for something that isn't true requires a form of creativity they find rewarding. Others do it because they like to get people riled up (it's amazing how easily some people can get riled up over other people being wrong about the shape of the earth, even when the reality that the flat earther isn't being sincere is staring them right in the face). Others still probably have other motivations. Probably only a very small portion of them actually believe what they say.
Person of Interest is the favourite series of mine. I love it, and I miss it so much.

My argument was implicitly about space-related sci-fi, because I was arguing about its impact on interest in space exploration :).

> Worth noting that Expanse is not on WP’s list.

Both the books and the show have received Atomic Rockets Seal of Approval; that IMO matters more than being on a Wikipedia list :).

http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/sealofapproval....
https://fuckoffgoogle.de/

There is now a website even.
I don't think anyone claimed that there are no valid reasons to decline a request to use Python.
Artificial intelligence tricked by optical illusion, just like humans
It was probably useful to someone else. I don't get why it should be a gotcha. Libraries can not be optimized for individuals and features that one does not use are not gotchas.
If you want to productively engage in a conversation, it isn't helpful if you use the weakest possible example for the other side's position to then dismiss it. That is just a slightly less obvious version of straw-manning.

Also, your definition of "voluntary" as "the victim could conceivably have done something to prevent it but didn't" is very unusual and completely useless. By that definition, if someone poisons your food with a poison that is detectable with a test known in the literature, and you then eat it without testing it first, you have voluntarily let yourself be poisoned. If you get shot because you didn't wear bullet-proof clothing, then you voluntarily let yourself be shot. That's neither what "voluntary" normally means, nor would it in any way be a useful definition, as essentially everything that happens to you would have to be considered voluntary.
Anti-Google Berlin Site (post was flagged and removed)
Seriously disappointed this morning to see the anti-Google site https://fuckoffgoogle.de/ flagged and removed from Hacker News.

It makes real points that obviously clash with the cultural norms more prevalent here, but that's why I would have loved to see them discussed.
Ambiguity is the way to deal with a changing landscape and changing technologies.

And I agree it sucks, but it sucks less than the alternative (which is to be rigid and say something that becomes meaningless one year after the law is published)
This isn't SQA testing, it's testing and validating human interaction with the user interface. You can't automate that (yet). You need human users
AFAIU only bitter almonds, which are not used to make almond butter, contain significant amounts of cyanide. You could eat pounds of almond butter and not have an issue.
I mean, even bitcoin is still just a proof of concept. A wider-adopted proof of concept.
The thing I find most infuriating speaking to anyone who believes in a conspiracy theory is that no rational argument can win them round because their arguments are rarely rational or based on concrete evidence. Antivaccers are particularly difficult because they simply have no faith in science or doctors and believe that any evidence is fabricated.

Has anyone found effective methods to counter the above traits? While not engaging is usually the best option it is sad and concerning when it is a family member so I don’t feel like ignoring it is the best approach.
Because not every year starts on monday?
>Chesterton was a writer of considerable talent who whose to suppress both his sensibilities and his intellectual honesty in the cause of Roman Catholic propaganda. During the last twenty years or so of his life, his entire output was in reality an endless repetition of the same thing, under its laboured cleverness as simple and boring as ‘Great is Diana of the Ephesians.’ Every book that he wrote, every scrap of dialogue, had to demonstrate beyond the possibility of mistake the superiority of the Catholic over the Protestant or the pagan.

And here Orwell is being "nationalistic" (in his sense of the word) over his preferred ideas, doing what he accused others of: "there is always a temptation to claim that any book whose tendency one disagrees with must be a bad book from a literary point of view. People of strongly nationalistic outlook often perform this sleight of hand without being conscious of dishonesty."
How many [somewhat efficiently recyclable] cans of fizzy drink product would it take to match the sunk cost of building this thing, with its own plethora of [recyclable?] components requiring periodic replacement?

And, is the end-product more enjoyable?
Those features you listed seem like quite useful ones for day to day usage. Many things won’t have a bright line “this makes the product useful” vs. “this makes the product addictive” feature classification.
> Person of Interest is the favourite series of mine.

Hmmm maybe I’ll have to give it another go. Does it get better after the first season?
> It’s like Enums + Data Classes on steroids.

