skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Let me guess. It's going to be US only again as always even though I pay for it... (like my GPM subscription price is not cheaper because parts of it are not available)
You're comparing things that aren't comparable. Of course single occupancy cars are inefficient, but that shouldn't obscure the fact that long distance transportation is a major source of emissions that should be severely limited. The fact that the industry is efficiency focused is also irrelevant at best, because they are high emitters in spite of it.
As far as I can tell, they basically don't build Japanese apartments without outdoor patios. No one has dryers, everyone hangs their clothes outside.

But to your point, my anecdotal impression is that even though the average 1 bedroom or 2 bedroom in Japan Tokyo is smaller than an equivalent in the US, the price per sq foot in Tokyo is also much less than in New York, San Francisco, or Los Angeles.

Hard to find reliable, cross-country data but this blog post [1] pegs price for rental square foot for SF at $4.75 and Tokyo at $2.79.

It's also true about the parking, but again regulations are at play here. Minimum parking requirements are the norm, not the exception in the US. Developers can’t build less parking even if they want to. Even a giant metropolis like San Francisco didn't start to eliminate minimum parking requirements until the late 90s [2].

1. https://www.rentcafe.com/blog/rental-market/what-is-1500-wor...

2. https://www.livablecity.org/parking-history-sf/
The title is a bit clickbait-y: passenger 747s were retired by the US airlines last year, and are not coming back. Passenger to freighter conversions (the BCF, Boeing Converted Freighter) are also not restarting. And, it’s highly unlikely there will be any new passenger 747s manufactured.
It's in the article.

Starting Tuesday, we're rolling out the new YouTube Music experience in the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, Mexico and South Korea*. It will expand more broadly in the coming weeks. We’ll also soon be launching in Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
It sounds like Lowrall
I would say that considering a number as "holy" is esotric by definition.
If it'll let me play YouTube audio on my Sonos it'd be a great feature. Otherwise I'm not quite getting the value.

Workaround for this is to buy an HDMI splitter and send the audio to a sound system then use Chromecast, but Sonos is just so convenient.
5 signs your trainer is not pushing you as hard as he should be
Ha. I had this open in another tab all day but I didn't realize it was Michael Pollan. Time to read.
Google support told me the opposite. Why does everything need to be so confusing?
YouTube has a lot of that weird shit and has been great for me for discovering music. Then usually the next step for me is to go search for a good quality version of it.

If this YouTube Music thing gives me what YouTube currently has plus better sound quality then I'm sold.
Not sure how I missed that.

Thanks!
Possibly; but as someone who maintains a NodeJS native addon in C++, I frequently _dread_ new releases of NodeJS that invariably break my bindings. A shim library called "NaN" has done so much to help with this; I would have given up sooner.

Having libraries implemented purely in the language from which the library is implemented solves many many headaches, irregardless of JavaScript or not.
That is a striking illusion!

Does anyone know how to recreate this illusion with other sentences?
But drugs are a physical-world object exerting physical changes on a meat brain, causing perception shift.

How could something of the simulation let you "peek behind the curtain?"
Lol their recommendation service? Are we using the same product? They are very heavily skewed towards popular things.
Nice. Seen anything interesting with your tool other than the amazon observation? You should update your resume with this, scatterstocks.com. The autocomplete feature isn't working with Firefox Quantum(60) on Windows 10.
> If you’re already a YouTube Red (soon to be YouTube Premium) member

I subscribe to google play music but if I look at my youtube red status is says member. So I assume, I will continue to enjoy it at no extra cost. I chatted with google and they said the same but the wording is really confusing...so who knows.
Just so you know, I setup a site here for this experiment: https://hackerforums.co

I'll get a Show HN going tomorrow!
This is business, my friend. :)
Here you go! I'm sure it still needs tweaks, but it's a start: https://hackerforums.co
GDPR KEY CHANGES
> The original author seems to he worried that some part of the system is not being updated to the newest available source before being built. I don't know of any system that would somehow automate that process.

Subversion with svn:external does exactly this by default, and generally you only peg a revision in an external dependency when you tag for release.
> Amazon, which went years without turning a profit.

This is semantics. If I make $100 on a $60 spend, and then choose, like Amazon, to reinvest the $40 in the knowledge that it will improve efficiency next year, my "profit" is technically $0, but my company is not worth a lot more than $40.

If like MoviePass, I spend $100 (of borrowed money) on revenues of $60, with no clear explanation of how I've added $40 of value to the company, that's a bit of a red flag. Saying "I'll figure it out eventually" is a bit touch and go.
Best Watches Under 10000
Sounds like "yelly" to me.

It makes sense that we'd occasionally find things like this, if human perception does work somewhat similarly to convolutional neural nets. Everyone trains their own feature detectors, and almost everyone ends up with something that works pretty well. (People who don't end up getting called things like "faceblind" or "tonedeaf" when their features don't work for a particular thing.) So it'd make sense that there are edge cases where two common approaches get different results. You could even argue these count as "adversarial examples".
I initially heard yanny a couple of times and then laurel. Then I was able to switch a few times before laurel won out ever after with a yanny whisper.

With the NYT slider I was able to adjust my yanny boundary leftward through some training.
I'm not sure your exact use case, but if you are a Youtube red subscriber, the official IOS app continues to play audio if the app is in the background.
Have you ever generated a ticket that could cost Amazon $1000 to a supplier though?

I agree, Amazon are usually happy to write off losses of ~$20 as a CODB, but it sounds like this is far beyond that.
Check it out! https://hackerforums.co/
Try not to phrase it like an essay question, the last thing you want is to come off like you've spent the last week thinking of the question (even if you have). However yes, "What are we doing in the AI space" is a good question if its not widely publicized.

Just make sure its not something that is supposed to be kept top secret and she can actually talk about it.
>Uber and the Army's research lab expect to spend a combined total of $1 million in funding for this research; this funding will be divided equally between each party.

That's about 8 person-years in salary. Given Uber's scale that doesn't make any sense.
YouTube Red is the killer feature that keeps me with GPM. If I lose YouTube Red, I'd probably switch back to Spotify.
>Well, it sounds like you went from being an atheist to an agnostic. That certainly is a more rational and less dogmatic position to take, based on what we know.

What we know is that there is absolutely no proof that God exists. With that being the case, I don't see why being an atheist is not the most rational position to take.

Can I win a $100 million lottery someday? Sure. Should I be living my life believing that I'd win a lottery? No, that would be stupid.
Check it out here! https://hackerforums.co/
This is a popular argument but I think it is wrong because it uses the wrong analogy. I'll illustrate.

If I buy a candy bar at the store for $0.99 and then you steal it, now you have it and I don't. I'm out $0.99 of value and you stole $0.99 of value.

But what if you steal the candy bar directly from the store? You got $0.99 of value, but the store didn't pay $0.99 for that candy bar; they may have only paid $0.40. What you actually stole from them was two things: $0.40 of inventory and $0.59 of foregone revenue.

Even if you drop $0.40 on the counter as you walk out the door, it would still be considered a theft because the store gets to decide what their retail prices are, not you. You're still stealing $0.59 of foregone revenue.

IP products essentially have an "inventory" cost near zero. Yet, if you take a song or a trade secret without paying for it, you're still taking their foregone revenue. Just like dropping $0.40 on the counter for a $0.99 candy bar, you're dropping $0.00 on the counter for a $0.99 song or $1 million trade secret. Reimbursing someone's inventory cost (even if it's $0.00) does not mean there is no theft occurring.

While the IP itself is non-rival, the revenue from each sale is rival; that is, if you acquire my IP via a pirated copy then I still have my IP, but I don't have the revenue from selling you my IP.
(October 2016)
Here it is! https://hackerforums.co/
You mean that if they are acyclic, you don't have to annotate the fields in Java either? Because the data objects I want to serialize usually are acyclic.
The title alone deserves an award. As a hobbyist cheesemaker, thanks for the suggestion, too.
It's not helpful, if you want I guess we can start talking about Nixon and the drug wars and Iran contra and if we really wanna get into it light a joint cause before you know it I'll be ranting about the CIA selling coke in the streets and the American government's war on black people.