Also known as algebraic data types, which have been around for decades and can be found in Ml/OCaml, Haskell, and Rust.
I noticed that too - very strange. The website contains content of concerned residents and could lead to good discussions. Maybe the language is a bit too direct for non Germans? In the US we talk a bit more cozy.
Samurai Email Discovery – Is a Email Discovery Framework That Grabs Emails
Generic types are useful, but still should be called as such, or for the new fad: dependent types. Abstract types would not allow instantiation.
It's not as easy as that. As I stated, the criterium for GDPR compliance for non-EU businesses is "does said business intent to seriously do business with EU citizen?". Pricing in EUR is merely one of the multiple possible factors that a judge would use to determine whether this is the case.

I'm not a lawyer so I'm not in a good position to evaluate Github. But I do know that Github has an office in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, so there is at least the possibility that they have to be GDPR compliant.

But let's say you're buying from a random small business web shop in the US, and everything about that web shop clearly screams that their main business intention is work with US customers, it's just that their delivery service happens to ship world wide even though they clearly don't care about non-US customers. Then yes in theory they can "what they like with my data". In practice they probably have to define what "what they like" means in a contract, like a privacy policy, so it's not as if you can't know about what they will do. You are still able to make an informed decision of whether you want to do business with them.
I agree. There is one particular piece of the story that actually made me give up on the show, and that is when a certain character was shot by a certain other character. I don't even remember the details at this point, and probably shouldn't write them out anyway so as to not spoil it for others but ugh, I remember it really annoying me. I think it was the straw that broke the camels back for me.
> it has become a fashion to brand any patriotic talk as "nationalistic"

Considering modern usage of the word, I can't tell what you mean by this. I've explained why here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17059121

EDIT: Aaaaand, immediately downvoted with no reply. I rest my case. :)
I know so many guys who planned to do this for 2-3 years to make some money and 20+ years later they’re still doing it, they (or their wives) spend the money faster than they make it, and their bones are getting brittle from the nitrogen...

(Former professional diver but I never did North Sea etc)
You must have not gotten the memo about the word "literally"

http://blog.nawaz.org/posts/2012/Aug/merriam-webster-is-roll...
The Drapers are weird. I guess the family has been rich for a long time and they've made a lot of investments, but I don't really see a clear track record of being particularly good at picking winners.

I was at a Bitcoin trade show a few years ago and his son was there pumping his Bitcoin specific venture fund. Quite honestly, he struck me as an enormous asshole. He was on a few panels with people who actually knew how that stuff works and he would just talk right over them again and again in an almost derogatory capacity. It was like zany high school shit.

Also these are the crazy people that want to split California up, well you know, just 'cause.
I generally support efforts to reduce human error, but the author goes too far by calling for format strings to be abolished.

Localization is hard, which is why these functions exist.

There is ctime() but it includes a trailing \n which isn’t always what you want.
Richard Stallman opposed the removal of an abortion joke from glibc source code
I worked as a technical diver, not a saturation diver, with full-face comms and Nitrox and spare air, servicing underwater hydraulics/electrical systems for over 450 dives. No need for extended stays underwater or lengthy decompression. Most injuries were related to the physical labor around heavy moving machinery and tool usage. Glad to say there were few injuries and these were all minor injuries of those involved.
The important technical point is that the largest increase in volume takes place in the first atmosphere or 33 ft (10 m) under the surface. The inverted bucket example of a full bucket of air going from full of air to half air at 33 ft below surface. It goes from 1/2 full of air to 1/3 at the 2-3 atm change. And that's where most typical recreational diving takes place with a maximum of 30 m to 40 m (100 ft to 130 ft).
Diving in confined spaces with the surface blocked by structure or machinery, and with the occasional oil leak causing visibility of less than 24 inches due to light diffusion provided for a mix of challenging tasks while staying calm and rational. I miss that part of it all.
Agreed on Altered Carbon. Some of the nudity is gratuitous, but most is not. I know the clone room scene was on some of the news sites, but why wouldn’t clones be naked? In a future where sleeves are changeable vessels, I would expect nudity, body image, etc... to be very different from today’s values.
Why is this an AMP link and not a direct link?
That doesn’t make it a straw man, because the argument you made applies equally well to languages/frameworks and to their features.
> strftime has had this forever (my man page implies since C89), it's %c. of course

%c neither lets you specify an overall width nor lets you specify which fields you actually want. Want the shortest possible representation because you don't have much room? Too bad. Want quarters because you actually need them? Fuck you. %c is useless, it's one of the reasons why developers have to resort to hand-rolled formats.
The least number of them use it voluntarily. It's usually in bigger corporations where it's set as default browser and even if you have an option of installing a different browser, there's no way of getting into the intranet with that.
>>Not sure where you are getting the idea that alibaba saved softbank. Softbank's Alibaba stake makes softbank very valuable, but it would be around without alibaba.

Without Alibaba they would have lost, say, 100% of their investment in the 90's. Makes a great "trust us with $100 Billion, we have a great record" pitch.

Also, "still being around" and worth a lot of money and still being trusted with investment money are two very different things.
While I don't believe it, I'm glad that flat earth theory exists. It's a fantastic caricature of scientific theory that seems to exist simply to shine a light on the fact that any theory has a nonzero chance of being true, albeit in the most ridiculous of realities.
“The Orville” and “Star Trek Discovery” are both amazing sci-fi shows, although they might not be as “hard” as you’d prefer.
We're getting off on a tangent, but I actually think that dependency management makes way more sense to do in a VCS than some other tool provided by a specific language.

Look at the cluster that is dependency management in JavaScript, Go, etc. Every ecosystem is solving the same problem over and over, and languages can live and die by the quality and capabilities of their package management system.

It also sucks once you start building projects that are multi-language/ecosystem. It's why so many front-end technologies have just sucked it up and adopted NPM, because it has the most market share and continuing to bifurcate the package ecosystem is too cumbersome for consumers.

It would be much better to solve it /once/, with a tool that provides the lower level constructs. Then tools could be built on top of that to serve specific needs & improve the UX.

Maybe git submodules could be that? Whether it could or not, though, I do think that providing the ability to manage the versions of my dependencies in the same tool that I manage the versions of my own project... makes a lot of sense!
The first season of the new Star Trek series wraps up the plot pretty well. There isn't much left unresolved after the season finale. I don't think it's guilty of what you are complaining about.
You cannot have ToS for a process you establish to correct a failure to perform for existing contracts, in this case for exchanging a defective product (other than what was part of the original contract).
Ask HN: Has HN Become a Cancer? (Fuck Off Google)
"Fuck Off Google: Don't let Google take over Berlin", which linked to ttps://fuckoffgoogle.de/, fits entirely within the purposes and goals of this website, was immediately flagged and dismissed as "Anarchist BS" by a half-dozen people towing a clear party line.

I'm going to bet all of them work at Google.

This is what HackerNews exists to spotlight, people come here to find stories like this. If a story like this can be killed to protect Google's interests, then HN has become part of that cancer, has it not?
Doesnt matter, this exploit was actually being deployed through a word document, which bypassed the need to actually use IE to be vulnerable.
That is not under dispute. Of course you should be careful with legal advice that isn't tailored for your specific situation. My comment does not contradict that notion. The content of the book also does not contradict that notion. The book explains the general situation and gives generic advice. But even generic advice is useful to a degree. It does not replace seeking specific advice from a lawyer, but it does complement it. Specific and generic advice are not mutually exclusive.
To tackle testing fraud?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synroc
Yup, and based on decent writing (books).

(Spoilers) I especially like how all the implications of the few base assertions are being explored: renting bodies to visit with dead relatives, class separation, immortality and untouchable lawlessness for the rich, on and on. Just well done.
I will be happy to be the first to say all of the disparaging comments probably come from google employees.
His father was one of the earliest of the modern venture capitalists. And among the first in California, circa 1959 (just two years after the founding of Fairchild Semi).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Henry_Draper_III
>Buy it, information is useless here.

Information isn't useless in this example. For some unexplained reason you have already obtained information for no cost which doesn't make any sense.

The real scenario is: cost overrun by $250k to $1 million over x months, profit increase between $50k to $100k per year. How much are you willing to spend to obtain 100% certainty?
Man, every time I think I ran out of reasons to think poorly of Tim Draper he opens his mouth and gives me one more.
To anyone that this question would apply: just learn it. You don't have to do it, but it will make your life way easier, even counting the effort needed to learn it.
Singing as you've never seen before
Very much. It starts as a faux-procedural, but past S1 it quickly turns into the (IMO) most accurate and reasonable portrayal of human-level artificial intelligence in the history of TV. It doesn't go any way outside present-era technology (beyond an AI running in the background, which is _the_ sci-fi element of this show). Things I particularly liked include:

- It has some great discussion and presentation of modern surveillance state issues, including predicting Snowden. That is, it actually had an NSA whistleblower before the Snowden leaks happened.