Fucking bullshit war on drugs man. Why doesn't our government have room for rationality?
Basic Income, Not Basic Jobs: Against Hijacking Utopia
> next tier will be much more a matter of paradigm shift than of growth on a line.

There are a limited number of paradigm shifts before AIs get "general" in their name. So "it already happened before" argument has a natural end. What makes you think it is still applicable?

Some organizations have access to a computational power reaching into the realm of a computational power of a human brain. We see commercial applications of systems which aren't programmed by hand like expert systems and which don't fail miserably like speech recognition engines of yore. How often do you hear about the curse of dimensionality today?

Some things have changed from then to now, the question is are they changed enough.
Until fairly recently with docker enterprise, from what I've been able to gather Docker's official stance on Enterprise™-use has been "don't use docker, use runc, and build / orchestrate / etc it with kubernetes or something" which basically means "rewrite whatever you intend to use". (afaik this all changed with https://blog.docker.com/2018/04/announcing-docker-enterprise... )

Which is fine. "can execute binaries in isolation" and "can schedule rollouts and efficient disk/networking structures across many thousands of instances" are vastly different problems. Even "can deploy to 100s" and "can deploy to 1000s" are quite different, without something targeting 1k+ I wouldn't expect it to handle beyond a couple hundred without compounding issues.
The newsworthiness of disasters has nothing to do with the number of deaths. It has to do with how dramatic and visually interesting the circumstances were (volcanoes and earthquakes are more dramatic than droughts and famine) and, at least for American media, whether the victims were American. Bonus points if the victims were children.
https://www.ansible.com/use-cases/configuration-management
It really depends on your library. If I try the feeling lucky radio on Google music now, I can't spot anything in the first 50 tracks or so that was / would be played on the radio.

The prepared mood radios are a bit more mainstream, but still not even close to the radio a/b-list
Accessible Gaming with the Xbox Adaptive Controller
definitely the latter.
In accounting it is known as contribution. Any sale that covers its variable costs is worth making.

Your sink costs are sunk and your investment costs are optional.
Create Blockchain in Haskell
> Note we don't want to avoid taxes, that's not what we're doing.

Tax avoidance is perfectly legal and encouraged to maximize shareholder value. Tax evasion is illegal.

> First, we can't offer options/stock to contractors

Can you elaborate why?
Trust isnt the only point though. The threat of a decline is full time journalists means also some things will fall through the cracks because no one invests the time to look at it.

A good example might be the Snowden documents. They were quite numerous and multiple news agencies put a lot of manpower into actually looking through them.
But the userbase grew a lot, didn't it? I guess that'd explain the effect pretty straightforwardly.
I'd rather say that it's about the relevance of the conflict to local readers. Middle Eastern terrorists harming some westerners (no matter if it happens in the west or to some tourists there) matter because it's part of an "their tribe vs our tribe" conflict; Middle Eastern terrorists harming a lot of locals does not matter as much to the local reader because it doesn't involve "our tribe" at all, it's just their own internal affair or civil war or even genocide.

News is not about reporting what happens, it's about reporting what's relevant - the events that can or will influence us in some way, so whether something is newsworthy depends on the audience. A limited conflict that affects the gas price is more relevant to local readers than a deadly conflict with little international influence.
Perhaps you should introspect and explore your subconscious further. Sometimes things like this follow a J curve - at first you regress and suffer before seeing benefit, like exercise. The experience on hallucinogens are a reflection of yourself, so this could be an opportunity to work through previously subconscious issues.
It’s funny to think of IR departments deciding on one of the most strategic capital allocation issues at any company (or maybe you consider that the CFO is part of the investor relations team, that wouldn’t be completely wrong but it’s not the usual definition).
Bill Gates on John Doerr's Measure What Matters
OutStanding
Smarter brains have fewer connections between neurones
> Google is so strong with ML today, and not stopping, I don't know what will allow smaller competitors to stay differentiated. I just had a call with a G recruiter, and pretty much 100% of the roles they have in all their European offices are ML-related roles, on most products. And they hire without ML experience, which I think is a sign of how much they are investing in ML.