- It stays up to date with infosec topics, and uses them, instead of inventing bullshit. Among other things, the show featured Stuxnet-based exploits (with Stuxnet code dumps visible), and a successful Shellshock attack just months after the story broke.

I loved the acting, loved the story, loved the way it discussed the friendly/unfriendly AI topics, loved the humour. I was deeply saddened that it got cancelled without advance warning, and had to wrap up all the major plot points in the second half of the last season.

(Also for those who like the writing of Westworld, Person of Interest was the previous show of that team.)
Creating Frogger using Hyperapp.js
A much better analysis and the source of the article is here: https://securelist.com/root-cause-analysis-of-cve-2018-8174/...
Does anyone still use ie?
Will we fall apart when the robots take our jobs?
If you were handed a pile of gold wouldn't you try to protect its value?

NIMBYism in SF real estate is all about people protecting their $2+ million investments. If the "gold bar" suddenly becomes a major tax liability NIMBYism will dissipate.

Building regs are only a small part of the story.
How do you link jnxx to nitrokey?
> i don’t make purposeful email addresses; i don’t have time for that.

I do, because I can make them automatically. With Fastmail, if your address is name@fastmail.com you can make an email somerandomcompany@name.fastmail.com and it will automatically make it to your inbox. Fast, convenient and zero effort.
> There is ctime() but it includes a trailing \n which isn’t always what you want.

It's also not useful what with being in a hard-coded US customary format.
Yeah - phenomenal money in the 90s and everyone wore a Rolex... now the money is pretty decent while working but big gaps between jobs
I would swear that they had years doing this. After using gmail or android for five minutes, I want to throw the devices out of the window.
This is why property isn't a great metaphor for certain situations[1]. An important aspect that people (incorrectly) attribute to property is exclusivity: When I own something, it's mine, and that means it's not anyone else's. A transfer of ownership is a severing of rights.

The fact is, for some things (like tissue samples with DNA), it's important to recognize that non-owners can have a stake in is done with something. The originator of a tissue sample cannot entirely severe their connection with that tissue, and that means that the new owner shouldn't be able to claim unrestricted ownership. The legality should recognize ways in which the non-owner can be affected by the owner's interactions with the sample.

(Aside: GDPR works by essentially doing the same thing with data. The "Rights of the Data Subject" stipulate that a non-owner of the data is still a stakeholder in that data.)

[1] Although, ironically, that actually makes property law well-suited to addressing the situation. In Common Law, the idea of 'ownership' is understood as 'a bundle of rights,' which can be un-bundled. A framework for addressing the situation is to enumerate separable rights for tissue samples, and stipulate different rules for delegating those rights.
There's no basis offered for any of the parent. Some things are obviously false:

> oil ... That's what ww1 and ww2 was fought over.

> Certain nations, like the US, don't have to work with anyone

> expand the US to include the anglo-nations ( Canada, Australia, etc )

etc.

These are arguments of white christian nationalists, who, as Orwell pointed out about nationalists in general, have no interest in reality, only justifying their hateful cause. They ignore the incredible, outrageous evil of Nazism, the universality and priority of human rights and freedom, basic economic reality, and the predictable destruction that comes with nationalism.

The American-led world order since WWII has led to an expansion of freedom and prosperity orders of magnitude beyond anything else in human history. It also embodies a just and fair way of managing international affairs, through law and democracy rather than the undemocratic system of the strong forcing the weak (it has a long a way to go, but it has come a very long way since WWII). A person must really embrace hate in order to give that up for nationalism, racism, and the destruction that inevitably follows, a return to pre-WWII or even pre-WWI. I suspect many of the white christian nationalists take that peace and prosperity for granted; they don't realize it was constructed by the survivors of WWII, who knew far more of nationalism and the world without a rules-driven world order.
"The Orville" is on my to-watch list. "Discovery", well... it would stand on its own as a general sci-fi show, but it just isn't Star Trek. The same applies to the JJ Abrams reboot movies. IMO they butchered all the good things about Star Trek, while retaining all the bad ones. So for me, Star Trek franchise still ends at Nemesis (movie) / Enterprise (series).
"Big data" analytics pointed specifically at social media data. Netbase and Crimson Hexagon are two good examples of incumbents in the space.
So far it gets better with each season.