Weird. I'm having the opposite experience, where I'm not having luck finding an ML team, even with research experience. What teams/products are hiring for ML-related roles without experience?
Although due to its size, 747F are usually used at a higher percentage of the time. The large freighters (7437, 777) are mostly used between hubs and for long-distance routes. That's why having fuel efficient planes (e.g. 747-8) makes sense.

What Wendover describes are cargo planes serving hubs, those often only fly 1-2 returns a day, so having a very cheap plane with higher consumption is worth it (e.g. A300).
Why can't I cast a Youtube video's audio to chromecast audio? The only way is to share the whole screen which burns battery and causes skipping if your wifi isn't perfect.
>If you are a subscriber to Google Play Music, good news, you get a YouTube Music Premium membership as part of your subscription each month.

Calling it now, within 5 years there are at least 5 different Google services for streaming music (up from 3 now, Play Music/Youtube/Youtube Music) at least 2 of which are also somehow messaging apps.

It's even plausible, one for VR music videos, one for streaming in your self driving google car?
Reminds me of a reddit thread I saved a couple days after they decriminalized weed in Washington: https://i.imgur.com/9HQ2Si7_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&f...
> So, on a post which discusses problematic behaviour on Github where entitled people try to bully us into working on what they want without writing any code themselves -- you (someone who has tried to bully us before on Github) -- decide that being in the spotlight is a perfect time for you to draw everyone's attention to your feature request once more. Because you think bullying us with HN social pressure will help your cause.

This whole sentence is false. I did not "bully" you anywhere (!), requested a feature from you, or pressured you to do anything. Quite the opposite, I showed an easy way to improve. Again, I could have been wrong on the effect. That's why the question. The "spotlight" reference was just a small joke. Sorry.

> And then, to back up your argument, you link to a page which is not running on Ghost - and actually does have optimised+responsive images.

I meant only the Ghost homepage in the link, and better optimization (proves [1]).

> All so you can spam your own image compression app.

I gave you the facts. Yet, you smeared me with false accusations. Is this even fair?

[1] https://github.com/vmdanilov/optimage/files/2011804/ghost.zi...
OpenBSD 6.3: why and how
> There is no reason to believe intentionally screwing with it's functioning would somehow increase it's ability to perceive the world truthfully.

Right, my point is that psychedelics are great for exposing falsehood in your thinking, but not necessarily uncovering truth.

> The 'most rational' position lies somewhere in that continuum. When converting to the usual trinary labels, one extreme or the other may end up being the most rational position. The center is not automatically best.

What are you talking about? I think you're misrepresenting my position. I'm nowhere on the continuum, I'm agnostic.
I had a similar experience, and for a few minutes I thought the demo was buggy. The original sound sounds like "yanni" to me, but if I moved it to "laurel" and back to the middle, the middle sound would sound like "laurel" as well. At first, the only way I could get it to stop astounding like "laurel" was to pause it for a few seconds. After this happened a few times I realized it wasn't a bug, but that I was somehow subconsciously adjusting which party of the sound I was paying attending to, and then I was able to shift my attention to whichever I wanted.
Hey, the two PR's are here: https://github.com/2factorauth/twofactorauth/pulls?utf8=&q=i...

As mentioned, one has been merged, but with incorrect information. The company in question (VentraIP) has actually got a better document about this now (https://ventraip.com.au/faq/article/two-factor-authenticatio...), but I'm honestly beyond done with the current maintainers of that repo so I'm not willing to add further info to the PRs.
Thankfully Microsoft thinks otherwise.

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/webdev/2018/05/02/blazor-0-...

https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2018/BRK2151
It's similar to NYC-LAX or NYC-SFO. Airlines realised that passengers prefer 10 flights a day with a small plane rather than 4 a day with a large plane. Boarding/deboarding is faster on single-aisle planes and it gives more flexibility on travel times. Operating costs for large planes are also not lower, as long as you can get landing rights. So apart from a few overcongested airports (e.g. London Heathrow), there's really no reason to use a large plane if you can use a small one instead.
Interesting, military only gave ~$1M for such an ambitious project while Uber is burning billions a year and could easily afford this.

My speculation is that this partnership is first and foremost an attempt to provide Uber with a patina of respectability for this attempt and access to military technical expertise. Uber just crashed and burned on self driving, something it desperately needs to quench its towering money fires. Uber's investors know that. Therefore, Uber needs to constantly appear to be "innovating" in flashy ways to keep its investors at bay with seductive promises of even greater riches.

This, even if the entire idea of flying cars driven by normal humans is insane or worse, piloted by a company known for breaking rules (now in Aviation of all things!) and have the dubious honor of being the first to kill a woman with self-driving AI.

It helps to have connections to get these contracts yo. And of course, yet another major American company cooperating with defense. Military-industrial complex indeed. Every peaceful venture must be tied to the killing machine. All the cool kids are, like Google and its TF support for drone assassinations.

EDIT: added technical expertise to 2nd paragraph
I'm sure you know both cons and pros of analog computing. As long as you can significantly improve digital tech every year, keep doing that. But as soon as that stops, or becomes too expensive, analog is the way forward.
I’ve been using the YouTube Music app for several months now. I find it convenient in some ways, but overall less polished and less useful than the main YouTube app - a conclusion I only came to recently and after the most recent, somewhat buggy update, which often displays the incorrect song playing on my iPhone lock screen, and incorporates slidey actions that interfere with iOS menus. I like that it has a playlist where you can easily see and skip back to history.

The main thing that has me using the standard app now is that Music has only a subset of videos available. I’ve been listening to a lot of obscure music lately, and I’ve started to come up with situations where 65% of the videos are available in the Music app and 100% in the YouTube app. I would love to use a YouTube app for music, but it can’t be a second tier service to the main one.
I can't hear "needle", no matter how much I concentrate on it.

The is a clear S in there, also I can clearly hear it's two syllables - where do you guys hear the third?
it's time for the smart jerks to die along with their stupid expositional picture-walls
I’m not sure how to engage with this question. The overwhelming majority of homes in capitalist countries were built for profit and sold at market rate under regulatory regimes that didn’t prohibit this. A human settlement can only exist because it was, at some point, permitted to intensify its built environment with economic
and population growth. Every affordable dwelling with neighbors in its line of sight is evidence of YIMBY policy working out well at some scale. We just didn’t call it
YIMBY policy until a political bloc showed up opposing it and declaring the city full.

What exactly is is that you’re looking for evidence of?
I hear "Yarry" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mean... Nix and Guix build entire systems off of the idea of capturing every single dependency in the build system, and they work in production
Introduction to Blockchain, Ethereum and Smart Contracts – Chapter 1
It's strange to think that this going viral might be the widest reaching implication of the entire life of the person who originally posted this.

(A story on the origin of this, if you're interested: https://www.wired.com/story/yanny-and-laurel-true-history/ )
> we now pay fees to all sorts of data protection authorities

What fees? In the UK you have to register with the authority (as UK companies did before) and that fee had a max of £2900 per year for companies with a turnover greater than £36million or more than 250 members of staff

Orgs under that limit pay £35 - £60 depending on size. Non profits pay zero, companies who only process data for things like staff admin pay zero, there are other exclusions
Because copyright holders don't allow you to. They want you to pay for music and not listen to it for free on YouTube.

This is why any kind of videoless playback is disabled without Red subscription.
in either case - until cheaper robots elsewhere cause those paychecks to disappear ...